You say that the ivy league MBAs and quants have not eliminated risk.. I am shocked..

Can we pass a constitutional amendment to ban risk..

I actually give government the lion's share of the credit for this crisis, Larry.

CR,

I wonder how this meeting will go.


APRIL 19, 2009, 2:46 P.M. ET
Auto Task Force to Meet With Salaried Retirees
Auto Retirees Press Case - WSJ.com

By ALEX P. KELLOGG

DETROIT -- Representatives of some 200,000 white collar retirees of the Big Three auto makers will meet with the Obama administration's auto task force later this week, a person familiar with the matter said.

The meeting is part of an effort by salaried retirees to press the case for preserving their retirement benefits amid the restructuring of Detroit. Unlike union workers and retirees, salaried retirees are often vulnerable in restructurings because their benefit packages are not governed by union contracts and companies often can change terms without consulting their former employees.Representatives of salaried retirees from General Motors Corp., Chrysler LLC, Ford Motor Corp. and supplier Delphi Corp. have been pushing for weeks to get a meeting with the auto task force, which is overseeing the restructuring of GM and Chrysler.At the meeting, they plan to outline the hardships retirees will suffer if GM and Chrysler are allowed to slash pensions, health care coverage and other retirement benefits.

Ways to view comments on this thread:
<br/><br/>

Dead simple, read only interface at: CR Comments 
<br/><br/>
CRC-like interface at CRCizer v.0.2.1a 
<br/><br/>
Full Blown Interface at Hoocoodanode? 
<br/><br/>
For live chat, join us in IRC.
<br/><br/>
To access IRC with firefox, install the chatzilla add-on and go to irc://irc.realize.org:9996/calculatedrisk .
<br/><br/>
Or set your IRC client for server irc.realize.org port 9996 and /join #calculatedrisk.
<br/><br/>
Feed back via bobn 

The problem is the TBTF doctrine. The more the government is afraid of natural decay and renewal, the more we build up for an even bigger crisis.

Case in point: GS wants to return TARP money and has successfully issued non-FDIC backed bonds. BUT, this is only possible with the rest of the financial system on the government's teat. Take away supports elsewhere and suddenly no one looks stable. This is deeply unstable and should not have occurred in the first place.

But with a government bent on preserving the status quo, we're just delaying pain.

BTW, anyone here have a comment on the Zero Hedge's post about the PPT: if they exist, their tool of choice is buying index futures.

http://zerohedge.blogspot.com/2009/04/visible-hand.html

I am not going to comment on this one...


Will the Next MBA Grads Take More Risks?
07:46 PM Tuesday March 24, 2009
By Stew Friedman

Who cares what games we choose...little to win, nothing to lose.

So goes the chorus of the Strawberry Alarm Clock's 1967 #1 hit song, Incense and Peppermints. This phrase — an iconic representation of '60s counterculture — came to mind the other day as I read what one of my Wharton MBA students wrote in response to this question I posed to them as we began the fourth quarter of their first year: How are you thinking about the future in light of how the economic context has changed since you first arrived at Wharton in August 2008? She said that now is a great chance "for my classmates and myself to find real opportunity in the market mostly because we are starting with so little and have so little to lose."

and yet the MSM wonders why we all tune out when they "hit em hard" like Gregory did in that interview.

the only media figure who gets it is Jon Stewart. Seriously. Things are mentioned on Stewart's show that I have not heard uttered outside the blogsphere by anyone else.

more like "starting with so much debt that we'll be forced to spend the next 15 years at jobs we hate (assuming we're lucky enough to even get those) if we hope to avoid indentured servitude"

Larry Summers ? Larry Summers ??
I would rather believe Britney Spears . Seriously !

"I think it is more difficult to call CRE a "bubble", as compared to the residential housing market, but the impact of a shakeout could be significant with the extensive leverage of buyers, and the loan concentration of mid-size institutions in CRE." - CR 12/06/06

It is very possible - based on tighter lending standards that the decline in non-residential investment will be greater (on a percentage basis) than the previous two busts. However, based on commercial vacancy rates, it doesn't appear that some segments of commercial are as overbuilt as in the '90/'91 and '01 periods." - CR 05/13/08

Just keeping track of the evolution.

