Mook wrote: As in "exit, pursued by a bear."
"Don’t try to outrun one of Dominia’s Grizzlies; it’ll catch you, knock you down, and eat you. Of course, you could run up a tree. In that case you’ll get a nice view before it knocks the tree down and eats you."
(text from MtG "Grizzly Bears", 4th Ed.)
Big banks or not, the insanity of bailing out Greece remains, though, at least with the concerns about German banks there appears to be at least a bit of self-interest at one level, the banker level, in Germany. A bailout still means destabilization of the entire eurozone.
Vonbek777 wrote: This is true...but from a survival standpoint, you do want your tribe to have more meat on their bones than the other tribe.
Arguably why our 'sweet tooth' evolved -- sugar is/was a very economical source of energy, fat and carbohydrates too. This worked well when we were out foraging, running around, and hunting mastodons 18 hours a day, but now the reward mechanism in our brain is more of a detriment than a useful guide to healthy behavior, and fully exploited by our food industry.
How About Obama Calling Blankfein and Dimon "Savvy?"
“'I know both those guys; they are very savvy businessmen,' Obama said in the interview yesterday in the Oval Office with Bloomberg BusinessWeek." LINK
yeah thats what i thought interest(more money) to the banks.why dont we just send them all our pennies,nickles, dimes,quarters,and so on,we could send it in every friday .
funny thing i saw this thing referred to as the panic of 2008, they called the gd29 depression because they thought panic scared the people.
whatever,it will be back financials are flying high wide and handsome and it aint going to last forever!
Can't find the original article I read way back when that song was released. I like her music, but as a philosophy/logic/etymology nut, this song annoyed the hell out of me.
Yes, we should certainly raise the interest rate paid on reserves in order to better communicate our policy.
Because the problem seems to be that we haven't shoveled enough money at the banks yet.
Caught the but I have to say it the other way around.
By dropping or even eliminating the interest paid on reserves, the Fed could communicate loud and clear.
As the large volume of reserves in the banking system moved back out (to the economy?) the Fed would be forced to liquidate parts of its balance sheet faster than anticipated or simply print more currency.
You can make up your own mind about the current behavior, but panic implies irrational fear while recent research suggests that depressed people tend to have good reasoning skills.
"In particular, it is possible that the Federal Reserve could for a time use the interest rate paid on reserves, in combination with targets for reserve quantities, as a guide to its policy stance, while simultaneously monitoring a range of market rates."
.........read: "We don't know what the Hell we'll be doing this afternoon, much less a week from now or further!"
Air traffic controllers, customs and tax officials, hospital doctors and schoolteachers walked off the job for 24 hours to protest sweeping government spending cuts that will freeze salaries and new hiring, cut bonuses and stipends and increase the average retirement age by two years to
Jamie Dimon got all the Greek bonus, again, not doctors or teachers.
Wait a minute, if they wait until interest rates go up to sell the bonds, don't they lose a huge amount of money? Aside from absorbing the huge balance sheet loss, doesn't that mean a large fraction of the base money they paid for the securities does not get drained out of the system?
....when MDs are paid $40K per year and 25% of everyone's income is "under the radar", you can't afford to be taking too many days off protesting anything.......
Sickening really CK, we read of $ million dollar bonuses for morons, yet the working group takes the hit ( pay cuts )......This country needs and enema, and quick.
Ok folks been a great morning to say the least, I just got the call for snow removal, and well I have 3 (20) something years olds driving my trucks, so being the good shill that I am I have to go baby sit them to make sure they are doing their jobs, good day to you all be safe and get home early going to get real nasty later on.....
Aside from absorbing the huge balance sheet loss, doesn't that mean a large fraction of the base money they paid for the securities does not get drained out of the system?
That's an interesting though, albrt. I wonder what other facility they'd be forced to use in that event?
The Associated Press: Greek unions strike against austerity plan
I have no idea why this should surprise anyone.
The options available to the Greeks, and their body politic, are: to accept the blame and bear the painful consequences, or to push most of the pain off on foreign governments and faceless creditors. Predicting their decision ain't rocket science.
And anyone who doesn't think America isn't going to make exactly the same decision when faced with the same dilemma hasn't been paying attention.
Just had a thought, sure this has been talked about in economic circles for some time, but I just thought of it (I'm slow sometimes to get simple concepts), so bear with me...
I am coming to the conclusion that Kermit is the actor while Elmo is the reactor in the market equation...that means Kermit will always be a head of Elmo unless Elmo decouples and starts acting independently of Kermit... and this would be a rare and serious event and also explains why Bulls are optimistic, and Bears always so pessimistic. Do I have that about right?
We might do this, we might do that......blah, blah, blah, blah.
Allow me to decode: We don't have a clue. We're making it up as we go along. The only thing you can count on is that we will CONtinue to enrich the bankers and preserve the value of trillions in fraudulent credit. Interest on "reserves" is another banker enrichment tool in our banker enrichment tool box.
The productive majority WILL be paying for the cost of banker fraud for a generation.
My father refused to join an intern strike. My mother was working at the time, and would have supported him (he was paid crap anyway). The strike failed, and it took the death of a young hospital patient to draw attention to the situation of overworked, underpaid interns.
Evidence from National Transportation Safety Board hearings last May and on Feb. 2 shed light on Renslow, who hid two failed flight tests, and Shaw, who made $16,000 in 2008 and got a raise 11 days before the crash to $23,400.
On Feb. 2, the NTSB concluded its investigation by blaming Renslow for the crash, citing his incorrect response to a cockpit stall warning. He pulled back on the control column after the warning, sending the plane’s nose up and putting the aircraft into a stall that led to the crash, the board found.
The cockpit crew’s failure to monitor airspeed, which slowed enough to trigger the stall warning, contributed to the accident, the NTSB found. Unnecessary conversations between the pilots, and Renslow’s failure to manage the flight, also contributed, the safety board found.
Renslow’s actions after the stall warning were “consistent with startle and confusion,” Evan Byrne, an agency investigator, told the board at the Feb. 2 hearing.
The pilot’s reaction was “very unusual,” Tom Haueter, the NTSB’s director of aviation safety, told the board. “I quite frankly can’t explain it.”
Colgan’s lack of standard procedures to help pilots select and manage airspeed for airport approaches in icing conditions contributed to the crash, the NTSB found.
The safety board also found that fatigue “likely impaired” the pilots, and Colgan didn’t “proactively address” fatigue for pilots who commute from other cities to their home airports, as Renslow and Shaw did.
“If you run a company where your values are how can we pay our people the least, get by with the fewest number of pilots, and provide them the least training, it’s no surprise when ill- trained, sick, fatigued people are in the cockpit and kill the passengers,” Kreindler said.
So here's a question? What happened to the $3-4T of "bad assets" on the banks balance sheets? My assumption is that its been offloaded onto the FED? I'm talking about the stuff that TARP was supposed to buy.... if the banks haven't gotten rid of that than aren't they still walking around with toxic balance sheets? The point of recapitalization was that they could realize those losses, wasn't it?
Reuters reported Tuesday that senior Chinese military officials suggested that nation sell some U.S. bonds to punish the American government for its latest sale of weapons to Taiwan.
Moreover, David Goldman, writing on the Inner Workings blog at the Asia Times internet site (http://www.atimes.com) wrote the Chinese government has ordered reserve managers to divest themselves of all U.S. securities that aren't backed by the implicit or explicit U.S. government, which would leave only Treasuries and certain U.S. agency securities. That would cover Chinese institutions' substantial holdings of U.S. corporate and asset-backed securities.
The financial relations between the world's largest debtor, the U.S., and the world's largest exporter and creditor, China, have become increasingly contentious. But as with many an unhappily married couple, they can't live with each other and they can't live without each other. (More)
I mentioned the other day that commuter pilots make about as much as a Mickey D's manager, and I want to take this time to apologize to any managers that i've made fun of, as it turns out they make more money...
So here's a question? What happened to the $3-4T of "bad assets" on the banks balance sheets? My assumption is that its been offloaded onto the FED? I'm talking about the stuff that TARP was supposed to buy.... if the banks haven't gotten rid of that than aren't they still walking around with toxic balance sheets? The point of recapitalization was that they could realize those losses, wasn't it?
The point of TARP is the same as the point of "Sleight of Hand". You're supposed to watch it while the real trick is going on elsewhere. I think the real trick might have been for the banksters to enrich themselves before TSHTF.
But if they dump bonds on the current market and there's no demand, won't that effectively cause interest rates to go up?
noob wrote
I wonder what other facility they'd be forced to use in that event?
I have been thinking about this since they started buying the non-government bonds. Cinco is right, which is why Bernanke is so keen to assure everybody that they will wait for the interest rates to go up before they sell any bonds.
I think the bottom line is that the Fed has a lot less ability to control interest rates and inflation than they had a few years ago, which is why they are jawboning so furiously. The only way we can get back to the Fed's comfort zone level of base money vs. debt is if the Fed holds these securities to maturity and everyone pays them off, and at the same time the banks lend enough to get private debt back to 2006 levels. I just don't see that happening.
yogi:
Those crash reports are brutal. I typically am on CRJs and I wanted to look up CRJ crashes; one of them was the takeoff from the runway (in Kentucky?). The pilots were talking about their families and future plans, what they were going to do on the weekend... one of them was talking about going to fly overseas... as they were missing all the cues that would've told them they were going onto the wrong runway.
Cinco-X wrote: I think the real trick might have been for the banksters to enrich themselves before TSHTF.
That's my understanding of it. Loot while there is still loot to loot.
The options available to the Greeks, and their body politic, are: to accept the blame and bear the painful consequences, or to push most of the pain off on foreign governments and faceless creditors.
Those foreign governments have the option of pushing it on bankers or the taxpayer. Jamie Dimon (Greek heritage) just got a huge fucking bonus. Did he cure cancer or something?
we are allowing agency debt and MBS to run off as they mature or are prepaid
Agency debt and MBS are not going to be prepaid as mortgage rates will never go low enough to get people to refi and forget about equity in the near future. So the fed has a 30 year runoff plan I guess. That should lighten their balance sheet.
Hold and hope is now an officially communicated policy....which is really not that different then most "professional" advice you get.
That's what I got out of that. It's one thing to hint at it without saying it...very different to actually set it in stone.
The only way we can get back to the Fed's comfort zone level of base money vs. debt is if the Fed holds these securities to maturity and everyone pays them off, and at the same time the banks lend enough to get private debt back to 2006 levels. I just don't see that happening.
I don't see that happening either, and I was hoping I had just missed something.
Credit creation in a fiat sytem is a privilege. This privilege should only be used for creating wealth, not extracting wealth. Yet, the Fed allowed and encouraged Wall St. to turn this smple tenet upside down.
We're in the mess we are in because Greensham and Bernanke championed Wall Street's use of credit for massive wealth extraction rather than wealth creation.
We've had unimaginable monetary and credit abuses over the past 15 years. Is it any wonder tens of millions of Americans are facing foreclosure, insolvency and a declining standard of living?
bearly wrote: Obama make another deal with the devil squid. Good to see he has a rigid spine. How cute.
Just another whore in a society full of them, bought and paid for. He ceased to bother me a while ago, it's just disheartening to have to watch.
