Housing: Starts and Completions

Should we not be looking for something like "housing under construction"? I would think that would be a better indicator of constr employment. Maybe average starts and completions?

sharkbait, I've looked at "under construction" too - and it is a good indicator of employment. I've been using completions because of the obvious relationship to starts. But under construction is a good suggestion.

EDIT: On Rebook retail, see comment further down.

Best to all.

I hope people that worked in RE related food chain companies saved for a rainy day. It's going to be ugly for them for some time.

"Under construction" is down about 11% from its peak. The greater steadiness of completions vs under construction suggests and effort to get 'em done so that costs can be reduced.

It's a hard to know what to draw from this. Permits generally run 2.5% higher (and a month or two) ahead of starts, but clearly it's greater than 2.5% now. It's not surprising that more projects are getting scrapped given the inventory glut.

One unit completions are down just 7.5% from last November, but sales for October were down 25% yoy.

I would think the key to a recovery in home building would be controlling inventory, but it seems individual builders have a lot of incentives to keep building. One of which is as a way to unload land (what Robert Toll was incredulous about.) Another is that it's much more difficult for a publicly traded company to down-shift than a private one. I have a feeling that when this is all said and done, there will be fewer publicly traded builders.

We're still in the early stages of this unfolding drama... Wink

AP is headlining this story as "Housing Rebounds" - natch.

Team Wall Street is unanimous: "Now is a great time to buy stocks!"

Stock Strategists Raise Alarms With Call for Rally (Update2) - Bloomberg.com

I wouldn't go long even with Patrick's money after reading a story like that.

I would be very careful to draw any conclusions from this data. Land represents a major component of value. Accordingly, it’s conceivable that a developer would write off the land value and still build because land is a sunk cost. In other words, in my opinion the bubble already burst and this data has little relevance regarding the magnitude of the collapse.

CR, where did you see the Redbook data?

I would think the key to a recovery in home building would be controlling inventory, but it seems individual builders have a lot of incentives to keep building. - Bob in MA

That's the key indeed. But from CRs Hovnanian link earlier we read...

"In the fourth quarter, we decided to walk away from $141 million in land deposits and predevelopment costs and took impairment charges of $174 million," said J. Larry Sorsby, Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer.

The thing that's most telling to me is that they not only walked away from land but were also willing to scrap some of their 'work in process'... the 'predevelopments'.

But my guess is the jump in permits coupled to slow sales indicates most builders believe the only way out of the swamp is to build their way out... prices, cancellations and weak margins be damned.

They are probably right that it is their best shot currently available to them but that doesn't mean it will work.

Watch their cash flows & bankable equity. It's like watching the gas tank needle while driving a very long stretch of barren desert highway. They better have a light foot & well maintained engine.

After overbuilding of the last four years (massive new housing inventory overhang) and home ownership at an all time high of 69%, the true demand for new housing is probably around 600-900K per annum.Currently, home building industry production capacity is about 2.2 Million (don't forget existing housing inventory competing with new construction) units per year. Guess what is gone happen to the overleveraged HB when we revert to mean? 70% of them will go BK. It will be a long time before they all get liquidated and housing market returns to equlibrium where supply matches the true demand. The Spring selling season will tell the truth about the state of the RE industry.

The WSJ take on this today is surprisingly bearish:

The government's measure of building permits isn't as closely watched by investors as housing starts, but some economists consider it a better measure of the outlook for construction. The number of permits that were issued for future construction projects fell by 31% between September 2005 and October 2006, to levels seen back in 2000. For November, economists think they were little changed. That's not very encouraging.

Meantime, the number of homes on the market remains a concern. Although the inventory of new homes for sale has fallen slightly since the summer, J.P. Morgan economists note that inventory of existing homes (that is, used) continues to rise. A growing number of homes on the market are vacant, which in many cases probably means they were bought speculatively.

False Start

Bob_in_MA, from DJ (via a friend). Here is a Reuters report: "In separate reports on Tuesday, the International Council of Shopping Centers and UBS Securities said U.S. chain store sales rose 1.6 percent last week to stand 2.4 percent above the year-earlier level, while Redbook Research said sales climbed 2.8 percent above last year."

Hmmm ... I'm not sure what the headline was about.

Best Wishes.

kris b, I've estimated new home sales will probably fall to around 800K (in the same range as your estimates).

However, you can't compare new home sales to starts directly. Starts include homes built by owners and apartments, in addition to homes built for sale. See the 2nd graph here for a breakdown of the reason new units were built (for owner, rent or for sale).