Shit, I wish I could ask a few questions myself like, "Mr Summers, what level of economic activity are you expecting we'll return to in 2-3 years, in comparison to 2006 say in inflaton adjusted GDP dollars".

Velocity. Ain't. Comin'. Back. The markets can't adjust to that, at all.

Forgot the"r"?

//Just keeping track of the evolution.//

GS wants to return TARP money and has successfully issued non-FDIC backed bonds

A big part of this story is the continued confirmation of the unlimited Treasury/Fed reserve line available to "important banks" : when they find themselves in trouble, the government will always prop them up to ensure their creditors do not take any losses. GS needed government money (not just TARP, but various liquidiyt facilities) in Q4 when the markets were tanking, GS does not need the money now as the markets have stabilized. So, of course, GS wants to return the money to avoid any potential government interference. If the markets seize up again, GS can count on timely help from the government again.

It is even better than the FDIC insurance, which costs money even in good times. The Treasury/Fed reserve line costs money only when it is exercised. Just think about it - a free reserve line of credit. Deals likes this are impossible between private parties, but, hey, isn't it the taxpayer's duty to support Goldman, Morgan, BofA and Citi?

Does it matter? The system is rigged and crumbling fast..


//A big part of this story is the continued confirmation of the unlimited Treasury/Fed reserve line available to "important banks" : when they find themselves in trouble, the government will always prop them up to ensure their creditors do not take any losses.//

badger boy wrote on Sun, 04/19/2009 - 3:40pm.
...the only media figure who gets it is Jon Stewart...

Really ? Are US media figures payed to "get it" ?
Or are they are payed to sell advertisements ?
Isn't that the bussiness model ?
And the people watching that stuff are fooled into believing they are given "information" instead that the whole purpose of these companies is to sell ads .

200,000 white collar retirees? That is a shocking number...I figure there's got to be 4 union retirees for every management retiree at least. That 1 million is more that a lot of metro areas in the US. A lot of benefit payments it looks like the taxpayer is going to be covering.

How about asking what will be disclosed in the stress tests? Or how much money we will print before the banks have earned their way out of their situation?

asset liability swaps! that must be the new silver bullet!

Paul Krugman:
"Is inflation the answer?
Greg Mankiw says yes. Since that was the answer I arrived at for Japan more than a decade ago, I have to say that it makes sense in principle.
But here’s why it won’t work now, at least not yet: we’re talking about making a credible commitment to fairly high inflation over the medium term, yet you still have distinguished central bankers appalled at the Fed’s 2 percent inflation target.
And again, the inflation commitment has to be credible. So I don’t think we’re ready for this, not yet."

Translation: "We're not going to be allowed to show the big inflation engines to the general public until we knock Volcker off the train... Almost there... Just one more push...."

Is inflation the answer? - Paul Krugman Blog - NYTimes.com

butter (member) wrote on Sun, 04/19/2009 - 4:03pm.
"asset liability swaps! that must be the new silver bullet!"

Swaps of debt for equity, I assume.

I don't understand why they keep saying "the first resort for more capital is going to the private markets". I can't imagine the insolvent banks raising private capital without hitting usury limits. I mean, can Citi sell bonds with a 30% coupon?

In what world does Citi not immediately look to the "second resort"?

We just came back from looking at a house. We were the 12th group of people through it today. The real estate agent mentioned that there was another one that just came on the market at 60k less. It is a short sale. One more for sale in the same area plus 1 under contract and 1 pending.

This is Oakton, a suburb of DC. They are selling for approx. 20% less than they did last year. My wife wants it. I would not mind it but we are going to wait another year. Funny, I saw people coming in as we were leaving and thought "My goblin! We need to move on this!" We don't have to do anything.

I read these posts, some books, actually sat and thought a bit which hurt, and there is no way this is over yet. If I am wrong, well it won't be the first time.

