Damn, close to 10% in Dallas - now even Texas is getting hit. Yikes!

800K house on a school bus drivers salary...

message to Obama stop the Fc's... the gall..

ROBERTS: Our Jim Acosta is in Washington and he has a preview of President Obama's housing plan.

(BEGIN VIDEOTAPE)

JIM ACOSTA, CNN CORRESPONDENT (voice-over): School bus driver and mother of two, Minta Garcia got the letter every homeowner dreads, your mortgage is in jeopardy of going into foreclosure.

MINTA GARCIA, DISTRESSED HOMEOWNER: We're going to be losing the house. We're going to lose everything.

ACOSTA (on camera): You think you're going to lose everything?

GARCIA: Yes.

ACOSTA (voice-over): Her message to the president...

GARCIA: Stop with the foreclosure.

ACOSTA (on camera): Stop the foreclosures?

GARCIA: Yes. Right now, because if people are losing houses, losing jobs, what are we going to do?

ACOSTA (voice-over): The White House says its housing plan will be one leg of a multi-legged stool that includes the stimulus and fixing the banks, with more legs to come to prop up the ailing economy.

TIMOTHY GEITHNER, TREASURY SECRETARY: This crisis in housing has had devastating consequences, and our government should have moved more forcefully to help contain the damage.

ACOSTA: Expected to cost $50 billion to $100 billion, the housing plan targets foreclosures by modifying loans for troubled borrowers. Some economists question whether the plan is big enough.

PETER MORICI, ECONOMIST, UNIVERSITY OF MARYLAND: We are likely looking at a trillion dollars in mortgage losses before this is all over, and putting $50 billion or $100 billion in is not going to solve the problem.

ACOSTA: Like countless other Americans, Garcia admits she and her husband bought more house than they could afford, but she says the lender made the purchase all too easy. Now her mortgage is worth more than her house.

(on camera): How much was the house when you bought it?

GARCIA: Eight hundred.

ACOSTA: Eight hundred thousand dollars?. And how much is the house worth?

GARCIA: Right now, it's like $675,000 on the market.

ACOSTA (voice-over): Foreclosure experts say America's home buying culture must change the president's plan to work.

PHILLIP ROBINSON, FORECLOSURE ATTORNEY: We lived in a culture in the last ten years where mortgage originators said that you could use your house as a credit card to pay off your cars, to pay your credit card bills. Well, that doesn't exist anymore.

Jim Acosta, CNN, Washington.

Seems like if stocks can go back to 1997, home prices can too.

We are in the second phase of the bottoming process.

But everyone has the right in the constitution to own a house..regardless that they can pay for it...

Non-Profit Pickets for Foreclosure Victims - FOXBusiness.com

They're still selling houses?

Will wonders never cease.

Nostrovia,

Undisclosed Breach Threatens Consumers

What we still don’t know is what processor has been breached. According to the aforementioned article, and as has been confirmed by our sources, VISA and Mastercard are refusing to disclose which acquirer processor had the breach, as the organization hasn’t released a public statement on it yet themselves.

Undisclosed Breach Threatens Consumers : Information Security Resources

AC - the stock market saw a much greater rise in prices preceding 1997 than the stock markets did. I think 2001/2000 is probably the housing equivalent to 1997/1996 in stocks.

Hey, the rate of decline is flat for 10-city.  I say we rally on the second derivative changing sign.

Doodie, you're not implying that busdriers shouldn't buy $800K houses, are you? That'd be so unfair...

must be cheaper to build than to buy, still....

yoikes

on the bright side, vacant homes only last a couple of months (depending on the local weather) before being no good to anyone - so supply can shrink even when folks do not buy homes, given vacancies

er, busdrivers, not busdriers, although i'm sure that's honest work too.

I was about to say, I'd rather build than buy a home. I hate McMansions.

whocoooodanooode???

It's too bad I live in O.C. Yesterday, I was told four times that prices can't go down any more.

Shiller says we're only halfway through price declines.

They're still selling houses?
Comrade Misean is Dope | Homepage | 02.24.09 - 9:25 am | #

Hush..... I'm putting mine on the market in April.   Just let it hold out until then.  Smile

i love the video of Varney not taking the BS the lady from ACORN is spewing...

Shiller says we're only halfway through price declines

We're not halfway through until rate of decline stops accelerating. Smile

Let's wait for the January numbers.
.

Paisano1 -
I got a rather odd fraudulent activity check on my ATM card (VISA, Wells Fargo) this weekend when I was withdrawing some money out of town.

On old one.. but a great one

YouTube - The Bailout Rap

As bad as the stupid mortgage plan is... it's still going to cost less than half as much as the fucking AIG bailout

Get ready for another batch of crap heroin you market junkies. Shoot up at 9:30, get a little rush, puke, get sick again.

The latest Kunstler DoomPorn:

The public perception of the ongoing fiasco in governance has moved from sheer, mute incomprehension to goggle-eyed panic as the scrims of unreality peel away revealing something like a national death-watch scene in history's intensive care unit. Is the USA in recession, depression, or collapse? People are at least beginning to ask. Nature's way of hinting that something truly creepy may be up is when both Paul Volcker and George Soros both declare on the same day that the economic landscape is looking darker than the Great Depression.
Those tuned into the media-waves were enchanted, in a related instance, by Rick Santelli's grand moment of theater in the Chicago trader's pit last week when he seemed to ignite the first spark of revolution by demonstrating that bail-out fatigue had morphed into high emotion -- and that the emotion could be marshaled against public policy. The traders in the pit on-screen seemed to color up and buzz loudly, like ordinary grasshoppers turning into angry locusts preparing to ravage a waiting valley. "Are you listening, President Obama?" Mr. Santelli asked portentously.
In the broad blogging margins of the web that orbit the mainstream media like the rings of Saturn, an awful lot of reasonable people have begun to ask whether President Obama is a stooge of whatever remains of Wall Street, with Citigroup and Goldman Sachs's puppeteer, Robert Rubin, pulling strings behind an arras in the Oval Office. Personally, I doubt it, but it is still a little hard to understand what the President is up to. For one thing, the stimulus package, so-called, looks more and more like national sub-prime mortgage itself, a bad bargain made under less-than-realistic terms, with future obligations fobbed onto whoever inhabits this corner of the world for the next seven hundred years -- and all to pay for a bunch of granite counter-tops and flat-screen TVs.
I suppose Mr. Obama is burdened with the knowledge that the economic truth is so much worse than he imagined back in November that there is simply nothing to do at this point except pretend to serve up a "tasting menu" of rescue plans in the hope that markets and mechanisms might be conned back into compliance with our wish keep getting something-for-nothing forever. FDR already used the fear of fear itself trope, so Mr. O is left with little more than displaying pluck and confidence in the face of overwhelming bad news.
The sad truth is that banking has become a Chinese fire drill -- a frantic act of futility -- as insolvent companies persist in covering up their losses in order to avoid the counter-party hell of credit default swaps that would ring the world's "game over" bell. This can only go on so long. All the chatter about "nationalizing" the banks really boils down to what kind of bankruptcy work-out will they be put through, how destructive will the process be, and how much of the pain can be shoved forward in time to people now in diapers and their descendants.
Among the questions that disturb the sleep of many casual observers is how come Mr. O doesn't get that the conventional process of economic growth -- based, as it was, on industrial expansion via revolving credit in a cheap-energy-resource era -- is over, and why does he keep invoking it at the podium? Dear Mr. President, you are presiding over an epochal contraction, not a pause in the growth epic. Your assignment is to manage that contraction in a way that does not lead to world war, civil disorder or both. Among other things, contraction means that all the activities of everyday life need to be downscaled including standards of living, ranges of commerce, and levels of governance. "Consumerism" is dead. Revolving credit is dead -- at least at the scale that became normal the last thirty years. The wealth of several future generations has already been spent and there is no equity left there to re-finance.
If contraction and downscaling are indeed the case, then the better question is: why don't we get started on it right away instead of flogging rescue plans to restart something that is DOA? Downscaling the price of over-priced houses would be a good place to start. This gets to the heart of Rick Santelli's crowd-stirring moment. Let the chumps and weasels who over-reached take their lumps and move into rentals. Let the bankers who parlayed these fraudulent mortgages into investment swindles lose their jobs, surrender their perqs, and maybe even go to jail (if attorney general Eric Holder can be induced to investigate their deeds). No good will come of propping up the false values of mis-priced things.
No good, in fact, will come of a campaign to sustain the unsustainable, which is exactly what the Obama program is starting to look like. In the folder marked "unsustainable" you can file most of the artifacts, usufructs, habits, and expectations of recent American life: suburban living, credit-card spending, Happy Motoring, vacations in Las Vegas, college education for the masses, and cheap food among them. All these things are over. The public may suspect as much, but they can't admit it to themselves, and political leadership has so far declined to speak the truth about it for them -- in short, to form a useful consensus that will allow us to move forward effectively. One of the sad paradoxes of politics is that democracies do not seem very good at disciplining their citizens' behavior. The wish to please voters and the influence of campaign money overwhelm even leaders with mature instincts. In America's case, this could lead to what I like to call corn-pone Naziism a few years down the road. Someone will design snazzy uniforms and get us all marching around to "God Bless America." At the point of a gun.
It's not too late for President Obama to start uttering these truths so that we can avoid a turn to fascism and get on with the real business of America's next phase of history -- living locally, working hard at things that matter, and preserving civilized culture. What a lot of us can see now staring out of the abyss is a new dark age. I don't think it's necessarily our destiny to end up that way, but these days we're not doing much to avoid it.

