CR - have any good hikes planned for the holiday? LA Times lists a pretty nice looking 19 mile loop to a hot spring. Oh, that, and how to dial 211 for free food distribution.
if the Republicans in the Senate try to obstruct everything
"if"?
that's a given.
what will be the Obama, Reid, Pelosi response to fillibusters on every action (as in nearly every proposal in the last Congress)?
Talen says this will happen quickly. I'm not so sure, given the delaying tactics of the Fed/Treasury. But I am SURE Congress will be tied up in proposals that don't get to final votes in the Senate.
I have a vivid imagination and I still can't grasp this thing! Will I have to shoot my neighbors when they come for my food and gold? I am starting to believe that I might. damn it!
I don't understand why Roubini is seen as such a doomster. The guy throws out a modest appraisal, waits for it to be born out and then edges in a new slightly more negative opinion. Remember when it was just a "credit cronch with an economic hard londing"?
Kevin Phillips had some nasty comments for Paulson, Bush, Rubin etc and the financial eleetes on CSPAN's In Depth program this am. Gives Obama a 3 in 10 chance to get the system fixed (due to Clinton era baggage reload). His new book, "Bad Money: Reckless Finance, Failed Politics, and the Global Crisis of American Capitalism" sounds like an interesting read. Basically he agrees we are screwed big time.
You can send your neighbors to the gulag and then you would not have to worry about them. I can send you the link to report them to the Obama administration.
When things do not make sense they do not look like they make sense.
I still have not figured out how everyone thinks they can afford the houses they live in and their retirement and this is not in a so called bubble area- but it is a bubble area. I have been thinking this for at least twenty years.
FRom the LATimes, a service piece for the newly poor...the formerly middle class who are now homeless, jobless and without health-care...a list of agencies and services. As the piece notes, those who have been poor for a while, know all this.
Those who used to make 80k a year, will need help navigating this new world.
"Will I have to shoot my neighbors when they come for my food and gold? I am starting to believe that I might. damn it!"
In the America that we can hope will arise from this distress, neighbors will (again) help one another.
Say what you might about the Mormons' beliefs, but their sense of community and charity could bear some replication, as does the same sense among other groups, ethnic, immigrant, or rural, in this country.
If you can keep your head when all about you Are losing theirs and blaming it on you, If you can trust yourself when all men doubt you, But make allowance for their doubting too;
If you can wait and not be tired by waiting, Or being lied about, don't deal in lies, Or being hated, don't give way to hating, And yet don't look too good, nor talk too wise:
If you can dream - and not make dreams your master; If you can think - and not make thoughts your aim; If you can meet with Triumph and Disaster And treat those two impostors just the same;
If you can bear to hear the truth you've spoken Twisted by knaves to make a trap for fools, Or watch the things you gave your life to broken, And stoop and build 'em up with wornout tools:
If you can make one heap of all your winnings And risk it on one turn of pitch-and-toss, And lose, and start again at your beginnings And never breathe a word about your loss;
If you can force your heart and nerve and sinew To serve your turn long after they are gone, And so hold on when there is nothing in you Except the Will which says to them: 'Hold on!'
If you can talk with crowds and keep your virtue, Or walk with kings - nor lose the common touch, If neither foes nor loving friends can hurt you, If all men count with you, but none too much;
If you can fill the unforgiving minute With sixty seconds' worth of distance run - Yours is the Earth and everything that's in it, And - which is more - you'll be a Man my son!
I'll file on $120k for 2008, but I have been living at the $24k (or less) level for... my whole life. I expect to file on something like $20-30k in 2009. Funny how my lifestyle won't change a bit. Might travel more now that gas is cheaper though.
Can someone like Roubini actually be anything other than an "optimist" or mere "ever-so-slightly more than pessimist optimist"? The Fed can't be anything but a soft-spoken slight optimist or barely a pessimist because, as if they are magic oracles, if they were to say what they (might) really think, the world would collapse into a black hole and form the core of a new galaxy.
The instant one of these people becomes "official" and "bonafide" they have to curtail their tongues - in either direction.
Our political whores haven't even blown the treasury market up and collaped the dollar yet leading into an Argentina dance, of course Roubini is an optimist!
It is all the rage now in the mainstream to trot out anyone who did not engage in the hubris and deception that all was well.
Trouble is, there aren't very many that they are aware of. The Charlie Rose I would actually watch would have a panel of e.g., Shedlock, CR, and a few other bloggers whose identities most of you could list off without pause, discuss what it was that allowed them to see it coming.
Thank God! For just a moment, I thought every other person on the planet had been sucked into the debt hole.
Yancey Ward | 12.07.08 - 1:43 pm | #
Somebody is always on the other side of a trade if there is a trade. On the other hand the other side's position is only as good as their counterparties' ability to make good on their obligations.
If Taleb is right then nobody walks away from this wreck completely intact. The winners will be the ones carried away only horribly mangled and wounded. The losers will be ash.
The point about the velocity of information is the salient issue. Someone misses a mortgage payment in Jersey and a factory shuts down in China and a ore barge is turned back to Australia and a bank delays a line of credit raising the LIBOR that adjusted the mortgage causing the missed mortgage payment.
There are no effective circuit breakers for international flow of funds or information because face it they are both conducted with electrons. Somebody's fat thumb could be the precipitator.
