Small Business and Employment

I didn't realize there were any small businesses left.

Dooooooooooooooom!!! alert - repost due to evil :pig:

I wrote some more doom fiction. There is no economic content in this post and it is rated R for violence. Background: The grid has failed. The economy has failed. Life sucks for far too many.

sample

We cut through a yard and crossed into the business district. It was a mess. Cars burnt and cars abandoned packed the main road. Trash was strewn everywhere. The businesses themselves were shattered windows, stripped inside of anything worth something to someone somewhere. We stopped long enough in front of a row of shop fronts so Max could put his Zippo to work.

place: American Apocalypse

Nemo,

Give it another year or two...there will be a lot less

The small business owners have gone Galt!

I didn't realize there were any small businesses left.

The mega-corps and their govt. employees are doing everything they can to destroy them. They're hoping to soon rid the entire nation of of the scourge of small businesses.
~splat

Welcome to the new economy, where you are either too big to fail, or you fail.

The U.S. is looking an awful lot like the countries I grew up laughing at.

Re: Nemo, gold-- a couple of weeks ago, I bought 15k of GOLDX (Gamco Gold) in the 401k. That's about as close as I've come to buying the stuff.

I wrote some more doom fiction

Ah.. sounds like Mexico Wink
~splat

Pigged reply:

What if Benjamins had an epiphany and came clean and explained exactly what's what and who the money was doled out to, and how much?

TBTF morph into Too Big to Conceal? not likely

on topic: what do small businesses matter in a socialist, centralized oilgarchy anyway?

It doesn't even matter anyway

splat,

But the food is worse...

The Corus deal is now official:

Corus Bank Assets – Winning Bidder Announced

FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE
October 6, 2009 Media Contact:
Andrew Gray (202-898-7192) or
angray@fdic.gov

The Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation (FDIC) has signed a bid confirmation letter to sell a 40 percent equity interest in a limited liability company (LLC) created to hold assets of Corus Bank, NA, Chicago, Illinois, to a consortium managed by Starwood Capital Group (Starwood) that also includes TPG Capital, Perry Capital and WLR LeFrak.

The sale was conducted on a competitive bid basis, and the best and final offers were received on Wednesday, September 30, 2009. A total of eight bidders submitted bids to purchase an ownership interest in the LLC, to which the FDIC as Receiver of Corus will convey a portfolio of predominantly performing and non-performing construction loans and real estate owned (REO) assets with an unpaid principal balance of approximately $4.5 billion. The FDIC initially will hold a 60 percent equity interest in the LLC.

The bid received from the consortium was determined to be the offer that would result in the greatest return for the receivership of all competing bids. Corus Bank failed on September 11, 2009, and the FDIC immediately entered into a purchase and assumption agreement with MB Financial Bank, National Association, Chicago, Illinois, to assume all of the deposits of the institution and approximately $3 billion of the assets, comprised mainly of cash and marketable securities. This transaction completes the sale of the majority of the remaining assets of Corus Bank.

The expected closing date is in mid-October, consistent with the timeline previously provided by the FDIC.

I am pretty sure gold is either going a lot higher or a lot lower.

You're welcome.

It was a mess...

Sounds like some developments aroundhere that "almost" made it.

Great Nova! Just in time for Halloween!!
I'm stoked!

"WLR LeFrak" sounds like a pen name for a six-year-old.

When I owned a small retail business with a ground-floor location 15 or so years ago, yellow-page ads cost me more than rent did. Are yellow-page ads as important nowadays?

If small businesses fail in America it is because they were not good enough. You have to find the flaw in you model and come back stronger. Just like flaws in ones characters must be rooted out so glod will bless you with money and all that comes with it.

I've been doing all my investing based on Nemo's insider information. So far, broken even. Not bad. Not bad at all.

sam.2 wrote:

what do small businesses matter in a socialist, centralized oilgarchy anyway?

It's funny tho, how REAL Mericans like to complain about socialists, but Europe is loaded with "small/medium business". There also seems to be less of the corporate-franchise concept there (meaning here: almost everything seems to be really a corporate-franchise and the "owner" aren't really "full" owners). Anyway, don't know for sure... Just observations of "small bidness" in yerp and Merica.

Maybe small business has discovered the joy of outsourcing...

Yes Mrs. Smith, your HVAC can be fixed if we send it to China.

(btw, I have now moved into a bearish mood....me thinks earnings will suck for the most part...I'm say'n little or no top line growth)

Are yellow-page ads as important nowadays?

Yes. and no. Depends. Many older people still have that "Yellow Page" mentality.
I'm SE and I almost went broke a few years ago trying to salvage what I had. The only good Yellow Pages did for me was to take calls from people looking to whore themselves out @ near minimum wage.

Glod bless Amerika....seventh inning stretch at the TwinkieDome

I know several small business owners who are hinting that they may give up the ghost.
Not a lot of loyalty to small businesses any more except for restaurants.

kind of hard to find that "flaw" when you have dozens of people that do the same thing you do that will be doing it cheaper...and cheaper...and cheaper.
Quality tends to go out the window.

Terry - Thx for that. I note:

Summary – Both the Advance Facility & the Term Notes must be paid in full prior to any
cash distributions to the equity holders

Okay then, does this include admin and operating costs or do they mean profits?mmmm....

Dr. Pitts cautions is pablum i.e. the The Global 2000, Wall St continue to outsource and downsize so if not small business who the hell is going to hire significant staff to helping fuel an employment recovery. It doesn't take a rocket scientist to figure out that you cannot maintain a 'consumer society' if they don't have jobs to purchase anything

Last Sat in his weekly radio and Internet video address Obama said passage of his health care proposals would create new jobs by making small business startups more affordable. But many can’t take that leap because they can’t afford to lose the health insurance they have at their current job."

Let's see if O follows through on walking the talk....

I've been doing all my investing based on Nemo's insider information. - rb

That's as good as anything. I bought more PEBIX because it has some Brazil stuff in there and I thought, what with the Olympics and all.... (blows on dice, rolls with a flick) Wink

"Are yellow-page ads as important nowadays?"

No, ,imho.

You can reinvest it in online adverts, loyalty and lead programs and targeted direct mail.

CR, I take it these are gross job losses not adjusted for any change in the proportion of small, medium, and large firms providing employment?

Maybe small business here has been squeezed out in a more thorough way than in euro zone...more ruthless ...??

The few small businesses that have clung on in spite of the box stores breathing down their necks, are in just as bad shape financially as the brobdingnagians, as luck would have it.

Pupfish or moby dicks, it makes no difference...

sporkfed wrote:

Not a lot of loyalty to small businesses

No, that's true too. Still very common to see small clothing stores (for example) in yerp. Even in small towns. The mega-stores are just getting started there, but - because of the roads (lack of freeways running though cities) - people are still more local oriented in shopping patterns. Stuff IS higher in price tho. Walmart does drive out the little guys with good prices.

CR - 1 currency now -yogi brings up a good point. I might also add that business creation is important. How many have started companies...business formation is a sign of potential growth.

km4 wrote:

Last Sat in his weekly radio and Internet video address Obama said passage of his health care proposals would create new jobs by making small business startups more affordable. But many can’t take that leap because they can’t afford to lose the health insurance they have at their current job."

