tough to keep house prices up when delinquencies are ~5-10%.

My read on the market: no chance declines are over, at least in Boston.

Pigged broward (homepage, profile) wrote (in reply to...) on Tue, 12/29/2009 - 12:10 pm
The US runs on lies, who the best liar is and who is friends with what liars.
I've seen it explode over the past fifteen years. It's in corporations, gov't, everywhere.
It's all about gladhanding and lying, which is why we have a lot of fake financials and loan defaults, etc, etc.

Basically, yes. We're already a third-world country, in effect.

Pigged In my Galileo's daughter book, the daughters seem to be ok as far as
clothes and shelter were concerned (lengths of silk being shared were mentioned)
but the letter-writing daughter keeps complaining of not enough food. Until at the
end when someone left the convent a farm as a legacy.

The daughter mentions this over and over again, somewhat to my bewilderment,
since he seems to have sent her money when she wanted to buy into a better
convent room. Then in reading the Great Wave, there were a lot of years with
not much food grown.

She died at only 33 or 34. And SHE PULLED OUT HER OWN TEETH, including
a specifically mentioned rotten molar. I suspect she has severe, multiple
nutritional deficiencies, which were probably so common as to be unremarkable.

Maybe she would have had to share any food with her numerous sisters that dad sent and it would have been
prohibitvely expensive to feed them all.

ResistanceIsFeudal wrote:

Basically, yes. We're already a third-world country, in effect.

broward wrote:

Lies.
Lies.
Lies.

Lies are a perfectly good survival trait in humans. Lying wasn't invented fifteen years ago. I think you just "woke-up" to it. People like you (and me) have a difficult time accepting that duplicity is a sign of maturity in people and these mature people rule the earth. I haven't done this myself, but people like us can only survive by accepting lying as good. In the end, to fit into any society, a person needs (no exceptions NEEDS) self-delusion (the ability to live more than one parallel "perfect moral" life) or duplicity. I think it might be easier to develop self-delusion than duplicity.

And Boston is the best, only 15% down.

Daughter lives in Winthrop, anybody know about that area
specifically.

My experience re:Boston is that it has declined less slowly because a high percentage of owners do not have a mortgage.

MA is one of the oldest and richest states. Combined with the fact that there was little building here for the last 10 years and a slow population bleed, it has been a grind as poorer generations shoulder the burden and houses are turned over. This will continue for years. I expect that boston will decline or stagnate for years after the rest of the country recovers.

Amazing what a couple trillion of government intervention will buy...

Turbo wrote:
Amazing what a couple trillion of government intervention will buy..
Amazing what little it will buy, actually. I guess diminishing returns does continue to apply to numbers in the astronomical range.

NOTaREALmerican wrote:

In the end, to fit into any society, a person needs (no exceptions NEEDS) self-delusion (the ability to live more than one parallel "perfect moral" life) or duplicity. I think it might be easier to develop self-delusion than duplicity.

I have recently started to appreciate how much religion can help in this regard.

Another thing: wait until the option arms recast. I've got colleagues that are planning to sell in 2011 because they will be foreclosed on otherwise. Shadow inventory is huge.

My daughter tore down her shack and is in the final throes
of rebuilding. House has a view of the bay from the 3rd
floor. NIMBY neighbors tried to block her building, for no
particular reason. She's living in it while doing a lot herself
and finishing up the contractor work. Wrong time to do
it I suppose (shack was paid off), but she is an architect and
didn't want to live in a shack forever. (It really was a shack
and couldn't even be heated sufficiently; 450 sq feet)

She still has her job!!

Also, weren't there some posts a while back which separated low medium and high areas?

I'd like to see some updated versions of that, tho the medium and high might be so thin
as to be meaningless. I guess volume would have to be factored in somehow.

We are all underincomed, remember.

Has anyone read John Perkins book Hood Winked?

I have recently started to appreciate how much religion can help in this regard.

Transcendent truth presents us with as much reality as we can absorb. If you want to see delusion, look at what "normal* people believe about themselves, about the world around them.

