Kinda spooky here all alone.

That's it, though, right..... that's the kitchen sink?

"The potential £28 billion loss"

Well at least they have London property to fall back on...oh wait...

Nostrovia,

An Obama caption contest from the blog that hopes to become too big to fail.

Caption Contest: Obama | Systemically Important

That is a lot of dollars...

Comrade Food, we are reading the article.

£28 billion ($41.29 billion)

I wouldn't trust that ratio for very long.  There's a chance the Pound could go Krona on us. 

Yes, I think the pound is goin' dound.

Rob - Once the BOE goes ZIRP you will be correct...I expect that very soon, then once they pull a 1992 and revalue the pound look for another leg down...bad teeth and bad money!

Eric,

"that's the kitchen sink?"

Nope. Bathroom. They're test marketing the whole "sink" thing.

Nostrovia,

Funny how 2 of the 3 banks that bought ABN Amro are toast but Santander just chugs along.

Pound can't go Icy(too many assets) but below parity to the Euro and near parity to the USD is the next best thing.

Nope. Bathroom. They're test marketing the whole "sink" thing.
Comrade Misean is Dope | Homepage | 01.19.09 - 9:26 am | #

I would guess with all the Lowes and Home Depots about to go under, you could pick up sinks for cheap, if you liked throwing them out every quarter.

Really dumb question -- Did England have a huge housing bubble, too? If not, than what are these massive losses attributed to?

I don't think I've seen containment spread so quickly before...

Doofus,

Yes, but they call them estates. They also had an orgy of rentals, but they call them toilets...erm...to lets.

Nostrovia,

Doofus, yes, they had a huge housing bubble too - so did Ireland - plus their banks are heavily exposed to the U.S. market.

best wishes.

Tom Stone,

"I don't think I've seen containment spread so quickly before..."

Hmmm...you missed that Bubonic Plague containment fiasco then, I take it.

Nostrovia,

Anybody here expect the euro to disappear? Seems to me Germany would be better off with its own currency.

RBS - the new descriptor for assets held - really bad sh!t...

I've lurked here a while now, trying to get my head around what you are all saying. Thank you all.

I have a question - what do you think of credit unions? In these times, are they a safe(r) place for your money - I'm just thinking as a normal depositor.

Anybody here expect the euro to disappear? Seems to me Germany would be better off with its own currency.

Suppose the same could be said for the U.S.

Perhaps it would be in our best interest to jettison California, Nevada, and Arizona from the union.

Did England have a huge housing bubble, too? If not, than what are these massive losses attributed to?
Doofus | 01.19.09 - 9:27 am | #

They had a housing bubble so big it made its way to Spain.

Plus it has massive CRE problems and excessive reliance on FIRE industries.

Perhaps it would be in our best interest to jettison California, Nevada, and Arizona from the union.
grim | 01.19.09 - 9:34 am | #

Priced Cali munis recently?  It's already being written off. 

Hardly even trying. You don't make front page for under 50 bil these days...

Come back next quarter RBS.

If you can.

C

Oh come now C! Scotland's rather small. That's quite an accomplishment.

Nostrovia,

Hmm, let me rethink. It might make more sense for Manhattan to secede from the union. Sort of a little Luxembourg of the Northeast.

The only question is whether the currency should be the Bloomberg or the Giuliani.

Does this mean they will stop wasting money advertising during PGA tournaments...

"There's a chance the Pound could go Krona on us. "

Cheap Prem tickets! But I fear we're all Krona now.

...."Perhaps it would be in our best interest to jettison California, Nevada, and Arizona from the union."

...what did WE (Nevadans) do to warrant your displeasure? Take too much of your paycheck thru our Las Vegas branch?

el lurko,

"But I fear we're all Krona now."

Naw! Iceland's Bjorked.

Nostrovia,

I think this means that the free set of bagpipes when you open a checking account promotion will be discontinued.

...what did WE (Nevadans) do to warrant your displeasure? Take too much of your paycheck thru our Las Vegas branch?
Black Star Ranch | 01.19.09 - 9:50 am | #

Downwind from California is reason enough.  Oh, and when California legalizes gambling outright you might as well turn out the lights in Vegas. 

BSR,

"Take too much of your paycheck thru our Las Vegas branch?"

Last time I was through they made me fill out IRS tax forms for taking too much of theirs. We'll we if that holds up tomorrow.

Nostrovia,

Still a little hope left out there. BAC is up 0.15 in Frankfurt today. C only down 0.04.

”Almost all their losses are in subprime mortgages in America and related to the acquisition of ABN Amro

RBS down only 68%. Great time to buy

Sometimes I wonder if this place is just a psyops mind f*ck. Do any of you notice some of the ads running on CR's main page? Have you juxtaposed this nonsense with the sentiment of the comments? It's quite a hoot. Here's one that made me LOL.

High Yield Certificate of Deposit Rates - High Yield CD Rates | Ally Bank

The 100 million pounds Man City are paying to
Kaka might be a good hedge.

They should of listen to their own warning ....The Royal Bank of Scotland has advised clients to brace for a full-fledged crash in global stock and credit markets over the next three months as inflation paralyses the major central banks.

"A very nasty period is soon to be upon us - be prepared," said Bob Janjuah, the bank's credit strategist. RBS issues global stock and credit crash alert - Telegraph

Nervous English Rose(Unrated) writes:
\t.....
I have a question - what do you think of credit unions? In these times, are they a safe(r) place for your money - I'm just thinking as a normal depositor.
\t Nervous English Rose | \t \t \t \t01.19.09 - 9:34 am | #

Nervous English Rose | 01.19.09 - 9:34 am | #

Dear Nervous,
or do you prefer Ms. Rose.  Are you in England?  If so, I wouldn't venture to guess, but I'd note that for US banks, someone posted a link a few weeks back that provided a rating for most if nat all banks in the US.  My banks is a small, local, NE bank, and is doing reasonably well.  It's a slightly low on capital, but has very high quality assets, etc. 
Many small NE banks, S&Ls, and Credit Unions are in good shape this time around, having taken a real beating in the early '90s; so much so that there aren't any large regional banks left.  I believe that BOA bought the last one some years ago. If you can go back thru the old posts or if someone will provide a link, you could research a good place to do your banking here in the US, assuming that's what you desire to do. 

"Downwind from California is reason enough. Oh, and when California legalizes gambling outright you might as well turn out the lights in Vegas."

Hurry. Please, make it quick. I'd love to see Vegas as a 21st Century ghost town. We Nevadans only show you the glitzy/sleezy front door - hopefully then you won't venture too much farther into our lovely state, turn around and go back home. [grin]

excellent article by Felix Salmon on why nationalizing the banks makes sense. very clear prose and sharp argument. Why Nationalization Is The Best Alternative - Market Movers - Portfolio.com

There's never been a better time to buy and sell Kaka.

The 100 million pounds Man City are paying to

Kaka might be a good hedge.

The sheikh lost £440MILLION on his barclays stake alone.
Anything to beat Man Utd is the motto.

I've been watching Bloomberg this morning. Their headline story is; "Not everyone agrees with the bailout... even after the government has said it is absolutely necessary."

Stupid group-think led us into this mess; stupid group-think will lead us out!


Hurry. Please, make it quick. I'd love to see Vegas as a 21st Century ghost town. We Nevadans only show you the glitzy/sleezy front door - hopefully then you won't venture too much farther into our lovely state, turn around and go back home. [grin]
\t Black Star Ranch | \t \t \t \t01.19.09 - 10:05 am | #

Black Star Ranch | 01.19.09 - 10:05 am | #

I thought that gambling and legalized prostitution was just entertainment for those passing time waiting for a quiclie divorce? No?

Man Utd's shirt sponsor is AIG.
So I guess City and the Sheikh still have some catching up to do

Nervous Rose

Bank Ratings provides free ratings of credit unions and banks, fuller reports for a fee.

Compare Mortgage Rates | CD Rates | Credit Cards Home Equity Loans Mortgages Best Rate Calculator Bankrate.com provides free ratings and info on banks.

credit unions are often (not always) more conservatively run than banks and therefore safer. But the devil is always in the details of the particular credit union or bank you are investigating.

Elvis writes:
I think this means that the free set of bagpipes when you open a checking account promotion will be discontinued.

LOL +1

Elvis writes:
I think this means that the free set of bagpipes when you open a checking account promotion will be discontinued.

LOL +1

Doc at the Radar Station | 01.19.09 - 10:10 am | #

I thought they threatened you with bagpipes if you didn't open an account. Wink

Hoocodanode and nobody expects the Spanish Inquisition!

So gambling is going to be one of the cornerstones of those ultradynamic Anglo economies after FIRE economy model hit the SHTF?

