......IF they start manufacturing again as the "new improved" GM, and before they start paying the $40-50-billion "bail-out" money back (within 5-years they say), will the partially built cars currently on the assembly lines be 2009s, 2010s, 2011s, 2012s, or 2009a/b's?? AND, do they have all the parts on-hand to even finish them? If not, are all the suppliers up and ready to go alongside them? NOT.
I have yet to own a GM car myself: I have owned 3 Ford's (Mazda, Volvo and, currently, Ford Expedition 1997) and 1 Chrysler (Dodge RAM with Diesel: bought in 2007 and get a check engine light every 2 or 3 months).
When we bought Expedition, Suburban was too big for our garage and Tahoe didn't have third row seating (and we needed a 4x4 vehicle that seats 8: so minivans were not even an option).
My parents insisted on GM (after bad experience with a Ford) until they bought Chevy Citation which was a problem car left and right. Now they only buy Toyota's (my sister, too, so far).
My father-in-law worked for Honda affliate so you can guess my wife's preference....
Now don't forget the whisper number on the street is Chapter 7. Looks like GM beats estimates with a Chapter 11 and stocks will soar on the "good" news.
I will never buy a car from a government owned auto company.
I am starting a new public boycott of all auto makers owned by the federal government to teach my government a lesson.
A public boycott of GM and Chrysler products is underway.
The Patriots have spoken.
Have a nice day.
You are not missing much. We have had a couple in the family over the years.
They have mostly been junk. Certain vintages of the Camero, Cadillac, and Corvette have been good. Others have been bad.
We've had much better luck with Fords, although there have been a couple of problems - mostly due to incompetent mechanics at dealers and unavailability of parts.
There are moments in the 'tween/'teen world when physical safety depends on it. Lord of the Flies was an appropriate story for a reason. Have had to deal with it in this household multiple times in the past several months...
Trying to get them to remember that I am ultimately their best friend, so make sure that you do come clean with me.
To Mister Richard Branson,
I am communicating to you on behalf of a group of people who for the past amount of years have been involved in the crimes that are tantamount to treason in a majority of nations worldwide, that have at times been know as terrorist and in other times liberating. This group has had the willing support of many others in its existance and now finds itself in the most dire need. They need one million dollars for the continuation of their cause, they know that in the past you have shown sympathy to groups with a similar belief and fundamental core structure. They believe that you are the man to help continue this cause. This group is known in various circles as FBI, they have promoted me on the basis that I will receive five percent of the total amount that you will willing donate to their cause, for the continuation of this mission. They are currently in the process of promoting a month long exercise at the expense of the public and other private groups to help achieve this cause; with your help the casualties of this, may be minimised.
Aan Mijnheer Richard Branson, Ik communiceer aan u namens een groep mensen die voor de afgelopen hoeveelheid jaren in de misdaden zijn geïmpliceerdr die wereldwijd aan verraad in een meerderheid van naties gelijkwaardig zijn, die af en toe kennen als terrorist en in andere tijden het bevrijden zijn geweest. Deze groep heeft de gewillige steun van vele anderen zijn bestaand gehad en zich nu in het meeste nijpend tekort gevonden. Zij hebben één miljoen dollars voor de voortzetting van hun oorzaak nodig, weten zij dat in het verleden u sympathie aan groepen met een gelijkaardig geloof en een fundamentele kernstructuur hebt getoond. Zij geloven dat u de man bent helpen deze oorzaak voortzetten. Deze groep is gekend in diverse cirkels aangezien FBI, zij me op de basis hebben bevorderd dat ik vijf percent van het totale bedrag dat u bereid om aan hun oorzaak te schenken zal, voor de voortzetting van deze opdracht zal ontvangen. Zij zijn momenteel tijdens het bevorderen van een maand lange oefening ten koste van het publiek en andere privé groepen helpen deze oorzaak bereiken; met uw hulp kunnen de slachtoffers van dit, worden geminimaliseerd. Oprecht H.B.
À Monsieur Richard Branson, Je communique à vous au nom d'un groupe de personnes qui pour la quantité passée d'années ont été impliqués dans les crimes qui sont équivalents à la trahison dans une majorité de nations dans le monde entier, cela ont parfois été savent comme terroriste et en d'autres fois libérant. Ce groupe a eu l'appui disposé de beaucoup d'autres dans son existence et se trouve maintenant dans la plupart de besoins extrêmes. Ils ont besoin d'un million de dollars pour la suite de leur cause, ils savent que dans vous avez montré au delà la sympathie aux groupes avec une croyance semblable et une structure fondamentale de noyau. Ils croient que vous êtes l'homme à aider à continuer cette cause. Ce groupe est connu dans divers cercles comme FBI, ils m'ont promu sur la base que je recevrai cinq pour cent du montant total que vous voulant donner à leur cause, pour la suite de cette mission. Ils sont actuellement en cours de favoriser un exercice long de mois aux dépens du public et d'autres groupes privés pour aider à réaliser cette cause ; avec votre aide les accidents de ceci, peuvent être réduits au minimum. Sincèrement H.B.
Zum Herrn Richard Branson, Ich stehe zu Ihnen im Namen einer Gruppe von Personen in Verbindung, die für die letzte Menge von Jahren in die Verbrechen, die mit Verrat in einer Majorität Nationen weltweit gleichwertig sind, das sind gewesen manchmal wissen als Terrorist und in anderer Zeitbefreiung miteinbezogen worden sind. Diese Gruppe hat die bereite Unterstützung von vielen anderen in seinem Bestehen gehabt und jetzt im meisten dringenden Bedarf findet. Sie benötigen eine Million Dollar für die Fortsetzung ihrer Ursache, wissen sie, dass in der Vergangenheit Sie den Gruppen mit einem ähnlichen Glauben und grundlegenden einer Kernstruktur Sympathie gezeigt haben. Sie glauben, dass Sie der Mann sind, zum zu helfen, diese Ursache fortzusetzen. Diese Gruppe bekannt in den verschiedenen Kreisen als FBI, sie haben gefördert mich auf der Basis, der ich fünf Prozent der Gesamtmenge, die Sie willend zu ihrer, Ursache zu spenden werden, für die Fortsetzung dieses Auftrags empfange. Sie sind z.Z. bei der Förderung einer einmonatigen Übung auf Kosten von der Öffentlichkeit und anderen privaten Gruppen, um zu helfen, diese Ursache zu erzielen; mit Ihrer Hilfe können die Unfall von diesem, herabgesetzt werden. Herzlichst H.B.
Στον κύριο Richard Branson, Επικοινωνώ με σας εξ ονόματος μιας ομάδας ανθρώπων που για το προηγούμενο ποσό ετών έχουν συμμετάσχει στα εγκλήματα που είναι ισοδύναμα προς την προδοσία σε μια πλειοψηφία των εθνών παγκοσμίως, τα οποία ήταν κατά περιόδους ξέρουν ως τρομοκράτης και σε άλλη χρονική απελευθέρωση. Αυτή η ομάδα είχε την πρόθυμη υποστήριξη πολλές άλλες στην ύπαρξή της και βρίσκεται τώρα στην περισσότερη τρομερή ανάγκη. Χρειάζονται ένα εκατομμύριο δολάρια για τη συνέχεια της αιτίας τους, ξέρουν ότι στο παρελθόν έχετε παρουσιάσει συμπόνοια στις ομάδες με μια παρόμοια πεποίθηση και μια θεμελιώδη δομή πυρήνων. Θεωρούν ότι είστε το άτομο για να βοηθήσετε να συνεχίσετε αυτήν την αιτία. Αυτή η ομάδα είναι γνωστή στους διάφορους κύκλους δεδομένου ότι FBI, με έχουν προαγάγει στη βάση ότι θα λάβω πέντε τοις εκατό του συνολικού ποσού που πρόθυμος να δώσετε στην αιτία τους, για τη συνέχεια αυτής της αποστολής. Είναι αυτήν την περίοδο στο στάδιο της προώθησης μιας μακροχρόνιας άσκησης μήνα εις βάρος του κοινού και άλλων ιδιωτικών ομάδων για να βοηθήσουν να επιτύχουν αυτήν την αιτία με τη βοήθειά σας τα θύματα αυτού, μπορούν να ελαχιστοποιηθούν. Ειλικρινά H.B.
Al l$signor Richard Branson, Sto comunicando a voi a nome di un gruppo di persone che per la quantità passata di anni sono stati coinvolgere nei crimini che sono equivalenti al tradimento in una maggioranza delle nazioni universalmente, quello occasionalmente sono stati sanno come terrorista ed in altre volte che liberano. Questo gruppo ha avuto il supporto disposto di molti altri nella relativa esistenza ed ora si trova nella maggior parte della necessità estrema. Hanno bisogno di un milione di dollari per la continuazione della loro causa, sanno che nel passato avete indicato la compassione ai gruppi con una simile credenza e una struttura fondamentale del centro. Credono che siate l'uomo da contribuire a continuare questa causa. Questo gruppo è conosciuto in vari cerchi come FBI, lo ha promosso sulla base che riceverò cinque per cento della somma totale che volendo donare alla loro causa, per la continuazione di questa missione. Sono attualmente nel corso della promozione dell'esercitazione di lunghezza di mese a scapito del pubblico e di altri gruppi riservati per contribuire a realizzare questa causa; con il vostro aiuto gli incidenti di questo, possono essere minimizzati. Francamente H.B.
미스터에 리처드 Branson, 나는 국가의 대다수에 있는 반역과 세계전반 동등한 범죄에서 테러리스트로 그리고 해방하는 다른 시간에서 년 과거 양을 위해, 그것 때때로 이다 것이 알고 있다 포함된 집단의 대신으로 당신에게 교통하고 있다. 이 그룹은 그것의 실존에서 많은 다른 사람의 기꺼이 하는 지원이 있고 지금 절박한 필요에서 찾아낸다. 그들은 그들 원인의 계속을 위한 일백만 달러를 필요로 한다, 과거에는 당신이 유사한 신념 및 기본적인 중핵 구조를 가진 그룹에 교감을 보여주었다는 것을 알고 있다. 그들은 당신이 이 원인을 계속한다고 것을 도울 남자 다고 믿는다. 이 그룹은 FBI로 각종 원형에서 나가 당신이 이 임무의 계속을 위한 총계의 5% 그들 원인에 기증하는 것을 의도한 받을 것이다 기초로 하여, 그들 증진해 저를 알려져. 그들은 공중 및 다른 개인 그룹을 희생해서 달 긴 운동을 승진시키기의 과정에서 이 원인을 달성하는 것을 돕도록 지금 이다; 당신의 도움으로 이것의 사고는, 극소화될지도 모른다. 근실하게 H.B.
Ao senhor Richard Branson, Eu estou comunicando-me lhe em nome de um grupo de pessoas que para a quantidade passada de anos foram envolvidas nos crimes que são equivalentes à traição em uma maioria das nações no mundo inteiro, isso foram às vezes sabem como o terrorista e em outras vezes que liberam. Este grupo teve a sustentação disposta de muita outro em sua existência e encontra-se agora em a maioria de extrema necessidade. Precisam um milhão de dólares para a continuação de sua causa, sabem que no perto você mostrou a simpatia aos grupos com uma opinião similar e uma estrutura fundamental do núcleo. Acreditam que você é o homem a ajudar a continuar esta causa. Este grupo é conhecido em vários círculos como o FBI, eles promoveu-me na base que eu receberei cinco por cento da quantidade total que você querendo doar a sua causa, para a continuação desta missão. Estão atualmente no processo de promover um exercício de um mês. às expensas do público e de outros grupos confidenciais para ajudar a conseguir esta causa; com sua ajuda as víctimas desta, podem ser minimizadas. Sincera H.B.
К господину Ричард Branson, Я связываю к вам именем группы людей которые для прошлого количества лет включались в злодеяния которые равный к предательству в большинстве наций всемирно, то временами знают как террорист и в других временах освобождая. Эта группа имела охотно готовую поддержку много других в своем существовании и теперь находит в большинств крайней нужде. Им нужны миллион долларов для продолжения их причины, они знают что в в прошлом вы показывали сочувствие к группам с подобным верованием и основной структурой сердечника. Они верят что вы человек, котор нужно помочь продолжать эту причину. Знают эту группу в различных кругах как ФБР, они повышала меня на основание которому я получу 5 процентов полной суммы которая вы будете завещающ для того чтобы подарить к их причине, для продолжения этого полета. Они в настоящее время в процессе повышать месячную тренировку за счет публики и других приватных групп для того чтобы помочь достигнуть этой причины; с вашей помощью потери этого, могут быть уменьшены. Задушевно H.B.
A señor Richard Branson, Estoy comunicando a usted a nombre de un grupo de personas que para la última cantidad de años han estado implicadas en los crímenes que son equivalentes a la traición en una mayoría de las naciones por todo el mundo, eso han estado ocasionalmente saben como terrorista y en otras veces que liberaban. Este grupo ha tenido la ayuda dispuesta de muchos otras en su existencia y ahora se encuentra en la mayoría de la extrema necesidad. Necesitan un millón dólares para la continuación de su causa, saben que en el pasado usted ha demostrado condolencia a los grupos con una creencia similar y una estructura fundamental de la base. Creen que usted es el hombre a ayudar a continuar esta causa. Conocen a este grupo en varios círculos como FBI, ellos me ha promovido sobre la base que recibiré el cinco por ciento de la cantidad total que usted queriendo donar a su causa, para la continuación de esta misión. Él está actualmente en curso de promover un ejercicio de un mes a expensas del público y de otros grupos privados para ayudar a alcanzar esta causa; con su ayuda las muertes de esto, pueden ser reducidas al mínimo. Sinceramente H.B.
My family never used GM, but I have gotten a Intrigue and G8 nothing but praise. The only problem has been the Intrigue's water pump broke once, but it is a 9 year old car. The G8 has been perfectly healthy for 3 years now. Good all is well.
It is about experience. Bad mouthing domestic automakers when it is all bias is bad. That is part of the rebuilding. Time to bad mouth Toyota's. They suck.
It's a time of sea change really.... I loved my Monaco rv's... now an orphan... I love my 2000 Buick Regal and my 2007 Saturn Vue - now both orphans... I'm not buying anything until the dust settles on all of this.... and I have a strong dislike for Govt Motors run by the UAW and the Democrats.... probably would not touch anything from them no matter what... So hey - Toyota, Honda, Mercedes, BMW, - whatcha got???
I would have bought a Chevy truck years ago. They said for an extra five hundred bucks, they'd extend the guarantee to one hundred thousand miles. I said if you don't expect your vehicle to go one hundred thousand miles I'll buy a Nissan. They said they were confident, I said then why is it going to cost me five hundred bucks? I bought a Nissan (built in Tennessee), it's over one hundred thousand miles.
I wonder how they're going to convince people to trust them.
And I am currently in negotiations with a Nigerian Prince to reclaim a large fortune which he is willing to share with an exclusive group of investors which do not include Richard Branson... to be considered as a member of this group, please reply immediately...
homedad43 (homepage, profile) wrote on Sat, 5/30/2009 - 9:47 pm
...Teach them how to lie when necessary...
