The market so far still seems to be interpreting all news in a positive light, with Walmart especially strong.
There's a lot of over the top bullishness out there. I subscribe to a news letter that recently put a "strong buy" on the home builders. He noted that housing downturns usually last 18 months and that the HB stocks shoot up early from the bottom. IMO, he's missing the point that the runup in home prices and HB stocks was anything but typical, leading the expectation of a typical rebound quite suspect.
The interesting point today will be whether the retail companies with "disappointing numbers" will go up or down. If they go up, this may mean that many on the Street believe this talk of a short term problem during September. Alternatively, a lot of investors are just playing the momentum. (I'm mostly bearish for the long, but have been long Nasdq 100 futures and am also doing well on Asia, Latin America and natural resources).
if you'll notice the lenders esp smaller ones like DSL, FHN are still getting hit despite the rebound rally since the rate cut. i was lucky to be on board DSL yesterday and expect another leg down hard. i'm waitng for my IYR short and SRS to begin another leg down shortly. the slow drip of bad news i think will eventually settle in to Wall St. i'm not convinced of a Weimar stock mkt blowoff in the long run b/c stocks are such a volatile and efficient mkt that i just can't see the pigmen alone driving the major indices to stratospheric heights. the risk is too great and their are more than enough guys like me who will bet against them. i may be wrong but still short. i am long precious metals and some oil though in a minority. congratulations on your long bets on tech and Asia. you must be doing well.
The market so far still seems to be interpreting all news in a positive light, with Walmart especially strong.
There's a lot of over the top bullishness out there...
It has nothing to do with good or bad news, bullishness, etc.
What's happening now is that we have a large segment of the financial industry that exists solely by driving asset prices up and borrowing against the appreciation to drive asset prices even higher. This is precisely what happened in housing and the related credit markets, now hedge funds are being forced to move to other markets.
What's important to understand is that asset prices MUST go higher for these businesses remain in operation (because that's the only way they can pay the interest on their existing debt), and so they will do what ever it takes to drive prices higher -- their life depends on it.
As long as the Fed provides the liquidity, the speculative finance industry will recycle it into higher and higher asset prices. The economy be damned.
This is the same phenomenon we saw in the 1929.
What worries me is that then there was a largely fixed money supply (since it was backed by gold), which we don't have now. I think it's conceivable that if the Fed remains cooperative, there's really no limit on how high asset prices can be leveraged.
Bill, I've seen similar analysis on the homebuilders - and historically their business does bounce back pretty quickly. But IMO those analysts are ignoring current fundamentals.
dc1000, hopefully your business is OK. DC has held up well compared to other areas - but those numbers are pretty shocking!
i understand your theory and its not an unreasonable one. its just not one i want to bet on. if corporate profits (true profits, not financially engineered share buybacks) increased in tandem with share prices then i would agree. but we're now seeing estimates of little to no earnings growth. PEG ratios are over 8 (usually 1-2) currently and may shoot higher depending on how bad earnings turn out to be. even a pigman should pause with those figures. i think there are enough other pigmen who will bet against them since you can also make money shorting. much of what i say applies to US domestic stocks.
(I'm mostly bearish for the long, but have been long Nasdq 100 futures and am also doing well on Asia, Latin America and natural resources).
Bill | 10.11.07 - 9:38 am | #
Well the QQQQ has been a good play so far.
IMHO with these five stocks making up a good percentage of the up momentum in recent weeks and things slowing down. Seems to me once the momentum swings the other way. Could be a risky play at these levels. Good luck.
i understand your theory and its not an unreasonable one. its just not one i want to bet on. if corporate profits (true profits, not financially engineered share buybacks) increased in tandem with share prices then i would agree. but we're now seeing estimates of little to no earnings growth. PEG ratios are over 8 (usually 1-2) currently and may shoot higher depending on how bad earnings turn out to be. even a pigman should pause with those figures. i think there are enough other pigmen who will bet against them since you can also make money shorting. much of what i say applies to US domestic stocks.
Well, stock trading now is heavily dominated by the hedge fund industry, and their primary interest is not earnings, but developing further collateral to borrow against.
Remember, the hedge fund managers ultimately don't care if the stocks go bust - they're gambling their clients' money, not theirs. Their concern is simply collecting fees for as long as possible on the greatest gains possibl.e.
The question is ultimately what comes along to stop all this, and when.
If negative earnings scare too many investors out of the market it could collapse, but I'm not convinced yet.