What most Americans don't understand is that
the NFL has nothing on the EPL as far as importance
to their fans.

Man Utd's shirt sponsor is AIG.

So I guess City and the Sheikh still have some catching up to do

The Sheikh is worth £33B give or take, lets see if money will buy success.
Oh and Chelksi are selling i hear..

excellent article by Felix Salmon on why nationalizing the banks makes sense. very clear prose and sharp argument. Page Not Found - Portfolio.com? tid=true

"Essentially, any government purchase of toxic assets can be split into two components: the market price, and a subsidy. If the subsidy is greater than half the market capitalization of the bank, and the government doesn't end up controlling the bank, then there's something very fishy going on indeed."

I wouldn't be surprised if the gov't shouldn't have owned BofA outright after last week's "injection," given this criterion.

What most Americans don't understand is that
the NFL has nothing on the EPL as far as importance

to their fans.

EPL is a religion. People have lived and died depending on their gods performance.

The LEH outcry about how it "caused" the credit crisis is a rallying crying for those who want to protect bondholders. Felix hits on the key point in this absurdity - that bondholders bought a risk free investment. This entire bailout scheme is about protecting bondholders using every agrument in the book. The solution is rather simple: liquidate the bad banks. If the governement is so worried about having private capitl involved, why not a simulataneous nationalization spin? Nationalize citi and reap a good bank immediately and spin it...the gov owns the bad bank and equity in the new bank to be sold down in an alloted timeframe. Existing bank shareholders will get to have a second life..

S,
Government has never been about doing the correct thing, or right solution. At least not right now.

Let's get Sully to fly our economy in for a water-landing...

This entire bailout scheme is about protecting bondholders using every agrument in the book. The solution is rather simple: liquidate the bad banks. If the governement is so worried about having private capitl involved, why not a simulataneous nationalization spin?
-S

If the government announced a nationalization program, wouldn't the bondholders rush to liquidate their holdings to avoid the inevitable haircut? Maybe that is what they are fearing, not nationalization per se.


Perhaps it would be in our best interest to jettison California, Nevada, and Arizona from the union.

California would do much better without the rest of the nation dragging it down. Throw in Oregon and Washington and it's a screaming deal.

Doofus writes:
Really dumb question -- Did England have a huge housing bubble, too? If not, than what are these massive losses attributed to?

They are currently blaming the woes on the bankrupt Americans and their devious ways.

The fact is, they had their own binge and several other countries' binge too (Spanish country houses, ahem). They may or may not recognize this with time, or they may just play the old "demonize the foreigners" saw.

Likewise the Europeans will blame the Americans until their own misdadventures in Eastern Europe, Russia and the Gulf become apparent. Then it may remain the evil Americans or they may come to recognize that they too fell victim to boomtown lending practices.

reptillian writes:
"Essentially, any government purchase of toxic assets can be split into two components: the market price, and a subsidy. If the subsidy is greater than half the market capitalization of the bank, and the government doesn't end up controlling the bank, then there's something very fishy going on indeed."

I wouldn't be surprised if the gov't shouldn't have owned BofA outright after last week's "injection," given this criterion.


Just so, Reptillian. Just so.

But by logical criteria the US should not have gone to war in Iraq, etc. The first problem was that George W Bush was president. Something was very fishy, indeed, as Felix Salmon wrote.

We will see what changes now. The political ground has shifted under economic policy debates. There is now almost no substantial opposition to major fiscal stimulus, which had been all but impossible under Bush. There is now a rising discussion about nationalizing the banks. I think it will happen.

"If the government announced a nationalization program, wouldn't the bondholders rush to liquidate their holdings to avoid the inevitable haircut?"

No announcement necessary. Executive order in the dead of night.

This is ONLY Half of What Cal. is in for....

If the government announced a nationalization program, wouldn't the bondholders rush to liquidate their holdings to avoid the inevitable haircut?

Liquidate? Who would buy?

"Man Utd's shirt sponsor is AIG."

It wouldn't surprise me to learn AIG crafted derivatives based on United's performance. Watch, we'll get an "unexpected and unusually large losses" driven bailout if United's title run tanks.

And now that I think about it, a portion of our tax dollars is now paying Ronaldo's salary. That, my friends, is the ultimate outrage.

Ececutive order in middle of night...Would have already seen that,,,,,but not on my watch.

Still, if it's not Scottish, it's CRAP!

Rob:

Are you talking Icelandic Krona or the Swedish Krona of '92 when they drove the rates to infinity?

So many currencies, so little time...

I knew it was a mistake when they made Groundskeeper Willie their Chief Risk Officer.

Politics is what it is...Watch closely the next 30 days, pain subsides as years pass, do it now, or not run 4 years from now.

This is ONLY Half of What Cal. is in for....
IWannaknow | 01.19.09 - 10:23 am | #

California is doig suprisingly well considering.  House prices are way off the peak, unemployment is still single digits, captial, business and middle class flight has been orderly.  Crime is only up a bit and even the government is becomng resigned to the need for structural changes.  

Liquidate? Who would buy?

Good point. The bondholders can only hope the US doesn't nationalize and they reap a premium through their guarantee or take the haircut when it comes.

Willy hears ya, Willy don't care!

Are you talking Icelandic Krona or the Swedish Krona of '92 when they drove the rates to infinity?
homedad43 | Homepage | 01.19.09 - 10:26 am | #

Exactly.  I was deliberately vague for that reason.  Personally I think they'll ZIRP and devalue.  If the US is going to ZIRP and devalue better to be first. 

I am trying to decide what kind of society I want to belong to:

i) hunter gatherer
or
ii) agrarian

I'm thinkin' hunter-gather. Scavenging is the 21st century's new black.

Anonymous writes:
If the government announced a nationalization program, wouldn't the bondholders rush to liquidate their holdings to avoid the inevitable haircut?

Liquidate? Who would buy?
Anonymous | 01.19.09 - 10:23 am


Quite right, old chap (We're all british now).

There are many ways for shareholders and bondholder to get their hair cut.

Longtime shareholders of financials, for example, have already taken a big haircut, with just a bit more stubble left to shave or pull out at the roots. But since they lost their long locks others have stepped in as speculators, buying and selling on waves of bail outs and busts, in effect making the bail out into a casino to misallocate capital. Nationalization would put a stop to that as it would also address the underlying fundamental problems.

Any of the commentariat between the EU zone and Russia catch any news about a deal actually being inked between Gazprom and Naftogaz?

Hoopajoops google "the free and independent state of jefferson".

Gold down, Oil down, futures down. I guess I'll buy a house tomorrow.

Anonymous | 01.19.09 - 10:35 am | #

And the dollar index DX up - looks like develering to pay dollar denominated obligations:
INO Equities Stocks Indexes - U.S $ INDEX (NYBOT:DX) Price Chart and Quote 

If the government announced a nationalization program, wouldn't the bondholders rush to liquidate their holdings to avoid the inevitable haircut? Maybe that is what they are fearing, not nationalization per se.
Doc at the Radar Station | 01.19.09 - 10:21 am | #


Yep.

That's why I've begun wondering this weekend if the whole "bad bank" conversation is a giant head fake.

The govt simply can't say, "hey, let's nationalize the banks..." with any kind of advance notice. It's a wholesale panic run by both the bondholders to dump their bonds AND the depositors to remove their savings.

Yeah, we can talk FDIC 'til we're blue in the face but the average joe is going to simply panic. And that leads to a question that I've had: are we talking a nationalization of the entire system or just individual banks? If the former, any advance notice simply leads to wholesale panic.

How can a bank lose over 28 Billion Pounds? Think about it.. they are a f**king bank! They are supposed to understand financial risk better than anyone else!

Just a few comments from an ordinary Edinburgh, Scotland resident about my wonderful local bank (which I don't use by the way).

In terms of net assets RBS is the world's largest company. They have £1.9 trillion of book assets, with liabilities to match of course.

They claim to have made profit across the UK (let alone Scotland) in 2008. - word is 90% of the losses are in the US dollar and Euro areas, and balance in the Far East.

What I'm trying to get my head around is whether it really in the UK tax payer interest to pick up these liabilities, rather than just let this bank fail.

I guess the argument is the credibility of the entire UK financial system is at stake and this outweighs the UK taxpayer potential hit. I believe 2 other UK banks are in the top 5 of world companies by book assets (Barclays and HSBC).

What a trade off!

If bankester's aren't punished "Brother you an't seen nothing."

Just don't lie to A Federal Agent. Yes Sir I did it, and no one else is involved. Case closed and in secrecy.

I guess the argument is the credibility of the entire UK financial system is at stake and this outweighs the UK taxpayer potential hit.

Have some vanity my Scot friend. The credibility of the world's banking system is at stake.

