JP, in general I like the HAFA guidelines, and I think this program will be successful (as opposed to HAMP that I argued would have limited success from the beginning). I think having the lenders hire the agent makes sense ... and I think it would be a good change.
I was glad to see that sentence slapping down the "short sale negotiators". I missed that earlier and I'll send it to Jillayne.
My bank account says I am a thousandaire atm, I would pay cash for a place, or pay up to but not exceeding 150 a month in rent. If these mark to market clowns can't beat that, then I'm sorry, I'm just gonna have to rough it out at my parents house for the time being.
It's not as sweet a deal as staying in a house rent/mortgage free for 2+ years, but I am not exactly hurting. I've been through worse.
Jim is downright bitter! Why is that even great purveyors of Schadenfreude like Jim still have the on? Even after giving us classic clips of copper stripping in million dollar houses! Get that man some Hoffman lenses.
biochemist wrote: If these mark to market clowns can't beat that, then I'm sorry, I'm just gonna have to rough it out at my parents house for the time being.
Even if you were on a food-service worker's income... with no family to support and your parents paying bills, room and board, it should not be hard to live minimally and save up a sizable cash horde. Suck up the social stigma (it's going to go away by necessity anyway) of living with the folks, and save for a better day.
I think I saw some of that insider short sale action here in Harford County, MD last summer. Looking for months, suddenly, a beautiful deal in a nice neighborhood, bid instantly but it was gone.
What we need is a viable alternative TO health insurance, then, if the problem isn't the private/public interest. Any suggestions? (non-Northrop SM-62)
Friend of mine went to refinance last week. Loan person asked for a retirement account statement (a new twist). Yo bank person, we're state workers, do you really need to count evaporating pennies??
I would guess that 1/3 to 1/2 of short sales have a significant element of fraud.The rules have not been enforced by the board of realtors for a long,long time.
CaptainMorgan wrote: Pay cash, plus catastrophic insurance, what we should have had all along.
I like it, just not at today's insurance-inflated prices. Moreover any catastrophic policies I've looked into are only 10-20% more than my cost to insure through my employer (definitely would not be the case for family coverage, however). People just don't look at the bills once their deductible and/or co-pay are met, which is a major part of the out-of-hand costs and inflated salaries.
Mike in Long Island, this is why I'm suggesting changing HAFA to have the agent work for the lender (not the "owner"). The problem right now is the agent's fiduciary duty is to the "owner", and the owner really doesn't care what the price is - since they are getting zero (unless there is a kickback).
Interesting... I always smile inwardly a bit to see that public unions "agree to" layoffs or pay cuts, but seriously it is good to see that at least someone out there in public-union land is willing to wake up and smell the skittles. Ok, 3.2% isn't much, but it is SOMETHING at least.
"Suck up the social stigma (it's going to go away by necessity anyway) of living with the folks, and save for a better day"
Oh that is not even an issue, sleeping in a public restroom crowding around a heater with total strangers, while trying to ignore the sssssssstststsssstsss hiss of crack pipes to get some sleep tends to make you appreciate the little things.
biochemist wrote: Oh that is not even an issue, sleeping in a public restroom crowding around a heater with total strangers, while trying to ignore the sssssssstststsssstsss hiss of crack pipes to get some sleep tends to make you appreciate the little things.
LOL, cool. This gives you a major advantage on your peers who were sold the culturally-toxic American debt dream
I agree that the current situation of having the homeowner negotiate a transaction for the lender is a serious agency problem. It's so bad I'm surprised that the banks would even consider it, never mind do it. The lender gets the money; of course the lender should negotiate the transaction.
greenchutes wrote: That's the sound of a functioning economy! Do you think they can afford luxuries like crack in Haiti?
ssssssssssssssssssssstssssssssss... is also the sound of air seeping out of a !
There is no chance the U.S. economy will see a so-called recession, so worries about another downturn are — for the moment — unfounded, Commerce Bank financial analyst Scott Colbert told an audience yesterday during the bank’s annual investment and economic update at Reynolds Alumni Center.
Here is a vision from this retard: Bond Fund Overview
We present you with the annual report for the Commerce Bond Fund for the one-year period ended October 31, 2007
During the later part of the fiscal year we reduced our Treasury and agency exposure and moved the mortgage backed securities (MBS) allocation to an overweight position. Increased volatility and the subprime mortgage problem provided some buying opportunities in the MBS sector.
CR,Real Estate In California has a number of serious Agency problems.A "buyers agent" is legally a sub-agent of the listing broker...who has a "supervisory duty" fro the sales agents who work for the broker.Supervision is a very bad joke,agents and brokers who act unethically make more money and pay no penalty for their transgressions.Jim the Realtor is right,and there is no chance in hell he will have a shot at that board and no one who is like him has a chance either.just the way it is...
Fair Economist,having the "Owner" list the property is a function of using a Deed of Trust to convey title.Messy but that is the only way to go since the lender does not hold the title...
I am freezing. We have this nice glow reflecting off the snow in the backyard, which is still coming down...my crazy photographer wife decided, hey we got the kids to bed so let's go outside and try some neat night snow photos. Did I mention I am freezing. She did get some nice shots of some rabbits. Did I mention I am freezing. Still snowing hard too. Shoveled the driveway earlier, can't tell. Even the snow man we made this morning is drowning in snow now. Hope she gets a snow day tomorrow.
This is just another program that's going to be gamed. I mean, most of these people are living rent free, not paying property taxes or insurance. Do you think they're interested in hurrying back into the"pay for shelter" lifestyle. Don't think so.
"
The BBC reported today that actual financial help from one country in the zone to another is illegal under European Treaty law. Under these circumstances it is hard to imagine how the windy waffle of a Eurosummit is going to change anything - "standing by" a country, what does that actually mean? Cold hard cash is what is required if the PIIGS aren't going to be turned out into the cold to revert to their currencies leaving France and Germany to share the euro. Interesting.
"
Christina Romer just said nothing like nobody ever said nothing on the PBS Newshour, like a Cheshire Cat as she faded away and left nothing but a grin...
Everyone have a good night tonight, I am off for a hot shower to warm up. Thinking about Dan Fogelberg tonight, miss ole Danny boy...can't find a good version online..but one of my favorite set of lyrics: Empty Cages
Waiting in the wings
Your courage sings before
you falter...
It's just another way to say
What's there but never
shows.
It's just another day to lay
Your sins before the altar.
And where it's going to end
this time around
Nobody knows.
Every time it seems that you
Have gained an understanding
Those devils at your heels
Reach up and try to tip the scales.
Waking from a dream
You see it's all been
Done without you.
And every vain attempt to
make it stay
Is destined to fail.
Chorus
Fury rages through your
restless days
Shades of time that's gone
before
Empty cages where the
prisoner plays
'Til the door swings closed
behind for evermore...
Evermore...
Evermore...
Long before we come of
Age we yearn to leave
The garden
And wrestle with a myth
The hand of fate
Has faintly drawn.
But somewhere on the way
We feel our hearts begin
to harden
And see just as we learn
to turn around
The garden is gone.
Fury rages through your
restless days
Shades of time that's gone
before
Empty cages where the
prisoner plays
'Til the door swings closed
behind for evermore...
Evermore...
Evermore...
Let's see. ..
No keysafe
Dirty house
Fat slob husband always in underwear farting when he comes to the door
Toilets backed up
Big mean dog
Green pool
Appointment times only 9a-9:30a except weekends when no one can come
It can get pretty easy to drag these things out if you want.
The Euro currency is only used by 16 countries, and some of the strongest countries in the Union are not part of the Eurozone... when you combine that with the lack of fiscal policy or enforcement power, it's hard to see how this cant end in failure...
This is NOT an agency problem - it's a fraud ENFORCEMENT problem. The banks are complicit in their own robbery, more laws won't help if we don't enforce existing law.
I can't tell you how many foreclosures I've looked at that had "owner occupied" mortgages, and were clearly investment properties. The banks were complicit in this, and the banks are allowing the scammers to rule the roost again, since NO ONE IN LAW ENFORCEMENT CARES!, and the mortgages are guaranteed by fannie and freddie.
At the beginning of this whole foreclosure mess, I was mad at the borrowers - after watching this stuff unfold, I really can't fault the scammers for getting free ponies - no one has made any effort to stop the looting.
I can't believe we have billions of dollars for "homeland security", but no money to spend 5 minutes reviewing each government insured mortgage for fraud. I'm not specially trained, these are public records available online with just a few clicks, that prove fraud on the part of the buyer, and show a damming case against the banks.
I think I haven't seen such a triple hit of disturbing headlines in such a short time..... Sushi for dinner, while I ponder how these dots connect to my household security.
The new bill drops disaster assistance and extensions of unemployment insurance and COBRA helath-insurance subsidies, all Democratic priorities which will need to be addressed before they expire within the next few weeks.
But Reid also ditched one of K Street's highest priorities, an extension of soon-to-expire tax breaks that are highly beneficial to major corporations, known as tax extenders, as well as other corporate giveaways that had been designed to win GOP support.
Hi Liz, my friend that looked at three houses, bid on the last one, but lost the bidding war. 5 days on market, and offers above asking I believe. Damn!
"Believe me, they can't tell when a relative--with a different last
name and good credit--buys an REO with the intent that the old
owner live in it."
Buying properties for relatives was surprisingly common in FL during the bubble, too.
Then when the loan went bad, we would call the borrower, and they would ADMIT they bought it for their Mom/Sister/etc, but they couldn't pay the loan anymore and the Mom/Sister/etc didn't live there anymore anyway.
The sooner we collapse it, the sooner we can work on building something that doesn't completely screw all but the fortunate few.
I am sympathetic to the frustration behind this impulse, but we don't need to collapse it to fix it. Besides, if we did collapse it, how long do you think it would take to fix it? My guess is that whatever we got after collapsing it would be even less likely to be an equitable system. The system we have now has been years in the making. No need to throw the baby out with the bathwater.
I'm not surprised. Cubans think of this as helping their
relatives out, and it is until it isn't. Lenders certainly didn't educate
them by not requiring even 1% down.
barfly wrote: The system we have now has been years in the making. No need to throw the baby out with the bathwater.
The system itself has never been more useful, tested, or efficient. It's the institutions that govern and operate it which have become hopelessly corrupt. With the present infrastructure I am sure we could just as well have a very prosperous world and the capital owners could still live in luxury relative to the population, just by a few less zeros in the orders of magnitude of their net worths relative to the population of the world at large
business has become more stable, and the daily rowing in the grind feals like easy long strokes, but a guy like me has to always put his legs and back into it.
thats how I row, I row the boat while everyone else in the boat sits back and enjoys the ride.
" Allow issuers of bonds for certain school and energy projects to continue providing bond holders a federal tax credit in lieu of an interest payment or convert them to a direct payment available under the Build America Bond program."
Goldman is a top underwriter of municipal bonds and the No. 1 underwriter of Build America Bonds. "These are a new type of municipal bond, part of the Obama administration's $787 billion stimulus plan. Cities, states, universities and government entities use BABs, as they're known, to finance infrastructure projects. This is a potential $50 billion annual market, Whitney says, and Goldman currently holds a 25 percent share," reports a Fortune article.
Hmmmm......... time for this really sucks icon! Furthermore, after Treasury pulls the plug on <BS manipulation and the trillion tossed at Wall street, the next joke is to use shit like this to suggest that we have a recovery....
I'm not so sure. Existing structures have powerful constituencies that resist any and all change, and yet those structures must change in order for a true fix to happen.
RiF, I certainly agree there's lots of room for improvement. And robert is right; no matter what we do, someone will try to game the system. It's going to require ever diligent vigilance.
Mr Slippery wrote: I think it is more than that. The levels of debt are not sustainable and cannot be paid in full.
LOL, agreed. So, basically, the technical infrastructure of the financial system is peerless and extremely useful, but the amount of debt it's being asked to support is unsustainable and the institutions that operate and govern it are wholly corrupt. Other than those minor aberrances, however, it's perfectly fine.
In other words: more
OT: Gold and Investment Strategies.
For those who are less engaged with those they see in the mirror than Eric and Rob Dawg, here's a lesson taken from an article in zero hedge. This poster is talking imo the truth. When it came to the low range, last week and early this, in gold, it was time to get in, and I posted such. It's still time to get in, now upping the ante to 60% of one's desired core position. Trading positions are not sure winners, but the weak hands are gone and the shorts are trapped.
" Oscar Wilde said he could resist anything but temptation. But doing something you know you shouldn't is easier if you can convince yourself that this will be the last time you indulge, that you won't do it again. So we convince ourselves that since we'll be strong in the future, we can still indulge today. Whether it?s smoking, eating too much or going to the pub instead of the gym, we delude ourselves into thinking that we will take the more difficult path next time.
A few years ago, two economists actually looked at the issue using gym membership data. They found that in a club in which non-members could pay a no-strings fee of $10 per visit, people preferred to pay the $70 per month for unlimited access. And since members only attended 4.3 times a month on average, they ended up paying an average $17 per visit. The authors concluded this to be clear evidence of "overconfidence about future self control."
Investors understand the affliction all too well: a stock trades at £10 and we tell ourselves that we?re buyers at £8. But how many of us buy when it gets to £8? Some of us do, but most of us don't. Most of us (I can?t be the only one!) convince ourselves that it's going lower still: “I’ll buy at £7” becomes “I’ll buy at £6” and by the time it's back at £8 we're “waiting for a pullback” Each investor has their own way of circumventing this problem. But at root, such poor decision-making is a consequence of our fundamental underestimation today of the discipline and even courage we will require in the future."
Just How Ugly Is The Sovereign Default Truth? How Self Delusions Prevent Recognition Of Reality
Tyler Durden's picture
Submitted by Tyler Durden on 02/11/2010 13:55 -0500
The public deserves better
Have you tried calling Yun?
The surge in home sales was driven by buyers responding strongly to the tax credit combined with record-low mortgage interest rates," said Lawrence Yun
Gaming has been going on forever. The level of debt is
unprecedented.
In the late 70s, my secy bought a house for 50k. (She sold it for 50k too,
but that's another story.)
The employment verification came in to our mutual boss and he
asked her, what do you want me to say you make? That was before
the days of providing paystubs etc.
The Massachusetts couple paid for their future retirement home in Spring Hill with cash in 2005, five years before agents for Bank of America seized the house, removed belongings and changed the locks on the doors, according to a lawsuit the couple have filed in federal court.
Early last month, Charlie Cardoso had to drive to Florida to get his home back, the complaint filed in Massachusetts on Jan. 20 states.
The bank had an incorrect address on foreclosure documents — the house it meant to seize is across the street and about 10 doors down — but the Cardosos and a Realtor employed by Bank of America were unable to convince the company that it had the wrong house, the suit states.
Lennar purchased a 40% interest in the loan portfolios, while the FDIC is keeping the remaining 60% equity interest. The FDIC provided $627 million of financing at no interest for seven years
makes you wonder why the fdic didn't just reduce the principle on the loans if borrower was in the house....
greed is out of control...
the same thieves that made money up are now looting us on way down...remember they just rec'd a tax break on losses....
