There is nothing ruthless about it. Two of my daughter's store credit card accounts were automatically transferred to electronic billing to an e-mail account she no longer used. By the time she was notified in writing, hundreds of dollars of penalty fees, interest and late payment assessments were added. She finally settled to not totally destroy her credit rating.
Personally I think these bank bastards should be put in jail. They are thieves.
And why are transaction costs for retailers still so high with all the innovation and advances in technology?
If you limit the credit card industry ability to price for risk (as per recently approved laws), you should expect that somebody else will end up paying more. So I would not expect lower credit card fees for retailers in the future.
c.1327, from reuthe "pity, compassion" (c.1175), formed from reuwen "to rue" (see rue (v.)) on the model of true/truth, etc. Ruthful (c.1225) has fallen from use since late 17c. except as a deliberate archaism.
There is no portion of the world economy that is more deserving of being brought down than the credit card business.
Ruthless default may be the preferred route instead of trying to regulate their greed and arbitrary behavior.
I know the rules with mortgage debt: It's either officially non-recourse, depending on the state and the state's rules for purchase money/refi/HELOC debt, or it's unofficially non-recourse, with just a few token cases of people being pursued all the way to substantial actual recovery for recourse debt. And short sales are loan mods are the new way out.
What are the rules for CC debt?
Is bankruptcy really the only way out? Or are CC companies doing mods? Writing down balances? Failing to pursue all other assets/ garnish wages?
Al-Braikan, Sued by U.S. SEC Over Textron Bid, Found Dead in Likely Suicide
(A51) "Hazem Al-Braikan, who was sued last week by the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission over bogus tender offers for Harman International Industries Inc. and Textron Inc., has been found shot dead with 43-bullet and stab wounds to his upper back and extremities, a security official at the Kuwaiti Interior Ministry said. "Al-Braikan probably committed suicide", said the official, who declined to be identified because the investigation is still ongoing."
Black Star Ranch, in case of what? I try to post articles of interest - and usually between other activities on the weekends.
Rob Dawg, ahhh ... what is the difference in fees charged for retailers between debit and credit cards?
Plantagenet, all the financial incentives are to keep the consumers uninformed, and the barriers to entry are massive (so there is no competition to bring down fees).
In this context, isn't it obvious that "Chicken Little" represents the sane vision and
that Homo Sapiens' motto, "Let's go shopping!" is the cry of the true lunatic?
- Dr. Peters, 12 Monkeys
If the credit card companies really wanted their money back, they'd enter agreements with customers to halt new credit, reduce interest to 7% on existing balances, and eliminate all penalties (and interest thereon) from the balance.
Instead they spend money on lawyers to fight to keep the debt intact even through a bankruptcy.
CC companies do have assistance programs for customers who are falling behind, which include lower APR and lower min due. Specifics of these programs vary greatly across CC companies.
The way CC debt is handled in BK depends on the type of BK:
- Ch7: It is essentially written off, very little recovered if anything
- Ch11: It is restructured along with other unsecured debt and paid over some time after the BK based on the program approved by the BK judge, the recovery rate could be 5-10%
"And why are transaction costs for retailers still so high with all the innovation and advances in technology?"
Did Congress pass a law saying that retailers can't charge extra for purchases paid by credit card versus cash? If they could (and did) charge the credit card transaction fees, that would apply pressure to bring the fees down and allow prices for cash purchases to come down. It would also reduce credit spending in aggregate, bringing more financial responsibility to the average consumer.
Marketing spawned our Culture of Denial. Marketing by definition is manipulation. All media is marketing and media is omnipresent. Our system is all manipulation. A system that enshrines the trick and rewards the shiftless manifests passive aggression. It has become a nasty part of the US personality type. People here fuck eachother over silently while they get smoothly fucked over in every corporate and government interaction.
Since a major personality trait of the US consumer citizen is passive aggressive, any possible Mass Reaction to the collapse will likely display passive aggressive characteristics. These include passive resistance to demands for acceptable fulfillment of social and occupational obligations, obstruction of other's efforts, deliberately inferior effort, and evasion and abdication of accountability and personal responsibility.
Passive aggression is seen in boycotts, road rage, banks refusing to lend, investors on strike, ruthless defaults, and multitudinous other silent fakes, quiet refusals, and lies of omission played to game the trick system. A pervasive "no snitches" attitude would be another example.
Americans are trained that the only way they can affect their universe is by altering their purchasing habits. Owners of corporations are trained that they can abandon their responsibilities with no liability by going bankrupt. Consumers will be acting like corporations with regards to their financial responsibilities. The corporations are the Gods of the consumers. Consumers will emulate their Gods.
Mass Choice can be exercised to NOT do something like pay your debts, resulting in widespread default and dead banks, or not pay taxes, resulting in dead governments. The possibility exists for the end of modern ponzi finance from fiscal discipline being forced on the banks in a widespread "democratic default" or modern equivalent "tea party" whereby the masses throw off their corporate colonists and cast their debts and other obligations into the sea in such numbers that it ruptures society.
Now that defaulting on your mortgage has become an accepted business decision on the part of homeowners, defaulting on unsecured debt like credit cards was just a story waiting to happen. Capital One be scared, be very very scared.
We're talking ruthless default in a climate of over 10% UE, along with the inability of homeowners to tap their equity to supplement their personal spending? Credit card lines being cancelled, interest rates jacked up, limits lowered, minimum payments raised?
This does not spell ruthless default to me. This spells desperation.
The reason so many consumers are defaulting on their cards is because they have no other place to go. Their cost of living has exceeded their incomes for a long time now.
Look at the median income - $50-60K. Look at the median home price. Look at the cost of health insurance/health care costs. Look at taxes of all shapes and sizes.
I hear about ruthless default, but I've never met a person who just decided out of the blue they didn't feel like paying their bills anymore. Just like I hear about ruthless default on mortgages, but every single news story I see consists of homeowners in tears practically clinging to their doorposts as the sheriff drags them out - figuratively, of course. Edit: Barring, of course, fraudsters and scamsters.
Ruthless talk is all about setting the scene so that the victim lenders can tighten the noose on those hedonistic borrowers.
But some words are really tricky to translate into Chinese. Such as:
Sophisticated
Ironic
Ruthless
Not kidding, if anyone can define what ruthless means in this context (some debtors bailing), then at least I can try to explain what's going on to my wife!
I doubt we'll see real change, though. More credit allows more purchases, allowing more profit for retailers, banks, and CC companies. Against those concentrated interests with powerful lobbies, you have the interests of the cash-paying consumers. I suspect I know how this will turn out. But discussing the law change is a great way for Congress to collect more campaign contributions. I often think that Congress operates like a fishing boat with nets, putting out proposed legislation that would excite powerful and wealthy lobbies, and considering it for long enough to extract a lot of contrubutions. When one topic is fished out, they move on. It almost doesn't matter what the outcome is, as long as they get the maximum yield in contributions to the members and their campaigns and friends and interests.
otishertz - yes, the corporations are the gods who rule our destinies and determine our collective fortune, as well as our standards of living. They are even immortal persons granted fully human status under the law. More human than human. The technical esoteric term more appropriate, however, at least in my opinion, is egregore.
"Did Congress pass a law saying that retailers can't charge extra for purchases paid by credit card versus cash?
Do you also advocate Congress telling oil companies how much they can charge to refiners or telling airlines which fees they can/can't charge?"
Did I say that I advocate Congress legislating to tell retailers that they can't charge extra for purchases paid by credit card versus cash? It must have been a while ago, and in a galaxy far, far, away...
Bring back debtors prison and we'll see how willing people are to ring up that cc debt. I'm sorry but I have no sympathy for anyone in credit card debt.
The current US situation is not unique to history. We are a dead empire. The twist was that our empire was corporate colonialism instead of the sovereign colonialism of history. Globalism and free trade were the cover story for corporate colonialism. Credit vending corporate colonialists are now overextended and trying to extract all they can from their colonies. The colonized are rejecting the colonists because they are already full up on credit.
How long before consumers refuse to play by rules they can see no longer exist all the way to the highest levels of government? Bankers steal, they gamble, they pay bonuses today with money borrowed against future tax dollars of unborn grandchildren. They renege on their debts and bad bets with impunity. Total Ethical Failure of US financial institutions and regulators should be expected to produce blowback. The average TV viewer is slowly beginning to conceive that bankers have captured the government. I have heard people in bars say the way to save their government from the bankers is to not pay the bankers.
I don't advocate defaulting on debts. I'm saying it is already happening and widespread debt dumping rooted in insolvency can catalyze with political dissent and distaste for corporate looting into a neutron bomb that obliterates the economy.
At some point as the current path of widespread insolvency continues the adult population will look around and see that almost everyone they know has ruined credit. Defaults then explode as people decide it is futile to pay back debts when nobody else does, or can.
A tipping point or critical mass of widespread insolvency where a sufficient percentage of credit cards and mortgages default is approaching. Once breached it could exponentially exacerbate in a societally shared realization that refusal to cooperate with the confidence game ends the confidence game.
The debts of the US and it's citizens are not serviceable at current low wage and diminishing asset price levels. Contracting local, national, and global economies compound the problem. What happens when people can't play the game anymore? How long before there are so many losers in the game that even those who still have the means to continue gambling in the ponziconomy refuse to play?
There is possibility of change coming from other places than the government if millions of Americans participate in the change by doing nothing.
The systems that support us all are all dependent on confidence.
Why not walk away from CC debt. What are they going to do cut you off? they probably did that all ready. Quit paying your mortgage another bonus free rent for how long 6 months a year + pay the bookie and car payment they will take your car or worse. We have raised a spend and charge all you can with zero responsibility to anyone. Just hand the bill to the chosen ones who pay taxes. Everyone else it's a free ride!
MrM, I do think that it would be a good idea for Congress to intervene in the retailer-CC relationship. CC companies exercise an oligopoly that can be abused. Making it difficult for retailers to charge extra for CC purchases versus cash if they want to use CC companies seems to me like an abuse of the oligopoly power.
CR: "Why aren't consumers being educated on the dangers of not paying off their credit card balance each month?"
Because that's not in credit card issuers interest.
Another question is why do credit card companies market to naive college students who have no employment, unless their purpose is to create a set of chronic debtors?
It bothers me that people can get away with defaulting on their obligations, but credit card companies and their clear intent of creating a population of debt slaves bothers me a hell of a lot more.
CR wrote: Rob Dawg, ahhh ... what is the difference in fees charged for retailers between debit and credit cards?
As an ex-processer ISO, certified with visanet (huge cost, lots of bullshit) I can tell you visa charges a base rate to the acquiring member bank, and the bank adds on whatever the market will bear. Visa's base used to be about 1.72% at the low end plus a network charge of .35 per transaction . Acquiring bank usually adds on a point or more, plus they might up the network transaction fee. Its pretty competative in my opinion, provided you are in the G7 economy. Outside of G7, prices may vary. And since russians don't use credit cards, we can ignore that market.
Have had one card canceled and had two others have their limits decreased. And I pay my bills on time and have NEVER been late. If I were to lose my job, I would have no qualms whatsoever about not paying my CC bills. The brother-in-law has gone BK TWICE in the last ten years and STILL drives around in a nice newer (financed) car and has a nice place to live. I'm SERIOUSLY contemplating defaulting even if I don't lose my job.
I agree with Outsider. It also seems to me that CC companies wrongly thought that tightening the bankruptcy laws would protect their usurious lending practices. Very bad bet. Most of the hucksters involved in the housing bubble got to keep their ill gotten gains and some got bailed out by the government, while the borrowers got very little help. Maybe the treasury will bail the "victims" of the "ruthless defaulters". 'Hope not. 'Seems like its pay back time. Forget the pitchforks, just don't pay.
JimPortlandOR - I am actually watching 12 Monkeys as I sit with a netbook in my lap, and heard the fortuitous bit of dialog by happenstance. Funny how that works sometimes!
BTW CR, on debit trans, I get a deal from my bank where i pay $12.50 a month for something like 25 transactions, (so 50 cents per trans) i think their unlimited package is 19.00, and there is no fee, if i simply do an interact cash withdrawl at their ATMBut then I am Canadian, and we use the debit card in place of the credit card as a matter of course. But since i am lazy and half stupid, I continue to swipe the debit card at retailers about 30 times a month (at least). I use the credit card about 3 times a month (automated payments), and always keep a zero balance, month end. But that's just me.
You borrowed it; you should repay it.
Well, they are unsecured loans, and it is a bet on both parties part.
I think it is up for examination-- if the creditor is not acting ethically, it is time for them to take the consequences.
Corporations are sociopaths by action and definition, and often need to be treated as such.
Here in Dubai there is debtor's prison. The also through company executives in jail for the slightest malfeasance (happened to executives in my former company, who are still in jail). Criticize the idea all you want....if we had debtor's prison in the US would we have these problems. Where would the country's economy be if every mortgagee that forged an application, every consumer that defaulted on debt, and every mortgage broker who pushed an appraiser the wrong way was in the slammer, what would the country's economy look like?
"In a normal world, failing to repay a debt would involve sorrow by the person who failed to repay."
Ruthlessness, what is this sorrow you speak of?
You're correct, of course, but I maybe have been wrong. I had told people that "ruthless default" implied a classification of defaults where the debtor could have repaid, and just chose not to. Could have been a mood swing or some such.
There are those who can pay, but recognize a chance to default, bolt, and don't care. (Ruthless)
there are those that cannot pay, recognize it, bolt, and are all torn up about it. (Lot's of Ruth, but defaulters just the same).
I can think of some instances where people could not repay, stoke their ego to think they could, but lay down on the debt. (beefless ruth defaulters).
In the end, it's just default. And if you want to get technical, sometimes the creditor is standing behind sojmeone.
traderwalt, who do you think lost and who gained in the following transaction?
