CR, I seem to remember that you pointed out how bad the seasonal adjustment is for the Case-Shiller. Presumably, this is why the market forms expectations around the NSA, which was a big fat miss and showed a decline.
S&P is really poor at releasing data. The release their report first that is for NSA data - and the media picks that up, as an example: http://www.cnbc.com/id/35077113
And then they release the actual data. And it shows a slight increase, not a decrease, using the SA data.
Geesh. Just release the data right away.
I think the LoanPerformance numbers are better anyway.
best to all
token bull, I've been reporting the SA data consistently, and I'm not going to switch because the numbers change.
House prices have a clear seasonal pattern, so they should be reported SA first.
Oh well ... it is kind of fun being the only site reporting an "increase" in prices. I expect the NY Times will get it right (they have been on top of this reporting issue)
"The seasonal adjustment appears pretty good in the '90s, but it appears insufficient now. I expect that the index will show steeper declines, especially starting in October and November."
The market ignores the SA for precisely this reason: it is essentially noise around the NSA.
IIRC, that program did end. Treasury had an MBS purchase program along with the Fed.
From the FRBNY,
How is the Federal Reserve's agency MBS purchase program related to the U.S. Treasury's efforts to purchase agency MBS?
The Federal Reserve's agency MBS program is separate and distinct from the U.S. Treasury's program but both programs are aimed at fostering improved conditions in mortgage markets.
I keep forgetting that a NC city is still worse off than Dallas. I have friends and relatives in NC, and they are in pretty nice and stable areas so easy to forget.
Dallas still down more than the FHA 3.5% down payments though.
Watch San Diego and then Sacramento for any signs of sustained stability or the start of another leg down. So far SD seems robust and their high prices magnify any credit problems and minimize the effects of government stimulus. It will be interesting when the investors who make up so much of the recent volume realize the benefits of a high interest rate environment (lower prices, less competition, larger tax benefits) stop flipping in anticipation of inflation.
"
The nexus of that growth often comes down to real estate: Who owns it, who gets the sweet deals on it, who gets ousted, and who among Communist Party officials and their developer cronies pockets the big bucks from the infrastructure, business and residential projects that have turned China into a monumental construction site.
The equation of the Chinese growth story that is changing the world (and keeping U.S. Wal-Mart customers happy) is unforgiving: Ten percent annual expansion is the guarantor of the Communist Party’s hold on power and so everything will be done to sustain it. Agonized debate (think U.S. health care reform or Afghan deployment) is not for China. Bulldozers are more its thing.
The thrill of living in China is this very short distance between words and action. Few Western executives are immune to the frisson. Forget Indian democratic dithering! Nowhere else are projects so intimate with their execution.
"
I know a guy who has been talking about this spread for at least 25 years and I don't think has made a buck trading it. However, he did buy gold at about $800/ oz in the ''70s (?) and still has it. As for the spread, you might as well try to predict the pork belly natural gas spread, you have a better chance of getting that one right...
“As a businessman, I more than recognize that the way the government is operating is not only unsustainable, it is a recipe for disaster and failure,” “This amendment will force Congress to become better stewards of the taxpayers’ money and give the President much-needed authority to remove items from appropriations bills that are considered wasteful on a national perspective.”
Senator Isaskon who pushed to extend the house credit.
Hi Josap. I'm still new at this. So it is just now sinking in with me how lacking in transparency our nation's residential real estate data are. Home ownership plays such a significant role in our economy—and it's one of the few tangible ways in which average Americans have been able to feel invested in the economy. But I am beginning to realize how easy it would be--for any entity that might find it in their best interest to do so--to manipulate these numbers. It surprised me that the National Association of Realtors report that was released yesterday seems to have as much weight as it apparently does. I would think that the NAR is not exactly an objective party in the real estate market. It is sensible to assume that Case Schiller would be more objective than the NAR, but it also seems that Case Schiller might not be set up yet to reliably pick up and report on nuances that are unique to a market that is trying to “unwind” itself. The more I see, the more inclined I am to credit the “recreational” residential real estate sites-- Zillow, MLS, Trulia, Cyber Homes, etc. with providing some of the most objective and “real time” data available to us. What do you smart people think?
Just got a message from a relative who is preparing to walk, Out of savings, tired of the run around from the mortgage mod, credit wrecked because of the mod application. Government program again seems to be more of the problem then the cure.
I'm not confident in their methodology and seasonal adjustment.
I have to say: I'm worried about all seasonal adjustments in the current environment. Most of the SA coefficients have built-in time constants, and I'm not optimistic that the coefficients change sufficiently fast in response to the step function that we have just experienced.
I could be wrong of course, and it's been on my list to explore the models for longer than I'd care to admit. (Resolution: skip posting, get modeling.) FYI for other adaptive filter geeks: Mathematica has some builtin.
tncubsfan wrote: The dollar is stronger, the market is down and...{GLD is not green}
The FX markets are moving fairly decisively this morning in European trading. Sterling is doing what it does best which is to fall against almost everything after the UK government announced that the country has finally exited its recession but with a disappointing 0.1% growth figure for the last quarter of 2009. Despite much more cheerful forecasts from many UK economists and pundits the actual number is hardly an occasion for celebration. The tide appears to be turning in favor of dollar bulls or perhaps more accurately it would be better to say that it is turning against the huge number of dollar bears.
As soon as the Fed stops buying and Admin lets the credits expire we'll see what happens to house prices. Until then it's all like the wizard behind the curtain.
After every financial bubble has run it's course, nobody really wants to see tulip bulbs, shares from a Mississippi land deal, silver ingots, baseball cards or beanie babies anymore, people are done with it.
Unfortunately, the powers that be blew a financial bubble this time out of something we really needed, shelter.
.....right you are. Having paid for this pile of sand "last decade", I've saved about $170,000 in house payments since. If I were to do it again, I'd wait for the right time - prolly about 6-8 months from now.
First the Federal Reserve should have followed a rule for monetary policy, such as using the growth rate of nominal gross domestic product to guide short-term rates, or a gold standard, or the Taylor rule. If they had, the federal funds rate never would have been cut to 1% in 2003 and housing over-investment would have been either nonexistent or much less damaging.
Article Controls
Second, if mark-to-market accounting rules had not been re-instituted in late 2007, loan problems would have never spread as far or as fast as they eventually did in 2008. Mark-to-market accounting rules are pro-cyclical in the extreme--there is a reason FDR got rid of them in 1938. These accounting rules--which require banks to price assets to illiquid market bids, even when cash-flows are unimpeded--turn a problem in the financial system into a catastrophe.
bearly wrote: As soon as the Fed stops buying and Admin lets the credits expire we'll see what happens to house prices. Until then it's all like the wizard behind the curtain.
The era of fake estate shall be over, the lyin' will lie down with the damned, and we will bleat our words and plow into shares...
I ain't holding my breath.
If you can get listing and sales numbers from a multipul listing service, those will be right
Thanks, Josap--I can't wait to have a look. I sure wish we knew what the banks have, though. How can we accurately assign a value to a home in a particular neighborhood, when we don't know how many of the other houses in the neighborhood are with the banks? (And could be dumped on the market at any time.) And some homes are selling for peanuts--without transparency, how do we know that, as everything unwinds, "insiders" are not going to be able to purchase homes (at various stages in the foreclosure process) at give-away prices? As consumers of residential real estate, it seems we should have some sort of watchdog group overseeing the process--particularly while this is all unwinding. It seems like there is soooo much room for even more fraud.
Could you imagine the Unabankers testifying to the FCIC, when they were asked why they took 100 cents on the dollar for securities worth a scintilla of that?
If only Lloyd Bonafide had replied ... "heck, we offered to tear them up, but that isn't the same as taking less than 100%"
as everything unwinds, "insiders" are not going to be able to purchase homes (at various stages in the foreclosure process) at give-away prices?
Well that always happens. The lenders package 10 or 20 houses, sell to an investor at about 20 cents on the dollar. Happens every time we have a bust in real estate. That helps clear the really low end properties. The investors buy up other properties cheap, most never hit MLS. You can find great deals at the lenders on builder spec houses as well, they have construction loans that never changed over to regular mortgages.
Could you imagine the Unabankers testifying to the FCIC, when they were asked why they took 100 cents on the dollar for securities worth a scintilla of that?
Sometimes the bank makes a calculation or attribution error and accidentally puts a few thousand in the wrong account. Their response is to never leave that money in the account but, instead, to remove it as soon as the error is noted.
