Sack... Smooth... Exit...
.
No one 17 and under admitted !!

yagij wrote:

Smooth... Sack... Exit...

I was thinking the same thing; what's the sack doing in there anyway? Must be a teabagger thing..... No one 17 and under admitted

There is plenty in this speech ...

When the time comes to tighten monetary policy, the Federal Reserve will be embarking on a tightening cycle like no other in its history. First, this tightening cycle will have two policy dimensions, in that the FOMC will have to decide on the path of its asset holdings in addition to the path of the short-term interest rate. Second, we will be using tools to drain reserves that are new and that will have to be implemented on a scale that the Fed has never before tried. And third, we will be operating in a framework of interest on reserves that has not been fully tested in U.S. markets.

best wishes

"Sack believes there will be little increase in the spread between mortgage rates and the Ten Year Treasury yield when the MBS purchase program ends."

I think the best news is we will know in about 6-8 weeks so we don't have to continue debating it.

Silky smooth. Just like the scotch they drink for breakfast.

If anyone thinks we will have anything other than endless fiat-flinging, they are crazy. Invest accordingly.

CalculatedRisk wrote:

When the time comes to tighten monetary policy, the Federal Reserve will be embarking on a tightening cycle like no other in its history. First, this tightening cycle will have two policy dimensions, in that the FOMC will have to decide on the path of its asset holdings in addition to the path of the short-term interest rate. Second, we will be using tools to drain reserves that are new and that will have to be implemented on a scale that the Fed has never before tried. And third, we will be operating in a framework of interest on reserves that has not been fully tested in U.S. markets.

Nice time for an experiment. This ends well.

Someday this war's gonna end...

CalculatedRisk wrote:

When the time comes to tighten monetary policy, the Federal Reserve will be embarking on a tightening cycle...drain reserves... operating in a framework...that has not been fully tested in U.S. markets.

In sum, we must:
* Tighten the sack
* Drain the sack
* Know the technique hasn't been fully tested.
.
That is too No one 17 and under admitted for me Shock

Citizen AllenM wrote:

we will be operating in a framework of interest on reserves that has not been fully tested in U.S. markets.

Nice time for an experiment. This ends well.
Someday this war's gonna end...

Are we going straight from '31 to '37!?

greenchutes got his Pigged, only to have this thread start out even more No one 17 and under admitted than the last.

ghostfaceinvestah wrote:

anything other than endless fiat-flinging, they are crazy.

lately I need the reassurance...thanks

I agree with Sack that the short-term liquidity facilities were a success. That is a key role for the Fed (lender of last resort):

With the wind-down of these short-term liquidity facilities, it is a good time to look back and assess their performance. The bottom line here is simple: These programs were an unquestionable success. We have witnessed a remarkable improvement in the functioning of short-term credit markets and an impressive recovery in the stability of large financial firms. While a whole range of government actions contributed to this recovery, giving financial institutions greater confidence about their access to funding, and that of their counterparties, was most likely a crucial step toward achieving stability.

Moreover, the exit from these facilities has been quite smooth. At their peak, these facilities provided more than $1.5 trillion of credit to the economy. Today, the remaining balance across them is around $20 billion. It is impressive that the Fed was able to remove itself from such a large amount of credit extension without creating any significant problems for financial markets or institutions. That success largely reflects the effective design of those programs, as most were structured to provide credit under terms that would be less and less appealing as markets renormalized. This design worked incredibly well, as activity in most of the facilities gradually declined to near zero, allowing the Fed to simply turn them off with no market disruption.

best to all

Cinco-X wrote:

Are we going straight from '31 to '37!?

With the injection of vast quantities of liquidity, time begins to dilate.

The Fed is always talking about exit, but when the time comes, will they Sack up?

ghostfaceinvestah wrote:

If anyone thinks we will have anything other than endless fiat-flinging, they are crazy. Invest accordingly.

Laughing out loud Good line. Monkeys Flinging Fiat. Nemo's Monkey

The second potential concern that some may have is whether the markets have adequately priced in the exit strategy.

It's only a "potential" concern, not an actual concern.

noob goldberg wrote:

With the injection of vast quantities of liquidity, time begins to dilate.

It's the "pulling out" that makes it more like '37-

Cinco-X wrote:

It's the "pulling out" that makes it more like '37-

The "pulling out" technique has always been a risky venture, and depending on the era, it has been an approved or disapproved course of action. Oups

I don't have a problem. I can stop any time I want.

At least the text indicates that he understands the enormity of the tightening that will be necessary to contain inflation. IMO containing inflation to "only" single digits. When the velocity of money ticks up even slightly draining liquidity will recreate the same credit lockup that liquidity was intended to address.

Bank of the United States now.

What I really want to know about are the secret $1 trillion in US equities held by the Fed and their plan to unwind those.

yagij wrote:

The "pulling out" technique has always been a risky venture, and depending on the era, it has been an approved or disapproved course of action.

I guess it needs to be teste'd.... Innocent

"From now to the end of 2011, we project that more than $200 billion of the agency debt and MBS held by the Federal Reserve will mature or be prepaid,"

Does foreclosed cause maturity and prepayment? Thought so.

ghostfaceinvestah wrote:

If anyone thinks we will have anything other than endless fiat-flinging, they are crazy.

Feddie fling my way
Sho' look good to me
Now would you please
Fling my way

Oxtail wrote:

Fling my way

I could tender you some TP....

Less the No one 17 and under admitted than the embarrassing subtext of CA politics, really.

Vampire Squid from Hell makes for an excellent looking ersatz spermatoza

MrBeach wrote:

What I really want to know about are the secret $1 trillion in US equities held by the Fed and their plan to unwind those.

In all seriousness, the S&P collapsed more than 50% in under a year. Given that our entire way of life (Pensions, Insurance, Savings) is now levered to positive returns on the stock market, why wouldn't the Fed have been buying equities along with Treasuries and MBSs?

In case you missed it this weekend.

Around Tampa Bay, foreclosure means never having to leave - St. Petersburg Times

" When his lender started to foreclose in 2003, Jeffrey De­Mauro appealed for time to resolve his financial problems.

"I sincerely want to work this situation out and get back on track and save my home,'' De­Mauro wrote to Pinellas County court officials. "I have two children and do not want to be put out of our house and on the street.''

