CR,
in the interest of fiarness you might point out that the savings rate peaked when transfer payments peaked and taxes hit low. This is not saving, it is handouts. And it is not delveraging when you look at the flow of funds. pom poms for the GDP report make the case that debt is indeed now wealth. it was my understanding that credit induced haze is exactly what got us here. But it is necessary evil I know. The composition of the "income" is nothing but handouts from the governement reflected in the rising debt load on the public sector. This isnt the end of recession or the beggining of any renewed growth. Perhaps you can find another word instead of recovery or growth. Both are patently misleading and outright lies.
From the BEA report linked by CR, here's some color on "Wages and Salaries", which suggests a weak non-farm Payrolls report next week:
Wages and salaries: Private wage and salary disbursements decreased $11.2 billion in September, in contrast to an increase
of $10.1 billion in August. Goods-producing industries' payrolls decreased $7.8 billion, compared
with a decrease of $6.3 billion; manufacturing payrolls decreased $1.5 billion, compared with a
decrease of $4.1 billion. Services-producing industries' payrolls decreased $3.4 billion, in contrast
to an increase of $16.4 billion. Government wage and salary disbursements increased $0.2 billion
compared with an increase of $2.4 billion.
Now those are non-SA numbers, but the only positive change in that bunch was a "slower rate of decline" in manufacturing. Everything else is
How is the health care bill going to affect Disposable Income?
especially with the bill containing fun language like
And for those who cry “read the bill,” beware. There are plenty of paragraphs like this one:
“(a) Outpatient Hospitals – (1) In General – Section 1833(t)(3)(C)(iv) of the Social Security Act (42 U.S.C. 1395(t)(3)(C)(iv)) is amended – (A) in the first sentence – (i) by inserting “(which is subject to the productivity adjustment described in subclause (II) of such section)” after “1886(b)(3)(B)(iii); and (ii) by inserting “(but not below 0)” after “reduced”; and (B) in the second sentence, by inserting “and which is subject, beginning with 2010 to the productivity adjustment described in section 1886(b)(3)(B)(iii)(II)”.
Purchases of nondurable goods increased 0.5 percent
in September, compared with an increase of 0.9 percent in August. Purchases of services increased 0.1 percent, compared
with an increase of 0.2 percent.
PCE price index -- The price index for PCE increased 0.1 percent in September, compared with an increase of 0.3
percent in August. The PCE price index, excluding food and energy, increased 0.1 percent, the same increase as in August.
I need a translation please. and Oh please see heath insurers profits reported yesterday through increased premiums (and likely massive DOS attack on their policy holders). This extends into Medicare recipients of course via supplemental coverage which is NOT optional today.
When I attended law school at George Washington U in 1969, the tuition was $1,900 a semester. I worked my way through and had no debts when I began to practice law.
Later, student loans became the norm. The loans were subsidized, encouraging students to become indebted rather than build sweat equity in themselves. Student loans also took parents off the hook for saving to pay for their childrens’ education. The result was still more government dependency.
Screwing up the marketplace with subsidies, drove up the price of education, encouraged institutions to grow based on government support, and placed undue emphasis (economically) on higher and frequently useless education.
We should expect the higher education market to suffer a similar fate to the real estate market, where subsidies, encouraging people to buy what they could not afford (and did not need) led them to a result that, when compared to their investment in time and treasure, was uneconomical.
Did you read that section really closely? I think there's something in the fine print...
“(a) Outpatient Hospitals – (1) In General – Section 1833(t)(3)(C)(iv) of the Social Security Act (42 U.S.C. 1395(t)(3)(C)(iv)) is amended – (A) in the first sentence – (i) by inserting $18 billion for AIG (which is subject to the productivity adjustment described in subclause (II) of such section)” after “1886(b)(3)(B)(iii); and (ii) by inserting $6 billion for GMAC “(but not below 0)” after “reduced”; and (B) in the second sentence, by inserting “and which is subject, beginning with 2010 to the productivity adjustment described in immunity for Hank Paulson section 1886(b)(3)(B)(iii)(II)”.
The cliff diving in private wages has moderated due to government deficit spending. So where are we? Well, private wages and salaries are down ~7.5% yoy. Moreover, private wages and salaries are at the same level they were three years ago (Q 3, 2006).
And, personal income less government transfers is at the same level it was at in Q2, 2005.
It's a recovery on Wall St. - record bonuses thanks to the treasury and the fed. Main St. is facing a depression due to excessive household debt.