Best Wishes.

Hmmm ... I'm not sure what the headline was about.

CR - Do you think it is intentional misinformation or just ignorance?

I ask that because the only journalists I know couldn't explain how water comes out of their tap... they'd just ask for a quote from the people turning the handle and try to get that right (note: try to get it right, not necessarily get it right).

I'm not knocking journalists - its hard to write (as evidenced by my collection of typos & malaprops) - but it really is stunning how the 'top line spin' can be so very different from the 'details' in these major MSM articles.

"Watch their cash flows & bankable equity. It's like watching the gas tank needle while driving a very long stretch of barren desert highway."

Continuing your metaphor, the problem for many is that they drove full speed into the desert with no gas in the tank.

Take KBH for example -- the last time they reported results was for the Q ended in May, and even then they had almost no cash.

Ugly doesn't even begin to describe their situation.

dryfly, I was referring to the DJ headline of the RedBook report (I deleted it from an ealier comment because it was misleading). Maybe the headline writer just misread the data ... I don't know.

For many MSM articles, the headline isn't written by the writer - and is definitely written to attract readers. Look at this AP headline:

Wholesale prices surge; Housing rebounds

It's not wrong, but I believe it gives an inaccurate picture. Of course the story isn't much better:

"Inflation at the wholesale level surged by the largest amount in more than three decades in November ..."

Once again, the sentence is correct, but this is just one month's data, and PPI doesn't look bad if you look at 6 months or a year.

On housing, this is all they say: "In other economic news, construction of new homes and apartments increased by 6.7 percent in November to a seasonally adjusted annual rate of 1.588 million units. However, in a sign of the troubles still besetting the housing industry, applications for permits to build new homes fell for a 10th consecutive month."

Not bad. Of course I think the key in this report is the coming loss of construction jobs - and the AP story misses that point completely.

And finally, I write the headlines for my blog, and I probably screw them up too.

Best Wishes.

I doubt Reuters is doing any headline confusion on purpose. Reuters does not have headline errors like that any more then other news agencies as far as I can tell. It is also not likely to help them enough to offset the credibility loss it creates.

One thing that I have seen in the commercial mortgage backed bond universe is selective delays in reporting between the mortgage servicing bank and the investors. When a prepayment comes (or defeasance - either way it is good news for the investors in the commercial world), this is always sent very quickly (and sometimes the prepayment news has been speculative then it falls through causing losses for the side that picked up the bond after the news). Delinquency reporting is often delayed and surprisingly not standardized by an SCC rule.

Speaking with bond traders, they often will not trade on a bond when the investment bank is about to release a new issuance! They consider it normal for investment banks to try to jack up their stats before a new issuance!

It is probably harder in the housing sector since the bonds are backed by many more mortgages (and you would have to delay/hide dozens or hundreds at a time instead of just 1). Data is so difficult to interpret.

Just cherry picking "Starts were Up" from this data as the headline should tell you a lot. These people are nurses not Rumplestilskins.
Looking at the regional data the South seems to be doing better than the rest, esp with Starts and I wonder if Katrina effects are really past.
Among the national Starts, I notice that 5+ units structures were noticeably out-sized, again the South region doing noticeably better. Maybe the SA is not all that seasonally adjusted.

It is amzing how many different analyses all converge on a 600k employment sector decline in a very short period of time. We've beated to death the obvious; Ford will get slaughtered over F series sales, copper/lumber declines on demand, etc. I'm wondering how many residential construction workers were their own customers. The demographics of first time buyers and young highly paid laborers seems to overlap a lot. If as I suspect those 600,000 were also recent homebuyers and if the traditional stereotypes of not saving and not experienced in downturns holds then we could see a death spiral as hundreds of thousands of nearly new pickup trucks and nearly new houses flood the market at distress pricing.

Dear CR
Off work today, so plenty of time to read and ponder my favorite blog. Staring out my window at the five story condo/retail building they are putting up on Lincoln Ave. that is blocking my view of the El train.

Starting me thinking about your predicted 400 to 600K job loss, so what follows is mainly just my personal observations and of limited value or meaning. In other words, BS.

Most of the condo construction/rehab workers in Chicago seem to be either Polish or Hispanic, but I was wondering: of your employment figure and of government employment figures in general is there any consideration given to illegal immigrants.

If 200,000 of your 400,000 job losses just pack up and leave (sarcasm: “Thank you global job market”), does it have much less effect on the U.S. economy?

