Adverse scenario isn't even the new baseline.

Care to see a CA example of why?

Check this one out :

663 OAKLAND Ave, Oakland, CA 94611 | MLS# 40416728

Sold for $1.185 mil in Oct 2006. Now, $600k bank owned.

TStone, where are ya?

The real news of the day is if Angelo Mozilo looks out his backyard across the golf course and just slightly to the left he can now see a foreclosure from his back porch.

Mr. Tan Man
Make me a loan
The craziest loan the world's ever known...

I didn't know that San Quentin had a golf course.

BofA puts 7-day hold on California IOUs

So what happens to all those folks who literally struggle paycheck to paycheck and now the paycheck is going to be effectively 7 days late? Will this apply to unemployment check issued as IOUs?

saw the pig so i will post on this thread, how do we know cali wont be the lehmans of the states?

What's the second deriviative of the increasing loss estimates?

It's an executive, par 3.

We know CA wont be Lehman, because we know how well that worked out. Im pretty sure TBTF has now become enshrined into law. Too bad TBTE has not.

Another sad story. This one sadder than most because the foreclosee
put a lot down.

Only 20k underwater. Some hope here. I don't like it when they have hope,
'cause I can't cleanly just say walk away. \

Was a rental and honestly described as same. Renter is paying rent reasonably
timely and has lived there many years--before my lady bought. If the bank
can be talked into reducing the interest rate to 3%, they can make the payments.

Won't quite cash flow, but almost.

This lady even paid extra on the mtg, but then their business went downhill,
and they couldn't any more. The business? Making custom furniture. Still have
some 'cause they deal with rich people.

boa said that they were only going to take ious til 7-10-09. and now they are holding them. it going to be a lehmans.

"S&P noted a surge in the inventory of bank-owned properties."

They're not the only ones. Haven't I been saying this for a few weeks?

And it is not just Alt A and Subprime that are going to be affected.

I posted this over the weekend; Whitney Tilson had some great comments in a recent Forbes article. Anyone who thinks they can accurately predict how mortgages are going to perform are fooling themselves, but of course that doesn't stop all the credit analysts in banks running their flawed LP model from putting in their rosy HP scenarios and justifying a mark of 95 cents on the dollar.

Tilson Talks Mortgage Default - Forbes.com

"And the third key variable is what are people who are underwater do? Twenty-five percent minimum of all the mortgages in the country are underwater. And so the question is: Some of those people are underwater and can't make the payments, but what about all the people who are underwater and who can make the payments but [who] might be economically rational to walk away and hand the keys to the bank? Because why should I keep paying the bank a $400,000 mortgage on a home that's only worth $250,000?

Now that's a key variable, because historically people don't like to lose their homes, they don't like to have their credit rating ruined. But historically no one has ever been $150,000 underwater with a mortgage. It's never happened before. And now you have millions of people who are deep underwater. So how those people behave in terms of walking away from loans that they can make the monthly payments on but it's economically rational for them to walk is going to be a very important variable and one I can't really predict. "

Effective Demand (homepage, profile) wrote on Mon, 7/6/2009 - 2:02 pm

The real news of the day is if Angelo Mozilo looks out his backyard across the golf course and just slightly to the left he can now see a foreclosure from his back porch.

My canary 92397 has gone insane. The stuff listed in the last 90 days is well above 2003 prices and frequently above 2006 prices for traditional offerings. REOs are on the other hand all over the map but sometimes half price. I just don't see how that is a market.

"BofA puts 7-day hold on California IOUs"

BofA does this as a matter of course on business accounts - sometimes a longer period.

They are among the slimiest of all banks, and going for #1.

sm_landlord (profile) wrote (in reply to...) on Mon, 7/6/2009 - 2:03 pm

I didn't know that San Quentin had a golf course.

9 holes and a marina if they accept my lowball bid. Wink

now the paycheck is going to be effectively 7 days late?

Excellent!

Now BofA & others can charge late fees, too, and really rack up the profits!

CA will need to run PSAs to maintain confidence....

"CAIOUs - as good as cash!"

and show a family guy using one to buy a candy bar for his kid.

Posted this last night:
BofA just "doubled" their margin on a credit card for my bud from 3.25% to 6.74%.
Burn, you SOB's.
Oh, and my bud as good credit; never late.

Gee really? all of this and no one in jail! Crap I wasted my life being honest and hard working. Crime does pay.

WestSac_Grrl, it is even worse because they made such a big deal of reassuring everyone that "the big banks" had agreed to honor the IOUs, in effect temporarily bailing out Cali by issuing actual cash for the darn things. Now BofA drops the bomb, "Oh, yeah, that's not real money, so it is subject to our 7-day hold policy ..."

Makes it look like BofA doesn't really want to hold these things after all, eh? But I have a hunch that this is not going to be popular with the boys in charge ... someone with a big desk and an Elliptical Office might just be about to step on BofA real hard. They're still TARPed, ain't they?
Or maybe a big line of people standing outside a local branch waving their useless IOUs for the cameras will do the trick.
"I'll take Pitchforks and Torches for $100, Alex!"

Of course it pays; otherwise no one would do it more than once.

But what if you are 20k underwater on a 200k house. My headache from above.

There goes the neighborhood.

LL,

I have been underwater on RRE before and understand you buy what you can afford and wait it out. The responsible thing to do.

yes yes, and only bums can't feed their kids...

BOA just wants better terms from the Fed government to be the conduit for the Cali bail-out. It'll get worked out.

