"Uh.....call me crazy....but 4% doesnt seem like that much. In this economy, I'da guessed a drop of at least 10% "
As some have said in other threads, a lot of rents nominally stay the same but the landlord throws in x number of free months, offers extra incentives, etc. The end result is the same; just doesn't show up on the stats.
And I also have wondered about the effect of illegal immigrants on the housing market; if fewer are coming and more are leaving, housing would be affected practically everywhere in California south of Sacramento. And there'd be no way to measure it; invisible outmigration.
The question is no longer "why are things falling", or even "will they continue falling". We know it's a huge recession, possibly worse (in some metrics) than the Great Depression. The question that matters now is: when will _____ (insert data series)_____ hit bottom, and why?
Rents are lagging indicators and can be misleading. Reported rates do not reflect incentives and that's where we've seen the most flexibility.
I had mentioned yesterday that my apartment building offered me a great deal to keep me for another year. I got the actual lease yesterday and it has the original "market" rent printed on the lease but includes an addendum that listed a monthly "concession." When combined, this reflects a 13% decline in the rent, yet they are still able to maintain that they are charging me the full "market" rent. I'm sure these concessions are a line item somewhere else on their balance sheet.
.......it won't matter. The typical living arrangement of 2020 will consist of a 6'X10' box not including the common shower & toilet - think Chinese dorms stacked within run-down malls. Enjoy the splendor, view, friendly, quiet neighbors with immaculate social graces and the sought after common amenities of 24-hour drunken fights, arguments, and intellectual political discussions at 3:45AM nightly......
"Pulte buying Centex reminds me of BofA buying Merrill."
And every stock market in the world rallies on the silly news of one crappy house builder buying another crappy house builder for $1.3 billion. I think the boys are ready to rob your 401k once again.
This 4% number seems bogus. The fact that they don't count incentives is blatant fraud. As I stated yesterday my rent this year is going down 14% and it could have been higher if we were willing to move. Is the L.A. economy that much better than here in The Wormy Apple?
Intellectual discussions at 3:45 AM sounds pretty much like my college dorm. Add in fire alarm pranks, real fires, and people spraying pepper spray under your doors and it would pretty much be home.
Going forward it's going to be important to measure those rents in something other than US Ponzi Notes to get a sense of their true value. With the bubble in oil mostly gone that might be a better basis of comparison if it doesn't become a speculative magnet once again.
a story on Bloomie about Paulson's son bringing a hockey team to Portland:
That left a $15 million hole that Paulson says must be filled by Sept. 1, or the stadium won’t be done in time for the 2011 MLS season. He says he can’t commit any more family money. He and his father are paying $35 million for the franchise and $12.5 million for the stadiums. They’re also guaranteeing rent and ticket taxes for 25 years and will pick up construction overruns beyond $2.5 million.
“We’ve ended up putting a lot more on the table to make this thing happen,” Paulson, 36, said in an interview in his office overlooking a rainy baseball field.
Makes Me Just Wanna Open a Box of Hankies! Waaaaa!
It figures that Paulson would invest in soccer in America, a mortal lock on losses is all that's assured whether your team wins or loses on the field of play.
My favorite part about the Paulson story is that the son's name is Merritt (like the parkway, Hank?), when it's clear merit has had absolutely nothing to do with this person's station in life.
Falling rents? That squares with rising unemployment, stagnant incomes and 19 million unoccupied housing units.
Also consistent with consolidating households. Regarding average household size... "the bottom is in", and that's IMHO a permanent reversal of a trend going back a very long time.
"Pulte buying Centex reminds me of the Donner party."
It reminds me more of a hillbilly wedding. You have one mutant first cousin marrying another mutant first cousin and the family is hoping something beautiful will come about. I just can't fathom that Pulte shareholders are happy about a 30% premium they are paying. I know I wouldn't be. Thank god I quit that stupid stock market thingie.
' some investor guy (member) wrote on Tue, 04/07/2009 - 2:56pm.
Actually, as I've said here before, it's really hard to find any metro area where there has been a 5% decline in overall rents. Hasn't happened in Detroit, despite its economic problems. It didn't happen in LA in the early 1990s, even with a recession, riots, and the prior housing bust in full swing.
Real rents decline sometimes, nominal rents almost never decline more than 5%.'
and
' some investor guy (member) wrote on Tue, 04/07/2009 - 4:37pm.
Los Angeles, CPI component for rent.
Year Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec Annual HALF1 HALF2
1999 167.5 167.9 168.1 168.5 168.8 169.6 170.2 170.6 171.3 171.6 172.4 172.8 169.9 168.4 171.5
2000 173.5 174.0 174.4 175.1 175.7 176.3 177.0 177.7 178.2 179.1 179.8 180.7 176.8 174.8 178.8
2001 181.5 181.9 182.4 183.3 184.6 185.9 186.6 188.0 189.5 190.2 191.0 191.9 186.4 183.3 189.5
2002 193.2 194.0 194.5 195.2 196.0 196.8 197.4 197.5 198.4 199.4 200.3 201.1 197.0 195.0 199.0
2003 202.4 203.1 204.0 205.1 206.0 206.4 207.2 208.9 210.0 210.9 211.8 212.7 207.4 204.5 210.3
2004 213.9 214.8 215.6 216.7 218.4 220.3 221.2 223.2 224.5 225.5 226.4 227.4 220.7 216.6 224.7
2005 228.6 229.4 230.9 232.2 233.1 234.1 235.7 237.2 238.0 238.6 240.3 241.0 234.9 231.4 238.5
2006 241.7 242.5 244.0 245.6 246.9 248.3 249.3 250.5 251.4 252.7 253.7 254.9 248.5 244.8 252.1
2007 256.593 258.644 260.742 261.380 261.998 262.968 263.821 265.428 266.358 267.864 268.975 270.330 263.758 260.388 267.129
2008 271.836 272.321 272.145 272.234 273.283 274.769 276.114 276.586 278.027 279.659 280.479 280.693 275.679 272.765 278.593
2009 281.000 281.005
Hope that came out right. CPI component for rent. Los Angeles. As you can see Danny, no decrease in the last year. The three columns on the right are annual, first half of the year, and second half.'
so rents aren't really falling in LA or are you just wrapping yourself in a warm data blanket with a few pesky holes in it?