"Well, the administration’s been, I think, consistent and clear"...totally not true!

"we certainly don’t want people starving automobile loans or starving the mortgage market or starving the small business market in order to pay back the government."..not an issue...The New York Federal Reserve Board released earlier this week it's Empire State Manufacturing Survey:

"Most respondents cited little or no difficulty obtaining financing for either long-term commitments (capital investment) or short-term needs (operating expenses). Moreover, fewer than 10 percent of those surveyed indicated that problems obtaining credit had adversely affected their production or sales."

That is the New York Fed saying that credit availability is not a problem in it's district. Inconsistency...

"the only media figure who gets it is Jon Stewart"

Oh JESUS give me a break with the inane Stewart worship. The only thing more sad than the Cramer drones are the Stewart drones. The Cramer drones are just deluded. The Stewart drones are as well but they think themselves rational and perceptive. Insufferably so.

well this pic says it all...

Insult Me With Any Offer

"Translation: "We're not going to be allowed to show the big inflation engines to the general public until we knock Volcker off the train... Almost there... Just one more push...."

Very disappointed in Krugman on that one. Everybody wants to punish the small saver to save the economy. Got to prod him along to get the economy going.

What you never hear a mainstream economist say is, "The first thing we have to do to get on track is reduce the concentration of half the wealth in .5 percent of the hands, and get the money moving again." The wealthy never have to give up anything for the good of the economy; that's for the poor people.

The wealthy never have to give up anything for the good of the economy; that's for the poor people.

When management says "We need to tighten our belt..." What that really means is "Worker Bees - you are so screwed."

Forget the top .5 - anyone who is in a financial position of power will use that to screw those without.

Oh, the poster Bob Dobbs. Click on his link. He can write. Well written as usual Bob.

but these have the potential to build into something that’s self-sustaining.

HAHAHAHAHA... urp, hic, {catching breath}... HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA

nova,

Stay the course, man, stay the course.

Bob Dobbs,

About Nietsche...well said. I never thought about him that way. Good stuff...

OK, I live in Boise, Idaho and have been charged with a felony for posting on a blog (not this blog, but in the local paper, because they did not like what I wrote). All I have to say is don't move to Idaho it's a lot like China, except everyone's Caucasian (like me) and part of Mormon Mafia.(not like me) ...

And yet it's not clear that even Nietzsche deeply believed "what does not kill me, makes me stronger;"

Bob Dobbs, I think a better translation would be:

"What has not killed me has made me stronger."

The change in verb tense does make a difference.

But I will defer to German linguists with access to the original text.

Good blog post BTW.

felony for posting on a blog

norma, are you serious? is the felony simply "posting" or does the post have to be tied to something else (e.g. libel, hate speech, inducing a run on a bank, etc)?

British home sellers boost asking prices 1.8% in April

I swear Krugman is a smug moron sometimes. Consider:


Matthew Yglesias notes that Tom DeLay is under the strange misapprehension that Texas is rich thanks to its low taxes and lack of regulation.

Just one minor issue: you really shouldn’t use median income, which can be distorted to the extent that inequality differs across states. You should instead use income per capita. As it happens, the comparison is even more striking. Texas, with its glorious free market regime and deeply incentive-creating 25 percent rate of health uninsurance, has a per capita income of $37,187; nanny-state New Jersey, with its oppressive taxes and regulation of everything (what it takes to get permission to cut down a dying tree … ), has a per capita income of $49,194.

Poor Texas - Paul Krugman Blog - NYTimes.com

How can it be that a Nobel winning economist does not factor cost of living into his comparison? If you plug those very numbers into a calculator like Cost of Living comparison calculator
Texas actually comes out ahead. Note that he chose NJ, which has the highest (nominal) income per-capita. If he had chosen CA or NY, the comparison would have been even worse. For example, that $37,187 in Dallas is comparable to $87,109 in Manhattan or $67,590 in San Francisco.

Thanks for reading, guys.