"Will I have to shoot my neighbors when they come for my food and gold? I am starting to believe that I might. damn it!"
They won't come to you. The have nothings have already hired Paulson and Bernanke to steal your savings, savings rate and wages by printing money and falsely decreasing their debt and increasing their assets worth. Worst part about it, they used your tax dollars to hire the crooks.
When Taleb says "quickly", he doesn't mean "soon". He means that when it starts happening, it will be like cresting that first peak on a roller coaster.
Just as everything gets worse faster so does the ability to stimulate get more or less instant.
the aenemic or dehydrated patient needing blood food and water needs time to avoid shock and so it has to be given more or less one drop at a time with monitoring.
If we really get deflation every bank account in the universe can get a years salary. It wont matter where it came from. It will be spent and if that does not stop deflation we can have two years salary. Whatever it takes. If we get inflation then we can ajust the amount and begin removing money. But the amount available to avoid deflation has no limit and if we have inflation we remove it.
How hard can it be??
If debtors get money to solve their debts what is the problem? Roubini is already talking about debt forgiveness. Whinge all you want about that but it solves the deflation problem. That problem anyway.
When the ultra perma never again bears come out you know we reached bottom. Roubini is a bear but even he knows that things not as bad as the doom sayers.
Cynical Dude(Unrated) writes:
Talen says this will happen quickly.
When Taleb says "quickly", he doesn't mean "soon". He means that when it starts happening, it will be like cresting that first peak on a roller coaster.
Cynical Dude | 12.07.08 - 2:23 pm | #
Or already HAPPENED - think radiation burst from a neutron bomb with the financial 'contagion' analogous to radiation... things look okay for while then everybody stars dieing of radiation poisoning with some dieing faster than others.
The financials have blown and now the real economy (Main Street) is dieing from the radiation.
I think the idea of the global economy regressing to the stone age is crazy, but things could get very bad:
I think the most likely scenairo is a lengthy recession (15-20 years) with high unemployment--nearly equalling the great depression.
I guess the government will inflate its way out of debt, since there really is no other alternative.
Imported items will become far more expensive. Consumer electronics will not fall in price as has been the norm.
Budgets will be much tighter--people will spend all of their income just providing the basics. Most families will get by with 1 or 2 cars; three car families will be rare.
Most everyone will know someone employed by a massive government jobs program.
A bank holiday will be declared and a massive banking system consolidation will occur. Depositers may lose a fraction of funds above FDIC limits.
Hotels will close worldwide as travel is greatly reduced for business and leisure. Island resort properties will close and decay. One third of Disney's hotels will be mothballed.
Las Vegas will be a strange place indeed, with very new properties falling into disrepair and decay.
Child day care centers will decline dramatically.
Fewer homes are needed as extended familes move in together to share costs.
Many casual dining chains will go out of business.
Airline travel will become less frequent. Airport expansions will be cancelled. Many aircraft manufacturers will file BK.
Pressure on the dollar will increase the price of oil.
Gold will go up in dollar terms, but not to stratospheric levels.
Property crimes will increase. There will be a great increase in alarm systems, security services of all kinds, self-defense products, window bars, steel doors, fences, video monitoring, etc.
The euro will be used by an increasing number of countries.
The cruise industry will nearly collapse. Ships will be left to rust; nobody will pay above scrap prices for a ship.
I do not expect a "run on the dollar" to occur where there is a sudden and massive drop in the use of the dollar worldwide. Nor do I expect a lengthy period of unavailability of electronic payment systems.
I don't expect food supplies to become unavailable; there is no reason why this would happen. A great deal of the food consumed in the USA is made in the USA. Of course, imported fresh fruits would be pricier.
Tim(Unrated) writes:
When the ultra perma never again bears come out you know we reached bottom. Roubini is a bear but even he knows that things not as bad as the doom sayers.
Tim | 12.07.08 - 2:29 pm | #
LOL - wish you could talk to some of my industrial contacts - their backlog has evaporated in less than 60 days. Layoffs will be accelerating after the first. My wife says her shop chops heads Monday (again second wave) - no one except the top executives know how big the cuts will be or whom. I hear this everywhere I go - wasn't like this as recently as late September. That was when the re-forecasting in earnest started.
And services based companies will cut even more aggressively than 'producers'.
As has been pointed out, what we're currently dealing with isn't even the Black Swan yet as it was eminently predictable. What's he's talking about is the future - eg the horns of mp's dilemna of 30% unemployment or 30% inflation.
THAT's where the Black Swan resides, as nobody can really predict how that will play out, especially in a globalized, nuked world. Maybe we somehow muddle through, maybe we have WW2 like event and 2 billion people cease to exist. Who knows?
Lots more fun days still lay ahead of us! Don't know whether to laugh or to cry...
Something to look forward to when the Small 3 go down in flames:
Interesting...but I don't think the collapse of the big 3 losers will help matters. They each actively don't WANT to license this vehicle from AFS. They prefer to continue building SUVs, trucks, and the like with MARGINALLY improved fuel efficiency. They don't WANT a major-league, leapfrog improvement.
One of the Big 3 would have to be forced to license and build this thing by a Congress that makes it a stipulation of a bailout - yeah right, they'd do that.