Local sw engineer has an Internet startup that's gaining some cred; he also has only one lung left. the other was removed this summer -- cancer. He can't afford to leave his day job because of insurance and is killing himself trying to work full-time at two jobs. His startup is suffering because of it, but most guys in his situation wouldn't have the intestinal fortitude to get even as far as he has. And they shouldn't have to.

As a tiny business ower, things are not good - but good enough. We do real estate property management, fee based.

When I first started out on my own (15yrs ago) I built and grew and hired and grew some more. After payroll, taxes, office space, overhead etc etc, I found that the more I worked to build, the more I paid out. So, I never really earned more. At least not enough to balance the work load, stress and liabiity issues.

Now it is just me and a leasing agent. I work 4 hrs a day, get everything done. I like my clients and most of my tenants. There is much less stress and I earn enough to be happy.

Bigger is not better.

Quick review of M. Melinda Pitts research
M. Melinda Pitts

Oh yeah she is eminently qualified to speak about the role small businesses will continue to play in hiring staff and helping to fuel an employment recovery Big smile

Bigger is not better.

A+

True, so true.

Small town people are loyal to price first and foremost. They may buy a tie at the clothing store but there blue jeans are from Walmart.

Re: " it's not clear whether small businesses will continue to play their traditional role in hiring staff and helping to fuel an employment recovery."

  1. I'll help you sweetie (Dr. Pitts) ... How bout no, because small businesses don't have future cash flow, because wall street flushed away the future with reckless and unregulated bullshit that was ignored by people like you, who were looking the other way, while the cash was ripped off.... Dooooooooooooooom!!!
  • Good one Nemo (opening tag)

"Looking ahead, it's not clear whether small businesses will continue to play their traditional role in hiring staff and helping to fuel an employment recovery."

What an incredibly absurd statement based on a fundamentally flawed perspective on what matters in a vibrant economy.

Corporations survive. Small business ends. Ensuring this outcome is simple. Increase taxes and fees for small business and give tax breaks and concessions to corporations. Should the entire economy be in trouble of sinking then give free money to corporations and increase taxes and fees to small business. Further concentration of wealth is assured and the middle class is literally destroyed along with the American Ream of independence and the entrepreneurship we built this country with. You want a future, get a corporate job and play by their rules. Don't question the system if you want to eat.

I wonder what could have been accomplished in righting this ship if 500 billion dollars was loaned at zero interest/no payment for 24 months to current small businesses or someone with a good business plan? Prop up manufacturing and allow for their expansion... the possibilities could have been endless. I am much more pleased with the choices made that got us here on the precipice.

Heeeyyyyy Ab-bott. I got a baaaad feelin'.

I'm thinking it's time for the "Merican public to go all in on equities or be priced out forever. Remember how many people jumped into tech stocks near the peak of the dotcom bubble? And how many jumped into real estate near the peak of the housing bubble?

Methinks there are investment professionals instilling fear into their smaller clients to get in on this rally before they get priced out of the market. And that said professionals, while they are buying for the little guys, will be selling for the big guys. Small investors will be the bag holders when this rally ends.

My loyalty is to quality.

That is why I shop at local small shops. Good quality, fair prices, many items US made by small vendors. Works for me.

josap,

Makes sense. I was talking to an attorney about a position I thought she should apply for. She has the background, federal judge clerk, White House staff, etc... She told me it isn't worth it. The money just can't pay for the time she would lose with her family etc.

Somewhere a long the line the only true career path was paved with 80 hour weeks. For what? Especially now when people are finding out what that really bought them.

Speaking of the ads. (Which we weren't but now we are...)
I have 3 - BB's secrets, something on how to lose 3lbs/week, and something about my credit score.
Sure... I could lose a few lbs... but I'm not really interested in Helo Ben's secrets nor my credit score.

Are there any mortgage people here? My "potential" refi lender wants a $500 rate lock fee and I don't remember paying those in the past. What is that all about?

sporkfed wrote:

Small town people are loyal to price first and foremost

I think everybody is. Including Europe. I've known a guy for years, he lives in Switzerland, and is an ear surgeon (so, money isn't exactly a problem). He still talks about the great deal he got on a tool-set when he lived in the US. He loved the disposable quality of everything here. His quote: In Switzerland it would cost 4 or 5 times more for a tool-set, but it would be amazing quality. But, he said, he doesn't want - ALL the time - great quality. So, cost is important for most stuff.

Funny ucgal, My ads are:

  1. Sell your kidney for big money!
  2. An ad that states "Makez BiG Moneys wiTH RealzEState
  3. Buy a Bazooka at 50% off

1.I'll help you sweetie (Dr. Pitts) ... How bout no, because small businesses don't have future cash flow, because wall street flushed away the future with reckless and unregulated bullshit that was ignored by people like you, who were looking the other way, while the cash was ripped off....

Doc Holiday,

Well said. I'd add that showering Wall St. & Banks with money is counterproductive at this point. The system is constrained by an inability and an unwillingness to borrow. Just look at all the reserves in the system. They're just sitting there.

You can't fix a debt problem with more debt. We need more savings. It's going to be a long tough slog.

but there blue jeans are from Walmart.

If those jeans are the same as the jeans from the mom&pop place, the m/p should have a serious sit down w/ their supplier or kick him/her out the door and find another.
Nova suggested finding the flaw....finding the "difference", inferring quality vs. quantity.

Is it worth it for many people to drive all the way to a Wal-Mart Cargo Station, spend 10 minutes finding a parking spot, another 5 walking to the actual store... Waiting in line for another 10 minutes after you have dodged 20 wild kids that are Ritalin candidates, then praying your car wasn't butchered by soccermom w/places to go fast just to save a few bucks? EVEN if it was APPLES to APPLES?

Personally I prefer my sanity over money.

There also seems to be less of the corporate-franchise concept there

McDonalds in the Louvre?

A Quarter Pounder With Cheese, S'il Vous Plait

barfly wrote:

McDonalds in the Louvre?

HA! Less, not none!

Extrapolating from these arbitrary firm sizes has limited value. If 10 small banks with 400 employees each are closed, and a big bank assumes all of their "business", adding 3000 jobs, there may or may not be a net gain to the communities those ten served.

First of all, if 3000 can provide the same service as 4000 working the same total hours, that's a net gain, but who eats it? The wages are bid down, since 4 workers are competing for 3 jobs. Lack of competition may allow the big bank to gouge oligopoly prices (fees). The big bank's crew may eat huge bonuses (maybe with a slice to their cronies at the 10): "look how we've grown through acquisition!"

Blackwaterwannabe,

Nova suggested finding the flaw....finding the "difference", inferring quality vs. quantity.

I think that was scone. She says smart stuff like that.

Thanks tho

Small business will continue to play a vital role in falsely fluffing up BLS birth/death employment numbers, while failing in the real economy.

The BLS employment numbers will then be adjusted more than a year after the fact, although the models will remain optimistic and lagging.

It is all part of the 5-year plan, comma, rad.

I like what Stihl has done. No sales over the internet, no sales in box stores, and the best quality tools out there, all sold in small stores all over the country.

I can't think of a "mom and pop" store that sells blue jeans. Some boutiques that sell premium denim, maybe. Other than that it's either chains like Gap or Levis at Fred Meyer. And neither Gap nor Levis are made in America anymore, so you're supporting a minimum wage clerk job, at best.

