do you think CITI should ask for a price adjustment with Paulson and CO?
paulson's fund was up seven fold in '07 !
maybe they could give a kickback to citi, help'em out, ya know!
No one could have predicted lending money to people that don't pay back money could have turned bad. It's unprecedented!!!
Nevermind that half of all Jumbos are in California, and 2/3 of those are interest only or negative amortization. That's a formula for growth right there! If everyone keeps paying more for housing we'll all be billionaires!!!!!
CR - is it starting to 'look' like a recession out there?
I ask that 'cause in the '80s Farm Crisis things got shabby really fast - strip malls emptied, tumbleweeds grew up in the cracks of farm product factories, paint peeled on about everything... etc.
I know it's early but a lot of us don't SEE So Cal all that often... what's it looking like? And what's the talk on the street out there?
You been through these before - me too - until recently (like within the last month even) I didn't see much that made it look like a recession was imminent (other than the numbers you and other econ wonks post)... now I'm starting to see the beginnings.
I can tell you that it is starting to look like one along Rt 80 in northern california. Driving from SF to SACTO brings into view an increasingly large number of going out of business, vacant and otherwise never occupied property on the commercial side. And of course we already know the residential picture along that road is skidsville. But I think we are really seeing the effect of a dying consumer on retail and the flowthrough to commercial building, which is to come as vacancies shoot up.
With the economy now in recession, a lot of the housing inventory will shift into the "must sell" category, and I also doubt banks would be willing to carry REOs until the market recovers ... whenever that comes.
All this supply being dumped onto the market and cleared at a median price of $425k? Sorry, don't think so.
As the saying goes, "Where are the customers' yachts?"
FWIW, I don't see obvious signs here in the Northern part of the state. Mostly folks still feel rich and spend.
However, here's a sign of change coming in the Bay Area: I am seeing lots of rental ads (for single family homes) in my area that are priced completely out of whack with reality. In particular, I keep an eye on Los Gatos, CA. Suddenly, there are lots of houses being offered at rental rates 75% to 100% above the "established" market rate.
They are often advertised as "executive homes", and they are completely remodeled, or even newly built.
I wonder why these folks are offering up these homes that they recently rebuilt or remodeled? Nothing like building your dream home, only to have to move out a few years later.... That's what I am seeing that is most telling.
CR - is it starting to 'look' like a recession out there?
I ask that 'cause in the '80s Farm Crisis things got shabby really fast - strip malls emptied, tumbleweeds grew up in the cracks of farm product factories, paint peeled on about everything... etc.
You know, my suspicion is that a lot of this real estate business was run out of peoples' homes and is therefore less visible.
I wonder if the nature of a huge surge in the economy due to mortgage borrowing and house flipping can be thought of a huge surge in home based business? American households, afterall, were a big part of this cycling of money through the economy using mortgage based credit even if they weren't directly involved in sales and remodeling.
That may explain why things could look less like past recessions in terms of the strip malls etc. At the outset anyhow.
It is sunny in LA today, high in the mid 70's, people are going to the gym, getting botox shots, all the same as any other day . . . except that their houses are worth less and less and less.
No tumbleweeds. . . .yet. But the pinch is going to start to hit, not just from housing and the broken home ATMs, but also from constrained spending by the state, realtors out of work, Countrywide leaving Calabasas for North Carolina (got to expect that) and lets not forget everyone out of work from the screen writers strike..........
I think this plus the Option Arm implosion spells doom.
What! That wasn't supposed to happen ... Here in southwest Idaho we have a 20 year (or a 240 month) supply of homes over $500,000.00 built just for Californians ...
dryfly, I don't know yet, I haven't been getting out much the last couple of weeks since my lady friend is out of town. I'll let you know later this month.
She is very funny. Every time we went out in December, the restaurants and the stores were very crowded - she was always kidded me "Hey, where is the recession?" It definitely didn't feel like a recession in SoCal in December.
SoCal has been sort of the Tale of Two Cities. Around us everything has been business as usual; however, a friend that lives across town has been saying it was dead slow for over a year.
Well I am seeing some things. Lots of brand new CRE along the 101 fwy from West SF Valley to Ventura. It's all got lease signs...
Seeing some long time established retail with going out of business sales. Many are furniture stores...mom and pop types, as well as chains.
Things like a comp usa that shuttered last spring, still empty. Ownit Mortgage building (rather large) empty since 01.07.
New housing complexes sitting 1/3 to 1/2 full and inventory not moving. Condo complexes still getting built with little interest. I mean who wants a Jumbo loan on a condo right now.
Home Depot's are pretty empty. Illegals hanging out at various street corners where day labor hangs out are jammed with guys standing around hoping for work.
she was always kidded me "Hey, where is the recession?" It definitely didn't feel like a recession in SoCal in December.
Ya my wife is the same way - her company is doing ridiculous amounts of overtime... but then her product sells domestically AND int'l... they have Chinese partners selling their output lights out in Asia right now.
Yet she looks at the numbers & sees the news and goes 'what the heck?'... it doesn't GROK...
That's why I asked... big historical events like this should be told both by the numbers but also by the narrative... we have enough people around the country (and even world) to do that... to look around & report in.
If you see tumbleweeds blowing down Sunset Blvd., that would be bad, right?
rich | 01.15.08 - 2:11 pm | #
Some times when you're driving in the country real fast... what looks from a distance like tumbleweeds is really hemp. Not sayin' it is, just sayin'...
I'll echo CR's comment that it doesn't feel like a recession yet. I'm in Huntington Beach and, although I see many vacant stores and going out of business signs, I also see good traffic at the newly redeveloped mall and Costco and Target.
A lot of vacant CRE available though. Boeing spec-built an industrial park in Seal Beach that completed recently. I haven't seen much actual business there though. No tumbleweeds yet.
I have a pretty good assesment of how SoCal looks since I have been driving around in it consciously looking for signs.
First, in the established neighborhoods, you can't tell much is different. There are plenty of for-sale signs and an occassional empty bank owned home...but you have to be looking to tell.
Second, in the new low-end communities like Chula Vista there are neighborhoods littered with empty homes, its very apparent. These are not all over the place, but you can find them if you look. There are new condo complexs that don't allow for-sale signs and so you have to look in windows and check the door knobs for lock boxes. Some in East Chula Vista have litterally dozens and dozens of empty condos in a large complex.
Third, there are many comercial for sale and lease signs and new-build commercial businesses awaiting tenents. These are clean and well kemp so unless you looking you won't think anything is wrong.
Finally, the established malls and restaurants are packed...no signs of recessions. The newer businesses and malls are struggling, empty, and stories appear in local papers about problems.
As for local news..it is littered with financial stories about the problems each city is having. Chula Vista is hurting, the police raise was delayed for the fiscal year (to be given in stipends later) just to balance the budget. This is before the state's problems have run downhill.
You have to look for it to see it, however, everyone I know, even those that aren't interested in such things, thinks a recession is comming and they don't seem to think much of it...it's all just the cycle of things they seem to believe. Certainly not much fear or panic.
Some times when you're driving in the country real fast... what looks from a distance like tumbleweeds is really hemp. Not sayin' it is, just sayin'...
dryfly | 01.15.08 - 2:16 pm | #
I guess, when your bong is empty, everything looks like dope.
Damn, I've got to go root out those Russian thistles again (tumbleweeds to you) in the lower yard.
Yes in San Diego things have been going down for a while, not always obvious, but the pattern of consumption changed, and now, it's becoming more apparent. But just as a side note, I drove down a six block street here in El Cajon (suburb of San Diego) and didn't see one realtor sign, that's gotta be good, right? I mean there's one street that hasn't been hit yet.
In my opinion we hit bottom a few months ago, cratered, and discovered a deep dark mine shaft, and are still busy exploring downward to a new level of affordability.
BTW-- What's your son reporting on the mall sales?
Banking Secretary Steve Kaplan said oversight of mortgage companies has improved, but customers need more, such as the bills that would make more mortgages subject to state law and require better disclosure.
The PFM (Personal Financial Management) case in which hundreds of homeowners, primarily in Berks and Lancaster counties, say they were misled on their mortgages is proof that more protection is needed, he said.
...
When the Exeter Township company filed for bankruptcy liquidation in September, most of its 811 borrowers discovered they had higher mortgages, at higher rates, than the company had promised them.
Company owner Wesley A. Snyder of Oley Township has pleaded guilty to one count of mail fraud and faces sentencing in March. State and federal civil and criminal probes are under way.
Meanwhile, the borrowers have begun to sue the banks, claiming Snyder operated as their agent.
...
- Ban mortgage companies from sending statements and notifications solely to mortgage brokers. In the local case, all notices went to Personal Financial Management, not to customers.
...
- Make it easier for mortgage company employees to report suspicious activity without fear of liability or retribution.
One great rate. Now that's a fresh start to a New Year.
Start the year with fewer bills and a brand-new rate.
This year, let your Citi® Card help you keep your financial resolutions. As a valued customer, you can get a great rate when you transfer balances. And consolidating your bills means you only have one monthly payment to make.
Sign on to account online today to get started.
Here are just some of the benefits of transferring your balances to Citi:
Get a great rate when you consolidate your bills
Make one easy monthly payment
Use your savings on interest to help pay off last years spending
Consolidate, get a great rate and start paying off your bills.
Act now. Offer ends March 1, 2008.
"Some times when you're driving in the country real fast" [dryfly]... well anyway it feels like it's fast, everything just zippin' by, kinda hard to focus. But it feels good, real peaceful, like you're just floating along. You say something to your companion. It's very profound. She says something back. It's also very profound. And funny. Very funny. She says 'look at those tumbleweeds rollin' by'. And you think those are beautiful tumbleweeds. And that she is very funny for saying that. Then you think you should have some food...
The reports from So Cal illustrate the vast differences in specific localities. That's why the past couple of days I asked if anyone had data on the distribution of Option ARMs in specific localities, as opposed to data for counties.
LA County and Orange County include large areas that are already under sub-prime water, as well as large areas that are just starting to impale themselves on the Option ARM iceberg.
The geographic distribution of these loans are skewed. One can figure that the distribution is skewed according to sale values. For example, Jumbo loans must be concentrated in areas where typical house prices are above the regional median level (such as westide LA, where the median has been up over $900K), and if 2/3s of Jumbos are composed of Interest Only and Option ARMs then one can guess . . .
But some data would be nice, and a colorful map showing the concentration of Option ARMs would also be nice to illustrate the dire financial situation that is about to hit.
It's all good here, just ask a realtor. Prices are not coming down anymore! The malls are like 'war zones' according to my husband, empty houses everywhere and they are still building, good luck finding a job... However, while calling about a house, one realtor did tell me that 'the problem will be getting the financing.' Think the gangland prices are coming soon to an area near me!
BTW, it's starting to look like I've made a bunch of enemies in the office by jokingly saying, two months ago, that I was shorting the NASDAQ because everybody here was long.
Lots of people giving me nasty looks now.
Be careful with that stuff.
Also, don't show up with a new luxury car and say "Hey everybody, I charged this to your 401k!"
Greater PHX resale numbers The 2007 Greater Phoenix resale home market continued to slow in December, with 3,290 sales recorded (3,280 sales in November), compared to 4,620 sales for a year ago. This is the lowest level of activity for December since 3,240 sales were recorded in 1999.
For 2007, a total of 50,975 sales were recorded, in contrast to 67,035 for 2006 and 110,835 sales for 2005. The market slowed greater than expected, especially in the latter months of 2007, ending as the lowest level of activity since 45,620 sales were recorded in 1997.
Activity is in the gutter, prices are in freefall in the periphery, starting to slide in the city core.
A teardown house I was looking at that I had been told had sold for full boat turns out to have been pulled off the market and now they're looking to re-list. They're now interested @ my offer of 10% of their asking($56 sq/ft), but I've found a spot with double the lot asking $40 sq/ft.
To add to Misean's commentary, if you get off of the freeway and drive into industrial park areas there is a for lease or sale sign in front of every other building and several large buildings mixed in that are in some stage of contruction and have a for lease/sale sign in front of them too. I have seen this in Ventura, Oxnard, and Camarillo. Also, a friend of mine bought a large wharehouse for half of its appraised value he said.
I'm keeping quiet about any financial good fortune I have going for me these days. I've learned that people don't like it when you tell them not to run with the herd. And they really don't like it when you are doing well and the herd isn't.
Hell, one time I refused to buy a ticket in the office lottery. Everyone was chipping in to buy a bunch for the big payout. I declined. I was scorned and derided, "you'll be sorry when we win". I told them they were wasting their money and if they wanted to be rich, there were much lower risk methods. I was right. and another reason I no longer work in an office.
I've seen several manias in investment markets, from the gold boom of the 70s to the RE boom of the 00s. It always seems like get-rich-quick types pile in right at the top.
I wonder if this bear market is deep, whether a lot of newbies will come piling in here in a few months because they heard through the grapevine this is the place where bears share gloom-and-doom and are making bucks.
If that happens, it will be time to get out of shorts. But it might be kinda fun to string people along and watch what they do. No?
I was wondering when we would reach the fear and loathing point in this. Sometimes I think the rest of the country is the attorney in the opening page when it comes to all of this. And the people on this blog have seen the
"terrible roar all around us and the sky was full of what looked like huge bats, all swooping and screeching and diving around the car, which was going about a hundred miles an hour with the top down to Las Vegas. And a voice was screaming: "Holy Jesus! What are those goddamn animals?"
Then it was quiet again. My attorney had taken his shirt off and was pouring beer on this chest to facilitate the tanning process. "What the hell are you yelling about?" he muttered, staring up at the sun with his eyes closed and covered with wraparound Spanish sunglasses. "Never mind," I said. "It's your turn to drive." I hit the brakes and aimed the Great Red Shark toward the shoulder of the highway. No point mentioning those bats, I thought. The poor bastard will see them soon enough.