The DeMauros are still in foreclosure. But by declaring bankruptcy 11 times, they have managed to hang on to their house and to continue living there — seven years after they made their last regular mortgage payment. "

CalculatedRisk wrote:

Moreover, the exit from these facilities has been quite smooth. At their peak, these facilities provided more than $1.5 trillion of credit to the economy.

Debt, $1.5T of debt. And when the "liquidity" is drained the debt remains. I don't see what the liquidity did for the economy that the debt didn't do regardless. The liquidity was all about the banks, didn't help anyone else.

ghostfaceinvestah wrote:

seven years after they made their last regular mortgage payment

They could be bandos and live in a much better place now. Fools.

ghostfaceinvestah wrote:

The DeMauros are still in foreclosure. But by declaring bankruptcy 11 times, they have managed to hang on to their house and to continue living there — seven years after they made their last regular mortgage payment. "

Damn! What gives?

ghostfaceinvestah wrote:

But by declaring bankruptcy 11 times

Amazing - that would have never occurred to me. Necessary is the mother of invention...

From Zero Hedge:
"Brian Sack, Executive Vice President and Undisputed Head of the Fed's Markets Group, Rumored Head of Mythical Plunge Protection Team. "

ghostfaceinvestah wrote:

The DeMauros are still in foreclosure. But by declaring bankruptcy 11 times, they have managed to hang on to their house and to continue living there — seven years after they made their last regular mortgage payment. "

Going for the gold. Is there a Special Olympics for Bankruptcy?

I bookmarked this xmas day zerohedge post.

"Out of the $2.22 trillion in expected 2010 issuance, $200 billion will be absorbed by the Fed while QE continues through March. Then the US is on its own: $2.06 trillion will have to find non-Fed originating demand. To sum up: $200 billion in 2009; $2.1 trillion in 2010. Good luck."

Brace For Impact: In 2010, Demand For US Fixed Income Has To Increase Elevenfold... Or Else | zero hedge 

Rob Dawg wrote:

And when the "liquidity" is drained the debt remains.

Like sex with a crack whore. When the sex is over the genital warts remain.

Elvis wrote:

Like sex with a crack whore. When the sex is over the genital warts remain.

Are you sure that's all you got from her?

steelhead wrote:

Rumored Head of Mythical Plunge Protection Team

Cruise Director on the Titanic perhaps? ...lets get back to bingo, dancing and drinking folks...ignore the seawater around your ankles.

With the conclusion of the programs approaching, the Desk has been tapering the pace of its purchases of agency debt and MBS.

Fewer needed at the Desk. More layoffs. Wonderful.

MrBeach wrote:

Given that our entire way of life (Pensions, Insurance, Savings) is now levered to positive returns on the stock market, why wouldn't the Fed have been buying equities along with Treasuries and MBSs?

I guarantee they were, there is no doubt in my mind. I doubt they bought equities outright, but futures.

Your point is right on, that was one of my thoughts during the crisis - our whole economic system is incredibly levered to the stock market. Like you said, pension funds, private retirement funds, university endowments, insurance companies.

There is little debate that a Plunge Protection Team was discussed sometime in the past. For exactly a situation like we had last year. 2+2...

The best-laid plans of mice and men often go awry...

John Steinbeck, adopted from Robert Burns poem.

CalculatedRisk wrote:

we will be using tools to drain reserves that are new and that will have to be implemented on a scale that the Fed has never before tried

That's the part that scares the bejeebers out of me. What new tools? On how big a scale? How much more is this gonna cost me?

Cinco-X wrote:

Are you sure that's all you got from her?

I'm not sure. But she told me to tell you "Hi." You still are her favorite son. "Hi."

steelhead wrote:

From Zero Hedge:
"Brian Sack, Executive Vice President and Undisputed Head of the Fed's Markets Group, Rumored Head of Mythical Plunge Protection Team. "

I guess this was the announcement of a downturn in the equity markets to keep the government bonds really cheap. Like appallingly low interest rates on the long bond, which we are selling a ton of this week.

So, this withdrawel of liquidity will be met with joy by the bankers, or is this just a shift of the manure back to the treasury by way of fannie and freddie?

Hmmmm, so many wheels within wheels.

Someday this war's gonna end...

ghostfaceinvestah wrote:

I guarantee they were, there is no doubt in my mind.

Patriot Act.

Feckless Ness wrote:

What new tools?

Paying higher interest on reserves.

To reduce the supply of money, we will create more money. Brilliant.

Going for the gold.

There IS gold there. 7 years without a mortgage payment? That is gotta be worth be worth at least $99 in a late night informercial.

Welcome to Amerika!

Experts agree that free money is the best kind...

black dog wrote:

7 years without a mortgage payment

It is the new America. Already overbuilt but cheap. And with cable.

ghostfaceinvestah wrote:

To reduce the supply of money, we will create more money

I'm confused... (Snark)

ghostfaceinvestah wrote:

There is little debate that a Plunge Protection Team was discussed sometime in the past. For exactly a situation like we had last year. 2+2...

Inferring from their preening and back-slapping along with their announced stopping of the QE program, I'd imagine that any futures-buying was part of a formal program with a stop-and-end. I wonder if the program has ended or will end at some point in the future...

Cinco-X wrote:

Are you sure that's all you got from her?

No, gotta get tested for AIGs too.

black dog wrote:

7 years without a mortgage payment?

With a regular mortgage payment. The article looked like it was worded carefully.

When the velocity of money ticks up even slightly draining liquidity will recreate the same credit lockup that liquidity was intended to address.

Which is precisely why it will never happen.

They'll keep on responding, "1937, 1937 ... mustn't recreate 1937 ..." every time the topic is raised in public until long after the point at which it would have been applicable. By which time they'll be busy recreating 1977 instead.

But don't worry about keeping inflation in single digits. Our appointed officials can always look a few thousand miles south to Cristina Fernandez de Kirchner to take pointers in that regard. Besides, what's the worst that could happen? After all, the Chinese shoulda known the risks when they bought all that US debt in the first place, right? Dooooooooooooooom!!!

2 derivatives + 2 derivatives = 60

ghostfaceinvestah wrote:

Like you said, pension funds, private retirement funds, university endowments, insurance companies.

None of that stuff is real or redeemable.

Juvenal Delinquent wrote:

2 derivatives + 2 derivatives = 60

More like 2 derivatives + 2 derivatives = 22.

Let me emphasize the wonderfulness of the new case I mentioned several threads down.

