Hearing that commercial real estate and construction remain strong, I wonder what percentage of office space is occupied by all the various real estate related businesses whose space requirements will fall so sharply in this downturn?
Wow, they have this really scary article on Barron's now. Anybody with a subscription should take a look:
The housing bubble is much more dangerous than the dot.com bubble. For the most part, dot.com speculators were only risking their original investment. Some housing speculators are risking loss of their primary residence because they borrowed against it to finance their spec homes. Yes, homes, plural: Many speculators bought several spec homes with low down-payments.
Well I don't think that is completely true. Since alot of people I know were trading on margin back in the good old Dot Com days. Being an IT person I really miss those days.
However I do agree that the RE bubble is much larger than the Dot Com one since way more people are into RE.
Thanks CR.
Since we're discussing real estate related employment, is anyone aware of any impact flat rate (non-commissioned) brokers are having on realtor profits. I live in the bay area and everyday I receive several direct mail ads from local agents trying to entice me to list my home. Lately there has been mail from "Help-U-Sell" and I just wondered if anyone reading this blog knows if the market penetration of those realtors is significant.
The important thing here is that this is just another one of the reasons that commercial building will dry up after a small delay. As vacancy rates climb from already high levels, there is no reason you'll sustain the strong non res investment figure you saw in q2. You'll get a couple more quarters of pipeline, then as these housing related companies consolidate and give back space, or just plain fold, and assorted other job losses slow the economy and lead other firms to start laying off staff to pare costs, another leg will be knocked out from under the already wobbly table that is the economy.
Remember also, that if what we are seeing in the residential investment housing market (and I mean worldwide - Ireland, Spain, area slowing - looks like a global bust) plays out in commercial (where cap rates are at idiotically low levels), we'll soon realize there was a bubble in commercial as well, and if those prices fall, you can bet your ass all this stuff that was built because of high prices is going to disappear from the pipeline. It's all linked together, but noone cared to notice on the upswing...
jm, I don't have any national numbers - just the numbers in the article.
Prescott Bush, I don't have any info on the impact of low commission brokers. The top agents I know have been cutting their commissions for years, so I don't think that will hurt them as much as the general housing bust.
Geoff, I read an article earlier this year (that I can't find) about how OC commercial vacancy rates were low - and rents were rising. Now when I drive around I see "For Lease" signs on more and more buildings. I haven't been involved in a lease negotiation for a commercial building in OC since '93 or '94 ... so I don't have any good first hand information ... but I think the housing bust will have a greater impact on commercial than most analysts expect.
I heard Steve Roach say that commercial building is already slowing, though the stats might not show it yet. A construction number is being released tomorrow. Many RETSs now are paying significantly less than T-bills. There's a Profunds fund that is inverse the commercial REIT index.
Re the opinion piece in Barron's, keep in mind this is Mike Morgan. He got into a pissing match with Lennar over some investment property he bought from them. He since has gone on a self-righteous crusade against them and the entire Florida real estate market. Don't get me wrong, I have puts on Lennar and think he's basically right about thinngs. But he isn't the objective observer he makes himself out to be. Barron's should have added a bio line.
I agree with Prescott, the good Bush. There are going to be way too many realtors fighting far fewer commissions at a time when the NAR monopoly is losing fights in legislatures and with regulaors, and there are all these new businesses coming online. Plus, sellers realizing they need to aim their sights lower price-wise, are probably much more sympathetic to the new players' pitches.
"Re the opinion piece in Barron's, keep in mind this is Mike Morgan. He got into a pissing match with Lennar over some investment property he bought from them."
I don't have a position in Lennar at the moment, but when I looked into this a few months ago I learned that Morgan's dispute with Lennar pertained to faulty construction and unremedied inspection issues at several properties for clients of Morgan. I never heard anything about properties he owned himself.
Given the way Lennar has behaved in this matter, I am more inclined to take Morgan's word than theirs.
I havent followed the individual markets since I left commercial research a couple of years back, but I know where to pull the info. OC is at about 7% now, down from a high of 16% in early 03, but clearly they took advantage of mortgage company leasing. The vacancy rate rose in the last quarter for the first time since that peak. So, OC very may well still be tight, but that could easily be an issue like DC, which is tight because of govt spending largely. Look what happened to DC in the mid 90s when they decided to pare back govt spdg. Same type of thing can happen to any market if its main lease source dries up.