DQ should report Q4 foreclosures next thursday. It'll be bloody, but not quite as bloody as people expect. I think everyone was holding off somewhat to see what the Bush plan entailed. Now that they see it sucked it is pedal to the metal.
Misean & I probably flip each other off on a regular basis as we cut each other off on the 101 near Rose. Rose is where the CompUSA store is still shuttered. This is a very high volume strip anchored by a Walmart and Sam's Club also with a Von's (supermarket) and a sporting goods national. They were killed by a Fry's (private) but the fact that they cannot sublease is telling.
My take on San Fernando Valley and points west is described as "batten down the hatches." My clients generally see what's coming. The biggest problems are that so much of the housing stock is so new that they each individually have a very high cost basis. Second problem is the massive CRE overbuilding based upon consumption patterns and very recent employment conditions. Countrywide shocks and Amgen attrition (at best) will saturate supply of both CRE (and Residential) for years to come.
Joe Schmoe wants a risk map but I say it doesn't matter. Housing is priced on the margin not the median or average. Everything that has changed hands from Venice to Goleta in the last 4 years is at risk regardless of which loan product was employed.
I can tell you that the near-high end in Ventura County already looks like the pre-depths of the 1991-1994 era. A neighbor wants $5m for a $1m house. A neighbor wants $7500/mo for a house that was last listed for $2.49m. Three houses further a less ambitious aquaintance is asking $2.1m. Abutting the $5m asking, a house that has gone from auction to rent to sale+rent in the last three months. None of the usual listing agents are being used.
My bottom line is that there were/are a lot more people swimming naked than I first assumed.
It always seems like get-rich-quick types pile in right at the top.
That's almost the definition of a top.
I'm actually starting to believe that the average person would do well to stay away from stocks. Stock markets tend to have dramatic highs and lows precisely because so many investors are buying and selling at precisely the wrong times.
I think the typical person will tend to get poor returns from stocks relative to the risk simply because the typical person is quite typically driven by psychological forces.
Maybe they're best advised to stay away.
So many people I knew bought houses in 2005-2006. There was not a thing you could do or say to dissuade them. I know; I tried.
I ask that because in the last couple busts I saw decent industrial warehouse space - heated, concrete floor suitable for light mfg as well as whse and access to main roads near a major city but not in slums - go for under $4/sqft... so a 10,000 sqft place with a 30-50ft clearance under roof might rent for as little as $3,000 a month. Hell they even had small offices attached (included in the price - maybe only 1000 sq ft or so - enough for a couple of desks, file cabinets, etc.).
The landlord would have to pay the taxes and insurance on the building - I'd have been liable for insurance on my stuff and utilities (not peanuts if I heated the whse - but nothing if I only heated & cooled the office).
C'mon nobody here in Florida? Let's here some bad news about Florida for a change, don't tell me we aren't winning the house price depreciation/highest inventory contest.
"we have enough people around the country (and even world) to do that... to look around & report in"
I live in SF, not much impact here in the core of the city, the "less desirable" areas are taking price hits on the RE side but still lots of hustle and bustle in the retail areas. I have family in the central valley... from Sacramento to Fresno things are looking grim. Lots of for sale signs and empty retail space, my brother works in construction related industry and they have already cut 50% staff and "won't see a bonus for several years"
North/Central Orange county here, and it doesn't look or feel like a recession. Malls and such are a little slow but no big deal. Plenty of houses for sale and storefronts for rent but nothing that jumps out at me. Furniture stores and home improvement stores are dead, though. Went out to Home Deport on a weekday afternoon and there were two lines open.
However, North and Central OC are established communities. The recent building and most vulnerable areas are in South County and I haven't been there in a while.
I gave the audiobook version of Fear and Loathing to my Arizona friends. Told them to start the CD as they hit Joshua Tree monument.
""No point mentioning those bats, I thought. The poor bastard will see them soon enough.""
When with friends, I've taken this approach about real estate and the economy chitchat.
There are still people drinking Kool-aid in Portland Oregon.. this, despite all the for-sale signs, the starting to be abandoned infill and CRE projects.... I figure, what the hell... they'll see those damned bats soon enough.
Toke?
Chevy Chase apparently quit originiating anything in FL because the valuations just aren't there. Too risky - how is that for FL news? The chances of them doing the same is CA is?
"So many people I knew bought houses in 2005-2006. There was not a thing you could do or say to dissuade them. I know; I tried."
The holistic investment adviser across the street (not kidding, this is Santa Cruz) has been trying to talk her SiliValley clients out of real estate investments for that long or longer. She said the response has almost always been the same: a self-assured "But real estate always goes up.."
I think its definitely coming for Ca. But we just started getting hit with the "declining market" flags in the major population centers so it'll be awhile before they are smart enough to figure out they probably shouldn't be putting money here.
So many lenders still want to step in front of that speeding train.
CR said: "...Every time we went out in December, the restaurants and the stores were very crowded - she was always kidded me "Hey, where is the recession?" It definitely didn't feel like a recession in SoCal in December."
I just got my credit card bill for December: Didn't look like a recession here, either. And I thought we were cutting back.
You're still missing a bet on this lower interest rates thing. I've been watching mortgage rates closely, just in case it becomes worthwhile to re-finance.
At current rates, (and I expect them to drop again with the next Fed meeting) I can re-finance my mortgage (again), do a modest cash-out to mop-up some small assorted consumer debt and take care of some minor re-modeling, and keep my monthly mortgage payment at virtually the same level. All with a fixed 30-year mortgage.
That postpones the payback until The Hereafter and allows me to spend more between now and then. Not a recipe for a consumer-led recession.
I agree that prices are set on the margins, and that all houses bought the last 4 years are at risk.
But the point of the data I'd like to see is that it would show (as you put it) the number of "people swimming naked" in specific areas.
Or, to put it another way, margins can be very thin and fleeting (e.g., when just a couple of houses in Brentwood go belly up) or margins can be big and broad and saturated with red (as when many houses in brentwood go belly up over the next few years because they were IO or Option ARMs).
Brentwood is just an example.
We all agree on the general direction, and we are mostly in synch onthe magnitude (it will be big - whether 25% decline or 50% decline), but data is still good to eat.....
I think CFC saying uncle (back in August) was the real catalyst for the slowdown. They were the major mover of the riskiest products and they simply had to stop and be a conforming schmuck like everyone else.
I think that will be the story for 2008.. no CFC non-conforming products in the market means much less sales in 2008.
You'll be fine because you bought your house long enough ago so even though it appraises less now than it did 6 months ago, but there's a whole segment of people who can't because the houses are appraising underwater so can't re-fi whatever the rate is short of a cram-down.
Leaving the rally that late means only 1 thing: short covering, especially if the volume(currently Nas 1.9, DJIA 1.3) adds another 500mm shares each in 30 minutes.
YEN up, continue's unwind of the carry trade. Big news today in tech land was how little Apple had to offer beside a slimmer notebook, it is selling off hard and taking the NDX down with it. The idea that a few key companies could or can hold up the market index's forever is getting a what it desires today.
CR - is it starting to 'look' like a recession out there? [dryfly]
dryfly -- It definitely looks like a recession here in Detroit, mainly because of the vacant houses, but now it's also the talk of the town.
Last year at this time, the vacant houses were beginning to be noticeable, but the number just exploded in the spring. Still, the economy seemed to be humming along otherwise. But now everyone is talking about the recession. Still some CRE development, but now the reports of new projects usually include some cautionary comments regarding the poor state of the economy.
I guess Detroit/SE Michigan has been in recession for 2 1/2 years now, but the pace has recently accelerated. I get the feeling that we're ahead of the rest of the country on this one...
Here in the east bay I'm seeing less traffic on street and freeways, empty stores (target-macys)with tons of clearance items still in stock, for sale signs all over the place especially 300K+ condo/twnhome
market. GF is human resource mgr for nordstrom-letting go of employees. I sell software to auto industry-They are cutting back on everything at dealer level!
With housing, auto, banking and govt. in dire straits I'm not looking optimistic. But I'm debt free!!
Union Bank banker told me that Wamu next door might be closed. 200 more locations also. She felt good about her job because they have always been a prime lending bank..
I started writing down comments as people made them on TV and radio so that I could go back a year later and listen to them (I always forget how wrong so many experts can be).
Here is my list so far (mostly from bloomberg and a So Cal radio show).
I didn't know it would only take a few weeks to see some results:
----"This is not what a recession looks like....no way!" Mike Green and Jim Benham show 11/16/07
----Mike Green: "Wallstreet thinks things are bad, but in reality things are very good!!) 12/18/07 Dow at 13323 Das at 2596, S&p 1454
----"I have a real problem with people not using facts in basing their opinions."
Pat Powell, Powell investments (Reference Peter Schiff's opinion
we are in a recession right now 11/22/07)
----"all the bad news is priced into financials" Mike Green and Jim Benham show 12/14/07
----Fred Layne (layne and Barry) "This is a great time to be a buyer of equities 12/19/07 on bloomberg.
----Donald Luskin calls the bottom for financials on 12/07/07 (VFH at $56.22 at time of call----$48.45 on 01/15/08)
----Economist Monti says there will probably not be a recession 12/17/07
----Mike Green: "This is the cheapest stocks have been in my lifetime" 12/17/07
----Fed Chairman, Fred Lacker said growth for 2008 will be between 2 and 2.5% 12/19/07
----Michael Darda from MKM partners: "There is no evidence for that (recession)" "I think those who think a recession is coming are wrong, dead wrong". 12/20/07
----Bruce Kassim "We think growth will rebound rather smartly in the second half of 08" 12/20/07
----Larry Kudlow "It does not look like a recession to me!" 12/20/07
----Brian Wesbury on Larry Kudlow show, "Brian Wesbury is not seeing recession, so add me to that list" 12/20/07 (Estimated 3.0 real growth next year, while Roubini estimated -1.5% 2008)
----Buzz Zaino, Royce & Associates: "I think the spring will see a rise in homebuying, why wait until 2009, the early buyers will get the best deal." "I think we've seen the bottom (housing stocks)" 12/26/07
----Richard DeKaser National City Chief Economist: "I think the first half of 08 will have GDP at less than 1% with a rebound to 3% in the second half of 08".
----Joe Brusuelus "I see an average growth of 2.1% for 2008. I think we will skirt a recession." 01/02/08
----Paul Kandel "I think we skirt by both a recession and stagflation and just see slow growth for 2008." 01/02/08
----Mike Green "These tech stocks are the cheapest I've ever seen them" 01/02/08
----Commerce Secretary Carlos Guitierrez, "we still see growth in 2008" (this after a horrible jobs report for December)
----01/06/08 Abby Joseph Coen calls for a 14% return on the S&P for 2008 to 1650 due to avoiding recession.
----01/06/08 Colin Glingsman Oppenheimer Capital...This month (Jan) is the bottom for financials, we will have a slight recession, the stock market will be up on anticipation for 2009,
Speaking of credability...MUNICH (Reuters) - Germany's Hypo Real Estate sprang a nasty surprise on investors on Tuesday, announcing unexpected subprime-linked writedowns that sent its stock down by more than a third.
Hypo Real Estate (HRXG.DE: Quote, Profile, Research), an investment bank and property lender, said it would take a writedown of 390 million euros ($580 million) on 1.5 billion euros of collateralised debt obligations (CDOs) -- close to the net profit it made in 2006.
The bank said in a presentation slide its net exposure to U.S. collateralised debt obligations (CDOs), a type of asset-backed security carrying various degrees of risk, was now less than 1 billion euros.
Investors, who had heard repeatedly from management that the credit-market crisis had passed it by, were shocked and the Munich bank's shares plunged, cutting about 2 billion euros off its market value.
Mo Money!
The Federal Reserves Flow of Funds data for Q3 showed that, not only was the economys net flow of credit uninterrupted as the credit crisis unfolded, it actually surged to a record USD 5trn or 35.7% of GDP. Some credit crunch!
All we need now is for Bush to attack Iran and throw the world economy into a tailspin.
James,
He doesn't even have to do that. He just needs to follow the Republican rhetoric, which says we ought to blow a couple of those inflatable speedboats right outta the water.
The Iraquis have good cameras. If the Muslim world saw body parts and rubber raft parts flying, the global jihad would be on.
All it takes is one destroyer captain watching a McCain speech at the wrong time.
Schmoe asks: ... data I'd like to see is that it would show (as you put it) the number of "people swimming naked" in specific areas.
Or, to put it another way, margins can be very thin and fleeting (e.g., when just a couple of houses in Brentwood go belly up) ...
It doesn't work that way. When my house went up 6x 1995 to 2006 there were no transactions to provide datums. Any refis or Helocs made no difference further obscuring valuations. Money ultimately has only one color. You want to know where exotic financial products are concentrated? First define geography, exotic and density. And even then I say it doesn't matter. Look at Buffalo, NY; $16,000 homes. Nobody is pulling No Doc I/Os on them and yet they still suffer.
We are in the process of nationally correctly pricing housing. It will be messy. At peaks like now there is froth, just like at troughs there is mud. My anchor is rent equivalents. Not the obscene OER the Census uses but the monthly renting versus owning net ROI.
the mkts are broken. the technicians like Denninger went long expecting a bounce here. they missed the 2 big down days out of 3. tough to day trade a new trend down. nasty.
I'm actually starting to believe that the average person would do well to stay away from stocks.
ac, You are right. Hedge funds have destoyed the stock market for everyone else. Maybe for a long time to come.
There two basic ideas that made stock markets work for a hundred years. One is the idea that you have some loyalty to a given company, if only for a short time. The other is that you can only invest money you actually have (plus a bit of margin). Those ideas are gone.
u left out the truly fundamental detrimental effect of hedge funds and Wall St in general. lack of TRUST. the ordinary investor can no longer invest in a company based on fundamentals. stock prices get manipulated all over the place. fortunately for all of us here, the financial economy eventually succumbs to the real economy.
i hope one here bit on the NASDAQ runup yesterday. INTC just reported and its getting crushed AH right now down 15.55%. my GRMN and AMZN shorts are falling in sympathy.
ac, You are right. Hedge funds have destoyed the stock market for everyone else. Maybe for a long time to come.