Whoever says the Fed doesn't know how to fly didn't look at this chart... HERE.

"Pull up, pull up - we're gonna crash!!!"

VRROoooooommm!!!

"Nice flying Ben!!!"

REBear wrote:

Philadelphia Stock Exchange halted due to smoke - MarketWatch

That's standard for exchanges and has been for years, so maybe it was the lack of mirrors that shut them down.

There aren't any normal people Pavel..

You know that.

Most people haven't any interesting thoughts about matters philosophical. I
know; I've asked.

pavel.chichikov wrote:

If you want to see delusion, look at what "normal* people believe about themselves, about the world around them.

I think it's the structure - or (maybe) the applied physical rules - of the religion itself, not (necessarily) the Deity/Spirit concept.

Everything's looking great, and ING just sent me this:

Warm up your home with savings this holiday season with Easy Orange. With a 5-year fixed rate loan at 3.750% (3.764% APR) and free bi-weekly payments, you'll save thousands in interest and own your home sooner.

Why would you not own a home right now?

dryfly wrote:

Whoever says the Fed doesn't know how to fly didn't look at this chart... HERE.
"Pull up, pull up - we're gonna crash!!!"
VRROoooooommm!!!
"Nice flying Ben!!!"

Now. Using that chart and everything you know is true anout GDP and markets predict what happened to 1) employment and 2) foreclosures over that same period. Any rational analysis would conclude rising employment and falling foreclosures. If that isn't true then I have a meta-question. What the heck good is economic analysis?

Oh, glod, that is just asking for a computer nightmare.

But they probably couldn't sell the loan.

pavel.chichikov wrote:
Transcendent truth presents us with as much reality as we can absorb. If you want to see delusion, look at what "normal* people believe about themselves, about the world around them.
More directly, look at what "normal" people are forced to believe about themselves and reality in order to justify their behavior and accept their own thought processes.

The LP with foreclosures is exactly the underlying pattern you would expect for a 3 month moving average like CS.

that is, if you took a 3 month moving average of the LP index, it would map CS pretty closely.

Rob Dawg wrote:

What the heck good is economic analysis?

Better yet what IS good economic analysis - hint its what the Vampire Squid from Hell eats.

shill wrote:

cryptogon.com » National Irish Bank Moves to Cashless Banking (Not The Onion)

Makes perfect sense - then they don't have to make the lobbies bigger [for the wheelbarrows].

shill wrote:

cryptogon.com » National Irish Bank Moves to Cashless Banking (Not The Onion)

Cashless banking sounds like bankless banking.

Just saw the fine print: 700+ FICO, <75% LTV. There ought to be at least a few dozen who qualify for that..

JimPortlandOR wrote:
Cashless banking sounds like bankless banking.
Hush that mouth! We need banks to intercede with Fed for us on our behalf.

"tough to keep house prices up when delinquencies are ~5-10%."

Not just the level of delinquencies, but the rate of increase. I would be less concerned if delinquencies were 10% but dropping.

The only way they will drop from here is through government manipulation of the numbers - i.e. stated income HAMP mods, which of course only push the problem down the road for a few months.

You even point out directly contrary beliefs and all you get is confusion,
when you don't get tears. I once made a Jehovah's witness cry, because she
was saying the world was going to end in such a short time that her kids
didn't have to go to college (this was in '73 about), and I said I was more for
black people than she was, since without the degree they couldn't be drs
or lawyers or whatever.

Her 2 core beliefs--black people should progress-- and the religion sez the
end is nigh and one should act on that belief--college not necessary--came into
direct and violent conflict, which she couldn't and didn't resolve. Just cried.

I liked her; didn't want her to cry. She needed her fairy tales to survive, mentally.

I wish I could believe in fairies, it would be very soothing, but I just can't.

This means that either I just can't absorb anything transcendental OR I just
can't force myself to belief stuff that my mind insists is illogical nonsense.

I tried to force myself to believe in Catholicism; didn't work. Painful.