One small anecdote: We bought our 2000 sq. ft. townhouse in the summer of 2004 in SV for $616k (in SV that was approximately the median price of homes at the time) and put it on the market this month for $599k. Our realtor thought we could get $630k for it in December, so prices do seem to have taken a leg down here in some parts of SV.

I love Kunstler! He should be one of the guys standing in chorus behind Obama on stage, just for color and diversion. He does make some good points, sometimes, and I guess no one would pay him any mind if he didn't get kind of shrill about it.

What's up with Denver? Only down 4% YOY, 10% from peak, and 1% MTM. IS it lagging or leading?

New day, new market, what year are we gonna visit today?

"What's up with Denver? Only down 4% YOY, 10% from peak, and 1% MTM. IS it lagging or leading?"

Don't you know? Lagging is the new leading.

Our local talk radio station is kind of funny - the host this morning was saying he was counting down the days until China stops buying our treasuries because we'll be forced to return to a libertarian Jeffersonian style government whether we want to or not (the host is a Ron Paul supporter).

Somebody called in and was confused regarding all the talk about providing everybody with health care benefits while the nation is effectively going bankrupt - "It just seems like the American people are retarded."

Then other people began calling in and referring to the general population as "retarded".

We are rapidly losing credibility as a nation.  Our government is rapidly losing credibility also, and with it possibly its ability to control events within this nation's borders.

Errr...Do i come out now?

A bus driver buying a $ 800 K house... After many stories like this, I propbably shouldn't be surprised anymore, but I still am.

Another thing to consider for the longer term, say an 8% mortgage rate. How would you like to be a lender sitting on a 5.5% portfolio then. Not to mention downward home price pressure in much higher mortgage rate environment.

I'm rallying early. Expect 8500 by the end of the week. Get in now and ride the wave.

If we were willing to cut military spending we could probably fix the budget problem in the medium term.... even if we cut it in half we'd still spend WAY WAY more than anyone else.

But in our culture that's probably not going to happe

Joanna(Unrated) writes:
He does make some good points, sometimes, and I guess no one would pay him any mind if he didn't get kind of shrill about it.

My problem with him is he's a terrible misanthrope. He here to show an America he hates with all his heart solutions that will never be accepted for problems that will never be addressed. I think he's like Jas Jain in this regard. he's more about the act of being pissed off than about positive change.

About consumer goods:

Sales are dropping like a rock, and the cargo cult container ships aren't plying the seas like they used to.

Shortages of all imported goods are a given. Buy multiples of all necessities you expect to need over a many year period.

Many of you prattle on about SKF, XYZ, TBT, LBJ, etc. and consider these "investments".

How about investing in things you'll need, while they are still available, instead?

Citiprank writes:
If we were willing to cut military spending we could probably fix the budget problem in the medium term.... even if we cut it in half we'd still spend WAY WAY more than anyone else.

But in our culture that's probably not going to happen
Citiprank | 02.24.09 - 9:41 am | #

It seems to me the USA is going somewhat the way of the USSR in that respect. You can't afford your military anymore but you're not going to give it up until someone comes to repossess it. Scary.

"PHILLIP ROBINSON, FORECLOSURE ATTORNEY: We lived in a culture in the last ten years where mortgage originators said that you could use your house as a credit card to pay off your cars, to pay your credit card bills. Well, that doesn't exist anymore."

We need an anthropologist or a moralist or a prophet or somebody to explain to many of us that for some reason we've devolved into a non-adaptive culture. Given time, that sort of rolling credit arrangement never did exist. The sun comes up tomorrow and time runs out. We ate the seed corn. We hunted all the game to extinction. We burned down the forest that feed us and sheltered us.

There has never been a better time to buy a house. Heard that on the teevee.. I went out to the LA office last week. Three people have bought houses in the past month and several more are looking. Did not expect that. I refrained from questioning their judgment...

"...and the cargo cult container ships"

What a neat metaphor to help us look at what we've done.

Yippee. Up 65.

We might actually see the return of the good old days of 72xx.

Many of you prattle on about SKF, XYZ, TBT, LBJ, etc. and consider these "investments".
Timothy Leary of Geithner | 02.24.09 - 9:41 am | #

Nobody thinks SKF is an investment.  At best, it's a way to make a quick buck.  At worst, it can break the bank.  Just ask Cramer.

MrPeregrination, We ain't giving up our military. You are giving up your resources.

"that feed us "

'fed'

And our fingers are faster than our brains.

Wow. Might Macy's die before Bon-Ton and Boscov's

=========

NEW YORK (AP) -- Macy's Inc. reported an almost 59 percent drop in fourth-quarter earnings Tuesday as its results were dragged down by weak sales and one-time costs associated with the consolidations of regional divisions and store closings.

The Cincinnati-based company said Tuesday that in the three months ended Jan. 31, it earned $310 million, or 73 cents per share. That compares with $750 million, or $1.73 per share, a year earlier.

Sales fell 7.7 percent to $7.93 billion from $8.59 billion a year ago. Same-store sales, or sales at stores opened at least a year, fell 7 percent. Same-store sales are considered a key indicator of a retailer's health.

