Boston.com says prices here are up 10% yoy. Game on!

Pigged
Paying the piper--the US spends much more than any other country on health care and on its defense department (Israel might spend more per capita, but it receives money from overseas to balance that out). As the world shrinks and trade barriers fall, those costs either shrink, or we become second tier.

If they go to the trouble of seasonally adjusting I wish they'd take the next step and introduce government adjustments so y-o-y accounts for things like $8k price supports.

Well, the market liked that news. 40 point turn-around.

The CNBS piece I saw showed only CA and NV with modest increase, all others down.

Does it every seem to phase people that, the only reason we have any housing price stability is because its being artificially propped up? Everyone one is hurting, and they act like oh we are moving up again. Seriously, if this is what the recovery feels / looks like, Lets head back to the recession.

Daily Job Cuts - Layoff News , Job Layoffs 2009 , Bankruptcy, Store closings and other Business Economy News

Standard and Poors still use the Commodore 64 for their web server?

Checking from Boston metwest 450K+. Despite what you may be hearing (boston.com/Warren), there is no increase in valuations in this segment. If anything, I've seen more price declines in the last month than I've seen in a while.

I suspect that the boston.com/Warren numbers are highly influenced by a change in mix---higher priced houses are moving after price cuts. The fact that sales increased over 2009 matches fits with this theory (higher priced houses are selling now...).

At the end of the day, my realtor contacts are telling me that the market is challenging above $450K. They cite a lack of buyers at those levels; they do not cite "fence-sitters".

Edgar Poe wrote:

Standard and Poors still use the Commodore 64 for their web server?

TRS-80 (aka Trash 80) w/ 8" floppy's

Flat will be good in a few months when the homebuyer credit and MBS purchases are gone. Yes, they'll be gone on schedule. Snark

I agree, Just on my street alone, there is about 60 houses. Out of 60 at least 12 for sale signs that is just crazy since its never been that high in my 20 years living here.

Cinco-X wrote:

Standard and Poors still use the Commodore 64 for their web server?
TRS-80 (aka Trash 80) w/ 8" floppy's

Ahhh, no wonder they had all those AAA++ MBS......

Elimination of the mortgage interest deduction for couples making over 250K might hurt sales as well, dontcha think?

Cinco-X wrote:
TRS-80 (aka Trash 80) w/ 8" floppy's
Love the Trash 80 and the C64... awesome bits in the retro hardware boneyard of computing Smile

In mid-New york, about hour from the city. Its always been a decent area, get alot of people from the city, that move away to go up north. And its incredible how bad everything looks around here.

MMMM...... loves me some bubbles.....

Rob Dawg wrote:

If they go to the trouble of seasonally adjusting I wish they'd take the next step and introduce government adjustments so y-o-y accounts for things like $8k price supports.

C'mon, Rob.....you mean something like "the truth, the whole truth, and nothing but, etc., etc.?.......it won't happen in THIS lifetime.

RD,

This is a world of head line impact, not realistic details.

Oh, OK. I thought you were in MetWest Boston. I was going to say, "20% of houses on a street for sale is pretty rare." In general the market is dead here. Not a lot of inventory, not a lot of sales, prices grinding lower at a rate of about 5% per year.

New Hampshire Assoc. of Realtors has been touting large y-o-y increases in home sales and median prices. I can post the details, but you can google too if interested.

Yeah, I suspect it is a change of mix. But I don't know NH; it could be that you are seeing the effect of lower priced homes gaining in value (that does appear to be happening to some degree).

I stand by what I know best: upper tier houses in MetWest Boston are declining in value.

Nope, but for here if you see 1 for sale for more than a month now that is rare, now its around 12 for 5+ months

(noob braces himself for the impending consumer confidence number)

Whoa, apparently it was bad.

noob goldberg wrote:

(noob braces himself for the impending consumer sentiment number)

Mr. Market hated it, whatever it is.

Another day when market participants need neck braces...

Eric wrote:

Mr. Market hated it, whatever it is.

46, when consensus was 55.

Here Noob,

Consumer confidence falls 11 points

Consumer confidence sinks to 46 in February

noob goldberg wrote:

46, when consensus was 55.

umm, unexpectedly? Snark

Check this out...

Daughter of Texas suicide pilot calls dad a hero - report - NYPOST.com

"The daughter of the man who carried out a suicide plane attack against the IRS in Texas last week said she considered her father a hero for standing up to "the system," but also said the attack that killed a government worker and injured 12 was "inappropriate" and "wrong," ABC News reported Monday."

