It’s only fitting in our bank monopoly system that Park Avenue Bank fails. Unfortunately we do not have a go to jail card for our banksters. They just pass go and keep collecting $200 billion dollars.
According to Stupak, that group of twelve pro-life House Democrats — the “Stupak dozen” — has privately agreed for months to vote ‘no’ on the Senate’s health-care bill if federal funding for abortion is included in the final legislative language. Now, in the debate’s final hours, Stupak says the other eleven are coming under “enormous” political pressure from both the White House and House Speaker Nancy Pelosi (D., Calif.). “I am a definite ‘no’ vote,” he says. “I didn’t cave. The others are having both of their arms twisted, and we’re all getting pounded by our traditional Democratic supporters, like unions.”
Stupak says he also doesn’t trust the “Slaughter solution,” a legislative maneuver being bandied about on Capitol Hill as a way to pass the Senate bill in the House without actually voting on it. “Fool me once, shame on you. Fool me twice, shame on me,” he says. “I don’t have a warm-and-fuzzy feeling about what I’m hearing.”
Valley National Bank(not the AZ one that is now part of Chase) is really stepping up to the plate, 2 in 2 days. I guess this is the start of the wave of consolidation.
...to you. Three out of four people in my department have had some kind of identity theft of bank fraud incident in the last 3 years. Banks don't like to talk about it, but their systems are vulnerable from many vectors.
In terms of liquidity, both ABS and CMBS are essentially back to before the crisis. There is a bid for everything, which is a good thing.
ABS is doing very well. Collateral performance is great (cards, autos, etc), as trends are mostly positive. Most of the issuers have come in to support their off-balance sheet trusts for reputation's sake, so there is a lot of confidence in these markets. We've seen a credit card trust fail (Advanta), and the deal structure worked how it was supposed to, which is reassuring.
CMBS is doing ok. The top tranches are performing extremely well, the bottoms are not. That's about what you would expect actually, the bottom tranches in most of the deals will take significant losses. One deal in particular, with a huge Stuy Town piece, will likely take losses all the way up to the originally AAA tranches. Good stuff.
The report’s juiciest finding relates to Lehman’s use of an accounting device called Repo 105, which allowed the bank to bring down its quarter-end leverage temporarily. Repurchase (“repo”) agreements, whereby borrowers swap collateral for cash and agree to buy the collateral back later at a small premium, are a very common form of short-term financing. They normally have no effect on a firm’s overall leverage: the borrowed cash and the obligation to repurchase the collateral balance each other out.
But Repo 105 took advantage of an accounting rule called SFAS 140, which enabled Lehman to reclassify such borrowing as a sale. Lehman would give collateral to its counterparty and receive cash in return. Because the deal was being recorded as a sale, the collateral disappeared from Lehman’s balance-sheet and the bank used the cash it generated to pay down debt. To outsiders, it looked as though Lehman had reduced its leverage. In fact, the obligation to buy back the collateral remained. Once the quarter-end had come and gone, Lehman borrowed money to repay the cash and buy back the collateral, and its leverage spiked back up again.
Mr Valukas marshals plenty of evidence to back up his claim that “Lehman painted a misleading picture of its financial condition”. The effect of Repo 105 was material: the firm temporarily removed around $50 billion-worth of assets at the end of the first and second quarters of 2008, a time when market jitters about its leverage were pervasive (see table below). Mr Valukas can see no legitimate business reason to undertake the transaction, which was more expensive than a normal repo financing and had to be done through its London-based arm because Lehman was unable to get an American lawyer to agree that Repo 105 involved a true sale of assets.
Somebody just tried to steal $14,750 from my trust account.
*My bank yanked the money back.
Citi apparently took the loss.
No kidding.
First time anything like this has ever happened.
The phony check had my former address on it*"
Counterfeit checks are a veritable locust swarm these days. Ask any front-end bank employee.
I hope this doesn't push Citi over the brink. But if it was a Citi depositor who deposited the bad check on your account, the loss is that guy's, and Citi will live another day.
Mr Slippery wrote: I thought the largest they printed was 100 trillion, which would be 100,000,000,000,000. You claim to hold a 10 quadrillion dollar note.
I have three of the ZIM 100 trillion notes, bought a few months ago... depending on the rate of inflation, 10 quadrillion could be worth what 100 trillion used to be worth when I purchased the notes. It's all relative, right?
In CMBS, there has been new issue from freddie with an agency wrap, and the FDIC deal of Corus assets that just went to market. There has been no new private label CMBS since 2008 that wasn't a repack of old junk.
I am told that in some cases involving state-chartered institutions, the state regulators take a more lenient approach and resist federal pressure to shut down a troubled bank.
thanks noob, it was a treat - out a bit early on a Friday - took the wife and kinder princess out to lunch, it is just a knockout gorgeous day here in Houston today
Mr Valukas can see no legitimate business reason to undertake the transaction, which was more expensive than a normal repo financing and had to be done through its London-based arm because Lehman was unable to get an American lawyer to agree that Repo 105 involved a true sale of assets.
Now that is saying something when you can't find an American lawyer to help you cook the books . . .
thanks noob, it was a treat - out a bit early on a Friday - took the wife and kinder princess out to lunch, it is just a knockout gorgeous day here in Houston today
ABS has been a lot of new issue.
In CMBS, there has been new issue from freddie with an agency wrap, and the FDIC deal of Corus assets that just went to market. There has been no new private label CMBS since 2008 that wasn't a repack of old junk.