Phil Hendrie has a most unusual gift, the gift of gab, he can conjure up dozens of different characters voices @ will, a gift only useful on radio.
He would bait his audience playing the straight man, while playing the voicetriloquist on the other side, getting the hoi ploy to call in, out of outrage.
I really wonder if investors are buying. It seems to me knife catchers mostly buying. The dynamics still are not right as I see it to rush to invest when prices will still come down. Another game of some sort?
If they never hit MLS, are these homes still going to be included in comparable sales data on appraisals? Maybe such properties should not be included during "normal" times--but they should be included during times like this. Distressed properties are the norm. But banks would be vested in keeping prices artificially high until they can dump all of their inventory, right?
The first graph is all anybody needs to pay attention to. The tax credits stopped the boulder momentarily, but it is only halfway down the hill. Incidentally, that part of the hill is heavily populated and most people are sleeping. Carnage is unavoidable.
That was a fun movie, but I really wish someone would design better 3D glasses for those who are already wearing glasses. It was like watching the movie through a pair of toilet paper rolls.
In Phx they are. When you can buy a 3 bed 2 bath for between $10,000. and $20,000. what is not to like. These are cash buyers, some flippers and some will hold for 5 yrs or so. 1/3 of all sales through MLS this year were for cash.
I really wonder if investors are buying. It seems to me knife catchers mostly buying. The dynamics still are not right as I see it to rush to invest when prices will still come down. Another game of some sort?
Their 15 year returns may very well exceed that of a 15 year bond. We'll know for sure in, say, about 15 year, though we'll have a pretty good idea in 12.
I really wonder if investors are buying. It seems to me knife catchers mostly buying.
Yesterday's total NYSE volume dropped 30%. Nasdaq volume dropped 25% below the previous day's level. Doesn't look like the big boys played the rally - at least to me.
Cinco-X wrote: America Increasingly Looks Like A Developing Nation As 30% Of Americans Rapidly Approach Poverty, Or Are Already There
There's only one way out of this, then: we have to pay people more money to do the same jobs. Then they won't be poor, AND we can keep home prices high.
If they never hit MLS, are these homes still going to be included in comparable sales data on appraisals? Yes, through county recordings.
Maybe such properties should not be included during "normal" times--but they should be included during times like this. Distressed properties are the norm. But banks would be vested in keeping prices artificially high until they can dump all of their inventory, right?
Yes, but they can't hold everything. Try as they might.
Their 15 year returns may very well exceed that of a 15 year bond. We'll know for sure in, say, about 15 year, though we'll have a pretty good idea in 12.
Like comparing strength of a two week old rat to the strength of a two week old guinea pig.
That was a fun movie, but I really wish someone would design better 3D glasses for those who are already wearing glasses. It was like watching the movie through a pair of toilet paper rolls.
I saw it in a theater with stadium seating and in IMAX. Definitely try to see it in IMAX; the glasses were better (similar to some old Elton John glasses) and the wrap around screen made the experience much better, IMNSHO-
There's only one way out of this, then: we have to pay people more money to do the same jobs. Then they won't be poor, AND we can keep home prices high.
I saw it in a theater with stadium seating and in IMAX. Definitely try to see it in IMAX; the glasses were better (similar to some old Elton John glasses) and the wrap around screen made the experience much better, IMNSHO-
I had the same Elton John plastic-framed polarized glasses, but they were flat and sat in front of my regular glasses, so it took the first 15 minutes of the movie to really get into the 3D experience. But once I did it was an awful lot of fun.
The election of Scott Brown to the Senate was not just a repudiation of health care reform although that may be a potential consequence. It cannot have been an endorsement of the Republican Party since Brown spent the entire campaign doing his best not to mention his party affiliation. It wasn’t a rejection of President Obama since a majority of the MA voters still support him. President Obama got it right when he said that Brown rode the same wave of anger into office that also elected him. That is true; it was definitely anger that drove voters, but what was the source of the anger? Was it anger at the financial sector and their bonuses? Or was it anger at the politicians who gave them access to the public purse and made the bonuses possible? Or was it anger at the complete failure of the political class to address the larger issue of the economy and jobs?
Cinco-X wrote: Snark! right?
Lord, don't I wish it was a snark... Additionally, we can give the unemployed government jobs, then they won't be unemployed. And if they're still poor, we'll just pay them more.
If I have to hurry up and wait for something to 'esplode, it's nice to relive the days of Phil, and these youtubes are great, because that's when you heard this superb radio drama, on the road, as per the videos.
The special effects were great, but in general, the movie was tiresome.
I assume you consumed the in advance of entering the theatre. Otherwise I'd have been throwing a sizable quantity of popcorn at you for stinking up the theatre
The special effects were great, but in general, the movie was tiresome.
Yes, it was tiresom because we had seen the exact plot in about 4 different movies. Only this time it was in trippy colors and 3D. I kept waiting for somebody to lean over their dragon with their arms out saying "I'm the King of the World" or whatever Leo said on the Titanic.
"
While prices have risen steadily on a national basis, some economists predict they will dip again early this year because of high unemployment and foreclosures.
"Until we get job growth, we won't get complete healing of the housing market," said Jeff Humphreys, an economist with the University of Georgia.
"
I suppose healing means 'bubbliscious' once more. Mr. Humphreys , '(what) are your being served?' ?
Lord, don't I wish it was a snark...Dooooooooooooooom!!! Additionally, we can give the unemployed government jobs, then they won't be unemployed. And if they're still poor, we'll just pay them more.
The problem with giving the poor money is that they then compete for goods with the nearly poor, driving up prices and making all of their lot's poorer. I know that sounds bizarre, but it's true, and it's partially why socialist schemes don't seem to work in a place where the opportunity to advance is ingrained in the culture. Do you really think that if we gave everyone the same food but enough to keep them from being hungry, the same housing to keep them warm in the winter, and the same occupation, that everyone would be happy? You'd go from having 20% of the populace being unhappy to 100% of the populace being unhappy.
Centex, the Texas-based developer that Pulte Homes acquired last year, did not have a permit for “an improperly constructed retaining wall” that collapsed Sunday, causing damage to at least three homes and forcing the evacuation of dozens of families, according to city officials.
There's only one way out of this, then: we have to pay people more money to do the same jobs.
Or lower the poverty level.
I think it was CO that lowered the minimum wage, it was tied to some inflation metric (not sure if CPI or other) Lowered a few cents to the federal minimum wage.
The problem with giving the poor money is that they then compete for goods with the nearly poor, driving up prices and making all of their lot's poorer.
Well then it's obvious that the solution is to take away money from the rich.
I've rebelled against fantasy, it's not nearly as interesting as reality.
That's sorta my beef with drama; who needs that crap after 50 hours a week working?
The problem with giving the poor money is that they then compete for goods with the nearly poor, driving up prices and making all of their lot's poorer.
Well then it's obvious that the solution is to take away money from the rich.
The top 1-3% could certainly stand to pay some more. However, don't extend that to the top 20%, since I'm in there and can't afford to part with any more. It's expensive to live here in the NE.
The first time I heard him, I was driving south on the 99, after a backpacking trip in Sequoia NP, and I was incredulous for about an hour, until I caught on. He eventually took it nationwide as far the callers were concerned, outrage is where you find it.
The problem under Louis XVI was that the poor constituted somewhere between 60-80% of the population or even more (someone else can look it up). We're heading that way, but we're not there yet.
It's not funny to laugh about "I'm fallen and I can't get up..." to me anymore. I had a personal experience the other day helping an elderly lady (83?) who fell on the pavement trying to get into her car and she said those words as she was lying on the pavement looking at me. She split her head open a little bit and was clearly embarrassed. After about 15 minutes she got into her car and drove off; claimed she had very strong bone density... so I wasn't going to force her not to drive.
noob goldberg wrote: Well then it's obvious that the solution is to take away money from the rich.
Yes and no - the key to stability (without military force or fascism, and fear and terror to keep the rebels in line) doesn't seem to be a magic number, nor equality, but a reasonable distribution that minimizes the inequities, which in turn results in price stability and more of a unified sense of culture.
The top 1-3% could certainly stand to pay some more. However, don't extend that to the top 20%, since I'm in there and can't afford to part with any more. It's expensive to live here in the NE.
Well, if we removed money from the top 20% they wouldn't be competing with each other for goods, which would drive down prices, thus reducing living expenses and making everyone better off.
the key to stability (without military force or fascism, and fear and terror to keep the rebels in line) doesn't seem to be a magic number, nor equality, but a reasonable distribution that minimizes the inequities, which in turn results in price stability and more of a unified sense of culture.
