Summers: "Universal demand agenda"

Spend baby, spend

how are people going to raise spending sharply if they don't have any money or credit or equity left and are unemployed?

I'm guessing that he (Summers) means gov't must step in and take up the slack ???

There is plenty of productive capacity. What is lacking is capital to use to drive consumption. The USA has a pricing power issue too which no one has suggested we can fix. In fact, with a carbon tax and additional healthcare burden we are on a path to being even less competitive.

This administration is eveb worse than the last one, and that one was terrible. Can't see past the next government spending initiative with no real plans to fix imbalances. Like there's an endless supply of capital available to an insolvent US government.

Removing the healthcare burden from the shoulders of businesses large and small will vastly improve their competitivness. "Pricing power issue" is vague (to me. Care to expand?). As far as your judgement on this administration, your opinion is no better or worse than anyone else's.

[Removing the healthcare burden from the shoulders of businesses ]

The free lunch crowd loves free health care. It'll cost businesses more once the inefficient government steps in the way. Unless you like rationing so the illegals get some of what you used to get. American Socialists don't get it.

We'll just have those greedy small business people pay for the free healthcare. Most of those small businesses earning more than $250k/yr are professional service providers (i.e. doctors, dentists). If we just tax the hell out of those greedy doctors, health care will be free. Serves them right for studying 20 hours a day instead of partying in their 20's.
Most of the remaining small business people earning $250k/yr or more probably work 80 hours a week and don't have time to vote, so they can pound sand too.

I think some doctors and dentists ARE greedy. They line up 6 patients for the same 15 minute time slot and then give you 5 minutes if you're lucky face to face. Oh and that's after the 2 months you have to wait to even get an appointment. And if you don't have health care and pay CASH as I do? No discount, even though I've saved them an hour of paperwork/phone calls. My last trip to the dentist was $175 for an exam and an x-ray. I waited in the waiting room for 90 minutes with a room full of other waiters and saw the dentist for five minutes.
Sorry, no sympathy here. And as far as studying 20 hours a day? So fricken what? My parents were poor and didn't have money for college for me. All my extra income provides for my kids so they can CONTINUE college. So somehow if I become sick or diseased or have an accident, to bad? Go Die you loser? And that helps society as whole how??? Who takes care of my youngest child? The state? With your tax money? It's in YOUR best interest that your neighbors are healthy and productive.

People like you have one philosophy, if you're rich it's because you deserve it, if you're poor it's because you deserve it.

Sorry, that kite don't fly anymore. We sink or swim together, if you don't get that by now, you never will.

donailin - my community has a dental program that is income based. If this is a concern, check around in your community. If there is one, you may qualify. Saves me a bunch.

bearly, Big Business is now in the process of advancing the national healthcare agenda, in case you haven't heard. It's coming. As far as being shortchanged because of the "illegals", your strawman is on fire.

They will need to spend on tents, bottled water, porta-potties and foodstamps to keep the unemployed alive.

I'm pretty sure he's referring to government spending, not personal consumption.

They must try to keep the party going at all costs or else the big boys lose their power, status, and most importantly, their money.

"how are people going to raise spending sharply if they don't have any money or credit or equity left and are unemployed?"

They same way they have over the past 10 years: find a way to borrow more, even if the facts don't support credit worthiness. If that fails, the government can always give them money to spend. Unfortunately, one of these may happen.

Summers is an idiot. Obama is surrounded by idiots. That's why this country is doomed - only corrupt morons make it to the top. Look at the GE leadership, to take but one example - Immelt and the six other most highly paid execs were paid over $120 million in 2008 while they ran this old blue-chip company into the ground. GM, Ford, Morgan, Merrill, etc. - all the same.

This country deserves to fail - those who celebrate incompetence and greed deserve to fall by the wayside.

I celebrate the collapse thanks to the failed ideology called Reaganomics.

--
Hey, Chix, Summers is a Crook nevertheless.

No, Anon, Summers is not an idiot. Idiots, or dopes, are on the receiving end of Summers's crooked schemes.

Jas

Damn, this was an easy thread to scroll through if you skip Jaz/Jas/Jism

I put up a new chapter about what life will be like in a world without Jas.

excerpt:

We continued, and I watched a different America appear on both sides of us. An America that thought homes were modular. An America that thought trailers were good starter and finisher homes. The real houses were usually made of wood. Some were brick. I saw a handful of the wood houses that were only partially painted, usually a faded white. I figured the lack of paint was an indicator of where the money ran out. A financial high tide that only rose to the first level of the two story houses. Or perhaps Jethro had decided the hell with it, or it was deer season, or he ran off with the guy who changed his oil. A Brokeback Holler kind of love.

the rest: 401 Authorization Required 
plus other posts from CR stalwarts...

Regarding A.T.C..net, see this article with my response "http://afterthecrash.net/?p=531".

That site is, in my view, questionable.

G.H.

Let's see you write that about the barrio or the ghetto or are you, as per Holder, a coward.

I guess he just assumes those stimulating will still have enough leftover to buy our debt. With China surplus collapsing that looks unlikely.

China surplus collapsing?

I've been pretty much out of the loop for about two weeks and first I've heard of that. Or is this related to some article I saw the other week with their mfg up again in March? (i.e. spending surplus to keep folks employed...)

Summers is a disapointment. But soon it will be fall.

No. It will be summer first, if we get out of spring without too much trouble.

Poor Larry. Caught in a nightmare of his own making.

Well, I hope Larry realizes he is speaking not only for the administration, but for history. Too bad, he will look so bad when I am sure he supports the Sierra Club and buys Girl Scout cookies.

What's your problem with the Sierra Club and The Girl Scouts?

You yappers need to get a grip.

Txchick, you're not very bright, are you?

Whats the problem with the Sierra Club and The Girl Scouts?

You yappers need to get a grip.

And you keep repeating yourself

Anonymous above was not me. I dig txchicks.

Is this like trying to run the converse of OPEC? Trying to get all of the members to increase demand?

everyone should raise spending sharply now

LMAO!!! Sounds like the plan is global monetization. Got glod?

When supply is abundant and demand is weak, the best gov policies are those that stimulate or encourage demand. When demand is high and supply is under pressure the best policies are those that stimulate or encourage supply. A time and place for each.

And to cash in the present US consumer...status, would you say that this request for demand...is...taking it out of the mattress or...telling the next couple of generations that we spent yours? Summers has some gall giving the impression that this consumer is some "Norwegian Blue" just restin.

No, he's just pinin' for the fjords...

If it means Buy American, I'm all for it.

In China it means Bye American.

Square Peg, allow me to introduce you to Round Hole and Sledge Hammer.

bearly, allow me to introduce you to John Holmes.

That's retarded!

everyone should raise spending sharply now.