There was the owner, a first mtg and a 2nd. The 2nd filed a motion to Dismiss because of
lack of standing of the foreclosing first mortgage. There was an assignment of mtg filed, but
it was in blank, not notarized, and presumably not recorded in the public records.

With no further proof that the 1st was a holder, or had that authority, the 1st was granted summary
judgment and the 2nd mtgee filed appeal. The house owners were not part of this at all.

The 2nd mtgee won on appeal. You just can't assume that a plaintiff owns the mtg, you
have to provide some proof, and there wasn't any. The was no discussion of any endorsements
on the note, so I don't know about that.

No other proof--such as proof money was paid for the note and mtg--was provided.

The appeals court sent the case back down to the trial Court for futher proceedings.

The name of the 1st mtg is Fremont and MERS. Could it be that there is no one left from
Fremont who has authority to sign an assignment?

It's one of those trusts of mortgage backed securities, so it prolly didn't pay anybody for
this particular note and mtg.

Still you could explore these matters and have someone appointed to sign an assignment.
I guess the 2nd is trying to blackmail the first??? Dunno, just know "reversed and remanded".

Oh happy day. Liz does a big happy dance.

black dog wrote:

$200 billion in 2009; $2.1 trillion in 2010.

Hot bond-on-bond action.

ghostfaceinvestah wrote:

What new tools?

Paying higher interest on reserves.
To reduce the supply of money, we will create more money. Brilliant.

How do you figure? Isn't the current paradigm to borrow cheap at the discount window and have it earn at the Fed Funds rate? Wouldn't reducing the practicality of this reduce the money supply, or am I mistaken about this paradigm?

Mook wrote:

After all, the Chinese shoulda known the risks when they bought all that US debt in the first place, right? Dooooooooooooooom!!!

Yes, for those sophisticated investors only, remember investments always involve risk, check with your broker. PT Barnum Rule applies.

lawyerliz wrote:

Could it be that there is no one left from Fremont who has authority to sign an assignment?

haha.

exactly why you never kill the head of the snake. Smile

now they can't surrender.

"... in Sack's view the impact ... should be gradual." Uh oh--impact is a word used often to describe plane crashes.

Nanoo-Nanoo wrote:

No, gotta get tested for AIGs too.

Is that curable?

"... in Sack's view the impact ... should be gradual." Uh oh--impact is a word used often to describe plane crashes.

Well, see, you wait til the last minute and one spouse files, and then you fool around in bk
court, eventually get dismissed and then the other spouse files, and then you fool around in
bk court some more and get dismissed.

And then 180 days has undoubtedly passed so the first spouse can file again.

And so on and so on.

Cheaper than mtg payments I suppose.

I assume other lawyers or RE people could back out what you said, but I think there was some stuff in-between the lines that got missed by some of us.

Cinco-X wrote:

Is that curable?

Yes, but the cure rate is well below 50%.

To sum up: $200 billion in 2009; $2.1 trillion in 2010. Good luck."

Putsch yourself in Germany and the year is 1921...

More like 2 derivatives + 2 derivatives = 22.

Nah. That kind of problem-solving my 3-year-old has already mastered, and I'm not willing to grant that level of sophistication to any of the principals in this drama.

I'm thinking that their thinking would be more along the lines of my 1-year-old. "What's 2 plus 2?" "Green!"

Mook wrote:

What's 2 plus 2?" "Green!"

It's a GO!

in all fairness, this will probably go just fine.

/ducks

United States: 5/1 ARM conforming mortgage ~5% Mortgage Loans - Compare Mortgage Rates - MSN Money
Canada: Conventional mortgage (<80% LTV, 30yr amortization) 5 year 5.39% Daily Digest-
Rates and Statistics- Bank of Canada

Gee, and Tanta was needed with her brigade of Steel Toed Bunny Slipper equipped beady eyed steel toed doc reviewers to ensure that everything was correct- too bad all of those folks were laid off in 2003!

I have zero sympathy for the inwestor that holds the first, or should I say held the phantom first- as the second is now the first! I think the homemoaner might be the big winner here- let the litigation finish and start making payments to the second!

Someday this war's gonna end...

The article looked like it was worded carefully.

Hhmm. Okay, we'll mark it down to $49.95 ... and throw in a whistle for those pesky creditor calls.

Cinco you know the answer to that one. It also leads to other chronic, debilitating chronic diseases like the Gee-MMMs. The M represents the current recovery process (stole it from somewhere but I forgot where now). As it happens, M is the first letter in Mortgage too which is also a derivative of the word Mort and in Latin that means...oh well nevermind. family blog, family blog.

Bernanke Finally Fingers Mark-to-Market - Brian S. Wesbury & Robert Stein - National Review Online

Late last month, during testimony before Congress, Federal Reserve chairman Ben Bernanke made the following eye-popping statement: “Commercial real-estate loans should not be marked down because the collateral value [the estimated value of the property on the market] has declined. It depends on the income from the property, not the collateral value.”

It would have been much better for the economy if Bernanke had been this clear about mark-to-market accounting back in 2008. If he had, the U.S. might have avoided the Panic of 2008.

But it’s never too late, and now that mark-to-market ideology is affecting the ability of the Fed to exit its quantitative-easing policy, Bernanke is finally onboard.........
Oups

To sum up: $200 billion in 2009; $2.1 trillion in 2010. Good luck.

Ain't nothing that price won't fix. snicker

"Please return your tray-tables to their upright position, buckle your seat-belts and kiss your assets goodbye. We know you had a choice of carriers and thanks for flying with us."

Preparing for a Smooth (Eventual) Exit sounds like someone who just ate a laxative and is headed to the toilet. I don't like the smell of it.

Nanoo-Nanoo wrote:

Cinco you know the answer to that one. It also leads to other chronic, debilitating chronic diseases like the Gee-MMMs. The M represents the current recovery process (stole it from somewhere but I forgot where now). As it happens, M is the first letter in Mortgage too which is also a derivative of the word Mort and in Latin that means...oh well nevermind. family blog, family blog.

No worries; this is a No one 17 and under admitted thread

Citizen AllenM wrote:

I have zero sympathy for the inwestor that holds the first, or should I say held the phantom first- as the second is now the first! I think the homemoaner might be the big winner here- let the litigation finish and start making payments to the second!

Fitting that Alice in Wonderland just came out.