I think many of us would be very interested in hearing more about this.
We are seeing deflation in asset values, of course, and now as the real estate deflation propagates into rents, that spills over into the tangible economy as well. While the CPI doesn't seem to show it, consumers willing to seek deals are paying less for all sorts of items. Aside from finally cleaning up the fraud and financial abuse in Washington, perhaps the biggest task ahead is to find a way to halt the deflation without triggering inflation...
“We’ve ended up putting a lot more on the table to make this thing happen,” Paulson, 36, said in an interview in his office overlooking a rainy baseball field.
Some people are born on third base and go through life acting like they just hit a triple.
Speaking anecdotally, rents are definitely soft in this part of LA. Every decent-sized complex is offering incentives, and even the huge corporate apartment complex known as the "Hollywood Halfway House" is offering free rent, something I've not seen from them in the 20 years I've been driving past. It wasn't that long ago that you practically had to know someone to find a place.
Aside from finally cleaning up the fraud and financial abuse in Washington, perhaps the biggest task ahead is to find a way to halt the deflation without triggering inflation...
The point I've made in this past is that people may not be considering that "deflation" is simply the financial system working properly and reflecting economic reality.
In other words, maybe this focus on deflation is part of a grand delusion that paper is the economy, not just a representation of it.
If the deflation is simply reflecting a real world phenomenon (overcapacity) then "curing" deflation simply involves "curing" our awareness of reality.
Getting rid of deflation may simply mean creating a new form of insanity.
Aside from finally cleaning up the fraud and financial abuse in Washington, perhaps the biggest task ahead is to find a way to halt the deflation without triggering inflation...
The point I've made in this past is that people may not be considering that "deflation" is simply the financial system working properly and reflecting economic reality.
In other words, maybe this focus on deflation is part of a grand delusion that paper is the economy, not just a representation of it.
If the deflation is simply reflecting a real world phenomenon (overcapacity) then "curing" deflation simply involves "curing" our awareness of reality.
Getting rid of deflation may simply mean creating a new form of insanity.
So I keep reading about 1500 people applying for 35 jobs, etc.
At what point does the employer tell the prospective employees that if they want to work, he's paying $5 an hour, and not one cent more.?
That would be the natural order of things. Unfortunately, government interference in the form of minimum wage laws won't allow it. Instead he'll only be able to hire 20 people.
Portland's soccer problem is that their current minor league team is really only viable because they had regional rivals. Seattle and Vancouver moving into MLS leaves them with no one nearby to play, which means that their entire schedule is going to be distant road games (the closest existing team would be in Minnesota). Increased travel costs basically means move up to MLS or no more team.
Moving up means capital expenditures and over time spending more on players, but also means that they get to share in the television and sponsor revenues that MLS has, and they would have better opportunities to sell kit and stadium sponsors, as well as to dramatically improve ticket sales because the team would be so much higher profile.
Investing in soccer 15 years ago was a real risk, doing it now (at least for men's soccer) isn't nearly as risky. The league and brands are established, there are clear roadmaps for what works and more importantly what doesn't work, and there is a pretty good fanbase as long as the teams don't alienate them.
That doesn't mean it's not risk free or that it's a cash cow like the NFL, but it's something that you can look at and make work if you're smart about how you do it.
Annonie pointed out my post from yesterday on the CPI for rent in LA. I can't find the source data for the USC article. I'm going to take a guess at some potential differences. 1. The CPI is rent for the same units at each survey. The USC study might not survey the same units over time. 2. The CPI survey is NOT for people newly moving in, it is a mix. Some people in the CPI survey have been in their apartments a very long time. The USC survey might be for new rental contracts, or new movins. The new moveins would be more volatile than the average rent for everyone regardless of tenure at their current apartment. 3. The USC survey might not be for rent paid by renters, but might be for average rent received by landlords per unit. In this case, it's like revpar for hotels, and changes in the vacancy rate affect the average rent received in such a calculation.
Typically, a renter deciding whether to buy a home compares ownership cost to their current rent. That is a cashflow question, and their current rental might be very different in size, location, etc. from where they are looking at buying.
Sometimes, they compare ownership cost to renting a similar home to the one they want to buy. This is the most direct form of comparable, and doesn't directly tell anything about whether they can afford either. It does tell you something about whether homes are overpriced.
Wisdom Speaker (member) wrote on Wed, 04/08/2009 - 7:23am.
Aside from finally cleaning up the fraud and financial abuse in Washington, perhaps the biggest task ahead is to find a way to halt the deflation without triggering inflation... "
Oil coming down from 145 to 50 is not deflation. Housing Price/Owners equivalent rent coming down 20% after its 150% run up is not deflation
April 8 (Bloomberg) -- A congressional panel overseeing the U.S. financial rescue suggested that getting rid of top executives and liquidating problem banks may be a better way to solve the economic crisis.
Bookvar is wrong on short selling because his basic frame of reference is wrong. His statement "Short selling is a legitimate form of speculation" says it all. Speculation is an illegitimate form of investment, and all it's manifestations should be significantly curtailed or banned.
The price of oil is not the core component of the price of gas. Refining (including profits of the refiner) is typically about 30 cents per gallon, distribution is another quarter (includes profits of the distributors and stations), and fifty cents a gallon is the norm for taxes nationwide. The rest is the price of oil. At two dollars a gallon, oil is contributing one dollar to the price. At four dollars a gallon, it is contributing three dollars to the price, corresponding to the 300% inflation in the price of crude.