(OT) Cinco-X said: "The problem under Louis XVI was that the poor constituted somewhere between 60-80% of the population or even more (someone else can look it up). We're heading that way, but we're not there yet."
That number was about 80% and they were heavily taxed, while the rich paid little in taxes. We're so far away from that situation that I don't see how we'll ever get there.
Where are the Dongs? The Munchkins are not with you unless you bring the Dongs. It brings up an interesting question about the male Munchkins sexuality, of course.
Well, if we removed money from the top 20% they wouldn't be competing with each other for goods, which would drive down prices, thus reducing your living expenses and making everyone better off.
Right the spread of the top 20% is SOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOO great. Perhaps 80-92% are in competition for McMansions, but that top 1-3% is so far out in the stratosphere it's not even funny. I might as well be a pauper next to Jamie Dimon, and I'm sure he's feel that way if our paths were to ever cross. BTW, I'm not even sure that I'm in the top quintile, but I think so. You wouldn't know it though; my "bigscreen" is a 32" Sony Bravia and I drive a compact. Thankfully we have essentially no debt, and some savings.
Cinco-X wrote: However, don't extend that to the top 20%, since I'm in there and can't afford to part with any more. It's expensive to live here in the NE.
LOL. That's exactly how they (the 1-3%) feel. And it's also damn expensive to live in Greenwich CT, especially with a summer home and an apartment in Manhattan to pay for.
LOL. That's exactly how they (the 1-3%) feel. And it's also damn expensive to live in Greenwich CT, especially with a summer home and an apartment in Manhattan to pay for.
Obi-Wan: A young debti named Tax eVader, who was a pupil of mine until he turned to evil, helped the Empire hunt down and destroy the debti knights. He betrayed and murdered the economy. Now the debti are all but extinct. eVader was seduced by the dark side of the Farce.
Luke: How did the economy die?
Obi-Wan: A young debti named Tax eVader, who was a pupil of mine until he turned to evil, helped the Empire hunt down and destroy the debti knights. He betrayed and murdered the economy. Now the debti are all but extinct. eVader was seduced by the dark side of the Farce.
Luke: I see Obi-Wan. By the way, do you know where Princess Leia is? I really want to nail that hot piece of bundum.
Obi-Wan: Sorry, Luke. I believe eVader is already doing that.
Luke: Damn. At least there are always the Ewoks.
food foraging in the NP would be limited to (in season) onions, thimbleberries, strawberries, miner's lettuce, and maybe a few other things. You would starve to death depending upon living off the land there.
Bloomberg to Hire Ex-Clinton Strategist - NY Times
Prediction: Bloomberg to run for Pres. as an independent in 2012 and has good chance to win ( vs what Perot did in 1992 ). I'm neutral on Bloomberg but would probably vote for him because am totally disgusted with status quo corrupt GOP and Dems and this country needs a change from these assclowns.
Yesterday was NOT an inside day. Thus the chart pattern drop of 500 points, based on that inside day chart bar did NOT appear.
There is no trade. I have no probability of any direction based on the chart pattern including yesterday. It doesn't mean that others know the probabilties of this pattern. I just know that what I know has not appeared.
That number was about 80% and they were heavily taxed, while the rich paid little in taxes.
While corp tax rates are high, after allowable deductions and special IRS rules, they pay very little percentage wise. I would say we are pretty much there. Warren said he paid less in taxes than his secretary.
That number was about 80% and they were heavily taxed, while the rich paid little in taxes. We're so far away from that situation that I don't see how we'll ever get there.
Argentina? Not finding tax info that makes it clear what it's like there, but they hit 25% unemployment, so had to be pretty high levels of poverty and little middle class left.
Wondering more than answering here, have not read up on it in quite some time.
Getting past the first couple of paragraphs, he seemed to catch his stride:
"There have been numerous changeups and curveballs in the financial markets over the past 15 months or so. Liquidation, reliquification, and the substituting of the government wallet for the invisible hand of the private sector describe the events from 30,000 feet. Now that a semblance of stability has been imparted to the economy and its markets, the attempted detoxification and deleveraging of the private sector is underway. Having survived due to a steady two-trillion-dollar-plus dose of government “Red Bull,” Adderall, or simply strong black coffee, the global private sector is now expected by some to detox and resume a normal cyclical schedule where animal spirits and the willingness to take risk move front and center. But there is a problem. While corporations may be heading in that direction due to steep yield curves and government check writing that have partially repaired their balance sheets, their consumer customers remain fully levered and undercapitalized with little hope of escaping rehab as long as unemployment and underemployment remain at 10-20% levels worldwide. “Build it and they will come” is an old saw more applicable to Kevin Costner’s Field of Dreams than to today’s economy. “Say’s Law” proclaiming that supply creates its own demand is hardly applicable to a modern day credit-oriented society where credit cards are maxed out, 25% of homeowners are underwater, and job and income creation are nearly invisible."
.....speaking of which........ever heard of Beef Products, Inc.? They provide Burger King, McDonalds, and most others with "meat"....or more properly called "pink slime". The company developed a technique that liquefies the trimmings, runs them through a centrifuge to separate the fat from the protein, then injects it with ammonia in an attempt to kill pathogens. Then it's turned into blocks and chips that are used to beef up hamburgers. The company sells 7 million pounds of it every week, and school lunch burgers are now 15 percent trimmings. The Times found one message from a USDA microbiologist who called this junk "pink slime" and wrote, "I do not consider the stuff to be ground beef, and I consider allowing it in ground beef to be a form of fraudulent labeling." .........Yummie..........
(OT) josap said: "While corp tax rates are high, after allowable deductions and special IRS rules, they pay very little percentage wise. I would say we are pretty much there. Warren said he paid less in taxes than his secretary."
"...In 2001, the latest year of available data, the top 5 percent of taxpayers paid more than one-half (53.3 percent) of all individual income taxes, but reported roughly one-third (32.0 percent) of income.
The top 1 percent of taxpayers paid 33.9 percent of all individual income taxes in 2001. This group of taxpayers has paid more than 30 percent of individual income taxes since 1995. Moreover, since 1990 this group’s tax share has grown faster than their income share.
Taxpayers who rank in the top 50 percent of taxpayers by income pay virtually all individual income taxes. In all years since 1990, taxpayers in this group have paid over 90 percent of all individual income taxes. In 2000 and 2001, this group paid over 96 percent of the total...."
Elvis wrote: Luke: I see Obi-Wan. By the way, do you know where Princess Leia is? I really want to nail that hot piece of bundum.
Obi-Wan: Sorry, Luke. I believe eVader is already doing that.
Luke: But I am an honest and faithful knight, and a student of the Farce.
Obi-Wan: Yeah, so was I, but eVader used his powers to build a bigger lightsaber than yours. Sorry dude. If it makes you feel better, he calls her a cheap slut when he's out drinking with Palpatine.
interesting choice of words. Its amazing what you can do when you don't have to deal with things like "due process". I think while it is easy to go gaga over Chinese growth rates- what makes that possible is also what makes things like the Cultural Revolution possible and the 10's of millions who have died in famines. It is easy to look at the last 25 years and say how wonderful that is - but I think to be balanced you have to look at the entire record from 1949.
In 2011 a high income NYC resident will pay 40% federal, 10% NYS, 5% NYC and probably a 5% federal healthcare surcharge, for a top marginal tax rate of 60%, with limited deductability because of that little treasure trove known as AMT. The plutocrats in America are lightly taxed because the capital gains rate is essentially a low rate flat tax for them, but it's complete crap that high income wage earners are undertaxed. The fact that taxing the crap out of wage earners who make $250k a year is one of Obama's populist themes, just shows how bought and paid for he is by the plutocracy.
Obi-Wan: Yeah, so was I, but eVader used his powers to build a bigger lightsaber than yours. Sorry dude. If it makes you feel better, he calls her a cheap slut when he's out drinking with Palpatine.
Luke: But Obi-Wan, Han Solo calls me a cheap slut and it really turns me on. That doesn't help me at all. It just gets me hotter.
know a guy who has been talking about this spread for at least 25 years and I don't think has made a buck trading it.
just a thought- if you are buying gold as a hedge against the collapse of the monetary system wouldn't silver be a better bet? After all you want something of low denominational value to transaction with on a day to day basis. Even a half gold coin is $550. Hard to have change made for that.
I found out after going to see Avatar that I no longer have stereo vision.
