Like there's the slightest worry that fiscal discipline will prevail. I mean really, we didn't get that structural deficit beng responsible with money.
Imagine getting into a line that was 30 people long, only inquiring as to what the store had to offer after a place in line had been secured, and then 20 minutes later getting the chance to buy canned turnips.
That's what communism was like.
How's that compare with your American experience so far?
TPTB will never have to 'withdraw liquidity' or suck up excess cash out of circulation. It's all fiat now. Currencies can die, and this one is getting sicker.
Yeah, one would think that today's debt monkey is not just "orders of magnitude" worse today, but an entirely different animal. Debt is not heroin here, it's oxygen.
i've read the rumors that the metals ETFs may not have, or not be able to procure, all the metal they are supposed to have to match the insane quantity of share purchases. it seems likely they don't, especially when you find the usual pm manipulators guarding the vaults. the size of these ETFs makes them dominant players in the market. you gotta wonder with the millions of ounces being added all the time to GLD and SLV why the spot price is not reacting more strongly. seems that the pm not being bought is a very possible answer. now the flip side, when the market continues it's dive and people need cash for bills, they will sell these etfs right away. i suspect that mass redemptions in GLD and SLV shares will have an asymmetric effect on the spot price compared to the same price movement on the upside.
blocks of shares, once created, are not destroyed in the same proportion on a downward price movement as when bought (and created) on the way up.
If PM ETFs are just a scam sponge to sop up all the investment demand for pm. this diversion not only suppresses the pm price now but could be used to absolutely crush it short term through the undermining of faith in the ETF itself, causing a run on the etf, and subsequent massive gold sales/shorts. seems to me if there was a sharp loss in confidence in the ETFs they (the shares, not the metal) would be clearly be sold. this selling would have to be matched by actual selling of PM. if the ETFs are run as advertised.
ultimately, though, an unraveling of a ponzi etf would cause a scramble for physical PM..
The ETFs are not gold, they are stock certificates. It is the supply and demand of these certificates that determines the share value, not the underlying. They only track the underlying according to how well the managers of the funds have set up the ETFs.
The current situation is reminiscent of the 1930s, but a lot is also different today. We cannot fight the last war.. this is a different war. We can use what we learned before, but we should not constrain our efforts to what worked before.
Ya otis even though I hold DBC and GSG I think the best thing is to have some of the real thing in a vault... I always liked the Maple Leaf the best - one of the prettiest coins ever... it doesnt hurt to have a few ...
Blinder is just setting up the pretexts for not ever reducing government spending. This time the Keynesians are ready to go all the way no matter the cost.
I read of 2 more Ponzi schemes in Cali, one for $440 Million and another one, a heavy-construction-equipment leasing company for a paltry $150 million.
the big boys are the only ones who can redeem ETF shares for the underlying commodity. so should i assume that everyone else (essentially everyone) cannot and their trades are just matched by brokers like stocks. so, except for the special exception of redemptions by say JPM and HSBC, shares do not come out of the float when sold.
what incentive do the big boys have to redeem shares for metal in a declining price environment. Seems to me they would rather have the cash if the metal price is expected to go down. I don't have any faith in the big boys just keeping the ETF float normalized out of the goodness of their hearts. besides, they can take delivery from comex.
it is hard to reconcile close tracking of the PM spot price with an ever increasing float. this implies that the share price tracking the underlying is a matter of faith, a psychological phenomena. eventually, the share price must depart, and fall, from the spot price because of the constant increase in supply of the shares.
if the etf departed from the spot by a large amount to the downside it could be seen as throwing off a forecast. the false impression that the etf is predicting the PM market would quickly become self reinforcing due to the over supplied shares getting sold off.
it is also easy to see that most people would mistake an issue of oversupply of shares for a price forecast inherent in the difference between the share and spot. this is where things would self perpetuate. people believe the religion that the free market finds the right price with the help of invisible hands, even though they could easily understand that it is supply and demand that determine market price.
along these lines, backwardation could be caused by a loss of confidence in the futures markets expressed as lower prices for futures instruments. this loss of confidence and reduced demand for futures contracts could trick bugs by falsely signaling something they have been waiting years to see.
one thing is for certain. the price is manipulated downward, which means it is on sale.
i believe that the primary purpose of most ETFs, particularly the ultras and PM shares, is to divert real buying or selling demand from the underlying commodity or sector.
Anak - thanks, trust the fragrant harbour is treating you well.
Last thread, Outsider asked what happens when SovBKCorp or other entity which appears royally skrood and well in line for the grim embrace of FDIC, but which is owned by a foreign entity, finally reaches the point of irredeemable insolvency.
Ta da! SWAPLINES!
Yes, this means that the Fed is printing / generating bytes for furriners too.
AMF - the apparatchiks in the USSR didn't just get turnips, they got pretty nice dachas if I recall & vacations down along the Black Sea.
Meanwhile the Heroes of Labor kept digging coal out in the Kolyma because they thought that maybe someday there would be more in it for them than that can of turnips. When that lie was exposed hell breaking out wasn't far behind.
Now fast forward to some hellish hot Vegas tract home 'community'... they too though there was more in it for them... thought they had moved right into it... but that wasn't to be as we know know.
Similar to the Soviet model our apparatchiks live in nice Manhattan equivalents of dachas [or better analogy - dachas in the Hampton's] and are getting bailed out by the 'party' to boot as we speak while the Heroes of Labor wait in the 'turnip line' and hope they are lucky enough to keep their place back out in the coal mine.
Now is it a surprise that a lot of our 'HOLs' believe maybe they got a similar lie? Are real pissed and maybe not going to go to the wall to save those in the dachas with the most to lose?
I realize the absolute material levels are different between the two systems but the emotions are the same and those are what tear societies apart.
so maybe the government somewhere down the line nationalizes the pm ETFs to "protect investors,"" forcing them to wait to settle in hyperinflating cash and through force majeure confiscates the (real or contrived) mountain of metal.
FDR made it illegal to own gold in 1933.
nixon ended gold convertibility to dollars.
check out this video of him blaming it on currency traders.
As I walked around Greenlake, it suddenly struck me... no, not a woman's hand but a thought. The Federal Reserve can be viewed as a wealth tax. That is, it acts as an averager which elminates the stagnant effects of long-term wealth accumulation, syndrome of "the Idle Rich".
The first generation passes its debts to the second, the second to the third.
The third collapses under the accumulated weight of sixty-seventy years.
By reducing interest rates on paper assets, the Fed is essentially smoothing wealth peaks down and pushing money from the first generation to the third.
I have to admit, it is pretty damn amazing to see how normal things still appear.
This Starbucks is packed.
The thing that got us out of the Depression was a huge build out of machinery and the establishment of the M-I complex IMO. The FED won't and can't pull back this time. There is nothing to replace that liquidity. China will take years to grow their domestic economy so China pulling the West out of this in the near term 5-6 years is off the table.
broward apparently people arent out of money yet... My wife says the high end places are still full of people - Whole Foods, etc... Are you brave enough to ask the people in Starbucks how many are not making their mortgage payments or credit card payments?
I'm beginning to think that we're not going to see the liquidity withdrawn or the budget deficit addressed any time soon.
It's just a feeling, but I find myself unconvinced that we're going to see policy changes like that until there is a change in the administration or congress, or some big external push.
If the Chinese wanted to upset the apple cart, they could have already done so. So I conclude that they do not intend to.
Unless there is a Republican takeover of Congress in the mid-term elections, I don't expect much to come from there other than tinkering with the spending programs to suit their political needs. And the odds of a Republican takeover of Congress any time soon are almost non-existent. Since there is no hope for third parties, the Democrats will be running things at least until the end of Obama's first term.
Addressing the budget deficit can be done in one of two ways: increase revenue or cut spending.
I don't think it's possible to increase government revenue significantly at this point, because the economy is weak and we're too far up the Laffer curve already. And cutting spending is beyond unlikely - in fact, spending looks like it's going to rise. And when was the last time our government actually cut spending overall?
So I consider it unlikely that the budget deficit will be addressed, other than rhetorically.
Actually, thus far Obama has been a carbon copy of FDR- his reforms have been very moderate- though the far right call him a socialist, well they called FDR that as well.
I just got 45K in 5 minutes over the phone on my 2 BofA credit cards at 2% till next march, no credit freeze in my wallet. Foreclosures here are going for 30K and I'm trying to pick one up. If I don't flip the house in time to pay back the bank, do I still get to keep the house? I still have a lot more credit card money left to tap and invest with and will probably be maxing them out as well. What do you think?
What will we pay police in? beyond a year or two, we will require a real economy of some sort.
//What we likely see is a police state not a dissolution of state//
~~~~~
We will have a real economy ... just smaller than it is now ...
Debt will have to be destroyed or inflated away ... and even now debt is being destroyed ...
The question is how far we go down this "Trickle Down" road ....
When Obama was campaigning I was encouraged that he said he would go over the federal budget and eliminate wasteful and fraudulent programs... So far no dice though... I didnt think the congress would be able to say no to him if he wanted to eliminate something useless...
If you were China and wanted to set in motion the financial future for the next 100 years, you'd be in no rush to make changes, especially as the only competitor on the world's stage was imploding before your very eyes.
Remember when we defiantly told China they couldn't buy Chevron Oil?
sm_landlord (profile) wrote on Sat, 5/16/2009 - 3:40 pm
Addressing the budget deficit can be done in one of two ways: increase revenue or cut spending.
I don't think it's possible to increase government revenue significantly at this point, because the economy is weak and we're too far up the Laffer curve already. And cutting spending is beyond unlikely - in fact, spending looks like it's going to rise. And when was the last time our government actually cut spending overall?
So I consider it unlikely that the budget deficit will be addressed, other than rhetorically.
Everything I see the Feds trying to do have already been tried in California with the obvious results. The only tool left is the printing press. Think they'll not print just because they know it isn't a good idea? We saw how that worked with TARP voting.
Blinder is just setting up the pretexts for not ever reducing government spending. This time the Keynesians are ready to go all the way no matter the cost.
No - it's that they don't have an answer what to do next.
Neither do the Austrians. Not really.
Austrians say 'let shit happen' markets work - but if the shit gets bad as it frequently does it tears society apart and then they are SURPRISED the public demands intervention [theoretical starving doesn't sound as bad as actual starving is]... if we are lucky the intervention is minor like FDR in the 30s. If not lucky the intervention is major & quite irreversible like USSR or Nazi Germany. Complete regime change.
In democracies we rarely let it get 'that bad' so we usually get a Keynesian-like intervention... and when they try to 'back it down' or reduce the 'intervention' so as to avoid 'permanent addiction' .. everyone all screams 1936!!! because it will start to 'hurt' again.
In the 70's when we had big inflation the winners were people who held real assets such as real estate - losers were on fixed income... I still think you need to hold all asset classes because no one is very accurate at picking the winners and losers... you can change your allocation but over the long haul a more or less equal allocation among classes probably works as well as anything...
Not only must the US withdraw the liquidity and address the budgets, it must pull back the guarantees, too. Unlike the last time around, this time they thought it was smarter to backstop the failures than to deal with the problems.
About the time inflation starts to look like a problem is about when the state government defaults should be in full force.
"i believe that the primary purpose of most ETFs, particularly the ultras and PM shares, is to divert real buying or selling demand from the underlying commodity or sector."
What purpose would that serve? If the ETFs stop tracking the underlying holdings, they would have to be abandoned, since no one could know what they actually were tracking.
Your criticism of ETFs would be better applied to the futures contracts. Some of those appear to be actually rigged in the sense that they are disconnected from the underlying commodity - Silver, for example, as discussed earlier this year.
I watched the SARS outbreak closely. I'm half convinced that the Internet did more to contain it than anything else. Likewise, I think the swine flu might be contained the same way. I'm not sure that the latency of stock markets has been affected much but as I walked along today, I wondered if there's some sort of effect, call it global consciousness for lack of a creative term, in that the emotional and current-event context of large numbers of people are more synchronized than in the past.
I'm still trying to figure out the "green shoot" effect. I believe it's MSM-driven but I have no evidence of a gov't conspiracy. It appears that the "green shoots' meme appeared much earlier, even before Obama took office but laid at a low level for awhile. It doesn't have the signature of an over-driven meme but... perhaps the perpetrators are much more skilled at impedance-balancing the push than I've seen before.
At some point, the Fed will have to withdraw liquidity, and the Congress will have to address govt deficits.
And at some point, we are all dead. With influential people like Alan Blinder, along with Ben Bernanke, Larry Summers, and practically every economist out there, advancing the theory that recessions can be avoided or significantly mitigated by more govt spending, the only question is how much more than it should will govt spending and the money supply grow.
Does anyone here honestly believe that the amount of cheap easy money, or of govt spending, will be shrunk before inflation has been allowed to transfer significant amounts of real wealth?
Like any other natural mechanism, our system will eventually self-correct, or at last reach a new equilibrium. But people like Alan Blinder will ensure that a major inflation lies between us and the next equilibrium.
Nobody really "owned" anything in the Soviet Union, as opposed to here where most everything & everybody is owned.
In the USSR the state owned most peoples homes, property, etc. The party apparatchiks ran the state.
In the USA most homes are TECHNICALLY owned by individuals... but are so levered that in fact the bank owns them - or at least owns liens to them. Foreclosures reinforce that reality daily. It appears our party is the 'banker party' and their apparatchiks run the state.
Now again who owns what where? And how is our average hero of labor going to tell the difference?
What if they are wrong? What if, due to technological advances among other variables, we are a much more efficient society than we were during the Great Depression or during the 70's? What if those who are most pessimistic about our economy are incorrect?
Now that Harvard is expecting a roughly $11 billion endowment decline over the current academic year--30% of the total--the university is in such a financial squeeze that it has frozen faculty salaries and offered early retirement to 1,600 employees. Princeton is even more addicted to its endowment, which provides about 45% of its operating budget. Princeton Provost Christopher Eisgruber warned in February: "We are beginning to live in the 'new normal' and we should not expect to go back to how we operated in the last 10 years."
At a 50% discount and give them all the voting rights they wanted... if they waffled we throw in Chrysler & GM as a bonus - almost like a TV infomercial... And there is MORE!!!
"What if, due to technological advances among other variables, we are a much more efficient society"
Efficiency isn't the issue.
The issue is several things but a big one is distribution of work, which is a proxy for distribution of income.