There two basic ideas that made stock markets work for a hundred years. One is the idea that you have some loyalty to a given company, if only for a short time. The other is that you can only invest money you actually have (plus a bit of margin). Those ideas are gone.
I'm actually speaking much more generally, not just at this point in time.
Take 1982, for example. One of the best times in history to buy stocks, but very few people were buying. Fast forward to 1999, one of the worst times, and everybody's buying.
The point is these kinds of dramatic swings mean a minority of the market participants will overperform and and a majority will underperform.
I'm suggesting it's always been the nature of the stock market to swing dramatically like this and for that reason most investors see a relatively poor risk reward ratio.
Of course it might ultimately be very bad for business to scare too many people away from the stock market.
Leaving the rally that late means only 1 thing: short covering, especially if the volume(currently Nas 1.9, DJIA 1.3) adds another 500mm shares each in 30 minutes.
Alec | 01.15.08 - 3:40 pm
Is 450mm shares in the last 30 minutes close enough?
the average investor doesn't have a chance if they don't meticulously read the alternative media daily. someone who bought INTC yesterday just lost 16% of their money. most big moves in stocks occur in off hours when none of us are around. stocks are meant to separate ppl from their money.
re: page 11, so Denver only has at most a 10% chance that local home prices will decline within 2 years.
Two years is a lifetime in real estate trends -- but so far (other than sub prime entry level neighborhoods) Metro Denver values have held up pretty well. For Denver-Aurora, OFHEO has values declining 1.5% year to year; for Colorado as a whole, values are up over that time period.
Of course, our values have been flat since 2001; we took a big hit in the Dot Com implosion, and the NW CRE corridor still hasn't recovered -- although I heard a rumor that the buyer for the 660 acre Sun Microsystems campus is either Google or eBay. Either would be good, but Google would be great.
Yep I'm out. Took most in late 99. Left some money in a trading account to dink around with. That was stupid as I lost $1500 last week. Would have rather lost that at a table in Vegas than this way.
INTC is driving futures lower big time. Asia should be a hoot to watch. Any JAN options holders need to worry here about the Fed pulling a Friday premkt screw job. They did it once already.
We may breach some technical index support levels before the open so I wouldn't count the PPT out here, even tomorrow.
ac, I was at a mutual fund client that had Money Mag's #1 fund in some category the year before. I sat near the call center and the phones rang off the hook for a while with new investors. They all went to the slaughterhouse for the next 3 years. That's the other way people doom their returns; chasing last year's news. If those funds ever had to report dollar weighted returns, there'd be alot of jaws on the ground.
stocks are meant to separate ppl from their money.
Well, the way I'd put it is that routinely throughout history the markets get hijacked by a bunch of professional cons and they use stocks to separate people from their money. Nothing intrinsically evil about stocks IMO. It's the deceptive, predatory mentality and lack of education on the subject that are the fundamental problem.
stocks are meant to separate ppl from their money.
That's going a bit far even for me. But definitely J6P with $50,000 in his 401k should stay well away from both stocks and funds that trade actively. When J6P tries to trade actively on 1-2 hours of grazing the intertubes per week, that's when the grifters take his money. He either needs to commit the time, or stay out and spend the time on the important stuff.
lama:"I sat near the call center and the phones rang off the hook for a while with new investors. They all went to the slaughterhouse for the next 3 years. That's the other way people doom their returns; chasing last year's news. If those funds ever had to report dollar weighted returns, there'd be alot of jaws on the ground."
In Jack Bogles book he looks at the return the majority of mutual fund holders get:
The Little Book of Common Sense Investing: The Only Way to Guarantee Your Fair Share of Stock Market Returns
It is eye opening. The whole book is. It's a very easy read and somewhat repetitive to hammer the point home. Picking stocks is a suckers game. The only way to get close to market returns is low cost, low tax (low turnover), market wide index funds.
The real problem is the Fed and inflation. Back in the day, J6P took his paycheck to the bank, put 5-10% in a passbook account, 2-3% in a Christmas fund, and the rest in a cash and checking. Every couple of months some of the passbook money was used to by T-bonds. The slightly better off middle class person, may have also bought a solid manufacturing stock with dividend re-investment. Not stellar returns, but it made money.
Since the 70's the only way to stay ahead was to make much riskier moves. That's the real problem.
Do after hours prices endure into the following trading day?
You mean laughter hours? never know really but the big news was the NDX closing below 1900 today. Asia has been a bit weird this year but if Brazil and Mexico are any indication they should go down strong tonight.
Dryfly, on your question on the signs of a recession... I'm not saying this is a depression and this is all anecdotal, but as I recall from all the stories I've heard from people that went through the depression it came on pretty fast and blindsided a lot of folks. One day things are fine and people are buying (and using bank loans and consumer credit) and manufacturers shipping product to markets, and then it all just up and shuts down as liquidity dries up almost overnight and financial infrastructure starts to crumble. As the apocryphal story goes, at that point nobody has money anymore to buy much of anything, and with people having no cash to buy things, perfectly good factories (which were overproducing and running at idle anyways) have to shutter and layoff, leaving the same people with no jobs to earn the money to replace what they suddenly don't have access to.
However, I'm going to have to do some research to see if I can find any references to back up that this is actually how we tipped over into the depression and saw it from the man on the street point of view. My admittedly faulty memory may be fibbing to me again.
the confirmed massive head and shoulders top since June should concern all bulls. the strong hands have been distributing their stock to the weak hands and we now could start to see an acceleration downward.
The Great Depression was not a sudden total collapse. The stock market turned upward in early 1930, returning to early 1929 levels by April, though still almost 30 percent below of peak in September 1929.[2] Together government and business actually spent more in the first half of 1930 than in the corresponding period of the previous year. But consumers, many of whom had suffered severe losses in the stock market the prior year, cut back their expenditures by ten percent, and a severe drought ravaged the agricultural heartland of the USA beginning in the northern summer of 1930.
In early 1930, credit was ample and available at low rates, but people were reluctant to add new debt by borrowing. By May 1930, auto sales had declined to below the levels of 1928. Prices in general began to decline, but wages held steady in 1930, then began to drop in 1931. Conditions were worst in farming areas where commodity prices plunged, and in mining and logging areas where unemployment was high and there were few other jobs.
..."
My uncle told me that during the depression, some people with factory jobs sometimes did not even own a coat. He used to see them running home after work, maybe stopping in his shop to buy something, warm up, then continue the run home.
I wonder if my Gore-Tex parka is good for 10 more years??
I'm curious to know your views on index funds. I've been reading on the diehards forum, but I wonder if maybe they are a little naive (the attitude of "tune out the noise and look at things long-term").
C'mon nobody here in Florida? Let's here some bad news about Florida for a change, don't tell me we aren't winning the house price depreciation/highest inventory contest.
no longer thinking of walking | 01.15.08 - 3:15 pm | #
I'm in Miami...watching prices plummet and starting the mental masturbation process for when I'm ready to buy up in two years. Two most recent funnies from my searches...1. Realtor lists $1.05m home with the blurb "Recent appraisal available for almost list price!"...2. Waterfront home in second-tier community bought in 2004 for $1.1m, looks like they put some new flooring, impact windows (important in hurricane-prone Fla.) and a couple bathrooms and kitchen -- maybe $150K of improvements, listed in August '06 for $3.7m, continuously on the market since then, asking price is now $2.1m with no takers in sight...
Cal, I'm a fan of Bogle. I've been on the inside of dozens of public companies wondering why the stock price is going up or down..knowing it had nothing to do with what the company was doing.
No visible impact so far in North Silicon Valley (Los Altos / Palo Alto / Menlo Park), despite my eager scrutiny. I blame the giant truckloads of cash being poured over Google and Apple employees.
Chapters 11-14 are good descriptions of the last few years of the 20s boom and subsequent bust.
The Florida descriptions are pretty amusing.
This may be a really big bust, but I wouldn't get ahead of myself and say a depression is coming. Much of the implosion was caused by unwind of German reparations cycle (US lends to Germany which pays UK, which uses funds to pay off war-related debt to US). Unwind caused massive deflation, which pricked credit bubbles around the world. Policy mistakes made it far worse.
Sure, we've had credit bubble, and the deleveraging will be dangerous. But at least we don't have one of the biggest economic powers lying in rubble and politically destablized. This is a big plus. The other is that
while GWB may give Hoover a run for the money on incompetence, Bernanke is far better than Mellon was. I think the team handling the crisis in the Fed has done a very good job so far. Fingers crossed this doesn't get out of hand. Mellon's famous words Liquidate labor, liquidate stocks, liquidate the farmers, liquidate real estate. remind me of the advice of several people here. That didn't work well.
oh by the way, miami-dade county has great internet availability of real estate mortgage, foreclosure, civil court and purchase documents. searchable by name, address or by clicking on an interactive map. You can easily cross-check listed homes against the public records and get the real story (i.e. what the seller paid for the house, the mortgages the seller slapped on the house, any lis pendens, divorce or other litigation the seller is involved in). In my limited research in spare time boredom, I've been amazed by 1. how many 80% first mortgage plus simultaneous 20% HELOCs were utilized, 2. how much mortgage fraud was perpetrated (you can follow recurring names of people who were buying multiple houses at the same time and selling to other recurring names, artificially inflating purchase prices and corresponding mortgages, with the final buyer left holding the bag but likely simply heading back to the home country in South or Central America) and 3. although prices have come down, how some sellers are still so out of touch with reality as to expect a 20% price increase from when they bought in mid-2005.
Wall Street used to have a legitimate economic function: access capital from across America (think ML wirehouse model) and overseas to fund corporate innovation and capital needs in general. It has now become a rigged casino with only the house and the croupiers profiting. Think about the giant rakeoffs (of our savings) fueling the NY and London RE markets. Also see Buffet's analogy with the family who owns all the assets in the country, but who keep hiring (no net value added) advisers to screw the other members of the family out of their share.
The Republican party will answer for the Randian looting of the middle and working class. I think this will be similar to the '30's in its implication for societal change. Face it, the over-borrow, over-consume, over-build, screw the environment, hollow out the economy model is soon to be dead. A better, kinder, more responsible system will take its place. But there will be a fight!
I have to disagree that you are better with your money in T-bills than stocks. T-bills barely outperform inflation before taxes and underperform after taxes. Even CDs are better right now. At least stocks give you a fighting chance.
Individual investors can beat the market if they work at it. In some respects they have advantages because they don't have to follow the herd, which is what mutual fund and hedge funds do. And charge fees. As for gold, which I know some of you love, if you owned it since 1980, you are finally back to even.
mbar-I hope you're right, but Japan does not support your case. The same ruling clique that has been in since 1945 is still in, 15 years of poor economic performance notwithstanding.
That said Dems are better for the market (15.3 % vs 9.5 %), so recovery may be on the way. So far W is neck and neck with nixon for worst since WW II. Bet he beats out Tricky Dick before his term is over.
No tumbleweeds here in NYC, especially in my arty neighborhood called LIC. Across the street from me is Citygroup"s 50 story building, I'm expecting the lunch crowd at the nice restaurants to start thinning soon, though.
There is a lot of real fear and panic from my friends in the financial world. One buddy at HSBC just had over half his trading staff laid off last week. But that's the nature of the beast. I remember from the last big recession of the 80"s here, first the financial's got hit, then the art gallery's, advertising, architecture firms, etc. in about that order. Schools and non-profits always did best. Oh and crime, crime always did well.
There is no difference of opinion between us about the direction of the housing market.
But the differences in loans in different localities does help to explain the timing of steep declines, and it may explain differences in their magnitude.
Some localities, like the So Cal Inland Empire and, I suppose, much of Buffalo NY were paved with sub-prime mortgages vintage 2004-2006, and these tended to be the areas that started to implode first, and have already seen steep declines.
Other localities, such as the westside of LA, saw bubbles funded with other kinds of crappy loans - not sub-prime but Alt-A and Prime jumbo loans, most probably often Interest Only and Option ARM. These loans kicked in a little later than the sub prime loans, and their implosions and explosions are happening in a different time frame. House values in westside LA, for example, have not yet (yet!) fallen very much.
But they will fall, and the timing of the fall and its acceleration will be determined in some large part by the number of forced sales (foreclosure, short sales, etc) and the timing of those sales, and that will likely be a function, in part, of the prevalence of these super funky mortgages.
A marginal sale of a couple of houses with exploding mortgages is one, and 100 marginal sales of houses with exploding mortgages running from 2008 to 2011 is another . . . and then if you couple that with a recession and other factors, well, . . .
Anyway, if there no reason to have any more data then there would be no reason to read Tanta and CR, except maybe for Tanta's brevity and wit, and the occasional humorous comment on Haloscan. But I still think we have room for more data and would like to see more finely broken down geographic tracking of Jumbo Option ARMs . . .
Doubt I will be surprised by that map if I ever get to see it, but it would sure scare the hell out of my neighbors and co-workers!
I'm up in the NW corner of the country, north of Bellingham, WA. We had our own little bubble here with McMansions covering any bit of formerly-productive farmland the zoning folks would allow to be subdivided.
I bought in 2005, but got a small, wonderfully-kept 1920 farmhouse on 1.3 acres of fertile land. The price was well within my budget, even during the boom, and I got solid 30 yr fixed terms and even managed to put a decent amount down. We're getting the gardening thing down pretty good and can grow and put up close to half of our food. We'll have milk once my cow calves. That is one big part of my "investment" strategy, tho it takes a bit of work.
On my 13 mile commute to the university I work for, I see house after house on the market, most with 'price reduced' signs aging in the winter weather. Subdivisions in the middle of nowhere sitting half, or less than half, built. Vacancies for rentals in town are low, but it's a college town and tenements are in demand. But the usual landscape of vacant condos, townhouses, brand new CRE, boarded up big box stores, etc. are everywhere in this tiny county.