Or, in other words, in a flexible job market are 400K workers switching jobs that big a deal? (Warning: being a bleeding-heart liberal, I realize that there is going to be a lot of personal tragedy as fall out from this housing fiasco. Hell one small example, my sister's house in Dallas has been sitting on the market for the last 6 months and they are trying to make payments on a new place in OK as well.)

Thought about not posting this...but just think that maybe the overall effect of this may be similar in scope to the S&L scandal, we read a lot about it in the papers but not much effect on overall U.S. economy.
Ok, I'm full of it today and need to post, for which I apologize, just wish I could be more like Tanta and always have something witty and germane to say!

On a reporter's note, what kind of damn confusing report mixes “Wholesale prices surge; Housing rebounds”?!

Illegal immigrant labor is a push phenomena not a pull phenomena. They don't come here to take jobs legals don't want rather, nasty ill paying jobs are created or preserved because a willing labor force exists to be exploited. Picking lemons by hand? Without a ready supply of cheap labor this would have been automated decades ago.

Illegal immigrant labor is a push phenomena not a pull phenomena. They don't come here to take jobs legals don't want rather, nasty ill paying jobs are created or preserved because a willing labor force exists to be exploited. Picking lemons by hand? Without a ready supply of cheap labor this would have been automated decades ago.

dryfly -- "Watch their cash flows & bankable equity. It's like watching the gas tank needle while driving a very long stretch of barren desert highway."

I agree with you dryfly. I've been reading that a lot of these homebuilders are new to the being a public company game. They are also just off an incredible run where they were the darling of every stockpicker's eye. (Which brings up shades of the dotcom companies to me) To keep their Wallstreet analysts happy, and probably buying into the management credo of profit maximization through leverage, they were probably busy running these companies hot and lean. This would have allowed them to jack the earnings per share and drain as much profits from the company as they could (as the analysts and consultants were probably telling them to do; greed is good right?). Well, as you implied, I think it's about to come back to bite them in the arse as we will see who had the foresight and has the financial reserves to outlast the dry spell. I've heard various people referring to the housing downturn as the equivalent to a localized depression in the economy as far as homebuilders are concerned.

I'm sure CR could tell us more about the dangers of leveraging a company to the hilt and planning where you only expect the best possible scenarios.

Robert:
Your statement regarding Illegal workers seems to be a bit over reaching. Since I work in the Calif wine industry and see the full extent of this, I have to say, the effects of illegal works extends far beyond the concept that they do work J6P will not or that one could simply automatic all these jobs is rather silly.
Illegal workers push down wages for locals and reduce opporunities for various segments of the society to find and create meaningful work. Illegals via hardword and education move from stoop labor into all segments of a given industry including lower management levels.
Next time you visit a California winery try and find a black american
working anywhere within the orgaization.

symptom:

just had a client call me and tell me he was refi'ing his house. i asked him what the LTV's and the value was. it was an inflated appraisal value and 100% LTV with a cash out. i asked him how were they ever going to get that value on the home.

he said his mortgage broker had a guy that would hit any number they needed.

ron

That is called invasion and displacment.

As my wife's late great uncle was Brother Timothy of the Christian Brothers I am familiar with the industry. In addition my brothers-in-law do the majority of the agricutrural electrical field work on the Oxnard plain. My house overlooks the rural stretch of the CA-118 and at night the only lights I see are ranches. My comments may have sounded overreaching but they are well founded. Ask yourself why near every other industry has been transformed by industrial methods but not certain sections of agriculture. Grain and corn use GPS and lasers and purchase subscriptions to private weather sattelite data. What is "special" about strawberries and avacados? The answer is access to cheap labor pools. This gets taken to extremes. Ranchers get massive subsidies via affordable and farmworker public housing projects for but one example. They are disincentivized to innovate. I see no technical difficulties in automating much of the ag sector. Sure it will be "expensive" but all automation is expensive at first. The difference is that we employ 3 engineers and programmers and telcoms rather than 20 stoop laborers. Look at how much home construction has been automated. Built in place cabinets? Not even in the high end houses. Commercial construction even moreso. A lot of the jobs lost this cycle will never come back as the recession will drive automation in search of lower labor costs. Ohhhh, did I just say that? And why is it again that sectors of agricultre are not innovating? Because they don't have exposure to true labor costs.

That is called invasion and displacment.

But that was then, this is now. Now we call that 'ethnic cleansing'.

So when they going to send in the UN?