Ain't no rescue helicopters coming girls.
We are on our own...
Lock and load.

And so I told her. It's my job to advise her what is best financially. But she could
be responsible and lose everything. There are more properties involved. She can't
keep them all and if she tries, she will lose everything, which is not good for
her or the banks involved.

Thanks again Liz, for your 'front lines' reporting.
Beer

I have been underwater on RRE before and understand you buy what you can afford and wait it out. The responsible thing to do.

Responsible in what sense of the word? Who do you owe responsibility to? Your family? The crooks holding paper over your head?

I thought so.

This idea of being "responsible" to society at large is an anachronism carried from a time when most of society played by the rules and didn't make their living by exploiting saps still playing by the rules. The old set of rules.

New age. Steal from the government, or steal from your family, as they said in Russia.

Think of it this way. The bankers will always get paid. Someone will be making those payments. You have a choice in this new economy, just about the only one afforded to you in this whole lousy operation: Who will be the ones making the payments? Your family or your government? Who benefits from making the payments and saving the banks, from maintaining the status-wage-slave-quo, your family, or your government?

Frankly, it's immoral to pay your debts in this environment. Keep that in mind, soldier.

So think about what is really happening here. Who should have been getting the money, that is now going to get an IOU? And which types would be in such unfortunate straits as to have to sell them asap for the cash? And if they really need the cash, and are forced to take under par for the IOU, say 95 cents, they get a 5% pay cut effective for the term of the IOUs.

But who gains from that? Probably no one who should. So we solve our problems through more upward redistribution of income? Egads.

Wall St is gearing up to trade this ??? I Mean, WTF is that? Like we need to try to fix the state's problems by giving a slice to wall street? Someone please wake me up from this long national nightmare.

FT.com / US & Canada - Wall Street gears up to trade California IOUs

"BofA just "doubled" their margin on a credit card for my bud from 3.25% to 6.74%.
Burn, you SOB's.
Oh, and my bud as good credit; never late"

Your bud is simply ani-amerikan - the interest would be lowered if he/she was chronically late....the objective is to rack interest not serve the customer...ggeezz!

I'm beginning to hear incredibly low prices tho, which fuel my trepidation about her trying to
work things out.

Her daughter is going for a house in a nice area for 140k. This area, 3 years ago, you
couldn't find an efficiency condo for that much. This is a sf house with 4 bedrooms and
cathedral ceilings on a reasonable sized lot. For you Cali persons, it's a huge lot.

Responsible in what sense of the word? Who do you owe responsibility to? Your family or the crooks holding paper over your head?

I really hope no "crooks" ever bother giving you a mortgage or a credit card.

"Frankly, it's immoral to pay your debts in this environment."

Especially when you realize the money that was lent to you was created out of thin air. The bank doesn't have on deposit the money it lent out, it only has a fraction of it.

So a bank creates money out of thin air, and charges you interest?

Nice game.

That would be Cali non-persons Liz. We are treated like dirt, and thus, dirt we shall become.

Imagine if you, as an individual, could create money to loan out to people? If you had, say, $50K in the bank, but could extend $500K of loans to your friends, and charge them interest for it?

Welcome to the wonderful world of fractional reserve lending. Literally a license to steal.

But historically no one has ever been $150,000 underwater with a mortgage. It's never happened before.

Well not exactly. Plenty of folks in the oil producing states were underwater to the tune of $150k in real terms during the 80's and early 90s. It took my brother over 15 years to see the nominal value of his condo rise to his mid 80s purchase price. Then there was the Florida land rush of the 1920s. RE booms and busts are not new, just take on different flavors.

Well, in the long run. . .we are all dirt.

This is bigger and more widespread than those earlier booms and busts.

It is different here, there and everywhere.

Yeh, but the long run is getting a heck of a lot shorter for CA folks.

I really hope no "crooks" ever bother giving you a mortgage or a credit card.

They don't need to anymore, they've found a more profitable venture: Scaring my tax dollars out of the government.

Essential for the economy, don't you know.

Would your opinion of me change if you knew that these banks were intentionally seeking out people like me, who wouldn't or couldn't pay, so they could write me a loan? No? And you're paying for their losses? No still?

Aren't you the "I know why unemployment is so high - you people are all just stupid and lazy, pull up your bootstraps" regean knob slobber from yesterday?

The first thing that I thought of when the Cali IOUs were announced was "how is Wall Street going to game this for profit".

When I got the details, it was exactly in line with what I had guessed would be their plan.

I don't know if that is a good or bad thing.

I'm leaning toward bad, though.

Now I just need to figure out how (NOT IF) and when (NOT IF) CA will get bailed by the Feds.

Any risk that the state unions would be paid less than 100% of what they are slated to be paid alone will be cause for the Obama Admin to step in.

It's never happened before.

Not on a national scale.

Word is circulating here that BofA is no longer agreeing to any short sales. My read is BofA has made a policy decision- take no prisoners. You either keep paying like the sap you are, or you take on the ignominy of being a loser and take the foreclosure.

We need to do everything to change the meme from "pay all your debts" to "pay your debts when it makes sense."

This is bigger and more widespread than those earlier booms and busts.

Agree 100%. But jingle mail is not new. There was plenty of it here in Texas, Oklahoma, and Lousianna during the 80s and early 90s.

or even "pay your debts only when the money isn't going to finance a noose around the necks of your children."

Aren't you the "I know why unemployment is so high - you people are all just stupid and lazy, pull up your bootstraps" regean knob slobber from yesterday?