Person A, who bought a home in 1997 for $200,000, sells it in 2007 for $800,000. Buyer B 'pays' $800,000, 100% borrowed from Big Bank. Big Bank dumps most of the loan on the govt (via a resale of 99% of it to Fannie Mae, or some more devious form of transfer). Now Buyer B walks, and the home is sold for what it's worth, $300,000.
Yes they are and are now getting what they deserve. The sad thing is CC companies found out many and not smart enough to control their finances. How does that reflect on our education system or should I call it Public programing system.
Which is worse - bankers or terrorists (profile) wrote on Sun, 7/26/2009 - 1:03 pm
Where would the country's economy be if every mortgagee that forged an application, every consumer that defaulted on debt, and every mortgage broker who pushed an appraiser the wrong way was in the slammer, what would the country's economy look like?
It might be a good sell to the prison-industrial complex, and their lobbyists can take it from there. Your new customers have to come from somewhere.
Then, of course, that small problem that one cannot expand indefinitely in a finite world.
Where interest is involved, one must expand, or it doesn't get paid back.
Any smart 10 year old can explain to you where this is ultimately heading.
One more point, people buying stuff they couldn't afford on credit drove up prices for the rest of us that actually use cash and spend what we actually have.
"And why are transaction costs for retailers still so high with all the innovation and advances in technology?"
1.6% and $0.25 per transaction are around what I used to pay for Visa and MC. The CC companies provide a lot of value to the merchant. Imagine factoring all your receivables, an in-house collection department, bad checks - all eliminated. Under 2% is a good deal. I understand debit cards are even cheaper.
AMEX and Discover wanted more money so I didn't carry them. I only lost one sale in 6 years due to not having the other cards. People always also had V-MC. Some retailers use credit card fees as a justification to up the sale with minimum sales against the contract they sign when setting up the merchant account that says minimums are not allowed. I am a little suspicious of merchants who have anything more than a $5 minimum. Another consideration is that the rate you pay the merchant account is somewhat dependent on the applicants credit score and bad credit can mean no merchant account.
Also, regarding my above comments on grassroots default and how they coexist with this post; CC companies that have GOOD customers will do just fine and still provide useful services to people like me and you. The crappy ones can crash and burn for all I care. Problem is they appear to all be pretty crappy, thus the scary systematic Armageddon nature of the problem. Crappy companies die or become the government. Once enough crappy companies comprise the government... .
patientrenter (profile) wrote on Sun, 7/26/2009 - 11:04 am
[W]ho do you think lost and who gained in the following transaction?
Person A, who bought a home in 1997 for $200,000, sells it in 2007 for $800,000. Buyer B 'pays' $800,000, 100% borrowed from Big Bank. Big Bank dumps most of the loan on the govt (via a resale of 99% of it to Fannie Mae, or some more devious form of transfer). Now Buyer B walks, and the home is sold for what it's worth, $300,000.
Person A paid taxes on their wise financial decisions and now pays for a share of person Bs and the banks' losing transactions. Person B got to live in a home they couldn't afford and didn't pay for and took massive tax deductions along the way. Perspective PR, perspective.
"The debts of the US and it's citizens are not serviceable at current low wage and diminishing asset price levels. Contracting local, national, and global economies compound the problem. What happens when people can't play the game anymore? How long before there are so many losers in the game that even those who still have the means to continue gambling in the ponziconomy refuse to play?"
What happens.....you short sell the 10-year Treasuries at that point b/c that motherf**ker is called is US sovereign default and it is the ultimate short play in human history.
Let's make a deal--create debtor's prisons and treat corporate officers as criminals for the antics of the company. No artificial debt or persons--you screw up, you pay. This will keep the jails full--and paid for by the confiscation of the ill begotten gains.
adornosghost (profile) wrote on Sun, 7/26/2009 - 1:07 pm
Then, of course, that small problem that one cannot expand indefinitely in a finite world.
Where interest is involved, one must expand, or it doesn't get paid back.
Any smart 10 year old can explain to you where this is ultimately heading.
the objectivity of prepubescence combined with lack of personal stake in the outcome
Where did that Kuwaiti article come from? The one posted on Yahoo Finance says, "Hazem al-Braikan was found dead in his bed with a gunshot wound to the head and a handgun at his side, said the official, speaking on condition of anonymity because he did not have the full details".
cc companies are settling on balances....cases vary...
the issue is 2 sided, as a underwriter on credit I could almost tell you 80% of the time who was going to bk ( outside of medical ) by just reviewing pti, dti, history and credit history/balance balloning over prior 6 months...
the issue is underwriters went to fica modeling similar to all the other financial modeling over last 10 years.. Calculus is bullshit when it comes to credit...no model works, only someone who understands credit trends should be making decisions on credit worthiness or application for more debt..not computer software.....
My fear is that if we create debtor's prisons in the US the Goldman Sachs Criminal Finance Syndicate will figure out how to run them and profit off of those two.
Financial companies have a responsibility to monitor the quality of their customers. If they have a bunch of crappy customers they are crappy companies. Either they are incompetent or engaged in predatory lending. These consumer credit companies are not victims all of a sudden, they were enablers for decades.
The problem with a debtors prison now is we would have to lock up a fair amount of people here. If we had one before then things probably would not have gone nuts. Then we have the Wall street and politicians how would we lock them up?
Goldman could really change the prisons once inside. Selling contraband, porn, cigarettes, are kind of informal prisons businesses but once GS Criminal Finance gets their arms around it that could really ramp up productivity, get some protection rackets going, etc. They could spin-off an entity, syndicate it and go public, and so on. One of the major operational problems with running a crime syndicate like Goldman Sachs is that you're always looking for a place to park your money....think of the synergy that could created with all of the untapped money laundering expertise in these prisons. It's not like they're doing anything else with their time....
All of this comes down to replacing human decision making with computer modeling....software sucks at figuring out how people are going to spend, pay back and fhat inherent risk...
people defaulting is fine with me, bringing down the pigmen is the only way we regain america the way it was....
debt sleeps with the devil....
disclaimer-becoming an anarchist is starting to sound good to me....
"The problem with a debtors prison now is we would have to lock up a fair amount of people here......then we have the Wall street and politicians how would we lock them up?"
Gosh it is almost like you just but the prison fence around the entire US and then.....well, Goldman is already running everything....would be the same in prison.....OK....perhaps we're already there....
The Time's article makes reference to Shays' Rebellion, but clearly the author knows nothing of the facts.
These were not people who built up debt through extravagant purchases and then defaulted.
From Wikipedia:
"Daniel Shays was a poor farm hand from Massachusetts when the Revolution broke out. He joined the Continental Army where he fought at Lexington, Bunker Hill, and Saratoga, and was eventually wounded in action. In 1780, he resigned from the army unpaid and went home to find himself in court for the nonpayment of debts. " Shays' Rebellion - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
He couldn't pay his debts because he hadn't been paid for five years service to his country! Meanwhile, debts from the war needed to be paid:
"The financial situation leading to the rebellion included the problem that European war investors (among others) demanded payment in gold and silver; there was not enough specie in the states, including Massachusetts, to pay the debts; and through the state, wealthy urban businessmen were trying to squeeze whatever assets they could get out of rural smallholders."
So the merchants and traders who profited from war spending we trying to squeeze the people who fought the war, who had often never received their skimpy pay.
How about some more Climate Change? Everyone seems to much in agreement on the CC stuff--
Periods of continental glaciation or "ice ages," and the "interpluvial" periods between them, are caused by orbital forcing. The predominant contributors to orbital forcing - the so-called "Milankovitch cycles (named after the Serbian geophysicist who described the three major cycles) - are as follows, with their periods:
Another cycle, which Milankovitch did not consider is:
Orbital inclination: ~70K yrs
These cycles may be modeled as sine waves (or more realistically as terms of a Taylor series) with periods as given & amplitudes determined as insolation at 65^o N. Using insolation in the northern hemisphere to determine amplitude gives the most useful information regarding influences on climate.
Superimposed, these cycles sometimes more or less cancel one another out and sometimes they potentiate or reinforce one another. When the latter happens the Earth experiences continental glaciation or warm interpluvials, respectively, depending on which side of the mean the combined peak or trough comes. Currently, the Ocean Planet is in an interpluvial dominated by the obliquity term. Net insolation in the northern hemisphere will increase for the next 25K years; in other words, the planet will not experience another ice age for at least 50K years. Orbital forcing by itself will result in an increasingly warmer planet for a long time.
In addition to these orbital cycles and their influence on climate comes the anthropogenic emissions of high heat capacity gasses into the atmosphere and surface oceans. During the Napoleonic wars, frostbite was "treated" by rubbing snow on the frozen body parts. Of course, this just made matters worse. The world is warming naturally, due to orbital forcing, and has been doing so since the end of the Pleistocene. By emitting massive amounts of oxidized carbon and other "greenhouse" gasses into the atmosphere, humans are effectively rubbing snow on a frostbite. Positive feedback mechanisms have been set in motion by human activity that are leading to rampant and catastrophic warming that is resulting in the mass extinction of species, collapse of ecosystems including agro-ecosystems, and the rapid melting of remaining continental ice sheets in Antarctica and Greenland along with mountain glaciers worldwide. This melting, along with the thermal expansion of the oceans, is causing an increase in sea level that will inundate great coastal cities and low-lying rice growing regions of south Asia that are the breadbasket of billions.
All of this is inevitable and can't be stopped, even if humans stopped buring fossil fuels immediately. This is humanity's and the biosphere's future. We have set in motion forces, on top of natural orbital forces, that can't be stopped and will result in a planet whose climate is radically different from that to which humans and the ecosystems that support us have evolved adaptations. The rapidity of change outpaces natural selection by several orders of magnitude. The outcome equates to the mass extinction of species including our own.
--darwinsdog
State officials who lead California's war on global warming often travel abroad on trips supported by the major greenhouse gas polluters they regulate, a Bee investigation has found. Industry lobbyists and executives routinely join them.
Since 2006, more than two dozen top state officials have fanned out across the globe on such trips, bound for a climate change policy tour in Europe, meetings with high-level government officials across South America and China, even a safari in Kruger National Park in South Africa – all on someone else's dime.
They have logged more than 700,000 air miles and touched down in 17 nations, on trips collectively costing hundreds of thousands of dollars. In the process, their air travel alone emitted 275,000 pounds of heat-trapping carbon dioxide into the atmosphere.
From the law of unintended consequences: "“With all the bailouts the government is giving everyone, no one has any personal accountability about their own debts,” said Roger Knauf, who runs a trade group of debt-buying firms. "
I think the OVERLEVERAGED® were just looking for a reason to stop paying, the government gave them a reason. It just happened sooner rather than later.
Good credit used to mean something, and it wasn't the ability to pay your minimum payments every month.
My experience has been that after a very long time, the cc companies will
settle. In the 80s I had a client who had accumulated about 80k in debt,
which was really a lot back then. He was selling a townhouse and getting
about 20-25 grand. I told 'em all, you ALL have to settle, or he is going to file
bk. I got better as I went along and they all accepted 15-25 cents on the dollar.
On the other hand, there is a 5 year statute of limitations.
About a year and a half ago, a the cc tried to collect a judgment which was
long over the statute of limitations. about 4-5k. Anyway, the cc co lawyer
argued that since there was a $35.00 payment within 5 years that the whole
thing stayed alive. Seems his dad had a very similar name and there was
a payment in a refi, but it went to the wrong account. We went to court and
the judge said the credit card company had to produce more proof and it
died there.
I got another one which is utterly uncollectable, where we offered 50 bucks
a month and they told us to stuff it.
I think the attys take a huge percentage of the amounts paid.
A recent report by the United Nations Environment Program finds that 25 percent of all fisheries are collapsing because of overfishing. (A fishery is considered collapsed if its annual catch is less than 10 percent of its historical maximum catch.) While the current state of fisheries sounds alarming, future forecasts look worse. A 2006 article published in Science predicts that by 2048, all fish stocks worldwide will be gone if historical trends continue
"Well stated otishertz.
I think it is 4th generation warfare being waged against us by TPTB. "
Hi Homegnome,
Is it really warfare or is it just inevitability, like Karma. Besides, these thoughts of mine, they are not revolutionary calls. I am describing what I see as already happened and plotting possible trajectories. It sounds predictive because of phraseology like saying 'could', 'might', etc.
The future is always already here but is kept at bay by bias towards denial of reality. This lag in perception of reality is largely what behavioral finance is about.
The only question is does this "ruthless default" "democratic default" "passive-aggressive resistance" perception / sentiment shift go parabolic.
I hope the PTB can keep it together. I'm used to this system. However, the system looks like it is on death spiral trajectory. It makes no sense to get upset criticizing a dead system or to speed its decomposition. There are ways to be productive, profitable and happy even in a perpetual state of economic decline.
There will be (probably already are) examples of Great Recession small business success stories.
In order to get ahead Embrace change as the only constant.
Effective Demand (I'm uncomfortable referring to you as "ED")
Succinct and correct for many.
Debtors (again, many, not all) have been playing kick the can down the road for some time and now it appears the road has a bridge out. This is an opportune time to join the other zebras in the herd and hope the lions can't catch all of us.
From the law of unintended consequences: "“With all the bailouts the government is giving everyone, no one has any personal accountability about their own debts,” said Roger Knauf, who runs a trade group of debt-buying firms. "
Or accountability for their usurious rates and deceptive fee schedules...
The local fishwrapper said that even tho guaranteed fha loans were available
for the banks to loan out, they were refusing to do so.
Now one may argue that fha loans should not be available, etc, etc. But it
seems the banks are simply refusing to loan money even tho their investment
is guaranteed.
Excuse me, why do banks exist in the first place if they are not gonna loan
money?
Yep off South Florida fishing of certain species is gonna be heavily
restricted for a while, and oh, the screaming!!! At least some thing
is being tried somewhere.
This is an opportune time to join the other zebras in the herd and hope the lions can't catch all of us.