Speculation is an illegitimate form of investment, and all it's manifestations should be significantly curtailed or banned.
It's not investment at all, just betting that values are going to change.
That said I don't think the evidence supports that speculation is really such a terrible thing because it always seems to be around in productive markets and economies, suggesting it is an elemental market function. I do think the evidence supports that speculation is frequently the vehicle for credit abuse, but ultimately it is the credit abuse that is the real evil.
Speculators using their own wealth rarely cause a lot of damage. If you're going to look at limiting something, IMO the focus should be on limiting excessive access to credit.
But that's basically what the Austrian crowd has been saying for years and years now.
The government has been doing precisely the opposite of this and once again Geitner is trying to leverage up the taxpayer into speculative positions in risky assets.
IMO, this should be curtailed. But there's nothing our government seems to love doing more than encouraging credit abuse.
"Economist Nouriel Roubini calls CNBC's Jim Cramer a 'buffoon'"
In other news, it was announced that The National Association of Buffoons have filed a $50 trillion defamation of character lawsuit against NYU economics professor Nouriel Roubini.
"It's not investment at all, just betting that values are going to change."
I don't see how "investment" isn't speculating. You either hold your dollars, or you buy something with it hoping to get more money than you started with. Time frame is irrelevant.
Again, you're failing to comprehend that what you consider yours is not yours. It was given to you by the public and you are expected under the social contract to be a good steward of it. If you are not a good steward, it will be taken from you and you will be lucky to escape with your life. It's all in the Bible
I want people to work to produce things that are value to society: art, science, food, useful goods. I want them to want to do it because their work brings them satisfaction. I don't want them to be slaves to a wage system that benefits only those who are already wealthy, a ruling class that exploits the weak and powerless and takes what little they have to give it to an upper middle class that will in turn exploit the lower middle class until it too is poor.
But you're entitled to your view of society, for now.
I see investment and speculation as different points on a continuum. Alternatively, maybe a Venn diagram.
Here's an example of an investment that few would call speculation: if I take a chunk of cash and purchase a truck outfitted with carpet cleaning equipment that I will operate, then I have essentially bought myself a job; the purpose of the investment is to make my labor more attractive or more valuable or more efficient.
OTOH, if I order a fleet of carpet-cleaning trucks with the idea of trying to sell them all to budding entrepreneurs, then that purchase is more likely to be called speculation. In fact, some would say I bought the trucks "on spec."
All those things you want are your specific wants. You basically listed off a bunch of talking points about how the world would be better if you were dictator.
When you buy the truck for work, you are speculating that there is a demand for your carpet cleaning services, most likely at a price that makes your operation profitable. You are speculating. Everything is speculating because no one knows what the future holds.
Whereas your perspective is based on a world where you ARE the dictator. My worldview is pie in the sky utopianism whereas yours is great because it's the current dominant paradigm and you believe that you are secure in your power and position because you measure your life in dollars. You're here because you're concerned that you're about to lose it to market forces beyond your control but you have no idea how much you have to lose.
This is a nightmare scenario for you. For me it's just a painful stretch of what will ultimately be history.
In what year did homebuilding or commercial construction move from investment to speculating? "Business fundamentals" are the numbers you guesstimate for the future.
In finance, speculation is a financial action that does not promise safety of the initial investment along with the return on the principal sum.[1] Speculation typically involves the lending of money or the purchase of assets, equity or debt but in a manner that has not been given thorough analysis or is deemed to have low margin of safety or a significant risk of the loss of the principal investment. The term, "speculation," which is formally defined as above in Graham and Dodd's 1934 text, Security Analysis, contrasts with the term "investment," which is an financial operation that, upon thorough analysis, promises safety of principal and a satisfactory return.[2]
In a financial context, the terms "speculation" and "investment" are actually quite specific. For instance, although the word "investment" is typically used, in a general sense, to mean any act of placing money in a financial vehicle with the intent of producing returns over a period of time, most ventured money—including funds placed in world's stock markets—is actually not investment, but speculation. Speculation - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
"speculation is a financial action that does not promise safety of the initial investment along with the return on the principal sum."
Which financial actions DO promise safety of initial investment and return of principal.
And I can't believe people think there is a real difference between speculation and investment when most people's base currency is U.S. dollars and Ben is trying to get you out of dollars, into paper assets. This whole batshit loony system is pure speculation.
I am used to Popeye being on the other side of my trades, but I am surprised to see him on the other side of this definition. I am with Basel Too, after giving allowance for the brevity of his formula.
Besides, when Graham and Dodd wrote, "upon thorough analysis," they were quite literally talking their book.
We expect that disinflationary forces combined with overt quantitative easing from the Federal Reserve will push the 30-year fixed rate mortgage down from the current 4.85% rate to 4.2% by year-end
Dead_Monkey_Bounce, I'm one of those persons who generally favors the values implied in your pie-in-the-sky utopian view. But, in the interest of efficiency and also sheer feasibility, we collectivize a lot of functions. I have always been stymied by the question "who experiences satisfaction collecting everyone else's garbage?"
"When combined, this reflects a 13% decline in the rent, yet they are still able to maintain that they are charging me the full "market" rent." ~Chicago Dude
But then how would they sell it for a billion dollars using the calc of rent per apt times one minus vacancy divided by zero point zero zero zero zero zero zero zero one? HAHAHAHAHa
The idea of passive income draws so many scammers in to the fields its gross.....
..............................
ac - great write up on credit vs spec.