Commercial construction even moreso. A lot of the jobs lost this cycle will never come back as the recession will drive automation in search of lower labor costs.

Funny you should say that... sitting next to me right now is a gear set one of the companies I work for is designing to be part of a 'portable crane'.

Think of it as the construction equivalent of the lift auto mechanics use to pull engines... only this sucker will be light & portable enough construction crews can use it to move and place bathtubs, toilets, granite counters, etc.

Instead of busting a team of workers backs & knees & fingers... strap in whatever needs to be moved & carefully placed and then start hitting the buttons.

They will still need people to do the fine adjustment required for final positioning - but at least the weight will be carried by the crane.

There are products out there like this now but the costs are dropping so fast damn near every small sub will be able to own them - almost throw away cheap like air compressors.

There will be WAY more of this kind of stuff coming on stream.

Isn't that called a productivity gain, and supposed to be a good thing?

Dryfly, yes. My whole life I've only been paid to do one thing, imagine what's next. The only possible hitch may be that access to cheap mechanicals from China may be fading. I've loaded up these last few years on tools. Truly amazing. I live in Camarillo, home to Harbor Freight & Tools. $40 for a framing nailer? $2 hammers with fiberglass handles? First quality 20 pc metric sockets for $7? Motorcylce lifts for $50? This cannot last. Can it?

But that was then, this is now. Now we call that 'ethnic cleansing'.

No, we call cultural tolerance around here. Last month I was at my eldests high school and the parking lot signs were mono-lingual and not English. “Plus ça change, plus c’est la même chose.”

CR, have you looked at vacancy rates  lately?

For homeowners the rate is 2.5%, the highest ever and still rising. It last peaked at 1.9 in the '89-91 period.

Rental vacancy rates are now rising again, after falling in 2005 and the beginning of this year. They are near their record 2004 levels, ca. 10%. In the '89-91 period they were ca. 4%.

Part of the increase in homeowner vacancy could be an increase in the number of second/vacation homes (they do count those as vacant.) But it has gone from 1.9% to 2.5% in one year, so it would seem resonable to guess there are 500,000 or so units that are unoccupied due to the glut.

The 10% rate for rentals seems to make any big increase in rents is likely, which some people were expecting.

Kett82, I'm just tracking BLS reported jobs - so this doesn't count the impact from unreported construction jobs. Obviously a number of illegal immigrants are working in construction, but I don't know what percentage are included in the BLS stats.

Every week, 300K+ people file for initial unemployment claims - so 400K+ construction jobs lost over the next 6 months doesn't sound like much. However these are additional lost jobs (in addition to the normal churn) and they tend to be high paying - and the skills are not easily transferable to other jobs - so there will probably be some friction as these people look for new jobs. Plus there will probably be a ripple effect with other jobs lost.

Best Wishes.

This cannot last. Can it?

I don't know - I'd think there will be an eventual 'market split' between tools people buy so they can say they bought a tool (but never really use - parks them in the garage) and those that get really used and used and used.

The hoist I described won't be made in China and won't be THAT cheap... just the part I'm looking at cost something like $15-$20 each and is only one part of many - some much more expensive.

But it won't be long until there are Chinese knock off's I'm sure. Except I doubt pro's will want to lift & position a $3,000 granite counter top trusting it to a $100 Chinese hoist made from poor materials with sloppy tolerances. Though the salesman selling them the granite would wish they would try.

On the socket sets & such - some of the offshore sets are pretty damned good (forged or cold forged from quality tool steel). But they aren't that cheap then either.

Then again some are terrible - bad steel & heat treat and cast, not even forged. These are frequently VERY cheap.

Usually pretty easy to tell the cast from forged but not easy to tell if the steel & heat treat is right without a met lab... looking at them carefully it is almost impossible to tell. Heck even I get fooled sometimes & I do this stuff for a living (look at parts & try to guess how they were made, suggest alternatives to lower cost, improve performance or better yet - do both simultaneously).

dryfly,

Don't be surprised when the granite comes from China too. We made a little addition to our house and had to add two cast iron radiators, one is a big boy. Guess where they came from? I couldn't believe it. I know the granite cube pavers used in landscaping now all come from India. It boggles my mind that it can be cost effective to ship things like rocks half way around the world.

Usually pretty easy to tell the cast from forged but not easy to tell if the steel & heat treat is right without a met lab... looking at them carefully it is almost impossible to tell. Heck even I get fooled sometimes & I do this stuff for a living (look at parts & try to guess how they were made, suggest alternatives to lower cost, improve performance or better yet - do both simultaneously).