If I was knee deep in debt I may think that. But I'm not, just not my nature. I never joined that herd. The good news for me I don't have to worry about the lions. I'm thinking about joining the vultures though, carrion is sounding mighty fine.
otishertz (profile) wrote on Sun, 7/26/2009 - 1:39 pm
I hope the PTB can keep it together. I'm used to this system. However, the system looks like it is on death spiral trajectory. It makes no sense to get upset criticizing a dead system or to speed its decomposition. There are ways to be productive, profitable and happy even in a perpetual state of economic decline.
IMHO we are going to end up with a lot more 'female' economy (for lack of a better term) in any path that resembles sustainability. Testosterone-driven risk aversion, culture of excess and social acceptability of speculation as a way of making a living will be out for a long while if we recover. Of course the old alphas have to keep up their power grab in the meantime, unable and unwilling to adjust to a new paradigm that doesn't include them on top and running the world into the ground.
The same would be nice for every product we buy as to the hidden tax built into the price. Example would be Pipeline transfer fees on gas, Excise taxes. The consumer would get quit a sobering look at indirect taxation as well.
Liz, sounds like most CC debt in effectively uncollectible. So if our culture accepts debt repudiation, then kiss goodbye to repayment. Taxpayers will pick up most of the tab, of course, "to save the economy".
"This is an opportune time to join the other zebras in the herd and hope the lions can't catch all of us."
I think this is exactly what's going on here. A few folks really did get in a pickle through no fault of their own, and have exhausted their means. Those are the stories in the newspapers, and the zebra that is doomed in the analogy. But for every zebra that is doomed, many more are zebras looking to break free with just a few scratches or shortness of breath. Borrowing without repaying is a lot nicer than borrowing and repaying on the original terms.
Which is worse - bankers or terrorists (profile) wrote on Sun, 7/26/2009 - 1:52 pm
ResistenceisFeudal-
If you say the economy will be more "female" in the future, then explain Goldman's results this quarter.
"Of course the old alphas have to keep up their power grab in the meantime, unable and unwilling to adjust to a new paradigm that doesn't include them on top and running the world into the ground."
I am not talking in short term or quarterly sales profit terms. I mean, if (when) they fail, what's coming will be a very different environment, probably for decades.
I am so glad I barely pay any taxes anymore to support this charade. And I have an aggregate 150k limit on my credit cards. (not including american express gold). The only dilemma is when to charge the whole thing......
But for every zebra that is doomed, many more are zebras looking to break free with just a few scratches or shortness of breath. Borrowing without repaying is a lot nicer than borrowing and repaying on the original terms.
I think that is exactly what is going on as well, which is why my sympathy is limited for both sides of the equation.
I for one think the borrowers and lenders should go under and pay the consequences for their actions. It would reduce the number of lenders making bad loans and the number of borrowers willing to overconsume and ruthlessly default.
But apparently according to modern economic theory I'm antiquated in my thinking.
This instant is the future. These CR articles are the future. The present facts are the future. What has already happened is the future. Global economic collapse is the future. Green shoots of Hopium delineate the present delay in perception.
"Credit card transactions need transparency. It would take about 3 seconds after the receipt is printed for cash payers to go postal over the inequity."
Exactly, RD.
BTW, the taxes paid by people who sold in 2007 were small, and are not going to be increased by much comapared to the total taxpayer loss of $500,000. Other taxpayers will be picking up most of that tab. I am not trying to blame all our ills on homeowners who sold out at the peak. I am just pointing out who actually gained and who lost. Where did the money all go, and who is paying the tab? It doesn't all balance out. Bank stockholders s ended up losing, net. Senior bank employees gained some. But I think the biggest dollar gainers in aggregate dollars are homeowners and the biggest losers are taxpayers. Not the same. (I am sensitive to the distinction because I've never owned a home, but I pay enough taxes every year to support several families in comfort.)
I would love to agree with you but see the opposite. Despite major economic restructuring, which historically usually causes major political upheaval, none of that is happening....Iceland applying for EU membership is not quite seismic enough for me. No boundaries redrawn on the world map. Goldman still running the country. USD is still the reserve currency. Nothing has changed.
otishertz (profile) wrote on Sun, 7/26/2009 - 1:59 pm
This instant is the future. These CR articles are the future. The present facts are the future. What has already happened is the future. Global economic collapse is the future. Green shoots of Hopium define the delay in perception.
The future is now.
So the degree to which the future is experienced is in some inverse proportion to the degree of hopium in one's subjective perception of that objective future?
My client has other considerations and reasons for not filing bk now. They
will in about 6-9 months. They also have a toe in a very profitable transaction
that could save their hides, but keeps getting put off.
The amount of debt that I have is very sustainable, no biggie at all.
But I have concluded that at least half the population can't be trusted to do
anything but pay cash.
And it seems me that corporations who sent out zillions of offers to draw
people into debt slavery deserve what they get.
And I have always been accused of being very cheap.
OT: While we are resting on our laurels, Brazil has been pumping huge amounts of money into research and has rocketed ahead of us in several areas of important technology:
Which is worse - bankers or terrorists (profile) wrote on Sun, 7/26/2009 - 2:01 pm
Resistence-
I would love to agree with you but see the opposite. Despite major economic restructuring, which historically usually causes major political upheaval, none of that is happening....Iceland applying for EU membership is not quite seismic enough for me. No boundaries redrawn on the world map. Goldman still running the country. USD is still the reserve currency. Nothing has changed.
Sadly, I see Goldman and other major albatrosses still to come given charge over massive social programs. Even more corruption is in the wings. Again, capitalism starts as scoundrels regulated by competition and ends in scoundrels regulating competition.
Rob Dawg wrote:
Credit card transactions need transparency. It would take about 3 seconds after the receipt is printed for cash payers to go postal over the inequity.
RobDawg, the fees discussed above are merchant fees. Its the merchant's business what his costs are. That's why most merchants like debit card transactions, because they are only charged a network fee. The user is charged a fee at his end, by the issuer on debit card trans.
Advice is worth what you pay for it from a disinterested, objective observer who can perfectly reflect its value in terms of price and who is not subject to the profit motive.
While we are on the subject of ACH clearing, i'll repeat mention of a post i made weeks ago, which no one commented on then, i think because the average person does not realise the ramifications, namely that ACH is extending its reach to the G20, and this appears to have been orchestrated in haste (although, i am out of the insider-loop these days, so maybe there was was more advance warning than I heard about).
Yep, I always charge a fee, even to people who very poor.
If you don't people will treat you with actual contempt, and
also disregard your good advice. I will reduce my fee to 20
bucks for a short consultation, if I feel sorry for the person,
but never zero.
P'ses me off when friends and relatives ask for advise, get
it and they repeatedly ignore me and continue to screw up.
\
I have gotten quite tart with them.
If you don't want to take my advice and change your situation,
the just accept the situtation you are in, and quit kvetching.
Sorry kr, I just don't get it. I read wiki and still don't understand what
it is or why I should care a lot, or why more countries being added is
significant.
lawyerliz (profile) wrote on Sun, 7/26/2009 - 2:13 pm
Yep, I always charge a fee, even to people who very poor.
P'ses me off when friends and relatives ask for advise, get
it and they repeatedly ignore me and continue to screw up.
\
I have gotten quite tart with them.
I get this with computer problems, particularly with relatives. If I had an uncle who was a plumber, I wouldn't ask him to stop by and fix a leaky sink for me for free just because that's what he does for a living. I've seen it with doctors too, where it would get even more annoying I'm sure.
With an independent-thinking, competent person who was honest and wanted reasonable compensation, advice's worth would probably be fairly close to the true unknown value. Which is probably why a society that values honesty and competence and recognizes the need to pay a reasonable price tends to work pretty well, even if it is primitive... There are always parasites and sociopaths but they are marginalized and outed and/or punished.
Liz, i wish I had a legal service that answered questions for $20 a pop. Think of the utility value, i would use it a lot i think. I bet tons of RE agents and the like would also. You might consider a website based on that. Just reinvent yourself offshore under an alias. Members could pay an annual fee to see all the questions and all the answers.
Do you have some kind of weblink to an article that shows this is being expanded through the G20. I'm wondering why....the main commentary with this has to do with consumer protections on returning checks, and the consumer rules within various G20 countries (US, EU, Saudi Arabia) are vastly, vastly different.
Not sure if the G20 would agree to this if the intent is a new currency....lots of rhetoric amongst the G20 about what the global reserve currency but they would agree if the intent relates to tax havens since there is agreement about tax haven-related issues amongst the G20 (the large industrial countries are the big tax haven losers).
ACH is a transaction clearing network for electronic payments, and notice its in association with the Fed (a private currency issuer), it was formerly USA only, then expanded to Mexico, Canada and then UK. Now its going to the G20. It means, the central clearing for transactions is being extended to 20 economies. There are many ramifications to this, especially for outsourcing payments. To expand on that, is a long conversation.
Heh, lliz - my father, currently solo practitioner in Alaska, gave me some good advice about eight years ago - several weeks, later I called him back after getting agitated about some trivial issue, and he said "Kid, I told you what I think - you don't have to take my advice - but if you don't I'm going to charge you for it."
Isn't this a good thing, KR? (Expanding a ulility like electronic payments.) I really like the Euro's convenience. In the days before national currencies, we all had to barter. Yes, I know it has some advantages, but a common currency is like electricity or other utilities - kinda handy.
I think everyone gets what you have explicitly said thus far, but is not sure what you're implying. Can you provide some weblinks? I'm Googling and only finding ACH being expanded to the Bahamas (seems like a tax haven thing once again).
To answer the question on source:
NACHA NEWS: Fed Releases FedGlobal ACH Services for IAT The Federal Reserve Banks are offering an enhanced offering for cross-border electronic payments that will be enabled by the International ACH Transaction rule. By Maria Bruno-Britz More from this author April 06, 2009
Gotta run out and fill my dumpster before it rains. On the ACH, you can view it as unified banking between G20. WE could not do one currency without such a mechanism.
I was chatting with a gentleman this weekend, and he was grousing about the impact the higher minimum wage was going to have on businesses and employment. I told him that if his business model was dependent upon someone making $6.50 an hour that business wasn't a good candidate to make it in the long run. My feelings are the same here. The credit card companies received almost half their revenue from late fees/over-the-credit-limit fees/cash advance fees etc. If your well being is dependent upon your customer acting irresponsibly and recklessly, don't be shocked when they don't show up to pull you out of the ditch.
Quite frankly, ruthless default is the mildest thing folks could do to bankers. During the Great Depression, people were known to hang bankers and their agents as they came out to auction the farm.
One currency for G20? Sounds good to me. Everyone else can run for their survivalist bunkers in the desert.
I just read Anna Schwartz's critique of Bernanke's stewardship of the Fed, in connection with his fitness for a new term. She is on the mark, I think. It's great that he's proven he can and will reflate and pour liquids for the party, but he has proven he is very poor at pulling the liquor, and that's what will have to come next.
"Quite frankly, ruthless default is the mildest thing folks could do to bankers. "
Sigh, I don't see any progress in people's understanding. Large-scale ruthless defaults will cost a lot of money, and most of those costs will be borne by US taxpayers. I don't know why we are advocating "screw the taxpayer" policies. (I'd be happy to see the lending banks and other institutions, and their depositors, take the losses, but this is politically impossible.)
To paraphrase, "it is hard to get a man to understand, when his ruthless default gain depends on him not understanding".
If you're still there, there is a very, very interesting coincidence between the implementation of this new program on September 18th and Treasury's tax amnesty program deadline of September 23rd. Hmmmm...
Right on HomeGnome. Although a banker did try to break into the house last week and force me and my wife...yes force us I tell ya to take the cards and buy, buy, buy. I am a modern american victim...consumer profiling probably.
patientrenter (profile) wrote on Sun, 7/26/2009 - 2:52 pm
Sigh, I don't see any progress in people's understanding. Large-scale ruthless defaults will cost a lot of money, and most of those costs will be borne by US taxpayers. I don't know why we are advocating "screw the taxpayer" policies. (I'd be happy to see the lending banks and other institutions, and their depositors, take the losses, but this is politically impossible.)
It will also force lenders, who are already skittish with credit, to adopt higher credit standards, as their models require them to based on default rates and related expectancies. Paradoxically, this will actually contract the availability of credit, and cause institutions to be even more risk-averse and unwilling to make the loans necessary to economic growth. Extending credit for consumption and a debt-financed lifestyle is a net loss for society.
It's about how the Minnesota AG's litigation against the National Arbitrator's association & American Arbitrator's Ass'n has demonstrated major conflicts of interest exist for members of either entity in arbitrating credit card issuer vs. user conflicts (mandated in most credit card agreements) or similar auto manufacturer agreements. Litigation has been apparently been sufficiently successful that both have decided not to do any more consumer credit arbitrations.
Nice to see that at least a few states are looking out for the interests of their residents.
Probably more work for Congressional lobbyists, pushing Congress to limit the rights of states to protect their residents from predatory corporations.
Honestly I am dumbfounded by CRs comments on Bernanke. His record not only shows that he lacks the foresight to have foreseen a calamity obvious to many but that he also lacks the moral fiber to be trusted with impartial and even handed regulation over the banking sector.
Exhibit A = Merrill lynch "merger" with BAC.
Preserving the system as it stands will lead to further boom and busts and pain for millions in the future.
The percentage of adults who are working has fallen from 64 at the end of the Clinton era to only 59.5 now. Some of those dropouts are retirees, but some may be responding to the economy’s declining dynamism. Traditionally, it was a mark of Americans’ resiliency that, when times were tough, they relocated from state to state and region to region. Now, according to the Census Bureau, mobility is at an all-time recorded low. Perhaps people with underwater mortgages cannot afford to move. Perhaps the areas they used to move to, typically the Sun Belt, are too devastated by foreclosures. But the vaunted ability of the U.S. economy to renew itself seems a little tarnished. Maybe it’s no accident that this time around, folks on the unemployment line are staying there longer.
So how does Obama respond to declining employment and falling wages?
