Roubini: The U.K. is NOT Iceland

Oops, no comments. I flatly refuse to be one of those yahoos who says first.

Roubini is becoming an optimist.

"Note that during WWII the UK public debt to GDP ratio peaked well above 150% and the UK government remained solvent."

This is not 1945, when as we know Britain had faced an existential threat for the past six years. (It wasn't until 2004 or so - I forget the exact year) that the British war debt was paid off).

That this is not 1945 means that what follows from 2008-09 is nowhere near predictable. Extrapolation in this case is not reliable.

The UK will have a worse time than the US even if it isn't the next Iceland. RBS alone has a balance sheet bigger than the UK GDP.

OTOH the UK is still better off than Spain, Greece, Italy, and assorted eastern EU countries.

.....thank goodness - a new thread. Catching up on all the "lets legalize pot, bongs, vaporizers, nicotine spit, et all" from throughout the night is finally over.....Morning....[eg]

One thing these economist geniuses haven't thought about is that pretty much every western and even many developing nations are now offering new bonds like there is no tomorrow. Whopping $3000 billion this year plus thousands of billions of rollover debt, according to FT.

So the question is which nation is the last one (aka most vulnerable) to be eaten by the bear aka "no-bids" bond auction judgement day. UK especially is looking very vulnerable...

Roubini says even if technically the UK government is solvent, near insolvency may be triggered by a financeability problem, i.e. the unwillingness of investors to increase their holdings of UK government debt and their failure to roll over debt coming to maturity. So an illiquidity crisis may eventually trigger a near insolvency crisis.

He also says that the US has a similar problem.

The solution is obvious. The US government will lend the UK what it needs to get by, and the UK government will lend the US what it needs.

Drug (debt) dealers of last resort.

Sorry, wehn I clicked comments I couldn't see the ones already written... argh.

....are there countries NOT experiencing cash flow/credit/deficit spending problems? What have they done differently?

I like this new form of "optimism".

"complete financial collapse and the end of your currency having value is unlikely...so cheer up, blokes"

I haven't figured out any countries that are SAFE. One of the ones I'm thinking about though is New Zealand. If commodities come back and if there is some growth in Asia they could be ok. Plus they have a good government. I'm thinking they may be the best of a bunch of bad choices for a dollar hedge. I will continue to study.

"are there countries NOT experiencing cash flow/credit/deficit spending problems? "

Norway, NOT wasting oil money to artificial islands and for keeping 1203 virgins in golden castles kinda helps.

....also, things must not be too bad in Iceland. I've never seen a "riot" where the windows remained unbroken, people quietly standing around looking at one another, everyone seems calm.

Maybe we should export some Detroit Pistons fans or SWLA residents over there to show them how a REAL riot is undertaken.

With all apologies to Njal:
So Thorgrim said "As to whether Gunnar's checking account is in the bank, you'll have to see for yourselves. But I know one thing: his debts are there." Whereuppon Thorgrim promply fell over, bankrupt.

I think the U.K. manufacturing base was substantially different in WW II. Certainly, there wasn't a lot of discussion about vacation homes in Spain or second homes in the countryside. There is not so much of a monoculture today. The Monarchy also had a stronger role than today. Britain will survive this, stiff upper lip and quiet desperation will save the day. Back to potted meat, overloaded flats, and the dole as unemployment skyrockets. But this time, the youth will be angrier.

Ireland, on the other hand, is cooked. They are Iceland, only with Guiness, sod, and sheep. Bad times ahead, but they've been through worse.

But in principle the UK looks more like the US: the public debt to GDP is relatively low (in the 40s % range) and thus the sovereign should be able to absorb fiscal bailout costs and additional fiscal stimulus costs that may eventually increase that debt ratio by as high as 20% of GDP. Note that during WWII the UK public debt to GDP ratio peaked well above 150% and the UK government remained solvent.

How does the picture change when you include private debt -- especially when these governments seem intent on taking it on to their balance sheets?

Why do economists only seem to focus on public debt, when the real explosion in these countries has involved private debt? Is private debt somehow less of a burden than public debt?

Are graphs like this erroneous or somehow misleading?

The above graph makes the current debt situation look worse than it's ever been.

Just to clarify terms:

Recession = your neighbour loses his job
Depression = you lose your job.
Financial collapse/meltdown = bank economists lose their jobs.
Armageddon = central bank economists lose their jobs.
Mad Max = The demand of lamp posts triples...

Repost with working link:

But in principle the UK looks more like the US: the public debt to GDP is relatively low (in the 40s % range) and thus the sovereign should be able to absorb fiscal bailout costs and additional fiscal stimulus costs that may eventually increase that debt ratio by as high as 20% of GDP. Note that during WWII the UK public debt to GDP ratio peaked well above 150% and the UK government remained solvent.

How does the picture change when you inclued private debt -- especially these governments seem intent on taking it on to their balance sheets?

Why do economists only seem to focus on public debt, when the real explosion in these countries has involved private debt? Is private debt somehow less of a burden than public debt?

Are graphs like this erronous or somehow misleading?

It makes the current situation look worse than it's ever been.

One hundred and three?

I would like to christen this era: The Owin' oh ohs.

So nice to see something POSITIVE on CR,YES we are canned!

ac:

its different this time....

hahaha..

ac

I'm with you. The private and public debt will roll this mess up in Britian.

Caught from a post on Denninger's Market Ticker Forum:

India bans Chinese toys for six months
24 Jan 2009, 0123 hrs IST, PTI
NEW DELHI: India on Friday slapped a ban on import of toys from China after cheap supplies from the neighbouring country upset the applecart of the
domestic manufacturers.
India bans Chinese toys for six months- Durables-Cons. Products-News By Industry-News-The Economic Times

24 Jan 2009, 0123 hrs IST, PTI
NEW DELHI: India on Friday slapped a ban on import of toys from China after cheap supplies from the neighbouring country upset the applecart of the
domestic manufacturers.

And so it begins...

Roubini has been way too optimistic over the last two years.

ac writes:
And so it begins...

And Buiter writes:
The second form of re-nationalisation of banking and finance is the restriction of access to the fiscal and financial resources of the nation state just to those banks and other financial entities that have a significant presence in that nation state. The foreign subsidiaries of bank groups or bank holding companies registered and headquartered in the UK will not be able to count on the fiscal support or on other financial support of the British sovereign. These foreign subsidiaries will sink or swim on their own or take the begging bowl to the fiscal authority of their host country.

The real canary may be Barclays and not RBS.

stockdog42 --

Nassim Taleb said that he was afraid Roubini was too optimistic.

I feel a little sick to my stomach... I don't know who to believe anymore. I want to believe Roubini, but the point about the private debt sounds solid to me. What happens this weekend? How is Citi (et al.) doing?

I am not sure the concept of sovereign solvency is well defined, since the sovereign balance sheet is a rather vague concept. A country is not a bank.
What is well defined is two things:
1) Government's ability to pay interest on its debt and to roll over its maturing debt. While there are cases of governments defaulting on debt denominated in their own currency (e.g., Russia 1998), a government can always choose not to default on debt in its currency. The UK government borrows in its own currency.
2) Foreign Exchange. If the country has a fixed or semi-fixed exchange regime, then it can run out of FX reserves. In this case the government can either devalue the currency and inflict pain on its citizens, or it can choose to default on its debt and inflict pain on its creditors. The GBP is a free floating currency.

I do not quite see how the UK Government would be forced to default. What it we are likely to see is the yield on its sovereign GBP-denominated debt going up and the GBP falling against other currencies, hence a very deep recession in the UK. But a sovereign default is unlikely to solve these problems, and hence it is unlikely.
(Btw, Iceland is rated BBB, it did not default)

ac....
I've never heard this brought up before. Why? It would seem this factor would be immensely important as to the hoped for results.

ac,

Well, given that the vast majority of economists are socialist "Master Planners" and look at the economy as some kind of mechanical model with all sorts of knobs and levers to twist and pull, it is hardly suprising that all they look at is "public" (gov't) debt.

A new five year plan, and more control by "virtuous" regulators will fix things up straight away. Private debt can be solved by fiddling with a few laws, tax policy, and fiscal policy and a bit of magic dust. Which is why we see great HUZZAHS! for stoopid little things like foreclosure freezes, cram downs, bankruptcy reforms, and a constant cry that the "BANKS MUST START LENDING!" and "WE MUST RESTORE CONFIDENCE!".

It won't work, because the demand for the former, and trust of the latter has colapsed. But since gov't can't actually do anything about that, it is ignored.

Nostrovia,

given that the vast majority of economists are socialist "Master Planners" and look at the economy as some kind of mechanical model with all sorts of knobs and levers to twist and pull

It's their own version of Sim City =)

With all due respect to the parties involved, IMO the UK is done.

They are like the US but much smaller in proportion to their liabilities. They also differ from the US in that the US doesn't have to compete with a vastly larger US-alike in the sovereign debt market.

The banks are not too big for the country to bail out, in that it has the administrative capacity to do so.

The country, however, is too big for the global macro managers to bail out while also minding their own snausage factories.

"NEW DELHI: India on Friday slapped a ban on import of toys from China after cheap supplies from the neighbouring country upset the applecart of the
domestic manufacturers."

Time for the shell game. I'm seeing more and more cheap goods marked "made in Vietnam." The new lower-cost outsourcing destination "for when a 25 cents an hour is just too high."

....The FedGov has been pushing banks to LOAN, LOAN, LOAN. Maybe they don't realize that a BIG percentage of people are "in debt up to their eyeballs"? Hence NO CONCERN for private debt? They can't be THAT insulated/stupid, can they?

ac - I suppose that high level of the total UK debt will mean that many UK corporations and banks will end up bankrupt or nationalized or bought up (especially by foreign capital given the falling GBP). That does not necessarily lead to the sovereign default though.

I think that the last option, insolvent companies being bought up by foreign capital, is going to be seen quite often when it comes to better known UK companies. Andrew Mellon is believed to have said that “In a depression assets return to their rightful owners" .

ac writes:
"Are graphs like this [see link above - U.S. private debt] erronous or somehow misleading?"

It's misleading. "Private debt" includes financial debt (I believe this is what is charted here); the number that matters is non-financial debt. (And keep in mind, non-financial debt has grown alot, but is not as big.)

Why: Financial debt is almost entirely issued to finance positions in non-financial debt. For example, a bank issues bonds so that it can finance its balance sheet, which may consist of commercial loans. The commercial loans are the actual net debt seen by the economy; the bank bonds' payments are matched by the payments on the loan portfolio. I.e., if you own the bank bonds, you really own the commercial loans, with a call on the sliver of equity that is on the bank's balance sheet. But the gross debt is now doubled in size (less the % of bank equity).

Securitization increases the double-counting. In a securitization, a SPV buys debt and issues new debt against it. It doubles the size of the debt debt outstanding, but all that is happening is that the cash flows are transformed from format to another. You then securitizations of securitizations.

What the explosion in private debt tells us is that the financial sector got big. It doesn't tell us anything about what the net debt servicing needs of the economy are.

Roubini has been way too optimistic over the last two years.
stockdog42 | Homepage | 01.24.09 - 10:21 am | #

Roubini called this mess to start with.  Now he's found a middle road between complete systemic collapse and depression from what I can tell.  I'm not sure I'm reading optimism into what he says.

Why do economists only seem to focus on public debt, when the real explosion in these countries has involved private debt? Is private debt somehow less of a burden than public debt?

It is almost impossible to have hyper-inflation in a country with little or no public debt. The central bank can raise interest rates to any level necessary without threatening the solvency of the sovereign.

Not even the Shadow knows...

Amidst all the flurry of action on fiscal and monetary fronts, no apparenent action has taken place on what seems like a fundamental issue:

How much questionable debt is in the hands of major institutions, private and public? Confidence depends on trust, and one can't trust a bank that has unknown unknowns.

Granted there is a risk in trying to value overpriced assets that can't and won't be sold at face value. What value should be assigned? That is unknown.

But, knowing the face value totals would allow third parties to make guesses of their own about the percentage of real market value those now-overpriced assets are worth.

Now, it may be that the total face value of deflated assets might shock the marketplace, but I'd argue that that risk is far better than having a financial world where nothing is trusted (which is where we are, when savers/investors don't know where to seek protection).

Let the truth be known! In spite of Col. Jessup's conviction that 'we can't handle the truth' (in the movie 'A Few Good Men'), I believe we must face the truth. Level 3 assets in the hands of financial institutions must be revealed, at face/purchase price as a starting place). Then we apply discounts to those values for assessing safety of the institution's books, and let the market begin to act as the valuator.

Speaking of "Made in Vietnam"

I bought an embroidered USMC baseball cap the other day. Nicest quality I've ever seen. Inside the rim were the words "Made In Vietnam". I almost didn't buy it.

Growing frankness is the upside of desperation. This is what a UK cabinet minister had to say on Monday:

"Privately, something close to desperation is starting to develop inside government. After watching the slide in bank shares on Friday, one cabinet minister did not altogether joke when he said: "The banks are fucked, we're fucked, the country's fucked."

Speaking at a Fabian Society gathering at the weekend, Lord Mandelson was typically and disarmingly frank. "I'm not going to say to you I think we've now at least reached a set of measures and actions that almost for sure are going to work."

Labour stakes its reputation on second gamble |
Politics |
The Guardian

I disagree, the fear is that UK is Iceland, and I think the fear is quite valid.

If bond market crumble we could find ourselves back into the worst of stagflation at lightspeed.

Someday this war's gonna end...

"given that the vast majority of economists are socialist "Master Planners" and look at the economy as some kind of mechanical model with all sorts of knobs and levers to twist and pull"

It's their own version of Sim City =)
anonymous

Except the Sims are not only smarter than the Master Planners but they also know far more about managing their own lives, businesses and finances than the Master Planners can ever know - because the master planners know nothing about what's going on in these local economies at a granular level. This only breaks down if the Sims become ignorant, complacent and uneducated because they actually believe the Master Planners can do what they claim to be able to.

