The article also notes that the results of the stress test could be released the week of May 4th - and not on May 4th as originally announced.
As I said, CR, I'd be willing to bet that there is an internal debate going on right now within the administration over exactly how much and what information will be revealed to the public.
(I suspect Geithner is on the side of telling no one nuthin'.)
Last night, I saw a dude under 880, just off the ramp to the Webster Tube in Oakland, CA. He had the full set up: a tent, a desk, a bookcase with some books, a rack for clothes - all under a freeway. The stuff looked decent so I'm guessing some CRE was vacated recently.
He does not yet have a shingle indicating his business; but he's set up, under the freeway, for what ever business it is.
Raise capital should read resurrect it! How you gonna' raise something that no longer exists in the physical world....unless it is created out of thin air?
Anybody with half a brain(or reads here) knew Citi was gonna need money and BofA does because of Merrill(and the government is backstopping that because that's the dowry of the Shotgun wedding.)
How do they do this? Issue and sell shares? Increase interest rates on deposits?
Don't we already suspect these banks to be over the required loan to asset ratios? Was that not the point of killing mark to market? Something does not smell right, and if this report is true (for O' values of truth) won't this tank the market tomorrow?
I think Sheila Bair is correct - the FDIC should be able to liquidate the commercial banks just as they do the others... anyone notice the power grabbing going on between the various agencies, and also the IMF and the World Bank - everyone is trying to take advantage of the crisis to expand their powers and empire - so they can justify a higher salary for themselves of course - that's how it works in the gubamint service..
April 27 (Bloomberg) -- A persistent recession and mounting unemployment will leave the U.S. financial system “insolvent,” implying the stress tests performed by regulators weren’t rigorous enough, said Nouriel Roubini, the New York University economics professor who predicted the financial crisis.
Losses at U.S. banks and broker dealers will swell to $1.8 trillion, almost 100 percent more than the current amount, as the economic slump lasts at least through this year and the jobless rate climbs to 12 percent by 2010, Roubini said today at the CFA Institute’s annual conference in Orlando, Florida.
The losses would exceed the $1.4 trillion in capital that banks currently have, meaning “the system in the aggregate looks insolvent,” Roubini said. The rate at which the U.S. economy contracts will diminish from the 6 percent annual pace in the fourth quarter to about 2 percent in the last three months of 2009, he said. Still, Roubini estimated the jobless rate will reach 11 percent by the end of this year and keep rising as companies retrench. Policy makers assumed the rate would reach 10.3 percent in 2010 in the “more adverse” of U.S. regulators’ two scenarios in the stress tests to determine how much capital banks may need over two years.“ The stress tests are not really serious,” he said, predicting even the more adverse outcomes predicted by officials will be overtaken by events.
You can blow your fife and bang your drum but all you will get....... is that there is more of the same yet to come.....Patriots are defined in the current environment are those who will take MASSIVE near term pain for the long term gain of the Country...or some form of B.S. like that. Frankly, NO NEWS is good news.......now a daze.
Shit that's up town brother! Cause the rest of us will be lucky to be located in the "tent city" camp. We will be thankful to have a TARP over our heads....:^)
These Wall Street assholes do not stop until they are killed, one way or another....
"On July 15, 2007, The New York Times published an article with the headline “The Richest of the Rich, Proud of a New Gilded Age.” The most prominently featured of the “new titans” was Sanford Weill, the former chairman of Citigroup, who insisted that he and his peers in the financial sector had earned their immense wealth through their contributions to society.
Skip to next paragraph
Soon after that article was printed, the financial edifice Mr. Weill took credit for helping to build collapsed, inflicting immense collateral damage in the process. Even if we manage to avoid a repeat of the Great Depression, the world economy will take years to recover from this crisis.
All of which explains why we should be disturbed by an article in Sunday’s Times reporting that pay at investment banks, after dipping last year, is soaring again — right back up to 2007 levels...."
Bykere said RGE Monitor, a consulting firm chaired by economist Nouriel Roubini, forecasts that unemployment will peak at 8.5 percent by the end of 2009. Last year, the rate averaged 4.6 percent.
I feel sorry for most people, they have no frekin clue what's coming. Our and the worlds economy are going down and it's going down hard. I believe we only have a short period of time to get ready. Woe to the woman that give suck in this time. I'm sorry but the time is near.
Ship owner declares futures market finished
Monday, 27 April 2009
The ship owner who once controlled about 15 per cent of global trading in shipping futures has pulled out of the market to concentrate on building up his physical fleet. Nobu Su said TMT, the company he owns, believed the shipping futures market was "finished".
"We didn't trade anything for the last year," he said. "Basically, this time the world has gone back to the real economy, not paper economics. People must go into real business and we're doing it."
TMT had closed most of the positions it kept open during last autumn's shipping market crash, when it is thought to have made significant profits from correctly betting that earnings of dry bulk ships would fall and rates for tankers would hold steady. Average earnings for the largest dry bulk ships fell 99 per cent from their peak in June to the low in December and are still down 80 per cent.
"We have a few [positions] left but very small and the market is dead," Su said.
Market participants believe Su must have made profits of hundreds of millions - if not billions - of dollars from his aggressive bets on the direction of shipping markets, as well as comparable losses when the market moved against him. He struggled to meet his obligations to other market participants last summer when the dry bulk market hit all-time record highs and he was betting on falls.
Su declined to say how much TMT had made from the paper market but said the company had been lucky always to have been proved right eventually in its bets.
"We want to use the capital to build a new generation of ships and return the money to the industry," he said.
The dry bulk market - ships that carry coal, iron ore, wheat and other bulk products - had now hit bottom, Su said. Demand would be helped by China's economic stimulus package and consequent spending on infrastructure. Many older ships were also being scrapped and 50 per cent of orders for new ships had been cancelled - a far higher figure than most market analysts give.
The market now represented a good "bottom-buying opportunity", said Su. "It's a good time to make innovative investments."
TMT again controlled 130 ships - including dry bulk ships, oil and gas tankers and car carriers - after briefly cutting the number of ships it chartered from other owners last year, Su said. Around 30 of the ships are owned directly, a figure that will increase as the new ships are delivered.
Ok. We all get it. The banks run everything including the government. When was this any different? The money changers at the temple were the banks of 2000 years ago. A carpenter with mad parables skillz turned over a few tables, messed up the operation for one day, and they had the government have him whacked. Banks running the show is old news, real old.
You whine but you do nothing about it, because the only known bank-less alternative lies frozen in a puddle among the ruins of the Soviet Union. None of your seem to be interested in going down that path and that is understandable.
But your inaction is understandable, because while you may not have reconsiled the thoughts with yourself, deep down you know this situation is acceptable among alternatives.
I, S-21, am here to remind you of why this current state is acceptable to your subconscious mind. While it may not be a good government, any government not actively trying to destroy you, is a good-enough government. Sure, it may make you poor, it may make our children hopelessly burdened by debt, it may proport dangerous lies, but it's not actively trying to do us in. It's good enough - and you are ok with it, you just need to admit it.
Regarding credibility....As was said in Jonathan Weil's Bloomberg editorial today (regarding the BofA-Merril deal):
"The best that can be said about Bernanke and Paulson is that they believed the ends justified the means, . . .And yet, if you think they didn’t breach the public’s trust, ask yourself this:
Knowing what we know now, how could you ever trust anything Bernanke says again?
What about Paulson’s successor as Treasury secretary, Timothy Geithner, who at the time was still the president of the Federal Reserve Bank of New York? How could he have been out of the loop?
Bank spokesbuffoon puts entire leg down own throat:
The spokesbuffoon is a partner at Jones Day, one of the bigger law firms in the country, who happens to make his enormous level of compensation by servicing other folks who also make enormous levels of compensation.
His classic comment n response to the devastating effect Wall Street had on Main Street: "Their compensation was completely wiped out, too."
You guys might as well discuss about the details of the Glorious 1985 Soviet Union 5-year plan because those stress tests are all crap. The purpose of the tests is to give an appearance of normality while the reality is everything but normal. Meanwhile, the banksters are looting everything on sight and giving themselves extra bonuses for their excellent looting skills! Well, they and their families will also make nice bullet magnets for sure, after the collapse...
//“I don’t want to be alarmist, but I’m worried next Monday could feel like September all over again,” Bank CEO from one of the 19 Banks Stress Tested."//
"and BofA does because of Merrill(and the government is backstopping that because that's the dowry of the Shotgun wedding.)"
i don't buy it. BofA knew what it was getting into & shotgun sounds like a very lame excuse. The idea was two kill two birds in one shot, a) Get MER investment business b) Get CASH without creating PANIC (in October, you couldn't raise capital from private sources, only from Gov). As the result, BoA might have created a perfect mouse trap. (mostly for its shareholders )
I think CR needs a full thread discussion on what it actually means when they talk about banks raising capitol. For my own benefit and the benefit of the audience, I would like to read about all the nuances of what it actually means and how it is done.
No SP21, there are plenty of in-betweens. There was Glass-Steagall. The US had a 90% tax rate once. (It applied to one man) There is return of an equivalent capital gains tax. We've had rent control, socialized water, sewer, sanitation, gas, heat, electric, public schools hospitals, unionized fire, police, teachers and civil service for decades and guess what? No Soviet Union. Take your red baiting back to the 1950's. Let them fail, we can handle the truth.