No actually I'm the guy who thinks unemployment is so high because people took on too much debt and aren't willing to take responsibility for their actions.

p.s. I really love that you think I'm a Reaganite, that is funny on a lot of levels.

But hey, keep taking on credit and not paying your bills. Let me know how that works out for you as a life plan.

"Word is circulating here that BofA is no longer agreeing to any short sales. "

It is definitely simpler that way - otherwise some homeowners get off easier than others.

"pay your debts when it makes sense."

That should always be the meme - otherwise, wouldn't every individual and company be able to borrow at the "risk-free" rate? You are charged more than the curve because you are a credit risk. Sometimes that risk pays off in the lender's favor, sometimes the borrower exercises their credit put.

"But jingle mail is not new. "

No, but the media effect is new.

so hiker90, if it caught on pretty good in the oil bust induced housing bust, dont you think it is just a matter of time before it catches fire nationally? I mean, so much dry kindling out there....the only thing I see keeping it from happening is financial illiteracy. Folks that were too stupid to realize what a bad decision they were making going in are highly unlikely to figure out that by continuing to pay their mortgage, they are making a bad investment worse.

Why is this? Well, if I recall, a lot of people who studied finance couldn't get their heads around the idea of sunk costs. Im guessing that concept will remain elusive to the masses. Im also counting on the banks counting on people remaining sheep.

I haven't heard this at all, do you have anymore info or source? Last I heard of BofA they reduced the amount they would take on a second before agreeing to a short sale.

ED, you mistake me for someone else. I have no debt, tons of cash, I have voluntarily left a high paying job in the corporate securities sector out of moral outrage, and I'm voluntarily unemployed.

I have voluntarily left a high paying job in the corporate securities sector out of moral outrage, and I'm voluntarily unemployed.

Again, let me know how that works out for you as a life plan.

Hoopa,
Your real beef is with the government.
They are the only ones who can steal from you.
Does it matter, red or blue?

Inflation by its very definition is theft.

And yet the Fed's ideal inflation rate is 2% a year.

I'm the guy who thinks unemployment is so high because people took on too much debt and aren't willing to take responsibility for their actions.

The traditional meme for limiting debt accumulation, which almost invariable fails because each successive generation maintains the standard of living of their parents. Collectively, the parents gut the wages of their children and replace that income with debt, which fails after about three generations.

But you really have no clue about any of this, which is why you're trapped in the first-generation cultural meme.

@Hoopajoops LTD

Good for you; I voluntarily quit my high-paying california job a few weeks ago as well, and converted most of my savings out of dollar (have been for a while). Gonna travel in Asia for a year soon (studying Japanese in Tokyo for 6 months)

Again, let me know how that works out for you as a life plan.

Sure, but when I give you the update, you should let me know how to quantify "how it worked out for me" in terms you can understand. Will I be reporting my life's work balance sheet in escalades I bought, promotions I won, hot wives I attracted, fucked and then dumped, square footage on my lawn, credit rating, or what? What kind of strange, alien life measurements do you recognize as valid? It's important for me to know, because you're obviously very judgmental and look down on those who don't meet the measures you've chosen to rank their life story.

So what am I going for here, escalades, golf club memberships, responsible loan payments, beautiful white skinned children, karate trophies, or what? What do you alien suburbanite corporate slave motherfuckers value these days?

ghostfaceinvestah (profile) wrote on Mon, 7/6/2009 - 5:06 p

Now that's a key variable, because historically people don't like to lose their homes, they don't like to have their credit rating ruined. But historically no one has ever been $150,000 underwater with a mortgage. It's never happened before. And now you have millions of people who are deep underwater. So how those people behave in terms of walking away from loans that they can make the monthly payments on but it's economically rational for them to walk is going to be a very important variable and one I can't really predict. "


I think you are exactly right- which is why all the "scenarios" regarding price declines are irrelevant. If people can not refinance and they are having their credit card lines cut for those cards that are not already maxed out- what exactly is the value of a good credit rating. Makes much more sense to stop paying and wait for the bank to come after you and in the meanwhile live rent free for a while. You can also stop making tax payments since the tax lien will come out of the banks hide. Good thing the banks raised some capital - it will make the hit tax payers are going to take smaller. I think we are close to the tipping point- when they start the "ruthless defaults" are going to make peoples heads spin.

Given this kind of back drop it is amazing that anybody is making non conforming loans. I guess getting hit by a 2 X4 is not enough to knock sense into lenders.

Hoopa,
What brought about this moral outrage in your corp. securities job?
and I'm just a Gnome...

Again, let me know how that works out for you as a life plan.

Well, typically it results in a culture of fraud and deceit and financial collapse so how's THAT working for you?

Off to play pool.

hopps

how about helping people? seems like a nice metric.

oh and helping people who actually need the help.

the Fed helping GS bankers via AIG backdoor conduits does not count.

We've had a few others opt out like MP. Last thing I would call either one is a loser, just sayin'
Although the idea of Hoops with an escalade is funny on it's own.

edit- removing an over enthusiastic O for posterity

Wall St is gearing up to trade this ??? I Mean, WTF is that? Like we need to try to fix the state's problems by giving a slice to wall street? Someone please wake me up from this long national nightmare.

Wow - just wow. You couldn't write fiction weirder than this.

SNL writers are any of you paying attention???