......................................
while we're on the deflation vs inflation thing. I was thinking about this the other day. I think most agree they are printing money, Jas doesnt, and I'm not smart enough to figure out who is right. Anyway say they are printing and still the consumers are feeling deflation. I would blame the consumers deflation on money velocity and that would mean that all of the excess supply has been absorbed by the fat kats perhaps? Is this all just more looting of the american citizen? TIA !
Why should someone else collect your garbage? You should clean up after yourself. This isn't a life of luxury here, this is a life of responsibility and accountability.
DMB, then we would have to decentralize garbage disposal. You cannot have the entire population of a city--person by person--taking their refuse to the local landfill. Perhaps Bubblisimo Gerkinov is right.
Depends on how much garbage there is. If you're presuming that we're going to continue in this disposable culture then you'll have a lot of it. If not then you'll have community gardens etc where you can compost or you'll have suburban farmers coming into the city to scavenge waste for composting, and other items will be reused or repaired, or scavenged for parts and raw materials. Scavenging has been an important factor of economic life for thousands of years.
There are social structures that don't involve paying one person to exclusively take away all the crap that you bought that you don't need anymore.
Sorry, I'm confused. Rents should only go down because of falling demand/rising vacancies. How can foreclosures can be spiking and rents decreasing at the same time? Where are all the folks who owned homes and rented apartments two years ago living now? I can't believe that reverse illegal immigration or additional homelessness, or overbuilding since 2007, explains the gap.
At what point does the employer tell the prospective employees that if they want to work, he's paying $5 an hour, and not one cent more.?
When that employer wants to pay big fines for violating minimum wage laws. Those laws were not enforced under W. but are much more likly to be under O.
When oil was $147 a barrel, I paid $4.39 a gallon, and now it's about 1/3rd of it's high price and i'm paying $2.29 a gallon.
Simple, crude is not the only cost in a gallon of gasoline, simply the most volitile. Taxes stay the same, the crack spread will stay relatively stable, or at least not nescissarrilly move in the same direction as crude, the retailer's profit margin stays about the same, etc etc.
Part of LA County's issue must be tied to illegal immigrants moving elsewhere.
Me?
Uh.....call me crazy....but 4% doesnt seem like that much. In this economy, I'da guessed a drop of at least 10%
Rents are lagging indicators and can be misleading. Reported rates do not reflect incentives and that's where we've seen the most flexibility.
Surely there will be a pump after the short sale rules are changed. Why change the rules if you can't really stick it to your opponents afterward?
"Uh.....call me crazy....but 4% doesnt seem like that much. In this economy, I'da guessed a drop of at least 10% "
As some have said in other threads, a lot of rents nominally stay the same but the landlord throws in x number of free months, offers extra incentives, etc. The end result is the same; just doesn't show up on the stats.
And I also have wondered about the effect of illegal immigrants on the housing market; if fewer are coming and more are leaving, housing would be affected practically everywhere in California south of Sacramento. And there'd be no way to measure it; invisible outmigration.
The question is no longer "why are things falling", or even "will they continue falling". We know it's a huge recession, possibly worse (in some metrics) than the Great Depression. The question that matters now is: when will _____ (insert data series)_____ hit bottom, and why?
don't worry, the government will bail out apartment owners too, no doubt, with more of that bottomless pit they call TARP.
Pulte buying Centex reminds me of BofA buying Merrill.
How do people make money in L.A. to afford to pay so much for apartments, anyhow?
Aside from Hollywood and the defense industry, is there any there, there?
re Centex/Pulte, I heard the Titanic is also planning a merger with the Lusitania.
Rents are lagging indicators and can be misleading. Reported rates do not reflect incentives and that's where we've seen the most flexibility.
I had mentioned yesterday that my apartment building offered me a great deal to keep me for another year. I got the actual lease yesterday and it has the original "market" rent printed on the lease but includes an addendum that listed a monthly "concession." When combined, this reflects a 13% decline in the rent, yet they are still able to maintain that they are charging me the full "market" rent. I'm sure these concessions are a line item somewhere else on their balance sheet.
CR & Ken,
I really like the new comments
.......it won't matter. The typical living arrangement of 2020 will consist of a 6'X10' box not including the common shower & toilet - think Chinese dorms stacked within run-down malls. Enjoy the splendor, view, friendly, quiet neighbors with immaculate social graces and the sought after common amenities of 24-hour drunken fights, arguments, and intellectual political discussions at 3:45AM nightly......
"Pulte buying Centex reminds me of BofA buying Merrill."
And every stock market in the world rallies on the silly news of one crappy house builder buying another crappy house builder for $1.3 billion. I think the boys are ready to rob your 401k once again.
This 4% number seems bogus. The fact that they don't count incentives is blatant fraud. As I stated yesterday my rent this year is going down 14% and it could have been higher if we were willing to move. Is the L.A. economy that much better than here in The Wormy Apple?
So I keep reading about 1500 people applying for 35 jobs, etc.
At what point does the employer tell the prospective employees that if they want to work, he's paying $5 an hour, and not one cent more.?
and intellectual political discussions at 3:45AM nightly......
you may have your sights set too high there...
Congress talking the big talk about firing bank management: Congressional Panel Suggests Firing Managers, Liquidating Banks - Bloomberg.com
SEC to announce proposals for shorts today: Uptick Rule Showdown Coming Wednesday | Innovation Update | Financial Articles & Investing News | TheStreet.com
How 'bout rents elsewhere?
Intellectual discussions at 3:45 AM sounds pretty much like my college dorm. Add in fire alarm pranks, real fires, and people spraying pepper spray under your doors and it would pretty much be home.
From EQR 10-K (very large apartment REIT)
2009 Same Store Assumptions
Physical occupancy
93.5%
Revenue change
(4.50%) to (1.50%)
Expense change
2.50% to 3.50%
NOI change
(9.25%) to (3.75%)
2008 Same Store Results
Physical occupancy
94.5%
Revenue change
3.2%
Expense change
2.2%
NOI change
3.8%
Average Rental Rate
3.3%
NEWS! 60 day comment period and 3 month implementation period for any short sale rule proposals.