Juvenal Delinquent wrote:

Putsch yourself in Germany and the year is 1921...

Finally, the brownshootstaffel get shirts to go along with the pants.

Mook wrote:

But don't worry about keeping inflation in single digits. Our appointed officials can always look a few thousand miles south to Cristina Fernandez de Kirchner to take pointers in that regard. Besides, what's the worst that could happen? After all, the Chinese shoulda known the risks when they bought all that US debt in the first place, right?

Excellent points but this time inflation won't save us. Too much debt at the short end. The Chinese were given too much time to prepare.

Rob Dawg wrote:

But don't worry about keeping inflation in single digits.

My fear is this: they will get massive inflation overnight due to currency collapse. At some point it will become evident that the only politically viable strategy is continuous currency debasement. It will take time for this knowledge to disseminate. The risk is we cross some event horizon and there will be turning back (politically speaking).

...or Austria or Hungary in 1921

Both of those countries had horrific hyperinflation, just not on the grand scale of Weimar.

If you read the extended version, he basically admits propping the morgage paper markets big time.

"In my previous speech back in December, I discussed in detail the channels through which these market effects may arise. By removing large amounts of duration and prepayment risk from the market, the Fed's asset purchases reduced the volume of risk that the market had to hold, which lowered the risk premia on those assets. Put differently, the purchases bid up the prices of those assets and hence lowered their yields. The lower levels of yields would be expected to boost other asset prices as investors substitute into alternative asset classes. These patterns describe what researchers often refer to as portfolio balance effects."

Um, there it is. The smoking gun. The indirect bid for equity is revealed right here in his speech.

Get out. Get out now if you are long. The Fed has decided that the market no longer needs the cushion.

This does not end up well for us.

Someday this war's gonna end...

Right now the banks say they "hold" the note and mtg, meaning are in the possession of it.

The mtg was originally made to some one else--like Fremont. The trail
stops there. No legitamate assignment to the present foreclosing lender, no
endorsement no nothing.

Foreclosure defense types have been arguing and winning to a certain extent,
saying this bank has proved no connection whatsoever with this mortgage,
but this is the first case that I know of that accepts that line of reasoning and
reversed the foreclosure and sent it back down for appropriate proof of ownership.

Which will take them months and years to figure out.

As it is, the Plaintiff bank argued it was the holder, well, just because it was.
Appeals Court sez to much paperwork error possilbe, you can't just assume it.

It's like I tried to foreclose your mortgage, on my bare say-so.

Happy dance, happy dance.

darnit, there is a 40bp spread between US-CAN 5yr govt bonds Global Government Bonds - Markets Data Center - WSJ.com
so instead of focussing on the mortgage - govt spread, the action will be in drawing away the marginal investment $$$s from govt treasuries? from junk bonds?

Rob Dawg wrote:

Too much debt at the short end. The Chinese were given too much time to prepare.

Yeah, Bernanke really screwed that up. He really should have just done a helicopter drop, caught the Chinese off guard.

Juvenal Delinquent (profile) wrote (in reply to...) on Mon, 3/8/2010 - 6:46 pm
Putsch yourself in Germany and the year is 1921...

Yep. And all of our asset are in the Fürst Fugger Bank.

lawyerliz wrote:

As it is, the Plaintiff bank argued it was the holder, well, just because it was.
Appeals Court sez to much paperwork error possilbe, you can't just assume it.

Calvinball comes to Court.

an impressive recovery in the stability of large financial firms

Of course that's all that really matters, don't pay any attention to the U-6 unemployment number that has edged upwards.

Poor old Gresham would be at a loss for words trying to differentiate good money from bad money, if he was around today...

Citizen AllenM wrote:

The Fed has decided that the market no longer needs the cushion.

I'm not sure that's an accurate assessment.

They may have decided they can't keep it up, regardless.

Calvin LOST. Happy dance, happy dance.

Citizen AllenM wrote:

The lower levels of yields would be expected to boost other asset prices as investors substitute into alternative asset classes. These patterns describe what researchers often refer to as portfolio balance effects."

Portfolio balance effects? Not sure that is the term. How about "liquidity fire hose"?

Bill Gross said basically the same thing months ago - the money received from selling MBS to the Fed was in turn put into other assets.

I am getting ready, we might have a short term drop between the time the Fed stops this round of QE and begins the next. Might sell some of my PM and commodities and buy back cheaper.

lawyerliz wrote:

Appeals Court sez to much paperwork error possilbe, you can't just assume it.

Bet some faces went white on that one. Smile

Citizen AllenM wrote:

The Fed has decided that the market no longer needs the cushion.

The reconfirmation of Bernanke, their apparent success in declawing the financial reform bill and their now their public preening all suggests that the Fed believes it has successfully won.

Afterall, Bernanke famously said regarding the Great Depression: "Let me end my talk by abusing slightly my status as an official representative of the Federal Reserve. I would like to say to Milton and Anna [Schwartz, Friedman's coauthor]: Regarding the Great Depression. You're right, we did it. We're very sorry. But thanks to you, we won't do it again."

These guys probably believe they have stopped Great Depression 2.

Nevermind that asset prices are entirely dislocated from economic fundamentals like income.

So yeah, I agree with you, now that they've "fixed" the hole in the economy, they're going take it into the deep ocean once again.

ghostfaceinvestah wrote:

Yeah, Bernanke really screwed that up.

what are you talking about?

Feds have been shifting heavily to the short-end since Clinton, to mask the true interest cost.

trading risk for money.

lawyerliz wrote:

It's like I tried to foreclose you mortgage, on my bare say-so.

Ah, now I got what you were saying. They could not produce proof that they owned the mortgage. Major sloppiness.

MrBeach wrote:

My fear is this: they will get massive inflation overnight due to currency collapse. At some point it will become evident that the only politically viable strategy is continuous currency debasement. It will take time for this knowledge to disseminate. The risk is we cross some event horizon and there will be turning back (politically speaking).

It may be the only way left to effectively repudiate USD denominated debt.

MrBeach wrote:

My fear is this: they will get massive inflation overnight due to currency collapse. At some point it will become evident that the only politically viable strategy is continuous currency debasement. It will take time for this knowledge to disseminate. The risk is we cross some event horizon and there will be turning back (politically speaking).

