The Next Stress Test Scenarios

Why bother? Everybody is "overcapitalized".

A double dip for the U.S. is included.
Double Dip Double Dip Double Dip Double Dip Double Dip Double Dip Double Dip Double Dip Double Dip Double Dip Double Dip Double Dip Double Dip Double Dip Double Dip Double Dip Double Dip Double Dip Double Dip Double Dip Double Dip Double Dip Double Dip Double Dip Double Dip Double Dip Double Dip Double Dip Double Dip Double Dip Double Dip Double Dip

How many flavors Big smile

How many stress tests can fit on the head of a pin?

As many as you want, if the books are cooked.

Can I go ahead and predict who gets a passing grade?

I'll bet I could name 19, just off the top of my head.

Stress tests are done on a squid pro quo basis.

Stress tests for banks just means they will get bailed out. No problem.

Why don't we stress test 100 families and see where they end up?

Five year horizon. Includes US in the test. I think these people want to know.

I wish the FSA had included there "double dip" forecast scenario for the U.S. That would be interesting ...

I think this is a much better way to do - make it part of the process, and forecast out a rolling 5 years. The U.S. encouraged banks to extend and pretend - and push the problems beyond the stress test horizon (into 2011).

The Treasury keeps talking about how great the stress tests were in helping recapitalize the banks. Great. Do them again

best to all

burnside wrote:

I think these people want to know.

I think these people already own their two largest banks.

Just think no stress test needed and taxpayers would not be on hook for $700B if only Pres. Hopium listened to this guy

Let banks fail, says Nobel economist Joseph Stiglitz - Telegraph

Instead we have a Vampire Squid from Hell clusterfuck with collusion

Anyone been reading about BlackRock and its ties to the US treasury/FED. Vampire Squid from Hell Vampire Squid from Hell Vampire Squid from Hell

Oh yeah vote in my Poll I know It kinda sucks I should close it but vote NE wayz

isn't the reccession over? these stress tests are not necessary.

we just need another war so that the debbie downers have something else to complain about!

Hat

Why conduct stress tests? To fool people into thinking you actually have a valid purpose.

[Fed.] Governor William J. Le Petomane: We've gotta protect our phoney baloney jobs, gentlemen!

Rajesh wrote:

I think these people already own their two largest banks.

Incentive, eh wot?

Tim waiting for 2012 wrote:

Anyone been reading about BlackRock and its ties to the US treasury/FED.

Yup, they are in deep. Lots of no-bid contracts. Sort of like the modern day Haliburton.

Good odds Timmy will end up there after this.

no need to worry about the stress tests

the feds marking the stress tests on a curve

and every bank gets bonus 65 points for showing up

impossible to fail

Plantagenet wrote:

Why conduct stress tests? To fool people into thinking you actually have a valid purpose.

that was my thought. What is the point? Just another waste of time and resources.

I wonder if the stress test includes a scenario where the government delays foreclosures for ANOTHER two years and the banks are holding RMBS with 80% delinquency rates marked to model assuming 75% of delinquent borrowers will cure.

ghostface... yeah kinda flys under the radar. thanks

Now vote in my damn poll!

first i gotta figure how to get to the polls....

Labor Market: States, Cities Likely to Slash Jobs As Stimulus Dwindles - CNBC Double Dip *

"State and local payrolls peaked in August 2008. Between then and January 2010, 191,000 jobs have been lost, three-quarters of them at the local level.

If those numbers seem small, consider that by one estimate, some 256,000 government jobs have been saved by stimulus funding."*

Somewhat OT -

Have a quarto edition of a book covering the restoration project following the Windsor fire. Andrew Nicolson - Harold's grandson, Nigel's son. They structured the job with rolling budget targets, and what's more, kept to them. Very impressive.

Good read from an engineering standpoint. In fact, good all-around rainy day fare.

BlackRock Hires Ex-Treasury Hand Wilson - WSJ.com

BlackRock Inc. is adding a former U.S. Treasury official and well-known investment banker to its executive team as it seeks to digest a major acquisition and manage $3.3 trillion of client assets.

Kendrick R. Wilson, 63 years old, will join the New York-based money manager Feb. 1 as vice chairman and will have a broad role supporting client relationships and advising the management team, BlackRock said on Friday.

