When is CR gonna extend that blue bar?

It's strange to see the line continue to go up, and the blueness stop.

In regards to chart number 1.

Holy Shit, Batman!

We're gonna need a graphling hook.

Juvenal Delinquent wrote:

We're gonna need a grappling hook.

And yodeling lessons!

That's, like, one job per store.

Chart #1 is crazy indeed! You know things are shattered when we are getting into 2nd standard deviations from the "norm". At lunch I need to see how CNBC is spinning this jobs report. Should be amusing. Falling Knife

I see there is someone called poopinator on.

I hesitate to ask him/her to post something.

Must get more. Lets take a coffee break

According to the BLS, there are a record 6.13 million workers who have been unemployed for more than 26 weeks (and still want a job).

Can we now please put the final nail into the coffin of BLS-measured unemployment (and U-3 in particular) being any sort of meaningful indicator of anything whatsoever as far as this recession goes?

I love how the holiday hiring graph is largely green and red. Ho Ho Ho!

That's, like, one job per store.

Don't laugh. Based on the few times I've been in and by there over the past few years, that's probably about half their retail workforce.

I was supposed to be doing some werk from home. - LL

Computers increase productivity. Or not. Laughing out loud

Juvenal Delinquent, that chart is stunning. A decade ago we had 4% unemployment, now we have 4% unemployment just counting those unemployed more that 26 weeks and still looking! Amazing. We've never seen anything like this before - since the Depression.

The long term unemployed is a huge problem

But the 2nd graph is important too. Those thinking the employment recession is over should take a hard look at the all industries diffusion index. That probably needs to be above 50 before the employment recovery starts.

best to all

I want a liberty smiley (please?) a serious smiley with a spikey green
crown, and green and silver torch and a green book.

blue bars? If only on this one chart?

Metaobservation. We are not making enough in wages to pay down consumer debt.

I should get back to football. This economic stuff is just too depressing.

The ostrich approach.

Yeah, but employment is exploding for those companies who deliver glod and sliver.

sportsfan wrote:

I should get back to football. This economic stuff is just too depressing.

The ostrich approach.

What do you do if you're a Bills fan?

Rob Dawg wrote:

We are not making enough in wages to pay down consumer debt.

That might explain the CC and Mortgage delinquency numbers.

Hey, we're better than Canada.
Look, they only lost 2,600 jobs.

Like I mentioned in the last thread, things were truly desperate here in the Central Valley a year ago, from an unemployment standpoint, and of course it was the Northern Inland Empire as far as new homebuilding was concerned, but with much more room to spread out and overbuild.

I could take you on a drive for a couple of hours, and show you bunches of 25 packs of home-sites, flattened out, lots ready to, electric box hooked up, going nowhere fast, abandoned.

Whiskey wrote:

What do you do if you're a Bills fan?

Punt ???

All those sales meant lots of high end lawyer employment. What
are they doing now?

Whiskey wrote:
What do you do if you're a Bills fan?

Let Norwood try to make the field goal?

Whiskey wrote:

What do you do if you're a Bills fan?

Pray for a WNFL where you can be competitive? [with a nod to the previous thread]

Rob Dawg wrote:

We are not making enough in wages to pay down consumer debt.

This is the primary thesis of Steve Keen, that the level of debt is what is driving the crisis, and that we have many years of pain ahead.

"My expectation is that, some time during 2010, the disconnect between the financial markets’ euphoric expectations and the hard reality of a deleveraging private sector will bring the optimism of both “born again Keynesian” neoclassical economists and the markets to an end."

Steve Keen's Debtwatch 

Went over to best Buy to look for computer.

3 just post teen "employees" talking to each other
I rudely interrupted them. The one who "waited on"
me clearly didn't want to, wanted to be off with his
friends. I bought at Office Depot, but they really lacked
stock.

We'd been dating for a year, and Houston was killing the Bills in a playoff game, and I was watching it at home, and called her @ half-time, to commiserate with her, and she said let's go grab a bite, why don't you come over?

By the time I got to her place, Reich's marshall Frank was pulling out a miracle...

And that got us to the Superbowl, where we lost again.

Looks like Nov was the middle peak of the "W" in terms of jobs.

Yep went on the list Jan 1 and I'm in the Central Valley it's pretty grim here of course that could be we haven't see the sun in a few days.

Juvenal Delinquent wrote:

And that got us to the Superbowl, where we lost again.

4 times to the NFC East. Those were the salad days for me. How bout them Cowboys!

Rob Dawg wrote:

Metaobservation. We are not making enough in wages to pay down consumer debt.

Isn't that what Bailout 4.0 (or is it 5.0?) will address? No worries if you're a banker, a homeowner, or a consumer with a bad loan/debt issue, Benny and Timmy got your back.

BY all means, take your money out of a money center bank that will still be here in 5 years and keep it in your mattress for 5 years while you try and find a small bank or credit union that will still be around in 2 years.

That'll show em Laughing out loud

And as for startups, I'm going into the hawaiian rum business. They're practically giving molasses away(ca. $100/tn), can contract out production on the islands at first until the biz gets legs, ship in bulk to the mainland because deadheading is dirt cheap. Have trademark, distro, label & bottle designed, can have molds maunfactured in S. Korea for 1/10th the cost of US. In the meanwhile I scavenge for failed microbrewing & distilling equipment that I can arbitrage.

Hopefully bottle gives off illusion of top shelf, set price point for early adopters as mid-tier so they are willing to give placement and have fat margins.

Uncle Ar wrote:

Let Norwood try to make the field goal?

Mr. Wide Right might work for the NYS. Missing goals by wide margins is a desired trait there.

Nemo wrote:

That's, like, one job per store.

The store manager.

They'll offer the floor workers a transfer to a store far away, and with fewer hours available. Most of them will walk, but it won't be a layoff.

lawyerliz wrote:

All those sales meant lots of high end lawyer employment. What
are they doing now?

Posting comments on CalculatedRiskBlog.

"Went over to best Buy to look for computer."

Why, that huge box store pays for CRE, lights and employees, Guess where they get that money from? You can buy online for much cheaper. When we set up our home network, I had to talk my dad out of buying from best buy, I bought a wireless router, and 2 network cards on newegg for what they were trying to charge for a single network card there. Plus you can check out the reviews.

Most people are used to traditional shopping but come on.

Ever meet a happy-go-lucky lawyer?

Juvenal Delinquent wrote:

Ever meet a happy-go-lucky lawyer?

Nope. Meet a few happy-go-Prozac lawyers tho

Foot Locker to close 117 stores, cut 120 jobs - Yahoo! News
xxx
That's 120 mgt jobs, plus the jobs at 3% of their stores, which would be around 1000 people, the low-end dirty-collar being tossed under the bus. They're dead meat unemployable. Maybe they should learn Chinese.

Metaobservation. We are not making enough in wages to pay down consumer debt.

We need a reset button. Jubilee, either partial or full.

Someone needs to have the guts to push the button. Otherwise, it's bk case by case by case, slow, laborious, and inefficient.

Slumdog wrote:

They're dead meat unemployable

Until they graduate high school, then college. Then only half of them are unemployable.

Fannie Mae relaxes Florida condo standards - Yahoo! Finance

It's like they always say: There's no problem with supply and demand that more low-cost speculation can't solve.

My Head Just Exploded, indeed.

and all those Foot Locker layoffs each one one condo a piece, probably recently refi'ed, or recently purchased under the 3% down, $8000 refund offering by the Feds.

Who's stupid here? The one entity that's not stupid is precious metals.

On PM, yesterday and today, silver outperformed gold. The ratio of 61:1 is at a historically high range. Expect 50:1.

That was an entertaining tale about Birkenfeld on 60 Minutes, check it out.

CBS.com - Official Site of CBS

Whistleblower goes to jail, perpetraitor of the crime remains on the job

Foot Locker stores never struck me as capable of being profitable to begin with. Sometimes a recession roots out the weak, this may just be one of those cases.

Outsider wrote:

Foot Locker stores never struck me as capable of being profitable to begin with.

Nike sneaker retails $120(?), costs $10(being generous) to manufacture. Half of the rest goes to Nike, half goes to Footlocker. If the nut is cheap enough....

We need a reset button. Jubilee, either partial or full.

Ah, the law of unintended consequences.

Banks and lenders of all stripes lined up (and lined their Congressmen's pockets) to oppose what I've fondly called "Tanta's Law" - which would allow judicial cramdowns on first-home mortgages in Chap. 13 bankruptcy.

They got their wish.

Now, instead, what's going to result in the years to come will be cramdowns that are (a) larger; (b) not limited to mortgages; and (c) not limited to Chap. 13.

After they lose the war, and sign the armistice, that first victory will seem an impossibly minor skirmish in comparison.

Roubini on unemployment this AM (CNBC)

But the road of a million miles starts with a single step. According to Roubini, we won't be at normal until 2015.

Whatever the new normal is.

Robots, offshoring, lower staffing ratios, less spending because less/stagnant wates, and more ills.

We prolly should acknowledge that we have 5-7% of people who want to work that will never make it in this decade. What should they do? What should WE do?

My choice, if it is as necessary as it seems, is socially paid jobs that could be done but are not well staffed (park rangers, park maintenance, assistants for the old and ill, day care, etc. We may have to choose between social instability and higher overall taxes (particularly at the upper income scales).