"President Barack Obama said he doesn’t “begrudge” the $17 million bonus awarded to JPMorgan Chase & Co. Chief Executive Officer Jamie Dimon or the $9 million issued to Goldman Sachs Group Inc. CEO Lloyd Blankfein, noting that some athletes take home more pay.
The president, speaking in an interview, said in response to a question that while $17 million is “an extraordinary amount of money” for Main Street, “there are some baseball players who are making more than that and don’t get to the World Series either, so I’m shocked by that as well.”
“I know both those guys; they are very savvy businessmen,” Obama said in the interview yesterday in the Oval Office with Bloomberg BusinessWeek, which will appear on newsstands Friday. “I, like most of the American people, don’t begrudge people success or wealth. That is part of the free- market system.” "
I'm thinking that the Greece thing will be papered over so that there is no real trail back to the german gov't.....have DB or whomever guarantee the debt and then bailout (officially) the bank or institution that makes the guarantee...that's one way to do it. But that also considers the laws surrounding the EU and it's member states.....like that really makes a difference....laws are made to be broken...you know the whole "exigent circumstances" BS pulled here.
Money won't necessarily buy a better pilot, but it can either go to investor/banker profit or to training pilots and raising their wages, which could mean fewer hours and less fatigue.
(Intern fatigue was blamed in the Libby Zion hospital death case in NY that I referred to above.)
Two of my 10 themes for 2010 are relevant to this discussion. The first is the "tricky trifecta," or the migration from societal acrimony to social unrest to geopolitical conflict. Populist uprising, the rejection of wealth and an emerging class war are symptomatic of this dynamic, as is the unfortunate fact economic hardship traditionally serves as a precursor to war. See "Ten themes for 2010"
We're in the mess we are in because Greensham and Bernanke championed Wall Street's use of credit for massive wealth extraction rather than wealth creation.
We're in this pickle because Western society as a whole decided to ignore long-term stability for short-term gains. This extends from individual consumers right through to bankers and high-level policy makers. No one has clean hands in this mess.
Credit creation in a fiat sytem is a privilege. This privilege should only be used for creating wealth, not extracting wealth. Yet, the Fed allowed and encouraged Wall St. to turn this smple tenet upside down.
I have to disagree; I do not believe that true wealth can be created by the creation of credit. Credit and money in and of themselves only facilitate commerce and the exchange or creation of wealth. I refuse to believe that credit or fiat money has any value when separated from the goods in the economy-
Actually the MSM take goes in the other direction:
The Fed chief used his remarks to explain how the central bank will try to withdraw the stimulus money without tipping the economy back into recession.
Using the rate it pays on banks' excess reserves to affect credit would be a new strategy for the Fed. Since the 1980's, its main lever to tighten or loosen credit has been the federal funds rate. That rate is now at a record low near zero.
The rate paid on banks' excess reserves is 0.25 percent. Boosting that rate would give banks an incentive to keep money parked at the Fed, rather than lend it.
It also would cause the funds rate to rise, economists say. Adjusting the interest paid on banks' excess reserves helps stabilize the funds rate when the financial system is awash in cash, as it is now.
Apparently, there is just too much cash sloshing around in the real economy. That's why people are spending so much money and business are hiring left and right to keep up with unprecedented demand.
ghostfaceinvestah wrote: “there are some baseball players who are making more than that and don’t get to the World Series either, so I’m shocked by that as well.”
I don't really like that either, but as a taxpayer I don't "own" part of their institutions (with no voting rights, of course), and didn't lend them large sums of my money.
"President Barack Obama said he doesn’t “begrudge” the $17 million bonus awarded to JPMorgan Chase & Co. Chief Executive Officer Jamie Dimon or the $9 million
I think "Savvy" means "contribute generously to my re-election campaign. But, you betcha' Sarah will turn down banker bux if they are offered.
I think Ken should consider changing the icon to Red. It would be much more fitting and actually better reflect the nature of the most deadly of the beasts. See, in MX a specific more deadly variety are referred to as Diablo Rojo, Red Demon or red devil, known as Humboldt Squid here. They're quite nasty beasts. I have pulled many from the water.
"Even if you're the person who pays off your balance and doesn't even have any credit card debt," says Bowne. "They might get a notice that says they're getting a $100 annual fee. Even people with stellar credit and stellar credit payment histories need to pay attention."
>
New credit card laws start Feb 22. Look out for higher fees.
We've had unimaginable monetary and credit abuses over the past 15 years. Is it any wonder tens of millions of Americans are facing foreclosure, insolvency and a declining standard of living?
....no wonder here.........acting like a teenager with a pocketful of $100-bills leads us to where we are. The biggest offenders and condoners are now the biggest whiners.
The poor don't begrudge the rich until it is clear that the two world theory is false. There is only one world for the poor and it is perched on their broken backs.
noob goldberg wrote: We're in this pickle because Western society as a whole decided to ignore long-term stability for short-term gains.
Yep. It's a cultural problem wrapped in an economic one. No one is blameless, but those least to blame are those punished the most.
"Obama is “trying to walk a very fine line,” said Mark Borges, a compensation consultant at Compensia Inc. in Corte Madera, California.
“He wants to represent popular anger at the bailout and Wall Street pay, while at the same time trying not to alienate these guys, who he needs if he’s going to get reforms enacted,” Borges said. “Not an easy task.” "
Would have been real easy if they just would have been nationalized.
In the long run, the Federal Reserve anticipates that its balance sheet will shrink toward more historically normal levels and that most or all of its security holdings will be Treasury securities.
Yeah, I'm sure that is the plan. And how many plans have survived the battlefield intact?
Frankly, I think the point of Ben's talk of an exit strategy is to dampen the talk of increased oversight/audit. But if Ben launches QE2 before the election - hand meet hornet's nest.
BZZZZT!...... There are some of us who were responsible and didn't take the carrot even though it was offered MANY times. I respectfully disagree with the above characterization....but it is true for a large swath of our population.
The point of recognition will eventually arrive that our debt issues are cumulative; when that happens, the contagion will no longer be contained. In the meantime, as we edge from here to there, be on the lookout for the unintended consequences of European austerity initiatives, including but not limited to social unrest and the abatement of risk appetites.
We've had unimaginable monetary and credit abuses over the past 15 years. Is it any wonder tens of millions of Americans are facing foreclosure, insolvency and a declining standard of living?
Badger boy wrote: Taxpayers pay to build stadiums for the billionaires who own the teams fulls of millionaires playing children's games. What a sad spectacle.
Pax Americana! Our only remaining export, really.
We've had unimaginable monetary and credit abuses over the past 15 years. Is it any wonder tens of millions of Americans are facing foreclosure, insolvency and a declining standard of living?
No one is blameless, but those least to blame are those punished the most.
I presume that you refer to folks like me that refused to buy a house or carry a revolving credit balance, and will now be expected to pay for this fiasco with their taxes since we're some of the few that actually still have some net worth?
MS wrote: Most of it is...we just can't or won't call it such...the whole stigma of socialization. We are already there just not in name.
If we called a spade a spade it would become all too clear that some spades are HELLA more equal than others.
OK CR (or somebody), what exactly will it mean when the Fed raises or lowers the interest rate on reserves? Is there some widely-understood theory of Interest-Rates-on-Reserves which will tell us what the Fed is trying to do and what might happen? (Never mind if said theory has been empirically tested - this is never the case.) Is this change going to make it easier for Congress and the public to understand what the Fed is up to? Do any economists outside the Fed understand this? Krugman didn't - he thought the excess reserves loaned by the Fed and controlled by these interest rates were deposits. I seem to recall that paying interest on reserves was something that Greenspan always wanted - that can't be a good sign.
Cinco-X wrote: I presume that you refer to folks like me that refused to buy a house or carry a revolving credit balance
Guilty as charged. I'm a member of the sucker party too, FWIW.
It occurs to me that all of the contortions the fed is going through can be reduced to two overall aims: 1) the end goal of transferring wealth from savers to the banks; 2) making the mechanisms of this transfer sufficiently opaque that it doesn't undermine the confidence in the entire system. It's all about how to steal from someone without them knowing it happened.
I think the real trick might have been for the banksters to enrich themselves before TSHTF.
That's my understanding of it. Loot while there is still loot to loot.
They better hope they looted enough to afford very high/strong fences around their home, a team of security personnel and advanced security systems to fight off the masses when TSHTF!!
I don't really like that either, but as a taxpayer I don't "own" part of their institutions (with no voting rights, of course), and didn't lend them large sums of my money.
Ahhh, but you most likely did if you live in a city with a team, as those stadiums usually cost the public a pretty penny.
Funny thing about those taxes. A patron of mine was complaining about how much he had to pay in taxes this year. I let him grumble for awhile and covet my whopping 300 bucks I was getting back before I asked him if he'd like to trade tax liability on the condition that we also trade incomes. He declined the offer, funny that.
“He (obama) wants to represent popular anger at the bailout and Wall Street pay, while at the same time trying not to alienate these guys, who he needs if he’s going to get reforms enacted,”
thats easy..with the bankstas, reditioned and hanging upside down in a cell, with electrodes attached to the appropriate places im sure they will give the commander in chief all the cooperation required
BZZZZT!...... There are some of us who were responsible and didn't take the carrot even though it was offered MANY times. I respectfully disagree with the above characterization....but it is true for a large swath of our population.
True, I was speaking in aggregate, and we can only be truly responsible for our own actions; there are, of course, examples of those who have been prudent throughout. However, in terms of society, of which we are all a part, the trend has been a cultural shift away from patience and prudence and toward immediate gratification through increased leverage.
We can pretend that the decision was forced upon the populace by circumstances beyond their control, but the reality is that large numbers of them made a conscious decision to extract from the future to enhance well-being in the present, and that has affected society as a whole.
OK CR (or somebody), what exactly will it mean when the Fed raises or lowers the interest rate on reserves?
I believe that the Fed can set the rate it charges for loans from the discount window, and the rates it pays for either reserves it holds for banks or "excess" reserves it holds for banks. Other than that, rates are governed by supply and demand for bonds and money.
I refuse to believe that credit or fiat money has any value when separated from the goods in the economy-
cinco-x,
You can refuse to believe all you want. But the wealth extracted by Wall St. via non-productive credit creation is real and spends just like the dollars created to produce real goods.
Private equity, hedge funds, trading fees, bogus investment vehicles founded on lies, etc. are primarly inflation creation tools designed for skimming.
In a poker game, a lot of money changes hands but no wealth is created. No harm no foul. But in a system set up to create positive inflation, you can't have the dealer and a few inside players creating and skimming all the inflation. In that scenario, inflationary credit creation is counter-productive for the majority as they become poorer and unable and unwilling to support the credit in the system.
They better hope they looted enough to afford very high/strong fences around their home, a team of security personnel and advanced security systems to fight off the masses when TSHTF!!
I'm under the impression the plan is to go to Costa Rica or Paraguay
I am beginning to wonder if this 'statement' by the president was required by the Republicans in order for negotiations on health care to move forward... maybe his teleprompter was broken and he had to think of something on the fly.