Now click them three times and say .. all banks are solvent.. there are no toxic assets, derivatives do not exist, all loans are performing.. and you will wake up in "kansas".
"The CEO's [Ken Lewis, who made 100 million in '07] have taken as big a hit as anyone..."
cause he got Arrogant, wanted to be out there - number one, without any concern for shareholders or anyone else. It was all about an ego satisfaction and 5 min fame of being CEO who steered BoA into the glory during the crisis. Poor guy overestimated his .. size and underestimated the size and consequences of yet another asset bubble.
We knew C and probably BAC would need money but what I think the market will find concerning...
1.The "negotiations" (a.k.a. fighting) between the government and the banks.
If you read the bottom of the WSJ piece, it is clear that Citi is too big for their execs to have any idea what their company is doing or holding in a timely fashion.
Sorry Security Prison 21, the current way of doing thins is totally unacceptable and I thank God every day for the complete and total economic catastrophe. With todays Internet, everyone can figure out what has been going on and what has to be done about it. Fortunately Divine Retribution is interceding for the know nothings and the smarter people are seeing to it that things are made right. Tuff shit for TPTB who don't like it.
Boy, does this surprise anyone? Take Wells Fargo for example, have you seen the provisions they are taking on their home equity portfolio? Laughable. They were good risk managers, but not "I am only going to have 10% of the losses of the rest of you" good. Just like the rising tide raising all ships...
Michael, you put $10 in a bank.
The bank can lend out $9, practically no questions asked.
Of the other $1, about 30 cents is supposed to be "tangible", like the bank could probably get 30 cents for it if it had to sell fast.
When the loans start to go bad, the bank must either get money from the government or the market to get up to the 10%. They can sell shares for cash, but of course that lowers the price for those shares, Ponzi dominos in reverse.
Easier to get bailed out as long as you can, or just go BK after having handed out the 250k guaranteed per depositor in bonuses and dividends.
My discussion concerns only the here and now, and only the psychological process of grief.
As expected, most are stuck in denial and anger. I am simply your friendly neighborhood S-21, trying to reduce your inner conflict, and move you on to a place of acceptance.
unless...
Michael and Short, are you preparing the revolutionary forces? If so, cool - it will be interesting to watch it play out. I am most interested in what factions arise as I have often pondered whcih I would join.
"Lehman bonds allegedly marketed to mentally ill
Isn't that a given? "
Watch it... My 75 year old mother was sold one in May by her trusted bond broker. When I told the broker her research dep't was mistaken, that Lehman would be dead before the end of the year, she had a good laugh.
DAVID WEIDNER'S WRITING ON THE WALL The bungling bailout brothers
Commentary: Geithner, Summers and Rattner may be Obama's biggest problem
http://www.marketwatch.com/news/story/Obamas-band-blundering-bailout-brothers/story.aspx?guid={E005357E-8BCB-42A8-B98B-C7EC5700CD75}&dist=SecMostRead
By David Weidner, MarketWatch
Last update: 12:01 a.m. EDT April 28, 2009
NEW YORK (MarketWatch) -- President Barack Obama can breathe a sigh of relief knowing he's made it through the first 100 days of his presidency with a successful foreign tour, a promising policymaking agenda and popular support behind him.
If he's smart, however, the nation's CEO won't get too comfortable. That's because the three men he's tapped to do the dirty work in his plan to stem the financial crisis are threatening to blow up the effort through their own gaffes, associations and fast-dealing.
These bungling bailout brothers are, of course: Steven Rattner, the private-equity fund manager turned auto industry bailout chief who is under investigation for potentially illegal payments; Larry "Sleepy" Summers, head of the National Economic Council, and; Treasury Secretary Timothy Geithner, who has been the subject of some withering attacks for his career ties to Wall Street.
"The important question is: how do you indict Lewis without also indicting Paulson (and perhaps Bernanke)?"
Why wouldn't you? If the SEC and JD are allowed to function they will be busy for 5 years. Plenty of lawyers out of work these days who know a little about the biz.
For me though, someone besides a reservist general needs to held accountable for Abu Garib and any waterboarding. If it was good enough to execute the Japanese for...
p.s." Bernanke is right about the past, Schwartz says, “but he is fighting the wrong war today; the present crisis has nothing to do with a lack of liquidity.” (!!!)
I think we need to move beyond The Stress Test and get back to how banks report earnings to shareholders. The Stress test is a scam and a PR stunt, nothing more; it has no legal backbone and is just smoke and mirrors to add drama and noise to the TARP confusion. This test does not add credibility or add to levels of confidence and that is why actual audited earnings reports should be dealt with in terms of Sarbanes Oxley/Patriot Act accountability. If there is fraud by management they simply need to go to prison, and America simply needs justice. Enron was not a perfect example of accountability, but there was a legal process that involved accountability -- where is that now? Why do we have the governmnet involved in fraud, conspiracy and involved with bailing out a wide spectrum of Enron-like entities that have provided a non-stop stream of fraud and non-accountability? Where is justice, where is the law, why is Obama seeming to be corrupt and allowing Timmy to continue to usurp authority from congress ...huh, huh?
i don't buy it. BofA knew what it was getting into & shotgun sounds like a very lame excuse. The idea was two kill two birds in one shot, a) Get MER investment business b) Get CASH without creating PANIC (in October, you couldn't raise capital from private sources, only from Gov). As the result, BoA might have created a perfect mouse trap. (mostly for its shareholders )
The premise is partially accurate.
BAC weren't exactly looking for an IB, while Paulson desperately needed a bank with enough heft who could possibly digest them, as JPM was already trying to digest Bear Stearns, Wells was too small and Citi was just f**ked. Part of this was a quid pro quo for getting approval for Check 21 approval and the First Boston acquisition (for JPM it was C21 and Bank One merger)
When BAC saw the initial scale of how bad Merrill had screwed the pooch(my Tier III buddy confirmed back in February), they indeed tried to walk away but Paulson barred the door.
So when Uncle Sam twists your arm (as he clock watches with his free hand), what are you supposed to do, say no and have the financial system implode(which is what would have happened) so the folks here can live their Boy and his Dog/Mad Max fantasies come true?
And now that they've done the deed, should they be thrown to the wolves so folks can get their bloodlust?
If the government wants to convert their preferreds to dilute shareholders to a $1 I'm fine with it , but this is approaching throwing the baby out with the bathwater territory.
Besides, Ken Lewis would have a woody if shares went to $1, he'd be buying with both fistsm as would I. When the economy turns the corner, they'll be naking money hand over fist, even with the govt. taking their cut.
"So when Uncle Sam twists your arm (as he clock watches with his free hand), what are you supposed to do, say no and have the financial system implode(which is what would have happened) so the folks here can live their Boy and his Dog/Mad Max fantasies come true?"
Yes.
And now that they've done the deed, should they be thrown to the wolves so folks can get their bloodlust?
[original had more space between paragraphs, KCoop]
Let's not forget: If the government wants to convert their preferreds to dilute shareholders to a $1 I'm fine with it , but this is approaching throwing the baby out with the bathwater territory.
Within hours of signing the landmark Sarbanes-Oxley legislation to fight corporate fraud, President Bush attempted to severely narrow which whistleblowers would be covered by the Act. White House Counsel Alberto Gonzales defended the narrowed interpretation when Senators Charles Grassley (R-IA) and Patrick Leahy protested the attempt to undermine whistleblower protections they had authored.
Ultimately, the White House backed down on its narrowed interpretation of the Act.
I would agree that BoA was in the worst of all bargaining positions, but can you step me through how this would end up as a Mad Max outcome?
Cascading cross defaults, anyone? The treasury didn't have the personnel(and still don't) to have a baby the size of Merrill dropped off at the front door in the middle of the night.
Utility-style regulation of the financial sector is not nihilism.
Save the financial tsunami talk for your next Ponzi bailout scheme. A falling house of cards doesn't damage Main Street, trying to keep it up as falls is the waste of resources. The confidence game is over.
I'm sure it's my ignorance talking, but that cascading cross defaults sound like bad news for the financiers and the rest of the world. Without them it's just bad news for those of us who make up the rest of the world. I guess we should save them and be grateful if they decide to help us out in any way. But I guess helping us isn't in the best interest of their shareholders, whereas taking our money is. Just one of those tough tough conundrums.
Mercer's quality of living by city survey is out, you'll only ever hear about it in the local news if your city did well. Thought I would share, not entirely sure why, many of the top cities are notorious for their financial services or real estate so it is topical. Given that the Londons/New Yorks/Zurichs will have to reinvent themselves to some extent to get by with a smaller financial sector, it might be of interest.
"Cascading cross defaults, anyone? The treasury didn't have the personnel(and still don't) to have a baby the size of Merrill dropped off at the front door in the middle of the night."
No I get that and with it would go AIG, C, BOA and a few others. I would think though that for less than 700B$ you could put together a pretty functional liquidation agency.
Still even if these TBTF entities failed tomorrow, how devastating would it be? No payroll checks for how many? How long until the good banks could fill in?
these stress tests... what scenarios are they using?
i heard they use something around 3.3% decline in GDP as the bear case scenario, but I think that should be our base case scenario, and that a bear case would be a bit more severe.
