I don't understand why localities are being so aggressive in their estimates for house prices. Just take a very conservative approach to housing values. And up the "mill rate." Outrage squelched.
there was another significant green shoot reported last thursday. The corporate default rate went up by 1% in a month!!! according to S&P. And of cause as expected this fact was overlooked by CNBPC ( broadcasting the polutbureau corporation) .
P.S. I DO want everything to turn better. However skewing the facts will not solve the problem. Also the last thing our economy needs is for people to lose any remaining trust in the government.
it's a good thing local government aren't too dependent on property taxes. /snark
the sad thing is that a lot of school districts bought into the "buy now or be priced out forever" meme and went on these massive building campaigns the past several years. even funnier (in a bad way) are these huge campuses in the middle of BFE that were erected because the population was going to grow X percent indefinitely. debt service is gonna suck, especially when the tax base never materializes. at some point "blood from a stone" is going to refer to the taxpayer.
When that house in New Jersey sells (currently listed at $1.3 million) or is reappraised, the local tax revenues will take a hit. And that same story is being repeated over and over ...
It will make for some interesting fireworks when the townships attempt to raise the mil rate in response to declining assessments.
In California the 58 counties are responsible for property tax processing. They all have an "Assessment Appeals Board." In normal times 90% of the issues are cleared up by staff and the remaining few are almost always obscure points of commercial real estate. Weird stuff like is the CUP for emergency mobilization points in the parking lot a diminution of the taxable value? These days it is a massive overflow of people just looking for a break. Staff has limited leeway and so these are kicked to the Board where tight budgets are making them less willing to give the plaintiff the benefit. Progressive counties like Ventura have in place generalized formulaic reductions without even asking. If you bought in the bubble you probably saw a modest decline in your bill in the hopes you'll be satisfied with that. Yet another break for the irresponsible at the expense of the prudent.
If my property value declined dramatically, I'd contest the tax bill too. But everyone in the article is acting like they were surprised by the tax bill.
If a person is at risk of losing their house because of a tax bill, it is only a matter of time anyway.
More American "spirit" required... POTUS via bloomie:
The American spirit, he said, “is what has always led us, as a people, not to wilt or cower at a difficult moment, but to face down any trial and rise to any challenge.”
“That is the spirit we are called to show once more,” he said.
With explicit oligarchy, American exceptionalism will be a tougher sell.
The American spirit, he said, “is what has always led us, as a people, not to wilt or cower at a difficult moment, but to face down any trial and rise to any challenge.”
“That is the spirit we are called to show once more,” [Obama] said.
Last weekend, my wife and I stopped at a couple of open houses on our way home to our DC place. One house was FSBO for 888K and moved out. We got home and saw it listed on Zillow with a 702K estimate. The next night, I got a voice mail from the owner asking if we were still interested. Stupid all around.
In our little town a local developer put up a new development with "cottage homes" from $500k, "custom homes" from $700k, and estate homes from the One millions (their phrase). Had a parade of eight homes there last year and to date no homes have sold.
Homes were $1.2 mil plus. Drove thru the other night and it had an absolute ghost town feel to it. It is located far from interstates and jobs, can't figure out what the hell the developer was thinking. Our illustrious ruling elites (city council) spent like a drunkard during the boom on many, many questionable projects; so it will be interesting to see the head on collision between declining revenues and the need for services. Iceberg dead ahead. Anyone for a "cottage home"?
Massachusetts actually has a pretty good system. Our rate changes with prices.
Each town can raise revenue on existing real estate 2.5%/year. If home prices rise faster than that, rates fall. When prices rise less than that, rates rise. The town can override the 2.5% cap by referendum. My town did that lat month.
I challenged my tax bill in NC. Got them to come off of $175,000 to $160,000 after sending them the appraisal done in Jan for $150,000. I'm going to challenge it again.