Somebody has delusions of grandeur and aspirations of being a Master Planner.

I think they have a beard.

Noted in a NYTimes story about banks not lending to charities...

Credit Crisis Is Leaving Charities Low on Cash - NY Times

Last summer, New York City committed to provide $2 million more to the organization to underwrite additional amenities at the site, but the bank’s risk managers turned down its request to increase the loan by that amount because Whedco did not yet have the money in hand.

“They were essentially challenging the full faith and credit of New York City,” Ms. Biberman said.

He sounds like he is trying to quell panic. The trouble with going from the sidelined speaker of truth to an oracle.

UK debt is 40% of GDP NOW, but after the bailout? 70%. Then when the recession double-dips?

I think the key numbers for the iceland cassandra is: Iceland was holding 900% of their GDP in bank deposits, and the UK has 450%. That's a comparable scale, and like Iceland, they are alone with their currency.

Roubini: The U.K. is NOT Iceland

Yeah... sez Roubini.

In many ways the UK looks more like the US than Iceland: a housing and mortgage boom that got out of control; excessive borrowing (mortgage debt, credit cards, auto loans, etc.) and low savings by households; a large and rising current account deficit driven by the consumption boom (and private savings fall) and the real estate investment boom; an overvalued exchange rate; an over-bloated financial system that took excessive risks; a light-touch regulation and supervision system that failed to control the financial excesses; and now an ugly financial and economic crisis as the housing and credit boom turns into a bust.

What didn't Iceland have in all this?

From BusinessWeek:

With the privatization of the banking sector, completed in 2000, Iceland’s banks used substantial wholesale funding to finance their entry into the local mortgage market and acquire foreign financial firms, mainly in Britain and Scandinavia…In just five years, the banks went from being almost entirely domestic lenders to becoming major international financial intermediaries. In 2000, says Richard Portes, a professor of economics at London Business School, two-thirds of their financing came from domestic sources and one-third from abroad. More recently—until the crisis hit—that ratio was reversed. But as wholesale funding markets seized up, Iceland’s banks started to collapse under a mountain of foreign debt.

OT: CR, the search function on your site is not working well, and I don't know if the archive is either. I searched for Iceland using the google search for your site, and the links it brings up aren't correct.

"I'm not going to say to you I think we've now at least reached a set of measures and actions that almost for sure are going to work."

You call that "frank" and clear? It took me about 90 seconds to parse that. Gotta love the Brits. As with the Rolls Royce company saying that their autos never "break down," they instead "fail to proceed."

Black Star Ranch writes:
"....The FedGov has been pushing banks to LOAN, LOAN, LOAN. Maybe they don't realize that a BIG percentage of people are "in debt up to their eyeballs"? Hence NO CONCERN for private debt? They can't be THAT insulated/stupid, can they?"

In a monetary economy, net cash flows amongst all entities is zero. In order for entities to have positive cash flows, other entities must have negative cash flows (or else the accounting systems are broken). In other words, somebody has to emit cash if somebody else has positive cash flow.

In a gold based monetary system, mined gold can generate some of those flows. In a modern fiat system, entities emit cash in exchange for debt - specie issuance (notes and coins) is negligible. (Zimbabwe and the Weimar Republic are not "modern" under this definition.)

Which pretty much says that a modern money-based cannot grow in nominal terms without debt issuance by the definition of what growth is (rising cash incomes). So for anyone who's actually studied how economies work is not going to be surprised by the call to increase bank lending.

Black Star Ranch writes:
Speaking of "Made in Vietnam"

I bought an embroidered USMC baseball cap the other day. Nicest quality I've ever seen. Inside the rim were the words "Made In Vietnam". I almost didn't buy it.


Black Star: After the American Revolution (1776, that is), newly independent Americans bought items with patriotic symbols manufactured in. . . . drum roll please . . . ..
BRITAIN.

That's capitalism. Everyone sells everyone the rope with which they will be hung, the toxic asset that will one day put them under, or the symbol of the very thing they just fought against.

Anyone up for a drive through the countryside in the Hummer? Gas is cheap.

reptillian writes:
Roubini is becoming an optimist.
reptillian | 01.24.09 - 9:45 am

+1

Thanks you Mr M for describing the facts.

The UK's debt are domestic, hence comments re the IMF (eg mr Cameron, leader of the Conservative Party) are so stupid because the IMF assist with external debt crisis.

And would these arm chair statisticians above please get logical before commenting in suihc absolutist terms........

For example, the balance sheet size of RBS or any other banks is totally irrelevant in absolute terms or in comparison to GDP if the government has underwritten funding (as in the UK).

It is the excess of liabilities over assets that is the key metric. As it happens, mortgages in the UK are recourse (unlike the US) so the net losses on mortgages will not be anywhere near those incurred by US banks since voluntary key hand-ins are rare.

Roubini seems to have gauged the situation.Since the Armagedden types trusted Roubini two years ago, why not now?

RockyR writes:
Roubini has been way too optimistic over the last two years.
stockdog42 | Homepage | 01.24.09 - 10:21 am | #

Roubini called this mess to start with. Now he's found a middle road between complete systemic collapse and depression from what I can tell. I'm not sure I'm reading optimism into what he says.

I agree but Roubini is forecasting a 9% unemployment rate at end of year. I believe this to be overly optimistic. Unemployment will be the real driver of the economy over the next few months.

Securitization increases the double-counting. In a securitization, a SPV buys debt and issues new debt against it. It doubles the size of the debt debt outstanding, but all that is happening is that the cash flows are transformed from format to another. You then securitizations of securitizations.

bond guy | 01.24.09 - 10:37 am | #

Hmmmm, intersting observation. Gotta think about it, but aren't double counting some GDP as well then?

bond guy writes: Which pretty much says that a modern money-based cannot grow in nominal terms without debt issuance by the definition of what growth is (rising cash incomes). So for anyone who's actually studied how economies work is not going to be surprised by the call to increase bank lending.

That's exactly right. Because contraction of lending leads to further contraction of the real economy, the government has been trying so desperately to convince bank start doing public service by lending more ("please, pretty please with sugar on top"). But it is in the interest of each individual bank not to do that. Hence the need for bank nationalization.

Censeo Bank Shareholders esse delendam

I think I will have to disagree with Roubinin on this one, but it isn't easy to see who is right.

Incidentally, I picked this up from Doug Noland's credit market report:

January 20 – Bloomberg (Jon Menon and Andrew MacAskill): “Royal Bank of Scotland Group Plc, facing the biggest loss in British history, promised to make 6 billion pounds ($8.7 billion) available to U.K. borrowers as the lender took another step toward full government control. In exchange for government guarantees on losses from toxic debt, the bank will have to sign a binding agreement with the Treasury on how much it will lend and on what terms. Auditors will move in to check the bank is following the government directive. ‘We’ll be one of the first guinea pigs,” RBS Chief Executive Officer Stephen Hester told reporters… Loans will only be made ‘on commercial terms and to creditworthy people,’ he said.”

January 19 – Bloomberg (John Fraher and Gonzalo Vina): “Prime Minister Gordon Brown’s government tightened its grip on Britain’s financial system, guaranteeing toxic assets and giving the Bank of England unprecedented power to buy securities. The plan will increase the cost of bailing out the nation’s banks by at least 100 billion pounds ($147 billion), the Treasury said in a statement today. The government raised its stake in Royal Bank of Scotland Group Plc to 70% and said it would use Northern Rock Plc to spur mortgage lending.”

Is it just me, or do the last parts of the first paragraph and the second paragraph really agree with each other? I will answer- no they don't. Believe the second one- the quote from the RBS head is bullshit of the highest order.

I agree but Roubini is forecasting a 9% unemployment rate at end of year. I believe this to be overly optimistic. Unemployment will be the real driver of the economy over the next few months.
stockdog42 | Homepage | 01.24.09 - 10:53 am | #

IMHO, the US is FUCT in the long run as are its allies to the North and East.  I think we are on our way to a depression, one that will leave a smoking crater where Omaha used to be.  Some days it feels like we are already there.  Rationally, we are not.  This thing my come apart next month, or it may take 5, 10, 15 years.  Either way, it's coming apart.

Roubini is calling in a short run prediction.

RR

PS 9% UE by what measure?  These numbers are heavily manipulated.  The .gov can massage the figures to make it appear to be a lot of things.

Hey mal,

Finished the Tainter book this week over a couple of flights. Thanks for the recommend, good read though definitely not a popularized version.

What did you think about his conclusion regarding the inability to collapse under a competitive peer polity regime (due to neighbor moving in)? That seemed more an assertion than a case he made, with the only alternative being a synchronous collapse.

Re: Debt vs GDP graph

When GDP drops and we add more stimulus, the sky is the limit. The graph peaked around the market bottom in 1933.

citizen energyecon writes:
"Hmmmm, intersting observation. Gotta think about it, but aren't double counting some GDP as well then?"

Most people plot the nonfinancial debt because of the issues with securitizations. When the financial sector was bank based and traditional, the relationship between financial and nonfinancial debt was stable, and so you could look at either. When securitization took off (1980s), the relationship broke down.

GDP should avoid double-counting by definition. The only contribution to GDP that comes from the financial sector is the fee income the sector earns. Their balance sheet size has no impact.

This is because (nominal) GDP should equal Gross Domestic Income (there's measurement errors that leaves a gap); the income of the financial sector thus shows up in the accounts. On the production side, the value-added is assumed to be the fee income earned. However, the same is true for other sectors for nominal GDP. For real GDP there is an attempt to measure "value added" in real terms, which can thus drive a wedge between nominal income and production.

Regarding the question of what countries are safe:

The amazing thing is that the U.S. is the safe harbor for the oncoming storm.

Even more amazing is that the things that make this country the safe harbor are the very things our elites have been fighting us to give away via globalization and de-regulation for thirty years.

They almost succeeded, but we'll be able to hang on to one or two of the remaining threads. Other countries will have a more difficult time.

"As it happens, mortgages in the UK are recourse (unlike the US) so the net losses on mortgages will not be anywhere near those incurred by US banks since voluntary key hand-ins are rare."

Ah, a different law allows one to get blood from a stone.

"But it is in the interest of each individual bank not to do that. Hence the need for bank nationalization."

No, because we know banks make a profit paying interest on deposits and not lending. That customers are saturated with debt means nothing. All we need is the benevolent hand of the state to shovel more money down the throats of the massively indebted to make things right.

"So for anyone who's actually studied how economies work is not going to be surprised by the call to increase bank lending."

Oh do tell, please. I thought economies were markets where individuals traded the product of their labor specializatiion for the goods and services of others. Silly me, it's all about pushing around little pieces of paper. We just need to adjust the spigots and crank the pumps. My bad.

Nostrovia,

PS 9% UE by what measure? These numbers are heavily manipulated. The .gov can massage the figures to make it appear to be a lot of things.
RockR

Government bettter get a damn good Masseuse working on this as California has pulled a groin muscle 9.3% unemployment. I'm fearful that the crater you speak of will be a little west of Omaha.

ac, re private debt vs. sovereign debt.

If I were to try to summarize some of the responses to your question (as set forth above by people who understand this a lot better than I do), it seems that private debt exists in a closed loop within the sovereign and thus need not be counted.

I'm fearful that the crater you speak of will be a little west of Omaha.
stockdog42 | Homepage | 01.24.09 - 11:10 am | #

LOL!  I was seeking the most central location I could think of excluding my own hood.

Roubini is the man.He is very smart.

IMHO, the US is FUCT in the long run as are its allies to the North and East. I think we are on our way to a depression

Wow. RockyR, you've turned around quite recently. I could have swore you were on the other side fairly recently.

IMHO, the US is FUCT in the long run as are its allies to the North and East. I think we are on our way to a depression, one that will leave a smoking crater where Omaha used to be. Some days it feels like we are already there. Rationally, we are not. This thing my come apart next month, or it may take 5, 10, 15 years. Either way, it's coming apart.

Stop being hysterical. We have a huge nation, abundant national resources, few problems with our borders, the best military, and a large portion of our populace is extremely enterprising. The world may be headed in the wrong direction, but America has the means and the ability to pivot into a better direction much better than just about any other country in the world. I think Germany has us beat as far as sensibility of the populace is concerned, but given all the other cards stacked in our favor, we'll weather this just fine. It'll be messy on the way, but what in life isnt?

it seems that private debt exists in a closed loop within the sovereign and thus need not be counted.
sportsfan | 01.24.09 - 11:11 am | #

Almost.  Private debt levels affect private consumption levels, as such affect government tax revenues (most tax regimes tax the velocity of money, excepting inflation-as-a-tax) and, consequently,  government ability to service its public debt without printing money.  The debt pyramid works well for everyone on the way up, but pretty horribly for everyone on the way down.

Oh and unlike other vast land baron nations, we don't have a balkans or vast cultural differences between regions creating other problems controlling our lands.

We have a huge nation, abundant national resources, few problems with our borders, the best military, and a large portion of our populace is extremely enterprising.

Yes, the fundamentals of our economy are strong.

but America has the means and the ability to pivot into a better direction much better than just about any other country in the world.
Hoopajoops, LTD | Homepage | 01.24.09 - 11:15 am | #

We certainly have the means, but I question the ability.

One minor detail to add to Roubini's statement: 'Note that during WWII the UK public debt to GDP ratio peaked well above 150% and the UK government remained solvent.'

Right, however Sterling was the world's base currency at the time, supported by central bank FX holdings such as the Bank of India and others. Within 2 years after WWII, India cashed in all her pounds for USD in a matter of days and the US took over as the owner of the world's base currency. (Marshall plan etc) The pound's crash was halted only thru propping up by the US.

Also Britain's economy was not top heavy with a financial sector service economy in the 40's, but rather industry skilled workers made up the bulk of the work force. After the demise of England's WWII economy, boat loads of skilled workers fled England for Canada and were welcomed with open arms. That immigration pattern continued thru the 50's.