Looking at level 3 assets on these guys' balance sheets, it is clear to see that in most cases they exceed their tangible equity by quite a bit. So if you are expecting future losses (which everyone is) you need to raise a lot of money.
Something in the range of 300-500 billion wouldn't be too far fetched.
More government ownership? I don't see any confidence from investors to put that much money into flailing institutions really...
Also these guys can't earn their way out of this mess. Q1 results were also dodgy and i took some time to write about this here:
"Intercontinental’s clearinghouse, known as ICE Trust, has the backing of nine banks including Goldman Sachs Group Inc., JPMorgan, Citigroup Inc. and UBS AG that Intercontinental obtained through its acquisition last year of the Clearing Corp., which the banks owned. The banks receive half the profit from clearing trades on ICE Trust.
Melamed said CME Group’s bank customers told it that the initial proposal to offer credit-default swaps for clearing only through its CMDX platform wasn’t how they wanted to use the system. The banks wanted to trade the contracts among themselves or with clients and then bring them to CME Group to be cleared, he said. "
--But evidently Melamed had seen 3-card monty enough to refuse.
"ICE Trust has cleared 875 credit-default swap transactions in Markit CDX North American indexes, guaranteeing $98 billion of the contracts, according to its Web site. "
--The big bad bank, taking nice fat insurance premiums, on policies they could never pay, steadily growing too big to fail even as everyone promises to cut that crap out.
"The total in credit swaps cleared by ICE Trust comprises 1.5 percent of the investment grade and high volatility CDX indexes, which total $6.4 trillion, according to the New York- based Depository Trust & Clearing Corp., which runs a central registry that captures most trading. Revenue from the business could reach $50 million a year, according to Goldman Sachs. That would boost revenue 6.2 percent at ICE or 2 percent at CME Group based on 2008 sales. "
The total CDS market is down to about 28 trillion, according to the article. So ICE becomes the official new AIG. Not regulated as insurance, self-governed, god knows what capital in reserve. "Trust us".
"ICE TrustTM is a limited purpose bank that serves as a central clearing facility for credit default swaps (CDS). As a New York trust company and a member of the Federal Reserve System, ICE Trust is subject to regulatory and supervisory requirements of the Federal Reserve System and the New York State Banking Department. In addition, both the Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) and the Commodity Futures Trading Commission (CFTC) may request the review of ICE Trust transaction data from its primary regulator, the Federal Reserve."
OK, trust the FED anyway. I will inquire with the New York State Banking Department as to their oversight. I do actually have some trust in that organization. We'll see if have a clue...
No I get that and with it would go AIG, C, BOA and a few others. I would think though that for less than 700B$ you could put together a pretty functional liquidation agency.
Still even if these TBTF entities failed tomorrow, how devastating would it be? No payroll checks for how many? How long until the good banks could fill in?
$700bn? With X cascades last fall, you're talking $700bnx10 and liquidity wouldn't exist for a decade, 1890s panic. BAC is bigger than the next 2 banks combined.
There's nothing to do for AIG and C but go off to runoff mode, but BAC is only hobbled by the forced aquisition of Merrill. Countrywide is already accretive to earnings.
Timothy Geithner, who at the time was still the president of the Federal Reserve Bank of New York? How could he have been out of the loop?
There were plenty of articles around the time of Timmay's confirmation hearings bragging that he not only was in the loop but that he took the lead in TARP design.
"ICE Trust's clearing services are provided by The Clearing Corporation (TCC). TCC was acquired by ICE on March 6, 2009. Founded in 1925 as the Board of Trade Clearing Corporation, TCC is one of the oldest independent clearing houses in the world. TCC's risk management systems were developed internally based on a proprietary risk assessment methodology designed specifically for the CDS market, and have been reviewed and validated by Finance Concepts, an independent risk management consultancy, as part of the regulatory review process. TCC's methodology is used by ICE Trust to determine initial and variation margin requirements, guaranty fund requirements and official daily settlement prices."
--Because private risk assessment has worked out so well....
"The U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) today issued an exemptive order permitting ICE Trust to clear CDS transactions. In December 2008, ICE Trust received approval from the New York State Banking Department (NYBD), and on March 5, 2009, the Superintendent of the NYBD issued the authorization certificate to ICE Trust to commence business as a regulated bank based in New York. These approvals, combined with the Federal Reserve Board of Governors' approval received on March 4, mark the completion of the required regulatory reviews prior to the launch of ICE Trust.
"Regulatory approval allows ICE Trust to bring to market the most comprehensive range of CDS clearing and risk management services available today," said Jeffrey C. Sprecher, Chairman and CEO of ICE. "ICE Trust has been designed to further enhance well-functioning CDS markets by reducing counterparty and systemic risks, and increasing transparency and capital efficiency in the CDS markets. ICE will continue to work closely with the Federal Reserve and other regulatory bodies in the U.S. and abroad in implementing risk management solutions for the vital credit markets."
"Robust counterparty risk management is a cornerstone to the success of privately negotiated derivatives and of the ISDA architecture," said Eraj Shirvani, ISDA Chairman and Head of Fixed Income for EMEA, Credit Suisse. "The development of options that deliver strength, flexibility and transparency to clearing and settlement are key to the evolution of CDS. We in the industry welcome solutions that help us achieve these goals."
Bank of America, Barclays Capital, Citi, Credit Suisse, Deutsche Bank, Goldman Sachs, J.P. Morgan, Merrill Lynch, Morgan Stanley and UBS have supported the establishment of the clearing house for CDS transactions, and are the initial clearing members of ICE Trust. Each of these participants has completed a rigorous technical testing and validation process over the past several months. In addition, each member has made a significant contribution to establish the ICE Trust guaranty fund, which will continue to increase as positions are transferred into the clearing house."
"...to further enhance well-functioning CDS markets..."
Bwaahhhaaahhaahhaahhh. That language is a dead giveaway. Like jumping up in a crowded theater and yelling, "THERE"S NO FIRE"
"ICE has contributed an initial $10 million to the guaranty fund from
cash on hand. Over a two-year period, ICE expects to increase its
contribution to the guaranty fund to a total of $100 million."
Of course, "In addition, each member has made a significant contribution to establish the ICE Trust guaranty fund." I suppose we're supposed to again guess what 'significant' means.
"The aggregate size of the guaranty fund will be determined by positions held
in the clearing house."
Oh the transparency is killing me. Well at least we know they're underwriting 98 billion with 10 million.
"Last night, I saw a dude under 880, just off the ramp to the Webster Tube in Oakland, CA. He had the full set up: a tent, a desk, a bookcase with some books, a rack for clothes - all under a freeway. The stuff looked decent so I'm guessing some CRE was vacated recently.
He does not yet have a shingle indicating his business; but he's set up, under the freeway, for what ever business it is."
Could it be Mr Pandit relocating to his new office ?
Deposits gratefully accepted or new loans personally processed by the CEO.
This is only a temporary measure to further enhance the bank's renewed profitability.
And a desire of the bank to increase its public profile and develop a closer relationship with its customers.
Kindly desist from asking questions which may require Mr Pandit to disclose sensitive or privileged information unwittingly.
your handle Security Prison 21 I hope doesn't allude to S-21 or Tuoul Sleng here in Phnom Penh. does it?
if so it is not only lacking in taste and respect but it is also factually wrong. S-21 was not a prison, it had but a
sole purpose - interrogation. The killings that occurred there were an afterthought.
So let's see: Ice Trust is a special purpose bank subsidiary of Ice, owned in large part by the big banks. It operates as a clearinghouse, or insurer, for credit default swaps mainly traded among the big banks. The swaps insure against credit events of large entities, such as the big banks. The big banks make money by borrowing from the FED and lending it out. Ice Trust is regulated by the FED.
If you can't smell Ponzi's armpits, your nose is up the FED's ass.
"Last night, I saw a dude under 880, just off the ramp to the Webster Tube in Oakland, CA. He had the full set up: a tent, a desk, a bookcase with some books, a rack for clothes - all under a freeway. The stuff looked decent so I'm guessing some CRE was vacated recently.
He does not yet have a shingle indicating his business; but he's set up, under the freeway, for what ever business it is."
Are you seroius?
I live pretty near there in alameda, right off broadway ? I might have to see this. I am not sure a tent city under the 880 would be so great, given the proximity to oakland and that its pretty cold out right now.
Bernanke's actions make a lot more sense if you view banks and bankers as helicopters. The banks and bankers are the transmission mechanisms for the money drops. It's comforting to know that we have the best and the brightest trickling down on us. Of course the taxpayer is on the hook for the money given to the bankers and the money borrowed from the bankers. But hey, it beats actually having to work to pay off all this debt.
Here's a thought. Perhaps we should pay bonuses to wall streeters on a monthly basis. At least until inflation takes hold. Once a year mega-bonuses just aren't cutting it
Store sales fell back steeply in the April 25 week according to ICSC-Goldman's same-store index that fell -0.7 percent for a -1.7 year-on-year rate -- the worst rate in nearly three months. Redbook is up at 8:55 a.m. ET.
Serious question - is there some overt of implied threat (and of course I've read what Chris Whalen has to say on the subject) that prevents C and BAC from fixing their balance sheets by doing a debt-to-equity cramdown like the automakers are being asked to do?