Haven't got time to go through all the comments from the last thread, but I have seen a noticeable uptick in delinquencies and foreclosures in the past 2 months, through May 31 (don't have June 30 data yet).
for dqs, there was a lull in Jan, Feb, Mar, some of it seasonal due to tax refunds
foreclosures were suppressed due to the moratoriums.
read this article yesterday, apologies if it has been posted already, very worthwhile reading, he makes some great points in that no one can predict how mortgage performance is going to work out (which highlights a flaw in PPIP btw: more uncertainty makes the debt more risky, meaning the govt is not charging nearly enough for the debt - a nice trick Geithner has learned - the public hates cash bailouts, but in unsophisticated in the ways of underpriced insurance).
"And the third key variable is what are people who are underwater do? Twenty-five percent minimum of all the mortgages in the country are underwater. And so the question is: Some of those people are underwater and can't make the payments, but what about all the people who are underwater and who can make the payments but [who] might be economically rational to walk away and hand the keys to the bank? Because why should I keep paying the bank a $400,000 mortgage on a home that's only worth $250,000?
Now that's a key variable, because historically people don't like to lose their homes, they don't like to have their credit rating ruined. But historically no one has ever been $150,000 underwater with a mortgage. It's never happened before. And now you have millions of people who are deep underwater. So how those people behave in terms of walking away from loans that they can make the monthly payments on but it's economically rational for them to walk is going to be a very important variable and one I can't really predict. "
A "high" tax rate? Around here, you have to escape to the suburbs to get that low a rate. Last place I looked at had assessment $192k, annual tax $8200.
Before our basement project was even finished, the county assessor's office showed up, knocked on the door and asked to be allowed to just come in to look at it.
No previous calls, no contacts to ask when was convenient.
I refused on grounds that still under construction so not yet ready. Okay, she responded, can you call me when it's done?
She's still waiting, pompous ****.
And when they finally do show up again, I'm going to refuse entry on grounds of non-convenience so that they have to contact me first.
And then, I'm going to contest the final appraisal. Several houses in my neighborhood are stalled in selling, so I should have no difficulty in contesting the arrogant prigs.
article in this morning's WSJ editorial page lays the blame for the foreclosures squarely on the variable of whether the owner is underwater. Because the largest increase in foreclosures has spread to primes, it obviously is the skin in the game that determines whether someone loses the house.
Sorry for no link, but had the hard copy WSJ and don't have subscription to online WSJ.
Mr. Obama, The spirit of xmas future is indeed welling up within us true 'murkins, however, you do not want to know the true nature of this spirit, for you would find it revolting.
Two issues with people who are now underwater but can afford to pay the mortgage.
Increase in unemployment will take care of the ability to make the payments.
If you figure you will not live long enough to get to break even, and people you know are walking away, people will walk. Social stigma will be on the banks, not the debters. I see this already happening.
There was a study done, don't remember where I saw it, that if you know someone who walked away, but could pay, you were over 30% more likely to do so as well. As more and more people walk away, more and more will figure it is acceptable.
If you can rent the same quality of housing for much less, why would someone continue to pay. Especially in a non-recourse state.
Also in the decision to walk away. In 3 years you can get a First Time Home Buyers loan from FHA.
Sure your credit is messed up for a bit, but now days most people's credit score is lower than it has ever been. And as most of the loss of available credit is due to the bank not lending, cutting credit avability etc, you are no differant than your neighbors and friends.
Taught an adult Sunday School for four weeks in May regarding the economic situation - where we are now, how we got here, what could happen and how faith beliefs would/should influence our response to the situation.
Asked the question "do you believe that you have a moral responsibility to pay your mortgage?" Unanimous response that yes. I challenged that with questions about the contract between you and the lender. Isn't there a penalty that would be suffered if you defaulted? What if you believe that the lender was misleading? Do you have a greater obligation to your family or to the contract that you believe duped you?
Discussed California. Then stated that in the circumstances, I'd give serious consideration to walking since contract is essentially amoral at best.