Perhaps a Honda or Toyota or Tata motors would license and build it.
At the risk of ruffling a few feathers, I am looking for comments that are more specific in identifying the casual chain of coming events. Just as in the house/mortgage bubble, many (most here) correctly noted the disconnect with reality, but where are we headed and how will it unfold? Taleb's statements are typical of many who talk in absolute general terms "it will be much worse", but what specifically are we talking about?
I have been trying to reconcile the conflicting views of deflation/deflation, and my sense is that most recognize they are not competing events, but consecutive with the ordering pretty well assumed (deflation first, then rapid inflation). So what excatly will trigger the transition from deflation to inflation and how will this first appear?
Reflecting on collective comments in past threads, it seems this will not occur simply as a result of excessive stimulus and other "bailouts" as the current pace of deflation may absorb, at least initially, much of the impact. It occurs to me that the knee in the curve will finally occur when production will have been so crippled by the current economic dislocations that shortages begin to emerge. Only at that point, when crippled production can no longer meet demand will the hyper inflation phase begin.
Am I correct in this thinking? Isn't a critical step in the transition to hyper inflation a correction in production yielding a clear shortage in goods and services?
And if this is correct, how far do we really have to go before such shortages are an issue (for the sake of discussion putting aside oil)? Hard to imagine in an economy and world that seems to suffer from excess rather than limited productive capacity.
"I do not expect a "run on the dollar" to occur where there is a sudden and massive drop in the use of the dollar worldwide. Nor do I expect a lengthy period of unavailability of electronic payment systems."
A magisterial tone, o.jeff. How much confidence to you have in your own forecasts?
Dry,
Not that you needed another anecdote, but we have many clients teetering near bankruptcy. This is a first. Yes, you know some of them.
Fortunately for us, they still have to file those k's.
If Taleb is right then nobody walks away from this wreck completely intact. The winners will be the ones carried away only horribly mangled and wounded. The losers will be ash.
dryfly | 12.07.08 - 2:20 pm |
Taleb certainly looked a bit smug.
I having been reading about deflation. The Irving Fischer link someone posted has been very helpful. He even has his version of what will happen, broken out into stages, probably where Roubini saw it.
I can't say I understood it completely but I think I understand why Bernake is printing. He knows we are experiencing deflation. He wants to inflate enough so the debt can be paid down easier for the large debtors. He won't succeed, but he can make it less devasting.
A report quoting the Dawn newspaper said U.S. Secretary of State Condoleezza Rice was understood to have told Pakistan that there was âirrefutable evidenceâ of involvement of elements in the country in the Mumbai attacks and that it needed to act urgently and effectively to avert a strong international response.
Too bad Dr. Rice has no credibility left when it comes to "irrefutable evidence."
Many theories on this crisis used by the most negative have been entirely blown out of the water and will not come back easily.
Decoupling. Collapse of the dollar. Bond vigilantes.
The world is more interested in helping America than i think most theorists want to believe. Instead they cling to theories now shown to have failed them.
"he once said atheists caused more wars than religious people because of nationalism."
Just musing. I doubt it. "Atheist" leaders killed more of their own nation's citizens, but I think "religious" opportunists caused more war. That's if your counting what the nations profess to believe.
And whether or not Taleb is a crank or Roubini said this or that; some people are looking for an infallible prophet. Just look at the ideas guys, do they make sense?
I can't say I understood it completely but I think I understand why Bernake is printing. He knows we are experiencing deflation. He wants to inflate enough so the debt can be paid down easier for the large debtors. He won't succeed, but he can make it less devasting.
nova | 12.07.08 - 2:43 pm | #
Depends on your definition of 'success' - if we have some mangled bodies exiting the crash but still alive to see another day - he might consider that 'success'.
I doubt the mangled will feel all that lucky though.
What's worse Cynical is Rice is going even further...This is troubling, very troubling...I only half believed they would try something crazy before leaving power...now I'm leaning towards 99% sure in my belief...
Optometrist? Certainly not an ostrich. I feel admiration for anyone who knows how little we know, and how unexpected the unknowable can be. How can we not develop fall-back plans for the unexpected? Because we began as migratory hunter-gatherers, who depended on known cycles and adventitious finds. It's hard-wired. Long range planning is not us. These disasters happen over and over, and as soon as matters improve the next generation forgets what the previous one has learned. Ours is a very clever but in some ways a very dumb species. It's outgrown its own survival instincts.
Let's see if we can improve our adaptations to reality.
I am looking for comments that are more specific in identifying the casual chain of coming events...
That's going to be a bit tough, given that nobody really knows what is going to happen next. Or put another way - the things we can predict will be overwhelmed by the things we didn't see coming.
I do not plan on shooting my neighbors. I would rather organize them which I think I can do. It helps I know almost everyone on my block. After 22 years of living in the same house that is not to difficult.
I like the idea of bouncing possible scenarios around. I do not see it as a chance for personal profit. Rather, a chance to do something good and useful.
Q: What will trigger the switch from deflation to inflation? A: China's huge currency reserves will start to come back into the market to cover for declining world demand. They will do this because maintaining high growth rates is the only way they can keep the populace gainfully employed instead of rioting in the streets. The flood of currency in the market chasing after real goods will cause massive inflation.