The POTUS actually admitted that the Swedish model was a better method than Japan in an interview at the time but also said it was not politically feasible to do so.
if the Fed wants to move bank reserves into the economy, it doesn't make sense that they would raise interest rates on those reserves. That would cause more money to be added to the reserves, not less.
Vonbek, read it again. He actually never said he doesn't begrudge Jamie his bonus. He said the baseball players pay "shocks him" as well. What he said was "I like most Americans don't begrudge people success and wealth"...It also stops there so we have no way of knowing if there is a "but" attached to that or not. Again, I will wait until I read the article with these statements in context, not spliced together to produce a meme.
noob goldberg wrote: However, in terms of society, of which we are all a part, the trend has been a cultural shift away from patience and prudence and toward immediate gratification through increased leverage.
Willingness to take on leverage is really only a later symptom of the underlying disease. The basic fact is we stopped being a productive and creative economy long ago and turned to looting one another to "get ahead" in a zero sum game.
Speaking of which...Google and intel want to try those brain and eye implants...I think Obama would be first on the list...imagine having a built in teleprompter and fact finder with instantaneous information transfer. Probably be a requirement for all government officials in the future.
I haven't been paying attention. Are we still in an inning or is this crash now measured in games, for example: We are in the 11th game of the 160 game season ?
The basic fact is we stopped being a productive and creative economy long ago and turned to looting one another to "get ahead" in a zero sum game.
It's only a zero sum game because we gave up on productive activities a turned to unproductive activities like finance. When we were building factories and creating capital, it was not a zero sum situation.
From my window it looks like a white-out here in DC. I can hear the wind mumbling and even shrieking a bit. Have not seen a single pedestrian or vehicle for hours on our side street. Everything shut down, we read.
Going out to see it after lunch. If I'm not back in an hour send the St. Bernard with keg.
Feb. 10 (Bloomberg) -- President Obama today announced a new plan to change the status of New Jersey from a state to an autonomous province. "This will allow New Jersey to become the Switzerland of America! Free from pesky regulations and better able to create wealth." When asked what this new autonomous province will be called Obama replied "Exit 666" is being considered.
You will never get the full context CK...they don't allow that...but knock yourself out, I read it on Bloomberg before coffee this morning, who knows what I read ...think the whole interview comes out on Friday and we will already have moved past it by then. My impression was the President wants a group hug moment.
It's only a zero sum game because we gave up on productive activities
I agree. I thought that is what I wrote, actually.
After a re-read, I see that it could have been interpreted that way. I just thought you were implying that life is a zero sum game, and it's not, unless the folks in power make it that way. My mistake.
When the economy is doing well, you need to print money to expand the money supply to match the pace of the economic expansion. When the economy is doing poorly, you need to print money to get more money into circulation to provide emergency liquidity. Is it just me or does this game seem rigged so that every answer is print more money and hand it over to rich bankers who are gracious enough to act as market intermediaries for this genius economic policy? Kind of reminds me of an alcoholic finding excuses to drink.
My point was that you cannot 'CREATE' wealth with credit. It's obvious that you can steal wealth with it.
Cinco-x,
I still see it a little differently. Credit does enable economies to create wealth. My point is that rather than using credit to enable wealth creation, Wall St. has hijacked the credit creation process to extract wealth and/or gather inflation.
Absent the Fed's epic fraudulent credit preservation efforts, Wall St would have collapsed and all would more fully understand the massive wealth extraction that has occurred.
The basic fact is we stopped being a productive and creative economy long ago and turned to looting one another to "get ahead" in a zero sum game.
Yes. There is a cure for that, but it would require a time horizon of at least a decade, so it is politically infeasible.
There is an alternative approach, however. Currently the problem is that the population views the government as the only mechanism to accomplish change. The government and its politicians are merely part of an institution, however. They can be manipulated to accomplish ends beyond typical political time horizons.
What is needed is a social plan, supported by a large swath of society--workers, industrial firms, smaller finance firms, academia, etc--that has the ultimate goal of arresting this trend over a period of a decade or more. With enough momentum and popular support, every politician would be forced to accept the tenets of the plan as a prerequisite toward gaining office.
I'm an optimist, but I recognize how utterly difficult such a strategy would be. But bemoaning the short-sightedness of politicians is even more counter-productive; it must simply be accepted. So we start elsewhere, and force government to be subservient to the will of the people. mp's industrial strategy would fall under such an initiative. Focus on R&D would also fall under it.
Here it is IN context. About what he has been saying all along that compensation should be tied to long term performance
Q Let's talk bonuses for a minute: Lloyd Blankfein, $9 million; Jamie Dimon, $17 million. Now, granted, those were in stock and less than what some had expected. But are those numbers okay?
THE PRESIDENT: Well, look, first of all, I know both those guys. They're very savvy businessmen. And I, like most of the American people, don't begrudge people success or wealth. That's part of the free market system. I do think that the compensation packages that we've seen over the last decade at least have not matched up always to performance. I think that shareholders oftentimes have not had any significant say in the pay structures for CEOs.
Q Seventeen million dollars is a lot for Main Street to stomach.
THE PRESIDENT: Listen, $17 million is an extraordinary amount of money. Of course, there are some baseball players who are making more than that who don't get to the World Series either. So I'm shocked by that as well. I guess the main principle we want to promote is a simple principle of "say on pay," that shareholders have a chance to actually scrutinize what CEOs are getting paid. And I think that serves as a restraint and helps align performance with pay. The other thing we do think is the more that pay comes in the form of stock that requires proven performance over a certain period of time as opposed to quarterly earnings is a fairer way of measuring CEOs' success and ultimately will make the performance of American businesses better.
Well I am trying to be a recovering paranoid android. I mean what is the Michael Penn song...Bad Sign:
Now that we're alone;
Trouble, baby, doesn't
always come in threes.
I had a hunch the fight was thrown,
But what's it going
to take to get me to
my knees?
It's a bad sign
When I'm just marking time...
A bad sign,
Hoping will be fine.
A bad sign.
When I think this way
It's a bad sign.
Been staring at a wall for days.
Can't hold a position I
will not reverse. The paper prints a simple phrase
But all I see are ciphers
in iambic verse.
Cinco-X wrote: I just thought you were implying that life is a zero sum game, and it's not, unless the folks in power make it that way
Exactly. And who, exactly, wants to give up monopoly advantage? Tyranny is the ultimate drug, and another large bit of genetic hard-wiring.
I still see it a little differently. Credit does enable economies to create wealth. My point is that rather than using credit to enable wealth creation, Wall St. has hijacked the credit creation process to extract wealth and/or gather inflation.
We seem to see it the same sans a slight semantic quibble. Enabling wealth creation is not creating wealth. It's enabling the creation of wealth.
Listen, $17 million is an extraordinary amount of money. Of course, there are some baseball players who are making more than that who don't get to the World Series either. So I'm shocked by that as well.
There are also some well known celebrities who make more than that doing one movie.
If compensation were aligned with social utility, the American Way wouldn't exist.
Two of my 10 themes for 2010 are relevant to this discussion. The first is the "tricky trifecta," or the migration from societal acrimony to social unrest to geopolitical conflict. Populist uprising, the rejection of wealth and an emerging class war are symptomatic of this dynamic,...
The class war's been going on for 10 or 20 years; just some on the side that's been pounded on no longer believe the aggressor's shouts of "It's for your own good, trust me!" What happens soon (I hope) is that both sides begin to fight.
Because if both sides don't fight, the war will never end.
BTW...I do understand the mix of options and cash was skewed towards the restricted stock shares however you may recall where GS stock was before Hanky-Poo took the job at Treasury and where it was when he finally sold it.
Wow, just had a ghost in the machine moment. After writing my recovering paranoid android statement, one of my cd library carousels hooked up to my pc booted up and spit out 16stone by Bush...everything zen and machinehead...problem with being paranoid is you never quite know what is just a freak random event. Go outside and see if the are hovering over again.
noob goldberg wrote: What is needed is a social plan, supported by a large swath of society--workers, industrial firms, smaller finance firms, academia, etc--that has the ultimate goal of arresting this trend over a period of a decade or more.
The problem is the tyranny of the majority - think of the stereotypical padded pension folks working minimal skill and minimal risk jobs... they are much better off than they would be if left to subsist on their merits, and will not give that advantage up easily. The sad fact is a small % of people are 'value-producing' ... and that's ok as long as social surplus exist. But the worst thing we can do is send highly-intelligent and self-motivated people into looting for a living, and/or streamlining the process, which is exactly what we are doing.
Yeah so Obama completely misses the point that baseball players compete in the open, even subject to random urine tests, and their stats and ticket sales are public knowledge and real. Public banks meet secretly with the President, have access to secret Fed money, fudge their accounting, and no drug testing (obviously, given their decision-making).
Yeah so Obama completely misses the point that baseball players compete in the open
Now that we are into Year Two of O, I'm not surprised that he is trying to save the bankers through association. Next thing he'll quote is how Cardinals and Bishops make decent money for their jobs whose organizations can be as opaque as the banker bunkers.
.
Rob Dawg wrote:
mumble mumble...
Speaking of mumbling, what is the next CA date for us to watch and hold our breaths? March 31? May 1?
But the worst thing we can do is send highly-intelligent and self-motivated people into looting for a living, and/or streamlining the process, which is exactly what we are doing.
I think there is a way to reverse that trend, and I don't even think it would be that expensive.
But my ping times are hitting the 1.1 second range, and my internet has slowed to an absolute crawl, so I'm going to pull back from hoocoodanode for the day.
The problem is the tyranny of the majority - think of the stereotypical padded pension folks working minimal skill and minimal risk jobs... they are much better off than they would be if left to subsist on their merits, and will not give that advantage up easily. The sad fact is a small % of people are 'value-producing' ... and that's ok as long as social surplus exist. But the worst thing we can do is send highly-intelligent and self-motivated people into looting for a living, and/or streamlining the process, which is exactly what we are doing.
That's a very accurate take; it's been mentioned before, but the problem is not allowing people to fail, whether it be "the stereotypical padded pension folks working minimal skill and minimal risk jobs" or the 'highly-intelligent and self-motivated people '. Unfortunately, it seems there is political value in not allowing either to fail, either from a standpoint of votes or money, and this leads us to where we are now. Freedom to fail would, I believe, bring more rationality to the market.
and no drug testing (obviously, given their decision-making).
"Mr. President?"
"Yes?"
"Those random drug tests you ordered for senior advisors?"
"Yes?"
"well, Timmay came up clean. No hopium, no green shoots, nothing."
"Dammit! Well tie him down and pump him full if oyu have to. If this gets out..."
"Yessir, the full 'Paulson" treatment it is."
"If that doesn't work I'm giving you Presidential authority to exceed safety limits and use Greenspanning if necessary. Hold the Libertarian sauce."
"If the Bloomberg story is to be believed, Obama thinks his key to electoral success is to trumpet “the influence corporate leaders have had on his economic policies.”
Feb. 10 (Bloomberg) -- UBS AG’s loss in 2009 will trigger the bank’s bonus claw back mechanism for the first time, depriving senior bankers of 300 million Swiss francs ($282 million) of deferred pay they were due to receive this year.
