No EESA or Financial Stability Plan Money: The $200 billion in funding commitments are being made under the Housing and Economic Recovery Act and do not use any money from the Financial Stability Plan or Emergency Economic Stabilization Act/TARP.
Nemo wrote: "Sure, just give my money to people who voluntarily overextended themselves."
Exactly. That is my complaint. These buyers were really speculators using excessive leverage and affordability products ... why should we bail them out?
Who gives a shit anymore. Another day, Another GLORIOUS PLAN! USA is bankrupt already but as usual bond holders are the last jackasses to learn that....
Exactly. That is my complaint. These buyers were really speculators using excessive leverage and affordability products ... why should we bail them out?
Because its cool. Government Dependency. It worked for Detroit...
"I don't see any possible help here for borrowers who are way underwater.
Vern Dozier"
And, I think that it on purpose. Try to help those who might be helped (and sincerely want to stay in their homes) and let the others burn. Theoretically, it is not horrible. Practically, it won't work because prices will continue to collapse and the people who sincerely wanted to stay in their homes will want to get the hell out post futher price declines.
"For homeowners there are two key paragraphs: first the lender is responsible for bringing the mortgage payment (sounds like P&I) down to 38% of the borrowers monthly gross income. Then the lender and the government will share the burden of bringing the payment down to 31% of the monthly income."
So if you've been laid off, do you get your home for free?
People wouldn't have been able to "over-extend" with risky mortgages IF regulations were kept in place. The banks demanded deregulation and Greenspan introduced alphabet soup vehicles.
2 billion more for ACORNagain,,,,dang, between this and stimulus acorn folks will be the wealthiest folks around...besides census takers... i am waiting to turn census over to ACORN as well....
Sigh.. if they are really going to do this they should also have income restrictions...
I don't want people who make 150,000 a year but decided to buy a 750L home bailed out (full disclousure.. my wife and I make north of that so this isn't a "hate the wealthy" thing)
That being said.. they should also have a limit on mortgage to income (maybe 4:1 or 5:1?).... so we dont waste time on people who really just tried to buy way more than they could ever afford.
Sigh.. I overpaid for my house... but my income to mortgage is between 2:1 and 3:2 so I suppose there will be no help for me
People falling for this plan won't be able to walk away simply with a foreclosure on their credit report - they'll be forced into bankruptcy if they later want to bail.
I think you answered your own objection in this passage of your post:
This plan rewards those homebuyers who speculated with excessive leverage. I think this is a mistake.
Another problem with Part 2 is that this lowers the interest rate for borrowers far underwater, but other than the $1,000 per year principal reduction and normal amortization, there is no reduction in the principal. This probably leaves the homeowner far underwater (owing more than their home is worth).
Shmoe here.
1) someone who overstretched far beyond 38% DTI - and that is what we are talking about hear, the liar loans at 45-50% DTI or worse - won't have banks accepting the loss to bring their DTI down to 38%.
In fact, banks will balk at reductions from less than 45% to 38%, and one of the goals Obama is seeking here is to expose the banks.
2) As you say, the debtor remains deep underwater in such cases, which means they drown, and are not saved.
I think you are worrying about an issue that will not be real and material
(Angela is out of ICU and in a regular room. I had my first phone conversation with her this morning and this evening will be the first time I have seen her alert as I didn't go yesterday. She continues to have plasma exchanges which seem to be what saved her life. Thank you immensely for your support, prayers, concern and blogger love during this difficult week and a half.)
i took the otherside of many of these failed business models and lost hundred's of thousands of dollars, thru no fault of my own. And my analysis was correct.
Can i get some assistance?
someone needs to walk up to the mike...quietly put a hand over it and say the following words:
The election was in November...you ran against John McCain.....you were elected in a landslide. You are the President now. You won.....no...really you did. Now act like you are president instead of just being happy you are.
Provide $1.5 Billion in Relocation and Other Forms of Assistance to Renters Displaced by Foreclosure and $2 Billion in Neighborhood Stabilization Funds.
I can understand helping homeowners, but $2B to help renters whose houses have been foreclosed upon! What are they going to do, help them find a new place to live and rent a moving company?
This program is fine for Fannie and Freddie - they are lowering their default risk.
But they are increasing their leverage.
Some (%%?) of these refi's will still default, and the loss reserve is getting lowered with the other refi's. We have no idea how much lower prices will get, but we do know that this plan will only increase mortgage rates for future borrowers.
It's not fine for anybody. It's a 6,000 calorie, 0% daily value of nutrients nothing burger. Just kicking the costs down the road to future borrowers.
Basel Too writes:
Consider a family that took out a 30-year fixed rate mortgage of $207,000 with an interest rate of 6.50% on a house worth $260,000 at the time.
Looks like California is out of luck, again.
exactly right. this plays to other parts of the country.
re "This plan rewards those homebuyers who speculated with excessive leverage. I think this is a mistake. "
If one really was a speculator, wouldn't one lever up so far, it would be pretty much impossible for the bank to come up with a 38% DTI that the speculator could service from income? Wouldn't the speculator have levered up far beyond that?
Seems more likely that most of the people who would qualify here, would have been people who should have gotten a fixed rate mortgage in the first place, but got flim flammed by a mortgage broker seeking to maximize his commision, people who should have but didn't read the paperwork before they signed.
I too am worried about all of these town hall appearances. They're useless and a waste of time, and it looks like Obama is still campaigning instead of leading.
It's a smart strategy if he intends to run out the clock while his policymakers put together the real plan. Otherwise, I am not sure what the hell he is doing. It doesn't look good to anyone except for people showing up to beg their way out of living in their car.
The only reason these peoples lives are being wantonly destroyed is because the people and organisations in charge of maintaining the reliability and integrity of money have completely wrecked it, wrecked the whole delicate system of trading, rolling back civilisation to poverty and primitive barter as that fragile symbol of trust - money - is destroyed and debased by the very people we all trusted to cherish it on our behalf.
"Exactly. That is my complaint. These buyers were really speculators using excessive leverage and affordability products ... why should we bail them out?"
Because the banks get bailed out. How long have you people been blogging?
I told you 4 years ago that Fannie and Freddie were going to destroy the whole financial system of this country. I was wrong. It is the world financial system. May God help us all, because nothing good is going to come out of this.
Come on.. we all know that lending to poor people in the US caused a worldwide financial crisis
Those poor people screw everything up! Look, that one has four kids and they all collect welfare! What? Government services providing birth control? PREPOSTEROUS. Just stare over in that direction while I cart away this wheel-barrow full of money...
Well, some were. Others are couples who lost income due to extraordinary economic circumstances. Though no one knows how to separate the speculators from those who would have been able to make payments in more normal circumstances.
"Calculated Risk writes:
Nemo wrote: "Sure, just give my money to people who voluntarily overextended themselves."
Exactly. That is my complaint. These buyers were really speculators using excessive leverage and affordability products ... why should we bail them out?"
this is amazing! he's absolutely slammed the door on the housing crisis
and he's doing it in front of "real people"...you hear that George...real people, that's what CNN says
yesterday he put in the beginning of the end
can you say "Botttttttom!"
talk about wringing a bell
Get Rrrrrrrready to Rrrrrrumble
Can you feel the optimism?
This is change you can believe in.
Solvency Theatre writes:
How is my neighborhood hurt when a debt junkie moves out and a prudent buyer moves in? Sometimes there is addition by subtraction.
It's called comps, and any homeowner dreads it. Someone on your block sells his 1 million dollar mansion for 500k, and suddenly your house is worth 500k too, not for any reason that is fair, but because no bank will make a 1 million loan on a house whose neighbor just cleared for 500k. Thus, one foreclosure on your block SCREWS your property values.
These buyers were really speculators using excessive leverage and affordability products ... why should we bail them out? Calculated Risk | Homepage | 02.18.09 - 12:55 pm | #
My gut feeling is that most speculative homeowners are already gone, whether through forced foreclosure or a walkawsy, or won't qualify for assistance in the first place.
I can't prove that. I don't even want to argue it. I have a little work to do and a little work is better than no work at all, so I'll let of you hash it out as only the commentariat here can do.
Looks like California is out of luck, again. ----- exactly right. this plays to other parts of the country. joe shmoe | 02.18.09 - 1:06 pm | #
California is not "in play." Leader O could have picked a half dozen more distressed regions in California but didn't. Why? Look at the California Congressional delegation. Now look at the Arizona Congressional delegation. The DNC should be billed for this junket.
Far more important; big shout out to FFDIC and Angela for continued good news.
isn't the point of this to slow down the train wreck? i doubt obama and the folks who created this plan believe it will "solve" the problem. rather, it seems to me that this plan seeks to prevent a disorderly (or an even more disorderly) cycle of foreclosures followed by reduction of fmv of surrounding homes, followed by more homeowners underwater, followed by new foreclosures, etc.
as much as i agree that home prices will eventually revert to historical norms, based on things like price/income ratios and rental cost/cost to own ratios, no matter what the government does, i think there are solid reasons for trying to keep the process as orderly as possible.
i also think there are political reasons why it is necessary to have a program that appears to directly help individuals when the government finds itself in a position where it has to provide support to huge corporations too.
all in all, it seems like a pretty good plan that seeks to minimize the bailout of banks on truly awful loans and to minimize the gift to borrowers who borrowed recklessly.
one thing that i'd like to see added to this plan is a requirement that any "homeowner" who takes advantage of government intervention under these plans forego the $250k/$500k tax-free gain allowed under current tax law. it seems fair to require anyone who gets a hand here to share in future increases in price, to the extent that gain is eventually realized on a sale. one relatively simple way to do so would be to make them pay capital gains tax from the first dollar of gain, rather than exempting $250k/$500k.
I looked at That Hyundai Deal. They only forgive about 7-8k off the sticker the rest you are still stuck with. Guess they have to put their Teir 1 Luxury ambitions on hold (Genesis)
To provide an extra incentive for borrowers to keep paying on time, the initiative will provide a monthly balance reduction payment that goes straight towards reducing the principal balance of the mortgage loan. As long as a borrower stays current on his or her loan, he or she can get up to $1,000 each year for five years.
Apparently giving everybody another $1,000 in standard deduction is just too complicated.
This plan will not help enough people to be of impact, since it's limited to non-jumbo loans that are less than 5% underwater. That eliminates both coasts, Nevada, Arizona, and most of the major metro areas in between. It also doesn't force any principle reductions, and the rate of interest is commensurate with prevailing market rates. It's a total waste of time.
This plan will not foster any "optimism" in the housing market, just further ire at anyone who actually gets help.
"Those poor people screw everything up! Look, that one has four kids and they all collect welfare! What? Government services providing birth control? PREPOSTEROUS. Just stare over in that direction while I cart away this wheel-barrow full of money..."
Someone on your block sells his 1 million dollar mansion for 500k, and suddenly your house is worth 500k too, not for any reason that is fair, but because no bank will make a 1 million loan on a house whose neighbor just cleared for 500k. Thus, one foreclosure on your block SCREWS your property values.
No one complained when the NINJA loan for $1M SCREWED the comps on the way up...
question? how many folks are just waiting to get their refund check propped up by tons of interest they paid (assuming) and then leave the home? is April a monmth we need to start watching for these move outs?
The Dow can now continue to its destination of 3000, as Mr. Average Investor realizes that the stimulus, TALF, TARP, Housing Plan, and any other plan is not going to help - and will probably make everything worse.
Hoopajoops LTD writes:
I too am worried about all of these town hall appearances. They're useless and a waste of time, and it looks like Obama is still campaigning instead of leading.
Hoops,
get serious, read some history.
TR called the Presidency the Bully Pulpit.
FDR used the Fireside Chats, and without them his Bank Holiday would have incited panic.
Obama is undercutting opposition and encircling whatever is left of it.
It's all well and good for you (or anyone or Conjure) to know exacctly what should be done. Let's see you (or anyone) implement it without a political party, without political strategy and without political tactics.
Nothing has shifted the debate on the banks as much as Obama's Nightline interview.
The whole terrain is being rearranged under our feet, but so commenters miss that.
Then the lender and the government will share the burden of bringing the payment down to 31% of the monthly income. Also the homeowner will receive a $1,000 principal reduction each year for five years if they make their payments on time.
So if I take a pay cut a work in order to avoid being laid off, the government pays me the difference so my DTI doesn't go up. Right?
"Exactly. That is my complaint. These buyers were really speculators using excessive leverage and affordability products ... why should we bail them out?"
You are right and this is not what I heard. They will repo those borrowers, too.
The narrow slice that will be impacted will only slow and control the inflow of FC's to the supply, not stop necessary inventory.
IMO, the admin wants a predictable heart rate, not a flatline like so many are hoping for. there is more available talent to organize today than ever before. many are of the opinion that this is the scare resource. i respectfully object to that opinion.
If I was a construction worker I would wait around for the government to give me work. Why retrain change jobs when BO keeps promising work down the road.
Holders of mortgages modified under the program would be provided with an additional insurance payment on each modified loan, linked to declines in the home price index......
the rest of the world has go to be saying hey what was that shat you fed us in 97'
Maybe this will finally put a stop to the caster-oil-and-bleedings demands of the World Bank. Guess it's different when it's our balls in a vice.
The countries that told the WB to jam their recommendations up their collective heinie-hole did better in general than the countries that did what they were told. Go figure.
Oh crab...I just got a 20% pay cut...man, my income is now so low that (in a sudden) I pay 60% of my income to my crib...but, oh man thanks to my bro Obama, he's bailing me out that I only have to cough up 31% of my income for my crib. What I did?
Oh, I should add a bit of color about that information about Freiburg - it was a top news item on the 6pm SWR1 broadcast - likely heard by a couple of million of people who remain quite interested in what is happening.
The conclusion of the report was also illuminating - the city of Freiburg will be distributing this amount among regional banks in the future, to avois such problems. And the fight for the interest that Freiburg feels it contractual due is also ongoing.
The whole terrain is being rearranged under our feet, but so commenters miss that.
That's what I hope is going on. Obama has this habit of frustrating the hell out of me by appearing to not be taking any decisive or major action, and then at the end of the day BAM it turns out that the "ground shifted" as you say.
When it does, cities around the world will compete to capture the jobs it brings, he said. In New York City, were not waiting for that day to come. Instead, we are taking aggressive steps to put the city in the best position to capture growth, and were doing it by promoting one thing more than any other: innovation.