I love it when most comments on here start saying Roubini is wrong and too optimistic. The response has become incredibly predictable.
There are two types of behavior that destroy fortunes - extreme pessimism and extreme optimism.
I think I'll listen to Roubini for now - unlike some here, I'd hardly call him an optimist. Maybe a realist, but hardly an optimist. He's also been right and I suspect he will be this time as well or certainly close - and as the facts develop he will change his views which is what your suppose to do.
The funny thing is that many of the extreme optimists I have known over the years have now become extreme pessimists and now see a never ending depression on the horizon. These are the same folks who laughed at me for being negative in 2007 and half lost north of half of their net worths since then.
As a matter of fact, a couple of them now read this blog and are probably some of the posters crapping on Roubini....hmm.....

Graham Cox(Unrated) writes:
Roubini seems to have gauged the situation.Since the Armagedden types trusted Roubini two years ago, why not now?

I didn't know who the heck Nouriel Roubini was two years ago. I'm a hobbyist political scientist with an interest in compromise and crisis in bureaucratic / policy structures. I saw this coming on the basis of policy cohort selection and rotation and policy structure capture years ago.

I am both in awe of the quantitative macro people here, and also find them hilarious, as they do all this work to get moment by moment predections of the expected future absolute bearing, flight speed, altitude, etc of an aircraft that is flying on a regularly scheduled route to a major airport.

Please don't ascribe belief in your cartoon of "armageddon" to me. Compromised states and policy structure are complicated animals and I am as much getting ready to make observations of the fascinating conditions that arise within dying empires as I am making predictions about what will happen next.

Collapses of big complicated societies like this one are fairly rare and each one is unique and quirky. Maybe it will look like what you think of as armageddon, maybe not. I don't really care, don't blame me, I didn't run this economy and nation into the ground.

That customers are saturated with debt means nothing.

It is not as much about giving more credit to consumers as much as lowering their interest burden, allowing them to roll over existing debt, and, much more importantly, ensuring flow of credit to companies of all size (maybe especially to SME) to keep them in business.

From Bloomberg: "Obama aides said banks that get additional aid will be prevented from using it to finance acquisitions and instead will be pressed to provide more credit to consumers and companies."

More "please, pretty please with sugar on top"

Rocky, the amount of private debt can certainly have an impact on the velocity of money and thus government tax receipts, but I think that is factored in to the sovereign's ability to cover its debt, which is the real issue.

BTW, I don't see a depression coming to the U.S., just a long, nasty recession.

As several folks noted here yesterday, even planning for Mad Max is a waste of time and effort.

Anonymous | 01.24.09 - 11:17 am

Typical contrarian rebuttal. I'll go contrarian-contrarian.

Wow. RockyR, you've turned around quite recently. I could have swore you were on the other side fairly recently.
anonymous | 01.24.09 - 11:15 am | #

For me it's a matter of short run vs. long run outcomes.  I'm more bullish than a lot of people about short run outcomes, as bearish as anyone else here about long run outcomes.  I base my short run bullishness on the fact that the US doesn't operate on an island, and the rest of the world is worse off than we are.  That, and we have the ability to further leverage ourselves.  The line will eventually run out on that one (i.e., we will eventually go broke).

No empire is immune from its own stupidity.

Yeah, whoever survives a Mad Max event, owes that survival to luck and chance and ferocity as much as planning.

Roubini is assuming, I think, that GB's ability to issue vastly more sovereign debt is a given. I don't. Being the world's reserve currency gives the US quite a bit more room, but even that has it's limits.

However, note what is really happening with these partial and total nationalizations- the purpose isn't create more fundamentally sound institutions- the purpose is to simply keep expanding credit to any and all who are willing or can be forced to take some. This ends in disaster the way it is going now.

hoopajoops and maria slartibartfest make excellent points.

disaster and depression do not mean death. the U.S. does have some important cards in its favor, even as it discovers that it has lost a few big cards from it hand (to stretch the metaphor, the US has not exactly been playing with a full deck in recent years).

Upthread there was discussion of Britain and its debt after WWII. Different situations, of course. WWII was an existential threat with a capital E. This economic meltdown is an existential threat with a smaller e. But Britain came out of WWII with a giant debt, a bombed out country, lots of dead soldiers, and an empire crumbling into sand....and Britain survived to go bankrupt today!

So lets be afraid of the most serious economic crisis before us, but let's not hyperventilate ourselves into irrational hysteria.

By the way, the movement to nationalization is on track. See Joe Nocera's somewhat sly article in the NYT today (sorry don't have the link at fingertips). He starts out talking about Paulson's TARP plan . . . somewhat confusedly or disenguously, but then ends by arguing there is a consensus around an expanded RTC type endeavor that would be, he says, nationalization. He still talks about healthy banks taking over weak and failed banks. The last bridge to cross is the recognition that there are no healthy banks big enough to take over other banks.

Banks need to be a public utility for a while until they can be cleaned and new managements grown. Then they can be privatized. It will hurt the GDP for a few years. The alternatives are worse.

it seems that private debt exists in a closed loop within the sovereign and thus need not be counted.
sportsfan | 01.24.09 - 11:11 am | #


You don't think public and private debt is homogeneous at this point?? Closed loop??

Have you missed the last 12 months, TARP, TAF, ect??? The whole point has been to OPEN the loop. To blend the public with the private.

Why do you think so many are pissed off??

Comrade Misean is Dope writes:
""So for anyone who's actually studied how economies work is not going to be surprised by the call to increase bank lending."
Oh do tell, please. I thought economies were markets where individuals traded the product of their labor specializatiion for the goods and services of others. Silly me, it's all about pushing around little pieces of paper. We just need to adjust the spigots and crank the pumps. My bad."

I somewhat apologize - I should have written "monetary economies work" rather than "economies work". The alternative would be a barter economy.

The vast majority of economic models assume that the economy is in fact a barter economy. All of the factors you mentioned are what economists go on about. However, very few of the economists realize that their conclusions are inapplicable to a monetary economy. Keynes did realize this, but he was unable to completely break away from his indoctrination in economic theory and his theory ended up being a bit of a mess.

If we ever do revert to a barter economy, the things you mention will be the only things worth studying. However, we're not there yet.

"We certainly have the means, but I question the ability."

I agree with the unreal tax load and the unproductive entitlement people. I have the same feeling. We do not have our grandparents standards of responsibility and work ethic.


As several folks noted here yesterday, even planning for Mad Max is a waste of time and effort.

sportsfan | 01.24.09 - 11:20 am | #

Yeah.  I keep thinking I'm going to run to Dicks to buy a Mossberg, but I still haven't.  Even now, I don't own a single gun.

/Putting money where mouth is Smile

The UK is Iceland lite, but on a far grander scale. Relative to the economy, banks were more than 2x the size they are in the UK. However, the economy of Iceland was miniscule, the total population of Iceland is about that of Dayton Ohio and its immediate suburbs. Still the problem of massive overseas laibilitys of the banking system are there, but just not to the extent of Iceland. The world could sustain Iceland sinnking into the sea like Atlantis, but it could not sustain the same thing happening to the UK

RockyR writes:
...and the rest of the world is worse off than we are...

Just loughed my ass off.

Whether the government correctly reports unemployment or not makes little difference. The velocity of money will slow dramatically and push us into a depression-stagflation by the end of this year.

Roubini is too optimistic on the unemployment rate. I respect his judgment but respectfully disagree.

"...and the rest of the world is worse off than we are..."

How do you spend your 30 cents left after taxed dollar now? Add the new debt the politicolwns are adding for you benefit.

If we ever do revert to a barter economy, the things you mention will be the only things worth studying. However, we're not there yet.
bond guy | 01.24.09 - 11:26 am | #

Do tell, what gives paper with pictures of dead people its value?

sportsfan(Unrated) writes:
As several folks noted here yesterday, even planning for Mad Max is a waste of time and effort.

Ever wonder about the origin of the belief / knowledge rice tastes best when aged a year or more?

If you are not getting long in this market slowly you are a fool.

Hedge a bit, buy funds or etfs instead of individual companies, and start wading in with money you do not need right away.

. . . there is a consensus around an expanded RTC type endeavor that would be, he says, nationalization.

I'm actually looking forward to this. The RTC did in fact straighten a few things out even if it cost a bit to do so.

An RTC2 would be much bigger and at a much larger cost, but would seem to involve a form of nationalization of the banks.

Just be a realist, if you have no job, have a mortgage, no saving, no family to put you up in standard's you are accustomed to, bad credit, and old car, no political connection's, flunked out of college or never went, have had more than one wife and paying child support, have never had a job with a key to the building, never worked all day, all night and all the next day to beat a deadline, no matter your age, you are about to be a real grown up, but a ward of the State.

Do tell, what gives paper with pictures of dead people its value?
--RockyR

Making all other currencies illegal and have an army to enforce it. (Couldn't really tell what you were trying to get at)

Much Sebastian-like rhetoric and pontification in these comments recently. Albeit on the bearish side. I'll bet those commenters suffer the same fate as our overly bullish friend. I mean what does Roubini know.... I seem to recall Sebastian dissing Noriel quite often too.
Seems to me like the lemmings are starting to resemble bears.
Disclosure, I am not long, but not nearly as short as I have been.

Assertion:
Roubini: The U.K. is NOT Iceland

Reply:
No, the UK is much bigger and more internationally interconnected. Barclay's for example.

You don't think public and private debt is homogeneous at this point?? Closed loop??

Have you missed the last 12 months, TARP, TAF, ect??? The whole point has been to OPEN the loop. To blend the public with the private.

I didn't say I supported TARP. In fact I ended my comments at the time with 'Just Say No.'

Wipe out the shareholders and take a cut from the bondholders, okay?

I have the same feeling. We do not have our grandparents standards of responsibility and work ethic.
Economist Moe Howard 3SU | 01.24.09 - 11:26 am | #

That, and we consistently reward incompetence over competence.  Who gets paid more in your organization, the knowledgeable producer or the incompetent blow hard? 

Our education system is gutted, we have a style-over-substance culture built on the spoils of wealth enjoyed but not earned.  These factors do not contribute to favorable long run outcomes.

Broken Clock Observer(Unrated) writes:
Seems to me like the lemmings are starting to resemble bears.

Why are you trying to predict history with TA of the commentariat?

Economist Moe Howard 3SU writes:
"...and the rest of the world is worse off than we are..."

How do you spend your 30 cents left after taxed dollar now? Add the new debt the politicolwns are adding for you benefit.

~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
I don't understand your answer. could you explain please?
P.S. Have drunk only coffee so far today.


Just loughed my ass off.

Werner | 01.24.09 - 11:28 am | #

Cool.  Please tell us what the new reserve currency is so that we can start to denominate our savings in those notes.

joe shmoe writes: Banks need to be a public utility for a while until they can be cleaned and new managements grown. Then they can be privatized. It will hurt the GDP for a few years. The alternatives are worse

Amen to that, brother.
Censeo Bank Shareholders esse delendam


How do you spend your 30 cents left after taxed dollar now?

Economist Moe Howard 3SU | 01.24.09 - 11:31 am | #

Well, first of all, I retain more than .30 on every pre-taxed dollar today...

Some folks here talk of Mad Max as a joke. Others, I think, take it more seriously.

The Mad Max scenario is like the Jack Bauer what-if-you-know-there-is-a-ticking-time-bomb-wouldn't-you-torture scenario. Both are fiction. Neither ever existed, ever. Both are self-destructive ways of looking at the world.

The Mad Max scenario did not happen in Germany as it lost WWII. It did not happen in Japan, despite the firebombing of every city except Kyoto, Nagasaki, and Hiroshima - and we all know why Nagasaki and Hiroshima were saved from fire bombing. People don't go Mad Max. It is a myth, most often deployed to legitimize the use of force by authority (i.e., governments, right wing movements, extreme left wing movements) to hold order together lest everyone turn to cannibalism.

Now, should we be prepared for a potential bank meltdown in ATMs don't work? Yes. Should everyone keep a few weeks supply of emergency food? Probably. We do it in California for earthquake preparedness. Will any of this translate to a Mad Max scenario? No. A Great Depression 2.0? Quite possibly or probably, but there was no Mad Max scenarios in GD 1.0.

Roubini is getting to warm and fuzzy lately. He is also jumping from the agreement that the banks are 'busted' to the notion that stimulus is the way to fix things.
I think a good deal more thought needs to be given to how they are broken and how to replace (note: NOT 'save') them.
My personal opinion is that the utility functions and investment functions do not belong in the same institution. I'd set up several new regional banks as non-profits to do the utility functions under specific government guidelines. I'd also make their earning tax-free and would back them fully with government guarantees. I'd allow investment banks, but not ever connected to the utility banks or to insurance functions. I'd regulate their leverage maximums and I'd tax the snot out of their earnings - that's the price they pay for the risk they impose on all the rest of us.

The situation for the U.K. is interesting, to say the least. But Willem Buiter's arguments (which partially precipitated the comments by Roubini) seem inconsistent.

If the U.K. nationalizes their banks, the government then ends up potentially exposed to foreign currency liabilities, like it or not. (There is no reason top be concerned about domestic liabilities, unless you are a taxpayer.) Buiter says some razzle-dazzle about "limited liability" and that the gov't can let the foreign currency debt default. Unfortunately, most large investors have large legal teams, and those legal teams spend their days finding holes in vague defenses like "limited liability".

He previously stressed the need to avoid foreign currency liabilities. From where I sit, the only way they can do that is to step in after the bankruptcy events, not before.

I don't have any solutions to offer, but I would be very suspicious of saying "nationalize the banks" without thinking very carefully about the contingent liabilities such an act would create. The Swedish banks were largely domestic-focused, and so the "Swedish solution" may not be the perfect role model that all the economists hold it up to be.

The UK's fortunes will depend on the value of the pound. As the pound sinks, UK debt in foreign currency becomes more burdensome. Watch the pound.

Roubini saw where we were going to go off the road. I doubt he will be able to perdict what is going to show up in the meadow other than the ride is going to be less than optimal.