No way should the creditors on the other side of the ledger from all that bad household debt be bailed out from their actions. No way.
,rade rally
i know,i tried to read one, refer to section II of article 5awab. its hard to read much less understand they really need to figure out how to write bills clearer more understandable. reading one now is almost like punishment
LOL...this is great. I've not been here all that long so if someone else said this I'm not trying to rip them off. Every time I see greenspan I see Mr. Burns of the Simpson, he even has age spots in all the right places! Coincidence? lol.
OT from a previously linked story on the worsening fiscal situation of the states...
The federal assistance to states provided in the American Recovery and Reinvestment Act is lessening the extent to which states need to reduce services or raise taxes. But it now appears likely the federal assistance will end before state budget gaps have abated.
The last sentence could be applied to the economy in general. The federal stimulus will end before the economy regains its footing (too much overhang in the FIRE sector which we are choosing to ignore). Extend and pretend will only work if robust organic growth returns, which almost noone is forecasting. So the logical conclusion is that we ought to either A) withdraw the supports, take our lumps and do a re-start, or B) redirect any future stimulus to getting the bad assets worked out through outright government absorption (nationalization). Of course, we'll do neither but continue to pursue this game of extend and pretend. Noone has the political will to do what they know is necessary, so we'll all end up paying a much higher price in the long term.
BTW, it looks like the data entered on briefing.com do not match the BEA report. At least, briefing.com is reporting a -0.5% drop in PCE prices, which isn't in the BEA report (BEA has +0.1%). That's a heck of an error (over 7% annualized) in the direction of massive deflation! This applies also to the economic calendar at yahoo.com, which gets its feed from briefing.com.
As he predicted at the end of 2007, Nenner still believes deflation remains the major economic problem "for another year." However, that deflationary cycle will be followed, Nenner claims, by 30-years of inflation. With that in mind, he recommends house hunters should lock in low long-term mortgage rates now because "soon interest rates will be much higher."
No way should the creditors on the other side of the ledger from all that bad household debt be bailed out from their actions. No way."
Not a chance in hell that this won't happen. The USG recognizes it is bankrupt. Dodd said so, quoted in the prior thread's comments. There's no choice if the USG wants to try to salvage a majority part of employment stability. If not, massive unemployment and near total loss of the USD's value.
Which would you choose if you were dependent on your Primary Dealers for your very existence? This is not a choices situation. It's all or all or if that doesn't work, all again.
Outcome: devalued USD big time; gold and some commodities as the hedge; necessity and govt service biz's doing well, for a while. And of course, another Lost Generation, courtesy of the refusal to believe Lyndon Johnson's Guns & Butter choice is real.
Cinco-X (profile) wrote (in reply to...) on Fri, 10/30/2009 - 8:20 am
Nanoo-Nanoo wrote:
greenspan I see Mr. Burns of the Simpson, he even has age spots in all the right places! Coincidence?
I think not-
They only appear to be age spots - in reality they are subcutaneous injections of tiny -like parasites that will grow and multiply at an exponential rate until they eventually devour their host's voluntary nervous system and replace it with their own, in effect controlling the dead husk.
If it ends up being another dud season, January should be quite exiting, with this years round of retailer BKs crushing CRE.
Even with a decent season, the winners will be online stores that have an increasing sales tax advantage over bricks-and-mortars stores. Retail CRE won't be pretty.
I don't think the issue is so much increasing sales taxes as declining store inventories. It's a lot easier to decide to order online when the local stores don't have what you want.
badger boy
no i didnt i saw that was going on with the economy and asked myself if i would want to be president,
i said no way. i would have to be crazy. i dont vote crazy. and it didnt make any difference which side
I just saw on Minyanville that Kevin Depew said that despite yesterday's rally, according to the P&F bullish percent indexes, all bullish percents for the major indexes declined, which means supply was internally outstripping demand. I'm adding to my SPY puts today.
agreed. this is one more unintended consequence - desperate states boost their sales tax rates, citizens shift purchases (especially big ticket) to online retailers, B&M retailers lose sales, states get lower tax revenues. Brilliant!
Supplemental coverage is optional for the vast majority of Medicare recipients due to cost. The privately run Medicare "advantage " programs are only for the wealthy.
The U.S. has LOTS of real wealth. As long as that is the case, our Government is not broke. I see no reason to dilute real wealth in an attempt to preserve the value of bad debt. It is immoral, unconstitutional and counterproductive to long term growth.
