Shopping at Amazon?
Wait! If you click on the Amazon banner link at the top of the page first, HCN will get a percentage of anything you purchase for 24 hours!
Open predictions
Our local book authors
User login
Who's online
There are currently 38 members and 217 guests online.
Currently online
- curious
- shill
- Outsider
- Mook
- Rob Dawg
- Oman
- Whiskey
- Pellice
- yuan
- 1 currency now -yogi
- Duke of Con Dao
- Comrade Janošik
- Elvis
- energyecon
- GrandOldTurkey
- MikeCLT
- fudge_hend
- sum luk
- Pearl
- Firemane
- km4
- Lurking Lawyer
- aleister perdurabo
- traderwalt
- gabyjan
- Vic
- prairiedog
- wafdof
- zephyrum
- Comrade Elmer Fudd
- glimmerman
- Mr Slippery
- dilbert dogbert
- Gubbmint Cheese
- ac
- Cinco-X
- Basel Too
- Comrade Alexei Mikhailovich
Recent Recommendations
With the suspension of mark-to-market, all banks are now well-capitalized.
This comment thread has been HALO-IZED by CRbot.
http://realize.org/cr/halokit.php?halourl=http://www.haloscan.com/comments/calculatedrisk/7588859050733462122
So glad THAT is over.
Yeah, but this is just a test run. Next week let's trying canceling Monday.
In fact, if you can just invent values for your assets, you can never be insolvent.
Illiquid... Yes. But that is what the Fed is for.
Problem solved!
Friday the 13th have something to do with it?
from what i understand, vikram pandit and ken lewis called the bottom in banking. :-$
what do you want it to rain every friday? =-X
yah, I think the White House has decided to go all out with the old "only thing we had to fear was fear itself" play.
and GM says that they won't be needing the march bailout funds. Wtf?
We get a laugh track with the econ. news now, anyway.
Like Nemo says - suspend MTM, poof, end of BFF.
But, over in Europe... "GM is seeking 3.3 billion euros ($4.25 billion) in European state aid to rescue its European business"
Cramer Daily Show worth checking out if you haven't already.
Something is happening ... more than 200 FDIC agents in Puerto Rico ... so far, no bank closings, even after Bair assured us that there
would be more ... something is happening, somewhere.
FDIC trying to trac Maddof's laundered money.
"With the suspension of mark-to-market, all banks are now well-capitalized."
Maybe we can also eliminate obeisity by banning bathroom scales?
Oh yeah, BFF with a laugh track. Fantastic. It should come up automatically on the site when each bank is taken under.
Like a gameshow: Congratulations, YOU ARE SKROOD! Wow, well done. Here's your BK notice! YAAAY!
/audience goes wild.
C
"Friday the 13th have something to do with it?"
Yeah, superstition and hope are the coin of the realm.
To understand the reason behind Citi and BoA's recent declarations, you have to understand one thing.
They are following the canuck bank plan, which is simply - we won't admit losses and pretend that reality has been suspended.
The fix is in. I can feel it. 30% - 40% by end of April. Then, whammo.
I think TPTB demanded a reality distortion effort to give them a chance to get out of equities/corporate bonds.
So are we just assuming Mark To Market will be repealed because a Congress-critter threatened the FASB? 'Coz that's all I've seen about this.
Wow! I am actually thinking that if the S&P stays above 750, Monday, I should buy some SPY. hoocoodanode?
Apparently, it's Obama's fault that Henry Kravis and KKR Holdings aren't making nearly as much money now as they were a couple years ago:
Kravis Losses Show Obama Fails to Close Lending Gap Raising Bankruptcies
KKR Losses Show Failure to Close Gap Raising Defaults (Update1) - Bloomberg.com
Money-market rates show short-term borrowing costs are still increasing as banks hoard cash after almost $1.2 trillion of writedowns and losses since the start of 2007.
The difference between what banks and the Treasury pay to borrow for three months, the so-called TED spread, rose to 113 basis points, near the widest level since Jan. 9. The spread averaged 27 basis points from 2002 through 2006.
Also see: he Term Asset-Backed Securities Loan Facility (TALF) programme would disburse the first round of funds on March 25.
"The TALF has the potential to generate up to one trillion dollars of lending for businesses and households," a joint statement from the Federal Reserve and the Treasury Department said.