Sorry Pavel.

Juvenal Delinquent wrote:

nemo

Is he on vacation or something?

It would be useful if this story also included actual results from 2009. 16% of employers planned to cut headcount in 2009--how many actually did?

Employers see uptick in hiring in 2010 - Yahoo! Finance

Would it be possible to overlay mortgage rates with the price/rent chart? Or to have a chart comparing payments on a 20% down 30 year fixed mortgage and rent? Because it seems to me that the current, still on the high side purchase/rent ratio may well be a rational response the the current, low by historical measure mortgage rates.

token bull wrote:

Shadow inventory is huge.

Sounds logical to me, but I have seen a few arguments against the presence of one.

NOTaREALmerican wrote:

duplicity is a sign of maturity in people and these mature people rule the earth

bullshit

Your instincts are right on, as anyone who has tried to sell a mortgage (or house) knows, mortgage payment to rent is a much more relevant statistic than price to rent - most people only care about the monthly payment.

Rising mortgage rates, in the absence of rising incomes and/or affordability products, in and of themselves will lower house prices.

token bull wrote:

Shadow inventory is huge.

There are still many issues facing the housing market. While the existing home market has improved considerably, the new home market remains challenged. Inventories in the existing home market, while improved, remain elevated and the always present threat of shadow inventory continues to loom. As such, it is more than likely that prices have a bit further to fall which should help continue supply/demand rebalancing and help fix the ongoing issues in the housing market. — Dan Greenhaus, Miller Tabak

Economists React: ‘Prices Have Further to Fall’ - Real Time Economics - WSJ

ghostfaceinvestah wrote:

Rising mortgage rates, in the absence of rising incomes and/or affordability products, in and of themselves will lower house prices.

Yup, we have a huge drop coming when inflation finally starts overcoming stagflation, and Gentle Ben has to save that darn pesky dollar. The high price of oil is the first sign that interest rates have to come up- gotta kill that easy peasy commodity play fast before we get back to $150 a barrel, and the real economy takes another 20% dive.

Someday this war's gonna end...

"Another thing: wait until the option arms recast. I've got colleagues that are planning to sell in 2011 because they will be foreclosed on otherwise. Shadow inventory is huge."

I don't think OA recasts will be a big deal, nearly half are already delinquent.

But shadow inventory is huge, just based on the (growing) size of the delinquency inventory. Historically, half of delinquencies are cured. In the current situation much fewer than half will cure, but even taking that 50% number, the amount of homes that should be on the market but are not is easily a year of supply.

Marketwatch: Treasury sells 5-year notes at highest yield since July

what is interesting is house prices are better than the stress tests, but unemployment is worse.

i think that is no coincidence.

ghostfaceinvestah wrote:

i think that is no coincidence.

Well, if they had subsidized labor they way they have house prices... If only TBTF had loaded up on employment CDS futures instead...

I don't have a lot of statistics on shadow inventory, but I've a lot of experience. And the market is not good: I've never heard of so many people "needing to sell by 2012". That is not the sign of a stable or improving market.

the higher rates go, the more taxes will have to increase eventually to pay for the interest on the debt.

compound interest is a bitch when you are a debtor.

either that or your dollars will be diluted.

neither is a positive outcome.

too bad the debt wasn't adding value, but it is not.

token bull wrote:

I don't have a lot of statistics on shadow inventory, but I've a lot of experience. And the market is not good: I've never heard of so many people "needing to sell by 2012". That is not the sign of a stable or improving market.

In 2012 everyone who was 50 or older in 2004 will be looking to sell at least one of their houses. There's demographic cash out coming and little demand for the asset in question.

ac wrote:

Marketwatch: Treasury sells 5-year notes at highest yield since July

"Indirect bidders, a class of investors that includes foreign central banks, bought 44% of the sale, compared to a recent average of 48.2%."

That does not make sense to me. There were more buyers, but they paid a higher price?

Blackhalo wrote:

That does not make sense to me. There were more buyers, but they paid a higher price?