Canadians flock south to pick our economic bones and rave about 'how cheap everything is', while we rapidly decline to our former rols as one-employer town in the middle of barely solvent farms.
I'm curious to know your views on index funds. I've been reading on the diehards forum, but I wonder if maybe they are a little naive (the attitude of "tune out the noise and look at things long-term").
Lots of people have done the analysis. Really depends on what you mean by long-term:
Bernanke isn't looking too good these days, to me. I like him but wonder why he didn't catch on sooner as to the problems we are experiencing.
The Fed may not have the tools to control the money supply, including credit, in this day and age. I haven't heard anything from him or the other Fed governors to this effect. They have been trying to solve major problems with fine tuning, it seems to me.
On the other hand, if the Fed had spoken up earlier, they would have been blamed for causing the recession. So it's business as usual until it's clear to everyone that that won't work anymore. The ludicrous credit offers have to stop now, and we have to rethink the role of the Fed in managing the money supply. What role can Bernanke and company play in this, since the Fed is supposed to be non-partisan?
rcryan, thanks for the link, it's a good read on the 1920's.. Which sound spookily similar to current times, at least in the Florida real estate boom market.
You're great at parroting the Wall Street line, but it just isn't true. Same goes with your biased view on gold; for example, NAZ sure doesn't look good if you assume everyone bought at 5000.
Detroit Dan, as well meaning and as educated on the effects of depression style economics as Bernanke may be, I suspect that he is probably feeling a bit like a man given the Captaincy of the Titanic just after the iceberg was sighted -- the ship has lots of momentum and there's very little spinning the wheel can do to affect the outcome and all he can do is try to minimize the damage and look confident.
Andrew, good analogy. With the media hanging on his every word, it would have been risky for him to give a strong warning a year or two ago. But he truly seemed to be a bit clueless. The clearest example I recall was back in August. One day they said everything appeared to be contained, then a couple of days later they had to take emerygency action (discount rate cut, I think). By that time, he should have been aware of the iceberg and better able to communicate sensibly...
Alec said: "You'll be fine because you bought your house long enough ago so even though it appraises less now than it did 6 months ago, but there's a whole segment of people who can't because the houses are appraising underwater so can't re-fi whatever the rate is short of a cram-down..."
How many is "a whole segment"? And of that "whole segment" how many have real money?
There's "a whole segment" of people like me, too, who are both conscientious in their spending and have above-median incomes. There are more of us, we've got more assets, and we think that spending $500k+ for 1,100 square feet that's not even on the beach is crazy and wouldn't do it.
"for example, NAZ sure doesn't look good if you assume everyone bought at 5000".
That's just ridiculous. No one is disputing that over the last 2 years, gold has been a great investment, better than the S & P 500. Though I have some stocks that have done about as well. As for the next 2 years, we'll see. The fact remains that over an average persons's investing lifetime (say 30 years or so), stocks have been the best investment. There are periods where stocks do terribly-we certainly appear to be in one now.
If you take all your money and put it into the market at the top, of course you will be killed. But real people don't invest like that. They buy a little bit at a time over many years, so the bit they buy at the top is made up for by the bit they buy at the bottom.
You know the numbers as well as I, but you choose to deny them for your own reasons.
This may be a really big bust, but I wouldn't get ahead of myself and say a depression is coming.
rcryan,
Back then we didn't have a service-oriented, consumer-based economy. Personal debt levels greatly exceed those of the GD, so the impact now is arguably greater.
Stating the "average" is akin to the "average" family of 1.4 kids -- it doesn't exist except as some fancy marketing statistic. J6P doesn't buy and hold for the recommended period; he moves in and out, chases returns, and pays lots of taxes and transaction fees.
Besides, index fund ETFs are a recent development, so any true long-term buy-and-hold investor got killed. How many of the original DOW stocks are even around??? Survivorship and inflation are never mentioned in the brochures.
Alec said: "You'll be fine because you bought your house long enough ago so even though it appraises less now than it did 6 months ago, but there's a whole segment of people who can't because the houses are appraising underwater so can't re-fi whatever the rate is short of a cram-down..."
How many is "a whole segment"? And of that "whole segment" how many have real money?
There's "a whole segment" of people like me, too, who are both conscientious in their spending and have above-median incomes. There are more of us, we've got more assets, and we think that spending $500k+ for 1,100 square feet that's not even on the beach is crazy and wouldn't do it.
S.
Sebastian
Gee, for a moment I thought you actually read this blog.
As for the latter half of your thesis, your Mt. Pilot sewing circle is not the rest of this country, GDP wise.
Neither is mine, but the proof is in the pudding of default rates in an economy that according to you isn't in recession and ain't headed there. GMAC didn't run all those Ditech ads because nobody paid attention.
Do after hours prices endure into the following trading day?
I've no experience with the after-hours market (clearly! -ed)
psychodave
In INTC's case, they will DEFINE the market tomorrow - especially the TECH side - so any play made must be thought of as a market play not a single stock play.
I'm waiting till the pre-open trading session before I make any trading move (long, short, index or sympathy stock). 12 Hours is a long time for things to go awry - in particular the rumor that the Fed may make an emergency cut, and the possible up (OR DOWN! ) reaction to it.
Then there's the CPI coming out tomorrow too.
Either way I'll wait till about 8:40 am EST before I act.
Index mutual funds have been around for about 30 years since Bogle started the first one at Vanguard. That's long enough for most of us here. The indexes are rebalanced every year or so, so the survivorship bias doesn't hold. The fund or ETF simply sells the losers when they drop off the index and buys the new entrants.
As for inflation, yes it reduces real yields from all investments equally. The fact is that stocks have outperformed T-bills or cash. Gold outperformed in the 70s, but that really had to do with the fact that its price was fixed from 1945 on, so it had a ton of catch up when the dollar link was taken off.
Thanks, Kicker. Now if I can just have a nice 35-year window... or maybe I should dust off my tape of "Alone in the Wilderness." Wolverine tastes ok, right?
If SPY yields 9 %/year, it wouldn't matter if all 500 stocks were different at end than they were when you bought it. You still made 9 %. Survivor bias applies if you want to generalize from that index to say how a "typical stock" performs. In that case, yes, survivor bias will lead you to overestimate how well an average stock does.
As for inflation, that affects what that 9% buys, but it has the same effect if you make your money in bonds, RE or pork bellies.
"Hell, one time I refused to buy a ticket in the office lottery. Everyone was chipping in to buy a bunch for the big payout. I declined. I was scorned and derided, "you'll be sorry when we win". I told them they were wasting their money and if they wanted to be rich, there were much lower risk methods." 12th percentile
rcryan writes, Mellon's famous words Liquidate labor, liquidate stocks, liquidate the farmers, liquidate real estate. remind me of the advice of several people here. That didn't work well.
One sees this quote again and again in the MSM and on the net, always with the implication that Hoover followed Mellon's advice and thereby caused The Great Depression.
That's simply not so.
Hoover completely ignored Mellon's advice and almost immediately began stimulative measures.
(Note also that Hoover was a brilliant man -- probably as smart as Bill Clinton, not a bozo like GWB.)
I just moved to northern Orange County, and I have to agree there's a lot of variation even between towns just a few miles away from each other. I've heard that towns in the inland empire are getting decimated with housing prices already 20-30% off their highs, lots of foreclosures, and more to come. OTOH, prices for prime beachfront property in Newport are still increasing (albeit less slowly).
The malls and office parks in my area still seem reasonably busy, so no tumbleweeds yet. Ask me again in 6 months...
BTW, I never knew so many people from orange county frequent this blog (et tu, CR??) We should organize a meetup of CR fans. We can even hold it next to where the realtors hang out just to get a little schadenfreude with our beer
do you think CITI should ask for a price adjustment with Paulson and CO?
paulson's fund was up seven fold in '07 !
maybe they could give a kickback to citi, help'em out, ya know!
Shocking!!
Who could have predicted??
Shocking!!
Who could have predicted??
Neal
No one could have predicted lending money to people that don't pay back money could have turned bad. It's unprecedented!!!
Nevermind that half of all Jumbos are in California, and 2/3 of those are interest only or negative amortization. That's a formula for growth right there! If everyone keeps paying more for housing we'll all be billionaires!!!!!
Neal, yes, very surprising. At Tanta put it this morning: "Who coodanode?"
Best to all.
CR - is it starting to 'look' like a recession out there?
I ask that 'cause in the '80s Farm Crisis things got shabby really fast - strip malls emptied, tumbleweeds grew up in the cracks of farm product factories, paint peeled on about everything... etc.
I know it's early but a lot of us don't SEE So Cal all that often... what's it looking like? And what's the talk on the street out there?
You been through these before - me too - until recently (like within the last month even) I didn't see much that made it look like a recession was imminent (other than the numbers you and other econ wonks post)... now I'm starting to see the beginnings.
You? Can you paint the picture for us?
I can tell you that it is starting to look like one along Rt 80 in northern california. Driving from SF to SACTO brings into view an increasingly large number of going out of business, vacant and otherwise never occupied property on the commercial side. And of course we already know the residential picture along that road is skidsville. But I think we are really seeing the effect of a dying consumer on retail and the flowthrough to commercial building, which is to come as vacancies shoot up.
In two words dryfly...surival mode.
.
With the economy now in recession, a lot of the housing inventory will shift into the "must sell" category, and I also doubt banks would be willing to carry REOs until the market recovers ... whenever that comes.
All this supply being dumped onto the market and cleared at a median price of $425k? Sorry, don't think so.
As the saying goes, "Where are the customers' yachts?"
dryfly,
FWIW, I don't see obvious signs here in the Northern part of the state. Mostly folks still feel rich and spend.
However, here's a sign of change coming in the Bay Area: I am seeing lots of rental ads (for single family homes) in my area that are priced completely out of whack with reality. In particular, I keep an eye on Los Gatos, CA. Suddenly, there are lots of houses being offered at rental rates 75% to 100% above the "established" market rate.
They are often advertised as "executive homes", and they are completely remodeled, or even newly built.
I wonder why these folks are offering up these homes that they recently rebuilt or remodeled? Nothing like building your dream home, only to have to move out a few years later.... That's what I am seeing that is most telling.
Lots of residential real estate for sale in coastal Orange County.
Increasing for lease signs on vacant CRE.
One of my friends got a great deal on office equipment from an auction of a defunct mortgage broker.
CR - is it starting to 'look' like a recession out there?
I ask that 'cause in the '80s Farm Crisis things got shabby really fast - strip malls emptied, tumbleweeds grew up in the cracks of farm product factories, paint peeled on about everything... etc.
You know, my suspicion is that a lot of this real estate business was run out of peoples' homes and is therefore less visible.
I wonder if the nature of a huge surge in the economy due to mortgage borrowing and house flipping can be thought of a huge surge in home based business? American households, afterall, were a big part of this cycling of money through the economy using mortgage based credit even if they weren't directly involved in sales and remodeling.
That may explain why things could look less like past recessions in terms of the strip malls etc. At the outset anyhow.
Clarification on my last post....I'm talking specifically about the Silicon Valley. I haven't been out and about around the rest of NorCal.
Dryfly
It is sunny in LA today, high in the mid 70's, people are going to the gym, getting botox shots, all the same as any other day . . . except that their houses are worth less and less and less.
No tumbleweeds. . . .yet. But the pinch is going to start to hit, not just from housing and the broken home ATMs, but also from constrained spending by the state, realtors out of work, Countrywide leaving Calabasas for North Carolina (got to expect that) and lets not forget everyone out of work from the screen writers strike..........
I think this plus the Option Arm implosion spells doom.
Joe
What! That wasn't supposed to happen ... Here in southwest Idaho we have a 20 year (or a 240 month) supply of homes over $500,000.00 built just for Californians ...
that should be southEAST Idaho. Jefferson county...
dryfly, I don't know yet, I haven't been getting out much the last couple of weeks since my lady friend is out of town. I'll let you know later this month.
She is very funny. Every time we went out in December, the restaurants and the stores were very crowded - she was always kidded me "Hey, where is the recession?" It definitely didn't feel like a recession in SoCal in December.
Best Wishes.
Everyone talks about California. But I simply can't imagine what will happen in Miami, especially with all the new condos.
Y'all need to see the corpse? Can't ya' smell it?
If you see tumbleweeds blowing down Sunset Blvd., that would be bad, right?
SoCal has been sort of the Tale of Two Cities. Around us everything has been business as usual; however, a friend that lives across town has been saying it was dead slow for over a year.
dryfly,
Well I am seeing some things. Lots of brand new CRE along the 101 fwy from West SF Valley to Ventura. It's all got lease signs...
Seeing some long time established retail with going out of business sales. Many are furniture stores...mom and pop types, as well as chains.
Things like a comp usa that shuttered last spring, still empty. Ownit Mortgage building (rather large) empty since 01.07.
New housing complexes sitting 1/3 to 1/2 full and inventory not moving. Condo complexes still getting built with little interest. I mean who wants a Jumbo loan on a condo right now.
Home Depot's are pretty empty. Illegals hanging out at various street corners where day labor hangs out are jammed with guys standing around hoping for work.
I'm seeing it.
Cheers,
Those aren't tumbleweeds - they're dollar bills.
A word from the hinteriest hinterlands...
Average home sale price for my zip code, in November, was $146K.
This month, we're on track for $100K average.
YEP! $146K. That was our bubble, man!
she was always kidded me "Hey, where is the recession?" It definitely didn't feel like a recession in SoCal in December.
Ya my wife is the same way - her company is doing ridiculous amounts of overtime... but then her product sells domestically AND int'l... they have Chinese partners selling their output lights out in Asia right now.
Yet she looks at the numbers & sees the news and goes 'what the heck?'... it doesn't GROK...
That's why I asked... big historical events like this should be told both by the numbers but also by the narrative... we have enough people around the country (and even world) to do that... to look around & report in.