The Swiss bank introduced last year a plan that would pay 900 million francs to managing directors, executive directors and directors in equal parts in 2010, 2011 and 2012. The lender yesterday posted a 2.74 billion-franc loss for 2009, compared with a loss of 21.3 billion francs for the previous year.
Speaking of mumbling, what is the next CA date for us to watch and hold our breaths? March 31? May 1?
The freaking idjits are debating online freaking poker. They don't have time for the real world. If routine revenues continue to disappoint (even odds) then we might need a quick fix by mid March. By the end of April I expect a Q1 '10 corporate and CY '09 personal income tax shortfall to precipitate the next crisis.
Anyone else having problems...I just had a lot of weird stuff happen...couldn't access anything, got knocked off my dsl modem multiple times...checking for virus now...something weird is going on.
yagij wrote: Rest assured that Momma Nature has done her own fair share of Rant seeing as how her children have wrecked the house.
Wrecked the house, then burned it for firewood.
reprint but one explanation
Safe Haven | Containing Inflation Via Unlimited Money Creation: The Feds Strategy
In this article we will illuminate what looks on paper to be a brilliant economic strategy, and then cut through the theory to get to the real world bottom line for all of us: you and I stand to lose everything if an ambitious but profoundly dangerous strategy goes awry, while the bonuses and future rewards continue to go straight to those whose short-sighted greed created this mess in the first place.
As I read this, I couldn't help thinking it was from the Onion, but sadly, no............
It really had no meaning, except that I know Rob loves the Family Blog line, and I felt like using it in a completely inappropriate context. Just to add a little mass confusion into everyone's day.
Anyone else having problems...I just had a lot of weird stuff happen...couldn't access anything, got knocked off my dsl modem multiple times...checking for virus now...something weird is going on.
Same thing has been happening to me all day. My pings hit the 1500ms range for a while.
Anyone else having problems...I just had a lot of weird stuff happen...couldn't access anything, got knocked off my dsl modem multiple times...checking for virus now...something weird is going on
Somebody linked yesterday to an article that said that O relied only on his 4 campaign advisers and that the Cabinet couldn't get any input through to him. That might partly explain this kind of cluelessness.
tg wrote:
a jet liner flew somewhere way over my head
It really had no meaning, except that I know Rob loves the Family Blog line, and I felt like using it in a completely inappropriate context. Just to add a little mass confusion into everyone's day.
Oh good. For a minute there I thought you actually knew what is in the Libertarian sauce. Then we'd have to kill you. Don't worry, we won't actually go to the effort of doing anything ourselves. We just assume the market would take care of it.
I interpret this to mean "the average American is screwed and will continue to be screwed far into the future, as we develope policies that favor Wall Street, banks, corporations et al to the detriment of 98% of the American puiblic."
Haven't they done that already? But remember bankers are just soldiers too, but for whose army?
On another note, not seeing any virus alerts...must be a local problem...maybe ATT is messing with the lines again. They're pretty mad that I won't switch to their u-verse package.
Cinco-X wrote: Freedom to fail would, I believe, bring more rationality to the market.
Yes, and that is not what we want. Because, again, rationality isn't in charge. Blame nature again
I don't necessarily agree with his ultimate conclusion, though, which seems to be that the Fed's balance sheet will never shrink and will actually continue to expand through reverse repos. I think the author should consider the natural runoff that will occur with many of the assets (even if it takes a generation) and the losses that will be sustained by the Fed as a result of purchasing toxic assets at par. Both events will cause some of that trillion created out of thin air to disappear.
I do see, though, that it's time for me to go pretend I'm doing something productive in the world, so have a good day, folks.
Oh good. For a minute there I thought you actually knew what is in the Libertarian sauce.
I had a good libertarian buzz going on in college, but I can't seem to find anyone selling it off-campus. And even if I could, it wouldn't be the same experience. Nothing more pathetic than a married father trying to recapture his college days.
"Anyone else having problems...I just had a lot of weird stuff happen...couldn't access anything, got knocked off my dsl modem multiple times...checking for virus now...something weird is going on."
My computer issues appear to be timed to when the helicopters show up outside. The louder the sound of the black choppers the worse my dsl connection. Very weird.
poic wrote: The louder the sound of the black choppers the worse my dsl connection.
tinfoil makes a lovely hat, but you may need a tinfoil suit of armor for this...
Yves here. This is why I am dubious of customized OTC derivatives (as opposed to plain vanilla products, like most interest rate and currency swaps). Their main uses are regulatory arbitrage, per above (generally with very rich fees attached) or to shift risk onto chumps.
Still getting knocked off...wonder what is up. Well in case I get knocked off for good for awhile everyone remember to clap for Kermit this afternoon when the markets open, haven't done that in a while.
The illegitimate son of a minor nobleman, Bernanke rises to considerable power within the decadent Empire by his own wits, and enjoys all the pleasures his position society gives him. Still he is painfully conscious of the impending fall of the Federal Reserve Empire and the subsequent "Long Night" of a galactic Dark Age. His career is dedicated to holding it off for as long as possible.
Of course, there are some baseball players who are making more than that who don't get to the World Series either.
Ummm ... which ball player was it that made a $17 million
bonus
in one season?
Yeah, didn't think so. Terrible analogy. Those guys sign multi-year deals, and their careers are often notoriously short.
Oh, and last I checked the .gov didn't bail out the White Sox, Lakers, or the Colts. Win or lose, they are on their own. (And yes, I know that tax initiatives are often passed to generate revenues for stadiums and such. Those are typically state or local initiatives, and they usually have to pass voter approval. As opposed to the bailout of the Big Boyz, which was almost universally opposed by people everywhere and happened anyway.)
It's not the same as a ball player getting paid fat money and not making it to the World Series ... it is possible for a team to be good, and still not quite get the World Series. It is also possible for a team that does not make the WS to make a lot of money, anyway.
The banksters are getting paid fatter money for losing money. It's absurd, and Obama should have the stones to say so. IMO. So there.
sportsfan (profile) wrote (in reply to...) on Wed, 2/10/2010 - 10:00 am
tg wrote:
one explanation
Thanks for the link, tg. I think that's an excellent article, especially on the facts.
Safe Haven | Containing Inflation Via Unlimited Money Creation: The Feds Strategy
I don't necessarily agree with his ultimate conclusion, though, which seems to be that the Fed's balance sheet will never shrink and will actually continue to expand through reverse repos.
there used to be a guy who commented here named "stagflationary mark"
we used to argue in favor of the opinion, that ultimately (long run) the fedrsrv, usgov, usindustry, will agree to inlfate their way out of the debt, and devalue the dollar to get out of the mess
The terrorist threat that led to the declaration on September 14, 2001, of a national emergency continues. For this reason, I have determined that it is necessary to continue in effect after September 14, 2009, the national emergency with respect to the terrorist threat."
In January, a media report said that the closely held Lembi Group was trying to renegotiate about $1 billion in debt to save dozens of buildings in its portfolio and had handed over 51 buildings to one of its lenders because of bad loans.
The joy of language is that words get bent to their meaning. If it doesn't hold anything, is it really a bank? Can they really be creditors if they're cynical?
Guest Post: How Has the Official State of Emergency in Continuous Effect from 2001 to the Present Effected the Economy and Business? « naked capitalism
Can we really trust an author that doesn't know the proper use of affect and effect?
"Exit strategy." As in "exit, pursued by a bear."
TIFIFY, Ben.
Someone check Kermit's alarm clock. Guess he slept in this morning since Elmo didn't arrive til late yesterday.
Ben Wa Balls pretty much said we are...
YouTube - Turning Japanese- The Vapors
Yes, we should certainly raise the interest rate paid on reserves in order to better communicate our policy.
Because the problem seems to be that we haven't shoveled enough money at the banks yet.
and that most or all of its [ie The Fed's] security holdings will be Treasury securities.
How will that be possible if the Gov't runs a balanced budget and pays down all of its debt just like everyone else in the US is doing?
Is rolling over not the same as kicking the can.
Hearing was snowed out.
I don't think the "prepared remarks" is actual testimony yet. The exit strategy could change any day.
I'd be sweating bullets if I was like 99% of the country that has dollar-denominated assets.
Mook wrote:
As in "exit, pursued by a bear."
"Don’t try to outrun one of Dominia’s Grizzlies; it’ll catch you, knock you down, and eat you. Of course, you could run up a tree. In that case you’ll get a nice view before it knocks the tree down and eats you."
(text from MtG "Grizzly Bears", 4th Ed.)
OT: Looks like an accessible backdoor has been found to let Greece into the QE orgy.
I always thought that 'sweating bullets' was an interesting phrase.
Absorba the Greek?
Juvenal Delinquent wrote:
Only the Oracle knows.
FT.com / Europe - Berlin looks to build Greek ‘firewall’
Big banks or not, the insanity of bailing out Greece remains, though, at least with the concerns about German banks there appears to be at least a bit of self-interest at one level, the banker level, in Germany. A bailout still means destabilization of the entire eurozone.
Watched "The Hurt Locker" last night, really an interesting film.
2 thumbs up~
This is true...but from a survival standpoint, you do want your tribe to have more meat on their bones than the other tribe.
Arguably why our 'sweet tooth' evolved -- sugar is/was a very economical source of energy, fat and carbohydrates too. This worked well when we were out foraging, running around, and hunting mastodons 18 hours a day, but now the reward mechanism in our brain is more of a detriment than a useful guide to healthy behavior, and fully exploited by our food industry.
yagij wrote:
Greeks are always looking for an orgy in the backdoor-
Juvenal Delinquent wrote:
Speaking of interesting films, did Greeks go to work, err... "strike" today?
ResistanceIsFeudal wrote:
FWIW, it's easier to turn most dietary sugar to body fat than it is to turn dietary protein or dietary fat.
How About Obama Calling Blankfein and Dimon "Savvy?"
“'I know both those guys; they are very savvy businessmen,' Obama said in the interview yesterday in the Oval Office with Bloomberg BusinessWeek." LINK
Obama Doesn’t ‘Begrudge’ Bonuses for ‘Savvy’ Blankfein, Dimon
I guess if I were a whore politician I would refer to two of my largest campaign donors as "savvy" as well
Cinco-X wrote:
Beware Greeks baring rifts
I miss Anthony Quinn.
shill wrote:
And yet a failure to bailout would mean ... destabilization of the entire Eurozone.
In the words of that noted philosopher Alanis Morissette: "Isn't it ironic? Don't ya think?"
YouTube - The Doors - Back Door Man (HD) (Vinyl)
It seems like -0.5% to -1% is the default market move now unless the market gets some positive news like the German bailout of Greece yesterday,
Juvenal Delinquent wrote:
Wrong back door. BTW, is it Nuke's family that lives in Greece?
yeah thats what i thought interest(more money) to the banks.why dont we just send them all our pennies,nickles, dimes,quarters,and so on,we could send it in every friday .
funny thing i saw this thing referred to as the panic of 2008, they called the gd29 depression because they thought panic scared the people.
whatever,it will be back financials are flying high wide and handsome and it aint going to last forever!
A fine Mexican actor, who could pass in Hollywood for a Greek.
Isn't It Ironic? Probably Not
Can't find the original article I read way back when that song was released. I like her music, but as a philosophy/logic/etymology nut, this song annoyed the hell out of me.