Numerous other actions could have been taken to stabilize the economy while allowing losses to accrue to banks and creditors. Instead, the fed is punishing the innocent and rewarding the guilty. The Fed did not regulate banks as required under its charter and is now papering over its own failures. Bernanke allowed trillions in non-economic debt to poison the system. More than anything, Bernanke is hiding the Fed's prior incompetence. Bernanke is bailing out the Fed (and the banks that own the fed) first and foremost.
Bernanke and the other fed governors should be fired.
BK: Posted some junk about that earlier: GS is making out like a bandit as usual servicing their bonds and debt. They are a BHC but didn't get TARP, now they will be assimilated.
Inflation-adjusted spending on durable goods, such as autos, furniture, and other long-lasting items, fell 7.2 percent last month after increasing 6.7 percent in the prior month.
Autos in October probably sold at a 9.85 million pace, down from an average 11.5 million rate in the third quarter than reflected the boost from ‘cars-for-clunkers,’ according to the median estimate of analysts surveyed by Bloomberg News. Purchases averaged 13.15 million in 2008.
Consumer purchases of non-durable goods increased 0.5 percent, and spending on services, which account for almost 60 percent of all outlays, rose 0.1 percent.
Kellogg Co., the largest U.S. breakfast-cereal maker, yesterday reported third-quarter profit that exceeded analysts’ estimates as costs fell more than sales.
[Bloomberg]
These numbers tell the story. Those Kellogg "costs" that fell are no doubt income to human workers in the form of wages. Profit exceeded estimates so some other human will get a bonus.
CIT got the first round of TARP. what they didn't get was an exemption from either the Fed or FDIC to stuff crap assets from their consumer finance division into the bank, so as to appear more solvent.
Personal income decreased $0.1 billion, or less than 0.1 percent, and disposable personal income (DPI) decreased $0.2billion, or less than 0.1 percent, in September, according to the Bureau of Economic Analysis. Personal consumption expenditures (PCE) decreased $47.2 billion, or 0.5 percent.
Personal disposable income perhaps fell due to this?
Aetna Profits rise 18%.
By Alex Nussbaum
Oct. 29 (Bloomberg) -- Aetna Inc., the third-largest U.S. health insurer, said higher premiums and enrollment helped profit beat analysts’ estimates even as medical costs rose to treat swine flu and jobless workers.
Third-quarter net income climbed 18 percent to $326.2 million, or 73 cents a share, the Hartford, Connecticut-based company said today in a statement. At the same time, Aetna narrowed its prediction for full-year earnings to $2.75 a share, at the low end of its prior forecast, citing increased costs.
In contrast to declines for larger rivals UnitedHealth Group Inc. and WellPoint Inc., Aetna said membership in its medical plans jumped 7.6 percent to 19 million from a year earlier. Chief Executive Officer Ronald Williams said in July that Aetna’s rates, still lower relative to competitors, made it harder to cover costs and would be adjusted for 2010.
Aetna reported a “solid third quarter,” with medical costs, reserves and other measures “better than we have see in over a year” from the company, said Josh Raskin, an analyst with Barclays Capital Inc. in New York, in a note. “It appears that Aetna is again taking a conservative approach to its outlook.”
Me again: WellPoint wasn't allowed sell anymore policies for a period of time as they in their supplemental insurance to Medicare recipients that included Part D:
Overcharged the government.
Overcharged for premiums.
Denied payment for critical medications.
I always thought the Chinese knew how to build walls...
“The Chinese manufacturers have taken a lax attitude, because they feel immune from prosecution,” said [lawyer] Weinstein, a managing partner at Morgan & Morgan in Fort Myers, Florida.
The largest supply of Chinese drywall came from subsidiaries of the privately owned German company Knauf Gips KG, Weinstein said.
"Michael W. McConnell: The Pay Czar Is Unconstitutional - WSJ.com"
Banksters are entitled to to be paid any amount they can get from the US treasury by any means necessary. The are the men who made America what is is.
Capitalism is about making money and they are entitled to yours. Everything they do is legal. If it isn't now, they'll get the laws changed. Sheeeeesh...
Soros is really "gabyjan" on this blog. I know this.
Oct. 30 (Bloomberg) -- Billionaire investor George Soros said a “bloodletting” may be coming for leveraged buyouts and commercial real estate amid the worst slowdown in 70 years.