...how to bluff...
Surprisingly, Liz, I have to agree with that.
There's really no alternative, is there? One of the joys of life. If only we lived in a completely honest world, ehehe
You can actually demonstrate pretty easily for most situations that the "saint" strategy makes for a sucker's outcome in any two-player game/interaction. For single games or repeated iterations it will always be exploited. Expected value is negative, so you are actually better off not having played at all. The moral? choose your games wisely, but your strategies even wiselier
Tim waiting for 2012 (homepage, profile) wrote (in reply to...) on Sat, 5/30/2009 - 10:54 pm reply Ignore user Pontiac has only produced the G8 since Summer 07. You couldn't have had it for even two years. Not like I'm ? your credibility...
Era the unholy alliance between the UAW and the administration has already cost the taxpayers 75 billion or so... I'm not about to give them any voluntary business...
Era the unholy alliance between the UAW and the administration has already cost the taxpayers 75 billion or so... I'm not about to give them any voluntary business...
UAW? Give me a break man. That entire group represents only a fraction of the entire cost. The real reason is to rebuild a auto industry in america where the merchant failed. Sorta like 1900 all over again and the likeness is striking.
That multilingual comment was certifiably strange.
Just strange.
I somehow doubt that Branson is communicating with a bunch of econogeeks.
That said, do we know who was dumping all of teh MBS on the bond market the other day? My understanding was that a bunch of them were unloaded and that was a predominant cause of the lockup.
Lawyerliz: how hard did they have to work? There a number of computer-generated translation services freely available on the internet (e.g. babblefish)
Jeez, you sound like a replay of the science fiction lunch conversation with my mother the other day.
I told her to move beyond the old Repub/Demo/Conservative/Liberal mindsets. We're dealing with the general situation of the late 19th century robber barons who looted teh US at that time.
The UAW is not the major reason for decay here. Consider the number of members of unions nationally and the decline in the past 25 years.
It's incredibly bad decisions that screwed their pooch.
Eras End, I think what you're seeing here is that people buy cars based on the car company's total reputation, not just based on the number of cupholders it has. Some people can be convinced to buy GM based on the cupholders, but most of us here will need to be impressed with the company's reputation. And good reputations take years, decades, of consistent good company behavior to build.
It's only fair that a company that served its employees first, and staked its strategy on marketing flash - the next hot high-margin model - instead of engineering and reliability, and then used its political muscle to force us, the taxpayers, pay for its avoidance of the full consequences of its actions, will have to overcome a lot of consumer resistance. What goes around comes around. Taxpayers are an easy mark, but we still have some freedoms.
Counterpointer (profile) wrote on Sat, 5/30/2009 - 10:03 pm
RIF - try instead Roger Myerson on multistage games with communication.
And yes, you can play this one with your fingers crossed.
C
Thanks! Looks like I'll be digging into some new reading material... It was an extremely nice day out so between lounging around this afternoon and walking a few miles I am only up to "Saturday, November 9, 1985" in "The Alchemy of Finance".
I've come down on the deflation side, but just holding my breathe otherwise. I have this dreadful feeling
we are all gonna lose everything, no matter what we do, but maybe I just need to take my Prozac.
Hey, all the current inventory gets marked to market. What's not to love? And hey, with brand new models that are going to be good this time , we promise, coming out of the new GM who'd want the old inventory anyway?
lawyerliz (profile) wrote on Sat, 5/30/2009 - 10:11 pm
I've come down on the deflation side, but just holding my breathe otherwise. I have this dreadful feeling
we are all gonna lose everything, no matter what we do, but maybe I just need to take my Prozac.
in my mind I am seeing the combination of Prozac and American Idle... shades of Clockwork Orange!
......and kids will understand when the appropriate time to lie, cheat, steal, bluff? They would look to the trainer, the role model, and their peers for examples. It looks like all would show the same face.
I fully agree with letting all kids know about there being "bad guys", but to import is to own.
There was that school shooting. . .in Colorado??. . .one kid shooter asked this girl if she were a Christian, with the
clear implication that she would get shot if she said yes. Which she did and was killed. If any kid of mine had said yes, even if I were thoroughly Christian, half of my mourning would involve my feeling a failure
'cause she acted so dumb. Of course the parents said how proud they were, as if the stupid, sick shooting kid
were the Roman Empire, and there was actually something to prove.
Re. that Richard Branson thing.............wouldn't it be strange if there were a coup d’état attempt? Wonder how the MSM would slant THAT? Or, more telling, how they would have slanted it differently with Bush?
lawyerliz (profile) wrote on Sat, 5/30/2009 - 10:19 pm
Of course the parents said how proud they were, as if the stupid, sick shooting kid
were the Roman Empire, and there was actually something to prove.
Peter denied Christ three times... but it would have been hard to have named him as the 'rock' upon which the church would be built if he was killed first by the Roman legions. So the jury's still out on the ethical high ground here...
I guess I'll never make saint. I try heavily to minimize lying personally, more out of laziness of having to remember multiple versions of the truth than anything "higher", really.
"What may break you is the realization that even doing nothing or opting out is an option they've already planned for."
there are millions of economic refugees that are out of the system but did not opt out. These millions have fled the system like refugees flee war zones in that they do it not from choice but because of the destruction of their previous universe.
They are shut out by the devastation wrought through deliberate pumping of the credit money system. loans were written without reserves, risk was fraudulently concealed and mispriced with CDS insurance also written without reserves to the tune of 6 times world GDP. then there was glass-steagall separations removed, ratings agency complicity, accounting rules skirted, SEC in hiding, etc.
In either case there is a similar end result, the rejection of the status quo myths of gluttony, thievery and mass produced thoughts and name brand lies. lower internet traffic is evidence of the dismissal of merry go round.
yeh, i have noticed the plans for this "option".
the PTB need the markets
no one man needs the market.
as people flee the debt fueled consumerist mind trap the scammers will suffocate.
When the kids are much smaller, then yes, we tell the truth. But when they get a bit older, then yes, use your head.
But I'm thinking of a specific situation in which one of my kids was getting jammed at the neighborhood playground by the asshole older brother of another kid. Mine just said what he had to say to get out of there alive...and he felt ashamed/guilty, thinking that he should've "manned up" to the young adult older brother. Per son, that older brother was bigger than me and even if he was exaggerating, there was still a beard on the brother's face. I double-checked his story with his friends who were there.
So yeah, go ahead and lie if you have to. Run fast, and forget the knee to the crotch nonsense. If you can reach his crotch, he can reach you.
Those are the moments that I'm talking about.
And yeah, I went back to the playground with him that evening - guy wasn't around. The standing rule is that if he even sees the yahoo, come home immediately.
ShadowInventory (profile) wrote on Sat, 5/30/2009 - 10:29 pm
Maybe I should have said - I'm not smart enough to be a 'successful' liar...
I'm too honest to lie well. It's a habit now, and one I don't care to break. It makes the world a lot simpler, and yet it really throws people off! Women especially.
The most amazing thing is that I have told the truth on a number of occasions, knowing that what
I was saying was so outrageous that it woud immediately be thought a humorous lie by the
listening people. This is lying of a high order. Or truth telling of a high order. One of those things
anyhow.
regarding new cults being formed. people are seriously susceptible to demagoguery and manipulation right now. i expect we will have new equivalent phrases to drinking the grape kool-aid or catching the comet in the near future.
i have noticed an astroturf cult that is metastasizing in florida.
--- - .. ... .... . .-. - --.. (homepage, profile) wrote on Sat, 5/30/2009 - 10:30 pm
resistance is feudal says,
the PTB need the markets
no one man needs the market.
You got it. But we also aren't islands unto ourselves, nor can we in present time acquire sufficient knowledge and expertise to entirely manage our own lives with no outside help, not without a lot of simplifications anyway.
Nope, I repeat, that just doesn't sound Nigerian. I've gotten a fair number of the Nigerian things and they aren't like
that. What's with Nigerians anyway?? The hub prosecuted some of them for an airline ticket fraud so complicated
that tho I understood at the time, I've forgotten again what they did.
The phrase “bankrupt General Motors,” which we expect to hear uttered on Monday, leaves Americans my age in economic shock. The words are as melodramatic as “Mom’s nude photos.” And, indeed, if we want to understand what doomed the American automobile, we should give up on economics and turn to melodrama.
Politicians, journalists, financial analysts and other purveyors of banality have been looking at cars as if a convertible were a business. Fire the MBAs and hire a poet. The fate of Detroit isn’t a matter of financial crisis, foreign competition, corporate greed, union intransigence, energy costs or measuring the shoe size of the footprints in the carbon. It’s a tragic romance—unleashed passions, titanic clashes, lost love and wild horses...
--- - .. ... .... . .-. - --.. (homepage, profile) wrote on Sat, 5/30/2009 - 10:36 pm
oh yeah, RIF,
regarding new cults being formed. people are seriously susceptible to demagoguery and manipulation right now. i expect we will have new equivalent phrases to drinking the grape kool-ade or catching the comet in the near future.
yes, I would expect it too. if something comes out of the whole David Icke worldview (or the other stuff even more targeted and unbalanced than Alex Jones) it will be a really bad sign IMHO. will have to check out your linked write-up; thanks for the response, post-pigging, from the last thread.
You got it. But we also aren't islands unto ourselves, nor can we in present time acquire sufficient knowledge and expertise to entirely manage our own lives with no outside help, not without a lot of simplifications anyway."
i think of the freegans and how there is enough flotsam and jetsam to sustain large numbers of people. beyond that, there is craigslist. we have enough left over crap to trade back and forth on craigslist for at least the next ten years. i have been calling our economy the craigslist economy for some time. further out there will be the craigslist equivalent for bartering whereby people match their surplus items directly across tens of millions of ads without the use of currency except for shipping costs. the only thing preventing mass, efficient, technologically assisted bartering is a critical mass of users.
so, while we certainly are not islands, striving to be an island is a better ideal than buying the american dream. better than being another sucker on the vine.
i did recently buy a new ford. its an f250, made in 1986. after an investment of 3 or 4k, i will have torn down and rebuilt every single piece of my new truck. i expect that if i am careful and lucky, it will last me 300k miles or more. government motors? who needs 'em?
Their real value can be found only at public auction, for cash money.
Otherwise, the dealers are blowing smoke up your skirt.
I personally believe many people have simultaneously concluded the same, and will put off any voluntary auto purchases until prices come into step with some sort of reality.
Who in their right mind is going to drop $40k on a pickup truck that only may be worth 25k or less this time next year?
OldSouth,
Exactly; a good chunk of the price of a new pickup is pure profit. The actual cost to manufacture isn't much greater than for sedans or minivans.
PARADIGM SHIFT STATED PLAINLY
The Chinese strategy remains hidden, to execute a grand paradigm shift that will take tacit control of the United States, which is now in disarray. Its leadership is too busy being coopted by the Wall Street banksters. The objective by Beijing leaders is to avoid violence and military actions altogether. Sun Tzu would be proud. Beijing is gradually subjugating the USGovt as a vassal in debt, the risk to the US being a transition toward servitude to their credit master. We are in the midst of an historical global paradigm shift, to date a quiet process. Power is shifting from WashingtonDC and New York City and London directly to Beijing.
The United States has little choice but to acquiesce and comply with Beijing wishes. The insolvent indebted nation with little industry left and a destroyed banking system can endure the shameful process of bankruptcy receivership, forced by the creditors, or the nation can permit a ‘New Alliance’ with China that involves obedient hidden directives. The US possesses a powerful defense contractor industry, half the world’s agricultural output, and many spectacular locations for residence. The practical consequence of the US ‘listening’ to Beijing wishes on a regular basis will be for the European Union to be pushed into a ‘New Alliance’ with Russia. Such a deal is practical, due to distances and supply lines. The United Kingdom is in all likelihood to be left out in the cold.
The Chinese and other Asians are playing economic Go; the Europeans and Russians are playing Chess; and the Americans are still trying to puzzle out Checkers.
"after an investment of 3 or 4k, i will have torn down and rebuilt every single piece of my new truck."
AND, a truck that's a better damned truck then the new ones. (But then I didn't even know nobody made a carbureted engine anymore) till my youngest "eloquently" pointed it out.
There was no doubt that the Chinese purchase of the port of Long Beach was a strategic acquisition...
We won't even mention Hutchinson Wampoa running the terminals at either end of the Panama Canal or the oil pipelines through Columbia from the Venezuela border to the Pacific Ocean.
Funny how that word WAR is creeping into the language of business evermore present...
"Currency markets have been in a weird state of what looks almost like equilibrium for the past couple of months. What’s really going on is something akin to an evenly matched tug of war that fails to move the ribbon tied around the center of the rope, giving the impression of harmony while powerful forces do silent battle until someone slips. "
“All currencies are being debased dramatically by their central banks at extraordinary speeds and so in relative terms it appears there is no currency problem,” Lee Quaintance and Paul Brodsky of QB Asset Management said in a research note earlier this month. “In reality, however, paper money is highly vulnerable to a public catalyst that serves to acknowledge it is all merely vapor money.”
There is an unfortunate thread of xenophobia in some people's reactions to changes in the world economy. The fact that China is producing a lot of things for us to keep and use entitles them to buy assets from us that will help them in the future. This is simply what we did for decades when we had trade surpluses. Was it evil of us? Did we really expect to get tons of stuff from China and then not give them anything in return?
I have to admit I find the presumption that foreigners are somehow automatically worse than us is distasteful.
sportsfan (profile) wrote on Sat, 5/30/2009 - 9:48 pm
Setting aside the U.S./China relationship for the moment, I'd like to see what China will do about North Korea.
You mean the NK problem isn't "contained" to sub-prime nations? [ducks]
There was that school shooting. . .in Colorado??. . .one kid shooter asked this girl if she were a Christian, with the
clear implication that she would get shot if she said yes. Which she did and was killed. If any kid of mine had said yes, even if I were thoroughly Christian, half of my mourning would involve my feeling a failure
'cause she acted so dumb. Of course the parents said how proud they were, as if the stupid, sick shooting kid
were the Roman Empire, and there was actually something to prove.
Liz, there's quite a bit of doubt that incident occurred the way it was recounted initially in the media:
Regardless, I don't think you can draw any conclusions about what Harris and Klebold would have done if she had answered differently. Clearly, they were cold-blooded killers that probably would have killed Bernall no matter what she had done or said.
BSR writes: "...wouldn't it be strange if there were a coup d’état attempt..."
It's happened before, Smedley Butler was instrumental in breaking a plot against Roosevelt. It is rumored that the missing nuke (still missing BTW) was a plot hatched by one and broken up by another faction within the military general officer ranks.
Strange? Yes. Fits right in with a whole bunch of other stuff.
I'd like to see what China will do about North Korea.
Nothing, as long as they think that they can use North Korea as a proxy to rattle the US and Japan and use Pakistan as a proxy to keep India off balance.
If a war starts, it will destroy South Korea's industrial base, resulting in one less competitor to Chinese manufacturers.