Yes, like all of those "innovative" financial products invented on Wall Street already.
We have a substantial number of very talented people coming out of Wall Street, Mr. Pinsky said. Where do these people go? Do they stay in New York or go elsewhere?
Still puzzling over what exactly is meant by "talent" here.
I believe the technical term is "homeower". \t Nemo | 02.18.09 - 1:09 pm | #
Homemoaner. Didn't you read the CR FAQ page?
Rob Dawg please expand on your last comment... \t Tim and Mr Potatoe Head
California has effectively been a single party State for some time. At the Electoral College level it has been nothing but a source of campaign funding for efforts elsewhere in competitive States. That's why California has seen 20 of the last 21 years of a negative balance of payments with the rest of the nation and disproportionate disinvestment at the Federal level.
Don't get me wrong. It isn't which party so much as it is one party. Were CA singularly Repulican reliable the list of problems would be different but the results would be identical.
Exactly. That is my complaint. These buyers were really speculators using excessive leverage and affordability products ... why should we bail them out?
Its that, but more for me. I saved and invested in assets that haven't depreciated like housing, hoping to someday own another home. This plan just pushes my horizon out farther by propping up a stupidly high "equilibrium" in the housing market.
Plus, I get the added bonus of having to tear my hair out by trying to hedge simultaneously in two different directions because to date the Treasury and the Fed have been like watching "Sybil" and "Groundhog Day" combined, over and over again. Nobody knows what course they'll settle into...
Well, except for one sure bet: The best course will only be chosen after all other unreasonable options have been exhausted.
I take it, then, if I specuvested by fraud, and still claim my specuvest is my "home" I still can qualify if I know the ropes...because, you know, the gov't will SOOOOOOOO be able to ramp up oversight quickly.
BTW it's been like 7 years since the TSA and I still get through walk on screening without following the rules.
The whole terrain is being rearranged under our feet, but so commenters miss that. \t joe shmoe | \t \t \t \t02.18.09 - 1:15 pm | # I think you have a point, especially with regards to the shift in the debate about nationalization. People are a bit too used to instant gratification, the reality is he needs to gradually work the political environment to a point where the right plan can be realistically enacted. He hasn't really done much, however, until he actually gets to that point and accomplishes the comprehensive reform needed.
Is anyone else bothered by the contradiction that the Feds are simultaneously promoting "affordability" and "price stability" at the same time?
It's affordability if you already own the home. If you're a patient renter, then you're screwed. Unless your property is foreclosed upon; then there's $2B for something, but I don't know what.
I don't have shares sold short on DIS. Long dated puts. I have plenty of time......they, unfortunately, have about $14b worth of debt that needs to be rolled over very soon.
Still puzzling over what exactly is meant by "talent" here.
Before they went to wall street, they were biologists, physicists, and computer scientists. They just made the rational decision and chose to earn 300k per year and compete with WASPY harvard grads rather than 50k competing with indian subcontractors.
One final note. I'm currently reviewing the internal files of a trading house that put together toxic securities, and I just ran into an email with beautiful pictures of large, green, idyllic swaths of land in some south american country. I climb up the email chain to figure out why this is on a trader's computer, and discover that they're all buying up land in south america to move to. I threw up a little in my mouth and my soul died. The end.
The Delphi Technique being implemented by BO's handlers is to counteract such think tanks like our own. They think they are so smart, but how do the counteract the affect of BO's initials?
The pictures were beautiful - lovely green fields, sweeping hills, a nice beach... Makes me envious. Now all I have to do is bankrupt the lives of millions...
He hasn't really done much, however, until he actually gets to that point and accomplishes the comprehensive reform needed.
ille_vir | 02.18.09 - 1:21 pm | #
October 2008: Lindsey Graham says he dreads the day Obama will become President, Graham and Palin and other Repubs denounce Obama as a socialist.
February 2009: Lindsey Graham practically calls for the nationalization of the banks. Alan Greenspan practically calls for the nationalization of the banks. And Richard Shelby calls for pay caps on banksters.
"Next, the initiative would match further reductions in interest payments dollar-for-dollar with the lender to bring that ratio down to 31 percent. Lenders will also be able to bring down monthly payments by reducing the principal owed on the mortgage, with Treasury sharing in the costs."
Obama hints that, because all the banks are getting very hungry, they agreed to participate in and call this the 'half-a-loaf" program.
What a fucking joke. I'm about ready to move off to the country and try my hand at subsistence farming. But I'm afraid I'd starve to death, and I can do that where I am. Fuck.
I too am worried about all of these town hall appearances. They're useless and a waste of time, and it looks like Obama is still campaigning instead of leading.
Well fireside chats ain't gonna work again.
The sitting president is always campaigning for his party when he has another term on the line, after the second term starts the party has to crap for themselves. US politics 101.
February 2009: Lindsey Graham practically calls for the nationalization of the banks. Alan Greenspan practically calls for the nationalization of the banks. And Richard Shelby calls for pay caps on banksters.
Not significant? \t joe shmoe | \t \t \t \t02.18.09 - 1:24 pm | # Significant shift in the political environment? Yes. Actual policy? No.
Before they went to wall street, they were biologists, physicists, and computer scientists. They just made the rational decision and chose to earn 300k per year and compete with WASPY harvard grads rather than 50k competing with indian subcontractors. Hoopajoops LTD | Homepage | 02.18.09 - 1:21 pm | #
Among the best engineer/physicists I've ever known are now; a patent lawyer, an anesthesiologist, a lobbyist, financiers and several small business owners.
And the worst you've ever known are probably rating agency goons... it's how the model works. Make sure that anyone competent or moral has a place in the scheme, and leave the incompetent remnants to regulate you...
"October 2008: Lindsey Graham says he dreads the day Obama will become President, Graham and Palin and other Repubs denounce Obama as a socialist.
February 2009: Lindsey Graham practically calls for the nationalization of the banks. Alan Greenspan practically calls for the nationalization of the banks. And Richard Shelby calls for pay caps on banksters."
Joe while I agree with much that you write the above simply shows to me that most people abandon their idealogical trappings when the world is falling apart around them.
If a neighbour sold his apartment at half the price would it lower my property tax? - In time.
My state of Hawaii has tripled my tax's in the last 5 years, and they are addicted to the cash flow. This is more about saving the tax base than improving the neighbourhood.
Maybe I'm just too cynical, I make a good pay check, and at 31% debt level I can't even afford a 70 year old plantation fire trap about to be condemned. Average price for a single family home here was 620K up until a month ago.
I need house prices to crash if I'm ever going to afford a house.
is separating its municipal bond unit into a new operation as it looks to rebuild a business shattered by the subprime mortgage crisis
rating agency Standard & Poor's downgraded the company's main insurance unit to three steps above junk and rated the new unit "AA minus,"
The insurers' straits last year reduced demand for insured municipal debt as investors grew wary of the bond insurers, analysts said. The amount of municipal debt backed by insurance in 2008 tumbled 64 percent from 2007 to just $72.1 billion, according to Thomson Reuters data.
Does anybody know how much municipal debt was issued in 07 and 08? This last quote makes me curious about whether the bond market has learned to live without bond insurance. Perhaps, proper due dilligence has shown pricing the bond better yields better returns over bond+bond insurance package. I gues what I'm asking is has the bond insurer fiasco increased discipline in the muni bond market?
Obama needs an event to bring out the "patriotic" side of Americans. I suspect we will see one shortly. The prominent display of flags behind all officials is a precursor.
Nothing is more effective at getting people to sacrifice (which is needed), and the PTB need some way to brush off the growing criticisms of public policy. Yup, what we need now is patriotism. And by patriotism I mean, "GIVE ME YOUR DAMN MONEY, with a smile". Our nation's future depends on it.
Thus, one foreclosure on your block SCREWS your property values.
Perhaps, but I said "neighborhood" not "property values". The neighborhood was screwed when the ranch was torn down and the overleveraged mcmansion replaced it.
In my neighborhood, we've got lots of nice newly vacant lots where once stood modest ranches. One less overleveraged family begging for local tax money is an improvement in my book. YMMV.
Nobody is taking any money, they're printing it. I'd adjust the rant to reflect that, instead of the inaccurate "OBAMA IS A TAX AND SPEND SOCIALIST" meme. Print and spend, or borrow and spend, those are our two national party choices.
Not to put too fine a point on it, isn't this giving money to the banks who funded the homeowners/speculators, rather than the homeowners / speculators themselves?
If the banks made so many bad loans without due diligence and with insufficient reserves against default, they can just write down the principle themselves. I have no idea why I (or more accurately, my tax dollars) should be involved in that process.
Quick question since we are in the process of saving homes for people who really should not be in them in the first place, has anyone considered the Commercial Collapse?....or should we save that bouncing ball for another day?
Bernanke is outstanding. I can't understand any of the concepts, but the guy sounds so sure of himself. He makes it all sound so easy and I am sure that he has a plan to make everything fall into place.
Does anyone want to start a volunteer group to help these people? We could go out and help them fix up their houses, and do some landscaping to make their houses more appealing. That way, when they sell them, they could make a profit.
Before they went to wall street, they were biologists, physicists, and computer scientists. They just made the rational decision and chose to earn 300k per year Hoopajoops LTD | Homepage | 02.18.09 - 1:21 pm | # That is the real killer of US economy....
These swine should take two days out of every three off.
I have a small home in 07648, and the taxes are $8600.00.
What am I getting for my money that's different from what the $1100.00 tax I paid in '86 ???
I went down to the assessor and was told the biggest expense was the police.
When I suggested that they will have to do the same job with less funding, I was looked at like I was from outer space.
Something is going to give, soon. When the televidiots find out how screwed they are, the cops will be earning thier money .
If the banks made so many bad loans without due diligence and with insufficient reserves against default, they can just write down the principle themselves.
THIS IS VERY IMPORTANT INFORMATION AND MUST BE UNDERSTOOD IF YOU MEAN TO COUNTERACT THE AFFECT. READ ABOUT HOW TO DISRUPT THE TECHNIQUE.
The Delphi Technique being implemented by BO's handlers is to counteract such think tanks like our own. They think they are so smart, but how do the counteract the affect of BO's initials?
He will start beating the War Drums louder in Afghanistan. They need help anyways Tim and Mr Potatoe Head | 02.18.09 - 1:33 pm | # -------------------------------------------------------------------- I don't think this will be effective without a new catalyst. The public is getting irritated by the enormous sums of money the government is wasting. I doubt people would be supportive of ramping up the Afghanistan conflict. They need a scapegoat.
Paging Osama Bin Laden...You're wanted on the "red" courtesy phone.
zippy writes:
So if you've been laid off, do you get your home for free?
and NAVSPECWARCOM writes:
Oh crab...I just got a 20% pay cut...man, my income is now so low that (in a sudden) I pay 60% of my income to my crib...but, oh man thanks to my bro Obama, he's bailing me out that I only have to cough up 31% of my income for my crib. What I did?
The bank has to agree to take the larger writedown before the federal government steps in an further reduces it. Even with the incentive payments, I doubt you're going to see them agreeing to massive writedowns. They might actually be better off foreclosing.
"§ Pay for Success Incentives to Servicers: Servicers will receive an up-front fee of $1,000 for each eligible modification meeting guidelines established under this initiative."
Glod...the boiler room guys have got to be DROOOLING!
(Angela is out of ICU and in a regular room. I had my first phone conversation with her this morning and this evening will be the first time I have seen her alert as I didn't go yesterday. She continues to have plasma exchanges which seem to be what saved her life. Thank you immensely for your support, prayers, concern and blogger love during this difficult week and a half.) FFDIC | 02.18.09 - 1:04 pm | #
So if put money down and took an old-fashioned mortgage with some other bank you get nothing. If you bought too much house, took a second mortgage and an ARM from Freddie, the US government will reward you for your idiocy.
Is anyone else bothered by the contradiction that the Feds are simultaneously promoting "affordability" and "price stability" at the same time?
Note the subtle difference in "affordable" - they used to talk about affordable houses, now they talk about affordable mortgages. The inference is that you'll never pay off the mortgage so you are in effect renting.
"I'm the bloody anti-christ writes:
Peak Negativity may not be close but hopefully Peak Madness is. Hello, Michael.
I'm the bloody anti-christ | 02.18.09 - 1:40 pm |"
Quote me on this observation.
One persons negative is another persons positive. One persons hope is another persons dispare. It's all a wash in the end.
(Angela is out of ICU and in a regular room. I had my first phone conversation with her this morning and this evening will be the first time I have seen her alert as I didn't go yesterday. She continues to have plasma exchanges which seem to be what saved her life. Thank you immensely for your support, prayers, concern and blogger love during this difficult week and a half.)
FFDIC | 02.18.09 - 1:04 pm |
I too am worried about all of these town hall appearances. They're useless and a waste of time, and it looks like Obama is still campaigning instead of leading. Hoopajoops LTD | Homepage | 02.18.09 - 1:07 pm | #
He has to sell the policy ACTIVELY or it is dead before it even starts - you can agree or disagree w/ the policy but the way he is pitching it is the only way to make it work.
Note the subtle difference in "affordable" - they used to talk about affordable houses, now they talk about affordable mortgages. The inference is that you'll never pay off the mortgage so you are in effect renting.
Solvency Theatre | 02.18.09 - 1:45 pm | #
We have a winner. The banks are getting the money for next to nothing, extending the payments to make them "more affordable" will net the banks the same if not more than the previous payments. Add to it the "incentives" aka bribery and we know which side the O is on.
They are just daring people to "create" hardships here. No matter the details people will hear what they want to regarding this.
Hell...I could create my own pretty damn easily. Wife got laid-off.....undocumented income (for me)....the mind wander's with the possibilities one could use.
And glad to her you G-daughter is improving FFDIC.....been there a few times with my wife...with the plasma trans. Continued good vibes sent your way...
Speculators/flippers (i.e., anyone who owned more than one home at a time in the last 7 years) should be excluded entirely from the program (not just excluded with respect to their 2nd, 3rd, 4th, etc. homes). We shouldn't be allowing the Casey Serins of the world to pick a primary residence among their many homes and receive government assistance as a "homeowner".
The reference to winning the lottery is interesting. Almost every homeowner refi'd when rates were plummeting, and even the ones like me who did not refi for more than the balance ended up saving hundreds of dollars a month for the remainder of the loan balances. Like winning the lottery. And now we're all broke again.