I had been under the impression that the "Swine Flue" was a direct money channel to the offal men that are in the midst of destroying our country, one lie at a time.
"The second lien holder, as is appropriate in the junior position, is taking more of a reduction in interest rate," one official said. "The interest rate will go at least as low as the interest rate on the first and it will (fall) much further to get there."
..... In fact, the program has only aided a handful of homeowners and the Department of Housing and Urban Development will offer mortgage servicers thousands of dollars for each home loan that they successfully modify under that troubled program, the officials said.
"Milan’s financial police seized 476 million euros ($620 million) of assets belonging to UBS AG, Deutsche Bank AG, JPMorgan Chase & Co. and Depfa Bank Plc as part of a probe into an alleged fraud.
...Milan is among about 600 Italian municipalities that took out 1,000 derivatives contracts worth 35.5 billion euros in all, the Treasury said.
...The banks reaped about 100 million euros in fees from the transactions, Milan’s financial police said today. The banks misled municipal officials on the advantages of buying the derivatives, including the impact of the fees they charged on the contracts, the financial police have said.
...The Milan case is among lawsuits filed by local governments from Germany to the U.S. amid allegations of mis-selling and fraud. Italy’s Senate is leading a review of the use of derivatives among local administrations.
The U.S. Justice Department has been investigating for more than two years whether banks and brokers conspired to overcharge local governments on similar swap agreements. "
The race is on. Possession is still 90% of the law, last I heard. Get those claws sharpened.
curious,
"Days before an expected vote, Senate leaders yesterday touted their version of a proposal to allow bankruptcy judges to modify mortgages, but have yet to secure the support of the financial services industry and face fierce opposition that could derail the proposal again." Mortgage Modification Bill Faces Trouble as Senate Vote Nears - washingtonpost.com
I found the Fed statements interesting as an example of damage control.
Whether these early reports were released intentionally or not - and I have no doubt whatever the leak was intentional - the WSJ piece serves to darken the prospects for the equity markets. If subsequent releases are shocking, they'll be less shocking in light of yesterday's comments. If markets are led to fear the worst this morning, subsequent reports may appear better than expected, that magical phrase.
This assumes all such releases are tactical. However benighted the Stress Tests are in fact, the Fed, Treasury and Administration are certain to put them to use to the extent that's possible.
Hmmm, the top five cities in the Americas all have something in common. Interesting...
I think the banking system there still has a pulse too.
Course, we all know when it comes to banks no pulse is required.
Did anyone notice if Bill Gross's head has exploded yet? He must hold GM debt, no?
It all sounds beyond a little fishy, a swinish red herring caught off the Gulf of Mexico and almost instantly incubated all over the world, a variant of martial law that uses fear as bait.
Re. the Senate "mortgage cramdown bill" Sen. Durbin has been playing with this for two years. Fiscal conservatives are against it, as is the Credit Union National Association. The Mortgage Bankers Association, American Bankers Association and Independent Community Bankers of America have walked away from nogociations - refusing even to discuss it.
Wouldn't this be like me financing a car for someone, and then some bankruptcy judge in a bad mood telling me that Joe Blow (who bought my car) no longer owes me $5000 for the car but instead will be liable only for $2250? If so, that's major BullZhit.
Is it any surprize that Bank Of America needs money? When I hear that the CEO was complaining about the FED and Paulsen,
a little voice kept telling me that somehow Bank of America would need to raise money. Funny about that. I fully expect that all
the banks and all the financials will start to support the party line. With the example of Bears and Lehman and possible Bank
of America, I suspect that everyone will toe the line and script given to them. Cheers.
Ken Lewis has been stating loudly, publicly and repeatedly that BofA does not need new capital. Does the SEC bring charges? Shareholders? Does Bair remove him for obvious incompetence? I say all of the above.
I think that may be a bad idea - unless he's charged. Who then has the right to determine a man's competence? The FedGov? Bad idea, bad idea, bad idea......
"Does Bair remove him for obvious incompetence?"
I think that may be a bad idea - unless he's charged. Who then has the right to determine a man's competence? The FedGov? Bad idea, bad idea, bad idea......
Agreed but they've done it before. Personally I want everyone who lost money shorting BofA in a class action suit to get him to pay back his stock gains and be barred from trading for life. That's justice no matter what else happens.
Sounds like a great investment. Where do I sign up?
Hell, I couldn' t resist
I hope Shela Bair gets to take out these banks soon and saves at least a little bit of taxpayer money.
The article also notes that the results of the stress test could be released the week of May 4th - and not on May 4th as originally announced.
As I said, CR, I'd be willing to bet that there is an internal debate going on right now within the administration over exactly how much and what information will be revealed to the public.
(I suspect Geithner is on the side of telling no one nuthin'.)
If Citi needs more capital, does that change anything? Convert more US govt-owned pfd to equity. Yawn... What actually happens?
Re: "No one will believe the test"
What test? This is just an extension of mark-to-fantasy and a way to adjust PR...
'Raise capital, Ken Lewis, or we'll tell the public we never told you you'd be fired; or else you're fired.'
Last night, I saw a dude under 880, just off the ramp to the Webster Tube in Oakland, CA. He had the full set up: a tent, a desk, a bookcase with some books, a rack for clothes - all under a freeway. The stuff looked decent so I'm guessing some CRE was vacated recently.
He does not yet have a shingle indicating his business; but he's set up, under the freeway, for what ever business it is.
It's not a solvency test...
It's not a liquidity test...
It's a fantasy test...
Goodnight, Blonderengel, where ever you are-
Raise capital should read resurrect it! How you gonna' raise something that no longer exists in the physical world....unless it is created out of thin air?
It's the Lake Wobegone test - all banks are above average...
Also I just loved those Shadow Inventory posts in the last thread...
The Shadow is Looming...
Anybody with half a brain(or reads here) knew Citi was gonna need money and BofA does because of Merrill(and the government is backstopping that because that's the dowry of the Shotgun wedding.)
Is this really news?
There are trillions of real capital sitting on the sidelines, waiting for the bottom to be in place, then the rally begins...
Obviously, the goal of the stress tests is to tell the public to take their money out of THAT bank and put it into THIS bank. Right?
How do they do this? Issue and sell shares? Increase interest rates on deposits?
Don't we already suspect these banks to be over the required loan to asset ratios? Was that not the point of killing mark to market? Something does not smell right, and if this report is true (for O' values of truth) won't this tank the market tomorrow?
I think Sheila Bair is correct - the FDIC should be able to liquidate the commercial banks just as they do the others... anyone notice the power grabbing going on between the various agencies, and also the IMF and the World Bank - everyone is trying to take advantage of the crisis to expand their powers and empire - so they can justify a higher salary for themselves of course - that's how it works in the gubamint service..
Would ruby slippers help these banks raise capitals?
or
Do we need a young priest and an older priest to exorcise these so called 'toxic assets'
Would you lend money to either of these fine financial institutions?
"Would you lend money to either of these fine financial institutions?"
You already have. Actually, you've given them money. No return is required.
These insolvent banks should be put in solvent...
So how long until Citi and BofA receive C&D orders?
(Hey, I can dream.)
Maybe, in grand derivative style, it was only a test of the idea of a test.
Why are people supposed to give money to these banks? A repost..
Roubini Says U.S. Stress Tests Not ‘Serious,’ Banks Insolvent
Roubini Says U.S. Stress Tests Not ‘Serious,’ Banks Insolvent - Bloomberg.com
By Carlos Torres
April 27 (Bloomberg) -- A persistent recession and mounting unemployment will leave the U.S. financial system “insolvent,” implying the stress tests performed by regulators weren’t rigorous enough, said Nouriel Roubini, the New York University economics professor who predicted the financial crisis.
Losses at U.S. banks and broker dealers will swell to $1.8 trillion, almost 100 percent more than the current amount, as the economic slump lasts at least through this year and the jobless rate climbs to 12 percent by 2010, Roubini said today at the CFA Institute’s annual conference in Orlando, Florida.
The losses would exceed the $1.4 trillion in capital that banks currently have, meaning “the system in the aggregate looks insolvent,” Roubini said. The rate at which the U.S. economy contracts will diminish from the 6 percent annual pace in the fourth quarter to about 2 percent in the last three months of 2009, he said. Still, Roubini estimated the jobless rate will reach 11 percent by the end of this year and keep rising as companies retrench. Policy makers assumed the rate would reach 10.3 percent in 2010 in the “more adverse” of U.S. regulators’ two scenarios in the stress tests to determine how much capital banks may need over two years.“ The stress tests are not really serious,” he said, predicting even the more adverse outcomes predicted by officials will be overtaken by events.
On this news, some negative futures (and Asian market) action, but not much.
Equities markets are now bullet-proof. Nothing, not even a flu pandemic can bring them down (much).
You can blow your fife and bang your drum but all you will get....... is that there is more of the same yet to come.....Patriots are defined in the current environment are those who will take MASSIVE near term pain for the long term gain of the Country...or some form of B.S. like that. Frankly, NO NEWS is good news.......now a daze.
Just so that you know.. Roubini is now officially in the 'at least 12% U3' camp.
How times have changed... 3 months ago he was a 9% er.