Like BlackRock itself, Mr. Wilson has been heavily involved in financial-crisis recovery efforts. As an adviser in the Treasury Department from August 2008 to January 2009, he had broad responsibilities, including helping to field suggestions and pleas for help from market participants, he says.

He previously held senior investment-banking roles at Goldman Sachs Group Inc. and Lazard Freres & Co.

Why don't we stress test 100 families and see where they end up?

An interesting concept. What if...a statistically significant random sample of American households was stress tested against reasonable employment, interest rate, stock market scenarios?

Guaranteed that the "failure" rate would open our eyes to...what may happen to some one else. Wouldn't affect "us" though.

quid
pro
quo

BlackRock increases Treasury holdings-report
| Reuters

BlackRock Inc (BLK.N)., the world's largest asset manager, increased its investment in U.S. Treasuries, the Wall Street Journal reported.

two days ago

rosethorn wrote on Mon, 3/8/2010 - 9:49 pm

"Help me out here; weren't the stress tests widely derided as a sham back when they were taking place? "


from over at naked capitalism

(btw i take umbrage with the authors cavalier use of the term mock

who does he think he is Wink

The fake stress tests

A post by Edward Harrison

About a month ago I wrote a post called “The coming wave of second mortgage writedowns” the gist of which was that the big four banks (Citi, JP, BofA, and Wells) had a shed load of exposure to now worthless second mortgages. With many first mortgages now hopelessly underwater, it stands to reason that second mortgages on those same properties have zero value.

The big four are certainly well aware of this problem and are looking for ways to extend the wherewithal of underwater borrowers and pretend they don’t need to take losses on these loans. On paper, these companies are very well capitalized. However, in the real world, the likely losses they must eventually take on loans already on their books would probably render them insolvent. This is what I hinted yesterday in my post on the stress tests.

I said:

I would say the stress tests were a mock exercise to instil confidence in the capital markets. This was important first and foremost because it would induce private investors to pay for bank recapitalization instead of taxpayers. But it was also important for the economy as a whole as the sick banking sector was dragging the whole economy down. The key, however, is that the tests were a mock exercise. Despite the additional capital, banks are still hiding hundreds of billions of dollars in losses in level three, hold to maturity, and off balance sheet asset pools. If asset prices fall and/or the economy weakens, all of this subterfuge would be for nought.

The fake stress tests « naked capitalism


so yes the stress tests are not worth the paper they are printed on imho, becasue of all the mark to fantasy and hidden crap

there is much more to the post about the fake stress tests, including tables with interesting numbers

that show the sham claim of 14% on seconds

is so much BS loss is really much bigger

read the rest if you like at naked capitalism link above

Not that Blackrock is very omniscient, though. Or they just like book-talking, like every other asset manager.

BlackRock's Fink sees 'capitulation' at hand - Apr. 16, 2008

For a firm that's gaining a reputation for cleaning up after financial disasters, BlackRock remains remarkably optimistic.

CEO Larry Fink said Wednesday that he believes investors are getting ready to return to riskier parts of the markets, such as the market for bank loans and the deeply distressed mortgage securities area. The comments come even as BlackRock's own first-quarter earnings show just the opposite has been happening at an unprecedented pace.

And this is nearly two years ago. Of course, nothing has happened. Bread and circuses.

US lawmaker eyes BlackRock role in Fed's Bear deal
| Reuters

“The very nature of what we are asking them to do almost guarantees that it is going to be to the benefit of BlackRock,” said Representative Darrell Issa of California, the ranking Republican on the House Committee on Oversight and Government Reform. “You can have separate pews, but if you go to the same church, it will cross over.”

We live in a kleptocracy, why do we even care about stress tests anymore? Last gaasp rules allow banks to lie and hide. The federal reserve can pretend it is solvent. And godman sacks is worshipped by the buffitologists. Financial cops are sent cowering. And we Americans fear to tread where braver men have died.

AAANNNDDD finally there is this guy.

Mr. Risk Goes To Wall Street--A Calculated Move - February 9, 2004

As the recently departed undersecretary for domestic finance at the Treasury, believe you me, Peter Fisher is known to every fiscal power broker from D.C. to Delhi. He's an unusual guy. For one, he gets visibly excited talking about financial policy. And for another, he's been pretty good at implementing it. He's also obsessed with the business of risk.