Honestly, several looked open-mouthed stunned. A few nodded in agreement.
I've been looking at Contra Costa homes for sale on Redfin and I'm struck by the massiveness of these homes. Average size in ZIP 94513 is 2300 ft^2. Of course, that means many are laerger/MUCH larger.
Probably seemed like a bargain at the time, but now they're albatrosses (albatri?).
I knew a guy about five years ago who was doing well, quite well, but chose to take a five-year loan so he could "buy more house," a McMansion-style residence but on a large lot with a view. Of course he planned to refi in two or three years with the increased equity and get a "real" loan.
Wonder how he's doing now with that decision. Especially since the source of his income was a service business linked to the travel industry.
“It’s worthy of a Dickens story,” said Gus Kramer, the assessor in Contra Costa County, Calif., outside San Francisco.
"Income 20 shillings, expenditure 20 shillings and sixpence, result misery. But income 20 shillings, expenditure 19 shillings and sixpence, result happiness." -Dickens
Does not work that way in North Carolina. Property is reassessed at least once every seven years. All disputes are at that date. It does not matter that prices hace changed.
It would be a sin to ascribe moral constraints to an earthly contract. Those contracts are a repudiation of any higher authority and thus not eligible for divine intervention. It is a moral imperative to adhere to the letter of a legal contract in the manner that most benefits your interests. In short we need to exhort those who believe themselves to be moral persons to review their mortgages and act in the manner most advantageous to the only moral person involved; themselves.
I can see small homes making a comeback, like small cars. Less to heat, cool, clean, debug and repair. Small homes also draw less scrutiny from the tax assessor, especially when they are old and haven't been enlarged or reassessed in many years.
In smaller, older homes, all bedrooms are often within arm's reach, which is good for family safety and peace-of-mind. There's more window are per interior space, which helps with light and ventilation.
I live in an 1,800 square foot home built in 1922. It still has the original center beam made of wood, in as good shape as ever. They don't build them like this now. Nobody knows how.
50-60 years ago, most U.S. homes had kitchens less than 100 square feet and one modest, functional bathroom. The average living room probably was less than 150 square feet. Many homes did not have rec rooms or family rooms, unless the basement was fixed up.
American houses got gluttonous, and now (like Americans) they're too fat.
Madoff's fraud was billions. Geither+Obammi+Ben+Summers+Paulson=trillons. And worst of all,
each and EVERY tax payer is a victim though hyperinflation and loss of basic civil
infastructures and institutions such as school, roads, and hospitals. Tax payer money is
being used to bailout banks and to ensure that the economy recovers ASAP so that the wealth
gap widens, more credit card debt, and the little people are gouged with surging food
prices, surging gas prices, lack of jobs, and inflation lagging wages. Only the upper
eschelons of society will benefit from a 'speedy recovery' It's been that way since 2002.
People now are getting paid the SAME WAGES as they did in 2000. But are prices at 2000
levels? H3LL NO. So they go into debt, adding more layers tothe USA debt ponzi scheme.
Real estate taxes are allocated differently in the East than in California. In the east, home values are used to decide the proportion of taxes each home will pay. So if all houses decline by 50%, each houses tax burden remains the same. It's only if house values rise and fall disproportionally across a tax district will some taxes rise, while others fall. In California, a homes taxes are based on the lower of the purchase price or current (assessed) value. So if values decline, so do tax revenues.
It is a sport in my family!
I luv tax appeals!!
I shoulda nemoed!
Someday this war's gonna end...
First reaction was "Appeals.." to whom, exactly??
Looks like cbpp.org is going to have to accelerate some of the revenue collapse projections.
C
I don't understand why localities are being so aggressive in their estimates for house prices. Just take a very conservative approach to housing values. And up the "mill rate." Outrage squelched.