Standing up to the system rarely works out, and if you do decide to do it, it is probably best to go ahead and off yourself while doing it. If the guy would have lived, I doubt she would be singing the same tune.

Anyway, there is this old saying, something about death and taxes.

Outsider wrote:

Another day when market participants need neck braces...

The market was just looking for a reason to tank today. Apparently this was the reason.

Okay, anyway, here from NHAR press release:

The positive momentum felt in the New Hampshire housing market during the second half of 2009 continued into January 2010, with the state’s residential home sales ahead of January 2009 by 16.5 percent. This time, there is additional good news on the price side as well, as the median price of residential homes increased by 7.5 percent over the same period last year – the first month-over-month median price increase in 26 months and the largest such jump in 52 months.

New Hampshire Association of Realtors - New Hampshire Realtor Resources - Real Estate News

noob goldberg (profile) wrote (in reply to...) on Tue, 2/23/2010 - 11:01 am replyIgnore userEric wrote:

Mr. Market hated it, whatever it is.

46, when consensus was 55.

  • Uh oh! How can that be spun? Elmo! may run wild for a while Laughing out loud

dum luk wrote:

Consumer confidence falls 11 points

Clearly the Ministry of Propaganda is failing in its job. Are the masses awakening, or what?

OT, but how come natural gas stocks have stayed strong while natural gas prices have tanked?

dum luk wrote:

Consumer confidence sinks to 46 in February

Can this thing go negative? Like what if consumers are only confident that they will be eating cat food before the year ends.

Ben's running low on bullets, or the market would go up on economic bad news.

•Uh oh! How can that be spun?

The weather. Obviously. How can consumer confidence rise when it's so gloomy outside and so many productive hours are spent shoveling? Plus, the kids were home from school, the snowblowers probably broke, there were tickets for parking in plow zones...

dum luk wrote:

Consumer confidence falls 11 points

Consumer confidence sinks to 46 in February

I have never understood why people pay attention to these “mood ring” surveys. Puzzled

Lobbyist Ben Dover wrote:

BSR,
Stereo!

And both channels in high fidelity. [promises to exchange secret greetings at the next meeting]

dr munch wrote:

OT, but how come natural gas stocks have stayed strong while natural gas prices have tanked?

Infrastructure, regulatory, franchise plays.

noob goldberg wrote:

46, when consensus was 55.

9pt drop in CC results in an immediate 65pt drop in the DOW. Huge spike in volume too; biggest mid-day bump in more than a week-

tncubsfan wrote:

Elmo! may run wild for a while

At least until lunch, or maybe the market opening bell at 3:30pm.....

The race to the bottom to be the last man standing is like a chess match between two drunk grand masters.

'I returned, and saw under the sun, that the race is not to the swift, nor the battle to the strong, neither yet bread to the wise, nor yet riches to men of understanding, nor yet favour to men of skill; but time and chance happeneth to them all.'

Time and chance being that ancient metaphor for the Vampire Squid from Hell

Uh oh! How can that be spun?

on CNBS now: 46 unexpectedly better than the expected whisper number on trading desks!

PARTY ON!!!

Juvenal Delinquent wrote:

55, 46 or fight

Doesn't appear to be much fighting Elmo! today.

But the day is young. Timmy's just finishing his cappuccino

4shzl wrote:

I have never understood why people pay attention to these “mood ring” surveys.

Because their horoscope tells them to.

Mike_ wrote:

Like what if consumers are only confident that they will be eating cat food before the year ends.

You got cat food? Did you bring enough for the rest of the commentariat?

Seriously, sentiment could be that low because of the stupid snowstorm. Nothingburger.

Who really gauges the economy; Wallstreet or consumers?

Drink your kool-aid america and no one gets hurt. Maybe....

......pay attention to these “mood ring” surveys.

LOL.....do they still have those things?

This is a coincident indicator ... and people clearly aren't happy ...

Consumer Confidence Falls to 10-Month Low in February - CNBC

best to all

Confidence in the PPT Cruiser is vastly more important than what the hoi ploy thinks is important...

When does the recession start?

Up 10%.....Home Equity here I come!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! Kool-Aid

The Austrian Masters' Wisdom

Mises Daily: Tuesday, February 23, 2010 by David Stockman
David Stockman
Reagan Budget Director David Stockman

[Excerpted from Minyanville.com.]

My proposition today is that we're in a fiscal calamity caused by the further, and perhaps final, triumph of politics. Admittedly, I issued this very same forecast awhile back — 23 years ago to be exact. But I'm not reluctant to try again. Having read Grant's continuously since 1988, I've learned there's no shame whatsoever in being early — even often!