@montas ankle

Micro-loans to local entrepreneurs in 3rd world countries are very helpful. Loans to americans so they can start more spas/yoga studios/surf shops/fast food restaurants/nail shops/chain stores, not so much.

Playing with crooks is irresponsible to yourself and your family. Sadly many folks just are screw ups and need some one to blame. If you don't understand what you are doing, don't do it. Your definition of responsible is sure different then mine.

What do you alien suburbanite corporate slave motherfuckers value these days?

Integrity.

We agree on one thing, Effective, B of A offered to bring my guy current if he paid 25 cents on the
dollar. He refused. but whoooo knows?

What brought about this moral outrage in your corp. securities job?

I'll give you one off the top of my head.

Credit syndication agreements - where two companies and one soon-to-be bankrupt subsidiary meet up and decide to swap the subsidiary. They load the subsidiary up with debt, arrange the deal so both parties get paid cash money, the bank granting the loan, being very respectable and having a reputation for "expertise" in business financing, syndicates it out to less sophisticated banks in, say, deutschland, washes their hands of it, and everyone walks away happy. Except for those stupid little banks that bought pieces of the debt. You make up some bullshit about the acquisition being "synergistic" in a business sense and suddenly it is a protected decision under the business judgment rule. Liability shield!

AAA rated securities losing > than 50%! Money market funds brought to the breach of default. The largest financial companies become wildly insolvent.

Do we get Pecora hearings? Nope. Do we get prosecutions? Nope. Do we get clawbacks? Nope. Do we get meaningful financial reform? Nope. Instead, we get accounting shenanigans and the banker bonus protection plan commonly known as TARP.

The biggest swindle in history.

@WestSac_grrl

"Last thing I would call either one is a looser, just sayin'"

What's a looser?

Thanks for your reply, Hoopa.

I think the United States of America is the world's 'bad bank'.
Sink the USD as world reserve currency by shuffling off pieces of "AAA" MBS suicide bombers and replace with Yuan.
of course, I could be wong; but Hu's your daddy.

I have heard seconds going away for a fraction of their balance. Since they have to charge it off anyways and future collection results will be spotty at best it makes some sense to get as much as they can now. At the very least the ruthless defaulters will probably take it.

The opposite of a "tighter".

"I think you are exactly right- which is why all the "scenarios" regarding price declines are irrelevant. "

The problem with the oil patch scenario is it was extremely localized, and like every other housing bust (until now) unemployment lead house price declines. Same as SoCal in the early 90s. Job losses came first, which dried up demand, which lead to local house price declines. It was really a supply/demand issue, where demand dried up due to the local employment situation. This time, we had a true bubble.

And the declines are much steeper this time. Based on OFHEO data (admittedly flawed), peak to trough declines in the oil patch were upwards of 30% in OK over 20 months. In CA, we have seen that level of decline in 10 month, and counting. The level of housing wealth destroyed in unprecedented in terms of speed and severity.

When people start to realize that their house value will probably never recover in their lifetime, and they will be underwater for perhaps 20 years or more, behaviors will change.


What do you alien suburbanite corporate slave motherfuckers value these days?

Effective Demand
Integrity.

Well show some more integrity and pay the banks for my neighbor's failed mortgage equity line of credit, you superlative-driven slave. To do otherwise would lack integrity.

My guy didn't take the 25% off from B of A, 'cause he would have had to pay taxes on
the forgiven amount.

No, but the media effect is new.

The media is irrelevant. The relatively new mechanism of destruction is the shadow banking system peddling derivatives tied to mortgages and bonds. This script has already been written and whatever media coverage it garners now will have no affect on the magnitude of damage.

Like we need to try to fix the state's problems by giving a slice to wall street?

Why would we bother, otherwise?

As far as I can tell that's part of the should-we-fix-this decision tree. No problem is worth addressing unless fixing it allows us to blow another WS bubble.

I present cap-and-trade as exhibit A.

That's quite loathsome hoops. I mean I knew stuff like that went on, but I really
didn't think about it.

Hoopa,
Why'd the neighbor's line of credit fail?

The Senate blocked a bid to permit the U.S. comptroller general, who heads the investigative arm of Congress known as the Government Accountability Office, to audit the Federal Reserve system and issue a report.

Senate turns aside new attempt to scrutinize Fed
| Reuters

When people start to realize that their house value will probably never recover in their lifetime, and they will be underwater for perhaps 20 years or more, behaviors will change.

Add to that the anger of knowing the bankers that pulled off this historic ripoff have made millions and are still getting huge bonuses and the walkaway becomes the default setting.

Here are the keys, enjoy your bonus Mr. Banker.

Well show some more integrity and pay the banks for my neighbor's failed mortgage equity line of credit, you superlative-driven slave. To do otherwise would lack integrity.

I can only control my actions. I take responsibility for them. I pay my debts (If I had any, I don't, but when I did, I did).

If people want to go "well everyone else is doing it, I might as well do it too".. It doesn't change my actions at all.. Because after all I can only control my actions and have to live with myself.

You want to advocate taking on debts and not paying them, go ahead (kind of funny coming from someone expressing moral outrage). It just doesn't seem like it has much personal integrity to it. But maybe that is your thing.

If people would just take care of their own shit before worrying about others shit the world would be in a much better place. People want to worry about blaming others as a pretext of ignoring their own problems.