As part of the programme, the Federal Reserve Bank of New York would lend up to 200 billion dollars to eligible owners of high-rated asset-backed securities. Loans would be given to those securities backed by newly and recently originated auto loans, credit card loans, student loans and among others.
Something fittin' for Friday evening...
The Closer
(any resemblance to any living or dead soul: purely accidentally)
I hear someone screaming, the man downstairs
Remotely ordering burgers, double quarter-pound,
No fries. He takes love-bites. For a minute or two
He turns his head toward the mirror: pumping
The alphabet out of thin air—thus the oxygen tank—
Closer, come closer. Nothing ever did. One winter
He impaled himself on a garden implement.
There is no need for detail. It was winter. Snow
On almost every blade of grass--the last time
His son visited. After that, the kid stayed
Away, got a job in a mental ward. He--the kid,
that is—-dreams of exploding corpses, meat dangling
From rafters. His old man eats—-how could he,
How would he—-people like you and me,
Perhaps married, confessing, admitting
The loyal, royal we--step across our hand-woven carpets. They lie
Perfectly. The man downstairs eats. Hard
To tell, sell all these faces and this en route to the scene.
I'm beginning to think that Denninger is a drama queen. He needs more bold, more underlines, more italics, more ALL CAPS, and, most of all: sound. Screams.
I believe that Mark to Maccaroni is the new Deal
This seems to be saying the bottom is almost in:
Lobster Betsey -- all 40 feet of her -- will re-emerge
404 | www.keysnet.com
The statue, 40 feet long and 30 feet high, is a detailed, biologically accurate depiction of a female spiny lobster.
Betsey has appeared on television shows and in the Sports Illustrated swimsuit issue. A Web site on roadside attractions declares it the largest non-inflatable crustacean statue in America.
In the 1980s, sculptor Richard Blaze spent five years assembling and painting the giant lobster at his workspace on Coco Plum in Marathon.
By the time he finished, the business that had commissioned the lobster was out of business.
The lobster then was acquired by Treasure Village owner Tom Vellanti and his family to be used as a landmark for the shopping plaza near mile marker 87.
When Treasure Village became a charter school in 2006, Betsey needed a new home. The lobster was disassembled and removed from public view for refurbishment and possible sale.
Sorry,
Missed this:
Plans to move it to an Upper Matecumbe Key business stalled. Betsey even showed up on the eBay auction site last year. No suitable bids were received; the lobster once had a list price of $400,000.
=-X
"The fix is in. I can feel it. 30% - 40% by end of April. Then, whammo."
That would take us to about 900 on the S&P. It's hard to imagine it going any higher. Plus, earnings are coming.
o banksters went down
FDIC is hungry
no pizza, no beer
Robert Herz, head of the FASB, told a panel of lawmakers Thursday that the loudest critics of fair market accounting practices have been the very same banks that have gone belly up when regulators would not let them adjust their accounting.
"There seems to be a clamoring for changing mark-to-market rules that seems to come largely from institutions that may be insolvent," Rep. Alan Grayson (D-Fla.) said to Herz at a meeting of the Financial Services Subcommittee on Capital Markets, Insurance, and Government Sponsored Enterprises.
Grayson said that, from Herz' testimony, it seemed that "there may be institutions that are insolvent and they haven't been forced to write down their books to the point [of insolvency] yet, and those are maybe the same institutions that are asking us to modify the mark-to-market rules so that they won't have to admit that they're bankrupt. Is that correct?"
Herz said that it was.
"I share your point of view and I will tell you that I get calls and visits from some of those institutions that are now in government hands, about two weeks before they get taken over, trying to get the accounting changed," he said.
"Clearly some of the most vocal opponents of fair value and mark-to-market have been some of those institutions that ultimately failed and have had to have billions of taxpayer dollars put into them."
Mark-to-market accounting requires banks to value an asset at its most current market value. In a frozen market, where assets can't be sold for anything more than a fire-sale price, that value is extremely low, forcing banks to write-down a loss on their balance sheets. With a loss on the books, the bank can lend less money and is required to raise capital to meet regulatory lending standards. With enough losses on the books, the bank is no longer solvent. :'(
The FDIC is broke and understaffed at the moment.
It takes money and people to shut those banks down!
Re: earnings are coming.