Hula gurls on label?

I once bought a bottle of frangelica was it? solely because
it was bottled in a monk shaped bottle with a while cord
around the waist. It was a gift for a hostess. She liked the
bottle and the booze both.

The only way you get a jubilee nowadays is complete and utter debauchment of your currency. Then you can hit the reset button.

But this is a lie, which the government seems to think that, if repeated enough, will transform into fact.

Just like the rest crop. & govt. they’re channeling Joseph Goebbels.
Yes there are to many True Belivers

Did Sebastian show up last thread to explain how this was just another garden variety recession, and that folks who held otherwise were just ignoring the data?

Gosh, maybe someday I'll have another closing.

This will cause prices to go down less quickly.

Wouldn't that lead from being a slave to the lender, to being a slave to a different political system?

Push.The.Button.Now. (reset, not nuclear Steve)

hmmmm UUP is down AND GLD is down wazzup wit dat ?

Two things:
Don't worry too much about banks being hurt by default on student loan debts -- they are almost NEVER dischargeable in BK. In fact if the ex-student defaults, he/she just makes it really, really worse. Autos can be repossessed (at some expense), but CC?? Completely different issue -- very dangerous for banks.
Talked to a friend over the holiday. He runs the equipment leasing branch of a major multinational empire. Says the shipping container industry has not built a single unit that he knows of since November, 2008. That's right, not one unit in the last 13-14 months. And the empties continue to pile up.

here is what I think are quite interesting numbers

employment data from the BLS
establishment houshold
original revised original revised

2005 135041 142782
2006 136214 137167 145926 145949
2007 138495 138078 146211 146294
2008 135489 135074 143338 143188
2009 130910 137792

yoy changes
establishment houshold
2006 1173 3144
2007 1328 262
2008 -2589 -2956
2009 -4164 -5396

You will note that in 2007 there was a substantial upward revision to the establishment survey (large than the projected bench mark decline). What I find most interesting is that the divergence between the household survey and the establishment survey actually forecasted the revision. Much as the divergence between the household and establishment in 2009 will accounted for the Feb 2010 benchmark revision. This data also suggests that the establishment survey undercounts on the way up and over counts on the way down.

lawyerliz wrote:

Hula gurls on label?

Nope, a stylized yucca that only grows on top of one of the island's volcanoes in a bottle that looks like a piece of obsidian. That way some of the dumber folks may think it's a tequila. All this savoring of flavors is for the birds, especially in rum. You either mix it with coke or you mix it with some sort of fruit mix.

"Did Sebastian show up last thread to explain how this was just another garden variety recession, and that folks who held otherwise were just ignoring the data?"

I can't work today. There's a horrible racket outside. Sebastian keeps buzzing my housing in his Model Wright Bi-Plane.

energyecon wrote:

Did Sebastian show up last thread to explain how this was just another garden variety recession, and that folks who held otherwise were just ignoring the data?

He just said; "Number 17" but he didn't tell it very well. No one laughed.

poic wrote:

Sebastian keeps buzzing my housing in his Model Wright Bi-Plane.

Low clouds here and very poor visibility, so no chance of house buzzing. And watch out for the high rises!

Piece of obsidian, cool.

I think you would do better with a girl.

km4 wrote:
Daily Kos: Birkenfeld Going to Jail; Geithner Going to Work
Reason why this country has gone downhill - Vampire Squid from Hell

Gross inequalities of wealth is what creates the protected class... I don't mean simply "inequalities" of wealth, just huge concentration at the top end characteristic of a gilded age, which ends in a robber-baron class that's able to seize the regulatory apparatus and make itself effectively function above the law (and as the law). The ONLY way it's ever been solved is when those gains are redistributed, peacefully or through a bloody revolution.

Their disinformation angle from the maim stream media about how any other financial instruments other than the dollar, might be hazardous to your wealth, or be the cause of the biggest war since World War 2*, along with the toady paid-off Keynesian economissed types babbling on about something they know very little about, bravely waving their credentials, which seemed bona fide enough, once upon a time.

  • They actually said that on 60 Minutes

The trouble with the diffusion index chart is that it 'implies' that there is a past precedent (the rising and falling 'humps') that has some correlation to the recessions. But as we know, correlation does not...
There would seem to be no reason that the index could not go the other direction at any time.
Is there any mechanism of diffusion that you know of that causes an economic movement upward or downward?

I bet we close green today. It's gonna be wack a bear day today.

Don't worry too much about banks being hurt by default on student loan debts -- they are almost NEVER dischargeable in BK.

There's about $550B worth of total student loan debt outstanding. This compares to $900B of credit-card debt, $1T of other nonrevolving loan debt, and, oh yeah, $14T+ worth of mortgage debt.

Every student loan ever written could pay off at 105% of par, and it would still all amount to putting a half-pint of blood in a patient whose EKG just went flat.

"garden variety recession"

Jungle is just a little bit overgrown garden, nothing to worry about.

Well, at least I know EHP saw my call of -80k last night at 5:24pm on the employment report in the FDIC comments. This was from a state by state jobs forecast for December. I also do an industry by industry forecast as a benchmark. That doesnt look too pretty either. If you look at those trends, just like CR was saying about the diffusion index, there is no way you can say we are in an employment recovery, or really even close to one. Remember that when we finally got jobs turning around in the last recession, it was after nearly a year of bouncing along the bottom. And this time, we are gaining a lot of jobs (or saving, or not losing) through the massive stimulus we've had, especially the money sent to the states to avoid dealing with budgets. Well, guess what? Either were going to send even more money to them again, or we're going to lose those jobs. And that is but one sector.

lawyerliz wrote:

Resurrect Teddy Roosevelt!

I'm tanned, I'm rested, I got the moustache. The only problem I'll have is in reeducating the voter base as to what it means to be a true Conservative as opposed to the changeling they've learned to hate. Conservatives bust trusts and expose corruption and start National Parks.

Juvenal Delinquent wrote:

Ever meet a happy-go-lucky lawyer?

Although I don't think you have ever met me, I don't actively practice anymore, JD.

The ONLY way it's ever been solved is when those gains are redistributed, peacefully

Peaceful redistribution.

I can't get this idea out of my head today. Not socialism, just a one-time event. Reset. Push The Button. Whatever.

Am I the only one thinking this way? I need a reality check.

crazyv wrote:

This data also suggests that the establishment survey undercounts on the way up and over counts on the way down

If you look at the BED survey to compare to the initial establishment nuimbers, the undercounting has increased from the start of the recession to today. They went from being almost spot on to 200k short (exB-D for both) per month in the most recent BED survey. This suggests that the B-D revision next month is gonna be a doozy of a number, something close to 800k at a minimum.

This link gives you all the ETF's broken down by Market Segment, Market Style, Industry Sector, Specialties, all of the Short ETF's and all of the Internationals.

http://www.morpheustrading.com/roundup.html

A small story about a job...

I went to the government website and saw a position for a landscape architect. This was a year and a half ago. Filled out the fields and dutifully updated information when prompted. I recieved an email saying that I was in the running for a particular postion at a national forest. Time passed, still no further information. I called the office where the postion would be. The job was cancelled. Reason?

The position was cancelled because the Forest Service could not hire the position fast enough to get this particular project going; a project with PG&E and the energy department. One and half years in total. They could not hire someone that would help with the project that included, as we all know the lightning speed of the energy department and the insanely fast PG&E.

Result: A person that had a job already was hired as a consultant.

biochemist wrote:

Most people are used to traditional shopping but come on.

Are you old enough to remember when retail sales was a career? When you were waited on in department stores and TV/stereo stores and clothing stores by employees who'd been in the business 20 years and knew the merchandise like the back of their hand? Where retail like that still exists, it's value-added. But as far as your average big-box store is concerned, the only advantage they offer over online is convenience.

Perhaps. Though, in contemporary times at least, one doesn't usually see the middle-aged overrepresented at protests and street demonstrations.

Attendance at speeches, rallies and at the polling stations would suffice.

lawyerliz wrote:
Resurrect Teddy Roosevelt!
It might have been possible for the ultrarich to hide well in the 1930s and abscond with their fortune. We live in a time of cheap and readily available tracking technology that's in the hands of the poor and rich alike, plus the ability to connect people from remote places and across large distances. Celebrities have massive wealth, and basically have no privacy anymore. That's their tradeoff. The ultrarich will live in fear and isolation, which in itself will make them targets.

Comrade Alexei Mikhailovich wrote 8:24 am

"BY all means, take your money out of a money center bank that will still be here in 5 years and keep it in your mattress for 5 years while you try and find a small bank or credit union that will still be around in 2 years."


yeah youre right we should just let the puppet masters have their way with us

ps...i gotta feeling very few if any depositors will loose money in their credit unions..ncua

so why not kick the bankstas in the ass?

Is Sebastian some sort of drug pusher or even more disgusting stock pusher? Or even lower scoundrel, selling CDS, SIV?

lawyerliz wrote:

I think you would do better with a girl.

Sailor Jerry already did it but frankly, I'm not selling it towards your demo. No offense intended.

Have you shot any big game in Africa?

"Metaobservation. We are not making enough in wages to pay down consumer debt."

