I recently read someone's comment that median prices are overstated as of late because of the fact that virtually no condos are moving, bringing the median up, since relatively speaking, homes are doing "less bad" than condos.

Does anyone have data to analyze this hypothesis, either for particular states or nationally?

R,

I don't have any data, but that sounds plausible. Condos typically are more volatile in prices and sales because they are favorites of speculators.

When California Implode's it is going to take the whole Country with it..IE: 1000Ft. Tsunami...
I just spoke to My mother who lives in Up-State New York..& she said the ammount of inventory and Forclosures has spread in her County Like A Plague.

I warned her about what was going on back in 05...Thankfully my Parents actually listened to me for once and took my advice to pay their home off, and for my mother to pull her 403k..which up untill this year was losing a vast ammount of money.

We are living in very interesting times to say the least.

OT:

FSO Editorials: "America's Total Debt Report - Update 2007" by
Michael W. Hodges 03/15/2007

America's Total Debt Report - Update 2007
$48 Trillion - and Soaring

" Now sleep well "..not!

Somehow I thought this headline was not doing the numbers justice. I know, such a shock, but after many similar 'hits', some (even me! and that's why I need to gripe now, before I miss it again) may not notice, even become complacent...and what could be worse than that?
Let's remind ourselves of what CR does better than anyone else: the graphical yoy presentations. And although that graph may be missing on this particular thread, we know the comparison to make is to that Feb 2006, Feb 2005, Feb 2004 series.
And so the (authoritative) number is "down 21.3%" and not the (somewhat molly coddling, somewhat brainless) "down 3.7 percent" (from Jan 2007).
And so that headline, "House sales decline", is somewhat softer than the numbers it purports to represent.
There may be a few moments where we do not adhere to that adage, 'Beware that moment of inattention', but we do so much better than most...not that I'm getting complacent about that gap.

Median prices tell you more about the median buyers than where individual house prices are going.

If I'm a buyer than can afford to spend $350,000, I'm going to spend it. I'm pre-qualified for $350,000, I've got the DP for $350,000, so I'll spend $350,000.

Now, the question is, did that get me a bigger or smaller house? More or less bedrooms? A more or less desirable neighborhood?

You can only get that information from comparing resales of similar properties, not by looking at aggregate statistics like median or average prices.

jb

Price per Sq Ft is the right yard stick to gauage the decline.

Median does not work well because there are more deals at the upper end now.

JB once again hits the nail on the head.

JB, since you are in Jersey, have you checked out the photoblog at newyorkssixth.com

It is stunning to go through all those pictures and get a sense of the capacity coming in Jersey City/Hoboken.

Even more breathtaking to take the light rail and see it in person.

"Last month's sales made for the slowest February since 1997, when 28,710 homes sold."

Population adjusted this probably is the slowest sales since WWII.

This is an important piece of data and confirms a continuation of a trend lower (i.e. we have not yet hit bottom).

Let's see how March, April, and May pan out as these are really critical months to move inventory as families tend to not want to relocate during the school year and whatever buyers remain in the market get more active in the spring.

If the trend continues even lower and we don't see even a seasonal bump, then inventory will really climb from 6.8 months supply to something really stifling like 8-9 months supply.

I'm still hoping for something better than the worst possible outcome, though I do believe that it is likely the country is entering a recession as we speak.

calmo, you hit the nail on the head as far as I'm concerned with regard to year over year being the most relevant figures...

Do you think this is real:

Working Group on Financial Markets - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

there are rumors they injected $57B into the market. Hard to imagine.

I thought there was a website where you could see the sales history of a particular sale, i.e. what it sold for the last time?

Stephen Roach wants you to prepare for the downside.
Morgan Stanley - Global Economic Forum 

Interesting bit this:

Seven years ago, the optimists argued that equities as a broad asset class were in reasonably good shape – that any excesses were concentrated in about 350 of the so-called Internet pure-plays that collectively accounted for only about 6% of the total capitalization of the US equity market at year-end 1999. That view turned out to be dead wrong.