China will sit back, play dumb, and sell war supplies to both sides.
patientrenter writes: "There is an unfortunate thread of xenophobia in some people's reactions to changes in the world economy. The fact that China is producing a lot of things for us to keep and use entitles them to buy assets from us that will help them in the future."
We got the whole frigging island of Manhattan for a box of beads, so there's precedent I suppose. I wouldn't call it xenophobia though, most just don't trust those fucking foreigners.
R D: That's the wisdom that comes from living in a house where your piss rolls downhill onto the rest of the town. China doesn't have to do shit. They're in charge.
I bought an electric toaster today at a neighbour's garage sale. I hate garage sales, especially when they are next door. On my way to the beer store (Hockey night), amid the trash and clutter strewn in neighbour's driveway, I noticed a toaster. It was a relic MADE IN USA stamped on the bottom. I flipped neighbour a buck (the asking price) and back in the house I went, with the treasure under arm. Since the toaster will last 20 years, I won't need to buy 10 disposable toasters from China to cover the same period. In nominal future dollars, I just saved about $500 I figure.
Norka West, FWIW, I didn't detect that the incidence of xenophobia identified in patientrenter's post (to which I reply) was directed at you. I assumed he was speaking about the morons who inhabit the airwaves.
I think I would prefer distrust of government, over total trust of government. He is clearly over the top, but I appreciate conspiracy types for keeping an over vigilant eye on things. Sometimes they are right.
OK, i check drudge on the weekend to know what the media fixation is this week. Susan Boyle. I really wanted to not like her because her style of singing makes me end the life cycle of consumer non durables. she is hard not to like. I know she is an excellent singer but had to read the lyrics it was so hard for me to hear before i realized they were from from the wizard of oz.
that this song, in this style, has captivated the nation, at this moment in history has me cyclops agog and is weirding me out. i don't want to say it but someone's gotta say it. i reaaly don't want to say it. so i'll let you fill in the blanks
volker the viking (profile) wrote on Sat, 5/30/2009 - 10:01 pm
R D: That's the wisdom that comes from living in a house where your piss rolls downhill onto the rest of the town. China doesn't have to do shit. They're in charge.
Sounds strangely reminiscent of "Japan Inc." from an earlier decade. How'd that work out?
china noticed that capitalism was corporate colonialism. they noticed the game western central bankers play of controlling nations with debt. they beat the us at our own game.
"Regardless, I don't think you can draw any conclusions about what Harris and Klebold would have done if she had answered differently. Clearly, they were insane and probably would have killed Bernall no matter what she had done or said."
Have to agree with Volker. China is in a vastly different place. China has greater needs than Japan. Larger population etc. They need energy not enough at home.
"Free Market internationalism at its finest. Disgrace" - Totally agree.
If you don't like GM or other American cars don't buy them on their merits.
But to boycott an American car company because the government is trying to save the US manufacturing base is way beyond Un-American. It shows not only a loyalty to globalism, but, even further, a contempt for anything which attempts to help Americans, misguided or not!!! This is what Republican economic policy is ALL all about. In theory it is concerned with free trade and protecting the profits of certain corporations which benefit from trade. (which is wicked in iteslf). But in practice it is more concerned with the jobs of foreigners, including the communist Chinese, than it is about building a strong America (which is wicked and twisted.) These Republicans will not be happy until they have dismantled the American industrial base to such an extent that there is no rebuilding it - their economic policy is beyond disloyal, they are doing the bidding of foreign powers, wittingly or not.
Rob Dawg: You may be surprised at the extent to which China will go to hold power. People are cheap and plentiful there. The concept of employment is new there. It's all about the state.
volker the viking (profile) wrote on Sat, 5/30/2009 - 10:52 pm
Rob Dawg: You may be surprised at the extent to which China will go to hold power. People are cheap and plentiful there. The concept of employment is new there. It's all about the state.
So we've gone from the Treaty of Versailles [fail] to Japan Inc. [fail] now to USSR [fail] comparisons? Rigid political states are brittle political states.
Ralph Nader: Obama's GM Plan Looks Like a Raw Deal
4) Why is the task force permitting GM to increase manufacturing overseas for export back into the U.S.? Under the GM reorganization plan, the company will rely increasingly on overseas plants to make cars for sale in the U.S., with cars made in low-wage countries like Mexico rising from 15% to 23% of GM sales here. For the first time, GM plans to export cars from China to the U.S. in what is a harbinger of the company's future business model. What is the conceivable rationale for permitting GM to increase manufacturing overseas -- especially in dictatorships, for export back into the U.S. -- when preserving jobs and industry is the avowed goal of this immense taxpayer bailout?
GM will not make this country great. The older folks are seeing the product of their generation die and they get upset. The world has moved on. "Saving the manufacturing base" by forcing malinvestment for a product which is not demanded or needed is really just a wealth transfer from one constituency to another courtesy of the government. I also have a problem with the government "saving" an industry for the sake of creating jobs. If it otherwise wouldn't exist, why would anyone want or need to take part in government make-work? Let free people be free. Forcing them to stand in a line to make an undemanded product for pieces of paper you printed is just stupid.
volker the viking (profile) wrote on Sat, 5/30/2009 - 10:58 pm
R D: Platitudes keep you satisfied.
I'll take solace in Mark Twain's observation that history doesn't repeat but often rhymes. I know there's no diffusing the hysteria around the latest threat to US world dominance. Only time and events can do that.
M-F: "But to boycott an American car company because the government is trying to save the US manufacturing base is way beyond Un-American. "
You're making an assumption that the car company bailouts are an attempt by the US govt to save the US manufacturing base. That's not entirely obvious to me. The govt could be simply paying back the UAW for its support for the Democratic party over the years, and continuing the life of some hopelessly inefficient and out of touch companies for another 4-8 years. I'd say the jury is still out.
People buy what they want. It's one of the few untrammeled freedoms we have left. No one can force us to buy a Toyota, and no one can force us to buy a GM. Personally, I'll buy my next car for the features, the price, and the reputation for exceptional and consistent reliability and quality of the cars the company makes. You are free to use your own criteria.
I appreciate your use of the un-American label though. It reminds me of the 1950's. Just change a few feet and a few shoes, and we're back there.
RATM - the problem is that, in a truly rational world economy there would be damn near NO manufacturing in the USA. It can ALL be done cheaper somewhere else. The only reason we (still) have much of what we have left is corporate inertia - it takes time to move tens of millions of jobs offshore. If markets were more efficient we would already be much poorer. This is the same thing that happened to Britain last century - when they embraced free trade, thier manufacturing base went away.
Do you want to live in an America with no manufacturing base? Just what do you think everyone will do for a living? Get PhDs and join the new economy? Maybe 1% at most right? What do you want everyone else to do - work in restaurants? Does that sound like a strong America to you? Or do you just figure that hopefully someday the Chinese will acquiesce and let the playing field level by floating their currency and giving foreigners a fair shake when they are rich enough to do so?
We need to damn well preserve what we can right now, because a quick collapse of the US industrial base will leave millions permanently unemployed - they won't be absorbed by any new industries in their lifetimes. Why we import so many cars is beyond me. Even Reagan squeezed the foreign car companies for voluntary import quotas - he wasn't as stupid as we are today.
china noticed that capitalism was corporate colonialism. they noticed the game western central bankers play of controlling nations with debt. they beat the us at our own game.
Because of his role at World Bank and IMF, pre- and post-Asian currency crises, Larry Summers is a persona non grata in Asia. And he's to head the FRB in 2010. This will not end well.
The market is recovering from an unusual and vicious financial crisis; this is a time in which market participants, after having been petrified, are starting to come to grips with the fact that Great Depression II is probably not going to happen.
This is also an extraordinary time - one in which vast numbers of market participants are wrongly over-allocated to cash. As investors adjust their asset allocations to account for new realities, the rally in financial markets will be extremely powerful.
Indeed, because of the large cash allocations, there’s the danger that at some point, things could get out of hand on the upside. Because of the effects of massive inflows by institutions that invest mechanically and are essentially insensitive to fundamentals, the market could overshoot to the upside, failing to properly account for the risk (as opposed to the certainty) that things could get materially worse in 2010.
However, we’ll worry about the risk of bullish overshoot later. As I point out in Op-Ed: The Crisis is Over - For Now, the financial crisis is over, for now. And for now, I believe this market is going higher - much higher.
-patientrenter - I don't think it's un-American to buy a foreign car. I think it's un-American to be more loyal to the concept of unfettered free trade than to your own country. Sorry if un_american is a loaded word. Maybe those angrily boycotting US government efforts to save industry should be more correctly labelled Anti-American because their loyalty sure isn't to America, it's to some concept of an unfettered free market which sure as hell doesn't exist.
M-F (homepage, profile) wrote on Sat, 5/30/2009 - 11:12 pm
...the problem is that, in a truly rational world economy there would be damn near NO manufacturing in the USA. It can ALL be done cheaper somewhere else.
Just wait. Dryfly is gonna find out about this and set you straight.
Lucy, you've got some 'splainin' to do. How is spending 50BB of USA tax dollars to move GM to China "Saving?" At least with liquidation, some hedge fund or investment collective could put the pieces back together to make something useful. Or get the dinosaur out of the way for a replacement, domestic start-up or eliminate a competitor to Ford, so they have a fighting chance.
GM totally gone, with the hit to all the parts suppliers and the associated unemployment seems preferable that yet another zombie proxy for outsourcing.
Tim "FRB? Bernanke is not close enough to the banks?"
I think BB is plenty close enough, but Summers is too, and Summers wants to be captain of his own ship. Don't forget that the FRb executes govt policy at just enough of an arm's length to allow Congress and the WH to deny responsibility for difficult decisions. You can guess from how many difficult decisions the FRB has made in the last 10 years just how independent it really is.
BB and Bair perspectives on the role of banking is slightly different than Summers and Geithner, which is probably why Geithner tried to have Bair removed. While I know many here think that BB is extremely arrogant, he actually has a reputation of being an extremely humble person; Summers not so much. He's got a Rumsfeldian complex, where he's so wedded to an ideology that he feels any compromise or backtracking from that ideology represents weakness. Personally, I don't think Summers can develop the international consensus needed, especially if the crisis drags on through 2010.
Interesting insight. Something may have to seriously wrong before BB is ousted. If it were to come without explanation or warning it could destabilize the propaganda machine.
Summers is Wall St's mouthpiece and he clearly has Obama's ear...
blackhalo - If GM becomes a conduit for importing chinese cars, then that's bad too. But I think we need to save it now, because I don't htink some hedge fund will buy it and start some new car company, especially in today's environment. Assets could well be sold for scrap or factories shipped overseas like in the 1980s Pennsylvania. The important thing is not to throw in the towel now. GM management has been HORRIBLE for decades now. Americans can make competitive cars and if GM goes away the disruption may be too great.
As for the 50 Billion - we gave 125 Billion to AIG to cover losses by what was essentially a hedge fund run out of their London Office!! 50 Billion to support real american jobs, rather than the FIRE economy seems like a bargain these days.
It makes me so mad when people talk of boycotting US car companies because the government is involved! It is sheer ignorance - if they had any idea of Chinese involvement and support for key Chinese industries maybe they could boycott those too.... but probably not because their brand of Anti-Americanism, and Anti-Americanism in general always puts a microscope on America and turns a blind eye to the sins of the rest of the world.
when all is said and done. The Gm bailout will cost over 100 billion. Saying this bailout cost less than another is an argument as thin as paper. What could 100 billion in VC do for other auto companies that want to get their shot at the marketplace?
Where was the sacrifice by GM shareholders? Not one pensioner took a penny in cuts to their payout. No manager at GM gave up their salary.
As for the 50 Billion - we gave 125 Billion to AIG to cover losses by what was essentially a hedge fund run out of their London Office!! 50 Billion to support real american jobs, rather than the FIRE economy seems like a bargain these days.
M-F, calling it a hedge fund was generous. I'd say the government paid off gaming chits.
But I do agree with you that keeping jobs in the U.S. is a worthwhile expenditure of funds.
(Personally, I don't like the term 'un-American' since it was thrown at me for opposing the invasion of Iraq.)
Makes perfect sense. The banks have given large amounts of campaign money to Congress esp banking committee, Obama and now the bill for those politicians is coming due. Do you think they gave all that money to leave anything to chance (BB)? Doubtful
the susan boyle-les miserables of oz-i have a dream song reminds me of this poem written by a 14 year old Jewish boy in an Auschwitz concentration camp
I was once a little child who long for other worlds.
But I'm no more a child for I have known fear, I have learned to hate...
How tragic, then, is youth which lives with enemies, with gallows ropes.
Yet, I still believe I only sleep today.
That I'll wake up, a child again, and start to laugh and play.
There is no guarantee that jobs over the long term will stay in the US. The debt that the next generation will owe and the opportunities that will be missed by not investing in something more worthwhile is guaranteed.
Tim, so many people (read that as corporations) give so much money to so many politicians that it's a wonder that anything with any degree of social utility is ever accomplished at all.
Frankly, the entire political process, as currently constituted, is disgusting. Unfortunately, it produces our leaders.
Tim .. 2012: Tell me what opportunities will be missed as a result of investing in car companies?
Fact is, the entire financial system, responsible for effectively allocating capital, for the past 6 years was awash in excess capital, and they directed all of that capital into the mortgage market until the bubble burst!!!!! All that Chinese money coming to America and looking for a place to invest and nothing got produced except houses!!! You think the government could allocate capital worse than the markets over the past decade? Look at the 90s Tech bubble, and the commodity bubble too, what a waste of a great deal of capital.
The financial markets have a horrible track record (as of late) at allocating capital to productive long term uses. The government on the other hand makes roads, bridges, schools, and funds research that no private company will. At this point, I don't know how someone can make the argument that markets allocate capital better than governments with a straight face. Look at all the capital misallocated by the markets in this housing debacle - and you are going to tell me that 50 Billion to try to save a big part of our manufacturing base is really so much worse?
I got a 70 year old guy in a wheel chair whose got his head sawed off by a 55 year old Marine Corps Sargent here in North Fort Myers Florida where I live.
Please Tell me why nobody in our country seems to care about this? news-press.com | Southwest Florida | The News-Press
Simple the tens of billions of dollars could be used to develop advanced battery technology. Companies such as Telsa could be given new seed money to scale up their operations. GM said the Volt would use Korean batteries from LG. This is foolish to have foreign technology and put it into American cars with expensive labor.
A majority of the money payed to GM by the govt (these are not loans) will go to pay for pension and health care costs. This is not productive use of capital.
There needs to be rewards and consequences in any industry. GM took a tremendous gamble on Trucks and SUVs as did many auto makers. They lost. Cars with character and economy are selling well like the MINI and some hybrids. Automakers must honor contracts with their workers and suppliers and when they cannot they declare BK. Functional societies and markets MUST have rules and laws.
That said I would have no problem having GM pensions be folded into the PBGC and having 50k of their salary guaranteed.
I don't know how someone can make the argument that markets allocate capital better than governments
More nonsense.