I was watching "Rick Steve's Europe" this weekend where they were traveling to Turkey. The Turks hedge against inflation by "always having a building under construction", and applying any spare cash to its construction. We probably need a strategy like that as well. I'm sure the Goldbugs will now chime in.....

ghostfaceinvestah wrote:

the money received from selling MBS to the Fed was in turn put into other assets.

Sigh. Yup. That's essentially what killed Greenspan's 2001 sticksave. Probably Japan, too.

MrBeach wrote:

So yeah, I agree with you, now that they've "fixed" the hole in the economy, they're going take it into the deep ocean once again.

doubtful.

Liz, excellent and congrats! I thought of you reading this the other day. There are more in spices too including whole black pepper, and some spice blends.

Mincing Overseas Spice Company Voluntarily Recalls Two Lots of Black Pepper

EvilHenryPaulson wrote:

Copper wire theft leaves hundreds in Surrey without 911 service

They're just getting to Vancouver now, at this late date?
Several years ago, we were already losing manhole covers and power lines faster than crews could replace them.

They almost never supply proper proof.

This is a big deal.

RockyR wrote:

doubtful.

What do you mean by that?

My original comment was this: IMHO, the Fed is going to see if the financial system will operate without QE as well as the various alphabet programs they are now shutting down. They're committed to ZIRP for a while. Does the system work without QE? We'll find out soon enough.

there is no place for spice racism in our polite society!

You do know there is white pepper and pink pepper.

And of course red pepper, but that is a different plant altogether.

Meaning what?"

March 8, 2010

"Russia plans to have its first batch of reserves of low-enriched uranium prepared by the end of 2010 to ensure stable nuclear fuel supplies for International Atomic Energy Agency member countries in the event of emergencies, including “insurmountable political difficulties,” Russia’s state-run nuclear power corporation Rosatom said March 8, RIA Novosti reported."

JP (profile) wrote (in reply to...) on Mon, 3/8/2010 - 7:01 pm r
lawyerliz wrote:
It's like I tried to foreclose you mortgage, on my bare say-so.
Ah, now I got what you were saying. They could not produce proof that they owned the mortgage. Major sloppiness.

Wait! I thought the entire lawyerin' industry was based on results ex nihilo?

I finally read the post.

7 1/2%.

You thought WRONG. Happy dance, happy dance. Real French Sparkly

Putsch yourself in Germany and the year is 1921...

As a result of WWI, the United States became the world's preeminent creditor nation. Now, 90 years later....

Aren't cycles fascinating?

Aren't cycles fascinating?

Tour de Finance

TBTF was/is always about preserving massive equity holders AFAIK.

TPTB are going to wish they spent less bullets propping up housing - a tril a year would go a long way towards slowly elevating the russell 5000, whereas nothing can support the entire RE market.

Juvenal Delinquent wrote:

Tour de Finance

Lanced ARMs wrong.

Wow -- low-enriched uranium?

This is definitely not good news.

In times of “insurmountable political difficulties,” we need to have lots of U-235 on hand...

Rob Dawg wrote:

It may be the only way left to effectively repudiate USD denominated debt.

It isn't clear that this can be done in a controlled fashion - especially with all the other central banks trying to do the same thing. Someone is going to make an unforced error causing deep volatility and uncertainty. Whether it will be the ECB, the Fed, the Chinese or the Japanese, we don't know.

The government says its decisions on redesigning currency are guided by assessments of counterfeiting threats, from digital technology or old-fashioned printing presses (and inflationary capital controls.)

Fixed It For Ya

Tinfoil Hat Will there be a premium on old 100 dollar bills?

With new $100 bill, Franklin gets a makeover - U.S. business- msnbc.com

“insurmountable political difficulties,” we need to have lots of U-235 on hand...

What sort of turmoil is anticipated, at least potentially?

Heard they were juiced with Anabolic Loan Steroids...

The real reason is the Feds finally got tired of paying BEP employess to sweep floors for two years!

Cinco-X wrote:

The Turks hedge against inflation by "always having a building under construction", and applying any spare cash to its construction.

In effect, transferring their paper money to laborers in exchange for real product (buildings). Our system used to be better - our strong legal system allowed up to tap the productive power of people well into the future through debt and equity. Somehow, somewhere we lost the core confidence and trust this system requires.

Now we literally fake it - by quantitatively easing value that does not exist - is not backed by anyone's promise of productive endeavor and handing it off as the real thing.

MrBeach wrote:

Whether it will be the ECB, the Fed, the Chinese or the Japanese, we don't know.

"Can we agree that whoever it is, the death of your paper is... inevitable, Mr Anderson?"

The Turks have been living with hyperinflation for a long time...

My brother in law was there about 10 years ago and the taxi ride from the airport to Istanbul was a few million lira. They eventually just chopped off zeroes from their currency like Mexico did in 1992

broward wrote:

"Can we agree that whoever it is, the death of your paper is... inevitable, Mr Anderson?"

Promise of indefinite ZIRP should destroy paper currencies. That it hasn't suggests that the Fed still has considerable credibility left. Why, I don't know. But apparently market participants are confident that the Fed will pull out of ZIRP at the right moment.

That it hasn't suggests that the Fed still has considerable credibility left. Why, I don't know.

Why not? What other practical option is there?

MrBeach wrote:

Fed will pull out of ZIRP at the right moment.

familyblog No one 17 and under admitted

pavel.chichikov wrote:

Why not? What other practical option is there?

Fair question. A rational response would be for capital to seek out sounder footing. An alternative is to turn around and take every dime possible by gently preying on the gullibility of J6P and Congress in this setup.

MrBeach wrote:

the Fed still has considerable credibility left. Why, I don't know.

I used to wonder, too.

But I'm firmly convinced now (yuk yuk) that most people are deeply programmed.

It will take a huge displacement to shake their belief system.

Heck, I see the intractability of some beliefs every day on this site.

broward wrote:

ghostfaceinvestah wrote:
Yeah, Bernanke really screwed that up.
what are you talking about?

The Feds only job is to protect the creditor class, and they have done a fine job!

adornosghost wrote:

The Feds only job is to protect the creditor class, and they have done a fine job!

I'm not so sure of that.

There's already been trillions in defaults and more trillions to come.

broward wrote:

But I'm firmly convinced now (yuk yuk) that most people are deeply programmed.

It is stunning that the Fed went from 5% interest rates to ZIRP & trillion+ in QE in under 18 months. This transition alone should have shattered any credibility the Fed had whatsoever.

