ghostfaceinvestah, It looks like WaMu hadn't market the loans down very much. In September 2008, JPM was expecting $36 billion in losses based on Dec 31, 2007 numbers, and that meant they had to take writedowns of close to $30 billlion - that suggests WaMu hadn't written the loans down very much.
Published: May 25 2009 03:00 | Last updated: May 25 2009 03:00
China's official foreign exchange manager is still buying record amounts of US government bonds, despite Beijing's increasingly vocal fear of a dollar collapse, according to officials and analysts.
In recent months, senior Chinese officials, including Premier Wen Jiabao, have repeatedly signalled their concern that US policies could lead to a collapse in the dollar and global inflation.
But Chinese and western officials in Beijing say China is caught in a "dollar trap" and has little choice but to keep pouring the bulk of its growing reserves into the US Treasury, which remains the only market big enough and liquid enough to support its huge purchases.
In March alone, China's direct holdings of US Treasury securities rose by $23.7bn (£14.9bn) to reach a new record high of $768bn, according to preliminary US data, allowing China to retain its title as the biggest creditor of the US government.
"Because of the sheer size of its reserves Safe [China's State Administration of Foreign Exchange] will immediately disrupt any other market it tries to shift into in a big way and could also collapse the value of its existing reserves if it sold to.....
Estimates of peak unemployment at 7%. Those were innocent days, weren't they? Long bond getting crushed today, again. Market's rally doesn't make much sense in an environment where long term rates are spiking.
Rob Dawg sez the drought isn't real, but why was there oh so little snow in the High Sierra this weekend? It seemed like the snow-line was around 10,000 feet, something you'd see in mid-July in a normal summer.
The only water the farmers have other than the Sierra, is the ever-deeper wells they keep digging, @ great expense, until the next ever-deeper wells need to be drilled...
Thank you x 1000 for digging thru these details for us CR. I haven't double checked the #'s yet, but having everything linked like this in one place is invaluable.
"Because of the sheer size of its reserves Safe [China's State Administration of Foreign Exchange] will immediately disrupt any other market it tries to shift into in a big way and could also collapse the value of its existing reserves if it sold to....."
The dollar will collapse suddenly not over years like everyone hopes. Hold on to your guns and bibles. Within two years for sure we will have a dollar collapse. -30%+
I'm still confused. The headlines all suggest that JPM is going to recognize a large profit on the WM assets, but it appears that the portfolio is considerably worse than JPM had originally forecast. How can both happen at once?
This might give them some idea of what their bad loans are worth:
my occassional handyman is in the midst of his second foreclosure (first it was the big house bought at peak, now his little original house heavily re-fied to buy the big house). So he is experienced with the process. The bank took back the little house via foreclosure in early may after about a year of no payments. Two weeks later, he gets his first contact from the bank's appointed realtor, who is willing to do "cash for keys." So my guy does some negotiating and ends up signing an agreement that gives him $4200 and allows him to stay to mid June.
So the bank that gave him something like $400,000 in a re-fi, then got maybe one years worth of payments in return, is now giving him yet another month of free rent and $4200 cash, just so he doesn't break the law by destroying the bank's property.
The bank will be lucky to sell the place for $200,000.
they worte the loans down by 25% at acquisition, then they are allowed to write them up if they perform and do better than they were written down to- of course, their projections were too optimistic, so I would think they need to write the loans down further actually...
Gavshire Hathaway (profile) wrote on Tue, 5/26/2009 - 3:17 pm
I'm still confused. The headlines all suggest that JPM is going to recognize a large profit on the WM assets, but it appears that the portfolio is considerably worse than JPM had originally forecast. How can both happen at once?
Calvinball accounting courtesy of owning the legislature.
Assuming that in 3-4 years everyone on this board is labeled a heretic and a traitor would I receive extra points if I held gold eagles vs Canadian maples or Krugerrands?
JPMorgan Chase & Co. (JPM: News ) stands to reap a $29 billion windfall due to an accounting rule that lets JPMorgan transform bad loans it purchased from Washington Mutual Inc. into income, the Bloomberg reported Tuesday.,
Dollar drop another 30-40% = imports get more expensive, exports get cheaper to other countries, we get more foreign tourist dollars, some recovery in employment.... The real danger is the Middle East countries could decide they dont want dollars for oil, then we have to buy whatever they want to pay for oil... Transport costs go through the roof, utility bills skyrocket... If that happened it would be a giant killer rabbit....
Market's rally doesn't make much sense in an environment where long term rates are spiking.
I've heard from two different people today that this is precisely why the market is rallying--a steep yield curve is "good for equities." Maybe that was a CNBC talking point and they both heard it at the same place?
Assuming that in 3-4 years everyone on this board is labeled a heretic and a traitor would I receive extra points if I held gold eagles vs Canadian maples or Krugerrands?
Gold Eagles have the interesting clause on them that the government doesn't want to know if you sell them (no 1099). They're not saying to cheat on your taxes; but its structured in a way that gives a wink and a nod.
As I recall, the Maple Leaf and the Panda have the finest gold content of all the gold coins... It's been a while since I looked at that though - maybe someone knows more...
As for JPM
I remember during the acquisition press conference. JPM's "adverse scenario" was very much a good estimate of what we would go through, and it made sense for them to sell the break-even scenario to shareholders. I think where they screwed up was assuming they would pay for the acquisition by selling more products to WaMu clients (eg Credit Cards). As I expected, Credit Cards are not paying their own way. It all works out though, they can get all the money they want under any terms they want. That's the benefit of being the most solvent among the insolvent. You don't have to outrun the bear, just the fat kid
Citizen Scotto
don't read to much into the forward looking continuation of the polynominal fit. Depending on the degree chosen, it goes to the moon or to hell. I put it in there mainly for the residuals to date which show deviation from trend
1st world Foreigners make a bee-line for our National Parks, because of their obvious beauty, and up until a week ago, it being the only gun-free sanctuary in the United States, unlike the rest of the country...
Does anyone have an update on Memorial Day weekend traffic?
I can't find anything but AAA was calling for a 1.5% increase in the number of travelers going more than 50 miles from home. A better proxy for consumer confidence than the 5000 households in this morning's survey?
Assuming that in 3-4 years everyone on this board is labeled a heretic and a traitor would I receive extra points if I held gold eagles vs Canadian maples or Krugerrands?