Juvenal Delinquent (profile) wrote on Tue, 10/6/2009 - 4:44 pm
I like what Stihl has done.

We've got 3 chainsaws 19", 26", 36" a power-pruner and heavy duty weed wacker - all Stihl

Several retail shop owners and two auto repair shops are telling me the end of the year, or the end of their lease, is going to be the end.

Hubby's business, computers, has been almost nonexistant for over a year. He gets enough work to get by, but no big jobs, no new equipment.

I say string her up and then tar and feather her, or is it better to tar her up, then string her up? Dooooooooooooooom!!!

And then... put her on a Wheres MY pony? and stuff like that!

During the boom/bubble, a lot of small business owners used credit cards and home equity withdrawal to finance their enterprises. This is pretty much over. And banks are not exactly hustling to get their business right now. How can these businesses add jobs?

Small business. A real shame...

Said the idle employee of a zombie bank. Oh, thanks for the bailouts.

(Just being extra mean and snarky, not serious... well, except for idle employee of a zombie bank part)

Quantity over quality. Price over sustainability. Engineered obsolescence.

Perfect consumer business credo until they transferred the entire process onto being an American consumer. People have written volumes about the inherent risks of consumerism and corporatism. We get to watch it become reality. Double plus good for us.

g'night

Is community organizing a small business? Or a curse on small businesses?

I wonder what could have been accomplished in righting this ship if 500 billion dollars was loaned at zero interest/no payment for 24 months to current small businesses or someone with a good business plan?

I'm going to guess the economy would be improving and an whole new generation of innovators would be creating some real innovation, rather than just innovative bank scams. However there also needs to be reform to the truly dreadful patent system and the overly generous duration of copyrights ( Disney paid it's congressional whores well to get the last extension thank you Sonny "the ho" Bono for that legacy ).

BUT with your plan a lot of very rich and powerful people would have lost a lot of money, which is very very very bad ( for them at least ).
~splat

Looking ahead, it's not clear whether small businesses will continue to play their traditional role in hiring staff and helping to fuel an employment recovery.

This largely depends on the nature of the next bubble.

Choosing economic policy by raw numbers of jobs and dollar profits "created" is like choosing to listen to a piece of music based on how many musicians put how much time into it and how many copies were sold.

One reason we have such decay with small businesses, is because of the wal-mart-style scale and build-out of corporate BIGBOX monopolies -- which is linked to the policy of zero regulation during the Bush years -- a time when all the little small business shops were run out of business. The homeownership society was fueled by fraud and every BIG business went along for a ride that helped destroy America..... Dooooooooooooooom!!!

Walk time

"Citi, which has ceded a 34 per cent stake to the US government in return for repeated bail-outs, said on Tuesday: “We are evaluating the best way forward for all stakeholders and are exploring several options.”

FT.com / Companies / Banks - Citi eyes commodities unit sell-off

I had no idea it was 34%!!

I think Scone was wondering what mom and pops sell jeans.

Consignment shops! heehee. silly but true. Alot of the little mom and pops near where I live do not sell anything that I want. It is all knick knacks, or antiques, or let's soak the tourist things. Being a small rural area there really isnt much call or need for mom n pops to sell everyday things. Goodwill, salvation army, and the consignment shop on the tourist walking area in winchester being the exceptions.

Ohhh splat guess what I saw in the flier for a kids book fair? a book called Splat the cat. I immediately thought of you but the blurb about the book is way to cute, I was picturing something along the lines of bill the cat.

kidbuck wrote:

Is community organizing a small business?

I think it would depend on who you asked. Small business owners would have the same "knee jerk" reactions as anybody else. I'm was amused that when I was on the general-plan-group of my small limousine-liberal town the chamber-of-commerce types were THE most pro-bidness, no-regulation, Merica F*** Yeah types, but then complained like hell when the Walmarts moved in on them and want “their government” to stop WalMart.

None of the true-believer “ism” people think ahead to what the consequences of their economic beliefs might be when applied to large systems (run by the smartest amoral scum-bags)

Ohhh splat guess what I saw in the flier for a kids book fair? a book called Splat the cat. I immediately thought of you but the blurb about the book is way to cute, I was picturing something along the lines of bill the cat.

Smile Now that made me laugh Smile
~splat

Is it worth it for many people to drive all the way to a Wal-Mart Cargo Station, spend 10 minutes finding a parking spot, another 5 walking to the actual store...

I dunno.. I'd say for most people that beats having to hit 4 different specialty stores to get the stuff they need, dealing with downtown parking (in some cases), and trying to make it in between 9 and 6.

"My "potential" refi lender wants a $500 rate lock fee and I don't remember paying those in the past. "

A lot of lenders are asking for that kind of fee to prevent you from rate shopping - that is, you lock with them, then if/when rates go down, you walk to another lender.

Ask if it is refundable at closing. A few lenders do this - they charge an "application fee", or "appraisal fee", then refund it against closing costs like title, notary, appraisal, etc.

It should be, as the intention is to ding the rate shoppers, not the people who actually close a loan.

It just occurred to me that what retail - "Mom and Stepdad " stores are really needed?

Time to make the snickerdoodles. Toodles guys.

Dead shtick has good points. In my area it is more convenient for me and cheaper and better selection of items to go to chain/big box

glad you laughed splat

Dead Shtick wrote:

I'd say for most people that beats having to hit 4 different specialty stores to get the stuff they need, dealing with downtown parking (in some cases), and trying to make it in between 9 and 6.

Yup. When Europeans live here - and move BACK, they always say how much they miss the convenience of shopping. Load up the wagon with half-a-ton of groceries, stop at WalMart - another half-ton-o-crap. Throw the ton-o-crap into the humongous freezer and garage. It IS way more convenient than lugging the stuff in a small car (or bus).

NOTaREALmerican wrote:

It's funny tho, how REAL Mericans like to complain about socialists, but Europe is loaded with "small/medium business". There also seems to be less of the corporate-franchise concept there (meaning here: almost everything seems to be really a corporate-franchise and the "owner" aren't really "full" owners). Anyway, don't know for sure... Just observations of "small bidness" in yerp and Merica.

In a franchise relationship the franchisee owns the risk... the franchiser owns the reward. Get it straight.

josap wrote:

Bigger is not better.

Call the guards! There is a subversive among us!

what retail - "Mom and Stepdad " stores are really needed?

That's a great question. But in my business (home improvements), quality vs quantity are something to consider.

After all, today you can bounce on down to HD and get the WHOLE house installed with (say) carpet for only $99...IF you pay the rediculous carpet prices and prey you get a good sub...sub....sub contractor that's not on drugs. Yes, they have sub/sub/sub c's.
Well, at least they have a CC.

As a scientist who once went the startup route, an unmentioned aspect of the overpricing of executive "talent" is that it has crushed the ability of small companies to transition from garages to 5-50 person operations -- the simple, yet essential, business skills needed are all priced at a level that extract all the value out of nascent companies, leaving no reason for anyone else to bother working hard.

The pricing of the 'talent' is killing the business incubator that was once the shining star of American business. Watch for China to take the lead -- if they can get their legal system to recognize IP, we're in big trouble.