The Cash for clunker program - go out and rack up more $$$ on credit but you will save $3500 - 4500 on trade in;)
Lobbyist, the All American Fool is now called the "term a la modern" VICTIM. It's all the rage. Reminds me of my father after coming home from WWII telling my mother that it was just amazing...he didn't meet a single nazi in germany...Hitler just captured the whole country by himself and forced them (yes I know it is tragic) yes forced to carry out the war. If it goes well, I am a genius, if it fails I was a victim. Americans are children.
What is frustrating to me that Tim 2012 has suggested is that we've gone through all of this for nothing. The TPTB are still in place, USD is still the reserve currency, Goldman still runs the country, and because of that we're just being set up for the next bubble.
badger (profile) wrote:" You still have faith in the system. I don't. I'm just a pawn in the aristocrasy's game."
Of course you are. But at least you are on the board, and if you play your cards right, you can become a knight. This century is not the worst one to be alive in.
azurite: "Probably more work for Congressional lobbyists, pushing Congress to limit the rights of states to protect their residents from predatory corporations."
azurite, I have been on the other side of those lawsuits, and while some corporations sometimes need to be reined in (as appears to be the case when CC companies use their oligopoly power to make it hard for retailers to offer lower cash prices), I have also seen how some lawyers and law firms abuse consumer protection laws to milk the system. it got to a point a while ago that people in my industry began to think that company owners were going to just collect a low 'rent', and any profits above that would be taken by lawyers (without much regard to the underlying merit of their clients' complaints). So it can cut both ways. Distinguish cases, exercise balance....
Alright, who bought this?
I know one of you must have...
LOS ANGELES (Reuters) - A small pistol belonging to 1930s gangster John Dillinger has been sold at auction to a private collector for $95,600 -- more than double the pre-sale estimate, the auction house said on Sunday.
The Remington .41 caliber Double Derringer was said to have been found hidden in one of Dillinger's socks when he was arrested in Tucson, Arizona in January 1934, said Dennis Lowe of Heritage Auction Galleries in Dallas.
According to affidavits, the pistol was given by the then Tucson sheriff to a probation officer and kept in the family until selling it in 1959.
The owner, who wished to remain anonymous, sold it because he was in declining health, Lowe said. It had been expected to fetch about $35,000 - $45,000 at the auction on Saturday in Dallas. A private Los Angeles collector made the winning bid of $95,600.
Dillinger, one of the most infamous bank robbers in the United States in the early 1930s, was shot dead by FBI agents in Chicago in July 1934 at the age of 31.
but I have no sympathy for anyone in credit card debt
"According to Boohaker (bankruptcy attorney and a certified financial planner) ‘the biggest misperception surrounding bankruptcy remains that bankruptcy is a lifestyle choice overspending consumers use to absolve themselves of debt obligations so they can spend anew.’ She says that typically, ‘any excessive use of credit occurs after a catastrophic event like a divorce, job loss or medical issue sends them scrambling to pay bills.’"
Sorry but most people would use all the credit they had if they found out they had a life threatening disease, they had no money and it was curable.
Before anymore bailouts, I think what a few million Americans need most is to get a dose of empathy.
I know some folks personally who have declared BK. Several of the same family members have done it. All seem to be "unlucky". Totally concidentally, they all live in nice homes, drive nice cars like big BMWs, and don't save very much. Just a coincidence, I know. I am sure all BK is due to life-threatening diseases striking uninsured people with little savings who are otherwise very responsible, just like in the adverts.
Goldman Sachs. after latching on to the government's teet, is set to give over 150 employees over $1,000,000 in bonuses, and folks are worried about someone taking a cruise to the Carribean and defaulting on their credit card.
Goldman Sachs. after latching on to the government's teet, is set to give over 150 employees over $1,000,000 in bonuses, and folks are worried about someone taking a cruise to the Carribean and defaulting on their credit card.
Well, duh.
If the proles don't cough up interest, how is GS supposed to pay bonuses?
If it is good for the Donald to default on real estate loans, why should not Joe Six Pack believe he cannot do the same on debt within his somewhat more meager domain?
Aftertall, The Donald is a TV star, so we must look up to him, no?
Are there classes on the dangers of not paying off debt? Maybe Treasury and assorted corporations like Fannie, AIG, CIT, FPM, Goldman and a few other thousand shitbag crooks should take that class?
MZM is still something to watch, as people stop spending cash and stop using credit; we are just phasing into a recession and then onto Great Depression ll.
Look at compounded rate of change over a nice long series... gotta go
No particular reason except for the fact the the summer spending season will have ended and Jobless benefits expire at an increasing pace after August. End of summer also marks the end of the RE selling season for a about 6-9 months.
Goldman's peak annual compensation was $20 billion. So, for the 5 worst years of the bubble, they took in less than $100 billion. I wouldn't complain about seeing most of that money taken back, and criminal penalties for the most culpable few dozen people, but this amount pales in comparison to the trillions in losses generated by bad lending during those years. Putting things in perspective can help everyone see more clearly (assuming you haven't already decided what you want to see).
Please..... credit cards, more specifically, debit cards are the new cigarettes, market to minors until they reach adulthood. My kid was given a VISA debit card with a pretty picture on it.
My 18 year old found out, when a vendor ran his card 2x, overdrafting his account for minutes, that BoA charged him $35 for the deal, sent him a post card 9 days later. Didn't attempt to email him, although they require an email address. By the time his post card arrived, there was a total of $175 in fees charged, $35 per transaction. Why? because a VISA debit card allows overdrafts of the checking account (overdrafts only becasue of the first fee)..... a very effective high fee credit card.
The PHeD and Tresury sent these pigs hundreds of millions of dollars so they can continue this practice.
Got the kid the heck out of BoA to a small local bank, one that will not let him over draw, and might pick up the phone if there is a problem. Hopefully, when he goes to college in a few weeks, he resists the credit card application.
Would probably be best to let him struggle on his own, even if he trashes his credit rating in his 20's, he'll be better off understanding the system instead of being bailed out.
I'm not sure I believe all of this. At one point does a default become ruthless? Suppose someone's income minus debt payments is near or below the poverty line? Is that not ruthless? How much income do you need for the default to be ruthless? The ruthless thing implies these people have loads of money and just aren't paying because they suddenly got mad for some reason. I don't think that's happening. I think most people who default on loans of any kinds either a) don't have the money and say they're not paying b/c they're too poor or b) don't have the money and say they're not paying as part of a strategy. I suspect most people who have a reasonable amount of money keep paying their bills.
whee!
Danger of not paying? What danger? There are no consequences any more.
CR....do you have these threads waiting just in case? LOL.
“They’ve done the math on their account and they’re very angry,”
Not so much angry as enlightened.
And CR asks (presumably rhetorically):
"And why are transaction costs for retailers still so high with all the innovation and advances in technology?"
Ans: For the same reason you are charged a transaction fee for ATMs but human tellers are still free.
It is obvious to me that some posters here are NOT familiar with the concept of sarcasm...
RE: HomeGnome (homepage, profile) wrote on Sun, 7/26/2009 - 1:01 pm
Enough of the climate change debate.
I want to debate abortion.
or which religion is the real one.
There is nothing ruthless about it. Two of my daughter's store credit card accounts were automatically transferred to electronic billing to an e-mail account she no longer used. By the time she was notified in writing, hundreds of dollars of penalty fees, interest and late payment assessments were added. She finally settled to not totally destroy her credit rating.
Personally I think these bank bastards should be put in jail. They are thieves.
that was an amazingly timely save by CR!
Let's go shopping!
I spy yet another deflationary trend....spending what you ACTUALLY HAVE. Not good for M3.
And why are transaction costs for retailers still so high with all the innovation and advances in technology?
If you limit the credit card industry ability to price for risk (as per recently approved laws), you should expect that somebody else will end up paying more. So I would not expect lower credit card fees for retailers in the future.
The Heart of Default Darkness
"Mistah Kurtz... he BK. "
I prefer 'ruthful' to ruthless:
c.1327, from reuthe "pity, compassion" (c.1175), formed from reuwen "to rue" (see rue (v.)) on the model of true/truth, etc. Ruthful (c.1225) has fallen from use since late 17c. except as a deliberate archaism.
There is no portion of the world economy that is more deserving of being brought down than the credit card business.
Ruthless default may be the preferred route instead of trying to regulate their greed and arbitrary behavior.
I know the rules with mortgage debt: It's either officially non-recourse, depending on the state and the state's rules for purchase money/refi/HELOC debt, or it's unofficially non-recourse, with just a few token cases of people being pursued all the way to substantial actual recovery for recourse debt. And short sales are loan mods are the new way out.
What are the rules for CC debt?
Is bankruptcy really the only way out? Or are CC companies doing mods? Writing down balances? Failing to pursue all other assets/ garnish wages?
See the light, embrace the darkside and default.
Why aren't consumers being educated? ... why are transaction costs for retailers still so high?
CR, you are kidding, aren't you?
CR wrote:
Why aren't consumers being educated on the dangers of not paying off their credit card balance each month?
That's not a danger, silly. That's profit.
Get ya some.
HomeG,.......no sarcasm or frivolity allowed.
OT?
Al-Braikan, Sued by U.S. SEC Over Textron Bid, Found Dead in Likely Suicide
(A51) "Hazem Al-Braikan, who was sued last week by the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission over bogus tender offers for Harman International Industries Inc. and Textron Inc., has been found shot dead with 43-bullet and stab wounds to his upper back and extremities, a security official at the Kuwaiti Interior Ministry said. "Al-Braikan probably committed suicide", said the official, who declined to be identified because the investigation is still ongoing."
.....time for my nap.........
Black Star Ranch, in case of what? I try to post articles of interest - and usually between other activities on the weekends.
Rob Dawg, ahhh ... what is the difference in fees charged for retailers between debit and credit cards?
Plantagenet, all the financial incentives are to keep the consumers uninformed, and the barriers to entry are massive (so there is no competition to bring down fees).
best to all
BSR,
posted this story this morning but you were probably out working with Milkshake.
Enjoy your rest.
Almost by definition, capitalism is ruthless. Back in the day, scoundrels were regulated by competition--but that's so yesterday.
In this context, isn't it obvious that "Chicken Little" represents the sane vision and
that Homo Sapiens' motto, "Let's go shopping!" is the cry of the true lunatic?
- Dr. Peters, 12 Monkeys
suicide is stainless
If the credit card companies really wanted their money back, they'd enter agreements with customers to halt new credit, reduce interest to 7% on existing balances, and eliminate all penalties (and interest thereon) from the balance.
Instead they spend money on lawyers to fight to keep the debt intact even through a bankruptcy.
CC companies do have assistance programs for customers who are falling behind, which include lower APR and lower min due. Specifics of these programs vary greatly across CC companies.
The way CC debt is handled in BK depends on the type of BK:
- Ch7: It is essentially written off, very little recovered if anything
- Ch11: It is restructured along with other unsecured debt and paid over some time after the BK based on the program approved by the BK judge, the recovery rate could be 5-10%
CR,
the last thread veered slightly off topic.
No biggie.
Thanks for your dedication!
"And why are transaction costs for retailers still so high with all the innovation and advances in technology?"
Did Congress pass a law saying that retailers can't charge extra for purchases paid by credit card versus cash? If they could (and did) charge the credit card transaction fees, that would apply pressure to bring the fees down and allow prices for cash purchases to come down. It would also reduce credit spending in aggregate, bringing more financial responsibility to the average consumer.
Black Star,
link please? All my articles omit the stab and multiple gunshot parts.
Mel (profile) wrote on Sun, 7/26/2009 - 12:24 pm
Almost by definition, capitalism is ruthless. Back in the day, scoundrels were regulated by competition--but that's so yesterday.
Capitalism begins as scoundrels regulated by competition but ends as competition regulated by scoundrels.
Bloomberg is reporting a gunshot wound...
Al-Braikan Dies in Likely Suicide, Official Says (Update3) - Bloomberg.com
Link us up, BSR.
Passive Aggressive Resistance
Did Congress pass a law saying that retailers can't charge extra for purchases paid by credit card versus cash?
Do you also advocate Congress telling oil companies how much they can charge to refiners or telling airlines which fees they can/can't charge?
If I had gotten into bed with the banks I'd do the same. Once you start dealing with the devil you can't be nice.
Marketing spawned our Culture of Denial. Marketing by definition is manipulation. All media is marketing and media is omnipresent. Our system is all manipulation. A system that enshrines the trick and rewards the shiftless manifests passive aggression. It has become a nasty part of the US personality type. People here fuck eachother over silently while they get smoothly fucked over in every corporate and government interaction.
Since a major personality trait of the US consumer citizen is passive aggressive, any possible Mass Reaction to the collapse will likely display passive aggressive characteristics. These include passive resistance to demands for acceptable fulfillment of social and occupational obligations, obstruction of other's efforts, deliberately inferior effort, and evasion and abdication of accountability and personal responsibility.
Passive aggression is seen in boycotts, road rage, banks refusing to lend, investors on strike, ruthless defaults, and multitudinous other silent fakes, quiet refusals, and lies of omission played to game the trick system. A pervasive "no snitches" attitude would be another example.
Americans are trained that the only way they can affect their universe is by altering their purchasing habits. Owners of corporations are trained that they can abandon their responsibilities with no liability by going bankrupt. Consumers will be acting like corporations with regards to their financial responsibilities. The corporations are the Gods of the consumers. Consumers will emulate their Gods.
Mass Choice can be exercised to NOT do something like pay your debts, resulting in widespread default and dead banks, or not pay taxes, resulting in dead governments. The possibility exists for the end of modern ponzi finance from fiscal discipline being forced on the banks in a widespread "democratic default" or modern equivalent "tea party" whereby the masses throw off their corporate colonists and cast their debts and other obligations into the sea in such numbers that it ruptures society.
or which religion is the real one.
Are you doubting Jesus Christ is your Lord and Savior?