“In commercial real estate and leveraged buyouts, the bloodletting is yet to come,” Soros said today during a lecture organized by the Central European University in Budapest, where he was born. “These factors will continue to weigh on the American economy, and the American consumer will no longer be able to serve as the motor for the world economy.”
I just spent a grandido, buying sporting goods for the backcountry along with a bunch of freeze-dried food, from a well-known online retailer that was offering 20% off on everything, free shipping and no sales tax.
If I was to buy the same goods @ REI (the only real outdoors store around here, sorry Big 5 and Sports Chalet, you don't count) I couldn't, because REI which stocks an awful lot, wouldn't have had about 1/2 of what I ordered. The idea that the nearest REI is about $30 in gas (to & from) away, really seals the deal online for me.
The only visceral difference is that I can't try on clothes, or actually touch and feel the merchandise, for about 35% savings?
Shouldn't that be reflected in sales tax numbers? The latest numbers for virginia have sales tax for september (collected from august sales) down 6.6% over august and YTD down 5.9%. Where is the increase coming from?
(amounts below are in millions)
Date ... Company ...... Type ......................... Headquarters....... Investment....... Funds awarded
Dec. 31 CIT Group..... Specialty lender........... New York............ $2,330............. Yes
Shouldn't that be reflected in sales tax numbers? The latest numbers for virginia have sales tax for september (collected from august sales) down 6.6% over august and YTD down 5.9%. Where is the increase coming from?*
When figures that should correlate don't, that tells you it is time to start asking questions. There has been an amazing amount of this kind of thing for the last few months. The question I ask is: can you really fake your way out of a recession? I'll let time tell the tale, but I do have a very strong personal opinion about this.
in the interest of fiarness you might point out that the savings rate peaked when transfer payments peaked and taxes hit low. This is not saving, it is handouts. And it is not delveraging when you look at the flow of funds.
but wont everything be revised downward in a month or two.?
What is the average revision lately?
seems like most everything gets the downward shift.
CR,
in the interest of fiarness you might point out that the savings rate peaked when transfer payments peaked and taxes hit low. This is not saving, it is handouts. And it is not delveraging when you look at the flow of funds. pom poms for the GDP report make the case that debt is indeed now wealth. it was my understanding that credit induced haze is exactly what got us here. But it is necessary evil I know. The composition of the "income" is nothing but handouts from the governement reflected in the rising debt load on the public sector. This isnt the end of recession or the beggining of any renewed growth. Perhaps you can find another word instead of recovery or growth. Both are patently misleading and outright lies.
but wont everything be revised downward in a month or two.?
Of course. There are leading and concurrent indicators that are still declining. The economy has not yet bottomed, Pollyanna opinions to the contrary.
I keep all my savings in Gold and Silver so I do not count.
From the BEA report linked by CR, here's some color on "Wages and Salaries", which suggests a weak non-farm Payrolls report next week:
Now those are non-SA numbers, but the only positive change in that bunch was a "slower rate of decline" in manufacturing. Everything else is
How is the health care bill going to affect Disposable Income?
especially with the bill containing fun language like
And for those who cry “read the bill,” beware. There are plenty of paragraphs like this one:
“(a) Outpatient Hospitals – (1) In General – Section 1833(t)(3)(C)(iv) of the Social Security Act (42 U.S.C. 1395(t)(3)(C)(iv)) is amended – (A) in the first sentence – (i) by inserting “(which is subject to the productivity adjustment described in subclause (II) of such section)” after “1886(b)(3)(B)(iii); and (ii) by inserting “(but not below 0)” after “reduced”; and (B) in the second sentence, by inserting “and which is subject, beginning with 2010 to the productivity adjustment described in section 1886(b)(3)(B)(iii)(II)”.
I need a translation please. and Oh please see heath insurers profits reported yesterday through increased premiums (and likely massive DOS attack on their policy holders). This extends into Medicare recipients of course via supplemental coverage which is NOT optional today.
From Mish:
Nanoo-Nanoo wrote:
Cash-for-Clunkers came with a hangover?
Comrade Rally Monkey wrote:
What disposable income
Is it Christmas yet! The death of American retail and with it the CRE that houses it.
the Banker's Disposable Income....Duhhhh
Oh but for us peasants those lofty salaries are good for us!
Comrade Rally Monkey wrote:
Beware the BDI! (Say it out loud: "beady eye"...)
Did you read that section really closely? I think there's something in the fine print...