Same here. Especially now with the cheap stuff getting pretty coatings. The stuff we probably won't see anymore: http://www.harborfreightusa.com/usa/itemdisplay/displayItem.do?itemid=90374

Twenty freakin' peso-dollars?

My first engineering job was aerospace fasteners, I have the last remaining wing pivot bolt from the American SST on my desk as a paperweight. And I agree, even though I can hold a chunk of metal in my hand and visualize crystaline structures and corrosion resistance it is getting harder but that is in part because if you are gonna dig ore and melt and machine it is equally inexpensive to do it right or wrong so the Chinese are doing it right. For them it is equally inexpensive is because they don't pay for intellectual content. We'd have a positive balance of trade if they paid for their appropriated manufacturing methods and software (intellectual property).

Bob - I can understand the cast iron radiators - perfect application really.

(1) China has a lot of low grade cast iron & it is the cheapest in the world unless Indian iron is cheaper.

(2) Hollow parts like radiators are pretty messy to 'clean' after pouring - need to get the sand out of the center cavities, lotsa hand work... perfect for a place with 50 cent/hr workers.

(3) Machining for the ports & fittings is pretty simple, easy to do. And even if they don't have perfect QC... who cares, remelt the defects right there at the foundry... something you can't do in the west with $100/hr plus factory rates.

The granite sounds like a candidate for 'currency distortion' to me... unless there is a lot of 'hand work' performed. I'd have to look at them & the process to have an 'informed' opinion.

And you are 'ahead of the curve' in observing this paradox... as energy prices increase we won't be shipping rocks around the world unless those rocks are damned valuable.

Having just completed my new office, a TuffShed in the backyard, I opted for granite countertops. Yup a tool shed with granite. It was~$80 more than formica, whyinthehell not? I had fun, I'd never do it again and with the pesodollar going south of the border probably never get another chance anyway. The two pieces were like 300lbs each 2ftx8ft. How do you even SHIP a 2x8 delicate object from a quarry in China to California for the $208 it cost me?

And I agree, even though I can hold a chunk of metal in my hand and visualize crystaline structures and corrosion resistance it is getting harder but that is in part because if you are gonna dig ore and melt and machine it is equally inexpensive to do it right or wrong so the Chinese are doing it right.

One of the best auditing practices is to see how close the machining operations are to where the metal is melted for the casting processes... and how much is there waiting to be remelted at any given time... If the two are in close proximity (as in conveniently close) that might indicate they recycle more than they should have to recycle in a 'perfect world'... if you get my drift.

In China it is common to find machining ops & foundry ops all but on top of each other. When their wages start to climb, that will cease... it will have to cease.

I get reports back all the time from buddies doing audits - it is a lot better than it used to be over there but cheap labor makes it less attractive to clean up dirty practices. Cheap labor & even cheaper currency hide a lot of sins.

Yup a tool shed with granite.

Think of it as a 2x8 granite 'flat plate'... then it makes sense.

Wink

Think of it as a 2x8 granite 'flat plate'...

Ohhhh, "deductible!"

The deflationary benefits you all are enjoying with tools and such can last for a long, long time. My business has been in deflation for decades, which is how I came to study the subject so closely.

What you are enjoying is simply the benefits of ongoing productivity improvements. We see the productivity numbers go up and up - think those are just dry academic statistics? No way, that increased productivity is supposed to mean that stuff gets cheaper and better all the time. Toss in countries which wish to become industrialized themselves and it gets even better.

Energy shipping costs? Piffle, productivity improvements are just as much in energy efficiency as anything else. A shipping line can move a LOT of material for very low costs these days. I just read a story where some Japanese engineers have discovered a process where you can shoot a layer of air bubbles under a ship and improve it's gas usage by, I forget 30% or something. All it takes is a compressor and some pipes.

At any rate, people seem to have an inflationary bias built in somehow, it must be evolutionary. Be wary of scaricity because it might happen. Fact is the world is highly deflationary right now, and we should enjoy it.

Its about time the public builders stop feeding the beast.

Put your self in thier shoes.... write down lots and land today to the lowest market value you can justify, subtract additional carry costs and final discounts, and next year you may be in the bonus pool again.

He who writes down the most, keeps his job, maintains the largest market share, wins.

Signed, privately owned builder.

"Rebound" - is that what they call catching the flag pole on the way down now?

Sigh.

If someone moves into a refrigerator box under a freeway, is that a "housing start"?

Login or register to post comments