When will we (if ever?) come to grips with the fact that home prices (not rents) are way off base and just accept that rather than try all these stupid games? Makes you wonder does it not?
Any insightful long term ideas welcome, short term fixes not so much.
creditcriminalslovetarp wrote: the same thieves that made money up are now looting us on way down...
I'd expect nothing less, actually. All that's missing are tax-dollar backed incentives encouraging the public to buy at the top, so the banks can later pick up the distressed properties for pennies on the dollar - oh, never mind...
The highest paid city government employee of Madison, Wisconsin, last year wasn't the mayor. It wasn't the police chief. It wasn't even the head of Metro Transit. It was bus driver John E. Nelson, says the Wisconsin State Journal.
Nelson earned $159,258 in 2009, including $109,892 in overtime and other pay.
He and his colleague, driver Greg Tatman, who earned $125,598, were among the city's top 20 earners for 2009, city records show.
They're among the seven bus drivers who made more than $100,000 last year thanks to a union contract that lets the most senior drivers who have the highest base salaries get first crack at overtime, says the Journal.
And there was a lot of overtime -- $1.94 million last year, $467,200 more than the bus system budgeted for and the most ever for the system -- as employees exhausted sick leave and took advantage of unpaid leave through the federal Family Medical Leave Act, officials say:
The NPR folks also interviewed a couple of lawyers and
such about the dysfunctional congress.
One wanted a constitutional convention. (And that wouldn't
be bought too?)
Another had a good idea. If you are willing to accept contributions of
only 100 bucks or less, your donations are quadupled. Sad to think
of taxpayer funding, but it might eliminate the contribution/bribery thing.
There prolly is a way of gaming this but at the moment, I am too tired
to think of how.
When will we (if ever?) come to grips with the fact that home prices (not rents) are way off base and just accept that rather than try all these stupid games?
The government has massively intervened in the housing market since the Great Depression. Why would they stop now?
comment in the marketwatch article on Lennar buying bad mortgages...
I'm getting a sweet deal from JP Morgan Chase. I havent paid them a nickel on my mortgage in 2yrs and they've agreed to reinstate my mortgage at a reduced payment with extended term from $2000 to $1500, so I'll make a few payments to make sure the modification sticks, then default again for another 2yrs of rent free living Up yers banksters.
In days of yore, I had to tell a bank that it had to release the
seller's property at no payment. The property had been sold
and when the owner re-fied they used the old legal description
which included the Sellers property next door.
In those days 20 years ago it was still possible to find a banker
with 2 or 3 brain cells to rub together.
OT: Some might find this interesting, maybe not, but I thought I'd post my experience with HARP (Home Affordable Refinance Program). I'm one of those people with an ARM that floats on June 1st, 2011. My wife and I late last year started getting nervous about interest rates going back up, and the fact that the housing prices, although they had slowed their decline substantially, were still trending downward. Chase services our mortgage so we went into a Chase branch to discuss our refinance options. We were told that our loan was "owned" by Fannie Mae, which was a bit of a shock as I had no idea and had assumed naively that Chase was holding the mortgage. We had put 20% down when we bought the house. If memory serves, I think the mortgage was originated at WAMU. Anyway, our home was now appraising a few thousand above the amount owed on the loan. To make a long story short, HARP was our only choice. We were able to refi our loan to a 30yr fixed @ 5.375%, the same rate we were paying on the ARM. Fees were minimal. They did not require a full appraisal (it was some sort of computer based appraisal), and in total we filled out 4 documents via email. Talking to our refi representative, he seemed very busy, so I think they are doing quite a bit of HARP business. The worst part of this whole business, besides evaporating equity, is knowing your loan is backstopped by the Government and you can't do anything about it. Well, except for selling the house and we have no plans to do that.
Too many good comments to reply to...
I guess I am just a simpleton and figure the best way forward is to "let the chips fall where they may".
I think we can get over this, not without pain, but I believe we can. Why not try it instead of all this crap which just makes people want to riot like in Greece?
Talked with somebody with a brain from SLS tonight. They got my offer, and they wanted a little more paperwork. They seemed hot to trot with the paperwork. Accused me of being a lawyer- nope married to one, consulted with one on how do the negotiations, but not a lawyer. Told him upfront that anything produce will be run by my attorney. Faxed them the latest from the first, and will call back on Monday, after I do my ski trip tomorrow.
Offer is for 17 cents on the dollar. He went off script after I called bushwa on the "We will pursue you for collections should you default." I said, "Did you get my offer letter?"- "Yes," he replied. "Well, then, you have the full offer, cash or deed in lieu- if they won't deal, I am willing to default on the first and leave them with nothing." Wanted the full tax returns. Told him pound sand, I have a prenup, and the wife refuses to divulge. Gave him the option of the last two years of Schedule E with redactions.
Wanted the final paperwork so he could run it past management for approval on Monday- in other words, they want the cash, and they understand I am serious. Looks like a deal is coming.
I will believe it when they FedEx me the docs.
Had lunch with an old friend who the recession has smacked down hard. She barely made 20k last year, and tried to carry 60k in credit card insanity from when she made much more. Asked her if she had filed yet for BK- she wanted to wait until she got a better job!! I said- NO way- file NOW!! Wipe the slate clean, and in a few years you can buy a house!
Doc Holiday wrote: Just fucking disgusting! (pardon my French)
Public unions are, again, an affront against all sense, reason and logic. Mish isn't wrong about this. They are a confiscatory mechanism that results in artificially-high wages and have no justification for existence except seizing political power. They are purely a positive-feedback loop system with no corrective mechanism and no incentive to control costs or accountability.
I am going to leave the whole society re chips fall comment alone. Anyone with an ounce of science background knows that the more you reward oor behavior you get more of it.
I'm trying to figure out what would motivate someone to do a short sale in the first place. Does it lessen the credit ding? I don't think so. Does it end up helping the owner financially? I don't think so. Does it mean extra time in the house? Maybe. Are they less recourse than foreclosures? I would doubt it.
Rick: How can you close me up? On what grounds? Captain Renault: I'm shocked, shocked to find that gambling is going on in here! [a croupier hands Renault a pile of money] Croupier: Your winnings, sir. Captain Renault: [sotto voce] Oh, thank you very much.
I dont agree, if the ones that got us into this mess were given their just reward and the rest of the country had to suffer and go on I think we would; pretending otherwise is an insult and shows a lack of faith.
I just noticed at the end of the article it mentions that this is becoming common in Florida. And people wonder why the process can't be sped up...pffft. They can't accommodate the current foreclosures without screwing it up.
Yep, I'm bitter. The public deserves better, and the Board of Realtors is in a position to clean it up, but does nothing.
I think what surprises me the most about that statement, as well as the statement in the video, is that you, Jim, expect that the Board of Realtors will actually do anything at all.
So far a I can tell from the outside looking in, they are no better than DRE when it comes to disciplining members.
Unions serve no purpose in this society. They were less of a bother when we had more apparent properity. Some extra skimming was acceptable. But not any longer. They are nothing but a legal racketeering operation.
Interesting Times, I had mentioned that we made a reasonable offer on a short sale in 2007, and the lender countered with a price higher than list. The whole deal was like that, they couldn't have been more obstructionist, and we ended up walking away.
But now that I think of it, strangely, that house went off the market, no sale documented anywhere, and has not been for sale since. I'll have to drive by and see if anyone is living in it. Maybe they rented it out, but they couldn't have rented it for what they owed on it, so, weird.
Mind you, that was 3 yrs. ago now. As CR had mentioned, lenders have probably gotten their acts together since then.
No, it's unusual. What is really unusual is they couldn't be
convinced of their mistake!
I beg to differ.
WAMU did similar on loans they had sold, and could not be convinced otherwise and took people to court when they clearly had documentation of payments to the new loan holder.
If you're still reading Jim-
Thanks for this (and previous) rants. I hope you succeed wildly in your campaign to straighten out some of the crap that is occurring.
JP
Case-Shiller strongly implies that it's going to vary locally. 50% off in AZ might be a high bid, but 50% off in Chicago or Dallas might just be too low.
If you're in a position to try, you could do something like offer Case-Schiller minus an additional 20% off or so to give yourself some margin.
I haven't been to a sheriff's auction in at least two years. I should start going again. Cheaper than a movie.
lenders have probably gotten their acts together since then.
Thanks! I ask because I am still renting, and the owner is trying to sell this place at the same time.
It has probably been listed for about a year now... He dropped the price by about 10k every 2 months (roughly). He's now a bit below what he bought it for (470ish)... just wonder if it would be insulting to offer something like 350 cash ?
I think what surprises me the most about that statement, as well as the statement in the video, is that you, Jim, expect that the Board of Realtors will actually do anything at all.
So far a I can tell from the outside looking in, they are no better than DRE when it comes to disciplining members.
I know what Jim needs, and he already has it. He needs a camera and an audience. Then, he needs to go find realtors doing dishonest things and ask them to explain themselves on camera. Then, he could go to the Board of Realtors for an explanation of why this isn't resulting in discipline. The local news crews would be all over him for exclusives.
DFW area, there were articles in the Dallas Morning News and other Texas papers, but I can't find anything at the moment. You can imagine WAMU and foreclosure has a lot of hits, and I can't quite fine tune the search to find it.
It has probably been listed for about a year now... He dropped the price by about 10k every 2 months (roughly). He's now a bit below what he bought it for (470ish)... just wonder if it would be insulting to offer something like 350 cash ?
During the tech wreck, I saw that the art of getting somebody to a post-crash fair value was a combination of how the offer was presented, as well as how quick of a learner the seller was.
It is not easy to close such deals, and I would normally recommend having a bunch of irons in the fire in order to increase the probability that one of them will work out.
I admit. I need a primer on the benefits of being progressively less productive and maybe some case studies on how being less productive leads to success.
Then, he needs to go find realtors doing dishonest things and ask them to explain themselves on camera. Then, he could go to the Board of Realtors for an explanation of why this isn't resulting in discipline. The local news crews would be all over him for exclusives.
I am curious who employs people like this. Actually, it is beyond curiosity. I won't reward any company that does.
This would be a good for a show like 20/20 to cover.
Mind you, that was 3 yrs. ago now. As CR had mentioned, lenders have probably gotten their acts together since then.
I don't think that many lenders have gotten their acts together, but they have finally dispensed with the notion that "your offer is laughable; I'll hold it for another year until the market comes back."
A year later, when contacted about that offer, they learned that it was no longer operative.
After another year, they were willing to consider other numbers, but by then the unpaid taxes (based on the fantasy valuation of times gone by) had to be deducted and, well, that doesn't leave much.
So in the third year, have they learned anything other than what fools they've been all along?
Of all the JTR videos (I am a subscriber on YouTube) the one I like best is where Jim has loaded his old 70's pickup full of loot from an abandoned house and is driving away with bicycles piled on top... Do you still have that old pickup Jim? I see you are driving the Benz in the rant video...
Interesting Times - Mortgage docs are not recorded online where you are?
I know here, in podunk NH, I was able to check the recorded mortgages online, thru the county office, to determine how much sellers owed on their homes before I thought about offers. It does help to know that information. Although I did always feel like a big snoop. But then, anyone can snoop out my mortgage docs online too - it's all there for the world to see.
One of the clerks at the tax assessors office in Miami
said that he has investors coming in to ask him about properties.
He says a bunch of them are waiting on the sidelines.
Also I had a client come in that just happens to work for the Trump
towers. Said a lot of them are owned by Russians or South'Americans
who never seem to show up. In 2 of the towers. He is not in a position to
really know about the finances of the towers, I don't think.
I need a primer on the benefits of being progressively less productive
Ask and ye shall receive.
HA! That is the most myopic analysys I have ever seen. Where does the case when a new need or product appears ? This imaginary universe assumes a lot of permanently stationary objects.
just wonder if it would be insulting to offer something like 350 cash ?
It could be an insult if you do it in writing. Meet with him and explain your reasoning and evaluation. Talk a while about all the problems before you come up with a number and have some solid comps or other evidence to support it.
RIF you should be ashamed. Bearly, I would expect that nonsense from.
You union bashers should work for the fucking government for a while before you spout off. But I support your right to free speech, the same right which allows me to bargain collectively. Fascists and Communists hate unions.
Mortgage docs are not recorded online where you are?
Canada has some pretty heavy privacy laws.... I don't think we have those online.
There might be other avenues to get that info. Personally, I think the poker game is much harder in Canada... They have a lot more to lose since banks rarely give in. And I know a senior banker who tells me this all the time....
So in the third year, have they learned anything other than what fools they've been all along?
Actually sportsfan, have you seen that video sprinkled on this blog the past day or 2, about how the big banks are actually making a lot of $$ off short sales? It's a blood pressure pumper.
There is no chance the U.S. economy will see a so-called Double Dip recession, so worries about another downturn are — for the moment — unfounded, Commerce Bank financial analyst Scott Colbert told an audience yesterday during the bank’s annual investment and economic update at Reynolds Alumni Center.
“We are firing fewer and fewer people faster and faster,” Colbert said. But, he warned, if there’s not positive employment growth this month or next, the chances of a double-dip recession grow.
Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof; or abridging the freedom of speech, or of the press; or the right of the people peaceably to assemble, and to petition the Government for a redress of grievances.
Had lunch with an old friend who the recession has smacked down hard. She barely made 20k last year, and tried to carry 60k in credit card insanity from when she made much more. Asked her if she had filed yet for BK- she wanted to wait until she got a better job!! I said- NO way- file NOW!! Wipe the slate clean, and in a few years you can buy a house!
She wants to wait long enough so the $20K is the income they use going into BK for means testing - not something prior to that. Not sure what the period is but she needs to make sure is clear of it for sure.
your comment that "unions serve no purpose in this society...and are nothing but a legal racketeering operation" is un informed and reveal a level of anger that maybe you might help me understand with what ever your personal experience was ..
there are good unions and their are bad unions
and their are good unions and good management teams that enter into defective labor management agreements
the examples like the over-paid bus drivers dont prove anything other than that particular union pushed for the moon and management rolled over
before there were unions workers were often treated worse than stray dogs
before there were unions there was no sick leave, vacation leave, benefits and people were routinely worked to death
it was not uncommon before unions for owners of factories, mines and agri businesses to force workers to take huge risks with their health and lives in order to squeeze out extra profits...and then discard people like so much refuse when the owners thought it expedient
i would not want to live in a world which hand no employee representation with management and where employees could not enter into contracts for employment with management
their is a proper balance between union power and the power of the owners, or management
when unions are bad, corrupt, over reach or are destructive to the reasonable and rightful authority that should remain managements prerogative , under these circumstances you and i could agree that union is no good and should be opposed
but if you are a fair and just person and have knowledge of the history of mines andd factories in our country then you must be able to see that, like my family personally experienced two generations ago, as coal miners...there is such a thing as worker abuse, and there is a proper place for good unions, appropriately regulated, to represent workers interests
For some reason Jim the Realtor sounds like what I imagine Frank Bascombe would sound like. And if I were to meet them, I feel like I'd like them both.
Perhaps I'm not making myself clear. It's not about rewarding "poor behavior". It's about supporting the less fortunate and weaker members of society who have fallen on hard times for whatever reason, most often through no fault of their own. It's a poor society that neglects that duty.