So how does this quarter compare to the second half of 2009 in terms of volume?
I have three of the ZIM 100 trillion notes, bought a few months ago..
I have some 1-billion-mark postage stamps from Weimar Germany in my collection...I also have some amusing covers (mailed envelopes) plastered with stamps, at a time when inflation required using an entire sheetof stamps to mail a letter.I bet you could find newer Zimbabwe stamps like that....
CMBS is about the same, which is effectively zero (the fdic/freddie deals were small).
ABS is probably the same. A lot of people issued ABS in H209 to ride the TALF train. Based on where new deals were pricing, TALF issuance was no longer profitable, so it slowed down a little bit, but it's still there.
Somebody just tried to steal $14,750 from my trust account
Doesn't anything over $10k require a report by the bank cashing it? In other words, ought not Citi "know" the perp?
But good to know you were made good
One of my banks just informed me that they will take up to seven days to clear any amounts deposited over $5000/day.
That pretty much puts them out of the running for business accounts.
I wonder who they think their customers are?
We're now doing wires for any amount over $10K or so. No one will accept checks for five figure and up amounts any more because their banks want the long float.
Cash management service-a deterrent to check fraud-by which banks compare a company's record of checks issued with checks presented for payment. Suspicious checks are referred to the check issuer for approval. A less-costly alternative, reverse positive pay, calls for the check issuer to self-monitor its checking account and notify the bank when it declines to pay a check.
The guy who originally called was from the fraud division of Citi.
He said they lost money.
Why did they clear the check so soon?
Interesting. I'm getting fairly regular calls from people who are selling stuff either online or in newspaper classifieds. They get a phone call or an email from a "purchaser" who sends them a "cashier's check" for more than the asking price, along with some blah blah blah about why this is necessary. The seller is then requested to deposit the check and wire the extra money back to the buyer.
Nobody here is silly enough to do that, are they? (Those who do are often surprised to discover that their bank is not sympathetic when the check turns out to be phony...)
CMBS is about the same, which is effectively zero (the fdic/freddie deals were small).
ABS is probably the same. A lot of people issued ABS in H209 to ride the TALF train. Based on where new deals were pricing, TALF issuance was no longer profitable, so it slowed down a little bit, but it's still there.
Thanks daddyo - seems like the drivers for the deterioration in the Hatzius FCI are in about the same place overall - I am keen to see an update with the latest data as it becomes available.
Reduced Documentation............ 67.09%
Full Documentation............... 15.03
SISA............................. 13.54
Alternative Documentation........ 4.19
No Income/No Asset............... 0.14
In connection with the Standard Underwriting Guidelines, Countrywide
originates or acquires mortgage loans under the Full Documentation Program, the
Alternative Documentation Program, the Reduced Documentation Program, the CLUES
Plus Documentation Program or the Streamlined Documentation Program.
The Alternative Documentation Program permits a borrower to provide W-2
forms instead of tax returns covering the most recent two years, permits bank
statements in lieu of verification of deposits and permits alternative methods
of employment verification.
Under the Reduced Documentation Program, some underwriting
documentation concerning income, employment and asset verification is waived.
Countrywide obtains from a prospective borrower either a verification of deposit
or bank statements for the two-month period immediately before the date of the
mortgage loan application or verbal verification of employment. Since
information relating to a prospective borrower's income and employment is not
verified, the borrower's debt-to-income ratios are calculated based on the
information provided by the borrower in the mortgage loan application. The
maximum Loan-to-Value Ratio, including secondary financing, ranges up to 75%.
The CLUES Plus Documentation Program permits the verification of
employment by alternative means, if necessary, including verbal verification of
employment or reviewing paycheck stubs covering the pay period immediately prior
to the date of the mortgage loan application. To verify the borrower's assets
and the sufficiency of the borrower's funds for closing, Countrywide obtains
deposit or bank account statements from each prospective borrower for the month
immediately prior to the date of the mortgage loan application. Under the CLUES
Plus Documentation Program, the maximum Loan-to-Value Ratio is 75% and property
values may be based on appraisals comprising only interior and exterior
inspections. Cash-out refinances and investor properties are not permitted under
the CLUES Plus Documentation Program.
The Streamlined Documentation Program is available for borrowers who
are refinancing an existing mortgage loan that was originated or acquired by
Countrywide provided that, among other things, the mortgage loan has not been
more than 30 days delinquent in payment during the previous twelve-month period.
Under the Streamlined Documentation Program, appraisals are obtained only if the
loan amount of the loan being refinanced had a Loan-to-Value Ratio at the time
of origination in excess of 80% or if the loan amount of the new loan being
originated is greater than $650,000. In addition, under the Streamlined
Documentation Program, a credit report is obtained but only a limited credit
review is conducted, no income or asset verification is required, and telephonic
verification of employment is permitted. The maximum Loan-to-Value Ratio under
the Streamlined Documentation Program ranges up to 95%.
ABS is probably the same. A lot of people issued ABS in H209 to ride the TALF train. Based on where new deals were pricing, TALF issuance was no longer profitable, so it slowed down a little bit, but it's still there.
Do you think the end of TALF is gonna have a big impact? Just curious, I don't follow non-mortgage ABS much at all.
I keep getting email from terminally ill widows with fortunes who tell me I am their only living relative. Funny, I never got birthday cards from Cousin Katherine from Dublin.
I keep getting email from terminal ill widows with fortunes who tell me I am their only living relative.