Thx for your effort.
As soon as the C and MER job cuts hit, Manhattan should finally begin to soften.
It's not just those jobs going. It's all the Manhattan lawyers, accountants and massage parlors that leech off them.
OT, but I don't know whether you guys saw this today on FT Alphaville:
HSBCs monoline bailout: MBIA saved by...a CDO
Feints within feints within feints (with apologies to Frank Herbert)
If you see tumbleweeds blowing down Sunset Blvd., that would be bad, right?
rich | 01.15.08 - 2:11 pm | #
Some times when you're driving in the country real fast... what looks from a distance like tumbleweeds is really hemp. Not sayin' it is, just sayin'...
I'll echo CR's comment that it doesn't feel like a recession yet. I'm in Huntington Beach and, although I see many vacant stores and going out of business signs, I also see good traffic at the newly redeveloped mall and Costco and Target.
A lot of vacant CRE available though. Boeing spec-built an industrial park in Seal Beach that completed recently. I haven't seen much actual business there though. No tumbleweeds yet.
I have a pretty good assesment of how SoCal looks since I have been driving around in it consciously looking for signs.
First, in the established neighborhoods, you can't tell much is different. There are plenty of for-sale signs and an occassional empty bank owned home...but you have to be looking to tell.
Second, in the new low-end communities like Chula Vista there are neighborhoods littered with empty homes, its very apparent. These are not all over the place, but you can find them if you look. There are new condo complexs that don't allow for-sale signs and so you have to look in windows and check the door knobs for lock boxes. Some in East Chula Vista have litterally dozens and dozens of empty condos in a large complex.
Third, there are many comercial for sale and lease signs and new-build commercial businesses awaiting tenents. These are clean and well kemp so unless you looking you won't think anything is wrong.
Finally, the established malls and restaurants are packed...no signs of recessions. The newer businesses and malls are struggling, empty, and stories appear in local papers about problems.
As for local news..it is littered with financial stories about the problems each city is having. Chula Vista is hurting, the police raise was delayed for the fiscal year (to be given in stipends later) just to balance the budget. This is before the state's problems have run downhill.
You have to look for it to see it, however, everyone I know, even those that aren't interested in such things, thinks a recession is comming and they don't seem to think much of it...it's all just the cycle of things they seem to believe. Certainly not much fear or panic.
Some times when you're driving in the country real fast... what looks from a distance like tumbleweeds is really hemp. Not sayin' it is, just sayin'...
dryfly | 01.15.08 - 2:16 pm | #
I guess, when your bong is empty, everything looks like dope.
Dryfly-No tumbleweeds. . . .yet.
Damn, I've got to go root out those Russian thistles again (tumbleweeds to you) in the lower yard.
Yes in San Diego things have been going down for a while, not always obvious, but the pattern of consumption changed, and now, it's becoming more apparent. But just as a side note, I drove down a six block street here in El Cajon (suburb of San Diego) and didn't see one realtor sign, that's gotta be good, right? I mean there's one street that hasn't been hit yet.
In my opinion we hit bottom a few months ago, cratered, and discovered a deep dark mine shaft, and are still busy exploring downward to a new level of affordability.
BTW-- What's your son reporting on the mall sales?
Lawmakers urged to tighten mortgage oversight
Banking Secretary Steve Kaplan said oversight of mortgage companies has improved, but customers need more, such as the bills that would make more mortgages subject to state law and require better disclosure.
The PFM (Personal Financial Management) case in which hundreds of homeowners, primarily in Berks and Lancaster counties, say they were misled on their mortgages is proof that more protection is needed, he said.
...
When the Exeter Township company filed for bankruptcy liquidation in September, most of its 811 borrowers discovered they had higher mortgages, at higher rates, than the company had promised them.
Company owner Wesley A. Snyder of Oley Township has pleaded guilty to one count of mail fraud and faces sentencing in March. State and federal civil and criminal probes are under way.
Meanwhile, the borrowers have begun to sue the banks, claiming Snyder operated as their agent.
...
- Ban mortgage companies from sending statements and notifications solely to mortgage brokers. In the local case, all notices went to Personal Financial Management, not to customers.
...
- Make it easier for mortgage company employees to report suspicious activity without fear of liability or retribution.
I guess, when your bong is empty, everything looks like dope.
One for the ages...
How come record activity highs are ok and normal to DQ but record lows are stressed and atypical?
BTW-- What's your son reporting on the mall sales?
sdtfs | 01.15.08 - 2:18 pm | #
I haven't talked to him since the holidaze - I need to do that & will report back.
My couch is empty so he must still be working which is a plus...
Hey...$425K
with $12,500 down, that house could get a conforming loan.
I would suggest a conforming 97% with MI. We call this the Mortgage Flex.
Gotta be flexible for the downdraft in your houses price.
But hey, who cares. LOL
Yep, that's a USCB errrrr UCSB alumn.
Cheers,
Um, what did citi promise?
Fresh off the email as of 12:21pm MST
-- Email Security Zone: AllenM
-- For your account ending in XZXZ
-- http://info.citibank.com/ZZZZZZZZZZZZZ
Add citicards@info.citibank.com to your
address book to ensure delivery.
One great rate. Now that's a fresh start to a New Year.
Start the year with fewer bills and a brand-new rate.
This year, let your Citi® Card help you keep your financial resolutions. As a valued customer, you can get a great rate when you transfer balances. And consolidating your bills means you only have one monthly payment to make.
Sign on to account online today to get started.
Here are just some of the benefits of transferring your balances to Citi:
Get a great rate when you consolidate your bills
Make one easy monthly payment
Use your savings on interest to help pay off last years spending
Consolidate, get a great rate and start paying off your bills.
Act now. Offer ends March 1, 2008.
Transfer Now:
http://info.citibank.com/XXXXXXXXX
Um, doesn't this materially violate their conference call?
I repeat, ain't it funny;-}
Someday this war's gonna end...
Um, doesn't this materially violate their conference call?
They didn't get the memo yet - after the announcement no doubt.
they didn't get the teaser freezer memo?
gee, and Paulson didn't even work there...
"Some times when you're driving in the country real fast" [dryfly]... well anyway it feels like it's fast, everything just zippin' by, kinda hard to focus. But it feels good, real peaceful, like you're just floating along. You say something to your companion. It's very profound. She says something back. It's also very profound. And funny. Very funny. She says 'look at those tumbleweeds rollin' by'. And you think those are beautiful tumbleweeds. And that she is very funny for saying that. Then you think you should have some food...
just sayin'...
Nope, no floating, more of a fear and loathing in Las Vegas moment before something kicks in to take the edge off.
Paranoia is good when the market is out for blood.
Someday this war's gonna end...
The reports from So Cal illustrate the vast differences in specific localities. That's why the past couple of days I asked if anyone had data on the distribution of Option ARMs in specific localities, as opposed to data for counties.
LA County and Orange County include large areas that are already under sub-prime water, as well as large areas that are just starting to impale themselves on the Option ARM iceberg.
The geographic distribution of these loans are skewed. One can figure that the distribution is skewed according to sale values. For example, Jumbo loans must be concentrated in areas where typical house prices are above the regional median level (such as westide LA, where the median has been up over $900K), and if 2/3s of Jumbos are composed of Interest Only and Option ARMs then one can guess . . .
But some data would be nice, and a colorful map showing the concentration of Option ARMs would also be nice to illustrate the dire financial situation that is about to hit.
Joe
I'd call that Cliff Diving!
Unfortunately, there's nothing but rocks below.
I'll echo CR's comment that it doesn't feel like a recession yet.
Until I see the sun go dim and the sky turn red, I'm not buying into any of this recession talk.
Told ya' all I did was get sh*t faced in Isla Vista and tossed in the klink by the IV Foot (NAZI's) Patrol.
Can you believe I actually graduated with a degree in Business Economics.
I am still stunned.
It's all good here, just ask a realtor. Prices are not coming down anymore! The malls are like 'war zones' according to my husband, empty houses everywhere and they are still building, good luck finding a job... However, while calling about a house, one realtor did tell me that 'the problem will be getting the financing.' Think the gangland prices are coming soon to an area near me!
USCB Alum - you ever meet Dr N?
USCB Alum - you ever meet Dr N?
dryfly | 01.15.08 - 2:41 pm
Maybe in the drunk tank in SB County....but hmmmm.....which time would it have been?
BTW, it's starting to look like I've made a bunch of enemies in the office by jokingly saying, two months ago, that I was shorting the NASDAQ because everybody here was long.
Lots of people giving me nasty looks now.
Be careful with that stuff.
Also, don't show up with a new luxury car and say "Hey everybody, I charged this to your 401k!"
They don't like that either.
I believe I wish I thought I said I predicted Ipods & Iphones would destroy America's youth.
Expired
Greater PHX resale numbers
The 2007 Greater Phoenix resale home market continued to slow in December, with 3,290 sales recorded (3,280 sales in November), compared to 4,620 sales for a year ago. This is the lowest level of activity for December since 3,240 sales were recorded in 1999.
For 2007, a total of 50,975 sales were recorded, in contrast to 67,035 for 2006 and 110,835 sales for 2005. The market slowed greater than expected, especially in the latter months of 2007, ending as the lowest level of activity since 45,620 sales were recorded in 1997.
Activity is in the gutter, prices are in freefall in the periphery, starting to slide in the city core.
A teardown house I was looking at that I had been told had sold for full boat turns out to have been pulled off the market and now they're looking to re-list. They're now interested @ my offer of 10% of their asking($56 sq/ft), but I've found a spot with double the lot asking $40 sq/ft.
What a great day for my stock holdings!
To add to Misean's commentary, if you get off of the freeway and drive into industrial park areas there is a for lease or sale sign in front of every other building and several large buildings mixed in that are in some stage of contruction and have a for lease/sale sign in front of them too. I have seen this in Ventura, Oxnard, and Camarillo. Also, a friend of mine bought a large wharehouse for half of its appraised value he said.
Same thing around exit 8 on the NJ turnpike. Industrial property wasteland. Vacancy signs everywhere...and it keeps getting worse everytime I go by...
I'm keeping quiet about any financial good fortune I have going for me these days. I've learned that people don't like it when you tell them not to run with the herd. And they really don't like it when you are doing well and the herd isn't.
Hell, one time I refused to buy a ticket in the office lottery. Everyone was chipping in to buy a bunch for the big payout. I declined. I was scorned and derided, "you'll be sorry when we win". I told them they were wasting their money and if they wanted to be rich, there were much lower risk methods. I was right. and another reason I no longer work in an office.
Bank of America to reduce collateralized debt obligations
Bank of America to sell its equity prime brokerage business
Bank of America to cut 650 investment banking, markets jobs
Additional context for the Dec 2007 SoCal Dataquick numbers:
To once again put price increases into perspective, here are the SoCal median prices per DataQuick:
1998 $187,000
1999 $198,000
2000 $220,000
2001 $247,000
2002 $289,000
2003 $346,000
2004 $424,000
2005 $479,000
2006 $490,000
2007 $425,000
I've seen several manias in investment markets, from the gold boom of the 70s to the RE boom of the 00s. It always seems like get-rich-quick types pile in right at the top.
I wonder if this bear market is deep, whether a lot of newbies will come piling in here in a few months because they heard through the grapevine this is the place where bears share gloom-and-doom and are making bucks.
If that happens, it will be time to get out of shorts. But it might be kinda fun to string people along and watch what they do. No?
I mean, part of it is entertainment.
more of a fear and loathing in Las Vegas moment
I was wondering when we would reach the fear and loathing point in this. Sometimes I think the rest of the country is the attorney in the opening page when it comes to all of this. And the people on this blog have seen the
"terrible roar all around us and the sky was full of what looked like huge bats, all swooping and screeching and diving around the car, which was going about a hundred miles an hour with the top down to Las Vegas. And a voice was screaming: "Holy Jesus! What are those goddamn animals?"
Then it was quiet again. My attorney had taken his shirt off and was pouring beer on this chest to facilitate the tanning process. "What the hell are you yelling about?" he muttered, staring up at the sun with his eyes closed and covered with wraparound Spanish sunglasses. "Never mind," I said. "It's your turn to drive." I hit the brakes and aimed the Great Red Shark toward the shoulder of the highway. No point mentioning those bats, I thought. The poor bastard will see them soon enough.
DQ should report Q4 foreclosures next thursday. It'll be bloody, but not quite as bloody as people expect. I think everyone was holding off somewhat to see what the Bush plan entailed. Now that they see it sucked it is pedal to the metal.
Q1-08 should be extremely ugly imho.
Last numbers post. Here's the median price for Orange County (in case the median prices listed above for all of SoCal look "reasonable"):
1998\t $236,000
1999\t $258,000
2000\t $292,000
2001\t $332,000
2002\t $385,000
2003\t $467,000
2004\t $551,000
2005\t $621,000
2006\t $630,000
2007\t $565,000
Where is the PPT? Are they taking today off?
"To once again put price increases into perspective, here are the SoCal median prices per DataQuick:
1998 $187,000
1999 $198,000
2000 $220,000
2001 $247,000
2002 $289,000
2003 $346,000
2004 $424,000
2005 $479,000
2006 $490,000
2007 $425,000"
So -- $346K again in early 2009? Any takers?
Misean & I probably flip each other off on a regular basis as we cut each other off on the 101 near Rose. Rose is where the CompUSA store is still shuttered. This is a very high volume strip anchored by a Walmart and Sam's Club also with a Von's (supermarket) and a sporting goods national. They were killed by a Fry's (private) but the fact that they cannot sublease is telling.
My take on San Fernando Valley and points west is described as "batten down the hatches." My clients generally see what's coming. The biggest problems are that so much of the housing stock is so new that they each individually have a very high cost basis. Second problem is the massive CRE overbuilding based upon consumption patterns and very recent employment conditions. Countrywide shocks and Amgen attrition (at best) will saturate supply of both CRE (and Residential) for years to come.