1 currency now -yogi wrote: But I support your right to free speech, the same right which allows me to bargain collectively.
See, that's the thing. In almost every case I don't see any bargaining, just collusion between two parties, neither of which has any liability or accountability for the money to be spent, and the taxpayer from whom the money actually is extracted is given no input into how his money is dispensed. The council pays off the union, the union pays off the council. Go along to get along. Repeat until you've bankrupted the citizens you supposedly serve. That's what public unions permit. I support private unions, but not those where the union is managed by a third party with no stake in either the well-being of the workers or the health of the company itself.
That's right, I lose it when I hear such crap on an intelligent forum like this.
Sportsfan, you said you would die for the First Amendment. It makes the US a better place to live than China will ever be. A union is an assembly of humans. It's easy to believe in free speech when everyone says what you want to hear. You don't need a Constitution for that.
Fed in Talks With Money Market Funds to Help Drain $1 Trillion
Maybe so. But they're also doing this to prevent the drain out of money market mutual funds, because investors are worried about more breaking the buck.
Total U.S. money market mutual fund assets peaked exactly a year ago at $3.9 trillion.
Dropping like a stone, to $3.2 trillion now.
Pretty stunning drop, and unprecedented since money market mutual funds were invented in 1970.
My 1952 pickup has a nice motor- it is a 1979 350 from a trans am, had less than 60k when the mains were spun by a buddy of mine. Paid him $60 for the short block.
Line hone, nice forged crank, Crane 262 cam, Edelbrock 600, ramshead exhausts, slightly ported- dual turbo exhausts- no crosspipe. Power flows through a four speed late 60's chevy truck transmission, with a Hurst Shifter- combined with a 4.11 rear end, turning the original 16-650 duallies.
Zero to sixty with one shift.
12 mpg on a good day- wife complains I still have not installed the seatbelts as promised.
No power steering.
Vacuum assisted braking.
before there were unions there was no sick leave, vacation leave, benefits and people were routinely worked to death
Look, I was in a union for a couple of tears and spent 10 years trying to figure out how to work within union constraints.
I have sick leave, vacation, benefits... and I am not in a union. The USG has effectively rendered union negotiated working conditions meaningless.Now they invent ways to become an obstruction They are now nothing but legalized mobs.
RIF, have you worked for the government? I had a long, nasty debate with Byzantine ruins on this subject, and don't feel like rehashing it. It's on haloscan. I gave a long detailed history of the public union I was in and the reason other structures for getting the work done had failed.
I suppose the Greek teachers and doctors should just shut the fuck up and let Jamie Dimon enjoy his hard-earned bonus.
Sportsfan, you said you would die for the First Amendment.
Yes, yogi, I have said that and I will say it again. The First Amendment to the U.S. Constitution is something worth giving my life to preserve.
I have nothing against unions. They actually do result, at least initially, from a free assembly of persons. Corporations, on the other hand, do not. Why the Supreme Court felt it necessary to say "oh, and unions, too" when granting corporations the right to spend shareholder money to influence elections is beyond me.
But then I haven't had an easy time understanding what motivates the honorable justices for a long time.
That is a conservative wet dream-go back to the days of the Robber Barons of the late 1900s.
No rules, exploitation, 15 hour days, child labor, poisoned food--
It was paradise!
Okay, on the Indymac/FDIC/One West Bank video, I would hope someone in Congress decides to hold a hearing or two.
But the bottom line, so far at least, is that the FDIC is funded by the banks. While the video and harsh reality suggest that the FDIC may soon be borrowing from the Treasury, unless Treasury forgives that loan, the taxpayers aren't directly being affected. The people who should be screaming the loudest are small town community bankers.
Will anyone listen if they do? Does anyone listen to all the rants here?
Now they invent ways to become an obstruction They are now nothing but legalized mobs.
If that is so, they would probably do a much better job of negotiating "assistance/bailout" terms with the banksters on behalf of the public than the members of either the Bush or Obama administration. Or members of the Congress during the Bush admin & Obama admin.
Look, I was in a union for a couple of tears and spent 10 years trying to figure out how to work within union constraints.
I have sick leave, vacation, benefits... and I am not in a union.
those benefits came into existence for common workers because of unions... and did not exist for common workers before unions
your personal experience with a bad union, or mine, does not constitute a reasonable analysis of the sum total of what good or what harm unions do
the bottom line is this....just as individuals have a right to collect in a group, invest and form a company,....
so do workers, or anybody else have the right to associate and work towards a common goal
whether that goal be about work, philanthropy, politics, recreation, hunting or conservation
we have freedom of association in the USA
as for you comment about how you couldnt figure out how to work within your union contract after 10 years emploment ,i dont you what you mean...please give an example
“This will certainly contribute to the downward spiral of two-way relations,” said Willy Lam Wo-Lap, adjunct professor of history at the Chinese University in Hong Kong. “Beijing’s reaction will be ferocious.”
how to piss off your biggest creditor in 30 days....starring....the wonderkid....
non-union folks "only" work eight hours a day, five days a week (if you're lucky) because of unions. The standard before unions used to be twelve hours a day, six days a week. Also, any overtime pay you are entitled to is a union gain. Private, non-union company employees benefit from hard won union wage and benefit gains, not the other way around.
Private, non-union company employees benefit from hard won union wage and benefit gains, not the other way around.
Yes, but when people ask "What have you done for me lately?" it's hard to come up with an answer.
Most Americans are as oblivious of labor history in this country as they are of every other form of history in this country, except perhaps what is required to be taught in K-12 (and they probably forgot most of that).
When I hear Jim's stories, I think about a recent experience of ours. We put an offer on a short sale that was on the market in Palos Verdes going on two years, the bank rejected ours along with a two+ other offers, so all offers were rejected. They allowed counters and we countered at 1.4 (900 down), but was outbid. The whole process took months. Months later the listing reappears on the MRLS very late Wed night as active. We submit an offer Friday morning, but it was too late; the house was sold. Final sales price 1.3. May not be an inside deal, but we wonder...
I have sick leave, vacation, benefits... and I am not in a union. The USG has effectively rendered union negotiated working conditions meaningless.Now they invent ways to become an obstruction They are now nothing but legalized mobs.
I call Bull. I live in a "right-to-work" state. Was talking to a classmate today - her husband, who had 20yrs with the same hospital as a NON-UNION nurse got canned, along with several other high-seniority workers just last week. Fired, and replaced with younger, cheaper workers, who hadn't amassed the right to vacation time and benefits. The government does not enforce existing labor laws, that is left to private attorneys. Most just take their lumps, and another lower-paying job. Two weeks ago, He prolly thought unions were worthless too.. now, I suspect he'd have a different opinion.
The union is a waste until you need it. Feel free to do your own version of "Joe the plumber" garbage, but don't ask intelligent people to buy it.
He doesn't need to grow a pair. That clanking noise could be handcuffs. When combined with a good indictment and lots of cameras, it can really change how people behave. Somewhere out there are lots of people who clearly and provably committed federal offenses related to the bubble or bailout.
creditcriminalslovetarp wrote: no... I would prefer for the goofball to figure out how to create jobs, raise taxes on the uber rich and feed homeless old ladies and children....
Rest assured the uber-rich will be granted loopholes or make them. They paid good money for this administration. Only the working rich and top end of the upper-middle class will pay. Of course, as the Bush tax cuts expire we all get to pay more as tax rates revert across the spectrum.
"While we're waiting, we might also take a look at who is trying to stop him from doing anything."
why not hire blackwater to take care of that issue....they need the work I here...and should be able to find them in dc or new york pretty easily, last I heard IED's were very rare around those parts...
"her husband, who had 20yrs with the same hospital as a NON-UNION nurse got canned, along with several other high-seniority workers just last week. Fired, and replaced with younger, cheaper workers, who hadn't amassed the right to vacation time and benefits."
Cry me a river, so the hospital wasn't supposed to replace someone who is replaceable at a lower cost?
Somewhere out there are lots of people who clearly and provably committed federal offenses related to the bubble or bailout.
I think one mistake he made was the "we're looking forward, not backward" remark early in office. He may like to style himself as post-partisan, post-racial and post-retributive, but the people want blood. On that I agree.
Of course, as the Bush tax cuts expire we all get to pay more as tax rates revert across the spectrum.
Ah, but some on this board will get to pay a whole lot more than others on this board.
Current income tax rates are an insult to anyone who can do math. I would actually seriously consider a flattened set of rates or the addition of a VAT, two concepts that weren't needed back when rates made more sense.
After watching that video of how the banks are cleaning up on the short sales, now I understand why a whole lot of houses that did show NOD or foreclosure are now listed for sale as a short sale...
ghostfaceinvestah (profile) wrote (in reply to...) on Thu, 2/11/2010
"her husband, who had 20yrs with the same hospital as a NON-UNION nurse got canned, along with several other high-seniority workers just last week. Fired, and replaced with younger, cheaper workers, who hadn't amassed the right to vacation time and benefits."
Cry me a river, so the hospital wasn't supposed to replace someone who is replaceable at a lower cost?
That's a great attitude if you don't ever plan on getting old.
The dismaying news is that... well, something like 50% of the IT industry is paranoid and easily manipulated.
I don't know Kurt Lochner, but if the filter works, use it.
Whether IT folks are more paranoid than others, I can't say, but then they are more familiar with the numerous ways people can invade the privacy of others, while those of us among the uninitiated just sit here and say "What, me worry?"
The statutes of limitations are running. Holder and Barofsky appear very weak right now. Schapiro seems to be making an effort. The Fed is theoretically a regulator. (Say no more).
"Cry me a river, so the hospital wasn't supposed to replace someone who is replaceable at a lower cost?
depends on whether or not the employees have a contract that stipulates termination for lack of performance
or
part of a reduction in force due to cost constraints etc
or
other non discriminatory reasons
if they have no contract and no fed laws were broken firing people because of race or religion for example
then yes the owners of the hospital or factory or what ever can fire people for just about any reason
as for the cry you a river part you asked for
well
we would only need to do that if you were so unlucky as to have been employeed at a company like that
and at job you really needed badly because you hadd kids and a recession was on
and you were fired just cause..oh well lets see, you wife got pregnant ,maternity costs with health plan the employer didnt want ot incur
or
you were getting older and the employer doesnt think people in their 40s are very useful
or
maybe you had a re-elect bush or re-elect obama bumper sticker and your boss didnt like that
then
that river
would turn out to be handy to ya
I have my rv parked in a retirement community in the Phoenix area.... most of the people here are way older than me, and I'm older than dirt... most of them dont have any idea of what is going on, and it's not good to talk about things like hyperinflation or reductions in SS benefits etc...
Also have a friend down here who is a retired CEO of a big bank in the midwest, and he is still on the board. Today when I went to see him he was tied up on a conference call - emergency board meeting - and his wife said he is considering resigning from the board... Last time I talked to him as soon as I said CRE he didnt want to talk about finance any more... also just like a lot of us their income is way down as they were counting on dividends from financial stocks... There is a lot more to the story, but it boils down to the point that the bankers never thought this thing would blow up either...
"That's a great attitude if you don't ever plan on getting old. "
Interesting, so if it was your business, you would overpay for your human resources? If you could hire someone equally as competent, but at half the price, you would pass on the opportunity?
Lets not forget that container shipping has enabled global wage arbitrage... The work is going to go where it is most cost effective... and then we become exposed to the risk of shipping interruptions... Fortunately we do not import much of our food, unlike some places...
barfly wrote: PolitiFact | Extend the Bush tax cuts for lower incomes - Obama promise No. 37:
PolitiFact | Repeal the Bush tax cuts for higher incomes - Obama promise No. 38:
Add them to the pool of tears and broken promises that may well be Obama's only lasting legacy. Do I look like Mrs. Obama?
Well, there's your problem right there. A hospital is not just someone's for-profit business. It functions within a society. Yes, even "private" hospitals.
I commented one night on the potential for short sale fraud and the few posters left awake dismissed my concern. I guess now I feel validated. Of course I think most realtors need to lose their licenses and also think fraud or dishonesty is involved in some aspect of just about every real estate deal.
Full disclosure: Put me down for a "Dawgwins". I live in San Diego.
My friend was a CEO of a big bank, but I dont think he had the knowledge of this blog. He was in the business of selling money to borrowers, and then selling loans to wall street.
Did the hospital owner educate and train the nurse? Does it benefit from public health insurance? Will someone die because inexperienced young workers can be hired on the cheap? Look up the Libby Zion case, or the the Colgan Air crash in the news today.
"That's a great attitude if you don't ever plan on getting old. "
Interesting, so if it was your business, you would overpay for your human resources? If you could hire someone equally as competent, but at half the price, you would pass on the opportunity?
A new nurse isn't "equally as competent" as a nurse with 20 years of experience. The hospital violated the law, and a union would have given the employee a small chance of recourse, since our government has chose not to enforce the law.
How Studying Cow Burps is Helping Argentinians Learn about Climate Change
....we've found that by changing them to a grass diet minimizes bad breath and cow farts. The downside is that milk production is 10-15% less. Since we aren't a dairy, that's an easy sacrifice.
To be clear, the proposal is now simply an outline of Obama's budget, and the budget still has to be approved by Congress, where Republicans are likely to oppose any effort to let the Bush tax cuts expire. So for now, we rate this promise In the Works.
1 currency now -yogi wrote: Well, there's your problem right there. A hospital is not just someone's for-profit business. It functions within a society. Yes, even "private" hospitals.
Agreed. Unfortunately that's only the way reality works if social consensus decides so. Otherwise everything is reality by default. The structure of business can support a lot of social goals on top of earning profit for its owners, but when your rivals are ruthless -disciples there is no choice but to follow suit, get ruthless, or go out of business.
edit: I think we are going to pay, big time, in social costs, infrastructure and quality of life, for the profit-centric myopia of most of our capitalist class... "noblesse oblige" is all but dead in this country.
Traders are driving relative yields on Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac mortgage bonds that most influence the interest rates consumers pay to the lowest in 17 years, speculating cash the companies use to buy delinquent loans will be recycled back into the securities.
ghost might be able to explain this better than article....more hopium for the mbs market it seems....
I did that right away to interpret the image. It didn't help. I just enlarged the type face on my browser page and still can't see what the image represents.
You will live longer out there on the farm than if you lived the city life... I grew up on a farm and owned a small one once, dont have one now, but I keep thinking that it would be a good investment if I could find some younger family to move in as tenants and help with the work as part or all of the rent...
The Shadow wishes he knew some way that we could work our way out of this fiscal mess, but despite conferring with all the kings horses and all the kings men, none seems to appear...
ShadowInventory wrote: The Shadow wishes he knew some way that we could work our way out of this fiscal mess, but despite conferring with all the kings horses and all the kings men, none seems to appear...
Humpty's problem was that he got too damned fat and his parts were too interconnected. In our world of course, he'd be declared TBTF.
Hey Jim, love your work. I'm a San Diego potential buyer.