It gets worse. I FOUND valuable lost property and the heir couldn't figure out how to accept it because it was half owned by a brother she couldn't find. Well into the six figures.
Finally saw "Capitalism: A Love Story." That movie is . . . accurate and well-done. I can't say it was actually good because it was just too depressing. But he got it right. The next drop down is going to be breathtaking.
GMAC Financial Services has hired Goldman Sachs to start the process of selling the company's money-losing mortgage unit Residential Capital Corp., according to a new published report.
He Liz ... check out FDIC: Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation Sheila has a video discussing how not to get ripped off. It's in honor of National Consumer Protection Week - if I'd only known sooner.
OT--belongs in a pigged thread, but I'm still trying to understand this numbers game.
This is dated January 9, 2010:
"AUSTIN – Four months into its new two-year budget, Texas already is nearly $1 billion behind its expected pace of sales tax collections, according to new figures released Friday.
Comptroller Susan Combs said there's no need for panic, as tax collections should start growing again in the first or second quarter of the year.
But the decline is dramatic. A year ago, Combs forecast essentially flat sales taxes receipts in the budget year that started Sept. 1; instead, they've decreased by 12.9 percent in the first four months."
And Texas is doing better than most states. So, what's with that alleged increase in sales? And how come no one is seriously challenging those numbers? CR?
The Federal Deposit Insurance Corp. (FDIC) is reportedly preparing to sell $3 billion worth of loans from AmTrust Bank, said a Bloomberg report, citing people who are involved in the sales. AmTrust is the a Cleveland-based lender seized by FDIC last December.
Please God let this be true.
ResCap on the Block?
GMAC Financial Services has hired Goldman Sachs to start the process of selling the company's money-losing mortgage unit Residential Capital Corp., according to a new published report.
I haven't checked the seat cushions recently so I'm in. Anybody else? I'm thinking we need postage to submit an offer that includes them paying us. A lot.
And Texas is doing better than most states. So, what's with that alleged increase in sales? And how come no one is seriously challenging those numbers?
Arithmetic was ruled out of Calvinball in Fall 2008. Since then, numbers just are. And all changes are subject to further modification.
Just read a NYer review of Stiglitz's book - a near-perfect abstract, really. They also got it right. Maybe Surowiecki doesn't quite rule the roost after all.
And the failure. It seems a lot of little fraud farms were opened about that time.
Remember the BFF when EHP and I tried to locate the branches of an institution that no one had heard of, and found only empty storefronts and parking lots on Google?
In its biennial revenue projections, the State Comptroller’s office reported that Texas brought in 2.7 percent less revenue during fiscal year 2009 than in 2008, due in part to reduced drilling activity. The office also projects a 58 percent drop in natural gas tax revenue in fiscal year 2010, after 2009’s actual 48 percent drop
The state controller's office issued nearly 130,000 IOUs â formally called registered warrants â for $436 million between July 2 and Friday. The state expects to issue $2.9 billion worth of IOUs through the end of July.
It took California a little over 8 months to conjure up about half a billion dollars out of thin air that major banks increasingly want no part of, and in the next 4 months, six times as much will be pumped out of 95736.
In the couple of years prior to the recent improvement, national home prices dropped approximately 30% while loss severities on loans which incurred losses doubled to record highs of 43% for private-label Prime loans, 58% for Alt-A loans and 72% for Subprime loans.
It took California a little over 8 months to conjure up about half a billion dollars out of thin air that major banks increasingly want no part of, and in the next 4 months, six times as much will be pumped out of 95736.
The sad part is a lot of the budget fixes are absofuckingloutely guaranfuckingteed to be reversed by the courts.
Were any of them co-located with Madoff's accountant?
No, but one of the "branches" seems to be in a building that contained a mortgage brokerage and a couple of real estate offices. Talk about a captive lender...
GMAC Financial Services has hired Goldman Sachs to start the process of selling the company's money-losing mortgage unit Residential Capital Corp., according to a new published report.
Ack. My mortgage is through GMAC. I hope they don't mess up the online statements and payments during any transition.
I've been hoping they would hang on a few more years until I finish paying it off. I've officially got 10 more years on a 15 year mortgage, but if I continue paying down principle at my current rate I'll have it paid off in 4 to 5 years. Which I realize doesn't do GMAC a lot of good...
I'm at 5.75% and whenever the rates drop way down I think about doing another refi, but at the rate I am paying it off, the interest savings on the remaining payments would not pay for the refi fees. Maybe if GMAC is bought by bozos I'll refi at one of my credit unions.
not sure if this has been posted yet.
Robert Reich (The Sham Recovery)
From the link...
America’s biggest companies are also showing fat profits and productivity gains because they continue to slash payrolls and cut expenditures. Alcoa, for example, had $1.5 billion in cash at the end of last year, double what it had on hand at the end of 2008. Sounds terrific until you realize how it did it. By cutting 28,000 jobs – 32 percent of workforce – and slashed capital expenditures 43 percent.
Read an article today - Shrinking Into Profitability - basically a road map on how to do it.
Just read The Greatest Trade Ever, about Paulson and others who shorted subprime going during the bubble. I think a lot of folks here would like it, because it goes into their emotions when they first started shorting subprime, but the value of the bonds went up, and they were like, WTF, sooner or later this bubble has to burst.
A good read on how tough it is to be a contrarian.
I've officially got 10 more years on a 15 year mortgage, but if I continue paying down principle at my current rate I'll have it paid off in 4 to 5 years.