We go through the various crisi every month nowadays, last month was Dubai, this month Greece, next month perhaps Portugal.
Home Loan Demand Drops Despite Dip in Rates - CNBC
DOW 10K hat getting frayed at the edges.
Oxtail wrote:
Ponzi street says hello " ...a little droopingly but with a hopeful heart" !
Mook wrote:
Caught the
but I have to say it the other way around.
By dropping or even eliminating the interest paid on reserves, the Fed could communicate loud and clear.
As the large volume of reserves in the banking system moved back out (to the economy?) the Fed would be forced to liquidate parts of its balance sheet faster than anticipated or simply print more currency.
BTW, I sent "the precious" off to Saxon last night, notarized and overnight mail. Now I wait for the returned, signed documents...
gabyjan wrote:
Citi is down as if GE; the rest seem to be up. Commodities seem to be taking a hit; maybe that's because the dollar is up today.
You can make up your own mind about the current behavior, but panic implies irrational fear while recent research suggests that depressed people tend to have good reasoning skills.
Absorba the Greek?
Very clever as usual, but don't think the Greeks are going to absorb this too well.
heres what greeks are talking about look at the last one.
ekathimerini.com | In Brief
.........read: "We don't know what the Hell we'll be doing this afternoon, much less a week from now or further!"
Jamie Dimon got all the Greek bonus, again, not doctors or teachers.
The Associated Press: Greek unions strike against austerity plan
I find this interesting, they want 1,200 people to take paycuts? shouldn't it be the other way around? pay raises!
It has been proven our wages have gone no where for years, yet they want people to take pay cuts.
Quincy Medical announces job and pay cuts - Quincy, MA - The Patriot Ledger
Maybe this is a better tune for the Greek financial situation?
YouTube - The Doors - Take It as It Comes (HD) (Vinyl)
We're lucky. Most nations don't get regular public testimony from their rogue traders.
Sing a fado.
Relax shill, it'll trickle down...honest
Wait a minute, if they wait until interest rates go up to sell the bonds, don't they lose a huge amount of money? Aside from absorbing the huge balance sheet loss, doesn't that mean a large fraction of the base money they paid for the securities does not get drained out of the system?
1 currency now -yogi wrote:
....when MDs are paid $40K per year and 25% of everyone's income is "under the radar", you can't afford to be taking too many days off protesting anything.......
I've had the pleasure of seeing fado sung in Portugal, very melancholy.
Cinco-X wrote:
SKF is down, so the financials are doing okay today, even with
.
Sickening really CK, we read of $ million dollar bonuses for morons, yet the working group takes the hit ( pay cuts )......This country needs and enema, and quick.
It's been like that for decades shill, why change now? I'm still waiting for that golden tinkle to shower down on me...Ronnie promised me it would.
albrt wrote:
But if they dump bonds on the current market and there's no demand, won't that effectively cause interest rates to go up?
Comrade Kristina wrote:
Relax shill, it'll trickle down...honest
A trickle is assured, it's only a matter of what trickled down...
Ok folks been a great morning to say the least, I just got the call for snow removal, and well I have 3 (20) something years olds driving my trucks, so being the good shill that I am I have to go baby sit them to make sure they are doing their jobs, good day to you all be safe and get home early going to get real nasty later on.....
albrt wrote:
That's an interesting though, albrt. I wonder what other facility they'd be forced to use in that event?
CK,
Urine for the shock of your life...
Austerity measures in Greece. First austerity domino.
Connecting the dots... how long before that migrates across the Atlantic and comes ashore ?
Earthquake Shakes Chicagoland |
NBC Chicago
That's pretty big for the plains-
negative feedback loops lead one closer to the truth
1 currency now -yogi wrote:
I have no idea why this should surprise anyone.
The options available to the Greeks, and their body politic, are: to accept the blame and bear the painful consequences, or to push most of the pain off on foreign governments and faceless creditors. Predicting their decision ain't rocket science.
And anyone who doesn't think America isn't going to make exactly the same decision when faced with the same dilemma hasn't been paying attention.
CK Family blog, refrain from using " Golden " and " Shower " in the same sentence hahah!
Just had a thought, sure this has been talked about in economic circles for some time, but I just thought of it (I'm slow sometimes to get simple concepts), so bear with me...
I am coming to the conclusion that Kermit is the actor while Elmo is the reactor in the market equation...that means Kermit will always be a head of Elmo unless Elmo decouples and starts acting independently of Kermit... and this would be a rare and serious event and also explains why Bulls are optimistic, and Bears always so pessimistic. Do I have that about right?
Ha JD, living in the US is like dating R. Kelly, you don't know when you're gonna get peed on but you can be pretty sure it is coming
Press room laughter dies down - PATRICK GAVIN | POLITICO CLICK
I wonder if this is significant?
Trickle down reality, It's 1990 again!
We might do this, we might do that......blah, blah, blah, blah.
Allow me to decode: We don't have a clue. We're making it up as we go along. The only thing you can count on is that we will CONtinue to enrich the bankers and preserve the value of trillions in fraudulent credit. Interest on "reserves" is another banker enrichment tool in our banker enrichment tool box.
The productive majority WILL be paying for the cost of banker fraud for a generation.
Here's a .torrent link to my MP3 collection of TARP COP hearings.
I haven't gotten May-August hearings but there's a lot of good stuff.
Why European debt matters to the U.S. Todd Harrison - MarketWatch
My father refused to join an intern strike. My mother was working at the time, and would have supported him (he was paid crap anyway). The strike failed, and it took the death of a young hospital patient to draw attention to the situation of overworked, underpaid interns.
Colgan Crash That Killed 50 Spurs Quest for Damages That Punish - Bloomberg.com
Too bad our corptocracy controlled Congress were pusillanimous in showing Bernanke an exit
So here's a question? What happened to the $3-4T of "bad assets" on the banks balance sheets? My assumption is that its been offloaded onto the FED? I'm talking about the stuff that TARP was supposed to buy.... if the banks haven't gotten rid of that than aren't they still walking around with toxic balance sheets? The point of recapitalization was that they could realize those losses, wasn't it?
China may be preparing to sell some of U.S. securities for financial or geopolitical motivations, or a combination of the two, according to two different accounts.
Where does the money come from to pay interest on reserves?
I mentioned the other day that commuter pilots make about as much as a Mickey D's manager, and I want to take this time to apologize to any managers that i've made fun of, as it turns out they make more money...
YLSP wrote:
The point of TARP is the same as the point of "Sleight of Hand". You're supposed to watch it while the real trick is going on elsewhere. I think the real trick might have been for the banksters to enrich themselves before TSHTF.
By dropping or even eliminating the interest paid on reserves, the Fed could communicate loud and clear. - sportsfan
Thanks, sportsfan. I think this is what Bernanke was getting at.
Cinco-X wrote:
noob wrote
I have been thinking about this since they started buying the non-government bonds. Cinco is right, which is why Bernanke is so keen to assure everybody that they will wait for the interest rates to go up before they sell any bonds.
I think the bottom line is that the Fed has a lot less ability to control interest rates and inflation than they had a few years ago, which is why they are jawboning so furiously. The only way we can get back to the Fed's comfort zone level of base money vs. debt is if the Fed holds these securities to maturity and everyone pays them off, and at the same time the banks lend enough to get private debt back to 2006 levels. I just don't see that happening.
yogi:
Those crash reports are brutal. I typically am on CRJs and I wanted to look up CRJ crashes; one of them was the takeoff from the runway (in Kentucky?). The pilots were talking about their families and future plans, what they were going to do on the weekend... one of them was talking about going to fly overseas... as they were missing all the cues that would've told them they were going onto the wrong runway.
Cinco-X wrote:
I think the real trick might have been for the banksters to enrich themselves before TSHTF.
That's my understanding of it. Loot while there is still loot to loot.
Those foreign governments have the option of pushing it on bankers or the taxpayer. Jamie Dimon (Greek heritage) just got a huge fucking bonus. Did he cure cancer or something?
I like this quote:
Agency debt and MBS are not going to be prepaid as mortgage rates will never go low enough to get people to refi and forget about equity in the near future. So the fed has a 30 year runoff plan I guess. That should lighten their balance sheet.
Hold and hope is now an officially communicated policy....which is really not that different then most "professional" advice you get.
That's what I got out of that. It's one thing to hint at it without saying it...very different to actually set it in stone.
Ciao
MS
Did he cure cancer or something?
Bank balance sheet cancer.
Obama make another deal with the devil squid. Good to see he has a rigid spine. How cute.
Angry Saver wrote:
Why only one generation? Are you aware of something that will stop the bankers from doing the same thing over and over again?
Given the nature of the runoff should someone inform the EPA?
From last thread:
"Import oil prices increased to $73.20 in December - up 87% from the low in February (at $39.22). "
Now, who paid for those banker bailouts?
albrt wrote:
I don't see that happening either, and I was hoping I had just missed something.
don't worry ...
Ben assured Reid and other
supporters that he will work towards increased lending by banks.
Credit creation in a fiat sytem is a privilege. This privilege should only be used for creating wealth, not extracting wealth. Yet, the Fed allowed and encouraged Wall St. to turn this smple tenet upside down.
We're in the mess we are in because Greensham and Bernanke championed Wall Street's use of credit for massive wealth extraction rather than wealth creation.
We've had unimaginable monetary and credit abuses over the past 15 years. Is it any wonder tens of millions of Americans are facing foreclosure, insolvency and a declining standard of living?
bearly wrote:
Obama make another deal with the devil squid. Good to see he has a rigid spine. How cute.
Just another whore in a society full of them, bought and paid for. He ceased to bother me a while ago, it's just disheartening to have to watch.
Obama Doesn’t ‘Begrudge’ Bonuses for ‘Savvy’ Blankfein, Dimon - Yahoo! News
"President Barack Obama said he doesn’t “begrudge” the $17 million bonus awarded to JPMorgan Chase & Co. Chief Executive Officer Jamie Dimon or the $9 million issued to Goldman Sachs Group Inc. CEO Lloyd Blankfein, noting that some athletes take home more pay.
The president, speaking in an interview, said in response to a question that while $17 million is “an extraordinary amount of money” for Main Street, “there are some baseball players who are making more than that and don’t get to the World Series either, so I’m shocked by that as well.”
“I know both those guys; they are very savvy businessmen,” Obama said in the interview yesterday in the Oval Office with Bloomberg BusinessWeek, which will appear on newsstands Friday. “I, like most of the American people, don’t begrudge people success or wealth. That is part of the free- market system.” "
I'm thinking that the Greece thing will be papered over so that there is no real trail back to the german gov't.....have DB or whomever guarantee the debt and then bailout (officially) the bank or institution that makes the guarantee...that's one way to do it. But that also considers the laws surrounding the EU and it's member states.....like that really makes a difference....laws are made to be broken...you know the whole "exigent circumstances" BS pulled here.
Ciao
MS
Money won't necessarily buy a better pilot, but it can either go to investor/banker profit or to training pilots and raising their wages, which could mean fewer hours and less fatigue.
(Intern fatigue was blamed in the Libby Zion hospital death case in NY that I referred to above.)