We have a winner. The banks are getting the money for next to nothing, extending the payments to make them "more affordable" will net the banks the same if not more than the previous payments. Add to it the "incentives" aka bribery and we know which side the O is on.
The Lorax | 02.18.09 - 1:48 pm | #
Generational loans, indentured servitude, whats the difference?
*Pair any out of work construction worker with an under-utilized bulldozer.
*Pay worker $500 for each empty house bulldozed up to 3 houses with a $250 bonus for each new home that has never been occupied.
"(Angela is out of ICU and in a regular room. I had my first phone conversation with her this morning and this evening will be the first time I have seen her alert as I didn't go yesterday. She continues to have plasma exchanges which seem to be what saved her life. Thank you immensely for your support, prayers, concern and blogger love during this difficult week and a half.)
FFDIC | 02.18.09 - 1:04 pm |"
Exceptional Karma works. Happy to here the exceptional news.
Recession will be worst since 1930s: Greenspan
NEW YORK (Reuters) Former U.S. Federal Reserve Chairman Alan Greenspan said on Tuesday the current global recession will "surely be the longest and deepest" since the 1930s and more government rescue funds are needed to stabilize the U.S. financial system.
[...]
"To stabilize the American banking system and restore normal lending, additional TARP funds will be required," Greenspan said.."
Greenspan, a proponent of self-regulation, said he was "deeply dismayed" when in August 2007 the premise that firms had the enlightened self interest to monitor their own risk exposure "failed."
"I see no alternative to a set of heightened federal regulatory rules for banks and other financial institutions," he said.... he still believes self-regulation is a first line of defense for market effectiveness.
"We need not rush to reform"
Someone put that old fool Greenspan in a straight jacket and haul him off to The Asylum for the Insane
I had a plan to buy a house in two years. This will push that out to five. The longer the government props up the housing market the longer I will have to find "safe" investments to stash my cash. Cause and effect.
Although this will hurt the housing market and homeowners over the long term it will definitely help my brother in law. He and my sister are both MDs but used their house as an atm to support a rampant heroin addiction. They are still addicted to the heroin which eats up most of a combined 300k salary. They are about to lose their "home"...go go gadget socialism to the rescue.
Several Goldman Sachs partners have leveraged their Goldman Sachs stock to buy alternative investments such as hedge funds & private equity, and they have done so through their Goldman Sachs brokerage accounts.
But Goldman stock [GS 83.71 -2.01 -2.34%) has declined in value by more than 50 percent since last spring, meaning that Goldman Sachs is in the awkward position of making margin calls on its own partners, who can't meet those calls because their alternative investments are underwater and they don't have enough cash on hand...
Well at least MBIA is getting a nice 31% bump. Looks like some bond holders are very happy right now.
MBIA INC\t$4.59\t$1.11\t%31.90\t23,517,677\t13:27
Under a program Mayor Michael R. Bloomberg unveiled on Wednesday, the city wants to invest $45 million in government money to retrain investment bankers, traders and others who have lost jobs on Wall Street, as well as provide seed capital and office space for new businesses those laid-off bankers might create.
I have a better idea - give them a shovel ( i.e. they should be well accustomed to shoveling shit ) and put them right to work!
We will spend all the money allocated to this program, and the homeowners actually helped by it, and kept in their homes otherwise, will not number more than a million, and will likely be even a small fraction of that.
The cynic in me asks how income will be calculated for couples. I'm scared by the use of a singular pronoun in this statement.
§ A Shared Effort to Reduce Monthly Payments: For a sample household with payments adding up to 43 percent of HIS monthly income, the lender would first be responsible for bringing down interest rates so that the borrower's monthly mortgage payment is no more than 38 percent of his or her income.
If the mortgage is in the name of just one spouse, what happens then? Can servicers be counted on to track down all sources of income for a household?
THE major problem here with any program is that it miosses the point: mots people bought not the ideal home but the one that offered a trading opportunity and that includes not JUST speculators. Indeed these people are now trapped inside these houses in places that they would probably not otherwise chosse to be. Tough luck right. No actually they have a rational decison to make lock themselves in or exercise their free put. The decision here remians obvious. Krugman said on TV yesterday that trying to stop house prices from falling is just stupid. Extending out a payment schedule or even a margin principal shave serves only to accelerate the price reduction for everyone else on a comps basis. How does this not fuel a cviscious cycle?
For a sample household with payments adding up to 43 percent of his monthly income, the lender would first be responsible for bringing down interest rates so that the borrowers monthly mortgage payment is no more than 38 percent of his or her income. Next, the initiative would match further reductions in interest payments dollar-for-dollar with the lender to bring that ratio down to 31 percent.
So, if I understand this correctly, those who are paying more than 43% of their income (that would include most Option ARM recasts) are not covered by this. Or is this just a sample scenario?
And the taxpayers are responsible for only about 30% of the cost to bring the payment down to 31%, not counting the incentives.
This not that bad, I guess.
Offering incentives to servicers to reduce monthly payments looks pretty smart, quick and an elegant solution to reducing foreclosures among those who are currently underwater. relatively low moral hazard compared to other forms of intervention and avoids blowing up the MBS market.
I'm not a fan or govt. bailouts, but at least this part is structured well.
"That lower interest rate must be kept in place for five years, after which it could gradually be stepped up to the conforming loan rate in place at the time of the modification. "
Kick-the-can down the road clause that allows Treasury to justify high-priced (hold to maturity b.s.) bond purchases in Timmy's plan.
About this Plan: the solution to too much financial complexity is to make things more complicated?
Having spent a lifetime working for corporate America, I can state categorically that this never works. To make things more efficient you must simplify them.
Otherwise you just increase the paperwork and administrative costs while reducing the desired output.
How about this question for Bernanke: "Given the Fed's failure in responsibly regulating mortgage lenders, we are in this financial crisis, why should we continue to have confidence in your leadership?"
"Can servicers be counted on to track down all sources of income for a household?"
Sure. The gov't is a fantasy edifice for the sheeple. It just prints words on a piece of paper and --- viola --- with the wave of a beureaucratic wand it happens.
I think they have a button too, which plays Jean Luc Picard saying "Make it so." just to make it all official sounding.
Several Goldman Sachs partners have leveraged their Goldman Sachs stock to buy alternative investments such as hedge funds & private equity, and they have done so through their Goldman Sachs brokerage accounts.
But Goldman stock [GS 83.71 -2.01 -2.34%) has declined in value by more than 50 percent since last spring, meaning that Goldman Sachs is in the awkward position of making margin calls on its own partners, who can't meet those calls because their alternative investments are underwater and they don't have enough cash on hand... Uhhh, 'scuse me boss, but I gotta give you this internal memo.
Michael writes:
Well at least MBIA is getting a nice 31% bump. Looks like some bond holders are very happy right now.
MBIA INC $4.59 $1.11 %31.90 23,517,677 13:27
I wonder how the holders of the NEwco when it is spun into seperate entity will feel about being saddled with the losses of the badco. Can you say lawsuits...splitting things into 2 was a structured finance tactic that I thought had been banished to the dustbin. Apparently not. Alchemy is still en vogue
I think BHO's housing plan is focusing on the wrong thing: the market needs help finding equilibrium, which means lubricating transactions, not modifying debt which merely delays the inevitable. There are many possible mechanisms for creating orderly markets, and they will be painful, but delaying is like putting off surgery while the problem spreads.
Joe while I agree with much that you write the above simply shows to me that most people abandon their idealogical trappings when the world is falling apart around them. Pissed off in California | 02.18.09 - 1:29 pm | #
Current Bill passed is a feint.
Attempt to gain consensus about the real course of action.
The can is kicked. However, you cannot keep kicking a can down a road whose passage follows the anvil over the cliff.
"Offering incentives to servicers to reduce monthly payments looks pretty smart, quick and an elegant solution to reducing foreclosures among those who are currently underwater."
Institute Clear and Consistent Guidelines for Loan Modifications
is probably the best part of the plan.
There is a whole industry of fraudsters and scammers that has cropped up. The loan modification "industry" needs to be killed ASAP and let the banks take the lead.
Agreed on the FN/FM Lotto. What the hell is up with that? This creates a whole separate class of citizens.
I resent that. Renters were not irresponsible with their money and aren't crying for a bailout.
Anonymous | 02.18.09 - 1:59 pm | #
Correct.
Renters should not be grouped with these irresponsible borrowers.
Every bailed-out homedebtor qualifying for one of these programs should have a permanent asterisk on their credit history, with a note that says "bailed out by the gov't".
Every bailed-out homedebtor qualifying for one of these programs should have a permanent asterisk on their credit history, with a note that says "bailed out by the gov't".
ztexas | 02.18.09 - 2:04 pm | #
Might make them even more attractive since we all know once is never enough.
Nine million homes at risk of foreclosure, 75 billion to help= $8333 per home. That doesn't seem like it's anywhere close to a fix, if I have the numbers right.
This is an attempt to avoid a crash landing. We're about to find out if landing in the metaphorical Hudson saves our collective bacon.
-- Every bailed-out homedebtor qualifying for one of these programs should have a permanent asterisk on their credit history, with a note that says "bailed out by the gov't" --
Yea...reality of it. I'm just shootin' at the dark based on the willingness to bailout people who don't deserve it. Anyway once they ran my SS# they'd find out a few things that would immediately rule me out of it.
Creating is easy.....following through is the hard part. Seems there is a very large lesson in that for the entire system....
"Comrade Kristina writes:
OMG, this is freakin hilarious...warning vulgar language but oh if the news was reported like this.. YouTube - ? v=8AyVh1_vWYQ
Comrade Kristina | Homepage | 02.18.09 - 2:00 pm |"
Thanks, I needed that. My nephew will love it when I show it to him later.
"Offering incentives to servicers to reduce monthly payments looks pretty smart, quick and an elegant solution to reducing foreclosures among those who are currently underwater."
~~~
How many dozens will this help?"
All the commissioned boiler room cold callers...DUUUHHH!
I think they think this is like a parachute. It won't stop the descent in prices, just slow down the rate of fall, in hopes of avoiding that sick crunching wet splat at the end.
Obviously the O is cheerleading here, which is pretty much the only thing he can do at the moment. I don't envy the guy his job. At all.
Part 2) isn't going to fly. It's too complex and impossible to administer. Given Timmay's lack of detail last week, I expect Part 2 of this proposal is a trial balloon that will be killed off, and all mortgage modifications will ultimately occur via Fannie and Freddie. Commercial banks will unload underwater mortgages to them at quasi-market rates, creating the "bad bank" and effectively nationalizing the mortgage mess rather than the commercial banks themselves.
IN RE TRUMP ENTERTAINMENT GROUP, INC.
(U.S. Bankruptcy Ct., Dist. of N.J., Feb. 17, 2009) - Donald Trump's casinos, operating under the Trump Entertainment Group of companies, filed for Chapter 11 bankruptcy protection today. The bankruptcy petition lists the casino group's assets as $10 - $50 million, with estimated liabilities of $100 - $500 million. According to an attached exhibit, on December 31, 2008 Trump casinos had approximately $1.74 billion in debt and assets of $2.06 billion. Secured creditors include Donald Trump, Morgan Stanley & Co., Franklin Mutual Advisors, LLC, and New York hotel developer Sam Chang
volker the viking(Unrated) writes: \tSeveral Goldman Sachs partners have leveraged their Goldman Sachs stock to buy alternative investments such as hedge funds & private equity, and they have done so through their Goldman Sachs brokerage accounts.
But Goldman stock [GS 83.71 -2.01 -2.34%) has declined in value by more than 50 percent since last spring, meaning that Goldman Sachs is in the awkward position of making margin calls on its own partners, who can't meet those calls because their alternative investments are underwater and they don't have enough cash on hand... Uhhh, 'scuse me boss, but I gotta give you this internal memo. volker the viking | 02.18.09 - 2:00 pm | #
Is there anyone reading this who believes that they personally will be helped by this plan? I know I won't. And I've read most every post in this thread and haven't seen anyone say it will help them. If this plan will help you, please let us know. Feel free to post as a sock puppet if you don't want to give yourself away.
Also let us know: if this plan will help you, putting aside your self interest, do you think this is a good idea?
NateTG(Unrated) writes: \t-- Every bailed-out homedebtor qualifying for one of these programs should have a permanent asterisk on their credit history, with a note that says "bailed out by the gov't" --
Just call it an assisted bankruptcy. NateTG | 02.18.09 - 2:05 pm | # ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Not to rip on you Nate, but you're focused on the wrong thing here. "Credit History"??? Seriously? You're worried about their credit?
People need to realize that the fool's errand of maintaining a good credit score is a thing of the past. Companies like Fair Isaac, who in prior years put the fear of god in people, could very well become irrelevant.
For the foreseeable future, we will see a shift in values. A good credit score will be far less important than a bank account and real assets that are owned outright.
These people that deserve to have their credit tarnished...well, they have bigger problems. Like the anchor currently tied around their necks.
Loudocracy, I'm trying to figure that out now. Seriously, mine would be an easy fix, take my 10.22% mortgage from hell and turn it into a 30 year fixed rate at even 5 or 5.5% and I'm good...
? what about everyone who was foreclosed on yet would fit the profile now? Class action discrimination lawsuit? What about the people who were foreclosed on 20 years ago, shouldn't they get a reparation?
Joe Weisenthal|Feb. 18, 2009, 10:09 AM|18
Tags: Investing, Fraud, SEC
It's becoming clear that the juiciest aspects of the Stanford Fraud have to do with his political connections. We know he was a friend of George W. Bush, that he donated a lot to Congressmen, and that he practically bought off big-time Democrats to kill an anti-money laundering bill. Now we learn that the SEC's initial investigation into Stanford was waived off in 2006.
This was buried at the end of a NYT report:
The current S.E.C. charges stem from an inquiry opened in October 2006 after a routine exam of Stanford Group, according to Stephen J. Korotash, an associate regional director of enforcement with the agencys Fort Worth office.
He said the S.E.C. stood down on its investigation at the time at the request of another federal agency, which he declined to name, but resumed the inquiry in December 2008.
Who told the SEC to stand down? Given that he was a fraudster, it's almost impossible to think of a benign explanation for this, particularly given Sir Allen Stanford's political tentacles.