China is walking an even more difficult tightrope right now than the US is.
Is it better to haved shared your last bit of food with a neighbor? Or better when they come to your door hungry; to turn them away?
Short term I see very ugly retail sales. Jobs cuts are going to come fast and furious. There is no social net to catch so many of us. There will be a gap when many will fall between the cracks.
ova writes:
I do not plan on shooting my neighbors. I would rather organize them which I think I can do. It helps I know almost everyone on my block. After 22 years of living in the same house that is not to difficult.
The problem is that if your neighbors are not prepared are you going to feed them? What about the neighborhood a mile away? I hope it does not get to that but it could. Bush deployed 20000 troops to respond to emergencies in the US. That scares me. They know what is coming?
When some of you guys say "Bernanke is printing," do you mean it literally or metaphorically?
Metaphorically at this point but it could turn 'literal' if they 'need it to' - watch how fast they (Fed) 'sterilize' the interventions (do they pull money out via TOMO equal to the money they pump in via TARP) It should show up in M1 & M2 eventually IF they don't keep these operations approximately equal in timing & magnitude. I believe that at least until recently - they have been equal (sterilized)... there is some discussion here & other econ blogs that might have changed recently.
nova(Unrated) writes: \tIs it better to haved shared your last bit of food with a neighbor? Or better when they come to your door hungry; to turn them away?
Cash in circulation has been a small fraction of m2 m3 etc for a while. But I would agree that none of the trillions mentioned are real until the treasury auctions off the bonds. Congress still reserves the right to dissolve the Federal Reserve and repudiate any public liabilities based on their liabilities, which are explicitly private, of course.
Taleb's claims about his clients being unaffected need close inspection. Even if he moved all of his clients money into cash - in which currency? If it is USD, was it a lucky guess a year ago or a conclusion of some chain of reasoning? If it is Euro, then they are not unaffected.
Taleb does not seem to have a positive theory/philosophy of how the world works, only a claim that anything is possible, and the likelihood of that is much more than you think. I had this insight when I was in school.
One such blogger, a retired veteran of Wall Street who signed his posts "Calculated Risk," had established his own blog in January 2005.
Calculated Risk quickly developed a cult following for its sophisticated analysis of economic data, for rapidly crunching numbers into readable graphs, and for the knowledgeable posts of Tanta, a guest blogger with razor-sharp prose and an almost limitless enthusiasm for exposing the inner workings of the mortgage industry. Tanta had worked as a mortgage banker, and the blog created an instant platform for this one thoughtful - and worried - insider. Today, her posts have become legendary as a prescient warning cry about the current financial meltdown.
Bernanke has started printing in the past few months.
For the year before that he was sterilizing which was worse: taking money from the broad economy and giving it, dollar-for-dollar, to the banks to lend back to us. He would rather do that still, I'm sure. That's who he seems to be and who he works for.
But for some reason, he is not sterilizing any more. Thank God.
"I always thought of hyperinflation as a monetary phenomenon.
It is."
dryfly, bgates; thanks for response. Given that inflation is a monetary phenomenon, isn't it measured by what you can purchase (X vs. 3X)? If production declines, or scarcity appears, and prices are finally bid up because demand can decline no further - what do you call that? If not tecnically inflation, isn't the result the same; money becomes worth less because you can buy less for the same amount?
The comment was on the statement that most families will get by on 1 or 2 cars.
My comment was:
The CIA's World Factbook reports chickens per capita for the world's countries. Why? Because it is a fairly good relative metric for nutrition and the ability of a country to feed itself.
When the US begins (speaking metaphorically) to think in terms of its own chickens, rather than cars, per capita, then the reality that change in life style of the last decade is both inevitable and necessary will gain traction.
Austin Tex writes:
In the America that we can hope will arise from this distress, neighbors will (again) help one another.
How exactly will this magical transformation take place in a people that have been conditioned to believe that government is there to provide for all their needs, cradle to grave?
Personally, I worry about Mesiahs. I do not know who makes me worry more; a Mullah, or a Baptist.
Fischer mentions in his writing that FDR had to print. If he didn't, the gov would have fallen. He also mentions the midwest where people were already starting to cross the line into outright revolution.
May we have an example of someone who knows how the world works?
Keynes and Fridman had postive, if opposite, theories that tried to explain how the world works. Nobody is trying to come with perfect Theory Of Everything (save string theorists). The point is that critisizing can be valuable but it usually is not hard. The real value is in trying to come with something new that helps understand how the world works.
V - I was trained as a chemical engineer but raised in a family full of economists (ya scary - you should have been to our family dinners).
Anyway the way I see it is inflation/deflation is like 'heat'... the thermal energy in molecules. There is no way to easily measure heat though - so we developed 'surrogate measures' that approximate heat content... temperature. Think of price & wage fluctuations as the monetary temperature... they aren't the underlying phenomenon but rather surrogate effects resulting from the deeper underlying cause.
"If production declines, or scarcity appears, and prices are finally bid up because demand can decline no further"
interesting point. obviously, the relationship between money supply and prices is never linear.
a noted bay area entrepreneur recorded a lecture on the relationship between a scarce product and a lack of monetary liquidity in the context of our last significant recession, which this lecture dates from:
The Federal government is already the largest employer in the country, even excluding the military and Post Office.