The system is fragile, though. It could be something as simple as a prominent article calling the industry out that causes the market to collapse. Those things are impossible to predict, though.
I would just comment that I don't think weather or money had much to do with anything. What was the story last month on back to school? That the kids were waiting to see what everyone else was wearing. Well apparently what is not for sale because it is really hideous this fall.
I think idoc is right and the earnings are what is going to gradually restrain the market. Gradually would be good!
DC1000, I hope you are still doing well? I think DC's outlying areas have fallen so much that it was bound to slowly move inward. That combined with the financing crunch forecasts a very rough spring.
What: "...a research company in Swampscott, Mass. "It was a perfect storm, a combination of abnormally warm weather, high food and energy prices, a continued sluggish housing marketing and tight credit"
Hogwash! There is no inflation!
This leads me to wonder if YOY, same store sales are normalized to account for the CPI or are they raw numbers? If they are raw numbers, and if there is some inflation, are these numbers saying "no growth".
Barley, no. The retail sales reports and the industry reports are all in nominal dollars. So yes, those increases you see reported are distorted when prices increase or decrease significantly.
I don't live in DC, but I have spent quite a bit of time there over the past couple years. I'm not exaggerating when I say there was an open house sign on every residential street corner in Chevy Chase last w/e. The DC market really looks to have taken a sharp lurch downward.
Borkafatty - Compucredit is due to report on November 5th. That one I watch because they are heavily involved in the poorer quality CC market and should trend before banks.
MOM:
we have ONE LAST RESIDENTIAL UNIT to sell and our pipeline is FREE AND CLEAR of residential units. we made that decision 18 months ago and its almost done. yeah!
confused:
my data is the raw data spewed out by the MRIS here. it may be dirty but i'm using the same data for 10 years+ now.
MOM, thanks thats what I thought. So, if YOY sales have increased at say 1.2% and inflation is at say 2.3%, I might assume the increase is actually a decrease on volume (lower unit sales) but rather just a rise in dollars churned.
CFC>"Delinquencies as a percentage of loans serviced rose to 5.87 percent in September from 5.05 percent in August and 4.50 percent in September 2006."
So who knows what is the long term norm od delinquencies? I thought it was 2.06% for budget/risk purposes.
Ken Perkins said:
"It was a perfect storm, a combination of abnormally warm weather, high food and energy prices, a continued sluggish housing marketing and tight credit."
Why is it that every time there is a hiccup in business people such as Ken Perkins have to blame it on "THE PERFECT STORM?"
I thought perfect storms were once in a lifetime events, like when the meteorologist in 'The Perfect Storm' says, "you can live your whole life and never see storm like this."
So far the DotComs and Nasdaq, the lending/subprime debacle and bigretailers have been hit by "perfect storms."
It appears to me as if these people do not want to take responsibility for their flawed business plans and simply blame everything on external forces, the more dramatic the better. Pretty soon they'll be saying we got Katrina'd...
Lets review managemnts's current outlook on their business:
10-Oct-07 MOZILO ANGELO R
Officer 139,918 Direct Option Exercise at $9.94 per share. $1,390,784
10-Oct-07 MOZILO ANGELO R
Officer 139,918 Direct Automatic Sale at $18.74 per share. $2,622,063
9-Oct-07 MOZILO ANGELO R
Officer 139,918 Direct Option Exercise at $9.94 per share. $1,390,784
9-Oct-07 MOZILO ANGELO R
Officer 139,918 Direct Automatic Sale at $19.87 per share. $2,780,170
8-Oct-07 MOZILO ANGELO R
Officer 139,918 Direct Option Exercise at $9.94 per share. $1,390,784
8-Oct-07 MOZILO ANGELO R
Officer 139,918 Direct Automatic Sale at $20.14 per share. $2,817,948
I wonder about the corporate spirit..."Yippie my boss just made another cool $9M...I gotta go sign the allegence letter again and now I will a second matching wrist band!"
What's important to understand is that asset prices MUST go higher for these businesses remain in operation (because that's the only way they can pay the interest on their existing debt), and so they will do what ever it takes to drive prices higher -- their life depends on it.
If by "these businesses" you mean hedge funds, the statement isn't true. Hedge funds have always been far less long and dependent on appreciation than other types of asset managers (e.g., mutual funds). The curiosity is why hedge funds have been so bullish lately.
I wouldn't count on it continuing. There's huge amounts of money that hedge funds know they can make on the downside, at the right time. I think they know that time is coming and are just waiting to pull the trigger. A couple of sharp spikes up, followed by a giant spike down, is made to order for hedge funds. They have great hubris in their ability to shift in time. And many of them probably will.
