Subprime, subprime, subprime.

Why do people think it is just "those people with bad credit"

Don't they understand that it is everyone who drive the value of homes that is part of the problem.

If a sub-prime borrower bought YOUR home you did not complain- right ?????

“It’s scary to think that your retirement or the kids’ college fund can be hurt by a mortgage company lending money to somebody who, it turns out, can’t afford the payments.”

“‘Things are connected,’ said Jason Henderson, a Federal Reserve economist in Omaha, meaning that problems with sub-prime lending, loans to people with poor credit scores, can have broader consequences on the financial markets and the economy as a whole.”

I have friends with excellent credit who bought way more house than they could afford because of "buy now or be priced out for evar!!!!1!!"

One good friend used an option ARM to buy a house in the NJ suburbs. But then, he also voted for Bush . . . not the sharpest knife in the drawer. Big hearted but terminally naive.

Nice post!!! The talking heads keep saying we are at or near the bottom---is there some real est. of when we could hit bottom from past cycles.

Higher interest rates should have compensated investors for risk if markets were functioning correctly, said Massachusetts Institute of Technology professor Robert Solow, winner of the 1987 Nobel Prize in economics. Standards may have fallen below appropriate levels in the ``euphoria'' of borrowing and lending, Solow said in an interview with Bloomberg Radio today.

I hate picking fights with Nobel Prize winners and Fed Governors, but not as much as I hate doing dishes, and since right at the moment those are my choices . . .

Higher interest rates should have compensated investors for the risk. Except that, it seems, when those ARMs adjust to those higher interest rates, the borrowers cannot afford them. Ignore, for a moment, the loosey-goosey underwriting standards problems; that's just a way of saying that lenders compensated for the inability of subprime borrowers to pay their true risk premiums and also afford current home prices by putting them in teaser ARMs and then "qualifying" at the teaser rate. The point is that we still have a situation in which Mr. Market cannot charge his required risk premium for subprime mortgage lending, because the houses are too expensive. I mean, we're seeing what happens when subprime lenders have to start limiting themselves to that "fully-indexed fully-amortizing" payment thing--no volume. And maybe, eventually, it will dawn on someone that "fully indexed" is a rough proxy for "current fixed rates." So if the borrower can qualify for that, why put them in an ARM at all? Mr. Greenspan? I'm talking to you.

CNNMoney.com: 404 Page Not Found

Countrywide stops no-money-down lending-
The mortgage lender tells brokers to end offering the option of no down payment as delinquencies increase.

Bies also said, "We're seeing this in a very narrow segment. We're watching for contagion, we haven't seen it. Outside of the housing and auto industries, the economy is strong."

What's everyone getting so excited about?

Housing and auto, shmousing and shmauto!

Okay, you're a real estate agent who can't get a job on an automobile assembly line. Tough.

Just another day in paradise. I think the home is going to have be a place for people to live, not an atm for wall street and the middle class- oh well all's well that ends well.

Now on the main event- the Great Housing Crisis of '07- delayed but not stopped by the easing off of the fed from the great interest rate accelerator. Now the fed will no longer dictate subprime through the false connection to the ten year note with no cushion for people going splat. First the fraud gets washed out of the system- a thing which is starting now with Casey Serin's foreclosures, and then the investors bail, and then the specuvestors who walk away from the builder deposits, and then the homebuilders, and then mom and pop have nobody left to sell to but I, the vulture.

That is when you know the market is bottoming, when I start buying, and I don't think it will be for several years now...too much pain ahead.

Housing and auto. A narrow segment.

Well, that's one eye a needle that many a rich man has passed through, narrow though it may be.

The debtors? Yes, too narrow for them.

The crime of the century. Or any century.

Anybody going to jail for any of this?

Are the people who created the suction that made the lenders on the street go nuts, are they going to jail?

The guys at F&F.

Ken Lay is screaming in hell.

IMHO, those worshipers at the altar of the markets are perfect and logical, are a bit out of it.

You can tell when they say the market should have but .......

The more I watch the subprime mess unfold and the guidelines changes taking place almost across the board, seemingly moving these lower tier players towards ALT-A and even conforming, I cannot dismiss the fact that this will create additional margin pressure on the conforming lenders in the near-intermediate term.

With margins already being squeezed by the yield curve and competition for deposits, it is inevitable that the tightening credit standards also apply earnings pressure.

We have already seen pre-packs involved in a couple deals, I believe that you will see two more in the near-term, the CA lawsuits prevent any other reasonable scenario as does the overcapacity.

I agree with Bies's latest statement, in that we are just getting started, the amount of qualified buyers being locked out will be felt, the HELOC extraction will show serious deterioration, and the ultimate result will be further pressure on an already weak economy.

My opinion is that this is not isolated to mortgage companies, banks will indeed fail/be taken over by the FED's. Widespread, no, but, enough to induce fear, absolutely.

The carnage in the high yield markets will likely be dramatic and create more concentrated damage.

What are you talking about!?!

Everyone knows that the markets are God's perfect vision of perfection. When Corning was $300 per share, or Microstrategy, or take your pick, they were valued perfectly right.

Until they weren't.

You're right, it is a strange form of insanity. Like the tax protesters, who remain convinced that THEY know the law, and that the prosecutors, defense attorneys, and judges are all either delusional or conspiring against them, even as they are led away in cuffs.

Then again, I believe worshippers at ANY altar are delusional, but I'm in the minority on that one.