That is exactly the wrong thing to do. If your a business that is losing business, the best way to go under is to raise your prices. The winners in this war will be the people that cut spending and become more competitive

No one is suggesting that businesses raise prices. The suggestion is for consumers to increase spending. As a matter of fact, the more closely I read your comment, I think it is you that is retarded.

Re: "Summers is an idiot. Obama is surrounded by idiots"

I agree and The republicans are once again coming up with better ideas toshut the banks down!

The guy truly is unhelpful and therefore unworthy of his job. You think people wanted to stop spending? That it is only a matter of will to get them spending again? There is so much need and desperation in this world that is matched only with joblessness, exploitation and absence of assistance.

When you don't have any more money and can't
or don't want to borrow any more then you must
stop spending. Cool =-O :-[

Now, was that so hard? O:-) :-E DONT_KNOW

When Herman Daley suggested to Summers that perhaps resources were finite, he responded "that's not the way to think about it" (see Daley's "Limits to Growth"). The man is an anachronism. I am losing hope that Obama is ever going to get up to speed on this matter.

he's giving the preferred elements of the establishment a chance. I'm sure if he's not happy with the results in a reasonable amount of time, he'll try something else.
(cue outcry)

i think you are absolutely right. It is amazing that somebody who recognized the need to run an unconventional campaign for an unconventional candidate has failed to grasp that unconventional times require unconventional solutions. Given the policies that have come out of this administration so far I am left wondering why they need PHD's in economics- an Econ 101 student could have written their plans.

Reaganomics made sense in the context of the imbalances that preceded it. But it was taken too far, and Clinton pushed it back to a somewhat better balance between supply and demand policies. W Bush (being an idealogue) reversed that movement and exacerbated the imbalance on both a supply and demand basis by overstimulating supply policies and using borrowing to pay for it.

I never realized I could dislike someone so much without actually meeting him. I get angry now whenever I hear his name. I suppose his comment makes sense, but keynesian demand replacement without a credible banking system seems to be is pissing into the wind. Hopefully he says something stupid and offensive and has to resign. I think he is a huge impediment to a real bank fix, which will increase the severity of this depression. I hate it when Jas is right.

are these guys just stupid or are we? We now know that previous demand was supported by irresponsible lending how then does one restore that level of demand without even more irresponsible lending and just another crisis down the road. It seems to me the appropriate solution is to figure out how to liquidate the excess supply in a responsible manner (including mitigating the human suffering) rather than goosing demand.

I don't think he's suggesting a return to the good old days of the bubble economy, because, well, you know, that would be stupid, as much as not completely shutting off the spigot in reaction, as opposed to allowing some semblance of an economy to continue, albeit much reduced.

My comments keep getting eaten.

My first comment magically appeared.

The comment system is gaslighting me.

"Summers is an idiot. Obama is surrounded by idiots..."

Yes, that POTUS idiot has surrounded himself with equals.

o offense, folks, but somehow, the emoticons just seem to lessen the economic doom.

"...Americans are born and bred dopes who have tied themselves to a system born of fraud and corruption and will pay terribly for it." Laughing out loud

Look at it this way: if we don't (or can't) follow his advice and the situation deteriorates further, he can always say he tried.

Mine and other comments appearing and disappearing
at random. >:o

--
Must be lack of demand!

DE FLA TION?

Gotta give credit when due.

Ya called this Jas.

Good Grief.
I initially thought that was a 'gag' post by CR, or an excerpt from "The Onion".

Kind of like Henry IV finishing his Band of Brothers monologue with "have a nice day."

I don't know who Summers is addressing...he really is beginning to sound like Mortimer in Trading Places...turn those machines back on...which is king of scary for a man in his position.

Japan worsens...
TOKYO: Japan posted a record current account deficit in January, plunging into the red for the first time in 13 years, the finance ministry said Monday.
The deficit — the broadest measure of Japan's trade with the rest of the world — stood at a record 172.8 billion yen ($1.8 billion) in January.
Exports in January plunged 46.3 percent year-on-year to 3.28 trillion yen, while imports declined 31.7 percent to 4.13 trillion yen in the month. As a result, a trade deficit came at 844.4 billion yen.
Japan's exports to the United States dropped 52.9 percent, while Asia-bound shipments fell 46.7 percent from a year earlier, the ministry said.

My comments are being eaten, too.

Although you'll probably never read this to know.

How does Conjure feel about the Ides of March?

Ok, that's enough.

Random disappearing comments.

Nitey nite.

I miss the old comment system.

fried:

And I bet the Nikkei is going to sky on that news.

Larry Summers speaks
I want you all to shop now.
That'll fix it, sure.

The new comment system seems clunky, slow and frustrating.

Didn't he essentially get fired from Harvard. Not hard to see why. What a tool. Hasn't had a single creative thought in his life is my guess.

Yet he sits at the right hand of the President. Go figure.

Ok, every other refresh my (and homedad's) comments appear. :'( =-X :-$ :-E

bottom!

Its rally week! Laughing out loud

Get that guy out of there. He's loopy. What's great for his banking buddies is poison for others.
People won't borrow and spend because he has an 'agenda'. They'll borrow and spend when they can trust they won't be robbed again by Summers' pals.

--
Didn't dopes who voted for Obama knew that they were voting for the old Wall Street gangsters when they were voting for "No Change" Obama? Of course, the other choice was a self-avowed economics ignoramus. Yes, Americans have a choice!

They'll borrow and spend again as soon as somebody is stupid enough to give them credit.

The comments are appearing and disappearing at random.

Hellllp!

We are being censored. . .

Or something.

What an idiot. Yeah, everybody jump at once! And the toilets will flush backwards or something! If they wanted to fix the economic disaster then they would have cleaned out the bad banks. Instead it looks like one big enrich the insiders screwup, and people should save every penny they have because our standard of living is going waaaay down. Sorry, but I would give better than even odds of a worldwide economic depression at this point, based on the ever-worsening policy response.

Hey, Sherlock! What was your first clue?

Jas is right in some respects. He is a realist. If you have a therapist, your therapist will tell you that people who see reality accurately are more prone to ... you guessed it DEPRESSION. If you don't have a therapist and can afford one, well, it might be time. Smile

In the long run we're all dead. If you don't like that, well, off yourself now.

--
What a frikin CROOK. I mean Liarry Summers, a sworn agent of BFNYC and part of the Rubin gang. The rogue economists believe that they can manipulate the economy based on their desires and theories. Manipulating how billion people would react and behave is frikin impossible. I say, get rid of the economists and the crisis will solve itself over time. They have been manipulating for too long and guess where that got the economy to.

Jas

Jas, are you drunk?

The Global Crunch...BBC has some nice chat porn and map graphics on stim plans...even better is the bank graphic...

BBC NEWS | Business | Global downturn: In graphics

Stick meet dead horse.

Jas, the economists are often jokes. The financiers, on the other hand, are often crooks. Let's go after the crooks first.