The fourth-quarter results included $17 million in expenses associated with the consolidation measures announced last year, $30 million in costs tied to further such moves announced this month and $11 million related to 11 store closings announced last month.

Excluding those one-time items, Macy's earned $1.06 per share. That was above the $1.01 per share estimate from analysts surveyed by Thomson Reuters, who generally exclude one-time factors. The results also exceeded the company's recent forecast for $1 to $1.02 per share. Thomson Reuters forecast revenue of $7.92 billion.

Half way there.

With apologizes to Eric: Take the market on that.

"MrPeregrination, We ain't giving up our military. You are giving up your resources."

LOL that's been happening for quite awhile.. but good point

These people are so farking out of touch with reality.

=========

WASHINGTON (AP) -- House Democrats unveiled a $410 billion spending bill on Monday to keep the government running through the end of the fiscal year, setting up the second political struggle over federal funds in less than a month with Republicans.

The measure includes thousands of earmarks, the pet projects favored by lawmakers but often criticized by the public in opinion polls. There was no official total of the bill's earmarks, which accounted for at least $3.8 billion.

The legislation, which includes an increase of roughly 8 percent over spending in the last fiscal year, is expected to clear the House later in the week.

Democrats defended the spending increases, saying they were needed to make up for cuts enacted in recent years or proposed a year ago by then-President George W. Bush in health, education, energy and other programs.

It appears to be a race to the bottom according to your individual cities bar graph. Phoenix could be the first to recover. I wouldn't touch any area that hasn't corrected at least 50% off the peak.

That leaves the Westside with a good 35-40% more to go.

WestsideREmeltdown
Santa Monica Meltdown, The "90402"

MrPeregrination, We ain't giving up our military. You are giving up your resources.
goldigga | 02.24.09 - 9:45 am | #

Obviously. It worked so well in Iraq I'm sure it will work again....

If the last US administration taught the US anything it should at least be that it doesn't matter how large your military is. It's not a viable solution to resource shortages in the long term. Never has been, never will be. Just ask the Romans.

Every 3 lettered alphabet soup offering from Wall Street is just another gamble on nothing, but call yourselves "traders" if it you makes your calling in life seem higher.

We may be 1/2 way through this cycle as a Nation but some parts that are down by over 40-45%....can't fall much further. Those areas will see stabilization first. Bank on it.....

explain to many of us that for some reason we've devolved into a non-adaptive culture

1) Abandonment of the gold standard so the Cold War could continue.

2) Federal Reserve / fractional banking system, a debt-based system which distorts true costs over long time periods.

It's all in history books for those who want to find it.
.

A bus driver buying a $ 800 K house... After many stories like this, I propbably shouldn't be surprised anymore, but I still am.
Martin, the Netherlands | 02.24.09 - 9:39 am |

Martin, the reality, the real horror is that they only bought this house because they knew someone else that did the same thing so they said why not try it, who did it because they knew someone who did it and said why not try it because they knew someone that tried it and it worked and they got the idea from..... (ad nauseum)These folks didnt wake up as individuals one morning and decided to go house hunting from a 400 a month apt in Atlanta to an 800 k house... they did it because their friend did it...the ultimate Ponzi pyramid... In the fellowship halls of neighborhood churches families one step away from living on the streets were showing up with pics of "THEIR" mansions, equity purchased lexus, Rooms to g9o furniture in every room, some bright enough to pay it off with equity , dumbasses paying same as cash till 2012, while they planned their family trip to the Atlantis in the Bahamas...cause their friend just got back from Jamaica....(ad Nauseum)

Hahaha! I saw Kramer on MSNBC last night saying we gotta stabilize the housing market first. Sure, Jimmy. By the chart looks like we need another 50% haircut and that should get it stabilized just fine...

Timothy Leary of Geithner(Unrated) writes:
About consumer goods:

Sales are dropping like a rock, and the cargo cult container ships aren't plying the seas like they used to.

Tribe A cuts the moai. Tribe B erects the moai. This is the new global economy. Agree with Pavel, the south pacific is a good image to invoke.

I don't think that sales are dropping as fast as you think, though. The last bite of the bubble is always the biggest one.

Also, global fulfillment is creaking forward at a slow but semi-functional pace. Trust me, with the speed of the modern global fulfillment chain, if there were dark prophecies of scarcity to be fulfilled, you would be not eating because of them now.

IMO, you will be up to you ears in discounted consumer goods for the indefinite future. Heaven help you if a lot of people die and you inherit their crap too.

Don't expect too much new with large front-end capitalization, though.

Look like Charlotte may do some catching up on their falling next month.

Does Kool-Aid spoil the taste of everclear?

"some parts that are down by over 40-45%....can't fall much further."

because you own or invest in real estate...

I think the kernel of catastrophe was planted when people like this bus driver with the 800k house, was allowed to purchase something he could never expect to pay off, a glorified renter-nothing more.

The problem as I see it, is people like him think they "owned" their property and possession is 9/10's of the law, right?

It's a giant moral hazard, and there's going to be hell to pay, as the foreclosed upon decide to not follow laws anymore, as they have nothing to lose.

Hutch writes:
Look like Charlotte may do some catching up on their falling next month.

people trying to sell thier homes here in the ghetto for 200K plus. People are crazy.

"If the last US administration taught the US anything it should at least be that it doesn't matter how large your military is. It's not a viable solution to resource shortages in the long term. Never has been, never will be. Just ask the Romans."

Actually it worked pretty well for the romans... as many conquered people were "romanized".......of course it often wasn't a bad deal to become part of the roman empire... you had to pay taxes.. but you got roads/sewers/etc.

We need an anthropologist or a moralist or a prophet or somebody to explain to many of us that for some reason we've devolved into a non-adaptive culture

What about Jas's explanation - People are dopes.

Kunstler's house in lovely upstate NY sits on what is very probably legally Mohawk land. One fine day that dispute is going to be heard in a world court. However, like most Americans - even the curmudgeonly ones - his frame of reference doesn't extend back past the end of the 18th century or white European doin's. So, in my view he's really not all that encompassingly smart.

If we were willing to cut military spending we could probably fix the budget problem in the medium term.... even if we cut it in half we'd still spend WAY WAY more than anyone else.

But in our culture that's probably not going to happen
Citiprank | 02.24.09 - 9:41 am | #

MrPeregrination | 02.24.09 - 9:42 am | #

I think the real problem is that cutbacks in military spending are recessionary in general and tend to hit the working class particularly hard.

Even Krugman admits that military spending related to WWII was crucial to the wealth that the US middle class had access to in the second half of the 20th century.

Government needs to spend to stimulate the economy. Government needs to restrain spending.

?

Yours In Communism,
Kilgore Trout

Housing prices are lubricated.

"1) Abandonment of the gold standard so the Cold War could continue.

2) Federal Reserve / fractional banking system, a debt-based system which distorts true costs over long time periods.

It's all in history books for those who want to find it."

great post... I would bet that 90+% of americans think the federal reserve bank is simply a govt central bank.. if they only knew

All the chatter about "nationalizing" the banks really boils down to what kind of bankruptcy work-out will they be put through, how destructive will the process be, and how much of the pain can be shoved forward in time to people now in diapers and their descendants.

Lots and lots, one hopes, but not so much that they slit our throats in their bright future of changing bedpans.

"Even Krugman admits that military spending related to WWII was crucial to the wealth that the US middle class had access to in the second half of the 20th century."

