New Home Sales YTD

What's special about 1.05 mln? What we know is that, perhaps with a big of a lag, slower new home sales means slower GDP growth, all else equal. A record high inventory level of unsold homes means that the slowdown in sales is likely to be magnified in the medium term as regards a slowdown in construction of homes. That has implications for construction hiring, hiring in related industries, and so on. Why expect a discontinuity at 1.05 mln?

The surface of this report and yesterday's existing sales report appears deceptively strong. This will likely allow the Fed to go to 5.25%.

At least 5.25% - perhaps more
the economy appears to be overheating, with more inflation then meets the eye- which does not surprise me.

You know I'm more concerned about the margins & profitability of the builders at this level of activity tan their gross sales. I've been saying all along that the mega-builders biz model looks more like auto mfg than traditional construction...

If that is the case then strong sales don't mean squat if they are secretly bleeding with every close. Look at the record sales GM has had over the last have decade then look at them now. 'Strong top line' does not guarantee 'strong bottom line'...

Heck even 'profitability' isn't a sure thing indicator of survivability... GM had monster profits a few years ago on top of monster sales... the problem though was the undiscovered cancers growing in the balance sheet... overstated phantom assets and underestimated future liabilities... Couple this with a high fixed to variable cost ratio and all it took was a modest slow down to 'hemorrhage red ink' and 'rain pink slips'.

I can't read the builder's balance sheets & income statements and make heads-or-tails of them but it appears to me they are vulnerable to some of the same problems... especially the 'phantom asset' problem if their land, work-in-process and finished inventory has to be written off. Then you'll see it get ugly...

But we aren't there yet. And I doubt anyone really knows - builders included - how close we are to that.

Anyone else?

DryFly: I'd be surprised if the homebuilders suffered anything close to what the auto's did. Firstly, they don't have the same labor issues - mostly retiree healthcare. The auto's are a victim of their prior success - they made HUGE promises to workers based on a 1970's global industry dominance that simply doesn't exist now. But the unions and retirees won't let them off the hook. Builder's don't have that legacy issue, to my knowledge, and also don't have as large a union issue. As far as the builder's balance sheets, remember that much of the land they bought 5 years is now worth 2X what they paid for it. I don't think they've been allowed to "write up" that land inventory, so they are unlikely to have face a write-down if prices come in, say, 20% or so. The obvious issue they would face is that, now that the general consensus is that the best of the residential real estate boom is behind us, their future projections of cash flow are being revised downward, and with it the value of their stock. But this is a shareholder value issue, not a business continuity problem. Unlike the autos, I don't think anyone is saying the big homebuilders have a 50% chance of bankruptcy and that their very business model may not be sustainable. They will muddle along through the decline, with stock prices 50% of what they were a year ago (like TOL), for another 10-15 years or so. Until the next big residential real estate cycle.

A much bigger concern to me is the negative savings rate: Consumption (and therefore much of our economy) is being fueled by people extracting equity from their homes! When prices come in 20-30% over the next 5 years, many of those people are going to be in deep trouble. The growth engine of GDP in this country will stall out.

Good points felix - I agree. I don't know how they treat land. I have heard that many of the builders were still buying land up until a few months ago at very high prices in places like Phoenix & LVNV... but can't confirm. If so their 'legacy hangover' will be this over-valued asset they can't move & can't use to pay down current obligations. A recipe for a cash crunch.

But I really don't know & their balance sheets & income statements don't make it very clear - especially how their inventory is valued.

k harris, there is no discontinuity at 1.05 million - that is just the percentage drop from the peak that has preceded previous economic problems. If sales only fall 10% this year (about what we have seen so far), then I expect the economy can probably adjust. That is all.

So far February's report has been the anomaly. Otherwise housing is in a slow but steady downturn.

Best Regards.

Check out Bloomberg @:
Bloomberg.com:
News

“New Homes Surge by Most in 13 Years”
They have an entirely different take on new home sales. It looks like they are measuring 2006 Feb to March numbers and not March YOY numbers.
With this in mind, if you read the article closely, you can see that none of it makes any sense…at least to the extent that the individual news bites present no coherent overall picture of what is happening.
And for this I endure the pop-ups!

Few points:

  1. Revisions since October have been consistently downward in every report. Recall that, when first released, October new home sales were a new reocrd of 1.424 million. Now, it stands at 1.345, below the 1.371 record set in July.
  2. Median prices on the other hand have been consistently revised up.
  3. Overall new home sales are 7.2% below yoy, but sales of complted homes are up 10.3% yoy. Builders are desperately pushing completed but unsold homes. Sales of homes not started or under construction are down 11.2% yoy.

YAWN

"Raining pink slips", eh? Again?

That same fly was buzzing that exact phrase back in September.

Wake me when rates and unemployment spike.

What's special about 1.05 mln?

lots of jobs at risk?

Wake me when rates and unemployment spike.