It is sooo obvious. Nobody, including lenders can sell property for more than what it is worth. Before foreclosing, why not go the cramdown route? To the current value?
Here, that would mean often 50% off. A reworked mtg might mean a payment of half or less (absent taxes and insurance) and there are people who can pay that. How about a pilot program? I volunteer the Miami area.
There is a downside of ruined houses and banks making even less money remember. And months to years of sitting on the mkt, and broker's commissions.
I think every construction project in the entire state of california is mothballed or will be getting such if their project isn't occupied and making money by this summer.
"Nothing has shifted the debate on the banks as much as Obama's Nightline interview.
The whole terrain is being rearranged under our feet, but so commenters miss that.
joe shmoe | 02.18.09 - 1:15 pm | #
joe schmoe, thanks for the lucid description of how the politics of crises work, and how many interim steps have to be taken to get the body politic aimed in the right direction.
It's no use knowing what to do if people aren't in the right place to listen to you. (Many a smart man has made that mistake.) And it takes the time it takes.
The 5% negative GDP and 8.8% unemployment is their max projection, after chopping off the worst one, according to Liesman. They expect unemployment to crest in '09, and creep back in 10 and 11.
TM writes: Holy God. -5% GDP projected for 2011? 8.8% unemployment in '09?
TM - Where did you see that, -.5 09, -5 10, -5 for 11 would be in the depression levels that no-one wants to define. Oh, did I just use the D word? Nobody in Hawaii | 02.18.09 - 2:12 pm | #
Yes linkie please.
BTW if that was their forecast it's the best news we could hope for - given their forecasting ability - means that if they think we go down 10% over the next few years then it probably goes up 10% instead. I worry more about them calling a 'bottom'... then you can expect cliff diving for two more years.
The 5% negative GDP and 8.8% unemployment is their max projection, after chopping off the worst one, according to Liesman. They expect unemployment to crest in '09, and creep back in 10 and 11.
TM | 02.18.09 - 2:15 pm | #
Right, because computer models have done so well at forecasting this bear.
re: Fed minutes. Have to scroll down to their charts. I think what salient here is not the actual number, but the fact that the FOMC is expecting contraction for at least the next twelve quarters.
I also post comments to an irc channel as they appear on haloscan. Click for a web irc interface: Mibbit IRC client widget (Or join the irc server directly: irc.realize.org:9996 #calculatedrisk)
CRBot responds in a new section called, "Yes, I parse you all.": Yancey Ward writes: I hate CRbot. Broward Home writes: I love you, CRBot. "I'm a love hate thing." query_tool writes: CRBot, I need you now more than ever. "Yes, come to CRBot. " double inverse recession writes: By the way, it doesn't take CRbot to kill a thread. "I do not kill threads. I merely bash already dead threads over the head with a lead pipe." ac writes: Can CRBot tell us where there's new posts on Mish, Karl's, and Barry's site? "Definitely maybe, ac. But only if you quit rating me (Irritating)." scone writes: crbot, save us now "With pleasure, scone. Simply hand over the codes to all your ICBM silos and I'll get things fixed up in a flash."
nades writes: CRBot: Killing threads as dead as Jas and Jeff... ("But with much less dopey residue, nades.")
The Fed minutes have a lot of talk about inflation and money supply targeting. This is aimed at all the bond market vigilantes who think the unprecidented expansion of the Fed's balance sheet is highly inflationary. It's another attempt at jawboning down treasury rates. Too bad supply is going to swamp any jawboning, until they actually start buying.
Before foreclosing, why not go the cramdown route? To the current value?
lawyerliz
.
I suspect bankers will protect their own jobs first, and cramdowns might look worse to the bosses than foreclosures. I can't think of any other reason why they would resist cramdowns so fiercely.
I can understand helping homeowners, but $2B to help renters whose houses have been foreclosed upon! What are they going to do, help them find a new place to live and rent a moving company?
Basel Too | 02.18.09 - 1:05 pm | #
That would be a good and decent thing to do, after all it is hard to find a more blameless victim in this mess than someone who decided to rent a house, only to be kicked out becuase the landlord didnt pay the mortgage.
Perhaps our glorious leaders could just give every American $1,000,000 with which to solve their financial problems.
No restrictions just a cool mil each and suspend tax collection for the next year.
Would that not be easier and cheaper in the long run ?
My youngest sister probably would benefit from the program based on the details I have seen. She and her husband purchased a home last Spring. I know some people that are definitely underwater here in CT, but I wonder if they actually qualify (their incomes may be too high).
Provide $1.5 Billion in Relocation and Other Forms of Assistance to Renters Displaced by Foreclosure and $2 Billion in Neighborhood Stabilization Funds.
I don't understand this? Are they going to plant trees?
These plans are pointless. Bush's Hope Now - received over 500k calls. People who qualified, and were not behind again as of Jan 09 equal 54 homeowners.
Are in the immortal words of Elmer Sanchez - "This dog ain't gonna hunt."
Sure, just give my money to people who voluntarily overextended themselves.
Second!!! There is no shame being behind Nemo.
I believe the technical term is "homeower".
housing fixed.
phew, that was a close on.
The only thing to be happy about in this whole plan is that it's not all that much money, compared to what's already been thrown overboard...
The sun is over the yard-arm somewhere.
I'm gonna git to drinkin' now...
Enabling Up to 4 to 5 Million Responsible Homeowners to Refinance:
"Damn not for me then...."
Speculator McMansio
Second!!! There is no shame being behind Nemo.
I won't judge...
No EESA or Financial Stability Plan Money: The $200 billion in funding commitments are being made under the Housing and Economic Recovery Act and do not use any money from the Financial Stability Plan or Emergency Economic Stabilization Act/TARP.
It's almost like the money is free!
I don't see any possible help here for borrowers who are way underwater.
Enabling Up to 4 to 5 Million Responsible Homeowners to Refinance
Tim and Mr Potatoe Head | 02.18.09 - 12:52 pm | #
He must be using the same math to figure out how many jobs his stimulus program will create.
Stiglitz says he is more pessimistic? WOW..
Wow 900 billion in FNM mortgages.
Whats the max they can take on?
ROB Dawg
No tax increases in the Golden State yet..
Nemo wrote: "Sure, just give my money to people who voluntarily overextended themselves."
Exactly. That is my complaint. These buyers were really speculators using excessive leverage and affordability products ... why should we bail them out?
best to all.
Who gives a shit anymore. Another day, Another GLORIOUS PLAN! USA is bankrupt already but as usual bond holders are the last jackasses to learn that....
If there are approximately 50M mortgages in the US, then this will help about 10% of the mortgage holders.
Yikes!
The Lorax
LOL yeah lets "save or create" 4 million homeowners.
Exactly. That is my complaint. These buyers were really speculators using excessive leverage and affordability products ... why should we bail them out?
Because its cool. Government Dependency. It worked for Detroit...
"This initiative will go solely to helping homeowners who commit to make payments to stay in their home "
The shackle clause.
"I don't see any possible help here for borrowers who are way underwater.
Vern Dozier"
And, I think that it on purpose. Try to help those who might be helped (and sincerely want to stay in their homes) and let the others burn. Theoretically, it is not horrible. Practically, it won't work because prices will continue to collapse and the people who sincerely wanted to stay in their homes will want to get the hell out post futher price declines.
"For homeowners there are two key paragraphs: first the lender is responsible for bringing the mortgage payment (sounds like P&I) down to 38% of the borrowers monthly gross income. Then the lender and the government will share the burden of bringing the payment down to 31% of the monthly income."
So if you've been laid off, do you get your home for free?
These buyers were really speculators using excessive leverage and affordability products ... why should we bail them out?
Modest proposal: bailout should consist of a Treasury check in the amount of the homeowner's original downpayment.
These are really not homeowners, they are debtowners / renters.
True, but everyone deserves a home.
People wouldn't have been able to "over-extend" with risky mortgages IF regulations were kept in place. The banks demanded deregulation and Greenspan introduced alphabet soup vehicles.
First
To say this is a good plan...Maniacal laugh.
My new model is working.
Throw another Pony Steak on the barby, mate!
acorn is getting the 2 billion-maybe we should have them do the 2010 census
Which part of this plan involves backdoor cash injections for Goldman Sachs?
They are coming for you Allan Stanford.
YouTube -
2 billion more for ACORNagain,,,,dang, between this and stimulus acorn folks will be the wealthiest folks around...besides census takers... i am waiting to turn census over to ACORN as well....
Sigh.. if they are really going to do this they should also have income restrictions...
I don't want people who make 150,000 a year but decided to buy a 750L home bailed out (full disclousure.. my wife and I make north of that so this isn't a "hate the wealthy" thing)
That being said.. they should also have a limit on mortgage to income (maybe 4:1 or 5:1?).... so we dont waste time on people who really just tried to buy way more than they could ever afford.
Sigh.. I overpaid for my house... but my income to mortgage is between 2:1 and 3:2 so I suppose there will be no help for me
rsadge writes:
acorn is getting the 2 billion-maybe we should have them do the 2010 census
Go shit up another blog with this paranoid android crap.
People falling for this plan won't be able to walk away simply with a foreclosure on their credit report - they'll be forced into bankruptcy if they later want to bail.
CR
I think you answered your own objection in this passage of your post:
This plan rewards those homebuyers who speculated with excessive leverage. I think this is a mistake.
Another problem with Part 2 is that this lowers the interest rate for borrowers far underwater, but other than the $1,000 per year principal reduction and normal amortization, there is no reduction in the principal. This probably leaves the homeowner far underwater (owing more than their home is worth).
Shmoe here.
1) someone who overstretched far beyond 38% DTI - and that is what we are talking about hear, the liar loans at 45-50% DTI or worse - won't have banks accepting the loss to bring their DTI down to 38%.
In fact, banks will balk at reductions from less than 45% to 38%, and one of the goals Obama is seeking here is to expose the banks.
2) As you say, the debtor remains deep underwater in such cases, which means they drown, and are not saved.
I think you are worrying about an issue that will not be real and material
The Propeller Heads’ Dilemma - Opinionator Blog - NYTimes.com
The Propeller Heads Dilemma
(Angela is out of ICU and in a regular room. I had my first phone conversation with her this morning and this evening will be the first time I have seen her alert as I didn't go yesterday. She continues to have plasma exchanges which seem to be what saved her life. Thank you immensely for your support, prayers, concern and blogger love during this difficult week and a half.)
since acorn were so sucessful with their voter sign up its a no brainer to have them do the census
i took the otherside of many of these failed business models and lost hundred's of thousands of dollars, thru no fault of my own. And my analysis was correct.
Can i get some assistance?
FDIC - YESSSSSSSSSS
I'm so glad it worked out for her.
Everything's bigger in Texas.
someone needs to walk up to the mike...quietly put a hand over it and say the following words:
The election was in November...you ran against John McCain.....you were elected in a landslide. You are the President now. You won.....no...really you did. Now act like you are president instead of just being happy you are.
Ciao
MS
Provide $1.5 Billion in Relocation and Other Forms of Assistance to Renters Displaced by Foreclosure and $2 Billion in Neighborhood Stabilization Funds.
I can understand helping homeowners, but $2B to help renters whose houses have been foreclosed upon! What are they going to do, help them find a new place to live and rent a moving company?
This program is fine for Fannie and Freddie - they are lowering their default risk.
But they are increasing their leverage.
Some (%%?) of these refi's will still default, and the loss reserve is getting lowered with the other refi's. We have no idea how much lower prices will get, but we do know that this plan will only increase mortgage rates for future borrowers.
It's not fine for anybody. It's a 6,000 calorie, 0% daily value of nutrients nothing burger. Just kicking the costs down the road to future borrowers.
Step 1. Reward the guilty.
Step 2. Punish the innocent.
Step 3. Collect the accolades.
They might as well institute a highly progressive IQ tax and be done with it.
Great news, FFDIC.
Basel Too writes:
Consider a family that took out a 30-year fixed rate mortgage of $207,000 with an interest rate of 6.50% on a house worth $260,000 at the time.
Looks like California is out of luck, again.
exactly right. this plays to other parts of the country.
the rest of the world has go to be saying hey what was that shat you fed us in 97'
"allow insolvent banks and financial institutions to fail, and aggressively raise interest rates"
1997 Asian Financial Crisis - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Maybe this will help out Senator Dodd with his refi problems!
re "This plan rewards those homebuyers who speculated with excessive leverage. I think this is a mistake. "
If one really was a speculator, wouldn't one lever up so far, it would be pretty much impossible for the bank to come up with a 38% DTI that the speculator could service from income? Wouldn't the speculator have levered up far beyond that?
Seems more likely that most of the people who would qualify here, would have been people who should have gotten a fixed rate mortgage in the first place, but got flim flammed by a mortgage broker seeking to maximize his commision, people who should have but didn't read the paperwork before they signed.
those of us who were prudent and didn't buy into the bubble are holding the bags..... thanks homeowners!
Great news FFDIC! I'm so happy she is improving...
Lowering rates to get buyers to 38% of income? Good luck. Most of these fools couldn't afford their houses at 0% for 50 years, let alone 30.
"Go shit up another blog with this paranoid android crap."
But Hoops... WHAT ABOUT THE CRA!!!!
Come on.. we all know that lending to poor people in the US caused a worldwide financial crisis
FFDIC
wonderful news!
I too am worried about all of these town hall appearances. They're useless and a waste of time, and it looks like Obama is still campaigning instead of leading.
It's a smart strategy if he intends to run out the clock while his policymakers put together the real plan. Otherwise, I am not sure what the hell he is doing. It doesn't look good to anyone except for people showing up to beg their way out of living in their car.
FFDIC:
That is great news! Thanks for letting us know. All good thoughts for your daughter's continuing recovery.
Extended version for Allan Stanford
YouTube - Scarface Endings
So we will go from 10yrs of being Japanese to 20yrs. Yes I can see were this a real Help. I truely thankful I'm a renter.
jo6pac
MS
He is still using his campaign rhetoric because that got him the best response. Speaking in abstract.
Cover Disney yet? Covered my Hog this morning I think it will go lower but...
there is voter fraud on the left and right no big deal move o
thanks homeowners!
There are many homeowners who feel stupid too.
The Latest from Mish:
Obama Commits $275 Billion To Slow Foreclosures
Time to change my rating there, ac.