And now that I think about it, a portion of our tax dollars is now paying Ronaldo's salary. That, my friends, is the ultimate outrage.

And he isn't that good a diver as well, weep for his ferrari though.

Front page article in the local rag this morning. Good to see people who made mistakes during the bubble have learned

Rent-to-own home leases becoming more popular

Rent now, buy later - Sun Sentinel

lucifer writes:
How can a bank lose over 28 Billion Pounds?

If you've let me become the sole qualified pilot on the plane, I know you'll give me 28 billion quid the second I point a revolver at my head during midflight, if I can just convince you I'm serious.

Way more leisure time in hunter and gather societies! But the population has to be very small for it to work, let's hope it doesn't come to that.

Agrarian is just work, work, work and tends not produce enough for all, so watch out for the nasty feudal lord and serf dynamic but there would be room for more of us.

If the Yellowstone caldera goes, we'll be lucky to come out with h/g!

Lyrics from 1929:

Oh, wear your flannel underwear,
When you climb a tree,
Take good care of yourself,
You belong to me!

Steer clear of frozen ponds, ooh-ooh,
Peroxide blondes, ooh-ooh,
Stocks and bonds, ooh-ooh,
You'll get a pain, ruin your bankroll

The lyric was from early 1929.

Premiere League Champion
World Club Champion
Champions Leaugue Champion

For my little bit I got quite a bit of enjoyment out of it (lol). Sorry the rest of you didn't. CR really did put on quite a show last year.

EPL is a religion.

You will never walk alone

Yeah, we can talk FDIC 'til we're blue in the face but the average joe is going to simply panic. And that leads to a question that I've had: are we talking a nationalization of the entire system or just individual banks? If the former, any advance notice simply leads to wholesale panic.

homedad, see anon's and joe schmoe's comments above about bonds. They wouldn't have any buyers. But managing panic is definitely what's at work and protecting the bondholders from loss. That's why they are avoiding nationalization. FDIC has been hiring a lot of people and renting a lot of office space in the past few months. I just wonder whether the aggregator bank idea is little more than a stalling tactic until they have the manpower to handle a nationalization. If the public views the FDIC as botching the nationalization process, that's probably when the REAL panic sets in...

@Homedad

I disagree about your hypothesized fear of public panic at the news of a bank nationalization.

First and most importantly, people don't panic when sound leadership explains a situation (see the recent plane landing in the Hudson River).

Second, nationalization further secures people's deposits, and people will understand this because it is an extension, in a way, of what people already know about FDIC.

Third, no panics so far during the many bank closings and mergers, which have been scarier and more unpredictable than a planned and announced nationalization.

Fourth, not only is there no reason to set up a nationalization plan by stealth and then a midnight surprise Presidential order, but it must in fact be talked about in public quite extensively to get lots of people on board.

Fifth, bondholders should be treated in some reasonable fashion, in between the world's biggest hair removal and lending full faith and credit - in other words, maybe a light trim around the edges, but not too drastic. The medicine needs to go down.

Hrumph...Groundskeeper Willie needs to hire Scotty then resign.

Nostrovia,

Mark writes:
What I'm trying to get my head around is whether it really in the UK tax payer interest to pick up these liabilities, rather than just let this bank fail.

Too much bank for too small a geographic asset base.

Lesson to take away from this; when you are running a banking / data haven, you better be ready to BK the various institutions operating in your territory with a budget substantially larger than your national yearly tax receipts, pretty much at a moment's notice.

Citizen energyecon - Russia and Ukraine signed today two 10-year contracts: transit of Russian gas via Ukraine and sales of Russian gas to Ukraine. The long term nature of these contracts is very important.
Putin is meeting with Timoshenko as we speak.

Just lower your expectations.
Just lower your expectations.
Just lower your expectations.

It's gonna take awhile.
It's gonna take awhile.
It's gonna take awhile.

Don't think about it.
Don't think about it.
Don't think about it.

Lucifer, you need to study the concept of fractional reserve banking. When you understand, go to D.C. and explain it to Obama. The future of the planet earth's children depends on him understanding it.
Insolvent.
Full stop.

RBS should have taken the high road.

...

Just waking up now. Something in the news about Spain?

EPL is a religion.

You will never walk alone

Nothing like seeing a 60-year old granny giving ronnie the 'finger' while he's trying to take a corner.

And the Gods smile.

durn. got rid of faz too soon.

Thankyou xxxxx and Joe Shmoe for your replies re: credit unions.

xxxxx - I am indeed in England, and getting more nervous by the day!

JS - I will check out the link, thanks!

I guess I'm just worried that the banks will completely collapse, and Gordon Brown's promise of £30k (I think it was) being guaranteed by the government for each savings account will just disappear up the swanny.

durn. got rid of faz too soon.
anonymous | 01.19.09 - 10:49 am | #

Heh.... market doesn't even open for 28+ hours.

Spain lost AAA rating, whoop-de-goddarn-doo

"Scotty, I need £30 billion in two days or we're all dead!"

"Cap'n, the CDOs are buckling! I canna change the laws of finance!"

A friend is wanting to file BK. She works, income above Ch. 7 standards. I'm telling her to hold on for 6-12 months, wait for a change in BK law that will allow her to walk away from all debts instead of repaying. Is this sound reasoning?

slid writes:
Agrarian is just work, work, work and tends not produce enough for all, so watch out for the nasty feudal lord and serf dynamic but there would be room for more of us.

Kitchen plot gardens are some of the world's most fantastically produtive enterprises.

The lord / serf dynamic is what produces the pumpkins loaded with pitchforks. Lack of stake, labor and soil exploitation for cash crop economies and continual undercutting of individual worker rights leads to the dramatic lack of productivity on large farms.

Compare / contrast the role of garden plots versus collective agriculture in the Soviet Union for a dramatic example.

EPL...hmmm...and when you're a haz waz...you get a $1B to sit on the sidelines in LA with a silicone enhanced pseudo model....

Where do I sign up?

Nostrovia,

Doc

Agreed that nationalization, if done, must be done right . . . or disaster becomes catastrophe.

But I don't think the government has been preparing for this at all. Until tomorrow it is still the Bush Administration. FDIC is beefing up, and that will be needed in the event of a nationalization, but it has been beefing up to do its traditional job, which is in growing demand.

I believe preparations for a possible nationalization will begin on January 20, at least as a contingency plan. The Bush Admn was famous for not making contingency plans. Remember Katrina? Remember the occupation of Iraq? Come on, stuff happens, they said.

Obama don't play that. There will be contingency plans, if not a more rapid decision to nationalize. I think the timing of the decision will be contingent on getting people on board, as much as it will be contingent on the speed of the bank meltdown.

"The long term nature of these contracts is very important."

The political/strategic implications of the contracts are even more important.

I'm telling her to hold on for 6-12 months, wait for a change in BK law that will allow her to walk away from all debts instead of repaying. Is this sound reasoning?

The primary change will be lien-stripping; she'll never be able to discharge all of her debts, especially if she's above the means-testing.

Problem with nationalization:  "Hi, I'm from the government and I'm here to help.  All that money you have in banks and stuff?  I'll be holding on to that for you so it will be safe." 

MrM | 01.19.09 - 10:47 am | #

Ten year contracts is huge - curious to see terms - ability to perform will be key for any price Ukraine agrees to in the contract...of course, I am sure that Gazprom would 'settle' for say, a controlling interest in the Naftogaz transport network if Ukraine can't keep current.

Any speculation on how will the Tymoshenko/Yuschenko rift play out with respect to this agreement?

I'd like to know the bonuses paid out in December 2008!

Nemo,

""Scotty, I need £30 billion in two days or we're all dead!""

Aye Cap'n. I'll just hook the warp drive into the transporters and plug it into this $100 bill.

Nostrovia,

Obama becomes prez. tomorrow...

the last hurrah before the cold realization that we're all still broke...

let's take a moment to remember the thousands of generations before us...they are now the soil on which we walk...and on the morrow we'll call our ships to port and realize that we too will soon soften the treads of our progeny.

Nervous Rose

You are welcome. The bank rating websites I posted are, I believe, US specific. But there must be something similar in the UK. A Google search should turn it up.

LOL @ Krugman today. Gothamgroup, or Gotham for short.

In normal times, ¡El Downgradio! would be big news.

The rating companies still have credibility? You must be kidding..

//Comrade Alexei Mikhailovich writes:
Spain lost AAA rating, whoop-de-goddarn-doo
Comrade Alexei Mikhailovich | 01.19.09 - 10:52 am | #//

joe,

"Agreed that nationalization, if done, must be done right"

And of course the entity to get it JUST RIGHT is the gov't.

Rob...