Poll Of Manufacturers: Cap & Trade will close 20% of manufacturers
OTHER CHOICES INCLUDED:
*Would raise the price of my product or service to customers (22 percent);
*A combination of price increases, personnel cuts and reductions in pay and benefits (20 percent);
*Switch to a 4-day workweek (15 percent);
*Layoff workers (14.5 percent).
*Only nine percent said they would do their best to absorb the energy costs increases without making any changes.
Breaking News: Manufacturing & Technology eJournal Poll Shows Clean Energy Act Could Force Nearly 20 Percent of Manufacturers to Close - Manufacturing & Technology eJournal
barfly: thanx for linc
there was another significant green shoot reported last thursday. The corporate default rate went up by 1% in a month!!! according to S&P. And of cause as expected this fact was overlooked by CNBPC ( broadcasting the polutbureau corporation) .
P.S. I DO want everything to turn better. However skewing the facts will not solve the problem. Also the last thing our economy needs is for people to lose any remaining trust in the government.
More American "spirit" required... POTUS via bloomie:
Obama Says American ‘Spirit’ Can Confront, Resolve Challenges - Bloomberg.com
C
We'll be the nation known for manufacturing only hope from now on. And porn.
(btw, porn/game/websites/movie/music are all pirated in Asia. In other words, they don't pay much of our exports)
it's a good thing local government aren't too dependent on property taxes. /snark
the sad thing is that a lot of school districts bought into the "buy now or be priced out forever" meme and went on these massive building campaigns the past several years. even funnier (in a bad way) are these huge campuses in the middle of BFE that were erected because the population was going to grow X percent indefinitely. debt service is gonna suck, especially when the tax base never materializes. at some point "blood from a stone" is going to refer to the taxpayer.
When that house in New Jersey sells (currently listed at $1.3 million) or is reappraised, the local tax revenues will take a hit. And that same story is being repeated over and over ...
It will make for some interesting fireworks when the townships attempt to raise the mil rate in response to declining assessments.
In California the 58 counties are responsible for property tax processing. They all have an "Assessment Appeals Board." In normal times 90% of the issues are cleared up by staff and the remaining few are almost always obscure points of commercial real estate. Weird stuff like is the CUP for emergency mobilization points in the parking lot a diminution of the taxable value? These days it is a massive overflow of people just looking for a break. Staff has limited leeway and so these are kicked to the Board where tight budgets are making them less willing to give the plaintiff the benefit. Progressive counties like Ventura have in place generalized formulaic reductions without even asking. If you bought in the bubble you probably saw a modest decline in your bill in the hopes you'll be satisfied with that. Yet another break for the irresponsible at the expense of the prudent.
Apropos of nothing: David Bowie doing "Space Oddity" on TV in 1969, after five years of record-making and starvation . . . .
YouTube - DAVID BOWIE - First TV appearance 1970 - SPACE ODDITY
If my neighborhood is anything to go by, the taxpayer is going to be inclined more to the spiritous, than to the spiritual...
C
If my property value declined dramatically, I'd contest the tax bill too. But everyone in the article is acting like they were surprised by the tax bill.
If a person is at risk of losing their house because of a tax bill, it is only a matter of time anyway.
More American "spirit" required... POTUS via bloomie:
The American spirit, he said, “is what has always led us, as a people, not to wilt or cower at a difficult moment, but to face down any trial and rise to any challenge.”
“That is the spirit we are called to show once more,” he said.
With explicit oligarchy, American exceptionalism will be a tougher sell.
The American spirit, he said, “is what has always led us, as a people, not to wilt or cower at a difficult moment, but to face down any trial and rise to any challenge.”
“That is the spirit we are called to show once more,” [Obama] said.
Was he speaking at the GS bonus awards banquet?
Last weekend, my wife and I stopped at a couple of open houses on our way home to our DC place. One house was FSBO for 888K and moved out. We got home and saw it listed on Zillow with a 702K estimate. The next night, I got a voice mail from the owner asking if we were still interested. Stupid all around.