Listen well:
Two of my 10 themes for 2010 are relevant to this discussion. The first is the "tricky trifecta," or the migration from societal acrimony to social unrest to geopolitical conflict. Populist uprising, the rejection of wealth and an emerging class war are symptomatic of this dynamic, as is the unfortunate fact economic hardship traditionally serves as a precursor to war. See "Ten themes for 2010"
Todd Harrison - Market Watch
Angry Saver wrote:
We're in this pickle because Western society as a whole decided to ignore long-term stability for short-term gains. This extends from individual consumers right through to bankers and high-level policy makers. No one has clean hands in this mess.
Angry Saver wrote:
I have to disagree; I do not believe that true wealth can be created by the creation of credit. Credit and money in and of themselves only facilitate commerce and the exchange or creation of wealth. I refuse to believe that credit or fiat money has any value when separated from the goods in the economy-
barfly wrote:
Actually the MSM take goes in the other direction:
Apparently, there is just too much cash sloshing around in the real economy. That's why people are spending so much money and business are hiring left and right to keep up with unprecedented demand.
Something's wrong when TALF is "monetary policy".
ghostface, the snippets from that article are spliced together in a cherry picked fashion. I think I'll wait until I read the article in context.
ghostfaceinvestah wrote:
“there are some baseball players who are making more than that and don’t get to the World Series either, so I’m shocked by that as well.”
I don't really like that either, but as a taxpayer I don't "own" part of their institutions (with no voting rights, of course), and didn't lend them large sums of my money.
I think "Savvy" means "contribute generously to my re-election campaign. But, you betcha' Sarah will turn down banker bux if they are offered.
Why only one generation? Are you aware of something that will stop the bankers from doing the same thing over and over again?
albrt,
You might be right. I'm just thinking that given enough misery there will be forced change.
I think Ken should consider changing the
icon to Red. It would be much more fitting and actually better reflect the nature of the most deadly of the beasts. See, in MX a specific more deadly variety are referred to as Diablo Rojo, Red Demon or red devil, known as Humboldt Squid here. They're quite nasty beasts. I have pulled many from the water.
Humboldt Squid - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Squidly
5-smart-moves-to-make-before-the-new-credit-card-law-takes-effect: Personal Finance News from Yahoo! Finance
"Even if you're the person who pays off your balance and doesn't even have any credit card debt," says Bowne. "They might get a notice that says they're getting a $100 annual fee. Even people with stellar credit and stellar credit payment histories need to pay attention."
New credit card laws start Feb 22. Look out for higher fees.
Angry Saver wrote:
....no wonder here.........acting like a teenager with a pocketful of $100-bills leads us to where we are. The biggest offenders and condoners are now the biggest whiners.
The poor don't begrudge the rich until it is clear that the two world theory is false. There is only one world for the poor and it is perched on their broken backs.
noob goldberg wrote:
We're in this pickle because Western society as a whole decided to ignore long-term stability for short-term gains.
Yep. It's a cultural problem wrapped in an economic one. No one is blameless, but those least to blame are those punished the most.
bearly wrote:
Vampire Squid - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Obama Doesn’t ‘Begrudge’ Bonuses for Blankfein, Dimon (Update1) - Bloomberg.com
"Obama is “trying to walk a very fine line,” said Mark Borges, a compensation consultant at Compensia Inc. in Corte Madera, California.
“He wants to represent popular anger at the bailout and Wall Street pay, while at the same time trying not to alienate these guys, who he needs if he’s going to get reforms enacted,” Borges said. “Not an easy task.” "
Would have been real easy if they just would have been nationalized.
In the long run, the Federal Reserve anticipates that its balance sheet will shrink toward more historically normal levels and that most or all of its security holdings will be Treasury securities.
Yeah, I'm sure that is the plan. And how many plans have survived the battlefield intact?
Frankly, I think the point of Ben's talk of an exit strategy is to dampen the talk of increased oversight/audit. But if Ben launches QE2 before the election - hand meet hornet's nest.
"No one has clean hands in this mess. "
BZZZZT!...... There are some of us who were responsible and didn't take the carrot even though it was offered MANY times. I respectfully disagree with the above characterization....but it is true for a large swath of our population.
Ciao
MS
Also this:
The point of recognition will eventually arrive that our debt issues are cumulative; when that happens, the contagion will no longer be contained. In the meantime, as we edge from here to there, be on the lookout for the unintended consequences of European austerity initiatives, including but not limited to social unrest and the abatement of risk appetites.
Todd Harrison - Market Watch
Yep, but that would be Socialism you betcha!
For right now, we're exporting the misery to China.
Taxpayers pay to build stadiums for the billionaires who own the teams fulls of millionaires playing children's games. What a sad spectacle.
Angry Saver wrote:
No, it isn't.
Some might suggest it was the inevitable result.
Bernanke: Federal Reserve's exit strategy"
they all board a plane for paraguay
Badger boy wrote:
Taxpayers pay to build stadiums for the billionaires who own the teams fulls of millionaires playing children's games. What a sad spectacle.
Pax Americana! Our only remaining export, really.
Angry Saver wrote:
It's a feature not a bug.
Whatever happened to the new law which was supposed to overrule supreme court ruling that removed campaign contributions limits by institutions??
"Would have been real easy if they just would have been nationalized. "
Most of it is...we just can't or won't call it such...the whole stigma of socialization. We are already there just not in name.
Ciao
MS
ResistanceIsFeudal wrote:
I presume that you refer to folks like me that refused to buy a house or carry a revolving credit balance, and will now be expected to pay for this fiasco with their taxes since we're some of the few that actually still have some net worth?
MS wrote:
Most of it is...we just can't or won't call it such...the whole stigma of socialization. We are already there just not in name.
If we called a spade a spade it would become all too clear that some spades are HELLA more equal than others.
OK CR (or somebody), what exactly will it mean when the Fed raises or lowers the interest rate on reserves? Is there some widely-understood theory of Interest-Rates-on-Reserves which will tell us what the Fed is trying to do and what might happen? (Never mind if said theory has been empirically tested - this is never the case.) Is this change going to make it easier for Congress and the public to understand what the Fed is up to? Do any economists outside the Fed understand this? Krugman didn't - he thought the excess reserves loaned by the Fed and controlled by these interest rates were deposits. I seem to recall that paying interest on reserves was something that Greenspan always wanted - that can't be a good sign.
REBear wrote:
It was ruled unconstitutional-
I know plenty of unemployed people that would love to pay taxes
Cinco-X wrote:
I presume that you refer to folks like me that refused to buy a house or carry a revolving credit balance
Guilty as charged. I'm a member of the sucker party too, FWIW.
It occurs to me that all of the contortions the fed is going through can be reduced to two overall aims: 1) the end goal of transferring wealth from savers to the banks; 2) making the mechanisms of this transfer sufficiently opaque that it doesn't undermine the confidence in the entire system. It's all about how to steal from someone without them knowing it happened.
ResistanceIsFeudal wrote:
No good deed goes unpunished-
Comrade Kristina wrote:
.....well, don't include ME in that group.......
I think the real trick might have been for the banksters to enrich themselves before TSHTF.
That's my understanding of it. Loot while there is still loot to loot.
35% Say New Political Party Is Needed - Rasmussen Reports™
Ahhh, but you most likely did if you live in a city with a team, as those stadiums usually cost the public a pretty penny.
Funny thing about those taxes. A patron of mine was complaining about how much he had to pay in taxes this year. I let him grumble for awhile and covet my whopping 300 bucks I was getting back before I asked him if he'd like to trade tax liability on the condition that we also trade incomes. He declined the offer, funny that.
ghostfaceinvestah wrote:
thats easy..with the bankstas, reditioned and hanging upside down in a cell, with electrodes attached to the appropriate places im sure they will give the commander in chief all the cooperation required
bankstas R terrorists
New poll:
Do you begrudge Jamie Dimon's $17 million bonus? | Hoocoodanode?
MS wrote:
True, I was speaking in aggregate, and we can only be truly responsible for our own actions; there are, of course, examples of those who have been prudent throughout. However, in terms of society, of which we are all a part, the trend has been a cultural shift away from patience and prudence and toward immediate gratification through increased leverage.
We can pretend that the decision was forced upon the populace by circumstances beyond their control, but the reality is that large numbers of them made a conscious decision to extract from the future to enhance well-being in the present, and that has affected society as a whole.
It'd be nice if Obama took the world serious, instead of comparing things to the world series.
mock turtle wrote:
Or just a Japanese style audit of
will do the trick.
skeptonomist wrote:
I believe that the Fed can set the rate it charges for loans from the discount window, and the rates it pays for either reserves it holds for banks or "excess" reserves it holds for banks. Other than that, rates are governed by supply and demand for bonds and money.
I refuse to believe that credit or fiat money has any value when separated from the goods in the economy-
cinco-x,
You can refuse to believe all you want. But the wealth extracted by Wall St. via non-productive credit creation is real and spends just like the dollars created to produce real goods.
Private equity, hedge funds, trading fees, bogus investment vehicles founded on lies, etc. are primarly inflation creation tools designed for skimming.
In a poker game, a lot of money changes hands but no wealth is created. No harm no foul. But in a system set up to create positive inflation, you can't have the dealer and a few inside players creating and skimming all the inflation. In that scenario, inflationary credit creation is counter-productive for the majority as they become poorer and unable and unwilling to support the credit in the system.
Comrade Kristina wrote:
I'm convinced there would have been a revolution in this country if Obama had nationalized the banks.
The teabaggers have already shown how many stark raving mad people who understand nothing are out there seething already.
tncubsfan wrote:
I'm under the impression the plan is to go to Costa Rica or Paraguay
I am beginning to wonder if this 'statement' by the president was required by the Republicans in order for negotiations on health care to move forward... maybe his teleprompter was broken and he had to think of something on the fly.
anotherajh wrote:
It's all about how to steal from someone without them knowing it happened.
I thought that's what finance always was...
It's a feature not a bug.
Rob Dawg,
Too funny! Hahaha!
The POTUS actually admitted that the Swedish model was a better method than Japan in an interview at the time but also said it was not politically feasible to do so.
Helicopter out of fuel?
Vonbek777 wrote:
Another misspoke?
I'm convinced there would have been a revolution in this country if Obama had nationalized the banks.
Or something. There are provisions in the Constitution.
Angry Saver wrote:
My point was that you cannot 'CREATE' wealth with credit. It's obvious that you can steal wealth with it.
if the Fed wants to move bank reserves into the economy, it doesn't make sense that they would raise interest rates on those reserves. That would cause more money to be added to the reserves, not less.
Vonbek, read it again. He actually never said he doesn't begrudge Jamie his bonus. He said the baseball players pay "shocks him" as well. What he said was "I like most Americans don't begrudge people success and wealth"...It also stops there so we have no way of knowing if there is a "but" attached to that or not. Again, I will wait until I read the article with these statements in context, not spliced together to produce a meme.
noob goldberg wrote:
However, in terms of society, of which we are all a part, the trend has been a cultural shift away from patience and prudence and toward immediate gratification through increased leverage.
Willingness to take on leverage is really only a later symptom of the underlying disease. The basic fact is we stopped being a productive and creative economy long ago and turned to looting one another to "get ahead" in a zero sum game.