;P

Nostrovia,

Nemo - I suspect they will be downgraded next week as some ratings agencies get up to speed

I believe preparations for a possible nationalization will begin on January 20, at least as a contingency plan.

Any nationalization has to be done through Congress. There simply is no statutory provision in the banking laws for nationalization of the banks, just receivership and conservatorship. You could stretch the definition of conservatorship to operating the bank as a going concern, but it's still not nationalization.

citizen energyecon writes:
...Any of the commentariat between the EU zone and Russia catch any news about a deal actually being inked between Gazprom and Naftogaz?...

Yea citizen energyecon, where is my daily dose of hysterical "gas" predictions ?

(btw. do you really think REUTERS knows what's really going on there?)

Rob Dawg writes:
Problem with nationalization: "Hi, I'm from the government and I'm here to help. All that money you have in banks and stuff? I'll be holding on to that for you so it will be safe."
Rob Dawg | Homepage | 01.19.09 - 10:57 am


Oh, Dawg. How many Reaganites buy and hold US Treasuries from the dastardly government that can't be trusted to protect their money? Really. Bush just buried Reagan, at long last.

some of us don't know what "nationalization" is. anybody care to explain? extra gratitude for addressing what happens to common, preferred, and the bonds. tia.

But I don't think the government has been preparing for this at all.
-joe schmoe

That makes sense. It has probably been off the table, verbotten, do not work on anything related to that... They have been very retroactive and they have dealt with problems one at a time and at the last minute.

The_Littlest_Mandarin,

I was being sarcastic.. I was merely pointing out the ridiculousness of banks screwing up so badly (again and again).

Should they be allowed to exist in their current forms? Would you buy a car that exploded every 1000 km? Or a medicine with poor quality control?

I have a feeling boys that within a year or two, my ex-president(Putin) will start sniffing the European leaders' asses.

What is this ? $41 bio loss?

biggest ever in (y)UK?

So, if the government owns your bank, does that then allow them to rummage through your safe deposit boxes?  Gotta be some clause of the Patriot Act that would apply, wouldn't you think?

Werner | 01.19.09 - 11:01 am | #

Please find a single post with a prediction, of any sort with respect to the gas war between your ally and the Ukraine.

Otherwise, answer the question - or get off the signal - specifically looking for widest possible information base.


each savings account will just disappear up the swanny.
Nervous English Rose

A couple of days ago you guys were looking for the Brit. equivalent of "this sucker's going down" ?

You just found it.

re: "why should the UK taxpayer be on the hook for RBS ?"

Yeah, that's what I thought when I saw the difficulties of Kauphthing, Landsbanksi, Glitnir as I nervously held on to my Iceland krona despite the S&P downgrade. Luckily, Everbank, with whom I had my Icelandic Krona CD enraged me by not passing on the high interest rates that were on offer - so I pulled out of the krona last May/June for a small loss.

Little did I know !

Anyway, IRS and terrorist-money/drug money monitoring / reporting trails be damned, I'm certainly planning a quick trip back to the UK now to get out of the undeclared UK Pounds that I still have in a bank over there and buy physical gold - there's a really nasty feeling to all this.

-K

"I am sure that Gazprom would 'settle' for say, a controlling interest in the Naftogaz transport network if Ukraine can't keep current."

Gazprom will prove to be very understanding given certain preconditions.

@ Basel Too,

No contradiction there. Legislation requires planning just as much as implementation requires planning, staff, etc. Remember the Paulson Plan - 3 pages that demonstrated there had been no planning.

@Misean,
Yes, the government. But not the Bush Govt that let New Orleans drown and dropped boys and girls into Iraq to die without body armor. Once upon a time govt managed to run a war against Germany and win, and build power grids that have worked for half a century (TVA), etc. Or I guess we could wait for the private sector to save us with the second comings of Angelo Mozilo and Ken Lay.

"Would you buy a car that exploded every 1000 km?"

You running Microsoft too Lucifer?

tj,

"So, if the government owns your bank, does that then allow them to rummage through your safe deposit boxes?"

If you are innocent, zen vhy should you care? I assume your papiers are in order, no?

Nostrovia,

"Any speculation on how will the Tymoshenko/Yuschenko rift play out with respect to this agreement?"

Mr. Yushchenko's political future is perhaps a bit uncertain.

Energyecon - I have not seen any details yet, only that the gas prices will based on a formula and will be market-based and that there will be no shady (Swiss-based) intermediaries

Pavel - Political implications are not clear yet, but I think the deal strengthens Timoshenko vis-a-vis Yushchenko, and she is more pro-Russian (some people would say more pragmatic Smile )

Comrade Peronista,

I am a regular here.. I was being sarcastic to drive home the least discussed point- namely that their actions suggest that they are worse than incompetent and therefore should not be allowed to exist in their current form.

We are essentially making Dr. Mengele (of auswitsch fame) the director of a jewish children hospital. We are rewarding the worst excesses, greed and incompetence with more power and money. This has to stop!

Ah, Pavel, your gift for understatement is...remarkable. Wink

I think I picked a bad season to re-read "Fight Club".

No need to beef up FDIC before the banks are nationalized. Gov't just states that deposits are good. If it's going to happen, it will probably happen this week. Hmmm ... may need to unload those 100 shares of BAC (lottery ticket) that I bought last Friday. Tomorrow, a.m.!

"So, if the government owns your bank, does that then allow them to rummage through your safe deposit boxes?"

You could always take your schematics and gold trinkets to another bank, Misean.

Never had a BSOD or any significant issue with WinXP Pro.. You are talking about Win95, Me and crapware like Vista

//You running Microsoft too Lucifer?
Anak | 01.19.09 - 11:08 am | #//

Anonymous writes:

some of us don't know what "nationalization" is. anybody care to explain? extra gratitude for addressing what happens to common, preferred, and the bonds. tia.

read the Felix Salmon article, linked by me up thread, also linked by Paul Krugman on his blog (linked to by CR). It is very clear.

Exactly what happens to bond holders in the event of nationalization is a policy decision - there is a range of possibilities: made whole, big hair cut, little trim, etc.

joe,

Your blinding partisanship is showing.

Go drool over CNN coverage, I've better things to do.

Nostrovia,

MrM,

Oho, the intermediaries got cut out? That would seem to have implications within Gazprom as well as the Ukraine (byzantine maze of middlemen passing billions back and forth in a very non-transparent fashion, somebody's gravy train just jumped off the tracks).

Exactly what happens to bond holders in the event of nationalization is a policy decision - there is a range of possibilities: made whole, big hair cut, little trim, etc.
joe shmoe | 01.19.09 - 11:12 am | #

If you're Bill Gross, you're made whole.

Otherwise, you're a bagholder.

homedad,

why would avers lose anything in a bnk nationalization? It is the bondholders that stand o get clipped and that is the third rail. Gov't should delare a ring fence around deposits and clean out bondholders. Their's is NOT a risk free investment - at least the debt not now backed by the FDIC/gov't. Also the race to extend the window to issue beyond july is all about avoiding the haircut. The sinsiter scheme by the gov't to get the debt gov't backed is in effect providing an insurance backstop to bondholders in banks against a nationalization. Exactly the opposite of what should happen. The entire plan by the governmint to steal your money is for your own good.

Shnaps,

Misean & I are just teasing those that are foolish enough to actually use SDBs.

Misean,

You finish the BFG 9000?

Comrade Janosik writes:
let's take a moment to remember the thousands of generations before us...they are now the soil on which we walk...

"Givin' thanks to the forefathers.
Givin' thanks to the Funk creators."

...Kitchen plot gardens are some of the world's most fantastically produtive enterprises."
........absolutely correct. There are a number of small growers here (less than 5-acres) that sell out every harvest twice yearly (outdoors) and year round (indoors) at top dollar to any LV hotels. Most with no inorganic pesticides.

Re: If you're Bill Gross

You're just sore because he never weeps.

reptillian writes:
No need to beef up FDIC before the banks are nationalized. Gov't just states that deposits are good.

I give Obama 2-4 weeks before he goes on primetime TV and explains what he's discovered during his first few weeks on the job. He has to dump as much on Bush as he can, fast, right out the gate. Words to the effect "drastic times call for drastic measures, bank deposits are safe but, no more good taxpayer money after bad,etc. Some type of nationalizing to follow. Obama's approvals hit the 80's.

"read the Felix Salmon article, linked by me up thread, also linked by Paul Krugman on his blog (linked to by CR). "

Six degrees of separation? Smile

"Givin' thanks to the forefathers.
Givin' thanks to the Funk creators."

I couldn't give a rat's ass about this or any country's forefather's...the rich that write the history books are a scam....

I give thanks to the millions of nameless poor that went through the meat-grinder...they are the only reason we have anything.

citizen energyecon writes:
...answer the question...