Dawg - LOL!
In the glorious future, every day will be like a GS bonus awards banquet.
Just don't ask who's the main course...
C
water/sewage rate increases will be massive
In our little town a local developer put up a new development with "cottage homes" from $500k, "custom homes" from $700k, and estate homes from the One millions (their phrase). Had a parade of eight homes there last year and to date no homes have sold.
Homes were $1.2 mil plus. Drove thru the other night and it had an absolute ghost town feel to it. It is located far from interstates and jobs, can't figure out what the hell the developer was thinking. Our illustrious ruling elites (city council) spent like a drunkard during the boom on many, many questionable projects; so it will be interesting to see the head on collision between declining revenues and the need for services. Iceberg dead ahead. Anyone for a "cottage home"?
Massachusetts actually has a pretty good system. Our rate changes with prices.
Each town can raise revenue on existing real estate 2.5%/year. If home prices rise faster than that, rates fall. When prices rise less than that, rates rise. The town can override the 2.5% cap by referendum. My town did that lat month.
It really is a smart system.
In the glorious future, every day will be like a GS bonus awards banquet.
Just don't ask who's the main course...
"To Serve Mankind."
I challenged my tax bill in NC. Got them to come off of $175,000 to $160,000 after sending them the appraisal done in Jan for $150,000. I'm going to challenge it again.
GS. . . perfect candidate to take up residence in its new tenth circle. (glossary)
Exurban damnation?
GS. . . perfect candidate to take up residence in its new tenth circle. (glossary)
With a sign over the entrance reading "Under New Management."
Gracious, Liz, just catching up on your crepe thread.
Hunger growing...Got.to.get.to.phaser......
Coffee!! Crepes!!!
Happy 4th All
But isn't increasing taxes on ordinary people, who are already stretched thin, a bad idea? What about taxing the wealthy and powerful?
In Az, our "value" was lowered last year and this year. They seem to do it automaticly.
What they are going to do about the loss of income is anyone's guess.
The outer area schools are already in a world of hurt.
But that would entail cutting into the financials' bonuses.
Haven't got time to go through all the comments from the last thread, but I have seen a noticeable uptick in delinquencies and foreclosures in the past 2 months, through May 31 (don't have June 30 data yet).
for dqs, there was a lull in Jan, Feb, Mar, some of it seasonal due to tax refunds
foreclosures were suppressed due to the moratoriums.
read this article yesterday, apologies if it has been posted already, very worthwhile reading, he makes some great points in that no one can predict how mortgage performance is going to work out (which highlights a flaw in PPIP btw: more uncertainty makes the debt more risky, meaning the govt is not charging nearly enough for the debt - a nice trick Geithner has learned - the public hates cash bailouts, but in unsophisticated in the ways of underpriced insurance).
some key points.
Tilson Talks Mortgage Default - Forbes.com
"And the third key variable is what are people who are underwater do? Twenty-five percent minimum of all the mortgages in the country are underwater. And so the question is: Some of those people are underwater and can't make the payments, but what about all the people who are underwater and who can make the payments but [who] might be economically rational to walk away and hand the keys to the bank? Because why should I keep paying the bank a $400,000 mortgage on a home that's only worth $250,000?
Now that's a key variable, because historically people don't like to lose their homes, they don't like to have their credit rating ruined. But historically no one has ever been $150,000 underwater with a mortgage. It's never happened before. And now you have millions of people who are deep underwater. So how those people behave in terms of walking away from loans that they can make the monthly payments on but it's economically rational for them to walk is going to be a very important variable and one I can't really predict. "
A "high" tax rate? Around here, you have to escape to the suburbs to get that low a rate. Last place I looked at had assessment $192k, annual tax $8200.
Before our basement project was even finished, the county assessor's office showed up, knocked on the door and asked to be allowed to just come in to look at it.