A 15 year mortgage? What are you, responsible or something?
There is no future in America for the likes of you.
Rob Dawg wrote:
Good thing they don't rely on natgas revenues.
I read an analysis the other evening, which claimed that most of the US shale gas operations are losing money at current prices.
Yup. The oil/natgas ratio is a true conundrum. I have absolutely no idea which way it breaks. Logic says oil crashes and natgas rises slightly but logic was the first causality when Calvinomics took over two years ago.
CP programs are one portion of the ABS market, but by no means all of it.
didn't mean to imply that, meant to suggest that the CP-ABS issuance went somewhere else
which would make sense with the lower long term interest rates, and increased liquidity premia compared to the last go around
Ok, FDIC New York team, press releases final check on the hour please, we are go for release by 10 past. Final systems check, Mayaguez on line one, back-office enquiry team, good, repeat spell check for the spanish version please Maria.
I read an analysis the other evening, which claimed that most of the US shale gas operations are losing money at current prices.
That is the understanding I have from inside the industry, the few shale players who are making money have either been carried by their hedges, have very liquids rich gas production or have the absolute lowest cost structure. And it will be interesting to see if these wells bleed gas for twenty years, or what kind of workover programs (aka additional investment) will be required to keep producing...
That is the understanding I have from inside the industry, the few shale players who are making money have either been carried by their hedges, have very liquids rich gas production or have the absolute lowest cost structure. And it will be interesting to see if these wells bleed gas for twenty years, or what kind of workover programs (aka additional investment) will be required to keep producing...
Same thing I was reading. My understanding is that if you stop drilling and fraccing, the gas stops. But there might be some bleed, of course. The implication was not much, if any.
A 15 year mortgage? What are you, responsible or something?
There is no future in America for the likes of you.
When I refied into this current mortgage I consolidated a previous 15 year mortgage about half paid off with a second I had take out in 2002 to do some home repairs and keep my business afloat. As of this month's mortgage payment, my balance is within $10 of the balance of my first at the time of the refi, so I have basically paid off the whole second.
And after my next payment I should owe about what I paid for the house in '85. (There was another refi in there in 96 to deal with what happens when you buy a fixer upper and can't afford to fix it for 10 years...new roof, jack the foundation, and a lot of stuff in between) . But if I really pay it off before August 2015 I will have made less than 30 years of payments.
5.75% feels cheap: I started out in 85 with loans in the 12% range.
It's Friday
It’s only fitting in our bank monopoly system that Park Avenue Bank fails. Unfortunately we do not have a go to jail card for our banksters. They just pass go and keep collecting $200 billion dollars.
The FDIC estimates that the cost to the Deposit Insurance Fund (DIF) will be $50.7 million.
There's probably 1500 banks that could be closed based upon a 10% loss threshold.
Movin' on up to da east side!
‘They Just Want This Over’ - Robert Costa - The Corner on National Review Online
Does it really count as a bank? More like a domestic safe in those parts, no?
C
And this may explain why we had a Thursday failure: the same assuming bank. Probably the assuming bank couldn't eat two in one day.
Valley National Bank(not the AZ one that is now part of Chase) is really stepping up to the plate, 2 in 2 days. I guess this is the start of the wave of consolidation.
What's with this 10% asset hit to the DIF
Nit picking at the baby banks.
We want to see some more 30-40%ers...
Got my BFF vote in with about 90 seconds to spare.
Somebody just tried to steal $14,750 from my trust account.
My bank yanked the money back.
Citi apparently took the loss.
No kidding.
First time anything like this has ever happened.
The phony check had my former address on it.
.
...you playing Moneyopoly, lawyerliz?
LibertyPointe yesterday, Park Avenue today. Sheila's painting the town
in red ink.
Trying desperately not to.
I nearly had a heart attack.
Both banks said that there was a lot of fraud.
Nemo wrote:
Second time this week.
There's probably 1500 banks that could be closed based upon a 10% loss threshold.
Ya. Makes me wonder if someone affiliated with the bank crossed someone up.
daddyo,
question for you got
Comment by energyecon from thread 'The Toxic Asset that Planet Money Bought'
lawyerliz wrote:
...to you. Three out of four people in my department have had some kind of identity theft of bank fraud incident in the last 3 years. Banks don't like to talk about it, but their systems are vulnerable from many vectors.
From the last thread, energyecon -
In terms of liquidity, both ABS and CMBS are essentially back to before the crisis. There is a bid for everything, which is a good thing.
ABS is doing very well. Collateral performance is great (cards, autos, etc), as trends are mostly positive. Most of the issuers have come in to support their off-balance sheet trusts for reputation's sake, so there is a lot of confidence in these markets. We've seen a credit card trust fail (Advanta), and the deal structure worked how it was supposed to, which is reassuring.
CMBS is doing ok. The top tranches are performing extremely well, the bottoms are not. That's about what you would expect actually, the bottom tranches in most of the deals will take significant losses. One deal in particular, with a huge Stuy Town piece, will likely take losses all the way up to the originally AAA tranches. Good stuff.
A postmortem on Lehman Brothers: Oh, brother | The Economist
lawyerliz wrote:
Were they discussing internal operations?
Sweet, I just got my Zim$ 10,000,000,000,000,000 note.
Now to call the bank, exchange it for 'loose change' and corner the metal market!
lawyerliz wrote:
*My bank yanked the money back.