That Nietzsche quote is problematic. One guy told me that the verb would be better translated as "destroy," which would actually more sense. Because you can be destroyed in many senses -- physically, emotionally, mentally, even professionally -- without actually dying.

Which might get Nietzsche off the hook, but not all the people who've adapted the saying into what we know today, and made it a truism.

I am really annoyed, I'm gonna make some squirrel soufle'.
The damn squirrels are not only eating the ripe peaches that I thought I'd get a decent
amount finally this year, they are eating the tiny green peaches.

I hope they get super duper squirrel tummy aches.

And yeah, we should care about what Larry thinks will happen in the economy because? ? ?

Only reason I can think of is fear he will do something awful and make it a lot worse.

But I am a mere woman and therefore not good at these things.

Anecdotally--Game Stop is busy. Clerk said they are doing just fine. We hypothesized that games==movies, for this depression. Barney's had customers. Mall otherwise pretty dead.
Thai restaurant we like has expanded into former offices next door.

Evil Walmart didn't have much of a selection of video cameras, so the hub didn't get one.

Insult me with any offer. Wow.

I'm surprised the owner isn't walking up and down with a sandwich board in front of the house.

Thank God for our fearless gov. And BTW it was Suzy Pole the realtor and John (Lefty) Pimp the mortgage broker who got us into this mess.

Nietsche didn't get stronger.

Tupuli,
Per capita income can be a misleading stat as well. Texas has a younger median age than NJ, which would suggest more kids per household, which would result in a lower per capita income than NJ even if household incomes were the same.

The wealthy never have to give up anything for the good of the economy; that's for the poor people.

Another excellent point, Bob Dobbs.

Under much the same theory, you won't find many Vietnam Veterans who came from rich families.

Now, tying this to your blog post about Annie, and your comment: It's not weakness to reach out to others in tough times; sometimes it's the only thing that gets us through. It's gotten me through:

I would say my relative degree of sanity today is based in part on unloading burdens upon friends and lovers for about two years after I got out of the service . . . losing some friends and lovers in the process.

For he also said: "Under peaceful conditions a warlike man sets upon himself."

Basel Too (member) wrote on Sun, 04/19/2009 - 4:32pm.
felony for posting on a blog
norma, are you serious?

DNFTT

Armstrong turn date is today/tomorrow....guy has been amazingly accurate so perhaps Summers comments are timely....

Insider info on reality from Armstrong, New Bubble analysis, and Tea Parties providing the perfect government distraction, more....

This week's 4best4worst....

4best4worst’s Blog 

Best to all

Maximus
4best4worst’s Blog 

Tupuli,

Isn't NJ a suburb of NY? Wink

LawyerLiz, always enjoy your commentary. It's like coming back to earth and hearing the bees, smelling the coffee, seeing the leaves.... Meanwhile others trade fire with empty poltiical opinions. Hope you save a few peaches.

You have to want to live in Dallas to prefer Dallas in any category. Our money would no doubt go even further in Tonga than in Dallas, but I don't want to live in Tonga either.

Yeah, Nietche was pretty much a poor soul, wasn't he?

Who could write a pithy slogan/proverb/saying.

anyone else think that the way theyve painted themselves into a box on this stress test result announcment May 4 pretty much means that ALL of the laggard banks will simultaneously announce deals with private capital just as they basically announce that they are the worst off of all the non-insolvent insolvent banks? I mean, how in heck can they say anything other than "all-clear!" otherwise? And then, what would the point of the whole thing been? A total sham will be exposed. So I just see this whole propaganda game as buying more time for the zombies. This gets us to May 4, the capital raising will be announced then, and then we have three more months to the next bank's earning report season, or so. At which point they are "hoping" (ie. executing their hope plan) that a natural and self sustaining recovery will have come about from the green sprouts of a ppt rigged one month mini bear market rally. It all stinks like an office with a dead fish above the suspended ceiling.

umm, that gets us us to my drop dead date--some time in the month of September.