I spent the first half hour taking the glasses off, putting them back on, squinting me eyes and thinking to myself "WTF everyone tells me the 3d special effects are new and improved"
So I had to spend the rest of the movie just concentrating on the weakest part, the storyline.
Noon you lucky sob atleast you still saw 3d through those toilet paper roll tubes.
crazyv - That was a good catch last night that 30 yr. mortgages actually last about 5, therefore the risk is lower with <5% 30 yr. fixed rates for banks.
However, in our new immobile society, I wonder if that will not work so well for them.
I think he means prices won't stabilize, but I'm being served eggs benedict and wheat toast.
(Oh yes, make sure it is 'whole grain' and not just 'whole wheat' for superior control of blood sugar!)
The preceding sentence in the article says:
"
While prices have risen steadily on a national basis, some economists predict they will dip again early this year because of high unemployment and foreclosures.
"
So I do not think he would use 'rising prices' as an illness that required 'healing'. It was the upcoming 'dip' he was referring to.
Even a half gold coin is $550. Hard to have change made for that.
Take a coin to your local shop and ask if you can get paid in cash, and what price they are paying. They can probably pay cash far beyond an ounce.
Pawn shops and coin shops generally have quite a bit of cash in hand. I have a coworker who always sells like this, gets decent but not great spreads as well. I have not sold in this manner.
But I agree with the sentiment of your post. I suppose 1/10 ounce gold coins would work as well, but don't recall what the spread is like on them.
just a thought- if you are buying gold as a hedge against the collapse of the monetary system wouldn't silver be a better bet? After all you want something of low denominational value to transaction with on a day to day basis. Even a half gold coin is $550. Hard to have change made for that.
That's why you want some of each. A cache of silver for barter, gold for wealth preservation.
just a thought- if you are buying gold as a hedge against the collapse of the monetary system wouldn't silver be a better bet? After all you want something of low denominational value to transaction with on a day to day basis. Even a half gold coin is $550. Hard to have change made for that.
Excellent point IMO! That's why I've been buying 1 oz. silver coins instead of any gold coins! I figured in a financial collapse that transacting with these coins would be much easier. Of course if society collapses to this extent it may not matter what you are bartering with, the other guy may slit your throat and steal everything you have!
I don't see how the politician most associated with Wall Street is going to ride a wave of populist anti-Wall Street anger to the White House. Vote for Bloomberg if you don't think the bank bailouts were big enough?
These accounting rules--which require banks to price assets to illiquid market bids, even when cash-flows are unimpeded--turn a problem in the financial system into a catastrophe.
typically Forbe's like. The real root of the problem as far as the banking system is concerned is why they should be holding any assets that require a mark to market calculation. That treatment is more appropriate to trading operations and should never have been part of bank in the first place. The only appropriate accounting treatment for a bank is and has always been the lower of cost or its impaired value.
The lenders package 10 or 20 houses, sell to an investor at about 20 cents on the dollar. Happens every time we have a bust in real estate.
this is the core conundrum - do you allow some people to get very rich through the liquidation process but get it done quickly- or do you try an avoid that and have the unwind take a long time.
@ EvilHenryPaulson - Bill likes Canada. And Germany. He makes no mention of Australia, which is interesting to me. Maybe that's because their housing is bubbly.
Noob- you disappoint me. I though you had better taste. I think the 3-D was very interesting- the movie was predictable and boring and included virtually every cliche from 80 years of movie making. and the left wing.
I find the discussions of using precious metals as post collapse money academic and outdated. Were events to devolve to a point where paper money fails we go straight to a subsistence barter economy.
I find the discussions of using precious metals as post collapse money academic and outdated. Were events to devolve to a point where paper money fails we go straight to a subsistence barter economy.
I find the discussions of using precious metals as post collapse money academic and outdated. Were events to devolve to a point where paper money fails we go straight to a subsistence barter economy.
I agree with Rob Dawg. That is why rice is twice as nice and only a fraction of the price.
I think what effects the price of silver now is the supply. I believe that much of it is a byproduct of copper and lead production. As the world economy improves the demand for lead and copper increases and so does the supply of silver.
Vote for Bloomberg if you don't think the bank bailouts were big enough?
That's a possible concern, though he's an able administrator and has been an effective mayor. What bothers me most about MB is the determination to fill a third term. Wouldn't initially have suspected him of latent Imperialism, but now . . . ?
I think what effects the price of silver now is the supply. I believe that much of it is a byproduct of copper and lead production. As the world economy improves the demand for lead and copper increases and so does the supply of silver.
So are you implying that silver has no where to go but up?
Noob- you disappoint me. I though you had better taste. I think the 3-D was very interesting- the movie was predictable and boring and included virtually every cliche from 80 years of movie making. and the left wing.
It was fun! I don't expect it to win any acting awards, and I can't say I became overly attached to any of the characters, but for a 3D romp through a giant imaginary world it was a good time.
It's like having sex with an ugly woman or driving a beater-car through an ice-storm: it can still be a lot of fun, no matter what your friends say.
do you allow some people to get very rich through the liquidation process but get it done quickly
But don't you think it could happen even more quickly if there were not these deals made in the shadows? In other words--aren't these "back room" deals sort of prolonging everything? I wonder if these deals are not giving everyone a false sense that we are in recovery mode, when in all likelihood , we really haven't even come close to the bottom in many areas? (Maybe?)
Inventory is up, just slightly but still up. Nevertheless, re agents are still whining that they'd be selling if they had anything decent to sell. All the competition is for 3/2s under 175K. If the property is under 1200 sqft, has off street parking, is located in the south markets, or is less then a full 3/2, it's sitting and sitting. The price sweet spot seems to be between $95 to $120 /sqft depending on location, size, and HOA/MR fees. This tells me that buyers are looking at rent parities and not for future appareciation. That said, Mcmansions outside of the foothills rent very cheap at around $50/sqft or under.
There were neighborhoods where any property listed was jumped on making it feel like we had 0 availability. That began to correct in mid Dec and it's still ongoing. I know this from personal experience as I made 7 offers during 2009. One finally stuck just before Xmas and I'm waiting on acceptance from the lender, it's a short sale. I am not holding my breath.
The price drops by sellers in the pricey midtown areas are still coming in as they have been since late 08. $/sqft has resumed it's slow trending down. Cash still wins though flippers seem to be fixiated on properties they can pick up for less then 60k which might resale for $160k. The good deals were in mid 08. 2009 seems have been filled latecomers who have missed the window.
I'm neutral on Bloomberg but would probably vote for him because am totally disgusted with status quo corrupt GOP and Dems and this country needs a change from these assclowns.
Cut out the middleman and vote for the oligarch directly - think of the savings!
Pirates give no quarter.
CR, I seem to remember that you pointed out how bad the seasonal adjustment is for the Case-Shiller. Presumably, this is why the market forms expectations around the NSA, which was a big fat miss and showed a decline.
S&P is really poor at releasing data. The release their report first that is for NSA data - and the media picks that up, as an example:
http://www.cnbc.com/id/35077113
And then they release the actual data. And it shows a slight increase, not a decrease, using the SA data.
Geesh. Just release the data right away.
I think the LoanPerformance numbers are better anyway.
best to all
Actually, even the realtors only use the NSA, except when the SA looks more favorable.
Bond market getting all jiggly again...CDS have hit a five week high
Credit-Default Swaps Rising to Five-Week High: Credit Markets - Bloomberg.com
token bull, I've been reporting the SA data consistently, and I'm not going to switch because the numbers change.
House prices have a clear seasonal pattern, so they should be reported SA first.
Oh well ... it is kind of fun being the only site reporting an "increase" in prices. I expect the NY Times will get it right (they have been on top of this reporting issue)
best to all
CalculatedRisk wrote:
that would be a refreshing change for them
Treasury MBS Purchase Program: This program will end Dec 31, 2009,
your gov't program page.
i can't keep all this straight. they extgended this one , right?
CR, you helpfully pointed out how imprecise the CS seasonal adjustments are:
Case-Shiller House Price Seasonal Adjustment and Comparison to Stress Tests
"The seasonal adjustment appears pretty good in the '90s, but it appears insufficient now. I expect that the index will show steeper declines, especially starting in October and November."
The market ignores the SA for precisely this reason: it is essentially noise around the NSA.
I expect further price declines in many cities.
In other words another year of no equity build to support MEW. And with ARRA on the fade...
Good morning from the front porch of the back of beyond...