LOL!... ya I know, I'm Johnny One-Note. But THIS TIME it might really be happening... REALLY! (chuckle)

I have a friend who is a sub to the big builders... he had 12 or more crews going full-time 18-24 months ago. By last fall it was down to 6 crews. Not a panic because fall always used to be slow. But right now he is only fielding 3-4 crews and it should be starting to be balls-to-the-wall. He is fairly small so not a down pour of layoffs but not a drought either.

Now in fairness - he refuses to take contracts at a loss. Nor will he accept especially long payment terms - wants the money from the primes in 30 days. If he can't make money on a build or has to finance the primes he will walk away from the bid.

He told me he sees a number of his competitors taking jobs he passed on (he believes) to keep their 'foot in the door'.

As for overall UE... are his old crews working for his competitors (say for less)? Some are for sure. But this is a pretty tight little community and some aren't working - he knows that - at least not in construction - he still hears from them.

My buddy will know pretty quick whether its picking back up again - we are so far north it takes a little longer than the rest of the country to get going. But as of two weeks ago when I talked to them last - it was very slow & he was looking at laying off some more.

So at least in this area (was supposedly one of the metros on 'the bubble watch') it is slowing.

But even so will this guy be on food stamps if it does stall for a while? Not too likely. We chat a lot and over the last 4-5 years he has squirreled away 'a couple million dollars' plus paid off all his biz debts & owns his home free and clear including about 15 prime acres. So do I feel his pain? Eh, not so much.

Don't look at the absolute number, but the rate of change. Joseph Ellis, Goldman Sachs' retail analyst (#1 for 18 consecutive years), has a great book, Ahead of the Curve. He writes about leading indicators in predicting economic trends.

The most important is real hourly wages, which drive consumer spending, which drives production, which drives capital spending, which drives employment. Most economists make the mistake of thinking the low unemployment is a healthy economy, but they are looking at the rear view mirror. Employment tells us where the economy WAS.

Most economists make the mistake of looking at absolute numbers, or quarterly changes which provide much noise.

Look at year-over-year changes. Look at the rate of change.

We are heading into a recession, and the leading indicators are in place: housing permits down, sales down, etc. etc.

Check out Ahead of the Curve by Joseph H. Ellis

One more comment: the San Diego U-T published an article today, saying permits are down 41% vs. Q1 2005. Check out the post I wrote over at
Piggington's Econo-Almanac | San Diego Housing Bubble News and Analysis.

The Businessweek story is bad economics, if they compare Feb to March. Year-over-year, that's crucial.

I just bought a house. I bid 25% under the asking price and they hit my bid. Anecdotal? Sure, but to me much more telling than any of these govt reports or speeches by real estate agents.

At 25% under the market I think there is value where I live (New Mexico).

CR-

Talked to a public homebuilder in San Diego today. They have a few projects that have zero net new sales since the the start of the year. Ouch.

Home builders will do ok. They have the ability to cut selling prices significantly without impinging on their profits (not so with the homeowner with a new maximum mortgage), they have a disposable labor force, they can negotiate reductions from suppliers, they can cut corners and still have a sellable house, they can sell partially finished houses. Dont worry about the large builders, worry about the small ones, the home owners, the laborers, and the stiffed suppliers.

I just had a builder allow me to place a reservation on a prime lot in a new subdivision for six months, to start building in October. They had a 10 grand Builders special on already built homes, but I was surprised they let us hold the lot. Our realitor said "things are moving slow, it will be good for him to have a confirmed build going into the winter".

But I really don't know & their balance sheets & income statements don't make it very clear - especially how their inventory is valued.

I'm no expert, but I just read that builders report the dollar value of their total land holdings in quarterly filings, but nothing is usually said about the prices paid for individual parcels. It is reasonable to expect that many of them will be facing writedowns as real estate markets continue to cool.

In fact, it's already started. Centex, one of the top national builders, just reported in their quarterly earnings report that they were taking charges against land purchases. They are the first to do so and they will be punished mercilessly by the stock market.

CR, if you mind a reader's critique, I am worried that you completetly locked in on housing, which I think you shouldnt.
In my view the international liquidity is a given a thing - i.e. the liquitidy is the consumption that CA surplus countries sacrifice as CA surplus for some future goals(like obtaining global market share, etc). In that sense housing and interest rates are just the transmission mechanism to get grab of this surplus liquidity.
If housing falls, there will be another clever transmission mechanism (maybe high tech shares again) which will let the american consumers to put his hands on OPEC's oil and China's clothes and laptops.
I think the interesting thing is to analyze what can make this surplus of goods and services in international trade go away or even get bigger.

RE: homebuilder balance sheets

(2) Homebuilding interest incurred is capitalized to inventories and relieved as cost of sales when homes are delivered or land is sold.

Hi Guys! I'm sorry, but I want to present you BEST links(P.S. as for me) about Super Girl Naughty Nati Crotch Naughty
\t\t\t\t\tPlease see this special link Naughty Naty Fuck
\t\t\t\t\tOr see this link about Naughty Nati Naughty Shot
\t\t\t\t\tThank's!
\t\t\t\t 274

Login or register to post comments
Syndicate content