Now Fisher has hung up his government scepter to join bond house BlackRock.

How awful of me to forget this pedigree:

"Fisher went to Concord Academy--where he became friendly with Caroline Kennedy--and then to Harvard College and Harvard Law. He took a job at the New York Fed, where he became a favorite of Fed chief William McDonough. There Fisher made his first mark, resolving the collapse of Long-Term Capital by organizing a $3.6 billion bailout from Wall Street's biggest institutions."

Harking back to the previous post, was there any consensus or at least comprehension of alternatives for 2nd lien holders?

ISTM that many underwater homeowners playing jingle mail or even taking HAMP-vantage of "Get-out-of-home" cards actually have assets that may be accessible to a collection agency if the loan is "resource." In fact, collection agencies have been known to not care whether the loan is resource or not.

The new stress test scenarios should include sovereign default, municipal downgrades, and large FX movements.

Pelosi: "now you see why we need to pass Obamacare, so we can find out how it deals with stress"

some investor guy wrote:

The new stress test scenarios should include sovereign default, municipal downgrades, and large FX movements

It's not really a stress test unless it includes thermonuclear weapons, invasion from another planet and the rapture of all godly people before the wrath of God is unleashed.

"A double dip for the U.S. is included."


at no extra charge

theres only one way outta this mess

mr peabody and sherman gotta take a ride

in the wayback machine

http://christianmystics.com/wp-content/uploads/2008/02/waybackmachine.jpg

It's not really a stress test unless it includes thermonuclear weapons, invasion from another planet and the rapture of all godly people before the wrath of God is unleashed.

Don't forget the contract from a large publisher - say one about seven feet tall.

"its not really a stress test....


unless its held in the coliseum and we can sell tickets

OT

From the last thread. memmel left another comment after Pigged , that was informative as well. Thanks again memmel.

"its not really a stress test..."

unless at least one bank requires paddles, high voltage, and CPR

Agreed. Why not all risks and exposures?

mock turtle, I think I was one of the few - some people have emailed me and said ONLY blogger - to support the stress tests. I still think they are generally a good idea. I'd have seized GMAC ... and maybe some others ... but the idea is to provide a measurement tool. But you can't just use it once.

That would be someone like deciding to lose weight, and then getting on the scale to see what they weigh - and then never weighing themselves again. It would be better to regularly check their weight ...

best
Bill

He's also obsessed with the business of risk.

Yeah, but whose risk?

For one, he gets visibly excited talking about financial policy.

Infallible sign of a human-alien hybrid.

Rajesh wrote:

the rapture of all godly people before the wrath of God is unleashed.

When the rapture comes, we get all their stuff. Wink

Basel II have lost some credibility, but to its credit, it does require stress tests on a regular basis.

CR i agree that stress testing the banks is a good idea

and your point is well made that if nothing else, repeated stress tests should give us a comparison over time

but my criticism is that when weighing the goods

if the vendor keeps putting his heavy thumb on the scale

i dont know if im buying more or less each time i put produce in the basket

CR hit me upside the head with a 2 x 4 made outta "all the reasons im wrong"...if i am

but sure seems to me theres so much stuff hidden and marked to model that

i dont know what these tests mean?...or am i just being short sighted and obstinate?

1) a baseline case matching the consensus view (or the Fed's current forecast), and 2) a more severe case with a double dip recession and further house price declines.

I won't feel comfortable until the double dip is the consensus.

Goldman Deal-Maker Now Advocates Regulation - NY Times

"
Today, he is emerging as one of the nation’s archreformers, pushing to impose some of the most stringent new financial regulations in history. And as the head of the Commodity Futures Trading Commission, the leading contender to oversee the complex derivatives contracts that played a central role in the financial crisis and, in turn, the Great Recession, he is in a position to influence the outcome.

It may seem an unlikely conversion, but it is one that has won the approval of Brooksley E. Born, of all people, a former outspoken head of the commission. She sounded alarms more than a decade ago about the dangers hiding in the poorly understood derivatives market and was silenced by the same Washington power brokers that counted Mr. Gensler as a member.
"

Rob Dawg wrote:

I won't feel comfortable until the double dip is the consensus.