I wish you'd stop wizzing on the neighbor's hydrangeas
Jan 24, 2010 Signs of the Times Bob Hoye 321gold ...inc ...s
Rally Monkey,
IIRC, that program did end. Treasury had an MBS purchase program along with the Fed.
From the FRBNY,
How is the Federal Reserve's agency MBS purchase program related to the U.S. Treasury's efforts to purchase agency MBS?
The Federal Reserve's agency MBS program is separate and distinct from the U.S. Treasury's program but both programs are aimed at fostering improved conditions in mortgage markets.
tg wrote:
I been watching. Silver is taking one on the chin!
I figure the correction is still on. Get the shekels ready.
In the depths of the Great Depression, the ratio was closer to 125-1
I keep forgetting that a NC city is still worse off than Dallas. I have friends and relatives in NC, and they are in pretty nice and stable areas so easy to forget.
Dallas still down more than the FHA 3.5% down payments though.
volker the viking wrote:
this man writes like he has a screw loose. we be tight

"Breakdown!" by Brian Bloom, FSU Editorial 01/25/2010
volker the viking, it depends on the writer.
I'm tired of the way S&P releases this data, and I'm not confident in their methodology and seasonal adjustment.
best wishes
Watch San Diego and then Sacramento for any signs of sustained stability or the start of another leg down. So far SD seems robust and their high prices magnify any credit problems and minimize the effects of government stimulus. It will be interesting when the investors who make up so much of the recent volume realize the benefits of a high interest rate environment (lower prices, less competition, larger tax benefits) stop flipping in anticipation of inflation.
OT
"
The nexus of that growth often comes down to real estate: Who owns it, who gets the sweet deals on it, who gets ousted, and who among Communist Party officials and their developer cronies pockets the big bucks from the infrastructure, business and residential projects that have turned China into a monumental construction site.
The equation of the Chinese growth story that is changing the world (and keeping U.S. Wal-Mart customers happy) is unforgiving: Ten percent annual expansion is the guarantor of the Communist Party’s hold on power and so everything will be done to sustain it. Agonized debate (think U.S. health care reform or Afghan deployment) is not for China. Bulldozers are more its thing.
The thrill of living in China is this very short distance between words and action. Few Western executives are immune to the frisson. Forget Indian democratic dithering! Nowhere else are projects so intimate with their execution.
"
OP-ED COLUMNIST; A Woman Burns - NY Times
Wal-Mart karma!
My neighbors are a few acres away, i'd have to have an 88 mm gun for a cannon to reach em'
I know a guy who has been talking about this spread for at least 25 years and I don't think has made a buck trading it. However, he did buy gold at about $800/ oz in the ''70s (?) and still has it. As for the spread, you might as well try to predict the pork belly natural gas spread, you have a better chance of getting that one right...
Good morning
HAMP horror stories all over the front pages today.
Could this mess just die? But then all those houses go into forclosure and the lenders take a hit.
traderwalt wrote:
Kinda funny considering the source.
“As a businessman, I more than recognize that the way the government is operating is not only unsustainable, it is a recipe for disaster and failure,” “This amendment will force Congress to become better stewards of the taxpayers’ money and give the President much-needed authority to remove items from appropriations bills that are considered wasteful on a national perspective.”
Senator Isaskon who pushed to extend the house credit.
Johnny Isakson, United States Senator from Georgia
"the pork belly natural gas spread"
actually, in my life the pork belly natural gas spread is a constant.
the more pork belly products I eat, the more natural gas I get. and vice versa.
tg wrote:
Actually I'm better at manipulating the peanut butter and jelly spread...
josap wrote:
Hi Josap. I'm still new at this. So it is just now sinking in with me how lacking in transparency our nation's residential real estate data are. Home ownership plays such a significant role in our economy—and it's one of the few tangible ways in which average Americans have been able to feel invested in the economy. But I am beginning to realize how easy it would be--for any entity that might find it in their best interest to do so--to manipulate these numbers. It surprised me that the National Association of Realtors report that was released yesterday seems to have as much weight as it apparently does. I would think that the NAR is not exactly an objective party in the real estate market. It is sensible to assume that Case Schiller would be more objective than the NAR, but it also seems that Case Schiller might not be set up yet to reliably pick up and report on nuances that are unique to a market that is trying to “unwind” itself. The more I see, the more inclined I am to credit the “recreational” residential real estate sites-- Zillow, MLS, Trulia, Cyber Homes, etc. with providing some of the most objective and “real time” data available to us. What do you smart people think?
josap wrote:
Just got a message from a relative who is preparing to walk, Out of savings, tired of the run around from the mortgage mod, credit wrecked because of the mod application. Government program again seems to be more of the problem then the cure.
Pearl
If you can get listing and sales numbers from a multipul listing service, those will be right. You have to be a member though in some places.
here are the reports for Maricopa County, Az. That includes Phoenix Metro.
ARMLS
This is the main page and you can get to several reports from here. Free and you don't have to be a member.
I know it's early yet today but: The dollar is stronger, the market is down and
is now in the green!
What the hell?
tncubsfan wrote:
Cue Slumdog.....
Real estate is so last decade.
Juvenal Delinquent wrote:
Real estate is so last decade.
Fake estate is much more 2010...
Juvenal Delinquent wrote:
That is the understatement of the month.
CalculatedRisk wrote:
I have to say: I'm worried about all seasonal adjustments in the current environment. Most of the SA coefficients have built-in time constants, and I'm not optimistic that the coefficients change sufficiently fast in response to the step function that we have just experienced.
I could be wrong of course, and it's been on my list to explore the models for longer than I'd care to admit. (Resolution: skip posting, get modeling.) FYI for other adaptive filter geeks: Mathematica has some builtin.
tncubsfan wrote:
The dollar is stronger, the market is down and...{GLD is not green}
Technical Analysis Morning Trader: stock picks, scans and ideas for day trading and short-term trading using technical analysis.
As soon as the Fed stops buying and Admin lets the credits expire we'll see what happens to house prices. Until then it's all like the wizard behind the curtain.
After every financial bubble has run it's course, nobody really wants to see tulip bulbs, shares from a Mississippi land deal, silver ingots, baseball cards or beanie babies anymore, people are done with it.
Unfortunately, the powers that be blew a financial bubble this time out of something we really needed, shelter.
...and the beat goes on
.....right you are. Having paid for this pile of sand "last decade", I've saved about $170,000 in house payments since. If I were to do it again, I'd wait for the right time - prolly about 6-8 months from now.
Broke? Blame The Government - Forbes.com
bearly wrote:
As soon as the Fed stops buying and Admin lets the credits expire we'll see what happens to house prices. Until then it's all like the wizard behind the curtain.
The era of fake estate shall be over, the lyin' will lie down with the damned, and we will bleat our words and plow into shares...
I ain't holding my breath.
tg wrote:
First chart is the one KD's been touting for awhile, and the one he says is predicting a massive correction, IIRC.
but jd it is/was such a good ride for the cds cdos and all its kin.
josap wrote:
Thanks, Josap--I can't wait to have a look. I sure wish we knew what the banks have, though. How can we accurately assign a value to a home in a particular neighborhood, when we don't know how many of the other houses in the neighborhood are with the banks? (And could be dumped on the market at any time.) And some homes are selling for peanuts--without transparency, how do we know that, as everything unwinds, "insiders" are not going to be able to purchase homes (at various stages in the foreclosure process) at give-away prices? As consumers of residential real estate, it seems we should have some sort of watchdog group overseeing the process--particularly while this is all unwinding. It seems like there is soooo much room for even more fraud.
Could you imagine the Unabankers testifying to the FCIC, when they were asked why they took 100 cents on the dollar for securities worth a scintilla of that?
If only Lloyd Bonafide had replied ... "heck, we offered to tear them up, but that isn't the same as taking less than 100%"
Juvenal Delinquent wrote:
Now they're almost done blowing one in Treasuries. Not that we really need those.
noob goldberg wrote:
Now they're almost done blowing one in Treasuries. Not that we really need those.
Well, I always wanted a treasury!
Where there is
The new proposal plans to help
keep
and eat 
Somehow that equation doesn't add up.
Pearl wrote:
Well that always happens. The lenders package 10 or 20 houses, sell to an investor at about 20 cents on the dollar. Happens every time we have a bust in real estate. That helps clear the really low end properties. The investors buy up other properties cheap, most never hit MLS. You can find great deals at the lenders on builder spec houses as well, they have construction loans that never changed over to regular mortgages.