"We have one who can see..." Steve

That does not make sense to me. There were more buyers, but they paid a higher price?

Those numbers to me suggest more domestic buyers? Maybe lured in by the higher yields? I don't pay much attention to the actual auctions these days...

Blackhalo wrote:

That does not make sense to me. There were more buyers, but they paid a higher price?

Higher Yield => Lower Price

Makes perfect sense... less CB buy means more private money but only at a lower buy in price & higher yield.

Blackhalo wrote:

Well, if they had subsidized labor they way they have house prices

They subsidized financial executive labor. Look at those bonuses!

shill wrote:

Good read.

Particularly to me:

"The fact that the Treasury can't actually identify the one of the largest buyer of its debt can't help but raise a few eyebrows.
Can you imagine a private company that couldn't identify its largest customer? Can you imagine a government who couldn't identify its largest creditor? Oh wait...It's beyond suspicious.
Are these phantom creditors hedge funds? Probably not.

It makes a person wonder if the Fed and/or Treasury hasn't been involved in either some shady accounting tricks, or hidden monetization of debt. Even if the these are legitimate investors, is it realistic to expect a savings-poor America will increasingly buy these Treasury bonds that yield almost no interest?"

Makes perfect sense... less CB buy means more private money but only at a lower buy in price & higher yield.

Sounds right to me.

dryfly wrote:

Higher Yield => Lower Price

Ah, thanks! I tend to get yield and price mixed up. So, a remarkably successful bond sale then. Banks cleaning up for EOY accounting?

Would like for China to sue GS for FRAUD, while taking names and kicking butts played out in New York in Federal Court with foreign press lined as for as the eye could see.

ac wrote:

Makes perfect sense... less CB buy means more private money but only at a lower buy in price & higher yield.

Sounds right to me.

That's how you avoid auction failures - let the yields go. It is actually good news in a perverse pain-feels-good sort of a way... less CB intervention, more private money back in the game... even if rates go higher. Prolly the most 'optimistic' thing I've read in months. Scratch 'prolly' - it IS.

MaryAnn wrote:

Would like for China to sue GS for FRAUD

What would be their standing? How have they been harmed? It would seem to me that J6P has a better case...

Rob Dawg wrote:

In 2012 everyone who was 50 or older in 2004 will be looking to sell at least one of their houses.

That seems a little overstated. I was 58 in 2004 and have no interest in selling in 2012. I'll be here until I can't climb stairs anymore. Of course, I only have one house.

MaryAnn wrote:

Would like for China to sue GS for FRAUD, while taking names and kicking butts played out in New York in Federal Court with foreign press lined as for as the eye could see.

Me too - never happen. They take profits when it is to their advantage and walk away behind the bamboo curtain when it isn't to their advantage. They are a mirror image of the Vampire Squid from Hell w/ politburo equivalent to Vampire Squid from Hell boardroom. Pox on them both.

MaryAnn wrote:

Would like for China to sue GS for FRAUD

That would be like China suing US govt., won't it?

Blackhalo, If I can find the link will put it up on why they are not paying GS 35B owed.

well, been wearing my DOW 10.5K hat a few days

good times

“Shadow Housing Inventory” Put At 1.7 Million in 3Q According to First American CoreLogic
http://www.facorelogic.com/uploadedFiles/Newsroom/RES_in_the_News/FACL_Shadow_Inventory_121809.pdf

That's how you avoid auction failures - let the yields go. It is actually good news in a perverse pain-feels-good sort of a way... less CB intervention, more private money back in the game... even if rates go higher. Prolly the most 'optimistic' thing I've read in months. Scratch 'prolly' - it IS.

Well things get interesting if the bond market is currently underestimating the amount of money out there (and overpricing bonds) or overestimating the Feds ability or intent to suppress yields.

In other words, what if our economy can't withstand a return to rational or sustainable expectations for yields in the credit markets?

in response to Rob Dawg who wrote: "...In 2012 everyone who was 50 or older in 2004 will be looking to sell at least one of their houses."

mhdoc responded: "That seems a little overstated. I was 58 in 2004 and have no interest in selling in 2012. I'll be here until I can't climb stairs anymore. Of course, I only have one house."