By the way, are you having any issue with all the REO listings requiring financed offers to be pre-approved through a loan officer of the bank or listing agent's choosing? Is this even legal? This is really getting old for me. Each offer and they say they have to run your credit again. I have 2 current pre-approvals yet it doesn't matter. Today Bank of America told me I couldn't make an offer without their approval but they won't take a credit report that was just pulled last week by another bank. I'm too close to 700 on my score to risk lowering it due to too many credit inquiries. Told BofA to pack sand. I won't make an offer. Anyway, end of rant. Have you had similar problems?
Did you know you could be fired for not removing a political sticker from your car — or even having a beer after work? Lewis Maltby says it's more than possible — it's happened. His new book, Can They Do That? explores rights in the workplace.
As he tells NPR's Ari Shapiro, "Freedom of speech is protected by the First Amendment — but only where the government is concerned.
"What most Americans generally don't know is that the Constitution doesn't apply to private corporations at all."
In terms of monitoring its employees, the list of things a corporation can't do is a short one — it's basically confined to eavesdropping on a personal oral conversation, Maltby said. "Anything else is open season."
I could fire people but if I didnt have a documented series of performance problems or good cause, then when they filed for unemployment my 'unemployment tax account' would get charged and my payroll taxes went up. After battling with the CA EDD for a while, I realized that the dice were loaded against me - no matter what evidence I had the EDD would always rule in favor of the employee... So I adjusted my business model to allow for the maximum EDD tax and lowered the maximum wage I was willing to pay to make up for it... So the good employees wound up subsidizing the bad employees and the EDD....
the bush tax cut of 2003 did not reduce federal income taxes for households with less than 57k income married filing jointly
the threshold numbers are around 27k for individuals
this means, that almost half of americans never got the tax cuts after income brackets adjusted to agi
Okay, if that's what you call an error. The 2001 tax cuts lowered all brackets, that being everyone who pays.
I lumped the 2001 and 2003 tax cuts together (since 2003 amended 2001). The fact that 2003 did not provide any tax relief for married filing jointly and earning over $56,800 AGI just shows how absurd those cuts were, not to mention totally unnecessary given that the 2001 cuts had just gone into effect.
As I said, they were designed to benefit the rich. The fact that the "surplus" was long gone before the 2003 legislation passed only goes to show that a Republican President and Republicans controlling both houses of Congress don't give a shit about the people or the country as a whole, just the rich folk in it.
"On the Inordinate Power of Some Law Professor to Justify Employers' Right to Fire Your Ass for No Particular Reason
You go to work Monday morning, as usual. As you are caffeinating yourself into sentience, your boss sidles up to your cubicle, "Right, so, I don't particularly like your name. It's just occurred to me how much I hate it. You're fired based on my intense dislike for the lack of euphony of your name." This has to be against the law, you think. He can't just do this, you think. It's not and he can.
And it's largely thanks to Richard Epstein, a professor at the University of Chicago Law School. He wrote an article, In Defense of the Contract at Will, 51 U. Chi. L. Rev. 947 (1984) which is such a strident paean for an employer's right to fire employees for any and no reason that it embarrassed me to read it. Before I attempt to blast shotgun-sized holes in his argument, I'll summarize it.
A Bit of Context
Historically, when you got a job in America, your employer had the legal right to fire you at any time for any reason and you had the power to quit at any time for any reason. At first, this seems only fair and balanced. But then you think for a second and realize that the power to quit is usually the power to inconvenience your employer, whereas the power to fire can be the power to make it hard for you to stay alive.
In any event, an employer's unfettered right to fire, known as the "at-will doctrine", was the default rule for employment contracts applied by U.S. courts during most of our rough and ready capitalist history. A default rule means that courts imply the rule into all employment contracts that don't mention firing. This rule was taken advantage of in all sorts of charming ways throughout history, e.g. firing people for unionizing, refusing to commit a crime, using their sick days, serving on a jury, getting pregnant, getting old, voting in a different way than your boss, speaking Spanish, etc, "
if inquiries are within 30 days for mortgage loan it shouldn't ding your score, RMCRs need to be updated every 30 days.....I would bring your last credit report.... or bring your own in by getting them here....same applies to auto loans...they know your shopping ....
where a business blog instructs owners how to fire for no reason
i rest my case
#
Can I Be Fired From Work For No Reason?
As an “at-will" employee, you can be fired for any reason, or no reason at all. For example, if your boss wants to fire you so that his boss' sister can ...
resources.lawinfo.com/.../can-i-be-fired-from-work-for-no-reason-.html - Cached - Similar
#
Can you get fired for no reason?
Mar 23, 2009 ... Where do you work? What does your employment contract say? ... Pretty much...an at will company CAN fire you for no reason! ... Answerology Error - Cached - Similar
#
Law Offices of Alexandra M. Steinberg: Yes, your boss really can ...
Yes, your boss really can fire you for no reason at all... but s/he CANNOT fire you for an illegal reason. 2009 m. Spalio 31 j., 02:01 ...
lt-lt.facebook.com/...your-boss...can-fire-you-for-no-reason...cannot-fire-you.../164089200815 - Lithuania - Cached
#
Can My Boss Fire Me at Any Time for Any Reason? What is “at will ...
What does this mean? In most cases, it means that your boss can fire you at any time for almost any reason or no reason at all. She can fire you because she ...
www.calaborlaw.com/.../can-my-boss-fire-me-at-any-time-for-any-reason-what-is-“at-will”/ - Cached - Similar
#
WikiAnswers - Can an employer tell anyone the reason you were fired
If you mean personally then the above poster is correct (it's your own business. ... Can an employer fire you for no reason? Can an employer find out is you ...
wiki.answers.com/.../Can_an_employer_tell_anyone_the_reason_you_were_fired - Cached - Similar
#
Can my boss threaten to fire me if I apply for a... - JustAnswer
Jun 9, 2008 ... In this situation, your boss can essentially fire you for any reason ... employer may fire an employee for any reason or no reason at all. ... Can my boss threaten to fire me if I apply for a... - JustAnswer - Cached
#
"How do you fire an employee?" from The Business Blog at Intuitive.com
As an employee, you have just as much responsibility to communicate your accomplishments ... Either way, just like any other good relationship, the employee / boss .... You can fire someone for no reason, but if you do give a reason, ... Error encountered trying to produce a page for you - Cached - Similar
sportsfan wrote: a Republican President and Republicans controlling both houses of Congress don't give a shit about the people or the country as a whole, just the rich folk in it.
I don't know if party affiliation makes that much difference. What does the trick is how the uber-wealthy brought most of the senators and congressmen not already in the political dynasties into the lowest levels of upper class society, so they had a vested interest in preserving the status quo for the elite levels.
I'm getting tired of shorts. I want to see thongs.
I think there is too much incentive for under-the-table payments to the current homeowner, aka short sale fraud.
OTOH: It's probably not as scary as running a no min auction.
JP, in general I like the HAFA guidelines, and I think this program will be successful (as opposed to HAMP that I argued would have limited success from the beginning). I think having the lenders hire the agent makes sense ... and I think it would be a good change.
I was glad to see that sentence slapping down the "short sale negotiators". I missed that earlier and I'll send it to Jillayne.
best wishes
Congressman Introduces Mortgage E-Verify Act for GSE and FHA Mods
A.R.M.s Length Transactions.
Seems like some Realtor licenses need to get revoked.
My bank account says I am a thousandaire atm, I would pay cash for a place, or pay up to but not exceeding 150 a month in rent. If these mark to market clowns can't beat that, then I'm sorry, I'm just gonna have to rough it out at my parents house for the time being.
It's not as sweet a deal as staying in a house rent/mortgage free for 2+ years, but I am not exactly hurting. I've been through worse.
Jim is downright bitter! Why is that even great purveyors of Schadenfreude like Jim still have the
on? Even after giving us classic clips of copper stripping in million dollar houses! Get that man some Hoffman lenses.
"http://www.dsnews.com/articles/congressman-introduces-mortgage-e-verify-act-for-gse-and-fha-mods-2010-02-11"
maybe we can outsource the verification to India to cut costs and streamline the process even further?
/doffs CEO think outside the box and make millions hat
biochemist wrote:
If these mark to market clowns can't beat that, then I'm sorry, I'm just gonna have to rough it out at my parents house for the time being.
Even if you were on a food-service worker's income... with no family to support and your parents paying bills, room and board, it should not be hard to live minimally and save up a sizable cash horde. Suck up the social stigma (it's going to go away by necessity anyway) of living with the folks, and save for a better day.
I think I saw some of that insider short sale action here in Harford County, MD last summer. Looking for months, suddenly, a beautiful deal in a nice neighborhood, bid instantly but it was gone.
The doctor say he's comin', but you gotta pay him cash.
Pay cash, plus catastrophic insurance, what we should have had all along.
Paying a paper pusher at your insurance company to pay a pharmacy paper pusher for a $50 prescription is insanity.
poic wrote:
CEO think outside the box and make millions hat
They aren't getting rich because they're brilliant... That's so 20th century anyway.
I was under the impression that all the cheaters were in Greece...
Yet another industry screaming for real regulation.
Friend of mine went to refinance last week. Loan person asked for a retirement account statement (a new twist). Yo bank person, we're state workers, do you really need to count evaporating pennies??
I would guess that 1/3 to 1/2 of short sales have a significant element of fraud.The rules have not been enforced by the board of realtors for a long,long time.
Whatever happened to fiduciary duty? Don't agents have one with respect to the seller - whether its an individual or a bank?
Speaking of which fiduciary doody was one of my favorite handles on the old haloscan.
CaptainMorgan wrote:
Pay cash, plus catastrophic insurance, what we should have had all along.
I like it, just not at today's insurance-inflated prices. Moreover any catastrophic policies I've looked into are only 10-20% more than my cost to insure through my employer (definitely would not be the case for family coverage, however). People just don't look at the bills once their deductible and/or co-pay are met, which is a major part of the out-of-hand costs and inflated salaries.
This was interesting from last thread and I just wanted to add a
YouTube - The Beatles - Yellow Submarine
Imma Freddie Mac February 8, 2010 30yr 5.25% baby.
Mike in Long Island, this is why I'm suggesting changing HAFA to have the agent work for the lender (not the "owner"). The problem right now is the agent's fiduciary duty is to the "owner", and the owner really doesn't care what the price is - since they are getting zero (unless there is a kickback).
I think the current setup has an agency problem
best wishes
Firefighters, police unions OK cut in pay of 3.2%
Interesting... I always smile inwardly a bit to see that public unions "agree to" layoffs or pay cuts, but seriously it is good to see that at least someone out there in public-union land is willing to wake up and smell the
skittles. Ok, 3.2% isn't much, but it is SOMETHING at least.
"Suck up the social stigma (it's going to go away by necessity anyway) of living with the folks, and save for a better day"
Oh that is not even an issue, sleeping in a public restroom crowding around a heater with total strangers, while trying to ignore the sssssssstststsssstsss hiss of crack pipes to get some sleep tends to make you appreciate the little things.
That's the sound of a functioning economy! Do you think they can afford luxuries like crack in Haiti?
biochemist wrote:
Oh that is not even an issue, sleeping in a public restroom crowding around a heater with total strangers, while trying to ignore the sssssssstststsssstsss hiss of crack pipes to get some sleep tends to make you appreciate the little things.
LOL, cool. This gives you a major advantage on your peers who were sold the culturally-toxic American debt dream
I agree that the current situation of having the homeowner negotiate a transaction for the lender is a serious agency problem. It's so bad I'm surprised that the banks would even consider it, never mind do it. The lender gets the money; of course the lender should negotiate the transaction.
Technically it should be the owner/guarantor of the mortgage who picks the realtor. In many cases that would be Fannie/Freddie/FHA, not the servicer.
greenchutes wrote:
!
That's the sound of a functioning economy! Do you think they can afford luxuries like crack in Haiti?
ssssssssssssssssssssstssssssssss... is also the sound of air seeping out of a
...and into a dream!
There is no chance the U.S. economy will see a so-called
recession, so worries about another downturn are — for the moment — unfounded, Commerce Bank financial analyst Scott Colbert told an audience yesterday during the bank’s annual investment and economic update at Reynolds Alumni Center.
‘Double-dip recession’ unlikely | ColumbiaTribune.com
Here is a vision from this retard: Bond Fund Overview
We present you with the annual report for the Commerce Bond Fund for the one-year period ended October 31, 2007
During the later part of the fiscal year we reduced our Treasury and agency exposure and moved the mortgage backed securities (MBS) allocation to an overweight position. Increased volatility and the subprime mortgage problem provided some buying opportunities in the MBS sector.
http://livermore.brand.edgar-online.com/EFX_dll/EDGARpro.dll?FetchFilingHTML1?SessionID=bElBWN_JjfMcpwh&ID=5639658&AnchorName=HH_&AnchorDistance=0&BeginHTML=%3Cb%3E%3Cfont+color%3D%22%23cc0000%22%3E&EndHTML=%3C%2Ffont%3E%3C%2Fb%3E&SearchText=fannie+mae
CR,Real Estate In California has a number of serious Agency problems.A "buyers agent" is legally a sub-agent of the listing broker...who has a "supervisory duty" fro the sales agents who work for the broker.Supervision is a very bad joke,agents and brokers who act unethically make more money and pay no penalty for their transgressions.Jim the Realtor is right,and there is no chance in hell he will have a shot at that board and no one who is like him has a chance either.just the way it is...
greenchutes wrote:
...and into a dream!
I was thinking -- into a black hole
OT: uhoh... Angela Merkel dashes Greek hopes of rescue bid: "German chancellor refuses to rescue Greece's ailing economy amid Berlin's domestic austerity"
(Guardian UK)
EDIT: Woops, sorry Barley! kcoop: Is there a way to be told ahead of time whether a link has already been posted in preview mode?
Fair Economist,having the "Owner" list the property is a function of using a Deed of Trust to convey title.Messy but that is the only way to go since the lender does not hold the title...
I am freezing. We have this nice glow reflecting off the snow in the backyard, which is still coming down...my crazy photographer wife decided, hey we got the kids to bed so let's go outside and try some neat night snow photos. Did I mention I am freezing. She did get some nice shots of some rabbits. Did I mention I am freezing. Still snowing hard too. Shoveled the driveway earlier, can't tell. Even the snow man we made this morning is drowning in snow now. Hope she gets a snow day tomorrow.
This is just another program that's going to be gamed. I mean, most of these people are living rent free, not paying property taxes or insurance. Do you think they're interested in hurrying back into the"pay for shelter" lifestyle. Don't think so.
A comment form that link, by patrickdodds
"
The BBC reported today that actual financial help from one country in the zone to another is illegal under European Treaty law. Under these circumstances it is hard to imagine how the windy waffle of a Eurosummit is going to change anything - "standing by" a country, what does that actually mean? Cold hard cash is what is required if the PIIGS aren't going to be turned out into the cold to revert to their currencies leaving France and Germany to share the euro. Interesting.
"
Christina Romer just said nothing like nobody ever said nothing on the PBS Newshour, like a Cheshire Cat as she faded away and left nothing but a grin...
Everyone have a good night tonight, I am off for a hot shower to warm up. Thinking about Dan Fogelberg tonight, miss ole Danny boy...can't find a good version online..but one of my favorite set of lyrics: Empty Cages
Waiting in the wings
Your courage sings before
you falter...