A good report on why the rumors of the consumer's demise have been greatly exaggerated.

I bet the average Japanese consumer or corporation had an absolutely stellar balance sheet back in the late 80s - their stocks and real estate were worth big big money and they even had a healthy savings rate.

What could possibly go wrong?

Excellent refinement David...time to sharpen my pencil.

Can anyone please post up the link to the big table provided by Ivy Zellman with the types of mortgages and the percentage in each class?

Steve, Thanks for the contrarian reference (on why rumors of the consumer's demise have been greatly exaggerated). Even this report, however, sees a significant slowing ahead in that:

  1. "A reduction in housing equity withdrawal will certainly be a drag on consumer spending in coming quarters."
  2. Debt service ratios have increased by several percentage points in recent years.
  3. "We see savings rates rising gradually over the next 5 years."

Then there are the usual canards about the subprime problems being limited to the subprime sector, and that consumers will stay solvent because stock prices have gone up so much. Finally, "we see consumer balance sheets as quite healthy" seems a bit delusional in light of all the foreclosures.

Anyway, it's good to see the other point of view...

Wow - a huge drop from 2006. Given that the subprime freeze-up did not occur until late February, we could see an even bigger Y-O-Y drop in the March numbers. Interestingly, the NAR forecast of 6.42 million released earlier this week conceded weakness in February, March, and April, but called for gradual improvement thereafter. Not likely. CR's forecast of 5.6 to 5.8 million existing home sales may turn out to be high.

Steve,

I have soome quibbles with the report you link to. First, it makes the idiotic, and tired, claim that only a small fraction of MEW went to consumption. How can anyone be foolish enough to belive that money used to pay down other debt, which went toward consumption, hasn't fueled consumption?

Next, they make the mistake that many others make in confusing the balance sheet of the average family with that of the median.

Financial assets make up 61% of all household assets, but are held mostlty by those near the top. Are they so clueless to believe that people refinanced taking cash out, often taking on a higher interest rate, at a time they had hundreds of thousands in financial markets. 40% of mortgages last year put no money down. Because the borrowers were too foolish to tap their huge piles of stocks?

Thanks. Seeing that makes me feel much better about my short positions.

Detroit Dan,

Everyone sees slowing consumer demand ahead. Hell, the Fed is counting on it! I think the overall point is that consumption growth will slow, not fall off a cliff.

MEW was a much more important factor in 2002-2005 when wage growth was slow to negative. However, in 2006 MEW actually decreased from 2005 levels, but PCE increased. Why? Well, there's probably some timing issues between equity extraction and spending, but is that enough to explain why PCE held up very well in 2006 while MEW dropped? I don't know, but I'd be very surprised if that completely explains things. More likely PCE is holding up because of strong job growth and wage gains. Yes, those two are expected to slow in 2007, but there's a difference between slowing growth and contraction.

There is no pulling the wool over your eyes BobinMa.
Why I read this blog: people who have a clue.

Shiller's data is probably the best for looking at resale values. His analysis is based on repeat sale of same house pairs. Much more reliable than median. The other think to notice about CA sales is that while median is hanging in there, volume is falling through the floorboards. It's not just a condo story... Guess what happens to median if you whack the entire low end of the market (where all the subprime lives)? You get artificially preserved median prices because the credit crunch hasn't moved far enough up the stack yet. Prices are still rising in SF b/c of low exposure to subprime, but exposure to Alt-A is way off the charts.

steve:

your link takes the position that the average american wages are rising at a steady rate. Note this from the Kash regarding this issue:

"Hand-in-hand with weaker job growth comes weak earnings growth by workers, of course. To the $10 per week increase in take-home pay that the average production worker has received since the year 2000, in February they were able to add another $0.30. Unfortunately, that only made up for about half of the fall in average weekly pay that they took home in January."

Your link also does not discuss the negative saving rate that has been on going for the last 24 months.
The other issue is why the huge run up in defaults and foreclosures if the American consumer is in such great shape. If the consumer is doing so well we should be expecting strong housing growth and below average rates for notice of defults and foreclosures in RE but we are getting just the opposite.