Juvenal Delinquent (profile) wrote on Tue, 5/26/2009 - 12:14 pm
reply ignore user
Rob Dawg sez the drought isn't real, but why was there oh so little snow in the High Sierra this weekend?
black dog
Crude inventory report on may 28 will be what matters. If oil is sold off, it gains momentum fast (that's the nature of swinging forcefully in either direction in recent history) and then suddenly there is a chunk of cash looking to hunt for high returns. Obviously you won't get those by going long financials at this point.
"I'm still confused. The headlines all suggest that JPM is going to recognize a large profit on the WM assets, but it appears that the portfolio is considerably worse than JPM had originally forecast. How can both happen at once?"
The headlines all suggest that JPM is going to recognize a large profit on the WM assets, but it appears that the portfolio is considerably worse than JPM had originally forecast.
Lost principal comes out of net income. That's what accounts for the massive writedowns.
Lost interest comes out of operating income. Say a 2006-2008 loan is written down as defaulting within 5 years, but the loan manages to be somewhat current. The bulk of those payments will be interest that JPM now realizes.
You get no points for holding a barbarous, worthless metal . Turn all of in immediately at your local Federal Reserve Bank for a wad of crisp Ameros.
@iceman,
Dealers have to report purchases (if the dealer buys from you) over a certain amount. I can't remember the exact amount right now, but I think it is around 20 oz of gold or 1000 oz of silver.
Looking at the TLT it appears there's a brisk orderly exit in progress. If Ben gets tied up and neglects to step in aggressively with his blank check authority, we may get someone screaming fire in the theater.
Seems easy enough to solve. Forget about current ratings and just revise the term sheet to make securities eligible if they did not have a rating below the highest investment-grade rating category from any TALF CMBS-Eligibile Rating Agency at the time of issuance.
"Dealers have to report purchases (if the dealer buys from you) over a certain amount. I can't remember the exact amount right now, but I think it is around 20 oz of gold or 1000 oz of silver."
There's an IRS thing at $10k, sounds pretty close to what you're describing.
The Government has launched the asset protection scheme (APS) to underwrite bad loans but the cost of using the scheme will be based on a bank's state of health, as determined by the Financial Services Authority's (FSA) stress tests. The FSA is thinking about publishing the parameters of the tests but not the results. The Treasury won't publish anything, despite a Freedom of Information Act request from Bloomberg. Neither of these responses is acceptable to us taxpayers who have bailed out the banks.
"RANKIN INLET, Nunavut - On the first day of her trip to the Arctic Michaelle Jean gutted a freshly slaughtered seal, pulled out its raw heart, and ate it."
Now we know what threat was made by Paulson and Bernanke to the bankers.
Juvenal Delinquent (profile) wrote on Tue, 5/26/2009 - 12:36 pm
Dawg,
That's all well and good, but how do you propose to deliver eastern Sierra water to the western slopes and into the farms and orchards?
It's time for you to back way from the computer and have a look at what's happening, not what you think is happening...
Time for you to consider that maybe, just maybe there are people who have been looking at the raw data for decades and have a different opinion.
Did we have an average year? No. Got that? We had a below average year. That's what you'll hear shouted again and again.
Do we need an average year? No! That's the part you'll never hear. We had "enough."
Besides, we "unbuy" the cotton or rice crop on the cheap in this economy and have a water surplus.
"Ecuador: Government Pays 35 Cents On The Dollar In Buybacks
May 26, 2009
Ecuador’s government has paid 35 cents on the dollar to buy back up to $3.2 billion of defaulted bonds, Bloomberg reported May 26. The government did not say how many investors participated in the buyback, but it said the offer would not be improved to creditors who hold out of the buyback auctions. Finance Minister Maria Elsa Viteri is scheduled to announce more details about the buybacks on May 28."
Comrade Elmer Fudd
You never want to eat the brains of an animal because of prions. Known for 'mad cow disease' and disorders amongst tribes that practised cannibalism
Which leaves me wondering--if folks don't expect any increase in income or job prospects or business activity, what exactly is it they think is going to improve?
I've got this suspicion that there are still a lot of people out there that think the price of their house is about to skyrocket again.
Which leaves me wondering--if folks don't expect any increase in income or job prospects or business activity, what exactly is it they think is going to improve?
Precious metals purchases are not reportable. Only some sales are reportable:
Customer sales to dealers of certain precious metals exceeding specific quantities call for reporting to the IRS on 1099B forms. The 1099B forms are similar to other 1099 forms taxpayers commonly receive; the "B" means they have been issued by a business other than a financial entity.
Reportable sales (again, customer sales to dealers) apply to 1-oz Gold Maple Leafs, 1-oz Krugerrands, and 1-oz Mexican Onzas in quantities of twenty-five or more in one transaction. Reporting requirements do not apply to American Gold Eagles, no matter the quantities. Furthermore, reporting requirements do not apply to any fractional ounce gold coins.
Only one common silver product is reportable when sold: pre-1965 U.S. coins. The quantity that causes the filing of a 1099B, however, is not clear. The IRS bases its authority to require reporting on CFTC-approved contracts that call for the delivery of $10,000 face value. Consequently, many dealers do not report sales of pre-1965 U.S. coins unless the sale totals $10,000 face value; others report $1,000 sales.
Sales of American Silver Eagles, privately-minted Silver Eagle 1-oz silver rounds, and 100-oz silver bars are not reportable, no matter the quantity. Other precious metals products are reportable, but they are not covered here because the average investor does not trade them.
This of course has nothing to do with reporting cash transactions of $10,000 or more, which are reportable for that reason alone.
I am back to wondering about the Consumer Confidence readings. Seems a little premature to get a moon shot on that index, what, with unemployment strapped to a launch vehicle. I expect a revision or some other form of retraction...
Thanks bearly. I wanted to make sure i saw the right thing getting quoted.
Three days like this is a row? A huge portion of indirect bidders at the auction, meaning Fed nominees and not foreign buyers in this instance I think. They better get some money in here, or this sucker's gonna go down.
There should be some small upticks in retail sales - the pantry wont last forever and if a household has decided to stop paying their bills they will have a few months of extra discretionary income before they have to find a new place to live... One of my old buddies owns a bar and he continually says that most people will spend everything they can get their hands on no matter what... So far I think he has been correct most of the time... When the going gets tough, the depressed go shopping... That's not going to solve the underlying contraction though - my guess is that we still have at least 2 years before there is any meaningful recovery...
Looks like the bbads are winning the battle of the long bond today. Treasury is going to need to issue something like $150 billion a month as far as the eye can see. Wake me up when the 10 year breaks 5%.