Making all other currencies illegal and have an army to enforce it.
s0mebody | 01.24.09 - 11:33 am | #

Labor ultimately underpins the value of our currency (although I really like your strong military point as well).  My point is that old models still apply.

"That, and we consistently reward incompetence over competence. Who gets paid more in your organization, the knowledgeable producer or the incompetent blow hard? "

I am retired, however my business we paid buy flat rate hours (commission) So the best made the most and the lesser got their just pay. The new world rewards eduction merit badges instead of quality production. Yes, our crank them out factory education system stinks.

RockyR writes:
...Please tell us what the new reserve currency is so that we can start to denominate our savings in those notes...

Your savings ??
Unpayable debt now counts as savings ?

Guess Jas needs to spruce up his terminology.

Very interesting comment over at Big Picture: the major rise in the national debt as a result of this 'crisis' will not be from the bailouts and stimuli, it will be from the decreased tax revenues that will follow this event for years.

Should everyone keep a few weeks supply of emergency food? Probably. We do it in California for earthquake preparedness. Will any of this translate to a Mad Max scenario? No. A Great Depression 2.0? Quite possibly or probably, but there was no Mad Max scenarios in GD 1.0.
joe shmoe | 01.24.09 - 11:39 am

My own efforts have greatly increased my 'earthquake kit,' but, yes, that is the important point.

GD 1.0 won't be our model, though, if we do get to that point. People in the U.S. now are not going to stoically suffer while trying to grow potatoes in the back yard.

They are going to get angry and they are going to take actions that will not benefit the social order.

Thus, everyone should be armed as a simple means of self defense.

RockyR writes:
"If we ever do revert to a barter economy, the things you mention will be the only things worth studying. However, we're not there yet.
bond guy
Do tell, what gives paper with pictures of dead people its value?"

Well, paper with pictures of nekkid people can be quite valuable, but that's another story.

Specie (notes and coins) is an insignificant part of the monetary system. The real action is in the electronic payments systems - very few people buy houses or cars with paper with pictures of dead people on them.

Sovereign-emitted money (of all types) keeps its value mainly because it is the sole means of paying tax liabilities, and because it is used in the interbank settlement process.

The important consequence of these properties is that people are actually willing to work in exchange for paper/electronic balances, and so money can be used to "command labor". Ask Karl Marx about how valuable the ability to "command labor" is. Hint: it's what capitalists do.

Morning, Comrades!

Somehow I'm not taking much comfort in this:

"Note that during WWII the UK public debt to GDP ratio peaked well above 150% and the UK government remained solvent."

I'm no econ major, but all that lovely solvency didn't do the Brits much good when the war ended and all that debt had to be paid. The gummit kept rationing on for years and years after the war, and directed production to export. Which didn't seem to help the Brits themselves, really. The Commonwealth countries picked up a lot of skilled British immigrants, though.

No. A Great Depression 2.0? Quite possibly or probably, but there was no Mad Max scenarios in GD 1.0.
joe shmoe | 01.24.09 - 11:39 am | #

I agree with you about the Mad Max scenario, but I have heard a lot of very level headed, well educated people point out that our culture in the US today is MUCH different than the one in the 20s, 30s.  These folks believe that today's society would not withstand 20+% UE without violence.

Also, you have to allow that there were pockets of Mad Max in GD I.  For instance, as legend has it, there were long stretches of highway in TX you didn't travel in the 30s for fear of losing your life to roaming gangs and bootleggers.

Still, I own no guns.

So, UK banks' foreign liabilities total $4.4 trillion.

According to the bank of england there are 54 billion pounds in circulation. Wait, that's probably on actual paper... how does one size an actual money supply?

Bonguy writes:
I don't have any solutions to offer, but I would be very suspicious of saying "nationalize the banks" without thinking very carefully about the contingent liabilities such an act would create. The Swedish banks were largely domestic-focused, and so the "Swedish solution" may not be the perfect role model that all the economists hold it up to be.
bond guy | 01.24.09 - 11:40 am | #


agreed. "nationalize the banks" is shorthand for a complex endeavor which, in this crisis, requires international cooperation.

the contingent liabilities do need to be thought out, but to a great extent many of them have already been assumed by the govt through loans, guarantees, equity purchases, and outright gifts of billions of dollars that set the precedent for more gifts. All that has been done without any control, leaving bankrupt management in place. Nationalization addresses those problems . . . . and leaves many more questions as yet unanswered, as you note.

"Well, first of all, I retain more than .30 on every pre-taxed dollar today...
RockyR | 01.24.09 - 11:39 am | # "

Really? prove it. Don't forget to include the product prices for Corporate taxes, fees licenses, permits. Hidden taxes like severance fees, pipeline distribution fess, etc just for a gallon of gas. Excise tax on tires? They have hidden tons of tax no one can find them all. They are there.

It's disingenuous to talk only about the public governmental debt. Intragovernmental debt covers (usually inadequately) expected shortfalls in future programs that are very hard to cut politically (mostly pensions). It's pretty much equivalent to publically held debt for practical purposes, and if anything understates predictable future loads on the country's finances.

Roubini a year or so ago, wanted to stimulate by dropping interest rates faster and farther than anybody else.

The way to succeed and make money is to do the opposite of everyone else. I think that the recession will be worse than predicted, but it will come to an end. I think the bearishness of the main stream media and everybody here is an indications that the tunnel may be quite long and unpleasant, but there is a barely visible light at the end of it which is NOT a train.

6 handle on the Dow.

I haven't figured out any countries that are SAFE. One of the ones I'm thinking about though is New Zealand.

You must be kidding. NZ has one of the biggest housing bubbles in the world. It has the US beat by a mile - it's probably even worse than the UK on a price/income basis.It also has a big current account deficit - about the same as Ireland which has a similar population. Actually NZ looks a lot like Ireland economically.

Of all the English speaking countries, Canada has the best fundamentals. Among other things, it has the smallest housing bubble (I mean nationally - the far West is as bad as anywhere), and it's the only one that's a net exporter of oil.

This is funny:

Obama breaks from Bush, avoids divisive stands

The article requested is no longer available.

Obama:

"You can't just listen to Rush Limbaugh and get things done"

PREZ ZINGS GOP FOE IN A $TIMULATING TALK - NYPOST.com

"Making all other currencies illegal and have an army to enforce it. "

The history of the world's religions in a nutshell.

Bank nationalizations might be the way to go if the purpose of doing so was to wind down the weak and strengthen the strong. This is clearly not the purpose. Note how the banks that received TARP funds are being harangued for not lending more. The deflation in credit threatens every government on the planet (threatens the citizenry too, but to a lesser extent since they benefit from deflation in a lot of ways that are not acknowledged by the inflationists). Governments do not want to shrink, they want to grow, and that growth is completely dependent on credit inflation. Taxing out the funds riles up the taxpayers to the point they hang politicians.

Now, should we be prepared for a potential bank meltdown in ATMs don't work? Yes. Should everyone keep a few weeks supply of emergency food? Probably. We do it in California for earthquake preparedness. Will any of this translate to a Mad Max scenario? No. A Great Depression 2.0? Quite possibly or probably, but there was no Mad Max scenarios in GD 1.0.
joe shmoe | 01.24.09 - 11:39 am | #

Hence my homepage.

Anyone here spend time with 'oldsters' lately in an old folks home? (Raises hand.) Get off your computer and this fictive "experience", and listen to a world view from someone who lived through deprivation, or at least through a less consumption-centric era. Or talk to an immigrant or traveler of any age who lived or traveled through SE Asia, South America, or sub-saharan Africa in the past 30 years. Ask some questions.

"It's different here." Where? Cyberspace? Yeah.... sure it is. Let some rain hit your face for a bit. The demise of the present economic system is the airport Byz_Ruins refers to (IMO). Whatever replaces it (whether similar but with greater regulation or descent into warlord territories) is not comforting. But I'm with Joe, here.

Your savings ??
Unpayable debt now counts as savings ?

Werner | 01.24.09 - 11:42 am | #

I didn't quite follow that.  I suppose you don't have an alternative to the US for greater stability in the world at present?

bond guy - You are exactly right that the straight extrapolation of the Swedish approach does not work because of globalization of finance.

It does not mean, of course, that it cannot be made to work. What is needed is for G7 or G20 to coordinate their approaches to the banking crisis, and consider mutual adjustment of cross-border bank debt.

I realize that coordination at such scale usually takes forever, but I got to believe that the US + UK can force the issue.

Nationalizing failed banks through short term bridge loans as described by Bill Siedman would be the least expensive approach to put a bottom under this contraction. Breaking up large inefficient financial organizations, writing off their bad assets, removing incompetent management, would be achieved in the shortest possible time. Painfull but necessary.

They are NOT going to nationalize the banks.

There have already been too many losses for individuals, institutions and pension plans.

If you think it will happen, you are dreaming.

Rocky R

This is all about having perspective, contemporary and historical.

There are and have been parts of the country in recent decades that have not been safe for strangers: the marijuana groing regions of Northern california and, though usually exagerrated (but that is what such rumors and stories are always about) urban racial ghettos.

Historically, the US had much more socially driven violence between 1876 and 1929 than in recent decades: labor violence, private armies deployed by industrialists, the haymarket bombings, the haymarket hangings, lynching, race riots in which white mobs killed dozens of black people in towns and cities across the South and into the West . . . and more.

Remember Katrina in New orleans? It was a horror. But remember the stories reported - I should say, "reported," out of new orleans? There were rape gangs and cannibals and lions and tigers and bears.

No, there were not. There were hundreds of thousands of people suffering under inhuman conditions, and there was looting, but no rape gangs, no cannibalism, and for the most part people in the Superdome tried to cooperate with each other.

The idea that today is different with respect to social unraveling is on a par with the housing bubble - this time it is different, they said. No It was not, no it is not.


The important consequence of these properties is that people are actually willing to work in exchange for paper/electronic balances, and so money can be used to "command labor". Ask Karl Marx about how valuable the ability to "command labor" is. Hint: it's what capitalists do.

bond guy | 01.24.09 - 11:46 am | #

No, I'm with you about command labor.  Let's put it this way: if you come to say "hey man, do this work for me for free.  I'll pay you later" (i.e., debt). I do the work and you don't pay me back... the next time you come knocking I tell you FO.  Your only choice is to put a gun to my head (real command labor!), an outcome that is CERTAINLY not good for long run outcomes.  I don't think our analysis needs to be much more complicated than that.

Debt does not provide an infinite supply of prosperity.  Maybe I've misunderstood your point about debt?

Nouriel...it's time to tell it like it really is and sacrifice your newly discovered status:

The GDP in the U.S. is consumer driven, not production driven. Over 70 percent of our GDP is based upon the consumption of goods and services, which over the past decade has been facilitated through the exponential increase in debt spending. We are not producing anything, we are spending money we do not have, and all of that is being called “growth” by those who benefit from the illusion of such growth. Growth as a measure of GDP is a fallacy! Moreover, growth as we have known it for decades is done, finished, over. It is mathematically and physically impossible to grow our GDP when (a) we don’t produce anything, and (b) consumers are totally tapped out and in debt up to their eyeballs and cannot consume anything else lest they explode (“…get me a bucket I think I’m going to vomit…”).

Over the counter trading of such instruments as Credit Default Swaps is unregulated. There are no capital requirements in place that might serve to moderate these bets that are STILL, by the billions, being placed today. Like the guy in “The Sopranos” who played poker with the big boys but had no money to back up his bets, trillions in debt have been created and no one has the cash to pay down their obligations. Meanwhile, everyone is busy hiding their exposure in these fetid instruments from one-another in fears that once counterparty risk is fully exposed, the whole game comes crashing down in a massive, uncontrollable wave of defaults and liquidations.

Enter the FED and Ben Bernanke, who in their “wisdom” have come to the conclusion that none of our banking and other financial institutions can be allowed to fail. And as such, trillions of dollars in the form of either US debt purchased by such nations as China and Japan, or as hundreds of billions of greenbacks printed fresh in the basement of the Federal Reserve, are being spent in a desperate attempt to keep the dead-men walking; to keep the insolvent banks from going belly-up. But of
course these banks already are belly-up, it’s just that they’re floating upside down in the middle of the ocean and they haven’t washed ashore yet for the world to see!

And since the profit motive remains king of the castle, networks like CNN and CNBC and Bloomberg continue to under-report unemployment numbers or massage statistics or promote the idea of economic recovery in an effort to stimulate artificial growth that might help the billionaires who own and RUN these "news" sources make a few bucks before the whole thing comes a-tumbling down. Unemployment is not 7.2%; it is more like 13.5%. Simply take a break from your double-latte and your shrimp cocktail and read the hidden reports from our honorable government. Compare the U3 rates (total unemployed) to the U6 rates (total unemployed, plus marginal workers, plus part-time workers ‘for economic reasons’). U-3 is measured as 7.2% nationally. U-6 at 13.5%. And frankly this measure is also flawed and under-reported in that the government-paid statisticians purposefully distort employment realities based upon such factors as what economic sectors are in question, and what the employment data tells us about the demography of such numbers (urban, rural, ethnicity), etc. The government and its accomplices will cook the books and massage the numbers and present false interpretation of data or purposefully omit information, all in an effort to downplay the gravity of the current situation. And they will defend such dishonest actions and purposeful distortions by self-righteously claiming that it is their job and patriotic duty to, despite the truth, try and keep people feeling good and confident about their prospects for the future.

And lest we forget, our representatives in Washington D.C. really have no idea what’s going on. They are all Gilligan’s, and Paulson and Bernanke and Greenspan and Geithner are their “Professors”. And whatever they are told they dutifully parrot back to their constituencies, and they love making grand speeches for each other, and congratulating each other for how hard they are all working, and meanwhile they are totally clueless. They epitomize the worst elements of our so-called democracy, in that they use wealth and influence to achieve their positions of power and authority, and then sell their souls to keep their cushy jobs.