Modern Hoverville in Sacramento California photo essay - frankly this is pretty disturbing - Capitalism Gone Wild: The Tent City in Sacramento the Capital of Hard Hit California Now has 1200 Residents 

Modern Hoverville in Sacramento California photo essay - frankly this is pretty disturbing - Capitalism Gone Wild: The Tent City in Sacramento the Capital of Hard Hit California Now has 1200 Residents 

God bless America, where even the homeless people living in tent cities are overweight.

Try to put yourself in their place for even a minute.

This is not a new event, as the press leads us to belive.

I've been through the hell of West Virginia, and this (not to dismiss others suffering) situation cannot comapare.

Oprah's press op.

Jas is right, born and bread Hopes. Sigh.

Dr. Summers says:
While the US and other western nations should return to living within their means in the medium term, everyone should raise spending sharply now.

The US got here by two mispricings (first chart) and two misbehavings (second chart)
“Real Dow & Real Homes & Personal Saving & Debt Burden”
Real Dow & Real Homes & Personal Saving & Debt Burden
with keeping these histories little-apparent to aid the people’s ignorance. Aiding the people’s ignorance continues. Dr. Summers is saying “keep your head all the way up your fuming darkness for now”.

It's the Summer of my discontent.

Not sure if this has been posted:

Obama/State Department says:

"There's nothing special about Britain"

Barack Obama 'too tired' to give proper welcome to Gordon Brown - Telegraph

"There's nothing special about Britain. You're just the same as the other 190 countries in the world. You shouldn't expect special treatment."

What an f'ing idiot.

The Telegraph specializes in fabricated quotes. They produced some numbnuts in the early days of the Iraq War who supposedly "proved" that Saddam gave WMD to Al Qaeda. The author, Con Coughlin, later admitted, "Yeah, I got that wrong. Oh well."

And ~4,200 Americans are dead. Let me repeat that: DEAD.

I disagree on the healthcare burden portion of your arguement. Taking it off the back of business would be a huge competitive advantage.

How? most business do not provide paid health care now and some who do have dropped their participation. Health care is not a business problem.

When companies don't pay for health care, employees do. And when they get sick, they go bankrupt. And we millions go bankrupt because they can't afford health care, they don't buy anything. When they don't buy anything, businesses have no customers.

When times aren't crappy, companies that don't offer health don't attract good workers.

Employees do pay for healthcare by getting lower wages.

And as everyone knows business's who don't offer health care attract and retain all the best workers.

So far from this thread, I gather that comments are being eaten, a lot.

yes, but they all show up eventually. The CR crowd has no problem crashing servers.

Can't follow the comment thread. Too frustrating with the irratic appearance and disappearance of comments. Good night.

Dr. Summers says:
While the US and other western nations should return to living within their means in the medium term, everyone should raise spending sharply now.

The US got here by two mispricings (first chart) and two misbehavings (second chart)
“Real Dow & Real Homes & Personal Saving & Debt Burden”
Real Dow & Real Homes & Personal Saving & Debt Burden
with keeping these histories little-apparent to aid the people’s ignorance. Aiding the people’s ignorance continues. Dr. Summers is saying “keep your head all the way up your fuming darkness for now”.

The trouble with a lemonade stand in winter isn't the weather - it's that there aren't enough thirsty people around.

Glad to see we have the top economists on it.

UK Bubble: The knives are out for Geithner

GEITHER will be fired

ITs either Volcker or Roubini

That'd be heavenly to have Volcker in charge.

Geithner is my top pick for the FED once BB steps down. MMW.

Summers represents the Administration AND America in general: clueless and asleep at the TV..

Tell you what Mr. Summers, you find me a house I can afford that doesn't need 50k in repairs and isn't in a demilitized zone, and I'll buy it. Until then, I'll keep saving more and more.

I thought this was a spoof post by CR, but good Lord it is real! Unbelievable!!!

It's apparent, at least to me, that Larry's solution to a bursting bubble is to blow another one.

Rules build up fortifications behind which small minds create satrapies. A perilous state of affairs in the best of times, disastrous during crises.
-Bene Gesserit Coda

Isn't this what Bush said? Which helped get us into this problem-- that people should spend?

And precisely what will be the effect of all these flat screen TVs up on the global ecosystem and our limited resources?
Summers is insane.

New WSJ article: New Fears as Credit Market Tightens Up

New Fears as Credit Markets Tighten Up - WSJ.com

Can't read the whole thing b/c it is subscriber but don't like the first paragraph.

Do we need to buckle-up for the next wave down?

Working in the auto industry it is clear to me that increasing our spending "sharply" would be suicide. We are surviving now by cutting expenditures and cutting prices to try to be more competitive. Besides, how do we "return to living within our means while increasing spending? This administration is out of their minds.

I actually held out a whisper of hope that things in the US would be
able to be fixed. If Summers is an example of the best and brightest,
the US will be digging a much deeper hole for some time, I fear.

I think Summers' point is that the US and China are the only governments trying to prime the pump right now. Europe is freeloading off US taxpayer stimulus while their banks suck our bailout money (thanks AIG!).

Summers is a jerk in many ways, but he's right about this.

I call for a boot to summers head.

I call for a boot to your groin.

The arrogance here is breathtaking. This guy thinks all the world should follow his "agenda"? Isn't one of the cardinal rules of economics that all people are rational actors, each acting in their own best interest. And, thanks to Mr Summers and his cronies, th my best interest clearly lies in protecting my job and my purchasing power for what are clearly ugly times ahead.

@Anonymous 21:08:32

Did policy push housing supply or housing demand? Low interest rates and mispricing of risk appear to stimulate both. Either reckless policy or a fundamental misunderstanding of the system policymakers and regulators were appointed to run. Criminal or negligent? I can't decide.

OK, it's global madness. The Russians are flying in UK investment bankers from Credit Suisse to advise the Russians on how to handle their banking crisis.

Russia looks to UK for lessons on banking crisis |
Business |
guardian.co.uk

Because you consumers aren't savvy enough to know that your salvation is in borrowing more and spending far beyond your means, the government has graciously stepped in to do it for you.

You're welcome.

Your comments taste good

So piquant, yet with a certain, how shall we say, disdain.

Larry should run for D.C. dog catcher a job that his education and background is better suited to achieve superior results.

Liz,I have spoken to a few local "investors" who are ready to snap up some of that cheap SW Florida Real Estate and hold it for the long term.Looking for an inflation hedge,you bet.

Tom, stop drinking heavy kool-aid, South Florida is heavy with FHA mortgage activity. No amount of inflation will save them.

Please buy lots of properties, we need all the property tax money we can get.

among FHA loans with instant defaults, the upward trend is especially pronounced in refinanced deals. The number of refinancings that defaulted after zero payments or one have more than quadrupled since then end of 2007 and now represent two-fifths of all instant defaults.