Of course, that won't be the case until the depression is into the main act. The opening act sure is a rollercoaster, isn't it?

The time for righteous indignation and the time for denial have passed, it is now time to recognize the reality at hand and place all bankers and politicians on logs and cover them with tar and feathers, and drop them back into the sea with the other Vampire Squid from Hell
Its a chopper, baby Its a chopper, baby Its a chopper, baby

I say, Amen
You Maniacs! You blew it up! Ah, damn you! Damn you all to hell!

CalculatedRisk wrote:

It would be better to regularly check their weight

Fat Cat have a tendency to keep getting fat, so continuous measurements of Fat Cat with the same tool, on a regular schedule seems like a very good theory, but as with all theories and measurements, there will be some degree of Fixed It For Ya

Speaking of GMAC. Based on what I have heard of their mortgage ops, this is optimistic.

Watchdog: GMAC bailout could cost taxpayers $6.3B - Yahoo! News
WASHINGTON – The Treasury Department sank billions into auto finance giant GMAC Inc. without an exit strategy or proof the company was viable — a decision that could cost taxpayers $6.3 billion, a new watchdog report says.

EDIT: This is what I have been saying all along - why is GMAC, to this day, still originating residential mortgages????

"The new report says the bailout effectively saved GMAC's mortgage arm and other unprofitable businesses. It questions whether the government should have wound down GMAC's operations that are not related to auto financing, perhaps by orchestrating the same sort of bankruptcy it arranged for GM and Chrysler."

ghostfaceinvestah wrote:

a decision that could cost taxpayers $6.3 billion

Remind me, is that a lot of money, or don't I care.

ghostfaceinvestah wrote:

The new report says the bailout effectively saved GMAC's mortgage arm and other unprofitable businesses.

Can it really ever be considered "saved" if it just keeps requiring successive bailouts?

Gotta love Karl:

This last month we posted a record $220.9 billion budget deficit. We took in $107 billion but spent $328 billion.

Isn't that special. We only funded 32% of expenditures?

Remember - entitlements were half of that $328 billion.

So let's see if we can do the math here.

Entitlements were about $164 billion last month in spending. The rest was, of course, the rest.

But we only took in $107 billion.

So even if we eliminated all entitlement spending we still did not have enough money to cover the rest.

Yeah.

What's Our Credit Limit Again? - The Market Ticker 

Could the EC shoot itself in the foot?

European Commission To Back CDS Trading Ban As Second Round Of Strikes Cripples Greece; Greek GDP Now Expected To Miss Worst Case Scenario | zero hedge

What scapegoaters seem to forget is that the vast majority of existing sovereign CDS notional is tied into perfectly boring insurance "basis" trades, in which the bond is held in combination with associated CDS. Once there is an inability to have hedged cash sovereign exposure, the demand for European sovereign paper will plummet, achieving precisely the opposite of what the CDS ban is attempting to accomplish.

TJ and The Bear wrote:

So even if we eliminated all entitlement spending we still did not have enough money to cover the rest.

To be fair, February is a particularly bad month for receipts. As are (to a lesser extent) January, March, July, August and all the rest.

50%off ca,ed hardy t-shirt$15 jeans,coach handbag$33,air max90,dunk,polo t-shirt$13,,lacoste t-shirt $13 air jordan for sale,$35,nfl nba jersy for sale

puma gucci$35,nike jordans six ring,yeezy$%5!!

new era caps$13 gucci handbags jeans,t-shirts sunglass,caps

true religion jeans$35,ca,ed hardy jeans$35

free shipping
accept paypal credit card
lower price fast shippment with higher quality

our website: offer cheap sports shoes and clothes

BEST QUALITY GUARANTEE!!
SAFTY & HONESTY GUARANTEE!!
FAST & PROMPT DELIVERY GUARANTEE!!

Packing: All the products are packed with original boxes and tags also retro cards/ code
numder

Features: AAA QUALITY, COMPETITIVE PRICE AND SERVICE
1) The goods are shipping by air express, such as EMS,the shipping time is in 5-7 business days
2) They are in stock now;
3) Various styles and color for clients' choice
4) The Products are fit for most people, because of our wholesale price

our website: offer cheap sports shoes and clothes

Login or register to post comments
Syndicate content