The Federal Gov't and globalization are two large disassociation engines, tearing "benefits" apart from "costs", harvesting benefits and tossing "costs" back into the corn field. I suspect they've been very "efficient" at this.
You cannot put life into something that is DEAD.....unless you are THE ALMIGHTY. This thing is toast and we are witnessing a slow degeneration into madness, starting with the working class. The poor and wealthy feel it very little because the poor are used to it and the wealthy are still well off. The middle man has had the rug pulled out from under him and we are still in the falling stage. When they finally "hit bottom"....is when all Hades will break loose. I fear for my Country because we are NOT a people to accept a police state. This could turn out to be one of the darkest days of our Republic since the Civil War and the Civil Rights Movement. I do not think it will be economic suffering that will tear us apart but the principals and social morality of bailouts for the rich and taxing the middle class that will cause people to turn on each other. Everyone knows we should help the poor and the "system" for the benefit of the whole but at what cost to the middle class? What we are seeing transpire is certain death to the entirety of what is left of the middle class. That ladies and gentlemen, will be akin to that movie Gangs of New York where it is dog eat dog. I pray for our Nation and it's leaders but I am afraid that is just not enough. Leadership has to take ownership over the power grab and mistakes made by BOTH political parties over the last 50 years.
i might do some deeper research on the subject or just watch for a confirmatory disconnect between the shares and spot.
honestly, i'm truly tired of finance. the scams and deceit are infuriating. can't wait for it to collapse. it is lonely, soul crushing, gut wrenching work.
can't even tell people you are a trader. they either hate you instantly or think you have a gambling problem.
broward (homepage, profile) wrote on Sat, 5/16/2009 - 3:52 pm reply Ignore user
"The only tool left is the printing press"
Is the Dawg piling into treasuries?
I am giving serious consideration to the other half of Jas' balanced portfolio. I'll be in Montreal in a few weeks. What was it you said? Argent is French for money? US paper for Canadian 1/10ths, halfs and full Maple Leafs. Deal.
It's a long story but over the past few years, I've concluded that most people are operating close to the maximum sustainable bandwidth in terms of brainpower. One of the effects of the credit cycle is that as people produce more in the same space of time, they're forced to consume faster in their remaining time. Think about how frantic the 1990s were.
That's bandwidth overload.
Now imagine that people have bandwidth quality-of-service.
What might people jettison to make room for incoming bandwidth?
I suspect that the ability to "rationalize markets and value" might take a hit, which would feed into a Optimistically Deluded Meme. Yes?
This chick is driving me crazy. She's talking terrorists, torture, Marxism, ,spacial art, novels, she's an 35-year-old big-blue-eyed, bohemian type and now she's TALKING TOO LOUD to distract me, I think it's on purpose. Begone! Begone, witch! I'm busy!
At a 50% discount and give them all the voting rights they wanted... if they waffled we throw in Chrysler & GM as a bonus - almost like a TV infomercial... And there is MORE!!!
dryfly pegs the mordacity meter!
Nah, when the siamese twins start fighting over their shared liver, true sailing is dead. Can't say it wouldn't happen someday, but I think they're forced to bide their time, which is something they've managed wisely to do so far...
Doc, I never looked on endowments as a negative. Particularly in a university setting.
There's the matter of how they're invested, of course, and I'm aware equity markets are deep in malinvestment at present. Do you see endowments as 'addictions' as HuffPo evidently does? Or in their case is it an ideology talking?
just curious if anyone has any thoughts on what will be the likely consequences of a strike by israel vs. iran. particularly with respect toimplications on oil. not trying to start any political strife here! no, if it happens (rightly or wrongly) what are the ramifications?
lucifer, loved your comment on global warming & vanity in the last thread....
Very few Americans travel overseas (85% don't have a passport) and precious few got to see communism in it's prime, and I was fortunate to see it up-close and personal as a young adult.
It was a eye-opening experience, and it was painfully obvious to me in the early 1980's that it couldn't last, but somehow it lasted until 1989.
Come on BH, you've got to have the bandwidth for that! But I agree we have a real luxury challenging our available consciousness with various what if scenarios. Much of the world around me is dealing with immediate, all too vital concerns.
An interesting thing I tested many years ago is Kitco's metal investment pool. You send them cash and theoretically they hold an equivalent amount of metal on hand. Since Kitco is located in Canada, taxation on profits is your responsibility.
Dawg wrote:
US paper for Canadian 1/10ths, halfs and full Maple Leafs. Deal.
Gold Maple Leafs are very nice coins, 24K. However, I like the alloyed coins better, the Krugerrand and American Eagle because they are harder and meant to be handled. You still get same amount of gold, just 22K with copper in the case of the Krug, and copper + silver in the Eagle. I like to handle the stuff and 24K is rather soft and prone to dent. All just personal preference.
What complexities of 1936 did the average person encounter in an average day?
1936 was some of the toughest years of the depression - coincided with the dust bowl. My father was born in the early 1920s - mid to late 1930s he was in middle school & high school - he remembered and told me about those times often. He lived on the northern edge of the great plains and while his area didn't blow away... it could be seen overhead and in the neighborhood as people farther west abandoned farms and moved in with families in the city who had jobs. Two of his uncles lived with them at that time in a small house [600 sq ft] - I believe ten of them lived in that two bedroom home... my father & his brother shared a temporary 'bedroom' thrown together on the porch. 1936 was one of the hottest summers [in the 100s] and coldest winters [minus 30] in Minnesota history to this day. It was miserable out on that porch all summer & winter but at least they ate - his father had a job... paid less than half what he was making pre-1929 but it was something. That fed, clothed and heated the home for all ten of them.
And of course that was the summer of the 1936 Olympics - followed by the war later.
1936 has a lot of emotional baggage associated with it. In many ways it is 'unfair' and not useful to compare our dilemma today to theirs back then but obviously the caparisons will be made anyway.
Why would you go to the great white north to buy coins you could buy here much easier, without hassles of GST and having to declare them as you cross the border?
I guess i'm not surprised considering who's making this fool's errand...
This "general equilibrium" determines the relative prices of goods and services and labor of all kinds, and the output of each kind of good or service and thus the RGDP.
NAIRU
The rate of unemployment at which inflation neither speeds up nor slows down.
When RDGP is more than the NAIRGDP, inflation tends to speed up;
The dilemma is: if the monetary policy does not accommodate shifts in FC ( Friedman Curve) there will be unemployment and human misery, perhaps on a large scale. On the other hand, accommodating monetary policy merely puts off the unemployment and misery, since the inflationary expectations will prove to be self-fulfilling prophesies and the inflationary spiral will just continue with no foreseeable end, if it is accommodated.
Also see: Friedman denied that there is a permanent trade-off between inflation and unemployment, as suggested by the so-called Phillips curve. He argued that there is a ‘natural rate of employment’, determined by structural and institutional forces in the labour market, such as trade unions, unemployment compensation, and the costs of moving house, which governments are powerless to alter solely by monetary and fiscal policies.
hong konger (profile) wrote on Sat, 5/16/2009 - 4:15 pm
"heard about a tofu factory for sale... "
LOL"""
i know, right?
anything sounds better than living in econo mental space...
but seriously there are some family ties to the business and they have decent regional distribution and a growing brand. it is on a long established large communal farm that is experiencing an influx of (highly vetted) residents due to the collapse. surrounding land is fairly cheap. not just anyone could even buy it and owning it would provide instant long term survivability if SHTF.
broward (homepage, profile) wrote on Sat, 5/16/2009 - 4:16 pm reply Ignore user
" I'll be in Montreal in a few weeks."
An interesting thing I tested many years ago is Kitco's metal investment pool. You send them cash and theoretically they hold an equivalent amount of metal on hand. Since Kitco is located in Canada, taxation on profits is your responsibility.
Just saying.
Why, now that you mention it... I do seem to remember something about that. Jus' sayin'.
Comrade Coinz also has a good point. Leafs are for transacting in envelopes not for spending. Too delicate.
I remember reading a story about a Canadian merchant marine that went back and forth to the UK during the 1930's, and he said it wasn't uncommon for the skies in Liverpool to be brownish from topsoil that had previously been on the ground in Canada and the USA.
I remember reading a story about a Canadian merchant marine that went back and forth to the UK during the 1930's, and he said it wasn't uncommon for the skies in Liverpool to be brownish from topsoil that had previously been on the ground in Canada and the USA.
Yup. It really happened. But that wasn't FDR's fault but the misery the crop failures caused was pinned on him & the Fed and their 'economic' decisions.
And of course - something like 30-40% of Americans were still on the farm or in farm communities - it affected them directly. I really don't know if economist ever correctly 'decoupled' the dust bowl effect from the 'monetary tightening'... but regardless the mid thirties sucked.
Wondering if the withdrawal of liquidity is some kind of basic politico-economic meme. Remember how increasing its VAT and introducing a consumption tax in 1997 affected Japan.
Be aware that tofu making is very labor intensive-- and least the good stuff.
Usually it's a husband wife team where the fellow gets up before dawn to make it, and the wife peddles it during the day as he sleeps. This allows for impropriety in social relations, which has led to the Chinese expression "Eat Tofu" as being synomous with a man taking advantage of an unaccompanied woman (usually verbally). Just saying be careful about your alternative lifestyle choices . . .
Endowments should be mechanisms to store surplus cash for future wants, thus they rely on long-term planning versus short -term casino plays. I think a lot of universities were like the majority of most entities and people that got out of control and focused on micro-managing short term casino chips. Everyone collectively lost focus, as if everyone had lotto fever. The interesting thing about a recession or depression is related to this stuff I was toying with related to marginal costs, i.e, higher input costs reduce the incentives for expansion, thus we as a society are going to fall backwards and re-boot, as we re-engineer all labor costs, housing costs, transportation and GDP. Society is on the edge of massive social and economic changes, so getting back to endowments, one can only hope that schools will still allow the lower classes to have opportunities to be educated, versus allowing the upper classes to re-invent The Next American Order (NAO). As such, the endowments will be less valuable and there will be fewer opportunities for all and the nature of risk will be re-thought by everyone.
I remember reading a story about a Canadian merchant marine that went back and forth to the UK during the 1930's, and he said it wasn't uncommon for the skies in Liverpool to be brownish from topsoil that had previously been on the ground in Canada and the USA.
Name the greatest natural disaster in US history.
You'd think it would be an earthquake or hurricane.
ETFs sound like another derivative to me.
What's the big deal with gold anyway? It's fairly rare, can be pounded really thin, it's heavy, it doesn't corrode and it conducts electricity really well. And it reflects light well in certain glass applications
It's too soft and heavy to really be used structurally. Basically it's non-toxic lead.
doug r (profile) wrote on Sat, 5/16/2009 - 4:42 pm reply Ignore user
It's too soft and heavy to really be used structurally. Basically it's non-toxic lead.
Three things. You can't easily counterfeit it. Enough people accept it as having enduring value. The third is new. The US Fed appears hellbent on destroying the US Dollar. You know the saying, you can't fight the Fed.
I read this post and initially thought: "so, we've been down this road before and everything ended up just fine." Then, I remembered the rest of the story. The economy collapsed back into depression in 1938. Hitler invaded Poland in 1939. In 1941, the Japanese bombed Pearl Harder. 70 million dead souls , nazi genocide, concentration camps, and two nuclear detonations later and the world was forever changed.
It's hard to decouple the end of the depression from World War 2. True, the relationship may be one of correlation instead of causation. However, it would pretty damned well hard to know how things would have turned out had that little conflict not taken place.
Anak, re: Aerial photos in last thread
The False Creek area did go from industrial to residential/light commercial on the water front. I don't know what used to be there in the 60s but isn't now other than saw mills. But it is just a creek and was never large enough to handle large ships. Those rail lines are a staging yard where they get the cars lined up in order and are still there today. There are 3 main harbors in the metro area, 1 in Burrard inlet which is the water north of the downtown peninsula, 1 wide open one to the south in Delta, and one in Richmond between the two. If you want to check out the stats of cargo shipped it's there in table form.
Yakolev was an interesting thread in the tapestry, haven't read the book itself yet but I will. It's nice to know that there always remain practical people who can't help but thinking independently
"Like a diabetic junkie camping out at a fast food takeout counter, President Obama, after increasing government debt and borrowing close to fourfold, says the debt and borrowing that are on his tab are not sustainable. And then pledges to bail out insurance companies, for no reason that anyone can seem to fathom, and to prop up the municipal bonds markets, after ensuring the death of those very markets himself with the announcement of the issuance of mind-boggling amounts of federal bonds.
Everything that still functions to a degree in the US now runs on government hand-outs, bail-outs and guarantees. Everything. That's it. And I’m not kidding here. Take out government support for banks, home purchases, car loans and all the rest, and you would be looking at a barren lunar economic landscape. And things are getting visibly worse every single day. GM and Chrysler may or may not come out of bankruptcy proceedings, their present predicaments are sure to cost millions of jobs this year alone. Those losses will be added up on top of the millions more in non-car-related firings, and there will come a point, and soon, when something breaks in the chain that cannot be mended easily, if it can at all.
America has been consuming a lot more than it has been producing for years now. What makes today stand out from what has been before is that what we are now witnessing is that the consequences of overconsumption are starting to further deplete production, and with a vengeance. The government is losing its grip at lightning speed, even though you would of course never know from their public utterances. Don't underestimate the possibility that they have reached the same conclusion that people like Stoneleigh and I did quite a while ago, that there is no way back, no recovery anywhere is sight. If that were so, and you would be in their shoes, what would you do?
I can tell you what their choice is: keep up the semblance of normality as long as possible, while behind the curtains frantic efforts are taking place to save and safeguard as much as possible for themselves and their own people. And no, you are not among their own people, you are not Obama's people. To know whose people you are, look around you in your homes, your towns and your families. "
"If I wanted to destroy a nation," he wrote in 1966, "I would give it too much and I would have it on its knees, miserable, greedy and sick."
- John Steinbeck
Sorry to say Obamanomics is going to fail because today's America is too far down the black hole of debt.
1) The projected budget deficit for 2009 is $2 trillion
2) The debt-drowned United States debt is already 350 percent of G.D.P and rising fast i.e. $53 Trillion in unfunded liabilities )
3) The Fed is now holding $10 Trillion of ‘assets’ ( mostly toxic ) transferred from too big to fail banks.
4) Other countries are now buying less of our debt
otishertz (profile) wrote on Sat, 5/16/2009 - 3:44 pm
i've read the rumors that the metals ETFs may not have, or not be able to procure, all the metal they are supposed to have to match the insane quantity of share purchases.