Can I politely remind you that you did not answer my question to you (I think the day before yesterday) about "how importent russian gas is for Germany" .

So, I will not answer your question!
Cheers.

I give Obama 2-4 weeks before he goes on primetime TV and explains what he's discovered during his first few weeks on the job.
Anonymous | 01.19.09 - 11:15 am | #

Yeah, my thinking too.  Something along the lines of "It's much worse than we were led to believe", but crafted in a way such as to not overly spook the sheep or totally piss off the minority party.

Gov't should delare a ring fence around deposits and clean out bondholders.

Yes, because small depositors make up the largest purchasers of Treasuries? The term "bond vigilantes" comes to mind. The Bill Grosses of the world do have the USG by the balls.

Maybe we need to increase the payroll taxes or War Bonds so that USG is more reliant on Joe Public for its borrowing.

So, if the government owns your bank, does that then allow them to rummage through your safe deposit boxes?  Gotta be some clause of the Patriot Act that would apply, wouldn't you think?
Comrade Bear (tj & the bear) | 01.19.09 - 11:06 am | #

We wuz jus' countin' it fer ya.  We were gonna put it all back.  Honest. 

I seem to recall that Obama is supposed to make some kind of an announcement after his swearing in on Tuesday? Perhaps it's supposed to happen on Wednesday? I'll try to find a link but for some reason I remember reading this, it had to do with the banking industry and it was going to be a big announcement. I'm thinking Nationalization is only a couple days away, thus the beefed up FDIC presence...Of course I've been wrong before.

citizen energyecon @11:12 am - yes, this is what Interfax reported - no intermediaries

Another thing in support of nationalization now is: who "owns" the banks? As of last Friday, I think the shorts and daytraders own BAC. Anyone with an interest in the dividend must have bailed. I know it's wrong, but people don't seem to mind sticking it to daytraders and shorts.

I see, TJ & Bear.

I always assumed most SDBs are just full of guns "with bodies on them", bricks of cocaine, and bearer bonds.

lucifer writes:
The_Littlest_Mandarin,
I was being sarcastic.. I was merely pointing out the ridiculousness of banks screwing up so badly (again and again).

But they are not screwing up. They are pursuing a very rational course for looting the state. First they got TBTF. Then they took very real insane risks (no question about convincing the victim you'll crash the plane). Now they collect the proceeds of the bet.

There are no mistakes in the general theory, although some people got sacrificed and that was probably not in the prospectus. It's merely asymmetric policy. Bankers, government policymakers and the general populace all have a different set of victory conditions.

Eric writes:
If you're Bill Gross, you're made whole.

When Bill Gross losses his first big bet, then I will believe in change.

I seem to recall that Obama is supposed to make some kind of an announcement after his swearing in on Tuesday? Perhaps it's supposed to happen on Wednesday?

FT.com / World - Obama team to prioritise credit flow

Same old crap:
President-elect Barack Obama will demand that banks receiving public support step up lending, top advisers said on Sunday, as they promised to make restoring the flow of credit a top priority for the new US administration.

“I think he is going to have a strong message for the bankers,” David Axelrod, a senior Obama strategist told ABC’s This Week. “We want to see credit flowing again. We don’t want them to sit on any money that they get from taxpayers.”

I like to get policy from Axelrod as much as Rove. /snark.

citizen energyecon writes:
...Any speculation on how...

And these (your own words) show what your are dealing with.

We were gonna put it all back...
Rob Dawg | Homepage | 01.19.09 - 11:18 am | #

...after we replace these shiny metals with nice green paper.

The sinsiter scheme by the gov't to get the debt gov't backed is in effect providing an insurance backstop to bondholders in banks against a nationalization.
-S

Will the new administration remove the insurance backstop?

Bond holders will be protected...On Nationalization Who? gets it and Who don't.

My hometown bank has always been greeeedy, owned locally, pays help 1970's wages, never buys inventory, and loans 1/3 of appraisal...Run like a family budget.

Amazing how fast our sense of scale changes. Back in August RBS lost one billion pounds as a result of the credit crisis. Royal Bank of Scotland poised for biggest loss in UK banking history - Times Online

"THE Royal Bank of Scotland is poised to unveil the biggest loss in UK banking history after taking a hit of almost £6 billion from the credit crisis.

Britain’s second-largest bank is this week expected to reveal a pre-tax loss of at least £1 billion for the first six months of the year, with analysts warning it could slide to as much as £1.7 billion in the red.

The loss would be roughly five times higher than the deficit racked up by Barclays in 1992 at the height of the last recession."

Anonymous writes:
reptillian writes:
No need to beef up FDIC before the banks are nationalized. Gov't just states that deposits are good.

I give Obama 2-4 weeks before he goes on primetime TV and explains what he's discovered during his first few weeks on the job. He has to dump as much on Bush as he can, fast, right out the gate. Words to the effect "drastic times call for drastic measures, bank deposits are safe but, no more good taxpayer money after bad,etc. Some type of nationalizing to follow. Obama's approvals hit the 80's


I think that's about right, Anonymous, not just as a shrewd political move but also as the reality of things: it will take at least a couple of weeks to survey the wreckage inside the executive branch.

@Reptillian,
Some big staff along the lines of the FDIC staff would be needed in nationalization because the banks would have to be inspected, new management put in place, etc. It is not just a matter of guaranteeing deposits - the FDIC insurance might not change at all, in fact. It is all about dealing with the banks' insolvency, and the bad assets and bad managements and bad regulatory/incentive structures that brought them to insolvency.

In the derivation of Black-Scholes, the authors took the bondholders as the true "owners" of a company, and treated the equity holders as holders of an "option" for residual value after all other claims are paid.

I used to think that a strange inversion, but seeing how well bondholders have been protected in the bailout process, while equity holders have been squeezed to nearly nothing, it sure looks that way in practice. Thus, it's only when the true "owners" (the bondholders) get their high-and-tight that we'll know the process is getting serious at allocating pain.

Thanks Basel for the link. At least I know I'm not senile yet.

In the event of nationalization, the job of the IRS will be made much easier and the black market will increase in scope hundredfold.

I used to think that a strange inversion, but seeing how well bondholders have been protected in the bailout process, while equity holders have been squeezed to nearly nothing, it sure looks that way in practice.
DCRogers | 01.19.09 - 11:23 am | #

That's the way it's supposed to work.  Equity -> zero first, bondholders next.

Geez, Shnaps, what neighborhood do you bank in?  Wink

Seriously, did you read those stories last year about BAC being sued over having sold the contents of various customer's boxes?  They reported the accounts abandoned to the state, even though the customers had numerous other active accounts in the bank.

Comrade Janosik writes:
the rich that write the history books are a scam....

Oh my illusions are crushed.

All history is a lie you tell yourself. Fact is political. There is no "true" story, because the truth is too large and complex to narrate. There's merely your reductionist lie of choice.

Get off it and thank all the ancestors -- you're just fibbing when you're picking favorites. They're just ancestors.

lucifer writes:
...The rating companies still have credibility? You must be kidding...

Interestingly you find S&P's and Moody's ratings still frequently used in americas media (e.g. Bloomberg, etc.)
As if nothing had happened.

Amazing! (Americas relationship with truth and honesty!)

The_Littlest_Mandarin writes:
But they are not screwing up. They are pursuing a very rational course for looting the state. First they got TBTF. Then they took very real insane risks (no question about convincing the victim you'll crash the plane). Now they collect the proceeds of the bet.

Very true. Much of the risk-taking rationale was based on the assumption that the MBS market was too important and the government will not let it fail.

the nationalization of such tremendous amounts of money is meant to be a trigger of massive inflation...

With people already swimming in debt...tripling the burden is meaningless in context.

...after we replace these shiny metals with nice green paper.
Comrade Bear (tj & the bear) | 01.19.09 - 11:21 am | #

$20 Double Eagles swapped out at face value for crisp new Andy Jacksons. 

In the event of nationalization, the job of the IRS will be made much easier and the black market will increase in scope hundredfold.
Black Star Ranch | 01.19.09 - 11:25 am | #

Yeah, sort of what I was (half-jokingly) hinting at.  If the government owns the bank, the government has unfettered access to the books.  Say what you will about bankers, but I'm not particularly fond of the IRS having direct realtime access to everyone's account information without warrant or consent.

Lucifer, I know.
Anyway, Obama's advisors have told him that people want more credit and that we have a liquidity problem.

Interestingly you find S&P's and Moody's ratings still frequently used in americas media (e.g. Bloomberg, etc.)

By law banks, insurance companies, and pension funds can only invest in certain grades of securities. The alternative may be the European approach (which the US is supposed to move towards) is to allow the bank itself to determine the risk.