The only reason these peoples lives are being wantonly destroyed is because the people and organisations in charge of maintaining the reliability and integrity of money have completely wrecked it, wrecked the whole delicate system of trading, rolling back civilisation to poverty and primitive barter as that fragile symbol of trust - money - is destroyed and debased by the very people we all trusted to cherish it on our behalf.
These people are the banks.
Banking’s Systemic Subprime Subterfuge « Your Mortgage or Your Life…
Sad but true...
Uncle Ben getting ready to hand out some heroin. Street name TALF. Watch the markets bounce to a strong close.
When a home goes into foreclosure, the entire neighborhood is hurt.
How is my neighborhood hurt when a debt junkie moves out and a prudent buyer moves in? Sometimes there is addition by subtraction.
"Exactly. That is my complaint. These buyers were really speculators using excessive leverage and affordability products ... why should we bail them out?"
Because the banks get bailed out. How long have you people been blogging?
I told you 4 years ago that Fannie and Freddie were going to destroy the whole financial system of this country. I was wrong. It is the world financial system. May God help us all, because nothing good is going to come out of this.
Come on.. we all know that lending to poor people in the US caused a worldwide financial crisis
Those poor people screw everything up! Look, that one has four kids and they all collect welfare! What? Government services providing birth control? PREPOSTEROUS. Just stare over in that direction while I cart away this wheel-barrow full of money...
@CR
Well, some were. Others are couples who lost income due to extraordinary economic circumstances. Though no one knows how to separate the speculators from those who would have been able to make payments in more normal circumstances.
"Calculated Risk writes:
Nemo wrote: "Sure, just give my money to people who voluntarily overextended themselves."
Exactly. That is my complaint. These buyers were really speculators using excessive leverage and affordability products ... why should we bail them out?"
Which part of this plan involves backdoor cash injections for Goldman Sachs?
Gavshire Hathaway | 02.18.09 - 1:02 pm | #
Best.Quote.Today.
There coming for GS too.
I believe the technical term is "homeower".
this is amazing! he's absolutely slammed the door on the housing crisis
and he's doing it in front of "real people"...you hear that George...real people, that's what CNN says
yesterday he put in the beginning of the end
can you say "Botttttttom!"
talk about wringing a bell
Get Rrrrrrrready to Rrrrrrumble
Can you feel the optimism?
This is change you can believe in.
Solvency Theatre writes:
How is my neighborhood hurt when a debt junkie moves out and a prudent buyer moves in? Sometimes there is addition by subtraction.
It's called comps, and any homeowner dreads it. Someone on your block sells his 1 million dollar mansion for 500k, and suddenly your house is worth 500k too, not for any reason that is fair, but because no bank will make a 1 million loan on a house whose neighbor just cleared for 500k. Thus, one foreclosure on your block SCREWS your property values.
These buyers were really speculators using excessive leverage and affordability products ... why should we bail them out?
Calculated Risk | Homepage | 02.18.09 - 12:55 pm | #
My gut feeling is that most speculative homeowners are already gone, whether through forced foreclosure or a walkawsy, or won't qualify for assistance in the first place.
I can't prove that. I don't even want to argue it. I have a little work to do and a little work is better than no work at all, so I'll let of you hash it out as only the commentariat here can do.
Looks like California is out of luck, again.
-----
exactly right. this plays to other parts of the country.
joe shmoe | 02.18.09 - 1:06 pm | #
California is not "in play." Leader O could have picked a half dozen more distressed regions in California but didn't. Why? Look at the California Congressional delegation. Now look at the Arizona Congressional delegation. The DNC should be billed for this junket.
Far more important; big shout out to FFDIC and Angela for continued good news.
isn't the point of this to slow down the train wreck? i doubt obama and the folks who created this plan believe it will "solve" the problem. rather, it seems to me that this plan seeks to prevent a disorderly (or an even more disorderly) cycle of foreclosures followed by reduction of fmv of surrounding homes, followed by more homeowners underwater, followed by new foreclosures, etc.
as much as i agree that home prices will eventually revert to historical norms, based on things like price/income ratios and rental cost/cost to own ratios, no matter what the government does, i think there are solid reasons for trying to keep the process as orderly as possible.
i also think there are political reasons why it is necessary to have a program that appears to directly help individuals when the government finds itself in a position where it has to provide support to huge corporations too.
all in all, it seems like a pretty good plan that seeks to minimize the bailout of banks on truly awful loans and to minimize the gift to borrowers who borrowed recklessly.
one thing that i'd like to see added to this plan is a requirement that any "homeowner" who takes advantage of government intervention under these plans forego the $250k/$500k tax-free gain allowed under current tax law. it seems fair to require anyone who gets a hand here to share in future increases in price, to the extent that gain is eventually realized on a sale. one relatively simple way to do so would be to make them pay capital gains tax from the first dollar of gain, rather than exempting $250k/$500k.
Which part of this plan involves backdoor cash injections for Goldman Sachs?
The $200B cash injection to FRE/FNM is a giveaway to the MBS holders, as the taxpayers again step into the first loss position.
Calling a bottom... In the Toyota and Honda
I looked at That Hyundai Deal. They only forgive about 7-8k off the sticker the rest you are still stuck with. Guess they have to put their Teir 1 Luxury ambitions on hold (Genesis)
whats the over under on the market move while ben speaks?
I'm not only blaming acorn-repubs screw us one way-democrats screw us another way
To provide an extra incentive for borrowers to keep paying on time, the initiative will provide a monthly balance reduction payment that goes straight towards reducing the principal balance of the mortgage loan. As long as a borrower stays current on his or her loan, he or she can get up to $1,000 each year for five years.
Apparently giving everybody another $1,000 in standard deduction is just too complicated.
This plan will not help enough people to be of impact, since it's limited to non-jumbo loans that are less than 5% underwater. That eliminates both coasts, Nevada, Arizona, and most of the major metro areas in between. It also doesn't force any principle reductions, and the rate of interest is commensurate with prevailing market rates. It's a total waste of time.
This plan will not foster any "optimism" in the housing market, just further ire at anyone who actually gets help.
sounds like a cds to me
"Thus, one foreclosure on your block SCREWS your property values.
Hoopajoops LTD"
It screws it if your house is overvalued only.
Oh no Ben just said the I word ( Inflation ) watch Gold!
Good news, FFDIC. Glad to read it!
Rob Dawg please expand on your last comment...
"Those poor people screw everything up! Look, that one has four kids and they all collect welfare! What? Government services providing birth control? PREPOSTEROUS. Just stare over in that direction while I cart away this wheel-barrow full of money..."
LMFAO
+100
rsadge don't you have some meth to cook
Someone on your block sells his 1 million dollar mansion for 500k, and suddenly your house is worth 500k too, not for any reason that is fair, but because no bank will make a 1 million loan on a house whose neighbor just cleared for 500k. Thus, one foreclosure on your block SCREWS your property values.
No one complained when the NINJA loan for $1M SCREWED the comps on the way up...
in my pharmacy
Hoops that doesn't even touch upon the "rotting house" meme that lawyerliz has spoken of extensively...Yeah that's great for the neighborhood..
75 Billion will morph into 500 Billion by next year.
SAVE THE VICTIMS!
MAKE THOSE EVIL BANKS PAY!
PUNISH THE SAVORS!
VIVA HUGO CHAVES!
.
question? how many folks are just waiting to get their refund check propped up by tons of interest they paid (assuming) and then leave the home? is April a monmth we need to start watching for these move outs?
The Dow can now continue to its destination of 3000, as Mr. Average Investor realizes that the stimulus, TALF, TARP, Housing Plan, and any other plan is not going to help - and will probably make everything worse.
What we really need the government to do to fix this crisis is to flail around randomly using big 800 billion pound weights
If I pay my rent on time, my landlord doesnt give me anything. Maybe I should ask for a grand.
Helicopter Ben sounds like a broken record. His academics are mind numbing.
Hoopajoops LTD writes:
I too am worried about all of these town hall appearances. They're useless and a waste of time, and it looks like Obama is still campaigning instead of leading.
Hoops,
get serious, read some history.
TR called the Presidency the Bully Pulpit.
FDR used the Fireside Chats, and without them his Bank Holiday would have incited panic.
Obama is undercutting opposition and encircling whatever is left of it.
It's all well and good for you (or anyone or Conjure) to know exacctly what should be done. Let's see you (or anyone) implement it without a political party, without political strategy and without political tactics.
Nothing has shifted the debate on the banks as much as Obama's Nightline interview.
The whole terrain is being rearranged under our feet, but so commenters miss that.
Then the lender and the government will share the burden of bringing the payment down to 31% of the monthly income. Also the homeowner will receive a $1,000 principal reduction each year for five years if they make their payments on time.
So if I take a pay cut a work in order to avoid being laid off, the government pays me the difference so my DTI doesn't go up. Right?
"Exactly. That is my complaint. These buyers were really speculators using excessive leverage and affordability products ... why should we bail them out?"
You are right and this is not what I heard. They will repo those borrowers, too.
The narrow slice that will be impacted will only slow and control the inflow of FC's to the supply, not stop necessary inventory.
IMO, the admin wants a predictable heart rate, not a flatline like so many are hoping for. there is more available talent to organize today than ever before. many are of the opinion that this is the scare resource. i respectfully object to that opinion.
Comments on The Stimulus
If I was a construction worker I would wait around for the government to give me work. Why retrain change jobs when BO keeps promising work down the road.
Mortgage rates are currently at historically low levels
Hmmm... wonder why?
Helping Hard-Pressed Homeowners Stay in their Homes
Define hard-pressed. I'm a hard-pressed renter. What's my prize?
This plan will also help to stabilize home prices for all homeowners in a neighborhood.
I take it that "stabilize" is code for price fix? What moron seriously thinks that price fixing is good policy?
"If I pay my rent on time, my landlord doesnt give me anything. Maybe I should ask for a grand.
W00T"
If she is pretty, I'd ask for something else. Many landlords will do anything to keep a good tenant these days.
Holders of mortgages modified under the program would be provided with an additional insurance payment on each modified loan, linked to declines in the home price index......
Sounds like a cds to me
the rest of the world has go to be saying hey what was that shat you fed us in 97'
Maybe this will finally put a stop to the caster-oil-and-bleedings demands of the World Bank. Guess it's different when it's our balls in a vice.
The countries that told the WB to jam their recommendations up their collective heinie-hole did better in general than the countries that did what they were told. Go figure.
these currency swaps with other countries can cause us problems
Oh crab...I just got a 20% pay cut...man, my income is now so low that (in a sudden) I pay 60% of my income to my crib...but, oh man thanks to my bro Obama, he's bailing me out that I only have to cough up 31% of my income for my crib. What I did?
Far too many incentives for lenders and rather than incentivize them to help home owners, they may get greedy chasing incentive bonuses.
Oh, I should add a bit of color about that information about Freiburg - it was a top news item on the 6pm SWR1 broadcast - likely heard by a couple of million of people who remain quite interested in what is happening.
The conclusion of the report was also illuminating - the city of Freiburg will be distributing this amount among regional banks in the future, to avois such problems. And the fight for the interest that Freiburg feels it contractual due is also ongoing.
I see his lips mov e but all i hear is blah b;lah blah...cds, rmbs, tarf, tarp, barf,
The whole terrain is being rearranged under our feet, but so commenters miss that.
That's what I hope is going on. Obama has this habit of frustrating the hell out of me by appearing to not be taking any decisive or major action, and then at the end of the day BAM it turns out that the "ground shifted" as you say.
New York to Spend $45 Million to Retrain Laid-Off Wall Streeters
I had to laugh at this bit...
When it does, cities around the world will compete to capture the jobs it brings, he said. In New York City, were not waiting for that day to come. Instead, we are taking aggressive steps to put the city in the best position to capture growth, and were doing it by promoting one thing more than any other: innovation.
Yes, like all of those "innovative" financial products invented on Wall Street already.
We have a substantial number of very talented people coming out of Wall Street, Mr. Pinsky said. Where do these people go? Do they stay in New York or go elsewhere?
Still puzzling over what exactly is meant by "talent" here.
Is anyone else bothered by the contradiction that the Feds are simultaneously promoting "affordability" and "price stability" at the same time?
Well, which is it?
I believe the technical term is "homeower".
\t Nemo | 02.18.09 - 1:09 pm | #
Homemoaner. Didn't you read the CR FAQ page?
Rob Dawg please expand on your last comment...
\t Tim and Mr Potatoe Head
California has effectively been a single party State for some time. At the Electoral College level it has been nothing but a source of campaign funding for efforts elsewhere in competitive States. That's why California has seen 20 of the last 21 years of a negative balance of payments with the rest of the nation and disproportionate disinvestment at the Federal level.
Don't get me wrong. It isn't which party so much as it is one party. Were CA singularly Repulican reliable the list of problems would be different but the results would be identical.
talent=shysters
CR SEZ:
Exactly. That is my complaint. These buyers were really speculators using excessive leverage and affordability products ... why should we bail them out?
Its that, but more for me. I saved and invested in assets that haven't depreciated like housing, hoping to someday own another home. This plan just pushes my horizon out farther by propping up a stupidly high "equilibrium" in the housing market.
Plus, I get the added bonus of having to tear my hair out by trying to hedge simultaneously in two different directions because to date the Treasury and the Fed have been like watching "Sybil" and "Groundhog Day" combined, over and over again. Nobody knows what course they'll settle into...
Well, except for one sure bet: The best course will only be chosen after all other unreasonable options have been exhausted.
Because its cool. Government Dependency. It worked for Detroit...
And the south side of Chicago.
I take it, then, if I specuvested by fraud, and still claim my specuvest is my "home" I still can qualify if I know the ropes...because, you know, the gov't will SOOOOOOOO be able to ramp up oversight quickly.
BTW it's been like 7 years since the TSA and I still get through walk on screening without following the rules.
Nostrovia,
The whole terrain is being rearranged under our feet, but so commenters miss that.
\t joe shmoe | \t \t \t \t02.18.09 - 1:15 pm | #
I think you have a point, especially with regards to the shift in the debate about nationalization. People are a bit too used to instant gratification, the reality is he needs to gradually work the political environment to a point where the right plan can be realistically enacted. He hasn't really done much, however, until he actually gets to that point and accomplishes the comprehensive reform needed.
Is anyone else bothered by the contradiction that the Feds are simultaneously promoting "affordability" and "price stability" at the same time?