Shit that's up town brother! Cause the rest of us will be lucky to be located in the "tent city" camp. We will be thankful to have a TARP over our heads....:^)
These Wall Street assholes do not stop until they are killed, one way or another....
"On July 15, 2007, The New York Times published an article with the headline “The Richest of the Rich, Proud of a New Gilded Age.” The most prominently featured of the “new titans” was Sanford Weill, the former chairman of Citigroup, who insisted that he and his peers in the financial sector had earned their immense wealth through their contributions to society.
Skip to next paragraph
Soon after that article was printed, the financial edifice Mr. Weill took credit for helping to build collapsed, inflicting immense collateral damage in the process. Even if we manage to avoid a repeat of the Great Depression, the world economy will take years to recover from this crisis.
All of which explains why we should be disturbed by an article in Sunday’s Times reporting that pay at investment banks, after dipping last year, is soaring again — right back up to 2007 levels...."
No one will believe the test results if Citi isn't required to raise more capital.
Will anybody believe the test results no matter what they publish?
Does anyone believe that any of the large banks are solvent?
For those who missed my earlier link:
Bank spokesbuffoon puts entire leg down own throat:
Video - CNBC.com
"Does anyone believe that any of the large banks are solvent?"
One? C'mon, gimme one. No?
timmyone, well, it's not like we haven't given them enough rope.
I still can't get over the 'sense of entitlement' these folks have.
Crystal balls tend to be inaccurate.
Jobless claims hit highest level since 1992
Christopher S. Rugaber, Associated Press
Friday, November 21, 2008
Jobless claims hit highest level since 1992
Bykere said RGE Monitor, a consulting firm chaired by economist Nouriel Roubini, forecasts that unemployment will peak at 8.5 percent by the end of 2009. Last year, the rate averaged 4.6 percent.
I feel sorry for most people, they have no frekin clue what's coming. Our and the worlds economy are going down and it's going down hard. I believe we only have a short period of time to get ready. Woe to the woman that give suck in this time. I'm sorry but the time is near.
Hellenic Shipping News Worldwide - Online Daily Newspaper on Hellenic and International Shipping
Ship owner declares futures market finished
Monday, 27 April 2009
The ship owner who once controlled about 15 per cent of global trading in shipping futures has pulled out of the market to concentrate on building up his physical fleet. Nobu Su said TMT, the company he owns, believed the shipping futures market was "finished".
"We didn't trade anything for the last year," he said. "Basically, this time the world has gone back to the real economy, not paper economics. People must go into real business and we're doing it."
TMT had closed most of the positions it kept open during last autumn's shipping market crash, when it is thought to have made significant profits from correctly betting that earnings of dry bulk ships would fall and rates for tankers would hold steady. Average earnings for the largest dry bulk ships fell 99 per cent from their peak in June to the low in December and are still down 80 per cent.
"We have a few [positions] left but very small and the market is dead," Su said.
Market participants believe Su must have made profits of hundreds of millions - if not billions - of dollars from his aggressive bets on the direction of shipping markets, as well as comparable losses when the market moved against him. He struggled to meet his obligations to other market participants last summer when the dry bulk market hit all-time record highs and he was betting on falls.
Su declined to say how much TMT had made from the paper market but said the company had been lucky always to have been proved right eventually in its bets.
"We want to use the capital to build a new generation of ships and return the money to the industry," he said.
The dry bulk market - ships that carry coal, iron ore, wheat and other bulk products - had now hit bottom, Su said. Demand would be helped by China's economic stimulus package and consequent spending on infrastructure. Many older ships were also being scrapped and 50 per cent of orders for new ships had been cancelled - a far higher figure than most market analysts give.
The market now represented a good "bottom-buying opportunity", said Su. "It's a good time to make innovative investments."
TMT again controlled 130 ships - including dry bulk ships, oil and gas tankers and car carriers - after briefly cutting the number of ships it chartered from other owners last year, Su said. Around 30 of the ships are owned directly, a figure that will increase as the new ships are delivered.
Whaaaa.... whaaaaa.... sniff.... whaaaaa
Ok. We all get it. The banks run everything including the government. When was this any different? The money changers at the temple were the banks of 2000 years ago. A carpenter with mad parables skillz turned over a few tables, messed up the operation for one day, and they had the government have him whacked. Banks running the show is old news, real old.
You whine but you do nothing about it, because the only known bank-less alternative lies frozen in a puddle among the ruins of the Soviet Union. None of your seem to be interested in going down that path and that is understandable.
But your inaction is understandable, because while you may not have reconsiled the thoughts with yourself, deep down you know this situation is acceptable among alternatives.
I, S-21, am here to remind you of why this current state is acceptable to your subconscious mind. While it may not be a good government, any government not actively trying to destroy you, is a good-enough government. Sure, it may make you poor, it may make our children hopelessly burdened by debt, it may proport dangerous lies, but it's not actively trying to do us in. It's good enough - and you are ok with it, you just need to admit it.
Regarding credibility....As was said in Jonathan Weil's Bloomberg editorial today (regarding the BofA-Merril deal):
"The best that can be said about Bernanke and Paulson is that they believed the ends justified the means, . . .And yet, if you think they didn’t breach the public’s trust, ask yourself this:
Knowing what we know now, how could you ever trust anything Bernanke says again?
What about Paulson’s successor as Treasury secretary, Timothy Geithner, who at the time was still the president of the Federal Reserve Bank of New York? How could he have been out of the loop?
One Nation, Under Banks With Justice for No One: Jonathan Weil - Bloomberg.com
Who's left to trust? I don't even trust Sheila Bair.
Bank spokesbuffoon puts entire leg down own throat:
The spokesbuffoon is a partner at Jones Day, one of the bigger law firms in the country, who happens to make his enormous level of compensation by servicing other folks who also make enormous levels of compensation.
His classic comment n response to the devastating effect Wall Street had on Main Street: "Their compensation was completely wiped out, too."
Yeah, he's a buffoon; just a very wealthy one.
Go long pitchforks.
You guys might as well discuss about the details of the Glorious 1985 Soviet Union 5-year plan because those stress tests are all crap. The purpose of the tests is to give an appearance of normality while the reality is everything but normal. Meanwhile, the banksters are looting everything on sight and giving themselves extra bonuses for their excellent looting skills! Well, they and their families will also make nice bullet magnets for sure, after the collapse...
From CNBC clip:
"The CEO's [Ken Lewis, who made 100 million in '07] have taken as big a hit as anyone..."
As if a 70% hit to Lewis is anywhere near as painful as a 20% loss to a median wage earner. Even the CNBC anchor couldn't keep a straight face.
Security Prison 21,
Your view doesn't hold up against reality.
You make it sound as if there's never been a revolution or a coup in the world.
Sorkin of NYT has an excellent piece on the Stress Test as well that just hit the wire.
“I don’t want to be alarmist, but I’m worried next Monday could feel like September all over again,” Bank CEO from one of the 19 Banks Stress Tested.
DEALBOOK; Stress Tests? No Big Deal After All - NY Times
Optimist!!
//“I don’t want to be alarmist, but I’m worried next Monday could feel like September all over again,” Bank CEO from one of the 19 Banks Stress Tested."//
"and BofA does because of Merrill(and the government is backstopping that because that's the dowry of the Shotgun wedding.)"
i don't buy it. BofA knew what it was getting into & shotgun sounds like a very lame excuse. The idea was two kill two birds in one shot, a) Get MER investment business b) Get CASH without creating PANIC (in October, you couldn't raise capital from private sources, only from Gov). As the result, BoA might have created a perfect mouse trap. (mostly for its shareholders )
I think CR needs a full thread discussion on what it actually means when they talk about banks raising capitol. For my own benefit and the benefit of the audience, I would like to read about all the nuances of what it actually means and how it is done.
No SP21, there are plenty of in-betweens. There was Glass-Steagall. The US had a 90% tax rate once. (It applied to one man) There is return of an equivalent capital gains tax. We've had rent control, socialized water, sewer, sanitation, gas, heat, electric, public schools hospitals, unionized fire, police, teachers and civil service for decades and guess what? No Soviet Union. Take your red baiting back to the 1950's. Let them fail, we can handle the truth.
p.s. anytime I hear Stress Test, the voice inside screams to infinity and beyond.
Ruby Slippers for Everyone!!
Now click them three times and say .. all banks are solvent.. there are no toxic assets, derivatives do not exist, all loans are performing.. and you will wake up in "kansas".
Lehman bonds allegedly marketed to mentally ill
Isn't that a given?
a full thread discussion on what it actually means when they talk about banks raising capitol.
While you're waiting, go back to CR's post on Liquidity and Solvency from yesterday. Capital is that little blue rectangle.
"The CEO's [Ken Lewis, who made 100 million in '07] have taken as big a hit as anyone..."
cause he got Arrogant, wanted to be out there - number one, without any concern for shareholders or anyone else. It was all about an ego satisfaction and 5 min fame of being CEO who steered BoA into the glory during the crisis. Poor guy overestimated his .. size and underestimated the size and consequences of yet another asset bubble.
We knew C and probably BAC would need money but what I think the market will find concerning...
1.The "negotiations" (a.k.a. fighting) between the government and the banks.