I guess it would be more efficient, cutting off the bank's payola to the credit agencies.

....The Newest Type of Private Bank:

Private Vaults! No ID required. The concept already been run thru the US courts - ruled no IRS access. Talked to the originator (a physician)in Texas. Quite remarkable.

24-7 Private Vaults - We draw the line for your peace of mind!

http://www.24-7privatevaults.com/

Not sure how much I can trust an organization that can't spell "theives" [sic]

BSR,

Damn, available up to 6 1/2 feet.  Shnaps could even fit his dead bodies in there!

"Yeah, sort of what I was (half-jokingly) hinting at. If the government owns the bank, the government has unfettered access to the books. Say what you will about bankers, but I'm not particularly fond of the IRS having direct realtime access to everyone's account information without warrant or consent."

Gov't gets reports on any transaction over 10000, plus studies for bundling. They essentially already get info about all (considered in terms of dollar value) transactions.

The Littlest Mandarin

I agree with your response.
I will only add that I have no illusions.

All history is indeed a lie...but it is one that the big wigs attempt to narrate.

force = mass x acceleration

And everyone applies their own leverage.

I will not charge my benefits on the backs of others. (as much as I can help that)

Another reason for Scottish independence. My distant cousins have need of renewed thriftyness.

aye! argh!

Private Vaults! No ID required. The concept already been run thru the US courts - ruled no IRS access. Talked to the originator (a physician)in Texas. Quite remarkable.
Black Star Ranch | 01.19.09 - 11:33 am | #

What's the big deal?  My last bank in NJ let me keep both keys.

It's not like they can't block off the building and drill them anyways.

Werner | 01.19.09 - 11:18 am | #

IEA energy statistics for Germany:
International Energy Agency - Germany Country Page
Natural gas becomes increasingly important to the energy matrix as the nuclear capacity is dismantled. Note that wedge will go to something...else. EU green house gas requirements mitigate the amount of oil and coal that can be used to substitute, and renewables cannot ramp at the rate of nuclear decommissioning.

Latest year available is 2006:
http://www.iea.org/textbase/stats/pdf_graphs/DETPESPI.pdf

Oh, and I'll answer the question you ducked - there are no predictions.

Basel Too writes:
...By law banks, insurance companies, and pension funds can only invest in certain grades of securities...

I know, that's what gave them their "credibility" in the first place. And after all that happened, this still is law?
So, you see the reason for the amazement. America seems to be incabable to rectify this mess !
(Just a few hearings (which I watched btw.) and possibly a few minor rules changed somewhere, that's all).

Black Star Ranch writes:
....The Newest Type of Private Bank:

Private Vaults! No ID required. The concept already been run thru the US courts - ruled no IRS access. Talked to the originator (a physician)in Texas. Quite remarkable.
I've been using them from the 80's on. One has size limations at banks. 250 grand in 20's weighs 80 pounds.
But that was the good old days------

"why should the UK taxpayer be on the hook for RBS ?"

As a British acquaintance put it: they've got their devolution, and we've still got a Jock running our government (Brown). What do we need this crap for?

What Recession? The $170 Million Inauguration up by 20 million since yesterday What Recession? The $170 Million Inauguration - ABC News

Jan. 19 ( Bloomberg) -- A rally that sent U.S. Treasuries to their best year since 1995 is coming to an end, South Korea’s National Pension Service, the country’s biggest investor, said.
U.S. government efforts to combat the recession will prompt the Federal Reserve to raise interest rates this year, said Kim Heeseok, who oversees $160 billion as head of global investments for the service in Seoul. The decline would snap a surge that sent the securities up 14 percent last year, according to Merrill Lynch & Co.’s U.S. Treasury Master index, as investors sought the relative safety of debt.

“It’s time to sell U.S. Treasuries,” said Kim, who took over as head of investments at the start of the year. “The stimulus plan may cause inflation. The U.S. will raise the benchmark interest rate.”

Wow.

What Recession? The $170 Million Inauguration up by 20 million since yesterday
Credit enima is coming..... | 01.19.09 - 11:55 am | #

Are Springsteen, et al donating their services? 

I'm a little surprised at all this talk about nationalizing banks in the U.S. It's not something I would have predicted. The alternatives, though, don't seem to offer much.

If in fact the Obama Administration is going to do this (and I have no way of knowing whether that is likely), I don't see it happening in the next two to four weeks. On the contrary, they would just cut off government subsidies for a while, leaving them 'twisting in the wind' as it were.

Only when the situation was dire in the eyes of ordinary folks would the concept of nationalization be put out there by the government. At that point the howls from the allegedly loyal opposition would be deafening.

What I would look for now are two things: (1) the second half of TARP going not to banks but elsewhere; and (2) some leaning on the recent BAC 'deal' that is currently having its details established.

I think that nationalization, this week, is the way to go. It's a bold stroke. It gives us a new start and a way out of this mess.

Things must be good - today's CR advertiser is offering 11% yield on a 3 year term deposit.

China reports two new cases of bird flu, one dead

Reuters AlertNet - China reports two new cases of bird flu, one dead

maybe the Black Swan really is a Black Swa

California is doig suprisingly well considering. House prices are way off the peak, unemployment is still single digits

Not in my little piece of Central Valley Paradise. Last I heard Fresno County was 12%+

MrM:

Makes you wonder if the Fed is now the only purchaser of the long bond (and perhaps the banks as part of sub rosa TARP agreements) because the Asian countries are definitely vacating that space.

anonymous writes:
Makes you wonder if the Fed is now the only purchaser of the long bond (and perhaps the banks as part of sub rosa TARP agreements) because the Asian countries are definitely vacating that space.

We will know the answer in the next 2-3 weeks.

Defense Secretary Gates to sit out the inauguration as 'designated successor.'

Good choice.

Rob Dawg-

SoCal crime has not increased...yet. I was doing busines on the streets of LA during the Rodney King period. Even though crime during that period was getting worse by the day, no one could have believed the riot that ensued.

We are in a much great period of uncertainity tha n the early 90's

SoCal is about to become very violent.

"Things must be good - today's CR advertiser is offering 11% yield on a 3 year term deposit."

Either 11% will turn out to be a bad deal because of inflation, or the return will not be collectable.

The mania continues...

Just had an interesting conversation with someone 'in the know' on stuff.

I guess this is obvious, but one of the key root problems right now has to do with the amount of money these bank execs and other financial industry participants need to keep their lifestyles going. That is to say they would rather lie about the asset values than risk government interference in their compensation. This is because they have such a big 'nut' to cover for their houses, private schools for their kids, etc. So, one idea being discussed is 'making them whole' so they have sufficient guaranteed money and then can make more honest disclosures.

I hope to god this is just an 'out of the box' idea and not somehthing that occurs because it would be sickening on the highest order.

Hmmm...you missed that Bubonic Plague containment fiasco then, I take it.

Nostrovia,
\t Comrade Misean is Dope

Comrade Misean is Dope | Homepage | 01.19.09 - 9:31 am | #

Fortunately, with advances in the zombification arts, the death rate for  this outbreak has been much lower than the 1/4 or 1/3 of the population for the plague.  Zombie banks are not quite dead (I think).  Yersinia bankus.

It's going down.

This one's for Werner (it's all in fun)

Obama Needs ‘Yes We Can’ Abroad to Help End Global Recession

With industrial nations suffering their first synchronous decline since World War II, Obama needs policy makers in other countries to pull their weight.

Cloverleaf....That's already going on.

Is it wrong to listen to people whine and cry about pay cuts and short workweeks and read about elaborate inauguration ceremonies that are 3 times more expensive than the last with glee.

Glee. Abject happiness that people are coming to realize that they need the money worse than the tax man, and if they do pay, then it will be pissed away on pomp and circumstance, eerily similar to Brittan in the early parts of this century.

Banks failing, and nobody knows why. Governments failing basic logic tests, and implementing policies of questionable efficacy. Raging deflation, in price and wage, with a population eager to willingly suspend their disbelief just to get back to something that resembles their recent experience. (last 60 years)

See you in hell.

From RGE Monitor:

Jan 19: Harrison: Der Spiegel reports that German banks are loaded with $400bn (EUR 300bn) of toxic U.S. assets only a fraction of which has been written down. if true it suggests that the entire German banking sector is extremely undercapitalized and vulnerable to further writedowns going forward. Different from UK, Germany so far refuses the idea of setting up a state-controlled ´bad bank´.

Fed Board: Flow of funds data show that foreigners hold 40% of U.S. originated securitizations--> out of a $10.8 trillion shadow banking universe, about $4.3 trillion are held abroad (mostly in Europe), of which about half in EMU.