Falling rents? That squares with rising unemployment, stagnant incomes and 19 million unoccupied housing units.
Of course tfalling rents come as a complete surprise to the geniuses at the fed and on wall street.
Only the best and brightest can work on wall street!
Going forward it's going to be important to measure those rents in something other than US Ponzi Notes to get a sense of their true value. With the bubble in oil mostly gone that might be a better basis of comparison if it doesn't become a speculative magnet once again.
I got it. That the yeast are in control and nothing
will be done* until waste exceeds population, sugar,
and flour.
Nature ALWAYS limits failed experiments.
*-a drastic change in temps will be the thing that
stops the yeast growth.
a bit O/T
Henry Paulson’s Son Finds Dad’s Money Won’t Buy Soccer Bliss - Bloomberg.com
a story on Bloomie about Paulson's son bringing a hockey team to Portland:
That left a $15 million hole that Paulson says must be filled by Sept. 1, or the stadium won’t be done in time for the 2011 MLS season. He says he can’t commit any more family money. He and his father are paying $35 million for the franchise and $12.5 million for the stadiums. They’re also guaranteeing rent and ticket taxes for 25 years and will pick up construction overruns beyond $2.5 million.
“We’ve ended up putting a lot more on the table to make this thing happen,” Paulson, 36, said in an interview in his office overlooking a rainy baseball field.
Makes Me Just Wanna Open a Box of Hankies! Waaaaa!
Citizen DH wrote on Wed, 04/08/2009 - 8:47am.
Pulte buying Centex reminds me of BofA buying Merrill.
Pulte buying Centex reminds me of the Donner party.
My short sale rule proposal:
If you can borrow it, you can sell it
Pulte buying Centex reminds me of the Donner party.
LOL!
It figures that Paulson would invest in soccer in America, a mortal lock on losses is all that's assured whether your team wins or loses on the field of play.
Yalt (member) wrote on Wed, 04/08/2009 - 10:11am.
Pulte buying Centex reminds me of the Donner party.
I'm with TJ and the Bear:
+1
Anyone in the DC, NoVa area seeing rent declines / concessions?
My renewal comes up soon...wondering what room to negotiate I have and what method is best to negotiate.
I've been in the place 4 years.
My favorite part about the Paulson story is that the son's name is Merritt (like the parkway, Hank?), when it's clear merit has had absolutely nothing to do with this person's station in life.
More good news for home prices and sales. Don't expect the White house to highlight this statistic.
Falling rents? That squares with rising unemployment, stagnant incomes and 19 million unoccupied housing units.
Also consistent with consolidating households. Regarding average household size... "the bottom is in", and that's IMHO a permanent reversal of a trend going back a very long time.
"Pulte buying Centex reminds me of the Donner party."
It reminds me more of a hillbilly wedding. You have one mutant first cousin marrying another mutant first cousin and the family is hoping something beautiful will come about. I just can't fathom that Pulte shareholders are happy about a 30% premium they are paying. I know I wouldn't be. Thank god I quit that stupid stock market thingie.
A friend tried to get me to invest in his energy bar company, but I wasn't eaten up by the name of it:
"Donner Bars"
Can't help but bring this up:
' some investor guy (member) wrote on Tue, 04/07/2009 - 2:56pm.
Actually, as I've said here before, it's really hard to find any metro area where there has been a 5% decline in overall rents. Hasn't happened in Detroit, despite its economic problems. It didn't happen in LA in the early 1990s, even with a recession, riots, and the prior housing bust in full swing.
Real rents decline sometimes, nominal rents almost never decline more than 5%.'
and
' some investor guy (member) wrote on Tue, 04/07/2009 - 4:37pm.
Los Angeles, CPI component for rent.
Year Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec Annual HALF1 HALF2
1999 167.5 167.9 168.1 168.5 168.8 169.6 170.2 170.6 171.3 171.6 172.4 172.8 169.9 168.4 171.5
2000 173.5 174.0 174.4 175.1 175.7 176.3 177.0 177.7 178.2 179.1 179.8 180.7 176.8 174.8 178.8
2001 181.5 181.9 182.4 183.3 184.6 185.9 186.6 188.0 189.5 190.2 191.0 191.9 186.4 183.3 189.5
2002 193.2 194.0 194.5 195.2 196.0 196.8 197.4 197.5 198.4 199.4 200.3 201.1 197.0 195.0 199.0
2003 202.4 203.1 204.0 205.1 206.0 206.4 207.2 208.9 210.0 210.9 211.8 212.7 207.4 204.5 210.3
2004 213.9 214.8 215.6 216.7 218.4 220.3 221.2 223.2 224.5 225.5 226.4 227.4 220.7 216.6 224.7
2005 228.6 229.4 230.9 232.2 233.1 234.1 235.7 237.2 238.0 238.6 240.3 241.0 234.9 231.4 238.5
2006 241.7 242.5 244.0 245.6 246.9 248.3 249.3 250.5 251.4 252.7 253.7 254.9 248.5 244.8 252.1
2007 256.593 258.644 260.742 261.380 261.998 262.968 263.821 265.428 266.358 267.864 268.975 270.330 263.758 260.388 267.129
2008 271.836 272.321 272.145 272.234 273.283 274.769 276.114 276.586 278.027 279.659 280.479 280.693 275.679 272.765 278.593
2009 281.000 281.005
Hope that came out right. CPI component for rent. Los Angeles. As you can see Danny, no decrease in the last year. The three columns on the right are annual, first half of the year, and second half.'
so rents aren't really falling in LA or are you just wrapping yourself in a warm data blanket with a few pesky holes in it?