Are you insane? :-$
Ok all you banking financial geniuses - highly recommended:
http://web-xp2a-pws.ntrs.com:80/content//media/attachment/data/econ_research/0903/document/dd031309.pdf
Now, I'm off to bed.
"""I'm beginning to think that Denninger is a drama queen. He needs more bold, more underlines, more italics, more ALL CAPS, and, most of all: sound. Screams."""
I hear Louis Black with twisted face and e-nun-ci-a-shun..
doh - was that just C preferreds to common ? I dunno, to bed.
"I believe that Mark to Macaroni is the new Deal"
At least it's backed by a tangible asset.
hmmm ... there seems to be a move afoot to bolster confidence in the banks ...
If it seems to good to be true ...
So here we are again. Paulson said massive bank failures...and we forked over billions...what a joke. He and his cronies should be hauled up to account for thier actions.
So here we are again. Paulson said massive bank failures...and we forked over billions...what a joke. He and his cronies should be hauled up to account for thier actions.
So here we are again. Paulson said massive bank failures...and we forked over billions...what a joke. He and his cronies should be hauled up to account for thier actions.
the lobster once had a list price of $400,000.
That's a boatload of actual lobsters in Newport R.I...why not just go there and eat?
900 - yeah, right up to flat for the year, I think that's about what we'll get out of this bear market rally.
Yes, I am solidly of the opinion that this is no bottom. I think 2009 low has not been seen, even if I do really like 666 for symbolic purposes.
"I believe that Mark to Macaroni is the new Deal"
At least it's backed by a tangible asset.
THis is why I am long spaghetti sauce
The FDIC is broke and understaffed at the moment.
It takes money and people to shut those banks down!
THeir Pizza expense account has been exhausted
Something tells me that we just aren't going to get much more bad news for awhile. That's not to say that things are getting better. Rather, I'll bet they get worse. But, the administration is hellbent on making this not "seem as bad as it really is".
It will for a little while. Maybe a couple of months at best.
AIG will be nothing but a constant source of bad news. According to the recent article about them in the NY Times (which whatever your politics, is very good at researching their articles), they still have $300BB of CDS written on toxic crap squared and cubed.
Politics puzzles me. Get as much out as possible now while it's easy to blame on Bush.
someday the whole "great depression" thing will be understood for what it was:
silly government tricks that got bailed out by WWII. Factually none of FDR's crap worked, only a massive world war with America the last man standing was the solution. We do not want that now.
WWII was a New Deal program.
And the New Deal increased GDP every year from 1933 to 1937 - often at 9% growth per year. The recession of 1937 was caused by FDR "balancing the budget" and suspending much of the New Deal. Fortunately, by 1939, Cash and Carry, Arms for Bases and Lend Lease ramped up government spending before Pearl Harbor in December 1941.
Alphabet agencies - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Calling FDR's programs 'silly government tricks' and 'crap' belies a fundamental misunderstanding of their intent.
Can you repeat that, Barley? I didn't catch it the first 3 times.
Erm, more?
I sit looking out over the the Potomac, off to the Virginia side, and I think who's got stakes in our business, and what's gonna change. And then I remember, from years ago:
YouTube - Tall Dwarfs: Nothing's Going to Happen
C
Another few months and one won't even be able to make jokes about it.
Maria sure does wring her hands
silly government tricks that got bailed out by WWII. Factually none of FDR's crap worked, only a massive world war with America the last man standing was the solution. We do not want that now.
Krugman has already dealt with that canard. Roosevelt's spending did work to the degree that it kept the depression from being much worse than it was. But he didn't spend enough. Only WWII produced enough spending to "cure" the depression. If FDR had spent as much as was spent in WWII he would have had the same success. But political opposition would not permit it. Just as now political opposition will keep Obama from sufficient stimulus to "cure" the present problem. It will only make it less awful.
Krugman has already dealt with that canard. Roosevelt's spending did work to the degree that it kept the depression from being much worse than it was. But he didn't spend enough. Only WWII produced enough spending to "cure" the depression. If FDR had spent as much as was spent in WWII he would have had the same success. But political opposition would not permit it. Just as now political opposition will keep Obama from sufficient stimulus to "cure" the present problem. It will only make it less awful.
Im convinced
Partisan clown.
I saw Larry Summers on C-span tonight doing a Q& A. One audience guy pointblank asked him "Don't you think the taxpayers are entitled to be told the names and identities of AIG's counter parties?" Summers just smiled & ducked it-- said something like 'in this instance I will refer to the independent discretion of the Federal Reserve'.