This entire debacle has continued far longer then I thought possible. The only "good news" is the bond market starting to send a message that down the QE path lies madness. Unfortunately reason and logic has been overtaken by fantasy and deception and will require a dose of harsh reality.
Credit defaults - gives the consumer a little temporary cash - that can cause a short uptick like the one in April... Of course if they dont pay their CC bill they probably are not going to get any more credit now... So unless they get some more cash somewhere, the crunch will continue...
Forgive my ignorance. But if JP bought the WaMu portforlio for 1.9 billion, and has so far made 1.26 billion off of that portfolio, doesnt it stand to reason that they are going to make a profit from this purchase? Or does buying out of receivership also mean you take ownership of liabilities. This point has always been a little hazy to me. Would be very nice to see a writeup about what exactly goes on when a bank buys another bank out of receivership from the FDIC.
BTW, in case you couldn't tell, I'm a big believer in commodity led booms. Nothing like a strong (expensive) foundation upon which to build your house (of cards).
If Ben can get the commodity bubble reflated ASAP, it should really restore all that lost wealth.
BB to AS (imagined): Look AS this QE is a very nuanced balancing act that requires the full faith and credit of yours truly. It's not like I can just get in a helicopter and drop money on you.
A Russian investment firm, Digital Sky Technologies, has invested $200 million in the social networking company Facebook in return for a 1.96 percent stake, the two companies said Tuesday.
The investment values Facebook’s preferred stock at $10 billion, a $5 billion drop from October 2007 when Microsoft paid $240 million for a 1.6 percent stake.
Facebook’s founder and chief executive, Mark E. Zuckerberg, said that the Microsoft investment was made at the “absolute peak of the market” and that it was just a part of Facebook’s partnership with Microsoft, which includes advertising and search agreements.
EHP, NOVA, Robdawg and anyone else especially in the VA/MD burbs,
question. In light of the credit suisse recast chart and the number of Alt A and options that wont really start hitting until june of 10 and that we have declined so much, would you consider buying if house is around 2003-2004 price and that the price seems fair in 1998 established neighborhood?
My concern is that some of the purchases in the hood we are looking in, that came after 2004 boom, more around 2006 might be fall out in the Credit Suisse chart, but not sure i want to hold off on onsey twosey possibility. However, knowing that in our county especially up in the northern part, most all 2005-2008 homes were purchased with Alt and options, however not sure how many in the hood we are wanting were...
however, those in the north could flood market bringing down "our" area 10% more.....in 2010-2011 time frame. I am wondering how much impact you guys give suisse chart as an indicator of when to buy...
and yes , i am going through the questioning myself phase that i do every summer for last 5 years....
It's really quite amazing that $100+ oil only led to 4 or 5% CPI inflation. Perhaps Ben will have to push oil to $300/bbl in order to get the desired inflationary effects.
$5.00/gal gas seems high, but it will be totally worth it if it strengthens our banking system and gets credit flowing again (to China).
All the signs are flashing inflation and commodity boom. I think it's almost natural for the market to rally in sympathy with commodities and PMs early in the trend. But there's no underlying strength for non-commodity/non-oil stocks going forward. They are tired and fragile at this point, and valuations are beyond irrational.
Nobody can predict the timing of a market this crazy. But I am now modestly net short for the first time in awhile and holding all shorts. I've been a contrarian here before, and even though I've held some shorts right through this bull run, I am up 8%+ so far in May.
Don't try to time gold. It will go to $1,200 at least and could get there fast. Get some silver. It will outperform gold and get to at least $20.
Don't believe inflation is good for stocks. As inflation takes hold, it's terrible for stocks, especially in this cycle and environment. Stocks will retest the March 9 low or come close, later this year.
Don't believe a steep yield curve is good for stocks. Not this time.
In our speculator-driven casinoconomy I think what might really get confidence up in a hurry is if Ben could just announce weekly lottery drawings where he awards $1mm newly printed dollars to anyone with a SSN ending in some 2 random digits. If that doesn't work, go to 1 digit. Odds are every 10 days every card carrying 'Merican gets a million dollahs to spend freely.
To me, it sounds like the oil companies undercharged on the way up and are overcharging now, to recoup lost revenue. I suspect they didn't want to have it get over the psychological barrier of $5 a gallon.
ShadowInventory (profile) wrote on Tue, 5/26/2009 - 3:48 pm
* reply
* Ignore user
Apparently Ecuador does not plan to be floating any more bonds in the future..
History will show that most of these countries defaulted at least twice int he 19th century. It is only in the last 50 years that we have built up this idea that sovereigns don't default ( Walter Wriston circa 1975). What countries are learning is that investor memories are pretty short and investor banker greed very high. Ecuador will be back to the market and bonds salesmen will be telling everybody it is different this time- plus the incremental yield will entice "smart money".
Chinese must be a little ticked right about now. They have been using Jas' playbook and getting their ass kicked. Can't be good long term. Might get nasty in fact.
Lived in established Silver Spring neighborhood (Four Corners area) from '92 - '98.
Purchased our house (solid mid-60s brick two story) for $155K and had to sell at a loss during downturn in '98. Sold at about $154K.
Did curiosity check on zillow, etc in 2004 and found that the neighboring houses - same general style, lot size, etc. - were going in the vicinity of $425K.
Well of course. Anyone that hesitates to spend Zimbabwean dollars loses, a lot, each minute. They figured it out over there so we could probably figure it out too.
And the danger of destroying demand permanently, prematurely. Supply is pretty inelastic and you need to keep the fuel moving as gasoline has a shelf life. Pretty complicated system...
Plan: Get the big fellas to leave equities in a coordinated fashion...retail investors crushed...flight to safety rescues BB...reestablish entry point for new pump. Repeat.
I should clarify my statement above regarding commodity booms.
I'm really only a believer in commodity led booms that are the result of excess liquidity and rampant speculation. The lack of end demand is a key distinction. That specific type of commodity boom is sure to lead to greater prosperity. I know it seems counter-intuitive, but think of it as a competitive devaluation on steroids.
Bernanke is going to put the CON back in our eCONomy. I can't wait.
"Well of course. Anyone that hesitates to spend Zimbabwean dollars loses, a lot, each minute. "
In Argentina in the 80s, people with cash in the morning would spend it by lunch time, it was depreciating that quickly.
Note that the 2 year auction went fairly well today, but the 10 year sold off. Everyone is staying short, waiting for the opportunity to roll into higher short term yields.
I'm really only a believer in commodity led booms that are the result of excess liquidity and rampant speculation. The lack of end demand is a key distinction. That specific type of commodity boom is sure to lead to greater prosperity. I know it seems counter-intuitive, but think of it as a competitive devaluation on steroids.