HomeGnome - He was in the business of building shopping malls, and lost his job a year and 6 months ago, but decided he should continue to have two gardeners, two maids, and a chef working for him. He got into his house at a relatively early stage, and drew way up on his HELOC to finance his lifestyle, thinking that the turnaround was just ahead, and he'd score a big deal with the next shopping mall. Now the contents of his public storage unit are up for auction due to nonpayment and he's roasting kettle corn in the parking lot of the local costco to finance his wife and kids living in a rental in Kalispel, Montana.

Regarding Cali IOU's. The state is paying salaries, pensions, etc. in cash not warrants.

0Ooooohhh. Ministry, they prolly did something really really baaaad.

Did you do your chem homework, Hoops?

And Demand, you are obviously new here; don't start insulting hoops who
and been clear and consistant as a poster for months and months.

And has displayed no lack of integrity whatsoever, unless quitting a loathsome
job for a different career somehow qualifies.

Effective Demand,

Stop ascribing moral value to your business decisions. The banks taking advantage of you and your family sure aren't. The minute you stop making "business sense," they'll drop you, regardless of any moral calculus. I see you pay on time... well... since we made some loans to some losers, we'll be raising your interest rate by three or four percent... you should be mad at those deadbeats, you see, they're responsible for your payments being so high... If you'll excuse me, I'm in the middle of a line of coke...

Don't you folks get it yet?
America has gone full on fascist.
Doesn't matter if you pay the bankers directly because they will get it from you (and your children) via the government through taxation.
Either way you WILL pay.

Elephants and Asses...

Hoopa,
Then it is your neighbor's fault that he did not repay his obligation.
Maybe he could have paid for the house but not the lifestyle.
He's just another degenerate gambler, as far as I'm concerned.
All hat and no cattle.

Hoop - arguing 'life measures' with a guy whose handle is 'Effective Demand' is probably a good way to not meet your own personal 'life measures'. Just sayin'...

BTW - you said you were gonna pursue 'applied sciences'... why not do UC Davis Brew School? Hell I'd do that myself...

HomeGnome, agreed. I feel sorry for his children.

The entire "credit score" meme is bullsh%t. Oooooh, people don't want to ruin their credit scores. What a crock. People will see throught that sham soon enough. If you live within your means and save diligently, a credit score is all but meaningless.

I have no idea what my credit score is, and I'm better off that way. I'm certain of it.

A couple years of working hard, living frugally and saving like crazy is all people need to ignore credit scores for the rest of their lives.

As a homebrewer of over 10 years, I like the way you think, Dryfly.
Beer

The neighbor had no respect for himself or his family for living on the financial edge. He did not act responsibly and wasted and simple solid life style for him and his family. Maybe next he can clean the porta poty.

liz, Effective Demand has been here for quite a while.

Though I tend to agree with Hoops on social issues, I don't see where E.D. has insulted him any more than the other way around.

BTW, I'm always up for a good food fight and I enjoy reading both of them.

I would absolutely do that, if I had any taste for beer or wine. It would be one of my first choices, actually. Fermentation is good for more than just wine and beer -- it's one of the first bioreactors human beings ever built. From those humble beginnings to the next century, when we'll be using a vat to grow everything from antibiotic, unspoilable cheese to brand new teeth. I drink no alcohol, otherwise I'd be all over it. I'm good personal friends with the director of one of those programs, won't say which.

@Effective Demand

The problem is there are honest, hard-working people who produces real work, who are supporting this corrupt system and keeping it alive. The longer the system is propped up, the longer the system will be able to suck more real wealth from you and your children. Some of us choose not to support this system, so eventually it will crash from its own weight. Sadly, it sounds like you'll be one of those sucker that will keep working and paying 50-60% taxes.

Yeah on thinking about ED (which stands for something else too, no?) is a troll.

I will not put him on ignore, 'cause I read everybody, and he's not as nutz as some,
but basically, trollish.

Angry,
You are aware that credit scores are used in hiring decisions and setting insurance premiums, aren't you?

Ben,
Well said.
But who wants to actually live a simple, solid life?
BRING ME THE BLING!

Quick!
Hide!
The trolls are coming!

"The media is irrelevant. "

I don't think you understand the term "media effect" when it comes to mortgage performance. What it refers to is the tendency of people to seek "social proof" through the media, i.e., if people hear about others walking away from their mortgage, or defaulting and living in their house rent-free for years, they will tend to do the same.

That is a big difference in this downturn. Some of you may not feel it is "moral" or whatever to stop paying your debts when you have the means to pay them, but believe me, I see it every day, more and more people are just stopping payment.

IMHO the govt is making matters worse with the bailouts, as people are taking their cue from the government that contracts and laws in this country can be repudiated on a whim.

"The relatively new mechanism of destruction is the shadow banking system peddling derivatives tied to mortgages and bonds. This script has already been written and whatever media coverage it garners now will have no affect on the magnitude of damage."

you lost me there.

hi everyone. today is my first day of default. i bought my first hose in june 2007 in carmichael, a suburb of sacramento. a 4-2, 2000 square foot for $375000. the price was very discounted at the time and i thought i would be protected through a drop in prices of 15%. but of course the drop is more like 50%. i saw my home as a investment ad as such i took the maximum leverage, 100% financing and IO for ten years, fixed rate of 6.375, amortorized over the last 20 years. well i wasnt thinking about ever foreclosing, but i am gald that i never overpaid my mortgage like my GF urged me to do. i have a housemate that helped me keep the cash flow comprable to rent, but i told him that since i am not paying my loan, he can stop paying rent and just cover 1/2 of utilities. i dont need the money from not paying the mortgage and i feel a litle bad about living rent free so i have decided to pay the 800 rent for a woman i met in the park who has 4 babies. i know that is kinda crazy but i am alright with it. if she can get on her feet i would rather donate the mortagage payment to a feed the homless program, cause tat would lower my tax bill. for now i am savng a little of that mortgage payment to pay my higher tax bill.

i have a very steady job that pays 85k and, because of my own savings and my dad's recent death, about 100k in savings, (non retriement)

i know i am going to piss some prople off but that's ok, i have three kids to help put through college and i feel that obligation makes more sense for society than paying the lousy bankers!