Citizen DH,
Yep, two drunks propping each other up...
Testing my Theory that stocks can't break through their resistance. Shorting some COKE. BBBY was able to break thru but we will see how it closes.
CR, you posted on April 3rd about "Inflation vs. Deflation" and concluded "I need to think about this."
Calculated Risk: Inflation vs. Deflation
I think many of us would be very interested in hearing more about this.
We are seeing deflation in asset values, of course, and now as the real estate deflation propagates into rents, that spills over into the tangible economy as well. While the CPI doesn't seem to show it, consumers willing to seek deals are paying less for all sorts of items. Aside from finally cleaning up the fraud and financial abuse in Washington, perhaps the biggest task ahead is to find a way to halt the deflation without triggering inflation...
“We’ve ended up putting a lot more on the table to make this thing happen,” Paulson, 36, said in an interview in his office overlooking a rainy baseball field.
Some people are born on third base and go through life acting like they just hit a triple.
Inflation in things you need; deflation in things you can no longer afford. We are all going to be a bit poorer.
Hysterian
The Haircut that the Cadillac Escalade Hybrids are taking prove you wrong
BS. Deflation in things I can no longer afford.
Speaking anecdotally, rents are definitely soft in this part of LA. Every decent-sized complex is offering incentives, and even the huge corporate apartment complex known as the "Hollywood Halfway House" is offering free rent, something I've not seen from them in the 20 years I've been driving past. It wasn't that long ago that you practically had to know someone to find a place.
Aside from finally cleaning up the fraud and financial abuse in Washington, perhaps the biggest task ahead is to find a way to halt the deflation without triggering inflation...
The point I've made in this past is that people may not be considering that "deflation" is simply the financial system working properly and reflecting economic reality.
In other words, maybe this focus on deflation is part of a grand delusion that paper is the economy, not just a representation of it.
If the deflation is simply reflecting a real world phenomenon (overcapacity) then "curing" deflation simply involves "curing" our awareness of reality.
Getting rid of deflation may simply mean creating a new form of insanity.
The current form has not served us well.
sanityclause (member) wrote on Wed, 04/08/2009 - 6:20pm.
My favorite part about the Paulson story is that the son's name is Merritt ...
Maybe that's where he was conceived.
Aside from finally cleaning up the fraud and financial abuse in Washington, perhaps the biggest task ahead is to find a way to halt the deflation without triggering inflation...
The point I've made in this past is that people may not be considering that "deflation" is simply the financial system working properly and reflecting economic reality.
In other words, maybe this focus on deflation is part of a grand delusion that paper is the economy, not just a representation of it.
If the deflation is simply reflecting a real world phenomenon (overcapacity) then "curing" deflation simply involves "curing" our awareness of reality.
Getting rid of deflation may simply mean creating a new form of insanity.
The current form has not served us well.
So I keep reading about 1500 people applying for 35 jobs, etc.
At what point does the employer tell the prospective employees that if they want to work, he's paying $5 an hour, and not one cent more.?
That would be the natural order of things. Unfortunately, government interference in the form of minimum wage laws won't allow it. Instead he'll only be able to hire 20 people.
Oh wait ... that's Marriot ...
... nevermind.
Portland's soccer problem is that their current minor league team is really only viable because they had regional rivals. Seattle and Vancouver moving into MLS leaves them with no one nearby to play, which means that their entire schedule is going to be distant road games (the closest existing team would be in Minnesota). Increased travel costs basically means move up to MLS or no more team.
Moving up means capital expenditures and over time spending more on players, but also means that they get to share in the television and sponsor revenues that MLS has, and they would have better opportunities to sell kit and stadium sponsors, as well as to dramatically improve ticket sales because the team would be so much higher profile.
Investing in soccer 15 years ago was a real risk, doing it now (at least for men's soccer) isn't nearly as risky. The league and brands are established, there are clear roadmaps for what works and more importantly what doesn't work, and there is a pretty good fanbase as long as the teams don't alienate them.
That doesn't mean it's not risk free or that it's a cash cow like the NFL, but it's something that you can look at and make work if you're smart about how you do it.
TCA - Exactly. The minimum wage effect is only "good" for those who get hired. The rest starve.
Wage laws were something an orderly society could waste time and energy worrying about, most lawsuits also.
It's a brave (well not very) new world~
Annonie pointed out my post from yesterday on the CPI for rent in LA. I can't find the source data for the USC article. I'm going to take a guess at some potential differences. 1. The CPI is rent for the same units at each survey. The USC study might not survey the same units over time. 2. The CPI survey is NOT for people newly moving in, it is a mix. Some people in the CPI survey have been in their apartments a very long time. The USC survey might be for new rental contracts, or new movins. The new moveins would be more volatile than the average rent for everyone regardless of tenure at their current apartment. 3. The USC survey might not be for rent paid by renters, but might be for average rent received by landlords per unit. In this case, it's like revpar for hotels, and changes in the vacancy rate affect the average rent received in such a calculation.
Typically, a renter deciding whether to buy a home compares ownership cost to their current rent. That is a cashflow question, and their current rental might be very different in size, location, etc. from where they are looking at buying.
Sometimes, they compare ownership cost to renting a similar home to the one they want to buy. This is the most direct form of comparable, and doesn't directly tell anything about whether they can afford either. It does tell you something about whether homes are overpriced.
Wisdom Speaker (member) wrote on Wed, 04/08/2009 - 7:23am.
Aside from finally cleaning up the fraud and financial abuse in Washington, perhaps the biggest task ahead is to find a way to halt the deflation without triggering inflation... "
Oil coming down from 145 to 50 is not deflation. Housing Price/Owners equivalent rent coming down 20% after its 150% run up is not deflation
Congressional Panel Suggests Firing Managers, Liquidating Banks
April 8 (Bloomberg) -- A congressional panel overseeing the U.S. financial rescue suggested that getting rid of top executives and liquidating problem banks may be a better way to solve the economic crisis.