Joe Schmoe wants a risk map but I say it doesn't matter. Housing is priced on the margin not the median or average. Everything that has changed hands from Venice to Goleta in the last 4 years is at risk regardless of which loan product was employed.
I can tell you that the near-high end in Ventura County already looks like the pre-depths of the 1991-1994 era. A neighbor wants $5m for a $1m house. A neighbor wants $7500/mo for a house that was last listed for $2.49m. Three houses further a less ambitious aquaintance is asking $2.1m. Abutting the $5m asking, a house that has gone from auction to rent to sale+rent in the last three months. None of the usual listing agents are being used.
My bottom line is that there were/are a lot more people swimming naked than I first assumed.
c&c,
Yeah, the market's been treading water all day, but looks like it's getting tired since no one's throwing it a life preserver.
The question is...what will the market do during the last hour? If it falls off of a cliff will the shorting hedgies be off to the races?
It always seems like get-rich-quick types pile in right at the top.
That's almost the definition of a top.
I'm actually starting to believe that the average person would do well to stay away from stocks. Stock markets tend to have dramatic highs and lows precisely because so many investors are buying and selling at precisely the wrong times.
I think the typical person will tend to get poor returns from stocks relative to the risk simply because the typical person is quite typically driven by psychological forces.
Maybe they're best advised to stay away.
So many people I knew bought houses in 2005-2006. There was not a thing you could do or say to dissuade them. I know; I tried.
w & Geoff - what are the rents going for?
I ask that because in the last couple busts I saw decent industrial warehouse space - heated, concrete floor suitable for light mfg as well as whse and access to main roads near a major city but not in slums - go for under $4/sqft... so a 10,000 sqft place with a 30-50ft clearance under roof might rent for as little as $3,000 a month. Hell they even had small offices attached (included in the price - maybe only 1000 sq ft or so - enough for a couple of desks, file cabinets, etc.).
The landlord would have to pay the taxes and insurance on the building - I'd have been liable for insurance on my stuff and utilities (not peanuts if I heated the whse - but nothing if I only heated & cooled the office).
Are we there yet?
I am not qualified to answer.
You know, ac, that's what I recall the advice was in the 50s or 60s: average people should avoid large exposure to stocks. Much has changed.
C'mon nobody here in Florida? Let's here some bad news about Florida for a change, don't tell me we aren't winning the house price depreciation/highest inventory contest.
"we have enough people around the country (and even world) to do that... to look around & report in"
I live in SF, not much impact here in the core of the city, the "less desirable" areas are taking price hits on the RE side but still lots of hustle and bustle in the retail areas. I have family in the central valley... from Sacramento to Fresno things are looking grim. Lots of for sale signs and empty retail space, my brother works in construction related industry and they have already cut 50% staff and "won't see a bonus for several years"
I am not qualified to answer.
Oh come on now, that never stops any of the rest of us from answering questions.
North/Central Orange county here, and it doesn't look or feel like a recession. Malls and such are a little slow but no big deal. Plenty of houses for sale and storefronts for rent but nothing that jumps out at me. Furniture stores and home improvement stores are dead, though. Went out to Home Deport on a weekday afternoon and there were two lines open.
However, North and Central OC are established communities. The recent building and most vulnerable areas are in South County and I haven't been there in a while.
12th percentile:
I gave the audiobook version of Fear and Loathing to my Arizona friends. Told them to start the CD as they hit Joshua Tree monument.
""No point mentioning those bats, I thought. The poor bastard will see them soon enough.""
When with friends, I've taken this approach about real estate and the economy chitchat.
There are still people drinking Kool-aid in Portland Oregon.. this, despite all the for-sale signs, the starting to be abandoned infill and CRE projects.... I figure, what the hell... they'll see those damned bats soon enough.
Toke?
Deutsche Bank Chief Says U.S. Housing Crisis Not Over (Update1) - Bloomberg.com
Lots more to come says DB.
Chevy Chase apparently quit originiating anything in FL because the valuations just aren't there. Too risky - how is that for FL news? The chances of them doing the same is CA is?
So what happened to the market? Did someone shut off the cool aid tap?
"So many people I knew bought houses in 2005-2006. There was not a thing you could do or say to dissuade them. I know; I tried."
The holistic investment adviser across the street (not kidding, this is Santa Cruz) has been trying to talk her SiliValley clients out of real estate investments for that long or longer. She said the response has almost always been the same: a self-assured "But real estate always goes up.."
Deflationary Jane,
I think its definitely coming for Ca. But we just started getting hit with the "declining market" flags in the major population centers so it'll be awhile before they are smart enough to figure out they probably shouldn't be putting money here.
So many lenders still want to step in front of that speeding train.
All we need now is for Bush to attack Iran and throw the world economy into a tailspin.
CR said: "...Every time we went out in December, the restaurants and the stores were very crowded - she was always kidded me "Hey, where is the recession?" It definitely didn't feel like a recession in SoCal in December."
I just got my credit card bill for December: Didn't look like a recession here, either. And I thought we were cutting back.
You're still missing a bet on this lower interest rates thing. I've been watching mortgage rates closely, just in case it becomes worthwhile to re-finance.
At current rates, (and I expect them to drop again with the next Fed meeting) I can re-finance my mortgage (again), do a modest cash-out to mop-up some small assorted consumer debt and take care of some minor re-modeling, and keep my monthly mortgage payment at virtually the same level. All with a fixed 30-year mortgage.
That postpones the payback until The Hereafter and allows me to spend more between now and then. Not a recipe for a consumer-led recession.
Sebastia
interesting tidbit from San Diego. In December 31% of sold homes were foreclosures, vs. 4% in Dec. '06. See
voiceofsandiego.org | News. Investigation. Analysis. Conversation. Intelligence.
Oh, and December had a record number of new foreclosures, so that more foreclosure inventory coming on line in the next couple of months.
Rob Dawg
I agree that prices are set on the margins, and that all houses bought the last 4 years are at risk.
But the point of the data I'd like to see is that it would show (as you put it) the number of "people swimming naked" in specific areas.
Or, to put it another way, margins can be very thin and fleeting (e.g., when just a couple of houses in Brentwood go belly up) or margins can be big and broad and saturated with red (as when many houses in brentwood go belly up over the next few years because they were IO or Option ARMs).
Brentwood is just an example.
We all agree on the general direction, and we are mostly in synch onthe magnitude (it will be big - whether 25% decline or 50% decline), but data is still good to eat.....
Joe
It's just Boeing. Boeing shares drop 6.5% to $76.35 after 787 delay report
"So what happened to the market? "
I think CFC saying uncle (back in August) was the real catalyst for the slowdown. They were the major mover of the riskiest products and they simply had to stop and be a conforming schmuck like everyone else.
I think that will be the story for 2008.. no CFC non-conforming products in the market means much less sales in 2008.
Sebastian, the one-man economy!
Received an IndyMac rumor: laying off "1700 staffers in the east coast and west coast wholesale and ops centers".
I'm looking for news.
Best to all.
tj & the bear said: "Sebastian, the one-man economy! :-)"
Evidently. Must be why the Efficient Market theorists get it wrong so often, there's only just the one rational investor, LOL!
S.
Inflation numbers tomorrow. Anybody want to wager that it comes in at over 5% year over year?
IMB news might be announced either here:
http://www.theimbreport.com/
Or you'll start hearing it here:
Loan Officer Forum - Mortgage Brokers
or on the implode forums.
PPT has arrived!
James, please speak in 'core' terms, only.
Repeat: 'Only CORE matters.'
Sebastian,
You'll be fine because you bought your house long enough ago so even though it appraises less now than it did 6 months ago, but there's a whole segment of people who can't because the houses are appraising underwater so can't re-fi whatever the rate is short of a cram-down.
This is the dilemma you're missing.
Bring out your dead!
YouTube - Monty Python-Bring out your dead!
Leaving the rally that late means only 1 thing: short covering, especially if the volume(currently Nas 1.9, DJIA 1.3) adds another 500mm shares each in 30 minutes.
Hint, Red is bad (page 11):
http://media.corporate-ir.net/media_files/irol/63/63356/Winter_2008_ERET.pdf
YEN up, continue's unwind of the carry trade. Big news today in tech land was how little Apple had to offer beside a slimmer notebook, it is selling off hard and taking the NDX down with it. The idea that a few key companies could or can hold up the market index's forever is getting a what it desires today.
APPL was bound to disapoint this year, you can't have a new iPhone every year. I think thier business model will suffer greatly in a recession.
I think the market was hoping for new iPhone models to be brought out, not just software upgrades.
CR - is it starting to 'look' like a recession out there? [dryfly]
dryfly -- It definitely looks like a recession here in Detroit, mainly because of the vacant houses, but now it's also the talk of the town.
Last year at this time, the vacant houses were beginning to be noticeable, but the number just exploded in the spring. Still, the economy seemed to be humming along otherwise. But now everyone is talking about the recession. Still some CRE development, but now the reports of new projects usually include some cautionary comments regarding the poor state of the economy.
I guess Detroit/SE Michigan has been in recession for 2 1/2 years now, but the pace has recently accelerated. I get the feeling that we're ahead of the rest of the country on this one...
tj, quit egging the schmucks on!
Sebastian,
that only works if your not already underwater indeed;-}
according to zillow I have lost 20% since 2005 on my property- so guess what?
My second is totally underwater!
Chase had best hope I keep my job!
My downpayment is totally gone!!!
Someday this war's gonna end...
Mandatory CC for Indymac employees:
Implode-Explode Forums :: View topic - INDYMAC MANDATORY CONFERENCE
re: page 11, so Denver only has at most a 10% chance that local home prices will decline within 2 years. Another rose colored report.
Here in the east bay I'm seeing less traffic on street and freeways, empty stores (target-macys)with tons of clearance items still in stock, for sale signs all over the place especially 300K+ condo/twnhome
market. GF is human resource mgr for nordstrom-letting go of employees. I sell software to auto industry-They are cutting back on everything at dealer level!
With housing, auto, banking and govt. in dire straits I'm not looking optimistic. But I'm debt free!!
Union Bank banker told me that Wamu next door might be closed. 200 more locations also. She felt good about her job because they have always been a prime lending bank..
I started writing down comments as people made them on TV and radio so that I could go back a year later and listen to them (I always forget how wrong so many experts can be).
Here is my list so far (mostly from bloomberg and a So Cal radio show).
I didn't know it would only take a few weeks to see some results:
----"This is not what a recession looks like....no way!" Mike Green and Jim Benham show 11/16/07
----Mike Green: "Wallstreet thinks things are bad, but in reality things are very good!!) 12/18/07 Dow at 13323 Das at 2596, S&p 1454
----"I have a real problem with people not using facts in basing their opinions."
Pat Powell, Powell investments (Reference Peter Schiff's opinion
we are in a recession right now 11/22/07)
----"all the bad news is priced into financials" Mike Green and Jim Benham show 12/14/07
----Fred Layne (layne and Barry) "This is a great time to be a buyer of equities 12/19/07 on bloomberg.
----Donald Luskin calls the bottom for financials on 12/07/07 (VFH at $56.22 at time of call----$48.45 on 01/15/08)
----Economist Monti says there will probably not be a recession 12/17/07
----Mike Green: "This is the cheapest stocks have been in my lifetime" 12/17/07
----Fed Chairman, Fred Lacker said growth for 2008 will be between 2 and 2.5% 12/19/07
----Michael Darda from MKM partners: "There is no evidence for that (recession)" "I think those who think a recession is coming are wrong, dead wrong". 12/20/07
----Bruce Kassim "We think growth will rebound rather smartly in the second half of 08" 12/20/07
----Larry Kudlow "It does not look like a recession to me!" 12/20/07
----Brian Wesbury on Larry Kudlow show, "Brian Wesbury is not seeing recession, so add me to that list" 12/20/07 (Estimated 3.0 real growth next year, while Roubini estimated -1.5% 2008)
----Buzz Zaino, Royce & Associates: "I think the spring will see a rise in homebuying, why wait until 2009, the early buyers will get the best deal." "I think we've seen the bottom (housing stocks)" 12/26/07
----Richard DeKaser National City Chief Economist: "I think the first half of 08 will have GDP at less than 1% with a rebound to 3% in the second half of 08".
----Joe Brusuelus "I see an average growth of 2.1% for 2008. I think we will skirt a recession." 01/02/08
----Paul Kandel "I think we skirt by both a recession and stagflation and just see slow growth for 2008." 01/02/08
----Mike Green "These tech stocks are the cheapest I've ever seen them" 01/02/08
----Commerce Secretary Carlos Guitierrez, "we still see growth in 2008" (this after a horrible jobs report for December)
----01/06/08 Abby Joseph Coen calls for a 14% return on the S&P for 2008 to 1650 due to avoiding recession.
----01/06/08 Colin Glingsman Oppenheimer Capital...This month (Jan) is the bottom for financials, we will have a slight recession, the stock market will be up on anticipation for 2009,
Cal, I've heard several rumors on IMB, but I can't find anything yet - other than the chat rooms.
Best Wishes.
Average Joe - Thanks for the concensus view!
Speaking of credability...MUNICH (Reuters) - Germany's Hypo Real Estate sprang a nasty surprise on investors on Tuesday, announcing unexpected subprime-linked writedowns that sent its stock down by more than a third.
Hypo Real Estate (HRXG.DE: Quote, Profile, Research), an investment bank and property lender, said it would take a writedown of 390 million euros ($580 million) on 1.5 billion euros of collateralised debt obligations (CDOs) -- close to the net profit it made in 2006.
The bank said in a presentation slide its net exposure to U.S. collateralised debt obligations (CDOs), a type of asset-backed security carrying various degrees of risk, was now less than 1 billion euros.