I feel sorry for the chef and gardeners.

Don't mistake my flamboyant writing for hostility or anger -- I'm just trying to make a point.

So why is my SRS in the crapper?

"I feel sorry for the chef and gardeners. "

Ha, I got the chef a job at my old law firm and gave him all my dress shirts. He's doing fine.

Gardeners, last I heard, were moving back to mexico. They were brothers from a small rural village where they spent most of their childhood farming. They'd trade off trips going back to pay the village for their ownership of their farm and other such things. I had some conversations with them where they discussed the problems they had living in america. Their number one complaint was that they had so much to worry about up here, compared to the simple living down there. I think they're doing just fine. Better than we will be, in two years, at any rate.

You are aware that credit scores are used in hiring decisions and setting insurance premiums, aren't you?

I know the deal. It's a racket and all rackets end.

I maintain that credit scores are useless and will become even more useless. Especially after the world realizes they were poor predictors of mortgage defaults.

In the future, who will they lend to - a saver with 20% down, or someone with no collateral and a good credit score?

The credit score meme was a sham to push debt. The jig is up.

b1whois - quite the freudian slip there : (I bought my first hose in June 2007...LOL)

But personally, I have no prob with you bailing. We talked a lot here about knifecatchers like yourself back at the time you bought. We just havent had a lot of them visit us just yet.

Effective Demand is just towing the govt's line. If people made a rational decision on defaulting on their mortgage, the financial system would be insolvent in an instant. It doesn't take much running of the numbers to see this.

Look at the BHO housing plan. Wasn't one of the cornerstones going to be bankruptcy cramdowns? But that never made it out of the Senate.

Instead, all you have are interest rate buydowns. Big deal. The govt needs people to pay on underwater mortgages to keep it all together.

GDD,I was out and about.The interior is a lot nicer than I remember from the late 1970's.I knew one of the students who rented the place back then and I went to a couple of parties there,one was memorable.That is a busy and noisy street,and I seem to recall that the "c" and 11 bus lines use oakland ave.You can easily walk to shopping,theaters,parks and restaurants but there has historically been a surprisingly high incidence of street crime along that stretch of oakland ave.

Sadly, it sounds like you'll be one of those sucker that will keep working and paying 50-60% taxes.

Don't get me wrong, I hate the bailouts people are getting. But everytime I ask myself if I would rather switch places with any of those people with debt up to their eyeballs and house in forclosure... I keep coming back to the same answer.

Like I said, If everybody concentrated on their own issues first and once they solved those then moved on to the others.. the world would be a better place.

Well, isn't that just peachy, Gnome.

"You are aware that credit scores are used in hiring decisions and setting insurance premiums, aren't you?"

Under the Fair Credit Reporting Act you are not required to consent to a credit check as a term of employment.

I have no issues. I only have a little credit card debt, and a car payment, both of which are current.

House paid for. That's just me.

Do you think that i should advise people to pay their debt when it is clearly not in their
financial interest to continue to do so?

I just find it interesting that Hoop advocates not paying debts (top post) but then turns around and is mad at those who don't (mad at his neighbor for doing exactly what he suggests in his first post).

As a homebrewer of over 10 years, I like the way you think, Dryfly.

Well it is all your fault [you and the dude from Hawaii]... I was reading all the home brew stuff here then quietly mentioned to my kids [ages18-26] that home brewing might be fun... so last week they showed up with a home brew kit from Northern Brewers & gift cert to go buy malt etc. They said "Do it - call us when its ready to drink." Oh man - teach me to keep my mouth shut.

Realize I was a chemical engineer & worked in large ethanol plants in the early mid 80s... fermenter capacity of approx. 3 million gallons turned over every 36-48 hours... so I got no excuses as to "I can't figure it out". I know what needs to be done - just hadn't the energy.

Reading recipe's & 'process sheets' this last weekend. Probably start my first brew w/ in a couple weeks.

Very good article. Unfortunately the mortgage losses will continue to pile up for some time.

So how is one supposed to make money in such an unpredictable stock market?

In my opinion, it is all a matter of market timing. It does not matter if it is gold, oil, or Microsoft, if you have access to good market timing signals, they will help you get in and out at a profit.

No guarantees in this business, but if they are right most of the time, you can still make $s.

There are may web sites providing them out there (search Google). Just find one that works and use it! Check out Invetrics - Financial insights and stock market timing signals for the active investor  as an example.

Its Dow Jones timing signals are up 49% as of 7/5/09 while the Dow is up just 25% off its March lows.

Following a market timing system works!

"Like I said, If everybody concentrated on their own issues first and once they solved those then moved on to the others"

Agreed, but that's not what we have now. Right now it's the federal reserve/banks/us government all working together to devalue your savings and steal your labor. It's an act of aggression; you have to fight back.

"Under the Fair Credit Reporting Act you are not required to consent to a credit check as a term of employment. "

And then you get denied the job for any variety of reasons. All the company needs to do is a credit during the interview process and your denial can result in any of the other 20 interviewees being the best fit for the company.