Corey | Homepage | 12.07.08 - 3:06 pm |
How exactly will this magical transformation take place in a people that have been conditioned to believe that government is there to provide for all their needs, cradle to grave?
Corey | Homepage | 12.07.08 - 3:01 pm | # [kill]
Taleb does not seem to have a positive theory/philosophy of how the world works, only a claim that anything is possible, and the likelihood of that is much more than you think
People are linear creatures. We extrapolate action along linear lines.
Complexity is multiplicative.
Ergo, there will also be a mismatch in expectations versus reality.
The forced merger, to me, looks good on paper. The reality, I think, would mean the end of Chryler, and all all the jobs it provided. GM has nothing either. I guess all it would do is kill both.
Phila writes:
What does Sweden have to do with it?
Sure, sure. People in L.A. are dialing 211 for emergency Christmas gifts [see article upthread]. Somehow I doubt we're ready to become that mythical nation of self-sufficiency and "neighbor helping neighbor".
During the Great Depression, unemployment was high. Many employers tried to get as much work as possible from their employees for the lowest possible wage. Workers were upset with the speedup of assembly lines, working conditions and the lack of job security. Seeking strength in unity, they formed unions. Automobile workers organized the U.A.W. (United Automobile Workers of America) in 1935. General Motors would not recognize the U.A.W. as the workers' bargaining representative. Hearing rumors that G.M. was moving work to factories where the union was not as strong, workers in Flint began a sit-down strike on December 30, 1936. The sit-down was an effective way to strike. When workers walked off the job and picketed a plant, management could bring in new workers to break the strike. If the workers stayed in the plant, management could not replace them with other workers. This photograph shows the broken windows at General Motors' Flint Fisher Body Plant during the Flint sit-down strike of 1936-37.
Dryfly: Anyway the way I see it is inflation/deflation is like 'heat'... the thermal energy in molecules.
If I could add that inflation is the average temperature of the economy. Increase in temperature/prices in some regions/asset classes does not constitute inflation. It has to be broad based.
The real value is in trying to come with something new that helps understand how the world works.
It seems to me that trying to understand where the boundary between "predictable" and "not-predictable" lies fully qualifies for your definition of "real value".
The impression I'm getting - and forgive me if it's just poor interpretation on my part - is that you're talking about a comic book caricature of Taleb - not what Taleb actually argues. And I freely admit it's easy to caricature Taleb - his presentation style practically begs for it! - but he's a lot more subtle than you appear to be giving him credit for.
This is a guy who has - in the past ten years - followed his style of thinking into capturing an equity bull market, an oil bull market, and the banking mother-of-all-bear markets. Damn few market mavens have the ability to switch meta-themes like this (Soros & Templeton come to mind, though Templeton rigidified in his late late years).
His persona and writing style can be quite harshly grating, no question. Personally I think he does himself a disservice using it, but then again, he's a best-selling author and I'm not, so maybe I'm misjudging how the public wants to hear its messages.
Thing to keep in mind - the guy puts his money where his mouth is - and makes serious coin doing so. For us market types, that's the only validation that really matters.
Crewman(Unrated) writes:
Bush deployed 20000 troops to respond to emergencies in the US. That scares me. They know what is coming?
20000 troops against 300 million inhabitants? I think we know who should be scared in that scenario. 20000 troops wouldn't even control a sizable midwest town; a metropolis is out of the question.
I don't know why Bush enacted that policy, but crowd control during a monetary collapse doesn't seem likely.
I would say he is a crank.
RationalJeff | 12.07.08 - 2:13 pm | #
That was a great clip. Why would you think he is a crank because he points out the complete failure of economic analysts to explain the economic finance? The fact that people take advice from MSNBC or Wall Street Journal commentators certainly does stem from a religious-like belief system.
Corey: How exactly will this magical transformation take place in a people that have been conditioned to believe that government is there to provide for all their needs, cradle to grave?
Funny, the lession I've been learning (or actually, the lesson that the powers that be have been trying to force into my skull) is that we are all on our own: "I got mine, screw you" or "Hooray for me, too bad for you" or "Not my problem if you were too stupid to not make yourself rich. Die already!"
stdfs: Chickens aren't the problem,...it's the roosters. Please remember, you don't need roosters for egg production
Ah, but you NEED a rooster to propagate your flock. No rooster, no replication.
We are planning to acquire a dozen chickens next year plus 2 roosters...but then, we're in the sticks.
Thanks for your response. What got me on this point is the assumption I had been holding that deflation was good for savers and those holding stored wealth. But this comfortable assumption rests on the belief that goods will remain plentiful, onlt their prices will change as demand collpases. There is a point at which the downturn is so severe that it affects productive capacity, in which case scarcity is not easily solved simply by resorting to savings.
But in our enormous economy, how much further will we have to go before we see the impact on productive capacity and emergence of scarcity relative to demand? Quite a ways I believe. For now there seems plenty of surplus. I also don't see a serious case for deflation until wages begin declining. What is the evidence on this metric?
Sure, sure. People in L.A. are dialing 211 for emergency Christmas gifts [see article upthread]. Somehow I doubt we're ready to become that mythical nation of self-sufficiency and "neighbor helping neighbor".