If you go on the GLD website, you will see that they do two bar counts each year: a full bar count at year-end and a statistical sample count in the during the year. INSPECTORATE did there sample count as of March 29, 2009. The INSPECTORATE report on the sample count is posted on the website.
The rumors are bullshit.
If you want to worry, then worry that the stocks and bonds that you think you own actually exist. Since the industry went to dematerialization a dozen years ago, stocks and bonds exist only as ledger entries at DTCC or the Treasury.
At least with gold, there is something physical to count.
Otis, my brother actually grows soybeans and don't think I haven't given this some thought, at least as a "plan 9". I'd just have to trust my better half, Mrs. Krakatau, as I do anyway....lol
Blinder is simply positioning himself for the failure that he can now see is coming. He and others like him- Krugman, DeLong, etc.- will simply say that their insane spend/borrow policies were not taken seriously enough.
....the house is burning and everyone is discussing the color of the drapes. Do some here just not see the flames? Do they think they will be extinguished by a timely rain? How important is discussion of breakfast tomorrow while the kitchen is ready to explode in conflagration? I just don't get it.
Blinder is doing nothing but respond to the NYTimes piece that said "only 6% of the stimulus has been spent and the stock market / initial claims prove that the recession is already over but we don't know it yet"
You'd think it would be an earthquake or hurricane.
It was the drought of 1934.
That and the Great Mississippi River Flood of '28(?)... it and the dust bowl did more to transform America both good & bad than any two events since the Civil War itself. My BIL (a New Orleans native & amateur historian) once told me the Great Flood FINISHED what the war started... it really wasn't 'over & behind us' until then.
The idea of giving your hard earned money to somebody to buy gold to hold it for you and package it in a ETF far, far away, doesn't seem to make much sense, when you can just buy the gold yourself and stick it in a safe-deposit box, and do your own 'bar count' whenever it's strikes your fancy.
The Fed will have purchased $1.5tn of MBS by year's end, probably long before then even. That is one position you can't liquidate. Ditto for the debt outstanding with an FDIC guarantee slapped on it for 3 years. Ditto for the saturated Treasury market that will face further weakening of demand as exporters not only have less float to reinvest, but have to withdraw and spend at home.
It's just posturing for the eyes and ears of the public. Taking sharp action from a political standpoint. It's no different than some political bobble-head taking the stage to demand AIG repay its loans within the next year. It has nothing to do with anything other than forcing your opponent to declare a position that you can potentially attack them for later.
".....when you can just buy the gold yourself and stick it in a safe-deposit box"
...I surely wouldn't trust ANY safe-deposit box administrator - ANYWHERE. But then it's easy to decide where the gold is buried when one doesn't own a shovel.
former GAO Comptroller General David Walker said sometime last year:
“If the federal government was a private corporation and the same report came out this morning, our stock would be dropping and some people would be talking about whether the company’s management directors needed a major shake-up”.
“The federal government’s total liabilities,” Walker explained, “translates into a de facto mortgage of about $455,000 for every American household and there’s no house to back that mortgage. In other words, our government has made a whole lot of promises that, in the long run, it cannot possibly keep without huge tax increases.”
Now with the $12 Trillion bail out of Wall St ‘too big too fail banks’ it’s probably $650,000 for every American household
I remember David Walker left the GAO in disgust, and went right into a private position that was basically a non-profit advocacy for common sense re: debt and unfunded obligations. I.O.U.S.A. - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia.
They had a movie... timing seemed impeccable, ironic though that it is probably the first time most people reading now have heard about it (I haven't seen the movie as a disclaimer)
apropos of political response, Calvin Coolidge as quoted in the John Barry book Rising Tide:
. . . the political mind "is a strange mixture of vanity and timidity, of an obsequious attitude at one time and a delusion of grandeur at another time, of the most selfish preferment combined with the most sacrificing patriotism. The political mind is the product of men in public life who have been twice spoiled. They have been spoiled with praise and they have been spoiled with abuse. With them nothing is natural, everything is artificial."
TODAY is "the new norm". Nothing will be as it was. We borrowed 1/3 - 1/2 of what we consumed. Assume everything will be reduced by that amount from here on out. Pretty simple, really. If you start from there, things won't "seem" quite as bad in another year, or two, or five, or ten...........
"A Beverly Hills hedge fund manager was arrested Friday on a charge he bilked investors out of $44.3 million, including $5 million he lost playing poker, the U.S. attorney's office said."
Tedium on my iPhone. I always saw Laffer as 2-d but EHP is prob right that a large # of simult eequations give an optimum revenue. A beautiful day, greenery ,lake, blue sky, student bosoms in halter tops, I like the flakiness of Seattle.
GF on a date, if I were ambitious I'd do the same.
Come on NSA guy, toss me a grant already!
....."our government has made a whole lot of promises that, in the long run, it cannot possibly keep without huge tax increases.”
.....President Obama has "just realized this" in his latest from the New Mexican Town Hall meeting. His current level of spending cannot be continued. His next step will be a coordinated effort to garner public support to increase taxes - but only from the "undertaxed high income wealthy".
--
Only comment on the topic: Too many "crooks" spoil the btoth. More interesting and OT...
BOOK Watch -- Nazi Nexus: America’s Corporate Connections to Hitler’s Holocaust
For Those Who Have Any Interest In knowing HOW MUCH America Contributed to The Holocaust can read Edwin Black’s Nazi Nexus: America’s Corporate Connections to Hitler’s Holocaust. I just watched Mr. Black’s presentation at Park East Synagogue in NYC. Mr. Black’s is a Jew whose young parents were thrown out of a train to Auschwich and survived.
Based on Mr. Black’s presentation of the facts of late 1910s and 1920s America there would never have been the Holocaust but for the importation of the American ideas on Race & Blood, including eugenics, to Germany and the help provided to the Nazis by powerful Americans. Needless to point out that Nazis learned the use of propaganda from the Americans (this is based on my knowledge from other source). According to Mr. Black, Henry Ford, John D. Rockefeller, a German American, and Thomas Watson of IBM were the most responsible. FDR got lot of support and money from Watson on behalf of IBM, Mr. Black asserts. Amazingly, The Holocaust Museum in New York does not allow any permanent exhibit implicating American corporations, according to Mr. Black. I am not surprised at all.
Regrettably, it is highly likely that the Gross Fuehrer (Great Leader) would be the American Hitler once the Greater Depression in America is an accepted reality and dopes get to vote for a demagogue “to fix” the problem. We know that people don’t learn from history. Least of it Americans, in general, and American Jews in particular. Why bother with inconvenient truths. Oh, I see, Americans are better, or smarter!, than the Germans of 80 years ago. Pride & Prejudice,
Jas
PS: Licifer, we are fighting the last war because we are BBAD. I said the we would as soon as Bernanke was appointed as the Chairman.
You take an inventory list; you randomly select which bars you will physically count; and then, you count this sample of your total inventory.
They do this sample count mid-year. They do a full count at fiscal year-end. (Full count = 'dis bar with serial number on the custodian's inventory matches 'dat bar sitting on the pallet in front of the auditor.)
AMF,
What complexities of 1936 did the average person encounter in an average day?
I asked my Dr. if something was wrong with me. I was in Metro, in a station I had been in many times, and all of a sudden I was lost. That and I have total blankness sometimes. All for a second or less but disconcerting. His reply was that he is hearing a lot of that, especially in the last few years. People who work information intensive jobs, live the same after work, are overdosing on data. He was telling me that our brains have not evolved enough to handle the constrant stream oof incoming info and that he thinks the blank seconds are akin to resets.
seems like CVS expends more effort counting tubes of personal lubricant than GLD does counting gold bars.
I would believe that if they kept all their lubricant in a precious metals vault run by a custodian company independent of CVS.
CC: the Morgan Stanley mess is why you should have previous metals custodied away from the broker who sold you the gold. It is an extra set of eyes keeping an eye on things.
German GDP Falls At An Incredible 15.2% Annualised Rate
“I believe there are some grounds for being optimistic that the pace of decline in economic activity will decelerate markedly in the months ahead,” was the view being expressed by Bundesbank President Axel Weber earlier this week. And we'd better hope he's right, since with figures from the Federal Statistics Office this morning showing that Germany's recession worsened considerably in the first quarter, with the economy shrinking by 3.8 percent compared with the previous three-month period I would hate to see it accelerating. Basically a 3.8 percent contraction in three months is equivalent to a 15.2% contraction as an annualised rate, so the chances are he is right, this is a breathtaking pace, and is unlikely to be maintained. But slowing down the rate of contraction is hardly equivalent to recovery, a point weber was quick to reinforce. “However, it is certainly not advisable to be overly optimistic that the recovery process is safely on track. This will most likely be a gradual process," he added.
"Based on Mr. Black’s presentation of the facts of late 1910s and 1920s America "
This is a sad post. It is a scurrilous misreading of history...Societies dedicated to Teutonic myths and Aryan racial purity were already influential in Vienna in the early 1900s. Freud and Adler, Wittgenstein and even Mahler, were subjected to anti-Semitism. Mahler was even criticized for conducting Mozart, the latter believed to be a free-mason, a group also among the despised. Besides the Jews and Masons, the Slavs and Bosnian Muslims were also among the reviled, despite membership in the Empire.
Vienna was the intellectual center of the German world at the turn of the 20th century, Berlin steps to the forefront of a broken Germany after WW1, and the idea of a pure Teutonic race betrayed by lesser races, already widely dispersed in the German-speaking world, was a salve to a defeated, impoverished nation.
Man, missed some great discussions today. Wish I had been here to opine on global warming and climate change. Lucifer you fight the good fight. Never give up and never surrender. It never ceases to amaze me that when a rational person disagrees with a fanatic, charges of ideology, lack of education or information, or general mental-midgetry are leveled against the transgressor. As a philosopher I embrace science, but science cannot trump philosophy---the pursuit of truth. It is a unique situation to be hated by religious fundamentalist as well as scientific fundamentalist...but the club does exist and I am happy to be in it. Climate change is real. Earth has a history of it. So do the rest of the planets in our solar system. Our sun is not constant either. For every claim of man-made global warming, I point to a dozen causes of climate change from the earth herself. The north magnetic pole is moving, magnetic field in general is weakening, great stores of carbon are being released from previous frozen areas, underwater volcanic activity and methane vents, etc....strange how in the crux of crisis on earth, changes are happening in the solar system and with the sun as well. How is it that man proved the earth revolves around the sun, but still insists he is the center of the universal cause of his demise. Do you think the dinosaurs declared themselves to be the primary cause of their own extinction? I know not whether we are simple animals, god's children, or a cruel joke...but I do know our vanity knows no limits. Because one dismisses evolution or global warming theories do not immediately preclude a person from understanding the theory in the first place. It doesn't make them a religious zealot or a political one, and it doesn't suggest they have a poor IQ. Science is based on human observation, human perceptions change over time and thus theories come and go. Science hails this as the glory of science and yet fanatics can't apply this simple truth to their own design. Always be skeptical, always try to prove what is, and in the face of what is not known, always keep looking. Never assume that the shadow you are seeing is actually the sun. My two cents.
if the only thing supporting the economy is government spending and you with draw that and the economy falls that is a surprise? How stupid does one have to be to become a Governor at the Federal Reserve. It seems to me that the lesson that has to be drawn is that government spending can't sustain an economy at an unstainable level. Sooner or later the government spending ends and gravity takes over. Much better in my opinion to allow the economy to find its own level. As with letting a fire burn itself out- important to have fire breaks but not necessary to fight the fire.
Vonbek777 - you want to turn the climate change thingie on it's head look at it this way:
Current meme is that increased human population & development cause climate change... okay.
How about climate change is primary cause of human development and increased population?
I live in the center of North America's bread basket - some 20,000 years ago there was something like a mile of ice above where I live now... or at least nearby [I am on the edge of what they call the 'driftless region' where ice went around in the last ice age].
Anyway once the ice went & the earth warmed the 'first agricultural revolution' was possible and with it excess food supply, division of labor, invention & eventually SUVs.
And since the planet was warming dramatically enough to melt a mile of ice and push it thousands of miles north and eventually make it go 'away' - all before SUVs - maybe there are more drivers to climate than just automobiles.
And I'm not even saying there isn't a possibility recent human released CO2 isn't adding to the sum of effects - just saying there is a lot going on and it has gone on for a long time.
BTW - I first came to this conclusion about 1979 while taking a class on ecology [not environmental studies but animal & plant population dynamics] and ancient history [where we discussed the ice melt in Scandinavia & Central Asia as drivers of their population explosions & the problems that caused for Mediterranean & Asian civilizations].
I've dropped that 'concept' on few folks and always receive the 'there goes dryfly again' look. Kinda fun really. Try it some day.
dryfly,
I don't think that is crazy at all. I have come to similar conclusions myself. Human anthropology has always fascinated me, and I agree with those that say fundamentally we haven't changed much over the last 10,000 years or more. Technology has created the illusion of change, but the fundamentals of human nature are still divided into hunters and gatherers. It has always amazed me how nice and tidy our little advances have developed over the development of civilization. Almost like a a collective unconscious committee is in charge of dispensing muses of invention to the human race. But try telling this plastic micro obsessed world that they aren't special and living at the apex of human achievement......pride before the fall, and lucy watch out for that first step.
You are certifiably crazy. If you want to rant against the PM ETFs, go ahead. But at least admit your disability so other people will understand where you are coming from.
Sure there is. Social Credit. Take a chunk of the economy, divide evenly. Its not perfect but it deals with the immediate needs without complex programs.
Playing by the same trade rules your partner does will settle any other troubles
abprosper,
I saw one of those families by choice tonight in Costco. It was a Saturday night, but they were dressed in their Sunday best eating in the food court. Seven children looked like the range was 17-6 months. Very well behaved, and looked very happy to boot. Mom and Dad were very tiny people. Both under 5'4, but eldest son was a big 6'3 at least. I am pretty sure if the financial world imploded tomorrow.....they would survive just fine despite the extra mouths. I only have two children, and I can't get mine to behave that well.
Given all the room to contract on the fiscal side, the Fed should be able to hold interest rates near zero for a decade. That's also the best policy vis a vis our trade deficit and the Chinese.