The Triumph of Politics was published early, mainly in the unflattering sense that I'd not completed my homework. I was hip to statist fiscal and regulatory evils, but had only dimly grasped the Austrian masters' wisdom on money; that is, in printing money backed by nothing, central banks inherently threaten prosperity. So today I'll add the proposition that fiscal decay is the inevitable stepchild of the very monetary rot that the Austrians — Mises, Hayek, Rothbard — so deplored. (More)

Re: consumer condience post.

"The present situation index dropped to 19.4 from 25.2 in January, the worst since February 1983".

At least in 1983 I was confident the Dead would be in town a few times a year. Party Bic Flick Kool-Aid

Elimination of the mortgage interest deduction for couples making over 250K might hurt sales as well, dontcha think?

anything that hurts sales brings lower prices, no? Good for buyers. All those who would like to see an end to the MID should be cheering.

This Bread Is Mine

Mises Daily: Tuesday, February 23, 2010 by Robert LeFevre

[Chapter 9 of This Bread Is Mine]

We must return to Adam Smith.

This great economist and father of the modern theory of free markets propounded an error which has haunted us ever since.

Smith's "labor theory of value" was mistaken. However, David Ricardo accepted it and elaborated it. As elaborated by Ricardo, the labor theory of value was still further developed by Karl Marx. Thus, we have a socialist theory of economic value resultant from a doubly compounded error. This error has become the moral fulcrum on which the political socialist lever rests.

What Smith was getting at, and what most individualists would agree with, is the moral certainty that the laborer is entitled to the full product of his own labor. Indeed, earlier in this essay that has been listed as a basic right of every human being.
Getting All That You Earn

The "surplus value" theory of Marx is derived from the "labor theory of value" of Smith and Ricardo. Briefly, the theory can be explained thusly: It is evident that natural resources do not prepare themselves for the use of man. Human energy and tools must be applied to the resources before they can be converted into usable form and transported to places where a demand for them exists.

One does not pay money to natural resources. Nor does one pay money to tools. It may be an essential to pay the person who owns the resources or the tools. But essentially, all money passes from one human hand into another human hand. And the passage relates to the amount of labor performed by the human energy supplied in each case.

Thus, one does not buy logs or lumber for building; one purchases the labor that has gone into the felling of the trees, the milling of the lumber. What are the logs worth while they are still trees? Fundamentally, they are worth whatever it costs to convert them. And here is Marx: If more than that basic cost of labor is included in the purchase price, the element of profit or "surplus value" appears. If you must pay a lumberman five dollars to fell a tree, trim it, saw it into usable lengths and thicknesses, and then deliver it, the tree is worth five dollars, no more, no less.

Superficially, this is reasonable enough — reasonable, that is, if this were a world in which hand tools were all that could ever be employed, land could never be privately owned, and our wants were such simple things as log houses. (More)

I'm double cheering, since I make less than the cutoff for loss of the deduction and will be buying someday.

That is a surprise considering it snowed in December. Without all the snow, I am sure prices would have been up a full percent.

Isn't it about time for us to be Slumdogged?

Don't cut off your nose to spite your face.

There are lots of things that would be good and right to do in terms of lending, but doing massive cuts rapidly would be disastrous.

Renter with 20% down payment ready to go saying this...

Isn't it about time for us to be Slumdogged?

Naw, GLD is down $0.94

DJIA continues down with some major spikes accompanying strong downward moves; any chance this is program trading related?

Cinco-X wrote:

any chance this is program trading related?

Is there any other kind of trading these days?

programs - git yer programs right here - can't tell yer winrs or yer loosers witout a program

Eric wrote:

any chance this is program trading related?

Is there any other kind of trading these days?

I presume that the trading done by folks here on CR is not program trading-

I presume that the trading done by folks here on CR is not program trading-

I even use my own crayons for charts.

Cinco-X wrote:

I presume that the trading done by folks here on CR is not program trading-

Pretty sure we're not 50% of the NYSE volume, either.

do we want a housing market advantageous to buyers or sellers? If you view the MID as gov't interference with the market, you should be for its elimination.

Eric wrote:

Pretty sure we're not 50% of the NYSE volume, either.

But it is another kind of trading nevertheless-

barfly wrote:

If you view the MID as gov't interference with the market, you should be for its elimination.

It is a price support, and furthermore, it results in a more complicated tax code, and I've heard the primary benefit is to folks with more expensive homes......

Cinco-X wrote:

But it is another kind of trading nevertheless-

Right, but it's not moving the market.

dum luk wrote:

I presume that the trading done by folks here on CR is not program trading-

I even use my own crayons for charts.