How does this lead to prosperity, or was that snark?
Angry Saver (profile) wrote on Tue, 5/26/2009 - 3:22 pm
It's really quite amazing that $100+ oil only led to 4 or 5% CPI inflation. Perhaps Ben will have to push oil to $300/bbl in order to get the desired inflationary effects.
$5.00/gal gas seems high, but it will be totally worth it if it strengthens our banking system and gets credit flowing again (to China).
Chinese must be a little ticked right about now. They have been using Jas' playbook and getting their ass kicked. Can't be good long term. Might get nasty in fact.
They don't care about their losses. They do care about their exports and their level of unemployment.
It's new (e)CONomy doublespeak. An integral part of our faith based money system
Also, I still believe this eCONomy has plenty of wealth unlocking potential. I'm just wondering though. Once wall street has extracted all the "value" out of the system, will the financial propaganda network (CNBC) still be necessary?
I am back to wondering about the Consumer Confidence readings. Seems a little premature to get a moon shot on that index, what, with unemployment strapped to a launch vehicle. I expect a revision or some other form of retraction...
It took me a while to figure this out too, but remember Consumer Confidence is a derivative of a derivative. Last month only 6% said they saw their income increasing in the future and this month it was 8%. That's an improvement and pushes the index above 50. Moon shot.
Maybe those 2% are just the newly unemployed whose income is now zero and can be excused for thinking it might be nonzero sometime in the future....
This fits more with previous threads, but why post anything on a dead thread:
Yahoo! 404 - Page Not Found
what did WM have the loans marked at when it failed?
removed - site troubles...
ghostfaceinvestah, It looks like WaMu hadn't market the loans down very much. In September 2008, JPM was expecting $36 billion in losses based on Dec 31, 2007 numbers, and that meant they had to take writedowns of close to $30 billlion - that suggests WaMu hadn't written the loans down very much.
best wishes
no problemo... ppip will fix anything wrong with JP's balances.
hey yahoo better be paying CR for using his charts!
How many of those ultimately impaired assets are still the responsibility of JPM and not J6P?
OT- FWIW:
Beijing is caught in 'trap' over dollar
By Jamil Anderlini in Beijing
Published: May 25 2009 03:00 | Last updated: May 25 2009 03:00
China's official foreign exchange manager is still buying record amounts of US government bonds, despite Beijing's increasingly vocal fear of a dollar collapse, according to officials and analysts.
In recent months, senior Chinese officials, including Premier Wen Jiabao, have repeatedly signalled their concern that US policies could lead to a collapse in the dollar and global inflation.
But Chinese and western officials in Beijing say China is caught in a "dollar trap" and has little choice but to keep pouring the bulk of its growing reserves into the US Treasury, which remains the only market big enough and liquid enough to support its huge purchases.
In March alone, China's direct holdings of US Treasury securities rose by $23.7bn (£14.9bn) to reach a new record high of $768bn, according to preliminary US data, allowing China to retain its title as the biggest creditor of the US government.
"Because of the sheer size of its reserves Safe [China's State Administration of Foreign Exchange] will immediately disrupt any other market it tries to shift into in a big way and could also collapse the value of its existing reserves if it sold to.....
FT.com / UK - Beijing is caught in 'trap' over dollar
so...they cheated?
The unemployment projections were and are still laughable. Are HELOC's included here?
Is my memeory failing me or didn't the US gov and FDIC enter into a loss sharing agreement on the WAMU portfolio?
GM up over 10% on wrod that bankruptcy is all but inevitable...
Estimates of peak unemployment at 7%. Those were innocent days, weren't they? Long bond getting crushed today, again. Market's rally doesn't make much sense in an environment where long term rates are spiking.
Rob Dawg sez the drought isn't real, but why was there oh so little snow in the High Sierra this weekend? It seemed like the snow-line was around 10,000 feet, something you'd see in mid-July in a normal summer.
The only water the farmers have other than the Sierra, is the ever-deeper wells they keep digging, @ great expense, until the next ever-deeper wells need to be drilled...
Thank you x 1000 for digging thru these details for us CR. I haven't double checked the #'s yet, but having everything linked like this in one place is invaluable.
"Because of the sheer size of its reserves Safe [China's State Administration of Foreign Exchange] will immediately disrupt any other market it tries to shift into in a big way and could also collapse the value of its existing reserves if it sold to....."
The dollar will collapse suddenly not over years like everyone hopes. Hold on to your guns and bibles. Within two years for sure we will have a dollar collapse. -30%+
10 yr just kissed 3.5%.
The dollar is already down 1/3 since 2000....
Smooch!
I'm still confused. The headlines all suggest that JPM is going to recognize a large profit on the WM assets, but it appears that the portfolio is considerably worse than JPM had originally forecast. How can both happen at once?
So another 1/3-2/5 down won't be that painful right?
"I'm still confused. "
1 + 1 = 3
This might give them some idea of what their bad loans are worth:
my occassional handyman is in the midst of his second foreclosure (first it was the big house bought at peak, now his little original house heavily re-fied to buy the big house). So he is experienced with the process. The bank took back the little house via foreclosure in early may after about a year of no payments. Two weeks later, he gets his first contact from the bank's appointed realtor, who is willing to do "cash for keys." So my guy does some negotiating and ends up signing an agreement that gives him $4200 and allows him to stay to mid June.
So the bank that gave him something like $400,000 in a re-fi, then got maybe one years worth of payments in return, is now giving him yet another month of free rent and $4200 cash, just so he doesn't break the law by destroying the bank's property.
The bank will be lucky to sell the place for $200,000.
Bouncing around 3.5 now ... those 5 and 7 year auctions could prove a bit exciting.
(delete repeat)
Gavshire - I too am confused
I'm also confused about what is so 'tricky' here
they worte the loans down by 25% at acquisition, then they are allowed to write them up if they perform and do better than they were written down to- of course, their projections were too optimistic, so I would think they need to write the loans down further actually...
or am i missing something?
Gavshire Hathaway (profile) wrote on Tue, 5/26/2009 - 3:17 pm
I'm still confused. The headlines all suggest that JPM is going to recognize a large profit on the WM assets, but it appears that the portfolio is considerably worse than JPM had originally forecast. How can both happen at once?
Calvinball accounting courtesy of owning the legislature.