“(a) Outpatient Hospitals – (1) In General – Section 1833(t)(3)(C)(iv) of the Social Security Act (42 U.S.C. 1395(t)(3)(C)(iv)) is amended – (A) in the first sentence – (i) by inserting $18 billion for AIG (which is subject to the productivity adjustment described in subclause (II) of such section)” after “1886(b)(3)(B)(iii); and (ii) by inserting $6 billion for GMAC “(but not below 0)” after “reduced”; and (B) in the second sentence, by inserting “and which is subject, beginning with 2010 to the productivity adjustment described in immunity for Hank Paulson section 1886(b)(3)(B)(iii)(II)”.
The
was screwed?
Next
will be Banker Bonus bonanza to boost Real Estate Market......you read it here in CR first.
Wisdom Speaker wrote:
Did you have a hard time sleeping last night?
The cliff diving in private wages has moderated due to government deficit spending. So where are we? Well, private wages and salaries are down ~7.5% yoy. Moreover, private wages and salaries are at the same level they were three years ago (Q 3, 2006).
And, personal income less government transfers is at the same level it was at in Q2, 2005.
It's a recovery on Wall St. - record bonuses thanks to the treasury and the fed. Main St. is facing a depression due to excessive household debt.
No way should the creditors on the other side of the ledger from all that bad household debt be bailed out from their actions. No way.
,rade rally
i know,i tried to read one, refer to section II of article 5awab. its hard to read much less understand they really need to figure out how to write bills clearer more understandable. reading one now is almost like punishment
LOL...this is great. I've not been here all that long so if someone else said this I'm not trying to rip them off. Every time I see greenspan I see Mr. Burns of the Simpson, he even has age spots in all the right places! Coincidence? lol.
OT from a previously linked story on the worsening fiscal situation of the states...
The federal assistance to states provided in the American Recovery and Reinvestment Act is lessening the extent to which states need to reduce services or raise taxes. But it now appears likely the federal assistance will end before state budget gaps have abated.
The last sentence could be applied to the economy in general. The federal stimulus will end before the economy regains its footing (too much overhang in the FIRE sector which we are choosing to ignore). Extend and pretend will only work if robust organic growth returns, which almost noone is forecasting. So the logical conclusion is that we ought to either A) withdraw the supports, take our lumps and do a re-start, or B) redirect any future stimulus to getting the bad assets worked out through outright government absorption (nationalization). Of course, we'll do neither but continue to pursue this game of extend and pretend. Noone has the political will to do what they know is necessary, so we'll all end up paying a much higher price in the long term.
BTW, it looks like the data entered on briefing.com do not match the BEA report. At least, briefing.com is reporting a -0.5% drop in PCE prices, which isn't in the BEA report (BEA has +0.1%). That's a heck of an error (over 7% annualized) in the direction of massive deflation! This applies also to the economic calendar at yahoo.com, which gets its feed from briefing.com.
Briefing.com: Economic Calendar
Economic Calendar: Financial Calendars - Yahoo! Finance
That data error may throw a bit of deflation scare into the masses today...
Nanoo-Nanoo wrote:
I think not-
In the event you're tired of all the happy news of the last few days:
The Economy Grows! Don't Rejoice, Forecaster Charles Nenner Says Things Will Sour Again in 2010
nova wrote:
If it ends up being another dud season, January should be quite exiting, with this years round of retailer BKs crushing CRE.
Dear Senator Dodd:
You are so full of shit I can't understand how your hair is not brown.
Please resign, with Geithner and Bernanke, for the good of the American people.
Angry Saver wrote:
Not a chance in hell that this won't happen. The USG recognizes it is bankrupt. Dodd said so, quoted in the prior thread's comments. There's no choice if the USG wants to try to salvage a majority part of employment stability. If not, massive unemployment and near total loss of the USD's value.
Which would you choose if you were dependent on your Primary Dealers for your very existence? This is not a choices situation. It's all or all or if that doesn't work, all again.
Outcome: devalued USD big time; gold and some commodities as the hedge; necessity and govt service biz's doing well, for a while. And of course, another Lost Generation, courtesy of the refusal to believe Lyndon Johnson's Guns & Butter choice is real.
Cinco-X (profile) wrote (in reply to...) on Fri, 10/30/2009 - 8:20 am
Nanoo-Nanoo wrote:
greenspan I see Mr. Burns of the Simpson, he even has age spots in all the right places! Coincidence?