Inquiring minds want to know---
The boss called us in.
He wanted to speak.
He said we'd be cut down
To three days a week,
And not only that
But rollbacks, as well;
Without cuts to our pay
We could all go to hell.
It hit me just like
A slap in the face,
And I realized right then
I might lose my place.
Now, this job to some
It might not mean a lot,
But for me and my family
It's all that we've got.
With all of our bills
It's been hard to save
What with the recession
And all the money I gave
To my Mom, when my Dad died
To put him away,
Kinda glad he's not here now
To see us today.
I hope that the bank
Will give us a break,
But they only give
In order to take.
So we'll see what happens
And tighten our belt
And hopefully survive
This hand we've been dealt.
edited
Now that defaulting on your mortgage has become an accepted business decision on the part of homeowners, defaulting on unsecured debt like credit cards was just a story waiting to happen. Capital One be scared, be very very scared.
Wait a minute.
We're talking ruthless default in a climate of over 10% UE, along with the inability of homeowners to tap their equity to supplement their personal spending? Credit card lines being cancelled, interest rates jacked up, limits lowered, minimum payments raised?
This does not spell ruthless default to me. This spells desperation.
The reason so many consumers are defaulting on their cards is because they have no other place to go. Their cost of living has exceeded their incomes for a long time now.
Look at the median income - $50-60K. Look at the median home price. Look at the cost of health insurance/health care costs. Look at taxes of all shapes and sizes.
I hear about ruthless default, but I've never met a person who just decided out of the blue they didn't feel like paying their bills anymore. Just like I hear about ruthless default on mortgages, but every single news story I see consists of homeowners in tears practically clinging to their doorposts as the sheriff drags them out - figuratively, of course. Edit: Barring, of course, fraudsters and scamsters.
Ruthless talk is all about setting the scene so that the victim lenders can tighten the noose on those hedonistic borrowers.
Some words are hard to translate out of Chinese.
But some words are really tricky to translate into Chinese. Such as:
Sophisticated
Ironic
Ruthless
Not kidding, if anyone can define what ruthless means in this context (some debtors bailing), then at least I can try to explain what's going on to my wife!
Sounds like the CC companies are the ones who have forced us to have the current system of pricing the same for cash and credit.
This article discusses the current situation and some proposed laws to change that:
With credit card reform, cash will be king -- DailyFinance
I doubt we'll see real change, though. More credit allows more purchases, allowing more profit for retailers, banks, and CC companies. Against those concentrated interests with powerful lobbies, you have the interests of the cash-paying consumers. I suspect I know how this will turn out. But discussing the law change is a great way for Congress to collect more campaign contributions. I often think that Congress operates like a fishing boat with nets, putting out proposed legislation that would excite powerful and wealthy lobbies, and considering it for long enough to extract a lot of contrubutions. When one topic is fished out, they move on. It almost doesn't matter what the outcome is, as long as they get the maximum yield in contributions to the members and their campaigns and friends and interests.
otishertz - yes, the corporations are the gods who rule our destinies and determine our collective fortune, as well as our standards of living. They are even immortal persons granted fully human status under the law. More human than human. The technical esoteric term more appropriate, however, at least in my opinion, is egregore.
"Did Congress pass a law saying that retailers can't charge extra for purchases paid by credit card versus cash?
Do you also advocate Congress telling oil companies how much they can charge to refiners or telling airlines which fees they can/can't charge?"
Did I say that I advocate Congress legislating to tell retailers that they can't charge extra for purchases paid by credit card versus cash? It must have been a while ago, and in a galaxy far, far, away...
homeGnome
you so brave, you so brave.
tell you what abortion really has to go, not on moral grounds but simply because we need those babies spending capability. not moral economical
Not kidding, if anyone can define what ruthless means in this context (some debtors bailing)
Without sorrow. (To "rue" = to be sorry for: "I rue the day I took out a NegAm loan.")
In a normal world, failing to repay a debt would involve sorrow by the person who failed to repay.
Bring back debtors prison and we'll see how willing people are to ring up that cc debt. I'm sorry but I have no sympathy for anyone in credit card debt.
The current US situation is not unique to history. We are a dead empire. The twist was that our empire was corporate colonialism instead of the sovereign colonialism of history. Globalism and free trade were the cover story for corporate colonialism. Credit vending corporate colonialists are now overextended and trying to extract all they can from their colonies. The colonized are rejecting the colonists because they are already full up on credit.
How long before consumers refuse to play by rules they can see no longer exist all the way to the highest levels of government? Bankers steal, they gamble, they pay bonuses today with money borrowed against future tax dollars of unborn grandchildren. They renege on their debts and bad bets with impunity. Total Ethical Failure of US financial institutions and regulators should be expected to produce blowback. The average TV viewer is slowly beginning to conceive that bankers have captured the government. I have heard people in bars say the way to save their government from the bankers is to not pay the bankers.
I don't advocate defaulting on debts. I'm saying it is already happening and widespread debt dumping rooted in insolvency can catalyze with political dissent and distaste for corporate looting into a neutron bomb that obliterates the economy.
At some point as the current path of widespread insolvency continues the adult population will look around and see that almost everyone they know has ruined credit. Defaults then explode as people decide it is futile to pay back debts when nobody else does, or can.
A tipping point or critical mass of widespread insolvency where a sufficient percentage of credit cards and mortgages default is approaching. Once breached it could exponentially exacerbate in a societally shared realization that refusal to cooperate with the confidence game ends the confidence game.
The debts of the US and it's citizens are not serviceable at current low wage and diminishing asset price levels. Contracting local, national, and global economies compound the problem. What happens when people can't play the game anymore? How long before there are so many losers in the game that even those who still have the means to continue gambling in the ponziconomy refuse to play?
There is possibility of change coming from other places than the government if millions of Americans participate in the change by doing nothing.
The systems that support us all are all dependent on confidence.
Once that goes...
yep those 43 bullet and stab wounds make it a suicide
The systems that support us all are all dependent on confidence.
Once that goes...
TEOTWAWKI
Goodbye charlie, goodbye!
Gee I go to lunch and miss the food fight!
Why not walk away from CC debt. What are they going to do cut you off? they probably did that all ready. Quit paying your mortgage another bonus free rent for how long 6 months a year + pay the bookie and car payment they will take your car or worse. We have raised a spend and charge all you can with zero responsibility to anyone. Just hand the bill to the chosen ones who pay taxes. Everyone else it's a free ride!
Get back in there and reinflate that balloon!
Ruthless default--a perfectly natural response to ruthless banks and credit card companies
They bought it, they can pay for it.
I tired of everybody pretending it isn't their fault.
It is their fault.
They bought a bunch of junk. Now pay for it!
MrM, I do think that it would be a good idea for Congress to intervene in the retailer-CC relationship. CC companies exercise an oligopoly that can be abused. Making it difficult for retailers to charge extra for CC purchases versus cash if they want to use CC companies seems to me like an abuse of the oligopoly power.
CR: "Why aren't consumers being educated on the dangers of not paying off their credit card balance each month?"
Because that's not in credit card issuers interest.
Another question is why do credit card companies market to naive college students who have no employment, unless their purpose is to create a set of chronic debtors?
It bothers me that people can get away with defaulting on their obligations, but credit card companies and their clear intent of creating a population of debt slaves bothers me a hell of a lot more.
I misread your comment then.
I was reacting to the idea the Congress should be in business of telling retailers what they can/can't charge for.
Well stated otishertz.
I think it is 4th generation warfare being waged against us by TPTB.
CR wrote: Rob Dawg, ahhh ... what is the difference in fees charged for retailers between debit and credit cards?
As an ex-processer ISO, certified with visanet (huge cost, lots of bullshit) I can tell you visa charges a base rate to the acquiring member bank, and the bank adds on whatever the market will bear. Visa's base used to be about 1.72% at the low end plus a network charge of .35 per transaction . Acquiring bank usually adds on a point or more, plus they might up the network transaction fee. Its pretty competative in my opinion, provided you are in the G7 economy. Outside of G7, prices may vary. And since russians don't use credit cards, we can ignore that market.
way OT: (but grist for pertinent posts):
100 Best Movie Lines in 200 seconds
Yep, Bob.
Every fall there are multiple booths at the Student Center hawking credit cards.
and you get a T-shirt!
Have had one card canceled and had two others have their limits decreased. And I pay my bills on time and have NEVER been late. If I were to lose my job, I would have no qualms whatsoever about not paying my CC bills. The brother-in-law has gone BK TWICE in the last ten years and STILL drives around in a nice newer (financed) car and has a nice place to live. I'm SERIOUSLY contemplating defaulting even if I don't lose my job.
I agree with Outsider. It also seems to me that CC companies wrongly thought that tightening the bankruptcy laws would protect their usurious lending practices. Very bad bet. Most of the hucksters involved in the housing bubble got to keep their ill gotten gains and some got bailed out by the government, while the borrowers got very little help. Maybe the treasury will bail the "victims" of the "ruthless defaulters". 'Hope not. 'Seems like its pay back time. Forget the pitchforks, just don't pay.
JimPortlandOR - I am actually watching 12 Monkeys as I sit with a netbook in my lap, and heard the fortuitous bit of dialog by happenstance. Funny how that works sometimes!
Really sucks when the credit card companies hold a gun to your head and make you take their loans!
You borrowed it; you should repay it.
IMO.
Borrowers are victims of their own ignorance or stupidity not the money lending whores.
Giving cocaine to a baby: endless credit cards with high limits and low minimum payments
Borrowers are victims of their own ignorance or stupidity not the money lending whores.
Your sentence works pretty well in the other direction too: Lenders are victims of their own ignorance or stupidity not the money borrowing whores.
... which leads me to assign the blame as 50-50.
BTW CR, on debit trans, I get a deal from my bank where i pay $12.50 a month for something like 25 transactions, (so 50 cents per trans) i think their unlimited package is 19.00, and there is no fee, if i simply do an interact cash withdrawl at their ATMBut then I am Canadian, and we use the debit card in place of the credit card as a matter of course. But since i am lazy and half stupid, I continue to swipe the debit card at retailers about 30 times a month (at least). I use the credit card about 3 times a month (automated payments), and always keep a zero balance, month end. But that's just me.
HG - No, but their marketers know and exploit every weakness of the human animal soul to feed their dead gods.
You borrowed it; you should repay it.
Well, they are unsecured loans, and it is a bet on both parties part.
I think it is up for examination-- if the creditor is not acting ethically, it is time for them to take the consequences.
Corporations are sociopaths by action and definition, and often need to be treated as such.
Shine on you Jamie D/Ben Dover
Here in Dubai there is debtor's prison. The also through company executives in jail for the slightest malfeasance (happened to executives in my former company, who are still in jail). Criticize the idea all you want....if we had debtor's prison in the US would we have these problems. Where would the country's economy be if every mortgagee that forged an application, every consumer that defaulted on debt, and every mortgage broker who pushed an appraiser the wrong way was in the slammer, what would the country's economy look like?
And therefore is that a bad thing?
I think it is an interesting question.
"In a normal world, failing to repay a debt would involve sorrow by the person who failed to repay."
Ruthlessness, what is this sorrow you speak of?
You're correct, of course, but I maybe have been wrong. I had told people that "ruthless default" implied a classification of defaults where the debtor could have repaid, and just chose not to. Could have been a mood swing or some such.
There are those who can pay, but recognize a chance to default, bolt, and don't care. (Ruthless)
there are those that cannot pay, recognize it, bolt, and are all torn up about it. (Lot's of Ruth, but defaulters just the same).
I can think of some instances where people could not repay, stoke their ego to think they could, but lay down on the debt. (beefless ruth defaulters).
In the end, it's just default. And if you want to get technical, sometimes the creditor is standing behind sojmeone.
traderwalt, who do you think lost and who gained in the following transaction?
Person A, who bought a home in 1997 for $200,000, sells it in 2007 for $800,000. Buyer B 'pays' $800,000, 100% borrowed from Big Bank. Big Bank dumps most of the loan on the govt (via a resale of 99% of it to Fannie Mae, or some more devious form of transfer). Now Buyer B walks, and the home is sold for what it's worth, $300,000.
JP
Yes they are and are now getting what they deserve. The sad thing is CC companies found out many and not smart enough to control their finances. How does that reflect on our education system or should I call it Public programing system.
Which is worse - bankers or terrorists (profile) wrote on Sun, 7/26/2009 - 1:03 pm
Where would the country's economy be if every mortgagee that forged an application, every consumer that defaulted on debt, and every mortgage broker who pushed an appraiser the wrong way was in the slammer, what would the country's economy look like?
It might be a good sell to the prison-industrial complex, and their lobbyists can take it from there. Your new customers have to come from somewhere.
Your comment leaves unclear who you think "bought it. "
Did the borrower buy goods that now must be paid for or did the lender buy the CC holder's chit?
"...and you get a T-shirt!"
I want one of the lumpy ones
Then, of course, that small problem that one cannot expand indefinitely in a finite world.
Where interest is involved, one must expand, or it doesn't get paid back.
Any smart 10 year old can explain to you where this is ultimately heading.
One more point, people buying stuff they couldn't afford on credit drove up prices for the rest of us that actually use cash and spend what we actually have.
"And why are transaction costs for retailers still so high with all the innovation and advances in technology?"
1.6% and $0.25 per transaction are around what I used to pay for Visa and MC. The CC companies provide a lot of value to the merchant. Imagine factoring all your receivables, an in-house collection department, bad checks - all eliminated. Under 2% is a good deal. I understand debit cards are even cheaper.
AMEX and Discover wanted more money so I didn't carry them. I only lost one sale in 6 years due to not having the other cards. People always also had V-MC. Some retailers use credit card fees as a justification to up the sale with minimum sales against the contract they sign when setting up the merchant account that says minimums are not allowed. I am a little suspicious of merchants who have anything more than a $5 minimum. Another consideration is that the rate you pay the merchant account is somewhat dependent on the applicants credit score and bad credit can mean no merchant account.