"Like I said, If everybody concentrated on their own issues first and once they solved those then moved on to the others.. the world would be a better place."

~~~~~

Failed leadership takes everyone down ... Unless you are part of the elite that gets saved from your own greed, fraud and abuse ...

i wish that there could be a place where people in cali could talk to others who are going through "strategic foreclsure" to kinda know what is happening to others....any suggestions?

Hey Tom...that place isnt what Im after at all, but I was shocked at the price drop in that period of time. Cant believe someone paid almost 1.2 mil for that. Crazy! Im going for something smaller, more charming, and a bit less off pitch, lets just say. It's really making me anxious now because I could buy, but Im going to force myself to wait a good long while and see how this plays out. Next month I'll start my licensing. That should be a hoot.

Ghost,
That may be true, but unfortunately you failed your drug test.
Sorry.
and no you may not see the results or get a second test.
NEXT!

Dry,
I've used Northern Brewer before.
Quick friendly service.
Keep it clean and your first brew should go great!

Scrooge,
Agreed.
FED, Treasury and FedGov. against the rest of us.
That's why I paid off all my debts in 2001.
Didn't see it?
They knew this sucker was going down even then.

Try the Irvine Housing Blog. Tell 'em lawyerliz sent you.

Nice to see a positive suggestion for a change. The threads the other evening were so negative and devoid of hope it was depressing.

I thought the guy roasting corn in the parking lot should get some credit for making the best of things too.

Liz - I don't understand why your client doesn't wait this out. 20k on a 200k property is only 10% underwater. If they can manage the payments, the market will return. If not through demand, through cheaper dollars that will inflate the price of the property down the line.

I just find it interesting that Hoop advocates not paying debts (top post) but then turns around and is mad at those who don't (mad at his neighbor for doing exactly what he suggests in his first post).

My neighbor managed his debt badly, and his children are suffering. If he did the exact same thing but planned wisely, maxed out his loans, and then did a ruthless default, walking away with money, I would have no problem with him.

But people screw up like that all the time. It's an ordinary evil of the world.

What isn't an ordinary evil of the world is the banks that loaned him that money and enacted unsound policies of credit extension can turn to the government, take money from the government, which then turns around and taxes me through inflation or at the barrel of a gun through normal taxation routes to pay the banks.

That's the evil you support by believing that paying your debts to scum bags like that shows "integrity." It shows a profound lack of societal awareness and moral depth. You have to see these moral issues in black and white, because the bigger picture eludes you.

"Like I said, If everybody concentrated on their own issues first and once they solved those then moved on to the others.. the world would be a better place."

Said one dutiful boilerroom coal shoveler in the titanic to the other, "Hey, I work pretty hard... but where's this ship going?"

"Concentrate on your own issue first, coalman."

It's an act of aggression; you have to fight back.

I always have, I have a very low consumption lifestyle and invest in such a way that keeps my tax hit as low as possible.

I don't go and start taking on debts that I can't & won't pay off. That isn't fighting back, that is just stupidity.

I told 'em to try to hang on. They are having trouble making the payment. An interest
rate drop would actualy help them. This is increasingly rare.

My typical client is a Jose 6 Pack de cerveza who is 100k to 150k underwater.
No hope.

I'm seeing the price drops accelerate even more. Wonder what Cash Shiller will show?

Poop. Pigged!

Why do most states allow non recourse ? Every debt should have recourse IMO. They made stupid rules and the stupid banks played along. The mortgagee is just playing by the same stupid rules if he walks.

Morality doesn't come into play based on the moral compass of our gov't. these days. Chivalry is dead.

Reading recipe's & 'process sheets' this last weekend. Probably start my first brew w/ in a couple weeks.

Dryfly,

Cleanliness is the key to a good brew. Germs can cause your brew to balistic - literally, as in caps popping off.

Try this: Take some barley seeds and roast them under the broiler of your oven. Then use a bottle or glass cup to crack the seeds. Put the cracked seeds into a wort bag (similar to cheese cloth). Add the bag to your boil for five or ten minutes. This will give you a fuller bodied and more robust tasting brew. Also, the more you broil the seeds, the nuttier your beer will taste - think Sam Smith's Nut Brown Ale.

The above got me an honorable mention at the Dock Street Brewery competition in Philly. Btw, I'm off the wagon now. Mrs. Angry said I was too boring as a tea totaler.

Frequently Asked Questions about Registered Warrants (IOUs)

  1. Who will continue to receive regular, or “normal,” pay warrants?
    The State Constitution mandates that education and debt service have priority status, and the Controller will work to ensure there are sufficient funds to continue to make those payments with regular warrants. The State Constitution, federal law and court order also require that State payroll, CalPERS, CalSTRS, In-Home Supportive Services and Medi-Cal providers continue to be paid with regular warrants.
  2. Who will receive registered warrants [IOU's]?
    The State in July will issue registered warrants, or IOUs, for all other payments, including those to private businesses, local governments, taxpayers receiving income tax refunds and owners of unclaimed property.

Effective Demand - I agree with you. Call me old fashioned, but I always believed if you borrow something, you pay it back. Period.

But of course, there are so many people in crisis these days, that compassion also ranks high on my list.

But when you can, do what's right. It's the way I was raised. And I ain't changing horses now.

I agree with you Outsider.

Hoop was mad at me yesterday because deigned to say that people getting more unemployment for sending out resumes won't help solve the crisis and instead we should encourage them after a year of unemployment to try to attain more or different skills. I don't believe that is lacking compassion, I don't see paying people to send out resume after resume as helping resolve the crisis. I say we pay them to do something else, go to school, relocate if they can find a job in another area. Anything but send out another resume.