Slightly OT, and a Dead Horse too... But assuming the growing "buzz" about MS buying NEW is true, can anyone explain to me why in the heck they would do that. I can think of a million reasons why they wouldn't, but if they are... Why? Body Parts?

Most of the people I know who bought via subprime voted Dimocrat in 06. Guess we've got a whole drawerful of those dull implements here...

If Morgan Stanley is buying NEW, it probably means they are taking over assets that NEW used as collateral for debts. The empty shell will bankrupt, buildings and people will work under MS. Maybe they will be assigned to some kind of debt collecting jobs? MS will provide hitmans on call - could be a good business together.

Countrywide stops no-money-down lending-
The mortgage lender tells brokers to end offering the option of no down payment as delinquencies increase.

Their March 6th rate sheet says otherwise. Could they be changing gears already? To borrow a phrase from Tanta, is it all asses-and-elbows over there?

I think it's generally wishful thinking on the part of NEW AEs and those unwilling to cash in their chips on the stock.

Wish in one hand, shit in the other. See which fills up first.

Updated Reuters article says nothing about buying NEW . . . just bettering collateral position for the inevitable.

Morgan Stanley loan to New Century sound--analysts
| Reuters

I should add that I'm looking at their CA rate sheet. I haven't looked at any other states.

OC,

I watch there rate sheets a lot, they often do weekend releases with the date set for the following monday, I'd look Sunday to see the new changes.

Business & Financial News, Breaking US & International News | Reuters.com

"Tougher lending standards stemming from the shakeout in the beleaguered subprime mortgage industry could prevent up to 1.1 million U.S. homebuyers from getting mortgages this year, a Bear Stearns analyst told investors on Friday."

I think at the end of the day, it's the rating agencies that really caused this. By allowing the street to package this crap, stuff it into a cdo and give it a AAA rating, the investment seemed safe to many institutional investors. Ever wonder why the sell side makes 5x's what the buy side does?

Cal, but we miss the 200K
foreclosures the come with it.

watch there rate sheets a lot

Cal, can you comment on their rates for 100% LTV versus 95%/80% and the trend over time? For 2/28's, the current sheet shows a spread of nearly 3% for low FICO and about 2.2% for a higher FICO. Has this spread increased as of late?

I think I figured how the Bear Stearns guy comes to 1.1million number, he figures $280 billion out of the mortgage market and divides it by the avg price of homes (268k) last year. Which gives approx 1.044 million.

Now there are several problems with this approach, but regardless it shows what we know, the pool of qualified buyers is shrinking. Add in all the motivated sellers, vacant homes, and the fact that we are at an all time high for home ownership (even fewer available buyers). Kind of paints a bleak picture, I think we have some more time before the stress really shows on the market, another 8-12 months at least.

OC,

I have some old rate sheets saved, I will post on the spreads later tonight when I get home. Prices have definitely gone up, but I'm not sure about spreads between the FICOs. Look for some new info in this thread in about 5 hours.

This is the year that people begin to realize that a house is just a place to live, not a pension plan.

OK, back in December when I was blissfully going along looking at houses, thinking of buying (blissfully as in ignorance is bliss) I contacted a couple of mortgage companies looking to get pre -approved.... (since then, of course, I've come to my senses). So today two of the folks I talked to back in December called within an hour of each other asking if I still needed to get a mortgage. In both cases I politely declined, but in the 2nd case I asked the caller how things were going in mortgage-land. She replied that things have been kind of crazy in the last couple of weeks. Subprime gone ("you might have heard about that", she says), Requirements tightening, etc. She also mentioned that 80/20s are basically gone because while you can easily get the 80, nobody wants to fund the 20. But she told me, I could still get an 80/15 given my FICO... "and the PMI is now tax deductable!"

Anyway, it would seem that it was a slow Friday afternoon in the mortgage biz.

"Kind of paints a bleak picture, I think we have some more time before the stress really shows on the market, another 8-12 months at least"

Possibly. Could be sooner... Summer. Spring bust will cause a lot of panic. REOs are beginning to show up on the market in meaningful numbers. Regulators seem be waking up from a 15 year nap and probably will be paying closer attention to NPA numbers and reserves (Tanta?). That should light a fire under the lenders to PRICE TO SELL.

Tanta, do you remember the onset of the RTC period and how lenders disposed of REOs? They probably don't want to chase the market down and with the high inventory levels they need for their REOs to get noticed.

It looks as if the changes being announced are across the board and effective Monday.

Of the absurd dot-coms, Microstrategy had to be top dog, for the name alone. I always assumed that they used that name on a dare, "things are so ridiculous, people will fund anything related to the Web, I bet we could name a company..."

gunthestops

is there some real est. of when we could hit bottom from past cycles.

Yes - When no one is talking about housing.

Looking at the rate sheets for the 2/28 up to 95%, the spread is actually narrower (very slight 100bp ish) slightly, but the base pricing for all the stated stuff is much higher (900bp). Plus their is now a stated wage earner add on of 250bp where before there was no difference between wage earner and self employed. They've also dropped some programs so i'm only comparing the remaining programs.

On the 100% 1 or 80/20 loan 2/28, there are no more stated and they dropped most of the full doc programs. Pricing is slightly less at the top levels and basically identical at the lower fico.

We shall see if there is a new rate sheet by Monday.

Login or register to post comments
Syndicate content