The whole damn housing bubble -- heck, the worldwide credit bubble -- was the result of government actions & incentives. Lowering the FFR to 1% kicked off the whole damned charade, and don't go arguing that the Fed isn't government.
Just because DC didn't spend the money directly doesn't mean they aren't responsible.
looking for a place to invest and nothing got produced except houses
Well, it wasn't that bad, or good (at least houses are capital stock).
Much of the hot cash ended up paying for saline solution bag implantations, botox shots, his & her jet skis, Mercedes leases, plus of course the smart ones found stashes like Casey Serin's coffee can.
The larger economy was getting juiced by HUNDREDS of billions of borrowed money every quarter, 2004~2007.
Of course, our good host was way ahead of the curve on this:
"The financial markets have a horrible track record (as of late) at allocating capital to productive long term uses. The government on the other hand makes roads, bridges, schools, and funds research that no private company will."
Well, it is Mish and other useful free-market-ueber-alles fanatics. Those idiots are really good for the rich elite because they provide the pseudo-science support for the looting of middle class by the rich bastards.
Invisible hand can be used for good of society but it requires free market staying free while under relatively strict supervision. Most markets do not stay free for long because markets always find those winners. Winners want to keep on winning. They do not want to level the playing field, they want to OWN it, make their own rules. That is where Mish is so wrong with is "free market always corrects itself"-crap.
Wal Mart killed most mom-and-pop shops with localized price dumping raids, one town after another. They provide now much lower wages for the modern day wage-slaves. Even worse, they try to externalize every possible cost to the local community. The same with healthcare, giant insurance companies robbing the middle class as fast as they can. Almost half of personal bankruptcies result from medical bills in the USA!
was the result of government actions & incentives.
The free market responds to the inputs it is given, yes.
Government cuts taxes significantly, people have more money, people bid rents & land prices up (increasing money chasing a good in limited supply).
Just because DC didn't spend the money directly doesn't mean they aren't responsible.
I agree but I place the blame on those charged with regulation, either in failing to add new regulations or failing to adequately enforce what was extant.
The way I see it the free market is like a steam engine, and government regulation is like, well, the governor
to keep its functioning on the rails and within parameters.
It was the abandoning of lending underwriting that really enabled the bubble to blow, 2004-2006. This was a failure of government to limit the free market.
"As for the 50 Billion - we gave 125 Billion to AIG to cover losses by what was essentially a hedge fund run out of their London Office!! 50 Billion to support real american jobs, rather than the FIRE economy seems like a bargain these days."
Two wrongs, does not make either action, right.
"If GM becomes a conduit for importing Chinese cars, then that's bad too."
GM is not going to become a conduit. They will fail. The Chinese will just let GM train workers and management, and then eat their lunch with those same employees, at a Chinese startup or government subsidized entity. Just like Acer, Asustek, Lenovo and Foxconn are going to kill Dell and HP. GM is dead. The wound is mortal. Their bloated, top heavy, government dependent and outmoded processes have killed them. All that remains is the mourning. We are just taking the longest and most painful possible path between them and what will eventually replace them.
The bankers did not kill GM. GM did, by their own resistance to change, and their ability to get the government to try to help them not have to change. They were wards of the state, and that never ends well.
GM and the government have a shared institutional memory of all the tanks and airplanes it built to successfully defend and then expand the USD bloc, 1942-44.
But in the age of the UAV we probably don't need that industrial capacity any more. Probably.
Hoped to find you online at a quiet moment, and here you are. Found this while making search for Durufle last week and thought you might like to hear it:
The FedGov has done as much as it can do for the UAW. The union helped in this death, but management never made the changes necessary to compete in the 21st century. What's untold will be CDS contracts and their effect on assets and distribution.
Funny you should say that Michael, I have talked to numerous friends and acquaintances and many of them have said the same thing. Of course, the next step for our dear leader is to "pressure" us to buy government cars from government motors.
Eras End, you won't have a choice in cary buyer when this deal gets furthere down the road. There will be "incentives" for you to buy the obamamobile. If you liked the Yugo and Trabi, you will love government motors.
UAW did not take a real hit. Gettelfinger should have been fired just like Wagner just to make the clean slate statement with labor as they did management. All of the real legacy retirement,medical cost needed to be pushed off on to the PBGC. Job protection and pensions should have been disbanded for modern flexible systems. Just resting the debt clock and GM stays a UAW retirement fund that makes cars. Now with misguidance from our governments desire for tin can cars that won't sell. All parties should start at square one. RIP GM.
I really like your comments but I always find it curious why everyone and his brother quotes Sun Tzu.
I say this because at Columbia I had to read through the canon of Chinese literature & philosophy
along with that of Japan and later the Middle East (I did the anti- Robert Hutchins and read the Other Great Books) and my profs, well credentialed in their fields, gave him
him short shrift.
I think why people quote Sun Tzu was that he became trendy on Wall St in the mid-80s onward. Every other month a new translation was published, many found right in the Biz sections of university bookstores. All of those 'Greed is Good" types needed some sacred text to kneel to, to rationalize at a corporate level the wholesale destruction of people's financial lives (see: Jack Welch, aka Neutron Jack).
A few years ago, a law enforcement officer friend of mine and I were talking about how he saw so many Hispanic families with a bunch of kids, with brand new Chevy Tahoes or other $30-40k SUV's, and he couldn't understand how this was feasible, economically?
We tend to think of subprime being a housing matter, but GM was handing out the keys to new cars in a similar fashion...
Not just GM but Banksters where part of the problem letting people trade their car in and rolling negative equity forward in to the new/new used car loan. Disgusting!
Excellent comment. The alternative is to extend unemp[oyment insurance indefinitely which I believe will have to be done any way. I wish they would talk about bailing out the citizenry rather than the banks.
LBD - roll up, roll up, get your Alt-A, OptArm, neg am, pick a pay car loans here! Try a jumbo! What the hey, try two! And a heloc for a bigger garage!
When GM got government money, there was almost universal scorn on this site--demanding bk. Now that bk is imminent, near universal scorn for their products. The 2 points can be compatible, but the attitude shows how bleak the future is for GM and, for the country as a whole. Without an industrial base, we become the largest banana republic. Not wanting that, the country better get behind the new GM/Chrysler and Ford if our children are to have a good economic future. Personally, I don't think the government/UAW can do a worse job than the capitalists. Not only did they push the wrong products, they were against government sponsored health insurance. Whatever its merits, that would have been a life saver for them and their legacy costs. Rich powerful people can be very stupid--and blindly selfish.
CR: as always thanks for your 24x7 work (or so it seems).
so, is GM "forced" into BK by the bondholders, or did it voluntarily enter it?
OK, it's time for an acronym: TIIR?
What does that stand for?
Will this finally cause the big sell off, or it is, ahemm, all priced in?
......IF they start manufacturing again as the "new improved" GM, and before they start paying the $40-50-billion "bail-out" money back (within 5-years they say), will the partially built cars currently on the assembly lines be 2009s, 2010s, 2011s, 2012s, or 2009a/b's?? AND, do they have all the parts on-hand to even finish them? If not, are all the suppliers up and ready to go alongside them? NOT.
Good point
I have yet to own a GM car myself: I have owned 3 Ford's (Mazda, Volvo and, currently, Ford Expedition 1997) and 1 Chrysler (Dodge RAM with Diesel: bought in 2007 and get a check engine light every 2 or 3 months).
When we bought Expedition, Suburban was too big for our garage and Tahoe didn't have third row seating (and we needed a 4x4 vehicle that seats 8: so minivans were not even an option).
My parents insisted on GM (after bad experience with a Ford) until they bought Chevy Citation which was a problem car left and right. Now they only buy Toyota's (my sister, too, so far).
My father-in-law worked for Honda affliate so you can guess my wife's preference....
Black Star Ranch.
Regarding teaching your children to lie.
Please reference Jonathan Swift's "A Modest Proposal."
A Modest Proposal by Jonathan Swift
Now don't forget the whisper number on the street is Chapter 7. Looks like GM beats estimates with a Chapter 11 and stocks will soar on the "good" news.
/snark off
GM death vigil and I must repeat myself;
I will never buy a car from a government owned auto company.
I am starting a new public boycott of all auto makers owned by the federal government to teach my government a lesson.
A public boycott of GM and Chrysler products is underway.
The Patriots have spoken.
Have a nice day.
This think is going to BK unless we get a 11th hour extension. Who holds the most CDS liabilities?
Has economic twilight fallen on nation's Sun Belt?
Yahoo! 404 - Page Not Found
DannyHSDad;
"I have yet to own a GM car myself:"
You are not missing much. We have had a couple in the family over the years.
They have mostly been junk. Certain vintages of the Camero, Cadillac, and Corvette have been good. Others have been bad.
We've had much better luck with Fords, although there have been a couple of problems - mostly due to incompetent mechanics at dealers and unavailability of parts.
I think thousands of Americans already beat you to it. chart their market share. Downward facing dog in Yoga speak
A Modest Proposal. Snark squared.
The nuns were careful to explain he didn't really mean it.
GM cars good. Toyota cars bad. Chrysler cars bad. Ford cars average.
What’s good for GM is good for the country right ?
U.S. National Debt Clock : Real Time
Tick Tick Tick
I like my Ford Fusion. I've hopelessly dinged it up already.
mmmmmmmmm Yearlings.....
I like my Honda.
Tommorrow will be BSS...
Black Swan Sunday!
...Teach them how to lie when necessary...
...how to bluff...
Surprisingly, Liz, I have to agree with that.
There are moments in the 'tween/'teen world when physical safety depends on it. Lord of the Flies was an appropriate story for a reason. Have had to deal with it in this household multiple times in the past several months...
Trying to get them to remember that I am ultimately their best friend, so make sure that you do come clean with me.
Honda ok. Way overrated in engine work however.
Family had Chevy trucks and Ford cars growing up. Both served the family well, but when we switched over to GM cars... not so much.
No good experiences with any domestics since, so no domestics were planned for the future. "Government Motors" just reinforces that.
To Mister Richard Branson,
I am communicating to you on behalf of a group of people who for the past amount of years have been involved in the crimes that are tantamount to treason in a majority of nations worldwide, that have at times been know as terrorist and in other times liberating. This group has had the willing support of many others in its existance and now finds itself in the most dire need. They need one million dollars for the continuation of their cause, they know that in the past you have shown sympathy to groups with a similar belief and fundamental core structure. They believe that you are the man to help continue this cause. This group is known in various circles as FBI, they have promoted me on the basis that I will receive five percent of the total amount that you will willing donate to their cause, for the continuation of this mission. They are currently in the process of promoting a month long exercise at the expense of the public and other private groups to help achieve this cause; with your help the casualties of this, may be minimised.
Sincerely H.B.
对理查・ Branson先生,我沟通给您代表为过去相当数量几年在罪行介入了是同等的对在大多数的谋反国家全世界的一群人,那时常是知道作为恐怖分子和在解放其他的次内。 这个小组在它的存在有许多其他的愿意的支持和现在发现自己在迫切需要。 他们需要他们的起因的继续的一百万美元,他们知道从前您显示了同情对与一个相似的信仰和根本核心结构的小组。 他们相信您是帮助的人继续这起因。 这个小组被认识以各种各样的圈子作为FBI,他们提升了我,根据我将接受您将愿捐赠到他们的起因总额的百分之五,这个使命的继续的。 他们当前是在促进月久的锻炼过程中牺牲公众和其他私人组帮助达到这起因; 在您的帮助下此的伤亡,也许减到最小。 恳切H.B。
對理查・ Branson先生,我溝通給您代表為過去相當数量几年在罪行介入了是同等的對在大多数的謀反國家全世界的一群人,那時常是知道作為恐怖分子和在解放其他的次内。 這個小組在它的存在有許多其他的願意的支持和現在發現自己在迫切需要。 他們需要他們的起因的繼續的一百萬美元,他們知道從前您顯示了同情對與一個相似的信仰和根本核心結構的小組。 他們相信您是幫助的人繼續這起因。 這個小組被认识以各種各樣的圈子作為FBI,他們提升了我,根據我將接受您將願捐贈到他們的起因总额的百分之五,這個使命的繼續的。 他們當前是在促進月久的鍛煉過程中犧牲公眾和其他私人组幫助達到這起因; 在您的幫助下此的傷亡,也許減到最小。 懇切H.B。
Aan Mijnheer Richard Branson, Ik communiceer aan u namens een groep mensen die voor de afgelopen hoeveelheid jaren in de misdaden zijn geïmpliceerdr die wereldwijd aan verraad in een meerderheid van naties gelijkwaardig zijn, die af en toe kennen als terrorist en in andere tijden het bevrijden zijn geweest. Deze groep heeft de gewillige steun van vele anderen zijn bestaand gehad en zich nu in het meeste nijpend tekort gevonden. Zij hebben één miljoen dollars voor de voortzetting van hun oorzaak nodig, weten zij dat in het verleden u sympathie aan groepen met een gelijkaardig geloof en een fundamentele kernstructuur hebt getoond. Zij geloven dat u de man bent helpen deze oorzaak voortzetten. Deze groep is gekend in diverse cirkels aangezien FBI, zij me op de basis hebben bevorderd dat ik vijf percent van het totale bedrag dat u bereid om aan hun oorzaak te schenken zal, voor de voortzetting van deze opdracht zal ontvangen. Zij zijn momenteel tijdens het bevorderen van een maand lange oefening ten koste van het publiek en andere privé groepen helpen deze oorzaak bereiken; met uw hulp kunnen de slachtoffers van dit, worden geminimaliseerd. Oprecht H.B.
À Monsieur Richard Branson, Je communique à vous au nom d'un groupe de personnes qui pour la quantité passée d'années ont été impliqués dans les crimes qui sont équivalents à la trahison dans une majorité de nations dans le monde entier, cela ont parfois été savent comme terroriste et en d'autres fois libérant. Ce groupe a eu l'appui disposé de beaucoup d'autres dans son existence et se trouve maintenant dans la plupart de besoins extrêmes. Ils ont besoin d'un million de dollars pour la suite de leur cause, ils savent que dans vous avez montré au delà la sympathie aux groupes avec une croyance semblable et une structure fondamentale de noyau. Ils croient que vous êtes l'homme à aider à continuer cette cause. Ce groupe est connu dans divers cercles comme FBI, ils m'ont promu sur la base que je recevrai cinq pour cent du montant total que vous voulant donner à leur cause, pour la suite de cette mission. Ils sont actuellement en cours de favoriser un exercice long de mois aux dépens du public et d'autres groupes privés pour aider à réaliser cette cause ; avec votre aide les accidents de ceci, peuvent être réduits au minimum. Sincèrement H.B.