Citi apparently took the loss.
No kidding.
First time anything like this has ever happened.
The phony check had my former address on it*"
Counterfeit checks are a veritable locust swarm these days. Ask any front-end bank employee.
I hope this doesn't push Citi over the brink. But if it was a Citi depositor who deposited the bad check on your account, the loss is that guy's, and Citi will live another day.
lawyerliz wrote:
Make them an offer they can't refuse. Lawyers ain't cheap. Forget the fraud, clear the title and let them walk away.
Jonathan wrote:
Are you sure? I thought the largest they printed was 100 trillion, which would be 100,000,000,000,000. You claim to hold a 10 quadrillion dollar note.
many thanks daddyo - so that is all existing inventory then? Or is new issuance in there as well?
Comrade Alexei Mikhailovich wrote:
LOL. Talk to me about "consolidation" when Sheila actually starts closing banks faster than new ones appear on the Problem Bank List.
At this point, it's a leaky faucet of consolidation.
EDIT: Oops, I misread that. Ignore.
How many new banks have been created since the start of the year?
Mr Slippery wrote:
I thought the largest they printed was 100 trillion, which would be 100,000,000,000,000. You claim to hold a 10 quadrillion dollar note.
I have three of the ZIM 100 trillion notes, bought a few months ago... depending on the rate of inflation, 10 quadrillion could be worth what 100 trillion used to be worth when I purchased the notes. It's all relative, right?
...it's a debt & pony show
ABS has been a lot of new issue.
In CMBS, there has been new issue from freddie with an agency wrap, and the FDIC deal of Corus assets that just went to market. There has been no new private label CMBS since 2008 that wasn't a repack of old junk.
I am told that in some cases involving state-chartered institutions, the state regulators take a more lenient approach and resist federal pressure to shut down a troubled bank.
ABS outstanding is way down in the Commercial Paper space FRB: Commercial Paper Rates and Outstandings
The guy who originally called was from the fraud division of Citi.
He said they lost money.
Why did they clear the check so soon?
noob goldberg wrote:
thanks noob, it was a treat - out a bit early on a Friday - took the wife and kinder princess out to lunch, it is just a knockout gorgeous day here in Houston today
It's still raining here.
Cinco-X wrote:
Now that is saying something when you can't find an American lawyer to help you cook the books . . .
CP programs are one portion of the ABS market, but by no means all of it.
energyecon wrote:
Nice!
daddyo wrote:
So how does this quarter compare to the second half of 2009 in terms of volume?
Hey wait a minnit!
Use positive pay Liz!
Park Avenue Bank? For balance, the FDIC plans on closing Skid Row Bank later today.
ResistanceIsFeudal wrote:
I have some 1-billion-mark postage stamps from Weimar Germany in my collection...I also have some amusing covers (mailed envelopes) plastered with stamps, at a time when inflation required using an entire sheetof stamps to mail a letter.I bet you could find newer Zimbabwe stamps like that....
hal5280 wrote:
Should have gone straight to a Greek lawyer-
lawyerliz wrote:
A New York minute?
CMBS is about the same, which is effectively zero (the fdic/freddie deals were small).
ABS is probably the same. A lot of people issued ABS in H209 to ride the TALF train. Based on where new deals were pricing, TALF issuance was no longer profitable, so it slowed down a little bit, but it's still there.
I'm confident that the people that jumped back into the ABS & MBS/CMBS markets will learn their lesson on the next round.
lawyerliz wrote:
Doesn't anything over $10k require a report by the bank cashing it? In other words, ought not Citi "know" the perp?
But good to know you were made good
Cinco-X wrote:
A New York minute?
Right... time runs differently in the Big Appal
What's positive pay?
Remember, this wasn't a check of mine, somebody else
printed it up.
LL, it was probably rampant in that bank. No one that I know of checks signatures anymore, all automation.
lawyerliz wrote:
One of my banks just informed me that they will take up to seven days to clear any amounts deposited over $5000/day.
That pretty much puts them out of the running for business accounts.
I wonder who they think their customers are?
We're now doing wires for any amount over $10K or so. No one will accept checks for five figure and up amounts any more because their banks want the long float.
Yeah, the Swiss seem be having a problem as well ...
HSBC admits huge Swiss data theft
Cash management service-a deterrent to check fraud-by which banks compare a company's record of checks issued with checks presented for payment. Suspicious checks are referred to the check issuer for approval. A less-costly alternative, reverse positive pay, calls for the check issuer to self-monitor its checking account and notify the bank when it declines to pay a check.
lawyerliz wrote:
He said they lost money.
Why did they clear the check so soon?
Interesting. I'm getting fairly regular calls from people who are selling stuff either online or in newspaper classifieds. They get a phone call or an email from a "purchaser" who sends them a "cashier's check" for more than the asking price, along with some blah blah blah about why this is necessary. The seller is then requested to deposit the check and wire the extra money back to the buyer.
Nobody here is silly enough to do that, are they? (Those who do are often surprised to discover that their bank is not sympathetic when the check turns out to be phony...)
daddyo wrote:
Thanks daddyo - seems like the drivers for the deterioration in the Hatzius FCI are in about the same place overall - I am keen to see an update with the latest data as it becomes available.