Dec 2 IRA: We hear from a very well placed Buy Side investor with extensive business interests in the US and EU that three primary banking institutions in Europe, two French and one German, have such significant CDS exposure and other problems that they cannot even begin to fund the payouts anticipated over the next quarter. The funding squeeze reportedly is exacerbated by a near-collapse among weaker players in the hedge fund market.This past summer, when the bank put out a call for redemptions of $4 billion in hedge fund investments, says the source, only $400 million was returned. And the French bank also used these same hedge funds and others to reinsure some of its own CDS exposure--> the investor claims that EU officials are considering a moratorium on CDS payments by the three Euroland banks in question. The banks would be given ten years to write down their CDS and hedge fund exposures and would receive additional infusions of capital by their respective governments.

Evans-Pritchard: The International Monetary Fund said the top 15 banks in the Eurozone, Switzerland, and Britain will need to roll over $700bn in debts by the end of 2009. It is far from clear whether they can do so. Even top banks are having to pay crippling interest rates of near 9pc to issue bonds.

Benink/Kaufman: Basel II with its risk- and ratings-based capital requirements has left the EU banking system severly undercapitalized--> major rethink is necessary.

Dec 16 FT: Investment banks, mostly in Europe, face losses of €8.4bn ($11.5bn) on exposure to a group of specialist bond insurers called credit derivative product companies that operate solely in the derivatives markets and are run by banks or specialist managers, according to analysts at JPMorgan.

Daniel Gros/Stefano Micossi: The “overall leverage ratio” - a measure of total assets to shareholder equity - of the average European bank is 35 due to large in-house investment banking operations, compared with less than 20 for the largest U.S. banks. This means that relatively small writedowns on their assets could have a devastating impact on a bank’s capital--> some EU banks have become too big for any one European country to save while an official cross-border crisis management mechanism with ex ante burden sharing is not in place.
cont.: The crucial problem on this side of the Atlantic is that the largest European banks have become not only too big to fail, but also too big to be saved. For example, the total liabilities of Deutsche Bank (leverage ratio over 50!) amount to about €2,000bn (more than Fannie Mae) or more than 80 per cent of the gross domestic product of Germany. This is simply too much for the Bundesbank or even the German state

cont.: AIG’s last annual report reveals that it had written coverage for more than $300bn of credit insurance for European banks. The comment by AIG itself on these positions was that they were “for the purpose of providing them with regulatory capital relief rather than risk mitigation in exchange for a minimum guaranteed fee”. (see also Fitch)

UK, Spain, Ireland financial sector additionally exposed to domestic housing bust--> Spanish banks e.g. not exposed to U.S. subprime fallout and off-balance sheet SIVs but draws heavily on ECB lending facility which delays actual writedowns on unviable domestic collateral (RGE analyst)

citizen energyecon writes:
...IEA energy statistics for Germany:...

Good, actually the question I (back three days) asked and (you ducked) was : "What percentage of Germanys energy consumtion comes from russian gas?"
here is the link :
HaloScan.com - Comments
and I think I asked this question more than once.

Sorry for not formulating my reminder here in this thread precisely enough! The actual question you ducked is :"What percentage of Germanys energy consumtion comes from russian gas?".

And I intentionally wanted the percentage figure to put that into relation to the dire statements made in these reports.

So, the original question (ducked by you) is :
"What percentage of Germanys energy consumtion comes from russian gas?"

it would be sickening on the highest order.

And redolent of Mandarin's pilot with the pistol analogy...

I am sure Obama reads Calculated Risk.

He already knows what he is getting into.

Trust in the US banking system is all but dead.

I am sure Obama reads Calculated Risk.
Quincy k | 01.19.09 - 12:14 pm | #

I think Conjure is the new Obama puppy.

Werner writes:

And I intentionally wanted the percentage figure to put that into relation to the dire statements made in these reports.
Werner | 01.19.09 - 12:13 pm | #

So, now it is the reports and not my predictions...nice shuffle step.

Trust in the US banking system is all but dead.
km4

As is the US consumer. You take these two out of the GDP and what do you have?

Speaking of Conjure, where is mp? It scares me when he goes missing for any period of time, it leads me to believe he and Conjure are tinkering with that infernal clock of theirs Wink

"Mr. President we have to do something about this bank loss gap"

Werner,

Your tunnel vision does not serve you well. The focus of the reporting is on the EU zone as a whole, and the dire impacts have been experienced by the eastern European nations.

However, the only EU nation directly visited by Vladimir Putin was...

There have been several posts lately using my handle. Please only credit me with the intelligent, witty or exceptionally funny posts. Thanks.

Comrade Bear (tj & the bear) writes:
So, if the government owns your bank, does that then allow them to rummage through your safe deposit boxes? Gotta be some clause of the Patriot Act that would apply, wouldn't you think?

Well, when FDR seized Gold you weren't allowed to open your safe deposit box without an agent of the IRS present. Couple that with many states recently moving up the deadline for declaring property in safety deposit boxes "abandoned" and you have the makings of a nice "heads I win, tails you lose" scenario.

credit unions are often (not always) more conservatively run than banks and therefore safer. But the devil is always in the details of the particular credit union or bank you are investigating.
joe shmoe | 01.19.09 - 10:10 am | #

  For a source of Credit Union Financials, please go here: The page cannot be found   For a guide to reading Credit Union Reports, please go here: The page cannot be found
Maybe FFDIC can post some UberNerd type comments on what to avoid when evaluating a financial institution.  I suspect that he has seen more failed financial institutions during his career than any of us would see in a dozen lifetimes.
NW

But to the extent that Germany is mandating various efficiency standards, it is not completely unrealistic to assume that reduced energy consumption is possible.
rent_to_own | 01.19.09 - 12:18 pm | #

Absolutely correct, particularly with the depth the recession ultimately reaches.

Either way, gas as a contributor to the national power matrix increases in importance, regardless of source.

"Germans are attempting to create housing that uses natural materials with minimal need for any energy apart from what the house can itself generate - just to give a yardstick of how far apart daily German and American experiences are."

Very few Germans live like that either.

But the european use of energy is influenced by higher taxes on it. A higher price does encourage less use.

How long before UK becomes a bust nation ?

you know it's bad when a Scottish banker is losing money.

It can only get worse when the Dutch, then Swiss start to have problems.

oh, wait a second ...

How long before UK becomes a bust nation ?
Frued | 01.19.09 - 12:22 pm | #

Can clocks show negative time?

Trust in the US banking system is all but dead.
\t km4

km4 | 01.19.09 - 12:15 pm | #

But the zombie of trust in the US banking system is still lurching around.  I think that will keep things going for a while.

Good one Eric Smile

What is happening to UBS and CS ? Eeerie silence from CS..too bad

take a name ass wipe writes:
Trust in the US banking system is all but dead.
km4

As is the US consumer. You take these two out of the GDP and what do you have?
take a name ass wipe | 01.19.09 - 12:17 pm | #

A DEPRESSION

What do I win Wink

Your tunnel vision does not serve you well.
citizen energyecon | Homepage | 01.19.09 - 12:19 pm | #

OT- Maybe Werner can expound on the special plan God has for us, which he mentioned on Friday.

A DEPRESSION

What do I win Wink
\t km4

km4 | 01.19.09 - 12:24 pm | #

On the positive side, lower prices.  On the other hand...

The bondholders...

That'd be the pension funds for the most part, wouldn't it?

Ho hum.

-- w

km4, you could always place your bets with intrade Wink

Credit enema...there ya go again! Only Faux meme for now.

I think that nationalization, this week, is the way to go. It's a bold stroke. It gives us a new start and a way out of this mess.

You mean, like, get ahead of the problem? I doubt it will happen that soon. Conjure's clock will likely strike midnight first - creating a situation which, as sportsfan notes, is "dire in the eyes of ordinary folks"

Third Bank of the United States clock:

11:54:35

From Mish

California's unpaid bills are mounting up. The total amount of California Unpaid Bills hit $3,126,408,000 as of 2009-01-14.

Anybody here expect the euro to disappear?
Mel | 01.19.09 - 9:32 am | #

I do.

"Trust in the US banking system is all but dead."

I don't think so. Most Americans aren't smart enough to be mad! Most are clueless as to what a bank is or a savings account. Look at the explosion in Pawn shops, Payday loans, car pawns and lets not forget those who see credit cards a wealth.

The bondholders...

That'd be the pension funds for the most part, wouldn't it?

And the endowment funds, the insurance companies, etc. Quite an incestuous web we wove...

Euro disappearance was extensively discussed in the morning part of the last thread. My view - the euro is not in danger. ECB is fundamentally more sound institution than FRB since it has only one mandate while FRB two competing ones.

If we nationalize the banks we could save a lot of money by merging them all together and closing all the redundant branches.