It's just another way to say
What's there but never
shows.
It's just another day to lay
Your sins before the altar.
And where it's going to end
this time around
Nobody knows.
Every time it seems that you
Have gained an understanding
Those devils at your heels
Reach up and try to tip the scales.
Waking from a dream
You see it's all been
Done without you.
And every vain attempt to
make it stay
Is destined to fail.
Chorus
Fury rages through your
restless days
Shades of time that's gone
before
Empty cages where the
prisoner plays
'Til the door swings closed
behind for evermore...
Evermore...
Evermore...
Long before we come of
Age we yearn to leave
The garden
And wrestle with a myth
The hand of fate
Has faintly drawn.
But somewhere on the way
We feel our hearts begin
to harden
And see just as we learn
to turn around
The garden is gone.
Fury rages through your
restless days
Shades of time that's gone
before
Empty cages where the
prisoner plays
'Til the door swings closed
behind for evermore...
Evermore...
Evermore...
ALL programs will eventually be gamed. Makes no sense to expect otherwise.
If the lenders don't like the offers, they can reject them.
Happens all the time.
F 'em.
The system we have is utterly, hopelessly stupid.
The sooner we collapse it, the sooner we can work on building something that doesn't completely screw all but the fortunate few.
Let's see. ..
No keysafe
Dirty house
Fat slob husband always in underwear farting when he comes to the door
Toilets backed up
Big mean dog
Green pool
Appointment times only 9a-9:30a except weekends when no one can come
It can get pretty easy to drag these things out if you want.
There is a difference between the 'European Union'...
European Union - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
and the 'Eurozone'
Eurozone - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
The Euro currency is only used by 16 countries, and some of the strongest countries in the Union are not part of the Eurozone... when you combine that with the lack of fiscal policy or enforcement power, it's hard to see how this cant end in failure...
robert wrote:
Goldman Sachs faces 'Robin Hood tax' vote-rigging claims - Telegraph
The PBS Newsour program tonight on the
is exquisite, check it out
...it's quite damning
This is NOT an agency problem - it's a fraud ENFORCEMENT problem. The banks are complicit in their own robbery, more laws won't help if we don't enforce existing law.
I can't tell you how many foreclosures I've looked at that had "owner occupied" mortgages, and were clearly investment properties. The banks were complicit in this, and the banks are allowing the scammers to rule the roost again, since NO ONE IN LAW ENFORCEMENT CARES!, and the mortgages are guaranteed by fannie and freddie.
At the beginning of this whole foreclosure mess, I was mad at the borrowers - after watching this stuff unfold, I really can't fault the scammers for getting free ponies - no one has made any effort to stop the looting.
I can't believe we have billions of dollars for "homeland security", but no money to spend 5 minutes reviewing each government insured mortgage for fraud. I'm not specially trained, these are public records available online with just a few clicks, that prove fraud on the part of the buyer, and show a damming case against the banks.
I think I haven't seen such a triple hit of disturbing headlines in such a short time..... Sushi for dinner, while I ponder how these dots connect to my household security.
Hi guys, did I miss any juicy
NY Governor Paterson calls bullshit on New York Post slander. NYT denies any story.
Reid Tosses Bloated Bipartisan Jobs Bill For Something Leaner
The new bill drops disaster assistance and extensions of unemployment insurance and COBRA helath-insurance subsidies, all Democratic priorities which will need to be addressed before they expire within the next few weeks.
But Reid also ditched one of K Street's highest priorities, an extension of soon-to-expire tax breaks that are highly beneficial to major corporations, known as tax extenders, as well as other corporate giveaways that had been designed to win GOP support.
Now,now Liar Loan,you simply underestimate the prevalence of multiple personality disorder.
Hi Liz, my friend that looked at three houses, bid on the last one, but lost the bidding war. 5 days on market, and offers above asking I believe. Damn!
Yes!
I would not be surprised if bank employees are already facilitating these scams....I would not be surprised one bit.
Oh, the banks are totally incompetent.
Believe me, they can't tell when a relative--with a different last
name and good credit--buys an REO with the intent that the old
owner live in it.
Values are still dropping here.
Tell me, tell me.
lawyerliz wrote:
That was just a teaser, so I'm sorry. I just got here a few minutes ago, so it looks like business as usual here:
I did just bust a bank analyst up a few lines, but, you'll have to provide us with something I'm afraid...
lawyerliz wrote:
How would a bank determine who is related and who isn't? I can imagine this isn't on their radar, even if it should be.
Congrats I think.
"Believe me, they can't tell when a relative--with a different last
name and good credit--buys an REO with the intent that the old
owner live in it."
Buying properties for relatives was surprisingly common in FL during the bubble, too.
Then when the loan went bad, we would call the borrower, and they would ADMIT they bought it for their Mom/Sister/etc, but they couldn't pay the loan anymore and the Mom/Sister/etc didn't live there anymore anyway.
Mind boggling.
Lenders cannot negotiate themselves out of a paper bag.
The fraud would squeeze out someplace else.
Where are you? I thought it had stopped.
The sooner we collapse it, the sooner we can work on building something that doesn't completely screw all but the fortunate few.
I am sympathetic to the frustration behind this impulse, but we don't need to collapse it to fix it. Besides, if we did collapse it, how long do you think it would take to fix it? My guess is that whatever we got after collapsing it would be even less likely to be an equitable system. The system we have now has been years in the making. No need to throw the baby out with the bathwater.
The New York Post is a scumrag. Rupert Murdoch is a slime.
Common yes, surprisingly common no.
I'm not surprised. Cubans think of this as helping their
relatives out, and it is until it isn't. Lenders certainly didn't educate
them by not requiring even 1% down.
tg wrote:
Rogue software engineer?
barfly wrote:
The system we have now has been years in the making. No need to throw the baby out with the bathwater.
The system itself has never been more useful, tested, or efficient. It's the institutions that govern and operate it which have become hopelessly corrupt. With the present infrastructure I am sure we could just as well have a very prosperous world and the capital owners could still live in luxury relative to the population, just by a few less zeros in the orders of magnitude of their net worths relative to the population of the world at large
REBear wrote:
proprietary voting
thanks.
business has become more stable, and the daily rowing in the grind feals like easy long strokes, but a guy like me has to always put his legs and back into it.
thats how I row, I row the boat while everyone else in the boat sits back and enjoys the ride.
Yep, I'm bitter. The public deserves better, and the Board of Realtors is in a position to clean it up, but does nothing.
P.S. This lady represents Indymac REO listings too.
Jim the Realtor wrote:
I'm ready for JiMLS.
NPR reported that Lennar (!) had bought a lot of FDIC mtges.
To discount them for borrowers like that other corp?
Are they that smart? Where did they get the money?
ResistanceIsFeudal wrote:
I think it is more than that. The levels of debt are not sustainable and cannot be paid in full.
Hmmmmm
Senate sets sights on limited jobs measure | freep.com | Detroit Free Press
" Allow issuers of bonds for certain school and energy projects to continue providing bond holders a federal tax credit in lieu of an interest payment or convert them to a direct payment available under the Build America Bond program."
Goldman is a top underwriter of municipal bonds and the No. 1 underwriter of Build America Bonds. "These are a new type of municipal bond, part of the Obama administration's $787 billion stimulus plan. Cities, states, universities and government entities use BABs, as they're known, to finance infrastructure projects. This is a potential $50 billion annual market, Whitney says, and Goldman currently holds a 25 percent share," reports a Fortune article.
Hmmmm......... time for this really sucks icon! Furthermore, after Treasury pulls the plug on <BS manipulation and the trillion tossed at Wall street, the next joke is to use shit like this to suggest that we have a recovery....
I better do some work ... this makes me sick!
Hi, Jim, I am in Florida and I like your stuff.
Assuming you are the real Jim the Realtor, and not
a phony. What's the password.
barfly wrote:
I'm not so sure. Existing structures have powerful constituencies that resist any and all change, and yet those structures must change in order for a true fix to happen.
Shout out to Jim. Thanks for the great videos.
lawyerliz wrote:
It's him alright. He's as unique and genuine as you are, liz.
RiF, I certainly agree there's lots of room for improvement. And robert is right; no matter what we do, someone will try to game the system. It's going to require ever diligent vigilance.
Mr Slippery wrote:
I think it is more than that. The levels of debt are not sustainable and cannot be paid in full.
LOL, agreed. So, basically, the technical infrastructure of the financial system is peerless and extremely useful, but the amount of debt it's being asked to support is unsustainable and the institutions that operate and govern it are wholly corrupt. Other than those minor aberrances, however, it's perfectly fine.
In other words: more
OT: Gold and Investment Strategies.
For those who are less engaged with those they see in the mirror than Eric and Rob Dawg, here's a lesson taken from an article in zero hedge. This poster is talking imo the truth. When it came to the low range, last week and early this, in gold, it was time to get in, and I posted such. It's still time to get in, now upping the ante to 60% of one's desired core position. Trading positions are not sure winners, but the weak hands are gone and the shorts are trapped.
" Oscar Wilde said he could resist anything but temptation. But doing something you know you shouldn't is easier if you can convince yourself that this will be the last time you indulge, that you won't do it again. So we convince ourselves that since we'll be strong in the future, we can still indulge today. Whether it?s smoking, eating too much or going to the pub instead of the gym, we delude ourselves into thinking that we will take the more difficult path next time.
A few years ago, two economists actually looked at the issue using gym membership data. They found that in a club in which non-members could pay a no-strings fee of $10 per visit, people preferred to pay the $70 per month for unlimited access. And since members only attended 4.3 times a month on average, they ended up paying an average $17 per visit. The authors concluded this to be clear evidence of "overconfidence about future self control."
Investors understand the affliction all too well: a stock trades at £10 and we tell ourselves that we?re buyers at £8. But how many of us buy when it gets to £8? Some of us do, but most of us don't. Most of us (I can?t be the only one!) convince ourselves that it's going lower still: “I’ll buy at £7” becomes “I’ll buy at £6” and by the time it's back at £8 we're “waiting for a pullback” Each investor has their own way of circumventing this problem. But at root, such poor decision-making is a consequence of our fundamental underestimation today of the discipline and even courage we will require in the future."
Just How Ugly Is The Sovereign Default Truth? How Self Delusions Prevent Recognition Of Reality
Tyler Durden's picture
Submitted by Tyler Durden on 02/11/2010 13:55 -0500
Just How Ugly Is The Sovereign Default Truth? How Self Delusions Prevent Recognition Of Reality | zero hedge
Fed in Talks With Money Market Funds to Help Drain $1 Trillion
Jim the Realtor wrote:
The surge in home sales was driven by buyers responding strongly to the tax credit combined with record-low mortgage interest rates," said Lawrence Yun
Gaming has been going on forever. The level of debt is
unprecedented.
In the late 70s, my secy bought a house for 50k. (She sold it for 50k too,
but that's another story.)
The employment verification came in to our mutual boss and he
asked her, what do you want me to say you make? That was before
the days of providing paystubs etc.
Apparently BofA can manage to foreclose on homes they don't actually hold mortgages on. You really can't make this stuff up...
Bank of America forecloses on house that couple had paid cash for - St. Petersburg Times
Lennar scoops up distressed loans from FDIC - MarketWatch
Where did they get the money? from us
Lennar purchased a 40% interest in the loan portfolios, while the FDIC is keeping the remaining 60% equity interest. The FDIC provided $627 million of financing at no interest for seven years
makes you wonder why the fdic didn't just reduce the principle on the loans if borrower was in the house....
greed is out of control...
the same thieves that made money up are now looting us on way down...remember they just rec'd a tax break on losses....
Slumdog wrote:
Physician heal thyself.
When will we (if ever?) come to grips with the fact that home prices (not rents) are way off base and just accept that rather than try all these stupid games? Makes you wonder does it not?
Any insightful long term ideas welcome, short term fixes not so much.
Why don't they lend me a mere million, no interest, I will
discount the hell out of them!!
Mish's Global Economic Trend Analysis: Governor Christie Declares "New Jersey on Edge of Bankruptcy"
Will New Jersey be the first state to default on teacher pensions? Could be.
EconomicDisconnect wrote:
Too many people don't consider "letting the chips fall where they may" to be a valid long-term idea. Certainly the politicians don't.
creditcriminalslovetarp wrote:
the same thieves that made money up are now looting us on way down...
I'd expect nothing less, actually. All that's missing are tax-dollar backed incentives encouraging the public to buy at the top, so the banks can later pick up the distressed properties for pennies on the dollar - oh, never mind...
Goldman Sachs faces 'Robin Hood tax' vote-rigging claims - Telegraph
I heard about this today, which fits in as well:
MADISON BUS DRIVER HIGHEST PAID CITY EMPLOYEE
The highest paid city government employee of Madison, Wisconsin, last year wasn't the mayor. It wasn't the police chief. It wasn't even the head of Metro Transit. It was bus driver John E. Nelson, says the Wisconsin State Journal.
Nelson earned $159,258 in 2009, including $109,892 in overtime and other pay.
He and his colleague, driver Greg Tatman, who earned $125,598, were among the city's top 20 earners for 2009, city records show.
They're among the seven bus drivers who made more than $100,000 last year thanks to a union contract that lets the most senior drivers who have the highest base salaries get first crack at overtime, says the Journal.
And there was a lot of overtime -- $1.94 million last year, $467,200 more than the bus system budgeted for and the most ever for the system -- as employees exhausted sick leave and took advantage of unpaid leave through the federal Family Medical Leave Act, officials say:
shill wrote:
YouTube - Sex Pistols - Friggin in the Riggin
Jim the Realtor wrote:
Don't you mean to say that she "represents FDIC REO listings too."?
The NPR folks also interviewed a couple of lawyers and
such about the dysfunctional congress.
One wanted a constitutional convention. (And that wouldn't
be bought too?)
Another had a good idea. If you are willing to accept contributions of
only 100 bucks or less, your donations are quadupled. Sad to think
of taxpayer funding, but it might eliminate the contribution/bribery thing.
There prolly is a way of gaming this but at the moment, I am too tired
to think of how.
Any lawyer would love that BAC case.
EconomicDisconnect wrote:
The government has massively intervened in the housing market since the Great Depression. Why would they stop now?
"letting the chips fall where they may" has a certain Darwinian ring to it, no? Not really feasable where whole societies are involved.
comment in the marketwatch article on Lennar buying bad mortgages...
I'm getting a sweet deal from JP Morgan Chase. I havent paid them a nickel on my mortgage in 2yrs and they've agreed to reinstate my mortgage at a reduced payment with extended term from $2000 to $1500, so I'll make a few payments to make sure the modification sticks, then default again for another 2yrs of rent free living
Up yers banksters.
here's a anchor steam lager to you sir....
Yep.
In days of yore, I had to tell a bank that it had to release the
seller's property at no payment. The property had been sold
and when the owner re-fied they used the old legal description
which included the Sellers property next door.
In those days 20 years ago it was still possible to find a banker
with 2 or 3 brain cells to rub together.
barfly wrote:
Why?
What could they do which would influence you to pay.