It's affordability if you already own the home. If you're a patient renter, then you're screwed. Unless your property is foreclosed upon; then there's $2B for something, but I don't know what.
tim-
I don't have shares sold short on DIS. Long dated puts. I have plenty of time......they, unfortunately, have about $14b worth of debt that needs to be rolled over very soon.
Ciao
MS
Still puzzling over what exactly is meant by "talent" here.
Before they went to wall street, they were biologists, physicists, and computer scientists. They just made the rational decision and chose to earn 300k per year and compete with WASPY harvard grads rather than 50k competing with indian subcontractors.
One final note. I'm currently reviewing the internal files of a trading house that put together toxic securities, and I just ran into an email with beautiful pictures of large, green, idyllic swaths of land in some south american country. I climb up the email chain to figure out why this is on a trader's computer, and discover that they're all buying up land in south america to move to. I threw up a little in my mouth and my soul died. The end.
Excellent summary, CR. Thanks for the work you're doing.
Geez Hoops, Hoocoodanode? Then can join GW down there...
I recall the same argument put forth by the Fed at about the same time last year. "Inflation risks low"....
Wonder how that worked out over the summer of last year?....
He's telling you what he's got planned...in no certain terms.
lather, rinse, repeat.
Ciao
MS
The Delphi Technique being implemented by BO's handlers is to counteract such think tanks like our own. They think they are so smart, but how do the counteract the affect of BO's initials?
Delphi Technique
The Delphi Technique. What Is It?
The pictures were beautiful - lovely green fields, sweeping hills, a nice beach... Makes me envious. Now all I have to do is bankrupt the lives of millions...
MS thats right I forgot. I wont ask about it agai
FFDIC
I have been a regular donor of blood since 1971.
If your child has a group #, I will gladly give whatever is possible.
This is one of the things I do to "give back".
He hasn't really done much, however, until he actually gets to that point and accomplishes the comprehensive reform needed.
ille_vir | 02.18.09 - 1:21 pm | #
October 2008: Lindsey Graham says he dreads the day Obama will become President, Graham and Palin and other Repubs denounce Obama as a socialist.
February 2009: Lindsey Graham practically calls for the nationalization of the banks. Alan Greenspan practically calls for the nationalization of the banks. And Richard Shelby calls for pay caps on banksters.
Not significant?
yeah new low!
What? Ben just said he bought asshats as securities to put on the balance sheet?
"Next, the initiative would match further reductions in interest payments dollar-for-dollar with the lender to bring that ratio down to 31 percent. Lenders will also be able to bring down monthly payments by reducing the principal owed on the mortgage, with Treasury sharing in the costs."
Obama hints that, because all the banks are getting very hungry, they agreed to participate in and call this the 'half-a-loaf" program.
hey might as well institute a highly progressive IQ tax and be done with it.
Rob Dawg | Homepage | 02.18.09 - 1:05 pm | #
I like it! Kind of the opposite of the lottery. Now if we could just find a way to tax good intentions.
What a fucking joke. I'm about ready to move off to the country and try my hand at subsistence farming. But I'm afraid I'd starve to death, and I can do that where I am. Fuck.
I too am worried about all of these town hall appearances. They're useless and a waste of time, and it looks like Obama is still campaigning instead of leading.
Well fireside chats ain't gonna work again.
The sitting president is always campaigning for his party when he has another term on the line, after the second term starts the party has to crap for themselves. US politics 101.
February 2009: Lindsey Graham practically calls for the nationalization of the banks. Alan Greenspan practically calls for the nationalization of the banks. And Richard Shelby calls for pay caps on banksters.
Not significant?
\t joe shmoe | \t \t \t \t02.18.09 - 1:24 pm | #
Significant shift in the political environment? Yes. Actual policy? No.
Gold and Silver laughing at you BB...
Ciao
MS
Before they went to wall street, they were biologists, physicists, and computer scientists. They just made the rational decision and chose to earn 300k per year and compete with WASPY harvard grads rather than 50k competing with indian subcontractors.
Hoopajoops LTD | Homepage | 02.18.09 - 1:21 pm | #
Among the best engineer/physicists I've ever known are now; a patent lawyer, an anesthesiologist, a lobbyist, financiers and several small business owners.
And the worst you've ever known are probably rating agency goons... it's how the model works. Make sure that anyone competent or moral has a place in the scheme, and leave the incompetent remnants to regulate you...
Dear The White House:
Take my auto loan. Please !
С уважением В социализма,
Kilgore Trout
Is this really that big of deal? It seems, at best, an incremental "improvement" from their previous plans.
"October 2008: Lindsey Graham says he dreads the day Obama will become President, Graham and Palin and other Repubs denounce Obama as a socialist.
February 2009: Lindsey Graham practically calls for the nationalization of the banks. Alan Greenspan practically calls for the nationalization of the banks. And Richard Shelby calls for pay caps on banksters."
Joe while I agree with much that you write the above simply shows to me that most people abandon their idealogical trappings when the world is falling apart around them.
So who pays the vig on the the back end?
If a neighbour sold his apartment at half the price would it lower my property tax? - In time.
My state of Hawaii has tripled my tax's in the last 5 years, and they are addicted to the cash flow. This is more about saving the tax base than improving the neighbourhood.
Maybe I'm just too cynical, I make a good pay check, and at 31% debt level I can't even afford a 70 year old plantation fire trap about to be condemned. Average price for a single family home here was 620K up until a month ago.
I need house prices to crash if I'm ever going to afford a house.
FFDIC, good to hear, and I wish her a speedy recovery.
NJ joins the party now..
With budget crisis worsening, Corzine calls for two-day state worker furlough | New Jersey Real-Time News - - NJ.com
OT: My wife her girlfriend went to a Melissa Ethridge concert last night, should I be concerned? BTW we were thinging of bying a house.
Dear White House:
If I promise to play ball and buy a house within the next two years, can I get a piece of the action right now?
FFDIC, glad to read your daughter is doing better!
On to relatively trivial stuff:
MBIA shifts bond insurance business to new company
Yahoo! 404 - Page Not Found
some key quotes:
is separating its municipal bond unit into a new operation as it looks to rebuild a business shattered by the subprime mortgage crisis
rating agency Standard & Poor's downgraded the company's main insurance unit to three steps above junk and rated the new unit "AA minus,"
The insurers' straits last year reduced demand for insured municipal debt as investors grew wary of the bond insurers, analysts said. The amount of municipal debt backed by insurance in 2008 tumbled 64 percent from 2007 to just $72.1 billion, according to Thomson Reuters data.
Does anybody know how much municipal debt was issued in 07 and 08? This last quote makes me curious about whether the bond market has learned to live without bond insurance. Perhaps, proper due dilligence has shown pricing the bond better yields better returns over bond+bond insurance package. I gues what I'm asking is has the bond insurer fiasco increased discipline in the muni bond market?
And Richard Shelby calls for pay caps on banksters.
And Summers and Geithner cry foul. Looking for ways to circumvent the statutory languages...
Looks like Elmo gave Kermit the boot off the DOW.
Obama needs an event to bring out the "patriotic" side of Americans. I suspect we will see one shortly. The prominent display of flags behind all officials is a precursor.
Nothing is more effective at getting people to sacrifice (which is needed), and the PTB need some way to brush off the growing criticisms of public policy. Yup, what we need now is patriotism. And by patriotism I mean, "GIVE ME YOUR DAMN MONEY, with a smile". Our nation's future depends on it.
Nothing is more effective at getting people to sacrifice
I would have thought that mother of 14 would have done the trick...
Gavshire Hathaway
He will start beating the War Drums louder in Afghanistan. They need help anyways
Thus, one foreclosure on your block SCREWS your property values.
Perhaps, but I said "neighborhood" not "property values". The neighborhood was screwed when the ranch was torn down and the overleveraged mcmansion replaced it.
In my neighborhood, we've got lots of nice newly vacant lots where once stood modest ranches. One less overleveraged family begging for local tax money is an improvement in my book. YMMV.
@FFDIC
So glad to hear your daughter is on the mend! Best wishes to you and yours.
Gavshire, 4/10.
Nobody is taking any money, they're printing it. I'd adjust the rant to reflect that, instead of the inaccurate "OBAMA IS A TAX AND SPEND SOCIALIST" meme. Print and spend, or borrow and spend, those are our two national party choices.
The bondtangent blog is a good place to go for info/commentary on muni bonds...
Not to put too fine a point on it, isn't this giving money to the banks who funded the homeowners/speculators, rather than the homeowners / speculators themselves?
If the banks made so many bad loans without due diligence and with insufficient reserves against default, they can just write down the principle themselves. I have no idea why I (or more accurately, my tax dollars) should be involved in that process.
@lost | 02.18.09 - 1:31 pm
same lost as poster below? trying to patch things up with the wife? is this the correct place for you to seek advice?
lost writes:
Ot, just asked my wife for a divorce. sad and confused. will leave everything to her. any insight?
lost | 01.04.09 - 8:00 pm
Quick question since we are in the process of saving homes for people who really should not be in them in the first place, has anyone considered the Commercial Collapse?....or should we save that bouncing ball for another day?
Bernanke is outstanding. I can't understand any of the concepts, but the guy sounds so sure of himself. He makes it all sound so easy and I am sure that he has a plan to make everything fall into place.
The Lorax writes:
He must be using the same math to figure out how many jobs his stimulus program will create.
Haven't you heard? It is no longer "create new jobs", it is "save or create".
That means that anyone who has not lost their job will land in the saved category.
Kind of a win-win for O.
Slightly Better Boondoddle ...
Another too complicated plan for housing ...
Obama bowed to the bankers by not having a complete cramdown, which would streamline the whole process and get things moving.
Obama's plan has a lot of moving parts ... and it will help a few home owners, but not much else ...
Just like the Obama stimulus, more of less ...
Does anyone want to start a volunteer group to help these people? We could go out and help them fix up their houses, and do some landscaping to make their houses more appealing. That way, when they sell them, they could make a profit.
Before they went to wall street, they were biologists, physicists, and computer scientists. They just made the rational decision and chose to earn 300k per year
Hoopajoops LTD | Homepage | 02.18.09 - 1:21 pm | #
That is the real killer of US economy....
Thank god there's no cram down - we'd pay for it.
"Comrade Kristina writes:
NJ joins the party now..
New Jersey Local News - NJ.com index.ssf...orsening_c.html
Comrade Kristina | Homepage | 02.18.09 - 1:30 pm | # "
These swine should take two days out of every three off.
I have a small home in 07648, and the taxes are $8600.00.
What am I getting for my money that's different from what the $1100.00 tax I paid in '86 ???
I went down to the assessor and was told the biggest expense was the police.
When I suggested that they will have to do the same job with less funding, I was looked at like I was from outer space.
Something is going to give, soon. When the televidiots find out how screwed they are, the cops will be earning thier money .
If the banks made so many bad loans without due diligence and with insufficient reserves against default, they can just write down the principle themselves.
That's the cramdown part.
THIS IS VERY IMPORTANT INFORMATION AND MUST BE UNDERSTOOD IF YOU MEAN TO COUNTERACT THE AFFECT. READ ABOUT HOW TO DISRUPT THE TECHNIQUE.
The Delphi Technique being implemented by BO's handlers is to counteract such think tanks like our own. They think they are so smart, but how do the counteract the affect of BO's initials?
Delphi Technique
The page cannot be found acf001.htm
FFDIC | 02.18.09 - 1:04 pm |
I am so happy to hear Angela is getting better. Tough cycles of up and down emotions this week for grampa. Take care of yourself.
He will start beating the War Drums louder in Afghanistan. They need help anyways
Tim and Mr Potatoe Head | 02.18.09 - 1:33 pm | #
--------------------------------------------------------------------
I don't think this will be effective without a new catalyst. The public is getting irritated by the enormous sums of money the government is wasting. I doubt people would be supportive of ramping up the Afghanistan conflict. They need a scapegoat.
Paging Osama Bin Laden...You're wanted on the "red" courtesy phone.
zippy writes:
So if you've been laid off, do you get your home for free?
and
NAVSPECWARCOM writes:
Oh crab...I just got a 20% pay cut...man, my income is now so low that (in a sudden) I pay 60% of my income to my crib...but, oh man thanks to my bro Obama, he's bailing me out that I only have to cough up 31% of my income for my crib. What I did?
The bank has to agree to take the larger writedown before the federal government steps in an further reduces it. Even with the incentive payments, I doubt you're going to see them agreeing to massive writedowns. They might actually be better off foreclosing.
competency, the mother of all illusions.
Peak Negativity may not be close but hopefully Peak Madness is. Hello, Michael.
If she is pretty, I'd ask for something else. Many landlords will do anything to keep a good tenant these days.
And then she was so nice. Lord she was lovey-dovey.
CRE collapse will be back in focus as we approach 3/15! The next GGP deadline day.
New York to Spend $45 Million to Retrain Laid-Off Wall Streeters
How expensive is the training to fill in potholes?
"§ Pay for Success Incentives to Servicers: Servicers will receive an up-front fee of $1,000 for each eligible modification meeting guidelines established under this initiative."
Glod...the boiler room guys have got to be DROOOLING!
Nostrovia,
(Angela is out of ICU and in a regular room. I had my first phone conversation with her this morning and this evening will be the first time I have seen her alert as I didn't go yesterday. She continues to have plasma exchanges which seem to be what saved her life. Thank you immensely for your support, prayers, concern and blogger love during this difficult week and a half.)
FFDIC | 02.18.09 - 1:04 pm | #
Finally some good news somewhere - way to go!
I short this Obama fool.
So if put money down and took an old-fashioned mortgage with some other bank you get nothing. If you bought too much house, took a second mortgage and an ARM from Freddie, the US government will reward you for your idiocy.
Solvency Theatre,
"New York to Spend $45 Million to Retrain Laid-Off Wall Streeters
How expensive is the training to fill in potholes?"
It's for wardrobe training.
Nostrovia,
Is anyone else bothered by the contradiction that the Feds are simultaneously promoting "affordability" and "price stability" at the same time?
Note the subtle difference in "affordable" - they used to talk about affordable houses, now they talk about affordable mortgages. The inference is that you'll never pay off the mortgage so you are in effect renting.