Yep. We are not ready. Doesn't mean it won't happen. To your previous question, people will stop believing the government provides when it can no longer do so. Kind of scary, huh?
Crewman, the opposite is going to occur in this collapse. Wages will decline precipitously and workers, blue collar and white collar alike, will be required to take it up the ass because there are others more desperate than them ready to open wider if they're not obliging. Unions were not the answer....just a band-aid...and now the wound is so large and deep, the band-aid's worthless. Workers should have taken control of the organizations and made them employee owned and run. It's too late now....they should have struck whilst the iron was hot, but instead they took the easy route...and now we're all going to pay.
@Cynical Dude 3:13 pm - I read both of Taleb's books and listened to/watched a number of his interviews. I value his view that financiers have to show more humility as there is much they cannot estimate. I wish he showed the same level of humility himself, instead of implying he is smarter than Merton, Black and others.
I am sorry to be off topic, but it's Sunday. Does anybody here, besides me, believe they will become homicidal if that Dell "caroling" commercial runs much longer? Thanks.
You cannot predict the long term (+5yrs) future! The best predictions are short term (upto 1yr), very good and objective analysis might even be accurate at intermediate timescales (1-5 yrs). However even short term predictions can be upset by unknown or poorly understood factors.
He is challenging the very basis of modelling futures with mathematical techniques, whether they be environmental scenarios, technological changes or financial scenarios. Many of his detractors either see their livelihood disappearing or are just plain scared of the implications of his ideas. Of course there are useful idiots who oppose him because he somehow appears to criticize their pet hobby horses.
A very large source of oppostion to his ideas also comes from the simple fact that even partially accepting their validity would destroy the well cultivated self image of the west.
20000 troops against 300 million inhabitants? I think we know who should be scared in that scenario. 20000 troops wouldn't even control a sizable midwest town; a metropolis is out of the question.
I agree but...
Paulson to Congress: There will be MARTIAL LAW in America if the bailout is not passed
More than 160 US, NATO vehicles burned in Pakistan
By RIAZ KHAN, Associated Press Writer Riaz Khan, Associated Press Writer 2 hrs 5 mins ago
PESHAWAR, Pakistan Militants torched 160 vehicles, including dozens of Humvees destined for U.S. and allied forces fighting in Afghanistan, in the boldest attack so far on the critical military supply line through Pakistan.
The American military said Sunday's raid on two transport terminals near the beleaguered Pakistani city of Peshawar would have "minimal" impact on anti-Taliban operations set to expand with the arrival of thousands more troops next year.
However, the attack feeds concern that insurgents are trying to choke the route through the famed Khyber Pass, which carries up to 70 percent of the supplies for Western forces in landlocked Afghanistan, and drive up the cost of the war
The disease, like the poor, will always be with us. Revolutions eat their children; just like software startups.
I don't know about always...but it will take multiple iterations of revolution to purge any last vestiges. That was the theory behind perpetual revolution, although, as we have witnessed, it was never put into practice. Sure, Castro continues to call it the revolution, but that's bullshit...and Che would agree if he was alive today. In fact, an argument could be made that's why he and Fidel parted ways. Che truly believed in the perpetuity of revolution to preclude the reentrenchment of corruption and vested individual interests. Fidel didn't want to lose his grip on power knowing full well that the Capitalists were waiting at the gates.
Thanks for your response. What got me on this point is the assumption I had been holding that deflation was good for savers and those holding stored wealth. But this comfortable assumption rests on the belief that goods will remain plentiful, onlt their prices will change as demand collpases. There is a point at which the downturn is so severe that it affects productive capacity, in which case scarcity is not easily solved simply by resorting to savings.
Deflation destroys productive capacity EXCEPT for 'pure services' - those that don't rely on any capital at all.
Everyone gets all hung up on debt vs savings but deflation also destroys capital intensive operations regardless whether they are debt free or not - look up 'operational leverage' [basically investing capital to produce more & better than is possible w/out that capital]... in a deflation it behaves almost like debt.
I mean who is going to invest in machinery TODAY if the products they produce are going to decline in price, even if the demand in non-monetary units is fairly constant? And especially if you believe the cost of those machines will also be declining - why not just wait?
So jobs go away in a deflation too - exacerbating the deflation.
People on this forum (and everywhere in general) are way to casual thinking through the repercussions - BOTH for inflation & deflation. They both suck but in different ways.
I don't expect food supplies to become unavailable; there is no reason why this would happen. A great deal of the food consumed in the USA is made in the USA. Of course, imported fresh fruits would be pricier.
Food will always be available at a price. But it could become less available in the U.S. at affordable prices if other countries start bidding it up and hoarding it. Also, if the growth of the middle class in the undeveloped world resumes faster than we think. Also, if global warming creates nightmares for crops.
Recently, Argentina was starving while its farmers were getting rich exporting to people who would/could pay more than domestic. The govt. had to step in and restrict food exports, which caused the farmers to riot and strike.
Satan: You cannot predict the long term (+5yrs) future! The best predictions are short term (upto 1yr), very good and objective analysis might even be accurate at intermediate timescales (1-5 yrs). However even short term predictions can be upset by unknown or poorly understood factors.
Few businesses that I know of have a need to predict their operating needs 5+ years into the future. When they do, it is based on simple arguments like "China is a big and growing market, we should have presence there".