Thanks for the link

R.E. lending infomercials are still huge in O.C., sometimes as many as 4 a a day. Also, remember CA has yet to sign on to CSBS guidelines AND that subprime rhetoric only recently ramped up.
Or, maybe the truth is simpler, maybe CA is leading the country in everything these days, including the "dumbing down" of our home buyers.

Everyone sees slowing consumer demand ahead. Hell, the Fed is counting on it! I think the overall point is that consumption growth will slow, not fall off a cliff.

Steve,

I think the major concern is that if consumers slow down their borrowing and spending that will cause asset prices to fall, forcing the consumer to slow down their borrowing and spending even more, causing asset prices to fall, forcing the consumer to slow down their borrowing and spending even more...

That's the danger inherent in wealth that's heavy on assets and light on cash. Assets have a way of collapsing just when people need them most.

Morgan Stanley - Global Economic Forum

"The case for a consumer spillover is compelling, in my view. A chronic shortfall of labor income generation sets the stage – real private compensation remains over $400 billion below the trajectory of the typical business cycle expansion. At the same time, reflecting the asset-dependent mindset of the American consumer, debt and debt service obligations have surged to all-time highs whereas the income-based saving rate has dipped into negative territory for two years in a row – the first such occurrence since the early 1930s. Equity extraction from rapidly rising residential property values has squared this circle – more than tripling as a share of disposable personal income from 2.5% in 2002 to 8.5% at its peak in 2005. The bursting of the housing bubble has all but eliminated that important prop to US consumer demand. The equity-extraction effect is now going the other way – having already unwound one-third of the run-up of the past four years. In my view, that puts the income-short, saving-short, overly-indebted American consumer now very much at risk – bringing into play the biggest spillover of them all for an asset-dependent US economy"

Ron,

A couple of points...

Ask yourself why Kash focuses on 2000?

The paper does mention the negative savings rate.

Defaults are up because credit was extended to people who didn't deserve the credit. Who wouldn't expect defaults to rise in such a situation?

Yal,

That link has already been posted in this thread.

‘If we could wave a wand and housing prices go up 10 percent, the subprime mortgage problem would disappear’

And if home prices go down, the problems gets worse.

This is what most people don’t get. Supply and demand. Home prices went up because there was a lot of demand that outstripped supply. But this demand was at least 30% speculative, or simply phantom, non-existent demand.

Now that people are realizing that the runup in prices was because of a FALSE demand, the prices will go down to whatever the market will bear.

And the idiot that bought 15 homes? He’s one that skewed that demand curve, as the REIT ‘assumed’ that he was 15 people wanting a home.

I predict that the housing supply is so large, that there are not enough people in the US to fill them up.

Fed Pushing to Expand Statement on Subprime Hybrid ARMs to Cover Prime, Alt A Hybrids

The Federal Reserve last week tipped its hand on what it hopes to do with the recent interagency “statement” on subprime hybrid-adjustable mortgages. Outgoing Fed Governor Susan Bies suggested that the Fed wants to extend the guidelines to prime ARMs as well...

OT
Sold all my gold and commodity positions today, sure hope hyperinflation doesn't break out anytime soon!

Countrywide's CEO, Angelo Mozilo, says he's "running out of time" and needs "balance" in his life. That's why, he says, he sold $140 million of his Countrywide stock over the last 14 months.

God, capitalism is great. And entertaining. I laughed so hard I cried. Yeah, Angelo, you're definitely running out of time. You need to dump that stock before it tanks. You get no sympathy from me, baby. $140 million will buy a lot of "balance" and time in the tanning booth.

Countrywide dismisses subprime naysayers
| Reuters

"Last month's sales made for the slowest February since 1997. . ." The population of California has grown by what, about 8% since 1997? If you factor-in that detail, how far back do we have to go to see such a slow February?