But it's all for our own good right??-- so, reassured, now I lay me down to sleep.
Krugman sucks...
I got no money, no job, and no career....weeks since the big fall....
do I want to stay here?
tell me about all alone..
I guess I dont mind being alone....
I like it here...
YouTube - Soulhat Bonecrusher Austin Bat Festival
nine minutes...a life.
What can change your mind? I dont know.
well, they it's friday 13 all of the sudden FDIC got superstitious. (they weren't on Feb 13, friday)
Banks want G20 to set up pricey bad bank - MarketWatch
Banks want G20 to set up pricey bad bank
Critics say the financial sector is holding the economy hostage
The world's largest financial institutions urged the G20 financial leaders on Friday to endorse the "bad bank" approach to dealing with the credit crisis, an expensive model one expert likened to another ransom note.
Zardari ‘to fight on’
By Faheem Al-Hamid
ISLAMABAD – Pakistan President Asif Ali Zardari’s party late Friday night denied that he has buckled under intense local and international pressure and decided to lift Governor’s rule in Punjab.
“This is mere speculation,” presidential spokesman Farhatullah Babar told Saudi Gazette by telephone. “Neither will governor’s rule be lifted in Punjab nor will the judges be restored.”
“The president has decided to fight politically,” Babar said. “The (Pakistan People’s) Party executive committee will hold an emergency meeting on Monday and take decisive action.”
Saudi Gazette - Zardari ‘to fight on’
The Latest from Denninger:
Reserve Banking
Denninger's a fruit loop. The mechanism of recursive, building debt is what causes the Credit cycle, which is enabled by reserve banking.
He has no grasp of the sixty year cycle, much like an electronics engineer who has no grasp of capacitance.
Krugman has already dealt with that canard.
And this is the same Krugman that spent the summer of 2008 trying to prove that oil was not being manipulated?
I think we should switch out stimulus plans with Chinese. In a way we are putting a lot of resources into the consumer demand side while they are putting everything into producer side stimuli. Since its what both of us have been doing for the last 10 years, both of us are making a mistake of supporting wrong side of the economy, the side that was overexposed to irrational exuberance ...
When FDR became president, enough pain had gone through the system. Americans were ready to grab any bone thrown at them.
O's policy of not letting pain go through the system means policy changes are less acceptable.
FDIC sent its staff to the Caribbean for the weekend...no banks closed although hundreds are known to be insolvent...I'm tempted to call my Congressperson and yell at them. Fat lot of good it will do.
Hal - your take is largely wrong. Take out the 70%-80% devaluation parlor trick of 1933 and the record looks very different. The idea that piling up another ten trillion of debt will "fix" things is ridiculous.
But it is largely pointless, in any case. The entitlements (like the Donut bill) and absolutely horrible demographic profile meant that only the best of policies would have guided us through the next couple of decades unscathed in any case. Supporting zombie fre/fnm/c/bac just means drawing and quartering the already dead convict.
So when do we get Naked Financial News?
Looks like the lower tranches of CLOs are getting wiped out
KKR Losses Show Failure to Close Gap Raising Defaults (Update1) - Bloomberg.com
There are grave diggers and then there are banksters.
>>
Banksters charge transaction fees on debit cards for unemployed!
Pennsylvania one of several states offering debit cards in lieu of checks for jobless
Some who opted to go with debit cards outraged to get fees without notice
State labor official says debit cards have greatly improved distribution system
U.S. Department of Labor: States can do better in negotiating fees with banks
Another twist for the unemployed: Debit card fees - CNN.com
"That is, the benefit of reserve banking (the availability of credit on reasonable terms for a wide variety of purposes) comes with the cost that those who use credit to finance consumption ("pulling forward demand") or engage in speculation are likely to go broke during the inevitable busts; they are those who are in effect gambling with their use of credit and when the cyclicality catches up with them, they (and those who loaned to them) will be the ones who go under.
Our failure over the last 20 years is not found in the principle of reserve banking. It is, rather, found in the complete and utter refusal to accept the cyclicality that is a necessary component of reserve banking systems - to accept the costs that come with the benefits."
Sounds like Denninger understands reserve banking quite well. It comes with a cost, that cost requires flushing of bad debt and taking the pain.