R&D definitely looks at a rather distant future, but smart companies do not try to apply strict forecasts to their R&D strategy, whether its high-tech or pharma. I think most of these companies try to pursue multiple paths and not be bound by "the" forecast.
The unemployment rates (UE's 3 through 6). Wages are sticky on the way down just like RE - doesn't mean they don't fall just more resistance down than up.
So just like you don't see RE prices fall much UNTIL sales all but stop... You won't see wages fall much UNTIL UE goes sky high...
We saw RE sales stop & prices fall... now we are seeing UE sky... wages will be next if this trend continues.
We think arithmetic while the world acts geometric
It's remarkable how few people understand the Mythical Man Month.
My favorite example is pregnancy - one woman can make a baby in nine months but nine women can't make a baby in one month.
Boise isn't that bad, overall. It's still isolated in many ways. A fellow stopped me in downtown with a question and I flinched, expecting another handout request.
But no, he just asked parking meters needed quarters after 5pm. Then we chatted about the city.
There's a lot of ads on TV that seem offkey for these times.
There's one for Burger King that shows Chinese peasants who have never tasted a hamburger ("Burger Virgins") doing a blind taste test between Big Mac and Whopper.
Is that sick or what?
You would think execs would be smart enough to pull offkey ads. Not so. Lots of denial.
"China is walking an even more difficult tightrope right now than the US is."
When china spends its reserves it will stimulate demand in the USA and tend to create inflation in the USA at some point they will be given the green light to begin spending and then their exports will recover.
If they spend dollars it buys stuff in the USA rather than China
I think there is that reality of cooperation and prearrangement
I don't expect food supplies to become unavailable. Food will always be available at a price. But it could become less available in the U.S. at affordable prices
I have met Nassim Taleb, he is a bigger horse's behind in person than he is on video. Arrogant and a very poor platform speaker. Had the whole audience hating him in the first 10 minutes.
"I don't expect food supplies to become unavailable; there is no reason why this would happen:......
Funny....that's what they thought in the Soviet Union with all those Mega-Farms back in the early 80's. They couldn't feed their own people - we had to ship milions of tons of foodstuffs to them!
"It's remarkable how few people understand the Mythical Man Month."
One of my favorite sayings from our former Engineering VP - when pressured by the CEO to speed up a product's development by adding more resources - "How many men does it take to make a baby"
By 1936, the 40-hour workweek was already in motion. The more "progressive" companies had already switched to it between 1928-1935 and official legislation was passed in 1938.
I really wish somebody would focus on the "production == consumption" aspect here. Credit is finite because production is finite. Production is finite because consumption is finite. So at any point in time, WORK is finite.
One of the major failing points of our current economic theory is that it assumes that infinite work is waiting in the wings to be discovered, and that information and coordination of information have zero costs or constraints.
Comrade V writes:
I also don't see a serious case for deflation until wages begin declining. What is the evidence on this metric?
The fast that those who are employed will have to accept lower wages will be reflected in declining average hourly earnings. Add to this rising unemployment and partial employment.
I received a bulletin from a news source which shall not be named here that there is some kind of 48 hour deadline to which Pakistan is supposed to respond, concerning a certain organization based in that country. A Pakistani official supposedly issued a statement that Pakistan does not answer to such ultimata.
I have not seen this item in any other news source so far.
I saw once a white swan on a lake beside the Novodevichy Cemetery in Moscow. May there never be a black swan on that lake.
Several days back you alluded to a reflection on the society of bees and their homes built of spit and paper. It didn't register much at first but subsequently really got me thinking.
Just want to say thanks for your contributions on the blog. I have long been an analytical person. Only recently have I begun to appreciate the insightful perspectives of the poet. Keep it up.
Taleb is taking on strawmen. The mathematical modelers do not believe everything runs according to Black-Scholes, or even a version of that with fat tails. We take it all with a grain of salt, it's just a model. Surely value-at-risk that ignores credit risk is not expected to account for credit risk.
The model does, however, help one to price options. People make money trading options with that formula (and other knowledge as well.)
If you want to model contagion, do it. And you'll understand that there is not much confidence in that model because it is not priced observably. To pretend that VAR accounts for contagion is intellectually dishonest, and those speaking have surely been told that and chosen to ignore the advice.
A carpenter who blames his tools for a mistake is not a good carpenter. He should know his tools.
If top management ignores what we say and says the models account for more than they do, that is entirely their fault. For example, Robert Rubin who says that he cannot be expected to know the nuts and bolts of Citi's operation, that is Risk Management's job. That remark was classic and should be enshrined somewhere.
....the next things nationalized here will be the agri-businesses. Our people won't be able to afford to feed themselves.
Not officially Nationalized, but certainly de facto. Consolidation in the Agribusiness sector has been occuring exponentially. Soon, there will only be a handful of players, and they will be joined at the hip with Government....kind of like the Oil Compananies.
Black swans are fairly common if you know where to look for them. I think for example rich peoples ornamental ponds and Australian parks tend to have them. Platypus i have no idea unless you go to Zoo Australia
What taleb is saying is that mathematical modelling of complex systems is worse than useless, especially when used to predict the future. Since we cannot account for all factors, our models will always be incomplete. While one can use incomplete models to start understanding reality, even very complex models are not reality!