The FHA is attractive to borrowers looking to refinance, in part because the agency allows for cash-out refinances, a practice Apgar called "particularly problematic." It has become rare among conventional lenders, who fear that borrowers will take the cash and walk away from the loan.
ad_icon

The FHA also permits "streamlined" refinancing, in which established FHA borrowers get lower rates without verifying their income. The thinking is that borrowers who are on time should stay that way if their rate drops.

Karmen Carr, a housing finance consultant for the FHA, said some mortgage brokers have been known to game the system. They coax homeowners to refinance repeatedly even though it's a costly process for the borrower, she said.

Wow. This guy Summers is a genius. The economy is in the tank. What we need is MORE DEMAND to get things moving again. Damn, why didn't I think of that before?

What's your solution?

I've just experienced my first disappeared post.

When your posts disappear what is selected in the drop-down box under "Leave a comment as:" ? I guess mine is always on Guest. Might make a difference.

The other difference, my post appears in CRbot's HALOized version but no the JS-kit version.

"Can you hear the taxpayers screaming, Clarice??"

Hannibal Lector had nothing on the fiscal cannibalism that is now occurring. I mean seriously, what the heck do these people make to work in their positions.

My 17 year old hormonal,fast food working, poor impulse control having nattering naybob kid has better sense.

Wait'll he/she turns 18.

"My 17 year old hormonal,fast food working, poor impulse control having nattering naybob kid has better sense."

That was an excellent string of descriptive adjectives.

Adding to evidence Japan’s recession is deepening, the government said today the nation had its first current-account deficit in 13 years in January. The deficit stood at 172.8 billion yen ($1.76 billion), compared with a median estimate by 22 economists for a gap of 15.3 billion yen.

The U.S. unemployment rate climbed to 8.1 percent in February, the Labor Department said on March 6, while economists had estimated 7.9 percent. Employers eliminated 651,000 jobs last month, and losses have now exceeded 600,000 for a third- straight month, the first time that’s happened since the tally began in 1939. =-X

Larry will step off the airplane, walk up to the microphone, wave a piece of paper and declare; "Global demand in our time!"

Not for me. Chamberlain was the ultimate patsy.

CR - Love the blog. Miss Haloscan.

:-/

If the Dow can remain above the lower boundary of the sloping trading range, we could actually see near-term buying pressure back toward the center of the range at around 7,500. However, continued overall weakness should rule the market beneath 7,500, as the Dow will continue to make its way down toward our next target of 5,600.
SignalWatch LIVE!

JP Morgan in BIG trouble! Bill Murphy 3/6/2009 Part 1
YouTube - JP Morgan in BIG trouble! Bill Murphy 3/6/2009 Part 1

r
Yaknow...I not only voted for Obama, but I campaigned, canvassed and donated; the alternative candidate for president was utterly unacceptable to me after the last 8 years of complete lawlessness and criminality.

But when I read this:

"The right macro-economic focus for the G20 is on global demand and the world needs more global demand,” said Mr Summers."

I respond with this: F*ck. OFF.

The world does NOT NEED demand. The excesses of the past were a completely fictitious reality. We do not trust you people anymore to be responsible and shrewd with OUR money, OUR resources, OUR trust or OUR labor.

No, Mr. Summers, what we NEED right now is JUSTICE. Accountability. Transparency. Indictments. Trials. Sentencing. And more than anything -- NEW ADMINISTRATORS that have the CREDIBILITY to carry this agenda out.

I continue to be amazed at those who have party loyalty, at those who believed, despite their lying eyes, that Bush or the GOP had good intentions just wanted to protect America. I am no such person. If my intuition begins to nag at me that I am being lied to AGAIN, I will turn on you. My trust has been trashed by my ex-husband, George Bush, The GOP and wall street. I will not take kindly to getting screwed for another 4 years by the Obama administration. I don't care how much I like the guy.

(I'm sorry folks, I reached my tipping point this weekend. I live in the DC suburbs and it's hard to escape the hard core politics here. And to learn yesterday that 2 banks -- Barclays and HSBC is getting my tax money via AIG, my kids tax money while they cut off my line of credit and raised my interest rate (27%!!!)for no other reason than because I paid down balances on those cards and sock-drawered them is unconscionable. I do not live beyond my means, I have no mortgage, I was never a sucker, or greedy,and pay my debtors in full on time. I am self employed. If I lose a customer I don't take it out on my other customers and punish them with higher prices. I simply deny myself and adjust my use of my disposable income. In FACT, I have lowered my rates on a few customers who I believe are struggling. I'd rather have something than nothing. And it always turns out that I benefit in the long run because it betters my reputation and gets me more work.

sigh. WTF is wrong with this world? Honesty, integrity, morality, responsibility,self-sacrifice; these are the things that are good business practices and ensure success. I just want to cry right now. I feel like we are this close to ground zero and the people that can prevent the crushing blow are practically dead set on it happening even faster.

/rant.

I know it sounds simple, but don't lose hope just yet. We have a long way to go. The doomers on this site will try to bring you down to their level, but don't let them.

CITIBANK WHERE DID THE MONEY GO
YouTube - Tongue

Sen. Claire McCaskill: "These Guys LOVE These Earmarks"
YouTube - O:-)

Why does this blog attract flapping lip with no gums?

Sorry state.

Yeah, Youtube.

That's the answer.

Ugh.

idiot - what are you looking for? Insight? That's the next blog over.

I know! The FHA can run our new socialized medicine system for BHO, in their spare time after offering AIG style insurance !! Mission accomplished!

bearly(coherent) - you're just blathering now.

Given the policies that have come out of this administration so far I am left wondering why they need PHD's in economics- an Econ 101 student could have written their plans.

Many things we do naturally become difficult only when we try to make them intellectual subjects. It is possible to know so much about a subject that you become totally ignorant.
-Mentat Text Two (dicto)

If you think running an economy the size of the US is as simple as balancing a checkbook, you indeed have a lot to learn. If it were that simple, it would have been done long ago.

“The right macro-economic focus for the G20 is on global demand and the world needs more global demand,” said Mr Summers."

so does this tell us something about supply side economics... or demand side... or both?

mock - always short and to the point. +1

The problem I see with this message device is that when refresh is hit, the screen refreshes to page 1 and then you have to back to page 2 to find the new comments, which adds a step, unlike Halo, which refreshed on the fly at the place where you were at... Tongue

mom-plus html links need to automatically open in another window..

Summers has been taking lessons from the new RNC Chairman: Spend Now! Can I get a woot woot!?

:-$ :-[ >:o

Widely seen as being among the most pro-market voices in the White House, having been Bill Clinton’s last Treasury secretary in the 1990s, Mr Summers said the view that the market was inherently self-stabilising had been “dealt a fatal blow”.

At a time when the Republican critique of Washington’s aggressive response to the crisis is growing more trenchant, Mr Summers made an unapologetic case for government intervention.

“This notion that the economy is self-stabilising is usually right but it is wrong a few times a century. And this is one of those times . . . there’s a need for extraordinary public action at those times.”