Investors, who had heard repeatedly from management that the credit-market crisis had passed it by, were shocked and the Munich bank's shares plunged, cutting about 2 billion euros off its market value.
o more IB for BAC - they had enough for the time being:
Bank of America to gut investment unit and focus on core - Jan. 15, 2008
Mo Money!
The Federal Reserves Flow of Funds data for Q3 showed that, not only was the economys net flow of credit uninterrupted as the credit crisis unfolded, it actually surged to a record USD 5trn or 35.7% of GDP. Some credit crunch!
RGE - Editor's Pick: The Effective Nationalization of the U.S. Mortgage Market in Q3 07
(Bugler sounds "Charge" in the distance)
3:30 tj: "The cavalry is coming" !!
4:00 tj: "Dang, it was the 7th" !!
well i'm glad i held onto my shorts!
the last 15 minutes showed weakness... maybe in expectation of more to come.
James,
He doesn't even have to do that. He just needs to follow the Republican rhetoric, which says we ought to blow a couple of those inflatable speedboats right outta the water.
The Iraquis have good cameras. If the Muslim world saw body parts and rubber raft parts flying, the global jihad would be on.
All it takes is one destroyer captain watching a McCain speech at the wrong time.
Watching the Indy closures. Rumor says they are letting go of retail people.
Schmoe asks: ... data I'd like to see is that it would show (as you put it) the number of "people swimming naked" in specific areas.
Or, to put it another way, margins can be very thin and fleeting (e.g., when just a couple of houses in Brentwood go belly up) ...
It doesn't work that way. When my house went up 6x 1995 to 2006 there were no transactions to provide datums. Any refis or Helocs made no difference further obscuring valuations. Money ultimately has only one color. You want to know where exotic financial products are concentrated? First define geography, exotic and density. And even then I say it doesn't matter. Look at Buffalo, NY; $16,000 homes. Nobody is pulling No Doc I/Os on them and yet they still suffer.
We are in the process of nationally correctly pricing housing. It will be messy. At peaks like now there is froth, just like at troughs there is mud. My anchor is rent equivalents. Not the obscene OER the Census uses but the monthly renting versus owning net ROI.
That's more humane than having to go into the auditorium.
I think the market was hoping for new iPhone models to be brought out, not just software upgrades.
Forget the rate cuts. What this economy needs is iPhone 2.0.
the mkts are broken. the technicians like Denninger went long expecting a bounce here. they missed the 2 big down days out of 3. tough to day trade a new trend down. nasty.
idoc,
Yes, for all our sakes, please don't drop your shorts.
tj
certainly not in front of Meredith. or maybe so?
ac, You are right. Hedge funds have destoyed the stock market for everyone else. Maybe for a long time to come.
There two basic ideas that made stock markets work for a hundred years. One is the idea that you have some loyalty to a given company, if only for a short time. The other is that you can only invest money you actually have (plus a bit of margin). Those ideas are gone.
Yes, most would be better served staying in Treasuries.
BTW, ever wonder why they didn't put Social Security receipts into regular Treasuries instead of those untradeable "special issues"???
rich
u left out the truly fundamental detrimental effect of hedge funds and Wall St in general. lack of TRUST. the ordinary investor can no longer invest in a company based on fundamentals. stock prices get manipulated all over the place. fortunately for all of us here, the financial economy eventually succumbs to the real economy.
i hope one here bit on the NASDAQ runup yesterday. INTC just reported and its getting crushed AH right now down 15.55%. my GRMN and AMZN shorts are falling in sympathy.
"i hope no one here"
ac, You are right. Hedge funds have destoyed the stock market for everyone else. Maybe for a long time to come.
There two basic ideas that made stock markets work for a hundred years. One is the idea that you have some loyalty to a given company, if only for a short time. The other is that you can only invest money you actually have (plus a bit of margin). Those ideas are gone.
I'm actually speaking much more generally, not just at this point in time.
Take 1982, for example. One of the best times in history to buy stocks, but very few people were buying. Fast forward to 1999, one of the worst times, and everybody's buying.
The point is these kinds of dramatic swings mean a minority of the market participants will overperform and and a majority will underperform.
I'm suggesting it's always been the nature of the stock market to swing dramatically like this and for that reason most investors see a relatively poor risk reward ratio.
Of course it might ultimately be very bad for business to scare too many people away from the stock market.
Leaving the rally that late means only 1 thing: short covering, especially if the volume(currently Nas 1.9, DJIA 1.3) adds another 500mm shares each in 30 minutes.
Alec | 01.15.08 - 3:40 pm
Is 450mm shares in the last 30 minutes close enough?
the average investor doesn't have a chance if they don't meticulously read the alternative media daily. someone who bought INTC yesterday just lost 16% of their money. most big moves in stocks occur in off hours when none of us are around. stocks are meant to separate ppl from their money.
Intel shares fall more than 10% in after hours trading
...but Cramer said buy techs
"...but Cramer said buy techs :)" and look at the YTD returns on Cramers "four hoursemen", that's all you need to know about Cramer
my TWM just did a bottle rocket.
Ziggurat,
if ur out there. do u still believe its all priced in?
re: page 11, so Denver only has at most a 10% chance that local home prices will decline within 2 years.
Two years is a lifetime in real estate trends -- but so far (other than sub prime entry level neighborhoods) Metro Denver values have held up pretty well. For Denver-Aurora, OFHEO has values declining 1.5% year to year; for Colorado as a whole, values are up over that time period.
Of course, our values have been flat since 2001; we took a big hit in the Dot Com implosion, and the NW CRE corridor still hasn't recovered -- although I heard a rumor that the buyer for the 660 acre Sun Microsystems campus is either Google or eBay. Either would be good, but Google would be great.
The page cannot be displayed
=========
rich,
Yep I'm out. Took most in late 99. Left some money in a trading account to dink around with. That was stupid as I lost $1500 last week. Would have rather lost that at a table in Vegas than this way.
Cheers,
I don't think IndyMac was at the CMLA wholesale lender fair last week -- it would be a first, and I've been going to the fairs for 10 years.
INTC is driving futures lower big time. Asia should be a hoot to watch. Any JAN options holders need to worry here about the Fed pulling a Friday premkt screw job. They did it once already.
We may breach some technical index support levels before the open so I wouldn't count the PPT out here, even tomorrow.
ac, I was at a mutual fund client that had Money Mag's #1 fund in some category the year before. I sat near the call center and the phones rang off the hook for a while with new investors. They all went to the slaughterhouse for the next 3 years. That's the other way people doom their returns; chasing last year's news. If those funds ever had to report dollar weighted returns, there'd be alot of jaws on the ground.
Re: INTC after-hours price drop
Do after hours prices endure into the following trading day?
I've no experience with the after-hours market (clearly! -ed)
stocks are meant to separate ppl from their money.
Well, the way I'd put it is that routinely throughout history the markets get hijacked by a bunch of professional cons and they use stocks to separate people from their money. Nothing intrinsically evil about stocks IMO. It's the deceptive, predatory mentality and lack of education on the subject that are the fundamental problem.
U.S. Recession a Bigger Risk Than China, Malkiel Says
U.S. Recession a Bigger Risk Than China, Malkiel Says (Update2) - Bloomberg.com
stocks are meant to separate ppl from their money.
That's going a bit far even for me. But definitely J6P with $50,000 in his 401k should stay well away from both stocks and funds that trade actively. When J6P tries to trade actively on 1-2 hours of grazing the intertubes per week, that's when the grifters take his money. He either needs to commit the time, or stay out and spend the time on the important stuff.
The mantra is "Stocks always go up". Every person i talk to knows this mantra because Cramer told them so.
lama:"I sat near the call center and the phones rang off the hook for a while with new investors. They all went to the slaughterhouse for the next 3 years. That's the other way people doom their returns; chasing last year's news. If those funds ever had to report dollar weighted returns, there'd be alot of jaws on the ground."
In Jack Bogles book he looks at the return the majority of mutual fund holders get:
The Little Book of Common Sense Investing: The Only Way to Guarantee Your Fair Share of Stock Market Returns
It is eye opening. The whole book is. It's a very easy read and somewhat repetitive to hammer the point home. Picking stocks is a suckers game. The only way to get close to market returns is low cost, low tax (low turnover), market wide index funds.
Consider:
Its always a good time to buy a house = its always a good time to pay a commission.
Its always a good time to buy stocks = Its always a good time to pay a load or commission or management fee.
Protect you nut, waal street and the fed won't.
OT: Our dog peed on the design calculations.
Maybe they were like off-balance sheet calcs
CNN.com - Page not found
.
ac, all...
The real problem is the Fed and inflation. Back in the day, J6P took his paycheck to the bank, put 5-10% in a passbook account, 2-3% in a Christmas fund, and the rest in a cash and checking. Every couple of months some of the passbook money was used to by T-bonds. The slightly better off middle class person, may have also bought a solid manufacturing stock with dividend re-investment. Not stellar returns, but it made money.
Since the 70's the only way to stay ahead was to make much riskier moves. That's the real problem.
Cheers,
Re: INTC after-hours price drop
Do after hours prices endure into the following trading day?
You mean laughter hours? never know really but the big news was the NDX closing below 1900 today. Asia has been a bit weird this year but if Brazil and Mexico are any indication they should go down strong tonight.
Dryfly, on your question on the signs of a recession... I'm not saying this is a depression and this is all anecdotal, but as I recall from all the stories I've heard from people that went through the depression it came on pretty fast and blindsided a lot of folks. One day things are fine and people are buying (and using bank loans and consumer credit) and manufacturers shipping product to markets, and then it all just up and shuts down as liquidity dries up almost overnight and financial infrastructure starts to crumble. As the apocryphal story goes, at that point nobody has money anymore to buy much of anything, and with people having no cash to buy things, perfectly good factories (which were overproducing and running at idle anyways) have to shutter and layoff, leaving the same people with no jobs to earn the money to replace what they suddenly don't have access to.
However, I'm going to have to do some research to see if I can find any references to back up that this is actually how we tipped over into the depression and saw it from the man on the street point of view. My admittedly faulty memory may be fibbing to me again.
Misean
i agree 100%. have u ever read the Creature from Jekyll Island by Griffin? about the genesis of the Fed.
the confirmed massive head and shoulders top since June should concern all bulls. the strong hands have been distributing their stock to the weak hands and we now could start to see an acceleration downward.
Hmm.. This is from Wikipedia, but seems to support my Great Depression consumer's view theory somewhat.
Great Depression - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
"Lurching downwards
The Great Depression was not a sudden total collapse. The stock market turned upward in early 1930, returning to early 1929 levels by April, though still almost 30 percent below of peak in September 1929.[2] Together government and business actually spent more in the first half of 1930 than in the corresponding period of the previous year. But consumers, many of whom had suffered severe losses in the stock market the prior year, cut back their expenditures by ten percent, and a severe drought ravaged the agricultural heartland of the USA beginning in the northern summer of 1930.
In early 1930, credit was ample and available at low rates, but people were reluctant to add new debt by borrowing. By May 1930, auto sales had declined to below the levels of 1928. Prices in general began to decline, but wages held steady in 1930, then began to drop in 1931. Conditions were worst in farming areas where commodity prices plunged, and in mining and logging areas where unemployment was high and there were few other jobs.
..."
My uncle told me that during the depression, some people with factory jobs sometimes did not even own a coat. He used to see them running home after work, maybe stopping in his shop to buy something, warm up, then continue the run home.
I wonder if my Gore-Tex parka is good for 10 more years??
ac,
I'm curious to know your views on index funds. I've been reading on the diehards forum, but I wonder if maybe they are a little naive (the attitude of "tune out the noise and look at things long-term").
C'mon nobody here in Florida? Let's here some bad news about Florida for a change, don't tell me we aren't winning the house price depreciation/highest inventory contest.
no longer thinking of walking | 01.15.08 - 3:15 pm | #
I'm in Miami...watching prices plummet and starting the mental masturbation process for when I'm ready to buy up in two years. Two most recent funnies from my searches...1. Realtor lists $1.05m home with the blurb "Recent appraisal available for almost list price!"...2. Waterfront home in second-tier community bought in 2004 for $1.1m, looks like they put some new flooring, impact windows (important in hurricane-prone Fla.) and a couple bathrooms and kitchen -- maybe $150K of improvements, listed in August '06 for $3.7m, continuously on the market since then, asking price is now $2.1m with no takers in sight...
Cal, I'm a fan of Bogle. I've been on the inside of dozens of public companies wondering why the stock price is going up or down..knowing it had nothing to do with what the company was doing.
No visible impact so far in North Silicon Valley (Los Altos / Palo Alto / Menlo Park), despite my eager scrutiny. I blame the giant truckloads of cash being poured over Google and Apple employees.
Chapters 11-14 are good descriptions of the last few years of the 20s boom and subsequent bust.
The Florida descriptions are pretty amusing.
This may be a really big bust, but I wouldn't get ahead of myself and say a depression is coming. Much of the implosion was caused by unwind of German reparations cycle (US lends to Germany which pays UK, which uses funds to pay off war-related debt to US). Unwind caused massive deflation, which pricked credit bubbles around the world. Policy mistakes made it far worse.
Sure, we've had credit bubble, and the deleveraging will be dangerous. But at least we don't have one of the biggest economic powers lying in rubble and politically destablized. This is a big plus. The other is that
while GWB may give Hoover a run for the money on incompetence, Bernanke is far better than Mellon was. I think the team handling the crisis in the Fed has done a very good job so far. Fingers crossed this doesn't get out of hand. Mellon's famous words Liquidate labor, liquidate stocks, liquidate the farmers, liquidate real estate. remind me of the advice of several people here. That didn't work well.
oh by the way, miami-dade county has great internet availability of real estate mortgage, foreclosure, civil court and purchase documents. searchable by name, address or by clicking on an interactive map. You can easily cross-check listed homes against the public records and get the real story (i.e. what the seller paid for the house, the mortgages the seller slapped on the house, any lis pendens, divorce or other litigation the seller is involved in). In my limited research in spare time boredom, I've been amazed by 1. how many 80% first mortgage plus simultaneous 20% HELOCs were utilized, 2. how much mortgage fraud was perpetrated (you can follow recurring names of people who were buying multiple houses at the same time and selling to other recurring names, artificially inflating purchase prices and corresponding mortgages, with the final buyer left holding the bag but likely simply heading back to the home country in South or Central America) and 3. although prices have come down, how some sellers are still so out of touch with reality as to expect a 20% price increase from when they bought in mid-2005.
whoa, SRS up to 137 AH on a huge buy.