Congressional Panel Suggests Firing Managers, Liquidating Banks - Bloomberg.com
Falling rents and flat debt equals.........DEFAULTS!!!!
Riddle me this batman?
When oil was $147 a barrel, I paid $4.39 a gallon, and now it's about 1/3rd of it's high price and i'm paying $2.29 a gallon.
Bookvar is wrong on short selling because his basic frame of reference is wrong. His statement "Short selling is a legitimate form of speculation" says it all. Speculation is an illegitimate form of investment, and all it's manifestations should be significantly curtailed or banned.
"Speculation is an illegitimate form of investment, and all it's manifestations should be significantly curtailed or banned. "
But you don't speculate, you invest for the long term. Right? What is the time limit for speculation versus investment, oh wise one?
The price of oil is not the core component of the price of gas. Refining (including profits of the refiner) is typically about 30 cents per gallon, distribution is another quarter (includes profits of the distributors and stations), and fifty cents a gallon is the norm for taxes nationwide. The rest is the price of oil. At two dollars a gallon, oil is contributing one dollar to the price. At four dollars a gallon, it is contributing three dollars to the price, corresponding to the 300% inflation in the price of crude.
Based on the federal tax code, the time limit for speculative activities is one year.
In my mind non-direct investment is speculative on it's face, but I'm not in the majority.
Should read not the ONLY core component of the price of gas. And if you're paying $2.30 you're paying too much, I pay $1.90 to fill up here in Boston.
Speculation is an illegitimate form of investment, and all it's manifestations should be significantly curtailed or banned.
ok Hitler, then why not continue that train of thought and tell us what we should do with our disposable income.
Godwin hereby invoked.
Another feud for 'Mad Money' host: Economist Nouriel Roubini calls CNBC's Jim Cramer a 'buffoon'
Another feud for 'Mad Money' host: Economist Nouriel Roubini calls CNBC's Jim Cramer a 'buffoon'
Why am I the only one posting?
"Based on the federal tax code..."
Oh, that's effin' brilliant. Let's use the tax code to mandate investment decisions.
DON'T TELL ME WHAT I CAN OR CAN'T DO WITH MY MONEY!
Speculation is an illegitimate form of investment, and all it's manifestations should be significantly curtailed or banned.
It's not investment at all, just betting that values are going to change.
That said I don't think the evidence supports that speculation is really such a terrible thing because it always seems to be around in productive markets and economies, suggesting it is an elemental market function. I do think the evidence supports that speculation is frequently the vehicle for credit abuse, but ultimately it is the credit abuse that is the real evil.
Speculators using their own wealth rarely cause a lot of damage. If you're going to look at limiting something, IMO the focus should be on limiting excessive access to credit.
But that's basically what the Austrian crowd has been saying for years and years now.
The government has been doing precisely the opposite of this and once again Geitner is trying to leverage up the taxpayer into speculative positions in risky assets.
IMO, this should be curtailed. But there's nothing our government seems to love doing more than encouraging credit abuse.
It's not your money, it's a representation of the common weal. You're just borrowing it.
"Economist Nouriel Roubini calls CNBC's Jim Cramer a 'buffoon'"
In other news, it was announced that The National Association of Buffoons have filed a $50 trillion defamation of character lawsuit against NYU economics professor Nouriel Roubini.
"It's not investment at all, just betting that values are going to change."
I don't see how "investment" isn't speculating. You either hold your dollars, or you buy something with it hoping to get more money than you started with. Time frame is irrelevant.
Falling rents and flat debt equals.........Another TARP opportunity.
Again, you're failing to comprehend that what you consider yours is not yours. It was given to you by the public and you are expected under the social contract to be a good steward of it. If you are not a good steward, it will be taken from you and you will be lucky to escape with your life. It's all in the Bible
"It's not your money, it's a representation of the common weal. You're just borrowing it. "
Uh-huh. You want people to work for money, but then you want to tell them the money isn't theirs. F U.
San Francisco proper rents are coming down while the number of rentals is rising rapidly.
it will be taken from you and you will be lucky to escape with your life
Next year's news.
I want people to work to produce things that are value to society: art, science, food, useful goods. I want them to want to do it because their work brings them satisfaction. I don't want them to be slaves to a wage system that benefits only those who are already wealthy, a ruling class that exploits the weak and powerless and takes what little they have to give it to an upper middle class that will in turn exploit the lower middle class until it too is poor.
But you're entitled to your view of society, for now.
I see investment and speculation as different points on a continuum. Alternatively, maybe a Venn diagram.
Here's an example of an investment that few would call speculation: if I take a chunk of cash and purchase a truck outfitted with carpet cleaning equipment that I will operate, then I have essentially bought myself a job; the purpose of the investment is to make my labor more attractive or more valuable or more efficient.
OTOH, if I order a fleet of carpet-cleaning trucks with the idea of trying to sell them all to budding entrepreneurs, then that purchase is more likely to be called speculation. In fact, some would say I bought the trucks "on spec."
Dead Monkey,
All those things you want are your specific wants. You basically listed off a bunch of talking points about how the world would be better if you were dictator.
investment = appreciation/profits based on the business fundamentals
speculation = appreciation/profits based on a bigger fool
ATM Card,
When you buy the truck for work, you are speculating that there is a demand for your carpet cleaning services, most likely at a price that makes your operation profitable. You are speculating. Everything is speculating because no one knows what the future holds.
You ppl are unmutual. Hillary and Newt are logging your IP addresses. You have been warned.
Whereas your perspective is based on a world where you ARE the dictator. My worldview is pie in the sky utopianism whereas yours is great because it's the current dominant paradigm and you believe that you are secure in your power and position because you measure your life in dollars. You're here because you're concerned that you're about to lose it to market forces beyond your control but you have no idea how much you have to lose.