Today I deigned to suggest that people should seriously consider any debt they take on before they take it on and do so very sparingly. And if they do take it on strive to pay it back. We wouldn't be in a credit bubble if that happened. Banks AND people lost the value of additional debt, it is a two way street.

GDD,don't sweat the sales license,it is pretty much a basic literacy and math test with a bit of R.E vocabulary tossed in.And yes that is a huge price drop,but what is the economic value? Lousy schools,street crime (car break ins,muggings,occasional rapes and murders),a LOT of noise from busses and the freeway...110x monthly rent ?

Tuition assistance (as in, pretty much free) for those in fields that no longer exist, to redirect them into careers that actually hold promise - that's an idea.

ED,

Do you work in collections? Just curious.

HomeGnome...BoA probably set up XYZ Corp to buy back exec cars and airplanes, now to be repurchased and financed by yours truly!

Outsider - i would agree w/ you. However, when none of the goodwill is reciprocated I think most finally give up and say why not

Your speculation on the pricing of seconds...

Hoop said I was calling them lazy. I thought I was suggesting that their career path had instead disapeared and we might be better served helping them find another one. If someone was busy going to school and noticed their career path came back they could always hit the abort switch and go back to work. But someone sitting sending resumes for the same job they were doing before after a year of unemployment should be encouraged to try something else.

I've heard of banks taking a certain % to settle debt (both seconds and CC, as seen in the NYT article). I have also heard after 90 days backs have to charge off such debt. And since as I understand it banks just sell recourse debt to debt collectors for pennies on whats owed... I just thought my statement was a logical extension of the banks maximizing their returns based of the facts as I know them.

Bank of America Corp. boosted the size of its planned sale of bonds backed by auto loans to $3.94 billion, according to a person familiar with the offering.

The bonds will be eligible for the Federal Reserve’s Term Asset-Backed Securities Loan Facility, said the person, who declined to be identified because terms are private. The sale was previously set at $2.523 billion.

I can't get my mind around the concept that anybody would buy bonds backed by auto loans. Or that regulators are not screaming bloody murder to prevent this. Or that the bonds are eligible for a Fed backstop.

The mind boggles.

I agree to some degree with both Hoops and ED. They seem to be arguing the same thing from opposing vantage points and that doesn't work.

Hoops might be a little shrill, but I'm sure he's more circumspect than his board persona. And ED, nobody can argue with your moral viewpoint, but that isn't always the question.

It's like a child who touches a hot stove and gets burned. It seems ED would rather make sure that the child knows full well that he/she should never do that again before applying the salve, whereas Hoops is arguing that the burn already happened so the lecture is useless. What do we do about it now that the damage is done? I can see both sides.

whereas Hoops is arguing that the burn already happened so the lecture is useless

I actually think Hoop is arguing that the kid should intentionally keep burning itself (take on more debt and ruthlessly default) in order to teach that stove (bank) a lesson.

ED - Sounds like maybe a difference in basic assumptions about people.

These are shorthand thoughts posted here. I wouldn't worry about what anyone else says about your posts because if you sat down face to face and really discussed it, you might find there's more agreement than disagreement. Internet communications tend to be a little weird.

ED - I don't think that's what Hoops is saying, and I concur with Outsider's comment. You two probably agree more than disagree but message boards don't allow for body language.

Outsider is correct in his comment.

Anyone who applies moral imperatives to their decision of whether to pay off Bank of America is still a sucker, though.

Well joe he is definitely advocating ruthless default. His first comment on here and his comment about why he was mad at his neighbor (he wasnt mad at his neighbor for defaulting, but instead defaulting stupidly). But anyways, it is neither here nor there.

Outsider is actually a she. And a former social work major. So we're all friends now? Good. You'll get my bill.

Smile

Thanks, Outsider. We owe you! Can we default? Does it have to be ruthless Smile

After further checking, apparently the short sales are being limited to severe hardship cases specifically income reduction due to job loss et al, divorce and death in family. The same limitations apply to loan modifications but these seem to be treated more liberally. If one stops making payments there is a presumption of hardship and the lender starts to talk to you about your "hardship." From what I can see in this market, Las Vegas, fewer than one in ten short sales meets the hardship test but more than half of potential loan modifications meet that criteria. It could be that the people in the two categories are that different. I think it's all about cash flow to the banks. If you stop making payments and they can modify you back into giving them cash they're happy, but if they don't allow a short sale, where their loss is now and substantial the banks give the borrower the hard choice- keep servicing an impossible debt or go to the trustee's sale. Admittedly the loss on the trustees sale is greater by about $50k than the short sale but its delayed typically six months and the game is won by the banks if a majority of would be short sellers can be forced back into making their payments.

Thanks for the update nevadabuilder.

hoops
"If he did the exact same thing but planned wisely, maxed out his loans, and then did a ruthless default, walking away with money, I would have no problem with him."

I am laughing at the irony in this comment. You are angry at the greedy stealing bankers for unethical behavior but would be proud of your neighbor if he behaved just like them? Are you listening to yourself? Rampant selfishness is not the solution to societal ills or the criminal behavior of others.

Login or register to post comments
Syndicate content