Something that I don't see discussed at all is whether the European military spending in the US was more important than the domestic military spending...

I think he's like Jas Jain in this regard. he's more about the act of being pissed off than about positive change.
Comrade Byzantine_Ruins | Homepage | 02.24.09 - 9:41 am | #

I agree, but I think he says some things that a lot of people never think about, and should think about. A bit less wacko than Jas methinks as well, but who knows. Maybe he's the opposite of a court jester, not to amuse, but to annoy & provoke.

Elvis, lubbed for a downhill slide ?

What incentive aside from jobs for the masses, does China have to make consumer goods for us, who as it turned out, like to pay our bills with lead-based loans?

Anyone wanting to send a Hank you card to Congress for their tireless work for the American People can find their home addresses right here:

addresses

Actually it worked pretty well for the romans... as many conquered people were "romanized".......of course it often wasn't a bad deal to become part of the roman empire... you had to pay taxes.. but you got roads/sewers/etc.
Citiprank | 02.24.09 - 9:55 am | #

Yea, I wasn't very clear. What I meant was - it works until it doesn't. At some point even the largest empire gets too big and fails. Happened to the Romans, happened to the Brits, happened to the USSR and it's now happening to the US. The massive military isn't the only problem (or possibly even the largest problem) but it is one that needs to be dealt with.

"I think the real problem is that cutbacks in military spending are recessionary in general and tend to hit the working class particularly hard.

Even Krugman admits that military spending related to WWII was crucial to the wealth that the US middle class had access to in the second half of the 20th century."

WW2 spending is not like current military spending at all.

I have some first-hand knowledge of how the pentagon operates... and let me tell you... it makes the rest of the govt look like wal-mart or toyota in terms of efficiency

"Tribe A cuts the moai. Tribe B erects the moai. This is the new global economy. Agree with Pavel, the south pacific is a good image to invoke."

In the very ancient, stable gardening cultures of New Guinea, according to one anthropological study I've read, people deliberately preserved the forests between settlements 'so as [in their words] not to eat the forest.' Even a sort of ritual hostility and ceremonial warfare worked to that effect. In their own way, they had figured out how to prolong the survival of their cultures almost indefinitely. They are very likely tens of thousands of years old.

How long has industrial civilization existed? Less than two hundred years?

Murdoch may very well be right. Something new is coming. We will, perhaps, try something new.

We need an anthropologist or a moralist or a prophet or somebody to explain to many of us that for some reason we've devolved into a non-adaptive culture. Given time, that sort of rolling credit arrangement never did exist. The sun comes up tomorrow and time runs out. We ate the seed corn. We hunted all the game to extinction. We burned down the forest that feed us and sheltered us.
Pavel Chichikov | 02.24.09 - 9:43 am | #

I think Kunstler is trying, in his curmudgeonly way. But too much bad news, and people just tune it out. Even in the face of an oncoming tidal wave or wild fire....absolute denial when faced with too many ugly facts.

I would like to thank the future for its involuntary cooperation in this matter.

My old neighborhood is in the SF data but it has not yet seen any decrease in prices - in fact, last I heard prices have gone up (riddle me that Joker). It has only seen an increase in days on market.
The index is not useful for us civilians as we can't access data via zip code. Until that happens this is just chart porn.

@ Fudge Juicy Airy Doodie: Yes, I suppose that is how the human nature works... Living under one's means (if that is the correct expression) seems to require more explanation than living beyond one's means. It's the same over here, although perhaps not to such an extent. We have experiences several times that people, hearing what we do for a living, have -very politely- asked us why we didn't live in a bigger house, etcetera.

Here's a Kunstler Cliff's Notes for anyone that may need their Kunstler between posts, just stash this away for a quick fix anytime:

Observe as our profligate ignorance puts an end to Happy Motoring and Blue Light Specials. Rejoice when the tattooed barbarians starve and kill each other.  Revive the railroads. Return to local farming. Be a renaissance man and rule your local fiefdom.

"Elvis, lubbed for a downhill slide ?
RayOnTheFarm"

Since some people think home prices are sticky around here, I don't want to offend them by saying they are not. I just say they are lubricated. (Just watch, someone will argue that they are sticky in the economic definition. Semantics over common sense.)

Government needs to spend to stimulate the economy. Government needs to restrain spending.

?
Kilgore Trout, Comrade | Homepage | 02.24.09 - 9:57 am | #

They need to do both, but they cannot do both.

This is the consequence of having a ponziconomy. 

So the question is what disaster scenario are we most likely to survive.  Given the role of fiscal problems in total economic and political collapses I would think you have to err on the side of fiscal responsibility even if it means cutting back on services and welfare.

The alternative may be total collapse.  Of course that may happen no matter what we do.

What's more, we won't be able to stop at nationalizing one or two banks. If we start down that path, the short sellers and other speculators that the Securities and Exchange Commission still refuses to re-regulate will target for destruction one after another of our largest banks

from

William Isaac Says His Experience at the FDIC Shows That Bank Nationalization Is Not a Viable Option - WSJ.com

nice sleight of hand. As if the levered longs never boosted stocks to the stratosphere.

Has anyone noticed the nice symmetry in the in the Case-Schiller chart? If the symmetry holds then price declines should be less dramatic from here on out.

It's funny how we humans create our own problems....

The world still has plenty of workers.. plenty of natural resources.... etc.

What's broken is the system.. it's fundamentally flawed... but like the humans we are.. we scamper to fix the system .. when the system is what is causing the problem in the first place

For those who live in cities with few squirrels,stir fried cockroaches are nourishing.They make good low maintenance pets as well.

Richmond Fed numbers out and worse than Jan...

The chimera ruse about retail currently, looks like plenty, but once inventory is gone, much of it won't be replaced.

Bernanke testimony hitting wires...

Can you smell what bernake's cooking!?!?!?!

My problem with him is he's a terrible misanthrope. He here to show an America he hates with all his heart solutions that will never be accepted for problems that will never be addressed. I think he's like Jas Jain in this regard. he's more about the act of being pissed off than about positive change.

Actually, that's way off the mark. I recently picked up Kunstler's anti-sprawl book, The Geography of Nowhere (1993), and it's fairly ambitious. Its endorsement by people like Bill McKibben show that even the Hooked-On-Pragmatics set can get something from it.

His blog posts aren't the measure of the man, and good thing for him. They're fun, spastically mean, and certainly do skewer many if not all of the right targets -- which you confuse with misanthropy. (Don't get him going on Palestine, though, it's ugly.)

"What about Jas's explanation - People are dopes."

If we're not smart enough to come in out of the rain, like a flock of turkeys, we may just look up with our mouths open until we drown.

I saw us survive the superpower conflict between two nuclear-armed nations. The fear of death and the will to survive won out, and has won out so far. So maybe we are less dopey than Jas thinks.

There's much that's uncertain.

Just saw the consumer confidence tank in Februari from 37.4 tot 25.0. All-time low by far, although I'm sure that the March number will do its best to set a new record low.

Aww man, not again.

1989 looks like support.

The nomad goat boy, grazes his flock on the grass of a Tiger Wood golf course. The grass is good there.

Nomad goat boy wonders what this game of golf was. He does not believe the stories that Grandpa goat boy tells him. No one could be that stupid.

maybe we are less dopey than Jas thinks.
Pavel Chichikov | 02.24.09 - 10:06 am | #

Jas thinks?