Wall Street used to have a legitimate economic function: access capital from across America (think ML wirehouse model) and overseas to fund corporate innovation and capital needs in general. It has now become a rigged casino with only the house and the croupiers profiting. Think about the giant rakeoffs (of our savings) fueling the NY and London RE markets. Also see Buffet's analogy with the family who owns all the assets in the country, but who keep hiring (no net value added) advisers to screw the other members of the family out of their share.
The Republican party will answer for the Randian looting of the middle and working class. I think this will be similar to the '30's in its implication for societal change. Face it, the over-borrow, over-consume, over-build, screw the environment, hollow out the economy model is soon to be dead. A better, kinder, more responsible system will take its place. But there will be a fight!
CFC now down to 5.72. stocks are realizing the BAC buyout will be a bust.
I have to disagree that you are better with your money in T-bills than stocks. T-bills barely outperform inflation before taxes and underperform after taxes. Even CDs are better right now. At least stocks give you a fighting chance.
Individual investors can beat the market if they work at it. In some respects they have advantages because they don't have to follow the herd, which is what mutual fund and hedge funds do. And charge fees. As for gold, which I know some of you love, if you owned it since 1980, you are finally back to even.
Forgot the link:
Table of Contents
mbar-I hope you're right, but Japan does not support your case. The same ruling clique that has been in since 1945 is still in, 15 years of poor economic performance notwithstanding.
That said Dems are better for the market (15.3 % vs 9.5 %), so recovery may be on the way. So far W is neck and neck with nixon for worst since WW II. Bet he beats out Tricky Dick before his term is over.
No tumbleweeds here in NYC, especially in my arty neighborhood called LIC. Across the street from me is Citygroup"s 50 story building, I'm expecting the lunch crowd at the nice restaurants to start thinning soon, though.
There is a lot of real fear and panic from my friends in the financial world. One buddy at HSBC just had over half his trading staff laid off last week. But that's the nature of the beast. I remember from the last big recession of the 80"s here, first the financial's got hit, then the art gallery's, advertising, architecture firms, etc. in about that order. Schools and non-profits always did best. Oh and crime, crime always did well.
Rob Dawg
There is no difference of opinion between us about the direction of the housing market.
But the differences in loans in different localities does help to explain the timing of steep declines, and it may explain differences in their magnitude.
Some localities, like the So Cal Inland Empire and, I suppose, much of Buffalo NY were paved with sub-prime mortgages vintage 2004-2006, and these tended to be the areas that started to implode first, and have already seen steep declines.
Other localities, such as the westside of LA, saw bubbles funded with other kinds of crappy loans - not sub-prime but Alt-A and Prime jumbo loans, most probably often Interest Only and Option ARM. These loans kicked in a little later than the sub prime loans, and their implosions and explosions are happening in a different time frame. House values in westside LA, for example, have not yet (yet!) fallen very much.
But they will fall, and the timing of the fall and its acceleration will be determined in some large part by the number of forced sales (foreclosure, short sales, etc) and the timing of those sales, and that will likely be a function, in part, of the prevalence of these super funky mortgages.
A marginal sale of a couple of houses with exploding mortgages is one, and 100 marginal sales of houses with exploding mortgages running from 2008 to 2011 is another . . . and then if you couple that with a recession and other factors, well, . . .
Anyway, if there no reason to have any more data then there would be no reason to read Tanta and CR, except maybe for Tanta's brevity and wit, and the occasional humorous comment on Haloscan. But I still think we have room for more data and would like to see more finely broken down geographic tracking of Jumbo Option ARMs . . .
Doubt I will be surprised by that map if I ever get to see it, but it would sure scare the hell out of my neighbors and co-workers!
Joe
I'm up in the NW corner of the country, north of Bellingham, WA. We had our own little bubble here with McMansions covering any bit of formerly-productive farmland the zoning folks would allow to be subdivided.
I bought in 2005, but got a small, wonderfully-kept 1920 farmhouse on 1.3 acres of fertile land. The price was well within my budget, even during the boom, and I got solid 30 yr fixed terms and even managed to put a decent amount down. We're getting the gardening thing down pretty good and can grow and put up close to half of our food. We'll have milk once my cow calves. That is one big part of my "investment" strategy, tho it takes a bit of work.
On my 13 mile commute to the university I work for, I see house after house on the market, most with 'price reduced' signs aging in the winter weather. Subdivisions in the middle of nowhere sitting half, or less than half, built. Vacancies for rentals in town are low, but it's a college town and tenements are in demand. But the usual landscape of vacant condos, townhouses, brand new CRE, boarded up big box stores, etc. are everywhere in this tiny county.
Canadians flock south to pick our economic bones and rave about 'how cheap everything is', while we rapidly decline to our former rols as one-employer town in the middle of barely solvent farms.
I'm curious to know your views on index funds. I've been reading on the diehards forum, but I wonder if maybe they are a little naive (the attitude of "tune out the noise and look at things long-term").
Lots of people have done the analysis. Really depends on what you mean by long-term:
S&P 500: Total and Inflation-Adjusted Historical Returns
rcryan, Interesting perspective.
Bernanke isn't looking too good these days, to me. I like him but wonder why he didn't catch on sooner as to the problems we are experiencing.
The Fed may not have the tools to control the money supply, including credit, in this day and age. I haven't heard anything from him or the other Fed governors to this effect. They have been trying to solve major problems with fine tuning, it seems to me.
On the other hand, if the Fed had spoken up earlier, they would have been blamed for causing the recession. So it's business as usual until it's clear to everyone that that won't work anymore. The ludicrous credit offers have to stop now, and we have to rethink the role of the Fed in managing the money supply. What role can Bernanke and company play in this, since the Fed is supposed to be non-partisan?
rcryan, thanks for the link, it's a good read on the 1920's.. Which sound spookily similar to current times, at least in the Florida real estate boom market.
aotc
no i haven't owned gold since 1980. i've owned it since 2005. up 2x.
aotc,
You're great at parroting the Wall Street line, but it just isn't true. Same goes with your biased view on gold; for example, NAZ sure doesn't look good if you assume everyone bought at 5000.
I was Anonymous at 6:15 PM...
Detroit Dan, as well meaning and as educated on the effects of depression style economics as Bernanke may be, I suspect that he is probably feeling a bit like a man given the Captaincy of the Titanic just after the iceberg was sighted -- the ship has lots of momentum and there's very little spinning the wheel can do to affect the outcome and all he can do is try to minimize the damage and look confident.
Andrew, good analogy. With the media hanging on his every word, it would have been risky for him to give a strong warning a year or two ago. But he truly seemed to be a bit clueless. The clearest example I recall was back in August. One day they said everything appeared to be contained, then a couple of days later they had to take emerygency action (discount rate cut, I think). By that time, he should have been aware of the iceberg and better able to communicate sensibly...
Alec said: "You'll be fine because you bought your house long enough ago so even though it appraises less now than it did 6 months ago, but there's a whole segment of people who can't because the houses are appraising underwater so can't re-fi whatever the rate is short of a cram-down..."
How many is "a whole segment"? And of that "whole segment" how many have real money?
There's "a whole segment" of people like me, too, who are both conscientious in their spending and have above-median incomes. There are more of us, we've got more assets, and we think that spending $500k+ for 1,100 square feet that's not even on the beach is crazy and wouldn't do it.
S.
"for example, NAZ sure doesn't look good if you assume everyone bought at 5000".
That's just ridiculous. No one is disputing that over the last 2 years, gold has been a great investment, better than the S & P 500. Though I have some stocks that have done about as well. As for the next 2 years, we'll see. The fact remains that over an average persons's investing lifetime (say 30 years or so), stocks have been the best investment. There are periods where stocks do terribly-we certainly appear to be in one now.
If you take all your money and put it into the market at the top, of course you will be killed. But real people don't invest like that. They buy a little bit at a time over many years, so the bit they buy at the top is made up for by the bit they buy at the bottom.
You know the numbers as well as I, but you choose to deny them for your own reasons.
This may be a really big bust, but I wouldn't get ahead of myself and say a depression is coming.
rcryan,
Back then we didn't have a service-oriented, consumer-based economy. Personal debt levels greatly exceed those of the GD, so the impact now is arguably greater.
aotc,
Stating the "average" is akin to the "average" family of 1.4 kids -- it doesn't exist except as some fancy marketing statistic. J6P doesn't buy and hold for the recommended period; he moves in and out, chases returns, and pays lots of taxes and transaction fees.
Besides, index fund ETFs are a recent development, so any true long-term buy-and-hold investor got killed. How many of the original DOW stocks are even around??? Survivorship and inflation are never mentioned in the brochures.
Alec said: "You'll be fine because you bought your house long enough ago so even though it appraises less now than it did 6 months ago, but there's a whole segment of people who can't because the houses are appraising underwater so can't re-fi whatever the rate is short of a cram-down..."
How many is "a whole segment"? And of that "whole segment" how many have real money?
There's "a whole segment" of people like me, too, who are both conscientious in their spending and have above-median incomes. There are more of us, we've got more assets, and we think that spending $500k+ for 1,100 square feet that's not even on the beach is crazy and wouldn't do it.
S.
Sebastian
Gee, for a moment I thought you actually read this blog.
If you want those answers, download the free sample of the CR/Tanta newsletter
As for the latter half of your thesis, your Mt. Pilot sewing circle is not the rest of this country, GDP wise.
Neither is mine, but the proof is in the pudding of default rates in an economy that according to you isn't in recession and ain't headed there. GMAC didn't run all those Ditech ads because nobody paid attention.
Re: INTC after-hours price drop
Do after hours prices endure into the following trading day?
I've no experience with the after-hours market (clearly! -ed)
psychodave
In INTC's case, they will DEFINE the market tomorrow - especially the TECH side - so any play made must be thought of as a market play not a single stock play.
I'm waiting till the pre-open trading session before I make any trading move (long, short, index or sympathy stock). 12 Hours is a long time for things to go awry - in particular the rumor that the Fed may make an emergency cut, and the possible up (OR DOWN! ) reaction to it.
Then there's the CPI coming out tomorrow too.
Either way I'll wait till about 8:40 am EST before I act.
-K
Index mutual funds have been around for about 30 years since Bogle started the first one at Vanguard. That's long enough for most of us here. The indexes are rebalanced every year or so, so the survivorship bias doesn't hold. The fund or ETF simply sells the losers when they drop off the index and buys the new entrants.
As for inflation, yes it reduces real yields from all investments equally. The fact is that stocks have outperformed T-bills or cash. Gold outperformed in the 70s, but that really had to do with the fact that its price was fixed from 1945 on, so it had a ton of catch up when the dollar link was taken off.
Thanks, Kicker. Now if I can just have a nice 35-year window... or maybe I should dust off my tape of "Alone in the Wilderness." Wolverine tastes ok, right?
The indexes are rebalanced every year or so, so the survivorship bias doesn't hold
Aheadofthecurve,
Please read that sentence again and explain to me how removing the dying companies from an index isn't survivor bias.
If SPY yields 9 %/year, it wouldn't matter if all 500 stocks were different at end than they were when you bought it. You still made 9 %. Survivor bias applies if you want to generalize from that index to say how a "typical stock" performs. In that case, yes, survivor bias will lead you to overestimate how well an average stock does.
As for inflation, that affects what that 9% buys, but it has the same effect if you make your money in bonds, RE or pork bellies.
"dryfly, I don't know yet, I haven't been getting out much the last couple of weeks since my lady friend is out of town."
Sure, the lady friend goes out of town and suddenly pictures of attractive middle-aged blond women start appearing.
Coincidence? I think not!
"Hell, one time I refused to buy a ticket in the office lottery. Everyone was chipping in to buy a bunch for the big payout. I declined. I was scorned and derided, "you'll be sorry when we win". I told them they were wasting their money and if they wanted to be rich, there were much lower risk methods." 12th percentile
You must be great fun at parties.
rcryan writes, Mellon's famous words Liquidate labor, liquidate stocks, liquidate the farmers, liquidate real estate. remind me of the advice of several people here. That didn't work well.
One sees this quote again and again in the MSM and on the net, always with the implication that Hoover followed Mellon's advice and thereby caused The Great Depression.
That's simply not so.
Hoover completely ignored Mellon's advice and almost immediately began stimulative measures.
(Note also that Hoover was a brilliant man -- probably as smart as Bill Clinton, not a bozo like GWB.)
Oops, rcyran, not rcryan.
tf cx;-lhb]p=
r32o1094ifuutgf48it95i559itm5ivf m v v
o i86jutfz;ohnm iocv1icv91
Thanks, rcyran. Wonder what happened to that lyrical banker?
I just moved to northern Orange County, and I have to agree there's a lot of variation even between towns just a few miles away from each other. I've heard that towns in the inland empire are getting decimated with housing prices already 20-30% off their highs, lots of foreclosures, and more to come. OTOH, prices for prime beachfront property in Newport are still increasing (albeit less slowly).
The malls and office parks in my area still seem reasonably busy, so no tumbleweeds yet. Ask me again in 6 months...
BTW, I never knew so many people from orange county frequent this blog (et tu, CR??) We should organize a meetup of CR fans. We can even hold it next to where the realtors hang out just to get a little schadenfreude with our beer
I guess my daughter commented at 10:06. I'm sure her insights helped you all.
You want to know where exotic financial products are concentrated? First define geography, exotic and density.
Tactical Flashlights
r c helicopter
video game