That they took these actions to backstop the TBTF banks they regulate should have been enough to separate the Fed from its regulatory duties.

Instead, we got a) Bernanke's reappointment b) Near collapse of financial reform and c) Preening central bankers.

Sad really.

MrBeach wrote:

What do you mean by that?

I don't think we're going to plunge back into the abyss. That's all.

broward wrote:

Heck, I see the intractability of some beliefs every day on this site.

What's more typical, Broward, credulity? Tentative acceptance of information, subject to review/fresh inputs? Ideas tested against ideology/orthodoxy?

Can't it not be said the Fed make a lot of people rich at the expense of future generations by being in on WMD that may or may not have actually went off.

Im shocked, shocked to find that gambling is going on in here! You really think those future generations are gonna pay?

I don't.

MrBeach wrote:

This transition alone should have shattered any credibility the Fed had whatsoever.

The bulk of the population is relatively unscathed, at least for now.

Their paperwork took a hit but most still believe that paper will recover.

There's little doubt in my mind of another big paper destruction in the near future.

RockyR wrote:

I don't think we're going to plunge back into the abyss. That's all.

I agree - the abyss has been largely backfilled by government guarantees and now ZIRP. Nevertheless, assets are still wildly overvalued. Lets see what happens when the Fed begins to backoff the accelerator.

Gotta go... Nytol

MrBeach wrote:

It is stunning that the Fed went from 5% interest rates to ZIRP & trillion+ in QE in under 18 months. This transition alone should have shattered any credibility the Fed had whatsoever.

Credibility is relative.

OT, but VASIMR could make a comeback after the NASA cuts:
SPACE.com -- New Rocket Engine Could Reach Mars in 40 Days

Can we afford a rocket big enough to carry the 111th Congress on a one-way trip?

broward wrote:

There's already been trillions in defaults and more trillions to come.

I agree about the fine job part, but their purpose is to protect the creditor class from volitive monetary situations and inflation.

burnside wrote:

Tentative acceptance of information, subject to review/fresh inputs? '

Most people don't bother.
I remember when I lost faith in our media.
Until Waco, I believed we had a trustworthy media.

Likewise, I believed many things like "the free market", "FDR was bad", etc, until around 2001-2002 when I came out of my stupor. There are many things I can't prove, though.

The latest bit on democraticunderground is a petition for Obama to dump Rahm.

Very sad to watch, the desperation to maintain belief in their 2008 vote.

The Fed had a choice. It was sacrifice "the banks" or "the economy then the banks." Idiots.

MrBeach wrote:

It is stunning that the Fed went from 5% interest rates to ZIRP & trillion+ in QE in under 18 months.

Yep. It's gonna take a long, long time to recover from that kind of deflation.

Yes, because the comparisons with Germany, 1921 are just so compelling.

lets see - food shortages as result of brutal 4 year war - erm, well there's an obesity problem.
millions dead because of ditto - not in the USA at least.
massive reparations to be paid because of said war in dollars, leading to obvious currency exploit opportunity to dodge them. Nope.
Strategic territory being given to former enemy (Danzig corridor etc.)
Admit it - you've never heard of the Danzig corridor have you?

I'm afraid regardless of what you may vaguely remember hearing, those who neglected to pay any attention whatsoever during their history lessons, are actually destined to be publicly mocked about it.

sm_landlord wrote:

OT, but VASIMR could make a comeback after the NASA cuts:
SPACE.com -- New Rocket Engine Could Reach Mars in 40 Days
Can we afford a rocket big enough to carry the 111th Congress on a one-way trip?

Can we afford not to?

Rob Dawg wrote:

It was sacrifice "the banks" or "the economy then the banks." Idiots.

I really wish I knew if Bernanke is deluded or evil.

That is the true mystery here for me.

Hiring IRS Agents now by the hundreds, what does that tell you.

They are going after my $323 really fervently.

MaryAnn wrote:

Hiring IRS Agents now by the hundreds, what does that tell you.

That this can only be solved by force now.

But I've assumed that for several years, I've been hoping until this week that I'd be wrong.

MaryAnn wrote:

Hiring IRS Agents now by the hundreds, what does that tell you.

Someone has to claw back those home buyers credits that went out incorrectly.

MaryAnn wrote:

Hiring IRS Agents now by the hundreds, what does that tell you.

Hopefully that they're going after the people who falsified their income to qualify for loans.

Realistically, they have probably found a way to define delinquency down and come after honest people.

adornosghost wrote:

I agree about the fine job part, but their purpose is to protect the creditor class from volitive monetary situations and inflation.

They are protected by the fact that they get the new money first and reap all of the benefit. The plebes get the new money last by which time its value has decreased.

That is the 64 quadrillion question. Pitchforks and Torches Im shocked, shocked to find that gambling is going on in here!

broward wrote:

That this can only be solved by force now.
But I've assumed that for several years, I've been hoping until this week that I'd be wrong.

can you clarify that statement? are you saying that the IRS can only be solved by force, or public financing can only be solved by force (i.e., forcefully taking peoples' money?)

warlock wrote:

Strategic territory being given to former enemy (Danzig corridor etc.)
Admit it - you've never heard of the Danzig corridor have you?

Modern day Gdansk [SP?] Home of Lech Wallessa [Sp?]

Theft by taxes, what a novel idea!

RockyR wrote:

can you clarify that statement?

I believe that the only solution to our current problems is a dissolution of the Federal gov't.

MaryAnn wrote:

Hiring IRS Agents now by the hundreds, what does that tell you.

Ummm......April 15th approaching? They always do a lot of temporary hiring for the facility in Andover, MA, and I presume elsewhere-

Lobbyist Ben Dover wrote:

Theft by taxes, what a novel idea!

it won't work.

warlock wrote:

Admit it - you've never heard of the Danzig corridor have you?

Okay, you got me. But I'm almost finished with my essay on the first Punic war ....

broward wrote:

I believe that the only solution to our current problems is a dissolution of the Federal gov't.

ah. right on, brother.

"massive reparations to be paid because of said war in dollars, leading to obvious currency exploit opportunity to dodge them. Nope."

Actually, warlock, that's the key one, and you're utterly wrong. We do have massive reparations to pay in the form of debt and entitlements.

I certainly hope you don't exist in a state of denial on something besides a professional basis. Steve

RockyR,

They have been doing it for ever and are just getting better at it.

broward wrote:

I believe that the only solution to our current problems is a dissolution of the Federal gov't.