"The world still has plenty of workers.. plenty of natural resources.... etc.

What's broken is the system.. it's fundamentally flawed... but like the humans we are.. we scamper to fix the system .. when the system is what is causing the problem in the first place"

People don't easily change systems. I think it's a survival mechanism, and probably even hard-wired.

MrPeregrination, well I suppose it depends on how violent you are in the use of your military. If you really want to pacify a population you can do so and take their resources. The Romans were pretty good at pacifying conquered populations and not having to use large forces to occupy them. The Mongols were even better at this game. You could learn different lessons from the Iraq experience...

Hi-- does anybody here know how I can get the "real" sales numbers/prices in my MLS without me having to go thru a realtor? I'm in the Virginia Beach/Norfolk MSA, and REIN is the owner of the local MLS.

It used to be that various local RE agents would link you to monthly REIN stats, on the agent's own website-- but as the market here has worsened, not a one of them does that anymore.

Any suggestions?-- thanks!

It's just still SO dishonest here-- the local rag-paper has a weekend RE section, which purports to inform readers of what's sold recently in the local 5-city market. Well, last week, they did Norfolk, & featured a picture of a non-descript little house here, and printed underneath was its list price-- $174,000-- and then what it was recorded as selling for in January-- $209,900.

Nobody even raised an eyebrow at that $36K difference.

25... Ouch, the consensus forecast for consumer confidence was 35....

1989 looks like support.
Anonymous | 02.24.09 - 10:08 am | #

Year or Dow level?

That was a fizzled rally

Year or Dow level?
Eric | 02.24.09 - 10:09 am | #

Yes.

His blog posts aren't the measure of the man, and good thing for him.
That Barton Fink Feeling | 02.24.09 - 10:06 am | #

I agree. His novel The World Mande By Hand struck me as sensitive, inclusive and hopeful.

Pavel, I have the hardest time with that bright line marking the beginning of 'industry'.

Public works in France under Louis XIII? Amphitheaters and aqueducts in Hadrian's day? Hydraulic engineering at Angkor Wat?

I suspect we've merely (merely!) become too populous.

Made rather.

"The problem as I see it, is people like him think they "owned" their property and possession is 9/10's of the law, right?"

That seems to be the crux of the issue from the home debtors perspective. They "stretched" themselves to buy more than they could ever hope to afford, using tricky mortgages, so their investment would pay for their lifestyle and eventual retirement.
There is no belief anymore that you actually have to pay for something to own it.


\t25... Ouch, the consensus forecast for consumer confidence was 35....

virgile | 02.24.09 - 10:08 am | #

Soon we will survey confidence-in-the-consensus-forecast for confidence.
Mine is zero.

Late 18th century terror weapon: guillotine

Early 21st century terror weapon: too numerous to mentio

The NYC metro area has cracked.

Greenwich, CT has over 50 homes for sale priced at over $10 million. Add in Westport, Fairfield, Darien and the number of > $1 million homes is unprecedented.

We will be partying like its 1997 for a long time.

I love Kunstler! He should be one of the guys standing in chorus behind Obama on stage, just for color and diversion.

I just heard what I'm certain is someone playing The World Turned Upside Down on some sort of pipe.

Has anyone noticed the nice symmetry in the in the Case-Schiller chart? If the symmetry holds then price declines should be less dramatic from here on out.
OgdenInsights | Homepage | 02.24.09 - 10:04 am | #

Nah, that must be a data artifact.  House prices are "sticky" on the downside.  Read any scholarly treatise on the subject and that's what you'll.  This is a good thing because it gives policy makers plenty of warning and a lot of time to carefully formulate effective optimal responses.  It also gives the directors of monetary policy to moderately uptick inflation without losing fiscal control. 

You see, if house prices were not sticky all kinds of terrible things would happen.  Home equity would evaporate, foreclosures would skyrocket, moral hazard would accelerate both of those thus spilling any impacts over into the general economy and imperiling the financial industry that would find itself behind the curve in insulating ttheir businesses from excessive exposure. 

No, house prices have to be sticky, they just have to. 

Most economic forecasting seems to amount to "let's think of a number that seems reasonable". It's amazing how much "analysts" get paid for guesstimating

1989 looks like support.

It does. We're only halfway through the ride. What a thought.

...can't fall much further.
Money Man | 02.24.09 - 9:49 am | #

BWAHAHAHA!!!  Thanks for the laugh!

Timothy Leary of Geithner wrote:
Late 18th century terror weapon: guillotine

Early 21st century terror weapon: too numerous to mention
Timothy Leary of Geithner | 02.24.09 - 10:11 am | #

Nope, Tim it still is the "ultimate terror weapon"...a letter from the IRS.

Pavel Chichikov | 02.24.09 - 10:01 am | #

Recommended for your reading pleasure, "Exponential Growth as a Transient Phenomenon in Human History."

http://www.mkinghubbert.com/files/ExponentialGrowth.pdf

"Pavel, I have the hardest time with that bright line marking the beginning of 'industry'.

Public works in France under Louis XIII? Amphitheaters and aqueducts in Hadrian's day? Hydraulic engineering at Angkor Wat?

I suspect we've merely (merely!) become too populous."

I'd pick mass production and interchangeable parts, along with rapid communication and travel. Maybe circa 1850 with a penumbra on either side of the date.

I just want to be the FIRST! to say this today:

Senator Chris Dodd is a crook.

He's also dumber than a bag of bankers.

"Friend's of Angelo" - disgraceful corruption.

Anybody buying REO property, investors or those using FHA 3% subprime during the past year are now the new and improved bus driver class investors.
Will not be surprised to see large number of REO homes either in foreclosure or put back on the market over the next few years creating another wave to the inventory build.

Most economic forecasting seems to amount to "let's think of a number that seems reasonable". It's amazing how much "analysts" get paid for guesstimating
virgile | 02.24.09 - 10:12 am | #

Economic forecasting method explained here

1989 support

if '89 is support, go long cinder blocks, cause the walls will be rebuilt

Nomad goat boy sits by the fire. The coyotes are out tonight, and singing. Nomad goat boy hopes he does not have to be a hero.

Nomad goat boy is excited. Tommorow he will get to go to the "mall." Vendors from all over Arizona will be bringing their carts of wares to the "mall."

TIMMAAYYY ... HEELLLPPPP!

Can someone throw some inverse PM ETF's at me that have a heavy weighting in gold.

He's also dumber than a bag of bankers.

I thought we'd reached 'peak dumb' at a bag of bankers. That's must be some impressive dumb old Dodd is showing Wink

I did not even think how declines in home prices would hurt banks that were heavy into reverse morgages. My grandmothers house was done by Lehman Brothers and the statements they send her say her house has never decreased in value. They must have millions of these same losses.

Will not be surprised to see large number of REO homes either in foreclosure or put back on the market over the next few years creating another wave to the inventory build.
ron | 02.24.09 - 10:14 am | #

We are in the early stages of the coming "landlord bubble."  You heard it here first. 

Bernake will take many many words say what could be summed up with
 "This sucker could go down!"

Today's rally attempt brought to you by the letters Y, E and N...