You are absolutely correct that it is climate change but even more important the stability following climate change that allowed human populations to expand world wide. We are currently living (last 200 years) in the most stable climate in the last 200,000 years and a climate that happens to be ideally suited to human populations. It is an aberration based on the climate record and regression to the mean suggests that at some point forces beyond human control will return the climate to normal i.e wildly fluctuating and less hospitable to human beings.
However, to argue from that point that we should not be concerned about human caused changes misses the whole point. Climatologists like economist are unable to conceive of punctuated equilibriums. I for one don't believe the the IPCC view of this slowly warming planet. Once you put a chaos system into motion it goes wild until it finds a new equilibrium point. Therefore, we should be taking every step possible to perpetuate the current island of stability for as long as possible by avoiding any actions that could upset the current stability.
Essentially your argument is that because killer bees come out of a hive on their own doesn't no harm is caused by sticking a stick into the hive or that since we are all going to die anyway why bother with any safety precautions.
Read the full post here
Blinder words in bold: The more important reason is that Barack Obama, Timothy F. Geithner and Ben S. Bernanke are not Herbert Hoover, Andrew Mellon and Eugene Meyer. (Who’s that? Mr. Meyer was the Federal Reserve chairman from September 1930 to May 1933.) In stark contrast to the laissez-faire crowd that ruled the roost in 1930 and 1931, our current economic leaders are not waiting for the sagging economy to right itself. Rather, they have taken numerous extraordinary steps already — and stand ready to do more if necessary.
The political actions taken during this economic crisis have not and will not be the same as those actions taken during the great depression. This means that the outcome will probably be materially different. This does not mean that this outcome will be better or that it will be worse - it just means that it will be different.
That’s the good news. But even if another depression is next to impossible, there is still the danger that next year, or the year after, might turn into 1936. Let me explain.
From its bottom in 1933 to 1936, the G.D.P. climbed spectacularly (albeit from a very low base), averaging gains of almost 11 percent a year. But then, both the Fed and the administration of Franklin D. Roosevelt reversed course.
In the summer of 1936, the Fed looked at the large volume of excess reserves piled up in the banking system, concluded that this mountain of liquidity could be fodder for future inflation, and began to withdraw it. This tightening of monetary policy continued into 1937, in a weak economy that was ill-prepared for it.
There are a couple of assumptions made here. First, Dr. Binder assumes that the strong economic growth from 1933 to 1936 was sustainable. Has he considered the possibility that the economy was goosed during this time period in an unsustainable fashion? If not, why not? We know that the FDR's New Deal was initiated from 1933 to 1935. Is it wild to speculate that these programs may have caused unsustainable distortions in the economy? Second, he assumes that tightening monetary policy in 1936 was the wrong choice and that not tightening would have been been the right choice. Has he considered the possibility that there was no right choice under the circumstances. If not, why not?
About the same time, President Roosevelt looked at what seemed to be enormous federal budget deficits, concluded that it was time to put the nation’s fiscal house in order and started raising taxes and reducing spending. This tightening of fiscal policy transformed the federal budget from a deficit of 3.8 percent of G.D.P. in 1936 to a surplus of 0.2 percent of G.D.P. in 1937 — a swing of four percentage points in a single year. (Today, a swing that large would be almost $600 billion.)
Thus, both monetary and fiscal policies did an abrupt about-face in 1936 and 1937, and the consequences were as predictable as they were tragic. The United States economy, which had been rapidly climbing out of the cellar from 1933 to 1936, was kicked rudely down the stairs again, and America experienced the so-called recession within the depression. Real G.D.P. contracted 3.4 percent from 1937 to 1938; the total G.D.P. decline during the recession, which lasted from mid-1937 to mid-1938, was even larger.
The moral of the story should be clear: Prematurely changing fiscal and monetary policies — from stepping hard on the accelerator to slamming on the brake — can be hazardous to the economy’s health.
Agreed. Rapidly goosing the economy and then abruptly stopping causes economic problems. Maybe we just should not goose it in the first place. Is that option on the table?
Wow, we’ve learned a lot since the ’30s, right? Well, maybe not. For the echoes of 1936 are being heard right now, even before the current recession hits bottom.If you’ve been paying attention, you know that a number of critics of the Fed are sounding alarms over the huge stockpile of excess reserves it has created — more than $775 billion at last count. What these critics are fretting about now is exactly what goaded the Fed into action in 1936: that the vast pool of loose money will ultimately be inflationary. The clear inference is that some of it should be withdrawn before it’s too late.
Will loose money not ultimately lead to inflation? Yes or no? Dr. Blinder never attempts to answer the question. I would argue that the loose economic policies should not have been implemented in the first place.
On the fiscal side, many of President Obama’s critics are complaining vociferously about the huge federal budget deficits. Try to ignore, if you can, the sheer hypocrisy of many Congressional Republicans who, having never uttered a peep about the huge deficits under George W. Bush, are suddenly models of budget probity. But whatever the motives, the worries of today’s deficit hawks sound eerily reminiscent of Roosevelt in 1936 and 1937.
In general I try to ignore politicians - period. Why does Dr. Blinder choose only these hypocritical individuals as the basis for dissent? Why not point towards those that are sounding the alarm that are not politically affiliated? Why not point towards Ron Paul, a Republican Congressman who has always been for fiscal and monetary conservatism from the 1970s into the latest Bush presidency and up to today? Probably because it is easier to whitewash all those who disagree with you as hypocrites instead of arguing the case itself. It is the oldest crutch in debate.
FORTUNATELY, Mr. Bernanke is a keen student of the Great Depression who will not allow the Fed to repeat the errors of 1936-37. But his critics, both inside and outside the Fed, are already branding his policies as dangerously inflationary, and no Fed chairman wants to be called an inflationist.
Again, I agree that Dr. Bernanke is aware of the policies enacted in 1936 and will not repeat those policies. Different policies will likely lead to different results. Why does one assume that these results will necessarily be better or worse than those results?
Similarly, I hope and believe that President Obama will not transform himself from the spendthrift Roosevelt of 1933 to the deficit-hawk Roosevelt of 1936 — at least not until the economy is back on solid ground.
How do we know when we are back on solid ground? If the economy grew on average 11% annually from 1933 to 1936, and that was not solid ground, then when will we know it is time to change course? Are you telling me that if the economy grows by the same amount through 2012 that we should continue with current record deficits and quantitative easing? Does that sound insane to anyone else besides me?
That said, a growing flock of budget hawks are already showing their talons. They will have their day — but please, not yet.
The budget hawks that Blinder is referring to are most likely Republican Congressmen. Through eight years of Bush spending excesses they did nothing (besides Ron Paul). They have more in common with vultures than hawks. Let's get that insult into the lexicon - hypocritical Republican budget hawks shall now be referred to as vultures.
To avoid a replay of the policy disasters of 1936-37, both the Fed and our elected officials must stay the course. Mark Twain once explained that, while history does not repeat itself, it often rhymes. We don’t want any rhymes just now.
At this point you most likely realize that I completely disagree with Dr. Blinder's view. What he is arguing is thus:
In situation A, we enacted policy B which lead to outcome C. Because outcome C was bad, we want to avoid policy B. Therefore, in situation A2 (somewhat similar to A), we will enact policy Y which will lead to outcome Z. Because Y is different from B (different policy), Z must be better than C (better outcome).
In reality, all Dr. Blinder is guaranteeing is that Z must be different from C (different outcome). Different does not mean better! He has refuted none of the inflationary warnings being fired by dissenters.
In the end, Dr. Blinder has nothing to worry about in regards to a repeat of 1936. I have little doubt that any such tough fiscal and monetary policies will be enacted. I mean, really, does he honestly think that Obama will try to balance the budget any time soon? No chance there.
The outcome of this economic crisis will not be 1936. It could be better and it could be worse. A lot worse. Read this description of the hyperinflation episode in Weimar Germany in the 1920s. In that context, maybe FDR made the right choice in 1936. Of course, we will never know what could have been we only know what happened. I have been on the inflationary/deflationary fence for quite some time now but I think I am ready to jump off and lump myself in with the inflationists. Any deflationists care to offer an opposing view?
Like there's the slightest worry that fiscal discipline will prevail. I mean really, we didn't get that structural deficit beng responsible with money.
2x+ good...
mmckinl,
Imagine getting into a line that was 30 people long, only inquiring as to what the store had to offer after a place in line had been secured, and then 20 minutes later getting the chance to buy canned turnips.
That's what communism was like.
How's that compare with your American experience so far?
I'd prefer to just borrow for ever... hey its worked this long...
CR,
Why are we fighting the last war?
Guess the depression is a "jagged L"?
C
people stand in line for concert tickets and wiis, thats worse than a soup line
This was for the last thread, but I'll toss it in here anyway.. a little thread music lubrication..
YouTube -
Arbitrage_Macht_Frei,
Power without accountability will always corrupt, whether you are a bankster or a government official.
So, we are trying to compare trying to score Rolling Stones tickets or the latest greatest video game, to a can of turnips?
blinder is a keynesian shill already trying to postion himself for when this program fails as it will. partison politics at ists best. Pathetic
TPTB will never have to 'withdraw liquidity' or suck up excess cash out of circulation. It's all fiat now. Currencies can die, and this one is getting sicker.
Blinder had better worry about 31-32 first !
Lucifer, must you always speak in platitudes?
Nice to see you back, C !
Yeah, one would think that today's debt monkey is not just "orders of magnitude" worse today, but an entirely different animal. Debt is not heroin here, it's oxygen.
Arbitrage_Macht_Frei (profile) wrote on Sat, 5/16/2009 - 3:10 pm
~~~~
The most likely scenario is a mild version of Russia AFTER the dissolution ...
but I get your point ...
i've read the rumors that the metals ETFs may not have, or not be able to procure, all the metal they are supposed to have to match the insane quantity of share purchases. it seems likely they don't, especially when you find the usual pm manipulators guarding the vaults. the size of these ETFs makes them dominant players in the market. you gotta wonder with the millions of ounces being added all the time to GLD and SLV why the spot price is not reacting more strongly. seems that the pm not being bought is a very possible answer. now the flip side, when the market continues it's dive and people need cash for bills, they will sell these etfs right away. i suspect that mass redemptions in GLD and SLV shares will have an asymmetric effect on the spot price compared to the same price movement on the upside.
blocks of shares, once created, are not destroyed in the same proportion on a downward price movement as when bought (and created) on the way up.
If PM ETFs are just a scam sponge to sop up all the investment demand for pm. this diversion not only suppresses the pm price now but could be used to absolutely crush it short term through the undermining of faith in the ETF itself, causing a run on the etf, and subsequent massive gold sales/shorts. seems to me if there was a sharp loss in confidence in the ETFs they (the shares, not the metal) would be clearly be sold. this selling would have to be matched by actual selling of PM. if the ETFs are run as advertised.
ultimately, though, an unraveling of a ponzi etf would cause a scramble for physical PM..
The ETFs are not gold, they are stock certificates. It is the supply and demand of these certificates that determines the share value, not the underlying. They only track the underlying according to how well the managers of the funds have set up the ETFs.
barfly,
The current situation is reminiscent of the 1930s, but a lot is also different today. We cannot fight the last war.. this is a different war. We can use what we learned before, but we should not constrain our efforts to what worked before.
mmckinl,
You need to study up a bit. I recommend "Re-inventing Collapse" by Dmitri Orlov.
Ya otis even though I hold DBC and GSG I think the best thing is to have some of the real thing in a vault... I always liked the Maple Leaf the best - one of the prettiest coins ever... it doesnt hurt to have a few ...
Anak,
but fiscal conservatives seem to ignore our current reality.
// Debt is not heroin here, it's oxygen.//
If there was never anything in the ETF vaults, how would that cause the price of all the actual metal above ground to drop?
The people that played digital metals get their fingers burned and lose everything.
Man, if they don't close a bank on Friday, everybody here gets cranky.
Blinder is just setting up the pretexts for not ever reducing government spending. This time the Keynesians are ready to go all the way no matter the cost.
everybody cranky - it's a really slow news day too - we dont have much to discuss so we wind up arguing theory which always has a bad end...
I read of 2 more Ponzi schemes in Cali, one for $440 Million and another one, a heavy-construction-equipment leasing company for a paltry $150 million.
Expect to see many more of these...
Arbitrage_Macht_Frei,
440 million and 150 million.. amateurs!!
millions - pfffft
there does appear to be an inordinate level of verbal masturbation today.
Arbitrage_Macht_Frei,
A quadrillion of notional contracts.. now that is more like a real ponzi scheme.
the big boys are the only ones who can redeem ETF shares for the underlying commodity. so should i assume that everyone else (essentially everyone) cannot and their trades are just matched by brokers like stocks. so, except for the special exception of redemptions by say JPM and HSBC, shares do not come out of the float when sold.
what incentive do the big boys have to redeem shares for metal in a declining price environment. Seems to me they would rather have the cash if the metal price is expected to go down. I don't have any faith in the big boys just keeping the ETF float normalized out of the goodness of their hearts. besides, they can take delivery from comex.
it is hard to reconcile close tracking of the PM spot price with an ever increasing float. this implies that the share price tracking the underlying is a matter of faith, a psychological phenomena. eventually, the share price must depart, and fall, from the spot price because of the constant increase in supply of the shares.
if the etf departed from the spot by a large amount to the downside it could be seen as throwing off a forecast. the false impression that the etf is predicting the PM market would quickly become self reinforcing due to the over supplied shares getting sold off.
it is also easy to see that most people would mistake an issue of oversupply of shares for a price forecast inherent in the difference between the share and spot. this is where things would self perpetuate. people believe the religion that the free market finds the right price with the help of invisible hands, even though they could easily understand that it is supply and demand that determine market price.
along these lines, backwardation could be caused by a loss of confidence in the futures markets expressed as lower prices for futures instruments. this loss of confidence and reduced demand for futures contracts could trick bugs by falsely signaling something they have been waiting years to see.
one thing is for certain. the price is manipulated downward, which means it is on sale.
i believe that the primary purpose of most ETFs, particularly the ultras and PM shares, is to divert real buying or selling demand from the underlying commodity or sector.
history will call them a scam.
Diablo,
I was almost embarrassed to bring them up, such penny-ante stuff.
Ya next generation is going to be saying "Trillions - pfffft"
Arbitrage_Macht_Frei,
do you remember the first austin powers movie.. "one million dollars!!"
Anak - thanks, trust the fragrant harbour is treating you well.