Juvenal Delinquent wrote:
Sometimes the bank makes a calculation or attribution error and accidentally puts a few thousand in the wrong account. Their response is to never leave that money in the account but, instead, to remove it as soon as the error is noted.
I say quid pro quo.
The right has 'Avatar' wrong - latimes.com
Phil Hendrie has a most unusual gift, the gift of gab, he can conjure up dozens of different characters voices @ will, a gift only useful on radio.
He would bait his audience playing the straight man, while playing the voicetriloquist on the other side, getting the hoi ploy to call in, out of outrage.
YouTube - Phil Hendrie & Lloyd Bonafide (KFI 1998)
I really wonder if investors are buying. It seems to me knife catchers mostly buying. The dynamics still are not right as I see it to rush to invest when prices will still come down. Another game of some sort?
America Increasingly Looks Like A Developing Nation As 30% Of Americans Rapidly Approach Poverty, Or Are Already There
josap wrote:
If they never hit MLS, are these homes still going to be included in comparable sales data on appraisals? Maybe such properties should not be included during "normal" times--but they should be included during times like this. Distressed properties are the norm. But banks would be vested in keeping prices artificially high until they can dump all of their inventory, right?
The first graph is all anybody needs to pay attention to. The tax credits stopped the boulder momentarily, but it is only halfway down the hill. Incidentally, that part of the hill is heavily populated and most people are sleeping. Carnage is unavoidable.
Cinco-X wrote:
That was a fun movie, but I really wish someone would design better 3D glasses for those who are already wearing glasses. It was like watching the movie through a pair of toilet paper rolls.
Lobbyist Ben Dover wrote:
In Phx they are. When you can buy a 3 bed 2 bath for between $10,000. and $20,000. what is not to like. These are cash buyers, some flippers and some will hold for 5 yrs or so. 1/3 of all sales through MLS this year were for cash.
Lobbyist Ben Dover wrote:
Their 15 year returns may very well exceed that of a 15 year bond. We'll know for sure in, say, about 15 year, though we'll have a pretty good idea in 12.
Another game of some sort?
Yesterday's total NYSE volume dropped 30%. Nasdaq volume dropped 25% below the previous day's level. Doesn't look like the big boys played the rally - at least to me.
Cinco-X wrote:
America Increasingly Looks Like A Developing Nation As 30% Of Americans Rapidly Approach Poverty, Or Are Already There
There's only one way out of this, then: we have to pay people more money to do the same jobs. Then they won't be poor, AND we can keep home prices high.
Pearl wrote:
Maybe such properties should not be included during "normal" times--but they should be included during times like this. Distressed properties are the norm. But banks would be vested in keeping prices artificially high until they can dump all of their inventory, right?
Yes, but they can't hold everything. Try as they might.
Cinco-X wrote:
Like comparing strength of a two week old rat to the strength of a two week old guinea pig.
noob goldberg wrote:
I saw it in a theater with stadium seating and in IMAX. Definitely try to see it in IMAX; the glasses were better (similar to some old Elton John glasses) and the wrap around screen made the experience much better, IMNSHO-
ResistanceIsFeudal wrote:
Snark! right?
Cinco-X wrote:
Did everyone wear Donald Duck suits, too?
Meet Ms Bobbie Dooley(and husband Steve), President of the Western Estates Homeowners Association...
YouTube - Phil Hendrie & Bobbie Dooley (smoking)
Elvis wrote:
It was dark, and I arrived late-
Thanks, I guess we are still in the won't happen here phase as fresh painted firewood still asking $20-30K. The waiting game continues.
put the youtube away
Cinco-X wrote:
I had the same Elton John plastic-framed polarized glasses, but they were flat and sat in front of my regular glasses, so it took the first 15 minutes of the movie to really get into the 3D experience. But once I did it was an awful lot of fun.
We took our towels and Don't Panic buttons to see Hitchhiker's Guide.
People looked at us sort of oddly.
Put it all on number 37 please, croupier.
Angry Voters
Cinco-X wrote:
Saw it last night, in IMAX, with some
and
.
The special effects were great, but in general, the movie was tiresome.
Cinco-X wrote:
Additionally, we can give the unemployed government jobs, then they won't be unemployed. And if they're still poor, we'll just pay them more.
Snark! right?
Lord, don't I wish it was a snark...
These economic reports are well described in terms of some classic cartoons:
"Help, I've fallen, and I can't get up!"
and
"Where's the V?" (Where's the beef?)
..... just for fun - look at tgt
If I have to hurry up and wait for something to 'esplode, it's nice to relive the days of Phil, and these youtubes are great, because that's when you heard this superb radio drama, on the road, as per the videos.
Eric wrote:
I assume you consumed the
in advance of entering the theatre. Otherwise I'd have been throwing a sizable quantity of popcorn at you for stinking up the theatre
ResistanceIsFeudal wrote:
Usually that is the Millitary, and lots of families in the millitary get food stamps due to low wages.
Eric wrote:
Yes, it was tiresom because we had seen the exact plot in about 4 different movies. Only this time it was in trippy colors and 3D. I kept waiting for somebody to lean over their dragon with their arms out saying "I'm the King of the World" or whatever Leo said on the Titanic.
dum luk wrote:
The VIX chart looks a little...volatile.
VIX on Yahoo
skunk works
"
While prices have risen steadily on a national basis, some economists predict they will dip again early this year because of high unemployment and foreclosures.
"Until we get job growth, we won't get complete healing of the housing market," said Jeff Humphreys, an economist with the University of Georgia.
"
I suppose healing means 'bubbliscious' once more. Mr. Humphreys , '(what) are your being served?' ?
Home prices rise for 6th straight month in Nov. - Yahoo! News
Juvenal Delinquent wrote:
I can imagine the fun of watching that movie whilst munching on a few funky mushrooms, myself.
Although much inappropriate giggling would probably have resulted.
ResistanceIsFeudal wrote:
The problem with giving the poor money is that they then compete for goods with the nearly poor, driving up prices and making all of their lot's poorer. I know that sounds bizarre, but it's true, and it's partially why socialist schemes don't seem to work in a place where the opportunity to advance is ingrained in the culture. Do you really think that if we gave everyone the same food but enough to keep them from being hungry, the same housing to keep them warm in the winter, and the same occupation, that everyone would be happy? You'd go from having 20% of the populace being unhappy to 100% of the populace being unhappy.
I've rebelled against fantasy, it's not nearly as interesting as reality.
SNAFU wrote:
I think he means prices won't stabilize, but I'm being served eggs benedict and wheat toast.
Perhaps the government intervention could be thought of in terms of a retaining wall. The question is, will it hold?
Slideshow: Hills Of Rivermist 'Slope Failure' - Photos - KSAT San Antonio
No permit for failed wall
Centex, the Texas-based developer that Pulte Homes acquired last year, did not have a permit for “an improperly constructed retaining wall” that collapsed Sunday, causing damage to at least three homes and forcing the evacuation of dozens of families, according to city officials.
ResistanceIsFeudal wrote:
Or lower the poverty level.
I think it was CO that lowered the minimum wage, it was tied to some inflation metric (not sure if CPI or other) Lowered a few cents to the federal minimum wage.
I like your plan better.
Elvis wrote:
It really was "Dances with Smurfs". I had read that description when it first came out, but after seeing it, that phrase pretty much nails it.
Cinco-X wrote:
Well then it's obvious that the solution is to take away money from the rich.
It seems as though the spreadsheets are no longer freely downloadable. A registration is now required.
Or am I doing something wrong?
Put it all on number 37 please, croupier.
Juvenal Delinquent wrote:
Juvenal Delinquent wrote:
Empire Strikes Back?
....just offer em some cake and be done with it
noob goldberg wrote:
I'm not in college any more, so, yeah...............
i've never heard him. pretty good stuff.
noob goldberg wrote:
The top 1-3% could certainly stand to pay some more. However, don't extend that to the top 20%, since I'm in there and can't afford to part with any more. It's expensive to live here in the NE.
Eric wrote:
Well, there's no accounting for regional variations. Maybe you found some mythical IMAX theatre that doesn't frown on such shenanigans
Cinco-X wrote:
Not if you are a bando and enjoy soup kitchen buffets.
The first time I heard him, I was driving south on the 99, after a backpacking trip in Sequoia NP, and I was incredulous for about an hour, until I caught on. He eventually took it nationwide as far the callers were concerned, outrage is where you find it.
dum luk wrote:
The problem under Louis XVI was that the poor constituted somewhere between 60-80% of the population or even more (someone else can look it up). We're heading that way, but we're not there yet.