As soon as it looks like a real recovery, oil will move up, sucking out what everybody thought would be increasing capacity for debt repayment.

poic wrote:

It's gonna be wack a bear day today.

Cruisers almost always sink a destroyer-escort in a gun battle at sea (or whatever war metaphor works for you).

The Big Boys can make the market do exactly what they want. Value is no longer an operative word in US equity markets.

It used to be said not to fight the Fed. Now, don't fight the Fed, GS, JPM, China Banks, Hedge Funds, Private equity funds, and a long list of others with the capacity and desire to manipulate for private advantage.

Outsider wrote:
I can't get this idea out of my head today. Not socialism, just a one-time event. Reset. Push The Button. Whatever.
History should have taught us that equal distribution sucks, some meaningful amount of inequality is necessary, but past a certain point it ends up de facto monopoly or at least oligopoly, unstable and a grossly unfair playing field.

Outsider wrote:

Peaceful redistribution.

Turning individual debt into tax obligations just means the burden never gets amortized. Great, one huge national Option ARM pick-a-pay.

Jungle is just a little bit overgrown garden, nothing to worry about.

(PC Police pulls over blogger...)

Hi, the reason I stopped you was, we longer call them jungles. They are now called rain-forests.

I'm going to let you off with a warning this time~

If one starts out with the assumptions that the vast majority of people who work at the BLS are professionals and have pride in their work than we set aside conspiracy theories and ask the more important question. Why are various statistical measures that should co -relate not doing so. One answer could be that they never do at inflection points and that kind of divergence is just a fact of life. Alternatively, the divergence in this recession is unusual which then gets us to the more interesting question -why.

Don't understand. I thought boys would like a
girl. What are you aiming for?

JimPortlandOR wrote:

The Big Boys can make the market do exactly what they want.

What market? Do we have markets in anything any more?

wally wrote:

"Metaobservation. We are not making enough in wages to pay down consumer debt."
As soon as it looks like a real recovery, oil will move up, sucking out what everybody thought would be increasing capacity for debt repayment.

As soon as it looks like a real recovery soon, all commodities will move up, sucking out what everybody thought would be increasing capacity for debt repayment.

There. I fixed that for ya.

It's gonna be wack a bear day today.

I know ya'll think I'm nutz for fixating on this, but tgt will spike again soon - least ways I bet that way again today.

mock turtle wrote:

i gotta feeling very few if any depositors will loose money in their credit unions..ncua
so why not kick the bankstas in the ass?


are not deposits in Credit Unions insured ? So unless we are talking about more than $250,000 why do I really care about finding either a bank or credit union that is going to be around in 2 -5 years?

Rob, if you don't like the reset idea, what's your solution for your metaobservation?

Might as well start honing your political platform issues.

crazyv wrote:

Why are various statistical measures that should co -relate not doing so.

I buy that the worker bees try to do their best, and also that inflections make data seem contradictory.

But don't underrate what happens to the data as it gets reviewed closer to the top of the pyramid. Science becomes politics and high finance.

apparatchica liz sez:

Have you shot any big game in Africa?

I hear ,rad Dawgma talks a big game.

I can't get the idea of oil tankers off the US coast, waiting, just waiting
for prices to go up so they can swoop in.

Bankers and Vampire Squid from Hell and oil guys and all making
capitalism look extremely loathesome.

ive been canoeing on rivers in the puget sound basin for many years...nisqually, cowlitz, black, green, puyallup...

sometimes you get sideways in the rapids just above a steep cataract

and you realize there are no maneuvers...no amount of strokes...no matter how hard you paddle

that will save you

youre goin over

and your last best move is to cinch that life vest a tad tighter

andd hold on tight to the one thing you want to save in the boat ... besides yourself

What market? Do we have markets in anything any more?

What's the difference between a market and a casino? In a casino there is a 'house', and the house always wins.

JimPortlandOR wrote:

But don't underrate what happens to the data as it gets reviewed closer to the top of the pyramid. Science becomes politics and high finance.


I think we way overstate that as a factor. In this political climate how long do you think it would be before somebody leaked that to the press. The fudging that goes on - with things like the CPI happen in clear view.

CoTD has a chart showing the wonderful job-creation record of the decade just ended:

Chart of the Day - Lowest decade job growth on record

So in addition to real wages falling, there wasn't any job growth either.
Way to go, Brownie.

crazyv wrote:

are not deposits in Credit Unions insured ? So unless we are talking about more than $250,000 why do I really care about finding either a bank or credit union that is going to be around in 2 -5 years?

CUs will be the last institutions standing. Not just lower cost bases but better (read conservatively) run. If you are +$250k then you shouldn't be here but for us peons if TSHTF and the banks start putting 30 day holds on paychecks the CUs will still be allowing cash withdrawals.

pavel.chichikov wrote:

What's the difference between a market and a casino? In a casino there is a 'house', and the house always wins.

This inspires an idea: Move Wall Street to Las Vegas, take over the debt-ridden buildings and use all those flashy lights to tell the investment story of the day. GS Casino, JPM Casino, etc.

Attendance at speeches, rallies and at the polling stations would suffice.

So, Pavel, a meta-question for you - were a demagogue to arise, from where would s/he expect to draw the broadest base of support? You seem to imply from the tail-end baby-boomers, while I would plump for the children of same (tweens, teens, and 20s).

The latter have known nothing but prosperity and entitlement their entire lives, whereas the former crowd have at least lived through the '70s - not the same, perhaps, but a basis for comparison to where I'd think enough of them might believe "this too shall pass". Plus, they have a reasonable path to some "security" (SS, Medicare, etc.) in sight (which the younger cohort, probably rightly, assume they won't ever see).

Reasonable arguments could be made for both, I suppose.

lawyerliz wrote:
Bankers and Vampire Squid from Hell and oil guys and all making
capitalism look extremely loathesome.

That's because it isn't anything remotely like free-market capitalism. It's a financial oligarchy.

mock turtle wrote:

ps...i gotta feeling very few if any depositors will loose money in their credit unions..ncua
so why not kick the bankstas in the ass?

Because it'd be cutting off your nose to spite your face. Look at the problem bank list and how F'd up those banks are. Do you think the average local bank or credit union is that far behind them if(as many of you think) that there's another leg down? Almost everybody was playing the same game and to quote George Carlin,"Think how dumb the average person is and remember that half the people are dumber than that." Some banks may be lucky that management was so slow that they couldn't get their pointy little heads around the most recent fads, but I wouldn't hang my hat on that.

If you have a best of breed local bank(like Hudson City) nearby, by all means go for it; but be careful what you wish for. FDIC and NCUA may guarantee to $250k, but I wouldn't count on it being readily available if the doom machine rolls through your town.

Rob Dawg wrote:

if TSHTF and the banks start putting 30 day holds on paychecks the CUs will still be allowing cash withdrawals.

How long could they keep that up if the TBTF banks were closed? The payroll accounts would have to be funded from somewhere, most likely TBTF banks.

sm_landlord wrote:

So in addition to real wages falling, there wasn't any job growth either.


remind me which party was in charge? Think that there is co-relation between being distracted by irrelevant things like guns, gays , god, patriotism and Clinton's BJ?. IMO people are getting exactly what they deserve.

Let's say after we let the Unabankers eat cake, how long will it take for the memory of their misdeeds to pass, before anybody trusts Wall*Street again?

CUs will be the last institutions standing.

We're in one, and it is very good to be there. It's conservatively run and they've always treated us well. But the membership is limited. I don't know how it is in larger CUs.

Here's where the purchase of treasuries will come from.

"Santelli: Administration To Initiate Comments On IRA Changes

Just spoke at top of hour of Obama administration wanting to restructure IRA rules to put money into treasuries"

Comrade Alexei Mikhailovich

my friend, the reason for moving the money out from under the bankstas has nothing to do with sound investment advice

it is just one of the few lawful and peaceeful ways the average person can stick their finger in the eye of the bankstas and possibly have a small but measurable impact on the government sanctioned financial fraud which continues to rule the land

George Carlin,"Think how dumb the average person is and remember that half the people are dumber than that."

Yeah, but can you chart that ?

It appears as if the Asians tried to "game" the Comex by dumping gold overnite ahead of the jobs number and got their fingers burned. This is an epic reversal for the metals on a "jobs lost" Friday. This is incredibly bullish.

The Fed has made it clear that they are going to have to ramp up their printing press, the Treasury yield curve is starting to price in an acceleration in inflation - either dollar devaluation/money supply expansion or actual price inflation, or both - and the Obama Government loses credibility now on a daily basis. The stock market - contrary to the babbling ignorance expressed by those on CNBC/Bloomberg (and now NPR) - is not reflecting the expectations of robust economicgrowth, but rather the clear and present signal that the Fed has no choice left but to hyperinflate the money supply in order to monetize growing Treasury issuance and the accelerating collapse of commercial and residential credit markets

Rare Technical Gold Formation

http://online.wsj.com/media/BatmanTop2_G_20100108093911.jpg

The Batman Top

So, Pavel, a meta-question for you - were a demagogue to arise, from where would s/he expect to draw the broadest base of support? You seem to imply from the tail-end baby-boomers, while I would plump for the children of same (tweens, teens, and 20s).