Last thread, Outsider asked what happens when SovBKCorp or other entity which appears royally skrood and well in line for the grim embrace of FDIC, but which is owned by a foreign entity, finally reaches the point of irredeemable insolvency.
Ta da! SWAPLINES!
Yes, this means that the Fed is printing / generating bytes for furriners too.
C
:: ::
AMF - the apparatchiks in the USSR didn't just get turnips, they got pretty nice dachas if I recall & vacations down along the Black Sea.
Meanwhile the Heroes of Labor kept digging coal out in the Kolyma because they thought that maybe someday there would be more in it for them than that can of turnips. When that lie was exposed hell breaking out wasn't far behind.
Now fast forward to some hellish hot Vegas tract home 'community'... they too though there was more in it for them... thought they had moved right into it... but that wasn't to be as we know know.
Similar to the Soviet model our apparatchiks live in nice Manhattan equivalents of dachas [or better analogy - dachas in the Hampton's] and are getting bailed out by the 'party' to boot as we speak while the Heroes of Labor wait in the 'turnip line' and hope they are lucky enough to keep their place back out in the coal mine.
Now is it a surprise that a lot of our 'HOLs' believe maybe they got a similar lie? Are real pissed and maybe not going to go to the wall to save those in the dachas with the most to lose?
I realize the absolute material levels are different between the two systems but the emotions are the same and those are what tear societies apart.
Adolf thought that imaginary divisions were going to save the day as the Reich was crumbling, and now we think imaginary division will work for us...
You need to study up a bit. I recommend "Re-inventing Collapse" by Dmitri Orlov.
~~~~
I've read his work ...
The US is in much better shape than the USSR was then ...
What we likely see is a police state not a dissolution of state ...
One quadrillion = 10 ^15
The Avogadro number = 6.022 141 79(30) × 10^23
Planck's constant = 6.626068 × 10^-34 m2 kg / s
I think there were some demonstrations out at the big shot's estates....
so maybe the government somewhere down the line nationalizes the pm ETFs to "protect investors,"" forcing them to wait to settle in hyperinflating cash and through force majeure confiscates the (real or contrived) mountain of metal.
FDR made it illegal to own gold in 1933.
nixon ended gold convertibility to dollars.
check out this video of him blaming it on currency traders.
video of Nixon
As I walked around Greenlake, it suddenly struck me... no, not a woman's hand but a thought. The Federal Reserve can be viewed as a wealth tax. That is, it acts as an averager which elminates the stagnant effects of long-term wealth accumulation, syndrome of "the Idle Rich".
The first generation passes its debts to the second, the second to the third.
The third collapses under the accumulated weight of sixty-seventy years.
By reducing interest rates on paper assets, the Fed is essentially smoothing wealth peaks down and pushing money from the first generation to the third.
I have to admit, it is pretty damn amazing to see how normal things still appear.
This Starbucks is packed.
dryfly,
My point.. for a long time. We have the internet now.. so events might occur faster.
// When that lie was exposed hell breaking out wasn't far behind.//
The thing that got us out of the Depression was a huge build out of machinery and the establishment of the M-I complex IMO. The FED won't and can't pull back this time. There is nothing to replace that liquidity. China will take years to grow their domestic economy so China pulling the West out of this in the near term 5-6 years is off the table.
mmckinl,
What will we pay police in? beyond a year or two, we will require a real economy of some sort.
//What we likely see is a police state not a dissolution of state//
mmckinl,
Nobody really "owned" anything in the Soviet Union, as opposed to here where most everything & everybody is owned.
A very critical difference.
broward,
I have been saying that for some time.. inflation screws over the rich more than the poor.
"Power without accountability will always corrupt"
I know that PG&E and Southern California Edison have accounting departments but...
they're corrupt, anyway.
broward apparently people arent out of money yet... My wife says the high end places are still full of people - Whole Foods, etc... Are you brave enough to ask the people in Starbucks how many are not making their mortgage payments or credit card payments?
I'm beginning to think that we're not going to see the liquidity withdrawn or the budget deficit addressed any time soon.
It's just a feeling, but I find myself unconvinced that we're going to see policy changes like that until there is a change in the administration or congress, or some big external push.
If the Chinese wanted to upset the apple cart, they could have already done so. So I conclude that they do not intend to.
Unless there is a Republican takeover of Congress in the mid-term elections, I don't expect much to come from there other than tinkering with the spending programs to suit their political needs. And the odds of a Republican takeover of Congress any time soon are almost non-existent. Since there is no hope for third parties, the Democrats will be running things at least until the end of Obama's first term.
Addressing the budget deficit can be done in one of two ways: increase revenue or cut spending.
I don't think it's possible to increase government revenue significantly at this point, because the economy is weak and we're too far up the Laffer curve already. And cutting spending is beyond unlikely - in fact, spending looks like it's going to rise. And when was the last time our government actually cut spending overall?
So I consider it unlikely that the budget deficit will be addressed, other than rhetorically.
Numbers of stars in the milky way.. 200 to 400 Billion
eventually, the share price must depart, and fall, from the spot price because of the constant increase in supply of the shares. ~otis,
are they constantly issuing new shares?
Actually, thus far Obama has been a carbon copy of FDR- his reforms have been very moderate- though the far right call him a socialist, well they called FDR that as well.
The analogy by Blinder is certainly possible.
I just got 45K in 5 minutes over the phone on my 2 BofA credit cards at 2% till next march, no credit freeze in my wallet. Foreclosures here are going for 30K and I'm trying to pick one up. If I don't flip the house in time to pay back the bank, do I still get to keep the house? I still have a lot more credit card money left to tap and invest with and will probably be maxing them out as well. What do you think?
What will we pay police in? beyond a year or two, we will require a real economy of some sort.
//What we likely see is a police state not a dissolution of state//
~~~~~
We will have a real economy ... just smaller than it is now ...
Debt will have to be destroyed or inflated away ... and even now debt is being destroyed ...
The question is how far we go down this "Trickle Down" road ....
I have been saying that for some time.. inflation screws over the rich more than the poor.
This is not true rich people depend on assets increasing in value. Who owns most of the art, Real estate, and brand equity?
Inflation makes the salary of the wage slave worth less.
When Obama was campaigning I was encouraged that he said he would go over the federal budget and eliminate wasteful and fraudulent programs... So far no dice though... I didnt think the congress would be able to say no to him if he wanted to eliminate something useless...
Nobody really "owned" anything in the Soviet Union, as opposed to here where most everything & everybody is owned.
A very critical difference.
~~~~
Agreed ... that's why there will be less chaos here ...
But it will be nasty ... no doubt ... at least by American standards ...
If you were China and wanted to set in motion the financial future for the next 100 years, you'd be in no rush to make changes, especially as the only competitor on the world's stage was imploding before your very eyes.
Remember when we defiantly told China they couldn't buy Chevron Oil?
Do you think we'd sell it to them today?
" Are you brave enough to ask the people in Starbucks how many are not making their mortgage payments or credit card payments?"
It's Greenlake, it's mostly students and pseudo-bohemian types.
Plus... Seattle is different.
And what would it matter if they're not paying their mortgage or credit card?
We know those things are optional now!
sm_landlord (profile) wrote on Sat, 5/16/2009 - 3:40 pm
Addressing the budget deficit can be done in one of two ways: increase revenue or cut spending.
I don't think it's possible to increase government revenue significantly at this point, because the economy is weak and we're too far up the Laffer curve already. And cutting spending is beyond unlikely - in fact, spending looks like it's going to rise. And when was the last time our government actually cut spending overall?
So I consider it unlikely that the budget deficit will be addressed, other than rhetorically.
Everything I see the Feds trying to do have already been tried in California with the obvious results. The only tool left is the printing press. Think they'll not print just because they know it isn't a good idea? We saw how that worked with TARP voting.
Blinder is just setting up the pretexts for not ever reducing government spending. This time the Keynesians are ready to go all the way no matter the cost.
No - it's that they don't have an answer what to do next.
Neither do the Austrians. Not really.
Austrians say 'let shit happen' markets work - but if the shit gets bad as it frequently does it tears society apart and then they are SURPRISED the public demands intervention [theoretical starving doesn't sound as bad as actual starving is]... if we are lucky the intervention is minor like FDR in the 30s. If not lucky the intervention is major & quite irreversible like USSR or Nazi Germany. Complete regime change.
In democracies we rarely let it get 'that bad' so we usually get a Keynesian-like intervention... and when they try to 'back it down' or reduce the 'intervention' so as to avoid 'permanent addiction' .. everyone all screams 1936!!! because it will start to 'hurt' again.
Ya well withdrawal hurts.
There is really no good painless answer.
In the 70's when we had big inflation the winners were people who held real assets such as real estate - losers were on fixed income... I still think you need to hold all asset classes because no one is very accurate at picking the winners and losers... you can change your allocation but over the long haul a more or less equal allocation among classes probably works as well as anything...
Not only must the US withdraw the liquidity and address the budgets, it must pull back the guarantees, too. Unlike the last time around, this time they thought it was smarter to backstop the failures than to deal with the problems.
About the time inflation starts to look like a problem is about when the state government defaults should be in full force.
"i believe that the primary purpose of most ETFs, particularly the ultras and PM shares, is to divert real buying or selling demand from the underlying commodity or sector."
What purpose would that serve? If the ETFs stop tracking the underlying holdings, they would have to be abandoned, since no one could know what they actually were tracking.
Your criticism of ETFs would be better applied to the futures contracts. Some of those appear to be actually rigged in the sense that they are disconnected from the underlying commodity - Silver, for example, as discussed earlier this year.
RD and then as you said, Mr. Bond might have to weigh in ....
"The only tool left is the printing press"
Is the Dawg piling into treasuries?
I watched the SARS outbreak closely. I'm half convinced that the Internet did more to contain it than anything else. Likewise, I think the swine flu might be contained the same way. I'm not sure that the latency of stock markets has been affected much but as I walked along today, I wondered if there's some sort of effect, call it global consciousness for lack of a creative term, in that the emotional and current-event context of large numbers of people are more synchronized than in the past.
I'm still trying to figure out the "green shoot" effect. I believe it's MSM-driven but I have no evidence of a gov't conspiracy. It appears that the "green shoots' meme appeared much earlier, even before Obama took office but laid at a low level for awhile. It doesn't have the signature of an over-driven meme but... perhaps the perpetrators are much more skilled at impedance-balancing the push than I've seen before.
mmckinl,
Lots of things are "owned" in America, but precious few of them free and clear.
At some point, the Fed will have to withdraw liquidity, and the Congress will have to address govt deficits.
And at some point, we are all dead. With influential people like Alan Blinder, along with Ben Bernanke, Larry Summers, and practically every economist out there, advancing the theory that recessions can be avoided or significantly mitigated by more govt spending, the only question is how much more than it should will govt spending and the money supply grow.
Does anyone here honestly believe that the amount of cheap easy money, or of govt spending, will be shrunk before inflation has been allowed to transfer significant amounts of real wealth?
Like any other natural mechanism, our system will eventually self-correct, or at last reach a new equilibrium. But people like Alan Blinder will ensure that a major inflation lies between us and the next equilibrium.
Remember when we defiantly told China they couldn't buy Chevron Oil?
Do you think we'd sell it to them today?
===
I think it was Unocal, but the question remains interesting. Sway. Not imponderable, but close.
Nobody really "owned" anything in the Soviet Union, as opposed to here where most everything & everybody is owned.
In the USSR the state owned most peoples homes, property, etc. The party apparatchiks ran the state.
In the USA most homes are TECHNICALLY owned by individuals... but are so levered that in fact the bank owns them - or at least owns liens to them. Foreclosures reinforce that reality daily. It appears our party is the 'banker party' and their apparatchiks run the state.
Now again who owns what where? And how is our average hero of labor going to tell the difference?
What if they are wrong? What if, due to technological advances among other variables, we are a much more efficient society than we were during the Great Depression or during the 70's? What if those who are most pessimistic about our economy are incorrect?
"Lots of things are "owned" in America, but precious few of them free and clear."
~~~~~
30% of the houses, supposedly there are trillions on the sidelines, I myself am cash or
less than 1yr treas ...
Blinder is talking his book and obviously shilling for endowment-linked TARP funds:
Universities Addicted To Endowments: The Curse of Hoarded Treasure
Universities Addicted To Endowments: The Curse of Hoarded Treasure
Now that Harvard is expecting a roughly $11 billion endowment decline over the current academic year--30% of the total--the university is in such a financial squeeze that it has frozen faculty salaries and offered early retirement to 1,600 employees. Princeton is even more addicted to its endowment, which provides about 45% of its operating budget. Princeton Provost Christopher Eisgruber warned in February: "We are beginning to live in the 'new normal' and we should not expect to go back to how we operated in the last 10 years."
Do you think we'd sell it to them today?
At a 50% discount and give them all the voting rights they wanted... if they waffled we throw in Chrysler & GM as a bonus - almost like a TV infomercial... And there is MORE!!!
"What if, due to technological advances among other variables, we are a much more efficient society"
Efficiency isn't the issue.
The issue is several things but a big one is distribution of work, which is a proxy for distribution of income.
The Federal Gov't and globalization are two large disassociation engines, tearing "benefits" apart from "costs", harvesting benefits and tossing "costs" back into the corn field. I suspect they've been very "efficient" at this.
patientrenter
We are no where near inflation ...
They are printing Zombie money for Zombie banks ...
All this money is is a place holder with zeroes ...
until it gets into the real economy ....
Trickle Down doesn't work ... unless you are a bankster ...
You cannot put life into something that is DEAD.....unless you are THE ALMIGHTY. This thing is toast and we are witnessing a slow degeneration into madness, starting with the working class. The poor and wealthy feel it very little because the poor are used to it and the wealthy are still well off. The middle man has had the rug pulled out from under him and we are still in the falling stage. When they finally "hit bottom"....is when all Hades will break loose. I fear for my Country because we are NOT a people to accept a police state. This could turn out to be one of the darkest days of our Republic since the Civil War and the Civil Rights Movement. I do not think it will be economic suffering that will tear us apart but the principals and social morality of bailouts for the rich and taxing the middle class that will cause people to turn on each other. Everyone knows we should help the poor and the "system" for the benefit of the whole but at what cost to the middle class? What we are seeing transpire is certain death to the entirety of what is left of the middle class. That ladies and gentlemen, will be akin to that movie Gangs of New York where it is dog eat dog. I pray for our Nation and it's leaders but I am afraid that is just not enough. Leadership has to take ownership over the power grab and mistakes made by BOTH political parties over the last 50 years.