Speaking of crayons check out the short interest in Radian which is up 10% on news that it won't be profitable for a long time: RDN: Options for Radian Group, Inc. - Yahoo! Finance
Over 10k May $2.50s? Somebody knows something.

barfly wrote:

If you view the MID as gov't interference with the market, you should be for its elimination.

But not overnight. Some things would have to be phased out slowly over time.

I also think we should have a down payment that doesn't put buyers immediately under water. The real problem is we can't enact these sorts of things overnight, or housing would crash. The $8k credit was just insanity IMHO, and I really want to wait until that sort of interference goes away to buy.

CCI is the worst idea of an indicator there could be. Bring back MIB (Money in the Bank) as a real source of healthy consumer information.

Maybe money in the sock drawer? Not sure money in the bank is that accurate these days either.

....the mortgage interest deduction is many things - for reasons of social engineering being one of the more abhorrent.

Black Star Ranch wrote:

for reasons of social engineering being one of the more abhorrent

Yes

It is a good indicator that you are not in a consumer debt ridden economy, CCI is part of the faux economy that is destroying us.

Black Star Ranch wrote:

....the mortgage interest deduction is many things - for reasons of social engineering being one of the more abhorrent.

I say bring it on. We rich will just form LLCs and lease back our own houses. Rob Dawg Predialian Manse LLC with holdings consisting of a single dawghouse. I'll still enjoy all the deductions and maybe even some favorable depreciation and management expense writeoffs. The poor will be stuck with those mortgage interest payments that aren't deductible. Suckers.

timmay the forehead is on the hotline to Lord Bankfiend, who is obviously shouting as timmay is holding the phone some distance from his ear:

Dad I meant to cook the CCI number, but I forgot to set the timer on the oven. If my undersecretary would get confirmed by the Senate . . .

(more shouting)

I know you paid top dollar for Barack and the congress . . .

(more shouting)

But Dad, I did the interview in Vogue . . .

(more shouting)

I'm going to have to model in Cosmopolitan like that guy from Massachusetts?

Cinco-X wrote:

barfly wrote:

If you view the MID as gov't interference with the market, you should be for its elimination.

I am of the opinion that the MID should be eliminated. It is clearly unfair to renters, and effectively rewards people for taking on debt. If anything, there should simply be some sort of standard deduction for monthly/yearly housing expenses (say, for example, $750 a month), whether rent or mortgage payments, and leave it at that. That way, everyone is covered, and there is no added incentive for taking on extra debt. Of course, since this is both equitable and sensible, it is clearly the politically unfeasible.

....lets see........I buy a cow outright for $1,000...............or, I buy it on payments of $50 a month, get to deduct the interest I pay on my beef until it's paid off or eaten? So the longer I take to eat my cow, the bigger the deduction?........can we do it with kids as well, maybe?.........how about as long as they stay at home?......Kool-Aid

Preaching to the choir. Two realities emerging. Either we merge them at some point, or anti-matter explodes...I don't know. Solutions require pain. We're pretty numb to pain at this point. A land of lotus-eaters.

Lobbyist Ben Dover wrote:

Bring back MIB (Money in the Bank)

It's still zero (or less).

Pigged (where are you people up so early?)

RE: Last thread: ... but what about XMAS? Santa

noob goldberg wrote:

46, when consensus was 55.

Where do these guys get their consensus? From Hopium smoking Nemo's Monkey Nemo's Monkey ??

Rob Dawg wrote:

We rich will just form LLCs and lease back our own houses.

You don't even have to be rich to do this, just knowledgeable. You can print of the forms online and file yourself for $300. (although I would recommend a lawyer if you don't know what you are doing)

I did lots of research on LLCs when considering starting a business, maybe the knowledge will come in handy one day

Anyone know of an alternate source to get the raw data?- The S&P site has been down all morning. Very curious to see how NYC fared.

Thanks.

Like Zeroman, I'n in upstate NY and there is more inventory on the market than ever and NOTHING is moving.

Inverted Hammer of Thor (profile) @ 10:51 am

Where do you factor in the fact that the renter's landlord can deduct his mortgage interest as a business expense?

On another tack: I spoke with a broker friend of mine (CRE and RRE) over the week-end and he said his company was profitable in 2009 because of the first time buyer credit. I expressed concern for his 2010 and he said "Wait and see. They won't extend it now, because too many people would that wait for further price declines. But, 4 to 6 weeks before the credit expires, they will extend it." Inside information? Wishful thinking? Wild ass guess? I don't know.

Login or register to post comments
Syndicate content