My point is that professional service jobs will definitely dry up in housing related areas, but as the economy slows, they will start to wither all over, and as companies hit a soft patch, they typically pare back costs which often means headcount. This is how the whole downward spiral presents itself - it doesnt have to be a specific trigger that changes economic momentum. This time it is housing, last time it was a biz investment bust. The question is always a matter of what feedback mechanism results from the bust, and what factors can mitigate. Last time would have been a severe consumer recession, but we offset with tax cuts, low rates, and housing equity extraction. None of those are coming this time around, so the chance of avoiding the consumer slowdown is about nil.
So think C+I+G+NE. Resid investment is tanking. Govt Spending is tapped out. You'll get a small lift from NE as imports slow and exports are helped by what will presumably be a falling dollar. That is for starters. Now, with that in place, the consumer slows, and when demand slows, you see the issue you are talking about above with revenue and corporate profits and once that is in play, you get the other parts of investment slowing - first cap ex, then comm building.
So, all we are doing here at this point is spectating. I dont see anything really that can be done to stave this off, particularly because I think monetary policy can only have a modest effect, and its not clear that we can even afford to cut rates to the bone again, given our country's financing needs. Sure, oil prices can pull back some, but to the extent they pull back a lot, it's for a bad reason - global slowdown.
I really think this is the dotcom bust, housing version, just in very slow motion, so you can't tell that you are repeating the same downward path, with different leading causing and lagging responses.
I agree with you that the key issue is the "feedback mechanism" or reflexivity between the housing bust and the economy as a whole.
My thought is that sentiment plays a key role in this as "wealth effects" from boom asset markets are psychological as well as financial.
Corporate CFOs are not going to invest in expansion capex into the teeth of a consumer-led slowdown, so it's hard for wall st to justify the "handoff" they have been waiting for. Massive stock buybacks in the face of all-time profit growth would seem to prove this point.
I too am a observer of the Commercial RE markets and would like to know where to find the free data you are looking at. If you could, please email me at
Sorry,if I mischaracterized the dispute, still he definitely has a personal axe to grind and I think a tag line was in order. If you do a Web search, the guy has a lot of breathless pieces like that up in various places. Like I say, I agree with his premise, and I certainly wouldn't want to buy a recent build in Florida. None-the-less...
BTW, I hail from Fredonia! I know, we lacked an "e", actually, the place lacked quite a bit else too....
Anyone buying anything built in the past year is taking a gamble. When you are putting up houses at the rate these people have been over the past few years, just think about all the marginal construction workers and people posing as construction workers who are building these monstrosities. The stuff built now is going to be even worse, since they are going to try to slap it together asap so that they can give a 20% discount to the next FB. Crazy...
Hi dryfly, Wasn't Prescott w's grandfather --who made the family fortune in banking for and manufacturing/selling arms to the Nazis as late as 1942? Prescott Bush - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
"manufacturing/selling arms to the Nazis as late as 1942"
Bit of a leap there, no?
I was referring to his generally moderate stances, I think his grandson's fiscal irresponsibility, constriction of civil liberties and pre-emptive invasion of a country with byzantine social and political structures would have him turning in his grave. I don't think dad is too happy about it either.
I don't mean to inject politics into the discussion. Just drawing a contrast.
Not really - Calmo has it pretty much right from what I've read on Prescott Bush & his friends in Berlin. He was an vocal admirer of the Nazis up until our entrance into WWII. His companies were trading with the Germans until prohibited from doing so by law.
Now having said that, he wasn't alone. 'Lucky Lindy' Lindberg, first solo flight over the Atlantic, was also an admirer of the Nazi's and thought it was national suicide to take them on.
But it is ironic that the Bush apples don't seem to ever fall far from the tree... Grand Daddy cozies up with Hitler & Goebbels... Pappy & Grand Son cozy up with Bin Ladens & Saudis.
Not saying there is a conspiracy - just a weird coincidence. A familial tendency to pick and hang with 'bad apples' maybe, huh?
I see the article doesn't mention who holds the mortgage on the office space.
I suppose only a survivor of the S&Ls would want to know that.
Hearing that commercial real estate and construction remain strong, I wonder what percentage of office space is occupied by all the various real estate related businesses whose space requirements will fall so sharply in this downturn?
... what percentage nationwide ..., that is.
Wow, they have this really scary article on Barron's now. Anybody with a subscription should take a look:
The housing bubble is much more dangerous than the dot.com bubble. For the most part, dot.com speculators were only risking their original investment. Some housing speculators are risking loss of their primary residence because they borrowed against it to finance their spec homes. Yes, homes, plural: Many speculators bought several spec homes with low down-payments.