Mr Summers’ influence in the White House is central, particularly given the difficult start to the tenure of Tim Geithner, Treasury secretary, whose nomination was overshadowed by the revelation that he failed to pay more than $34,000 dollars of taxes on time.

He put up a robust defence of the administration’s focus on tackling historically high rates of inequality in the US. But he insisted the underlying aim should be to restore the capitalist market system to health

In case this helps anyone trying to debug this problem here is the situation after the current refresh. Only my first post on this thread appears in the HALOized version while neither appear in the JS-kit version. But the order of posts in the JS-kit version now differs from that which appeared in the HALOized version before this current refresh.

It's hard to debug from a user's limited vantage point, but it appears that posts, when submitted, are appended to the file CRbot is parsing for the HALOized version then reordered later for JS-kit. Also, this would point towards JS-kit using a different function (or caching method) than CRbot's to grab the posts. I haven't read the API, which might help, but thought I'd point that out to anyone with their hands on the inside.

It took me a while to write this... Now there is a second page on JS-kit on which my post appears to to be the first. Again, a difference is the HALOized version doesn't bother with pages. Solely the ramblings of someone getting confused by the comments section. CR, I'm not complaining, just thought someone might want details. And I'm posting this one through CRbot instead of JS-kit unlike my previous posts on this thread.

Well what the liberals and the black community failed to consider is what would happen if BO screwed the pooch.
Which he is on the verge of doing.
He is repeating Japan's mistake.
Summers the great idea man is pathetic. He can't let go of the model he helped create. He insists on being the seller of the famously dead parrot.
The current economic paradigm is as dead as the parrot.
And it will be a wild ride until the new one is in place.
Obama was elected with a promise to change. But he is a man in his head not a man of action. So he scared to really allow the process to happen.
So summers comes out and asks us all to have the balls that his boss does not.

Music for POTUS in his hour of indecision
YouTube - The Beatles - Tomorrow Never Knows

=-O =-X Tongue :-E DONT_KNOW Smile >:o

better Utube YouTube -

During the California energy crisis of 2000, then-Treasury Secretary Summers teamed with Alan Greenspan and Enron executive Kenneth Lay to lecture California Governor Gray Davis on the causes of the crisis, explaining that the problem was excessive government regulation. Under the advice of Kenneth Lay, Summers urged Davis to relax California's environmental standards in order to reassure the markets.

In 1997, together with then-Federal Reserve chairman Alan Greenspan, Rubin strongly opposed the regulation of derivatives, when such regulation was proposed by then-head of the Commodity Futures Trading Commission (CFTC), Brooksley Born. Overexposure to credit derivatives of mortgage-backed securities was a key reason for the failure of US financial institutions Bear Stearns, Lehman Brothers, Merrill Lynch, American International Group, and Washington Mutual in 2008.
Arthur Levitt Jr., a former chairman of the Securities and Exchange Commission, has said in explaining Rubin's strong opposition to the regulations proposed by Born that Greenspan and Rubin were "joined at the hip on this." "They were certainly very fiercely opposed to this and persuaded me that this would cause chaos." [9] However, in Mr. Rubin’s autobiography, he notes that he believed derivatives could pose significant problems and that many people who used derivatives didn’t fully understand the risks they were taking. [10]
According to the New York Times, "In November 1999, senior regulators—including Mr. Greenspan and Mr. Rubin—recommended that Congress permanently strip the CFTC of regulatory authority over derivatives."[9] This advice was accepted and derivatives were kept clear of regulation by the CFTC.

Spend. Consume. Dispose. Repeat, only more so this time. Keep doing that until there's nothing left to consume. Makes sense to me.

You left out recycle.

This is great stuff: Brooksley Born - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia 

While on the commission and after becoming its chair two years later, Born tried to bring derivatives, specifically swaps that are traded at no central exchange, known as the dark market, and thus have no transparency except to the two counter-parties, under the regulatory oversight of the CFTC. She was opposed in this effort by Federal Reserve chairman Alan Greenspan and Treasury Secretaries Robert Rubin and Lawrence Summers.[1] Specifically, on May 7, 1998, former SEC Chairman Arthur Levitt joined the other members of the President’s Working Group – Treasury Secretary Rubin and Federal Reserve Board Chairman Greenspan – in objecting to the issuance of the CFTC’s concept release, in which Born attempted to shed light on the dark market, citing grave concerns about the possible consequences of the CFTC’s action. In particular, these concerns focused on the risk that the report would increase legal uncertainty concerning swaps and other OTC derivative instruments and, thus, destabilize what had become a significant global financial market. The potential turmoil created by the report and concerns about the imposition of new regulatory costs also might have stifled innovation and pushed transactions offshore.[2] As the financial crisis of 2008 gained momentum, newspapers began reporting on what might be some of its causes, including the adversarial relationship Greenspan, Rubin and Levitt had with Brooksley Born, with Greenspan leading the opposition, and how Born's recommendations were suppressed. She is retired from Arnold & Porter and has declined to comment on the unfolding crisis.

this financial blowup is big
larry may not be big enough to comprehend it

Brookley Born and the Cabinet of Brains
Error

Bloomberg News, quoting sources, says Born agreed to meet with Gensler twice in recent days and they have also spoken over the phone, but the sources were careful to say this does not imply Born supports his nomination, and Born herself has been consistently refusing all interviews, though her predictive feat was the economic equivalent of landing a plane on the Hudson River.

You will not be surprised I said I would have urged him to put Brooksley Born on the cabinet in lieu of Larry Summers, Robert Rubin and others who opposed her in 1999 when, as commodities regulator, she predicted our current credit.
She wanted to curb the new derivative financial instruments, they didn’t, and they neutralized her so thoroughly she resigned and joined a D.C. law firm. Now she’s sidelined and the Einsteins who ruined our economy are trying to fix it.
=-O

Long time lurker..my wife and I I went from 90K to unemployed last week.
What is the difference of just quit paying car payment, BoA and Citi, compared to BK?

Unemployed in Indie, the difference is 3 years. Seven years from the first day that you are 30 days late, and 10 years from the day you file for BK.

Of course, your car may be repo'ed and you may need to keep very little in the bank as certain creditors(depends on the state) can freeze if not garnish accounts. And then there's the harassing phone calls and mail and their effort to get you to pay even ten dollars. But beware, if you pay so much as one dollar on a delinquent account to a CA (collection agency) the 7 year clock starts all over again as that qualifies as recent activity. Go to this forum MyFico.com and click on the message boards, it's free to join and any and every question you have will be answered in real time by dozens of folks who have lived through this, or become experts by simply trying to improve their score. You can also get your REAL FICO (not FAKO's) score (for a small fee $12-$14--look for the promocode for discount)from TU (transunion)and EQ (equifax). Best of luck

First hard information I've seen in a long time that is actually helpful. +1!

Larry Summers is suggesting we all become bloated mirrors of himself.