I wonder if they'll go without a fight. Stern words only.... Puzzled

broward wrote:

RockyR wrote:
can you clarify that statement?
I believe that the only solution to our current problems is a dissolution of the Federal gov't.

I was thinking more along the lines of a Reformation. Bloodier and far more emotionally cathartic.

Lobbyist Ben Dover wrote:

They have been doing it for ever and are just getting better at it.

yes. but, the amount of taxes they would have to collect to survive moving forward is a staggering amount. there are levels of taxation where people stop trying (i.e., they stop working for it).

greenchutes wrote:

Actually, warlock, that's the key one, and you're utterly wrong. We do have massive reparations to pay in the form of debt and entitlements.

On the bright side, we owe them in USD, not some other currency, and we can print as many of those as we want.....Weimar Germany owed France reparation in Francs......

millions dead because of overeating - in the USA at least.

massive debt reparations to be paid because of said debt in dollars, leading to obvious currency exploit opportunity to dodge them.

Strategic territory being given to former enemy (Iraq corridor etc.)

Fixed It For Ya

Cinco-X wrote:

I wonder if they'll go without a fight. Stern words only....

I think it's unlikely that they'll go. It has to happen at a State level and from what I can see on FreeRepublic and DemocraticUnderground, the majority of the population is unable to get past the LEFT/RIGHT paradigm as they fight for control of the money fountain.

I think the country is baked, one way or another.

Nanoo-Nanoo wrote:

No, gotta get tested for AIGs too.

So far no full-blown AIGs for me, but I did test SIV-positive Sad

broward wrote:

I think the country is baked, one way or another.

And getting very surreal:
"Palin Crossed Border For Canadian Health Care
First Posted: 03- 8-10 11:59 AM | Updated: 03- 8-10 12:26 PM

Former Alaska Gov. Sarah Palin -- who has gone to great lengths to hype the supposed dangers of a big government takeover of American health care -- admitted over the weekend that she used to get her treatment in Canada's single-payer system.

"We used to hustle over the border for health care we received in Canada," Palin said in her first Canadian appearance since stepping down as governor of Alaska. "And I think now, isn't that ironic?"

The irony, one guesses, is that Palin now views Canada's health care system as revolting: with its government-run administration and 'death-panel'-like rationing. Clearly, however, she and her family once found it more alluring than, at the very least, the coverage available in rural Alaska. Up to the age of six, Palin lived in a remote town near the closest Canadian city, Whitehorse.

Officials at several hospitals in that area declined to give out information on patient visits. "

Wow!

Patrick Henry would be damn proud ...

noob goldberg wrote:

So far no full-blown AIGs for me, but I did test SIV-positive

Brokerage may be hazardous to your health.

You really think those future generations are gonna pay?

The assumption being that there will be future generations.

anyone got an ear to the ground for law school internships and MBA hiring? is it still at 2009 levels? if so, how big can the backlog grow before the system breaks down?

adornosghost wrote:

The irony, one guesses, is that Palin now views Canada's health care system as revolting

Irony, or full-blown political satire?

Samdog wrote:

Irony, or full-blown political satire?

Or expediency....

Waiting for Micheal Moore to go to Cuba for his heart attack!

broward wrote:

There's little doubt in my mind of another big paper destruction in the near future.

Just think how many twenty- and thirty-somethings are already used to defaulting; voluntarily or involuntarily, home loan, car loan, student loan, credit card.. all beside the point. When they are older they'll be in charge and defaulting will already be old hat to them. Hard to blame them, they got leveraged by their ancestors before they were even born, can't expect them to honor those contracts.

Samdog wrote:

Wow!
Patrick Henry would be damn proud ...

:blushes: You just earned yourself permanent residency status and voting rights in Dawgifornia.

broward wrote:

the majority of the population is unable to get past the LEFT/RIGHT paradigm

Divide and conquer.

warlock wrote:

Admit it - you've never heard of the Danzig corridor have you?

Have you encountered the Nicolson diaries? Copious notes on the period. Hasty edit with warts and wrinkles left intact (and far better for it). Delegate to Versailles, among many other things.

What is a "law school internship", Hank? Do you mean on-campus recruiting of incoming 2Ls for summer firm work?

Rob Dawg wrote:

You just earned yourself permanent residency status and voting rights in Dawgifornia.

BTW, Has Arnie put your castle up for sale yet?

Foxglove is beautiful in our area in the Spring and early Summer

SM, you've probably met spector - you tell us how the castle sale is going!

Have you encountered the Nicolson diaries?

That's odd. The volume covering 1939-45 is on a bookshelf in my study, a few feet to my left. I was just looking at the spine of the book the other day.

greenchutes wrote:

What is a "law school internship", Hank? Do you mean on-campus recruiting of incoming 2Ls for summer firm work?

that's what I mean, internships for people who have entered but not yet exited law school

29 year old I know has already filed bk, and is in foreclosure.

All he did was hide from the process server and to my knowledge,
he is going on 2 years without paying. He didn't hire me.

This can't go on.

Rob Dawg wrote:

You just earned yourself permanent residency status

I'm deeply disturbed by the withholding of tax refunds and CA's appropriation of money before it's even earned.

That puts us squarely into Sheriff of Notthingham Land.

We're no longer dealing with rational people.

Incredibly poor judgement which permanently damages credibility.

you tell us how the castle sale is going!

De drawbreedge is awp. You vill haf to spend de naiggghhht.

pavel.chichikov wrote:

The assumption being that there will be future generations.

Gotta love that dry slavic humor!

sm_landlord wrote:

Rob Dawg wrote:
You just earned yourself permanent residency status and voting rights in Dawgifornia.
BTW, Has Arnie put your castle up for sale yet?

Excellent memory. Your travel visa is hereby upgraded beyond Malibu.
Comment by Rob Dawg from thread 'CIT: Government Support Unlikely'

Oooooooooooo. Im Lovin It! scary.
. . . . . . . . . . . Bubble, Bubble, Toil and Trouble Bubble, Bubble, Toil and Trouble Bubble, Bubble, Toil and Trouble Bubble, Bubble, Toil and Trouble Bubble, Bubble, Toil and Trouble

broward wrote:

That puts us squarely into Sheriff of Notthingham Land.

well, it certainly puts us into "us vs. them" land.