Sorry Security Prison 21, the current way of doing thins is totally unacceptable and I thank God every day for the complete and total economic catastrophe. With todays Internet, everyone can figure out what has been going on and what has to be done about it. Fortunately Divine Retribution is interceding for the know nothings and the smarter people are seeing to it that things are made right. Tuff shit for TPTB who don't like it.
"Asia Stocks, U.S. Futures Fall on Concern U.S. Banks Need Funds; Yen Gains" - Bloomberg
Why is Europe unconcerned?
since the crash started i keep thinking about this guy.
"Tsunami engulfs a man"
YouTube - Tsunami engulfs a man - Khao Lak, Thailand
Boy, does this surprise anyone? Take Wells Fargo for example, have you seen the provisions they are taking on their home equity portfolio? Laughable. They were good risk managers, but not "I am only going to have 10% of the losses of the rest of you" good. Just like the rising tide raising all ships...
Poor guy overestimated his .. size and underestimated the size and consequences of yet another asset bubble.
He also overestimated his ability to stay out of prison by claiming he broke the law because "they told him to."
Still, his money would make life easier in a minimum security facility.
The important question is: how do you indict Lewis without also indicting Paulson (and perhaps Bernanke)?
I give the government credit for including off balance sheet assets in the stress test since FASB is likely to require banks to do it in 2010 anyway.
Michael, you put $10 in a bank.
The bank can lend out $9, practically no questions asked.
Of the other $1, about 30 cents is supposed to be "tangible", like the bank could probably get 30 cents for it if it had to sell fast.
When the loans start to go bad, the bank must either get money from the government or the market to get up to the 10%. They can sell shares for cash, but of course that lowers the price for those shares, Ponzi dominos in reverse.
Easier to get bailed out as long as you can, or just go BK after having handed out the 250k guaranteed per depositor in bonuses and dividends.
Game over.
Gotta see if Jon Stewart has anything interesting to say tonight, so goodnight, all.
My discussion concerns only the here and now, and only the psychological process of grief.
As expected, most are stuck in denial and anger. I am simply your friendly neighborhood S-21, trying to reduce your inner conflict, and move you on to a place of acceptance.
unless...
Michael and Short, are you preparing the revolutionary forces? If so, cool - it will be interesting to watch it play out. I am most interested in what factions arise as I have often pondered whcih I would join.
Jon Stewart is on fire.. he is the most reasonable MSM news source.. first show about the swine flu scare that has perspective.
Security Prison 21,
The most powerful human on this planet has no more influence on the universe than an ant.. sorry to pour cold water on your deluision.
"Lehman bonds allegedly marketed to mentally ill
Isn't that a given? "
Watch it... My 75 year old mother was sold one in May by her trusted bond broker. When I told the broker her research dep't was mistaken, that Lehman would be dead before the end of the year, she had a good laugh.
I'm waiting for Ken Lewis to start singing the second verse of that nice song he was sharing last week. Sing, Pigeon, Sing!
DAVID WEIDNER'S WRITING ON THE WALL
The bungling bailout brothers
Commentary: Geithner, Summers and Rattner may be Obama's biggest problem
http://www.marketwatch.com/news/story/Obamas-band-blundering-bailout-brothers/story.aspx?guid={E005357E-8BCB-42A8-B98B-C7EC5700CD75}&dist=SecMostRead
By David Weidner, MarketWatch
Last update: 12:01 a.m. EDT April 28, 2009
NEW YORK (MarketWatch) -- President Barack Obama can breathe a sigh of relief knowing he's made it through the first 100 days of his presidency with a successful foreign tour, a promising policymaking agenda and popular support behind him.
If he's smart, however, the nation's CEO won't get too comfortable. That's because the three men he's tapped to do the dirty work in his plan to stem the financial crisis are threatening to blow up the effort through their own gaffes, associations and fast-dealing.
These bungling bailout brothers are, of course: Steven Rattner, the private-equity fund manager turned auto industry bailout chief who is under investigation for potentially illegal payments; Larry "Sleepy" Summers, head of the National Economic Council, and; Treasury Secretary Timothy Geithner, who has been the subject of some withering attacks for his career ties to Wall Street.
Thank God for the vultures that are giving TPTB pennys on the dollar for their no good debt instruments.
Feeling piggish? Should you find yourself behaving in a manner befitting only a Wall Street Banker, you may have the Swine flu. Oink oink!
The best way for Citi to raise money is to buy back bonds at a discount.
"The important question is: how do you indict Lewis without also indicting Paulson (and perhaps Bernanke)?"
Why wouldn't you? If the SEC and JD are allowed to function they will be busy for 5 years. Plenty of lawyers out of work these days who know a little about the biz.
For me though, someone besides a reservist general needs to held accountable for Abu Garib and any waterboarding. If it was good enough to execute the Japanese for...
Ann Schwartz (co-founder of Monetarism as econ "movement") on current FED policy:
Monetarism Defiant by Guy Sorman, City Journal Spring 2009
ouch.
p.s." Bernanke is right about the past, Schwartz says, “but he is fighting the wrong war today; the present crisis has nothing to do with a lack of liquidity.” (!!!)
"The best way for Citi to raise money is to buy back bonds at a discount. "
With whose money?
I think we need to move beyond The Stress Test and get back to how banks report earnings to shareholders. The Stress test is a scam and a PR stunt, nothing more; it has no legal backbone and is just smoke and mirrors to add drama and noise to the TARP confusion. This test does not add credibility or add to levels of confidence and that is why actual audited earnings reports should be dealt with in terms of Sarbanes Oxley/Patriot Act accountability. If there is fraud by management they simply need to go to prison, and America simply needs justice. Enron was not a perfect example of accountability, but there was a legal process that involved accountability -- where is that now? Why do we have the governmnet involved in fraud, conspiracy and involved with bailing out a wide spectrum of Enron-like entities that have provided a non-stop stream of fraud and non-accountability? Where is justice, where is the law, why is Obama seeming to be corrupt and allowing Timmy to continue to usurp authority from congress ...huh, huh?
i don't buy it. BofA knew what it was getting into & shotgun sounds like a very lame excuse. The idea was two kill two birds in one shot, a) Get MER investment business b) Get CASH without creating PANIC (in October, you couldn't raise capital from private sources, only from Gov). As the result, BoA might have created a perfect mouse trap. (mostly for its shareholders )
The premise is partially accurate.
BAC weren't exactly looking for an IB, while Paulson desperately needed a bank with enough heft who could possibly digest them, as JPM was already trying to digest Bear Stearns, Wells was too small and Citi was just f**ked. Part of this was a quid pro quo for getting approval for Check 21 approval and the First Boston acquisition (for JPM it was C21 and Bank One merger)
When BAC saw the initial scale of how bad Merrill had screwed the pooch(my Tier III buddy confirmed back in February), they indeed tried to walk away but Paulson barred the door.
So when Uncle Sam twists your arm (as he clock watches with his free hand), what are you supposed to do, say no and have the financial system implode(which is what would have happened) so the folks here can live their Boy and his Dog/Mad Max fantasies come true?
And now that they've done the deed, should they be thrown to the wolves so folks can get their bloodlust?
If the government wants to convert their preferreds to dilute shareholders to a $1 I'm fine with it , but this is approaching throwing the baby out with the bathwater territory.
Besides, Ken Lewis would have a woody if shares went to $1, he'd be buying with both fistsm as would I. When the economy turns the corner, they'll be naking money hand over fist, even with the govt. taking their cut.
" banks raising capitol."
Michael, i think you meant to say "banks razing Capitol".
"financial system implode(which is what would have happened) so the folks here can live their Boy and his Dog/Mad Max fantasies come true?"
I would agree that BoA was in the worst of all bargaining positions, but can you step me through how this would end up as a Mad Max outcome?
Foucault you, Broward.
"So when Uncle Sam twists your arm (as he clock watches with his free hand), what are you supposed to do, say no and have the financial system implode(which is what would have happened) so the folks here can live their Boy and his Dog/Mad Max fantasies come true?"
Yes.
And now that they've done the deed, should they be thrown to the wolves so folks can get their bloodlust?
[original had more space between paragraphs, KCoop]
Yes.
The financial system will implode anyway, silly. It's a matter of who winds up in jail.
"United Auto Workers are walking a whole new line as it goes from being just a labor union to owners of the companies its members work for."
Barfly.... Are you going to form a union to represent your views to... the union?
Let's not forget:
If the government wants to convert their preferreds to dilute shareholders to a $1 I'm fine with it , but this is approaching throwing the baby out with the bathwater territory.
What's this precious baby we're trying to save?
"It's a matter of who winds up in jail."
Please let it be Paulson, Fuld, Thain and Timmy G. (kind of like Kenny G. but instead of playing the sax, Sachs plays him)
Within hours of signing the landmark Sarbanes-Oxley legislation to fight corporate fraud, President Bush attempted to severely narrow which whistleblowers would be covered by the Act. White House Counsel Alberto Gonzales defended the narrowed interpretation when Senators Charles Grassley (R-IA) and Patrick Leahy protested the attempt to undermine whistleblower protections they had authored.
Ultimately, the White House backed down on its narrowed interpretation of the Act.
I would agree that BoA was in the worst of all bargaining positions, but can you step me through how this would end up as a Mad Max outcome?