CR: Great posts today
,,,
O/T: did a chart of case-shiller http://img40.imageshack.us/img40/6180/csehp.png
Assuming that in 3-4 years everyone on this board is labeled a heretic and a traitor would I receive extra points if I held gold eagles vs Canadian maples or Krugerrands?
saw this posted at Jesse's blog
Jesse's Café Américain
http://www.rttnews.com/Content/BreakingNews.aspx?Node=B1&Id=959650%20&Category=Breaking%20News
JPMorgan Chase & Co. (JPM: News ) stands to reap a $29 billion windfall due to an accounting rule that lets JPMorgan transform bad loans it purchased from Washington Mutual Inc. into income, the Bloomberg reported Tuesday.,
Congrats to JPMorgan who wins the gold medal for some of the boldest and most corrupt financial engineering racketeering ever !
John Boogle 'good ethics is good business' would be proud
EHP: Love your Case-Shiller chart.
doesn't look promising for a bottom anytime soon
Dollar drop another 30-40% = imports get more expensive, exports get cheaper to other countries, we get more foreign tourist dollars, some recovery in employment.... The real danger is the Middle East countries could decide they dont want dollars for oil, then we have to buy whatever they want to pay for oil... Transport costs go through the roof, utility bills skyrocket... If that happened it would be a giant killer rabbit....
Did the UK pound collapse help their exports??
Market's rally doesn't make much sense in an environment where long term rates are spiking.
I've heard from two different people today that this is precisely why the market is rallying--a steep yield curve is "good for equities." Maybe that was a CNBC talking point and they both heard it at the same place?
Assuming that in 3-4 years everyone on this board is labeled a heretic and a traitor would I receive extra points if I held gold eagles vs Canadian maples or Krugerrands?
Gold Eagles have the interesting clause on them that the government doesn't want to know if you sell them (no 1099). They're not saying to cheat on your taxes; but its structured in a way that gives a wink and a nod.
As I recall, the Maple Leaf and the Panda have the finest gold content of all the gold coins... It's been a while since I looked at that though - maybe someone knows more...
As for JPM
I remember during the acquisition press conference. JPM's "adverse scenario" was very much a good estimate of what we would go through, and it made sense for them to sell the break-even scenario to shareholders. I think where they screwed up was assuming they would pay for the acquisition by selling more products to WaMu clients (eg Credit Cards). As I expected, Credit Cards are not paying their own way. It all works out though, they can get all the money they want under any terms they want. That's the benefit of being the most solvent among the insolvent. You don't have to outrun the bear, just the fat kid
You don't have to outrun the bear, just the fat kid - great point there.... I'm going to work that into my asset management pitch....
Citizen Scotto
don't read to much into the forward looking continuation of the polynominal fit. Depending on the degree chosen, it goes to the moon or to hell. I put it in there mainly for the residuals to date which show deviation from trend
1st world Foreigners make a bee-line for our National Parks, because of their obvious beauty, and up until a week ago, it being the only gun-free sanctuary in the United States, unlike the rest of the country...
Does anyone have an update on Memorial Day weekend traffic?
I can't find anything but AAA was calling for a 1.5% increase in the number of travelers going more than 50 miles from home. A better proxy for consumer confidence than the 5000 households in this morning's survey?
Tim I dunno on the UK pound - not up on the GB economy at all - but I do like Guiness if that counts...
Assuming that in 3-4 years everyone on this board is labeled a heretic and a traitor would I receive extra points if I held gold eagles vs Canadian maples or Krugerrands?
No you would be one smart man indeed...holdem.
Juvenal Delinquent (profile) wrote on Tue, 5/26/2009 - 12:14 pm
reply ignore user
Rob Dawg sez the drought isn't real, but why was there oh so little snow in the High Sierra this weekend?
Three lifts still running at Mammoth.
I'd drove 40 miles and didn't spend a dime. Fill up when prices come off the weekend high not saying much. Better to look at Hotel bookings
3.512% hmmmm.
black dog
Crude inventory report on may 28 will be what matters. If oil is sold off, it gains momentum fast (that's the nature of swinging forcefully in either direction in recent history) and then suddenly there is a chunk of cash looking to hunt for high returns. Obviously you won't get those by going long financials at this point.
"I'm still confused. The headlines all suggest that JPM is going to recognize a large profit on the WM assets, but it appears that the portfolio is considerably worse than JPM had originally forecast. How can both happen at once?"
Remember the GAAP between reality and the books.
Did the UK pound collapse help their exports??
it raised world demand for pasty looking drunks able to riot at soccer games.
Dawg,
That's all well and good, but how do you propose to deliver eastern Sierra water to the western slopes and into the farms and orchards?
It's time for you to back way from the computer and have a look at what's happening, not what you think is happening...
Ghostfaceinvestah, others -- probably not news to any of the pros but wouldn't it suck to be the last guy to know.
Zero Hedge: S&P To Downgrade Most Of 2005-2008 CMBS Classes, Derails TALF For CMBS
Tuesday, May 26, 2009
S&P To Downgrade Most Of 2005-2008 CMBS Classes, Derails TALF For CMBS
Posted by Tyler Durden at 3:28 PM
The headlines all suggest that JPM is going to recognize a large profit on the WM assets, but it appears that the portfolio is considerably worse than JPM had originally forecast.
Lost principal comes out of net income. That's what accounts for the massive writedowns.
Lost interest comes out of operating income. Say a 2006-2008 loan is written down as defaulting within 5 years, but the loan manages to be somewhat current. The bulk of those payments will be interest that JPM now realizes.
Water from Mammoth winds up in LA....
EHP,
What is a 6 degree fit?
Dirk van Dijk (profile) wrote on Tue, 5/26/2009 - 12:06 pm This fits more with previous threads, but why post anything on a dead thread:
Come on Dirk. The only way I know a thread is really dead and gone is when I see one of your posts at the end of it.
TiLT!
@Tim waiting for 2012,
You get no points for holding a barbarous, worthless metal . Turn all of in immediately at your local Federal Reserve Bank for a wad of crisp Ameros.
@iceman,
Dealers have to report purchases (if the dealer buys from you) over a certain amount. I can't remember the exact amount right now, but I think it is around 20 oz of gold or 1000 oz of silver.
Looking at the TLT it appears there's a brisk orderly exit in progress. If Ben gets tied up and neglects to step in aggressively with his blank check authority, we may get someone screaming fire in the theater.
Equities are a side show at this point.
O/T: one of the top stories in Canada today. Our head of state Michaelle Jean is so much cooler than Obama, at least for today.
RANKIN INLET, Nunavut - On the first day of her trip to the Arctic Michaelle Jean gutted a freshly slaughtered seal, pulled out its raw heart, and ate it.