There does seem to be a concerted effort to make things look a lot better than they appear. It dovetails nicely with efforts to announce all-clear on banks (GDD9000) and just generally to generate upward momentum. I think our leaders (minus Volcker) think it's just a loss of confidence, and we just need to get back to ever-rising asset prices, and we have a decent chance of getting there if we can get everyone to believe it's already happening for a few months. Then clear the underlying imbalances with major inflation (5-10%) for a long time (5-10 years). All solved!

However, Tonga is connected in my mind with something wonderful having to do with values and common sense. Years ago, when I watched television, I saw a documentary program about the visit of a young western woman - she may have been American, or may have been British - to Tonga, where at one point she met with a sort of council of Tongan notables, who tend to be very large, very dignified men. She prattled on and on about her accomplishments, and then, while strolling along a beach with an extremely large and dignified Tongan, who towered over her, she boasted about having single-handled a sailing ship around the world on the 40th parallel. The Tongan looked at her with a kind of thoughtful intensity for a moment, and then he said: "What a stupid thing to do."

I think it was the most wonderful moment of television, at least of the documentary sort, I ever saw.

You have to want to live in Dallas to prefer Dallas in any category. Our money would no doubt go even further in Tonga than in Dallas, but I don't want to live in Tonga either.

I don't disagree with that line of reasoning. I just found it remarkably daft of Krugman not to adjust for purchasing power. He would never compare US vs. China without adjusting for PP.

It reveals a certain ignorance about the world that would not exist if he had, you know, spent a few days in flyover country.

I think our leaders (minus Volcker) think it's just a loss of confidence, and we just need to get back to ever-rising asset prices, and we have a decent chance of getting there if we can get everyone to believe it's already happening for a few months.

patientrenter, I have a somewhat different take.

There's some happy talk for sure and it looks like all the banks will pass, but I think this administration is trying to slow the rate of descent in the economy because they really do think it could get really ugly if they don't.

'Really ugly' is still on the table so far as I'm concerned.

It is increasingly clear that inflation is the only way out, and that there is no way to make it happen in a collapsing job market.

I'm still a bit confused as to why anyone might think that the duration of this downturn should be any shorter than the 18 years and counting in the Japanese experience, when our profile in terms of demographics and entitlements is far worse and we're copying every single aspect of their playbook circa 1995.

Anecdotally--Game Stop is busy. Clerk said they are doing just fine. We hypothesized that games==movies, for this depression.

That's a widely held theory right now. Video games are by far the cheapest form of entertainment.

It floored me when non-metropolitan movie theaters crossed the $10/ticket mark. I wish them luck.

/not really

[ Then clear the underlying imbalances with major inflation (5-10%) for a long time (5-10 years).]

Can't work like it has in the past. The USG desperately needs capital not just to funds it operations but to revolve short term debt. Looming SS (indexed) & Medicare won't wait 10 years. I can imagine trying to shave existing debtholders and savers via inflation but the USG is in a box here.

"He would never compare US vs. China without adjusting for PP."

Yep. One of my entertainments is reading travel guides. My traveling days ar probably over, but I like to imagine myself in various places, and I often try to calculate if we could afford to live there. But I always end by thinking that we're best off where we are, even if DC is a lot more expensive than, say, Minot, ND, or Erie, Pa.

I'm still a bit confused as to why anyone might think that the duration of this downturn should be any shorter than the 18 years and counting in the Japanese experience, when our profile in terms of demographics and entitlements is far worse and we're copying every single aspect of their playbook circa 1995.

Clearly someone has not been reading the Gospel of Jas Smile

"...the USG is in a box here."

Yes, one wonders. There is a suggestion of a coming political turbulence here. There are obligations which may not by sloughed off without consequences.

Luckily squirrels don't eat gardenias. The first gardenias on one branch are blooming. I smelled 'em before I saw 'em.

Hey, black star ranch, what can I do to discourage squirrels?

Merritt Island is really a great place to garden. We are right on the temporate/subtropic line and therefore can grow both azealias (sp?) and bouganvillias, gardenias and roses. Roses theoretically can be grown in South Fla, but you have to spray them with stuff every 10 minutes. Here you just have to fertilize the heck out of them.