I just bought Fidelity Capital and Income because I figure a few junk bonds are less risky than overexposure in Treasuries. Sick. Just sick. Sick

Barley wrote:

Maybe small business has discovered the joy of outsourcing...

Yes Mrs. Smith, your HVAC can be fixed if we send it to China.

That is almost done now - the 'repair' is a sub-assembly they just 'plug' in and the broken sub-assembly thrown away. The sub-assemblies come in boxes - from China.

Thank you ghostface! I was hoping you were around.

Answers my question and I appreciate it.

dryfly wrote:

corporate-franchise concept there

I guess I was looking at it less from the financial point of view and more from the management point of view. Here, anybody can plunk-down a million and buy "a franchise". So, you've got all these absentee "owners". European "small business" are run BY the owner. They are there, in the store (usually with a few kids or relatives or two, too). Not just a lawyer or dentist "owning" a McD and then hiring a "manager".

That kinda thing.

Edit: Which is WHY small stores in europe are closed from 12 - 2. People, amazingly enough, have to go home to give their kids lunch. No managers and high-schools kids running the place full time.

just bought Fidelity Capital ..

TY. Our retirement accounts are now safer... Smile

Barley wrote:

CR - 1 currency now -yogi brings up a good point. I might also add that business creation is important. How many have started companies...business formation is a sign of potential growth.

As long as the business start-up isn't a forced last resort kitchen table consultancy. That's just more extend & pretend.

I'm sure there were a few independent contractors (of the home improvement variety) in those small biz death numbers.

A few? Ha. And don't forget, no UE comp for them either.

Oh, don't get me started.

As long as the business start-up isn't a forced last resort kitchen table consultancy. That's just more extend & pretend.

that hurt

Juvenal Delinquent wrote:

I like what Stihl has done.
YES! Weed whacker and chain saw, both with the EZ start. It worth it for old people who are tired of yanking the cord and I love not worrying about climbing with a running chainsaw. I can sit up in a tree and start the damn thing without wondering what part of my anatomy I could be missing in about twenty seconds or so. And have the confidence to turn it off as I move around in the tree, knowing it will start back up again.

"what retail - "Mom and Stepdad " stores are really needed? "

Independent auto repair shops. Dealerships are a bunch of crooks. With an independent, there's a chance of getting to know the guy and determining whether he's honest.

Stores that sell stuff that has to be fitted, like bike shops or tailor shops/stores that sell made-to-measure suits or stores that sell good hiking boots. You have to do this in person. Of course, you can get fitted once then order over the internet.

Mom & Pop restaurants often have better quality than chains and have similar (maybe even lower) prices. Most chain restaurant food is pretty nasty.

many RockyR, many. I'm just praising the Lord of Heaven I'm not one yet.

feralpig wrote:

Most chain restaurant food is pretty nasty.

But, It was good tho, we got lots of food.

Off to the health-club.

It's hard to beat the dollar menu on price, and unemployed or underemployed people have no choice about quality. Walmart and McD's are 2 sides of 1 coin.

DCRogers wrote:

As a scientist who once went the startup route, an unmentioned aspect of the overpricing of executive "talent" is that it has crushed the ability of small companies to transition from garages to 5-50 person operations -- the simple, yet essential, business skills needed are all priced at a level that extract all the value out of nascent companies, leaving no reason for anyone else to bother working hard.

Run, do not walk, from such "talent". It's just not worth it. Ever.
And the hilarious thing? Large companies have not yet realized this either.

Barley,

That was the story from the YUM 'beat' earlier this evening - IIRC, US same store sales down 6%, ROW down 3% - slight miss on topline, beat on bottom line...

Almost forgot about my anecdote tonight.

A few days ago I noticed in a neighbor's driveway (he's a very private person - we wave, but I don't even know his name) there was a "new" older camper with temporary plates. I thought at first maybe he bought it - he's kind of an outdoorsy guy. Then I saw a man standing outside of it yesterday on his cell phone. And that's when the light bulb went off. This man has lost his place of abode and is taking up residence in a camper in my neighbor's driveway. When I drove in tonight around dinnertime, the light was on in the camper. Friend or family member I assume.

I get the feeling I'm noticing more RVs and campers and people's driveways. We'll see how long this one stays. Then I'll know.

(What was the name of that nosey neighbor on Bewitched?)

That was the story from the YUM 'beat' earlier this evening - IIRC, US same store sales down 6%, ROW down 3% - slight miss on topline, beat on bottom line...

talking heads on bloomberg radio were talking about what an amazing success this was.

@ Outsider - the fact that this is unusual gives me hope for NH. Here in Oregon, I can look out the window and see quite a few driveway campers. My next door neighbor rents his driveway out.

JP wrote:

Run, do not walk, from such "talent". It's just not worth it. Ever.

Not always - sometimes real talent is worth paying real money for. Just make sure they bring real talent and not just impressive resume.

Also - if you can't pay cash for all their 'skills' try to comp them some other way - like better hours & more flexibility. Something non-money related. I knew an ass kick senior tooling engineer who was used to making $120K in automotive [that was circa 1990 - talking real money]. He loved to sail and found the automakers wouldn't cut him slack [like when the Mackinaw Race was on]... he left and went to a small supplier to automotive and took about a 40% cut in pay BUT the deal was 'I sail when I want to sail - and trust me to get the projects done in time' [he did].

My next door neighbor rents his driveway out.

Jesus. Are you serious? Perhaps Nova has a point....

@ DCRogers (profile) wrote on Tue, 10/6/2009 - 5:09 pm
As a scientist who once went the startup route, an unmentioned aspect of the overpricing of executive "talent" is that it has crushed the ability of small companies to transition from garages to 5-50 person operations -- the simple, yet essential, business skills needed are all priced at a level that extract all the value out of nascent companies, leaving no reason for anyone else to bother working hard.

I agree you need to hire smart and be frugal to get a product out and get initial customer traction while keeping pretender executive "talent" out of early stage startups but geez what a gross generalization.

JP wrote:

Run, do not walk, from such "talent". It's just not worth it. Ever.

It is amazing, how fast, bringing in this type of talent, sinks a growing business. Once you let one in, they tend to fill all avalible positions with similar, dead weight, and begin to impose a regimen of rewarding ass kissing, over exceptionalism.

The great outdoors & re-education camping...

Wow scone - well, as you know, things aren't quite as bleak here as they are there - yet.

BTW, meant to tell you my college student has a work study job collecting ticks in fairly local areas. She came back the first day and said - I finally found a nice town that even dad would like. I said - let me guess. Hollis. She said - how did you know?

If it weren't for you, I never would have known. Smile

A little OT, but...

The bank that bought Corus' deposits foreclosed on a condo building recently and is offering condos at a 30% discount from the previous price and offering 95% financing and doesn't require any mortgage insurance. The banker who told me about this says that the deal is described in the latest Crain's Chicago Business.

Jesus. Are you serious? Perhaps Nova has a point.... - B

Yep. In Oregon anything and everything goes. The other day I was walking downtown, passed a couple sprawled on the sidewalk doing meth, you could smell it down the block. Then had to hack my way past a couple of spare change entrepreneurs, to a local "mom and pop" restaurant that's in a death spiral because they have cut quality so much. Seriously, get me out of here!!!

Downtown Portland? Or sunnyside?