CR: "The sharp slowdown in September consumer spending was not a surprise."
Except to most of the anaylsts who follow most of the retailers whose same-store sales were reported by AP. Note the huge consensus misses in several cases:
DC1000 we have ONE LAST RESIDENTIAL UNIT to sell and our pipeline is FREE AND CLEAR of residential units. we made that decision 18 months ago and its almost done. yeah!
Very glad to hear it. So I guess we won't hear you talking about "Perfect Storms" and "economic shocks" on the tube or read your doleful comments in WaPo, eh? Every storm is a perfect storm if you never bother to check the weather forecasts! The only thing you can do is get out of the way of these things.
Commercial retail is shaping up to head the same way with a lag, and office space is overbuilt already in some areas. Specifically about the DC area, I know a couple of people who work for companies in the area. The companies are cutting or holding expenses, so I think DC will not be immune. Still some startups, though!
Many misinterpret the nature of the builders. They are highly cyclical and their business models do not "bouce back" very easily. Stocks may pop and swoon, but the are very cycle dependent. Even after the bubble deflates, the businesses of these companies will be lackluster, although positive.
"It was a perfect storm, a combination of abnormally warm weather, high food and energy prices, a continued sluggish housing marketing and tight credit."
Due to global warming, retail sales suck.
The market so far still seems to be interpreting all news in a positive light, with Walmart especially strong.
There's a lot of over the top bullishness out there. I subscribe to a news letter that recently put a "strong buy" on the home builders. He noted that housing downturns usually last 18 months and that the HB stocks shoot up early from the bottom. IMO, he's missing the point that the runup in home prices and HB stocks was anything but typical, leading the expectation of a typical rebound quite suspect.
The interesting point today will be whether the retail companies with "disappointing numbers" will go up or down. If they go up, this may mean that many on the Street believe this talk of a short term problem during September. Alternatively, a lot of investors are just playing the momentum. (I'm mostly bearish for the long, but have been long Nasdq 100 futures and am also doing well on Asia, Latin America and natural resources).
the ole blame it on the weather reason. Funny how the weather never enters the discussion when sales are above expectations eh...
The markets keep climbing a mountain of worry.
sorry OT but i just had a heart attack.
latest DC numbers are out :
YOY for Sept:
Total dollar volume: -37%
Avg sold price: -3.65%
Median sold price: -17.58%
Total units sold: -34.61%
inventory clearing ratio: 8.39 months
(last seven months it had been below 5)
Bill
if you'll notice the lenders esp smaller ones like DSL, FHN are still getting hit despite the rebound rally since the rate cut. i was lucky to be on board DSL yesterday and expect another leg down hard. i'm waitng for my IYR short and SRS to begin another leg down shortly. the slow drip of bad news i think will eventually settle in to Wall St. i'm not convinced of a Weimar stock mkt blowoff in the long run b/c stocks are such a volatile and efficient mkt that i just can't see the pigmen alone driving the major indices to stratospheric heights. the risk is too great and their are more than enough guys like me who will bet against them. i may be wrong but still short. i am long precious metals and some oil though in a minority. congratulations on your long bets on tech and Asia. you must be doing well.
The market so far still seems to be interpreting all news in a positive light, with Walmart especially strong.
There's a lot of over the top bullishness out there...
It has nothing to do with good or bad news, bullishness, etc.
What's happening now is that we have a large segment of the financial industry that exists solely by driving asset prices up and borrowing against the appreciation to drive asset prices even higher. This is precisely what happened in housing and the related credit markets, now hedge funds are being forced to move to other markets.
What's important to understand is that asset prices MUST go higher for these businesses remain in operation (because that's the only way they can pay the interest on their existing debt), and so they will do what ever it takes to drive prices higher -- their life depends on it.
As long as the Fed provides the liquidity, the speculative finance industry will recycle it into higher and higher asset prices. The economy be damned.
This is the same phenomenon we saw in the 1929.
What worries me is that then there was a largely fixed money supply (since it was backed by gold), which we don't have now. I think it's conceivable that if the Fed remains cooperative, there's really no limit on how high asset prices can be leveraged.
Bill, I've seen similar analysis on the homebuilders - and historically their business does bounce back pretty quickly. But IMO those analysts are ignoring current fundamentals.
dc1000, hopefully your business is OK. DC has held up well compared to other areas - but those numbers are pretty shocking!