What complexities of 1936 did the average person encounter in an average day?
Radio, Cars, Refrigerator, Airplanes, Trains, Telephones & Telegraph, etc.
How's that compare with the average person's complexities today?
if you don't think ETFs divert buying and selling from their underlying consider this
StreetInsider.com - Bank Stocks and ETFs Encompass 41% Of Today's NYSE Volume
small landlord,
i am only speculating on the integrity of ETFs.
i might do some deeper research on the subject or just watch for a confirmatory disconnect between the shares and spot.
honestly, i'm truly tired of finance. the scams and deceit are infuriating. can't wait for it to collapse. it is lonely, soul crushing, gut wrenching work.
can't even tell people you are a trader. they either hate you instantly or think you have a gambling problem.
heard about a tofu factory for sale...
broward (homepage, profile) wrote on Sat, 5/16/2009 - 3:52 pm reply Ignore user
"The only tool left is the printing press"
Is the Dawg piling into treasuries?
I am giving serious consideration to the other half of Jas' balanced portfolio. I'll be in Montreal in a few weeks. What was it you said? Argent is French for money? US paper for Canadian 1/10ths, halfs and full Maple Leafs. Deal.
"How's that compare with the average person's complexities today?"
AMF, argh, I'm actually trying to do some work for once, and now you're going to get me started.
How the city hurts your brain - The Boston Globe
It's a long story but over the past few years, I've concluded that most people are operating close to the maximum sustainable bandwidth in terms of brainpower. One of the effects of the credit cycle is that as people produce more in the same space of time, they're forced to consume faster in their remaining time. Think about how frantic the 1990s were.
That's bandwidth overload.
Now imagine that people have bandwidth quality-of-service.
What might people jettison to make room for incoming bandwidth?
I suspect that the ability to "rationalize markets and value" might take a hit, which would feed into a Optimistically Deluded Meme. Yes?
This chick is driving me crazy. She's talking terrorists, torture, Marxism, ,spacial art, novels, she's an 35-year-old big-blue-eyed, bohemian type and now she's TALKING TOO LOUD to distract me, I think it's on purpose. Begone! Begone, witch! I'm busy!
The world of 1936 and today are certainly different- the economic aspects are similair- the end results of an asset financial bubble burst.
Do you think we'd sell it to them today?
At a 50% discount and give them all the voting rights they wanted... if they waffled we throw in Chrysler & GM as a bonus - almost like a TV infomercial... And there is MORE!!!
dryfly pegs the mordacity meter!
Nah, when the siamese twins start fighting over their shared liver, true sailing is dead. Can't say it wouldn't happen someday, but I think they're forced to bide their time, which is something they've managed wisely to do so far...
Doc, I never looked on endowments as a negative. Particularly in a university setting.
There's the matter of how they're invested, of course, and I'm aware equity markets are deep in malinvestment at present. Do you see endowments as 'addictions' as HuffPo evidently does? Or in their case is it an ideology talking?
just curious if anyone has any thoughts on what will be the likely consequences of a strike by israel vs. iran. particularly with respect toimplications on oil. not trying to start any political strife here! no, if it happens (rightly or wrongly) what are the ramifications?
lucifer, loved your comment on global warming & vanity in the last thread....
dryfly,
Very few Americans travel overseas (85% don't have a passport) and precious few got to see communism in it's prime, and I was fortunate to see it up-close and personal as a young adult.
It was a eye-opening experience, and it was painfully obvious to me in the early 1980's that it couldn't last, but somehow it lasted until 1989.
"heard about a tofu factory for sale... "
LOL
35-year-old big-blue-eyed, bohemian type....
Come on BH, you've got to have the bandwidth for that! But I agree we have a real luxury challenging our available consciousness with various what if scenarios. Much of the world around me is dealing with immediate, all too vital concerns.
" I'll be in Montreal in a few weeks."
An interesting thing I tested many years ago is Kitco's metal investment pool. You send them cash and theoretically they hold an equivalent amount of metal on hand. Since Kitco is located in Canada, taxation on profits is your responsibility.
Just saying.
"Come on BH, you've got to have the bandwidth for that"
She's definitely interesting.
I like a woman who and throw me over her shoulder and carry me around, though.
Seattle GF is too much fun.
just curious if anyone has any thoughts on what will be the likely consequences of a strike by israel vs. iran.
particularly with respect toimplications on oil.
~~~~
oil skyrockets as does the dollar ...
recreating another oct-nov-dec cascade in economic activity ...
Man, I'm just not into this today.
Out to walk around the lake again.
Later.
Dawg wrote:
US paper for Canadian 1/10ths, halfs and full Maple Leafs. Deal.
Gold Maple Leafs are very nice coins, 24K. However, I like the alloyed coins better, the Krugerrand and American Eagle because they are harder and meant to be handled. You still get same amount of gold, just 22K with copper in the case of the Krug, and copper + silver in the Eagle. I like to handle the stuff and 24K is rather soft and prone to dent. All just personal preference.
What complexities of 1936 did the average person encounter in an average day?
1936 was some of the toughest years of the depression - coincided with the dust bowl. My father was born in the early 1920s - mid to late 1930s he was in middle school & high school - he remembered and told me about those times often. He lived on the northern edge of the great plains and while his area didn't blow away... it could be seen overhead and in the neighborhood as people farther west abandoned farms and moved in with families in the city who had jobs. Two of his uncles lived with them at that time in a small house [600 sq ft] - I believe ten of them lived in that two bedroom home... my father & his brother shared a temporary 'bedroom' thrown together on the porch. 1936 was one of the hottest summers [in the 100s] and coldest winters [minus 30] in Minnesota history to this day. It was miserable out on that porch all summer & winter but at least they ate - his father had a job... paid less than half what he was making pre-1929 but it was something. That fed, clothed and heated the home for all ten of them.
And of course that was the summer of the 1936 Olympics - followed by the war later.
1936 has a lot of emotional baggage associated with it. In many ways it is 'unfair' and not useful to compare our dilemma today to theirs back then but obviously the caparisons will be made anyway.
mmckinl,
that's pretty much what i was thinking....
thanks for your thoughts.
Why would you go to the great white north to buy coins you could buy here much easier, without hassles of GST and having to declare them as you cross the border?
I guess i'm not surprised considering who's making this fool's errand...
1936 ?
I say we have 1931-1932 ahead of us ...
but I guess Blinder couldn't say that ...
too much truth to handle ...
AMT,
That was Chevron buying Unocal where the Chinese got shut down...just sayin'
This "general equilibrium" determines the relative prices of goods and services and labor of all kinds, and the output of each kind of good or service and thus the RGDP.
NAIRU
The rate of unemployment at which inflation neither speeds up nor slows down.
When RDGP is more than the NAIRGDP, inflation tends to speed up;
The dilemma is: if the monetary policy does not accommodate shifts in FC ( Friedman Curve) there will be unemployment and human misery, perhaps on a large scale. On the other hand, accommodating monetary policy merely puts off the unemployment and misery, since the inflationary expectations will prove to be self-fulfilling prophesies and the inflationary spiral will just continue with no foreseeable end, if it is accommodated.
Also see: Friedman denied that there is a permanent trade-off between inflation and unemployment, as suggested by the so-called Phillips curve. He argued that there is a ‘natural rate of employment’, determined by structural and institutional forces in the labour market, such as trade unions, unemployment compensation, and the costs of moving house, which governments are powerless to alter solely by monetary and fiscal policies.
hong konger (profile) wrote on Sat, 5/16/2009 - 4:15 pm
"heard about a tofu factory for sale... "
LOL"""
i know, right?
anything sounds better than living in econo mental space...
but seriously there are some family ties to the business and they have decent regional distribution and a growing brand. it is on a long established large communal farm that is experiencing an influx of (highly vetted) residents due to the collapse. surrounding land is fairly cheap. not just anyone could even buy it and owning it would provide instant long term survivability if SHTF.
broward (homepage, profile) wrote on Sat, 5/16/2009 - 4:16 pm reply Ignore user
" I'll be in Montreal in a few weeks."
An interesting thing I tested many years ago is Kitco's metal investment pool. You send them cash and theoretically they hold an equivalent amount of metal on hand. Since Kitco is located in Canada, taxation on profits is your responsibility.
Just saying.
Why, now that you mention it... I do seem to remember something about that. Jus' sayin'.
Comrade Coinz also has a good point. Leafs are for transacting in envelopes not for spending. Too delicate.
dryfly,
I remember reading a story about a Canadian merchant marine that went back and forth to the UK during the 1930's, and he said it wasn't uncommon for the skies in Liverpool to be brownish from topsoil that had previously been on the ground in Canada and the USA.
you can scratch maples with your fingernail.
small weights are available in maples though, not so much in other brands.
apmex.com
I remember reading a story about a Canadian merchant marine that went back and forth to the UK during the 1930's, and he said it wasn't uncommon for the skies in Liverpool to be brownish from topsoil that had previously been on the ground in Canada and the USA.
Yup. It really happened. But that wasn't FDR's fault but the misery the crop failures caused was pinned on him & the Fed and their 'economic' decisions.
And of course - something like 30-40% of Americans were still on the farm or in farm communities - it affected them directly. I really don't know if economist ever correctly 'decoupled' the dust bowl effect from the 'monetary tightening'... but regardless the mid thirties sucked.
Wondering if the withdrawal of liquidity is some kind of basic politico-economic meme. Remember how increasing its VAT and introducing a consumption tax in 1997 affected Japan.
Be aware that tofu making is very labor intensive-- and least the good stuff.
Usually it's a husband wife team where the fellow gets up before dawn to make it, and the wife peddles it during the day as he sleeps. This allows for impropriety in social relations, which has led to the Chinese expression "Eat Tofu" as being synomous with a man taking advantage of an unaccompanied woman (usually verbally). Just saying be careful about your alternative lifestyle choices . . .
burnside,
Endowments should be mechanisms to store surplus cash for future wants, thus they rely on long-term planning versus short -term casino plays. I think a lot of universities were like the majority of most entities and people that got out of control and focused on micro-managing short term casino chips. Everyone collectively lost focus, as if everyone had lotto fever. The interesting thing about a recession or depression is related to this stuff I was toying with related to marginal costs, i.e, higher input costs reduce the incentives for expansion, thus we as a society are going to fall backwards and re-boot, as we re-engineer all labor costs, housing costs, transportation and GDP. Society is on the edge of massive social and economic changes, so getting back to endowments, one can only hope that schools will still allow the lower classes to have opportunities to be educated, versus allowing the upper classes to re-invent The Next American Order (NAO). As such, the endowments will be less valuable and there will be fewer opportunities for all and the nature of risk will be re-thought by everyone.
I remember reading a story about a Canadian merchant marine that went back and forth to the UK during the 1930's, and he said it wasn't uncommon for the skies in Liverpool to be brownish from topsoil that had previously been on the ground in Canada and the USA.
Name the greatest natural disaster in US history.
You'd think it would be an earthquake or hurricane.
It was the drought of 1934.
ETFs sound like another derivative to me.
What's the big deal with gold anyway? It's fairly rare, can be pounded really thin, it's heavy, it doesn't corrode and it conducts electricity really well. And it reflects light well in certain glass applications
It's too soft and heavy to really be used structurally. Basically it's non-toxic lead.
doug r (profile) wrote on Sat, 5/16/2009 - 4:42 pm reply Ignore user
It's too soft and heavy to really be used structurally. Basically it's non-toxic lead.
Three things. You can't easily counterfeit it. Enough people accept it as having enduring value. The third is new. The US Fed appears hellbent on destroying the US Dollar. You know the saying, you can't fight the Fed.
I read this post and initially thought: "so, we've been down this road before and everything ended up just fine." Then, I remembered the rest of the story. The economy collapsed back into depression in 1938. Hitler invaded Poland in 1939. In 1941, the Japanese bombed Pearl Harder. 70 million dead souls , nazi genocide, concentration camps, and two nuclear detonations later and the world was forever changed.
It's hard to decouple the end of the depression from World War 2. True, the relationship may be one of correlation instead of causation. However, it would pretty damned well hard to know how things would have turned out had that little conflict not taken place.
Anak, re: Aerial photos in last thread
The False Creek area did go from industrial to residential/light commercial on the water front. I don't know what used to be there in the 60s but isn't now other than saw mills. But it is just a creek and was never large enough to handle large ships. Those rail lines are a staging yard where they get the cars lined up in order and are still there today. There are 3 main harbors in the metro area, 1 in Burrard inlet which is the water north of the downtown peninsula, 1 wide open one to the south in Delta, and one in Richmond between the two. If you want to check out the stats of cargo shipped it's there in table form.
Thanks EHP. The link on Aleksandr Yakovlev was actually a lot more intersting than cargo stats ! You are a man of catholic interests.
Anak,
What is "a man of catholic interests"?
Yakolev was an interesting thread in the tapestry, haven't read the book itself yet but I will. It's nice to know that there always remain practical people who can't help but thinking independently
catholic (lower case): wide, broad, varied, diverse.
EHP, what Burnside said. Plus you show more energy than just about anybody I've encounered on line or off !
"Like a diabetic junkie camping out at a fast food takeout counter, President Obama, after increasing government debt and borrowing close to fourfold, says the debt and borrowing that are on his tab are not sustainable. And then pledges to bail out insurance companies, for no reason that anyone can seem to fathom, and to prop up the municipal bonds markets, after ensuring the death of those very markets himself with the announcement of the issuance of mind-boggling amounts of federal bonds.
Everything that still functions to a degree in the US now runs on government hand-outs, bail-outs and guarantees. Everything. That's it. And I’m not kidding here. Take out government support for banks, home purchases, car loans and all the rest, and you would be looking at a barren lunar economic landscape. And things are getting visibly worse every single day. GM and Chrysler may or may not come out of bankruptcy proceedings, their present predicaments are sure to cost millions of jobs this year alone. Those losses will be added up on top of the millions more in non-car-related firings, and there will come a point, and soon, when something breaks in the chain that cannot be mended easily, if it can at all.
America has been consuming a lot more than it has been producing for years now. What makes today stand out from what has been before is that what we are now witnessing is that the consequences of overconsumption are starting to further deplete production, and with a vengeance. The government is losing its grip at lightning speed, even though you would of course never know from their public utterances. Don't underestimate the possibility that they have reached the same conclusion that people like Stoneleigh and I did quite a while ago, that there is no way back, no recovery anywhere is sight. If that were so, and you would be in their shoes, what would you do?