No previous calls, no contacts to ask when was convenient.
I refused on grounds that still under construction so not yet ready. Okay, she responded, can you call me when it's done?
She's still waiting, pompous ****.
And when they finally do show up again, I'm going to refuse entry on grounds of non-convenience so that they have to contact me first.
And then, I'm going to contest the final appraisal. Several houses in my neighborhood are stalled in selling, so I should have no difficulty in contesting the arrogant prigs.
ghost::
article in this morning's WSJ editorial page lays the blame for the foreclosures squarely on the variable of whether the owner is underwater. Because the largest increase in foreclosures has spread to primes, it obviously is the skin in the game that determines whether someone loses the house.
Sorry for no link, but had the hard copy WSJ and don't have subscription to online WSJ.
Mr. Obama, The spirit of xmas future is indeed welling up within us true 'murkins, however, you do not want to know the true nature of this spirit, for you would find it revolting.
Two issues with people who are now underwater but can afford to pay the mortgage.
Increase in unemployment will take care of the ability to make the payments.
If you figure you will not live long enough to get to break even, and people you know are walking away, people will walk. Social stigma will be on the banks, not the debters. I see this already happening.
There was a study done, don't remember where I saw it, that if you know someone who walked away, but could pay, you were over 30% more likely to do so as well. As more and more people walk away, more and more will figure it is acceptable.
If you can rent the same quality of housing for much less, why would someone continue to pay. Especially in a non-recourse state.
Whoa ... cool!
A middle class tax cut ....
wow, sorry about that last one. I was like totally out there in the 2015 Depression zone. It was not nice.
Luke, where is that? That's amazing.
We just voted to raise ours to (I think) $13.50/1,000
Also in the decision to walk away. In 3 years you can get a First Time Home Buyers loan from FHA.
Sure your credit is messed up for a bit, but now days most people's credit score is lower than it has ever been. And as most of the loss of available credit is due to the bank not lending, cutting credit avability etc, you are no differant than your neighbors and friends.
You are kinda cool looking, pre-shit and all that.
Take a name asswipe (profile) wrote on Sat, 7/4/2009 - 2:30 pm
"... sewage rate increases will be massive"
Leading to a massive decrease in demand for wiping?
oh shit, i was not like supposed to do affect you guys? right, carry on! Like something you do here?
is thi Wed 2017 July 5th or or Fri 2008?
just kidding
It's just so cool when the refresh mode flashes the screen but there's no new listings. Thanks Ken!
Taught an adult Sunday School for four weeks in May regarding the economic situation - where we are now, how we got here, what could happen and how faith beliefs would/should influence our response to the situation.
Asked the question "do you believe that you have a moral responsibility to pay your mortgage?" Unanimous response that yes. I challenged that with questions about the contract between you and the lender. Isn't there a penalty that would be suffered if you defaulted? What if you believe that the lender was misleading? Do you have a greater obligation to your family or to the contract that you believe duped you?
Discussed California. Then stated that in the circumstances, I'd give serious consideration to walking since contract is essentially amoral at best.
Honestly, several looked open-mouthed stunned. A few nodded in agreement.
"Leading to a massive decrease in demand for wiping?"
A return to "if it's yellow, let it mellow..." to decrease the water bill.
yeag
But with today's environmentally correct low-flow toilets, even if it's brown, it won't flush down.
D
One word: humanure!
Humanure - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
I've been looking at Contra Costa homes for sale on Redfin and I'm struck by the massiveness of these homes. Average size in ZIP 94513 is 2300 ft^2. Of course, that means many are laerger/MUCH larger.
Probably seemed like a bargain at the time, but now they're albatrosses (albatri?).
BobinMA I am in New Haven CT. In theory the assessed value is below the market value, but not so much as to drop the rate below 3.5%.
We have lots of albatri here. Mostly refered to as McMansions.
This is the most appealing Americans have been for awhile.