Best to all.
ac
i understand your theory and its not an unreasonable one. its just not one i want to bet on. if corporate profits (true profits, not financially engineered share buybacks) increased in tandem with share prices then i would agree. but we're now seeing estimates of little to no earnings growth. PEG ratios are over 8 (usually 1-2) currently and may shoot higher depending on how bad earnings turn out to be. even a pigman should pause with those figures. i think there are enough other pigmen who will bet against them since you can also make money shorting. much of what i say applies to US domestic stocks.
(I'm mostly bearish for the long, but have been long Nasdq 100 futures and am also doing well on Asia, Latin America and natural resources).
Bill | 10.11.07 - 9:38 am | #
Well the QQQQ has been a good play so far.
IMHO with these five stocks making up a good percentage of the up momentum in recent weeks and things slowing down. Seems to me once the momentum swings the other way. Could be a risky play at these levels. Good luck.
AAPL 8.98%
MSFT 5.92%
QCOM 5.32%
GOOG 4.49%
RIMM 2.27%
26.98% of QQQQ
ac
i understand your theory and its not an unreasonable one. its just not one i want to bet on. if corporate profits (true profits, not financially engineered share buybacks) increased in tandem with share prices then i would agree. but we're now seeing estimates of little to no earnings growth. PEG ratios are over 8 (usually 1-2) currently and may shoot higher depending on how bad earnings turn out to be. even a pigman should pause with those figures. i think there are enough other pigmen who will bet against them since you can also make money shorting. much of what i say applies to US domestic stocks.
Well, stock trading now is heavily dominated by the hedge fund industry, and their primary interest is not earnings, but developing further collateral to borrow against.
Remember, the hedge fund managers ultimately don't care if the stocks go bust - they're gambling their clients' money, not theirs. Their concern is simply collecting fees for as long as possible on the greatest gains possibl.e.
The question is ultimately what comes along to stop all this, and when.
If negative earnings scare too many investors out of the market it could collapse, but I'm not convinced yet.
The system is fragile, though. It could be something as simple as a prominent article calling the industry out that causes the market to collapse. Those things are impossible to predict, though.
Hmm
Got Plastic??
Baltimore Sun breaking news, sports, weather and traffic in Baltimore - baltimoresun.com
I would just comment that I don't think weather or money had much to do with anything. What was the story last month on back to school? That the kids were waiting to see what everyone else was wearing. Well apparently what is not for sale because it is really hideous this fall.
I think idoc is right and the earnings are what is going to gradually restrain the market. Gradually would be good!
DC1000, I hope you are still doing well? I think DC's outlying areas have fallen so much that it was bound to slowly move inward. That combined with the financing crunch forecasts a very rough spring.
Countrywide cuts nearly 5,000 jobs as lendings slide
Countrywide slashes jobs as bad loans rise
| Reuters
What: "...a research company in Swampscott, Mass. "It was a perfect storm, a combination of abnormally warm weather, high food and energy prices, a continued sluggish housing marketing and tight credit"
Hogwash! There is no inflation!
This leads me to wonder if YOY, same store sales are normalized to account for the CPI or are they raw numbers? If they are raw numbers, and if there is some inflation, are these numbers saying "no growth".
Thoughts please...
Barley, no. The retail sales reports and the industry reports are all in nominal dollars. So yes, those increases you see reported are distorted when prices increase or decrease significantly.
I don't live in DC, but I have spent quite a bit of time there over the past couple years. I'm not exaggerating when I say there was an open house sign on every residential street corner in Chevy Chase last w/e. The DC market really looks to have taken a sharp lurch downward.
inventory clearing ratio: 8.39 months
(last seven months it had been below 5)
dc1000
hey dc, your source for the #'s?
tia
Borkafatty - Compucredit is due to report on November 5th. That one I watch because they are heavily involved in the poorer quality CC market and should trend before banks.
MOM:
we have ONE LAST RESIDENTIAL UNIT to sell and our pipeline is FREE AND CLEAR of residential units. we made that decision 18 months ago and its almost done. yeah!
confused:
my data is the raw data spewed out by the MRIS here. it may be dirty but i'm using the same data for 10 years+ now.
MOM, thanks thats what I thought. So, if YOY sales have increased at say 1.2% and inflation is at say 2.3%, I might assume the increase is actually a decrease on volume (lower unit sales) but rather just a rise in dollars churned.
CFC>"Delinquencies as a percentage of loans serviced rose to 5.87 percent in September from 5.05 percent in August and 4.50 percent in September 2006."