OT: Some might find this interesting, maybe not, but I thought I'd post my experience with HARP (Home Affordable Refinance Program). I'm one of those people with an ARM that floats on June 1st, 2011. My wife and I late last year started getting nervous about interest rates going back up, and the fact that the housing prices, although they had slowed their decline substantially, were still trending downward. Chase services our mortgage so we went into a Chase branch to discuss our refinance options. We were told that our loan was "owned" by Fannie Mae, which was a bit of a shock as I had no idea and had assumed naively that Chase was holding the mortgage. We had put 20% down when we bought the house. If memory serves, I think the mortgage was originated at WAMU. Anyway, our home was now appraising a few thousand above the amount owed on the loan. To make a long story short, HARP was our only choice. We were able to refi our loan to a 30yr fixed @ 5.375%, the same rate we were paying on the ARM. Fees were minimal. They did not require a full appraisal (it was some sort of computer based appraisal), and in total we filled out 4 documents via email. Talking to our refi representative, he seemed very busy, so I think they are doing quite a bit of HARP business. The worst part of this whole business, besides evaporating equity, is knowing your loan is backstopped by the Government and you can't do anything about it. Well, except for selling the house and we have no plans to do that.
Doc Holiday wrote:
Do the math on that overtime. Nobody is minding the store.
barfly wrote:
You prefer the current approach wherein the only chips falling are on those without connections?
lawyerliz wrote:
Become honest and fair?
Democracy is highly overrated.
Too many good comments to reply to...
I guess I am just a simpleton and figure the best way forward is to "let the chips fall where they may".
I think we can get over this, not without pain, but I believe we can. Why not try it instead of all this crap which just makes people want to riot like in Greece?
EconomicDisconnect wrote:
Just remember...
when you take the "I" out of "riot", you rot.
Another report from Crush Your Creditors(tm)
Talked with somebody with a brain from SLS tonight. They got my offer, and they wanted a little more paperwork. They seemed hot to trot with the paperwork. Accused me of being a lawyer- nope married to one, consulted with one on how do the negotiations, but not a lawyer. Told him upfront that anything produce will be run by my attorney. Faxed them the latest from the first, and will call back on Monday, after I do my ski trip tomorrow.
Offer is for 17 cents on the dollar. He went off script after I called bushwa on the "We will pursue you for collections should you default." I said, "Did you get my offer letter?"- "Yes," he replied. "Well, then, you have the full offer, cash or deed in lieu- if they won't deal, I am willing to default on the first and leave them with nothing." Wanted the full tax returns. Told him pound sand, I have a prenup, and the wife refuses to divulge. Gave him the option of the last two years of Schedule E with redactions.
Wanted the final paperwork so he could run it past management for approval on Monday- in other words, they want the cash, and they understand I am serious. Looks like a deal is coming.
I will believe it when they FedEx me the docs.
Had lunch with an old friend who the recession has smacked down hard. She barely made 20k last year, and tried to carry 60k in credit card insanity from when she made much more. Asked her if she had filed yet for BK- she wanted to wait until she got a better job!! I said- NO way- file NOW!! Wipe the slate clean, and in a few years you can buy a house!
Someday this war's gonna end...
TJ, I prefer fixing the recognizable problems through effective regulation with as little collateral damage as possible.
It's in Florida, liz should give them a call!
Doc Holiday wrote:
Just fucking disgusting! (pardon my French)
Public unions are, again, an affront against all sense, reason and logic. Mish isn't wrong about this. They are a confiscatory mechanism that results in artificially-high wages and have no justification for existence except seizing political power. They are purely a positive-feedback loop system with no corrective mechanism and no incentive to control costs or accountability.
EconomicDisconnect wrote:
Either way we may still have Greece-like fires. J6P has been sold on "bread and circuses" and will NOT like facing reality.
huh? That wasn't me, I just lifted the comment....lots of good ones in the article...
the sheeple are waking up...finally...
I pay and can't figure out why right now....
I am going to leave the whole society re chips fall comment alone. Anyone with an ounce of science background knows that the more you reward oor behavior you get more of it.
I'm trying to figure out what would motivate someone to do a short sale in the first place. Does it lessen the credit ding? I don't think so. Does it end up helping the owner financially? I don't think so. Does it mean extra time in the house? Maybe. Are they less recourse than foreclosures? I would doubt it.
So what is the driving force behind short sales?
Are they just fraud fertilizer?
A committee on real estate ethics... meh.
Rick: How can you close me up? On what grounds?
Captain Renault: I'm shocked, shocked to find that gambling is going on in here!
[a croupier hands Renault a pile of money]
Croupier: Your winnings, sir.
Captain Renault: [sotto voce] Oh, thank you very much.
Warning Russian Propaganda
YouTube -
rehash of goldman greek thingy
I dont agree, if the ones that got us into this mess were given their just reward and the rest of the country had to suffer and go on I think we would; pretending otherwise is an insult and shows a lack of faith.
Thanks but they have an atty already--and it's considered
ambulance chasing, or the real estate/litigation equivalent thereof.
barfly wrote:
I'd agree, except we're well past that point. As others have pointed out repeatedly, Wile E's already run off the cliff.
Oh, it didn't sound like you. I was startled.
I just noticed at the end of the article it mentions that this is becoming common in Florida. And people wonder why the process can't be sped up...pffft. They can't accommodate the current foreclosures without screwing it up.
How does a buyer initiate a short sale on listed property? Just offer a low ball cash deal? If so, what are we talking about 50% of list or less ?
What is generally reasonable?
Jim the Realtor wrote:
I think what surprises me the most about that statement, as well as the statement in the video, is that you, Jim, expect that the Board of Realtors will actually do anything at all.
So far a I can tell from the outside looking in, they are no better than DRE when it comes to disciplining members.
Doc Holiday wrote:
Unions serve no purpose in this society. They were less of a bother when we had more apparent properity. Some extra skimming was acceptable. But not any longer. They are nothing but a legal racketeering operation.
No, it's unusual. What is really unusual is they couldn't be
convinced of their mistake!
Comrade Kristina wrote:
People where you work start drinking before noon ? Must be a productive crowd.
I repeat, that now, moral hazard or no, the only thing that will
work is big cram downs.
I have never figured out why borrowers like short sales, but so
they do.
And yeah, given the right situation, you can get 50% off or even
more.
Interesting Times, I had mentioned that we made a reasonable offer on a short sale in 2007, and the lender countered with a price higher than list. The whole deal was like that, they couldn't have been more obstructionist, and we ended up walking away.
But now that I think of it, strangely, that house went off the market, no sale documented anywhere, and has not been for sale since. I'll have to drive by and see if anyone is living in it. Maybe they rented it out, but they couldn't have rented it for what they owed on it, so, weird.
Mind you, that was 3 yrs. ago now. As CR had mentioned, lenders have probably gotten their acts together since then.
lawyerliz wrote:
I beg to differ.
WAMU did similar on loans they had sold, and could not be convinced otherwise and took people to court when they clearly had documentation of payments to the new loan holder.
This was well before the housing peak.
If you're still reading Jim-
Thanks for this (and previous) rants. I hope you succeed wildly in your campaign to straighten out some of the crap that is occurring.
JP
bearly wrote:
bearly bitching about productivity again.
still can't figure it out.
Oh, yes. Well, not gotten their acts together, but
much more cooperative.
Why don't you check the tax records and see who owns
it. Maybe the house is languishing in foreclosure oblivion?
Where is Nova?
cclt
heres some more about lennar
New homebuilder comes to Atlanta | ajc.com
Ok, I stand corrected Where?
Case-Shiller strongly implies that it's going to vary locally. 50% off in AZ might be a high bid, but 50% off in Chicago or Dallas might just be too low.
If you're in a position to try, you could do something like offer Case-Schiller minus an additional 20% off or so to give yourself some margin.
I haven't been to a sheriff's auction in at least two years. I should start going again. Cheaper than a movie.
Outsider wrote:
Thanks! I ask because I am still renting, and the owner is trying to sell this place at the same time.
It has probably been listed for about a year now... He dropped the price by about 10k every 2 months (roughly). He's now a bit below what he bought it for (470ish)... just wonder if it would be insulting to offer something like 350 cash ?
broward wrote:
LOL!
sportsfan wrote:
I know what Jim needs, and he already has it. He needs a camera and an audience. Then, he needs to go find realtors doing dishonest things and ask them to explain themselves on camera. Then, he could go to the Board of Realtors for an explanation of why this isn't resulting in discipline. The local news crews would be all over him for exclusives.
Go ahead and insult him. What can you lose? What is the
mtg balance?
lawyerliz wrote:
I am perfectly willing to insult real estate agents, banks, and owners. I've been doing it since 2005. Why stop now?
DFW area, there were articles in the Dallas Morning News and other Texas papers, but I can't find anything at the moment. You can imagine WAMU and foreclosure has a lot of hits, and I can't quite fine tune the search to find it.
Good question. No idea. He's probably getting underwater right about ..... now....
I just checked the property tax records online, and the owner still owns the house.
I'm driving by tomorrow, because I know the owner had moved to NC when we put our offer in.
If he is a nice guy, you might act apologetic first.
And if you want to pay 350, offer 330 first.
I add the yapstone because otherwise it will feel neglected.
Assuming you are the real Jim the Realtor, and not a phony. What's the password.
Password?
I remember about a year ago when you asked here if I ever sell anything.
Interesting Times wrote:
During the tech wreck, I saw that the art of getting somebody to a post-crash fair value was a combination of how the offer was presented, as well as how quick of a learner the seller was.
It is not easy to close such deals, and I would normally recommend having a bunch of irons in the fire in order to increase the probability that one of them will work out.
broward wrote:
I admit. I need a primer on the benefits of being progressively less productive and maybe some case studies on how being less productive leads to success.
some investor guy wrote:
I am curious who employs people like this. Actually, it is beyond curiosity. I won't reward any company that does.
This would be a good for a show like 20/20 to cover.
Outsider wrote:
I don't think that many lenders have gotten their acts together, but they have finally dispensed with the notion that "your offer is laughable; I'll hold it for another year until the market comes back."
A year later, when contacted about that offer, they learned that it was no longer operative.
After another year, they were willing to consider other numbers, but by then the unpaid taxes (based on the fantasy valuation of times gone by) had to be deducted and, well, that doesn't leave much.
So in the third year, have they learned anything other than what fools they've been all along?
lawyerliz wrote:
Thanks! I might just do that... what can I lose right ??
Of all the JTR videos (I am a subscriber on YouTube) the one I like best is where Jim has loaded his old 70's pickup full of loot from an abandoned house and is driving away with bicycles piled on top... Do you still have that old pickup Jim? I see you are driving the Benz in the rant video...
Interesting Times - Mortgage docs are not recorded online where you are?
I know here, in podunk NH, I was able to check the recorded mortgages online, thru the county office, to determine how much sellers owed on their homes before I thought about offers. It does help to know that information. Although I did always feel like a big snoop. But then, anyone can snoop out my mortgage docs online too - it's all there for the world to see.
Obviously you do!!
One of the clerks at the tax assessors office in Miami
said that he has investors coming in to ask him about properties.
He says a bunch of them are waiting on the sidelines.
Also I had a client come in that just happens to work for the Trump
towers. Said a lot of them are owned by Russians or South'Americans
who never seem to show up. In 2 of the towers. He is not in a position to
really know about the finances of the towers, I don't think.
JP wrote:
I have been so jaded by the ridiculous prices in Canada, that I don't have anything else on the radar... but I know the time is coming soon....
bearly wrote:
Ask and ye shall receive.
HA! That is the most myopic analysys I have ever seen. Where does the case when a new need or product appears ? This imaginary universe assumes a lot of permanently stationary objects.
Accompanied by a petty rainbow.
http://realmeme.com/roller/page/realmeme?entry=rainbow
Interesting Times wrote:
It could be an insult if you do it in writing. Meet with him and explain your reasoning and evaluation. Talk a while about all the problems before you come up with a number and have some solid comps or other evidence to support it.
RIF you should be ashamed. Bearly, I would expect that nonsense from.
You union bashers should work for the fucking government for a while before you spout off. But I support your right to free speech, the same right which allows me to bargain collectively. Fascists and Communists hate unions.
ShadowInventory wrote:
He does! You ought to see the video of him cruising downtown RSF in it. LMAO!!!
Canada has some pretty heavy privacy laws.... I don't think we have those online.
There might be other avenues to get that info. Personally, I think the poker game is much harder in Canada... They have a lot more to lose since banks rarely give in. And I know a senior banker who tells me this all the time....
So in the third year, have they learned anything other than what fools they've been all along?
Actually sportsfan, have you seen that video sprinkled on this blog the past day or 2, about how the big banks are actually making a lot of $$ off short sales? It's a blood pressure pumper.
“We are firing fewer and fewer people faster and faster,” Colbert said. But, he warned, if there’s not positive employment growth this month or next, the chances of a double-dip recession grow.
When things start to sound this stupid, go short.
I believe in these parts mortgages are considered public record.
Personally, I find that an invasion of privacy. But public records must be accessible to all who ask.
Outsider wrote:
No, I missed it. I can't be here as often as I would like, but when I am, it beats the heck out of TV.
1 currency now -yogi wrote:
Remind me... what amendment to the Constitution was that one?
Not arguing the legal right per se, just pointing out that it's far from the same.
YOU EITHER BELIEVE IN THE FIRST AMENDMENT OR YOU DON'T SUPPORT THE CONSTITUTION.
ShadowInventory wrote:
Ask him about the 'Vette motor.
yogi, you're shouting.
Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof; or abridging the freedom of speech, or of the press; or the right of the people peaceably to assemble, and to petition the Government for a redress of grievances.
Thanks again. I'll let the forum know if I pull the trigger and give him a low ball offer and how it progresses. I still feel that even at 330k it's
Citizen AllenM wrote:
She wants to wait long enough so the $20K is the income they use going into BK for means testing - not something prior to that. Not sure what the period is but she needs to make sure is clear of it for sure.
Freedom of speech and of assembly. Number fucking one.
Here, sportsfan, this is for you, because I don't think any true CR devotee would want to miss this:
Video Marketing and Mortgage News Designed for Mortgage and Real Estate Sales
1 currency now -yogi wrote:
Oh, I thought we were talking about collective bargaining, which is something else entirely. Sorry.
bearly
your comment that "unions serve no purpose in this society...and are nothing but a legal racketeering operation" is un informed and reveal a level of anger that maybe you might help me understand with what ever your personal experience was ..
there are good unions and their are bad unions
and their are good unions and good management teams that enter into defective labor management agreements
the examples like the over-paid bus drivers dont prove anything other than that particular union pushed for the moon and management rolled over
before there were unions workers were often treated worse than stray dogs
before there were unions there was no sick leave, vacation leave, benefits and people were routinely worked to death
it was not uncommon before unions for owners of factories, mines and agri businesses to force workers to take huge risks with their health and lives in order to squeeze out extra profits...and then discard people like so much refuse when the owners thought it expedient
i would not want to live in a world which hand no employee representation with management and where employees could not enter into contracts for employment with management
their is a proper balance between union power and the power of the owners, or management
when unions are bad, corrupt, over reach or are destructive to the reasonable and rightful authority that should remain managements prerogative , under these circumstances you and i could agree that union is no good and should be opposed
but if you are a fair and just person and have knowledge of the history of mines andd factories in our country then you must be able to see that, like my family personally experienced two generations ago, as coal miners...there is such a thing as worker abuse, and there is a proper place for good unions, appropriately regulated, to represent workers interests
For some reason Jim the Realtor sounds like what I imagine Frank Bascombe would sound like. And if I were to meet them, I feel like I'd like them both.
yogi, actually it was the third one proposed:
First Twelve Articles of Amendment - The U.S. Constitution Online - USConstitution.net
The first two just weren't adopted back in the 18th century, though the second one made it eventually.