And it is not an overstatement to repeat just how insane the policy of propping up failed banking institutions truly is. It is like a global game of “Weekend at Bernie’s”: Who can make the dead body appear alive for the longest?!?!? Of course this charade does not ever bring the corpse back to life. But our financial and political leaders continue this charade for they obviously believe that we are stupid enough to think that they are earnest and honest men---and maybe we are---and they actually think that trillions in recapitalization can reanimate these corporate corpses, and they are not willing to accept the fact that the sick extravagances that they have peddled for the past generation or two have brought us this calamity. And seriously folks, they will continue to do everything in their collective power to save a dead system, even if it means sacrificing us all along the way.

And everyone should recognize the following axiom: When someone purposefully hides information and then not only tries to pretend that they are not, in fact, hiding anything, but that even if they were hiding something it would be OK because it is for the common good, then you know something is very, very wrong. It reminds me a bit of the story of the kid who hides bottle-rockets in his locker at school. Sure the kid’s going to try and do anything in his power from letting the principal see what’s locked behind the steel doors of his supposed school book repository: he will lie, change the lock, hide the stuff that is inside in most creative ways, cover the odor of fireworks with perfumes or stink bombs, etc. Not only doesn't he want to get caught, but he also wants to keep the explosives! However, the more this kid works to hide the truth, the more any school official worth his or her salt knows that it’s high time he gets the hack saw out and makes sure that the student isn't hiding a pound of pot or an AK-47 in his locker. (Fireworks are always a relief for beleaguered school administrators.) And now look at our lovely Wall Street and D.C. fellows: Those vaults in the back rooms of those banks and in the basements of those financial institutions are hiding trillions in bad assets, and they are being kept closed and away from any prying eyes through spending trillions MORE in debt---debt that has to eventually be repaid by the American taxpayers---and our leaders are creating “ringed fence” policies and developing elaborate red-herring legislative actions to put people off of the scent. Anything to keep us from knowing the truth: the truth being that our banks and other financial institutions and insurance companies are all leveraged 20, 30, 40:1, because all of the securitized instruments in which these institutions so carelessly and greedily invested are worthless pieces of garbage, and we’re the schmucks who are going to end up paying for their crimes---and still the truth is hidden from us, and we do nothing.

And this is not an isolated event folks. The entire world is involved. All of the world’s advanced and developing economies are getting crushed under the weight of hundreds of trillions in debt and toxic assets. China’s economy is contracting and tens of millions of workers are fleeing to the countryside as factories close by the hundreds, and export markets are collapsing, and international shipping is grinding to a halt, and unemployment rates in the U.K. and Brazil and Ukraine are erupting like angry dormant volcanoes after eons of fitful sleep, and civil unrest is spiking around the globe in response to people’s anger and hunger: Riots are exploding in Latvia, Estonia, Iceland, Bulgaria, Greece. All in response to growing economic hardships brought on by the nefarious actions of those seeking unimaginable profits whilst the common man and woman suffers in poverty.

And the Obama-Bernanke-Rubin triumvirate somehow seems to believe that China and Japan and other nations will continue to buy our increasingly unreliable debt to support our efforts at economic resuscitation. But our leaders seemingly refuse to accept the fact that all of these other nations’ economies are also collapsing, and at some point these countries are going to have to look inward and spend any and all of their dwindling resources on trying to stimulate growth at home, and measly 3% returns on U.S. Treasuries certainly is not going to make a difference for China and Japan and other countries who for decades have supported American extravagance, and in fact the U.S., if asked to service its debt in the form of payment for Treasuries being “cashed in”, will not be able to do so. And then the United States of America defaults on its debt. What then Mr. O?

And whilst all of this is happening, our economic and political leaders continue to speak of getting the economy moving again and loosening frozen credit markets and returning to the days of 5% GDP growth, as if by some miracle of nature one can magically create infinitely renewable resources and new mountain ranges of debt that do not have anything to do with the old mountain ranges of debt. It’s not magical thinking, it’s not even insanity---at least insanity is on some level innocent of itself. This type of thinking is actually evil: it is an obvious lie, and it is a lie that is promoted as being a truth by those who have the power to twist reality and to present their twisted version of reality to the masses. Evil people manipulate sorry, helpless people to promote their agendas of power, wealth and delusion. Cult leaders like David Koresh are (were) evil

Good summary by Roubini. Let's come back in 18 months and see where we are.

Oh, wait. The WaPo reports the Obama team is considering additional stimulus so the economy can be "jump-started." Obviously in light of this news Roubini has not been paying close enough attention to what's going on in the West Wing. Cancel the above comment.

RockyR writes:
...I suppose you don't have an alternative to the US for greater stability in the world at present?...

I do, and the more Americans are keept away from it, the better for it.
The last thing on earth you want is to get it being messed up by Americans drowning in bad debt.

"Yancey Ward writes:
Bank nationalizations might be the way to go if the purpose of doing so was to wind down the weak and strengthen the strong."

Even if we had the political will to do this, it would take years to separate the weak from the strong, because you have to examine the books. If you suspect even a small percentage of the banks are cooking the books, then you must examine all of them, and dig up all the dead bodies. This takes lots of time, which we do not have. A blowup this year is inevitable at this point, IMO.


Really? prove it. Don't forget to include the product prices for Corporate taxes, fees licenses, permits. Hidden taxes like severance fees, pipeline distribution fess, etc just for a gallon of gas. Excise tax on tires? They have hidden tons of tax no one can find them all. They are there.

Economist Moe Howard 3SU | 01.24.09 - 11:48 am | #

I'll concede this point to you.  I suppose I could command a much larger share of goods and services if I didn't have to support all of that largess... assuming we could put all of those bureaucrats to work doing something productive or out to pasture to fend for themselves Wink

gosh...rioting in the streets brings down Iceland's government. What happens when a more populated country moves in this direction..the UK, Russia, Germany.

"The government of Iceland today became the first to be effectively brought down by the credit crunch.
After several nights of rioting over the financial crisis, Prime Minister Geir Haarde, surrendered to increasing pressure and called a general election for May."

Smart people are usually pessimists because they see the clouds more clearly, and fear the rain. Sebastion was the voice of msm here, everything was rosy to him/them. This site was the wake up call for me and for so many others. Now, however, too many are pessimistic and are not displaying their true contrarian colors.

Roubini is not being optimistic (except on unemployment)--he sees that the world has the flu and that the recovery will happen sooner than many here seem to be rooting for. The US has a more competent government in place, the medicine will have bad side effects, but the patient will be cured.

"Anonymous writes:
gosh...rioting in the streets brings down Iceland's government. What happens when a more populated country moves in this direction..the UK, Russia, Germany."

You trot out the Army or the Cossacks, and mow them down in the streets. This works until the Army can no longer be paid, and then everybody switches over to the revolution.

Broken Clock Observer said: "...I seem to recall Sebastian dissing Nouriel quite often, too..."

Respectfully, your memory on that is flawed.

Sebastia

Wally,

RE:separation of bank functions!

GO WALLY!!!

Remember Katrina in New orleans? It was a horror. But remember the stories reported - I should say, "reported," out of new orleans? There were rape gangs and cannibals and lions and tigers and bears.

No, there were not. There were hundreds of thousands of people suffering under inhuman conditions, and there was looting, but no rape gangs, no cannibalism, and for the most part people in the Superdome tried to cooperate with each other.
joe shmoe | 01.24.09 - 11:56 am | #

Um.  There were US army units dispatched into firefights in New Orleans after Katrina.  Toe tags of the mortally wounded indicated "drowning victim".  Ha!  Were you there to dispute the first hand accounts I have from rescue workers that went into that mess?

the president has no clothes:

CHICAGO (AP) - The Chicago-based company that makes suits preferred by President Barack Obama has filed for bankruptcy.
Hartmarx Corp. and its U.S. subsidiaries filed for Chapter 11 protection Friday. The company says its Canadian and other non-U.S. affiliates have not sought bankruptcy protection.

Hartmarx makes business, casual and golf apparel under its own brands, including Hart Schaffner Marx.

scone(Unrated) writes:
This works until the Army can no longer be paid, and then everybody switches over to the revolution.

Technically, everyone just switches over to anyone who can offer them a stable income flow.

If there's an active, organized and unified group struggling for rule at that time, they will get the majority of the dandruff of poverty, but you can have an institutional failure without a ready replacement.

"the recovery will happen sooner than many here seem to be rooting for."

The term recovery is for many of us hiding the rotten Easter egg to only find a bigger one next time. Recovery will be a realistic balance of reasonable debt. That is not going to happen especially when they are filling a bottomless hole and shot gunning stimulus at the wrong target. This time it is fugly.

A soft market!

TOKYO (Reuters) - Toyota Motor Corp (7203.T) plans to reduce vehicle production in Japan by nearly 60 percent in April, a level that could force it to cut its domestic workforce amid slumping car sales, Tokyo Shimbun newspaper reported on Saturday.

I do, and the more Americans are keept away from it, the better for it.
The last thing on earth you want is to get it being messed up by Americans drowning in bad debt.

Werner | 01.24.09 - 11:59 am | #

That's like saying I drive Bentley but you can't see it, because... well, just because... 

Nevermind.

/sigh

The market is determining which banks are failing. Pfd shares of Citi yield over 15%, BAC pfd yield 12%, USB 8.5% and WFC 8%. Unlike BAC this time don't ruin a good bank with bad assets (MER and CFC), what a travesty.

"Um. There were US army units dispatched into firefights in New Orleans after Katrina. Toe tags of the mortally wounded indicated "drowning victim". Ha! Were you there to dispute the first hand accounts I have from rescue workers that went into that mess?
RockyR | 01.24.09 - 12:06 pm"

True, and that was in a situation where the surrounding society was still stable, and where the victims knew that eventually the cavalry would show up. America has never been tested in terms of a total permanent breakdown of law and order. That's why it's vital to keep the military relatively happy. You don't want them turning into roving gangs of wannabe warlords.

The US has a more competent government in place, the medicine will have bad side effects, but the patient will be cured.
Mel | 01.24.09 - 12:03 pm | #

Bwhahahaha!!!

oh wait, did I betray myself with that one?

I've got to go spend some money, today.  I'll squawk at you all later Smile

joe schmoe,

With all due respect I would not trust my future to an absence of 'social unraveling' when the economy gets really bad and people get desperate.

You are correct our lifetimes have not been as violent as 19th century U.S. life was, but I have no reason to believe that we won't see in the future in the U.S. the greatest levels of violence that we have ever seen.

To repeat: People here will not stoically suffer and try to plant potatoes in the back yard. GD 1.0 offers no model for how it will be.

I don't expect a depression, but I do expect serious economic dislocation and I do think the thin veneer of civilization will crack rather easily.

But that's just part of the 'earthquake kit.

Mel said: "...Sebastian was the voice of msm here, everything was rosy to him/them..."

Actually, I'm as skeptical of the mainstream media as anyone else here. They're pandering for readers/viewership, not trying to be an objective, thoughtful informational resource. My "rosy" posts were based not on what Larry Kudlow was saying, but on the broad-based economic data showing that things didn't get really bad until about September, 2008.

There's a reason why the NBER couldn't call the recession until a year after it began: It wasn't that obvious from looking at the data available in real time.

And I would also point out that the recovery is also not going to be obvious in real time, either.

Sebastia

Anonymous writes:
A soft market!
TOKYO (Reuters) - Toyota Motor Corp (7203.T) plans to reduce vehicle production in Japan by nearly 60 percent in April, a level that could force it to cut its domestic workforce amid slumping car sales, Tokyo Shimbun newspaper reported on Saturday.
Anonymous | 01.24.09 - 12:11 pm | #


According to a relative who works for Toyota, they are shifting jobs to the US to protect that market.

In other news, Honda here in Canada just dropped a shift (one of two) this week, laying off about 2,500.

Mel - very well stated.
Sebastian - sorry, my comment was meant to be metaphorical.

"Technically, everyone just switches over to anyone who can offer them a stable income flow.

If there's an active, organized and unified group struggling for rule at that time, they will get the majority of the dandruff of poverty, but you can have an institutional failure without a ready replacement.
Comrade Byzantine_Ruins | Homepage | 01.24.09 - 12:08 pm"

Not so much income, just food and a relatively safe place to sleep. And everybody will be dandruff. That's what has happened to Africa, anyway.

Of course, when the factories fail, there are no more guns and bullets. So you go to machetes. When you can't get iron and steel, you go back to stone tools. Africa could fall back a very long way indeed. Whereas it would take the developed countries a much longer time to work through all their stockpiled goods.

The Chicago-based company that makes suits preferred by President Barack Obama has filed for bankruptcy.
Hartmarx Corp. and its U.S. subsidiaries filed for Chapter 11 protection Friday. The company says its Canadian and other non-U.S. affiliates have not sought bankruptcy protection.

One of the reasons that Obama preferred them was that they used union workers. Kind of interesting how it was only the US entity that filed BK.

Economist Moe Howard 3SU writes:
...They have hidden tons of tax no one can find them all. They are there...

Can I help an "Economist" ?
I thought that if you deduct from gov. spending the new debt it takes on, you have taxes ?

Broken Clock Observer said: "...Sebastian - sorry, my comment was meant to be metaphorical."

No worries. I've been called a lot worse metaphors.Smile))

S.

I believe Shorting USD/GBP is going to pay a lot.

I watched the charts closely and it sure looks like an oppurtunity

Agreed UK is in problems but the price action on the currency was too much that it has to reverse

When the first politician stands up and tells people that their paper assets are not worth what the people think they are, that we, as a country, have to start recognizing this fact, and that the source of consumption is the actual production of the citizens and not government handouts- that is the person to look to for leadership. That person is not Barack Obama. He promises what every other politician has promised us so far.

"Yancey Ward writes:
When the first politician stands up and tells people that their paper assets are not worth what the people think they are..."

No one is going to do that for fear of starting a panic, with lots of urban violence. They wouldn't tell us even if we were being invaded by aliens. They have no choice but to lie.