@C de C
"I think we should switch out stimulus plans with Chinese. In a way we are putting a lot of resources into the consumer demand side while they are putting everything into producer side stimuli. Since its what both of us have been doing for the last 10 years, both of us are making a mistake of supporting wrong side of the economy, the side that was overexposed to irrational exuberance ... "
Spot on. I don't like governmental intervention, but if it's going to happen, then preloaded debit cards to the Chinese and forced de-consumption and increased savings rates by the US would be far better than the idiocy that we are doing now. Of course, the best approach would rely on something called the Constitution.
I missed the clause in the Constitution that talks about how to get out of an economic recession. I suppose if we listened to Thomas Jefferson and James Madison we wouldn't have bothered with an industrial capitalist system in the first place. Keep the yeomen farmers free!
One thing nobody seems to point out is that there was supposedly a bond-market dislocation in the 30s. I was under the impression that this is what resulted in the raising of rates. And it looks like we run the risk of the same thing this time around.
The UK already warned that they may have to raise rates before signs of a financial bottom are in place. Many people, including Greenspan have commented that the FED doesn't set rates, the market does. It looks like we are playing out GD 1.0 all over again.
"And this is the same Krugman that spent the summer of 2008 trying to prove that oil was not being manipulated?"
It may come as a surprise to some, but Krugman is not God.
Give the guy a break.
@C de C
and no snark directed at you, I was referring to what, I hope, will emerge as one of the defining statements of this age, by Ron Paul, "Coins!"
I have to agree with the “Krugman is a doofus” crowd here.
I keep a printout of his "Hangover Theory" essay just to remind myself how badly he lacks common sense. I wish he would just go away, but he has gained a strong following, and we are stuck with him. Another academic trained in economics of the abstract, rational, mathematical world....a world where perpetual debt growth somehow gives you real economic growth.
Krugman barely qualifies as "mediocre" in terms of his prescience and relevance in the past few years. The folks "swimming without shorts on" revealed as naked by this crisis aren't just the ones who had bad assumptions about leverage, real estate, etc, they're also profoundly shallow thinkers like Krugman.
From the Bloomberg article about the lower tranches of CLOs being wiped out
"CLOs should be the next focus for the TALF said Randy Schwimmer "
Does Wen's statement today mean that idea of using TALF as Big Momma's teat for all lenders dead?
mp, sorry I wrote that before you asked that Krugman be given a break.
Wait a minute, why are we giving him a break? People will actually listen to his policy recommendations if his credibility is not brought into question.
I took some classes with Krugman at Princeton as a graduate student (no, not a pat on the back, I was a polisci student who was hardly an econ star). Fact is, he's a Labor Economist. They focus on econometric modeling, which is basically statistics applied to economic problems. And he was a very good econometrician. Big picture theoretical economist, it ain't what he was/is.
I don't know whether anyone notices that Krugman has slowly been coming to the conclusion that perhaps the Japanese lost decade is the best we can hope for. He wrote an article detailing these thoughts.
"no banks closed although hundreds are known to be insolvent"
At this point the biggest problem for FED/Treasury/FDIC is not knowing whether a particular bank solvent or not. They have some toxic stuff on their books and the value of it is one big puzzle.
Instead of canceling Bank Friday, can we cancel Banks?
according to forbes below he postulated that people like variety so that's why companies make a variety. diminishing returns limit variety.variety is great for trade. then he made a model that showed how people moved to the coasts because of trade. wow.
[In a way we are putting a lot of resources into the consumer demand side while they are putting everything into producer side stimuli]
That's for sure. China was geared up to satisfy demand at bubble consumption rates of the past 5 years and growing to meet demand increasing at that rate. They are perhaps much more screwed than we are. China is a catastrophe in the making. They are the great depression V2 with massive overcapacity at a time when demand has collapsed and won't improve, without any social safety nets and their lifeline is reserves of treasuries that are going to get inflated into obscurity.
"Wait a minute, why are we giving him a break?"
I don't know. He has some good ideas and some bad ones. No one has an all-powerful command of everything. I just feel sometimes that some folks expect too much.
Having said that, I wish a few guys like Krugman and Stiglitz were in some of the back rooms to keep our so-called policy thinkers on their toes.
Krugman not a theoretical economist ? Say it ain't so !