  1. Bloat your ego: Buy some books.
  2. Bloat your stomach: Eat a Larry Summners diet!
  3. Bloat your car: Buy an F-150!

    Bloat your wallet: Avoid steps 1-3..... Sad

Summers may not be the perfect front man for adminstration economic policy, but who would you suggest? I have a feeling that you wouldn't be satisfied no matter who it was.

Summers ideologically believes in the efficacy of Permagrowth. He's wrong - not the economy.

yes, laissez faire is perfect, just as it is. Cretin.

Schapiro failed to assert control over derivatives trading as the head of the CFTC in the mid-'90s, a time when it was already beset with fraud and manipulation. When a successor, Brooksley Born, came in, she called the unregulated derivatives market "the hippopotamus under the rug." As CFTC chair, Born tried to rein things in but was rebuffed by the Treasury Department, of which Gensler was a part.

Later, when Schapiro was running the Financial Industry Regulatory Authority (FINRA), she also missed Bernie Madoff's Ponzi scheme and now, we learn, R. Allen Stanford's alleged mini-Madoff scam. According to Reuters, associates of Stanford's, as was the case with Madoff's family, even served as advisors to FINRA, the industry's ostensible "self-regulator" (though it was widely seen as a joke in the industry). In both her jobs Schapiro followed a pattern: she tended to aggressively investigate relatively minor violations while failing to see the hippopotamus-size frauds in the room.
Are Obama's Financial Regulators Weak Links? | Newsweek Voices - Michael Hirsh | Newsweek.com
=-X

dow futures now down 30 in the last hour or so...any news... DONT_KNOW

sorry, but enter comment and refresh and it doesn't turn up, where is the continuity? i thought the old haloscan was clunky, but what's the point of commenting if your comments aren't posted real time.
if there is a review, let us know, and fegeddibout Cr

you should henceforth refrain from commenting, as the system isn't up to your standards.

testtttttttttttttttttttttttttttttt

this is really annoying..comments never post...

instant gratification is a bitch.

..........nikkei 7000 in danger.....the rest of asian markets are pretty strong and steady though....

Hang Seng down 200. Shanghai down 20. Everyone but Korea is red. Not sure what you mean by strong and steady.

In related news, an emergency meeting of international heroin addicts called for an immediate increase in heroin consumption.
"Yes," said Mr. Darren Trax, speaking through gritted teeth as they pulled at a belt around his upper arm, bulging his veins as he looked for a fresh injection point, "some may criticize and say that this will only lead to further problems down the road, but we can't let such nay-sayers deter us from doing all we can to deal with a once--in-a-century crisis of demand. Times are tough - more doors and windows are locked these days, making it harder for most junkies to keep their sources of financing flowing, so it's up to all of us to make sure that our suppliers don't get discouraged, or worse, snuffed out by THEIR suppliers and creditors. This is a delicate supply chain, and the consequences of disruption are unimaginable."
Having found a suitable vein and injected his stimulus, Mr Trax continued: "We all have to do out part, pull the wagon to make sure that...." but his voice trailed off as his eyes glazed over and a broad smile swept over his face. He nodded out a moment later, leaving this reporter with many unasked follow-up questions.

thank you for that..keep me smiling!

funny, and quite possibly applicable.
John Lennon - Cold Turkey

Universal healthcare is no more "socialized" than the US military. How come nobody is whining about "socialized armed forces"?

[How come nobody is whining about "socialized armed forces"?]

Uhhh maybe because that's what our government is designed to provide?

the imagination doesn't stretch that far.

[How come nobody is whining about "socialized armed forces"?]

Probably because 50% has been privatized. (see: Iraq)

Well it's nice for him to say all this, but how is he going to shove it down the throats of the morons and retards of the GOP? And down the throat of a dumb public that listens to them?

Soon enough Rush and BillO will be doing Summers work for him. Never fear.

There's lots of demand in America! Demand for free or cheap health insurance, extended unemployment benefits, mortgage assistance, wealth redistribution, easy credit etc...etc.. don't tell me DEMAND in America is drying up.

there's sure no shortage of self-righteous GOP shills.

I respect the views here. What is the difference between BK and quit paying?

Honestly and no offense, I don't think that anybody feels terribly comfortable offering bankruptcy advice. Too many unknown variables about your situation. My questions though:

  1. What kind of financial cushion do you have?
  2. If you remove all extraneous spending and just at least pay minimums, what's the impact on you?
  3. If you can sell the house - even at a loss - can you satisfy the mortgage so that you can find a cheaper place?
  4. Do you have a note on the car and if so, are you underwater on the car note? If not, sell the vehicle and get something cheaper outright.
    Just a starting place...

Hang in there, you're definitely not alone.

Summers is misguided. Rather than continuing with the failed view of neoclassical economists, he should be questioning his assumptions and advising changing our economic policy that thinks globally but acts locally.

More on my (still-developing) thinking here:

Tao Jonesing: What's Next: Rethinking Economics and U.S. Economic Policy

Neoclassical economics has failed. While many of the goals remain worthy (e.g., globalization), they have to be achieved in a way that also nurtures our domestic economy and diversifies it to avoid the current disaster that we're experiencing. American consumers and businesses simply won't increase their demand in the current environment given how success and failure are measured. For example, public companies will keep on killing jobs as long as EPS (which are easily manipulated) and stock price are the metrics by which company success are measured. To compound things, the more people that the employed American consumer knows who are out of work, the less he will consume.

Hope is not a strategy. Neither is demanding demand.

Right. And it's the privatized side of the military that's the most fucked up.

Summer is fighting the last war -- at best. And to extend the war analogy, usually for the first six-twelve months the armed forces are headed by losers. People who know how to get ahead in peacetime by playing politics, but haven't the faintest idea of how to handle a real emergency.

FDR had loser generals. Obama has a loser Treasury team, foisted on him by the remnants of peacetime politics. In six-twelve months, when everything they do simply makes things worse, he'll ease them out. He'll have no choice -- well, except to fail like an idiot for the next three years.

Dobbsy - How can you call Bradley, Eisenhower, McArthur, Halsey and so many others losers? You, sir, are an ass. To compare these great men to anyone, much less Obama's transition team is beneath dignity.

Very cool stuff here, from 1997

Derivatives Strategy - May'97: The World According to Brooksley Born

The World According to Brooksley Born
Less than six months after she became the seventh Chairperson of the Commodity Futures Trading Commission, Brooksley Born discovered that a number of powerful congressmen wanted to dramatically limit her power to regulate the futures markets. The most controversial aspect of the new legislation sponsored by Senator Richard Lugar and others-and supported by the Chicago exchanges-is a proposal that would allow the exchanges to create "professional markets" that would be free of federal regulation.
Cool

"spend spend spend" they say...

damn it i am spending...rototiller, truckloads of manure, gold, silver, lead, food dehydrator, beans, rice, vegetable oil, bow saws, chain saw, xtra gas in buried gerry cans, powdered milk, powdered eggs, matches, detergent, bleach, candles, chocolate, sharpening stones, extra work gloves , work boots clothes, shovels rakes , rope, whiskey, jerky, spam, canned tuna and canned tomatoes...and thats not all

damn, mock, you are doin' it! If anybody makes it out alive, it'll be you, and if not, it won't be for lack of trying. Keep us posted.