Zum Herrn Richard Branson, Ich stehe zu Ihnen im Namen einer Gruppe von Personen in Verbindung, die für die letzte Menge von Jahren in die Verbrechen, die mit Verrat in einer Majorität Nationen weltweit gleichwertig sind, das sind gewesen manchmal wissen als Terrorist und in anderer Zeitbefreiung miteinbezogen worden sind. Diese Gruppe hat die bereite Unterstützung von vielen anderen in seinem Bestehen gehabt und jetzt im meisten dringenden Bedarf findet. Sie benötigen eine Million Dollar für die Fortsetzung ihrer Ursache, wissen sie, dass in der Vergangenheit Sie den Gruppen mit einem ähnlichen Glauben und grundlegenden einer Kernstruktur Sympathie gezeigt haben. Sie glauben, dass Sie der Mann sind, zum zu helfen, diese Ursache fortzusetzen. Diese Gruppe bekannt in den verschiedenen Kreisen als FBI, sie haben gefördert mich auf der Basis, der ich fünf Prozent der Gesamtmenge, die Sie willend zu ihrer, Ursache zu spenden werden, für die Fortsetzung dieses Auftrags empfange. Sie sind z.Z. bei der Förderung einer einmonatigen Übung auf Kosten von der Öffentlichkeit und anderen privaten Gruppen, um zu helfen, diese Ursache zu erzielen; mit Ihrer Hilfe können die Unfall von diesem, herabgesetzt werden. Herzlichst H.B.
Στον κύριο Richard Branson, Επικοινωνώ με σας εξ ονόματος μιας ομάδας ανθρώπων που για το προηγούμενο ποσό ετών έχουν συμμετάσχει στα εγκλήματα που είναι ισοδύναμα προς την προδοσία σε μια πλειοψηφία των εθνών παγκοσμίως, τα οποία ήταν κατά περιόδους ξέρουν ως τρομοκράτης και σε άλλη χρονική απελευθέρωση. Αυτή η ομάδα είχε την πρόθυμη υποστήριξη πολλές άλλες στην ύπαρξή της και βρίσκεται τώρα στην περισσότερη τρομερή ανάγκη. Χρειάζονται ένα εκατομμύριο δολάρια για τη συνέχεια της αιτίας τους, ξέρουν ότι στο παρελθόν έχετε παρουσιάσει συμπόνοια στις ομάδες με μια παρόμοια πεποίθηση και μια θεμελιώδη δομή πυρήνων. Θεωρούν ότι είστε το άτομο για να βοηθήσετε να συνεχίσετε αυτήν την αιτία. Αυτή η ομάδα είναι γνωστή στους διάφορους κύκλους δεδομένου ότι FBI, με έχουν προαγάγει στη βάση ότι θα λάβω πέντε τοις εκατό του συνολικού ποσού που πρόθυμος να δώσετε στην αιτία τους, για τη συνέχεια αυτής της αποστολής. Είναι αυτήν την περίοδο στο στάδιο της προώθησης μιας μακροχρόνιας άσκησης μήνα εις βάρος του κοινού και άλλων ιδιωτικών ομάδων για να βοηθήσουν να επιτύχουν αυτήν την αιτία με τη βοήθειά σας τα θύματα αυτού, μπορούν να ελαχιστοποιηθούν. Ειλικρινά H.B.
Al l$signor Richard Branson, Sto comunicando a voi a nome di un gruppo di persone che per la quantità passata di anni sono stati coinvolgere nei crimini che sono equivalenti al tradimento in una maggioranza delle nazioni universalmente, quello occasionalmente sono stati sanno come terrorista ed in altre volte che liberano. Questo gruppo ha avuto il supporto disposto di molti altri nella relativa esistenza ed ora si trova nella maggior parte della necessità estrema. Hanno bisogno di un milione di dollari per la continuazione della loro causa, sanno che nel passato avete indicato la compassione ai gruppi con una simile credenza e una struttura fondamentale del centro. Credono che siate l'uomo da contribuire a continuare questa causa. Questo gruppo è conosciuto in vari cerchi come FBI, lo ha promosso sulla base che riceverò cinque per cento della somma totale che volendo donare alla loro causa, per la continuazione di questa missione. Sono attualmente nel corso della promozione dell'esercitazione di lunghezza di mese a scapito del pubblico e di altri gruppi riservati per contribuire a realizzare questa causa; con il vostro aiuto gli incidenti di questo, possono essere minimizzati. Francamente H.B.
氏にリチャードBranson、私は国家の大半の反逆に世界的にほとんど等しい罪にテロリストとしてそして解放する他の時間で年の過去量のために、それ時々あったあることが知っているかかわった集団に代わってあなたと伝達し合っている。 このグループに存在で多くの他の喜んでサポートがあり、今緊急に必要とする状態の見つける。 それらは原因の継続のための百万ドルを必要とする、以前同じような確信および基本的な中心の構造を持つグループに共鳴を示したことを知っている。 彼らはこの原因を続けるのを助けるべき人であることを信じる。 このグループはFBIとしてさまざまな円で私があなたがこの代表団の継続のための総計の5%原因に寄付することを決定する受け取るという事実に基づいて、彼ら促進し私を知られていて。 それらは公衆および他のプライベートグループを犠牲にして月の長い練習の促進の過程においてこの原因の達成を助けるように現在ある; あなたの助けによってこれの死傷者は、最小になるかもしれない。 誠意をこめてH.B。
미스터에 리처드 Branson, 나는 국가의 대다수에 있는 반역과 세계전반 동등한 범죄에서 테러리스트로 그리고 해방하는 다른 시간에서 년 과거 양을 위해, 그것 때때로 이다 것이 알고 있다 포함된 집단의 대신으로 당신에게 교통하고 있다. 이 그룹은 그것의 실존에서 많은 다른 사람의 기꺼이 하는 지원이 있고 지금 절박한 필요에서 찾아낸다. 그들은 그들 원인의 계속을 위한 일백만 달러를 필요로 한다, 과거에는 당신이 유사한 신념 및 기본적인 중핵 구조를 가진 그룹에 교감을 보여주었다는 것을 알고 있다. 그들은 당신이 이 원인을 계속한다고 것을 도울 남자 다고 믿는다. 이 그룹은 FBI로 각종 원형에서 나가 당신이 이 임무의 계속을 위한 총계의 5% 그들 원인에 기증하는 것을 의도한 받을 것이다 기초로 하여, 그들 증진해 저를 알려져. 그들은 공중 및 다른 개인 그룹을 희생해서 달 긴 운동을 승진시키기의 과정에서 이 원인을 달성하는 것을 돕도록 지금 이다; 당신의 도움으로 이것의 사고는, 극소화될지도 모른다. 근실하게 H.B.
Ao senhor Richard Branson, Eu estou comunicando-me lhe em nome de um grupo de pessoas que para a quantidade passada de anos foram envolvidas nos crimes que são equivalentes à traição em uma maioria das nações no mundo inteiro, isso foram às vezes sabem como o terrorista e em outras vezes que liberam. Este grupo teve a sustentação disposta de muita outro em sua existência e encontra-se agora em a maioria de extrema necessidade. Precisam um milhão de dólares para a continuação de sua causa, sabem que no perto você mostrou a simpatia aos grupos com uma opinião similar e uma estrutura fundamental do núcleo. Acreditam que você é o homem a ajudar a continuar esta causa. Este grupo é conhecido em vários círculos como o FBI, eles promoveu-me na base que eu receberei cinco por cento da quantidade total que você querendo doar a sua causa, para a continuação desta missão. Estão atualmente no processo de promover um exercício de um mês. às expensas do público e de outros grupos confidenciais para ajudar a conseguir esta causa; com sua ajuda as víctimas desta, podem ser minimizadas. Sincera H.B.
К господину Ричард Branson, Я связываю к вам именем группы людей которые для прошлого количества лет включались в злодеяния которые равный к предательству в большинстве наций всемирно, то временами знают как террорист и в других временах освобождая. Эта группа имела охотно готовую поддержку много других в своем существовании и теперь находит в большинств крайней нужде. Им нужны миллион долларов для продолжения их причины, они знают что в в прошлом вы показывали сочувствие к группам с подобным верованием и основной структурой сердечника. Они верят что вы человек, котор нужно помочь продолжать эту причину. Знают эту группу в различных кругах как ФБР, они повышала меня на основание которому я получу 5 процентов полной суммы которая вы будете завещающ для того чтобы подарить к их причине, для продолжения этого полета. Они в настоящее время в процессе повышать месячную тренировку за счет публики и других приватных групп для того чтобы помочь достигнуть этой причины; с вашей помощью потери этого, могут быть уменьшены. Задушевно H.B.
A señor Richard Branson, Estoy comunicando a usted a nombre de un grupo de personas que para la última cantidad de años han estado implicadas en los crímenes que son equivalentes a la traición en una mayoría de las naciones por todo el mundo, eso han estado ocasionalmente saben como terrorista y en otras veces que liberaban. Este grupo ha tenido la ayuda dispuesta de muchos otras en su existencia y ahora se encuentra en la mayoría de la extrema necesidad. Necesitan un millón dólares para la continuación de su causa, saben que en el pasado usted ha demostrado condolencia a los grupos con una creencia similar y una estructura fundamental de la base. Creen que usted es el hombre a ayudar a continuar esta causa. Conocen a este grupo en varios círculos como FBI, ellos me ha promovido sobre la base que recibiré el cinco por ciento de la cantidad total que usted queriendo donar a su causa, para la continuación de esta misión. Él está actualmente en curso de promover un ejercicio de un mes a expensas del público y de otros grupos privados para ayudar a alcanzar esta causa; con su ayuda las muertes de esto, pueden ser reducidas al mínimo. Sinceramente H.B.
Eras End: "GM cars good. Toyota cars bad. Chrysler cars bad. Ford cars average."
Saturday night sarcasm....
My first car was a used Toyota. Excellent value. I'll buy GM when they have 10 years of the top reliability ratings under their belt.
Saturday night sarcasm....
Naw, Toyota has been in decline for some time.
My family never used GM, but I have gotten a Intrigue and G8 nothing but praise. The only problem has been the Intrigue's water pump broke once, but it is a 9 year old car. The G8 has been perfectly healthy for 3 years now. Good all is well.
It is about experience. Bad mouthing domestic automakers when it is all bias is bad. That is part of the rebuilding. Time to bad mouth Toyota's. They suck.
Hugh, I'll nominate that as the strangest post of the month.
Eras End
GM cars good huh. If you can convince about 400k of your closet friends BHO has a job for you...
'Vulture' shoppers circle Chrysler dealers
'Vulture' shoppers circle Chrysler dealers - Los Angeles Times
Hunh, bastard?
It's a time of sea change really.... I loved my Monaco rv's... now an orphan... I love my 2000 Buick Regal and my 2007 Saturn Vue - now both orphans... I'm not buying anything until the dust settles on all of this.... and I have a strong dislike for Govt Motors run by the UAW and the Democrats.... probably would not touch anything from them no matter what... So hey - Toyota, Honda, Mercedes, BMW, - whatcha got???
see the movie
buy the doll
see the movie
buy the doll
CLAP HANDS!
YouTube - Tom Waits - Clap Hands
GM files Ch 11 - a triumph of bailout DIPlomacy.
So, taxpayers, how you like your new cars? That AGM should be a blast, huh? To the proxies, people!
C
I would have bought a Chevy truck years ago. They said for an extra five hundred bucks, they'd extend the guarantee to one hundred thousand miles. I said if you don't expect your vehicle to go one hundred thousand miles I'll buy a Nissan. They said they were confident, I said then why is it going to cost me five hundred bucks? I bought a Nissan (built in Tennessee), it's over one hundred thousand miles.
I wonder how they're going to convince people to trust them.
I think the belief that GM can ever repay ANY money back is based on their prior profit margins.
Small cars and electric cars make very little profit and there is plenty of competition to make them.
Pontiac has only produced the G8 since Summer 07. You couldn't have had it for even two years. Not like I'm ? your credibility...
.... and I have a strong dislike for Govt Motors run by the UAW and the Democrats....
Free Market internationalism at its finest. Disgrace
Does anybody really believe they'll pay money back?
See previous thread for comments about lying and detection of same.
And I am currently in negotiations with a Nigerian Prince to reclaim a large fortune which he is willing to share with an exclusive group of investors which do not include Richard Branson... to be considered as a member of this group, please reply immediately...
Yeah, Shadow, that's what it reminded me of, except those things are poorly written and not in a
number of languages. Somebody worked hard on that.
Question:
when you drive by used car lots and see ZERO DOWN painted large on every windshield do you think those cars are overpriced or underpriced?
homedad43 (homepage, profile) wrote on Sat, 5/30/2009 - 9:47 pm
...Teach them how to lie when necessary...
...how to bluff...
Surprisingly, Liz, I have to agree with that.

There's really no alternative, is there? One of the joys of life. If only we lived in a completely honest world, ehehe
You can actually demonstrate pretty easily for most situations that the "saint" strategy makes for a sucker's outcome in any two-player game/interaction. For single games or repeated iterations it will always be exploited. Expected value is negative, so you are actually better off not having played at all. The moral? choose your games wisely, but your strategies even wiselier
Tim waiting for 2012 (homepage, profile) wrote (in reply to...) on Sat, 5/30/2009 - 10:54 pm reply Ignore user Pontiac has only produced the G8 since Summer 07. You couldn't have had it for even two years. Not like I'm ? your credibility...
Wrong. Summer of 2006.
Era the unholy alliance between the UAW and the administration has already cost the taxpayers 75 billion or so... I'm not about to give them any voluntary business...
Oh, what the hell, let's just have a trade war.
Era the unholy alliance between the UAW and the administration has already cost the taxpayers 75 billion or so... I'm not about to give them any voluntary business...
UAW? Give me a break man. That entire group represents only a fraction of the entire cost. The real reason is to rebuild a auto industry in america where the merchant failed. Sorta like 1900 all over again and the likeness is striking.
Go worship your internationalist heroes.
That multilingual comment was certifiably strange.
Just strange.
I somehow doubt that Branson is communicating with a bunch of econogeeks.
That said, do we know who was dumping all of teh MBS on the bond market the other day? My understanding was that a bunch of them were unloaded and that was a predominant cause of the lockup.
Is that correct?
Lawyerliz: how hard did they have to work? There a number of computer-generated translation services freely available on the internet (e.g. babblefish)
Couldn't be. Pontiac was still selling the GTO in 2006. They stopped making the GTO in 2006. There was at least a 1 year hiatus between the two.
How many state and local government employee layoffs are coming at the end of next month? I'm counting 1m+ in July.
I see a hungry troll! They always seem to show up in these car threads...
RIF - try instead Roger Myerson on multistage games with communication.
And yes, you can play this one with your fingers crossed.
C
I've never seen any of those translation things that really worked. But I have not looked at them in a long while
either. The Spanish seemed ok to me.
Eras End
Tell these guys that the car came out in 2006. They are clamoring for "pre-production" photos in 2007
Production Pontiac G8 Pictures From Woodward Dream Cruise - GM Inside News Forum
Does anybody really believe they'll pay money back?
See previous thread for comments about lying and detection of same.
Another valuable skill: detecting when someone thinks they are telling the truth, but in reality they're just self-delusional.
Jeez, you sound like a replay of the science fiction lunch conversation with my mother the other day.
I told her to move beyond the old Repub/Demo/Conservative/Liberal mindsets. We're dealing with the general situation of the late 19th century robber barons who looted teh US at that time.