If anyone wants the real gory details of what was in the toxic pile the NPR folks bought, here is the prosupp.
http://www.sec.gov/Archives/edgar/data/826219/000112528205004565/b408557_424b5.txt
Someone asked about doc:
Reduced Documentation............ 67.09%
Full Documentation............... 15.03
SISA............................. 13.54
Alternative Documentation........ 4.19
No Income/No Asset............... 0.14
In connection with the Standard Underwriting Guidelines, Countrywide
originates or acquires mortgage loans under the Full Documentation Program, the
Alternative Documentation Program, the Reduced Documentation Program, the CLUES
Plus Documentation Program or the Streamlined Documentation Program.
The Alternative Documentation Program permits a borrower to provide W-2
forms instead of tax returns covering the most recent two years, permits bank
statements in lieu of verification of deposits and permits alternative methods
of employment verification.
Under the Reduced Documentation Program, some underwriting
documentation concerning income, employment and asset verification is waived.
Countrywide obtains from a prospective borrower either a verification of deposit
or bank statements for the two-month period immediately before the date of the
mortgage loan application or verbal verification of employment. Since
information relating to a prospective borrower's income and employment is not
verified, the borrower's debt-to-income ratios are calculated based on the
information provided by the borrower in the mortgage loan application. The
maximum Loan-to-Value Ratio, including secondary financing, ranges up to 75%.
The CLUES Plus Documentation Program permits the verification of
employment by alternative means, if necessary, including verbal verification of
employment or reviewing paycheck stubs covering the pay period immediately prior
to the date of the mortgage loan application. To verify the borrower's assets
and the sufficiency of the borrower's funds for closing, Countrywide obtains
deposit or bank account statements from each prospective borrower for the month
immediately prior to the date of the mortgage loan application. Under the CLUES
Plus Documentation Program, the maximum Loan-to-Value Ratio is 75% and property
values may be based on appraisals comprising only interior and exterior
inspections. Cash-out refinances and investor properties are not permitted under
the CLUES Plus Documentation Program.
The Streamlined Documentation Program is available for borrowers who
are refinancing an existing mortgage loan that was originated or acquired by
Countrywide provided that, among other things, the mortgage loan has not been
more than 30 days delinquent in payment during the previous twelve-month period.
Under the Streamlined Documentation Program, appraisals are obtained only if the
loan amount of the loan being refinanced had a Loan-to-Value Ratio at the time
of origination in excess of 80% or if the loan amount of the new loan being
originated is greater than $650,000. In addition, under the Streamlined
Documentation Program, a credit report is obtained but only a limited credit
review is conducted, no income or asset verification is required, and telephonic
verification of employment is permitted. The maximum Loan-to-Value Ratio under
the Streamlined Documentation Program ranges up to 95%.
Of all the banks with ginned up balance sheets in the world why did She(ila) have to walk into this one?
Nice sleuthing, ghost.
daddyo wrote:
Do you think the end of TALF is gonna have a big impact? Just curious, I don't follow non-mortgage ABS much at all.
Hey would you like debt chaser with your drink of debt?
To fill more of those orders, Treasurer Bill Lockyer raised the size of the offering to $2.5 billion.
LATimes.
It's only OPM. Eh. What could happen?
lawyerliz wrote:
How much rain did you get? last night on the tube they said it might be bad in florida
Are they going to do a podcast about their new toxic asset? I hope more people pick up on that trend.
Angry Saver wrote:
John Stark wrote:
Not me. I provided my account information to an orphan princess so that she could use it to unlock her deceased father's fortune.
Apparently there are lots of people in this situation, as I get constant requests for help.
EDIT:
Darling I love you, but give me PARK AVENUE !
The poor man, doesn't he have enough troubles back in Blighty to deal with?
ghostfaceinvestah wrote:
Geez, the jokes write themselves: Blues Clues. The Game Clue.
But mostly, Countrywide needed to buy a clue.
Never heard of either.
We're almost all JPM now.
NYC is about to close a lot of firehouses, but JPM branches keep opening up. Not a good equation.
I keep getting email from terminally ill widows with fortunes who tell me I am their only living relative. Funny, I never got birthday cards from Cousin Katherine from Dublin.
ResistanceIsFeudal wrote:
Another expression: "Country Mile" Ya'; they measure miles different in the country....
Baltic Avenue Bank will cost the DIF 4
s and 2 cases of
Things really different on the other side of the board.
ghostfaceinvestah wrote:
Just noticed something - above is the supposed max of the Reduced Doc program - 75LTV.
Reduced Doc was 67% of all loans.
But yet 48% loans were at 80LTV.
Sheesh, they couldn't even keep their story straight in the prosupp.
You know darn well that whoever bought these didn't even look at the documents, they just bought a rating and a yield.
noob goldberg wrote:
LOL--please keep us updated on how that's working out for ya.
1 currency now -yogi wrote:
One starts F.I.R.E.S. and the other puts them out. Eh. What could happen?
Vonbek777 wrote:
It gets worse. I FOUND valuable lost property and the heir couldn't figure out how to accept it because it was half owned by a brother she couldn't find. Well into the six figures.
Fahrenheit 401k
Vonbek777 wrote:
I never got any from Aunt Luwanda in Liberia either...
Was it ever resolved? Did yesterday's Friday count as part of today's Friday?
Cinco-X wrote:
Give me your info and I'll put you in touch.
Turns out I'm the new Nigerian Finance Minister! According to an email. Maybe I misread it. Something about a locker in Rotterdam too.
C
We are waiting for a ruling from the SEC, should come in our lifetime.
Finally saw "Capitalism: A Love Story." That movie is . . . accurate and well-done. I can't say it was actually good because it was just too depressing. But he got it right. The next drop down is going to be breathtaking.