Werner,

The Economist Moe Howard is a play on Moe of the Three stooges. Auto Mechanic Entrepreneur. My point is simple Americans have no clue as to badly we have been taxed to death chasing the piece of cheese our government has drag in front of us. Americans a fools and that is how we got here. I don't challenge economic points. I would rather study peoples actions and educated trolls. Our grand parents where simple people who really made it work. Now we are educated and rock dumb.

Our grand parents where simple people who really made it work. Now we are educated and rock dumb.
Economist Moe Howard 3SU | 01.24.09 - 12:27 pm |

Our grand parents paid much higher taxes--91% top rate--and that worked.

Mel -
shhhh - let's not talk about tax rates. We don't want anybody reminding people that the Republicans under Eisenhower felt that such high taxation was the American way - back when America was by far the world's mightiest economy.

scone(Unrated) writes:
Not so much income, just food and a relatively safe place to sleep. And everybody will be dandruff. That's what has happened to Africa, anyway.

Sure -- sorry for being imprecise. Much of the payment will surely be in-kind or informal.

Eisenhower was one of the best presidents ever--and gets no respect. If he didn't send troops into Little Rock, Obama would still be in Chicago. Of course, his choice of running mate was a mistake--but Nixon was at least smart.

"Our grand parents paid much higher taxes--91% top rate--and that worked."

I doubt mine did how ever I don't know what the bottom rate was and have no clue as to the built in hidden taxes where. I bet they had a more in a spendable dollar.

Thain and company would have been less larcenous if the top rate was still 91%

Werner doesn't like american consumers, ignoring that yankee apetites for cheap chinese junk kept the german export model humming...now that the american consumer isnt buying, chinese factories are closing, and german sales to chinese manufacturers are diving...from the IHT...

"In Germany, which since 2003 has been the world's largest merchandise exporter, sales to other countries drove growth for the past five years. But in the third quarter the slump in exports dragged down the economy, pushing Germany firmly into recession.

Virtually all economists expect 2009 to be a lost year for Germany, which will pay a heavy price for the slump in the global economy. Estimates range from a decline in economic activity for the year of about 1.5 percent to as much as 4 percent.

The retrenchment bears out what Haeusgen feels in his bones, that there is a link between the Chinese prosperity that rested in part on U.S. profligacy, and German sales to China and elsewhere. German exports of capital goods feed a Chinese industrial economy that itself is fed by U.S. demand for inexpensive consumer goods."

This is Schiff at WSJ on the rest of the world buying American debt:
Opinion: U.S. Debt's Appeal Has Limits - WSJ.com

One of my nightmare scenarios goes like this: the Saudis finally refuse to buy any more American financial paper, so the Americans say, "fine, we withdraw from the Middle East" and the Israelis take the opportunity to turn the desert to a sheet of glass. This will please the Rapture people embedded in the gummit to no end.

My taxes go to this:

If you're asking, “Get what?” you missed Thursday's disclosures by The Daily Beast website, alongside CNBC, that Mr. Thain personally signed off on a $1.2-million do-over of his office, including a $13,000 chandelier for the dining room, $18,000 for a George IV desk and that $5,000 mirror. This and more as the company barrelled toward financial catastrophe.

I need a pitch fork!

Also don't forget German exports to Russia, which is Germany's largest trading partner outside the EU. If oil stays below $50 for any length of time that's a lot fewer Mercedes, BMW's, and other gizmos that get sold.


I doubt mine did how ever I don't know what the bottom rate was and have no clue as to the built in hidden taxes where. I bet they had a more in a spendable dollar.

Economist Moe Howard 3SU | 01.24.09 - 12:39 pm | #

It's worth examining the old tax rates.  Right now, top rates are lower than most of the last century.

Economist Moe Howard 3SU writes:
"Our grand parents paid much higher taxes--91% top rate--and that worked."

In 1960, my father was a petty officer in the US Navy, in So. CA (LB)(Single earner family). His annual income was $3,000 An aerospace worker in Downey/Lakewood made $6,000/yr...

Just an example of inflation...While my family could not, families better off were purchasing autos every other year...

FYI

Economist Moe Howard 3SU writes:
...The Economist Moe Howard is a play on Moe of the Three stooges...

I see, was not awaee of that. (I am German)

...Our grand parents where simple people who really made it work...

There is nothing to be said against "simple people" who honestly do their work. Very honorable, and I would prefere them any time over "educated liars".

I am not sure that todays educated people are rock dumb, I rather suspect they are just more dishonest than people generally were back then, and they hide their dishonesty in their "educated speak".
But on the other hand you have an excellent point in that because in spite of all their education they collectively managed to run your financial system into desaster. And that is very dumb indeed !

So, yes I agree with you, your are much better off with honest "simple" people than with highly educated liars.

We do not have our grandparents standards of responsibility and work ethic.
Economist Moe Howard 3SU | 01.24.09 - 11:26 am | #

Gah! I call BS. The work ethics are identical. Yeah, our grandparents had to chop wood 12 hours a day for a month leading into winter. They did that because otherwise they'd have frozen to death. That does not mean that if they didn't have to they wouldn't have otherwise sat around playing cards, nor does it mean that in the same circumstance our generation would chose to freeze to death. All it means is they had to and we don't.

Try reading a newspaper from 1900-1010 (my family has pile of cuttings related to our family history) they is laden with pundit style lamentations about loss of fundamental craft knowledge and a decline in work ethic. That one generation differs from another on this point is the West's longest running urban myth.

fried -
good article, though I think it is a few days old. I read it at the train station, actually, before buying a fresh baked croissant.

The globalized world is not flat, it is flat broke. Everyone is going to be hurting, and a number of Germans still have a difficult time grasping this, as they remain fairly convinced that they live in the world's greatest economy, blessed with unique advantages, and only a few rotten apples in a giant barrel of uniquely talented individuals, like the almost convicted Deutsche Bank head Ackermann. Who is either one of the few rotten apples, or one of the many talented managers - seems to depend on what news source you prefer.

The region I live in is heavily dependent on Mercedes, and Mercedes is in standstill mode. As are its suppliers. And the towns that are losing major tax revenue - no production equals no turnover, which equals no taxes. The same applies to BMW, Opel, Ford, etc. - the collapse is clear, the denial remains until reality is inescapable.

But many Germans property owners (both private and commercial - though probably not Werner, with a seeming reflexive reaction against the Greens), have been spending the last few years investing things like home insulation, solar water heaters, and PV panels. I am going to guess that such investments will pay off much better than stainless steel or granite. As for growing things in your backyard - a pretty common German pastime, in my experience.

The problems in this unofficial depression are at least approaching that of the GD. There was widespread devaluation in the 30s. I continue to state that widespread devaluation is a near certainty. Now that everyone is off the pesky gold standard, it is quite easy to achieve.

Give Ireland back to the Irish...

John Lennon The Luck of the Irish

YouTube - John Lennon ,Yoko Ono-The Luck of the Irish

Mel,

Our grandparents paid far lower taxes than grandparents of today. You are making the common mistake of thinking rates equal actual payments. Only a complete fool would pay 91%, and I assure you they were not fools. Beyond a certain point well below 91%, trying to tax income is a game of whack-a-mole.

People like Thain and others are the responsibility of the incompetent, disinterested shareholders who could control this larceny if they took the time to do so. Legislation strengthening shareholder rights would certainly have a more beneficial effect than trying to corner a weasel like Thain through tax law.

I find it interesting the continuing comments dissing the folks who take the effort to prepare for difficult times (doomers, mad max, fly over idiots, or some other derisive phrase).

I look at it this way. The clear potential for significant downside problems exists. How bad things will get is hard to say, but the potential for very bad times is there. Now if really hard times come to pass one would feel kind of foolish not to have prepared somewhat for them if they had recognized the possibility of them occurring.

People talk about how in GD1 folks still behaved. This is largely true. My mother, who graduated from HS in 34, lived on a homestead next to the rail tracks in the middle of nowhere in Wyoming. Every day hobos jumped off the train and came over to their little homestead to get food. Most of the time it was just her mother and the kids there as Grandpa was hundreds of miles away looking for work. Only one time did anyone even steal anything and that was 1 chicken. However, Grandma still had the 30-06 behind the door and had real life experience in using it to protect herself (a diffent event). Why would I choose not to be prepared the same way she was. Is society as self disciplined now as it was then. I don't think so myself. But I am not willing to take a chance on finding out either.

How far one goes is a fair question. But basic preparations are simple, inexpensive and justifiable. It is like car insurance. Or a cost benefit calculation. It is what mature serious people do in my opinion. Especially if they have families and loved ones. It is a responsibility. You invest as best you can for their future and your own. You drive safely to get them to their destination in one piece. You feed them and protect them.

For an insignificant sum one can store a multi-month supply of food. Purchase sufficient arms for self defence. And take many other actions which could be beneficial. And none of these actions hurt anyone.

Now I recognize that some go over board on this issue and that generates a lot of the comments about crazies arming themselves to the teeth and digging a bunker under their cabin in the woods (yes I know a few of these types - they are f'ed up). But the basic requirement is valid and I feel a responsibility to deal with it. Nothing is truer than the saying "Deal with Reality or it will deal with you."

RockyR-

trying to draw a correlaation to today's society and that of the 30's is grossly negligent.

The U.S. currently has the highest gun rate possession rate per capita in the world.

We also have the highest incarceration rate per capita in the world.

A large percentage of our society is very violent. Many with nothing to lose and more to gain(three squares and a warm bed) by being inside than out.

"Just an example of inflation...While my family could not, families better off were purchasing autos every other year..."

My Father was a Navy career vet. In 1960 on ADJ1 pay, one income, he bought new cars about every 3 years. Difference was cars cost were low cost enough and could be bought on a 36 month payments. Today buy an equal car and pay it of in 72 months. Cost today inflated (including lots more hidden taxes) but with income should come out to 36 months today. They don't and that is partly due to the taxation of the dollar. Less spendable, Spiral up or down. Taxation, debt spending is good for all when spending discipline is used. That has not happened for a very long time. At some point you hit the point of no return which we in my opinion are pushing hard now.

Obama has no clue what he's doing and obviously we have the worst congress in American history!

Thank God for pent demand and the will of the people to consume!

On "pent up demand:"
I'm currently in a flame war on the decorating blogs. You cannot convince those girls to stop spending money they don't have on stuff they don't need. Especially on kitchen renovations! And the other posters are enabling this behavior, and attacking me on the grounds that: "we've got to have this stuff because that's what's in the decorating magazines!"

In other words, these girls have been conditioned to spend and spend, in order to stay in fashion, and it's become an addiction. It's hard to break an addiction once it takes hold, especially if all your enablers are addicted too. So, it's not so much "pent up demand" in any legitimate sense, it's just junkies craving their fix.

Peasant Darkness,

You apparently do not have blue collar employees in the service industry from the 70's to today. Major drop in in responsibly and skill.

Not only was the top rate 91% for individuals, corporate was 52%. Billionaires popped up during Reaganomics--as did huge income disparity.

There is a tsunami of pent up demand!! Beware the flood! Ignore this warning and be doomed to repeat the mistakes of your past!

obviously we have the worst congress in American history!

Thank God... will of the people to consume!

Entrade has a new trade up...

"How many congressmen will the people consume?"
.

UK public debt is manageable. That's not the problem.

The problem is that UK banks (many apparently insolvent) have foreign-currency liabilities equal to 200% of GDP (says Ambrose Evans-Pritchard).

This creates a dilemma. If they nationalize, and if the banks' foreign-currency assets are seriously impaired, then the UK takes on huge foreign-denominated debts that cannot be inflated away. On the other hand, if they don't nationalize RBS, Barclays and friends, then the global banking system collapses.

The foreign-denominated obligations are what recalls Iceland. Iceland's situation was much worse as a percentage of GDP, but the UK's situation is serious.

dan w | Homepage | 01.24.09 - 11:57 am | #

Your message is consistent in its theme and rational in its conclusions. Always appreciate the read.

Good points Wyoming.

We get hellacious windstorms here, plus snow, earthquakes, etc. Having a stocked pantry and some basic equipment means not having to do without or brave bad roads, empty shelves, etc.

Not to mention it's like money in the bank during a job loss or related downturn.

"deflation tends to produce not only radical anti-capitalism, but also a profound hostility to any kind of economic or political organization"

Harold James Professor of history and international affairs at the Woodrow Wilson School, Princeton University

Re: So, it's not so much "pent up demand" in any legitimate sense, it's just junkies craving their fix.

So what, things get outdated and need replaced; depreciation is what drives GDP, and there is no way around that fact!

These women are just a bit ahead of the curve and replacing outdated crap with materials that will have greater future value. You can put off upgrades for only so long.

Not to mention it's like money in the bank

You exaggerate, Joanna.

I'm sure that the stockpiled food is not completely worthless!
.

losr&confused writes:

In 1960, my father was a petty officer in the US Navy, in So. CA (LB)(Single earner family). His annual income was $3,000 An aerospace worker in Downey/Lakewood made $6,000/yr...

Interesting. My father in '60, a civil engineer, was making about 3,000 a year. Parents bought a nice home for 8,500. Same home, still in the family is worth 300,000 today - 35X the '60 price. The engineer that replaced dad, probably earns about 85,000 today (28X the '60 wage)

You apparently do not have blue collar employees in the service industry from the 70's to today. Major drop in in responsibly and skill.
Economist Moe Howard 3SU | 01.24.09 - 1:13 pm | #

OTOH, I've been pleasantly surprised in the last few months how much better the attitude of the retail employees has been.  And perhaps I'm mistaken, but the younger ones seem to be more helpful. 

Then again, maybe it's because they see me as an old man.

Werner,

Most of my friends are College educated and they get it. They are generally around 50. Some have PHD's and teach at Universities others small business people like I was. My insights are shared buy all of my friends as to the qualities of the educated that can't "think for themselves". Either our Financial Best in America (probably with others in the world) are a choice of "Dumb and disconnect" or Thieves. Take your pick. Politicians are generally the second choice but in all fairness there are a few exceptions. Sorry for the confusion.