The UAW is not the major reason for decay here. Consider the number of members of unions nationally and the decline in the past 25 years.
It's incredibly bad decisions that screwed their pooch.
That multilingual comment was certifiably strange.
Richard Branson reads CR? And he's not smart enough to ask what the FBI has to do with this? Hoocoodanode.
Eras End, I think what you're seeing here is that people buy cars based on the car company's total reputation, not just based on the number of cupholders it has. Some people can be convinced to buy GM based on the cupholders, but most of us here will need to be impressed with the company's reputation. And good reputations take years, decades, of consistent good company behavior to build.
It's only fair that a company that served its employees first, and staked its strategy on marketing flash - the next hot high-margin model - instead of engineering and reliability, and then used its political muscle to force us, the taxpayers, pay for its avoidance of the full consequences of its actions, will have to overcome a lot of consumer resistance. What goes around comes around. Taxpayers are an easy mark, but we still have some freedoms.
Counterpointer (profile) wrote on Sat, 5/30/2009 - 10:03 pm
RIF - try instead Roger Myerson on multistage games with communication.
And yes, you can play this one with your fingers crossed.
C
Thanks! Looks like I'll be digging into some new reading material... It was an extremely nice day out so between lounging around this afternoon and walking a few miles I am only up to "Saturday, November 9, 1985" in "The Alchemy of Finance".
I've come down on the deflation side, but just holding my breathe otherwise. I have this dreadful feeling
we are all gonna lose everything, no matter what we do, but maybe I just need to take my Prozac.
Hey, all the current inventory gets marked to market. What's not to love? And hey, with brand new models that are going to be good this time , we promise, coming out of the new GM who'd want the old inventory anyway?
lawyerliz (profile) wrote on Sat, 5/30/2009 - 10:11 pm
I've come down on the deflation side, but just holding my breathe otherwise. I have this dreadful feeling
we are all gonna lose everything, no matter what we do, but maybe I just need to take my Prozac.
in my mind I am seeing the combination of Prozac and American Idle... shades of Clockwork Orange!
...Teach them how to lie when necessary...
...how to bluff...
......and kids will understand when the appropriate time to lie, cheat, steal, bluff? They would look to the trainer, the role model, and their peers for examples. It looks like all would show the same face.
I fully agree with letting all kids know about there being "bad guys", but to import is to own.
I have 3k in GM bucks. I'll have one at 50% off plus the 3K plus rebates. Otherwise, take a hike and will not buy from government motors.
There was that school shooting. . .in Colorado??. . .one kid shooter asked this girl if she were a Christian, with the
clear implication that she would get shot if she said yes. Which she did and was killed. If any kid of mine had said yes, even if I were thoroughly Christian, half of my mourning would involve my feeling a failure
'cause she acted so dumb. Of course the parents said how proud they were, as if the stupid, sick shooting kid
were the Roman Empire, and there was actually something to prove.
I don't think that is actually known as "buying" Michael. I think it is what is known as "getting it free".
But you knew that.
Re. that Richard Branson thing.............wouldn't it be strange if there were a coup d’état attempt? Wonder how the MSM would slant THAT? Or, more telling, how they would have slanted it differently with Bush?
lawyerliz (profile) wrote on Sat, 5/30/2009 - 10:19 pm
Of course the parents said how proud they were, as if the stupid, sick shooting kid
were the Roman Empire, and there was actually something to prove.
Peter denied Christ three times... but it would have been hard to have named him as the 'rock' upon which the church would be built if he was killed first by the Roman legions. So the jury's still out on the ethical high ground here...
I guess I'll never make saint. I try heavily to minimize lying personally, more out of laziness of having to remember multiple versions of the truth than anything "higher", really.
Kinda like that Liz, Yeah.
Whatever happens, we will deal with it and adjust. The strong will survive. Your wealth is the time of your consciousness.
I'm not smart enough to be a liar. And I dont want the consequences either.
Maybe I should have said - I'm not smart enough to be a 'successful' liar...
resistance is feudal says,
"What may break you is the realization that even doing nothing or opting out is an option they've already planned for."
there are millions of economic refugees that are out of the system but did not opt out. These millions have fled the system like refugees flee war zones in that they do it not from choice but because of the destruction of their previous universe.
They are shut out by the devastation wrought through deliberate pumping of the credit money system. loans were written without reserves, risk was fraudulently concealed and mispriced with CDS insurance also written without reserves to the tune of 6 times world GDP. then there was glass-steagall separations removed, ratings agency complicity, accounting rules skirted, SEC in hiding, etc.
In either case there is a similar end result, the rejection of the status quo myths of gluttony, thievery and mass produced thoughts and name brand lies. lower internet traffic is evidence of the dismissal of merry go round.
yeh, i have noticed the plans for this "option".
the PTB need the markets
no one man needs the market.
as people flee the debt fueled consumerist mind trap the scammers will suffocate.
Thanks for your responses and your comments RIF.
Yeah, me too. Bluffing is best.
BSR:
When the kids are much smaller, then yes, we tell the truth. But when they get a bit older, then yes, use your head.
But I'm thinking of a specific situation in which one of my kids was getting jammed at the neighborhood playground by the asshole older brother of another kid. Mine just said what he had to say to get out of there alive...and he felt ashamed/guilty, thinking that he should've "manned up" to the young adult older brother. Per son, that older brother was bigger than me and even if he was exaggerating, there was still a beard on the brother's face. I double-checked his story with his friends who were there.
So yeah, go ahead and lie if you have to. Run fast, and forget the knee to the crotch nonsense. If you can reach his crotch, he can reach you.
Those are the moments that I'm talking about.
And yeah, I went back to the playground with him that evening - guy wasn't around. The standing rule is that if he even sees the yahoo, come home immediately.
ShadowInventory (profile) wrote on Sat, 5/30/2009 - 10:29 pm
Maybe I should have said - I'm not smart enough to be a 'successful' liar...
I'm too honest to lie well. It's a habit now, and one I don't care to break. It makes the world a lot simpler, and yet it really throws people off! Women especially.
Absolutely, homedad.
The Nigerians are getting desperate. They've worn out the bulk mail scam.
The most amazing thing is that I have told the truth on a number of occasions, knowing that what
I was saying was so outrageous that it woud immediately be thought a humorous lie by the
listening people. This is lying of a high order. Or truth telling of a high order. One of those things
anyhow.
oh yeah, RIF,
regarding new cults being formed. people are seriously susceptible to demagoguery and manipulation right now. i expect we will have new equivalent phrases to drinking the grape kool-aid or catching the comet in the near future.
i have noticed an astroturf cult that is metastasizing in florida.
i wrote about it here:
404 - PAGE NOT FOUND
Congratulations.
You've got me thinking of another approach to an article that I've been struggling with.
--- - .. ... .... . .-. - --.. (homepage, profile) wrote on Sat, 5/30/2009 - 10:30 pm
resistance is feudal says,
the PTB need the markets
no one man needs the market.
You got it. But we also aren't islands unto ourselves, nor can we in present time acquire sufficient knowledge and expertise to entirely manage our own lives with no outside help, not without a lot of simplifications anyway.
Nope, I repeat, that just doesn't sound Nigerian. I've gotten a fair number of the Nigerian things and they aren't like
that. What's with Nigerians anyway?? The hub prosecuted some of them for an airline ticket fraud so complicated
that tho I understood at the time, I've forgotten again what they did.
The End of the Affair
-- P.J. O'Rourke, WSJ
The phrase “bankrupt General Motors,” which we expect to hear uttered on Monday, leaves Americans my age in economic shock. The words are as melodramatic as “Mom’s nude photos.” And, indeed, if we want to understand what doomed the American automobile, we should give up on economics and turn to melodrama.
Politicians, journalists, financial analysts and other purveyors of banality have been looking at cars as if a convertible were a business. Fire the MBAs and hire a poet. The fate of Detroit isn’t a matter of financial crisis, foreign competition, corporate greed, union intransigence, energy costs or measuring the shoe size of the footprints in the carbon. It’s a tragic romance—unleashed passions, titanic clashes, lost love and wild horses...
G'night folks.
Homedad, are you congradulating Code Otis or me or somebody else?
Oh, well, I should go to bed also.
--- - .. ... .... . .-. - --.. (homepage, profile) wrote on Sat, 5/30/2009 - 10:36 pm
oh yeah, RIF,
regarding new cults being formed. people are seriously susceptible to demagoguery and manipulation right now. i expect we will have new equivalent phrases to drinking the grape kool-ade or catching the comet in the near future.
yes, I would expect it too. if something comes out of the whole David Icke worldview (or the other stuff even more targeted and unbalanced than Alex Jones) it will be a really bad sign IMHO. will have to check out your linked write-up; thanks for the response, post-pigging, from the last thread.
Liz, the post makes no sense.
Where is Harley Earl when we really need him! Bring back the big fins and the 1950's will return! Golly this is Cargo Cult thinking...
""no one man needs the market.
You got it. But we also aren't islands unto ourselves, nor can we in present time acquire sufficient knowledge and expertise to entirely manage our own lives with no outside help, not without a lot of simplifications anyway."
i think of the freegans and how there is enough flotsam and jetsam to sustain large numbers of people. beyond that, there is craigslist. we have enough left over crap to trade back and forth on craigslist for at least the next ten years. i have been calling our economy the craigslist economy for some time. further out there will be the craigslist equivalent for bartering whereby people match their surplus items directly across tens of millions of ads without the use of currency except for shipping costs. the only thing preventing mass, efficient, technologically assisted bartering is a critical mass of users.
so, while we certainly are not islands, striving to be an island is a better ideal than buying the american dream. better than being another sucker on the vine.
bought my last GM in 2000; a saturn ION. ick.
i did recently buy a new ford. its an f250, made in 1986. after an investment of 3 or 4k, i will have torn down and rebuilt every single piece of my new truck. i expect that if i am careful and lucky, it will last me 300k miles or more. government motors? who needs 'em?
uce
Overpriced, either new or used.
Their real value can be found only at public auction, for cash money.
Otherwise, the dealers are blowing smoke up your skirt.
I personally believe many people have simultaneously concluded the same, and will put off any voluntary auto purchases until prices come into step with some sort of reality.
Who in their right mind is going to drop $40k on a pickup truck that only may be worth 25k or less this time next year?
OldSouth,
Exactly; a good chunk of the price of a new pickup is pure profit. The actual cost to manufacture isn't much greater than for sedans or minivans.
OT-
Market Skeptics: *****Loud Paradigm Shift Rumblings*****
PARADIGM SHIFT STATED PLAINLY
The Chinese strategy remains hidden, to execute a grand paradigm shift that will take tacit control of the United States, which is now in disarray. Its leadership is too busy being coopted by the Wall Street banksters. The objective by Beijing leaders is to avoid violence and military actions altogether. Sun Tzu would be proud. Beijing is gradually subjugating the USGovt as a vassal in debt, the risk to the US being a transition toward servitude to their credit master. We are in the midst of an historical global paradigm shift, to date a quiet process. Power is shifting from WashingtonDC and New York City and London directly to Beijing.
The United States has little choice but to acquiesce and comply with Beijing wishes. The insolvent indebted nation with little industry left and a destroyed banking system can endure the shameful process of bankruptcy receivership, forced by the creditors, or the nation can permit a ‘New Alliance’ with China that involves obedient hidden directives. The US possesses a powerful defense contractor industry, half the world’s agricultural output, and many spectacular locations for residence. The practical consequence of the US ‘listening’ to Beijing wishes on a regular basis will be for the European Union to be pushed into a ‘New Alliance’ with Russia. Such a deal is practical, due to distances and supply lines. The United Kingdom is in all likelihood to be left out in the cold.
The Chinese and other Asians are playing economic Go; the Europeans and Russians are playing Chess; and the Americans are still trying to puzzle out Checkers.
This is going to turn out real well.
"after an investment of 3 or 4k, i will have torn down and rebuilt every single piece of my new truck."
AND, a truck that's a better damned truck then the new ones. (But then I didn't even know nobody made a carbureted engine anymore) till my youngest "eloquently" pointed it out.
There was no doubt that the Chinese purchase of the port of Long Beach was a strategic acquisition...
In the practical art of war, the best thing of all is to take the enemy's country whole and intact; to shatter and destroy it is not so good.
Sun Tzu
There was no doubt that the Chinese purchase of the port of Long Beach was a strategic acquisition...
We won't even mention Hutchinson Wampoa running the terminals at either end of the Panama Canal or the oil pipelines through Columbia from the Venezuela border to the Pacific Ocean.
The United States has little choice but to acquiesce and comply with Beijing wishes.
Oh, just like the Treaty of Versailles.
BB and Timmy are walking a fine line and the stress is showing...
"Teach them to smile while thinking:
FUCK YOU. "
Mom, I didn't know you read Calculated Risk
LOL
Funny how that word WAR is creeping into the language of business evermore present...
"Currency markets have been in a weird state of what looks almost like equilibrium for the past couple of months. What’s really going on is something akin to an evenly matched tug of war that fails to move the ribbon tied around the center of the rope, giving the impression of harmony while powerful forces do silent battle until someone slips. "
“All currencies are being debased dramatically by their central banks at extraordinary speeds and so in relative terms it appears there is no currency problem,” Lee Quaintance and Paul Brodsky of QB Asset Management said in a research note earlier this month. “In reality, however, paper money is highly vulnerable to a public catalyst that serves to acknowledge it is all merely vapor money.”
Dollar Is Dirt, Treasuries Are Toast, AAA Is Gone: Mark Gilbert - Bloomberg.com
NorkaWest, as much as I like the go/chess/checkers metaphor, it really isn't that bad.
Alliances are formed for many reasons, economics chief among them.
Setting aside the U.S./China relationship for the moment, I'd like to see what China will do about North Korea.
NorkaWest,
If what you post is true, we will soon learn the importance of electing strong, tough, smart leaders once again.
There is an unfortunate thread of xenophobia in some people's reactions to changes in the world economy. The fact that China is producing a lot of things for us to keep and use entitles them to buy assets from us that will help them in the future. This is simply what we did for decades when we had trade surpluses. Was it evil of us? Did we really expect to get tons of stuff from China and then not give them anything in return?
I have to admit I find the presumption that foreigners are somehow automatically worse than us is distasteful.
sportsfan (profile) wrote on Sat, 5/30/2009 - 9:48 pm
Setting aside the U.S./China relationship for the moment, I'd like to see what China will do about North Korea.
You mean the NK problem isn't "contained" to sub-prime nations? [ducks]
There was that school shooting. . .in Colorado??. . .one kid shooter asked this girl if she were a Christian, with the
clear implication that she would get shot if she said yes. Which she did and was killed. If any kid of mine had said yes, even if I were thoroughly Christian, half of my mourning would involve my feeling a failure
'cause she acted so dumb. Of course the parents said how proud they were, as if the stupid, sick shooting kid
were the Roman Empire, and there was actually something to prove.