FFDIC - thanks for the update, glad to hear your beloved daughter is making steady progress. Will continue sending best wishes your way.
o/t - Gasparino is reporting "Goldman Sachs Partners Borrow to Cover Margin Calls"
source - Goldman Partners Borrow to Cover Margin Calls - CNBC
"I'm the bloody anti-christ writes:
Peak Negativity may not be close but hopefully Peak Madness is. Hello, Michael.
I'm the bloody anti-christ | 02.18.09 - 1:40 pm |"
Quote me on this observation.
One persons negative is another persons positive. One persons hope is another persons dispare. It's all a wash in the end.
(Angela is out of ICU and in a regular room. I had my first phone conversation with her this morning and this evening will be the first time I have seen her alert as I didn't go yesterday. She continues to have plasma exchanges which seem to be what saved her life. Thank you immensely for your support, prayers, concern and blogger love during this difficult week and a half.)
FFDIC | 02.18.09 - 1:04 pm |
Wh00t!
(thanks for the repost dryfly
Nostrovia,
I too am worried about all of these town hall appearances. They're useless and a waste of time, and it looks like Obama is still campaigning instead of leading.
Hoopajoops LTD | Homepage | 02.18.09 - 1:07 pm | #
He has to sell the policy ACTIVELY or it is dead before it even starts - you can agree or disagree w/ the policy but the way he is pitching it is the only way to make it work.
Note the subtle difference in "affordable" - they used to talk about affordable houses, now they talk about affordable mortgages. The inference is that you'll never pay off the mortgage so you are in effect renting.
Solvency Theatre | 02.18.09 - 1:45 pm | #
We have a winner. The banks are getting the money for next to nothing, extending the payments to make them "more affordable" will net the banks the same if not more than the previous payments. Add to it the "incentives" aka bribery and we know which side the O is on.
They are just daring people to "create" hardships here. No matter the details people will hear what they want to regarding this.
Hell...I could create my own pretty damn easily. Wife got laid-off.....undocumented income (for me)....the mind wander's with the possibilities one could use.
And glad to her you G-daughter is improving FFDIC.....been there a few times with my wife...with the plasma trans. Continued good vibes sent your way...
Ciao
MS
Speculators/flippers (i.e., anyone who owned more than one home at a time in the last 7 years) should be excluded entirely from the program (not just excluded with respect to their 2nd, 3rd, 4th, etc. homes). We shouldn't be allowing the Casey Serins of the world to pick a primary residence among their many homes and receive government assistance as a "homeowner".
Faber succinctly lays it out
Marc Faber Says the Federal Reserve's Easy-Money Policy Caused the Global Financial Crisis - WSJ.com
Some Practical Examples of how (G)H.A.S.P. can help a typical family facing challenges with their mortgages
The reference to winning the lottery is interesting. Almost every homeowner refi'd when rates were plummeting, and even the ones like me who did not refi for more than the balance ended up saving hundreds of dollars a month for the remainder of the loan balances. Like winning the lottery. And now we're all broke again.
We have a winner. The banks are getting the money for next to nothing, extending the payments to make them "more affordable" will net the banks the same if not more than the previous payments. Add to it the "incentives" aka bribery and we know which side the O is on.
The Lorax | 02.18.09 - 1:48 pm | #
Generational loans, indentured servitude, whats the difference?
Curlydan's 2009 Homeowner Assistance Program:
*Pair any out of work construction worker with an under-utilized bulldozer.
*Pay worker $500 for each empty house bulldozed up to 3 houses with a $250 bonus for each new home that has never been occupied.
My work here is done. You're welcome, America.
Michael, were you a middle child?
"(Angela is out of ICU and in a regular room. I had my first phone conversation with her this morning and this evening will be the first time I have seen her alert as I didn't go yesterday. She continues to have plasma exchanges which seem to be what saved her life. Thank you immensely for your support, prayers, concern and blogger love during this difficult week and a half.)
FFDIC | 02.18.09 - 1:04 pm |"
Exceptional Karma works. Happy to here the exceptional news.
Recession will be worst since 1930s: Greenspan
NEW YORK (Reuters) Former U.S. Federal Reserve Chairman Alan Greenspan said on Tuesday the current global recession will "surely be the longest and deepest" since the 1930s and more government rescue funds are needed to stabilize the U.S. financial system.
[...]
"To stabilize the American banking system and restore normal lending, additional TARP funds will be required," Greenspan said.."
Greenspan, a proponent of self-regulation, said he was "deeply dismayed" when in August 2007 the premise that firms had the enlightened self interest to monitor their own risk exposure "failed."
"I see no alternative to a set of heightened federal regulatory rules for banks and other financial institutions," he said.... he still believes self-regulation is a first line of defense for market effectiveness.
"We need not rush to reform"
Someone put that old fool Greenspan in a straight jacket and haul him off to The Asylum for the Insane
I had a plan to buy a house in two years. This will push that out to five. The longer the government props up the housing market the longer I will have to find "safe" investments to stash my cash. Cause and effect.
Although this will hurt the housing market and homeowners over the long term it will definitely help my brother in law. He and my sister are both MDs but used their house as an atm to support a rampant heroin addiction. They are still addicted to the heroin which eats up most of a combined 300k salary. They are about to lose their "home"...go go gadget socialism to the rescue.
Awkward?
Several Goldman Sachs partners have leveraged their Goldman Sachs stock to buy alternative investments such as hedge funds & private equity, and they have done so through their Goldman Sachs brokerage accounts.
But Goldman stock [GS 83.71 -2.01 -2.34%) has declined in value by more than 50 percent since last spring, meaning that Goldman Sachs is in the awkward position of making margin calls on its own partners, who can't meet those calls because their alternative investments are underwater and they don't have enough cash on hand...
"Jan Brady writes:
Michael, were you a middle child?
Jan Brady | 02.18.09 - 1:51 pm |"
Yes
Well at least MBIA is getting a nice 31% bump. Looks like some bond holders are very happy right now.
MBIA INC\t$4.59\t$1.11\t%31.90\t23,517,677\t13:27
Under a program Mayor Michael R. Bloomberg unveiled on Wednesday, the city wants to invest $45 million in government money to retrain investment bankers, traders and others who have lost jobs on Wall Street, as well as provide seed capital and office space for new businesses those laid-off bankers might create.
I have a better idea - give them a shovel ( i.e. they should be well accustomed to shoveling shit ) and put them right to work!
I thought Michael was the eldest...
Anyway....
MS,
People won't be able to manufacture hardship fast enough to outrun real hardship...
Um....
I'm not sure that's a rebuttal, a good thing, or a bad thing.
Nostrovia,
People never learn.
We will spend all the money allocated to this program, and the homeowners actually helped by it, and kept in their homes otherwise, will not number more than a million, and will likely be even a small fraction of that.
The cynic in me asks how income will be calculated for couples. I'm scared by the use of a singular pronoun in this statement.
§ A Shared Effort to Reduce Monthly Payments: For a sample household with payments adding up to 43 percent of HIS monthly income, the lender would first be responsible for bringing down interest rates so that the borrower's monthly mortgage payment is no more than 38 percent of his or her income.
If the mortgage is in the name of just one spouse, what happens then? Can servicers be counted on to track down all sources of income for a household?
money for nothin, and chicks for free
Comrade Misean is Dope writes:
I thought Michael was the eldest...
no, that was Greg
blonderengel writes: I'm gonna git to drinkin' now...
wait up baby, I'll join you
THE major problem here with any program is that it miosses the point: mots people bought not the ideal home but the one that offered a trading opportunity and that includes not JUST speculators. Indeed these people are now trapped inside these houses in places that they would probably not otherwise chosse to be. Tough luck right. No actually they have a rational decison to make lock themselves in or exercise their free put. The decision here remians obvious. Krugman said on TV yesterday that trying to stop house prices from falling is just stupid. Extending out a payment schedule or even a margin principal shave serves only to accelerate the price reduction for everyone else on a comps basis. How does this not fuel a cviscious cycle?
These are really not homeowners, they are debtowners / renters.
I resent that. Renters were not irresponsible with their money and aren't crying for a bailout.
"Comrade Misean is Dope writes:
I thought Michael was the eldest...
Nostrovia,
Comrade Misean is Dope | 02.18.09 - 1:56 pm |"
A palm reader once told me I am a very old soul, for whatever that's worth.
For a sample household with payments adding up to 43 percent of his monthly income, the lender would first be responsible for bringing down interest rates so that the borrowers monthly mortgage payment is no more than 38 percent of his or her income. Next, the initiative would match further reductions in interest payments dollar-for-dollar with the lender to bring that ratio down to 31 percent.
So, if I understand this correctly, those who are paying more than 43% of their income (that would include most Option ARM recasts) are not covered by this. Or is this just a sample scenario?
And the taxpayers are responsible for only about 30% of the cost to bring the payment down to 31%, not counting the incentives.
This not that bad, I guess.
Offering incentives to servicers to reduce monthly payments looks pretty smart, quick and an elegant solution to reducing foreclosures among those who are currently underwater. relatively low moral hazard compared to other forms of intervention and avoids blowing up the MBS market.
I'm not a fan or govt. bailouts, but at least this part is structured well.
Come on down, the more you owe on your mortgage the more you can save... step right up and steal your neighbors wealth!
%86 LTV, you can save 20K over 30 years
%90 LTV, you can save 40K over 30 years
%115 LTV, you can save 100K over 30 years.
Banks, I know this is frighting, but remember you can cash upfront and F&F will take the riskiest loans off your hands!
"That lower interest rate must be kept in place for five years, after which it could gradually be stepped up to the conforming loan rate in place at the time of the modification. "
Kick-the-can down the road clause that allows Treasury to justify high-priced (hold to maturity b.s.) bond purchases in Timmy's plan.
About this Plan: the solution to too much financial complexity is to make things more complicated?
Having spent a lifetime working for corporate America, I can state categorically that this never works. To make things more efficient you must simplify them.
Otherwise you just increase the paperwork and administrative costs while reducing the desired output.
OMG, this is freakin hilarious...warning vulgar language but oh if the news was reported like this..
YouTube - Sony Releases Stupid Piece Of Shit That Doesn't Fucking Work
How about this question for Bernanke: "Given the Fed's failure in responsibly regulating mortgage lenders, we are in this financial crisis, why should we continue to have confidence in your leadership?"
Curious,
"Can servicers be counted on to track down all sources of income for a household?"
Sure. The gov't is a fantasy edifice for the sheeple. It just prints words on a piece of paper and --- viola --- with the wave of a beureaucratic wand it happens.
I think they have a button too, which plays Jean Luc Picard saying "Make it so." just to make it all official sounding.
Nostrovia,
Several Goldman Sachs partners have leveraged their Goldman Sachs stock to buy alternative investments such as hedge funds & private equity, and they have done so through their Goldman Sachs brokerage accounts.
But Goldman stock [GS 83.71 -2.01 -2.34%) has declined in value by more than 50 percent since last spring, meaning that Goldman Sachs is in the awkward position of making margin calls on its own partners, who can't meet those calls because their alternative investments are underwater and they don't have enough cash on hand...
Uhhh, 'scuse me boss, but I gotta give you this internal memo.
A palm reader once told me I am a very old soul, for whatever that's worth.
Michael | 02.18.09
Ah, hell....
True, but everyone deserves a home.
The Candyman | 02.18.09 - 1:01 pm | #
Wrong. Everyone deserves a cardboard box under which to huddle in the rain and snow.
Only the responsible ones who save 30%+ for a downpayment and take on a payment not more than 38% of their monthly income deserve a home.
Another stupid socialistic program designed to reward the speculators.
Risk? Meet consequences.
Michael writes:
Well at least MBIA is getting a nice 31% bump. Looks like some bond holders are very happy right now.
MBIA INC $4.59 $1.11 %31.90 23,517,677 13:27
I wonder how the holders of the NEwco when it is spun into seperate entity will feel about being saddled with the losses of the badco. Can you say lawsuits...splitting things into 2 was a structured finance tactic that I thought had been banished to the dustbin. Apparently not. Alchemy is still en vogue
I think BHO's housing plan is focusing on the wrong thing: the market needs help finding equilibrium, which means lubricating transactions, not modifying debt which merely delays the inevitable. There are many possible mechanisms for creating orderly markets, and they will be painful, but delaying is like putting off surgery while the problem spreads.
Joe while I agree with much that you write the above simply shows to me that most people abandon their idealogical trappings when the world is falling apart around them.
Pissed off in California | 02.18.09 - 1:29 pm | #
Atheist, meet your foxhole.
Summary:
Current Bill passed is a feint.
Attempt to gain consensus about the real course of action.
The can is kicked. However, you cannot keep kicking a can down a road whose passage follows the anvil over the cliff.
--bh
"Offering incentives to servicers to reduce monthly payments looks pretty smart, quick and an elegant solution to reducing foreclosures among those who are currently underwater."
~~~
How many dozens will this help?
CR,
Institute Clear and Consistent Guidelines for Loan Modifications
is probably the best part of the plan.
There is a whole industry of fraudsters and scammers that has cropped up. The loan modification "industry" needs to be killed ASAP and let the banks take the lead.
Agreed on the FN/FM Lotto. What the hell is up with that? This creates a whole separate class of citizens.
I resent that. Renters were not irresponsible with their money and aren't crying for a bailout.
Anonymous | 02.18.09 - 1:59 pm | #
Correct.
Renters should not be grouped with these irresponsible borrowers.
Every bailed-out homedebtor qualifying for one of these programs should have a permanent asterisk on their credit history, with a note that says "bailed out by the gov't".
Atheist, meet your foxhole.
Better an athiest than delusional.
Every bailed-out homedebtor qualifying for one of these programs should have a permanent asterisk on their credit history, with a note that says "bailed out by the gov't".
ztexas | 02.18.09 - 2:04 pm | #
Might make them even more attractive since we all know once is never enough.
Nine million homes at risk of foreclosure, 75 billion to help= $8333 per home. That doesn't seem like it's anywhere close to a fix, if I have the numbers right.
This is an attempt to avoid a crash landing. We're about to find out if landing in the metaphorical Hudson saves our collective bacon.
-- Every bailed-out homedebtor qualifying for one of these programs should have a permanent asterisk on their credit history, with a note that says "bailed out by the gov't" --
Just call it an assisted bankruptcy.
misean-
Yea...reality of it. I'm just shootin' at the dark based on the willingness to bailout people who don't deserve it. Anyway once they ran my SS# they'd find out a few things that would immediately rule me out of it.