So who knows what is the long term norm od delinquencies? I thought it was 2.06% for budget/risk purposes.
Ken Perkins said:
"It was a perfect storm, a combination of abnormally warm weather, high food and energy prices, a continued sluggish housing marketing and tight credit."
Why is it that every time there is a hiccup in business people such as Ken Perkins have to blame it on "THE PERFECT STORM?"
I thought perfect storms were once in a lifetime events, like when the meteorologist in 'The Perfect Storm' says, "you can live your whole life and never see storm like this."
So far the DotComs and Nasdaq, the lending/subprime debacle and bigretailers have been hit by "perfect storms."
It appears to me as if these people do not want to take responsibility for their flawed business plans and simply blame everything on external forces, the more dramatic the better. Pretty soon they'll be saying we got Katrina'd...
CFC
Lets review managemnts's current outlook on their business:
10-Oct-07 MOZILO ANGELO R
Officer 139,918 Direct Option Exercise at $9.94 per share. $1,390,784
10-Oct-07 MOZILO ANGELO R
Officer 139,918 Direct Automatic Sale at $18.74 per share. $2,622,063
9-Oct-07 MOZILO ANGELO R
Officer 139,918 Direct Option Exercise at $9.94 per share. $1,390,784
9-Oct-07 MOZILO ANGELO R
Officer 139,918 Direct Automatic Sale at $19.87 per share. $2,780,170
8-Oct-07 MOZILO ANGELO R
Officer 139,918 Direct Option Exercise at $9.94 per share. $1,390,784
8-Oct-07 MOZILO ANGELO R
Officer 139,918 Direct Automatic Sale at $20.14 per share. $2,817,948
I wonder about the corporate spirit..."Yippie my boss just made another cool $9M...I gotta go sign the allegence letter again and now I will a second matching wrist band!"
X, don't forget the sometimes cited '10 sigma event' as an alternative to 'perfect storm.
"The markets keep climbing a mountain of worry."
No the market is just reflecting that the dollar is soon going to have the same purchacing power as toilet paper.
http://www.weblinks247.com/indexes/idx24_usd_en_2.gif
jg-
10 sigma-perfect storm......
These guys should be flogged.
If by "these businesses" you mean hedge funds, the statement isn't true. Hedge funds have always been far less long and dependent on appreciation than other types of asset managers (e.g., mutual funds). The curiosity is why hedge funds have been so bullish lately.
I wouldn't count on it continuing. There's huge amounts of money that hedge funds know they can make on the downside, at the right time. I think they know that time is coming and are just waiting to pull the trigger. A couple of sharp spikes up, followed by a giant spike down, is made to order for hedge funds. They have great hubris in their ability to shift in time. And many of them probably will.
X
Management wants above average wages for average to below average performance.
The only way to do this is to blame everything except themselves.
CR: "The sharp slowdown in September consumer spending was not a surprise."
Except to most of the anaylsts who follow most of the retailers whose same-store sales were reported by AP. Note the huge consensus misses in several cases:
The article requested is no longer available.
dc1000, is that just the district itself or for the whole metro area?
DC1000 we have ONE LAST RESIDENTIAL UNIT to sell and our pipeline is FREE AND CLEAR of residential units. we made that decision 18 months ago and its almost done. yeah!
Very glad to hear it. So I guess we won't hear you talking about "Perfect Storms" and "economic shocks" on the tube or read your doleful comments in WaPo, eh? Every storm is a perfect storm if you never bother to check the weather forecasts! The only thing you can do is get out of the way of these things.
Commercial retail is shaping up to head the same way with a lag, and office space is overbuilt already in some areas. Specifically about the DC area, I know a couple of people who work for companies in the area. The companies are cutting or holding expenses, so I think DC will not be immune. Still some startups, though!
Many misinterpret the nature of the builders. They are highly cyclical and their business models do not "bouce back" very easily. Stocks may pop and swoon, but the are very cycle dependent. Even after the bubble deflates, the businesses of these companies will be lackluster, although positive.
Reggie Middleton's Boom, Bust & Bling Blog - HAS MOVED TO REGGIEMIDDLETON.BOOMBUSTBLOG.COM!!!: Straight Talk From a Homebuilder CFO: did Wall Street mis-categorize (mis-value) builders and are you?
Gotta love this quote:
"It was a perfect storm, a combination of abnormally warm weather, high food and energy prices, a continued sluggish housing marketing and tight credit."
...abnormally warm weather...
WTH?