Florida's Housing Hurricane - Barrons.com
Well I don't think that is completely true. Since alot of people I know were trading on margin back in the good old Dot Com days. Being an IT person I really miss those days.
However I do agree that the RE bubble is much larger than the Dot Com one since way more people are into RE.
For the most part, margin is only about 1/2 of the investment so that you can lost at most your investment and your home is safe.
At the moment, RE is the only margin investment where you can borrow 90%-125% of the value of the asset. And lose your home.
Thanks CR.
Since we're discussing real estate related employment, is anyone aware of any impact flat rate (non-commissioned) brokers are having on realtor profits. I live in the bay area and everyday I receive several direct mail ads from local agents trying to entice me to list my home. Lately there has been mail from "Help-U-Sell" and I just wondered if anyone reading this blog knows if the market penetration of those realtors is significant.
The important thing here is that this is just another one of the reasons that commercial building will dry up after a small delay. As vacancy rates climb from already high levels, there is no reason you'll sustain the strong non res investment figure you saw in q2. You'll get a couple more quarters of pipeline, then as these housing related companies consolidate and give back space, or just plain fold, and assorted other job losses slow the economy and lead other firms to start laying off staff to pare costs, another leg will be knocked out from under the already wobbly table that is the economy.
Remember also, that if what we are seeing in the residential investment housing market (and I mean worldwide - Ireland, Spain, area slowing - looks like a global bust) plays out in commercial (where cap rates are at idiotically low levels), we'll soon realize there was a bubble in commercial as well, and if those prices fall, you can bet your ass all this stuff that was built because of high prices is going to disappear from the pipeline. It's all linked together, but noone cared to notice on the upswing...
Such an intimidating tag Prescott --is housing your forte or are you concealing a major political disposition?
jm, I don't have any national numbers - just the numbers in the article.
Prescott Bush, I don't have any info on the impact of low commission brokers. The top agents I know have been cutting their commissions for years, so I don't think that will hurt them as much as the general housing bust.
Geoff, I read an article earlier this year (that I can't find) about how OC commercial vacancy rates were low - and rents were rising. Now when I drive around I see "For Lease" signs on more and more buildings. I haven't been involved in a lease negotiation for a commercial building in OC since '93 or '94 ... so I don't have any good first hand information ... but I think the housing bust will have a greater impact on commercial than most analysts expect.
Best to all.
I heard Steve Roach say that commercial building is already slowing, though the stats might not show it yet. A construction number is being released tomorrow. Many RETSs now are paying significantly less than T-bills. There's a Profunds fund that is inverse the commercial REIT index.
Re the opinion piece in Barron's, keep in mind this is Mike Morgan. He got into a pissing match with Lennar over some investment property he bought from them. He since has gone on a self-righteous crusade against them and the entire Florida real estate market. Don't get me wrong, I have puts on Lennar and think he's basically right about thinngs. But he isn't the objective observer he makes himself out to be. Barron's should have added a bio line.
I agree with Prescott, the good Bush. There are going to be way too many realtors fighting far fewer commissions at a time when the NAR monopoly is losing fights in legislatures and with regulaors, and there are all these new businesses coming online. Plus, sellers realizing they need to aim their sights lower price-wise, are probably much more sympathetic to the new players' pitches.
"Re the opinion piece in Barron's, keep in mind this is Mike Morgan. He got into a pissing match with Lennar over some investment property he bought from them."
I don't have a position in Lennar at the moment, but when I looked into this a few months ago I learned that Morgan's dispute with Lennar pertained to faulty construction and unremedied inspection issues at several properties for clients of Morgan. I never heard anything about properties he owned himself.
Given the way Lennar has behaved in this matter, I am more inclined to take Morgan's word than theirs.
CR,
I havent followed the individual markets since I left commercial research a couple of years back, but I know where to pull the info. OC is at about 7% now, down from a high of 16% in early 03, but clearly they took advantage of mortgage company leasing. The vacancy rate rose in the last quarter for the first time since that peak. So, OC very may well still be tight, but that could easily be an issue like DC, which is tight because of govt spending largely. Look what happened to DC in the mid 90s when they decided to pare back govt spdg. Same type of thing can happen to any market if its main lease source dries up.