I think not-
-like parasites that will grow and multiply at an exponential rate until they eventually devour their host's voluntary nervous system and replace it with their own, in effect controlling the dead husk.
They only appear to be age spots - in reality they are subcutaneous injections of tiny
Indeed; I expect quite a few retailers will be exiting in January.
LOL.
But, why are people complaining? WE elected lawyers as legislators. WE deserve what we get.
Rich nailed it!
If it ends up being another dud season, January should be quite exiting, with this years round of retailer BKs crushing CRE.
Even with a decent season, the winners will be online stores that have an increasing sales tax advantage over bricks-and-mortars stores. Retail CRE won't be pretty.
The pony was screwed?
I think you can go to Mexico for that.
Nanoo-Nanoo wrote:
I see someone totally different.
YouTube - Magoo's Surprise Party
ResistanceIsFeudal wrote:
You mean like spiders? Those SPX/ETF indexes?
I don't think the issue is so much increasing sales taxes as declining store inventories. It's a lot easier to decide to order online when the local stores don't have what you want.
badger boy
no i didnt i saw that was going on with the economy and asked myself if i would want to be president,
i said no way. i would have to be crazy. i dont vote crazy. and it didnt make any difference which side
I just saw on Minyanville that Kevin Depew said that despite yesterday's rally, according to the P&F bullish percent indexes, all bullish percents for the major indexes declined, which means supply was internally outstripping demand. I'm adding to my SPY puts today.
iceman,
agreed. this is one more unintended consequence - desperate states boost their sales tax rates, citizens shift purchases (especially big ticket) to online retailers, B&M retailers lose sales, states get lower tax revenues. Brilliant!
Nanoo-Nanoo (profile) wrote (in reply to...) on Fri, 10/30/2009 - 8:27 am
ResistanceIsFeudal wrote:
until they eventually devour their host.
You mean like spiders? Those SPX/ETF indexes?
I did, originally, but I got a better idea and changed motifs on you. Sorry.
Supplemental coverage is optional for the vast majority of Medicare recipients due to cost. The privately run Medicare "advantage " programs are only for the wealthy.
Ouch! What is going on at CIT?
ResistanceIsFeudal wrote:
Slumdog,
The U.S. has LOTS of real wealth. As long as that is the case, our Government is not broke. I see no reason to dilute real wealth in an attempt to preserve the value of bad debt. It is immoral, unconstitutional and counterproductive to long term growth.
Numerous other actions could have been taken to stabilize the economy while allowing losses to accrue to banks and creditors. Instead, the fed is punishing the innocent and rewarding the guilty. The Fed did not regulate banks as required under its charter and is now papering over its own failures. Bernanke allowed trillions in non-economic debt to poison the system. More than anything, Bernanke is hiding the Fed's prior incompetence. Bernanke is bailing out the Fed (and the banks that own the fed) first and foremost.
Bernanke and the other fed governors should be fired.
Ouch! What is going on at CIT?
voting deadline for the debt exchange offer was last night. bunch of bonds due Nov 3.
BK: Posted some junk about that earlier: GS is making out like a bandit as usual servicing their bonds and debt. They are a BHC but didn't get TARP, now they will be assimilated.
[Bloomberg]
These numbers tell the story. Those Kellogg "costs" that fell are no doubt income to human workers in the form of wages. Profit exceeded estimates so some other human will get a bonus.
They are a BHC but didn't get TARP,
CIT got the first round of TARP. what they didn't get was an exemption from either the Fed or FDIC to stuff crap assets from their consumer finance division into the bank, so as to appear more solvent.
Basel Too wrote:
= likely bk filing Nov 2.
Personal income decreased $0.1 billion, or less than 0.1 percent, and disposable personal income (DPI) decreased $0.2billion, or less than 0.1 percent, in September, according to the Bureau of Economic Analysis. Personal consumption expenditures (PCE) decreased $47.2 billion, or 0.5 percent.
Ahhhhh.... the sweet smell of economic recovery.
I guess we're going to get the... "So you wanna get rid of TARP?" minicrash?
I guess we're going to get the... "So you wanna get rid of TARP?" minicrash?
From your lips to
's ears
ylsp
could be. be interesting to see how timmay handles it. i just hope he doesnt get down on his knees.
Ah, the sweet smell of financial sector recovery of parasitic blood-sucking.