Also, regarding my above comments on grassroots default and how they coexist with this post; CC companies that have GOOD customers will do just fine and still provide useful services to people like me and you. The crappy ones can crash and burn for all I care. Problem is they appear to all be pretty crappy, thus the scary systematic Armageddon nature of the problem. Crappy companies die or become the government. Once enough crappy companies comprise the government... .
Bad Volker,
No muffin for you.
patientrenter (profile) wrote on Sun, 7/26/2009 - 11:04 am
[W]ho do you think lost and who gained in the following transaction?
Person A, who bought a home in 1997 for $200,000, sells it in 2007 for $800,000. Buyer B 'pays' $800,000, 100% borrowed from Big Bank. Big Bank dumps most of the loan on the govt (via a resale of 99% of it to Fannie Mae, or some more devious form of transfer). Now Buyer B walks, and the home is sold for what it's worth, $300,000.
Person A paid taxes on their wise financial decisions and now pays for a share of person Bs and the banks' losing transactions. Person B got to live in a home they couldn't afford and didn't pay for and took massive tax deductions along the way. Perspective PR, perspective.
"The debts of the US and it's citizens are not serviceable at current low wage and diminishing asset price levels. Contracting local, national, and global economies compound the problem. What happens when people can't play the game anymore? How long before there are so many losers in the game that even those who still have the means to continue gambling in the ponziconomy refuse to play?"
What happens.....you short sell the 10-year Treasuries at that point b/c that motherf**ker is called is US sovereign default and it is the ultimate short play in human history.
Let's make a deal--create debtor's prisons and treat corporate officers as criminals for the antics of the company. No artificial debt or persons--you screw up, you pay. This will keep the jails full--and paid for by the confiscation of the ill begotten gains.
adornosghost (profile) wrote on Sun, 7/26/2009 - 1:07 pm
Then, of course, that small problem that one cannot expand indefinitely in a finite world.
Where interest is involved, one must expand, or it doesn't get paid back.
Any smart 10 year old can explain to you where this is ultimately heading.
the objectivity of prepubescence combined with lack of personal stake in the outcome
Person A paid taxes on their wise financial decisions and now pays for a share of person Bs and the banks' losing transactions.
Except for that capital gains exclusion.
@BSR,
Where did that Kuwaiti article come from? The one posted on Yahoo Finance says, "Hazem al-Braikan was found dead in his bed with a gunshot wound to the head and a handgun at his side, said the official, speaking on condition of anonymity because he did not have the full details".
cc companies are settling on balances....cases vary...
the issue is 2 sided, as a underwriter on credit I could almost tell you 80% of the time who was going to bk ( outside of medical ) by just reviewing pti, dti, history and credit history/balance balloning over prior 6 months...
the issue is underwriters went to fica modeling similar to all the other financial modeling over last 10 years.. Calculus is bullshit when it comes to credit...no model works, only someone who understands credit trends should be making decisions on credit worthiness or application for more debt..not computer software.....
Oilshertz- good stuff.....
Mel-
My fear is that if we create debtor's prisons in the US the Goldman Sachs Criminal Finance Syndicate will figure out how to run them and profit off of those two.
But Goldman/Sachs workers will be in the next cell--servicing Bubba.
Goldman Sachs would ALWAYS be the top.
Financial companies have a responsibility to monitor the quality of their customers. If they have a bunch of crappy customers they are crappy companies. Either they are incompetent or engaged in predatory lending. These consumer credit companies are not victims all of a sudden, they were enablers for decades.
They are spammers FCS.
The problem with a debtors prison now is we would have to lock up a fair amount of people here. If we had one before then things probably would not have gone nuts. Then we have the Wall street and politicians how would we lock them up?
If they have a bunch of crappy customers they are crappy companies.
Right. And the penalty for being a crappy company in a darwinist, capitalistic system is that you get naturally selected.
Problem is: The past and present admins seem to have forgot what exactly they get selected for.
From the article: After she tried to get the bank’s attention by skipping a payment,it immediately raised her rate to 25 percent.
Well she got their attention!
Goldman could really change the prisons once inside. Selling contraband, porn, cigarettes, are kind of informal prisons businesses but once GS Criminal Finance gets their arms around it that could really ramp up productivity, get some protection rackets going, etc. They could spin-off an entity, syndicate it and go public, and so on. One of the major operational problems with running a crime syndicate like Goldman Sachs is that you're always looking for a place to park your money....think of the synergy that could created with all of the untapped money laundering expertise in these prisons. It's not like they're doing anything else with their time....
All of this comes down to replacing human decision making with computer modeling....software sucks at figuring out how people are going to spend, pay back and fhat inherent risk...
people defaulting is fine with me, bringing down the pigmen is the only way we regain america the way it was....
debt sleeps with the devil....
disclaimer-becoming an anarchist is starting to sound good to me....
After she tried to get the bank’s attention by skipping a payment,it immediately raised her rate to 25 percent.
Thereby giving great incentive to the borrower to default.
Bankers are terrorists.
In US history, who is the bigger villain--G/S or the mafia?
Ben Dover-
"The problem with a debtors prison now is we would have to lock up a fair amount of people here......then we have the Wall street and politicians how would we lock them up?"
Gosh it is almost like you just but the prison fence around the entire US and then.....well, Goldman is already running everything....would be the same in prison.....OK....perhaps we're already there....
The Time's article makes reference to Shays' Rebellion, but clearly the author knows nothing of the facts.
These were not people who built up debt through extravagant purchases and then defaulted.
From Wikipedia:
"Daniel Shays was a poor farm hand from Massachusetts when the Revolution broke out. He joined the Continental Army where he fought at Lexington, Bunker Hill, and Saratoga, and was eventually wounded in action. In 1780, he resigned from the army unpaid and went home to find himself in court for the nonpayment of debts. "
Shays' Rebellion - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
He couldn't pay his debts because he hadn't been paid for five years service to his country! Meanwhile, debts from the war needed to be paid:
"The financial situation leading to the rebellion included the problem that European war investors (among others) demanded payment in gold and silver; there was not enough specie in the states, including Massachusetts, to pay the debts; and through the state, wealthy urban businessmen were trying to squeeze whatever assets they could get out of rural smallholders."
So the merchants and traders who profited from war spending we trying to squeeze the people who fought the war, who had often never received their skimpy pay.
Theirs a highway here named for Daniel Shays.
sex pistols..
YouTube - Sex Pistols - Anarchy In The UK (Broadcast Debut)
I ran up my credit
On geegaws and junk,
And then the axe fell
And now I am sunk.
I can't make my payments
So I guess I'll just wait
And live here for free
'Til the arms of the state
Remove me by force
Out onto the street
Where my sole mode of travel
Will be on my feet.
It's a good thing I saved
This pistol of mine.
It might come in handy
Somewhere down the line.
The Banksters and corrupt politicians couldn't have done it with out the All American Fool. Party is over and yes we are there.
I think its an open question of who exactly is terrorizing whom here. Both sides are looking pretty bad in that article.
The mafia at least has the sense to keep the host alive.
How about some more Climate Change? Everyone seems to much in agreement on the CC stuff--
Periods of continental glaciation or "ice ages," and the "interpluvial" periods between them, are caused by orbital forcing. The predominant contributors to orbital forcing - the so-called "Milankovitch cycles (named after the Serbian geophysicist who described the three major cycles) - are as follows, with their periods:
Axial rotation (precision): 26K yrs
Axial tilt (obliquity): 41K yrs
Orbital eccentricity: ~100K yrs
Another cycle, which Milankovitch did not consider is:
Orbital inclination: ~70K yrs
These cycles may be modeled as sine waves (or more realistically as terms of a Taylor series) with periods as given & amplitudes determined as insolation at 65^o N. Using insolation in the northern hemisphere to determine amplitude gives the most useful information regarding influences on climate.
Superimposed, these cycles sometimes more or less cancel one another out and sometimes they potentiate or reinforce one another. When the latter happens the Earth experiences continental glaciation or warm interpluvials, respectively, depending on which side of the mean the combined peak or trough comes. Currently, the Ocean Planet is in an interpluvial dominated by the obliquity term. Net insolation in the northern hemisphere will increase for the next 25K years; in other words, the planet will not experience another ice age for at least 50K years. Orbital forcing by itself will result in an increasingly warmer planet for a long time.
In addition to these orbital cycles and their influence on climate comes the anthropogenic emissions of high heat capacity gasses into the atmosphere and surface oceans. During the Napoleonic wars, frostbite was "treated" by rubbing snow on the frozen body parts. Of course, this just made matters worse. The world is warming naturally, due to orbital forcing, and has been doing so since the end of the Pleistocene. By emitting massive amounts of oxidized carbon and other "greenhouse" gasses into the atmosphere, humans are effectively rubbing snow on a frostbite. Positive feedback mechanisms have been set in motion by human activity that are leading to rampant and catastrophic warming that is resulting in the mass extinction of species, collapse of ecosystems including agro-ecosystems, and the rapid melting of remaining continental ice sheets in Antarctica and Greenland along with mountain glaciers worldwide. This melting, along with the thermal expansion of the oceans, is causing an increase in sea level that will inundate great coastal cities and low-lying rice growing regions of south Asia that are the breadbasket of billions.
All of this is inevitable and can't be stopped, even if humans stopped buring fossil fuels immediately. This is humanity's and the biosphere's future. We have set in motion forces, on top of natural orbital forces, that can't be stopped and will result in a planet whose climate is radically different from that to which humans and the ecosystems that support us have evolved adaptations. The rapidity of change outpaces natural selection by several orders of magnitude. The outcome equates to the mass extinction of species including our own.
--darwinsdog
Barfly,
your on a roll with lyrics...maybe I'll put some music behind it, post it on youtube and split the earnings
good stuff...
State officials who lead California's war on global warming often travel abroad on trips supported by the major greenhouse gas polluters they regulate, a Bee investigation has found. Industry lobbyists and executives routinely join them.
Since 2006, more than two dozen top state officials have fanned out across the globe on such trips, bound for a climate change policy tour in Europe, meetings with high-level government officials across South America and China, even a safari in Kruger National Park in South Africa – all on someone else's dime.
They have logged more than 700,000 air miles and touched down in 17 nations, on trips collectively costing hundreds of thousands of dollars. In the process, their air travel alone emitted 275,000 pounds of heat-trapping carbon dioxide into the atmosphere.
404 - Not Found - sacbee.com
From the law of unintended consequences: "“With all the bailouts the government is giving everyone, no one has any personal accountability about their own debts,” said Roger Knauf, who runs a trade group of debt-buying firms. "
I think the OVERLEVERAGED® were just looking for a reason to stop paying, the government gave them a reason. It just happened sooner rather than later.
Good credit used to mean something, and it wasn't the ability to pay your minimum payments every month.
There is a reason credit card debt is called "unsecured debt"
My experience has been that after a very long time, the cc companies will
settle. In the 80s I had a client who had accumulated about 80k in debt,
which was really a lot back then. He was selling a townhouse and getting
about 20-25 grand. I told 'em all, you ALL have to settle, or he is going to file
bk. I got better as I went along and they all accepted 15-25 cents on the dollar.
On the other hand, there is a 5 year statute of limitations.
About a year and a half ago, a the cc tried to collect a judgment which was
long over the statute of limitations. about 4-5k. Anyway, the cc co lawyer
argued that since there was a $35.00 payment within 5 years that the whole
thing stayed alive. Seems his dad had a very similar name and there was
a payment in a refi, but it went to the wrong account. We went to court and
the judge said the credit card company had to produce more proof and it
died there.
I got another one which is utterly uncollectable, where we offered 50 bucks
a month and they told us to stuff it.
I think the attys take a huge percentage of the amounts paid.
climate change is real...
the ocean dying is even more realistic..
without the ocean teeming with life...we all die....
love that whale wars captain...he's a real hero...
AIER - Are Property Rights Key to Saving U.S. Fisheries?
A recent report by the United Nations Environment Program finds that 25 percent of all fisheries are collapsing because of overfishing. (A fishery is considered collapsed if its annual catch is less than 10 percent of its historical maximum catch.) While the current state of fisheries sounds alarming, future forecasts look worse. A 2006 article published in Science predicts that by 2048, all fish stocks worldwide will be gone if historical trends continue
"Well stated otishertz.
I think it is 4th generation warfare being waged against us by TPTB. "
Hi Homegnome,
Is it really warfare or is it just inevitability, like Karma. Besides, these thoughts of mine, they are not revolutionary calls. I am describing what I see as already happened and plotting possible trajectories. It sounds predictive because of phraseology like saying 'could', 'might', etc.
The future is always already here but is kept at bay by bias towards denial of reality. This lag in perception of reality is largely what behavioral finance is about.
The only question is does this "ruthless default" "democratic default" "passive-aggressive resistance" perception / sentiment shift go parabolic.
I hope the PTB can keep it together. I'm used to this system. However, the system looks like it is on death spiral trajectory. It makes no sense to get upset criticizing a dead system or to speed its decomposition. There are ways to be productive, profitable and happy even in a perpetual state of economic decline.
There will be (probably already are) examples of Great Recession small business success stories.
In order to get ahead Embrace change as the only constant.
Effective Demand (I'm uncomfortable referring to you as "ED")
Succinct and correct for many.
Debtors (again, many, not all) have been playing kick the can down the road for some time and now it appears the road has a bridge out. This is an opportune time to join the other zebras in the herd and hope the lions can't catch all of us.
From the law of unintended consequences: "“With all the bailouts the government is giving everyone, no one has any personal accountability about their own debts,” said Roger Knauf, who runs a trade group of debt-buying firms. "
Or accountability for their usurious rates and deceptive fee schedules...
The local fishwrapper said that even tho guaranteed fha loans were available
for the banks to loan out, they were refusing to do so.
Now one may argue that fha loans should not be available, etc, etc. But it
seems the banks are simply refusing to loan money even tho their investment
is guaranteed.