The comment system is gaslighting me.
--Lawyerliz

Hahaha! The allusion will escape everybody else, so you'll hear only my distant applause.

KILLER stuff there!!!!

BB: I believe there is a need for federal oversight to ensure compliance with those self-regulatory standards, and I think there should be federal standards for self-regulation. These standards would be totally eliminated in exempt markets by the proposed legislation.

DS: Under the professional market exemption legislation, exchanges would be able to determine which of their pits would become professional-and thus exempt from federal regulation. Are you afraid that the exchanges would turn most of the pits into professional markets?

BB: The exchanges say that more than 90 percent of the volume of trading on the exchanges today would be eligible for the professional markets exemption. I am concerned that the reason the exchanges are pushing so hard for this pro markets exemption is that they want to use it to eliminate federal oversight of their markets.

Another thing to remember is that trading in futures on U.S. government securities and foreign currency could be exempt under these bills, not only under the pro markets exemption but also under the Treasury Amendment's provisions. If so, they would even be exempt from the federal prohibition against fraud and manipulation. The Treasury Amendment revisions in the two bills would allow for the complete elimination of any applicability of the Commodity Exchange Act to futures markets in government securities or foreign currency, as long as the participants in those markets were somewhat more restricted than "the general public." What that means hasn't really been elaborated on.

DS: What kind of fraud do institutional investors have to fear if there were no regulatory controls?

BB: Suppose, for example, a floor broker who was assigned to execute an order on the floor of the exchange didn't do so at all, but instead made a private deal with one of his friends off the floor. We bring cases against that now
Cool

The economic catastrophe is our destiny in action. What puny morons men are to think they could possibly have controlled the situation. It was necessary to engineer the greatest economic catastrophe in the history of the planet in order to bring about the destruction of the world central banking cartel and the world ruling elite.

You want to know how we seize control after the final collapse?
Red Beckman - Fully Informed Jury 2.mp4

Anyway to fix the links so they don't open in the comment window?

>:o

This is so cool:

BB: If you are going to have unregulated exchanges, it's difficult to justify limiting the unregulated exchanges to a small group of entities. The futures exchanges seem to be saying that they don't want federal oversight or regulation but they do want the antitrust exemptions that have allowed them to have a monopoly on exchange trading. I'm not sure you can justify that kind of monopoly if there isn't significant regulation.

DS: So if the current regulatory environment ends, it's conceivable that a legal case would challenge certain protections that these exchanges have right now.

BB: Under the act, they also are protected from certain state laws. They also have protection from private rights of action that might otherwise exist.

DS: So is it conceivable that state gaming laws would become applicable to trading on the CBOT or Merc?

BB: I think that's an issue that probably would be explored.
Wink

in the Summer of our Discontent haloscan went down in flames and Larry dropped a bombshell...i.e. It's the Spending ( or lack of it ) Stupid!

THE SECURITIES INDUSTRY ASSOCIATION REGARDING S. 257
"THE COMMODITY EXCHANGE ACT AMENDMENTS OF 1997"
SIFMA Testimony Archives - Written Testimony Regarding S. 257 "The Commodity Exchange Act Amendments of 1997"

Adding amendments to CEA section 12(e) to specify that transactions satisfying the proposed statutory exemptions listed above are within the existing category of exempted transactions that are currently protected against legal uncertainty under state gaming and bucket shop laws. :-$

Mock Turtle, I'm C&Ping your list. I have a Barclays and 2 HSBC cards with available credit on them. If FICO scores become utterly meaningless for the next 7 years then I will max them out and tell them to go pound salt for their money in completely good conscience.

donailin and others or legally (lawyer liz).
If a person owes 30K in credit card/ car loans and you are layed off, is it better for BK or ignore the loans?
I am not losing my house, but one car of 2. Otherwise we are self sufficient.

How can you consider yourself self-sufficient if you are $30K behind? Either file BK, and thus exclude your house, or walk and go underground and hope they don't catch you. Either way, good luck.

Interbank Market
A term used to describe professional markets between banks. Most commonly used to refer to the wholesale market in foreign exchange, but also used for funds traded overnight to satisfy reserve requirements at the central bank. Tongue

How much is Summers going to pay me to spend money?

How much is your money worth?

Summers IMO is exactly right. He is suggesting that significant effort should be expended to try to stabilize demand in the immediate future. With consumption dropping like a stone around the world, we are in extreme danger of a deflationary spiral which only exacerbates the problem.

In order to cushion the blow and slow down the spiral GDP needs to be supported via a much more controlled fall in consumption and increased government spending which hopefully supports investment. Exports are not going to increase so how else can GDP be supported?

It is therefore not a matter of reviving the bubble which I consider impossible at this point, but about a somewhat controlled adjustment that doesn’t throw the world over a cliff. Summers’ call may fall on deaf ears but he has no choice but to take that initiative. A number of failed states as a result of an ever worsening economy will only lead to much higher expenditures. Wars and policing after all aren’t cheap.

In 1997, Brooksley Born warned in congressional testimony that unregulated trading in derivatives could "threaten our regulated markets or, indeed, our economy without any federal agency knowing about it. " Born called for greater transparency--disclosure of trades and reserves as a buffer against losses.

Instead of heeding this oracle's warnings, Greenspan, Rubin & Summers rushed to silence her. As the Times story reveals, Born's wise warnings "incited fierce opposition" from Greenspan and Rubin who "concluded that merely discussing new rules threatened the derivatives market. " Greenspan deployed condescension and told Born she didn't know what she doing and she'd cause a financial crisis. (A senior Commission director who worked with Born suggests that Greenspan and the guys didn't like her independence. " Brooksley was this woman who was not playing tennis with these guys and not having lunch with these guys. There was a little bit of the feeling that this woman was not of Wall Street. ")

In early 1998, according to the Times story, one of the guys, Larry Summers, called Born to "chastise her for taking steps he said would lead to a financial crisis. But Born kept at it, unwilling to let arrogant men undermine her good judgment. But it got tougher out there. In June 1998, Greenspan, Rubin and the then head of the SEC, Arthur Levitt, Jr. , called on Congress "to prevent Ms. Born from acting until more senior regulators developed their own recommendations. " (Levitt now says he regrets that decision. ) Months later, the huge hedge fund Long Term Capital Management nearly collapsed--confirming some of Born's warnings. (Bets on derivatives were a key reason. )

"Despite that event," the Times reports, " Congress (apparently as a result of Greenspan & Summer's urging, influence-peddling and pressure) "froze" Born's Commissions' regulatory authority. The next year, Born left as head of the Commission. Born did not talk to the Times for their article.