It's not funny to laugh about "I'm fallen and I can't get up..." to me anymore. I had a personal experience the other day helping an elderly lady (83?) who fell on the pavement trying to get into her car and she said those words as she was lying on the pavement looking at me. She split her head open a little bit and was clearly embarrassed. After about 15 minutes she got into her car and drove off; claimed she had very strong bone density... so I wasn't going to force her not to drive.
noob goldberg wrote:
Well then it's obvious that the solution is to take away money from the rich.
Yes and no - the key to stability (without military force or fascism, and fear and terror to keep the rebels in line) doesn't seem to be a magic number, nor equality, but a reasonable distribution that minimizes the inequities, which in turn results in price stability and more of a unified sense of culture.
Cinco-X wrote:
Well, if we removed money from the top 20% they wouldn't be competing with each other for goods, which would drive down prices, thus reducing living expenses and making everyone better off.
EDIT: Oh, and I'm seriously
ing here.
it was 95% yesterday.
does that mean it's 85% today?
ResistanceIsFeudal wrote:
Ding! Ding! Ding! Ding! Ding! Ding! Ding!
Juvenal Delinquent wrote:
So last decade. Now it is a food foraging and poaching excursion into a NP.
(OT) Cinco-X said: "The problem under Louis XVI was that the poor constituted somewhere between 60-80% of the population or even more (someone else can look it up). We're heading that way, but we're not there yet."
That number was about 80% and they were heavily taxed, while the rich paid little in taxes. We're so far away from that situation that I don't see how we'll ever get there.
Sebastian
Eric wrote:
YouTube - Colors of the Wind
Cinco-X wrote:
Where are the Dongs? The Munchkins are not with you unless you bring the Dongs. It brings up an interesting question about the male Munchkins sexuality, of course.
noob goldberg wrote:
Right
the spread of the top 20% is SOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOO great. Perhaps 80-92% are in competition for McMansions, but that top 1-3% is so far out in the stratosphere it's not even funny. I might as well be a pauper next to Jamie Dimon, and I'm sure he's feel that way if our paths were to ever cross. BTW, I'm not even sure that I'm in the top quintile, but I think so. You wouldn't know it though; my "bigscreen" is a 32" Sony Bravia and I drive a compact. Thankfully we have essentially no debt, and some savings.
Cinco-X wrote:
However, don't extend that to the top 20%, since I'm in there and can't afford to part with any more. It's expensive to live here in the NE.
LOL. That's exactly how they (the 1-3%) feel. And it's also damn expensive to live in Greenwich CT, especially with a summer home and an apartment in Manhattan to pay for.
Jeremy, thinks, among other things, that the financial industry drags down GDP by about 4.5%
Stop the Presses! Deep Thoughts From Jeremy Grantham | zero hedge
Cinco-X wrote:
You must not be a taxpayer. Good for you.
ResistanceIsFeudal wrote:
But do they REALLY nee that 4th Lexus?
Luke: How did the economy die?
Obi-Wan: A young debti named Tax eVader, who was a pupil of mine until he turned to evil, helped the Empire hunt down and destroy the debti knights. He betrayed and murdered the economy. Now the debti are all but extinct. eVader was seduced by the dark side of the Farce.
Juvenal Delinquent wrote:
The SA data in this series are useless. Only the NSA data is any good, and it showed a decline.
I am not even sure how to interpret seasonality in a house price series. A transaction series, yes, but not a price series.
To the person sitting there underwater on their mortgage, the SA price has no meaning.
JD - that was your best. Congrats
food foraging in the NP would be limited to (in season) onions, thimbleberries, strawberries, miner's lettuce, and maybe a few other things. You would starve to death depending upon living off the land there.
PIMCO - February 2010 Gross Ring of Fire
YouTube - Johnny Cash-Ring of Fire 1963
Yoda: Debt is a natural part of life. Rejoice for those around you who transform into the Farce. Mourn them do not.
Bloomberg to Hire Ex-Clinton Strategist - NY Times
Prediction: Bloomberg to run for Pres. as an independent in 2012 and has good chance to win ( vs what Perot did in 1992 ). I'm neutral on Bloomberg but would probably vote for him because am totally disgusted with status quo corrupt GOP and Dems and this country needs a change from these assclowns.
Juvenal Delinquent wrote:
You are speaking merely of those resource poor NP in CA I believe. Other NP are chalk full of food. A veritable feast.
DJIA drop, update.
Today, the chart pattern was published for yesterday.
BigCharts - QuickCharts
Yesterday was NOT an inside day. Thus the chart pattern drop of 500 points, based on that inside day chart bar did NOT appear.
There is no trade. I have no probability of any direction based on the chart pattern including yesterday. It doesn't mean that others know the probabilties of this pattern. I just know that what I know has not appeared.
I have nothing further to add on this topic.
... by the by - - that's roughly double normal TGT volume for this time of day
Slumdog wrote:
Guess you turned out to be lumpen, eh?
Sebastian wrote:
While corp tax rates are high, after allowable deductions and special IRS rules, they pay very little percentage wise. I would say we are pretty much there. Warren said he paid less in taxes than his secretary.
Sebastian wrote:
Argentina? Not finding tax info that makes it clear what it's like there, but they hit 25% unemployment, so had to be pretty high levels of poverty and little middle class left.
Wondering more than answering here, have not read up on it in quite some time.
Slumdog wrote:
trading in general?
scone wrote:
Getting past the first couple of paragraphs, he seemed to catch his stride:
As you like it...
noob goldberg wrote:
It's the "Ring of Fire" chart that strikes me as very important.
noob goldberg wrote:
Is that the good invisible or the bad invisible. Because there are a lot of perks if you have the superpower of invisibility.
not seeing the massive
yet
Slumdog wrote:
I added to it last topic, for those who where wondering about DSI.
When we interview people, we send them up to the white board to "teach us" what they know. If they can't do it, we assume they don't really know it.
Don't out drive your headlights...
"Where's the V?" (Where's the beef?)
.....speaking of which........ever heard of Beef Products, Inc.? They provide Burger King, McDonalds, and most others with "meat"....or more properly called "pink slime". The company developed a technique that liquefies the trimmings, runs them through a centrifuge to separate the fat from the protein, then injects it with ammonia in an attempt to kill pathogens. Then it's turned into blocks and chips that are used to beef up hamburgers. The company sells 7 million pounds of it every week, and school lunch burgers are now 15 percent trimmings. The Times found one message from a USDA microbiologist who called this junk "pink slime" and wrote, "I do not consider the stuff to be ground beef, and I consider allowing it in ground beef to be a form of fraudulent labeling." .........Yummie..........
(OT) josap said: "While corp tax rates are high, after allowable deductions and special IRS rules, they pay very little percentage wise. I would say we are pretty much there. Warren said he paid less in taxes than his secretary."
"...In 2001, the latest year of available data, the top 5 percent of taxpayers paid more than one-half (53.3 percent) of all individual income taxes, but reported roughly one-third (32.0 percent) of income.
The top 1 percent of taxpayers paid 33.9 percent of all individual income taxes in 2001. This group of taxpayers has paid more than 30 percent of individual income taxes since 1995. Moreover, since 1990 this group’s tax share has grown faster than their income share.
Taxpayers who rank in the top 50 percent of taxpayers by income pay virtually all individual income taxes. In all years since 1990, taxpayers in this group have paid over 90 percent of all individual income taxes. In 2000 and 2001, this group paid over 96 percent of the total...."
js-1287: Fact Sheet: Who Pays The Most Individual Income Taxes?
Sebastian
Elvis wrote:
Luke: I see Obi-Wan. By the way, do you know where Princess Leia is? I really want to nail that hot piece of bundum.
Obi-Wan: Sorry, Luke. I believe eVader is already doing that.
Luke: But I am an honest and faithful knight, and a student of the Farce.
Obi-Wan: Yeah, so was I, but eVader used his powers to build a bigger lightsaber than yours. Sorry dude. If it makes you feel better, he calls her a cheap slut when he's out drinking with Palpatine.
Grand Canyon, Zion, Cascades, etc. virtually all the big beautiful NP's in the west, have very little in the way of natural food sources.
Juvenal Delinquent wrote:
Go East, young man.
SNAFU wrote:
interesting choice of words. Its amazing what you can do when you don't have to deal with things like "due process". I think while it is easy to go gaga over Chinese growth rates- what makes that possible is also what makes things like the Cultural Revolution possible and the 10's of millions who have died in famines. It is easy to look at the last 25 years and say how wonderful that is - but I think to be balanced you have to look at the entire record from 1949.