I don't know, Mook. My crystal ball doesn't have that kind of resolution. I think it would depend on the seriousness, length and intensity of the crisis. There are regional and cultural factors as well.

Markets: Bubble warning | The Economist
Markets are too dependent on unsustainable government stimulus. Something’s got to give

Gee hasn't this subject already been discussed quite thoroughly and this blog Big smile

Mook wrote:

Now, instead, what's going to result in the years to come will be cramdowns that are (a) larger; (b) not limited to first mortgages; and (c) not limited to Chap. 13.

If they also get (d) fully paid for by the federal government, it'll have been a worthy victory.

Denny's

It's where the functional illiterates hang out.

Can you think of any other restaurant with photos of all the food on the menu?

Words are hard.

Outsider wrote:

Rob, if you don't like the reset idea, what's your solution for your metaobservation?
Might as well start honing your political platform issues.

The reset idea won't work. Doesn't matter whether I like it or not. My neighbor is LTV 130% , I'm 30% and our common neighbor is 0%. Mortgage debt erasure is neither logistically nor socially possible. IMO it isn't desirable either. I suggest that 12 fully amortizing payments earn the mortgage payer a tax credit equal to the last two principal payments (per amort sched). Gets people paying again, rewards prudence and saves the banks. I don't care about saving the banks but as a freebie I'll take it.

I'll be calling this the Party Party. I wanted to be the Apathy Party and pick up all the non-votes but the Elections Division said the ruling parties gat all those by default.

They have edible oatmeal.

Some of the menus here have Spanish pictures.

it is just one of the few lawful and peaceeful ways the average person can stick their finger in the eye of the bankstas and possibly have a small but measurable impact on the government sanctioned financial fraud which continues to rule the land

mock -

Here's another way:

Video - Breaking News Videos from CNN.com

"Man Sparks Credit Card Revolt"

Forever blowing bubbles?
well how else can the dysfunctional American economy operate Big smile

poic wrote:

I bet we close green today. It's gonna be wack a bear day today.

I was surprised we weren't green right out of the chute. Crazyv's analysis was correct; this was a very bullish report.

Yeah, but you like Underwood deviled ham, on wry.

comrade alexie mikhailovich said,

"If you have a best of breed local bank(like Hudson City) nearby, by all means go for it; but be careful what you wish for. FDIC and NCUA may guarantee to $250k, but I wouldn't count on it being readily available if the doom machine rolls through your town."


comrade!

when the airliner looses all power and begins to nose down into the deck

it wont matter whether or not you are seated in tourist class, business , or luxury first class

the plane is going down

if you really want protection from the crash

pack a parachute

( preferably a golden parachute... Wink )

no really...cash... coin... food... seeds .. things of value to trade

"Can you think of any other restaurant with photos of all the food on the menu?

Words are hard. "

Yes, some of the Chinese restaurants we go to occasionally. Not surprisingly it's only white guys like me looking at the pictures, everyone else is reading the Chinese menus.

lawyerliz wrote:

Have you shot any big game in Africa?

Played rugby which Roosevelt threatened to ban and thus spurred the bastard child of American footbal. Why do you think it is called a touchdown when you don't have to touch it down? Ans: in the true sport you do.

Dawg, what about renters?

I liked the rugby scenes in Invictas, tho I didn't understand
what was going on.

Pretty amazing chart! What happened in the last decade? Bin Laden of course but what else? Any articles out there that analyzes why and how? Is this the end of the US as we knew it? May be it is the debt burden.

"
For some perspective, today's chart illustrates the percent increase in the number of jobs for every decade since the 1940s (the data goes back to 1939). As today's chart illustrates, the number of jobs at the end of a decade has been anywhere from 20% to 38% greater than 10 years prior. That 20% plus growth has been the case until the decade just passed during which the number of jobs basically ended the year where it began. This subpar job growth is particularly noteworthy due to the fact that the US population has increased by 10% in addition to a significant increase in global wealth during the same time frame.
"

Chart of the Day - Lowest decade job growth on record 

They have edible oatmeal.

Very important. I'm serious.

The Government household survey show 680,000 jobs were lost in December.

I have 2 brother inlaws who just fell off the payroll ( both in the construction field ), one has been trying for weeks to get another extension, and the other is in the same boat. I just got off of the phone with one of them as we hang out and what not, he just told me and I quote " I just called the un-employment office again, and the guy literately told me we cannot help you " No BS. I am sure there are many more like him.

And of course his next question to me was " can I borrow some money "....

( Crickets chirping )

But reset, according to Michael Hudson, was common in the ancient societies. It must have worked.

Granted, he did state that the creditors in those societies were primarily the govt., whereas now creditors are fellow citizens - does make it more painful.

I'm sure you checked out this link I posted several times. Since I know you value my posts.

Video Michael Hudson, British Economist 

Ha.

Oops, Crisis Wasted:

crisis wasted serious wall street reform unlikely with or without dodd: Tech Ticker, Yahoo! Finance

"Meanwhile, South Dakota Senator Tim Johnson is seen as likely to replace Dodd as Senate banking chairman. Viewed as friendly to Wall Street, Johnson was the only Democrat to oppose the 2009 CARD Act; coincidentally (or not) Citigroup's credit card operations are based in South Dakota."

Well here is a real job for unions.

Rob Dawg wrote:

He just said; "Number 17" but he didn't tell it very well. No one laughed.

Had to go back and wade through last thread comments...

SNAFU

Mostly the result of leaps and gains made in productivity.

Well we can all work at the Apple Store.

"Think how dumb the average person is and remember that half the people are dumber than that."

Some people are so smart the make themselves sick.

The ancient Greek word for that illness was hubris.

Rob Dawg wrote:

Conservatives bust trusts and expose corruption and start National Parks.

Hoocoodanode? Wink

Uncle Ar wrote:

Dawg, what about renters?

Renters are God's people. They'll benefit from the rapture. Think about it. With a housing surplus and huge reduction in costs of ownership they'll be able to pick from the lowest cost basis landlords with the best repayment histories. Rents will fall, the best landlords will benefit and the specuvestors will wash out without harming the prudent.

" The Government household survey show 680,000 jobs were lost in December.

I have 2 brother inlaws who just fell off the payroll ( both in the construction field ), one has been trying for weeks to get another extension, and the other is in the same boat. I just got off of the phone with one of them as we hang out and what not, he just told me and I quote " I just called the un-employment office again, and the guy literately told me we cannot help you " No BS. I am sure there are many more like him.

And of course his next question to me was " can I borrow some money "...."

Again, tinder.

km4 wrote:

Markets are too dependent on unsustainable government stimulus. Something’s got to give.

As Mr. Volker pointed out, the market is the government at this point. The notion that "WE ALMOST LOST IT LAST YEAR" was not an overstatement. The notion that things are "good to go" and can be rationally subjected to ordinary market analysis - that my friend is what is what's not sustainable.
We be in hurt - dat's a fact - but we are now only arguing about the best way to back to normal. GLD has seen zenith.

Just my take.

I'm glad he did it literately.

At least the guy understood what he was saying.

The distribution of SHLD continues apace, this is like the third time IIRC that it has been at or near the top of the list for selling on strength...
Money Flows: Selling on Strength - Markets Data Center - WSJ.com

lawyerliz wrote:

I liked the rugby scenes in Invictas, tho I didn't understand
what was going on.

Rugby is the parent of footbal, soccer and basketball. The rules are far simpler than footbal.

Alas, there is no normal.

There is merely stuff that goes on for a long time.

*Alas, there is no normal.

There is merely stuff that goes on for a long time. *

That's what I've been trying to say here.

pavel.chichikov wrote:

Again, tinder.

Would that be tinder for the redistribution of concentrated wealth happening peacefully or through a bloody revolution, using the options that ResistanceIsFeudal proposed above?

Admittedly just a rhetorical question.

had a good friend that played for them in 80's, 1/2 mauri 1/2 german...met him in hawaii at night club, actually broke his tooth by lifting a bottle of heineken as we were partying, he ran to bathroom, spit out tooth and then came back to keep drinking, good friends since then....tough and full of vigor...

Whiskey wrote:

What do you do if you're a Bills fan?

bloviate about the coaching....

But doesn't one have to create ones own normal?

Dawg, paying homedebtors already get their handout in the form of tax breaks.

energyecon wrote:

The distribution of SHLD continues apace, this is like the third time IIRC that it has been at or near the top of the list for selling on strength...
Money Flows: Selling on Strength - Markets Data Center - WSJ.com

Didn't I say this was coming? And all the block trades are negative. Somebody knows something.

Be my guest.

Your environment may have other ideas.

lawyerliz wrote:
When and where wasn't it?
Look for a time period in which their averaged wins and losses were approximately what you'd expect from random statistical noise. If they are consistently "smarter" than the market over an extended period of time, it wasn't really much of a market to begin with.

Rob Dawg wrote:

Conservatives bust trusts and expose corruption and start National Parks.

yabut, what have you done for us lately?

NOTaREALmerican wrote:

yabut, what have you done for us lately?