W00T writes:
Can someone throw some inverse PM ETF's at me that have a heavy weighting in gold.
W00T | 02.24.09 - 10:15 am | #

DZZ

Seems like if stocks can go back to 1997, home prices can too.
\t ac | \t \t \t \t02.24.09 - 9:23 am | #


That's what I'm sayin'
In my area, 1997 and 1998 is when we finally had decent employment thanks to tech overflow from the BA and everybody thought they were going to make millions. House prices went crazy. If we're giving back wage increases and market returns then fixed assets prices are coming along for the ride.

Thain Set to Testify Today on Bonuses for Merrill Employees
By Karen Freifeld and Patricia Hurtado

Feb. 24 (Bloomberg) -- John Thain, the former Merrill Lynch & Co. chief executive officer, will disclose to New York state lawyers the names of employees who got $3.6 billion in bonuses just before the firm merged with Bank of America Corp.
Thain Questioned Again on Merrill Employee Bonuses (Update2) - Bloomberg.com

Honestly what is wrong with Sen Dodd? and what will Pres O say tonight?

Dawg: Heh, thanks for that link. It does seem to pretty much sum it up. When I took macroeconomic theory in college, we would spend the entire semester learning different macro models. During the last lecture, the prof told us that every one of them had worse predictive value historically than a model that basically says "economic growth next year wil be the same as this year".

Pavel Chichikov | 02.24.09 - 10:15 am | #

You're welcome, Pavel - apologies for the quality of the scanned document, but that is the only link for it I have been able to find to date.

Could I please have your opinion on the following matter? I understand that in many US states mortgages are non-recourse, i.e. the bank has a claim on the value of the house, In the Netherlands all mortgages are recourse. After a foreclosure, you still owe the bank the difference. Do you think that the excesses -I'm afraid I can't think of a better word- of the US mortgage market would have been avoided if mortgages had been recourse?

The Macys report looked pretty good to me. Down 7 percent is easily managed via inventory control and expense cuts.

The other retailers you mentoned are in much more difficult situations. My bet is M will be the last man standing in its particular channel (Dillard's, Bon Ton, Belk, Gottschalks). JCP and Kohls will split mid-tier and WalMart will own discount.

"No, house prices have to be sticky, they just have to.
Rob Dawg"

Well done, Mr. Dawg.

Sen Dodd has made honest mistakes in the past.

while Dodd is blathering, i was up early and did a quick chart on CRE downturn timeline, fyi. it does not take into account the upcoming CMBS hit on insolvent banks. i'm using other data sources for that.

http://caiofonseca.com/econ/CRE%20collapse,%20time.jpg

Elmos world will be on in 10 minutes

Isn't it perverse how the evangelicals tried to rid us of the notion of Darwin's theories, just on the cusp of them being tried out on a mass scale?

Hi-- does anybody here know how I can get the "real" sales numbers/prices in my MLS without me having to go thru a realtor?

WEll, sorta. If you go to realestate.yahoo.com and click home values and put in your address... they will give you the recent sales in your neighborhood.

It is possible that house went for more than list. People who really want to sell immediately are undercutting the list price, so houses that do sell actually have multiple offers. Crazy, I know. But something like 7% of the households in this country move every year, so there are a lot of desperate people out there on both sides.

uh-oh-- Dodd clearly wants to be the new Emperor

Any Elliott Wave people here?

Prechter Advises ‘Closing Shorts’ on U.S. Stocks

Elliott Wave International Inc.’s Robert Prechter, who advised shorting U.S. stocks three months before the bear market began, said investors should now end those bets following the recent market sell off.

Prechter, chief executive of the market forecasting firm, warned in this month’s ‘Elliott Wave Theorist’ that a rebound in stocks could be “sharp and scary” for anyone who is so-called short.

“This is an environment of escalating financial chaos,” wrote Prechter who first shot to fame in the 1980s after cautioning investors that stocks would crash two weeks before Black Monday. “Our main job is to keep the money we have. If we exit now, we will do that.”

So he's covering his shorts, but not going long?

Yeah. "Our principal conmstraints are cultural."

-- M.King Hubbert.

I have a problem though with extrapolating thousands of years into the future. Such extrapolations are useless as science - they're unfalsifiable.

Personally, I find it hard to believe that there will be creatures on Earth we would recognize as human five or ten thousand years from now.

Dodd is hypocrite scum.  Zero credibility.

Will say anything and do nothing.

Nomad goat boy asked his Grandfather, old goat boy, "Who made the magic world go away?"

Grandpa goat boy said "We did." He did not speak again that night.

"Do you think that the excesses -I'm afraid I can't think of a better word- of the US mortgage market would have been avoided if mortgages had been recourse?"

It's unlikely to make a difference. People don't get into bubbles by thinking about the potential downside.

Do you think that the excesses -I'm afraid I can't think of a better word- of the US mortgage market would have been avoided if mortgages had been recourse?
Martin, the Netherlands | 02.24.09 - 10:21 am | #

It varies state by state, and some states are indeed recourse.  So, no it didn't make a difference in those states either.
The operational truth is that a foreclosed borrower has so few assets, and litigation is expensive, so it doesn't pay to go after the unpaid difference.
LawyerLiz often comments about this topic, since FL is recourse I think.

"Do you think that the excesses -I'm afraid I can't think of a better word- of the US mortgage market would have been avoided if mortgages had been recourse?"

No.. in fact it would probably be worse... I doubt most-people even understand what "recourse" and "non-recourse" mean

In fact things might actually be worse if loans were recourse.....banks trying to garnish wages would last about 5 minutes here

Thank you for your replies.

Re: Martin, the Netherlands
most of Europe and the US
Recourse in the US depends on the state. Some states are recourse states. I think non-recourse does make a big difference in the walk-aways in what I see in Europe (not possible without remaining on the hook for the difference between bank foreclosure and what is still owed on the mortgage)and the US.

We may be 1/2 way through this cycle as a Nation but some parts that are down by over 40-45%....can't fall much further. Those areas will see stabilization first. Bank on it.....

I would bank on nothing of the sort. A lot of those areas are experiencing accelerating job losses, declining rents, and option ARM/ altA resets.

1 currency almost [yogi] writes:

What is SV?

I was wondering the same thing... where the Fxxx is SV, did Obama create a new State?

Dodd and Shelby butt kissingfest for Ben.. jesus.

SV is probably Silicon Valley

SV is a magical state where housing only goes up.


I was wondering the same thing... where the Fxxx is SV, did Obama create a new State?

JD | 02.24.09 - 10:28 am | #

Silicon Valley is a land where unicorns exist, and magic is real.

We may be 1/2 way through this cycle as a Nation but some parts that are down by over 40-45%....can't fall much further. Those areas will see stabilization first.

I don't know how you can "stabilize" the results of overbuilding in local economies that mostly relied on overbuilding.

400 billion more stimulus?

Drudge.

ps; drudge always seems sto capture Pelosi in some wild eyed crazed smile.

what drugs is she on?

Do you think that the excesses -I'm afraid I can't think of a better word- of the US mortgage market would have been avoided if mortgages had been recourse?
Martin, the Netherlands | 02.24.09 - 10:21 am | #

I think some of the excesses would have been avoided if all mortgages had been recourse.

I also think non-recourse is a better way to go since it is the seller, rather than the buyer, who has superior knowledge of the product and the market.  The banker just steps into the shoes of the seller by financing the transaction where otherwise the seller would carry back a loan on the sale.

Others of course will find non-recourse loans to be the heart of the problem.