"So what, things get outdated and need replaced; depreciation is what drives GDP, and there is no way around that fact!

These women are just a bit ahead of the curve and replacing outdated crap with materials that will have greater future value. You can put off upgrades for only so long.
Tsunami"

I'm down with that, but it's not "outdated crap" they are replacing. They are trashing perfectly good kitchens, baths etc. to put in ultra-luxury stuff, because they truly believe 'the market will recover' and they'll get their money back out. They also believe a mega-expensive kitchen enhances their social status, and the enablers are cheering them on. This is so not about utilitarian value.

Of course when the national debt rose to 150% of GDP the pound was soon devalued. In 1949, if I recall correctly, it dropped from $4.90 to $2.80. I went to university in the UK in 1951 and everything was incredibly cheap. A full year's tuition, board and room at Cambridge cost 400 pounds, or $1120 at the time. A four course dinner cost 8s.6d. or $1.20.

sdtfs | 01.24.09 - 1:22 pm | #

I've noticed it as well. Even Circuit City employees were helpful and what was their motivation?

citizen energyecon writes:
Werner | 01.24.09 - 11:28 am | #
German Economy Watch 

citizen e., I am aware of that blog. URL was posted here some days ago.

But : When I then carefully looked at it, I could not find any "masthead" (how do you call it?). So, I have no idea who puts it out, and therefore am very suspicious. (Usually people somehow do identify themselfs.)
However, I may simply have overlooked it which would be my fault.

P.S. I hope you are aware that e.g. REUTERS and AP do lie! (e.g. photoshops pictures, invents stories, etc.). I became aware of that during the last Israeli/Lebaneese war (REUTERS). Several blogs investigated and exposed that (Michelle Malkin was one of them (for AP and an story about Iraq), but there were some others which had a more leading role in investigating and documenting that. I was quite surprized then to learn that these major news agencies do outright lie and falsify !

Roubini- "A more dramatic run on the cross-border liabilities of banks, a run on the government debt and a hard landing of the pound can be prevented by coherent and forceful policy action."

A coherent and forceful policy action would be nice, but where is it?

"OTOH, I've been pleasantly surprised in the last few months how much better the attitude of the retail employees has been. And perhaps I'm mistaken, but the younger ones seem to be more helpful."

It only took one guys who thought he was the best tech in the world and was getting low pay to upset the whole shop. Fire the wizard and everybody seemed to step up and a better attitude surfaced. Maybe retail falling apart has a "I better compete or I gone next" affect. Lessons for the young.

KR,

Maybe so, but did your father spend is paycheck on booze for/with his buds, while his wife with 4 young children live on her allotment check in Navy housing?

Figurative sculpture planned for Liffey scrapped
Figurative sculpture planned for Liffey scrapped - The Irish Times - Sat, Jan 17, 2009

“The sculpture is an important element of the Docklands Arts Strategy as outlined in its recently adopted 2008 master plan aimed at ensuring that arts and culture become part of the Docklands identity,” a spokeswoman said.

“However, given the current economic environment, the Docklands Authority will not be proceeding with this development.” The project would be kept under review, she said.

The steel-lattice figure was to have been erected in the water at City Quay, 30m (100ft) to the east of Seán O’Casey Bridge and 12m (40ft) from the quay wall.

At exactly 46.2m (151.57ft) above the water, based on the river’s mid-low spring tide level, the sculpture would have been just 30cm (11.8 inches) shorter than the Statue of Liberty from her foot to the top of her torch.

Hal writes:
Of course when the national debt rose to 150% of GDP the pound was soon devalued. In 1949, if I recall correctly, it dropped from $4.90 to $2.80. I went to university in the UK in 1951 and everything was incredibly cheap.


So Hal, what do you imagine to be the outcome for the UK and the GBP over the next year? What's in the tea leaves?! Smile

Anonymous writes

Obama has no clue what he's doing and obviously we have the worst congress in American history!
Anonymous | 01.24.09 - 1:11 pm | #

§§§§§§§§§§§§§§§§§§§§§§§§§§§§§§§§§§§§§§§§

And who are you to say so?

A Chinese central banker denounced accusations by U.S. Treasury Secretary-designate Timothy Geithner that China was manipulating its yuan currency, calling them misleading and warning against "excuses" for protectionism.

Su Ning, a vice governor of the People's Bank of China, called the comments by Geithner "out of keeping with the facts" and said they were "misleading in analysing the causes of the financial crisis," the official China News Service reported on Saturday. Su also warned against trade protectionism. "We believe that faced with the financial crisis there should be a spirit of self-criticism," Su said while visiting a business newspaper office in Beijing, according to the report. "The international community is currently working together in actively responding to the financial crisis, and it must avoid exploiting different excuses for renewing or encouraging trade protectionism," Su said, adding that such steps would harm global economic recovery

Battle over; Obama gets his BlackBerry

Nation & World | Battle over; Obama gets his BlackBerry | Seattle Times Newspaper

This is beyond stupid. I am sure it will be hacked.

"Maybe so, but did your father spend is paycheck on booze for/with his buds, while his wife with 4 young children live on her allotment check in Navy housing?
losr&confused | 01.24.09 - 1:30 pm | # "

The money was there, the choices were the parents. Doesn't change what could have been. That is why the "Spendable dollar" is more important the how much one makes.

KR,
By the way, if $3,000 annual income was so great in 1962, how was my mother able to get hardship scholarships/grants to attend her third and fourth year at USC? Possible reason for break up of my parent's marriage?

Setser has pointed out that the pound will continue to fall until it comes to a level that make holding pound denominated assets attractive. This surely is not now and it may have to fall a lot further before people want to buy many US assets.

losr&confused writes:
KR,
Maybe so, but did your father spend is paycheck on booze for/with his buds, while his wife with 4 young children live on her allotment check in Navy housing?


Ah..no. Mom worked as a lab tech, they were both savers. (they bought and sold a farm post war also, as both were from the farming community). So mom today, at 95 has a net worth of well over a million. In '60 she was making $1.10 hr...

They set very good examples for their 3 kids. We all maintained a similar work ethic. (BUT we are not as hard working, or saving though, as these two parents that came thru the depression, and were forever shaped by it)

This is beyond stupid. I am sure it will be hacked.
Bubbles | 01.24.09 - 1:34 pm | #

Maybe that is the intent. It sure did get a lot of media attention.

By the way, if $3,000 annual income was so great in 1962, how was my mother able to get hardship scholarships/grants to attend her third and fourth year at USC? Possible reason for break up of my parent's marriage?
losr&confused | 01.24.09 - 1:34 pm | #

Need to remember, the 60's saw tremendous wage inflation, so depending on what time segment you're looking at, you could be talking at cross porpuses.

"Bubbles writes:
Battle over; Obama gets his BlackBerry
http:// seattletimes.nwsource.com...ackberry23.html
This is beyond stupid. I am sure it will be hacked."

Crackberry addiction. I need a word that means "unbreakable addiction to consumer goods."

We need some of this in the US.

Price Waterhouse Auditors Arrested in India in Satyam Inquiry

Price Waterhouse Auditors Arrested in Satyam Inquiry

Dan w-
you are the man...great rant...

Seems some readers here are suddenly wearing rose colored glasses. Demand for consumption is dead in the water.
People are becoming smart to the real problem of govt and bailouts.

the revolution is brewing, it's like a heart attack. The veins are clogged and no amount of low cost credit medicine can stop the inevitable stroke that is a coming. Ticking away it will happen without warning.

I see no pick up in demand at all..I look forward to someone pointing out where demand is picking up. I will embrace it but I doubt it's nothing more than the last stragglers rounding the bend picking some ripe berries by the trail while unknown to them a hungry grizzly trying to feed her cubs is right around the corner.

credits usually play at the end of the movie too. The movie is getting close to the end and the cheap coke and popcorn are leaving a bad taste in your mouth while hardening the veins..

I meant UK assets, not US.

toobigtofail,

Approval of Congress has dipped below 20% for only the fourth time in the 34 years Gallup has asked Americans to rate the job Congress is doing. Today's 18% score, based on a May 8-11 Gallup Poll, matches the record lows Gallup recorded in August 2007 and March 1992.

That was in May, before the retards ignored the public and went along with Paulson and Bernanke.

As for Obama, his concept of what will stimulate growth is way off track, because he is ignoring the corruption on wall street which is also related to TARP and congress, and thus he has pie-in-the-sky ideas and theories as to inventing jobs

Obama Details Recovery Plan - washingtonpost.com

The report said Obama would spend at least 75 percent of the stimulus package in the first 18 months after passage. Among the other major goals is updating the electric grid by laying more than 3,000 miles of transmission lines and installing 40 million "Smart Meters" in American homes. The plan also would weatherize at least 2 million homes to save low-income families on average $350 per year, and modernize at least 75 percent of federal buildings.

The plan calls for several major infrastructure investments, including enhancing security of 90 major ports and modernizing the nation's water system by launching 1,300 wastewater projects, 380 drinking water projects and 1,000 rural and sewer system projects.

In the area of education, Obama's plan calls for renovating 10,000 schools and funding the shortfall in Pell Grants, which would increase college affordability for seven million students. The plan also calls for tripling the number of undergraduate and graduate fellowships in science and providing an additional 350,000 children access to quality pre-kindergarten programs.

That is all bullshit and that will not turn the economy around, while wall street continues to be run by crooks!

President Obama, put your money where your mouth is at. Hit China hard with Section 301 legislation, ASAP. It will make you feel real good to punish these trade evildoers.

Chairman Hu, put your money where your mouth is at. Sell off some Treasuries to warn the US of its foolishness. You have Uncle Sam by the balls.

International Political Economy Zone: China/US: Cut the Crap and Just Fight Each Other

but the U.K. clearly has some serious problems.

Agreed. They need more dentists.

anon--excellent thought. Let it get hacked and use it to throw people off?

I just found a job:

providing an additional 350,000 children access to quality pre-kindergarten programs.

ROTFLMFAO!! Bahahahahah

Bubbles writes:
We need some of this in the US.

Washington, fish in a barrel.

Maybe the UK can turn around their accounting fraud and boot the economy with The Obama stiulus plan:

providing an additional 350,000 children access to quality pre-kindergarten programs.

ROTFMAO! Moohawhahaha

Daycare centers around the globe save deflation and depression; Obama takes credit for growth:

providing an additional 350,000 children access to quality pre-kindergarten programs.

"trying to draw a correlaation to today's society and that of the 30's is grossly negligent (snip)

A large percentage of our society is very violent. Many with nothing to lose and more to gain(three squares and a warm bed) by being inside than out."
Quincy k | 01.24.09 - 1:08 pm |

§§§§§§§§§§§§§§§§§§§§§§§§§§§§§§§§§§§§§§§

You focus on the wrong differences. America has ALWAYS been a violent place. The two real differences are that 1) today many many times fewer Americans have the skill to provide for their basic needs without a complex industrial / information infrastructure supporting them and 2) debt, also 3) debt

ER,

gee, it must be nice that you had a two income family in the 60's...My parents were somewhat uneducated...Father entered the Navy in 1943...didn't finish the 9th grade...from a bricklayer family in OK...My mother finished the 11th grade from a small town in Iowa, number seventh of 10 children...

I guess we can pick our friends, but not our family or family background...

By the way, graduated from UC Berkeley after serving two years in the USMC (one year in Vietnam)...

A kitten plays at the Nekorobi cat cafe in Tokyo, Japan. Cat cafes are growing in popularity as people can spend time playing with the felines for $10 an hour.

American's are just not thinking hard enough about jobs!

PageNotFound

The Obama stiulus plan is a nothingburger.

Evidently a lot of Obama's stimulus money is intended for the union guys who were told to vote for him. That's just old-fashioned politics. I guess they think giving all those laid off construction guys a job will help the F-150 sales.

They are still fighting the last war here. Or if they do get it, they aren't telling the rest of us. It's getting to be like Kremlinology, trying to read their minds.

The Obama stiulus plan is a nothingburger.

It's not even close and it looks like it came from a high school science fair project (that lost)

Tsunami writes:
"So what, things get outdated and need replaced; depreciation is what drives GDP, and there is no way around that fact!"

There is analysis of the "broken window fallacy" - replacing broken windows creates GDP, but doesn't improve anything.

A big problem people have in discussing growth is that economists have mentally equated:

rising per capita real GDP = rising standard of living.

This is an embedded assumption that underlies almost all discussions of growth. This then causes the "broken window fallacy" problem.

Ignore real GDP. It's impossible to measure. Instead, look at Gross National Income. It's what really matters, especially for things like the bond market. Why: debt is serviced out of income; and thus all debt is serviced out of all incomes (GDI). When you are in a debt deflation, levels of nominal incomes become an extremely important thing to watch.

Economists may point out right about now that GDI equals GDP. (And in fact, it's easier to measure, and is reported before GDI.) Yes, but that's for nominal GDP. Real GDP is an attempt to translate production measured into dollars into "real" production. (For example, tracking the number of cars produced, rather than the dollar value of the cars). The reality is that such measuring "real" production is largely impossible in a world with a changing mix of products and services. (Is a 10% rise in CDO production more important than a 1% drop in Civic production?)

Nominal growth implies rising nominal incomes; any other implication becomes risky to assume.

Crackberry addiction.
scone | 01.24.09 - 1:37 pm | #

Don't have one, don't need one, but I wouldn't claim that means no one has a justifiable utility for one.

BEIJING, Jan. 24 -- Two men were sentenced to death Thursday for their roles in the melamine contamination milk scandal that left at least six Chinese infants dead and almost 300,000 ill.

Now I ask you if Madoff was in China, what would be his fate?

I do like this, though:

The administration said it would launch a Web site, Recovery.gov  where all citizens will be able to see how recovery funds are being spent.