Liz, there's quite a bit of doubt that incident occurred the way it was recounted initially in the media:
Cassie Bernall - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Regardless, I don't think you can draw any conclusions about what Harris and Klebold would have done if she had answered differently. Clearly, they were cold-blooded killers that probably would have killed Bernall no matter what she had done or said.
BSR writes: "...wouldn't it be strange if there were a coup d’état attempt..."
It's happened before, Smedley Butler was instrumental in breaking a plot against Roosevelt. It is rumored that the missing nuke (still missing BTW) was a plot hatched by one and broken up by another faction within the military general officer ranks.
Strange? Yes. Fits right in with a whole bunch of other stuff.
I'd like to see what China will do about North Korea.
Nothing, as long as they think that they can use North Korea as a proxy to rattle the US and Japan and use Pakistan as a proxy to keep India off balance.
If a war starts, it will destroy South Korea's industrial base, resulting in one less competitor to Chinese manufacturers.
China will sit back, play dumb, and sell war supplies to both sides.
NW
patientrenter writes: "There is an unfortunate thread of xenophobia in some people's reactions to changes in the world economy. The fact that China is producing a lot of things for us to keep and use entitles them to buy assets from us that will help them in the future."
We got the whole frigging island of Manhattan for a box of beads, so there's precedent I suppose. I wouldn't call it xenophobia though, most just don't trust those fucking foreigners.
Rob Dawg,
I only mean it's in their neighborhood and we aren't the world's policeman any more. China needs to man up to this one.
R D: That's the wisdom that comes from living in a house where your piss rolls downhill onto the rest of the town. China doesn't have to do shit. They're in charge.
I bought an electric toaster today at a neighbour's garage sale. I hate garage sales, especially when they are next door. On my way to the beer store (Hockey night), amid the trash and clutter strewn in neighbour's driveway, I noticed a toaster. It was a relic MADE IN USA stamped on the bottom. I flipped neighbour a buck (the asking price) and back in the house I went, with the treasure under arm. Since the toaster will last 20 years, I won't need to buy 10 disposable toasters from China to cover the same period. In nominal future dollars, I just saved about $500 I figure.
China will sit back, play dumb, and sell war supplies to both sides.
Hey, that used to be our plan.
Seriously, though, China cannot afford the wild card next door that it the current North Korea.
The U.S. would be foolish to get 'rattled.' Diplomatic nay-saying is required, of course, but nothing else.
unfortunate thread of xenophobia
My comment wasn't "xenophobia".
It was respect for a hand well played by a master and dismay at the skill level displayed by my country's leadership.
Norka West, FWIW, I didn't detect that the incidence of xenophobia identified in patientrenter's post (to which I reply) was directed at you. I assumed he was speaking about the morons who inhabit the airwaves.
"Alex Jones"
I think I would prefer distrust of government, over total trust of government. He is clearly over the top, but I appreciate conspiracy types for keeping an over vigilant eye on things. Sometimes they are right.
Blackhalo: Sometimes they are right.
If i'm not mistakin' the truth movement was started by 9/11. In this case, they are right about WTC.
OK, i check drudge on the weekend to know what the media fixation is this week. Susan Boyle. I really wanted to not like her because her style of singing makes me end the life cycle of consumer non durables. she is hard not to like. I know she is an excellent singer but had to read the lyrics it was so hard for me to hear before i realized they were from from the wizard of oz.
that this song, in this style, has captivated the nation, at this moment in history has me cyclops agog and is weirding me out. i don't want to say it but someone's gotta say it. i reaaly don't want to say it. so i'll let you fill in the blanks
It's not over until the _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _.
Watch the video at youtube
YouTube - Susan Boyle - Singer - Britains Got Talent 2009 (With Lyrics)
I dreamed a dream in time gone by
When hope was high,
And life worth living
I dreamed that love would never die
I dreamed that God would be forgiving.
Then I was young and unafraid
When dreams were made and used,
And wasted
There was no ransom to be paid
No song unsung,
No wine untasted.
But the tigers come at night
With their voices soft as thunder
As they tear your hopes apart
As they turn your dreams to shame.
And still I dream he'll come to me
And we will live our lives together
But there are dreams that cannot be
And there are storms
We cannot weather...
I had a dream my life would be
So different from this hell I'm living
So different now from what it seems
Now life has killed
The dream I dreamed.
volker the viking (profile) wrote on Sat, 5/30/2009 - 10:01 pm
R D: That's the wisdom that comes from living in a house where your piss rolls downhill onto the rest of the town. China doesn't have to do shit. They're in charge.
Sounds strangely reminiscent of "Japan Inc." from an earlier decade. How'd that work out?
snork re the lady sings
RD writes: "Sounds strangely reminiscent of "Japan Inc." from an earlier decade. How'd that work out?"
Differences:
1) Japan was operating minus a military of any consequence.
2) Japan's people are determined not to exert their influence militarily.
3) China has a population approaching 2 billion.
4) China has the land mass and thus the natural resources.
5) China's system is much older and more disciplined.
6) China is not beholden to the USA.
7) China doesn't operate based on the short term. Short term for them is a century.
NorkaWest (profile) wrote on Sat, 5/30/2009 - 9:25 pm
OT-
Market Skeptics: *****Loud Paradigm Shift Rumblings*****
PARADIGM SHIFT STATED PLAINLY""""
china noticed that capitalism was corporate colonialism. they noticed the game western central bankers play of controlling nations with debt. they beat the us at our own game.
agree, sun tsu would be proud.
"Regardless, I don't think you can draw any conclusions about what Harris and Klebold would have done if she had answered differently. Clearly, they were insane and probably would have killed Bernall no matter what she had done or said."
Fixed it for you.
Have to agree with Volker. China is in a vastly different place. China has greater needs than Japan. Larger population etc. They need energy not enough at home.
holy smokes, obama is the Manchurian Candidate!
YouTube - The Manchurian Candidate
morse code, the lady can sing. Doesn't matter that she lost in the finale. She made her point and ran the table.
Susan Boyle settles for second on ‘Talent’
No one can take that away from her.
7) China doesn't operate based on the short term. Short term for them is a century.
Their necessity of full employment is driving their short term actions. They aren't supermen.
"Free Market internationalism at its finest. Disgrace" - Totally agree.
If you don't like GM or other American cars don't buy them on their merits.
But to boycott an American car company because the government is trying to save the US manufacturing base is way beyond Un-American. It shows not only a loyalty to globalism, but, even further, a contempt for anything which attempts to help Americans, misguided or not!!! This is what Republican economic policy is ALL all about. In theory it is concerned with free trade and protecting the profits of certain corporations which benefit from trade. (which is wicked in iteslf). But in practice it is more concerned with the jobs of foreigners, including the communist Chinese, than it is about building a strong America (which is wicked and twisted.) These Republicans will not be happy until they have dismantled the American industrial base to such an extent that there is no rebuilding it - their economic policy is beyond disloyal, they are doing the bidding of foreign powers, wittingly or not.
Rob Dawg: You may be surprised at the extent to which China will go to hold power. People are cheap and plentiful there. The concept of employment is new there. It's all about the state.
volker the viking (profile) wrote on Sat, 5/30/2009 - 10:52 pm
Rob Dawg: You may be surprised at the extent to which China will go to hold power. People are cheap and plentiful there. The concept of employment is new there. It's all about the state.
So we've gone from the Treaty of Versailles [fail] to Japan Inc. [fail] now to USSR [fail] comparisons? Rigid political states are brittle political states.
Many here are arrogant, deluded, and distracted.
They're coming (think about whom before you get your nightly exercise by jumping to the wrong conclusion) folk. Do the math.
But to boycott an American car company because the government is trying to save the US manufacturing base is way beyond Un-American.
ROFLMAO!!! Man, you must engage in some really good stuff on the weekends to come up with that crap.
"Teach them to smile while thinking:
FUCK YOU. "
Mom, I didn't know you read Calculated Risk"""""
good one!
RD
With all due respect you sound as if your standing on stable ground... How is Japan inc any different than Reganomics?
R D: Platitudes keep you satisfied.
Obama's GM Plan Looks Like a Raw Deal - WSJ.com
Ralph Nader: Obama's GM Plan Looks Like a Raw Deal
4) Why is the task force permitting GM to increase manufacturing overseas for export back into the U.S.? Under the GM reorganization plan, the company will rely increasingly on overseas plants to make cars for sale in the U.S., with cars made in low-wage countries like Mexico rising from 15% to 23% of GM sales here. For the first time, GM plans to export cars from China to the U.S. in what is a harbinger of the company's future business model. What is the conceivable rationale for permitting GM to increase manufacturing overseas -- especially in dictatorships, for export back into the U.S. -- when preserving jobs and industry is the avowed goal of this immense taxpayer bailout?
Props to Obama for taking his wife to dinner and a Broadway show.
I'd like to take my wife to dinner and go see Les Miserables if it's playing.
I could relate to it better now.
M-F,
GM will not make this country great. The older folks are seeing the product of their generation die and they get upset. The world has moved on. "Saving the manufacturing base" by forcing malinvestment for a product which is not demanded or needed is really just a wealth transfer from one constituency to another courtesy of the government. I also have a problem with the government "saving" an industry for the sake of creating jobs. If it otherwise wouldn't exist, why would anyone want or need to take part in government make-work? Let free people be free. Forcing them to stand in a line to make an undemanded product for pieces of paper you printed is just stupid.
All these bailouts are meant to show us a specter of success.
"we are OK our large banks are still open and hey look there's a new GM car and Mcdonalds over there..."
volker the viking (profile) wrote on Sat, 5/30/2009 - 10:58 pm
R D: Platitudes keep you satisfied.
I'll take solace in Mark Twain's observation that history doesn't repeat but often rhymes. I know there's no diffusing the hysteria around the latest threat to US world dominance. Only time and events can do that.
M-F: "But to boycott an American car company because the government is trying to save the US manufacturing base is way beyond Un-American. "
I appreciate your use of the un-American label though. It reminds me of the 1950's. Just change a few feet and a few shoes, and we're back there.
RATM - the problem is that, in a truly rational world economy there would be damn near NO manufacturing in the USA. It can ALL be done cheaper somewhere else. The only reason we (still) have much of what we have left is corporate inertia - it takes time to move tens of millions of jobs offshore. If markets were more efficient we would already be much poorer. This is the same thing that happened to Britain last century - when they embraced free trade, thier manufacturing base went away.
Do you want to live in an America with no manufacturing base? Just what do you think everyone will do for a living? Get PhDs and join the new economy? Maybe 1% at most right? What do you want everyone else to do - work in restaurants? Does that sound like a strong America to you? Or do you just figure that hopefully someday the Chinese will acquiesce and let the playing field level by floating their currency and giving foreigners a fair shake when they are rich enough to do so?
We need to damn well preserve what we can right now, because a quick collapse of the US industrial base will leave millions permanently unemployed - they won't be absorbed by any new industries in their lifetimes. Why we import so many cars is beyond me. Even Reagan squeezed the foreign car companies for voluntary import quotas - he wasn't as stupid as we are today.
china noticed that capitalism was corporate colonialism. they noticed the game western central bankers play of controlling nations with debt. they beat the us at our own game.
Because of his role at World Bank and IMF, pre- and post-Asian currency crises, Larry Summers is a persona non grata in Asia. And he's to head the FRB in 2010. This will not end well.
I see some testosterone flowing...
OT, i read this article on miniyanville today. Really agressive bullish. Interesting I thought. Here's the conclusion (last page of 4)
Why the Countertrend Rally Can't Be Stopped-Minyanville
Why the Countertrend Rally Can't Be Stopped
Conclusion
The market is recovering from an unusual and vicious financial crisis; this is a time in which market participants, after having been petrified, are starting to come to grips with the fact that Great Depression II is probably not going to happen.
This is also an extraordinary time - one in which vast numbers of market participants are wrongly over-allocated to cash. As investors adjust their asset allocations to account for new realities, the rally in financial markets will be extremely powerful.
Indeed, because of the large cash allocations, there’s the danger that at some point, things could get out of hand on the upside. Because of the effects of massive inflows by institutions that invest mechanically and are essentially insensitive to fundamentals, the market could overshoot to the upside, failing to properly account for the risk (as opposed to the certainty) that things could get materially worse in 2010.
However, we’ll worry about the risk of bullish overshoot later. As I point out in Op-Ed: The Crisis is Over - For Now, the financial crisis is over, for now. And for now, I believe this market is going higher - much higher.
-patientrenter - I don't think it's un-American to buy a foreign car. I think it's un-American to be more loyal to the concept of unfettered free trade than to your own country. Sorry if un_american is a loaded word. Maybe those angrily boycotting US government efforts to save industry should be more correctly labelled Anti-American because their loyalty sure isn't to America, it's to some concept of an unfettered free market which sure as hell doesn't exist.
morse code, the 'professional' rendition of the song you linked:
Les Miserables 10th anniversary - I Dreamed a Dream
Compare the two. Lyrics are even included for the hard of hearing.
Les Miserables, wizard of oz, these days what's the difference.
M-F (homepage, profile) wrote on Sat, 5/30/2009 - 11:12 pm
...the problem is that, in a truly rational world economy there would be damn near NO manufacturing in the USA. It can ALL be done cheaper somewhere else.
Just wait. Dryfly is gonna find out about this and set you straight.
Basel
FRB? Bernanke is not close enough to the banks?
"Saving the manufacturing base"
Lucy, you've got some 'splainin' to do. How is spending 50BB of USA tax dollars to move GM to China "Saving?" At least with liquidation, some hedge fund or investment collective could put the pieces back together to make something useful. Or get the dinosaur out of the way for a replacement, domestic start-up or eliminate a competitor to Ford, so they have a fighting chance.
GM totally gone, with the hit to all the parts suppliers and the associated unemployment seems preferable that yet another zombie proxy for outsourcing.
"Because of his role at World Bank and IMF, pre- and post-Asian currency crises, Larry Summers is a persona non grata in Asia."
Understated eloquence. He is also not welcome at Harvard. Won't end well? Another euphemism.
Tim "FRB? Bernanke is not close enough to the banks?"
I think BB is plenty close enough, but Summers is too, and Summers wants to be captain of his own ship. Don't forget that the FRb executes govt policy at just enough of an arm's length to allow Congress and the WH to deny responsibility for difficult decisions. You can guess from how many difficult decisions the FRB has made in the last 10 years just how independent it really is.
Bernanke is not close enough to the banks?
BB and Bair perspectives on the role of banking is slightly different than Summers and Geithner, which is probably why Geithner tried to have Bair removed. While I know many here think that BB is extremely arrogant, he actually has a reputation of being an extremely humble person; Summers not so much. He's got a Rumsfeldian complex, where he's so wedded to an ideology that he feels any compromise or backtracking from that ideology represents weakness. Personally, I don't think Summers can develop the international consensus needed, especially if the crisis drags on through 2010.
then again, decoupling can't be thaaat bad?
. . . these days what's the difference.
Most everyone is down on GM and Chrysler because they're not selling a lot of cars.
For all their own problems, both of them are caught in the visegrips of recent history.
Credit was far too loose. Everyone and his brother-in-law was buying and/or leasing a new car.