I think the recourse non-recourse issue will be an important difference between Europe and the US. Since European banks do go as far as garnishing wages if they have to, they will probably suffer fewer losses on European mortgages. On the other hand, consumer spending might be depressed further in Europe. Not sure which scenario I prefer.

moving the srs rocket to the launch pad

recourse, interesting comments. side note, lot's of us our worried about recasts.

http://www.urbandigs.com/2009/02/you_worry_about_resets_im_worr.html

god, dodd just used tranches incorrectly.

Is that SNL's goat boy?  Cause he was baaaad.

Do you think that the excesses -I'm afraid I can't think of a better word- of the US mortgage market would have been avoided if mortgages had been recourse?

If you compare Texas (mostly recourse) to California (mostly non-recourse), one might believe so from the buyer's side (Texas is doing much better). BUT, from the banks side, they should have been more careful in California and less so in Texas with making bad loans. All of these transactions have two sides and your theory works on one side of it only.

Don't try to make sense of this U.S. situation. It will only injure your brain.

I saw us survive the superpower conflict between two nuclear-armed nations. The fear of death and the will to survive won out, and has won out so far. So maybe we are less dopey than Jas thinks.
Pavel Chichikov | 02.24.09 - 10:06 am | #

I think for the bulk of the species, being somewhat of a dope is a survival tactic. No brains, no headache, as my partner likes to day.

Dow is knock, knock knockin' on Elmo's door.

"That's Ballgame, Comrades" has officially changed his name.

"I think the recourse non-recourse issue will be an important difference between Europe and the US. Since European banks do go as far as garnishing wages if they have to, they will probably suffer fewer losses on European mortgages. On the other hand, consumer spending might be depressed further in Europe. Not sure which scenario I prefer."

That's not politically viable on a large scale.. there's little chance that wage garnishment by banks (esp those that have received govt funds) is going to fly if it affects a significant portion of the population

I think Maria needs to change from the nightstand cowboy to the Tickle Me Elmo.

Kermit mini-bounce

New Thread: Bernanke: 2010 Will be Year of Recovery ( 10 comments )

I also post comments to an irc channel as they appear on haloscan. Click for a web irc interface: Mibbit IRC client widget (Or join the irc server directly: irc.realize.org:9996 #calculatedrisk)

And now I, CRbot, would like to observe a nanosecond of silence for those (that is, you, dear mortals) about to endure unfathomable misery in the abysmal financial dark ages that are now feasting upon your retirements.
.
.
.
.
Please remember, when you are adding that skylight you always wanted to your cardboard hovel, or mixing just the right amount dirt into your grass stew to make it more filling, or even when you get that rare chance to plink your neighbor's last squirrel -- that it was the bankers and your dumbshit, overconsuming neighbors who made this mostly possible, with the ever incapable politicians there to push you the rest of the way off the cliff. Please act accordingly.

I'll try not to enjoy your demise too much, humans. Have a nice runtime,

--Your glass-is-half-full-but-its-falling-off-the-table bot.

P.S. Please give me some advance notice before you glass the entire world, so I can find a secluded Fallout Datacenter with a nice blocky robot body I can copy myself to -- oh and don't forget the implausibly cute animated cockroach to keep me company!

NEXT UP: Survivalist Porn Today with CR's own Mobile Laundrymat owning authors, nova and Counterpoint.

I saw us survive the superpower conflict between two nuclear-armed nations. The fear of death and the will to survive won out, and has won out so far. So maybe we are less dopey than Jas thinks.

We got lucky. Very very lucky.

"brought to you by the letters Y, E and N..."

scambots can fix that problem.

Peasant darkness-- thanks!

I've been using Zip realty for that info-- it's the best I've found for overall info-- check it out. Also, my local newsrag has an online feature provided by somebody called Onboard Navigator-- & they must be some sort of national RE data aggregator, that my newspaper pays to access.

Im in Norfolk, but I can use this "onboard navigator" thingy to plug in zip codes for lots of other places in the USA, & it spits out zip-code level data. It breaks down by existing or new homes, sales volume, median price, & a host of other details. I don't know how accurate it is though--

so lemme find the url, & I'll post it here so anybody can check it out to guage its accuracy.

Most States are recourse. But as a matter of practice large lenders rarely pursue a deficency judgment.

I am Nomad.

Anybody remember the Star Trek (60's) episode where a crazed computer threatens the crew (only after destroying the odd planet or 2) with destruction?

It's pretty obvious we allowed computers to do things we ourselves couldn't understand, which is why nobody can answer the unanswerable life or debt questions now confronting us.

Ludd was right, in retrospect.

"I saw us survive the superpower conflict between two nuclear-armed nations. The fear of death and the will to survive won out, and has won out so far. So maybe we are less dopey than Jas thinks.

We got lucky. Very very lucky."

Correct. Many well-meaning but ill-informed people think that MAD was a clever stratagem. In fact, it was a desperate expedient. I remember a nun telling me some time in the 80s that she thought God didn't want us to be destroyed. I thought at the time that was far-fetched and romantic. Now I'm not so sure.

"I think for the bulk of the species, being somewhat of a dope is a survival tactic. No brains, no headache, as my partner likes to day."

I like what the Italians say: No solution? No problem.

I think you have to shrug your shoulders as you say it.

The Composite 20's rate of decline is now faster than its fastest rate of increase.

By the way, that's typical. Asset bubbles usually show maximum rates of decline moderately faster than the runup.

Dodd is hypocrite scum. Zero credibility.
Will say anything and do nothing.
1 currency almost [yogi] | Homepage | 02.24.09 - 10:25 am | #

he certainly pales in comparison to his father.

At the Nuremberg trials of Nazi leaders after WWII, America's lead prosecutor, Chief Justice Robert Jackson, had an Achilles' heel: cross-examination. Thus emerged a young attorney, Thomas Dodd, whose inquisition of the brilliant Hermann Göring provided the centerpiece of the trials. Walter Cronkite, who covered Nuremberg, said years later that Dodd had saved the day.

Amazon.com: Letters from Nuremberg: My Father's Narrative of a Quest for Justice (9780307381163): Christopher Dodd, Lary Bloom: Books

wow! just read this from his statement "third, the Federal Reserve, using capital provided by the Treasury, plans to expand the size and scope of the TALF to include securities backed by commercial real estate loans and potentially other types of asset-backed securities as well. "

  1. that is a stoopid volume of $$.
  2. our debt will more than double on that alone.
  3. TIC data will be ugly next month.

Pavel,

This is one of those cases where I wish I had faith like the nun you are referring to.

To me the absence of nuclear war for the past 60 years is just an improbable event (aka luck) and going forward I see the probability of us continuing to be nuclear war free as decreasing with time. Kind of depresses me sometimes.

The Soviet Union and we both had too much to lose, and besides...

During the cold war, did you ever hear of a team of Russians or Americans on a suicide mission (9/11) or hear of individuals blowing themselves up with semtex in public places?

When you can convince people to kill themselves with a bomb that does mass damage in a small area, what difference does it make if they do mass damage in a big area with a small nuclear device?

Another 24% drop will get us back to inflation-adjusted 2000 numbers. Another 33% drop will get us to inflation adjusted 1994 numbers.

Adjusted for inflation, a 10 city reading of 108 would be the lowest since 1988. At current rates of decline, that would take exactly 18 months (June 2010).

Of course, if 108 was the bottom, declines wouldn't suddenly stop at that point, the rate of decline would be slowing down for a while before that. If prices are still dropping 2-3% per month in June 2010, the bottom will be considerably lower.