Isn't this just what Pearl and I have been talking about for awhile?

RockyR wrote:

well, it certainly puts us into "us vs. them" land.

But "us" is not fighting back.

Mom's heartrate medication was made from the foxglove plant. Digitalis. Mom was on Digoxin after her stroke. I hate being a walking pharmacy. I miss her.

greenchutes wrote:

SM, you've probably met spector - you tell us how the castle sale is going!

Heh, I meant Dawg's future castle in San Simeon.

Fortunately I wasn't at work the day Spector fired a gun during a session.
But there were a couple of other incidents - Once we got invaded by an armed crew looking for a certain producer who was in arrears on certain debts. The shotgun butt did a number on the little dials on the console. And his gold RR needed some repairs. Fortunately no discharges, but you could say we were a bit worried.

adornosghost wrote:

But "us" is not fighting back.

we're pretty seriously out-gunned and pretty well placated... at least those of us among us who may be inclined to lead. funny how this system works.

Which the US legal system allows its citizens to default on, in countries like Iceland for example this isn't possible. In addition the sale of securitised loans to the European banks - and subsequent repudiation of, has actually helped keep the dollar from dropping.

I'm not saying the mechanics of the financial situation aren't as fubar'd as they could be, but a large part of that is virtual money. In any way comparable to mainland Europe in the early 20's, when the French were physically carting off coal from the Alsace mines, which the germans needed for heating, it certainly is not.

Similarly with the predicted dollar currency collapse. Even in Iceland, where the currency halved in value in a couple of months, and the country is dependent on a lot of imports, there hasn't been anything that remotely resembles hyperinflation. Imports are around 20% of US GDP. Which means 80% of the economy could care less about the trading relationship of the currency.

I don't doubt that the trauma of not being able to afford top of the range european luxury cars for your wall street wheelers and dealers will be extraordinary - but i kind of think you'll survive.

I posted that this morning adornosghost. The hypocrisy is so thick you can cut it. "Ironic", I don't think that word means what she thinks it means, also Wink ;)

Many years ago I knew a young woman on whom I had a mad crush. She was half El Salvadorean and half Scottish. One memorable thing about her - but of course not the only memorable thing - is that she could do a wonderful Bela Lugosi imitation: The drawbridge is up - you will have to spend the night.

She was slim, had long red curly hair, a pretty face and a very warm allure.

She rejected me utterly. But I still think of that imitation - and other things.

The ones that can make you laugh are always the ones you remember pavel. My husband has his faults but he has made me laugh from the day I met him and through my darkest hours.

pavel.chichikov wrote:

is that she could do a wonderful Bela Lugosi imitation:

Do you know a guy named Ashburn?

OT -- Re tax refunds

Colorado, at least, is paying its tax refunds. Impressively quickly, too. I filed electronically on the 28th, CO officially accepted the return Wednesday afternoon the 3rd, and the (admittedly quite small) refund showed up in my account today. TaxAct is predicting that the Federal refund (return accepted on Monday the 1st) may hit my account Friday -- apparently the Feds send out refunds on Fridays.

Ha broward, the jokes on that guy just write themselves.

The ones that can make you laugh are always the ones you remember pavel.

I remember her so well.

warlock wrote:

Even in Iceland, where the currency halved in value in a couple of months, and the country is dependent on a lot of imports, there hasn't been anything that remotely resembles hyperinflation. Imports are around 20% of US GDP. Which means 80% of the economy could care less about the trading relationship of the currency.

good point, we're all to concentrated on our own positions -- those who are further ahead, or behind are seldom looked at -- instead we tend to work backwards from results we want/fear

Comrade Kristina wrote:

I posted that this morning adornosghost. The hypocrisy is so thick you can cut it.

I think it would make Kafka blush. I've been in the City all day, and the Financial District of SF was just buzzing along as usual, with the "more shares you own, the more reaving of information we can be" attitude in full swing (I actually overheard this in a conversation).

Not exactly. I think you and Pearl have been talking about double assignment.

I actually haven't come across that.

This is simply spending the money to hire the employees to do the work to
prove your case. It usually can be done. In this case, because Fremont is
involved, and I can't figure out why the 2nd is bothering, it is possible that there
is no one to properly sign the assignment, and really the court would authorize
that if they were asked nicely, with appropriate proof.

People who are living there free have a motive; people who are renting have a motive.
what motive would a 2nd have that's getting no money?

Do you know a guy named Ashburn?

No.

isn't this ll country?

Underwater borrowers: To walk away or not when you owe more than home is worth - South Florida Sun-Sentinel.com

"Michael Keigans is "underwater" on his mortgage, owing $80,000 more than his Deerfield Beach house is worth.

Keigans figures it could take a decade or two to recover the lost equity, so he's tempted to walk away, even though he has the money to pay. "Why keep putting money into a house that's going down in value?" he asks.

It's a question being debated in many households nationwide as the housing crunch continues. Some borrowers feel they have a moral obligation to pay the mortgage, but a growing number of homeowners and consumer advocates say walking away could be a smart business decision.

The scale of the problem is daunting: More than half of all residential mortgage holders in Broward County are underwater, California research firm First American CoreLogic said last week. In Palm Beach County, nearly half of mortgage holders fall in that category."

Maybe it was just me. I know Pearl is into the double assignment but I've also said all along that they were selling these things so fast half the time they couldn't be bothered to do that pertaining paperwork that actually assigns foreclosure rights to the new "owner" or "owners" as it were. I'm fairly certain something like that has to be the case with mine for them to do such an about face and give me something far better than necessary after I mentioned a note hunt to the "bad cop".

Yep. Have underwater clients in Broward Couonty.

EvilHenryPaulson wrote:

Warm, dry conditions signal threat of 2010 drought in B.C.

That should be bad news for the two BC farmers who planted a total of 15 corn and 42 soybean plants. However, I wonder how dry it will be in the Peace River Valley where they grow lots of canola (but the real worrythere is an early frost...) or a little further east on the Canadian Prairies where they grow winter wheat. But then again wheat doesn't need much water.

See CR, this is where we differ. I believe the Fed is a criminal cartel and should be abolished. And then let the legal system do it's thing, if the masses aren't already in control.

traderwalt
BC usually gets more precipitation than California... if BC's snowpack is at 80% in the south, what does that say for California's watershed and the upcoming wildfire season?

Login or register to post comments
Syndicate content