Can't grow tamirinds or poincianas. Or orchids. I had an orchid stuck to a bottle brush tree; it even survived hurricane Andrew because it was facing away from the wind. Of course you can grow them inside.

But I always end by thinking that we're best off where we are, even if DC is a lot more expensive than, say, Minot, ND, or Erie, Pa.

Yes, but I do wonder how many people are going to begin questioning the American dream when they realize that they can't afford health care and that they'll never own a house. Many of the best parts of DC, NY, CA, etc. aren't accessible to such people.

Hey, black star ranch, what can I do to discourage squirrels?

Increase unemployment?

"... , going and working with the private markets in a variety of, kind of, so-called asset liability swaps that would have the effect of perhaps diluting some shareholders but also fortifying the level of capital that those banks had."

Bond holders take shares? Evil

sportsfan, I understand that the admin may just be trying to avoid a catastrophe, but I think they could do that just by pointing out some very obvious facts:

  1. How much future income the owners of stocks can expect to earn is very closely related to aggregate corporate earnings, and these are as fairly stable but cyclical % of the entire economy (which is pretty stable and usually grows). Show how total GDP changes over very long time periods, and how aggregate corporate earnings vary over time as a % of the total economy, and how aggregate stock market valuations vary over time with both. Give everyone a very basic education on long term economic and financial cycles and the averages.
  2. Do the same for house prices
  3. Admit that the recent bubble in equities means that many people misunderstood how much future income they could expect from their prior equity investments.
  4. Admit the same for the housing bubble, but then add that the excessive leverage allowed in the housing market caused damage to savers whose money was used to lend to people buying overpriced houses. That money will never be repaid, but savers will (for the most part) be made whole because they had no upside and weren't responsible. the money to make the savers whole will come from taxpayers, so tax rates will go up starting in year 201x.
  5. This is a huge realignment of wealth, real and imagined, and not everything will be seen as fair by everyone. but every effort will be made to make sure that people who were responsible will suffer the least, and people who were irresponsible will suffer. There will be some accounting, for fairness.
  6. With that giant re-set, we now just have to start over from the new points, and get on with our normal business, and figuring out what changes are appropriate in our personal lives, jobs, and businesses.

Instead of that (being treated like adults) we get pablum and make-believe from Summers and others. It is more damaging their way.

I watched TV last night. Something I have not done since October or so. The ads were interesting. How to prepare a meal for your family under $10 (Campbells Soup). Stouffer had the same thing as did Popeye. Hyundai was in heavy rotation with the "Buy a car. Lose a job. We will still love you short time."

I watched TV last night. Something I have not done since October or so. The ads were interesting. How to prepare a meal for your family under $10 (Campbells Soup).

Our local Kroger has large displays with Mac & Cheese for ~$0.50/box. Combined with the $0.68 two liter bottles of Kroger brand (orange) soda and by mid-summer I expect to see orange kids running around.

"Many of the best parts of DC, NY, CA, etc. aren't accessible to such people."

There are older people who are, in a manner of speaking, grandfathered into the best parts, and now they're having a hard time paying their taxes. People think that if they live in an affluent neighborhood they must be affluent, but they're not.

There are obligations which may not by sloughed off without consequences.

Would you rather be on the side of millions of retirees that control the ballot box, or somewhat fewer millions of workers that control the pitchforks?

Yodel anecdotal: Know a pharm sales rep whose sales force went from Xk to Yk, at a haircut of about 70% of sales employees. Literally told me he's only hoping to hang on for 8-10 more years, get his kids through college, then figure it out from there. Lives in one of the most prosperous (or expensive, depending upon your view of things) zip codes in the country.

Spoke with a colleague at the part-time job yesterday who said he wants to sell his house but is underwater and can't get out. It is "killing him." He's living here in America thanks to his natural-born wife; he's not a citizen yet but working toward it, and took advantage of his athletic ability to get a university degree (bachelor's).

Colleague at real job hasn't paid one CC for six months, just missed mortgage last month. Husband unemployed with medical issues.