Cascading cross defaults, anyone? The treasury didn't have the personnel(and still don't) to have a baby the size of Merrill dropped off at the front door in the middle of the night.
Yogi, nihilism gets you nowhere.
Goodnight Y'all.
[sorry to get politico]
The greatest act of W. Bush's Presidency will be the failure to pardon Paulson, Cheney, and himself.
And the shoe-ducking act was pretty cool.
Utility-style regulation of the financial sector is not nihilism.
Save the financial tsunami talk for your next Ponzi bailout scheme. A falling house of cards doesn't damage Main Street, trying to keep it up as falls is the waste of resources. The confidence game is over.
I'm sure it's my ignorance talking, but that cascading cross defaults sound like bad news for the financiers and the rest of the world. Without them it's just bad news for those of us who make up the rest of the world. I guess we should save them and be grateful if they decide to help us out in any way. But I guess helping us isn't in the best interest of their shareholders, whereas taking our money is. Just one of those tough tough conundrums.
Mercer's quality of living by city survey is out, you'll only ever hear about it in the local news if your city did well. Thought I would share, not entirely sure why, many of the top cities are notorious for their financial services or real estate so it is topical. Given that the Londons/New Yorks/Zurichs will have to reinvent themselves to some extent to get by with a smaller financial sector, it might be of interest.
"Cascading cross defaults, anyone? The treasury didn't have the personnel(and still don't) to have a baby the size of Merrill dropped off at the front door in the middle of the night."
No I get that and with it would go AIG, C, BOA and a few others. I would think though that for less than 700B$ you could put together a pretty functional liquidation agency.
Still even if these TBTF entities failed tomorrow, how devastating would it be? No payroll checks for how many? How long until the good banks could fill in?
Futures feeling fluish.
Banks razing capitol, good turn of phrase
"How long until the good banks could fill in?"
The over-under is 72 hours.
Broward could recode Treasury Direct into a retail savings bank in between games of pool.
Mercer link off limits.
Have mercy, just tell me how Gotham sits.
Merci.
these stress tests... what scenarios are they using?
i heard they use something around 3.3% decline in GDP as the bear case scenario, but I think that should be our base case scenario, and that a bear case would be a bit more severe.
Looking at level 3 assets on these guys' balance sheets, it is clear to see that in most cases they exceed their tangible equity by quite a bit. So if you are expecting future losses (which everyone is) you need to raise a lot of money.
Something in the range of 300-500 billion wouldn't be too far fetched.
More government ownership? I don't see any confidence from investors to put that much money into flailing institutions really...
Also these guys can't earn their way out of this mess. Q1 results were also dodgy and i took some time to write about this here:
The Simmering Pot: The RISKIER you are, the richer...
Good luck all. We are going to need it...
yogi,
NYC was 49th
PR: http://www.pressreleasepoint.com/quality-living-global-city-rankings-–-mercer-survey
survey summary, attempt no 2: Mercer's 2009 Quality of Living survey highlights
BBerg on CDS clearinghouse contest:
"Intercontinental’s clearinghouse, known as ICE Trust, has the backing of nine banks including Goldman Sachs Group Inc., JPMorgan, Citigroup Inc. and UBS AG that Intercontinental obtained through its acquisition last year of the Clearing Corp., which the banks owned. The banks receive half the profit from clearing trades on ICE Trust.
Melamed said CME Group’s bank customers told it that the initial proposal to offer credit-default swaps for clearing only through its CMDX platform wasn’t how they wanted to use the system. The banks wanted to trade the contracts among themselves or with clients and then bring them to CME Group to be cleared, he said. "
--But evidently Melamed had seen 3-card monty enough to refuse.
"ICE Trust has cleared 875 credit-default swap transactions in Markit CDX North American indexes, guaranteeing $98 billion of the contracts, according to its Web site. "
--The big bad bank, taking nice fat insurance premiums, on policies they could never pay, steadily growing too big to fail even as everyone promises to cut that crap out.
Ice ICE, baby.
Pool: which will melt down first?
ICE Trust or Polar ice cap?
"The total in credit swaps cleared by ICE Trust comprises 1.5 percent of the investment grade and high volatility CDX indexes, which total $6.4 trillion, according to the New York- based Depository Trust & Clearing Corp., which runs a central registry that captures most trading. Revenue from the business could reach $50 million a year, according to Goldman Sachs. That would boost revenue 6.2 percent at ICE or 2 percent at CME Group based on 2008 sales. "
The total CDS market is down to about 28 trillion, according to the article. So ICE becomes the official new AIG. Not regulated as insurance, self-governed, god knows what capital in reserve. "Trust us".
"ICE TrustTM is a limited purpose bank that serves as a central clearing facility for credit default swaps (CDS). As a New York trust company and a member of the Federal Reserve System, ICE Trust is subject to regulatory and supervisory requirements of the Federal Reserve System and the New York State Banking Department. In addition, both the Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) and the Commodity Futures Trading Commission (CFTC) may request the review of ICE Trust transaction data from its primary regulator, the Federal Reserve."
OK, trust the FED anyway. I will inquire with the New York State Banking Department as to their oversight. I do actually have some trust in that organization. We'll see if have a clue...
No I get that and with it would go AIG, C, BOA and a few others. I would think though that for less than 700B$ you could put together a pretty functional liquidation agency.
Still even if these TBTF entities failed tomorrow, how devastating would it be? No payroll checks for how many? How long until the good banks could fill in?
$700bn? With X cascades last fall, you're talking $700bnx10 and liquidity wouldn't exist for a decade, 1890s panic. BAC is bigger than the next 2 banks combined.
There's nothing to do for AIG and C but go off to runoff mode, but BAC is only hobbled by the forced aquisition of Merrill. Countrywide is already accretive to earnings.
So ICE Bank guarantees 98 billion in CDS. I wonder whether 100 billion would have mandated a stress test.
Basel, EHP? CR?
And a fine runoff it is. Taxpayer gives billions to AIG. AIG gives billions to GS. Launder. Repeat. Only 1.6 trillion left, according to Liddy.
I'll take liquidation over that liquidity.
The light and transparency from Chicago's favorite community organizer are blinding. Better transparency a millionaire's money can't buy!
Timothy Geithner, who at the time was still the president of the Federal Reserve Bank of New York? How could he have been out of the loop?
There were plenty of articles around the time of Timmay's confirmation hearings bragging that he not only was in the loop but that he took the lead in TARP design.
From their website:
"ICE Trust's clearing services are provided by The Clearing Corporation (TCC). TCC was acquired by ICE on March 6, 2009. Founded in 1925 as the Board of Trade Clearing Corporation, TCC is one of the oldest independent clearing houses in the world. TCC's risk management systems were developed internally based on a proprietary risk assessment methodology designed specifically for the CDS market, and have been reviewed and validated by Finance Concepts, an independent risk management consultancy, as part of the regulatory review process. TCC's methodology is used by ICE Trust to determine initial and variation margin requirements, guaranty fund requirements and official daily settlement prices."
--Because private risk assessment has worked out so well....
"The U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) today issued an exemptive order permitting ICE Trust to clear CDS transactions. In December 2008, ICE Trust received approval from the New York State Banking Department (NYBD), and on March 5, 2009, the Superintendent of the NYBD issued the authorization certificate to ICE Trust to commence business as a regulated bank based in New York. These approvals, combined with the Federal Reserve Board of Governors' approval received on March 4, mark the completion of the required regulatory reviews prior to the launch of ICE Trust.
"Regulatory approval allows ICE Trust to bring to market the most comprehensive range of CDS clearing and risk management services available today," said Jeffrey C. Sprecher, Chairman and CEO of ICE. "ICE Trust has been designed to further enhance well-functioning CDS markets by reducing counterparty and systemic risks, and increasing transparency and capital efficiency in the CDS markets. ICE will continue to work closely with the Federal Reserve and other regulatory bodies in the U.S. and abroad in implementing risk management solutions for the vital credit markets."
"Robust counterparty risk management is a cornerstone to the success of privately negotiated derivatives and of the ISDA architecture," said Eraj Shirvani, ISDA Chairman and Head of Fixed Income for EMEA, Credit Suisse. "The development of options that deliver strength, flexibility and transparency to clearing and settlement are key to the evolution of CDS. We in the industry welcome solutions that help us achieve these goals."
Bank of America, Barclays Capital, Citi, Credit Suisse, Deutsche Bank, Goldman Sachs, J.P. Morgan, Merrill Lynch, Morgan Stanley and UBS have supported the establishment of the clearing house for CDS transactions, and are the initial clearing members of ICE Trust. Each of these participants has completed a rigorous technical testing and validation process over the past several months. In addition, each member has made a significant contribution to establish the ICE Trust guaranty fund, which will continue to increase as positions are transferred into the clearing house."
"...to further enhance well-functioning CDS markets..."
Bwaahhhaaahhaahhaahhh. That language is a dead giveaway. Like jumping up in a crowded theater and yelling, "THERE"S NO FIRE"
Note the big name oligarchs cementing the bonds of more too big to fail, under the FED's sharp winking eye.
"ICE has contributed an initial $10 million to the guaranty fund from
cash on hand. Over a two-year period, ICE expects to increase its
contribution to the guaranty fund to a total of $100 million."