Coming soon to a political theater
near you: Son of TARP
I don't even know what positions I have anymore... Gold and a bunch of defunct puts that have no hell in going itm...
i guess this means that they havent tried everything yet.
Thanks for the clarification Basel Too.
Personal disposable income perhaps fell due to this?
Aetna Profits rise 18%.
By Alex Nussbaum
Me again: WellPoint wasn't allowed sell anymore policies for a period of time as they in their supplemental insurance to Medicare recipients that included Part D:
Overcharged the government.
Overcharged for premiums.
Denied payment for critical medications.
Don't know if they are selling again now.
oops Edit to add citation: http://www.bloomberg.com/apps/news?pid=newsarchive&sid=ancdQvCVzayQ
Blackhalo,
Goldman Sachs cut the size of the CIT rescue loan.
Goldman Sachs cut the size of the CIT rescue loan.
And charged CIT a fee for doing so. The
always gets paid.
YLSP, someone's attacking the constitutionality of some TARP provisions.
True to WSJ, it's over Ken Feinberg's appointment, and not the billions given to any firm.
Michael W. McConnell: The Pay Czar Is Unconstitutional - WSJ.com
wonder if golden sacks is going to pick up the "good parts" after the bk ?
I always thought the Chinese knew how to build walls...
China Drywall Emits Gas; No Tie to Illness, U.S. Says (Update3) - Bloomberg.com
It's wonderful that the health insurers are taking a bigger slice from doctors and patients.
They'll grow obese from swallowing more of the smaller pie and will create jobs for personal trainers and dieticians.
Eric wrote:
We prefer to call it "interspecies erotica."
Happy days, Obama has created OR saved 650,000 jobs, though the White house says it's closer to a million.
created OR saved, for one year OR many years.
( Crickets Chirping )
"Michael W. McConnell: The Pay Czar Is Unconstitutional - WSJ.com"
Banksters are entitled to to be paid any amount they can get from the US treasury by any means necessary. The are the men who made America what is is.
Capitalism is about making money and they are entitled to yours. Everything they do is legal. If it isn't now, they'll get the laws changed. Sheeeeesh...
where? we're losing 200 jobs here,maybe more.who knows.
We just have to cut corporate and capital gains taxes and poof, the "private" sector will have everyone employed [or dead] in no time.
Soros is really "gabyjan" on this blog. I know this.
Oct. 30 (Bloomberg) -- Billionaire investor George Soros said a “bloodletting” may be coming for leveraged buyouts and commercial real estate amid the worst slowdown in 70 years.
“In commercial real estate and leveraged buyouts, the bloodletting is yet to come,” Soros said today during a lecture organized by the Central European University in Budapest, where he was born. “These factors will continue to weigh on the American economy, and the American consumer will no longer be able to serve as the motor for the world economy.”
I just spent a grandido, buying sporting goods for the backcountry along with a bunch of freeze-dried food, from a well-known online retailer that was offering 20% off on everything, free shipping and no sales tax.
If I was to buy the same goods @ REI (the only real outdoors store around here, sorry Big 5 and Sports Chalet, you don't count) I couldn't, because REI which stocks an awful lot, wouldn't have had about 1/2 of what I ordered. The idea that the nearest REI is about $30 in gas (to & from) away, really seals the deal online for me.
The only visceral difference is that I can't try on clothes, or actually touch and feel the merchandise, for about 35% savings?
PCE was up 3.4% annualized in 3rd quarter.
Shouldn't that be reflected in sales tax numbers? The latest numbers for virginia have sales tax for september (collected from august sales) down 6.6% over august and YTD down 5.9%. Where is the increase coming from?
[re: CIT] They are a BHC but didn't get TARP
(amounts below are in millions)
Date ... Company ...... Type ......................... Headquarters....... Investment....... Funds awarded
Dec. 31 CIT Group..... Specialty lender........... New York............ $2,330............. Yes
Tracking the $700 Billion Bailout - The New York Times
*PCE was up 3.4% annualized in 3rd quarter.
Shouldn't that be reflected in sales tax numbers? The latest numbers for virginia have sales tax for september (collected from august sales) down 6.6% over august and YTD down 5.9%. Where is the increase coming from?*
When figures that should correlate don't, that tells you it is time to start asking questions. There has been an amazing amount of this kind of thing for the last few months. The question I ask is: can you really fake your way out of a recession? I'll let time tell the tale, but I do have a very strong personal opinion about this.
S wrote:
Very well put, S. Thank you.