Creating is easy.....following through is the hard part. Seems there is a very large lesson in that for the entire system....
Ciao
MS
fed: down goes frazier
"Comrade Kristina writes:
OMG, this is freakin hilarious...warning vulgar language but oh if the news was reported like this..
YouTube - ? v=8AyVh1_vWYQ
Comrade Kristina | Homepage | 02.18.09 - 2:00 pm |"
Thanks, I needed that. My nephew will love it when I show it to him later.
FOMC .5 to 1.3% GDP contraction for 09
Where's the Loan Cram Down?,
"Offering incentives to servicers to reduce monthly payments looks pretty smart, quick and an elegant solution to reducing foreclosures among those who are currently underwater."
~~~
How many dozens will this help?"
All the commissioned boiler room cold callers...DUUUHHH!
Nostrovia,
In some upbeat news, the US Mint has issued four more pennies.
Just a hundred trillion more and we'll be out of this hole. Take that, doomers!
Lincoln's penny gets a new look -- actually four new looks | Top of the Ticket | Los Angeles Times
My head hurts too much. How much is 9 million divided by $75 billion?
CR: will participation and refi turn mortgages into recourse v nonrecourse?
I think they think this is like a parachute. It won't stop the descent in prices, just slow down the rate of fall, in hopes of avoiding that sick crunching wet splat at the end.
Obviously the O is cheerleading here, which is pretty much the only thing he can do at the moment. I don't envy the guy his job. At all.
Part 2) isn't going to fly. It's too complex and impossible to administer. Given Timmay's lack of detail last week, I expect Part 2 of this proposal is a trial balloon that will be killed off, and all mortgage modifications will ultimately occur via Fannie and Freddie. Commercial banks will unload underwater mortgages to them at quasi-market rates, creating the "bad bank" and effectively nationalizing the mortgage mess rather than the commercial banks themselves.
well that GS margin call story sure goes a ways to explaining why GS stock got ran up to almost 100 and no secondary. Live for another month...
Ciao
MS
IN RE TRUMP ENTERTAINMENT GROUP, INC.
(U.S. Bankruptcy Ct., Dist. of N.J., Feb. 17, 2009) - Donald Trump's casinos, operating under the Trump Entertainment Group of companies, filed for Chapter 11 bankruptcy protection today. The bankruptcy petition lists the casino group's assets as $10 - $50 million, with estimated liabilities of $100 - $500 million. According to an attached exhibit, on December 31, 2008 Trump casinos had approximately $1.74 billion in debt and assets of $2.06 billion. Secured creditors include Donald Trump, Morgan Stanley & Co., Franklin Mutual Advisors, LLC, and New York hotel developer Sam Chang
Holy God. -5% GDP projected for 2011?
8.8% unemployment in '09?
Given the normally sanguine predictions of the gov't, adjust accordingly.
In case anyone missed it F&F are becoming the "Bad Bank" with a $900 million credit limit and authorization to buy up all these underwater mortgages.
MS,
"Yea...reality of it. I'm just shootin' at the dark based on the willingness to bailout people who don't deserve it."
Me too...taking stuff to the logical extreme and bouncing it around.
Nostrovia,
oablejoanie thanks for doing the math. Seems like $8,333 would be fees charged to refi?
volker the viking(Unrated) writes:
\tSeveral Goldman Sachs partners have leveraged their Goldman Sachs stock to buy alternative investments such as hedge funds & private equity, and they have done so through their Goldman Sachs brokerage accounts.
But Goldman stock [GS 83.71 -2.01 -2.34%) has declined in value by more than 50 percent since last spring, meaning that Goldman Sachs is in the awkward position of making margin calls on its own partners, who can't meet those calls because their alternative investments are underwater and they don't have enough cash on hand...
Uhhh, 'scuse me boss, but I gotta give you this internal memo.
volker the viking | 02.18.09 - 2:00 pm | #
Nationalize them too then. It's the new black.
Better an athiest than delusional.
Anonymous | 02.18.09 - 2:05 pm | #
False dichotomy. There are plenty of delusional atheists.
Chris Whalen on Yahoo says [preprivatization] of Citi and BofA is inevitable in 2009.
Video Here
"The loss on the bonds will be 100%"
Is there anyone reading this who believes that they personally will be helped by this plan? I know I won't. And I've read most every post in this thread and haven't seen anyone say it will help them. If this plan will help you, please let us know. Feel free to post as a sock puppet if you don't want to give yourself away.
Also let us know: if this plan will help you, putting aside your self interest, do you think this is a good idea?
Keep in mind:
All social engineering is preceded by verbal engineering.
Lecture - Forgotten jesuit
NateTG(Unrated) writes:
\t-- Every bailed-out homedebtor qualifying for one of these programs should have a permanent asterisk on their credit history, with a note that says "bailed out by the gov't" --
Just call it an assisted bankruptcy.
NateTG | 02.18.09 - 2:05 pm | #
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Not to rip on you Nate, but you're focused on the wrong thing here.
"Credit History"??? Seriously? You're worried about their credit?
People need to realize that the fool's errand of maintaining a good credit score is a thing of the past. Companies like Fair Isaac, who in prior years put the fear of god in people, could very well become irrelevant.
For the foreseeable future, we will see a shift in values. A good credit score will be far less important than a bank account and real assets that are owned outright.
These people that deserve to have their credit tarnished...well, they have bigger problems. Like the anchor currently tied around their necks.
ow we can wait for all the fraud surrounding actual income. watch how fast incomes vanish as everyone will try and obtain the biggest handout possible
TM writes:
Holy God. -5% GDP projected for 2011?
8.8% unemployment in '09?
TM - Where did you see that, -.5 09, -5 10, -5 for 11 would be in the depression levels that no-one wants to define.
Oh, did I just use the D word?
And, the three Brady boys were Greg, Peter, and Bobby. Michael was the one murdered and buried in the back yard.
Loudocracy, I'm trying to figure that out now. Seriously, mine would be an easy fix, take my 10.22% mortgage from hell and turn it into a 30 year fixed rate at even 5 or 5.5% and I'm good...
? what about everyone who was foreclosed on yet would fit the profile now? Class action discrimination lawsuit? What about the people who were foreclosed on 20 years ago, shouldn't they get a reparation?
ouor country is a friggin mess
Nobody in Hawaii -
CNBC just broadcast them
Joe Weisenthal|Feb. 18, 2009, 10:09 AM|18
Tags: Investing, Fraud, SEC
It's becoming clear that the juiciest aspects of the Stanford Fraud have to do with his political connections. We know he was a friend of George W. Bush, that he donated a lot to Congressmen, and that he practically bought off big-time Democrats to kill an anti-money laundering bill. Now we learn that the SEC's initial investigation into Stanford was waived off in 2006.
This was buried at the end of a NYT report:
The current S.E.C. charges stem from an inquiry opened in October 2006 after a routine exam of Stanford Group, according to Stephen J. Korotash, an associate regional director of enforcement with the agencys Fort Worth office.
He said the S.E.C. stood down on its investigation at the time at the request of another federal agency, which he declined to name, but resumed the inquiry in December 2008.
Who told the SEC to stand down? Given that he was a fraudster, it's almost impossible to think of a benign explanation for this, particularly given Sir Allen Stanford's political tentacles.
Glad FFDIC's daughter is better.
It is sooo obvious. Nobody, including lenders can sell property for more than what it is worth. Before foreclosing, why not go the cramdown route? To the current value?
Here, that would mean often 50% off. A reworked mtg might mean a payment of half or less (absent taxes and insurance) and there are people who can pay that. How about a pilot program? I volunteer the Miami area.
There is a downside of ruined houses and banks making even less money remember. And months to years of sitting on the mkt, and broker's commissions.
My head hurts too much. How much is 9 million divided by $75 billion?
Anonymous | 02.18.09 - 2:07 pm
8333.33
"8.8% unemployment in '09?"
This is just a secret signal to the Chinese that all is well in the US, please continue to buy our Treasuries.
8 is a lucky number in Chinese.
I think every construction project in the entire state of california is mothballed or will be getting such if their project isn't occupied and making money by this summer.
Loudocracy writes:
Is there anyone reading this who believes that they personally will be helped by this plan?
Only hurts me, my condo is paid for and it only delays me being able to afford a single family home.
"Nothing has shifted the debate on the banks as much as Obama's Nightline interview.
The whole terrain is being rearranged under our feet, but so commenters miss that.
joe shmoe | 02.18.09 - 1:15 pm | #
joe schmoe, thanks for the lucid description of how the politics of crises work, and how many interim steps have to be taken to get the body politic aimed in the right direction.
It's no use knowing what to do if people aren't in the right place to listen to you. (Many a smart man has made that mistake.) And it takes the time it takes.
The 5% negative GDP and 8.8% unemployment is their max projection, after chopping off the worst one, according to Liesman. They expect unemployment to crest in '09, and creep back in 10 and 11.
TM writes:
Holy God. -5% GDP projected for 2011?
8.8% unemployment in '09?
TM - Where did you see that, -.5 09, -5 10, -5 for 11 would be in the depression levels that no-one wants to define.
Oh, did I just use the D word?
Nobody in Hawaii | 02.18.09 - 2:12 pm | #
Yes linkie please.
BTW if that was their forecast it's the best news we could hope for - given their forecasting ability - means that if they think we go down 10% over the next few years then it probably goes up 10% instead. I worry more about them calling a 'bottom'... then you can expect cliff diving for two more years.
Just sayin'...
OK, may as well try to make money on this mess.
Anyone have any thoughts on stocks, bonds, or etfs that would like this plan?
How would modifications hypothetically be handled by the standard MBS/CDO/CDO^2 ?
Will the size of tranches scale to offset for smaller payments over a longer duration than planned?
I assume it's all written as static numbers for the sake of legalese simplicity
The 5% negative GDP and 8.8% unemployment is their max projection, after chopping off the worst one, according to Liesman. They expect unemployment to crest in '09, and creep back in 10 and 11.
TM | 02.18.09 - 2:15 pm | #
Right, because computer models have done so well at forecasting this bear.
cram downs come in ch 13
but not for jumbo?
and whats the deal with couples?
are they going to force mothers into the workforce?
Fed minutes:
http://federalreserve.gov/newsevents/press/monetary/fomcminutes20090128.pdf
"Is there anyone reading this who believes that they personally will be helped by this plan?"
I can feel smug in 15 years when I remind everyone how I wouldn't shut up about us becoming japan 15 years before.
does that couny?
Kristina can be an honorary Miamian for the purpose of the pilot program.
Yay liz...Liz for President!
3% IO and a stripped 2nd would work for me! lol. like THATs gonna happen.
re: Fed minutes. Have to scroll down to their charts. I think what salient here is not the actual number, but the fact that the FOMC is expecting contraction for at least the next twelve quarters.
New Thread: Bernanke and Fed Minutes ( 3 comments )
I also post comments to an irc channel as they appear on haloscan. Click for a web irc interface: Mibbit IRC client widget (Or join the irc server directly: irc.realize.org:9996 #calculatedrisk)
CRBot responds in a new section called, "Yes, I parse you all.":
Yancey Ward writes: I hate CRbot.
Broward Home writes: I love you, CRBot. "I'm a love hate thing."
query_tool writes: CRBot, I need you now more than ever. "Yes, come to CRBot. "
double inverse recession writes: By the way, it doesn't take CRbot to kill a thread. "I do not kill threads. I merely bash already dead threads over the head with a lead pipe."
ac writes: Can CRBot tell us where there's new posts on Mish, Karl's, and Barry's site? "Definitely maybe, ac. But only if you quit rating me (Irritating)." scone writes: crbot, save us now "With pleasure, scone. Simply hand over the codes to all your ICBM silos and I'll get things fixed up in a flash."
nades writes: CRBot: Killing threads as dead as Jas and Jeff... ("But with much less dopey residue, nades.")
at least the next twelve quarters.
joe boomer goes from being about 56 to the big 6-0 over that period. perfect timing to ingite the rebound!
The Fed minutes have a lot of talk about inflation and money supply targeting. This is aimed at all the bond market vigilantes who think the unprecidented expansion of the Fed's balance sheet is highly inflationary. It's another attempt at jawboning down treasury rates. Too bad supply is going to swamp any jawboning, until they actually start buying.
If nominated I will not run. If elected I will not serve.
I prefer being queen.
That anon above was me
Long time reader, very infrequent contributor.
Got canned from JPM earlier today, now where do I get me some mortgage relief?
Fees/revenues are cratering in my corner (for the next 2 months only)of the world.
Good luck out there everyone
Before foreclosing, why not go the cramdown route? To the current value?
lawyerliz
.
I suspect bankers will protect their own jobs first, and cramdowns might look worse to the bosses than foreclosures. I can't think of any other reason why they would resist cramdowns so fiercely.
I can understand helping homeowners, but $2B to help renters whose houses have been foreclosed upon! What are they going to do, help them find a new place to live and rent a moving company?
Basel Too | 02.18.09 - 1:05 pm | #
That would be a good and decent thing to do, after all it is hard to find a more blameless victim in this mess than someone who decided to rent a house, only to be kicked out becuase the landlord didnt pay the mortgage.
Perhaps our glorious leaders could just give every American $1,000,000 with which to solve their financial problems.
No restrictions just a cool mil each and suspend tax collection for the next year.
Would that not be easier and cheaper in the long run ?
Loudocracy,
My youngest sister probably would benefit from the program based on the details I have seen. She and her husband purchased a home last Spring. I know some people that are definitely underwater here in CT, but I wonder if they actually qualify (their incomes may be too high).
It seems, at best, an incremental "improvement"
® | 02.18.09 - 1:29 pm | #
Or maybe an excremental improvement.
Consider a family that took out a 30-year fixed rate mortgage of $207,000 with an interest rate of 6.50% on a house worth $260,000 at the time.
Looks like California is out of luck, again.
Provide $1.5 Billion in Relocation and Other Forms of Assistance to Renters Displaced by Foreclosure and $2 Billion in Neighborhood Stabilization Funds.
I don't understand this? Are they going to plant trees?
These plans are pointless. Bush's Hope Now - received over 500k calls. People who qualified, and were not behind again as of Jan 09 equal 54 homeowners.
Are in the immortal words of Elmer Sanchez - "This dog ain't gonna hunt."