Spoken like a true 'MErican! Smile

@ dum luk (profile) wrote (in reply to...) on Fri, 1/8/2010 - 10:26 am

Paul Volcker also said "The American political process is about as broken as the financial system. Therefore, one has to be a bit skeptical. Just to give you one little example, one unrelated to the financial crisis. Here we are on Dec. 29, almost a year after the Inauguration, and there is no Under Secretary of the Treasury. That should be an important position. How can we run a government in the middle of a financial crisis without doing the ordinary, garden-variety administrative work of filling the relevant agencies? The Treasury is an outstanding example of a broken system, but it's not the only one......"

why is Timmy still pretending to be Treasury Sec and why does Obama have his head up Vampire Squid from Hell _____

I want the conservatives who are fiscally conservative
and help (force) most everybody else to be that way too.

So where are they?

energyecon wrote:

The distribution of SHLD continues apace, this is like the third time IIRC that it has been at or near the top of the list for selling on strength...
Money Flows: Selling on Strength - Markets Data Center - WSJ.com

Useful, IMHO:

Retail: The Good, the Bad and the Ugly -- Seeking Alpha

mock turtle

ive been canoeing on rivers in the puget sound basin for many years

You don't know how to Eskimo Roll in a canoe?

In the end, you can thank Enron for bringing us the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, a ghastly financial reporting regulation for which compliance is grossly expensive, and - stop the presses! - hasn't prevented similar repeats.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sarbanes-Oxley_Act

Would that be tinder for the redistribution of concentrated wealth happening peacefully or through a bloody revolution, using the options that ResistanceIsFeudal proposed above?

*Admittedly just a rhetorical question. *

I do not see the US as a country in which 'bloody revolution' will happen. The last one here happened three centuries ago. It's a different era.

I merely spoke, hypothetically, of demagoguery. A mass movement centered around vast promises, morale-boosting rallies and intoxicating slogans, along with an easily grasped summary of resentments. Scapegoats would be indispensable.

Stilt life portrait up top, check it out^

dum luk wrote:

energyecon wrote:
The distribution of SHLD continues apace, this is like the third time IIRC that it has been at or near the top of the list for selling on strength...
Money Flows: Selling on Strength - Markets Data Center - WSJ.com
Useful, IMHO:
Retail: The Good, the Bad and the Ugly -- Seeking Alpha

Looks like that 13.1% short interest is getting some pressure in an...erm...sensitive location

We could all learn that Maori rugby dance, and line up in
front of gov't buildings and have at it.

In a just world, sometime in the future we will see Slumdog painted, just like Shirley Eaton......

lifted from mchugh site....

Since the March 9th, 2009 closing low at 6,547.05, the Dow Industrials have had 30 "up" Mondays (or Tuesdays after a Monday holiday) out of a possible 43, in other words, have been up 70 percent of the time the day after a weekend. Further, 16 of the past 18 Mondays were "up" days, or 89 percent "up" days. 80 percent of all the dollar gains from March 9th, 2009 came on those 30 Monday up days. There were 212 trading days since March 9th, 2009, and 30 Mondays accounted for 80 percent of price gains. I don't know about you, but I find that bizarre. Why? Because only 58 percent of all trading days (Monday through Friday) since March 2009 were "up" days. We should not have seen this many "up" Mondays, and further, we should not have seen 80 percent of all dollar gains for the rally from March 2009 on just 30 "up" Mondays

Fridays at 3:15 or later seem like a lock in the casino.....

SNAFU wrote:

Any articles out there that analyzes why and how?


sometimes we just over think things. What was the most remarkable event of the late 90's early 00's. Fiber optic cables particularly the network established by Global Crossing and copied by so many others. From a communications cost perspective there was no difference between an employee in Bangalore India or one across the river from Manhattan in Jersey city. Add to that you had in places like India economies that hadn't grown much so there were vast pools of qualified talent that could be exploited with the communications revolution. Throw in the outsourcing of manufacturing jobs to China and there is your answer.

I would feel more optimistic about the future (given that growth rates in India have absorbed a lot of the surplus talent) but for the fact that the population there embraces education (not because they want prayer in the schools or teaching creationism) but because they see it as a way forward. So there is a large privae industry in education ( no arguments about vouchers) catering to providing the education necessary for the new economy. So while our education system goes down (while we fight the same tired battles Teachers unions on one side the right wing on the other) both India and China are stepping up their education efforts.

Ironically the one thing that could help jobs and incomes is a big increase in the global price of oil or failing that a carbon tax that is levied on imports.

lawyerliz wrote:

We could all learn that Maori rugby dance, and line up in front of gov't buildings and have at it.

HA! That would be funny.

NOTaREALmerican wrote:

Rob Dawg wrote:
Conservatives bust trusts and expose corruption and start National Parks.
yabut, what have you done for us lately?

Knowing that you can lead a horse to water for the last century we have allowed you to learn the lessons that cannot be taught so that this young nation never forgets the evils of socialism, liberalism, fundamentalism, oligarchy, bureaucracy, et al. Come back to the true party wayward children, you shall be welcome.

Strangely the formation of the EPA is a seminal event in history yet rarely gets mentioned. You need only ask why and observe the perverted results to understand the reasons for the true conservative long view.

Gnomester, gnomester, sis boom bah,
Vote on bank poll, rah, rah, rah.

Re: ""We're going to have to work harder to create more jobs," U.S. Labor Secretary Hilda Solis ....

Unemployment remains the Achilles heel of the economic recovery, which started in the third quarter of 2009 following the worst recession in 70 years. Creating jobs is critical to sustaining the economic recovery when government stimulus fades.

For the whole of 2009, the economy shed 4.2 million jobs, according to the Labor Department's survey of employers."

In this post-Dot-Com Bubble, Mom and Pop stores are dead and commercial retail business will never look the same again in our ifetimes, this is a generational shift **that is entirely off the radar (eceptt'n for me) and furthermore, the only employment increase that will increase in this Obama economy, will be **worker retraining jobs at community colleges, where unemployed people will look for ways to rebuild their shattered lives; those jobs at colleges which will help government statistics will be** jobs that pay about $300 per month**. Hence and in closing, America is screwed and the double dip recession is already here -- and obviously it will not be recognized for a loooong time (officially)!!! Dooooooooooooooom!!!

km4 wrote:

why is Timmy still pretending to be Treasury Sec and why does Obama have his head up _____

gimme a K
gimme an L
gimme an E
gimme a P
gimme a T
gimme an O
gimme a C
gimme an R
gimme an A
gimme a C
gimme a why

what does it spell ?

lawyerliz wrote:

We could all learn that Maori rugby dance, and line up in
front of gov't buildings and have at it.

The ultimate reach around!

Strangely the formation of the EPA is a seminal event in history yet rarely gets mentioned. You need only ask why and observe the perverted results to understand the reasons for the true conservative long view.

I've had a chance to observe what happens in a richly endowed country that has no EPA. That country is dying, in more ways than one.

Our dance would be called the 'Hock-a'

Doc Holiday

An Internet tax could (amazon tax) help stem the slide in Commercial RE... at least for a little while

people calling for Timmay's resignation (Clusterstock among others)) fail to realize who we get to replace him. Dimon, Summers, Dodd etc. Same story, different day....

Ciao
MS

I think the Dawg is proposing to conserve things, only
in a different way.

lawyerliz wrote:

Gnomester, gnomester, sis boom bah, Vote on bank poll, rah, rah, rah.

Is that a Maori chant?

Doing a little history reading the last few hours, and I have found a few interesting points to ponder, as too whats next:

Both Fannie and Freddie were nationalized 28 days later, on September 8, 2008.

Ben Bernanke claimed on February 28, 2008, "Among the largest banks, the capital ratios remain good and I don't expect any serious problems of that sort among the large, internationally active banks..." Henry Paulson added on July 20, 2008, that "It's a safe banking system, a sound banking system. Our regulators are on top of it. This is a very manageable situation."

Since the recession started in December, 2008, 144 banks have failed.

Paulson informed us on April 20, 2007, that "All the signs I look at show the housing market is at or near the bottom."

The number of foreclosures skyrocketed shortly thereafter and will now any day surpass those during the Great Depression.

Ben Bernanke announced on June 20, 2007, that "[The sub prime fallout] will not affect the economy overall."

Less than one year later, the stock market crashed, losing 53% of its value, and is still down 25% despite one of the biggest bounces in history.

???????????????????????

pavel.chichikov wrote:

Strangely the formation of the EPA is a seminal event in history yet rarely gets mentioned. You need only ask why and observe the perverted results to understand the reasons for the true conservative long view.
I've had a chance to observe what happens in a richly endowed country that has no EPA. That country is dying, in more ways than one.

Praise be that archetypical liberal Nixon.

Simon Johnson had a proposed replacement who sounded plausible---
umm forget his name. Midwest Fed guy?

Only a Lizori chant and a poor one at that.

WE are living in a generational shift phenomena; there is no economist alive that has a model or understands the ramifications of what's going on (trust me):

Re: a record 6.13 million workers who have been unemployed for more than 26 weeks

pavel.chichikov wrote:

I merely spoke, hypothetically, of demagoguery. A mass movement centered around vast promises, morale-boosting rallies and intoxicating slogans, along with an easily grasped summary of resentments. Scapegoats would be indispensable.

Yes, I understood your comments, but I happen to think demagoguery has a long standing tradition in the U.S. There's nothing hypothetical about it. It will again be our future in this country.