Gladys Kravitz
edit: point to scone! Smile

Blackhalo wrote:

It is amazing, how fast, bringing in this type of talent, sinks a growing business. Once you let one in, they tend to fill all avalible positions with similar, dead weight, and begin to impose a regimen of rewarding ass kissing, over exceptionalism.

Shhhh. You'll destroy my niche.

@ Outsider -- you're welcome. I keep that vision of a quiet, clean, orderly town in my head as I try to escape from this here. Oregon was once a wonderful place, now it's going down hill very fast.

And on that sad, unhappy note, Nytol.

Downtown Portland? - B

Downtown, near a certain formerly nice Indian restaurant which shall remain nameless.

We had mysterians here over the summer, and they went out east after hanging out, and their 9 years of higher education only amounted to one $9 an hour job offer, somewhere on just the other side of nowhere in flyover, when they tried to work off their cumulative $100k student loan debt, and they keep asking me "how would a jubilee work, exactly?" their ersatz chance at winning the lottery.

They are coming back for the winter, next week...

Over the years, I have done some work on contingency for startups and small businesses. It went something like this. One was a very promising idea I spent a few days helping a friend on. It imploded because their potential business partner, a very well known guy, was afraid that somehow he wouldn't get a big enough share of the profit. Yes, he believed there would be big profits. Rather than taking a guaranteed x% of revenues on something which likely would have done very well, he took 100% of nothing.

A second client has made it to round five of funding, and is pretty close to a profitable buyout or IPO. Well, that is if the market doesn't tank and scare everyone again. That risk tolerance and entrepreneurial desire is taking hold again. I have an equity share.

I did some contingency work for a law firm (forensic accounting and calculations). Ended up paying off well.

I did contingency work with a large well known firm. They made money, liked it, hired me. Less than two years later, I was laid off after a merger.

@ some investor guy (profile) wrote on Tue, 10/6/2009 - 5:40 pm
After 15 yrs consulting with about 18 early stage software startups I can attest that its a numbers game that you try and play smart and fast analogous to today's VC mentality of placing smaller bets in 'let a thousand flowers bloom' investment strategy.

Blackhalo wrote:

" It is amazing, how fast, bringing in this type of talent, sinks a growing business. Once you let one in, they tend to fill all avalible positions with similar, dead weight, and begin to impose a regimen of rewarding ass kissing, over exceptionalism. "

Google around a bit and find Philip Greenspun's story about what happened to him when he tried to grow his software business. It is a bit of work to find the story but the internet saves everything.

km4: "gross generalization"

I'm interested in your argument -- care to elaborate? I've made mine.

josap,

I use property managers for my stuff. When you grew did you pay your employees on a commission bases or by the hour?

I've now enabled the new Hoocoodanode theme ('Hoocooblue') for browsers that have demonstrated their ability to present it well. The system should automatically switch to the appropriate theme without any intervention on your part. Browsers currently supported are Firefox 3.5+, IE 7+, Safari 4+, Chrome 3+, and Opera 9.5+.

I have also added the ability to specify which theme you want to use for a given browser session. If you prefer the old theme ('Legacy or Mobile'), or would like to try out the new theme on a browser not listed above, select the one you want under Change Theme. Note that this change will not be remembered if you go to a different browser. If you find a browser (or browser version) not on the list above works well for you, please let me know, and I'll add it to the supported list. Also, if you prefer the old theme, please let me know why - ultimately I'd like to phase it out.

As this is the first time we've worked with theme switching, there may be initial hiccups. Please let me know if you experience any problems.

@ DCRogers (profile) wrote (in reply to...) on Tue, 10/6/2009 - 5:48 pm
km4: "gross generalization"
I'm interested in your argument -- care to elaborate? I've made mine.

No argument because I generally agree what you stated so will expound on what I meant by "gross generalization" which in hindsight may be a poor choice of words.

The key individuals associated with a startup — Board and management alike — are better advised to concentrate on business model, strategy, execution and maintaining focus. When problems arise, look to problem identification and problem-solving approaches before copping out with 'pretender executive talent' answers.

Efforts should be focused; business models should be clear; execution should be emphasized; resources should be zealously protected and stewarded; questions should be constantly asked; and team efforts and building should be fostered. Patience is not a four-letter word, especially if progress is steady and being accomplished in a cost-effective manner.

Nurture and training of initial founders and staff is important. Financing would not have been initially achieved without some belief in these individuals. Not now actually performing to plan is, in fact, an expected outcome.

Nurture and training of initial founders and staff is important. Financing would not have been initially achieved without some belief in these individuals.

Excellent km

328 guests online with only 38 users? Is it a slow Tuesday night?

Thanks for the theme, Ken. Looks good, doesn't distract - very nice.

"Looking ahead, it's not clear whether small businesses will continue to play their traditional role in hiring staff and helping to fuel an employment recovery."

I read this as academic speak for "Listen up people, small businesses are frickin' toast, and so is any employment recovery"

Nearly all creators of Utopia have resembled the man who has toothache, and therefore thinks happiness consists in not having toothache. They wanted to produce a perfect society by an endless continuation of something that had only been valuable because it was temporary. The wider course would be to say that there are certain lines along which humanity must move, the grand strategy is mapped out, but detailed prophecy is not our business. Whoever tries to imagine perfection simply reveals his own emptiness.-- Eric Blair

Dr N wrote:

I read this as academic speak for "Listen up people, small businesses are frickin' toast, and so is any employment recovery"

I read it the exact same way, except without the word 'employment'.

testing again,

seems fine now.

.......I have started up about a dozen businesses. Most of them, with exception of the last one, I sold after 2-3 years. The fun was in the initial start-up with a new business concept. IMHO, SMALL business in THIS go-around has finally thrown in the towel. As time progressed (from the '70s until late 90's) I was spending increasing amounts of time jumping through regulatory hoops than keeping the customer satisfied. Add employees and their increasing workplace costs over the years and profit margins decreased to nothing.

I'd guess after many 80-100 hour work-weeks and the increase in overhead costs, paperwork requirements, and governmental red-tape & hassle many have finally just said "Fu**-it", I'm done, I'm not giving it away anymore".

It won't let me scroll unless I use the sidebar...grrrrrr.

Kcoop,

A suggestion on the best way to support IE and safari:

if(useragent("MSIE") != FALSE) {
echo "Please Install Firefox";
sleep 100;
}
elseif(useragent("Safari") != FALSE) {
echo "Please Install Firefox";
sleep 100;
}

jd
just google business,city, state havent used yellow pages in a long while

yes, Noob, that is a better reading.

It works in legacy/mobile mode for me so that'll work.

Comrade Kristina wrote:

It won't let me scroll unless I use the sidebar...grrrrrr

What browser/OS versions are you using?

One of the most rewarding things about running a small business, is you are the boss.

But when push>meets<shove, a lease is like a ball & chain~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

Dr N wrote:

yes, Noob, that is a better reading.

Well, I'll grant them that it's a tough line to walk. You just can't run around screaming 'oh my god we're all going to die' when you're a PhD economist working for the fed. But that's about as close as you can get while still maintaining the facade of neutrality.

FWIW's ken my actual scroll thingy is broken, I click the center button and just slide the mouse up and down to scroll. It is working fine in the legacy mode.

Comrade Kristina wrote:

Firefox, the latest one.