Of course, "In addition, each member has made a significant contribution to establish the ICE Trust guaranty fund." I suppose we're supposed to again guess what 'significant' means.
"The aggregate size of the guaranty fund will be determined by positions held
in the clearing house."
Oh the transparency is killing me. Well at least we know they're underwriting 98 billion with 10 million.
"Last night, I saw a dude under 880, just off the ramp to the Webster Tube in Oakland, CA. He had the full set up: a tent, a desk, a bookcase with some books, a rack for clothes - all under a freeway. The stuff looked decent so I'm guessing some CRE was vacated recently.
He does not yet have a shingle indicating his business; but he's set up, under the freeway, for what ever business it is."
Could it be Mr Pandit relocating to his new office ?
Deposits gratefully accepted or new loans personally processed by the CEO.
This is only a temporary measure to further enhance the bank's renewed profitability.
And a desire of the bank to increase its public profile and develop a closer relationship with its customers.
Kindly desist from asking questions which may require Mr Pandit to disclose sensitive or privileged information unwittingly.
your handle Security Prison 21 I hope doesn't allude to S-21 or Tuoul Sleng here in Phnom Penh. does it?
if so it is not only lacking in taste and respect but it is also factually wrong. S-21 was not a prison, it had but a
sole purpose - interrogation. The killings that occurred there were an afterthought.
So let's see: Ice Trust is a special purpose bank subsidiary of Ice, owned in large part by the big banks. It operates as a clearinghouse, or insurer, for credit default swaps mainly traded among the big banks. The swaps insure against credit events of large entities, such as the big banks. The big banks make money by borrowing from the FED and lending it out. Ice Trust is regulated by the FED.
If you can't smell Ponzi's armpits, your nose is up the FED's ass.
"Last night, I saw a dude under 880, just off the ramp to the Webster Tube in Oakland, CA. He had the full set up: a tent, a desk, a bookcase with some books, a rack for clothes - all under a freeway. The stuff looked decent so I'm guessing some CRE was vacated recently.
He does not yet have a shingle indicating his business; but he's set up, under the freeway, for what ever business it is."
Are you seroius?
I live pretty near there in alameda, right off broadway ? I might have to see this. I am not sure a tent city under the 880 would be so great, given the proximity to oakland and that its pretty cold out right now.
Bernanke's actions make a lot more sense if you view banks and bankers as helicopters. The banks and bankers are the transmission mechanisms for the money drops. It's comforting to know that we have the best and the brightest trickling down on us. Of course the taxpayer is on the hook for the money given to the bankers and the money borrowed from the bankers. But hey, it beats actually having to work to pay off all this debt.
Here's a thought. Perhaps we should pay bonuses to wall streeters on a monthly basis. At least until inflation takes hold. Once a year mega-bonuses just aren't cutting it
I'll shoot Bernanke an e-mail.
=(
Store sales fell back steeply in the April 25 week according to ICSC-Goldman's same-store index that fell -0.7 percent for a -1.7 year-on-year rate -- the worst rate in nearly three months. Redbook is up at 8:55 a.m. ET.
Serious question - is there some overt of implied threat (and of course I've read what Chris Whalen has to say on the subject) that prevents C and BAC from fixing their balance sheets by doing a debt-to-equity cramdown like the automakers are being asked to do?
Why is this option not even on the table?
I had been under the impression that the "Swine Flue" was a direct money channel to the offal men that are in the midst of destroying our country, one lie at a time.
Update on Hope for Homeowners.
"The second lien holder, as is appropriate in the junior position, is taking more of a reduction in interest rate," one official said. "The interest rate will go at least as low as the interest rate on the first and it will (fall) much further to get there."
.....
In fact, the program has only aided a handful of homeowners and the Department of Housing and Urban Development will offer mortgage servicers thousands of dollars for each home loan that they successfully modify under that troubled program, the officials said.
What a long, strange trip the government is making out of this.
Bberg:
"Milan’s financial police seized 476 million euros ($620 million) of assets belonging to UBS AG, Deutsche Bank AG, JPMorgan Chase & Co. and Depfa Bank Plc as part of a probe into an alleged fraud.
...Milan is among about 600 Italian municipalities that took out 1,000 derivatives contracts worth 35.5 billion euros in all, the Treasury said.
...The banks reaped about 100 million euros in fees from the transactions, Milan’s financial police said today. The banks misled municipal officials on the advantages of buying the derivatives, including the impact of the fees they charged on the contracts, the financial police have said.
...The Milan case is among lawsuits filed by local governments from Germany to the U.S. amid allegations of mis-selling and fraud. Italy’s Senate is leading a review of the use of derivatives among local administrations.
The U.S. Justice Department has been investigating for more than two years whether banks and brokers conspired to overcharge local governments on similar swap agreements. "
The race is on. Possession is still 90% of the law, last I heard. Get those claws sharpened.
I'm a day late (and a dollar short), but I want to draw your attention to a very important topic. Yesterday was:
National Hairball Awareness Day.
Please celebrate appropriately and responsibly with a feline of your choice.
Meow!
(Sun GlassFish Enterprise Server v2.1.1 Patch06 - Error report
The most offal man is nowhere to be seen anymore, after giving away the store.
It shouldn't be too hard to find a tall sweaty bald man that stutters often, should it?
curious,
"Days before an expected vote, Senate leaders yesterday touted their version of a proposal to allow bankruptcy judges to modify mortgages, but have yet to secure the support of the financial services industry and face fierce opposition that could derail the proposal again."
Mortgage Modification Bill Faces Trouble as Senate Vote Nears - washingtonpost.com
I found the Fed statements interesting as an example of damage control.
Whether these early reports were released intentionally or not - and I have no doubt whatever the leak was intentional - the WSJ piece serves to darken the prospects for the equity markets. If subsequent releases are shocking, they'll be less shocking in light of yesterday's comments. If markets are led to fear the worst this morning, subsequent reports may appear better than expected, that magical phrase.
This assumes all such releases are tactical. However benighted the Stress Tests are in fact, the Fed, Treasury and Administration are certain to put them to use to the extent that's possible.
People are running out of equities so they can fund the U.S. deficit? I don't get it.
Oh, and in case you are looking to see your house, here are some staging tips:
Lovely Listing – Odd Finds in Real Estate Listings
Elmo in bed with fluuu.
Looks like the "global nice nice" rally is over. Blame it on the influenza, no doubt.
Hmmm, the top five cities in the Americas all have something in common. Interesting...
I think the banking system there still has a pulse too.
Course, we all know when it comes to banks no pulse is required.
Did anyone notice if Bill Gross's head has exploded yet? He must hold GM debt, no?
The best way to deal with a swine econdemic is to slaughter all the pigs.
Very few people are going to believe the results anyways given how they were administered with kid gloves.
dum luk,
Interesting article. If that bill were to pass, I wonder what effect it would have on prices for troubled assets?
.....that's probably the brightest thing I've ever heard you say, AMF......good one!
It all sounds beyond a little fishy, a swinish red herring caught off the Gulf of Mexico and almost instantly incubated all over the world, a variant of martial law that uses fear as bait.
Oh, Ken! You're a Prince!
sterlingerl (profile) wrote on Tue, 4/28/2009 - 8:51 am
Did anyone notice if Bill Gross's head has exploded yet? He must hold GM debt, no?
Hedged with CDS at a TBTF institution, of course.
WSJ Breaking: S&P Case-Shiller 20-city home price index fell 18.6% year over year in February.
Back in the day, almost 700 years ago they called it "The Black Death"
Or situation is more like "The Red Debt"
Re. the Senate "mortgage cramdown bill" Sen. Durbin has been playing with this for two years. Fiscal conservatives are against it, as is the Credit Union National Association. The Mortgage Bankers Association, American Bankers Association and Independent Community Bankers of America have walked away from nogociations - refusing even to discuss it.
Wouldn't this be like me financing a car for someone, and then some bankruptcy judge in a bad mood telling me that Joe Blow (who bought my car) no longer owes me $5000 for the car but instead will be liable only for $2250? If so, that's major BullZhit.
There are a million stories of greed and avarice, in the naked Citi.
Is it any surprize that Bank Of America needs money? When I hear that the CEO was complaining about the FED and Paulsen,
a little voice kept telling me that somehow Bank of America would need to raise money. Funny about that. I fully expect that all
the banks and all the financials will start to support the party line. With the example of Bears and Lehman and possible Bank
of America, I suspect that everyone will toe the line and script given to them. Cheers.
Ken Lewis has been stating loudly, publicly and repeatedly that BofA does not need new capital. Does the SEC bring charges? Shareholders? Does Bair remove him for obvious incompetence? I say all of the above.
"Does Bair remove him for obvious incompetence?"
I think that may be a bad idea - unless he's charged. Who then has the right to determine a man's competence? The FedGov? Bad idea, bad idea, bad idea......
"Does Bair remove him for obvious incompetence?"
I think that may be a bad idea - unless he's charged. Who then has the right to determine a man's competence? The FedGov? Bad idea, bad idea, bad idea......
Agreed but they've done it before. Personally I want everyone who lost money shorting BofA in a class action suit to get him to pay back his stock gains and be barred from trading for life. That's justice no matter what else happens.