Pimco Says Subprime Collapse May Spread to Alt-A, Jumbo Loans

1] `subprime loans performance will carry over to Alt-A and possibly Jumbo prime markets.

2]U.S. median home prices will fall by 4 to 5 percent this year.

3]Housing and related industries account for about 23 percent of the U.S. economy.

Kiesel said, “housing is the next Nasdaq bubble.”

Pimco Says Subprime Woes May Spread to Alt-A, Jumbo (Update1) - Bloomberg.com

"Home prices went up because there was a lot of demand that outstripped supply."

And exotic loans. Nothing like low-rent money available to anyone with a pulse to send prices skyrocketing.

Unfortunately, many of the renters who signed a "lease" on an ARM will find the "landlord" is now raising the rent 200%.

mp, you figure that is a fair encapsulation of most (major) US CEO psychology for outrageous (even compared to non-US counterpart CEOs) compensation?
No confidence in the future, so you might as well plunder now while the plundering is good.
The upper echelon cannot get enough security and so the disparity continues?

from the previous post

Gross isn't the only bear on housing. Executive vice president Mark Kiesel said in June that he had sold his Southern California home and moved to an apartment.

Steve,

After a long week filled with work-related frustrations, your link to the Societe General report was just the tonic I needed. Now, instead of feeling sorry myself, I am comforted by the reminder that there are so many "professionals" who are less fortunate than myself -- especially those employed as economists at Wall Street firms. What a misery it must be to have to willfully disregard the self-evident message of the data, and instead be obliged to construct a tortuous, tendentious argument drawing the opposite conclusion. Every week brings another sh*t twinkie, and they're required to take a big bite and smile -- while averring it's a delectable chocolate eclair.

All part of Mother Nature's cruel and inscrutable plan, I suppose. TGIF, I say, in conclusion, offer this little reminder that -- however bad it was -- it could have been worse: http://www.glass5.com/MF%20Dung%20Beetle.jpg

Houses need to go down minumum 50% in calibubbleland.

Vacation Mortgage

I too heard this advertisement on the radio. One poster got a chuckle from me...

Welcome to the mortgage business..making used car dealers look good since 1999. - Brian Brady

Everyone sees slowing consumer demand ahead. Hell, the Fed is counting on it! I think the overall point is that consumption growth will slow, not fall off a cliff.

I agree but unfortunately the economy is being driven by 'low riders'... we might only fall off the curb but for many if not most, it will feel like a cliff.

That is an important distinction... something those Frenchmen should have considered. The margins.

And debt will be at the 'core' of the problem even though the problem itself looks to be only on the 'periphery'.

Anonymous | 03.16.07 - 3:41 pm = me

However, in 2006 MEW actually decreased from 2005 levels, but PCE increased. Why?

Ask Visa & Master Card.

What I can't figure out is why "umppity squat" Loan company can advertise "$150,000 refi loans for only $453"?

It's obscene.

beebs

Calmo, sure, I suppose it's fair to say that Angelo is one of the poster boys. He knows what time it is, has made some coin, is getting "older," and knows that it's a good time to get out because it might take years for the stock to recover if it tanks.

Hey, you'd probably do the same thing. I know I would. The difference between Angelo and me is that I wouldn't say I was doing it because I needed "balance" in my life, or was "running out of time." I'd simply say, "Hey, now's a good time to retire."

NOVASTAR just laid off 300 people

Mortgage Grapevine: NOVASTAR just laid off 300 people

"
So my friends at Acceleron- still bullish? At 4:30 PM, a 2 minute conference call was held to announce "that if you are on this call and received this email", you job has been eliminated.

NFI is drowning and now the morale is lower than ever. "

Novastar is still alive???? Only 300 people???

A good report on why the rumors of the consumer's demise have been greatly exaggerated.

I would really love to see that first chart by quintile. I am less concerned about the bottom 20% (generally in transition or afflicted in some way). I have grave concern for the middle 40%.

"$140 million will buy a lot of "balance" and time in the tanning booth."