And it won't scroll? Do you mean with the keyboard? If so, can you try switching back, clicking in the text somewhere, and then trying it?

The *nix gods will punish you for treating MSIE and Safari equally. Steel Toed Bunny Slipper

Thanks for your reply -- all of your points are true, but do not address my point -- that if executive pay is a greater share of startup resources, it squeezes out other productive activities, and we've reached the point where expectations are so high that many startups are 'priced out'. (For example, we've looked at buying at number of small firms, and one of the warning flags is the percentage still held by the founders and workers -- if it is very small, that's a company drowning -- and executive pay is often one of the largest expenses.)

I should mention that the well-intentioned, but ill-advised, changes to the tax laws that altered how stock options are accounted for on the books of companies has had a big effect here -- it has really killed off the use of options to attract and keep people, esp. middle-tier professionals. RSAs (restricted stock) makes more accounting sense, but the numbers never impress as much. So cash became more important, sadly -- I preferred for them to sit with me in the stock option pool. Oh well.

Hey Coop,

Need any new icons?

Comrade Kristina wrote:

I click the center button and just slide the mouse up and down to scroll

I just tried this here in Firefox. You're right! Wierd. I'll see if there are any workarounds.

The point is that we are all capable of believing things which we know to be untrue, and then, when we are finally proved wrong, impudently twisting the facts so as to show that we were right. Intellectually, it is possible to carry on this process for an indefinite time: the only check on it is that sooner or later a false belief bumps up against solid reality, usually on a battlefield.-- Eric Blair

Ben,

Depended on the position. Supervisors were given a number of properties and paid a % of gross. Bookkeeping, recep, onsite managers salary, maint hourly. I paid well and the hours were pretty loose, always wanted the mom to be home with her twins if there was no school.

Juvenal Delinquent wrote:

Intellectually, it is possible to carry on this process for an indefinite time: the only check on it is that sooner or later a false belief bumps up against solid reality, usually on a battlefield.-- Eric Blair

I take it Mr. Blair wasn't married.

Anyone post this from naked capitalism on Latvia?
Tuesday, October 6, 2009
Sweden prepares for financial collapse in Latvia and major bank losses at home

Submitted by Edward Harrison of Credit Writedowns

The following is my translation of a much-discussed article that appeared in Swedish daily Svenska Dagbladet at the weekend. This information was being withheld from the public and leaked at an inopportune moment.

Note that the Swedish government has secretly been preparing the banks for financial Armageddon, encouraging Swedbank into a rights issue which arguably was conducted under fraudulent pretenses – very reminiscent of Bank of America’s shareholder vote for the merger with Merrill Lynch. In August, I asked “Why is Swedbank doing a second rights issue?.” Now we know.

Sweden prepares for financial collapse in Latvia and major bank losses at home « naked capitalism

Doc Holiday wrote:

Need any new icons?

What did you have in mind?

Gotta run right now, but I'll check in again later for problems.

I just got my Adobe CS4 package and used to enjoy making stuff... I'll be in touch

noob goldberg wrote:

I take it Mr. Blair wasn't married.

==George Orwell

I too am having trouble scrolling, but only with the up/down arrows on keyboard. Mouse wheel works fine, Page Up/Down works fine. Safari 4.0.3 on OS X.

Ken, it will work that way in legacy though so it's cool with me. I did like the new style though, I really need to buy a new mouse so I can use the regular scroll wheel...I like to procrastinate though.

if executive pay is a greater share of startup resources, it squeezes out other productive activities, and we've reached the point where expectations are so high that many startups are 'priced out'. (For example, we've looked at buying at number of small firms, and one of the warning flags is the percentage still held by the founders and workers -- if it is very small, that's a company drowning -- and executive pay is often one of the largest expenses.)

That is all true - but I've seen the opposite as well. Companies where the 'content' talent was very strong but they didn't have basic business support talent [read that as sales & marketing, accounting, 'systems' & logistics - the boring stuff] to enable the content talent to excel. And they refused or couldn't pay for it either. Result was they never 'broke out'. A number of them missed their window of opportunity and eventually failed.

It is really a difficult dilemma - and I don't think there is a one-size fits all solution.

Just a heads up. Ken has a thread up for discussing th new controls.

Jestures in the Mac firefox work for scrolling.

It's hard to beat the dollar menu on price,

Everything I eat in McD is on the dollar menu.

And I never spend more than two dollars.

I screw them every time.

When I have hired people there is one rule to stick to. What do they do better than I do? That is what they will bring to the firm and what I will happily pay for.

rich wrote:

Everything I eat in McD is on the dollar menu.
And I never spend more than two dollars.
I screw them every time.

They make it up in cardiologist kickbacks.

josap,

Just wondered, I figured it would be all commission as income generally comes in on that bases. Just for your info I pay 10% collected rent and 1/2 months rent for the first signed lease and the credit report. I have a real good manager and feel the cost is mostly recovered in increased rent then I would get on my own.

dryfly wrote:

Companies where the 'content' talent was very strong but they didn't have basic business support talent [read that as sales & marketing, accounting, 'systems' & logistics - the boring stuff] to enable the content talent to excel. And they refused or couldn't pay for it either. Result was they never 'broke out'. A number of them missed their window of opportunity and eventually failed.

I came in and helped clean up after one of those, but only to the extent that the proprietor got to keep their house and walk away with the shirt on their backs. It was a pure shame; they had a bead on an incredible opportunity, but the management execution was atrocious. My wife and I were called so late that it was basically a few weeks of evenings going through years of old receipts and invoices to balance everything out. By the time we were done--and given the state of the 'partnership' they were wrapped up in--the best we could do is advise them on how to wrap things up in an orderly fashion.

josap wrote:

When I have hired people there is one rule to stick to. What do they do better than I do? That is what they will bring to the firm and what I will happily pay for.

In my particular case -- it wouldn't be difficult to find 'talent' better than I am in most disciplines.

It's not just small businesses that get looted by management. My husband works for a fairly large manufacturing firm. They recently brought in a new top-level executive (from a very well-known firm), and he promptly set about pushing out the existing management to replace with his cronies (some grotesquely unqualified). Sales are very down (an industry issue, primarily) and the solution is to fire actual workers - and create new management positions for more cronies. They do waive the hiring freeze for real workers if somebody who knows new management needs a job (they're usually unqualified too.) Since it's an American firm, where anybody remotely competent gets a "management" position, shoving out the lower-level managers has left the company bereft of critical skills, and there are now existing orders they can't complete because all the people with requisite skills are gone. Management seems uninterested in fixing the problems and is mostly just collecting data on the oncoming catastrophes to (the employees presume) justify closing down all operations in the States.