In fact, we could merge the new single bank with the US Postal Service. That would allow the use of the existing post offices and employees, with the added service of home delivery banking.

Senorito: What a GOPer grinch!

Nothing new under the sun : Behold, there come seven years of great plenty throughout all the land of Egypt: And there shall arise after them seven years of famine; and all the plenty shall be forgotten in the land of Egypt; and the famine shall consume the land; And the plenty shall not be known in the land by reason of that famine following; for it shall be very grievous.

Kitchen plot gardens are some of the world's most fantastically produtive enterprises.
The_Littlest_Mandarin | 01.19.09 - 10:54 am | #

I believe Logsdon, of The Contrary Farmer, claims that an 8’ x 8’ plot is all that is necessary---I do think his theory involves chickens though (for fertilization and all that)--- so check your zoning….

"ECB is fundamentally more sound institution than FRB since it has only one mandate while FRB two competing ones."

However, the ECB has many participating nations with strongly conflicting needs and
desires.

"In fact, we could merge the new single bank with the US Postal Service."

Sandy Weil in shorts with an eagle on his shoulder... yeah, that's the ticket!

....If the banks are nationalized, it'll be like waiting in line at the DMV, only worse - probably like the numbered ticket bit in Beetlejuice.

BTW, I thought IRS agents needed to be present at a Bank Deposit Box opening for probate and other deaths anyway.

"--- so check your zoning…."

Our zoning rules are: "...work and play well with your neighbors..."

I believe Logsdon, of The Contrary Farmer, claims that an 8' x 8' plot is all that is necessary---I do think his theory involves chickens though (for fertilization and all that)--- so check your zoning….
TC | 01.19.09 - 12:36 pm | #

8X8 won't do it unless all you want are a few veggies and herbs to add a little flavor & nutrition to the sacks of rice & beans you buy.

Or unless you grow an illegal herb and sell it for food - then 8X8 might get you by.

The plane crash into the Hudson just won't leave my thinking. The parallels between the crash and our sinking economy/nation are striking.

The airplane(complex system) has an outside force(Force Majeure, no blame game)crash it in a densely populated area(high risk for catastrophe). The pilot(President) manages to glide it in and saves everyone.

My only missing corollary is who/what is represented by the ferries that quickly swooped in and really saved everyone. There in a nutshell is the future problem/unknown facing the USA.

TARP was not necessary and it's a trillion dollar robbery
Daily Kos: Oh boy - TARP was not necessary and it's a trillion dollar robbery

The reality is that the banking system is fucked up beyond help, and the only solution is to nationalize it wholesale in order to put it back on a sound footing.

There are no mistakes in the general theory, although some people got sacrificed and that was probably not in the prospectus. It's merely asymmetric policy. Bankers, government policymakers and the general populace all have a different set of victory conditions.
The_Littlest_Mandarin | 01.19.09 - 11:20 am | #

Generic name for this is "Bust-out Capitalism".

The current banking system is terminally bankrupt. Banks today will not lend, even to sound businesses, even if you give them the money to do so. So you have to compel them to lend.

THESE BASTARDS should be prosecuted then jailed !

anonymous writes:
...This one's for Werner (it's all in fun)
Obama Needs ‘Yes We Can’ Abroad to Help End Global Recession
With industrial nations suffering their first synchronous decline since World War II, Obama needs policy makers in other countries to pull their weight...

Thanks anonymous (fun is always good).

But I guess we (Europeans) just told "our weight" because we might need it to pull our selfs out of this (american caused) situation. It's not over yet !
So if, in let's say, three years America is still in a desaster and Europe looks very good, we might consider an "european Marshall-Plan" for America. But not now, not to spare iresponsible, corrupt (the collusion between real estate/ scuritizers/ regulators/ and Congress) America to pay a prize for it's irresponsibility.

And in any event that "corrupt american system" needs to be changed first (might be even a prize for any european help!).
Remember that the allies in WWII correctly (!) let the Nazies completely fail/capitulate before any help was given! Imagine they had accepted peace negotiations/armistice before the complete capitulation of the Nazies! Would not have been an good outcome.

I suppose Rubin stashed away a lot of money before running away from Citigroup just before Obama became Pres.

I seem to recall that Obama is supposed to make some kind of an announcement after his swearing in on Tuesday? Perhaps it's supposed to happen on Wednesday? I'll try to find a link but for some reason I remember reading this, it had to do with the banking industry and it was going to be a big announcement. I'm thinking Nationalization is only a couple days away, thus the beefed up FDIC presence...Of course I've been wrong before.
Comrade Kristina | Homepage | 01.19.09 - 11:19 am | #

I think the announcement will be that he's really a white man.

citizen energyecon writes:
...So, now it is the reports and not my predictions...nice shuffle step...

Well, whatever you disseminated.
That's what I mean.

The plane crash into the Hudson just won't leave my thinking. The parallels between the crash and our sinking economy/nation are striking.
anon | 01.19.09 - 12:41 pm | #

Especially if you think of it as having had simultaneous black swan bird-strikes to its engines!

In the derivation of Black-Scholes, the authors took the bondholders as the true "owners" of a company, and treated the equity holders as holders of an "option" for residual value after all other claims are paid.
DCRogers | 01.19.09 - 11:23 am | #

That is what they taught us in MBA finance classes in 1979.

They also taught us that securitization was the next big money thing.

"I think the announcement will be that he's really a white man"

Isn't he as much a "White Man" as he is a "Black Man:?

Scholes, and Long Term Capital Management.

The next three day weekend is President's Day (Feb 16).

"The plane crash into the Hudson just won't leave my thinking. The parallels between the crash and our sinking economy/nation are striking."

You'll notice that the pilot admitted reality: he had no power. He didn't try to pretend to keep the plane in the air, he tried to set down with minimal loss.
When that is the best you can do, you try to do it well. He did.

You'll notice that the pilot admitted reality: he had no power. He didn't try to pretend to keep the plane in the air, he tried to set down with minimal loss.
When that is the best you can do, you try to do it well. He did.
wally | 01.19.09 - 12:59 pm | #

Fortunately, he had a river to land in/on. I'm afraid there's no such luck when it comes to the world economy. There will be much gnashing of teeth.

Good point. Time for us to stop trying to fly as well. Zombie banks are a bad solution.

The river that is being used is the taxpayer.

Black Star Ranch writes:
"I think the announcement will be that he's really a white man--Isn't he as much a "White Man" as he is a "Black Man:?"

BOTH SIDES DID IT!

I would like to thank the Conservatives for bringing honor back to the White House.

re : rent_to_own | 01.19.09 - 12:18 pm

Thanks for your observations, but I also want to point out a completely schizophrenic situation in Europe:

While France has (I think ca. 80%) of it's electricity from nuclear reactors, Germany has little (don't know, maybe 20% ?). You just can not understand the dichotomy between the "comfortableness" of the French with nuclear energy and the "Angst" the Germans have about it. Doesn't make any sense. Two not so completely different countries and diametrically opposed attitudes against nuclear energy ! And we Germans buy french nuclear-generated electricity.

We Germans could have any amount of energy we wanted if we were a bit more rational about the "dangers" of nuclear energy. Just saying.

But instead we flee into "green energy" phantasies, and whenever you go down to the real facts (Watts, predictability, cost, etc.) you see the "greens" just fleeing (into their now probably two decades old phantasies).

Its Only a Matter of Time before nationalization becomes policy.

TARP, as presently constituted, has allowed the fiction of normalcy to be served up to a fairly uniformed public, but the day of reckoning is coming up fast.

.....currently minting "BSR Bucks"...

Get in on the ground floor. 2 for a dollar!

Something to remember about nationlization. This would most likely be a credit-default event under the terms of many CDS. Very ugly to unwind the losses behind one of these events especially for a larger bank.

This is why we are getting something that looks like nationalization but "technically" isn't.

The same reasoning behind why the government has purchased at most 79.9% of any financial institution so far (FNM/FRE/AIG). 80% ownership requires the US Government to show the assets and liabilities on it's balance sheet.

Paradigm Lost writes:
Senorito: What a GOPer grinch!
Paradigm Lost | 01.19.09 - 12:34 pm | #


Neither a GOP'er or a grinch....

Nor a Dem for that matter. More of a, whats the phrase, Independent Thinker.

xxxxx writes:
...OT- Maybe Werner can expound on the special plan God has for us, which he mentioned on Friday...

Hmm, I remember something about that, but could you please give me the link to that so I can refresh my memory?

Thanks.

Nationalize Gothambank. Then nationalize all the other banks that wrote CDS on it. Then...

Economist Moe Howard 3SU writes:
...I don't think so...

Excellent!

Login or register to post comments
Syndicate content