Good call mp. How can anyone take this guy seriously? He really looks like he's been working hard...on his tan!!! What a joke!! What was his take home pay? He comes on TV to calm the fears on the sub-prime market and looks like he's got all his money stuffed in suitcases and heading for some Carribean Island!! What does he care, he's already locked in enough money for him and his family.

I have one concern about all the subprime talk. With all the worry in the RE market, why have prices not come down more. Where I live, NY, prices are still going up!!! The asking prices are just as high as they have ever been.

When will the real falloff be? After a bad spring season?

Kiesel said, “housing is the next Nasdaq bubble.”

If that is all it is, then it a problem, but not a catastrophe. We were personally very heavily effected by the dat.bust and 9/11 to the tune of three negative years, but we made it through those dark days (with the help of a HELOC or three). Our real estate appreciation kept us from going under.

My hope is that continuing income growth will keep this real estate bust from growing into a larget bust than the dot.com bust.

I have one concern about all the subprime talk. With all the worry in the RE market, why have prices not come down more. Where I live, NY, prices are still going up!!! The asking prices are just as high as they have ever been.


Prices can inflate to 1 million plus, does not mean jack, if joesixpack and his meager earnings can not afford to buy it...so sure the paper wealth continues..who is getting funded may I ask?...sorry just the negitive side of your positive statment..

mp, so candid:
Hey, you'd (calmo, but anyone) probably do the same thing.

throw dirt (or worse) at me if I do.
We ain't here to put Angelo on some pedestal.
We are here to point out that he couldn't give a sh*t about ordinary people (us) that so far have not called him a self-interested hazard to that thing we used to take some pride in calling "Our Community".
The only positive feature about Angelo is that he shows us (please see this) how weak this community interest really is.
There is more to life than Forbes's list of individual billionaires.

Calmo, hey. I'd be the last guy to offer Angelo a pedestal. He knows what time it is, and he's not about to offer his spot in the lifeboat to you, me, or anyone else. As for "community," well, $140 million will buy a lot of that, too.

RM, IMO, this credit crunch is almost ready to unwind. All that's required now is a Kreditanstalt-type event to start the blow-off. And we'll get one.

Where's my post maul?
mp, I think if we thought more about each other, if we thought about this "community" like an extended family, none of these heisters would be bothering us with their self-aggrandizement...we wouldn't be looking at 12M illegal aliens either.
Might even be a friendlier place, if we had a less predatory attitude about our working conditions.
Ok, Mother Teresa says I can shudup now.

Calmo, you express fine sentiments and I respect you for it. You're a very bright guy, I know that, from having read your posts on this and other blogs.

However, this discussion reminds me of a line in Machiavelli's Prince. It goes something like this: "The world is so far removed from the way it ought to be that anyone who pursues what should be for what is, pursues their downfall rather than their preservation."

And that's why, after having a very active career, I now live in a very rural area and tend my vines.

I too heard this advertisement on the radio. One poster got a chuckle from me...

Welcome to the mortgage business..making used car dealers look good since 1999. - Brian Brady

That ad reminds me of the one I used to hear from a remodeling company ...

"Don't be cheated by dishonest remodeling companies. Give us a shot at cheating you first."

R,

You can see a condo effect on overall median by analysing the OC figures at Lansner on Real Estate : The Orange County Register

mp, beware those moments when guys think I am a bright guy. They have no clue...not like Mae West, my hero.
What do you make of Steve's link to whoeverhewas who supports Steve's notion that the consumer's reliance on MEW and housing in general to support his consumption habits, has been greatly exaggerated. The claim is "compensation accelerated especially from 2005 on".
Would you say that was a pickle in his pocket or something even more disappointing?

Calmo, I suppose it depends on where you're at on the income distribution. Those on the high end probably didn't MEW as much as those on the low end. Also, it depends on what you call compensation. If it's real hourly earnings, they have only just begun to rise after having fallen for several years. Overall, I don't buy the theory, except for maybe the top end of the income distribution.

Login or register to post comments
Syndicate content