My husband has not been sleeping well lately.

energyecon
Pressure on Latvia Builds - WSJ.com
STOCKHOLM -- Pressure is mounting on crisis-stricken Latvia after Sweden's finance minister said Tuesday he wanted to "send a clear signal" that the Baltic state won't get additional rescue-loan payments unless government spending is slashed further.
Continuing his recent stern rhetoric, Swedish Finance Minister Anders Borg told reporters in Stockholm that many have worked hard to help Latvia deal with its severe economic recession but that patience is wearing thin.
The country this year has needed to renegotiate its €7.5 billion ($10.99 billion) emergency-loan package, set up late last year with the International Monetary Fund, the European Union, Nordic countries and other bilateral lenders as Latvia tipped ito economic crisis.
"It would be very, very difficult to once again convince the world to provide the loan if Latvia doesn't fulfill the requirements," Mr. Borg said.
...
Also Tuesday, Fitch Ratings said Latvian failure to implement budget cuts and remain on track with its emergency loan program could lead to a downgrade. The company reiterated its double-B-plus, or junk status, rating on Latvia and kept its rating outlook at negative.
In Latvia, the government said Tuesday that it needs to delay submitting its 2010 budget proposal to parliament by nearly a week to Oct. 28.
Also, in a sign of the economic condition in the country, Latvian Prime Minister Valdis Dombrovskis asked his legal team to look into potential legislation that would limit mortgage borrowers' liability to the value of the collateral, not to the size of the loan, the prime minister's office said Tuesday.
The steps, which are only "an idea at this point" are needed to help borrowers who are finding it difficult to service their loans, said Liga Krapane, a spokeswoman for the prime minister.
While the legislation may take months to implement, analysts at Danske Bank were quick to voice concern over the potential changes in laws, which they called "draconian."
"This will, for all practical reasons, be a nonrecourse model, where mortgage borrowers can hand in the keys to the bank, and not be liable for anything," the Danske Bank analysts wrote in a research note.
They said the regulations would put banks in Latvia, which are mostly subsidiaries of Nordic banks, "in a very bad position" and would make currency devaluation less of a problem for Latvian citizens by reducing the devaluation effects.

josap wrote:

When I have hired people there is one rule to stick to. What do they do better than I do? That is what they will bring to the firm and what I will happily pay for.

What about "what can they do that I won't have to do anymore?" Even if you're better at it, Ricardo would say you should pay attention to comparative advantages.

That entirely depends on the business you are in. When I used to manage my ex bf's business I hired them in the hopes they would actually show up 75% of the time and stay sober through their entire shift.

Fair Economist - I see those situations a lot. Frequently w/ companies owned by 'private equity'... they really ought to be called 'pirate equity' the way they loot once well run firms.

And they are almost always US based. We haz met the enemy and he iz us.

With the uncertainties around DC why would any small business hire people? To pay for their health care. To pay new taxes? Too many uncertainties. Why hire?

Caraway cheese is traditionally served on the Latvian festival Jāņi.

Lots of small service business will fall off the radar as the expense of an office and location can be absorbed into homes. Cell phones etc. Many will fall of the radar with licenses and taxation. Survival mode and to dam much government intervention. Many have learned lots about laws from Banksters and illegals. The rules have changed.

Ben. a good manager will get you market rent. However you will get a better, longer term tenant and the property will be well maintained. We charge the client a flat fee and flat rate lease up comm.

It has been difficult trying to explain to clients that market rent is down and may go down further in the Phx Metro area. Not good for anyone, except the tenants.

Comrade Kristina wrote:

That entirely depends on the business you are in. When I used to manage my ex bf's business I hired them in the hopes they would actually show up 75% of the time and stay sober through their entire shift.

School bus company?

Lobbyist Ben Dover wrote:

Lots of small service business will fall off the radar as the expense of an office and location can be absorbed into homes.

My office is where my laptop & cellphone is - been that way for almost ten years now.

Imagine our all-too real version of Monopoly ending, because of Baltic Avenue loans?

Juvenal Delinquent wrote:

Imagine our all-too real version of Monopoly ending, because of Baltic Avenue loans?

The bank cannot run out of money in Monopoly, or turns out, in real life.

The game might end, but the bank will still have plenty of funny money on hand.

JD - LOL!

Also notice the great temptation to stick it to foreign lenders when the local pain becomes too unbearable. Sign of things to come to another debt-ridden country, on the other side of the Atlantic?

KC,

I bet you don't miss the Adult Day Care business any more. The collect call on Monday mornings from the city jail. I never excepted any.

test,

my last comment froze the site up for me.

Great link. Thanks...

"n secret talks with Swedish banks, Anders Borg explained the growing pressure that exists within the International Monetary Fund (IMF) to force Latvia into a devaluation.

A collapse in Latvia would have serious implications for several major Swedish banks. With a devaluation the already high loan losses would explode overnight, especially because many Latvians have loans in euro, which would become significantly more expensive."

IMF to force a devaluation? Because the Latvians refuse to cut their govt budget further. If they cut the govt budget further, the citizens revolt because that's the only thing holding their economy together.

Double Bottom Breakdown on Null
get ready folks wild ride coming up.

Cross currency war is gonna blast a hole in the Euro so hard, I might go to Italy next year, Turkey will be even cheaper.

rosethorn wrote:

IMF to force a devaluation? Because the Latvians refuse to cut their govt budget further. If they cut the govt budget further, the citizens revolt because that's the only thing holding their economy together.

Butterfly effect? Unpredictable outcomes...

Rob Dawg wrote:

Just a heads up. Ken has a thread up for discussing th new controls.

Yes, forgot to mention this, thanks Rob Dawg. In general, I'm going to be creating posts for system related things, and pointing to them, to reduce the clutter here. Better to comment directly on them. You can find them by clicking on the Home link, or the "Hoocoodanode?" banner.

Moody’s: Iceland, Latvia and Hungary in “fragile stabilization” - Credit Writedowns

The ratings of these countries still carry negative outlooks, signaling the possibility of further downgrades in the next 12 to 18 months.

Sorry for disrupting, just got home from work and hadn't checked all threads first. It's about time to get pigged anyway...

josap wrote:

my last comment froze the site up for me.

Browser/OS version?

testing again.

thread for comments regarding theme change, no access under recent posts.

Cross currency war is gonna blast a hole in the Euro so hard, I might go to Italy next year, Turkey will be even cheaper.

Are you suggesting Euro will lose to USD?
Because the US will be in a better shape than the EU?
Just curious about the thinking behind (no snark intended)

rosethorn wrote:

IMF to force a devaluation? Because the Latvians refuse to cut their govt budget further. If they cut the govt budget further, the citizens revolt because that's the only thing holding their economy together.

We are talking Latavia. Right? Right? [crickets]

Latvia has been hoping to hold out with it's euro peg until 2011(?). Then they are admitted to the eurozone. If IMF pulls the plug, that throws the whole Baltic accession to the EU into limbo. The Latvians will be mighty ticked at their prospective Euro buddies, if the IMF goes ahead.

Dryfly, I'm not sure whether it's good not to be alone or bad to know lots of other people are going through the same things.

Anybody remember the grief I got for speculating that the Germans would fracture the EU because they couldn't carry the load without breaking their own back?

bANK fAILURE wrote:

thread for comments regarding theme change, no access under recent posts.

Ah. Those have been just CR posts. Suppose I could add mine in...

Swedbank was the short last year. you're out of that trade already.

the Euro top vs US dollar is in.
Spanish banks are the short, and Turkey to Finland are scrambling, I like the pound here too. It comes down to a Sovereign issue. The Euro trash girls blow the gold bubble, not the American J6P. Gold Rallies while the USD rallies against the Euro.

mytoocents

edits working fine. with non reply too.

MrM wrote:

Just curious about the thinking behind (no snark intended)

I do'nt know about bANK fAILURE, but my thinking is that the USD pessimism is a little overdone for the moment.