Obama or his spokesperson will "walk" the statement back.
Speaking of which...Google and intel want to try those brain and eye implants...I think Obama would be first on the list...imagine having a built in teleprompter and fact finder with instantaneous information transfer. Probably be a requirement for all government officials in the future.
I haven't been paying attention. Are we still in an inning or is this crash now measured in games, for example: We are in the 11th game of the 160 game season ?
sportsfan wrote:
The teabaggers have already shown how many stark raving mad people who understand nothing are out there seething already.
at a minimum he would have been politically tarred and feathered...and maybe the target of a coup
the dems will live to regret their tarp vote in 08
had they let the system crumble when it should have then the blame would have been appropriately shared
and thee people would have begged for temporary bank nationalization
but now...obama and the dems will get the blame they so richly deserve, and then some
unfortunately the repubs will get to play the party of no and laugh all the way to the bank
ResistanceIsFeudal wrote:
It's only a zero sum game because we gave up on productive activities a turned to unproductive activities like finance. When we were building factories and creating capital, it was not a zero sum situation.
Nothing wrong with paying taxes. It is what they have done with them and still want more.
Comrade Kristina wrote:
Jeez, these men in power always with sex on the brain....Wonder if Michelle is aware of her hubby's preferences
?
Cinco-X wrote:
It's only a zero sum game because we gave up on productive activities
I agree. I thought that is what I wrote, actually.
From my window it looks like a white-out here in DC. I can hear the wind mumbling and even shrieking a bit. Have not seen a single pedestrian or vehicle for hours on our side street. Everything shut down, we read.
Going out to see it after lunch. If I'm not back in an hour send the St. Bernard with keg.
Feb. 10 (Bloomberg) -- President Obama today announced a new plan to change the status of New Jersey from a state to an autonomous province. "This will allow New Jersey to become the Switzerland of America! Free from pesky regulations and better able to create wealth." When asked what this new autonomous province will be called Obama replied "Exit 666" is being considered.
You will never get the full context CK...they don't allow that...but knock yourself out, I read it on Bloomberg before coffee this morning, who knows what I read
...think the whole interview comes out on Friday and we will already have moved past it by then. My impression was the President wants a group hug moment.
Men don't have to be in power for that rps
rps wrote:
men in power always with sex on the brain
Don't you think there's a reason those go together?
mock turtle wrote:
A kneeling Paulson before the clueless, tingling Pelosi and a regret is born!
mock turtle wrote:
Yeah, we just got a reminder of the Patriot Act vote earlier in this thread.
pavel.chichikov wrote:
Oh great. Now you are expecting a Swiss bailout as well?
ResistanceIsFeudal wrote:
After a re-read, I see that it could have been interpreted that way. I just thought you were implying that life is a zero sum game, and it's not, unless the folks in power make it that way. My mistake.
I prefer the Denmark model
I just get suspicious when I see quotes spliced together to create a new sentence...
ResistanceIsFeudal wrote:
Yes, but it usually falls under the topic of abnormal psychology.
When the economy is doing well, you need to print money to expand the money supply to match the pace of the economic expansion. When the economy is doing poorly, you need to print money to get more money into circulation to provide emergency liquidity. Is it just me or does this game seem rigged so that every answer is print more money and hand it over to rich bankers who are gracious enough to act as market intermediaries for this genius economic policy? Kind of reminds me of an alcoholic finding excuses to drink.
My point was that you cannot 'CREATE' wealth with credit. It's obvious that you can steal wealth with it.
Cinco-x,
I still see it a little differently. Credit does enable economies to create wealth. My point is that rather than using credit to enable wealth creation, Wall St. has hijacked the credit creation process to extract wealth and/or gather inflation.
Absent the Fed's epic fraudulent credit preservation efforts, Wall St would have collapsed and all would more fully understand the massive wealth extraction that has occurred.
Oh great. Now you are expecting a Swiss bailout as well?
ResistanceIsFeudal wrote:
Yes. There is a cure for that, but it would require a time horizon of at least a decade, so it is politically infeasible.
There is an alternative approach, however. Currently the problem is that the population views the government as the only mechanism to accomplish change. The government and its politicians are merely part of an institution, however. They can be manipulated to accomplish ends beyond typical political time horizons.
What is needed is a social plan, supported by a large swath of society--workers, industrial firms, smaller finance firms, academia, etc--that has the ultimate goal of arresting this trend over a period of a decade or more. With enough momentum and popular support, every politician would be forced to accept the tenets of the plan as a prerequisite toward gaining office.
I'm an optimist, but I recognize how utterly difficult such a strategy would be. But bemoaning the short-sightedness of politicians is even more counter-productive; it must simply be accepted. So we start elsewhere, and force government to be subservient to the will of the people. mp's industrial strategy would fall under such an initiative. Focus on R&D would also fall under it.
It's a thought.
I just get suspicious when I see quotes spliced together to create a new sentence...
Quote of the day (so far)
":Goldman Sachs CFO:Low 2009 Bonuses Not Firm's New Formula"
Those were low?.....
Ciao
MS
barfly,
The thinking is that paying interest on reserves will keep money at the Fed rather than circulating in the economy.
Here it is IN context. About what he has been saying all along that compensation should be tied to long term performance
Well I am trying to be a recovering paranoid android. I mean what is the Michael Penn song...Bad Sign:
Now that we're alone;
Trouble, baby, doesn't
always come in threes.
I had a hunch the fight was thrown,
But what's it going
to take to get me to
my knees?
It's a bad sign
When I'm just marking time...
A bad sign,
Hoping will be fine.
A bad sign.
When I think this way
It's a bad sign.
Been staring at a wall for days.
Can't hold a position I
will not reverse.
The paper prints a simple phrase
But all I see are ciphers
in iambic verse.
That's me...
Comrade Kristina wrote:
I wonder where he picked up that talking point.
Cinco-X wrote:
I just thought you were implying that life is a zero sum game, and it's not, unless the folks in power make it that way
Exactly. And who, exactly, wants to give up monopoly advantage? Tyranny is the ultimate drug, and another large bit of genetic hard-wiring.
REBear wrote:
Foe of ARod?
Angry Saver wrote:
We seem to see it the same sans a slight semantic quibble. Enabling wealth creation is not creating wealth. It's enabling the creation of wealth.
Comrade Kristina wrote:
There are also some well known celebrities who make more than that doing one movie.
If compensation were aligned with social utility, the American Way wouldn't exist.
ResistanceIsFeudal wrote:
pavel.chichikov wrote:
The class war's been going on for 10 or 20 years; just some on the side that's been pounded on no longer believe the aggressor's shouts of "It's for your own good, trust me!" What happens soon (I hope) is that both sides begin to fight.
Because if both sides don't fight, the war will never end.
They only call it class warfare when we fight back Bob Dobbs...
BTW...I do understand the mix of options and cash was skewed towards the restricted stock shares however you may recall where GS stock was before Hanky-Poo took the job at Treasury and where it was when he finally sold it.
Ciao
MS
Palin/ Dobbs 2012!
Jamie Dimon for Treasury Czar!
Pat Robertson for Defense Czar!
Jeff Gannon for Press Czar!
Jim Haggard for Faith Based Programs Czar!
Angry Saver wrote:
reprint but one explanation
Safe Haven | Containing Inflation Via Unlimited Money Creation: The Feds Strategy
Wow, just had a ghost in the machine moment. After writing my recovering paranoid android statement, one of my cd library carousels hooked up to my pc booted up and spit out 16stone by Bush...everything zen and machinehead...problem with being paranoid is you never quite know what is just a freak random event. Go outside and see if the
are hovering over again.
yagij wrote:
I was thinking Squat box.
pavel.chichikov wrote:
The snow here is beautiful as well. The difference is our snow is polite enough to be seen and not felt: http://2.bp.blogspot.com/_zqzPMzXNGso/S3LhFXKQ7eI/AAAAAAAAD6s/hqeC5lEgqLg/s1600-h/CRW_4128.jpg
HomeGnome wrote:
Church Czar
noob goldberg wrote:
What is needed is a social plan, supported by a large swath of society--workers, industrial firms, smaller finance firms, academia, etc--that has the ultimate goal of arresting this trend over a period of a decade or more.
The problem is the tyranny of the majority - think of the stereotypical padded pension folks working minimal skill and minimal risk jobs... they are much better off than they would be if left to subsist on their merits, and will not give that advantage up easily. The sad fact is a small % of people are 'value-producing' ... and that's ok as long as social surplus exist. But the worst thing we can do is send highly-intelligent and self-motivated people into looting for a living, and/or streamlining the process, which is exactly what we are doing.
HG, stop it.
Yeah so Obama completely misses the point that baseball players compete in the open, even subject to random urine tests, and their stats and ticket sales are public knowledge and real. Public banks meet secretly with the President, have access to secret Fed money, fudge their accounting, and no drug testing (obviously, given their decision-making).
Today's volume is the lowest in almost a month. The last day volume was this low was January 14th.
Comrade Kristina wrote:
mumble, mumble... uppity servants... mumble... don't know their place... mumble mumble...
1 currency now -yogi wrote:
Now that we are into Year Two of O, I'm not surprised that he is trying to save the bankers through association. Next thing he'll quote is how Cardinals and Bishops make decent money for their jobs whose organizations can be as opaque as the banker bunkers.
.
Rob Dawg wrote:
Speaking of mumbling, what is the next CA date for us to watch and hold our breaths? March 31? May 1?
Cinco-X wrote:

Yeah, it's not fair to direct that rage at people or institutions, so I just blame nature and evolution for screwing us all.
ResistanceIsFeudal wrote:
I think there is a way to reverse that trend, and I don't even think it would be that expensive.
But my ping times are hitting the 1.1 second range, and my internet has slowed to an absolute crawl, so I'm going to pull back from hoocoodanode for the day.
Good luck everyone, we're all counting on you.
ResistanceIsFeudal wrote:
Rest assured that Momma Nature has done her own fair share of
seeing as how her children have wrecked the house.
Wall St. committed TREASON against the United States and their citizens; aided and abetted by FEDgov.
ResistanceIsFeudal wrote:
That's a very accurate take; it's been mentioned before, but the problem is not allowing people to fail, whether it be "the stereotypical padded pension folks working minimal skill and minimal risk jobs" or the 'highly-intelligent and self-motivated people '. Unfortunately, it seems there is political value in not allowing either to fail, either from a standpoint of votes or money, and this leads us to where we are now. Freedom to fail would, I believe, bring more rationality to the market.
1 currency now -yogi wrote:
"Mr. President?"
"Yes?"
"Those random drug tests you ordered for senior advisors?"
"Yes?"
"well, Timmay came up clean. No hopium, no green shoots, nothing."
"Dammit! Well tie him down and pump him full if oyu have to. If this gets out..."
"Yessir, the full 'Paulson" treatment it is."
"If that doesn't work I'm giving you Presidential authority to exceed safety limits and use Greenspanning if necessary. Hold the Libertarian sauce."
Rob Dawg wrote:
Libertarian sauce? FamilyBlogFamilyBlogFamilyBlogFamilyBlogFamilyBlogFamilyBlogFamilyBlogFamilyBlog.