Thanks, Outsider, I'll watch it now.
1 currency now -yogi wrote:
You're still here?
It's over.
Go home.
Go
Perhaps I'm not making myself clear. It's not about rewarding "poor behavior". It's about supporting the less fortunate and weaker members of society who have fallen on hard times for whatever reason, most often through no fault of their own. It's a poor society that neglects that duty.
1 currency now -yogi wrote:
But I support your right to free speech, the same right which allows me to bargain collectively.
See, that's the thing. In almost every case I don't see any bargaining, just collusion between two parties, neither of which has any liability or accountability for the money to be spent, and the taxpayer from whom the money actually is extracted is given no input into how his money is dispensed. The council pays off the union, the union pays off the council. Go along to get along. Repeat until you've bankrupted the citizens you supposedly serve. That's what public unions permit. I support private unions, but not those where the union is managed by a third party with no stake in either the well-being of the workers or the health of the company itself.
mock turtle wrote:
Yep, just like there are good corps and bad corps, good people and bad people, etc.
The '66 Chevy feature starts at 2:55:
YouTube - Vista, CA bank-owned house
That's right, I lose it when I hear such crap on an intelligent forum like this.
Sportsfan, you said you would die for the First Amendment. It makes the US a better place to live than China will ever be. A union is an assembly of humans. It's easy to believe in free speech when everyone says what you want to hear. You don't need a Constitution for that.
Maybe so. But they're also doing this to prevent the drain out of money market mutual funds, because investors are worried about more breaking the buck.
Total U.S. money market mutual fund assets peaked exactly a year ago at $3.9 trillion.
Dropping like a stone, to $3.2 trillion now.
Pretty stunning drop, and unprecedented since money market mutual funds were invented in 1970.
I hope this is wrong, because if it is correct, free speech and Short Sales will not be an issue:
http://i129.photobucket.com/albums/p237/1ace11/WorldCC200704.jpg
Jim the Realtor wrote:
LMAO: Chick magnet.
My 1952 pickup has a nice motor- it is a 1979 350 from a trans am, had less than 60k when the mains were spun by a buddy of mine. Paid him $60 for the short block.
Line hone, nice forged crank, Crane 262 cam, Edelbrock 600, ramshead exhausts, slightly ported- dual turbo exhausts- no crosspipe. Power flows through a four speed late 60's chevy truck transmission, with a Hurst Shifter- combined with a 4.11 rear end, turning the original 16-650 duallies.
Zero to sixty with one shift.
12 mpg on a good day- wife complains I still have not installed the seatbelts as promised.
No power steering.
Vacuum assisted braking.
Someday this war's gonna end...
mock turtle wrote:
Look, I was in a union for a couple of tears and spent 10 years trying to figure out how to work within union constraints.
I have sick leave, vacation, benefits... and I am not in a union. The USG has effectively rendered union negotiated working conditions meaningless.Now they invent ways to become an obstruction They are now nothing but legalized mobs.
buy a url that has a porn like name and just throw in a bunch of corresponding links....wala....success.....
just dont tell the neighbor...
Oh yeah - always love the ice cream trucks too - REO's and ice cream trucks just seem to go together...
That foreclosure is on Rhea St. - (as in diarrhea)....
Oh she is clear of it, I have done her taxes for years. She just needed to stop pissing the last of her savings down a rathole. Like her last 2k.
Makes me angry.
Someday this war's gonna end...
1 currency now -yogi wrote:
On the contrary, I need an extremely strong constitution to listen to Sportslan.
...when the mains were spun
gee, I love that kinda talk
RIF, have you worked for the government? I had a long, nasty debate with Byzantine ruins on this subject, and don't feel like rehashing it. It's on haloscan. I gave a long detailed history of the public union I was in and the reason other structures for getting the work done had failed.
I suppose the Greek teachers and doctors should just shut the fuck up and let Jamie Dimon enjoy his hard-earned bonus.
bearly wrote:
You forgot the weekend -- no weekend off until union pressure, That was what Hay Market was all about.
If unions were banned, you wouldn't.
1 currency now -yogi wrote:
Yes, yogi, I have said that and I will say it again. The First Amendment to the U.S. Constitution is something worth giving my life to preserve.
I have nothing against unions. They actually do result, at least initially, from a free assembly of persons. Corporations, on the other hand, do not. Why the Supreme Court felt it necessary to say "oh, and unions, too" when granting corporations the right to spend shareholder money to influence elections is beyond me.
But then I haven't had an easy time understanding what motivates the honorable justices for a long time.
1 currency now -yogi wrote:
That is a conservative wet dream-go back to the days of the Robber Barons of the late 1900s.
No rules, exploitation, 15 hour days, child labor, poisoned food--
It was paradise!
Okay, on the Indymac/FDIC/One West Bank video, I would hope someone in Congress decides to hold a hearing or two.
But the bottom line, so far at least, is that the FDIC is funded by the banks. While the video and harsh reality suggest that the FDIC may soon be borrowing from the Treasury, unless Treasury forgives that loan, the taxpayers aren't directly being affected. The people who should be screaming the loudest are small town community bankers.
Will anyone listen if they do? Does anyone listen to all the rants here?
Oh, I think you know why they threw unions in the ruling.
Okay, on the Indymac/FDIC/One West Bank video, I would hope someone in Congress decides to hold a hearing or two.
I'd rather be spared another hearing of Congress humbly pitching softballs to their masters
If that is so, they would probably do a much better job of negotiating "assistance/bailout" terms with the banksters on behalf of the public than the members of either the Bush or Obama administration. Or members of the Congress during the Bush admin & Obama admin.
1 currency now -yogi wrote:
It would just be a SWAG.
adornosghost wrote:
3 out of 5 ain't bad
bearly wrote:
I have sick leave, vacation, benefits... and I am not in a union.
those benefits came into existence for common workers because of unions... and did not exist for common workers before unions
your personal experience with a bad union, or mine, does not constitute a reasonable analysis of the sum total of what good or what harm unions do
the bottom line is this....just as individuals have a right to collect in a group, invest and form a company,....
so do workers, or anybody else have the right to associate and work towards a common goal
whether that goal be about work, philanthropy, politics, recreation, hunting or conservation
we have freedom of association in the USA
as for you comment about how you couldnt figure out how to work within your union contract after 10 years emploment ,i dont you what you mean...please give an example
Obama-Dalai Lama Meeting Set; China Urges U.S. Cancel (Update1) - Bloomberg.com
“This will certainly contribute to the downward spiral of two-way relations,” said Willy Lam Wo-Lap, adjunct professor of history at the Chinese University in Hong Kong. “Beijing’s reaction will be ferocious.”
how to piss off your biggest creditor in 30 days....starring....the wonderkid....
sportsfan wrote:
I read them occasionally.
But not listen.
The heavy accents throw off Google Voice and all I get is gibberish.
non-union folks "only" work eight hours a day, five days a week (if you're lucky) because of unions. The standard before unions used to be twelve hours a day, six days a week. Also, any overtime pay you are entitled to is a union gain. Private, non-union company employees benefit from hard won union wage and benefit gains, not the other way around.
Reason #20,938,475,982 why I am glad I am not president.
barfly wrote:
Yes, but when people ask "What have you done for me lately?" it's hard to come up with an answer.
Most Americans are as oblivious of labor history in this country as they are of every other form of history in this country, except perhaps what is required to be taught in K-12 (and they probably forgot most of that).
When I hear Jim's stories, I think about a recent experience of ours. We put an offer on a short sale that was on the market in Palos Verdes going on two years, the bank rejected ours along with a two+ other offers, so all offers were rejected. They allowed counters and we countered at 1.4 (900 down), but was outbid. The whole process took months. Months later the listing reappears on the MRLS very late Wed night as active. We submit an offer Friday morning, but it was too late; the house was sold. Final sales price 1.3. May not be an inside deal, but we wonder...
bearly wrote:
I call Bull. I live in a "right-to-work" state. Was talking to a classmate today - her husband, who had 20yrs with the same hospital as a NON-UNION nurse got canned, along with several other high-seniority workers just last week. Fired, and replaced with younger, cheaper workers, who hadn't amassed the right to vacation time and benefits. The government does not enforce existing labor laws, that is left to private attorneys. Most just take their lumps, and another lower-paying job. Two weeks ago, He prolly thought unions were worthless too.. now, I suspect he'd have a different opinion.
The union is a waste until you need it. Feel free to do your own version of "Joe the plumber" garbage, but don't ask intelligent people to buy it.
creditcriminalslovetarp wrote:
Would you prefer it if he took his marching orders directly from Bejing?
Citizen AllenM wrote:
What don't you have life insurance?
no... I would prefer for the goofball to figure out how to create jobs, raise taxes on the uber rich and feed homeless old ladies and children....
we have issues here....
creditcriminalslovetarp wrote:
I would prefer that also. Let's see if he is able to do more than he has done so far.
While we're waiting, we might also take a look at who is trying to stop him from doing anything.
I am getting a frightening ad from BofA:
"Nothing stimulates the economy like credit. We are proud to have extended the most"
Obama better grow a pair that clank and get on the stick if he hopes to keep his family in the White House for a second term. Time's a-wastin'.
I'm still trying to figure out how broward gets Google Voice to do accents.
barfly wrote:
He doesn't need to grow a pair. That clanking noise could be handcuffs. When combined with a good indictment and lots of cameras, it can really change how people behave. Somewhere out there are lots of people who clearly and provably committed federal offenses related to the bubble or bailout.
"The Animal Farm" should be required reading for all those elected to public office...
creditcriminalslovetarp wrote:
no... I would prefer for the goofball to figure out how to create jobs, raise taxes on the uber rich and feed homeless old ladies and children....
Rest assured the uber-rich will be granted loopholes or make them. They paid good money for this administration. Only the working rich and top end of the upper-middle class will pay. Of course, as the Bush tax cuts expire we all get to pay more as tax rates revert across the spectrum.
"While we're waiting, we might also take a look at who is trying to stop him from doing anything."
why not hire blackwater to take care of that issue....they need the work I here...and should be able to find them in dc or new york pretty easily, last I heard IED's were very rare around those parts...
"her husband, who had 20yrs with the same hospital as a NON-UNION nurse got canned, along with several other high-seniority workers just last week. Fired, and replaced with younger, cheaper workers, who hadn't amassed the right to vacation time and benefits."
Cry me a river, so the hospital wasn't supposed to replace someone who is replaceable at a lower cost?
some investor guy wrote:
I think one mistake he made was the "we're looking forward, not backward" remark early in office. He may like to style himself as post-partisan, post-racial and post-retributive, but the people want blood. On that I agree.
sportsfan wrote:
I purposely leave Kurt Lochner's last batch of slander up.
It helps enormously in filtering out The Paranoid during the job search.
The dismaying news is that... well, something like 50% of the IT industry is paranoid and easily manipulated.
Shadow, where the
have you been? Coma?
ResistanceIsFeudal wrote:
Ah, but some on this board will get to pay a whole lot more than others on this board.
Current income tax rates are an insult to anyone who can do math. I would actually seriously consider a flattened set of rates or the addition of a VAT, two concepts that weren't needed back when rates made more sense.
RIF wrote
"Of course, as the Bush tax cuts expire we all get to pay more as tax rates revert across the spectrum."
is that right...the expiration of the bush tax cut will raise taxes on everyone?
Ah Yogi - I been lurking.... Also been traveling around... Right now I am in the Phoenix area - sort of the west coast version of Florida...
After watching that video of how the banks are cleaning up on the short sales, now I understand why a whole lot of houses that did show NOD or foreclosure are now listed for sale as a short sale...
Olympic Village: Athletes Impressed, Taxpayers Angry - TIME
I'm really glad Chicago didn't get the Olympics. I can't imagine what taxpayers would have ended up paying for if they had won.
Just think, if they keep kicking the can, we might not get a system crash until 2012. Won't the London Olympics be fun that year?
"her husband, who had 20yrs with the same hospital as a NON-UNION nurse got canned, along with several other high-seniority workers just last week. Fired, and replaced with younger, cheaper workers, who hadn't amassed the right to vacation time and benefits."
Cry me a river, so the hospital wasn't supposed to replace someone who is replaceable at a lower cost?
That's a great attitude if you don't ever plan on getting old.
ShadowInventory wrote:
......except without the girls, beaches, and warm waves lapping up against my cool margarita on the chaise lounge.....
broward wrote:
I don't know Kurt Lochner, but if the filter works, use it.
Whether IT folks are more paranoid than others, I can't say, but then they are more familiar with the numerous ways people can invade the privacy of others, while those of us among the uninitiated just sit here and say "What, me worry?"
The statutes of limitations are running. Holder and Barofsky appear very weak right now. Schapiro seems to be making an effort. The Fed is theoretically a regulator. (Say no more).
ghostfaceinvestah wrote
"Cry me a river, so the hospital wasn't supposed to replace someone who is replaceable at a lower cost?
depends on whether or not the employees have a contract that stipulates termination for lack of performance
or
part of a reduction in force due to cost constraints etc
or
other non discriminatory reasons
if they have no contract and no fed laws were broken firing people because of race or religion for example
then yes the owners of the hospital or factory or what ever can fire people for just about any reason
as for the cry you a river part you asked for
well
we would only need to do that if you were so unlucky as to have been employeed at a company like that
and at job you really needed badly because you hadd kids and a recession was on
and you were fired just cause..oh well lets see, you wife got pregnant ,maternity costs with health plan the employer didnt want ot incur
or
you were getting older and the employer doesnt think people in their 40s are very useful
or
maybe you had a re-elect bush or re-elect obama bumper sticker and your boss didnt like that
then
that river
would turn out to be handy to ya
I have my rv parked in a retirement community in the Phoenix area.... most of the people here are way older than me, and I'm older than dirt... most of them dont have any idea of what is going on, and it's not good to talk about things like hyperinflation or reductions in SS benefits etc...
Also have a friend down here who is a retired CEO of a big bank in the midwest, and he is still on the board. Today when I went to see him he was tied up on a conference call - emergency board meeting - and his wife said he is considering resigning from the board... Last time I talked to him as soon as I said CRE he didnt want to talk about finance any more... also just like a lot of us their income is way down as they were counting on dividends from financial stocks... There is a lot more to the story, but it boils down to the point that the bankers never thought this thing would blow up either...
mock turtle wrote:
Yes, and Obama has said that he would offset any increase with a decrease for "common workin' folk" or some such similar remark.
The Bush tax cuts of 2001 and 2003 benefited the rich disproportionately, on the theory that those who paid more should get more of the surplus back.