Rob Dawg wrote:

Anybody remember the grief I got for speculating that the Germans would fracture the EU because they couldn't carry the load without breaking their own back?

You actually said that? You are Dead to me. Dead.

The "Real" Economy Is Dying Q4 "Going to Be a Bloodbath" Whalen Says: Tech Ticker, Yahoo! Finance

"Why is liquidity going into the financial sector? It's because the real economy is dying [and] everyone is fleeing into the stocks and bonds because they're liquid at the moment," Whalen says. "That's not a good sign."

Services sector index signals expansion -- DailyFinance
Accommodation and food services sector: "Lack of capital available for new project development."

Fewer Lativian food chains! Dooooooooooooooom!!!

my thinking is that the USD pessimism is a little overdone for the moment.

USD pessimism (not a crash but a relative devaluation) = US economic recovery

Got to pick your poison

noob goldberg wrote:

You actually said that? You are Dead to me. Dead.

The EU is a pack of sheep and a wolf voting to go vegetarian. Everybody wins right? Right? [crickets]

Doc Holiday wrote:

Accommodation and food services sector: "Lack of capital available for new project development."

HAHAHAHA!

Oh lord that was lovely.

A hearty belly-laugh was just what the doctor ordered.

Does anyone else have the "cut down 3 lbs of your belly fat" thing?

Out here the usual routine in the 1980s was to have a startup run on a shoe string. Once they got it up and running, they would hire a few gold plated resumes to do the road show and take it public.

The resumes got most of the stock options and the worker bees who had actually built the business got bupkiss. The worker bees had been naive and believed the lies that they were told about loyalty and being taken care of, instead of getting iron clad employment contracts. Their kids are much more savvy and hard nosed, after watching their parents and friends' parents business careers.

Doc Holiday wrote:

Does anyone else have the "cut down 3 lbs of your belly fat" thing?

No my ad is for a 12 step program for recovering BBAD's. Acceptance to the program is based on an interview with some wild Indian trannies that check to see if you are long treasuries.

noob goldberg wrote:

I do'nt know about bANK fAILURE, but my thinking is that the USD pessimism is a little overdone for the moment.

Noob - it isn't pessimism its numbers - monetized numbers. Only way EU explodes vis-a-vis USD is a political breakdown. Dollar is a Fed-Gone-Wild breakdown...

Rob Dawg wrote:

The EU is a pack of sheep and a wolf voting to go vegetarian. Everybody wins right? Right? [crickets]

How do you say "MMMMmmmm leg of lamb!" in German?

MrM wrote:

USD pessimism (not a crash but a relative devaluation) = US economic recovery

In a smaller economy, I'd agree with that. Seeing as the USD is the international reserve currency and there is no other economy on earth who can absorb American manufacturing output for an extended period, I think any policy banking on a devalued USD to spur recovery is doomed to failure.

They make it up in cardiologist kickbacks.

Everything I eat in McD is on the dollar menu.
And I never spend more than two dollars.

They make it up in cardiologist kickbacks.

I figure, how many calories and how much fat can you get for $2?

That's one reason I eat on the dollar menu. It's a kind of diet.

Sometimes, I spend my $2 on the children's menu instead. That's when you get into more dangerous territory.

Is there an edit button so I can fix my typos or has it gone bye-bye?

It's there.

Thank you, kcoop.

Re: "... interview with some wild Indian trannies that check to see if you are long treasuries."

That's sorta why I asked, so thanks for the heads up!

Fubar, I still have an edit button on my posts.

dryfly wrote:

Noob - it isn't pessimism its numbers - monetized numbers. Only way EU explodes vis-a-vis USD is a political breakdown. Dollar is a Fed-Gone-Wild breakdown...

I'm playing devils advocate here, dryfly, and if anything it would be a short-lived rally. But there's an awful lot of leverage pushing down on the USD right now, and if some sort of black swan spooks the skittish shorts who knows where it could end.

I don't disagree with the analysis; I'm just injecting some irrationality.

Comrade Kristina wrote:

Fubar, I still have an edit button on my posts.

Not anymore.

As soon as someone responds to your post, you can't edit any longer.

any policy banking on a devalued USD to spur recovery is doomed to failure.

Is there any policy to spur a recovery in the US that does not involve a devalued USD?
Not that any such policy will succeed, but one of such policies will almost certainly be tried

edit access exists unless a human has read your comment, and replied to it.

MrM wrote:

Is there any policy to spur a recovery in the US that does not involve a devalued USD?
Not that any such policy will succeed, but one of such policies will almost certainly be tried

You and I are in perfect agreement.

Wealth management due for $10 trillion shift: BlackRock exec
| Reuters

Baby boomers will move the industry's main client goal from one from accumulation -- investing in assets that create the most value over time -- to one of "decumulation," said Frank Porcelli, who heads U.S. retail for BlackRock, at the Reuters Global Wealth Management Summit in Boston. Dooooooooooooooom!!!

I'll be back....

noob goldberg wrote:

In a smaller economy, I'd agree with that. Seeing as the USD is the international reserve currency and there is no other economy on earth who can absorb American manufacturing output for an extended period, I think any policy banking on a devalued USD to spur recovery is doomed to failure.

So you Canadians like working for FREE too then do ya? Just like the Chinese. Cause as long as we run huge CADs we are in effect giving you empty promises for the wood you cut and all that nice taiga covered oil sand you are digging up to process & send to us as 'oil'.

And if we are to put an end to you all working for nuttin' it means ending the US current accounts deficits and the only way that happens is via 'devaluation'.

We in the US can't make that call - you [rest of the world] are the ones who will end it or continue to be our dollar slaves. Buy our dodgy assets and be happy about it - then send us stuff.

A bit harsh but that's really where its at. It blows my mind that people outside the US don't get it - might as well just send the stuff straight to me - I'll scribble some IOUs and send them right back.

dryfly wrote:

And if we are to put an end to you all working for nuttin' it means ending the US current accounts deficits and the only way that happens is via 'devaluation'.

Dryfly, the rest of the world has to stop treating the USA as its dump for final good production. A reduction in the account deficit is absolutely imperative. The only thing I'm saying is that simply devaluing the USD will not accomplish some export-led recovery from this malaise because there is no other 'USA consumer economy' out there to leach onto.

A policy of a USD devaluation will spread pain everywhere to every economy because we'll all have to devalue together, intentionally or unintentionally, because the first one to stand up to that kind of pressure will become an export target.

EDIT: I doing what every citizen of the developed world should be doing, which is not underestimating the ability of the American manufacturing sector to recover in an extremely short amount of time given appropriate stimulation. You guys will swamp the world before we can even react, and I'm just trying to think my way through it and understand the path forward, dryfly.

why is there a little pink pig at the bottom right in front of #of comments and to the left of the discard button?
how long has it been there?

gabyjan wrote:

why is there a little pink pig at the bottom right in front of #of comments and to the left of the discard button?
how long has it been there?

It shows up when the thread has been 'pigged'. So it's been there for not quite an hour...

noob goldberg
thank you i just notice it.

If I were going to interpret this, I would say that the Fed is ass covering here. Banks are slow to recognize losses at the direction and encouragement of the Fed and Treasury.

Login or register to post comments
Syndicate content