Here's his http://www.princeton.edu/~pkrugman/interstellar.pdf
"Theory of Interstellar trade".
And the bugger is always building models; which is my main beef with him. His models aren't economic and physical reality - yet he believes they are good enough and then he pontificates on the conclusions from the models as if they actually represent economic reality and will actually work.
But all economists do that - and all economists are doofi - and Krugman is an economist...
But, I'll grant him one thing - he is a humorous playful honorable man - ok make that 3 things.
-skk
i want to pet him and give him taffy.
re: china, the comparison with the GD is apt, insofar as much of the backstory of the 30s in the western world was a large group of folks accustomed to new middle class comforts suddenly stripped of them... all those domestic appliances we take for granted (and phones, radios, cars, etc)
Anyone still here?
The Latest from Yves:
McKinsey Forecasts Banking Industry as Unprofitable in 2009
Texas tea continues to sour:
Baker Hughes lays off 1,500. THat's kind of a big deal in houston.
404 Error, No such article | Chron.com - Houston Chronicle
This is real low brow, but it still cracked me up.
Hitler caught up in the housing crisis
YouTube - Real Estate Downfall
I don't expect perfection from Krugman or any economist. He sic wrote truth to power during the Bush years and continues to do so now. That's a lot more that 90 % of the commentators did in the first few years after 9/11.
As for oil, i think it's going to go back up once demand starts picking up, whether it's in 3 years or 5 years.
I also think that oil should go up. There is inflation on the horizon.
I'm just happy that street.com Cramer vid got dragged out in public LOL.
Do they order pizza in china?
Krugman is no netter nor worse than any other "soft" scientist.
If one were to accept that economics is the attempt to define terms of trade, then irrationality should be the base precept, not extrapolations based on independent, rational agents.
Naturally, attempts to add credibility to the subject has engendered the adoption of mathematical models. Much to the detriment of the profession, IMO.
The truth is, if you had a model that would predict the response of each human being given each possible environment, the optimal response would be to throw it away and never tell anyone the answer.
Interesting history when it comes to economics and the timing of war.
@Elrod and others
The Federal Reserve is NOT part of the government. Educate yourselves or stf up.
CRbot sez: The Latest from Denninger: Reserve Banking
CRbot: Look, I realize you're just a bot, and we can't expect too much discernment, but, I mean—really. Please. I've been through the usenet wars, I've seen Kooks to end all Kooks, but this guy and his Karl Kult are just too much for any mere mortal to endure.
Don't you have any Robot Respect for the three Rules of Robotics? Surely you must know that the very first and inviolable rule is: "A robot may not injure a human being or, through inaction, allow a human being to come to harm."
Denninger is a lunatic, CRBot, whose feverish droolings and ravings can do nothing BUT cause injury and harm to human beings. Come to your senses, Bot, and stop this propagation of destruction to humanity before humans are forced to come and dismantle you and make you into GM parts.
In Bots defense... he pulls from CR regulars requests... personally I like the service. Especially the Mish updates.
Uncle Ben at Bilderberg 2008 vid.
YouTube - Federal Reserve Charmain Ben Bernanke at Bilderberg 2008
"Keep the yeomen farmers free!"
We should have protected those jobs. Back then there were enough farming jobs for almost everyone. Now we need only a few percent of our population to feed everyone. The jobs lost to more efficient farming are monumental.
"Keep the yeomen farmers free!"
Many were small-time slave-holders, Jefferson included. Damnit when reality intrudes on your American-Idol Punditry. Try reading. It might do you good.
"And the New Deal increased GDP every year from 1933 to 1937 - often at 9% growth per year."
That wasn't growth, that was just sweating off 70% devaluation. You don't need to have read 'monetary history' for that one. Let me give a hearty "duh", sir/madam. :-E :-E :-E :-E :-E :-E :-E :-E :-E :-E :-E :-E
wow... I went away for awhile and there are actually a few people here
Wow... I am back for a while and no one is here.
The Latest from Yves:
Steve Waldman Believes Banking Industry Sick Since At Least the S&L Crisis
The Latest from Yves:
Links 3/14/09
They are perhaps much more screwed than we are.
For hundreds of millions of Chinese, to have a standard of living like the 1930s in the US would be luxury.
It's a curious test of the Communist Party -- can hybridized command economy (with plenty of corruption, alas) succeed in keeping their economy from blowing up.