Seems easy enough to solve. Forget about current ratings and just revise the term sheet to make securities eligible if they did not have a rating below the highest investment-grade rating category from any TALF CMBS-Eligibile Rating Agency at the time of issuance.
"Dealers have to report purchases (if the dealer buys from you) over a certain amount. I can't remember the exact amount right now, but I think it is around 20 oz of gold or 1000 oz of silver."
There's an IRS thing at $10k, sounds pretty close to what you're describing.
"a steep yield curve is "good for equities."
As long as you do not have any debt... Not too many businesses who meet that criteria these days.
Is TLT an ETF or direct proxy?
US exporting absurdity to the UK:
The Government has launched the asset protection scheme (APS) to underwrite bad loans but the cost of using the scheme will be based on a bank's state of health, as determined by the Financial Services Authority's (FSA) stress tests. The FSA is thinking about publishing the parameters of the tests but not the results. The Treasury won't publish anything, despite a Freedom of Information Act request from Bloomberg. Neither of these responses is acceptable to us taxpayers who have bailed out the banks.
"RANKIN INLET, Nunavut - On the first day of her trip to the Arctic Michaelle Jean gutted a freshly slaughtered seal, pulled out its raw heart, and ate it."
Now we know what threat was made by Paulson and Bernanke to the bankers.
Fiduciary Doodie
Polynomial Regression Data Fit
Juvenal Delinquent (profile) wrote on Tue, 5/26/2009 - 12:36 pm
Dawg,
That's all well and good, but how do you propose to deliver eastern Sierra water to the western slopes and into the farms and orchards?
It's time for you to back way from the computer and have a look at what's happening, not what you think is happening...
Time for you to consider that maybe, just maybe there are people who have been looking at the raw data for decades and have a different opinion.
Did we have an average year? No. Got that? We had a below average year. That's what you'll hear shouted again and again.
Do we need an average year? No! That's the part you'll never hear. We had "enough."
Besides, we "unbuy" the cotton or rice crop on the cheap in this economy and have a water surplus.
"Ecuador: Government Pays 35 Cents On The Dollar In Buybacks
May 26, 2009
Ecuador’s government has paid 35 cents on the dollar to buy back up to $3.2 billion of defaulted bonds, Bloomberg reported May 26. The government did not say how many investors participated in the buyback, but it said the offer would not be improved to creditors who hold out of the buyback auctions. Finance Minister Maria Elsa Viteri is scheduled to announce more details about the buybacks on May 28."
A precedent?
Basel
Thanks. so are they pushing earnings to the current quarter only to disappoint later?
pavel.chichikov
That's not all we have in Canada
ShadowInventory (profile) wrote on Tue, 5/26/2009 - 12:37 pm
Water from Mammoth winds up in LA....
Shhhh. Let Juvenal dig his own grave (well?). [Thanks though for making my point.]
Apparently Ecuador does not plan to be floating any more bonds in the future....
I had to make up for screwing up the election results the other day...
Does she bite off live chicken heads in farm country?
Very nice detective work, CR!
Ten year over 3.50 - BB must be distracted...
LEH synthetic 20yr Treasury bond index ETF. No ultra this or that or anything funky.
The real consumer confidence chart not that photo shop addition to Markets Watches front page of glory.
http://4.bp.blogspot.com/_8rpY5fQK-UQ/ShwNTFKtVUI/AAAAAAAAG04/IINPFJTuEY0/s1600-h/cc.png
As one can clearly see the contraction out ways any expectations.
Comrade Elmer Fudd
You never want to eat the brains of an animal because of prions. Known for 'mad cow disease' and disorders amongst tribes that practised cannibalism
@Byzantine_Ruins
"S&P To Downgrade Most Of 2005-2008 CMBS Classes, Derails TALF For CMBS"
"Throw in a downgrade of 90% of the 2007 vintage and it's time to go back to the drawing board."
"This plan will work!"
Ha! - ha!
Any setback to Timmy's doomed efforts to kick start the MBS machine give me a warm fuzzy.
ShadowInventory (profile) wrote on Tue, 5/26/2009 - 12:49 pm
I had to make up for screwing up the election results the other day...
Screwing up an election is a badge of honor. Can I hire you to screw up the next election?
If I was willing to use the tactics of the left, CA would go conservative...
Scuse me while I kiss the sky
"You never want to eat the brains of an animal because of prions. Known for 'mad cow disease' and disorders amongst tribes that practised cannibalism"
You'd think it would be a good idea to not use left over bits of animal in feed.
10 year 3.53 You can almost hear the NAR crying.
Lookin at 3.54 or so? So much for smoochin 3.50.
Which leaves me wondering--if folks don't expect any increase in income or job prospects or business activity, what exactly is it they think is going to improve?
I've got this suspicion that there are still a lot of people out there that think the price of their house is about to skyrocket again.
Which leaves me wondering--if folks don't expect any increase in income or job prospects or business activity, what exactly is it they think is going to improve?
=====
peak despair?
JPM stock up 5.7%. There you go hyping JPM stock again CR.
A brain is a terrible thing to waste.
Deep End Dining: Brains Are Back. Tacos de Sesos aka Beef Brain Tacos. Crazy Delicious! Carnitas Michoacanas. Reseda, CA. (The Original, Unjacked Version).
Precious metals purchases are not reportable. Only some sales are reportable:
Customer sales to dealers of certain precious metals exceeding specific quantities call for reporting to the IRS on 1099B forms. The 1099B forms are similar to other 1099 forms taxpayers commonly receive; the "B" means they have been issued by a business other than a financial entity.
Reportable sales (again, customer sales to dealers) apply to 1-oz Gold Maple Leafs, 1-oz Krugerrands, and 1-oz Mexican Onzas in quantities of twenty-five or more in one transaction. Reporting requirements do not apply to American Gold Eagles, no matter the quantities. Furthermore, reporting requirements do not apply to any fractional ounce gold coins.
Only one common silver product is reportable when sold: pre-1965 U.S. coins. The quantity that causes the filing of a 1099B, however, is not clear. The IRS bases its authority to require reporting on CFTC-approved contracts that call for the delivery of $10,000 face value. Consequently, many dealers do not report sales of pre-1965 U.S. coins unless the sale totals $10,000 face value; others report $1,000 sales.
Sales of American Silver Eagles, privately-minted Silver Eagle 1-oz silver rounds, and 100-oz silver bars are not reportable, no matter the quantity. Other precious metals products are reportable, but they are not covered here because the average investor does not trade them.