Excuse me, why do banks exist in the first place if they are not gonna loan
money?
c_c_l_t - thanks. Do with it whatever you want.
Yep off South Florida fishing of certain species is gonna be heavily
restricted for a while, and oh, the screaming!!! At least some thing
is being tried somewhere.
LLiz: Thanks for the anecdotes.
I got another one which is utterly uncollectable, where we offered 50 bucks
a month and they told us to stuff it.
So what does the end of that story look like? BK with some amount? or 0?
@ MrM
which credit card company do you work for (snark off)
I'd be happy to let CC co.s price for risk-but in exchange we reinstate usury laws......
"During the Napoleonic wars, frostbite was "treated" by rubbing snow on the frozen body parts. Of course, this just made matters worse."
This sounds like fixing debt deflation by taking on more sovereign debt.
This is an opportune time to join the other zebras in the herd and hope the lions can't catch all of us.
If I was knee deep in debt I may think that. But I'm not, just not my nature. I never joined that herd. The good news for me I don't have to worry about the lions. I'm thinking about joining the vultures though, carrion is sounding mighty fine.
@ barfly
I hope the Boss is reading......that'd go nice to music.....
Credit card transactions need transparency. It would take about 3 seconds after the receipt is printed for cash payers to go postal over the inequity.
CCard Receipt:
Store Info
Date
Product Price $10.00
Transaction Fee... $0.35
Transaction rate fee @ 2.45% $0.25
Sales Tax @ 6.00% $0.60
Total: $11.20
Cash Receipt:
Store Info
Date
Product Price $10.37
Sales Tax @ 6.00% $0.63
Total: $11.20
Mayhem ensues.
otishertz (profile) wrote on Sun, 7/26/2009 - 1:39 pm
I hope the PTB can keep it together. I'm used to this system. However, the system looks like it is on death spiral trajectory. It makes no sense to get upset criticizing a dead system or to speed its decomposition. There are ways to be productive, profitable and happy even in a perpetual state of economic decline.
IMHO we are going to end up with a lot more 'female' economy (for lack of a better term) in any path that resembles sustainability. Testosterone-driven risk aversion, culture of excess and social acceptability of speculation as a way of making a living will be out for a long while if we recover. Of course the old alphas have to keep up their power grab in the meantime, unable and unwilling to adjust to a new paradigm that doesn't include them on top and running the world into the ground.
"Credit card transactions need transparency."
The same would be nice for every product we buy as to the hidden tax built into the price. Example would be Pipeline transfer fees on gas, Excise taxes. The consumer would get quit a sobering look at indirect taxation as well.
Liz, sounds like most CC debt in effectively uncollectible. So if our culture accepts debt repudiation, then kiss goodbye to repayment. Taxpayers will pick up most of the tab, of course, "to save the economy".
"This is an opportune time to join the other zebras in the herd and hope the lions can't catch all of us."
I think this is exactly what's going on here. A few folks really did get in a pickle through no fault of their own, and have exhausted their means. Those are the stories in the newspapers, and the zebra that is doomed in the analogy. But for every zebra that is doomed, many more are zebras looking to break free with just a few scratches or shortness of breath. Borrowing without repaying is a lot nicer than borrowing and repaying on the original terms.
ResistenceisFeudal-
If you say the economy will be more "female" in the future, then explain Goldman's results this quarter.
Which is worse - bankers or terrorists (profile) wrote on Sun, 7/26/2009 - 1:52 pm
ResistenceisFeudal-
If you say the economy will be more "female" in the future, then explain Goldman's results this quarter.
"Of course the old alphas have to keep up their power grab in the meantime, unable and unwilling to adjust to a new paradigm that doesn't include them on top and running the world into the ground."
I am not talking in short term or quarterly sales profit terms. I mean, if (when) they fail, what's coming will be a very different environment, probably for decades.
more parsnips
less debt
I am so glad I barely pay any taxes anymore to support this charade. And I have an aggregate 150k limit on my credit cards. (not including american express gold). The only dilemma is when to charge the whole thing......
But for every zebra that is doomed, many more are zebras looking to break free with just a few scratches or shortness of breath. Borrowing without repaying is a lot nicer than borrowing and repaying on the original terms.
I think that is exactly what is going on as well, which is why my sympathy is limited for both sides of the equation.
I for one think the borrowers and lenders should go under and pay the consequences for their actions. It would reduce the number of lenders making bad loans and the number of borrowers willing to overconsume and ruthlessly default.
But apparently according to modern economic theory I'm antiquated in my thinking.
This instant is the future. These CR articles are the future. The present facts are the future. What has already happened is the future. Global economic collapse is the future. Green shoots of Hopium delineate the present delay in perception.
The future is now.
People are defaulting in mass waves right now.
"Credit card transactions need transparency. It would take about 3 seconds after the receipt is printed for cash payers to go postal over the inequity."
Exactly, RD.
BTW, the taxes paid by people who sold in 2007 were small, and are not going to be increased by much comapared to the total taxpayer loss of $500,000. Other taxpayers will be picking up most of that tab. I am not trying to blame all our ills on homeowners who sold out at the peak. I am just pointing out who actually gained and who lost. Where did the money all go, and who is paying the tab? It doesn't all balance out. Bank stockholders s ended up losing, net. Senior bank employees gained some. But I think the biggest dollar gainers in aggregate dollars are homeowners and the biggest losers are taxpayers. Not the same. (I am sensitive to the distinction because I've never owned a home, but I pay enough taxes every year to support several families in comfort.)
Resistence-
I would love to agree with you but see the opposite. Despite major economic restructuring, which historically usually causes major political upheaval, none of that is happening....Iceland applying for EU membership is not quite seismic enough for me. No boundaries redrawn on the world map. Goldman still running the country. USD is still the reserve currency. Nothing has changed.
otishertz (profile) wrote on Sun, 7/26/2009 - 1:59 pm
This instant is the future. These CR articles are the future. The present facts are the future. What has already happened is the future. Global economic collapse is the future. Green shoots of Hopium define the delay in perception.
The future is now.
So the degree to which the future is experienced is in some inverse proportion to the degree of hopium in one's subjective perception of that objective future?
My client has other considerations and reasons for not filing bk now. They
will in about 6-9 months. They also have a toe in a very profitable transaction
that could save their hides, but keeps getting put off.
The amount of debt that I have is very sustainable, no biggie at all.
But I have concluded that at least half the population can't be trusted to do
anything but pay cash.
And it seems me that corporations who sent out zillions of offers to draw
people into debt slavery deserve what they get.
And I have always been accused of being very cheap.
OT: While we are resting on our laurels, Brazil has been pumping huge amounts of money into research and has rocketed ahead of us in several areas of important technology:
Print Story: Yahoo! News - Yahoo! News Photos
Gas station nearby lists 2 prices for cash & credit.
Later Taters,
I'm going to go drink some chilled urine, smoke some pot and ride my bike.
Parting words:
Advice is worth what you pay for it.
Which is worse - bankers or terrorists (profile) wrote on Sun, 7/26/2009 - 2:01 pm
Resistence-
I would love to agree with you but see the opposite. Despite major economic restructuring, which historically usually causes major political upheaval, none of that is happening....Iceland applying for EU membership is not quite seismic enough for me. No boundaries redrawn on the world map. Goldman still running the country. USD is still the reserve currency. Nothing has changed.
Sadly, I see Goldman and other major albatrosses still to come given charge over massive social programs. Even more corruption is in the wings. Again, capitalism starts as scoundrels regulated by competition and ends in scoundrels regulating competition.
Otishertz: "Parting words:
Advice is worth what you pay for it."
I have some very expensive advice available. Send me the money and I'll send you the advice.
Rob Dawg wrote:
Credit card transactions need transparency. It would take about 3 seconds after the receipt is printed for cash payers to go postal over the inequity.
RobDawg, the fees discussed above are merchant fees. Its the merchant's business what his costs are. That's why most merchants like debit card transactions, because they are only charged a network fee. The user is charged a fee at his end, by the issuer on debit card trans.
Climate Change is real because we are overfishing the oceans. Now that is logic I can depend on!
Who cares? EVERYONE is saying the recession is over.
Advice is worth what you pay for it from a disinterested, objective observer who can perfectly reflect its value in terms of price and who is not subject to the profit motive.
Bankrupt US parts maker Delphi dumps pension obligations
Bankrupt US parts maker Delphi dumps pension obligations
While we are on the subject of ACH clearing, i'll repeat mention of a post i made weeks ago, which no one commented on then, i think because the average person does not realise the ramifications, namely that ACH is extending its reach to the G20, and this appears to have been orchestrated in haste (although, i am out of the insider-loop these days, so maybe there was was more advance warning than I heard about).
Yep, I always charge a fee, even to people who very poor.
If you don't people will treat you with actual contempt, and
also disregard your good advice. I will reduce my fee to 20
bucks for a short consultation, if I feel sorry for the person,
but never zero.
P'ses me off when friends and relatives ask for advise, get
it and they repeatedly ignore me and continue to screw up.
\
I have gotten quite tart with them.
If you don't want to take my advice and change your situation,
the just accept the situtation you are in, and quit kvetching.
bsneath-you read it wrong....
Climate change is real...period..
overfishing is a larger problem.. no fish, no life..
drink some coffee...
What's ACH clearing?
I take that back. Paid advice is frequently worth beans. Words either add up or they don't independently of the byline.
KR-
Explain ACH clearing being expanded to the G20.....
Yeah, but if you don't pay, you don't take it seriously,
and that is bad for the recipient of the advice.
lawyerliz :What's ACH clearing?
That will cost you $20.00
hahahahah
Google Automated Clearing House....
But what does that mean?
Which is worse - bankers or terrorists (profile) wrote
KR-
Explain ACH clearing being expanded to the G20.....
Automated Clearing House - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
The ACH is now wiring into the G20. It should be self-explanitory I think. But if not, its a prelude to a new currency. They will need this step...
And by the way, seems I've earned my keep here.
Sorry kr, I just don't get it. I read wiki and still don't understand what
it is or why I should care a lot, or why more countries being added is
significant.
This seems like an anti-tax haven thing to me.
lawyerliz (profile) wrote on Sun, 7/26/2009 - 2:13 pm
Yep, I always charge a fee, even to people who very poor.
P'ses me off when friends and relatives ask for advise, get
it and they repeatedly ignore me and continue to screw up.
\
I have gotten quite tart with them.
I get this with computer problems, particularly with relatives. If I had an uncle who was a plumber, I wouldn't ask him to stop by and fix a leaky sink for me for free just because that's what he does for a living. I've seen it with doctors too, where it would get even more annoying I'm sure.
With an independent-thinking, competent person who was honest and wanted reasonable compensation, advice's worth would probably be fairly close to the true unknown value. Which is probably why a society that values honesty and competence and recognizes the need to pay a reasonable price tends to work pretty well, even if it is primitive... There are always parasites and sociopaths but they are marginalized and outed and/or punished.
Liz, i wish I had a legal service that answered questions for $20 a pop. Think of the utility value, i would use it a lot i think. I bet tons of RE agents and the like would also. You might consider a website based on that. Just reinvent yourself offshore under an alias. Members could pay an annual fee to see all the questions and all the answers.
KR-
Do you have some kind of weblink to an article that shows this is being expanded through the G20. I'm wondering why....the main commentary with this has to do with consumer protections on returning checks, and the consumer rules within various G20 countries (US, EU, Saudi Arabia) are vastly, vastly different.
Not sure if the G20 would agree to this if the intent is a new currency....lots of rhetoric amongst the G20 about what the global reserve currency but they would agree if the intent relates to tax havens since there is agreement about tax haven-related issues amongst the G20 (the large industrial countries are the big tax haven losers).
I only am so cheap for people that I feel sorry for.
Legal advice almost always has to be customized
to the specific person.
When somebody asks me to do "a simple quit claim deed"
I know I have to spend at least an hour with them.
ACH is a transaction clearing network for electronic payments, and notice its in association with the Fed (a private currency issuer), it was formerly USA only, then expanded to Mexico, Canada and then UK. Now its going to the G20. It means, the central clearing for transactions is being extended to 20 economies. There are many ramifications to this, especially for outsourcing payments. To expand on that, is a long conversation.
Heh, lliz - my father, currently solo practitioner in Alaska, gave me some good advice about eight years ago - several weeks, later I called him back after getting agitated about some trivial issue, and he said "Kid, I told you what I think - you don't have to take my advice - but if you don't I'm going to charge you for it."
Words o' wisdom - thanks Dad!
Isn't this a good thing, KR? (Expanding a ulility like electronic payments.) I really like the Euro's convenience. In the days before national currencies, we all had to barter. Yes, I know it has some advantages, but a common currency is like electricity or other utilities - kinda handy.
I think I will mow some weeds.
Sorry kr, I just don't get it.
Rest of the world is building direct transactions so they can quit using the dollar completely.
Jim Willie's most recent article talks about it.
Hard to gauge the truth of it but it makes some sense.
.
.
Abandoned USDollar & Paradigm Shift
KR-
I think everyone gets what you have explicitly said thus far, but is not sure what you're implying. Can you provide some weblinks? I'm Googling and only finding ACH being expanded to the Bahamas (seems like a tax haven thing once again).
Down by the river,
The pickin's are slim
Tonight 'round the campfire
As dark closes in.
The fishin' is bad.
The apples are gone.
And the kids are all whinin'
And askin' what's wrong,
While the women are
Doin' their best to be strong,
It's a matter of time
'Til we move along.
We follow the sun
As best we could.
Stay by the water.
Stay by the wood.
Scavenge old orchards
For what we can find;
We are experts with slingshots
And pieces of twine.
The occasional squirrel
Is always a treat.
Our diet does not
Consist of much meat.
The men killed a hog
One day with their spears,
And we feasted like kings
Right down to the ears.
The people we meet
Are ragged and thin,
But friendly and helpful
So we take them in.