Options dwindle for cashing California IOUs |
World news |
guardian.co.uk
Please God let this be true.
ResCap on the Block?
GMAC Financial Services has hired Goldman Sachs to start the process of selling the company's money-losing mortgage unit Residential Capital Corp., according to a new published report.
tg wrote:
Too old to be relevant.
I'm shy. How bout you meet cousin Katherine for me...send my regards.
He Liz ... check out FDIC: Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation
Sheila has a video discussing how not to get ripped off. It's in honor of National Consumer Protection Week - if I'd only known sooner.
OT--belongs in a pigged thread, but I'm still trying to understand this numbers game.
This is dated January 9, 2010:
"AUSTIN – Four months into its new two-year budget, Texas already is nearly $1 billion behind its expected pace of sales tax collections, according to new figures released Friday.
Comptroller Susan Combs said there's no need for panic, as tax collections should start growing again in the first or second quarter of the year.
But the decline is dramatic. A year ago, Combs forecast essentially flat sales taxes receipts in the budget year that started Sept. 1; instead, they've decreased by 12.9 percent in the first four months."
Texas sales tax collections are $1 billion behind |
News for Dallas, Texas | Dallas Morning News
| Texas Legislature
And Texas is doing better than most states. So, what's with that alleged increase in sales? And how come no one is seriously challenging those numbers? CR?
FDIC Said to be Prepping Sale of $3 Billion of AmTrust Bank Loans
The Federal Deposit Insurance Corp. (FDIC) is reportedly preparing to sell $3 billion worth of loans from AmTrust Bank, said a Bloomberg report, citing people who are involved in the sales. AmTrust is the a Cleveland-based lender seized by FDIC last December.
Chit happens...
Rob Dawg wrote:
my bad
That article is hilarious.
Officials said it was too early to tell if businesses that receive the IOUs were feeling a financial squeeze.
Edit: I'll second that "my bad", but it's still funny...
gruntled wrote:
Mish has a good post about this, I can't verify the accuracy of his claims, but it kinda makes sense.
Mish's Global Economic Trend Analysis: Retail Sales Rise: Where? Let's Take a Look; Expect Nothing Less Than Panic
ghostfaceinvestah wrote:
I haven't checked the seat cushions recently so I'm in. Anybody else? I'm thinking we need postage to submit an offer that includes them paying us. A lot.
gruntled wrote:
Arithmetic was ruled out of Calvinball in Fall 2008. Since then, numbers just are. And all changes are subject to further modification.
And in other news...Texas flea markets thriving, yard sales are up, and backyard bartering during the witching hour is rumored to be increasing.
Forgot to mention that the new in thing for middle class moms is shopping at Goodwill.
That is going to have significant impact as TX has no income tax.
Ah. Ok. Park Avenue in Brooklyn. Opened in 2005. That would explain the obscurity.
Hawley -
Just read a NYer review of Stiglitz's book - a near-perfect abstract, really. They also got it right. Maybe Surowiecki doesn't quite rule the roost after all.
steelhead wrote:
Yep, sales tax and property taxes are primary revenue sources...
1 currency now -yogi wrote:
And the failure. It seems a lot of little fraud farms were opened about that time.
Remember the BFF when EHP and I tried to locate the branches of an institution that no one had heard of, and found only empty storefronts and parking lots on Google?
not sure if this has been posted yet.
Robert Reich (The Sham Recovery)
LOL. Were any of them co-located with Madoff's accountant?
C
energyecon wrote:
Good thing they don't rely on natgas revenues.
In its biennial revenue projections, the State Comptroller’s office reported that Texas brought in 2.7 percent less revenue during fiscal year 2009 than in 2008, due in part to reduced drilling activity. The office also projects a 58 percent drop in natural gas tax revenue in fiscal year 2010, after 2009’s actual 48 percent drop
It took California a little over 8 months to conjure up about half a billion dollars out of thin air that major banks increasingly want no part of, and in the next 4 months, six times as much will be pumped out of 95736.
72% loss severities on subprime, ouch.
Expiring Govt. Programs to Result in Higher RMBS Losses, Fitch Says
In the couple of years prior to the recent improvement, national home prices dropped approximately 30% while loss severities on loans which incurred losses doubled to record highs of 43% for private-label Prime loans, 58% for Alt-A loans and 72% for Subprime loans.
ghostfaceinvestah wrote:
ghostfaceinvestah, thanks.
Anyone read yves book yet, ECONned?
Someone put together an absolutely sh!tkicking high def video to promote it I found on her blog...worthy of the 95 MB or so it takes up on your hard drive (720p resolution). There is also a low res embedded on yves site:
http://www.nakedcapitalism.com/2010/03/econned-%e2%80%93-the-movie-um-video.html
sm_landlord wrote:
Was Cassano (AIGFP) head of the FDIC that year?
Juvenal Delinquent wrote:
The sad part is a lot of the budget fixes are absofuckingloutely guaranfuckingteed to be reversed by the courts.
Park Avenue Bank. Oh my!! And Holy Shit, Batman. WTF?
As they used to say at the dog track out in Colorado, "Heeeerrreee Cooommmeee's Rusty!!!!"
Counterpointer wrote:
No, but one of the "branches" seems to be in a building that contained a mortgage brokerage and a couple of real estate offices. Talk about a captive lender...
Next bank please...
Rob Dawg wrote:
You already have my e-mail.....