My point is that professional service jobs will definitely dry up in housing related areas, but as the economy slows, they will start to wither all over, and as companies hit a soft patch, they typically pare back costs which often means headcount. This is how the whole downward spiral presents itself - it doesnt have to be a specific trigger that changes economic momentum. This time it is housing, last time it was a biz investment bust. The question is always a matter of what feedback mechanism results from the bust, and what factors can mitigate. Last time would have been a severe consumer recession, but we offset with tax cuts, low rates, and housing equity extraction. None of those are coming this time around, so the chance of avoiding the consumer slowdown is about nil.
So think C+I+G+NE. Resid investment is tanking. Govt Spending is tapped out. You'll get a small lift from NE as imports slow and exports are helped by what will presumably be a falling dollar. That is for starters. Now, with that in place, the consumer slows, and when demand slows, you see the issue you are talking about above with revenue and corporate profits and once that is in play, you get the other parts of investment slowing - first cap ex, then comm building.
So, all we are doing here at this point is spectating. I dont see anything really that can be done to stave this off, particularly because I think monetary policy can only have a modest effect, and its not clear that we can even afford to cut rates to the bone again, given our country's financing needs. Sure, oil prices can pull back some, but to the extent they pull back a lot, it's for a bad reason - global slowdown.
I really think this is the dotcom bust, housing version, just in very slow motion, so you can't tell that you are repeating the same downward path, with different leading causing and lagging responses.
By they way, CR, if you need access to commercial trends in any market, I can tell you where to find them, for free.
Geoff--
I agree with you that the key issue is the "feedback mechanism" or reflexivity between the housing bust and the economy as a whole.
My thought is that sentiment plays a key role in this as "wealth effects" from boom asset markets are psychological as well as financial.
Corporate CFOs are not going to invest in expansion capex into the teeth of a consumer-led slowdown, so it's hard for wall st to justify the "handoff" they have been waiting for. Massive stock buybacks in the face of all-time profit growth would seem to prove this point.
I too am a observer of the Commercial RE markets and would like to know where to find the free data you are looking at. If you could, please email me at
alexsnorman@gmail.com
thanks,
Alex
Captain,
Sorry,if I mischaracterized the dispute, still he definitely has a personal axe to grind and I think a tag line was in order. If you do a Web search, the guy has a lot of breathless pieces like that up in various places. Like I say, I agree with his premise, and I certainly wouldn't want to buy a recent build in Florida. None-the-less...
BTW, I hail from Fredonia! I know, we lacked an "e", actually, the place lacked quite a bit else too....
Anyone buying anything built in the past year is taking a gamble. When you are putting up houses at the rate these people have been over the past few years, just think about all the marginal construction workers and people posing as construction workers who are building these monstrosities. The stuff built now is going to be even worse, since they are going to try to slap it together asap so that they can give a 20% discount to the next FB. Crazy...
I agree with Prescott, the good Bush.
IS there such a thing as a 'Good Bush'?
After all, even Glinda, the 'Good Witch of the North' in the 'Wizard of Oz', was still a witch. Whether good or not might just be perspective.
Hi dryfly, Wasn't Prescott w's grandfather --who made the family fortune in banking for and manufacturing/selling arms to the Nazis as late as 1942?
Prescott Bush - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Our colorful but not well-published history.
"manufacturing/selling arms to the Nazis as late as 1942"
Bit of a leap there, no?
I was referring to his generally moderate stances, I think his grandson's fiscal irresponsibility, constriction of civil liberties and pre-emptive invasion of a country with byzantine social and political structures would have him turning in his grave. I don't think dad is too happy about it either.
I don't mean to inject politics into the discussion. Just drawing a contrast.
I see that private construction spending continued to surge in August!
Bit of a leap there, no?
Not really - Calmo has it pretty much right from what I've read on Prescott Bush & his friends in Berlin. He was an vocal admirer of the Nazis up until our entrance into WWII. His companies were trading with the Germans until prohibited from doing so by law.
Now having said that, he wasn't alone. 'Lucky Lindy' Lindberg, first solo flight over the Atlantic, was also an admirer of the Nazi's and thought it was national suicide to take them on.
But it is ironic that the Bush apples don't seem to ever fall far from the tree... Grand Daddy cozies up with Hitler & Goebbels... Pappy & Grand Son cozy up with Bin Ladens & Saudis.
Not saying there is a conspiracy - just a weird coincidence. A familial tendency to pick and hang with 'bad apples' maybe, huh?