In 2011 a high income NYC resident will pay 40% federal, 10% NYS, 5% NYC and probably a 5% federal healthcare surcharge, for a top marginal tax rate of 60%, with limited deductability because of that little treasure trove known as AMT. The plutocrats in America are lightly taxed because the capital gains rate is essentially a low rate flat tax for them, but it's complete crap that high income wage earners are undertaxed. The fact that taxing the crap out of wage earners who make $250k a year is one of Obama's populist themes, just shows how bought and paid for he is by the plutocracy.
ResistanceIsFeudal wrote:
crazyv wrote:
.....or the last 100-years and say how "hot" it is......sorry.......:winking:
traderwalt wrote:
just a thought- if you are buying gold as a hedge against the collapse of the monetary system wouldn't silver be a better bet? After all you want something of low denominational value to transaction with on a day to day basis. Even a half gold coin is $550. Hard to have change made for that.
I found out after going to see Avatar that I no longer have stereo vision.
I spent the first half hour taking the glasses off, putting them back on, squinting me eyes and thinking to myself "WTF everyone tells me the 3d special effects are new and improved"
So I had to spend the rest of the movie just concentrating on the weakest part, the storyline.
Noon you lucky sob atleast you still saw 3d through those toilet paper roll tubes.
crazyv - That was a good catch last night that 30 yr. mortgages actually last about 5, therefore the risk is lower with <5% 30 yr. fixed rates for banks.
However, in our new immobile society, I wonder if that will not work so well for them.
Elvis wrote:
(Oh yes, make sure it is 'whole grain' and not just 'whole wheat' for superior control of blood sugar!)
The preceding sentence in the article says:
"
While prices have risen steadily on a national basis, some economists predict they will dip again early this year because of high unemployment and foreclosures.
"
So I do not think he would use 'rising prices' as an illness that required 'healing'. It was the upcoming 'dip' he was referring to.
Captain Morgan said:
I'm having that printed up and framed. Thanks.
SNAFU wrote:
Is Jaswant Jain coming back?
HAL: I've just picked up a fault in the DSI unit. It's going to go 100% failure in 72 hours.
Elvis wrote:
That's never going to be paid back, so I don't count it
I traced slumdogs ip address back to Cramer's office. His "enlightening" trading calls finally make sense.
1/10 oz. coins are running about $130. Still cumbersome, but maybe you could buy goods in bulk.
crazyv wrote:
Take a coin to your local shop and ask if you can get paid in cash, and what price they are paying. They can probably pay cash far beyond an ounce.
Pawn shops and coin shops generally have quite a bit of cash in hand. I have a coworker who always sells like this, gets decent but not great spreads as well. I have not sold in this manner.
But I agree with the sentiment of your post. I suppose 1/10 ounce gold coins would work as well, but don't recall what the spread is like on them.
crazyv wrote:
That's why you want some of each. A cache of silver for barter, gold for wealth preservation.
just a thought- if you are buying gold as a hedge against the collapse of the monetary system wouldn't silver be a better bet? After all you want something of low denominational value to transaction with on a day to day basis. Even a half gold coin is $550. Hard to have change made for that.
I don't see how the politician most associated with Wall Street is going to ride a wave of populist anti-Wall Street anger to the White House. Vote for Bloomberg if you don't think the bank bailouts were big enough?
Cinco-X wrote:
typically Forbe's like. The real root of the problem as far as the banking system is concerned is why they should be holding any assets that require a mark to market calculation. That treatment is more appropriate to trading operations and should never have been part of bank in the first place. The only appropriate accounting treatment for a bank is and has always been the lower of cost or its impaired value.
CaptainMorgan wrote:
"Why do you rob pawn shops?'
"Because that is where the money is."
"Then why do you rob coin shops?"
"Because I'm a collector."
josap wrote:
this is the core conundrum - do you allow some people to get very rich through the liquidation process but get it done quickly- or do you try an avoid that and have the unwind take a long time.
@ Oxtail - because more and more people are disgusted with both GOP and Dems and independents will likely be most significant group in 2012
dum luk wrote:
It's also applicable while driving, but don't out drive your brakes either.
Hey Ken,
I want to add a picture of a bulldozer as a tile. How do I do that?
km4 wrote:
May be as early as 2010 Nov.
damn, there went the slumdog prophecy
@ EvilHenryPaulson - Bill likes Canada. And Germany. He makes no mention of Australia, which is interesting to me. Maybe that's because their housing is bubbly.
SNAFU wrote:
Nixon's "silent majority"?
noob goldberg wrote:
Noob- you disappoint me. I though you had better taste. I think the 3-D was very interesting- the movie was predictable and boring and included virtually every cliche from 80 years of movie making. and the left wing.
I find the discussions of using precious metals as post collapse money academic and outdated. Were events to devolve to a point where paper money fails we go straight to a subsistence barter economy.
Rob Dawg wrote:
So you favor lead in lieu of gold and silver?
enjoying the movie script collaboration, Kevin Smith couldn't have done better himself.
Rob Dawg wrote:
I agree with Rob Dawg. That is why rice is twice as nice and only a fraction of the price.
If you have toilet paper and food, I imagine the rest works itself out in time.
I thought most of our discussions were academic!
I think what effects the price of silver now is the supply. I believe that much of it is a byproduct of copper and lead production. As the world economy improves the demand for lead and copper increases and so does the supply of silver.
Oxtail wrote:
That's a possible concern, though he's an able administrator and has been an effective mayor. What bothers me most about MB is the determination to fill a third term. Wouldn't initially have suspected him of latent Imperialism, but now . . . ?
traderwalt wrote:
So are you implying that silver has no where to go but up?
traderwalt wrote:
I think this is the case, very certain in regards to lead. Gold is also byproduct of copper mines.
crazyv wrote:
It was fun! I don't expect it to win any acting awards, and I can't say I became overly attached to any of the characters, but for a 3D romp through a giant imaginary world it was a good time.
It's like having sex with an ugly woman or driving a beater-car through an ice-storm: it can still be a lot of fun, no matter what your friends say.
crazyv wrote:
But don't you think it could happen even more quickly if there were not these deals made in the shadows? In other words--aren't these "back room" deals sort of prolonging everything? I wonder if these deals are not giving everyone a false sense that we are in recovery mode, when in all likelihood , we really haven't even come close to the bottom in many areas? (Maybe?)
noob goldberg wrote:
Do you turn the lights off or use a paper bag? Just curious-
Cinco-X wrote:
That's what the women say about you, too.
Cinco-X wrote:
I turn the lights off on the beater car and use the paper bag for the girl.
Elvis wrote:
Except of course I didn't say that; fix your quoting or pipe down-
Pearl wrote:
From a lender's perspective, that's a feature.
noob goldberg wrote:
Good plan! I like it
Elvis wrote:
So are you implying that silver has no where to go but up?
Obviously, I haven't a clue...
salutations from the front lines
Inventory is up, just slightly but still up. Nevertheless, re agents are still whining that they'd be selling if they had anything decent to sell. All the competition is for 3/2s under 175K. If the property is under 1200 sqft, has off street parking, is located in the south markets, or is less then a full 3/2, it's sitting and sitting. The price sweet spot seems to be between $95 to $120 /sqft depending on location, size, and HOA/MR fees. This tells me that buyers are looking at rent parities and not for future appareciation. That said, Mcmansions outside of the foothills rent very cheap at around $50/sqft or under.
There were neighborhoods where any property listed was jumped on making it feel like we had 0 availability. That began to correct in mid Dec and it's still ongoing. I know this from personal experience as I made 7 offers during 2009. One finally stuck just before Xmas and I'm waiting on acceptance from the lender, it's a short sale. I am not holding my breath.
The price drops by sellers in the pricey midtown areas are still coming in as they have been since late 08. $/sqft has resumed it's slow trending down. Cash still wins though flippers seem to be fixiated on properties they can pick up for less then 60k which might resale for $160k. The good deals were in mid 08. 2009 seems have been filled latecomers who have missed the window.
Cinco-X wrote:
Does this offend you?
km4 wrote:
Cut out the middleman and vote for the oligarch directly - think of the savings!
do outdrive the outraged, golfclub swinging , nordic hottie.
Share of AGI:
Top 1% = 15.3%
Bottom 50% = 13.6%
Elvis wrote:
Attributing what noob goldberg wrote:
to me and then making some snarky remark does.