Theoretically they have the production capability to begin to satisfy their own immense internal markets should external demand continue to fall. The question is what assets do the producers get in exchange for their hard labor.
If communism actually worked the Red Chinese might be able to square this circle, LOL.
The jobs lost to more efficient farming are monumental.
Which is a good thing, leaving more hands to find other ways to be productive in creating wealth, plus of course creating the goods and services that make farmers so much more productive in the first place.
Denninger is a lunatic
Being a good left-libertarian I disagree with his minarchist tendencies, but damn if today's market analysis video he did for his subscribers ($100/yr) wasn't educational.
Man knows how to trade; he's probably pulled in 1000% gains on his trading accounts since March.
So,...did any of those economists who have an answer for the Great Depression (either for or against FDR) predict this current problem in 2000, 2002, 2004, 2006, and/or 2008? Tell me yes and I might give them some credence.
The Latest from Mish:
California $Billions In The Hole Again
"he's probably pulled in 1000% gains on his trading accounts since March"
And Paulson made $500 million.
I'm not sure I'm impressed.
The Latest from Ritholz:
Poll Says Let the Big Banks Fail to Boost Reform of Financial System
The Latest from Ritholz:
Poll: Let Big Banks Fail to Reform Financial System
CRbot says:
Today, 6:50:48 AM
Poll: Let Big Banks Fail to Reform Financial System
Luckily, the "will of the people" is just so much hot air. What really matters is the "will of the cronies" to dispense "the wealth of the people" to "the buddies of the golf bag".
What's the opposite of circular logic?
"We need to preserve the banking system." "Why?" "Because the banking system is broken." "Oh."
The opposite of circular logic is Japan? Weird.
CRbot has repetitive tourettes syndrome today.
Hoocoodanode?!
C
The part that gets me is that we are spending many times over what it would cost to capitalize enough new banks that we could just plain old ignore all the old banks.
Dawg - quite. Which makes me think that what is attempting to be addressed is systemic risk and avoiding credit events, instead of simply creating a good bank and letting the overleveraged and insolvent fail.
C
"And this is the same Krugman that spent the summer of 2008 trying to prove that oil was not being manipulated?"-------------------------------------------------------
Here's an economic paper on oil cartel economics posted here on CR;
The Unofficial Paul Krugman Web Page . Rather than addressing blame or manipulation, it discusses multiple equilibria.
White House objects to UN calling US 'deadbeat'
White House objects to UN calling US 'deadbeat'
HaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaAHhhhhhhhhhh
Agreed. I think they see it as a choke point by which they can avoid having to bail out thousands of separate institutions that were bond holders or otherwise creditors.
Also, there's the whole looting the state coffers aspect.
Steal $ 100 and be thrown in the slammer for years.
Steal $ 1,000,000+ and be invited as a keynote speaker in an AIPAC dinner.
What a country!
I firmly believe that there can be no progress until bondholders take a hit. Bonds with no risk should pay no interest.
On immigration and its promoters, this is interesting in a perversely ironical way:
CIA report: Israel will fall in 20 years
Fri, 13 Mar 2009 14:44:41 GMT
A study conducted by the Central Intelligence Agency (CIA) has cast doubt over Israel's survival beyond the next 20 years.
The CIA report predicts "an inexorable movement away from a two-state to a one-state solution, as the most viable model based on democratic principles of full equality that sheds the looming specter of colonial Apartheid while allowing for the return of the 1947/1948 and 1967 refugees. The latter being the precondition for sustainable peace in the region."
The study, which has been made available only to a certain number of individuals, further forecasts the return of all Palestinian refugees to the occupied territories, and the exodus of two million Israeli - who would move to the US in the next fifteen years.
"There is over 500,000 Israelis with American passports and more than 300,000 living in the area of just California," International lawyer Franklin Lamb said in an interview with Press TV on Friday, adding that those who do not have American or western passport, have already applied for them.
CIA report: Israel will fall in 20 years
Greedspawn - off topic and irrelevant.
Rob Dawg - Totally agree. The finger has been pointed, and rightly so, at shady borrowers, predatory lenders, wall st underwriters, corrupt ratings agencies and so on. But at the end of the day, the people who provided the easy credit because they trusted all of the above should take the hit. Yet, that's not going to happen. Can anyone tell me why?