This is a nightmare scenario for you. For me it's just a painful stretch of what will ultimately be history.
Basel Too,
In what year did homebuilding or commercial construction move from investment to speculating? "Business fundamentals" are the numbers you guesstimate for the future.
In finance, speculation is a financial action that does not promise safety of the initial investment along with the return on the principal sum.[1] Speculation typically involves the lending of money or the purchase of assets, equity or debt but in a manner that has not been given thorough analysis or is deemed to have low margin of safety or a significant risk of the loss of the principal investment. The term, "speculation," which is formally defined as above in Graham and Dodd's 1934 text, Security Analysis, contrasts with the term "investment," which is an financial operation that, upon thorough analysis, promises safety of principal and a satisfactory return.[2]
In a financial context, the terms "speculation" and "investment" are actually quite specific. For instance, although the word "investment" is typically used, in a general sense, to mean any act of placing money in a financial vehicle with the intent of producing returns over a period of time, most ventured money—including funds placed in world's stock markets—is actually not investment, but speculation.
Speculation - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
"Whereas your perspective is based on a world where you ARE the dictator."
You're right. I dictate my life, and if you tell me my money isn't my money I won't work for your money anymore.
"speculation is a financial action that does not promise safety of the initial investment along with the return on the principal sum."
Which financial actions DO promise safety of initial investment and return of principal.
And I can't believe people think there is a real difference between speculation and investment when most people's base currency is U.S. dollars and Ben is trying to get you out of dollars, into paper assets. This whole batshit loony system is pure speculation.
And I quit.
Dead_Monkey_Bounce,
"Again, you're failing to comprehend that what you consider yours is not yours."
So whose ideas are you expousing? And why are you speculating in them? Whose time are you speculating away as you play here?
the differential between the decline in oil prices and the decline in gas prices is taxes, which have not changed
another retailer beat estimates. Jos A Banks (+17%)
of course, how much of that is real, who knows?
I am used to Popeye being on the other side of my trades, but I am surprised to see him on the other side of this definition. I am with Basel Too, after giving allowance for the brevity of his formula.
Besides, when Graham and Dodd wrote, "upon thorough analysis," they were quite literally talking their book.
This thread reads like a room full of high undergrads.
We expect that disinflationary forces combined with overt quantitative easing from the Federal Reserve will push the 30-year fixed rate mortgage down from the current 4.85% rate to 4.2% by year-end
anybody seeing 4.85%?
Dead_Monkey_Bounce, I'm one of those persons who generally favors the values implied in your pie-in-the-sky utopian view. But, in the interest of efficiency and also sheer feasibility, we collectivize a lot of functions. I have always been stymied by the question "who experiences satisfaction collecting everyone else's garbage?"
"When combined, this reflects a 13% decline in the rent, yet they are still able to maintain that they are charging me the full "market" rent." ~Chicago Dude
But then how would they sell it for a billion dollars using the calc of rent per apt times one minus vacancy divided by zero point zero zero zero zero zero zero zero one? HAHAHAHAHa
The idea of passive income draws so many scammers in to the fields its gross.....
..............................
ac - great write up on credit vs spec.
......................................
while we're on the deflation vs inflation thing. I was thinking about this the other day. I think most agree they are printing money, Jas doesnt, and I'm not smart enough to figure out who is right. Anyway say they are printing and still the consumers are feeling deflation. I would blame the consumers deflation on money velocity and that would mean that all of the excess supply has been absorbed by the fat kats perhaps? Is this all just more looting of the american citizen? TIA !
... "who experiences satisfaction collecting everyone else's garbage?"
Don't knock it ... govt. job, short hours, good benefits ... could be a lot worse.
new post.
The future inventor of the iRobot Bathroomba?
Why should someone else collect your garbage? You should clean up after yourself. This isn't a life of luxury here, this is a life of responsibility and accountability.
DMB, then we would have to decentralize garbage disposal. You cannot have the entire population of a city--person by person--taking their refuse to the local landfill. Perhaps Bubblisimo Gerkinov is right.
Depends on how much garbage there is. If you're presuming that we're going to continue in this disposable culture then you'll have a lot of it. If not then you'll have community gardens etc where you can compost or you'll have suburban farmers coming into the city to scavenge waste for composting, and other items will be reused or repaired, or scavenged for parts and raw materials. Scavenging has been an important factor of economic life for thousands of years.
There are social structures that don't involve paying one person to exclusively take away all the crap that you bought that you don't need anymore.
lmfao, there is NO WAY rents "fell" only 4%, what a joke.
apartments that were going like hotcakes a year ago for $1,100/month are sitting empty and begging at $700 today.
with so many deals one with extreme leverage and i/o notes due soon, you are going to see MASSIVE carnage throughout los angeles.
Sorry, I'm confused. Rents should only go down because of falling demand/rising vacancies. How can foreclosures can be spiking and rents decreasing at the same time? Where are all the folks who owned homes and rented apartments two years ago living now? I can't believe that reverse illegal immigration or additional homelessness, or overbuilding since 2007, explains the gap.
At what point does the employer tell the prospective employees that if they want to work, he's paying $5 an hour, and not one cent more.?
When that employer wants to pay big fines for violating minimum wage laws. Those laws were not enforced under W. but are much more likly to be under O.
When oil was $147 a barrel, I paid $4.39 a gallon, and now it's about 1/3rd of it's high price and i'm paying $2.29 a gallon.
Simple, crude is not the only cost in a gallon of gasoline, simply the most volitile. Taxes stay the same, the crack spread will stay relatively stable, or at least not nescissarrilly move in the same direction as crude, the retailer's profit margin stays about the same, etc etc.