In our little band
The rules are few:
Just do unto others
As they do to you.
To answer the question on source:
NACHA NEWS: Fed Releases FedGlobal ACH Services for IAT The Federal Reserve Banks are offering an enhanced offering for cross-border electronic payments that will be enabled by the International ACH Transaction rule. By Maria Bruno-Britz More from this author April 06, 2009
NACHA NEWS: Fed Releases FedGlobal ACH Services for IAT by Bank Systems & Technology
barfly (profile) wrote on Sun, 7/26/2009 - 2:37 pm
In our little band
The rules are few:
Just do unto others
As they do to you.
In a perverse way, that may be exactly what has to happen.
Gotta run out and fill my dumpster before it rains. On the ACH, you can view it as unified banking between G20. WE could not do one currency without such a mechanism.
I was chatting with a gentleman this weekend, and he was grousing about the impact the higher minimum wage was going to have on businesses and employment. I told him that if his business model was dependent upon someone making $6.50 an hour that business wasn't a good candidate to make it in the long run. My feelings are the same here. The credit card companies received almost half their revenue from late fees/over-the-credit-limit fees/cash advance fees etc. If your well being is dependent upon your customer acting irresponsibly and recklessly, don't be shocked when they don't show up to pull you out of the ditch.
Quite frankly, ruthless default is the mildest thing folks could do to bankers. During the Great Depression, people were known to hang bankers and their agents as they came out to auction the farm.
One currency for G20? Sounds good to me. Everyone else can run for their survivalist bunkers in the desert.
I just read Anna Schwartz's critique of Bernanke's stewardship of the Fed, in connection with his fitness for a new term. She is on the mark, I think. It's great that he's proven he can and will reflate and pour liquids for the party, but he has proven he is very poor at pulling the liquor, and that's what will have to come next.
"Quite frankly, ruthless default is the mildest thing folks could do to bankers. "
Sigh, I don't see any progress in people's understanding. Large-scale ruthless defaults will cost a lot of money, and most of those costs will be borne by US taxpayers. I don't know why we are advocating "screw the taxpayer" policies. (I'd be happy to see the lending banks and other institutions, and their depositors, take the losses, but this is politically impossible.)
To paraphrase, "it is hard to get a man to understand, when his ruthless default gain depends on him not understanding".
KR-
If you're still there, there is a very, very interesting coincidence between the implementation of this new program on September 18th and Treasury's tax amnesty program deadline of September 23rd. Hmmmm...
That is very interesting.
The American Credit Card holder has kissed the banking frog which turned into
a trillion dollar pig.
As Congress put it......oink ....oink
or which religion is the real one?<i/>
No ghost, he was referring to anthropomorphic global warming the one and true religion...Al Gore told me so.
You still have faith in the system. I don't. I'm just a pawn in the aristocrasy's game.
Right on HomeGnome. Although a banker did try to break into the house last week and force me and my wife...yes force us I tell ya to take the cards and buy, buy, buy. I am a modern american victim...consumer profiling probably.
patientrenter (profile) wrote on Sun, 7/26/2009 - 2:52 pm
Sigh, I don't see any progress in people's understanding. Large-scale ruthless defaults will cost a lot of money, and most of those costs will be borne by US taxpayers. I don't know why we are advocating "screw the taxpayer" policies. (I'd be happy to see the lending banks and other institutions, and their depositors, take the losses, but this is politically impossible.)
It will also force lenders, who are already skittish with credit, to adopt higher credit standards, as their models require them to based on default rates and related expectancies. Paradoxically, this will actually contract the availability of credit, and cause institutions to be even more risk-averse and unwilling to make the loans necessary to economic growth. Extending credit for consumption and a debt-financed lifestyle is a net loss for society.
For the last time, I was being sarcastic!
PR,
Good article. Did you look at any of the other articles listed at the bottom of the page? One: Arbitration: No longer an easy out for credit card companies? -- DailyFinance
It's about how the Minnesota AG's litigation against the National Arbitrator's association & American Arbitrator's Ass'n has demonstrated major conflicts of interest exist for members of either entity in arbitrating credit card issuer vs. user conflicts (mandated in most credit card agreements) or similar auto manufacturer agreements. Litigation has been apparently been sufficiently successful that both have decided not to do any more consumer credit arbitrations.
Nice to see that at least a few states are looking out for the interests of their residents.
Probably more work for Congressional lobbyists, pushing Congress to limit the rights of states to protect their residents from predatory corporations.
The reason people aren't paying back their credit cards is because they can't afford to.
Educating them on making the monthly payment isn't really going to help in that case.
Honestly I am dumbfounded by CRs comments on Bernanke. His record not only shows that he lacks the foresight to have foreseen a calamity obvious to many but that he also lacks the moral fiber to be trusted with impartial and even handed regulation over the banking sector.
Exhibit A = Merrill lynch "merger" with BAC.
Preserving the system as it stands will lead to further boom and busts and pain for millions in the future.
-Tim Disappointed in 2009
The percentage of adults who are working has fallen from 64 at the end of the Clinton era to only 59.5 now. Some of those dropouts are retirees, but some may be responding to the economy’s declining dynamism. Traditionally, it was a mark of Americans’ resiliency that, when times were tough, they relocated from state to state and region to region. Now, according to the Census Bureau, mobility is at an all-time recorded low. Perhaps people with underwater mortgages cannot afford to move. Perhaps the areas they used to move to, typically the Sun Belt, are too devastated by foreclosures. But the vaunted ability of the U.S. economy to renew itself seems a little tarnished. Maybe it’s no accident that this time around, folks on the unemployment line are staying there longer.
So how does Obama respond to declining employment and falling wages?
The Cash for clunker program - go out and rack up more $$$ on credit but you will save $3500 - 4500 on trade in;)
Lobbyist, the All American Fool is now called the "term a la modern" VICTIM. It's all the rage. Reminds me of my father after coming home from WWII telling my mother that it was just amazing...he didn't meet a single nazi in germany...Hitler just captured the whole country by himself and forced them (yes I know it is tragic) yes forced to carry out the war. If it goes well, I am a genius, if it fails I was a victim. Americans are children.
I'm just a pawn in the aristocrasy's game.
I'm a rook.
Much better benefits.
What is frustrating to me that Tim 2012 has suggested is that we've gone through all of this for nothing. The TPTB are still in place, USD is still the reserve currency, Goldman still runs the country, and because of that we're just being set up for the next bubble.
"I'm a rook.
Much better benefits."
you get rooked right after the pawns and before the knights and bishops
badger (profile) wrote:" You still have faith in the system. I don't. I'm just a pawn in the aristocrasy's game."
Of course you are. But at least you are on the board, and if you play your cards right, you can become a knight. This century is not the worst one to be alive in.
azurite: "Probably more work for Congressional lobbyists, pushing Congress to limit the rights of states to protect their residents from predatory corporations."
azurite, I have been on the other side of those lawsuits, and while some corporations sometimes need to be reined in (as appears to be the case when CC companies use their oligopoly power to make it hard for retailers to offer lower cash prices), I have also seen how some lawyers and law firms abuse consumer protection laws to milk the system. it got to a point a while ago that people in my industry began to think that company owners were going to just collect a low 'rent', and any profits above that would be taken by lawyers (without much regard to the underlying merit of their clients' complaints). So it can cut both ways. Distinguish cases, exercise balance....
Bankers or terrorists
Nothing has changed. we are just more broke and more unemployed than we were 2 years ago.
On the Netflix banner ad on top of this page, is that Tim Geithner or Sean Penn when he played that mentally challenged charecter?
OT:
Alright, who bought this?
I know one of you must have...
LOS ANGELES (Reuters) - A small pistol belonging to 1930s gangster John Dillinger has been sold at auction to a private collector for $95,600 -- more than double the pre-sale estimate, the auction house said on Sunday.
The Remington .41 caliber Double Derringer was said to have been found hidden in one of Dillinger's socks when he was arrested in Tucson, Arizona in January 1934, said Dennis Lowe of Heritage Auction Galleries in Dallas.
According to affidavits, the pistol was given by the then Tucson sheriff to a probation officer and kept in the family until selling it in 1959.
The owner, who wished to remain anonymous, sold it because he was in declining health, Lowe said. It had been expected to fetch about $35,000 - $45,000 at the auction on Saturday in Dallas. A private Los Angeles collector made the winning bid of $95,600.
Dillinger, one of the most infamous bank robbers in the United States in the early 1930s, was shot dead by FBI agents in Chicago in July 1934 at the age of 31.
but I have no sympathy for anyone in credit card debt
"According to Boohaker (bankruptcy attorney and a certified financial planner) ‘the biggest misperception surrounding bankruptcy remains that bankruptcy is a lifestyle choice overspending consumers use to absolve themselves of debt obligations so they can spend anew.’ She says that typically, ‘any excessive use of credit occurs after a catastrophic event like a divorce, job loss or medical issue sends them scrambling to pay bills.’"
Sorry but most people would use all the credit they had if they found out they had a life threatening disease, they had no money and it was curable.
Before anymore bailouts, I think what a few million Americans need most is to get a dose of empathy.
@danm (profile) wrote (in reply to...) on Sun, 7/26/2009 - 1:26 pm
but I have no sympathy for anyone in credit card debt
Ditto
How about trying and live within your REAL means rather than being a pretender
I know some folks personally who have declared BK. Several of the same family members have done it. All seem to be "unlucky". Totally concidentally, they all live in nice homes, drive nice cars like big BMWs, and don't save very much. Just a coincidence, I know. I am sure all BK is due to life-threatening diseases striking uninsured people with little savings who are otherwise very responsible, just like in the adverts.
Goldman Sachs. after latching on to the government's teet, is set to give over 150 employees over $1,000,000 in bonuses, and folks are worried about someone taking a cruise to the Carribean and defaulting on their credit card.
Goldman Sachs. after latching on to the government's teet, is set to give over 150 employees over $1,000,000 in bonuses, and folks are worried about someone taking a cruise to the Carribean and defaulting on their credit card.
Well, duh.
If the proles don't cough up interest, how is GS supposed to pay bonuses?
Personal bankruptcies will spike in the fall. Scouts promise.
Last thing About CR on Bernanke. at least we all know where CR stands. It will help me put his comments into Perspective from now on.
Personal bankruptcies will spike in the fall.
Any particular reason coming up?
Re: "Why aren't consumers being educated on the dangers of not paying off their credit card balance each month? "
That, is too fucking funny ....ROTFLMAO and Moohawhahahahhawha, mooha
Consumers just want to be treated like companies.
If it is good for the Donald to default on real estate loans, why should not Joe Six Pack believe he cannot do the same on debt within his somewhat more meager domain?
Aftertall, The Donald is a TV star, so we must look up to him, no?
Methinks the herd is beginning to get nervous...
Are there classes on the dangers of not paying off debt? Maybe Treasury and assorted corporations like Fannie, AIG, CIT, FPM, Goldman and a few other thousand shitbag crooks should take that class?
Bike ride time
the herd is getting restless, and bitter
based on what I am hearing out there
I'm sorry that was to be JPM as in the people who were given Lehman lotto tickets
"(A fishery is considered collapsed if its annual catch is less than 10 percent of its historical maximum catch.)"
Seems like 10% of historical maximum could be an unsustainable amount (viz, for example Galapagos Turtles).
I sense a new market opportunity for Blackwater.
No wait a tic, before that ride gets underway:
ALFRED: Series: MZM, MZM Money Stock
MZM is still something to watch, as people stop spending cash and stop using credit; we are just phasing into a recession and then onto Great Depression ll.
Look at compounded rate of change over a nice long series... gotta go
JP
No particular reason except for the fact the the summer spending season will have ended and Jobless benefits expire at an increasing pace after August. End of summer also marks the end of the RE selling season for a about 6-9 months.
This dude has a nice blog and some info on MZM, but really, gotta go:
The Bonddad Blog: Some Inconvenient Truths -- Invictus
Goldman's peak annual compensation was $20 billion. So, for the 5 worst years of the bubble, they took in less than $100 billion. I wouldn't complain about seeing most of that money taken back, and criminal penalties for the most culpable few dozen people, but this amount pales in comparison to the trillions in losses generated by bad lending during those years. Putting things in perspective can help everyone see more clearly (assuming you haven't already decided what you want to see).
Hey Barfly.....mind if I save the last?
Please..... credit cards, more specifically, debit cards are the new cigarettes, market to minors until they reach adulthood. My kid was given a VISA debit card with a pretty picture on it.
My 18 year old found out, when a vendor ran his card 2x, overdrafting his account for minutes, that BoA charged him $35 for the deal, sent him a post card 9 days later. Didn't attempt to email him, although they require an email address. By the time his post card arrived, there was a total of $175 in fees charged, $35 per transaction. Why? because a VISA debit card allows overdrafts of the checking account (overdrafts only becasue of the first fee)..... a very effective high fee credit card.
The PHeD and Tresury sent these pigs hundreds of millions of dollars so they can continue this practice.
Got the kid the heck out of BoA to a small local bank, one that will not let him over draw, and might pick up the phone if there is a problem. Hopefully, when he goes to college in a few weeks, he resists the credit card application.
Would probably be best to let him struggle on his own, even if he trashes his credit rating in his 20's, he'll be better off understanding the system instead of being bailed out.
@Liz:
[When somebody asks me to do "a simple quit claim deed"
I know I have to spend at least an hour with them. ]
How long when they want a "quick" claim deed?
I'm not sure I believe all of this. At one point does a default become ruthless? Suppose someone's income minus debt payments is near or below the poverty line? Is that not ruthless? How much income do you need for the default to be ruthless? The ruthless thing implies these people have loads of money and just aren't paying because they suddenly got mad for some reason. I don't think that's happening. I think most people who default on loans of any kinds either a) don't have the money and say they're not paying b/c they're too poor or b) don't have the money and say they're not paying as part of a strategy. I suspect most people who have a reasonable amount of money keep paying their bills.