This of course has nothing to do with reporting cash transactions of $10,000 or more, which are reportable for that reason alone.
Shill's chart is a quantitative illustration of "hope".
I am back to wondering about the Consumer Confidence readings. Seems a little premature to get a moon shot on that index, what, with unemployment strapped to a launch vehicle. I expect a revision or some other form of retraction...
Thanks bearly. I wanted to make sure i saw the right thing getting quoted.
Three days like this is a row? A huge portion of indirect bidders at the auction, meaning Fed nominees and not foreign buyers in this instance I think. They better get some money in here, or this sucker's gonna go down.
what, with unemployment strapped to a launch vehicle.
I'm envisioning buzz lightyear strapped to a bottle rocket by Sid
sportsfan
So you have to report purchases of 10k or more?
thanks TBT
There should be some small upticks in retail sales - the pantry wont last forever and if a household has decided to stop paying their bills they will have a few months of extra discretionary income before they have to find a new place to live... One of my old buddies owns a bar and he continually says that most people will spend everything they can get their hands on no matter what... So far I think he has been correct most of the time... When the going gets tough, the depressed go shopping... That's not going to solve the underlying contraction though - my guess is that we still have at least 2 years before there is any meaningful recovery...
Looks like the bbads are winning the battle of the long bond today. Treasury is going to need to issue something like $150 billion a month as far as the eye can see. Wake me up when the 10 year breaks 5%.
GM days range: 1.12 - 1.84
LOL
Oil quantitatively eased its way over $62/bbl today for a new high for the year.
TNX up to 3.53% last I looked.
EDIT: TNX up to 3.55%
So you have to report purchases of 10k or more?
The 10k reporting law is completely separate from precious metals and applies to everything.
If you buy a $22,000 car and pay with Ben Franklins, the dealer should file a report with the IRS.
".. One of my old buddies owns a bar and he continually says that most people will spend everything they can get their hands on no matter what.."
Right, but easy credit pulls that purchasing power forward. Now we're getting the credit hangover.
"Ten year over 3.50 - BB must be distracted... "
Keeping his powder dry for the 5 and 7?
This entire debacle has continued far longer then I thought possible. The only "good news" is the bond market starting to send a message that down the QE path lies madness. Unfortunately reason and logic has been overtaken by fantasy and deception and will require a dose of harsh reality.
A message from the bond market.
YouTube - Which Side Are You On? (Keep This In Mind)
lackluster day after the morning moonlaunch, sawing across 8450, but Kermit takes the day
Credit defaults - gives the consumer a little temporary cash - that can cause a short uptick like the one in April... Of course if they dont pay their CC bill they probably are not going to get any more credit now... So unless they get some more cash somewhere, the crunch will continue...
BH I thought last week they were supporting 3.30 but now it looks like they are on the sidelines...
Case-Shiller declines from peak
S&P500 Volume
"Wake me up when the 10 year breaks 5%."
So, just a short nap then?
sportsfan
Thanks.
Oil quantitatively eased its way over $62/bbl today for a new high for the year.
Looks like the bottom is unfalling out of oil. Looks to me like a classic case of qualitative uneasing resulting from quantitative (dis)easing.
Thanks Ben. I really appreciate the higher fuel bills!
EHP,
You promised a "perfect storm" and I want one!
EHP
Exhaustion up move on 5/8?
Anyways does the GM union deal matter if it goes to the court? Can the bondholders force liquidation BK?
nova
May 28, May 29
Forgive my ignorance. But if JP bought the WaMu portforlio for 1.9 billion, and has so far made 1.26 billion off of that portfolio, doesnt it stand to reason that they are going to make a profit from this purchase? Or does buying out of receivership also mean you take ownership of liabilities. This point has always been a little hazy to me. Would be very nice to see a writeup about what exactly goes on when a bank buys another bank out of receivership from the FDIC.
BTW, in case you couldn't tell, I'm a big believer in commodity led booms. Nothing like a strong (expensive) foundation upon which to build your house (of cards).
If Ben can get the commodity bubble reflated ASAP, it should really restore all that lost wealth.
BB to AS (imagined): Look AS this QE is a very nuanced balancing act that requires the full faith and credit of yours truly. It's not like I can just get in a helicopter and drop money on you.
This is the 3rd year of a ongoing drought, but you know more than anybody else, because, well, because Rob Dawg can't be wrong, ever.
"Face the Kremlin"
A Russian investment firm, Digital Sky Technologies, has invested $200 million in the social networking company Facebook in return for a 1.96 percent stake, the two companies said Tuesday.
The investment values Facebook’s preferred stock at $10 billion, a $5 billion drop from October 2007 when Microsoft paid $240 million for a 1.6 percent stake.
Facebook’s founder and chief executive, Mark E. Zuckerberg, said that the Microsoft investment was made at the “absolute peak of the market” and that it was just a part of Facebook’s partnership with Microsoft, which includes advertising and search agreements.
EHP, NOVA, Robdawg and anyone else especially in the VA/MD burbs,
question. In light of the credit suisse recast chart and the number of Alt A and options that wont really start hitting until june of 10 and that we have declined so much, would you consider buying if house is around 2003-2004 price and that the price seems fair in 1998 established neighborhood?
My concern is that some of the purchases in the hood we are looking in, that came after 2004 boom, more around 2006 might be fall out in the Credit Suisse chart, but not sure i want to hold off on onsey twosey possibility. However, knowing that in our county especially up in the northern part, most all 2005-2008 homes were purchased with Alt and options, however not sure how many in the hood we are wanting were...
however, those in the north could flood market bringing down "our" area 10% more.....in 2010-2011 time frame. I am wondering how much impact you guys give suisse chart as an indicator of when to buy...
and yes , i am going through the questioning myself phase that i do every summer for last 5 years....
It's really quite amazing that $100+ oil only led to 4 or 5% CPI inflation. Perhaps Ben will have to push oil to $300/bbl in order to get the desired inflationary effects.
$5.00/gal gas seems high, but it will be totally worth it if it strengthens our banking system and gets credit flowing again (to China).
Bring on the prosperity.
All the signs are flashing inflation and commodity boom. I think it's almost natural for the market to rally in sympathy with commodities and PMs early in the trend. But there's no underlying strength for non-commodity/non-oil stocks going forward. They are tired and fragile at this point, and valuations are beyond irrational.
Nobody can predict the timing of a market this crazy. But I am now modestly net short for the first time in awhile and holding all shorts. I've been a contrarian here before, and even though I've held some shorts right through this bull run, I am up 8%+ so far in May.