I can tell you what their choice is: keep up the semblance of normality as long as possible, while behind the curtains frantic efforts are taking place to save and safeguard as much as possible for themselves and their own people. And no, you are not among their own people, you are not Obama's people. To know whose people you are, look around you in your homes, your towns and your families. "
~ The Automatic Earth
"If I wanted to destroy a nation," he wrote in 1966, "I would give it too much and I would have it on its knees, miserable, greedy and sick."
- John Steinbeck
Prescient....YES !
Grapes of Wrath, a classic for today?
BBC NEWS | Americas | Grapes of Wrath, a classic for today?
Sorry to say Obamanomics is going to fail because today's America is too far down the black hole of debt.
1) The projected budget deficit for 2009 is $2 trillion
2) The debt-drowned United States debt is already 350 percent of G.D.P and rising fast i.e. $53 Trillion in unfunded liabilities )
3) The Fed is now holding $10 Trillion of ‘assets’ ( mostly toxic ) transferred from too big to fail banks.
4) Other countries are now buying less of our debt
anak,
yep, probably just another crazy idea.
otishertz (profile) wrote on Sat, 5/16/2009 - 3:44 pm
i've read the rumors that the metals ETFs may not have, or not be able to procure, all the metal they are supposed to have to match the insane quantity of share purchases.
If you go on the GLD website, you will see that they do two bar counts each year: a full bar count at year-end and a statistical sample count in the during the year. INSPECTORATE did there sample count as of March 29, 2009. The INSPECTORATE report on the sample count is posted on the website.
The rumors are bullshit.
If you want to worry, then worry that the stocks and bonds that you think you own actually exist. Since the industry went to dematerialization a dozen years ago, stocks and bonds exist only as ledger entries at DTCC or the Treasury.
At least with gold, there is something physical to count.
Otis, my brother actually grows soybeans and don't think I haven't given this some thought, at least as a "plan 9". I'd just have to trust my better half, Mrs. Krakatau, as I do anyway....lol
Re the gold ETF... I've read the prospectus a dozen times and still can't be absolutely sure what the fund holds, exactly.
If you can't be sure, then it's probably safe to assume the worst.
I'd feel a lot better if there was a clear statement to the effect of "You may exchange 10 shares for one ounce of physical gold. "
That, plus taxing it at the collectibles rate, makes it a pretty onerous hold outside of an IRA.
"withdraw liquidity"
that means sell crap.
CR,
Blinder is simply positioning himself for the failure that he can now see is coming. He and others like him- Krugman, DeLong, etc.- will simply say that their insane spend/borrow policies were not taken seriously enough.
....the house is burning and everyone is discussing the color of the drapes. Do some here just not see the flames? Do they think they will be extinguished by a timely rain? How important is discussion of breakfast tomorrow while the kitchen is ready to explode in conflagration? I just don't get it.
Blinder is doing nothing but respond to the NYTimes piece that said "only 6% of the stimulus has been spent and the stock market / initial claims prove that the recession is already over but we don't know it yet"
Old men don't stir unless you poke them
Name the greatest natural disaster in US history.
You'd think it would be an earthquake or hurricane.
It was the drought of 1934.
That and the Great Mississippi River Flood of '28(?)... it and the dust bowl did more to transform America both good & bad than any two events since the Civil War itself. My BIL (a New Orleans native & amateur historian) once told me the Great Flood FINISHED what the war started... it really wasn't 'over & behind us' until then.
BSR - nice allegory for a disastrous going down America situation !
Black Star Ranch
Counting your chickens while the hen house burns down ?
I'm waiting for the next ISM PMI report so we can hear more talk about inflection points...
Great Mississippi River Flood, April 1927. Was all of that.
Rising Tide by John Barry is a great read if interested.
The idea of giving your hard earned money to somebody to buy gold to hold it for you and package it in a ETF far, far away, doesn't seem to make much sense, when you can just buy the gold yourself and stick it in a safe-deposit box, and do your own 'bar count' whenever it's strikes your fancy.
But then again, do you trust yourself?
The etf is appealing for shorter term trading, the physical metal is more appealing for a buy and hold forever...
norka, i'm happy to hold a few coins as armageddon insurance, that's about it.
what the heck is a "statistical sample count"
what's wrong with a plain old addition?
Besides, "withdrawing liquidity"?
The Fed will have purchased $1.5tn of MBS by year's end, probably long before then even. That is one position you can't liquidate. Ditto for the debt outstanding with an FDIC guarantee slapped on it for 3 years. Ditto for the saturated Treasury market that will face further weakening of demand as exporters not only have less float to reinvest, but have to withdraw and spend at home.
It's just posturing for the eyes and ears of the public. Taking sharp action from a political standpoint. It's no different than some political bobble-head taking the stage to demand AIG repay its loans within the next year. It has nothing to do with anything other than forcing your opponent to declare a position that you can potentially attack them for later.
".....when you can just buy the gold yourself and stick it in a safe-deposit box"
...I surely wouldn't trust ANY safe-deposit box administrator - ANYWHERE. But then it's easy to decide where the gold is buried when one doesn't own a shovel.
former GAO Comptroller General David Walker said sometime last year:
“If the federal government was a private corporation and the same report came out this morning, our stock would be dropping and some people would be talking about whether the company’s management directors needed a major shake-up”.
“The federal government’s total liabilities,” Walker explained, “translates into a de facto mortgage of about $455,000 for every American household and there’s no house to back that mortgage. In other words, our government has made a whole lot of promises that, in the long run, it cannot possibly keep without huge tax increases.”
Now with the $12 Trillion bail out of Wall St ‘too big too fail banks’ it’s probably $650,000 for every American household
When the news of the very first ETF that turns out to be a Ponzi scheme breaks, every other ETF will be held in the same contempt, deservedly or not.
Financial birds of a feather flock together, usually.
anak, was thinking their packaging equipment and existing distribution probably worth more than the asking price.
they sell to whole foods.
Hey Broward, you waking around Parkcenter pond? If so you're in my hood.
What game should we play?
Electronic Liquidity Drawdown or Unfunded Liabilities,
how about global-thermo soverign bank war?
I remember David Walker left the GAO in disgust, and went right into a private position that was basically a non-profit advocacy for common sense re: debt and unfunded obligations.
I.O.U.S.A. - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia.
They had a movie... timing seemed impeccable, ironic though that it is probably the first time most people reading now have heard about it (I haven't seen the movie as a disclaimer)
What happened in 1936? My dad was born in 1927 and he seems to be really worried, but won't say why...
apropos of political response, Calvin Coolidge as quoted in the John Barry book Rising Tide:
. . . the political mind "is a strange mixture of vanity and timidity, of an obsequious attitude at one time and a delusion of grandeur at another time, of the most selfish preferment combined with the most sacrificing patriotism. The political mind is the product of men in public life who have been twice spoiled. They have been spoiled with praise and they have been spoiled with abuse. With them nothing is natural, everything is artificial."
TODAY is "the new norm". Nothing will be as it was. We borrowed 1/3 - 1/2 of what we consumed. Assume everything will be reduced by that amount from here on out. Pretty simple, really. If you start from there, things won't "seem" quite as bad in another year, or two, or five, or ten...........
Woody Guthrie - Dust Bowl Blues
Califorina hedge fund manager arrested
"A Beverly Hills hedge fund manager was arrested Friday on a charge he bilked investors out of $44.3 million, including $5 million he lost playing poker, the U.S. attorney's office said."
Yahoo! 404 - Page Not Found
anybody remember that TIme magazine cover that had the Bernanke profile with the red hammer and sickle background?
Lenin-esk?
amf,
i think you just gave me a new nightmare to work into the repertoire (re- ETFs)....
black star ranch
Actually six months from now will hopefully be bottom then that will be the new norm.
Tedium on my iPhone. I always saw Laffer as 2-d but EHP is prob right that a large # of simult eequations give an optimum revenue. A beautiful day, greenery ,lake, blue sky, student bosoms in halter tops, I like the flakiness of Seattle.
GF on a date, if I were ambitious I'd do the same.
Come on NSA guy, toss me a grant already!
BSR ... yep !
"The Worst Is Yet to Come": If You're Not Petrified, You're Not Paying Attention
http://finance.yahoo.com/tech-ticker/article/248398/%22The-Worst-Is-Yet-to-Come%22-If-You%27re-Not-Petrified-You%27re-Not-Paying-Attention?tickers=^DJI,^GSPC,DDR,XLF,GM,RWR?sec=topStories&pos=9&asset=&ccode
....."our government has made a whole lot of promises that, in the long run, it cannot possibly keep without huge tax increases.”
.....President Obama has "just realized this" in his latest from the New Mexican Town Hall meeting. His current level of spending cannot be continued. His next step will be a coordinated effort to garner public support to increase taxes - but only from the "undertaxed high income wealthy".
Behind the Iron Curtain of Credit
Lies a
Decieved Believer.
seems like CVS expends more effort counting tubes of personal lubricant than GLD does counting gold bars.
..........bbl.......time to milk, water, weed and feed........
--
Only comment on the topic: Too many "crooks" spoil the btoth. More interesting and OT...
BOOK Watch -- Nazi Nexus: America’s Corporate Connections to Hitler’s Holocaust
For Those Who Have Any Interest In knowing HOW MUCH America Contributed to The Holocaust can read Edwin Black’s Nazi Nexus: America’s Corporate Connections to Hitler’s Holocaust. I just watched Mr. Black’s presentation at Park East Synagogue in NYC. Mr. Black’s is a Jew whose young parents were thrown out of a train to Auschwich and survived.
Based on Mr. Black’s presentation of the facts of late 1910s and 1920s America there would never have been the Holocaust but for the importation of the American ideas on Race & Blood, including eugenics, to Germany and the help provided to the Nazis by powerful Americans. Needless to point out that Nazis learned the use of propaganda from the Americans (this is based on my knowledge from other source). According to Mr. Black, Henry Ford, John D. Rockefeller, a German American, and Thomas Watson of IBM were the most responsible. FDR got lot of support and money from Watson on behalf of IBM, Mr. Black asserts. Amazingly, The Holocaust Museum in New York does not allow any permanent exhibit implicating American corporations, according to Mr. Black. I am not surprised at all.
Regrettably, it is highly likely that the Gross Fuehrer (Great Leader) would be the American Hitler once the Greater Depression in America is an accepted reality and dopes get to vote for a demagogue “to fix” the problem. We know that people don’t learn from history. Least of it Americans, in general, and American Jews in particular. Why bother with inconvenient truths. Oh, I see, Americans are better, or smarter!, than the Germans of 80 years ago. Pride & Prejudice,
Jas
PS: Licifer, we are fighting the last war because we are BBAD. I said the we would as soon as Bernanke was appointed as the Chairman.
And to whom does the general public look to for economic inspiration; a chipmunk toothed charlatan.
- NY Times
penalty for reading too fast: I read Jas's last "Gross Fuehrer (Great Leader)" as a reference to Rush L.
@Arbitrage,
You want an example of an ETF-like fraud by Morgan Stanley? Check this out:
http://www.lawyersandsettlements.com/settlements/08388/precious-metals.html
And this:
http://www.reuters.com/article/bankingfinancial-SP/idUSN1228014520070612
Precious metals fraud by Morgan Stanley. Oh yes, you can trust Wall Street to handle your precious metals. /snark
what the heck is a "statistical sample count"
You take an inventory list; you randomly select which bars you will physically count; and then, you count this sample of your total inventory.
They do this sample count mid-year. They do a full count at fiscal year-end. (Full count = 'dis bar with serial number on the custodian's inventory matches 'dat bar sitting on the pallet in front of the auditor.)
NW
AMF,
What complexities of 1936 did the average person encounter in an average day?
I asked my Dr. if something was wrong with me. I was in Metro, in a station I had been in many times, and all of a sudden I was lost. That and I have total blankness sometimes. All for a second or less but disconcerting. His reply was that he is hearing a lot of that, especially in the last few years. People who work information intensive jobs, live the same after work, are overdosing on data. He was telling me that our brains have not evolved enough to handle the constrant stream oof incoming info and that he thinks the blank seconds are akin to resets.
seems like CVS expends more effort counting tubes of personal lubricant than GLD does counting gold bars.
I would believe that if they kept all their lubricant in a precious metals vault run by a custodian company independent of CVS.
CC: the Morgan Stanley mess is why you should have previous metals custodied away from the broker who sold you the gold. It is an extra set of eyes keeping an eye on things.
NW
nova - you've mentioned this off and on for a while, but maybe it depends how you're sleeping. Quite common in chronic sleep deprivation cases.
C
C,
Well, that would also be me. I will look into that. Thanks,
Germany is not as far as 1936 yet...
German GDP Falls At An Incredible 15.2% Annualised Rate
“I believe there are some grounds for being optimistic that the pace of decline in economic activity will decelerate markedly in the months ahead,” was the view being expressed by Bundesbank President Axel Weber earlier this week. And we'd better hope he's right, since with figures from the Federal Statistics Office this morning showing that Germany's recession worsened considerably in the first quarter, with the economy shrinking by 3.8 percent compared with the previous three-month period I would hate to see it accelerating. Basically a 3.8 percent contraction in three months is equivalent to a 15.2% contraction as an annualised rate, so the chances are he is right, this is a breathtaking pace, and is unlikely to be maintained. But slowing down the rate of contraction is hardly equivalent to recovery, a point weber was quick to reinforce. “However, it is certainly not advisable to be overly optimistic that the recovery process is safely on track. This will most likely be a gradual process," he added.
Few seem to discuss our incredible aggregate debt to GDP. It is higher now than in 1933. How do we resolve what clearly appears to be Ponzi finance?
Spain is doing better than Italy?????
Slovakia GDP Drops 11.2%
German GDP Falls At An Incredible 15.2% Annualised...
Italian GDP Falls An Annualised 9.6%
Spain is 7.2
168 ignores 19
35 to 129
-odds are good for this question.
Why is Barclays shopping the Merril/Lehman SPDR bonds?
-this comment was actually posted twice.
Uh oh. We're venturing into the intricate webs of gold theory. Time to push off.
Onward and upward. Good day, all.
Great Mississippi River Flood, April 1927. Was all of that.
Rising Tide by John Barry is a great read if interested.
Ya - I have the book but haven't read it. My sister & BIL gave it to me - the one from New Orleans.