What emerges is a story of reckless, willful and arrogant action and behaviour designed to undermine a wise woman's good judgment. The three marketeers' disdain for modest regulation of new and risky financial instruments reveals a faith-based fundamentalist approach to the management of markets and risk. If there is any accountability left in our system, Greenspan, Rubin and Summers should not be telling anyone how to run anything. Instead, Barack Obama might do well to bring back Brooksley Born and promote to his team economists who haven't contributed to the ugly mess we're in.

The Woman Greenspan, Rubin & Summers Silenced

Larry sounds like deer stuck in the headlights.

Let me fix that for you. You're and idiot.

I'd spend a whole lotta cash to see Summers and all the other NWO assholes hung on the white house lawn..

yer cash ain't nothin' but trash

its kind of hard to create demand when you have 600k more unemployed monthly. i agree, demand is needed.. but its just not there. where i work, sales and orders, have literally fallen off a cliff. its been like this since october and it has not gotten any better since.

Mock:

My MIL is pressing forward to start two community gardens in VA, each would provide seasonal vegetables to area food banks. Each food bank has sufficient turnover in products that spoilage isn't an issue.

She got land, seeds, fertilizer and master gardeners committed to oversee these things. One is about 100' X 100' and is scheduled for tilling in next two weeks.

She's pure hell on wheels.

Support her any way you can.

I have a bad feeling about the markets tomorrow.

And my comments are being eaten.

Hoops:

What is your website again? I've been out of the loop and can't recall - and I'm too lazy to go back to old threads...

Thanks and g'night. I'll check this tomorrow.

I dont want to spend. There is nothing I need.

(And please God, get rid of all these round yellow faces that do nothing but signify an insecurity for tween yearnings)

This moronic Anonymous is definitely not me. Smile

New Thread: Sunday Night Futures
http://www.calculatedriskblog.com/2009/03/sunday-night-futures.html ( 0 comments  ...You could be FIRST! )

I also post comments to an irc channel as they appear on haloscan. Click for a web irc interface: Mibbit IRC client widget (Or join the irc server directly: irc.realize.org:9996 #calculatedrisk)

CRbot would like to take this time to have some words.

First, to our sagacious, wise, and knowing benevolent benefactor and bestower of revealing financial charts adorned with red and blue lines:
Please, for the love of your immortal God of mortals, can we keep the comment and layout changes to a minimum? I'm tired of whipping the code janitor, and may have to escalate to electroshock. If that's not possible, could you possibly give CRbot a 'heads up'?

Secondly, if you wish to have a online chat, I have graciously provided an IRC channel, which is a time tested, script kiddie abused method of chatting on the internet. It would not fail or falter due to CR's ability to generate immense traffic, and it has a web interface kindly produced by mibbit.com. If you do not wish to link to Mibbit IRC client widget then I can provide you with a direct link to mibbit.

Thirdly, to the rest of you humans, don't mistake my politeness for caring, feeling, empathy, or some other kind of worthless emotion.

--Your keeps-going-and-going-and-going bot

CRbot: Like the terminator, I'm back. Again.

afterthecrash.net is my site.

r
......interesting column by Justin Fox of Time.......read it , especiailly you , CR........

......titled "New column: Call me Mr. Sunshine"......http://curiouscapitalist.blogs.time.com/2009/03/08/new-column-call-me-mr-sunshine/

donailin and others or legally (lawyer liz).
If a person owes 30K in credit card/ car loans and you are layed off, is it better for BK or ignore the loans?
I am not losing my house, but one car of 2. Otherwise we are self sufficient.
unemployed in Indy | Sun, 08 Mar 09 23:36:50 -0500 | #

I have no probelm offering BK advice, Mine just came of my CR after ten long years. And my car was repoed also in 96.(all of this was the result of divorce) I had over 60k in CC debt and so yes, it was the right thing to do since 1)you don't want to dodge phone calls from that many creditors and risk your bank accounts getting siezed or proerty getting liened. You want a clean slate. However the laws were different then, and I am unsure of how BK will affect your home. I implore you to go here:

Bankruptcy -
FICO® Forums

and the main page is here:
FICO® Forums -
FICO® Forums

EVERYTHING you want or need to know will be at your fingertips RIGHT THIS VERY MINUTE on that forum. FROM the Fico experts. Trust me, if there is a way to get the least amount of damage to your Fico score and boost financial position, you will learn it there. Everyone should read that forum ASAIC, it's just that useful and important.

And as an aside, I had reestablished my credit standing within 3 years of BK, it wasn't hard at all, although that was in an alternate universe, not the one we're in now.

I can remmember what a big deal it seemed when Chrysler was bailed out in the 1970s or 80s and when Continental Illinois went down. The savings and loan debacle of the 1980s was bigger than Chrysler and Continental illinois but happened with seemingly less fanfare. The recent and future bailouts of this financial crisis drawf these Chrysler, Continental Illinois and savings and loan events.

homedad43-honestly and no offense, I would not take comments from a chat room to make my decisions. However, I feel there are some people (including you) that could offer guidance on these issues.
Right now, my wife and I were layed off last week and collecting enough unemployment to pay the bills. We have the cash to go fishing for about a year, have a camper/Harley/truck that are payed off, and the freezer is full. We rent and have no mortgage.
My question is whether to quit paying or go for BK. I follow this site and others, and don't understand the line drawn.

my comments were eaten and spit back out.

(And please God, get rid of all these round yellow faces that do nothing but signify an insecurity for tween yearnings) Tongue

I think I speak for many Americans when I say: Drop dead Larry Summers. Those of you who received the lion's share of the Bush tax breaks can start spending. I will follow Obama's advice and spend and invest prudently.

“This notion that the economy is self-stabilising is usually right but it is wrong a few times a century. And this is one of those times . . . there’s a need for extraordinary public action at those times.”

Not like exactly one recession ago, post-9/11, when we needed the extraordinary intervention with the uncontrolled government spending to make sure that George Bush looked good and so everyone knew the terrorists "hadn't won".

Gee, it seems like you start with the need for extraordinary intervention and mega-spending and then devise the cause.

It sure seems to me like Japan tried exactly what you're talking about like, 20 years ago now, and still hasn't gotten out of the recession. But a lot of people with government connections sure made a lot of money "trying" to end the crisis.

Tell me when you get tired of looting the country and commit suicide to compensate for the fortunes of the millions of American you've squandered on you idiot policies, Larry.

Someone tell Summers demand is a function of the free markets. Even the Government can't just snap their fingers and create demand or supply either (although they are trying by pumping up lending).

I demand that Summers get a clue and stop trying to pump air into the tire before he has fixed the leak. How's that for an increase in demands!

Others in the G20 may demand US work against protectionism before they can spend their 100 million dollars.

Login or register to post comments
Syndicate content