(balance of comment redacted)

lawyerliz wrote:

I think the Dawg is proposing to conserve things, only
in a different way.

"Change you can believe in." Oh... wait.

Hoenig? Never happen...at least from the standpoint of implementing his latest "fed must raise rates" mantra.

Ciao
MS

Model/maps are NOT the territory.

Different models have the slush at various points north and
south.

Humility is appropriate in the face of extreme complexity.

That's the same line of thinking that kept King George II ensconced in power, as who could stomach his replacement?

creditcriminalslovetarp wrote:

We should not have seen this many "up" Mondays, and further, we should not have seen 80 percent of all dollar gains for the rally from March 2009 on just 30 "up" Mondays

Refer to discussion above regarding free markets.

Bottom line: after all the bailout programs, housing initiatives, rescue efforts, stimulus schemes, bank takeovers, wars, unemployment benefit extensions, and numerous other promises, the biggest financial deception of the decade is what the U.S. government is doing to the dollar. Nothing else even comes close.

This reckless activity has spooked our foreign creditors, weakened our global standing, diluted our currency, is punishing savers and retirees, and ultimately sets us up for a level of inflation this country has never seen before.

Yet, what is the guardian of our economy and money telling us now?

"Will the Federal Reserve's actions to combat the crisis lead to higher inflation down the road? The answer is no; the Federal Reserve is committed to keeping inflation low and will be able to do so. In the near term, elevated unemployment and stable inflation expectations should keep inflation subdued, and indeed, inflation could move lower from here." (Ben Bernanke, December 7, 2009).

This is pure rubbish. If inflation could be controlled by just thinking stable inflation thoughts, then Ben should be able to grow a full head of hair by just thinking scalp follicle thoughts. This is so ridiculous, it's insulting.

Government actions make a mockery of their words; what they say and what they do are diametrically opposed. It's clear that inflation is not a question of if, but when.

I speak from the standpoint that no ONE man is in charge....it's the system that needs to be replaced...good luck with that.

Ciao
MS

Doc Holiday wrote:
WE are living in a generational shift phenomena; there is no economist alive that has a model or understands the ramifications of what's going on (trust me):
And way too many who think they do, which only tends to support your observation

Since it seems I'm too addicted to get any werk done,
I think I will tear myself away, and go to lunch with the
momster.

Isn't Ben a member of the heir club for men?

rich said, "You don't know how to Eskimo Roll in a canoe?"


how is that safer...she rocks hard and always wants to bee on top?

Since it seems I'm too addicted to get any werk done,
I think I will tear myself away, and go to lunch with the
momster.

Beer Real French Sparkly .............................. Currently Smoking Cannibis

Rob Dawg wrote:

Praise be that archetypical liberal Nixon.

The problem with the conservatism that I personally know is that there's still nothing in their philosophy of life to address the simple truth that the smart amoral scumbags NEED to screw the rest of us (this is a human need, not a desire or want). So, until conservatives create a "conservative EPA", which prevents the smart amoral scumbags from poisoning us (the NEED to screw) then the ONLY alternative is a socialist EPA. In the vacuum of ideas something will rush in to fill the vacuum. If you don't want big-government socialist stupidity then SOMETHING ELSE must be offered as an alternative. But, the alternative can NOT be the usual conservative response of: "the smart amoral scumbags deserve to do the screwing so the rest of us should just enjoy it".

GDD9000
Good call on the 80k


Rob Dawg
The idea of the US Treasury chipping in 12 months of mortgage payments goes against your credo, you know? The only way that would be productive is if it accelerated a default on US debt, and thus returned debt:income to a region of stability. In which case there are many superior ways than mortgage payments for the money to be spent. If you just wanted to reward people who didn't borrow and get in trouble, then distribute a $x,000 debit card to anyone who didn't default recently. That would benefit renters and unmortgaged owners who were even more responsible than those with mortgages, furthermore it would not encourage people in proportion to how big their mortgage is.

Tim waiting for 2012 wrote:

Internet tax

As the average person adjusts to the reality of the new world economy, there will be people that survive in their homes doing small business service jobs and the main means of communication will be the internet, thus I'm sure that you can count on the powers that be to tax the little guy in his or her home, and in so doing, provide lavish tax breaks for global fascist corporations that will provide the only other available jobs. The walmarts of the world will use scale to destroy Mom & Pops and only essential services will be left standing within 2 years. There is no way for Mom & Pop to justify paying a lease in a building where the profit margin will be near zero -- Mom & Pop will go back ino their homes and look for ways to sell shit on line (or themselves); however, they will be taxed, and they will support the infrastructural needs of the walmarts ..... Amen and out

MS wrote:

I speak from the standpoint that no ONE man is in charge....it's the system that needs to be replaced...good luck with that.

Completely agree. The constitution did not address the smart amoral scumbags winning. It took them 200 years to win. Now what?

the financier told me before he died,

a hum titty titty titty bum,
a hum titty titty titty bum.

the financier told me before he died,
tho I've every reason to believe he lied,

a hum titty titty titty bum,
a hum titty titty titty bum.

he had a debt with a spread so wide,

a hum titty titty titty bum,
a hum titty titty titty bum.

he had a debt with a spread so wide,
that it could never be satisfied,

a hum titty titty titty bum,
a hum titty titty titty bum.

so he built a bloody great tranche,

a hum titty titty titty bum,
a hum titty titty titty bum.

so he built a bloody great tranche,
too big too fail and a backstop of steel,

a hum titty titty titty bum,
a hum titty titty titty bum.

the great big banks he filled with cream,

a hum titty titty titty bum,
a hum titty titty titty bum.

the great big banks he filled with cream,
and the whole bloody issue was driven by dreams,

a hum titty titty titty bum,
a hum titty titty titty bum.

he laid his debt upon the bed,

a hum titty titty titty bum,
a hum titty titty titty bum.

he lais his debt upon the bed,
and tied her legs behind her head,

a hum titty titty titty bum,
a hum titty titty titty bum.

he put the machine in a place to pump,

a hum titty titty titty bum,
a hum titty titty titty bum.

he put the machine in a place to pump,
he switched it on and wished 'Merica luck,

a hum titty titty titty bum,
a hum titty titty titty bum.

round and round went the bloody great tranche,

a hum titty titty titty bum,
a hum titty titty titty bum.

round and round went the bloody great tranche,
...

I must be losing my mind. I could have sworn that natgas was way above the 5 year average for a while, but now I check the chart and it's only skirting the upper boundary. When did that happen?

Weekly Natural Gas Storage Report 

Doc Holiday wrote:

Mom & Pop will go back ino their homes and look for ways to sell shit on line (or themselves); however, they will be taxed,...

Good luck to Mom and Pop trying to figure sales tax for umpteen jurisdictions.

Also expect new "Business and Professions" taxes to catch people who aren't working for BigCorps.

Strangely the formation of the EPA is a seminal event in history yet rarely gets mentioned. You need only ask why and observe the perverted results to understand the reasons for the true conservative long view.

Strangely enough, we reached the end of our tethers on 2 fronts at about the same time, when Nixon closed the Gold Window and closed down pollution that could no longer be denied, as the results of our lack of care for our environment could go on, no further.

I suspect, this is why Nixon reached out to China @ about the same time, to export our pollution, somewhere else.

Mission Accomplished

The walmarts of the world will use scale to destroy Mom & Pops and only essential services will be left standing within 2 years. There is no way for Mom & Pop to justify paying a lease in a building where the profit margin will be near zero -- Mom & Pop will go back ino their homes and look for ways to sell shit on line (or themselves); however, they will be taxed

Except that as soon as it is mandated, there will be an incredible business opportunity to provide sales tax look-up services to the small mom and pop. And the infrastructural needs to do so are, frankly, minimal so it doesn't have to cost much of anything. A penny or two per look-up.

It is really hard to crush the little guy on the internet if the little guy understands how the internet works.

The U.S. Treasury and Labor Departments will ask for public comment as soon as next week on ways to promote the conversion of 401(k) savings and Individual Retirement Accounts into annuities or other steady payment streams, according to Assistant Labor Secretary Phyllis C. Borzi and Deputy Assistant Treasury Secretary Mark Iwry, who are spearheading the effort.

NOTaREALmerican wrote:

It took them 200 years to win.

Aaron Burr; who was almost President of the United States and Thomas Jefferson, who was President of the United States.

I missed GDD9000's call on 80k last night, but I saw his reference to High School Musical this morning:

YouTube - We're All in This Together

I'm guessing that doesn't count for much.

GDD9000 wrote:

Well, at least I know EHP saw my call of -80k last night at 5:24pm on the employment report in the FDIC comments.

The first thing I thought this morning when I saw the numbers was, "Wow, GDD9000 completely nailed it!"

That's why I read this board so religiously. The amount and quality of analysis on here is amazing. Smile

This is a repeat of an earlier post:

This link gives you all the ETF's broken down by Market Segment, Market Style, Industry Sector, Specialties, all of the Short ETF's and all of the Internationals.

http://www.morpheustrading.com/roundup.html

Today's community service obligation has now been satisfied. Proceed at your own risk.

EvilHenryPaulson wrote:

Rob Dawg
The idea of the US Treasury chipping in 12 months of mortgage payments goes against your credo, you know?