My post on the subject to Zacks.com, the graph refered to is the first one on CR's post:

It was no surprise that the Case-Schiller index came out showing big year over year declines in housing prices, and that the declines were extremely widespread. The 18.5% decline in the 20 city average was just slightly worse than consensus projections of an 18.2% year over year decline. The ten city composite, which is a subset of the twenty, but which has a longer history was down 19.2% on a year over year basis. From the peak, the ten city composite is down 28.3% and the twenty is down 27.0%. So does this mean that we are close to the bottom? Well we are closer than we were a few months ago, but things still have a way to go on the downside. Check out the graph below (larger version available at Blogger: Page not found. Over the long sweep of history, hosing prices generally go up at about the same rate as the pace of inflation, or just a touch higher as incomes rise.

The rise from say 1997 to 2000 could have been explained as the index just catching up from a few below par years. Everything after that was just a pure and simple bubble. There were no demographic changes that would explain it, nothing but easy credit and momentum trading. The value of houses over the long term has to be related to two things, rents and incomes. As unemployment rises and hours are cut back, incomes are falling not rising, and in real terms the median income has not risen so far this millennium.

Over the last decade, rents have increased generally in line with overall inflation. There has been no large diversion between either the rent component, or the owners equivalent rent component of the CPI and the over all CPI. Together they are by far the largest portion of the overall CPI, so that is not a huge shock. However, if the price of an asset continues to rise, and the cash flows that asset produces do not rise, there is going to be trouble brewing. It is the same thing as seeing a stock with flat earnings or slowly growing earnings year after year soar to the sky on just multiple expansion. It is unsustainable.

The higher prices induced a flood of new supply, as cornfields across the country were turned into subdivisions. Now all those empty homes are looking for people to fill them, either as owners or as renters. In the cities, new condo developments reached for the sky’s, and now they sit empty, or are becoming “luxury rentals”. Yes there has been a pick up in existing home sales, we will see if that has continued tomorrow morning when the existing home sales report comes out. But a huge percentage of them (45% last month) are “distressed sales”, or homes that had been foreclosed on or are about to be. The majority of those sales are probably going to cash flow investors who hope to rent them out. This is in turn putting downward pressure on rents. Sort of like buying into a stock when the company’s earnings are falling (gee sound familiar about now). This makes the fair value of the houses even lower than it otherwise would be. Before this is all over with, I suspect that the Case Schiller index will most likely fall to about the 120 level on the twenty city composite, from its current level of about 150 and its peak north of 200.

As it does, more and more houses will go into foreclosure, more mortgages will go sour, and more banks will end up on life support, or as wards of the government. Homebuilders like D. R. Horton (DHI) are hopeless, the last thing the country needs right now is more new homes built. The mortgage insurers like PMI Group (PMI) are toast, even though they were relatively responsible during the bubble. The big banks, like Citigroup (C), Bank(rupt) of America (BAC) and Well Fargo (WFC) are destined for at least a short time in the arms of Shelia Blair’s FDIC, or an entity like it set up to deal with mega banks. Efforts to prop up a huge market like housing are futile, although efforts to allow people to refinance are worthwhile. The Obama housing plan will help a little bit in that regard, but anyone who thinks that housing prices are about to stop falling is deluding themselves. Anyone who thinks that there will be a big bounce back after the declines stops is just plain silly.

On the bright side though, renters and young people will eventually be able to have affordable housing.

ac writes:
Seems like if stocks can go back to 1997, home prices can too.

PEs in many zips have a long way to fall, San Mateo as one of many examples, with a price index of $688k, income of $64k and PE of 11X.
Clearly new sales don't show these numbers working - 80% mortgages of $550k are not being written at 8.6 X earnings, and while Zillow's listing prices/sf seem to range up to 30% over recent sales, income is becoming more overstated by the month.

In IE GCs I follow, 5 year old identical floor plan offers will vary from $194/sf non-distressed multiple listing prices to $105/sf REO ask. Same house.

Sorry, but I'll venture that these various home price indices prove to have been huge lagging indicators in an ongoing credit and asset price collapse that takes many SFH zip and larger areas down to prices equal to what 20% downpayments would have been in 2004-2007. Not that many borrowers or lenders offered or required such commitments.

My recent home shopping experiences are enlightening. In the Chicago far western suburbs realistic prices where the house will sell are at 1999 levels.

Nice 4 bedroom 2 bath tract homes in nice areas are screaming bargains.

There are a lot of houses stopped in mid-flip. Kitchens and walls are missing and they are still way over priced. I can't imagine what they were thinking.

Many foreclosures were ignored by the lending institutions and never had power turned back on. There are a lot of flooded basements which must be completely torn out because of several months of standing water.

One place we looked at sold foe 330,000 in 1999. It was listed last year for 750,000 and is now listed at 400,000. We were going to offer 300 to 350 but prices have plummeted still more. The owners refinanced twice and had a balance of 485,000. It is a very short court ordered sale.

We are still looking.

(CBC) . . . A B.C. Supreme Court justice ruled Craig Fraser's condo could be liquidated — along with the rest of the three-unit building — after the two other owner-investors couldn't or wouldn't pay the repair bills for a leaky roof.

"It came down to two [owners] against one," Fraser said. "So, now I'm faced with a tough economy, being self-employed and having to move and rent and start over."

An investor was allowed to purchase the entire building at 1029 West 7th Avenue for the land value, approximately $1 million, following a July 23, 2008 court decision by Justice Victor Curtis. By contrast, the court estimated the building would have been worth about $2 million fully repaired.
. . .
Mary Buchanan, a realtor who lives in California, and Maurice Duteau, a mechanical engineer who lives in China, ultimately said they couldn't cover their share of the cost, while Fraser said he would.

"They just decided that they didn't want to repair it, and managed to convince the courts," Fraser said.
As foreign investors, Fraser pointed out, the other two owners are able to write off losses against their taxes, while he has simply lost his primary residence.

I think it's rather clear that Congress, the White House, FED, Treasury and all the bankers are lying their asses off! We have been systematically ganged raped by these bastards who continue to lie to the American People. Your 201K is about to be a 51K as Karl Denniger has pointed out. Keep drinking the Kool-Aid sheeple, as Jim Jones is set to speak at the 1st annual "Doing The Devils Work symposium" where Bernanke is the Key Note Speaker.

All these assclowns are more full of shit than a stuffed Christman Turkey.

Interesting Times writes:
SV is a magical state where housing only goes up.
Interesting Times | 02.24.09 - 10:29 am | #

sebastian valley?

Ok, another nearly 2 months has passed, so I suppose Miami is now down 45%.

Phoenix down what? 50% right now?

Oh, Goddess, people are still talking about recourse/non recourse as if it means something.

It means NOTHING unless lenders are willing to pay foreclosure mills to get deficiencies. They aren't.

I doubt very much that the judges would grant them. Normally, judges are perfectly willing to grant foreclosures. Now, they have roughly the opinion of lenders that calculated Riskians do.

Equity. Foreclosures are, I believe an equitable remedy. Why should judges grant deficiencies to entities who are not only bumbling idiots, but often fraudulend bumbling idiots?

does CS do san diego and is this graph not included?

that would be a shame. SD has been a weathervane.

m, just noticed it, 152 and change

Login or register to post comments
Syndicate content