Okay, Rob Dawg, I'll bite, too: What's going to happen to me in 2012 that's going to make me want to sell my house? (I can't imagine anything that's going to make me want to sell my house, ever, BTW.)

Sebastian

MaryAnn wrote:

Would like for China to sue GS for FRAUD

...and then Lord Bankfine decides to visit China?

dryfly wrote:

That's how you avoid auction failures - let the yields go. It is actually good news in a perverse pain-feels-good sort of a way... less CB intervention, more private money back in the game... even if rates go higher. Prolly the most 'optimistic' thing I've read in months. Scratch 'prolly' - it IS.

Not for home equity and MBS though, I suspect.

The Fed better get a handle on that before EOY...

Loan Type Today Last Week
30 Year Fixed 5.37% 5.11%

[on Dave's return to the ship, after HAL has killed the rest of the crew]

HAL: Look Dave, I can see you're really upset about this. I honestly think you ought to sit down calmly, take a stress test, and think things over.

war, murder, shelter

U2, Jagger, Fergie, Will.I.Am: Gimme Shelter

Oh, a storm is threat'ning
My very life today
If I don't get some shelter
Oh yeah, I'm gonna fade away

War, children, it's just a shot away
It's just a shot away
War, children, it's just a shot away
It's just a shot away

...

"Would be like China suing US govt," Yes......Yes, thats the point. GS/USGovernment/Federal Reserve all funded by the peasants.

ac wrote:

In other words, what if our economy can't withstand a return to rational or sustainable expectations for yields in the credit markets?

Of course it can't withstand that - not while a lot of the market is in the current free-lunch central-bank-save-us mind set. That's why seeing a gradual slide back to rational returns [increasing yields] is positive news. That isn't the same as saying it won't suck - just differently.

high yeilds will discourage law makers from auditing the fed?

dryfly said: "...That isn't the same as saying it won't suck - just differently."

...which sort of sums up every recovery.Smile

Sebastian

The Automatic Earth: December 27 2009: Eyes wide open and pedal to the metal

Out of the $2.22 trillion in expected 2010 issuance, $200 billion will be absorbed by the Fed while QE continues through March. Then the US is on its own: $2.06 trillion will have to find non-Fed originating demand. To sum up: $200 billion in 2009; $2.1 trillion in 2010.

... the stunning result is that net issuance in 2009 was only $200 billion.

Seem like allot of loot to refi.

REBear wrote:

high yeilds will discourage law makers from auditing the fed?

Like they were ever going to anyway? Really audit them?

REBear wrote:

high yeilds will discourage law makers from auditing the fed?

I think fear will keep them from doing it. Pulling back the curtain is scary for children. Especially when the boogieman start making the scary noises. oooooooooooo OOOOOOOOOOOOOO...

NOTaREALmerican wrote:

Seem like allot of loot to refi.

Which is prolly why the central banks are 'letting' [like they even have a choice] the yield slide up... as opposed to a rocket shot if there is even a hint of an auction failure. These guys aren't stooooopid.

regarding the need to sell in 2012...I think that might be when we start to get the first wave of the boomer's starting to retire and thus needing to sell that larger home.

Ciao
MS

Of course it can't withstand that - not while a lot of the market is in the current free-lunch central-bank-save-us mind set. That's why seeing a gradual slide back to rational returns [increasing yields] is positive news. That isn't the same as saying it won't suck - just differently.

Haha, well that's what I think, but they way I think of "can't withstand that" is an actual loss of ability to govern in a system where governance and finance are so intertwined -- i.e. a bond market collapse becomes almost synonymous with collapse of the government.

oooooooo nice chart here via Ezra Klein at WaPo on the contribution of various policies/activities on fiscal deficit.

Out-years hint: look at the effect of Bush Tax Cuts on deficit up to 2019.