We’re doomed."*
Krugman today
RD, you're just wrong for that
Who dat say the Swiss don't know how to begrudge.
UBS Claws Back $282 Million of Bonuses After Posting 2009 Loss - Bloomberg.com
yagij wrote:
Momma Nature is a great believer in freedom to fail. It's the only way in the long run.
thanks, tg, for that link. Very helpful. Perhaps the best explanation I've yet seen on the subject written for the layman.
noob goldberg wrote:
a jet liner flew somewhere way over my head
Phil and Wendy will be most upset....
rps wrote:
Don't kid yourself.
I don't have that much power.
Who dat say Paulson and Buffett don't know how to sell books:
Paulson, Once a Top Earner, Says Bankers Are Overpaid (Update1) - Bloomberg.com
yagij wrote:
The freaking idjits are debating online freaking poker. They don't have time for the real world. If routine revenues continue to disappoint (even odds) then we might need a quick fix by mid March. By the end of April I expect a Q1 '10 corporate and CY '09 personal income tax shortfall to precipitate the next crisis.
Anyone else having problems...I just had a lot of weird stuff happen...couldn't access anything, got knocked off my dsl modem multiple times...checking for virus now...something weird is going on.
Cinco-X wrote:
I agree, but man, do we hate to "fail". More like "freedom to flail".
yagij wrote:
Rest assured that Momma Nature has done her own fair share of Rant seeing as how her children have wrecked the house.
Wrecked the house, then burned it for firewood.
Nothing here Vonbek, I think they are onto you...
tg wrote:
As I read this, I couldn't help thinking it was from the Onion, but sadly, no............
yagij wrote:
I agree, but man, do we hate to "fail". More like "freedom to flail".
Freedom to bail.
Just need a common sense conservative solution: "Freedom Fail"
You betcha'
yagij wrote:
Dexterous to the max.
tg wrote:
It really had no meaning, except that I know Rob loves the Family Blog line, and I felt like using it in a completely inappropriate context. Just to add a little mass confusion into everyone's day.
Vonbek777 wrote:
Same thing has been happening to me all day. My pings hit the 1500ms range for a while.
Vonbek777 wrote:
Rob Dawg wrote:
Fix what you can.
Avoid what you can not fix.
Pretty typical in projects, I see it often.
We have our eye on you, noob.
Somebody linked yesterday to an article that said that O relied only on his 4 campaign advisers and that the Cabinet couldn't get any input through to him. That might partly explain this kind of cluelessness.
What if a study showed that soldiers on amphetamines were more likely to survive, and bankers on coke made smarter trades?
yagij wrote:
Most of us are on the receiving end of that flail---
barfly wrote:
your quite welcome,
Freedom Flail.

Another common sense solution.
You betcha'
1 currency now -yogi wrote:
To perform a true scientific analysis you'd have to find one that's not. Good luck.
noob goldberg wrote:
Oh good. For a minute there I thought you actually knew what is in the Libertarian sauce. Then we'd have to kill you. Don't worry, we won't actually go to the effort of doing anything ourselves. We just assume the market would take care of it.
I was thinking that myself noob...The control group would be nil.
I interpret this to mean "the average American is screwed and will continue to be screwed far into the future, as we develope policies that favor Wall Street, banks, corporations et al to the detriment of 98% of the American puiblic."
HomeGnome wrote:
Beatings to continue until morale improves...
Haven't they done that already? But remember bankers are just soldiers too, but for whose army?
On another note, not seeing any virus alerts...must be a local problem...maybe ATT is messing with the lines again. They're pretty mad that I won't switch to their u-verse package.
Cinco-X wrote:
Freedom to fail would, I believe, bring more rationality to the market.
Yes, and that is not what we want. Because, again, rationality isn't in charge. Blame nature again
Comrade Kristina
+10... for putting the quote in context
noob goldberg wrote:
the evil noob goldberg
Rob Dawg wrote:
Has anyone ever actually seen or tasted Libertarian Sauce, or is it in reality just another Urban Legend?
tg wrote:
Thanks for the link, tg. I think that's an excellent article, especially on the facts.
Safe Haven | Containing Inflation Via Unlimited Money Creation: The Feds Strategy
I don't necessarily agree with his ultimate conclusion, though, which seems to be that the Fed's balance sheet will never shrink and will actually continue to expand through reverse repos. I think the author should consider the natural runoff that will occur with many of the assets (even if it takes a generation) and the losses that will be sustained by the Fed as a result of purchasing toxic assets at par. Both events will cause some of that trillion created out of thin air to disappear.
I do see, though, that it's time for me to go pretend I'm doing something productive in the world, so have a good day, folks.
Rob Dawg wrote:
I had a good libertarian buzz going on in college, but I can't seem to find anyone selling it off-campus. And even if I could, it wouldn't be the same experience. Nothing more pathetic than a married father trying to recapture his college days.
Coming soon to the rest of Europe:
FT.com / World / FT World News
Ciao
MS
Booyah!
"Anyone else having problems...I just had a lot of weird stuff happen...couldn't access anything, got knocked off my dsl modem multiple times...checking for virus now...something weird is going on."
My computer issues appear to be timed to when the helicopters show up outside. The louder the sound of the black choppers the worse my dsl connection. Very weird.
Cinco-X wrote:
Needs galt.
The
is there for your freedom, poic.
are showing up on the WMD scanners...
Either that or your
noob goldberg wrote:
Yes, you really need a divorce to do it right.
"Has anyone ever actually seen or tasted Libertarian Sauce "
Goes well with squirrel.
Maury the Credit Responsibility Panda wrote:
poic wrote:
The louder the sound of the black choppers the worse my dsl connection.
tinfoil makes a lovely hat, but you may need a tinfoil suit of armor for this...
Good one, Maury.
Goldman Helped Greece Disguise Deficit « naked capitalism
Yves here. This is why I am dubious of customized OTC derivatives (as opposed to plain vanilla products, like most interest rate and currency swaps). Their main uses are regulatory arbitrage, per above (generally with very rich fees attached) or to shift risk onto chumps.
"Either that or your Brown Pants are showing up on the WMD scanners... "
They're standing in my bedroom closet. I don't usually put them on until 1 hour before market close.
Angry Saver for Treasury Secretary!
some music to enhance your reading pleasure
YouTube - appassionata
Still getting knocked off...wonder what is up. Well in case I get knocked off for good for awhile everyone remember to clap for Kermit this afternoon when the markets open, haven't done that in a while.
poic wrote:
Another of the commentariat blogging in his undershorts! Man I wish I didn't know that....
sportsfan wrote:
The illegitimate son of a minor nobleman, Bernanke rises to considerable power within the decadent Empire by his own wits, and enjoys all the pleasures his position society gives him. Still he is painfully conscious of the impending fall of the Federal Reserve Empire and the subsequent "Long Night" of a galactic Dark Age. His career is dedicated to holding it off for as long as possible.
poic wrote:
TMI... TMI... familyblogfamilybogfamilyblog....
I wear a robe now since the kids are getting older. Looking into kilts.
Cinco-X wrote:
It's one of the perks about working from home.
"Another of the commentariat blogging in his undershorts! Man I wish I didn't know that...."
Don't worry I wear my tin-foil bath robe the rest of the day.
Vonbek777 wrote:
---That could be hazardous to your health.
Rob Dawg wrote:
Glad to know I'm not the only person with that kind of family...
That cheap ass foil kept tearing on me so I switched to "survival blankets" instead.
HomeGnome wrote:
Especially around open flames or Greek parties
After the Tape: U.S. Losing Edge on Export-Led Growth - Real Time Economics - WSJ
That'd be a good point if the year was 1976...
Ummm ... which ball player was it that made a $17 million
in one season?
Yeah, didn't think so. Terrible analogy. Those guys sign multi-year deals, and their careers are often notoriously short.
Oh, and last I checked the .gov didn't bail out the White Sox, Lakers, or the Colts. Win or lose, they are on their own. (And yes, I know that tax initiatives are often passed to generate revenues for stadiums and such. Those are typically state or local initiatives, and they usually have to pass voter approval. As opposed to the bailout of the Big Boyz, which was almost universally opposed by people everywhere and happened anyway.)
It's not the same as a ball player getting paid fat money and not making it to the World Series ... it is possible for a team to be good, and still not quite get the World Series. It is also possible for a team that does not make the WS to make a lot of money, anyway.
The banksters are getting paid fatter money for losing money. It's absurd, and Obama should have the stones to say so. IMO. So there.
UTILIKILTS - American Made Utility Kilts for Everyday Wear
Seattle-based.
What can I say?
sportsfan (profile) wrote (in reply to...) on Wed, 2/10/2010 - 10:00 am
tg wrote:
one explanation
Thanks for the link, tg. I think that's an excellent article, especially on the facts.
Safe Haven | Containing Inflation Via Unlimited Money Creation: The Feds Strategy
I don't necessarily agree with his ultimate conclusion, though, which seems to be that the Fed's balance sheet will never shrink and will actually continue to expand through reverse repos.
there used to be a guy who commented here named "stagflationary mark"
we used to argue in favor of the opinion, that ultimately (long run) the fedrsrv, usgov, usindustry, will agree to inlfate their way out of the debt, and devalue the dollar to get out of the mess
i continue to keep to this belief
Wow, broward, you are my hero... those are great.
Vonbek777 wrote:
You'd be surprised how often I see one, perhaps once a month at a restaurant, etc.
threetorches wrote:
On the other hand, baseball is a .gov sanctioned monopoly...
Vonbek777 wrote:
It's not a look everyone can pull off.
That tuxedo model is something...
Mock, he stops by occasionally and still maintains his own blog, as well.
Illusion of Prosperity
"The banksters are getting paid fatter money for losing money. It's absurd, and Obama should have the stones to say so. IMO. So there."
In a nushell that's the problem.....your entire response is spot-on...especially the last sentence. Bravo
Ciao
MS
My wife won't watch that movie with me anymore. She says its not as funny when you are living it.
"On September 10 2009, President Obama continued the state of emergency:
The terrorist threat that led to the declaration on September 14, 2001, of a national emergency continues. For this reason, I have determined that it is necessary to continue in effect after September 14, 2009, the national emergency with respect to the terrorist threat."
Guest Post: How Has the Official State of Emergency in Continuous Effect from 2001 to the Present Effected the Economy and Business? « naked capitalism
Sorry about your rug...
Vonbek777 wrote:
If it's not in Tartan, is it really a kilt?
Four CitiApartments affiliates file for bankruptcy
| Reuters
shill wrote:
I forget. When businesses do it, is it "jingle mail" or "ruthless default"?
The joy of language is that words get bent to their meaning. If it doesn't hold anything, is it really a bank? Can they really be creditors if they're cynical?
rosethorn wrote:
Can we really trust an author that doesn't know the proper use of affect and effect?
Neither. It is called a business decision.
On topic but it takes a leap of faith.
We know now why M3 was dropped from official reporting. Money Supply Charts
The Fed and CBs fear deflation. For decades it was easy, print print print. Until it stops working.
I remember laughing out loud at the German nihilists and everyone in the theater was scratching their heads or walking out... loved that movie.