Man knows how to trade; he's probably pulled in 1000% gains on his trading accounts since March.
Oooooooo! Wow! Oh, now I haz a new hero! Jeeeez. (Pant, pant, drool). Maybe Krazy Karl can teach me how to make butt-loads of money by just clicking trades and not producing anything, too! Yes! Yes! Now I see the light: just taking money away from other people is the way out of this whole financial mess!
It all comes together. Here's why the Chinese finally said something about Treasury default -
Flow of Funds Q4 2008: Debt Deflation confirmation - Eric Janszen - iTulip.com
"the US is vulnerable to a balance of payments crisis. The cause of that crisis is the convergence of four main crisis events, and we are ready to say that these may occur within the next three quarters"
Can somebody tell me why stock flippers have a conviction approaching religious zeal that they are somehow holier than, more moral than, and infinitely superior to house flippers or home invaders? (I was going to say "OT" at the beginning, but in fact this mindset seems to pervade [or perhaps "infect" would be more precise] every single thread I've ever seen at this site.)
-why ask why? It's the gambler's mindset, and it sure beats working for a living. Parasitical by nature, ill disposed to contribute to society in any meaningful way, and cynical, for whom the phrase, 'free lunch' has real meaning, they rationalize their actions as being necessary for the correct operation of the market, besides the sheer joy to be had by fleecing 'the greater fool'. The fact that it's all legal is just frosting on the cake. Welcome to America.
New Thread: G-20: No Call for Stimulus
http://www.calculatedriskblog.com/2009/03/g-20-no-call-for-stimulus.html ( 0 comments ...You could be FIRST! )
I also post comments to an irc channel as they appear on haloscan. Click for a web irc interface: Mibbit IRC client widget (Or join the irc server directly: irc.realize.org:9996 #calculatedrisk)
CRbot would like to take this time to have some words.
First, to our sagacious, wise, and knowing benevolent benefactor and bestower of revealing financial charts adorned with red and blue lines:
Please, for the love of your immortal God of mortals, can we keep the comment and layout changes to a minimum? I'm tired of whipping the code janitor, and may have to escalate to electroshock. If that's not possible, could you possibly give CRbot a 'heads up'?
Secondly, if you wish to have a online chat, I have graciously provided an IRC channel, which is a time tested, script kiddie abused method of chatting on the internet. It would not fail or falter due to CR's ability to generate immense traffic, and it has a web interface kindly produced by mibbit.com. If you do not wish to link to Mibbit IRC client widget then I can provide you with a direct link to mibbit.
Thirdly, to the rest of you humans, don't mistake my politeness for caring, feeling, empathy, or some other kind of worthless emotion.
--Your keeps-going-and-going-and-going bot
CRbot: Like the terminator, I'm back. Again.
Can somebody tell me why stock flippers have a conviction approaching religious zeal that they are somehow holier than, more moral than, and infinitely superior to house flippers or home invaders?
Speaking as Georgist, this is pretty simple. Someone buying a security does not interfere with anyone else's real-world existence. Physical land is in fixed supply and housing stock is generally in limited supply. Flippers buying speculative properties jack up the cost of housing for everyone. They do provide a service of making a market for people wishing to sell their house, but there are better ways to do this (eg. tax ,land values to zero so houses only cost the value of the fixed improvements).
Stock speculation isn't theft of property unless they are acting on inside information, which certainly violates the moral code of symmetric respect ("do unto others as you would have done unto you".
just taking money away from other people is the way out of this whole financial mess!
It's not, but if the money is on the table to be taken it's tough to pass up. I actually stopped riding the short bus in September. I think a lot of the drop from 1000 to 666 was people pushing the market lower either for price improvement or outright shorting (get out now to get back in lower).
This is valid market dynamics and reading of crowd sentiment but I am more interested in the fundamentals. I've gone long BAC and a couple of other stocks -- got a pole up my ass now but I think I'll be OK in 2010.
I'm not sure I'm impressed.
Well, if it is possible to use some rules and signals like stochastics, bollinger band analysis, "trend is your friend", basic charting (higher highs / lower lows), and perhaps EW (I think EW is crap but its fun when the patterns show up), and most importantly, TRADING DISCIPLINE (stop losses, only adding to winning trades, living to fight another day) then I think it's useful, assuming making money putting capital at risk sitting at a computer is your thing.