Haha, well that's what I think, but they way I think of "can't withstand that" is an actual loss of ability to govern in a system where governance and finance are so intertwined -- i.e. a bond market collapse becomes almost synonymous with collapse of the government.

Also, such a collapse would then lead to a war between the Robots and Mormons for control of America. The winner of that bracket would then go on to fight the Muslims for control of the entire World.

MS wrote:

we start to get the first wave of the boomer's starting to retire and thus needing to sell that larger home.

It would seem to me that the smarter of the lot, would be doing that sooner, rather than later, in an effort to recover what little home equity may remain, before interest rates crush house prices, when the Fed stops buying MBS/Treasuries.

I would love to see Lord Blankencrap go to China and show the same lack of deference that he has shown to Obama.  He would get his ass kicked to the curb in a jiffy.

Snubbing the leader and threatening economic armagedon can get you a nice stay in jail, not multi million dollar bonuses.

NOTaREALmerican wrote:

I think fear will keep them from doing it. Pulling back the curtain is scary for children. Especially when the boogieman start making the scary noises. oooooooooooo OOOOOOOOOOOOOO...

I had a friend who studied 'political economy' in the late 70s... did a stint at LSE and also Oxford. He used to say the US did have a system with balance of powers [checks and balances]... but not congress vs. executive... it was Federal Reserve [and banking industry] vs. Joint Chiefs [and MIC]. Congress and the executive branch were in effect 'the curtain' you mention. I always thought [then] he was FOS. Watching congress manage both the 9-11 Gitmo thing and also Alan & Ben at the Fed makes me realize he was three decades ahead of me.

Somebody asked about Wildcat Banknotes, which were also known as Broken Bank Notes, because the issuer invariably went out of business.

Here's a description of money backed by nothing, lifted from the internet

The Free Banking Era followed the demise of the First and Second Banks of the United States, marking a quarter century in which American banking was a hodgepodge of state-chartered banks without federal regulation. Had you lived between 1836 and 1866, during the Free Banking Era, your wallet would have been filled with State Bank notes of different sizes, shapes, and designs. Notes of the same denomination had different values, depending on what backed the currency. Some notes were counterfeited. Lax federal and state banking laws allowed almost anyone--states, private banks, railroads, stores, and individuals--to issue currency. A dollar issued by the "City of Atlanta" wasn't necessarily worth as much as a dollar printed by the "City of New York."

ac wrote:

The winner of that bracket would then go on to fight the Muslims for control of the entire World.

Wow! Sounds exciting. Maybe we should get cable or merchandise rights on this. I'm betting on the Robot.

dryfly wrote:

Watching congress manage both the 9-11 Gitmo thing and also Alan & Ben at the Fed makes me realize he was three decades ahead of me.

HA! Fascinating. I never thought of it that way either.

Housing prices are fixed! Yeah! Time to fix the jobs situtation.

I'm thinking a $40 minimum wage coupled with $200K a year government jobs for anyone unable to get a job in the private sector should do the trick.

If we are going to print/spend our way out, LETS DO IT RIGHT!

Wow! Sounds exciting. Maybe we should get cable or merchandise rights on this. I'm betting on the Robot.

Well remember if you're not a Mormon or a Robot you'll be dead by then.

Also my bet would be on swarms of microbots rather than one large robot.

"There were three key economic stress test parameters: house prices, GDP and unemployment. "

To me, the House Price measure is deceptive for the reason that the beginning of the test - the initial date- is so far behind the curve compared to the other two measures. The start point on the chart is Dec. 2008, and prices are already down 28% from peak by that date. The chart shows house prices 'beating' the estimates, but if the chart went back two years earlier the current apparent good news would not seem like such a big deal... especially in a country that had never seen a full year decline since the GD.

Blackhalo said: "It would seem to me that the smarter of the lot, would be doing that sooner, rather than later, in an effort to recover what little home equity may remain, before interest rates crush house prices, when the Fed stops buying MBS/Treasuries."

Here's an idea: In San Diego (CR's MSA) home prices have fallen by -38.8% since the peak (according to the latest C-S).