75% loan to value?
And they were lying anyway?
ghostfaceinvestah wrote:
Ack. My mortgage is through GMAC. I hope they don't mess up the online statements and payments during any transition.
I've been hoping they would hang on a few more years until I finish paying it off. I've officially got 10 more years on a 15 year mortgage, but if I continue paying down principle at my current rate I'll have it paid off in 4 to 5 years. Which I realize doesn't do GMAC a lot of good...
I'm at 5.75% and whenever the rates drop way down I think about doing another refi, but at the rate I am paying it off, the interest savings on the remaining payments would not pay for the refi fees. Maybe if GMAC is bought by bozos I'll refi at one of my credit unions.
Rob Dawg wrote:
I read an analysis the other evening, which claimed that most of the US shale gas operations are losing money at current prices.
ghostfaceinvestah wrote:
From the link...
Read an article today - Shrinking Into Profitability - basically a road map on how to do it.
energyecon wrote:
Not yet, will look into it.
Just read The Greatest Trade Ever, about Paulson and others who shorted subprime going during the bubble. I think a lot of folks here would like it, because it goes into their emotions when they first started shorting subprime, but the value of the bonds went up, and they were like, WTF, sooner or later this bubble has to burst.
A good read on how tough it is to be a contrarian.
Crooklyn.
Park Ave. Manhattan is too connected to fail.
Vonbek777 wrote:
while you are waiting
YouTube - Cooking - Squirrel (Skillet)
Partition suit.
some investor guy,
I did catch your reply taking $200,000 over 30 years to $485,000+ at 3% annualized.
I happen to think the dollar will be devalued by more than 3% annualized over the next 30 years.
But even if it isn't, the house would no longer be underwater and the adjusted payment was a reasonable cost for housing over those 30 years.
pythia wrote:
A 15 year mortgage? What are you, responsible or something?
There is no future in America for the likes of you.
And we are off to an early start.
Robert Reich using "Sham Recovery"! Yves using eCON title!
Love it. Now where did they get such brilliant titles?
Kauai_Kahuna wrote:
But a slow one. And I'm thirsty.
sm_landlord wrote:
Yup. The oil/natgas ratio is a true conundrum. I have absolutely no idea which way it breaks. Logic says oil crashes and natgas rises slightly but logic was the first causality when Calvinomics took over two years ago.
The invisible hand is shoved deep up somebody assignats in the Golden State...
daddyo wrote:
didn't mean to imply that, meant to suggest that the CP-ABS issuance went somewhere else
which would make sense with the lower long term interest rates, and increased liquidity premia compared to the last go around
Ok, FDIC New York team, press releases final check on the hour please, we are go for release by 10 past. Final systems check, Mayaguez on line one, back-office enquiry team, good, repeat spell check for the spanish version please Maria.
And 3, 2, 1...
C
ghostfaceinvestah wrote:
Who died and left them money?
Angry Saver wrote:
Did you see Blodget on YahooTube today asking Mish and Marc Faber if we're all going to be shooting
s in the park for food?
faber and mish we're doomed and washington can't do anything about it: Tech Ticker, Yahoo! Finance
Arithmetic was ruled out of Calvinball in Fall 2008. Since then, numbers just are. And all changes are subject to further modification.
POTD
At the moment I'm contemplating 14750. Such a lovely, lovely
number. So different from 14751.
Two more: FL & LA
Old Southern Bank, Orlando
Statewide Bank, Covington
MLM wrote:
Ken,
We are going to need a :greenbeer: icon for St. Patrick's Day and the impending Ireland implosion.
fudge_hend wrote:
No banks left standing in Atlanta?
Well, one bank and one
down tonight....at least it's Friday and the credit card collection depts get off early.
Erin go broke?
Maria, you're working on the Florida file? Whaaat? C'mon, we're doing Westernbank today!
C
sm_landlord wrote:
That is the understanding I have from inside the industry, the few shale players who are making money have either been carried by their hedges, have very liquids rich gas production or have the absolute lowest cost structure. And it will be interesting to see if these wells bleed gas for twenty years, or what kind of workover programs (aka additional investment) will be required to keep producing...
I bet big. Come on Sheila.
liz, that one is in your neighborhood ?
Juvenal Delinquent wrote:
You can do better. Even I passed on that one.
More minnows, under $130m on the DIF for both.
My BFF bet is looking good.
C
energyecon wrote:
Same thing I was reading. My understanding is that if you stop drilling and fraccing, the gas stops. But there might be some bleed, of course. The implication was not much, if any.
Irish I hadn't bought all those condos in Dublin.
Juvenal Delinquent wrote:
Ye mistake was Dublin down.
Nope, don't think so.
15% and 30% DIF hits. All over the map.
ghostfaceinvestah wrote:
There is no future in America for the likes of you.
When I refied into this current mortgage I consolidated a previous 15 year mortgage about half paid off with a second I had take out in 2002 to do some home repairs and keep my business afloat.
As of this month's mortgage payment, my balance is within $10 of the balance of my first at the time of the refi, so I have basically paid off the whole second.
And after my next payment I should owe about what I paid for the house in '85. (There was another refi in there in 96 to deal with what happens when you buy a fixer upper and can't afford to fix it for 10 years...new roof, jack the foundation, and a lot of stuff in between) . But if I really pay it off before August 2015 I will have made less than 30 years of payments.
5.75% feels cheap: I started out in 85 with loans in the 12% range.
.