Let me clarify. 2 months of principal after 12 months of fully amortizing payments.

The only way that would be productive is if it accelerated a default on US debt, and thus returned debt:income to a region of stability.

Ahh but is does reduce outstanding debt and in a fashion that doesn't rely on default.

In which case there are many superior ways than mortgage payments for the money to be spent.

Agreed but I also want to incentivize repayment of existing loans not just stimspend.

If you just wanted to reward people who didn't borrow and get in trouble, then distribute a $x,000 debit card to anyone who didn't default recently.

No. Too many vagaries. Recently turned 18? Bribed you lender to not report you? On and on. What is "default?" 30 days, 90? Written off 4 months ago? Let's keep it simple.

poic

Son of Social Security Is coming.

Of course they will buy US Treasuries Smile

Rob Dawg wrote:

round and round went the bloody great tranche,

Don't we need some sort of safety switch?

"Wrecked him? Damn near killed 'em."

"Timmay was not involved in AIG coverup" - WhiteHouse My Head Just Exploded My Head Just Exploded My Head Just Exploded My Head Just Exploded My Head Just Exploded My Head Just Exploded

sm_landlord wrote:

figure sales tax for umpteen jurisdictions

Yah, but that will be a new focus from IRS, because the nly cash flow out there will be continued offshore tax evasion by global pirates and then Mom & Pop; my money says the IRS will take the easypath and screw the little guys that can't fight back.

Re (previous thread and CR-Speak): "When the job market starts to recover, many of these people will reenter the workforce and look for employment - and that will keep the unemployment rate elevated for some time."

I have to take CR to task here for suggesting that people will go back to work and that the economic will re-set with job creation in some normal way like after the 2001 recession; the only reason that recession was short, was because of the tsunami of cheap and easy cash from Asia which fueled our Ownership Society, which in retrospect was a synthetic shitfest of derivative ponzi scams and accounting corruption -- hence the future job growth will obviously be either a total shift away from traditional economic paradigm/models or a return to TARP-like unaccountability and a path towards socialist/fascist corruption that will rely on American consumers to take on more debt. Job creation is never going to return to anything that seems normal, so I wonder where those jobs will be that people will return to????

thank you both (EHP & Oxtail) - the picture is not a pretty one, especially when you look at it state by state. The industry by industry look I did afterwards wasnt a whole lot more encouraging.

noob goldberg wrote:

I must be losing my mind. I could have sworn that natgas was way above the 5 year average for a while, but now I check the chart and it's only skirting the upper boundary. When did that happen?
Weekly Natural Gas Storage Report

January 1 they took the super duper overage as the new maximum:

The 5-year (2005 - 2009) averages, maxima, minima, and year-ago working gas statistics for each report week in 2010 have been released. A spreadsheet containing these estimates is available for download at: http://www.eia.doe.gov/oil_gas/natural_gas/ngs/ngsstats.xls. For a description of the methodology used to determine the statistics, please see EIA file not found error message.

Tim waiting for 2012 wrote:

"Timmay was not involved in AIG coverup" - WhiteHouse

Where's the Notorious AIG when you need him? He'd clear this up in a jiffy.

I'm glad somebody caught that one..hahaha.

energyecon wrote:

January 1 they took the super duper overage as the new maximum:

Ahhh, thanks EE. I knew you'd know the down-low.

@Tim waiting for 2012 (homepage, profile) wrote on Fri, 1/8/2010 - 11:04 am
"Timmay was not involved in AIG coverup" - WhiteHouse

And Obama does not have his head up Vampire Squid from Hell ______

poic

the push on the part of TPTB to expedite ira and 401k into annuities tells me one big thing

steep interest rate curve coming

get people to settle now, during low interest rate environment, on a low fixed monthly payment

and then the insurance companies (annuities) reap the benefit of higher interest rates down the road

noob goldberg wrote:

Ahhh, thanks EE. I knew you'd know the down-low.

Hey, I am a computer expert too Wink:
xkcd - A webcomic of romance, sarcasm, math, and language - By Randall Munroe

Doc Holiday posted: "...Hence and in closing, America is screwed and the double dip recession is already here -- and obviously it will not be recognized for a loooong time (officially)!!! "

And yet industrial production hit its low for the cycle in April, 2009 and has never made another new low since. The ISM indices show that the economy is expanding. GDP shows that the economy is expanding. The 4-week average of new unemployment claims continues to fall from its peak.

This fixation with only the most extreme (bearish) charts and data, to the exclusion of any other data that doesn't "fit", is only going to lead to incorrect conclusions about what's happening/going to happen with the economy. It's a mirror-image of exactly the same mistake that I made during the recession (in denying that there was a recession).

Sebastian

poic wrote:

The U.S. Treasury and Labor Departments will ask for public comment as soon as next week on ways to promote the conversion of 401(k) savings and Individual Retirement Accounts into annuities or other steady payment streams, according to Assistant Labor Secretary Phyllis C. Borzi and Deputy Assistant Treasury Secretary Mark Iwry, who are spearheading the effort.

This is the reason I only contribute enough to my company retirement plan to get the match. Some type of government control capture of accounts is likely. I've not only assumed that S.S. is going to be worthless I generally don't count on my retirement account to be completely mine in the future either. But thats just the doomer in me I guess.

Sebastian wrote:

And yet industrial production hit its low for the cycle in April, 2009 and has never made another new low since.

Hmmm. I thought utilization hit a low in April not production. Am I wrong? Neverthe less you assume the cycle is over.

Your prediction for the possibility of a double dip? 10-20%?

Chicago Dude wrote:

It is really hard to crush the little guy on the internet

The game of efficiency and innovation will make our world more and competitive, but it may be a race to the bottom as deflation enters the internet economy. As with walmart, you can undercut other businesses with scale, but at some point you start to lose an advantage, because consumers will be vigilant and demand lower prices. I think it will take the manufacturing sector time to understand how they fit into a long-term global price war....

Sebastian,

You never made it to the ranks of being an ex-expert, and haven't seemed to catch onto to the economy's drift, but now you know what you're doing.

Sebastian wrote:

This fixation with only the most extreme (bearish) charts and data,

Here's your Chuckle for the Day, Seb.

I often drive by a university which is surrounded by duplex student rentals and until Christmas, they all carried that same generic red "For Rent, Call (XXX-XXXX)" sign and there's a LOT of them empty. Here's the new trend in rental signs. Go long Sign Printers. Smile

http://realmeme.com/roller/images/TheCrash/RentalDesperation.jpg

I see the little hand has gone past the big 10, so I'm more than an hour late for what passes for work in my life. I like to think of it as my own personal version of 'extend and pretend.' I extend effort and pretend to earn something.

Have a good day, folks, and enjoy your BFF.

dum luk wrote:

This link gives you all the ETF's broken down by Market Segment, Market Style, Industry Sector, Specialties, all of the Short ETF's and all of the Internationals.
http://www.morpheustrading.com/roundup.html 

Thanks.

energyecon wrote:

Hey, I am a computer expert too

[noob quickly prints off flowchart and faxes it to his mother]

What's the total # of workers and duration on that supposed to be - (census)?

We pretend to have work, and they portendably play us.

Sebastian wrote:

It's a mirror-image of exactly the same mistake that I made during the recession (in denying that there was a recession).

I'm beginning to see your point of view and why there's a disconnect with this site's bears.

Your are looking primarily at "the right now" (the transition from recession to recovery). You point out (correctly, I think) that the recession as is "technically" over. I think, however, the reason the bears can't "understand" you is "they" think nothing has been "fixed" and, therefore, in the bear's "near future" there can be no "sustained" recovery. This means you and "the bears" are discussing two DIFFERENT topics at the same time. You say: the recession is over (an event). The bears say: the conditions which caused the recession still exist so a recovery long-term isn't possible.

Seems to me, unless both side explicitly qualify the length of time they are talking about you'll be continuously talking past each other.

Rob Dawg said: "I thought utilization hit a low in April not production. Am I wrong?"

You mean to tell me that you're giving me a hard time because you don't know what the facts are?

You just lost a lot of points with me.

Sebastian

dum luk wrote:

This link gives you all the ETF's broken down by Market Segment, Market Style, Industry Sector, Specialties, all of the Short ETF's and all of the Internationals.

http://www.morpheustrading.com/roundup.html 

Very Nice, Thanks!

Sebastian wrote:

You just lost a lot of points with me.

I'm guessing you didn't like that rental sign. Smile

Sebastian wrote:

This fixation with only the most extreme (bearish) charts and data, to the exclusion of any other data that doesn't "fit", is only going to lead to incorrect conclusions about what's happening/going to happen with the economy.

Economic data and stock market speculation is pointless and I think Bush helped prove that with the Ownership Society. Obama can twist it the other way as well (now), but if you do take a sample of the middle ground, the economy is not going to bounce back and the stock market is not going to go up another 70% this year. To assume that there is symmetry or a mirror image this time will be a mistake! If you disagree, please provide an example of how the trillions lost in the last few years will be re-gained (anytime soon).

Dooooooooooooooom!!! Nytol

OTT

Lieberman's Approval Ratings Tank In Connecticut - Yahoo! News

That is not good news given this man's penchant for new wars. Fortunately he is not up for reelection till 2012.