Let's ask him if he sold his house.

Sebastian

timmay is thrashing on his couch in his office, soaked in sweat, as he takes his afternoon nap. his teddy has fallen on the floor . . .

his dream is about interest rates getting out of control:
Loan Type Today Last Week
30 Year Fixed 5.37% 5.11%

he dreams that he is speed dialing Lord Blankfiend:
"Dad, this sucker is going down".

Juvenal,
That was Me!!!
Funny how with all the funny money passing around that the country was growing so fast. That policy works when you have an open unexploited continent in front of you but I am afraid not when you have reached the limits of growth.
The doomers who are stocking up on food guns and gold have the wrong strategy; Party Party Party is the right way to go. When shit happens the sociopaths will rule and they will take everything you have. You might get time to take a few shots at them and maybe take a few out but in the end they will rule.
Enjoy!

Let's ask him if he sold his house.

Sebastian

I sold my house (or the part that I owned) back in 2006! I recall that Tanta seemed somewhat displeased that I was being opportunistic, or at least that was my impression. I remember a distinct tone of disapproval for some reason, but sometimes I imagine stuff like that.

ac wrote:

Also my bet would be on swarms of microbots rather than one large robot.

I prefer the classic Japanise, giant robots coming ashore on the west coast...

ac wrote:

a war between the Robots and Mormons for control of America

What about China and Hindus?

Not me. No plans to sell for 5-10 years.

Sebastian wrote:

Let's ask him if he sold his house.

Oddly enough, I've always looked at my house price relative to what I COULD purchase IF I sold it. So, I don't care if housing prices go to 0, as long as they all go to 0. The banks would probably care tho. For me, it's way too much of a hassle to move just for possible gain.

Here's an idea: In San Diego (CR's MSA) home prices have fallen by -38.8% since the peak (according to the latest C-S).

I think that is true for the low end, the middle third has not dropped by more than 10% (yet) would be my guess. At least based on asking prices.

What about China and Hindus?

Well China's going to be manufacturing the Robots that are fighting the Mormons in America so I kind of think of them as one in the same. Not sure about the Hindus.

Fudd, I can see Timmy taking lessons on how one can get out from under a moving bus.

Sebastian wrote:

Let's ask him if he sold his house.

IIRC - he looked into selling his home [houses were for sale all over his area - he posted pictures of a forest of for sale signs]... said his neighbor listed for an outrageous asking price - CR said that if that sold he'd contemplate doing the same. It didn't sell - or nowhere near the ask price. He realized it was already too late to exit at the previous silly bubble prices by then. My recollection that was late 2006 or so. Possibly even earlier.

Lotta water over the dam since then. Lotta folks got wet too.

Blackhalo wrote:

giant robots coming ashore on the west coast...

I thought the Robots were the fundies in the southeast. It sounds like this is turning into a real tournament, tho.

NOTaREALmerican wrote:

The banks would probably care tho.

You need a 'deafening understatement' warning before writing something like that.

Seb,
We sold a year ago. Checking Zillow, (I Know, I Know Zillow prices are wrong), and it shows that we made a big mistake selling last year and not this year. If we could sell for the Zestimate we would have been able to stay in the same area, downsizing, rather than having to move 3 hours away from our old home. We are comfortable and really don't have anything to complain about except the 3 hour drive I will have to do to party with old friends.
Palo Alto price crazyness continues as it has for my entire life.

dryfly wrote:

He used to say the US did have a system with balance of powers [checks and balances]... but not congress vs. executive... it was Federal Reserve [and banking industry] vs. Joint Chiefs [and MIC].

Last night we were talking about precision machining in the context of military tech; I mentioned my father had worked on n-sub refits, Pavel answered that he had a relative who'd worked on the Apollo LEM; and I remembered (but did not answer) that one of my uncles manufactured (literally, he ran the line) the explosive bolts that connected the ascent and descent stage. And then of course I grew up in an entire town that supported maintenance of military technology (Vallejo/Mare Island). Just made me realize again how wide the reach of the MIC was through our economy. Still is, I guess, though with many fewer bases and contractors (though larger) out here on the west coast now it's harder to notice.