Me? All my savings (sans 201K) going to medical issue in 10 days. Not sure about job status, but if it goes, so does a mortgage and car loan to WFC.

The sorry-arse grifter I allow to live at my house is, yet again, behind on the paltry 2 hundred I ask for a month. 2007 Tahoe still sitting in my driveway, his cougar girlfriend is here and they're fooling around when both should be working; he couldn't get a 1 bedroom in the worst part of town for half his car payment.

Yeah, I'm a glutton for punishment and don't stick up for myself, but that day is coming and it's about 6 weeks from this one.

There are a lot of deadbeats here in the grand old USA, and I have no sympathy for any of them when they get called out, whether they are Wall Street or Main Street frauds.

Lotta people going to be dislocated both physically and financially and that pain IS going to come back to those who financed them.

Hello auto, credit card, and mortgage industry!!

NEW POST at Calculated Risk .

Ways to view:
<br/><br/>
Dead simple, read only interface at: CR Comments  - not available for 5 minutes after this post however, to avoid 'first grappling' per request of Ken Cooper.
<br/><br/>
CRC-like interface at CRCizer v.0.2.1a 
<br/><br/>
Full Blown Interface at Hoocoodanode? 
<br/><br/>
For live chat, and the new Mishbot feature, as well as notice of new posts on other blogs, join us in IRC.
<br/><br/>
To access IRC with firefox, install the chatzilla add-on and go to irc://irc.realize.org:9996/calculatedrisk .
<br/><br/>
Or set your IRC client for server irc.realize.org port 9996 and /join #calculatedrisk.
<br/><br/>
Feed back via bobn 

"Would you rather be on the side of millions of retirees that control the ballot box, or somewhat fewer millions of workers that control the pitchforks?"

It will not further our national well-being if we fight one another. That would be another stupid thing to do.

That said, it may be that the era of the pitchfork as a decisive weapon is over. I'm not being literal, of course, but I think the meaning is clear.

Damn, Rott, here's hoping everything works out for you somehow.

patentrenter, I think you give ordinary Americans a lot of credit for being able to handle the truth and for being educated enough to understand economic theory (even those more obvious facts). I think they would fail on both points.

I'm not happy with the administration's current approach and, frankly, it's a little disconcerting to see Obama/Geithner following the Bush/Paulson playbook so closely. Whether all we're getting is pablum, though, is an open question. I think some effort has been made to date to say 'business as usual' doesn't apply any more.

Although a more radical approach may have generated that massive reset sooner than will otherwise occur, I don't think that would have been politically possible to accomplish. The opposition party has already been tough on utter nonsense. What would the reaction have been if Treasury had told Citi: no, no more money, you had two bailouts, now you're on your own?

We would have been hearing that the new anti-American President was going to destroy the entire American Way of Life.

There would have been calls for the violent overthrow of the government . . . and not just from Idaho.

Yes, I'd like to see some retribution and some punishment of those who have caused problems. I'm still waiting.

Summers: "Well, the administration’s been, I think, consistent and clear in taking what I would guess almost everybody would agree is the right position."

The Washington echo chamber is an amazing thing.

In it, a fart sounds to its maker like Mozart.

"Hey, black star ranch, what can I do to discourage squirrels?"

well, we first got a couple cats - turns out they weren't "coyote proof". Then we got a cute little puppy and started feeding her BBQ'ed squirrel - more and more on the rare side every meal. That seemed to work. She chases everything on four legs except the cows AND she doesn't like chicken. No more squirrels and and lots more veggies and fruit.

Nova, you've been quite the doomer. If you turn, I'm going all in. Housing, equities, bonds... you name it Wink

Right on Lothar! Good on ya mate!

"There are older people who are................. having a hard time paying their [property] taxes."

.....welcome to the supporters of California's "Prop-13". (Older people who after continued reassessments could no longer afford to pay their property taxes and had to sell their property and move.)

Are the big 3 going to compete with cars from China and india in globalization?

God we are screwed.

Login or register to post comments
Syndicate content