The data I proved above indicating that the administration is looking at moving all 401k plans and IRAs into a model to fund the government deficit is another STRONG point indicating that we are in a garden variety recession.

/snark

talk about an inability to see the forest (world-wide credit bust) for the trees (business recession)

sheesh

poic wrote:

moving all 401k plans and IRAs into a model to fund the government deficit

A considerable improvement as it will now be guaranteed by the full faith and credit of the US Government!

Whoo hooo!

I liked it when Seb was trying to shore up the economy singled-handedly, by buying a bunch of consumer crap, being a card-carrying member of the consumeratti, joy joy.

broward

Taxes will cover all loses. Nothing will change.

Sebastian wrote:

Rob Dawg said: "I thought utilization hit a low in April not production. Am I wrong?"
You mean to tell me that you're giving me a hard time because you don't know what the facts are?
You just lost a lot of points with me.

I was politely giving you a chance to clarify whether you meant industrial utilization versus gross industrial production before I commented. My deepest apologies for suggesting your comment might possibly have more than one interpretation. I shan't hesitate before attacking in the future seeing as asking for discourse earns me lost points. BTW, thanks for that. I imagine I get three CR points for every lost Seb point . I also know I lose one of the CR points for saying as much.

NOTaREALmerican wrote:

Seems to me, unless both side explicitly qualify the length of time they are talking about you'll be continuously talking past each other.

This was my take on this issue as well. Looking at the numbers, as Seb rightly points out, leads to the conclusion that there was most likely a technical end to the recession earlier in 2009. For all we know this recovery could extend for many more months, even years. But, sadly, without even making the most rudimentary changes to the system, it will inevitably stumble into another crisis in the future; these crises will increase in frequency until necessary changes to the system are finally implemented.

km4 wrote:

The Big Picture » Blog Archive » Unemployment Exhaustion Rate = 53.78%, a New High
wow look at the incline of that curve !

No, no by considering that graph you are obviously focusing only on the most extremely bearish data, ignoring the Green Shoots and the Hopium smoke being blown up your...backside

Sebastian wrote:

This fixation with only the most extreme (bearish) charts and data, to the exclusion of any other data that doesn't "fit", is only going to lead to incorrect conclusions about what's happening/going to happen with the economy. It's a mirror-image of exactly the same mistake that I made during the recession (in denying that there was a recession).

Sebastian,

I wasn't here to observe whatever error you made, but I concur with your assessment as the existence of a group fixation here.

Perhaps the fixation is a keystone for jokes. If that's all it is - please note folks: THE JOKE IS OLD and you are repeating yourselves - A LOT.

If on the other hand, it's a mantra, then, OEAIUM.................................

Rob Dawg wrote:

Ahh but is does reduce outstanding debt and in a fashion that doesn't rely on default.

No, it is the US Treasury -- for whatever reason -- contributing 2 months of principal to someone's mortgage. Where do you think a tax credit comes from? It just transfers the debt from the mortgagee to the Federal government.
For those with negative equity, it won't come close to changing their choice so no multiplier effect. As for what people do with the extra income, they're most likely to save it, so no multiplier effect again.
The people who should be concerned about ensuring loan repayment are the creditors. That's why you consider collateral, debt servicing, income stability, and other risks before the loan so that you have the wiggle room to maintain profits later. Why would you impose a greater burden on work income -- where the government derives its own revenue -- just to subsidize capital income at a time like this? Why should creditors be ranked ahead of the US Federal government?
You're missing a crucial point here, even if everyone repays all their outstanding loans it would severely depress the domestic economy and it would take decades to do, and it would only work if there were other countries able and willing to run big trade deficits to keep the domestic economy from doing the deflationary spiral.
How about this, apply your logic on the mortgages to the state debts. Let's say California got your gospel, and decided to cut spending 30%, and hike taxation 30%. What would happen?
Besides the unemployment checks, one of the major things keeping the economy stable is the money saved on mortgage payments by those agents acting in an economically efficient manner. Having them pay their mortgages instead will not make the situation any better

A reminder to all of you muggs and muggettes out there...

Use your frequent flier/cc points asap.

It's not like you are earning interest on them~

Re: "This fixation with only the most extreme (bearish) charts and data, to the exclusion of any other data that doesn't "fit", is only going to lead to incorrect conclusions about what's happening/going to happen with the economy. It's a mirror-image of exactly the same mistake that I made during the recession (in denying that there was a recession)."

One more thing .... that is the very same thinking, about mirrors and symmetry that got every quant, analyst and economist in trouble ,,, as well as most investors around the globe, including hedge funds (obviously)! If you look for a pattern in all this, you will be disappointed! The generational shift we are in, is not on the map and the problems and solutions are also off the map, so don't go back to 1981 or 2001 to look for the future .... gotta go!

@energyecon (homepage, profile) wrote (in reply to...) on Fri, 1/8/2010 - 11:29 am
Big smile I need another hit Hopium

dum luk wrote:

I concur with your assessment as the existence of a group fixation here.

This isn't the blogs of yore. It isn't fixation or echo chamber, it is a general acceptance range that is retested all the time. It has even been wrong. The Stress Test C-S baseline and extreme case numbers being an obvious example. And please don't include the fun of BFFs or doom wallowing for anything other than socialization.

Good afternoon everyone. Well another successful computer build. New primary up and running. Haven't lost my touch. Real nice machine. SSDs are a wee bit faster aren't they. Wink Not sure I like Windows 7 yet, but we will see. Still glad I skipped Vista.

Doc Holiday wrote:

The generational shift we are in, is not on the map and the problems and solutions are also off the map, so don't go back to 1981 or 2001 to look for the future .... gotta go!

Agreed. The system has been damaged, and will not react in the same way as it has in the past. It truly is uncharted territory.

I'm only here to observe the schadenfraud and report back to my superiors, on Saturn.

NOTaREALmerican said: "I'm beginning to see your point of view and why there's a disconnect with this site's bears..."

There are likely others, too.

Poor fundamentals before a recession and a major bear market don't have the same outcome as the same poor fundamentals after the economy and stock market have made major adjustments to the poor conditions.

Also the "survivorship bias" that dryfly and I have alluded to. For example, the investment banks that got us into this have seen their influence greatly diminished and may take years to "come back" (if they ever do?). Meanwhile, other healthier companies will lead us out of recession and into recovery.

Sebastian

No JD, mayhaps Jupiter, but not Saturn. Wink

Juvenal Delinquent wrote:

I'm only here to observe the schadenfraud and report back to my superiors, on Saturn.

I thought that company was put out to pasture? In fact, I myself recall a certain shadenfraud at the news.

Sebastian wrote:

Meanwhile, other healthier companies will lead us out of recession and into recovery.

Graveyard, meet Whistler.

If you believe this is a business cycle recession then it makes sense to look at the models that Sebastian refers to.

On the other hand if you believe this is credit bust over-laying a business cycle recession the standard models are useless and will lead to erroneous conclusions.

The revisions after the fact in GDP numbers, BLS numbers, unemployment numbers etc.. should be a very strong indication that standard models don't apply here.

seb- healthy without govt aid or accounting tricks? Apple, Google..whom else...fnm, aig, chase, ba?

It will be interesting to see how NC comes out of the recession...I doubt it will....the drivers are staying in the bag on this go around....

noob goldberg wrote:

and will not react in the same way as it has in the past.

At least that's what I'm hoping for anyway. Personally, I'm not seeing much difference. I'm betting on a long decline, so a decline should result in behavioral changes. If I don't see any, then I'm wrong.

Sebastian wrote:

For example, the investment banks that got us into this have seen their influence greatly diminished and may take years to "come back" (if they ever do?).

I have seen no evidence of this. I personally think it will be an inevitable outcome, but at the current time their influence appears to be enhanced when contrasted to prior years.

dum luk said: "I wasn't here to observe whatever error you made..."

Too bad. It was epic.Smile But, I owned it, so that's something.

Sebastian

"For example, the investment banks that got us into this have seen their influence greatly diminished and may take years to "come back" (if they ever do?)"

Step AWAY from the bong, slowly. Put the reefer on the ground, and slowly put your hands up.

How on GODS earth can you make the above statement? I truly can't fathom how anyone who reads CR could in all seriousness make the above statement.

You seriously have to be joking, but I didn't see a snark tag ?!?!?!?!?!?!?

The japanese economy 'grew' every year '99 to '07. Because QE works! Just ask any happy resident of the land of the rising sun. Things just get better and better there.

Sebastian wrote:

For example, the investment banks that got us into this have seen their influence greatly diminished

Really? I honestly can't think of a time when the societal dominance of large investment banks (JPM and GS in particular) was more clear.

"But, I owned it, so that's something."

Owned but alas didn't learn from it.

Sigh............................................................

Sebastian wrote:

Also the "survivorship bias" that dryfly and I have alluded to. For example, the investment banks that got us into this have seen their influence greatly diminished and may take years to "come back" (if they ever do?). Meanwhile, other healthier companies will lead us out of recession and into recovery.

OMG. Words fail. We have 19 TBTFs that you would call healthy and some of us would call perpetual millstones around our necks. To lead us out of rescession we need... I don't know what we need but I do know it is not financialization.

Login or register to post comments
Syndicate content