Credit is now mostly non-existent for the working class. Nobody or his brother-in-law can afford a new car.
The problem is the fucking bankers, and the government policies that facilitated them, not the car makers.
That's the difference.
Hence, a national health care policy. The box isn't so big that no one thinks outside of it.
No xenophobia here, just the desire to see America maintain control over her own affairs.
sportsfan, susan boyle is way better than the "pro".
Basel
Interesting insight. Something may have to seriously wrong before BB is ousted. If it were to come without explanation or warning it could destabilize the propaganda machine.
Summers is Wall St's mouthpiece and he clearly has Obama's ear...
just caught a commercial selling gold plated two dollar bills foe 12.95 + s&h
uffdah!
blackhalo - If GM becomes a conduit for importing chinese cars, then that's bad too. But I think we need to save it now, because I don't htink some hedge fund will buy it and start some new car company, especially in today's environment. Assets could well be sold for scrap or factories shipped overseas like in the 1980s Pennsylvania. The important thing is not to throw in the towel now. GM management has been HORRIBLE for decades now. Americans can make competitive cars and if GM goes away the disruption may be too great.
As for the 50 Billion - we gave 125 Billion to AIG to cover losses by what was essentially a hedge fund run out of their London Office!! 50 Billion to support real american jobs, rather than the FIRE economy seems like a bargain these days.
It makes me so mad when people talk of boycotting US car companies because the government is involved! It is sheer ignorance - if they had any idea of Chinese involvement and support for key Chinese industries maybe they could boycott those too.... but probably not because their brand of Anti-Americanism, and Anti-Americanism in general always puts a microscope on America and turns a blind eye to the sins of the rest of the world.
Basel, I can't believe that Obama would consider nominating Summers for the FRB Chair next year.
Have you actually heard folks suggesting this is possible?
MF
when all is said and done. The Gm bailout will cost over 100 billion. Saying this bailout cost less than another is an argument as thin as paper. What could 100 billion in VC do for other auto companies that want to get their shot at the marketplace?
Where was the sacrifice by GM shareholders? Not one pensioner took a penny in cuts to their payout. No manager at GM gave up their salary.
As for the 50 Billion - we gave 125 Billion to AIG to cover losses by what was essentially a hedge fund run out of their London Office!! 50 Billion to support real american jobs, rather than the FIRE economy seems like a bargain these days.
M-F, calling it a hedge fund was generous. I'd say the government paid off gaming chits.
But I do agree with you that keeping jobs in the U.S. is a worthwhile expenditure of funds.
(Personally, I don't like the term 'un-American' since it was thrown at me for opposing the invasion of Iraq.)
Sports
Makes perfect sense. The banks have given large amounts of campaign money to Congress esp banking committee, Obama and now the bill for those politicians is coming due. Do you think they gave all that money to leave anything to chance (BB)? Doubtful
It makes me so mad when people talk of boycotting US car companies because the government is involved!
QUICK! Put all your money in Citigroup accounts ASAP! Insurance? Move it to AIG immediately!!!
the susan boyle-les miserables of oz-i have a dream song reminds me of this poem written by a 14 year old Jewish boy in an Auschwitz concentration camp
I was once a little child who long for other worlds.
But I'm no more a child for I have known fear, I have learned to hate...
How tragic, then, is youth which lives with enemies, with gallows ropes.
Yet, I still believe I only sleep today.
That I'll wake up, a child again, and start to laugh and play.
M-F, Sports
There is no guarantee that jobs over the long term will stay in the US. The debt that the next generation will owe and the opportunities that will be missed by not investing in something more worthwhile is guaranteed.
Tim, so many people (read that as corporations) give so much money to so many politicians that it's a wonder that anything with any degree of social utility is ever accomplished at all.
Frankly, the entire political process, as currently constituted, is disgusting. Unfortunately, it produces our leaders.
TJ
+1 No one is saying boycott all American cars. Ford makes cars in the US. So does BMW, Honda and Toyota as well as Nissan Mercedes and Mazda.
SF
No single industry gives as much money to the politicians as the financial industry. The world of corporate lobbying is not flat.
Tim .. 2012: Tell me what opportunities will be missed as a result of investing in car companies?
Fact is, the entire financial system, responsible for effectively allocating capital, for the past 6 years was awash in excess capital, and they directed all of that capital into the mortgage market until the bubble burst!!!!! All that Chinese money coming to America and looking for a place to invest and nothing got produced except houses!!! You think the government could allocate capital worse than the markets over the past decade? Look at the 90s Tech bubble, and the commodity bubble too, what a waste of a great deal of capital.
The financial markets have a horrible track record (as of late) at allocating capital to productive long term uses. The government on the other hand makes roads, bridges, schools, and funds research that no private company will. At this point, I don't know how someone can make the argument that markets allocate capital better than governments with a straight face. Look at all the capital misallocated by the markets in this housing debacle - and you are going to tell me that 50 Billion to try to save a big part of our manufacturing base is really so much worse?
I got a 70 year old guy in a wheel chair whose got his head sawed off by a 55 year old Marine Corps Sargent here in North Fort Myers Florida where I live.
Please Tell me why nobody in our country seems to care about this?
news-press.com | Southwest Florida | The News-Press
Simple the tens of billions of dollars could be used to develop advanced battery technology. Companies such as Telsa could be given new seed money to scale up their operations. GM said the Volt would use Korean batteries from LG. This is foolish to have foreign technology and put it into American cars with expensive labor.
A majority of the money payed to GM by the govt (these are not loans) will go to pay for pension and health care costs. This is not productive use of capital.
morse code, on that . . . poem written by a 14 year old Jewish boy in an Auschwitz concentration camp.
It's a real tragedy what we do to our children and we, as a people, seem to do it over and over again.
So I'll leave you, and the others here, with a song.
Earth, Wind &Fire - That's The Way Of The World
That's the way of the world.
Plant your flower; let it grow.
Child is born with a heart of gold
The way of the world makes his heart so cold
You would think that we, as a species, could do a better job.
Last thing I will say about GM and the Automakers
There needs to be rewards and consequences in any industry. GM took a tremendous gamble on Trucks and SUVs as did many auto makers. They lost. Cars with character and economy are selling well like the MINI and some hybrids. Automakers must honor contracts with their workers and suppliers and when they cannot they declare BK. Functional societies and markets MUST have rules and laws.
That said I would have no problem having GM pensions be folded into the PBGC and having 50k of their salary guaranteed.
I don't know how someone can make the argument that markets allocate capital better than governments
More nonsense.
The whole damn housing bubble -- heck, the worldwide credit bubble -- was the result of government actions & incentives. Lowering the FFR to 1% kicked off the whole damned charade, and don't go arguing that the Fed isn't government.
Just because DC didn't spend the money directly doesn't mean they aren't responsible.
looking for a place to invest and nothing got produced except houses
Well, it wasn't that bad, or good (at least houses are capital stock).
Much of the hot cash ended up paying for saline solution bag implantations, botox shots, his & her jet skis, Mercedes leases, plus of course the smart ones found stashes like Casey Serin's coffee can.
The larger economy was getting juiced by HUNDREDS of billions of borrowed money every quarter, 2004~2007.
Of course, our good host was way ahead of the curve on this:
Calculated Risk: GDP Growth: With and Without Mortgage Extraction
"The financial markets have a horrible track record (as of late) at allocating capital to productive long term uses. The government on the other hand makes roads, bridges, schools, and funds research that no private company will."
Well, it is Mish and other useful free-market-ueber-alles fanatics. Those idiots are really good for the rich elite because they provide the pseudo-science support for the looting of middle class by the rich bastards.
Invisible hand can be used for good of society but it requires free market staying free while under relatively strict supervision. Most markets do not stay free for long because markets always find those winners. Winners want to keep on winning. They do not want to level the playing field, they want to OWN it, make their own rules. That is where Mish is so wrong with is "free market always corrects itself"-crap.
Wal Mart killed most mom-and-pop shops with localized price dumping raids, one town after another. They provide now much lower wages for the modern day wage-slaves. Even worse, they try to externalize every possible cost to the local community. The same with healthcare, giant insurance companies robbing the middle class as fast as they can. Almost half of personal bankruptcies result from medical bills in the USA!
was the result of government actions & incentives.
The free market responds to the inputs it is given, yes.
Government cuts taxes significantly, people have more money, people bid rents & land prices up (increasing money chasing a good in limited supply).
Just because DC didn't spend the money directly doesn't mean they aren't responsible.
I agree but I place the blame on those charged with regulation, either in failing to add new regulations or failing to adequately enforce what was extant.
The way I see it the free market is like a steam engine, and government regulation is like, well, the governor
Centrifugal governor - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
to keep its functioning on the rails and within parameters.
It was the abandoning of lending underwriting that really enabled the bubble to blow, 2004-2006. This was a failure of government to limit the free market.
"As for the 50 Billion - we gave 125 Billion to AIG to cover losses by what was essentially a hedge fund run out of their London Office!! 50 Billion to support real american jobs, rather than the FIRE economy seems like a bargain these days."
Two wrongs, does not make either action, right.
"If GM becomes a conduit for importing Chinese cars, then that's bad too."
GM is not going to become a conduit. They will fail. The Chinese will just let GM train workers and management, and then eat their lunch with those same employees, at a Chinese startup or government subsidized entity. Just like Acer, Asustek, Lenovo and Foxconn are going to kill Dell and HP. GM is dead. The wound is mortal. Their bloated, top heavy, government dependent and outmoded processes have killed them. All that remains is the mourning. We are just taking the longest and most painful possible path between them and what will eventually replace them.
The bankers did not kill GM. GM did, by their own resistance to change, and their ability to get the government to try to help them not have to change. They were wards of the state, and that never ends well.
WRT oversight, again, our host with the post:
Calculated Risk: OTS Official Accused of Backdating IndyMac Capital Infusion
Note the picture with the guy with the chainsaw in 2003.
GM is dead. The wound it mortal.
GM and the government have a shared institutional memory of all the tanks and airplanes it built to successfully defend and then expand the USD bloc, 1942-44.
But in the age of the UAV we probably don't need that industrial capacity any more. Probably.
Troyski,
I agree totally with your 12:35 comments.
Inspirational Sunday thread music:
Neal Fox - Fuck The Fed (HQ)
YouTube - Neal Fox - Fuck The Fed (HQ)
Another uplifting message:
Gene Burnett - Jump You F*#kers (HQ)
YouTube - Gene Burnett - Jump You F*#kers (A Song For Wall Street)
Yaawwwwwn, g'mng mary-nam. This thread still going? Another night of Chimerica agonistes?
Coffee.
C
This will not end well. The amputation of even a gangrenous limb is traumatic. But nothing human in this life lasts indefinitely.
pavel - true, especially when the gangrene started at the heart.
C
Pavel:
Hoped to find you online at a quiet moment, and here you are. Found this while making search for Durufle last week and thought you might like to hear it:
YouTube - Sanctus, dal Requiem - Maurice Duruflé
edit: And now I see you've gone . . .
"The govt could be simply paying back the UAW for its support for the Democratic party over the years ..."
Who mixed your kook-aid?
TORTURINGDEMOCRACY.ORG
Torching Democracy...
Not sure if previously reported or commented on...
My take away, no US citizen should travel abroad...
Very sad...for America...
sigh...
The FedGov has done as much as it can do for the UAW. The union helped in this death, but management never made the changes necessary to compete in the 21st century. What's untold will be CDS contracts and their effect on assets and distribution.
correction...Torturing America...
"The phrase “bankrupt General Motors,” which we expect to hear uttered on Monday, leaves Americans my age in economic shock."
This is typical of the out-of-touch blather you'll read in the WSJ. Bankruptcy is the best business option for GM. I am not in "economic shock."
Funny you should say that Michael, I have talked to numerous friends and acquaintances and many of them have said the same thing. Of course, the next step for our dear leader is to "pressure" us to buy government cars from government motors.
Huffpo today refs CR, and a classic, understated comment it is:
Arianna Huffington: Everyone Agrees We Need to Reform Wall Street... Just Like After Enron
I think if CR ever did hyperbolic bombast that really would be The End.
C
Eras End, you won't have a choice in cary buyer when this deal gets furthere down the road. There will be "incentives" for you to buy the obamamobile. If you liked the Yugo and Trabi, you will love government motors.
UAW did not take a real hit. Gettelfinger should have been fired just like Wagner just to make the clean slate statement with labor as they did management. All of the real legacy retirement,medical cost needed to be pushed off on to the PBGC. Job protection and pensions should have been disbanded for modern flexible systems. Just resting the debt clock and GM stays a UAW retirement fund that makes cars. Now with misguidance from our governments desire for tin can cars that won't sell. All parties should start at square one. RIP GM.
NorkaWest,
I really like your comments but I always find it curious why everyone and his brother quotes Sun Tzu.
I say this because at Columbia I had to read through the canon of Chinese literature & philosophy
along with that of Japan and later the Middle East (I did the anti- Robert Hutchins and read the Other Great Books) and my profs, well credentialed in their fields, gave him
him short shrift.
I think why people quote Sun Tzu was that he became trendy on Wall St in the mid-80s onward. Every other month a new translation was published, many found right in the Biz sections of university bookstores. All of those 'Greed is Good" types needed some sacred text to kneel to, to rationalize at a corporate level the wholesale destruction of people's financial lives (see: Jack Welch, aka Neutron Jack).
46.7% is the new 50!
Hey, if you round up, its close enough for rock and roll.
A few years ago, a law enforcement officer friend of mine and I were talking about how he saw so many Hispanic families with a bunch of kids, with brand new Chevy Tahoes or other $30-40k SUV's, and he couldn't understand how this was feasible, economically?
We tend to think of subprime being a housing matter, but GM was handing out the keys to new cars in a similar fashion...
Not just GM but Banksters where part of the problem letting people trade their car in and rolling negative equity forward in to the new/new used car loan. Disgusting!
M-F
Excellent comment. The alternative is to extend unemp[oyment insurance indefinitely which I believe will have to be done any way. I wish they would talk about bailing out the citizenry rather than the banks.
LBD - roll up, roll up, get your Alt-A, OptArm, neg am, pick a pay car loans here! Try a jumbo! What the hey, try two! And a heloc for a bigger garage!
That'll work.
C
Since part of this problem is, in a way, about banking, here's some historical perspective on banksters:
Doonesbury
— UCLICK GoComics.com
Not everything that can be counted counts, and not everything that counts can be counted.
Einstein
When GM got government money, there was almost universal scorn on this site--demanding bk. Now that bk is imminent, near universal scorn for their products. The 2 points can be compatible, but the attitude shows how bleak the future is for GM and, for the country as a whole. Without an industrial base, we become the largest banana republic. Not wanting that, the country better get behind the new GM/Chrysler and Ford if our children are to have a good economic future. Personally, I don't think the government/UAW can do a worse job than the capitalists. Not only did they push the wrong products, they were against government sponsored health insurance. Whatever its merits, that would have been a life saver for them and their legacy costs. Rich powerful people can be very stupid--and blindly selfish.
Damn right, on the money!