There will be books written about this period too.
Allen C
Here's the chart ...
Has Deleveraging Even Begun? (Not For the Fainthearted) « naked capitalism
Besides, "withdrawing liquidity"?
The Fed will have purchased $1.5tn of MBS by year's end, probably long before then even. That is one position you can't liquidate.
Those are positions you 'incinerate' you don't liquidate.
"Based on Mr. Black’s presentation of the facts of late 1910s and 1920s America "
This is a sad post. It is a scurrilous misreading of history...Societies dedicated to Teutonic myths and Aryan racial purity were already influential in Vienna in the early 1900s. Freud and Adler, Wittgenstein and even Mahler, were subjected to anti-Semitism. Mahler was even criticized for conducting Mozart, the latter believed to be a free-mason, a group also among the despised. Besides the Jews and Masons, the Slavs and Bosnian Muslims were also among the reviled, despite membership in the Empire.
Vienna was the intellectual center of the German world at the turn of the 20th century, Berlin steps to the forefront of a broken Germany after WW1, and the idea of a pure Teutonic race betrayed by lesser races, already widely dispersed in the German-speaking world, was a salve to a defeated, impoverished nation.
Man, missed some great discussions today. Wish I had been here to opine on global warming and climate change. Lucifer you fight the good fight. Never give up and never surrender. It never ceases to amaze me that when a rational person disagrees with a fanatic, charges of ideology, lack of education or information, or general mental-midgetry are leveled against the transgressor. As a philosopher I embrace science, but science cannot trump philosophy---the pursuit of truth. It is a unique situation to be hated by religious fundamentalist as well as scientific fundamentalist...but the club does exist and I am happy to be in it. Climate change is real. Earth has a history of it. So do the rest of the planets in our solar system. Our sun is not constant either. For every claim of man-made global warming, I point to a dozen causes of climate change from the earth herself. The north magnetic pole is moving, magnetic field in general is weakening, great stores of carbon are being released from previous frozen areas, underwater volcanic activity and methane vents, etc....strange how in the crux of crisis on earth, changes are happening in the solar system and with the sun as well. How is it that man proved the earth revolves around the sun, but still insists he is the center of the universal cause of his demise. Do you think the dinosaurs declared themselves to be the primary cause of their own extinction? I know not whether we are simple animals, god's children, or a cruel joke...but I do know our vanity knows no limits. Because one dismisses evolution or global warming theories do not immediately preclude a person from understanding the theory in the first place. It doesn't make them a religious zealot or a political one, and it doesn't suggest they have a poor IQ. Science is based on human observation, human perceptions change over time and thus theories come and go. Science hails this as the glory of science and yet fanatics can't apply this simple truth to their own design. Always be skeptical, always try to prove what is, and in the face of what is not known, always keep looking. Never assume that the shadow you are seeing is actually the sun. My two cents.
mmckinl,
Check out the Morgan Stanley chart. It breaks out the debt by type. I recall Zero Hedge posted the chart. Sorry for the lack of link.
if the only thing supporting the economy is government spending and you with draw that and the economy falls that is a surprise? How stupid does one have to be to become a Governor at the Federal Reserve. It seems to me that the lesson that has to be drawn is that government spending can't sustain an economy at an unstainable level. Sooner or later the government spending ends and gravity takes over. Much better in my opinion to allow the economy to find its own level. As with letting a fire burn itself out- important to have fire breaks but not necessary to fight the fire.
Vonbek777 - you want to turn the climate change thingie on it's head look at it this way:
Current meme is that increased human population & development cause climate change... okay.
How about climate change is primary cause of human development and increased population?
I live in the center of North America's bread basket - some 20,000 years ago there was something like a mile of ice above where I live now... or at least nearby [I am on the edge of what they call the 'driftless region' where ice went around in the last ice age].
Anyway once the ice went & the earth warmed the 'first agricultural revolution' was possible and with it excess food supply, division of labor, invention & eventually SUVs.
And since the planet was warming dramatically enough to melt a mile of ice and push it thousands of miles north and eventually make it go 'away' - all before SUVs - maybe there are more drivers to climate than just automobiles.
And I'm not even saying there isn't a possibility recent human released CO2 isn't adding to the sum of effects - just saying there is a lot going on and it has gone on for a long time.
BTW - I first came to this conclusion about 1979 while taking a class on ecology [not environmental studies but animal & plant population dynamics] and ancient history [where we discussed the ice melt in Scandinavia & Central Asia as drivers of their population explosions & the problems that caused for Mediterranean & Asian civilizations].
I've dropped that 'concept' on few folks and always receive the 'there goes dryfly again' look. Kinda fun really. Try it some day.
dryfly,
I don't think that is crazy at all. I have come to similar conclusions myself. Human anthropology has always fascinated me, and I agree with those that say fundamentally we haven't changed much over the last 10,000 years or more. Technology has created the illusion of change, but the fundamentals of human nature are still divided into hunters and gatherers. It has always amazed me how nice and tidy our little advances have developed over the development of civilization. Almost like a a collective unconscious committee is in charge of dispensing muses of invention to the human race. But try telling this plastic micro obsessed world that they aren't special and living at the apex of human achievement......pride before the fall, and lucy watch out for that first step.
Feldstein on the economy
Yahoo! 404 - Page Not Found
otishertz,
You are certifiably crazy. If you want to rant against the PM ETFs, go ahead. But at least admit your disability so other people will understand where you are coming from.
Sure there is. Social Credit. Take a chunk of the economy, divide evenly. Its not perfect but it deals with the immediate needs without complex programs.
Playing by the same trade rules your partner does will settle any other troubles
Interesting story. The biggest asset we have over the folks in 1936 is the humble birth control pill.
No more "10 kids to a family" unless it by choice -- this makes a recovery a lot faster as there are no "yet to be useful" mouths to feed
abprosper,
I saw one of those families by choice tonight in Costco. It was a Saturday night, but they were dressed in their Sunday best eating in the food court. Seven children looked like the range was 17-6 months. Very well behaved, and looked very happy to boot. Mom and Dad were very tiny people. Both under 5'4, but eldest son was a big 6'3 at least. I am pretty sure if the financial world imploded tomorrow.....they would survive just fine despite the extra mouths. I only have two children, and I can't get mine to behave that well.
Given all the room to contract on the fiscal side, the Fed should be able to hold interest rates near zero for a decade. That's also the best policy vis a vis our trade deficit and the Chinese.
You are absolutely correct that it is climate change but even more important the stability following climate change that allowed human populations to expand world wide. We are currently living (last 200 years) in the most stable climate in the last 200,000 years and a climate that happens to be ideally suited to human populations. It is an aberration based on the climate record and regression to the mean suggests that at some point forces beyond human control will return the climate to normal i.e wildly fluctuating and less hospitable to human beings.
However, to argue from that point that we should not be concerned about human caused changes misses the whole point. Climatologists like economist are unable to conceive of punctuated equilibriums. I for one don't believe the the IPCC view of this slowly warming planet. Once you put a chaos system into motion it goes wild until it finds a new equilibrium point. Therefore, we should be taking every step possible to perpetuate the current island of stability for as long as possible by avoiding any actions that could upset the current stability.
Essentially your argument is that because killer bees come out of a hive on their own doesn't no harm is caused by sticking a stick into the hive or that since we are all going to die anyway why bother with any safety precautions.
Read the full post here
Blinder words in bold:
The more important reason is that Barack Obama, Timothy F. Geithner and Ben S. Bernanke are not Herbert Hoover, Andrew Mellon and Eugene Meyer. (Who’s that? Mr. Meyer was the Federal Reserve chairman from September 1930 to May 1933.) In stark contrast to the laissez-faire crowd that ruled the roost in 1930 and 1931, our current economic leaders are not waiting for the sagging economy to right itself. Rather, they have taken numerous extraordinary steps already — and stand ready to do more if necessary.
The political actions taken during this economic crisis have not and will not be the same as those actions taken during the great depression. This means that the outcome will probably be materially different. This does not mean that this outcome will be better or that it will be worse - it just means that it will be different.
That’s the good news. But even if another depression is next to impossible, there is still the danger that next year, or the year after, might turn into 1936. Let me explain.
From its bottom in 1933 to 1936, the G.D.P. climbed spectacularly (albeit from a very low base), averaging gains of almost 11 percent a year. But then, both the Fed and the administration of Franklin D. Roosevelt reversed course.
In the summer of 1936, the Fed looked at the large volume of excess reserves piled up in the banking system, concluded that this mountain of liquidity could be fodder for future inflation, and began to withdraw it. This tightening of monetary policy continued into 1937, in a weak economy that was ill-prepared for it.
There are a couple of assumptions made here. First, Dr. Binder assumes that the strong economic growth from 1933 to 1936 was sustainable. Has he considered the possibility that the economy was goosed during this time period in an unsustainable fashion? If not, why not? We know that the FDR's New Deal was initiated from 1933 to 1935. Is it wild to speculate that these programs may have caused unsustainable distortions in the economy? Second, he assumes that tightening monetary policy in 1936 was the wrong choice and that not tightening would have been been the right choice. Has he considered the possibility that there was no right choice under the circumstances. If not, why not?
About the same time, President Roosevelt looked at what seemed to be enormous federal budget deficits, concluded that it was time to put the nation’s fiscal house in order and started raising taxes and reducing spending. This tightening of fiscal policy transformed the federal budget from a deficit of 3.8 percent of G.D.P. in 1936 to a surplus of 0.2 percent of G.D.P. in 1937 — a swing of four percentage points in a single year. (Today, a swing that large would be almost $600 billion.)
Thus, both monetary and fiscal policies did an abrupt about-face in 1936 and 1937, and the consequences were as predictable as they were tragic. The United States economy, which had been rapidly climbing out of the cellar from 1933 to 1936, was kicked rudely down the stairs again, and America experienced the so-called recession within the depression. Real G.D.P. contracted 3.4 percent from 1937 to 1938; the total G.D.P. decline during the recession, which lasted from mid-1937 to mid-1938, was even larger.
The moral of the story should be clear: Prematurely changing fiscal and monetary policies — from stepping hard on the accelerator to slamming on the brake — can be hazardous to the economy’s health.
Agreed. Rapidly goosing the economy and then abruptly stopping causes economic problems. Maybe we just should not goose it in the first place. Is that option on the table?
Wow, we’ve learned a lot since the ’30s, right? Well, maybe not. For the echoes of 1936 are being heard right now, even before the current recession hits bottom. If you’ve been paying attention, you know that a number of critics of the Fed are sounding alarms over the huge stockpile of excess reserves it has created — more than $775 billion at last count. What these critics are fretting about now is exactly what goaded the Fed into action in 1936: that the vast pool of loose money will ultimately be inflationary. The clear inference is that some of it should be withdrawn before it’s too late.
Will loose money not ultimately lead to inflation? Yes or no? Dr. Blinder never attempts to answer the question. I would argue that the loose economic policies should not have been implemented in the first place.
On the fiscal side, many of President Obama’s critics are complaining vociferously about the huge federal budget deficits. Try to ignore, if you can, the sheer hypocrisy of many Congressional Republicans who, having never uttered a peep about the huge deficits under George W. Bush, are suddenly models of budget probity. But whatever the motives, the worries of today’s deficit hawks sound eerily reminiscent of Roosevelt in 1936 and 1937.
In general I try to ignore politicians - period. Why does Dr. Blinder choose only these hypocritical individuals as the basis for dissent? Why not point towards those that are sounding the alarm that are not politically affiliated? Why not point towards Ron Paul, a Republican Congressman who has always been for fiscal and monetary conservatism from the 1970s into the latest Bush presidency and up to today? Probably because it is easier to whitewash all those who disagree with you as hypocrites instead of arguing the case itself. It is the oldest crutch in debate.
FORTUNATELY, Mr. Bernanke is a keen student of the Great Depression who will not allow the Fed to repeat the errors of 1936-37. But his critics, both inside and outside the Fed, are already branding his policies as dangerously inflationary, and no Fed chairman wants to be called an inflationist.
Again, I agree that Dr. Bernanke is aware of the policies enacted in 1936 and will not repeat those policies. Different policies will likely lead to different results. Why does one assume that these results will necessarily be better or worse than those results?
Similarly, I hope and believe that President Obama will not transform himself from the spendthrift Roosevelt of 1933 to the deficit-hawk Roosevelt of 1936 — at least not until the economy is back on solid ground.
How do we know when we are back on solid ground? If the economy grew on average 11% annually from 1933 to 1936, and that was not solid ground, then when will we know it is time to change course? Are you telling me that if the economy grows by the same amount through 2012 that we should continue with current record deficits and quantitative easing? Does that sound insane to anyone else besides me?
That said, a growing flock of budget hawks are already showing their talons. They will have their day — but please, not yet.
The budget hawks that Blinder is referring to are most likely Republican Congressmen. Through eight years of Bush spending excesses they did nothing (besides Ron Paul). They have more in common with vultures than hawks. Let's get that insult into the lexicon - hypocritical Republican budget hawks shall now be referred to as vultures.
To avoid a replay of the policy disasters of 1936-37, both the Fed and our elected officials must stay the course. Mark Twain once explained that, while history does not repeat itself, it often rhymes. We don’t want any rhymes just now.
At this point you most likely realize that I completely disagree with Dr. Blinder's view. What he is arguing is thus:
In situation A, we enacted policy B which lead to outcome C. Because outcome C was bad, we want to avoid policy B. Therefore, in situation A2 (somewhat similar to A), we will enact policy Y which will lead to outcome Z. Because Y is different from B (different policy), Z must be better than C (better outcome).
In reality, all Dr. Blinder is guaranteeing is that Z must be different from C (different outcome). Different does not mean better! He has refuted none of the inflationary warnings being fired by dissenters.
In the end, Dr. Blinder has nothing to worry about in regards to a repeat of 1936. I have little doubt that any such tough fiscal and monetary policies will be enacted. I mean, really, does he honestly think that Obama will try to balance the budget any time soon? No chance there.
The outcome of this economic crisis will not be 1936. It could be better and it could be worse. A lot worse. Read this description of the hyperinflation episode in Weimar Germany in the 1920s. In that context, maybe FDR made the right choice in 1936. Of course, we will never know what could have been we only know what happened. I have been on the inflationary/deflationary fence for quite some time now but I think I am ready to jump off and lump myself in with the inflationists. Any deflationists care to offer an opposing view?