RockyR writes:
There were US army units dispatched into firefights in New Orleans after Katrina. Toe tags of the mortally wounded indicated "drowning victim". Ha! Were you there to dispute the first hand accounts I have from rescue workers that went into that mess?


There were people shot by white sheriffs and deputies when they were trying to leave New Orleans. That is very well documented (see Spike Lee's When the Levies Broke, see reporting from the New Orleans Picauyune and much more), and they were shot because of the Mad Max stories that circulated outside of New Orleans, undergirded by the belief taht black people are basically savages waiting to revert to form.

With all respect, RockyR, I do not believe there is any factual basis for believing that US Army units were dispatched into firefights in New Orleans. All the stories about helicopters being shot at were debunked along with the baby raping stories. It did not happen.

There is analysis of the "broken window fallacy" - replacing broken windows creates GDP, but doesn't improve anything.
bond guy | 01.24.09 - 1:46 pm | #

So economists don't fix their windows?  I think people are confusing the message.

losr&confused writes:
ER,

gee, it must be nice that you had a two income family in the 60's...My parents were somewhat uneducated...Father entered the Navy in 1943...didn't finish the 9th grade...from a bricklayer family in OK...My mother finished the 11th grade from a small town in Iowa, number seventh of 10 children...


Agreed, we were lucky as hell to have two sane hardworking parents, both committed to building net worth and raising a family. BTW, during the '60 decade I delivered newspapers for about 5 years stretch, and i can say that 90% of the women on my route were stay-at-home moms (normal working class neighbourhood, 50% military families, )

Tsnunami Jane wrote:

"The report said Obama would spend at least 75 percent of the stimulus package in the first 18 months (snip) updating the electric grid (snip) weatherize at least 2 million homes(snip) modernize at least 75 percent of federal buildings (snip) infrastructure investments enhancing security of 90 major ports and modernizing the nation's water system by launching 1,300 wastewater projects, 380 drinking water projects and 1,000 rural and sewer system projects (snip) 10,000 schools and funding the shortfall in Pell Grants, (snip) increase college affordability for seven million students (snip)tripling the number of undergraduate and graduate fellowships in science and providing an additional 350,000 children access to quality pre-kindergarten programs.

That is all bullshit and that will not turn the economy around, while wall street continues to be run by crooks!
Tsunami Jane | 01.24.09 - 1:38 pm | #

You make an excellent point, that seems to suggest all Obama need do additionally is arrest try and execute a few thousand banksters and voila the USA moves ahead!

Sounds good to me!

Oops. When I wrote:
"Instead, look at Gross National Income." I meant "Gross Domestic Income (GDI)". Gross National Income would match GNP (although I've never heard of GNI being used).

Maybe Obama will use the stimulus to pay for my yard care. I could use the summer off.

Obama has no clue what he's doing and obviously we have the worst congress in American history!
Anonymous | 01.24.09 - 1:11 pm | #

Life gives us two choices, Anonymous. Adapt or die. Choose wisely.

ER,
I delivered newpapers also, the Press-Telegram...however it sucked, because my customers would not pay the $2.25 per month bill that I was responsible for out of profits...My customers were deadbeats...However the area manager made we go out and solicit new customers who could not afford or other wise pay me...

I wised up after a year and bailed...

Obama Stimulus Plan should demand that 10,000 cat cafes be opened ASAP:

YouTube - 新猫ちゃん@ねころび The New Member @ Nekorobi

JOBS for cats, jobs for daycare ... whoohoo!

sdtfs writes:
"So economists don't fix their windows? I think people are confusing the message."

It creates income (for whoever installed and manufactured the window), but the end result is no improvement for the economy. Before the window broke, the building had a window. After the replacement, you still have a building with a window. So therefore, the inhabitant has no improvement in their standard of living versus the state he was in pre-breakage.

@Conjure,

Old man, you have seen it all, and so I would like you historical input, as well as the advice of your fictional friend, MP.

When and where have you seen a Mad Max scenario? Up thread I said it did not happen in Germany or Japan at the end of WWII. It did not happen in Great Depression 1.0. It did not happen in New Orleans after Katrina.

I would add to that list the Holocaust. It did not happen in the Warsaw Ghetto, it did not happen in the extermination camps (to be precise, under the most extreme conditions people cooperated and did not fall into slaughtering themselves for sport to please their exterminators).

I know you have seen the most gruesome horrors humankind has to offer, dear Conjure. But where has there been a Mad Max scenario, except in those Mel Gibson movies?

I hope, dear Conjure, that you can offer some perspective on this discussion.

Your friend,

Anonymous writes:
The Obama stimulus plan is a nothingburger (snip) it looks like it came from a high school science fair project (that lost)
Anonymous | 01.24.09 - 1:45 pm | #

§§§§§§§§§§§§§§§§§§§§§§§§§§§§§§§§§§§§§

And you sir are a nothing person Smile

Crackberry addiction.
scone | 01.24.09 - 1:37 pm | #

"Don't have one, don't need one, but I wouldn't claim that means no one has a justifiable utility for one.
sdtfs"

I don't know that he is an addict, I'm just repeating the pop culture meme for the thing. If it is a meme.

Of course, if I get really paranoid, I imagine he has a Blackberry "behind" the one we know about. The known Blackberry gets hacked, and leaks deliberate misinformation. Could be fun.

The Obama stiulus plan is a nothingburger.

It's not even close and it looks like it came from a high school science fair project (that lost)
Anonymous

Let's impeach the bastid. He's had 4 days and what has he showed us? Nothing

Maybe Obama will use the stimulus to pay for my yard care.
Yancey Ward | 01.24.09 - 1:52 pm | #

See, now you're touching on the "Mowed Lawn Fallacy", it doesn't make anything better.  Try to convince your neighbors of economic facts.

The problem with the U.S. as a "safe haven" is that it's going to fall apart during the next 50 years.

I'd like to thank you all for this thread. Best reading since the last great thread.

Seriously, thank you.

If Geithner wanted to piss off the Chinese, he succeeded. I understand the desire to please domestic audience by shifting the blame abroad, but has the new administration really thought through all the moves?

From Bloomberg:
China’s commerce ministry said the country hasn’t manipulated the value of its currency to promote exports and that accusations of government tampering in foreign exchange will fuel U.S. protectionism. “China will keep its currency stable and will not depreciate the currency to support exports,” said a ministry spokesman who couldn’t be identified under ministry rules.
... People’s Bank of China Vice Governor Su Ning echoed the commerce ministry comments in an article published by the official Xinhua News Agency today that called Geithner’s allegations “untrue and misleading.” An official in the central bank’s press office declined to comment further.
... “The yuan exchange rate is not the cause of the U.S. trade deficit,” Chinese Foreign Ministry Spokeswoman Jiang Yu said at the time. “I hope the U.S. can expand its exports to China and reduce barriers to trade and investment.”

Sounds good to me!
toobigtofail

Really? Most of the money spent has been collected by your state and local governments for many of these projects. This is a reward for redirecting money to non producing social projects. I see it as more unsustainable government in the long run.

@bond guy
Yes, I think the "broken window fallacy" is about breaking the window to stimulate the economy, not fixing or maintaining what needs it.

"mal writes:
The problem with the U.S. as a "safe haven" is that it's going to fall apart during the next 50 years.
mal"

Beyond my personal event horizon, or as the man said, "in the long run we're all dead."

Mowed Lawn Fallacy? Mowed lawns are the future and they help provide places for people to go, WTF are suggesting there suggesting that there is a fallacy?

losr&confused writes:

In 1960, my father was a petty officer in the US Navy, in So. CA (LB)(Single earner family). His annual income was $3,000 An aerospace worker in Downey/Lakewood made $6,000/yr...

lakewood-tomorrows city today..
first day and night helicopters used in US in sheriff dept, largest mall in the world in 60's, one first suburban planned community, mcdonell douglas on edge of town in long beach made town overnight

Lakewood, California - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

McDonnell Douglas - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

great town to grow up....

Lawns are a fallacy. Rip them up. Plant drought tolerant perennials that use less fertilizer and plant edible things. Lawns are boring and wasteful, not just unproductive but counterproductive symbols of American wastefulness.

I have the final announcement regarding the future of our country:

It will be blogged about in real time.

You exaggerate, Joanna.

I'm sure that the stockpiled food is not completely worthless!
.
\t Broward Horne | \t \t \tHomepage | \t01.24.09 - 1:18 pm | #

Broward Horne | Homepage | 01.24.09 - 1:18 pm | #

ROTFL!!!
You're so right! I get a much better return from my stocked pantry and other 'investments' than I do from money in the bank.

What about nationailized pet care centers that also have outdoor service centers for kids? Tax revenue could be used to support pet care center jobs and then connect the Obama plan to have 350,000 daycare workers taking care of kids and pets.

Obviously this would need TARP funds, because the Mom's & Dads and pet owners would remain unemployed, but at least they would have a place to take their family for a few hours a day, and that could stimulate time to look for jobs, so very much, a win-win situation for America!

Conservatives seem to run down LBJ...while he had many faults (Vietnam War), he did initiate the war on poverty in the late 60's and Medicare...

I can still recall the pictures of RFK in the South and the Appalachians...Nothing today, even Katrina, could/can match today with the 1960's...

Up to the 1960's, there was real poverty and lack of educational opportunities in America...

Back OT: what really weirds me out is Roubini's tone: it's as if he's trying to be reassuring, soothing, calming. That's scary.

Roubini misses the obvious point that THIS time, the UK's debt is denominated very disproportionately in foreign currency, which it CANNOT print.

The UK cannot print its way out of a debt crisis. The US can. In previous crises there had been no collective de-linking from gold. The only governments whose currencies collapsed were the governments who lost control of their gold reserves to another faction or nation-state.

What's just happened in New York re the senatorial selection (confused process, surprising result) is just a foretaste of what's in store for the entire country.

Upstate NY has been in economic decay for decades, sitting like a mushroom in a closet, while downstate got richer and richer. The political powers that be thought they could get away forever with calling this two-economy state "the Empire State" and that they could keep running it with no disruptions.

What has happened is not so much a "revolt," as a slow accumulation of political factors and complexities, and personal confusions that got us to the point where in a critical moment, someone made a choice not to continue to enable a dying dynasty (the Kennedys), enraging the poobahs and delighting the mushrooms.

It's little choices like these that open the door to havoc, hopefully creative havoc and not just destructive... But the fact is, the powers that be have lost control of their own empires - it took a cascade of factors - and this is just one example.

"Up to the 1960's, there was real poverty and lack of educational opportunities in America..."

Kind of makes the Poverty of today BS.

The whole WORLD is SUBPRIME!!!!

@joe schmoe

Joe, Conjure considers the probability of the so-called "Mad Max" scenario to be approximately .01. It certainly isn't likely, but it's now on the table.

He considers the probability of a global depression to be far higher, almost .50.

Rent-to-own,
That triangular trade between Germany, China and the US is not much mentioned...and it is the piece of the puzzle that Werner, for example, with his rigidity does not see..
On a similar note, there was a great piece yesterday in the Guardian on Polish emigre workers leaving the UK in droves to return home. The Poles seem convinced they are in the catbird seat vis a vis the rest of Europe. Of course the Poles have also left Ireland as it's 'miracle" has collapsed.
I'll see if I can find the link...you might find it interesting.

Let's not get back to mushrooms. I'm still getting the taste of bongwater out of my brain.

Maybe Roubini is not with out political bias?

Don't fear the changes. Embrace the change you would like to see and work to create it in your community.

Disregard if you have neo con leanings.

Re: The Obama Plan, intended to provide an additional 350,000 children access to quality pre-kindergarten programs.

I see this as a window of opportunity to also start a national program to domesticate squirrels and let these toddlers come to think of squirrels as the national recovery animal, e.g, kind of like Smokey The Bear. That actually may stimulate toy sales and I can already see Intel inside ... this could be really big shit!

"in a critical moment, someone made a choice not to continue to enable a dying dynasty (the Kennedys), enraging the poobahs and delighting the mushrooms."

To enable a strengthening dynasty perhaps...Gilliband was the choice of the Clinton clan...and they put heavy pressure on Patterson.
Punishing the Kennedy's for supporting Obama was high on the Clinton agenda, and yes, they were out for blood. Made a fool of Patterson in the process, but no matter.
Dynastic politics at work.

Werner | 01.24.09 - 1:25 pm | #

Agreed, multiple data sources and explicit original sourcing whenever possible.

Joe schmoe:
But where has there been a Mad Max scenario, except in those Mel Gibson movies?But where has there been a Mad Max scenario, except in those Mel Gibson movies?

When you ask these foolish questions, it's hard to give a serious answer. Yes, Francis, societies have in fact collapsed before.

Memo from the Duh dept. writes:
"Roubini misses the obvious point that THIS time, the UK's debt is denominated very disproportionately in foreign currency, which it CANNOT print."

That is true for the banks (which have foreign currency assets and liabilities, which are hopefully matched), but is not true for the UK gov't. There may be a few euro denominated UK govvies or whatever out there; they certainly aren't a large market. But in almost all cases OECD governments swap foreign currency debt payments back into the local currency. (EM governments don't have that luxury.)

All issuers tend to do is arbitrage funding differentials; they don't do currency risk. (Governments did that in the 1970s and got their clocks cleaned.)

an additional 350,000 children access to quality pre-kindergarten programs

That seems like an oxymoron statement, first, what is meant by additional 350,000 and then why do they bring up the idea of quality? This implies that there are 350,000 kiddies in low quality daycare who will now be upgraded to a new standard? This does seem really stupid and to think of this in terms of helping bailout the economy, this is not exactly stuff that should be coming from a president that is almost in a depression; very sad to see this low level thinking!!

Has anyone heard the expression from shirt sleeve to shirt sleeve?

If I understand it correctly, the first generation are the robber barons and builds up the principal..

The second generation lives off the interest...

The third generation consumes the principal...

Of course this does not apply to the Rockefellers, Vanderbilts or the Kennedys...

Login or register to post comments
Syndicate content