Ha ha ha, remember all that "surplus" talk?
PolitiFact | Extend the Bush tax cuts for lower incomes - Obama promise No. 37:
PolitiFact | Repeal the Bush tax cuts for higher incomes - Obama promise No. 38:
BSR - There's girls and swimming pools, and we had so much rain a couple weeks ago that the desert was flooded!
"That's a great attitude if you don't ever plan on getting old. "
Interesting, so if it was your business, you would overpay for your human resources? If you could hire someone equally as competent, but at half the price, you would pass on the opportunity?
Lets not forget that container shipping has enabled global wage arbitrage... The work is going to go where it is most cost effective... and then we become exposed to the risk of shipping interruptions... Fortunately we do not import much of our food, unlike some places...
barfly wrote:
PolitiFact | Extend the Bush tax cuts for lower incomes - Obama promise No. 37:
PolitiFact | Repeal the Bush tax cuts for higher incomes - Obama promise No. 38:
Add them to the pool of tears and broken promises that may well be Obama's only lasting legacy. Do I look like Mrs. Obama?
Well, there's your problem right there. A hospital is not just someone's for-profit business. It functions within a society. Yes, even "private" hospitals.
ShadowInventory wrote:
That's the most amazing part, more amazing even that the real estate agents who were buying houses to rent.
The bankers were supposedly educated in matters financial and should have seen exactly what would happen.
Like the eskimo and snow, we need more variation in our expression of outrage.
"if they have no contract and no fed laws were broken "
"and you were fired just cause..oh well lets see, you wife got pregnant ,maternity costs with health plan the employer didnt want ot incur"
I believe that is breaking a fed law.
"you were getting older and the employer doesnt think people in their 40s are very useful"
ummmm, that too, that would be breaking a federal law.
"maybe you had a re-elect bush or re-elect obama bumper sticker and your boss didnt like that"
yup, that too would be a violation of a federal law.
replacing one position with a position that has equal responsibilities but pays 50% less?
not a violation of federal law.
I commented one night on the potential for short sale fraud and the few posters left awake dismissed my concern. I guess now I feel validated. Of course I think most realtors need to lose their licenses and also think fraud or dishonesty is involved in some aspect of just about every real estate deal.
Full disclosure: Put me down for a "Dawgwins". I live in San Diego.
My friend was a CEO of a big bank, but I dont think he had the knowledge of this blog. He was in the business of selling money to borrowers, and then selling loans to wall street.
Did the hospital owner educate and train the nurse? Does it benefit from public health insurance? Will someone die because inexperienced young workers can be hired on the cheap? Look up the Libby Zion case, or the the Colgan Air crash in the news today.
ghostfaceinvestah wrote:
Interesting, so if it was your business, you would overpay for your human resources? If you could hire someone equally as competent, but at half the price, you would pass on the opportunity?
A new nurse isn't "equally as competent" as a nurse with 20 years of experience. The hospital violated the law, and a union would have given the employee a small chance of recourse, since our government has chose not to enforce the law.
Black Star Ranch - remember this one from quite a while ago -
BSR SOLVES COW FLATULENCE PROBLEM!!!
How Studying Cow Burps is Helping Argentinians Learn about Climate Change : TreeHugger
kcoop, I can't be the only one trying to figure out what that is.
My eyes are older than some here, I'll admit.
"A hospital is not just someone's for-profit business. It functions within a society. Yes, even "private" hospitals. "
So hospitals, even private hospitals, are not supposed to minimize their costs if they can do so while delivering equal quality?
the produce section is fool of food from chile right now, it's picked early, sits in a boat for a couple days and tastes like.... nothing...
I remember in our youth..canned fruits were all the rage....
ghostfaceinvestah wrote:
So hospitals, even private hospitals, are not supposed to minimize their costs if they can do so while delivering equal quality?
When you need your hip replaced, do you want a "first-timer" holding the knife??? The quality cannot be "equal".
Try hovering over it, and see if that helps.
hover over your hoover
What law would that be, counselor?
ShadowInventory wrote:
....we've found that by changing them to a grass diet minimizes bad breath and cow farts. The downside is that milk production is 10-15% less. Since we aren't a dairy, that's an easy sacrifice.
The icons have come to the point where the poster can :put any phrase in colons: and let the reader deduce their own image...
RIF, from #38:
To be clear, the proposal is now simply an outline of Obama's budget, and the budget still has to be approved by Congress, where Republicans are likely to oppose any effort to let the Bush tax cuts expire. So for now, we rate this promise In the Works.
1 currency now -yogi wrote:
reality by default. The structure of business can support a lot of social goals on top of earning profit for its owners, but when your rivals are ruthless
-disciples there is no choice but to follow suit, get ruthless, or go out of business.
Well, there's your problem right there. A hospital is not just someone's for-profit business. It functions within a society. Yes, even "private" hospitals.
Agreed. Unfortunately that's only the way reality works if social consensus decides so. Otherwise everything is
edit: I think we are going to pay, big time, in social costs, infrastructure and quality of life, for the profit-centric myopia of most of our capitalist class... "noblesse oblige" is all but dead in this country.
BSR you are already positioned for self sufficiency when Nova's predictions become the evening news...
Fannie, Freddie Spreads Narrowest in 17 Years: Credit Markets - Bloomberg.com
Traders are driving relative yields on Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac mortgage bonds that most influence the interest rates consumers pay to the lowest in 17 years, speculating cash the companies use to buy delinquent loans will be recycled back into the securities.
ghost might be able to explain this better than article....more hopium for the mbs market it seems....
kcoop wrote:
I did that right away to interpret the image. It didn't help. I just enlarged the type face on my browser page and still can't see what the image represents.
Does that mean I'm not really outraged?
Thanx, Shadow, I'd like to think we're at least headed in the right direction......I've never worked so hard in my entire life, though....LOL.
barfly wrote:
So for now, we rate this promise In the Works.
LOL... glad we have that squared away
barfly wrote:
Actually, it's the other way around. The tax cuts expire and it will take Congressional action to reinstate them.
Cue the shouting and hollering anyway.
You will live longer out there on the farm than if you lived the city life... I grew up on a farm and owned a small one once, dont have one now, but I keep thinking that it would be a good investment if I could find some younger family to move in as tenants and help with the work as part or all of the rent...
Should it behoove you
sportsfan (profile) wrote (in reply to...) on Thu, 2/11/2010 - 9:48 pm
mock turtle wrote:
is that right...the expiration of the bush tax cut will raise taxes on everyone?
Yes, and Obama has said that he would offset any increase with a decrease for "common workin' folk" or some such similar remark.
mock back to ya
you appear to be in error
the bush tax cut of 2003 did not reduce federal income taxes for households with less than 57k income married filing jointly
the threshold numbers are around 27k for individuals
this means, that almost half of americans never got the tax cuts after income brackets adjusted to agi
Jobs and Growth Tax Relief Reconciliation Act of 2003 - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Humankind has come full circle. We've returned to hieroglyphs.
(Nature abhors a vacuum.)
Feckless Ness wrote:
Who knew the smiley face would lead to this....
The tax cuts expire and it will take Congressional action to reinstate them.
thanks, sportsfan.
The Shadow knows!
Okay, it's a vacuum cleaner. I should have gotten that from ShadowInventory's remark, but I didn't.
I literally didn't get the hoover and hover reference at the time.
Now, for a little lawyerliz style humility, I suppose everyone else here got that right away.
The Shadow wishes he knew some way that we could work our way out of this fiscal mess, but despite conferring with all the kings horses and all the kings men, none seems to appear...
ghostfaceinvestah
you are making it up
name the law or give me a link that supports your position that employers where employees dont have a contract to the contrary cant fire you at will
without stating a reason
( btw,you dont think the boss is going to come out ans say hey i dont like that you are old do ya
hes just going to fire you
and if you have no contract he can
you are wrong
I could read the text in the balloon for the vac. icon... running Firefox 3.6 on Ubuntu 9.10...
ShadowInventory wrote:
The Shadow wishes he knew some way that we could work our way out of this fiscal mess, but despite conferring with all the kings horses and all the kings men, none seems to appear...
Humpty's problem was that he got too damned fat and his parts were too interconnected. In our world of course, he'd be declared TBTF.
Hey Jim, love your work. I'm a San Diego potential buyer.
By the way, are you having any issue with all the REO listings requiring financed offers to be pre-approved through a loan officer of the bank or listing agent's choosing? Is this even legal? This is really getting old for me. Each offer and they say they have to run your credit again. I have 2 current pre-approvals yet it doesn't matter. Today Bank of America told me I couldn't make an offer without their approval but they won't take a credit report that was just pulled last week by another bank. I'm too close to 700 on my score to risk lowering it due to too many credit inquiries. Told BofA to pack sand. I won't make an offer. Anyway, end of rant. Have you had similar problems?
employers can fire you at will
Can Employers Do That? Turns Out, They Can: Exploring Workers' Rights : NPR
Did you know you could be fired for not removing a political sticker from your car — or even having a beer after work? Lewis Maltby says it's more than possible — it's happened. His new book, Can They Do That? explores rights in the workplace.
As he tells NPR's Ari Shapiro, "Freedom of speech is protected by the First Amendment — but only where the government is concerned.
"What most Americans generally don't know is that the Constitution doesn't apply to private corporations at all."
In terms of monitoring its employees, the list of things a corporation can't do is a short one — it's basically confined to eavesdropping on a personal oral conversation, Maltby said. "Anything else is open season."
I could fire people but if I didnt have a documented series of performance problems or good cause, then when they filed for unemployment my 'unemployment tax account' would get charged and my payroll taxes went up. After battling with the CA EDD for a while, I realized that the dice were loaded against me - no matter what evidence I had the EDD would always rule in favor of the employee... So I adjusted my business model to allow for the maximum EDD tax and lowered the maximum wage I was willing to pay to make up for it... So the good employees wound up subsidizing the bad employees and the EDD....
Aleph, bet (looks like a house[Heb.]), gimel (looks like a camel), dalet (looks like a door) etc.
It's not rocket science, thank
mock turtle wrote:
Okay, if that's what you call an error. The 2001 tax cuts lowered all brackets, that being everyone who pays.
I lumped the 2001 and 2003 tax cuts together (since 2003 amended 2001). The fact that 2003 did not provide any tax relief for married filing jointly and earning over $56,800 AGI just shows how absurd those cuts were, not to mention totally unnecessary given that the 2001 cuts had just gone into effect.
As I said, they were designed to benefit the rich. The fact that the "surplus" was long gone before the 2003 legislation passed only goes to show that a Republican President and Republicans controlling both houses of Congress don't give a shit about the people or the country as a whole, just the rich folk in it.
ghostfaceinvestah
heres another link
this web site has hyper links for every reference or claim made to a legal precedent
so if you want to check my claim out feel free
Your boss can fire you for no reason@Everything2.com
"On the Inordinate Power of Some Law Professor to Justify Employers' Right to Fire Your Ass for No Particular Reason
You go to work Monday morning, as usual. As you are caffeinating yourself into sentience, your boss sidles up to your cubicle, "Right, so, I don't particularly like your name. It's just occurred to me how much I hate it. You're fired based on my intense dislike for the lack of euphony of your name." This has to be against the law, you think. He can't just do this, you think. It's not and he can.
And it's largely thanks to Richard Epstein, a professor at the University of Chicago Law School. He wrote an article, In Defense of the Contract at Will, 51 U. Chi. L. Rev. 947 (1984) which is such a strident paean for an employer's right to fire employees for any and no reason that it embarrassed me to read it. Before I attempt to blast shotgun-sized holes in his argument, I'll summarize it.
A Bit of Context
Historically, when you got a job in America, your employer had the legal right to fire you at any time for any reason and you had the power to quit at any time for any reason. At first, this seems only fair and balanced. But then you think for a second and realize that the power to quit is usually the power to inconvenience your employer, whereas the power to fire can be the power to make it hard for you to stay alive.
In any event, an employer's unfettered right to fire, known as the "at-will doctrine", was the default rule for employment contracts applied by U.S. courts during most of our rough and ready capitalist history. A default rule means that courts imply the rule into all employment contracts that don't mention firing. This rule was taken advantage of in all sorts of charming ways throughout history, e.g. firing people for unionizing, refusing to commit a crime, using their sick days, serving on a jury, getting pregnant, getting old, voting in a different way than your boss, speaking Spanish, etc, "
if inquiries are within 30 days for mortgage loan it shouldn't ding your score, RMCRs need to be updated every 30 days.....I would bring your last credit report.... or bring your own in by getting them here....same applies to auto loans...they know your shopping ....
AnnualCreditReport
ghostfaceinvestah
notice the last link
where a business blog instructs owners how to fire for no reason
i rest my case
#
Can I Be Fired From Work For No Reason?
As an “at-will" employee, you can be fired for any reason, or no reason at all. For example, if your boss wants to fire you so that his boss' sister can ...
resources.lawinfo.com/.../can-i-be-fired-from-work-for-no-reason-.html - Cached - Similar
#
Can you get fired for no reason?
Mar 23, 2009 ... Where do you work? What does your employment contract say? ... Pretty much...an at will company CAN fire you for no reason! ...
Answerology Error - Cached - Similar
#
Law Offices of Alexandra M. Steinberg: Yes, your boss really can ...
Yes, your boss really can fire you for no reason at all... but s/he CANNOT fire you for an illegal reason. 2009 m. Spalio 31 j., 02:01 ...
lt-lt.facebook.com/...your-boss...can-fire-you-for-no-reason...cannot-fire-you.../164089200815 - Lithuania - Cached
#
Can My Boss Fire Me at Any Time for Any Reason? What is “at will ...
What does this mean? In most cases, it means that your boss can fire you at any time for almost any reason or no reason at all. She can fire you because she ...
www.calaborlaw.com/.../can-my-boss-fire-me-at-any-time-for-any-reason-what-is-“at-will”/ - Cached - Similar
#
WikiAnswers - Can an employer tell anyone the reason you were fired
If you mean personally then the above poster is correct (it's your own business. ... Can an employer fire you for no reason? Can an employer find out is you ...
wiki.answers.com/.../Can_an_employer_tell_anyone_the_reason_you_were_fired - Cached - Similar
#
Can my boss threaten to fire me if I apply for a... - JustAnswer
Jun 9, 2008 ... In this situation, your boss can essentially fire you for any reason ... employer may fire an employee for any reason or no reason at all. ...
Can my boss threaten to fire me if I apply for a... - JustAnswer - Cached
#
"How do you fire an employee?" from The Business Blog at Intuitive.com
As an employee, you have just as much responsibility to communicate your accomplishments ... Either way, just like any other good relationship, the employee / boss .... You can fire someone for no reason, but if you do give a reason, ...
Error encountered trying to produce a page for you - Cached - Similar
sportsfan wrote:
a Republican President and Republicans controlling both houses of Congress don't give a shit about the people or the country as a whole, just the rich folk in it.
I don't know if party affiliation makes that much difference. What does the trick is how the uber-wealthy brought most of the senators and congressmen not already in the political dynasties into the lowest levels of upper class society, so they had a vested interest in preserving the status quo for the elite levels.