Why would anyone sell a house thats free and clear at this point in time, unless you were in the top 5% and had your own private island next to Paulson who was teaching you to rob the US Treasure and was gonna be rewarded by those that you were robbing.

lawyerliz wrote:

And is never seen again. Fiendish

I donno. I have a feeling that Lord Blankenfiend would fit right into the Chinese Central Committee.

Cap'n Ahablankfein isn't taken a leave of absence from his position as cruise-director for Moby Vampire Squid from Hell, is he?

Bob Dobbs wrote:

Still is, I guess, though with many fewer bases and contractors (though larger) out here on the west coast now it's harder to notice.

Its still plenty noticeable in the SE US [say from Virginia to Texas]. BTW - during that same period my father ran a plant in north Alabama . His was non-military BUT most of our neighbors worked at the Redstone Arsenal on the Saturn V boosters. My best friend's father was a project manager for the rocket motors. MIC was alive and well there too.

dryfly said: "IIRC - he looked into selling his home [houses were for sale all over his area - he posted pictures of a forest of for sale signs]... said his neighbor listed for an outrageous asking price - CR said that if that sold he'd contemplate doing the same. It didn't sell - or nowhere near the ask price. He realized it was already too late to exit at the previous silly bubble prices by then. My recollection that was late 2006 or so. Possibly even earlier.

Lotta water over the dam since then. Lotta folks got wet too."

Just to be clear (in case it wasn't), I was absolutely not trying to embarrass CR, just refuting Blackhalo's point that "smart people were selling their homes." If anyone here could claim "smartness" about the state and nature of the housing market, it would be CR, and if he didn't sell a couple of years ago and isn't contemplating it now...

Full disclosure, I never sold my house, either, and a good thing, too: I'd be paying more than I could have sold it for 2-3 years ago.

Sebastian

Really OT:

Thinking about adding this guy to my dream 2012 administration, to help eliminate Vampire Squid from Hell:

http://i290.photobucket.com/albums/ll242/Groovy23_Photos/Emperor_Penguin_Manchot_empereur.jpg

Of course, the fact that we're having 45 mph winds and below zero wind chills brings on these thoughts. I expect to see one of these waddle by at any moment.

Still, they love to eat Vampire Squid from Hell.

Where are you, you poor thing?

Florida is heeerrrrrrre.

dryfly wrote:

MIC was alive and well there too.

A 50+ year socialist bonanza. Everybody knows somebody working in MIC probably. My BIL was designing the wing flaps for the C17 many years ago. Most of the people I worked with had a relative (or themselves) in the military.

I really wanted to sell in '05, but it was because of the 2 years of the 4 hurricanes,
not because of any housing perspicacity. We didn't.

Bob Dobbs wrote:

Last night we were talking about precision machining in the context of military tech; I mentioned my father had worked on n-sub refits, Pavel answered that he had a relative who'd worked on the Apollo LEM; and I remembered (but did not answer) that one of my uncles manufactured (literally, he ran the line) the explosive bolts that connected the ascent and descent stage. And then of course I grew up in an entire town that supported maintenance of military technology (Vallejo/Mare Island). Just made me realize again how wide the reach of the MIC was through our economy. Still is, I guess, though with many fewer bases and contractors (though larger) out here on the west coast now it's harder to notice.

My grandfather worked on the LEM for Grumman as well. He started there just before WWII I think and worked there for 40 some odd years.

I just got my homeowners insurance bill for next year. It went up a whopping 33%. I called my agent and said that was extreme. I think his insurance company must have given the agents a spiel to spin. He started about how their payouts are greater than the premiums they charge and their investment returns are down and they have to maintain their bond ratings and so forth.

I had blue ribbon coverage, so made some adjustments, but landords are going to have to pass some of this on to the renters.

Login or register to post comments
Syndicate content