Don't try to time gold. It will go to $1,200 at least and could get there fast. Get some silver. It will outperform gold and get to at least $20.
Don't believe inflation is good for stocks. As inflation takes hold, it's terrible for stocks, especially in this cycle and environment. Stocks will retest the March 9 low or come close, later this year.
Don't believe a steep yield curve is good for stocks. Not this time.
it would be interesting if $150 oil was in place for say 24-36 months how that would work through inflation wise.
right now it is claimed that there is a real physical glut, so the advancing prices may be unsustainable in the short term.
In our speculator-driven casinoconomy I think what might really get confidence up in a hurry is if Ben could just announce weekly lottery drawings where he awards $1mm newly printed dollars to anyone with a SSN ending in some 2 random digits. If that doesn't work, go to 1 digit. Odds are every 10 days every card carrying 'Merican gets a million dollahs to spend freely.
EHP,
Thank you. You are the best.
It is depressing not having the sky falling...
How does the price of a gallon of 87 work out?
When oil was $147 a barrel, I was paying $4.649
Now it's $62 a barrel, and i'm paying 2.799
To me, it sounds like the oil companies undercharged on the way up and are overcharging now, to recoup lost revenue. I suspect they didn't want to have it get over the psychological barrier of $5 a gallon.
"Would be very nice to see a writeup about what exactly goes on when a bank buys another bank out of receivership from the FDIC"
funny you mention that, it looks like WM shareholders are asking for the same accounting:
Yahoo! 404 - Page Not Found
It has been asked here on a few occasions what a 4% ten year will do to mortgage rates.
So far BB's money printers have held the MBS market up, but the cracks are starting to show. A few more days like this....ouch.
Bloomberg.com:
Personal Finance
poor russian saps got fleeced.
Just like microsoft did
ShadowInventory (profile) wrote on Tue, 5/26/2009 - 3:48 pm
* reply
* Ignore user
Apparently Ecuador does not plan to be floating any more bonds in the future..
History will show that most of these countries defaulted at least twice int he 19th century. It is only in the last 50 years that we have built up this idea that sovereigns don't default ( Walter Wriston circa 1975). What countries are learning is that investor memories are pretty short and investor banker greed very high. Ecuador will be back to the market and bonds salesmen will be telling everybody it is different this time- plus the incremental yield will entice "smart money".
i'm just not seeing net price inflation taking hold long-term with increasing UE, decreasing wages, and decreasing access to credit.
price inflation in specific "needs" -> e.g. oil, food, yes, but across-the-board? no way
Odds are every 10 days every card carrying 'Merican gets a million dollahs to spend freely.
=======
but you have to spend it, not save it, like Brewster's Millions
Chinese must be a little ticked right about now. They have been using Jas' playbook and getting their ass kicked. Can't be good long term. Might get nasty in fact.
"It is depressing not having the sky falling... "
In the bond market today, the sky was falling...
*** is so last century...
Re: price of oil
There are fixed and variable costs
It creates a price curve not a simple line
Fiduciary re MD/VA 'burbs.
Lived in established Silver Spring neighborhood (Four Corners area) from '92 - '98.
Purchased our house (solid mid-60s brick two story) for $155K and had to sell at a loss during downturn in '98. Sold at about $154K.
Did curiosity check on zillow, etc in 2004 and found that the neighboring houses - same general style, lot size, etc. - were going in the vicinity of $425K.
FWIW.
[but you have to spend it]
Well of course. Anyone that hesitates to spend Zimbabwean dollars loses, a lot, each minute. They figured it out over there so we could probably figure it out too.
[Re: price of oil
There are fixed and variable costs]
And the danger of destroying demand permanently, prematurely. Supply is pretty inelastic and you need to keep the fuel moving as gasoline has a shelf life. Pretty complicated system...
Plan: Get the big fellas to leave equities in a coordinated fashion...retail investors crushed...flight to safety rescues BB...reestablish entry point for new pump. Repeat.
I should clarify my statement above regarding commodity booms.
I'm really only a believer in commodity led booms that are the result of excess liquidity and rampant speculation. The lack of end demand is a key distinction. That specific type of commodity boom is sure to lead to greater prosperity. I know it seems counter-intuitive, but think of it as a competitive devaluation on steroids.
Bernanke is going to put the CON back in our eCONomy. I can't wait.
"Well of course. Anyone that hesitates to spend Zimbabwean dollars loses, a lot, each minute. "
In Argentina in the 80s, people with cash in the morning would spend it by lunch time, it was depreciating that quickly.
Note that the 2 year auction went fairly well today, but the 10 year sold off. Everyone is staying short, waiting for the opportunity to roll into higher short term yields.
Angry Saver wrote:
I'm really only a believer in commodity led booms that are the result of excess liquidity and rampant speculation. The lack of end demand is a key distinction. That specific type of commodity boom is sure to lead to greater prosperity. I know it seems counter-intuitive, but think of it as a competitive devaluation on steroids.
How does this lead to prosperity, or was that snark?
Angry Saver (profile) wrote on Tue, 5/26/2009 - 3:22 pm
It's really quite amazing that $100+ oil only led to 4 or 5% CPI inflation. Perhaps Ben will have to push oil to $300/bbl in order to get the desired inflationary effects.
$5.00/gal gas seems high, but it will be totally worth it if it strengthens our banking system and gets credit flowing again (to China).
Bring on the prosperity.
Angry Saver, your name is extremely well chosen.
Chinese must be a little ticked right about now. They have been using Jas' playbook and getting their ass kicked. Can't be good long term. Might get nasty in fact.
They don't care about their losses. They do care about their exports and their level of unemployment.
Comrade Coinz,
It's new (e)CONomy doublespeak. An integral part of our faith based money system
Also, I still believe this eCONomy has plenty of wealth unlocking potential. I'm just wondering though. Once wall street has extracted all the "value" out of the system, will the financial propaganda network (CNBC) still be necessary?
I am back to wondering about the Consumer Confidence readings. Seems a little premature to get a moon shot on that index, what, with unemployment strapped to a launch vehicle. I expect a revision or some other form of retraction...
It took me a while to figure this out too, but remember Consumer Confidence is a derivative of a derivative. Last month only 6% said they saw their income increasing in the future and this month it was 8%. That's an improvement and pushes the index above 50. Moon shot.
Maybe those 2% are just the newly unemployed whose income is now zero and can be excused for thinking it might be nonzero sometime in the future....
Come on Dirk. The only way I know a thread is really dead and gone is when I see one of your posts at the end of it.
LOL so true