I knew a guy about five years ago who was doing well, quite well, but chose to take a five-year loan so he could "buy more house," a McMansion-style residence but on a large lot with a view. Of course he planned to refi in two or three years with the increased equity and get a "real" loan.
Wonder how he's doing now with that decision. Especially since the source of his income was a service business linked to the travel industry.
“It’s worthy of a Dickens story,” said Gus Kramer, the assessor in Contra Costa County, Calif., outside San Francisco.
"Income 20 shillings, expenditure 20 shillings and sixpence, result misery. But income 20 shillings, expenditure 19 shillings and sixpence, result happiness." -Dickens
Deleted
but 100 dollar is like 100 dollar ?
Does not work that way in North Carolina. Property is reassessed at least once every seven years. All disputes are at that date. It does not matter that prices hace changed.
zeropoint -> ZAP! on Ignore
When is the next 7 yr date in NC? There will probably be a large drop at that time.
California introduced the sales tax 08/01/1933 at 2.50%.
California increased the sales tax 07/15/1991 1.25% to 6.00%.
How'd those work out as a green shoots?
At the height of California's Golden Age the sales tax was 4.00%.
Mr. Kramer, the assessor in Contra Costa County, said homeowners started swamping his office with requests for new assessments in December.
BOOOOOYAAAAH!
"In the glorious future, every day will be like a GS bonus awards banquet.
Just don't ask who's the main course...
"To Serve Mankind."
A Vision:
pavel.libsyn.com
This is where you separated the Sunday Christians from the true believers.
It would be a sin to ascribe moral constraints to an earthly contract. Those contracts are a repudiation of any higher authority and thus not eligible for divine intervention. It is a moral imperative to adhere to the letter of a legal contract in the manner that most benefits your interests. In short we need to exhort those who believe themselves to be moral persons to review their mortgages and act in the manner most advantageous to the only moral person involved; themselves.
D
I can see small homes making a comeback, like small cars. Less to heat, cool, clean, debug and repair. Small homes also draw less scrutiny from the tax assessor, especially when they are old and haven't been enlarged or reassessed in many years.
In smaller, older homes, all bedrooms are often within arm's reach, which is good for family safety and peace-of-mind. There's more window are per interior space, which helps with light and ventilation.
I live in an 1,800 square foot home built in 1922. It still has the original center beam made of wood, in as good shape as ever. They don't build them like this now. Nobody knows how.
50-60 years ago, most U.S. homes had kitchens less than 100 square feet and one modest, functional bathroom. The average living room probably was less than 150 square feet. Many homes did not have rec rooms or family rooms, unless the basement was fixed up.
American houses got gluttonous, and now (like Americans) they're too fat.
More reinforcement of the downward spiral... Depression on schedule!
Madoff's fraud was billions. Geither+Obammi+Ben+Summers+Paulson=trillons. And worst of all,
each and EVERY tax payer is a victim though hyperinflation and loss of basic civil
infastructures and institutions such as school, roads, and hospitals. Tax payer money is
being used to bailout banks and to ensure that the economy recovers ASAP so that the wealth
gap widens, more credit card debt, and the little people are gouged with surging food
prices, surging gas prices, lack of jobs, and inflation lagging wages. Only the upper
eschelons of society will benefit from a 'speedy recovery' It's been that way since 2002.
People now are getting paid the SAME WAGES as they did in 2000. But are prices at 2000
levels? H3LL NO. So they go into debt, adding more layers tothe USA debt ponzi scheme.
good finance articles: Interesting Finance & Economic articles
Real estate taxes are allocated differently in the East than in California. In the east, home values are used to decide the proportion of taxes each home will pay. So if all houses decline by 50%, each houses tax burden remains the same. It's only if house values rise and fall disproportionally across a tax district will some taxes rise, while others fall. In California, a homes taxes are based on the lower of the purchase price or current (assessed) value. So if values decline, so do tax revenues.