He is telling you, obliquely, that most of the speculative assumptions of western thinking are BS. Most of your beliefs about the future are therefore worthless. He is calling out something that I have often mentioned- Hubris.
He is also pointing out that some of the basic assumptions and behaviors of western capitalism will have to change if we want a functional society. Some of you might yammer about how human behavior never changes and status quo. Some of you believe that we go back to GD1 or even medievial times. I predict that given the nature and spread of technology + demography- the present course of events will lead us to a place where we won't have much of a species left.
However consider the known trajectory of humans as a species. It is hard to say that we have not changed substantially over the millenia- behaviors, organizations, beliefs. Some of you might think that since most men still prefer bustier women, we are just cavemen in clothes. However that statement is only partially true, and the parts that have changed can hurt your modelling efforts much more than you realize.
"It shows, among other things, that median household income has fallen monotonically for the last 5 years."
PapaSloth, Dryfly, thanks for responses. Maybe the aggregate data shows this, but I agree wages are "sticky" and even an emotional issue. Contractors in my locale, although more interested and "available" for projects are still not willing to acknowledge price competitivness, and will no bid rather than lower a tenative bid. When I see hourly rates notch lower than I'll know we've broken through. Hasn't happened yet, despite 18 months of shrinking demand.
Taleb is taking on strawmen. The mathematical modelers do not believe everything runs according to Black-Scholes, or even a version of that with fat tails. We take it all with a grain of salt, it's just a model. Surely value-at-risk that ignores credit risk is not expected to account for credit risk. comrade artichoke | 12.07.08 - 3:45 pm | #
As a (statistical) modeler, I can say that, with some exceptions, this is spot-on. I work for people who want The Answer, even if I know there is no such answer exists. You can push for a better understanding of risk all you like, but you're still a prisoner of the prejudices of management. The same applies to the Mythical Man-Month observation. The developers understand it; the traders don't. Yet it's the traders asking you if you could use another hand (not theirs) to work on something at the last minute.
That's not the whole picture, though, and it's intellectually dishonest and sloppy to say that the housing bubble was unknowable.
"Taleb is taking on strawmen. The mathematical modelers do not believe everything runs according to Black-Scholes, or even a version of that with fat tails. We take it all with a grain of salt, it's just a model. Surely value-at-risk that ignores credit risk is not expected to account for credit risk.
The model does, however, help one to price options. People make money trading options with that formula (and other knowledge as well.)
If you want to model contagion, do it. And you'll understand that there is not much confidence in that model because it is not priced observably. To pretend that VAR accounts for contagion is intellectually dishonest, and those speaking have surely been told that and chosen to ignore the advice.
A carpenter who blames his tools for a mistake is not a good carpenter. He should know his tools.
If top management ignores what we say and says the models account for more than they do, that is entirely their fault. For example, Robert Rubin who says that he cannot be expected to know the nuts and bolts of Citi's operation, that is Risk Management's job. That remark was classic and should be enshrined somewhere."
I get the impression that what Taleb is trying to say is that there is NO way to model for every unforeseen event.
If you accept that you can't model for every possibility then you must accept that you can't take as much risk going forward.
This leads to:
a reduction in leverage == less profit for financial companies
carrying proper financial reserves == less profit for financial companies
carrying loans on your books == less profit for financial companies
28% DTI properly documented loans == less profit for financial companies
Taleb may have a bad attitude and rub people the wrong way but how many 100 year 6-sigma blow up the model events do we need over the last 30 years to convince us that just perhaps modeling doesn't work too well in a high leveraged, complex, interconnected world?
Is all of this happening in a vacuum? Is the US alone facing economic collapse? Do we still have allies after the CDO/CDS market and the past 8 years of unilateralism?
The economy is tanking, unemployment is doing a moonshot. The citizens are sedentary paper pushers with nary an original thought or the critical thinking skills to examine implications.
Mexico is a failed state. South America is heading towards socialism. Asia is dominated by China and China is pissed. Rumors of currency devaluation and trade wars in the near future. Russia will use it's military and energy resources to have it's way with Europe. India and Pakistan could very well blow up into war anyday. The only power we have left is our troops in Iraq keeping the petrodollar alive and our subs with nuclear weapons parked all over the world.
Worrying about our economy is great but the geopolitical instability resulting in war with the nuclear cards dealt to so many countries, most unfriendly to us, is scaring me spitless. The worst part is that these unfriendly states could easily lose a few weapons to some terrorist factions and our ports go boom.
We got the world into this mess and we damn well better show everyone a way out. The changes coming will literally beggar our nation and our sense of identity. Nationalism and populist rhetoric are a direct result of failed economies. We aren't alone in this recipe for disaster. We might be alone when we have to face the rest of the world over the hardship wall street started.
I am pretty willing to dig ditches and eat/live simply if it allows my children a future, even a bare basics existence. I am not willing to go to war because some companies lost money and influence.
...well, I'll be waiting for you guys to come down to my $8950 annum. The only difference is I already have the cave, the chickens, cows, plowed fields and teenage slaves. Welcome to my world
Nick Taleb is a lucky fool: the other side of Larry Kudlow. Charlie Rose, as usual provides us with twenty minutes of frippery and flummery. Don't trust people who steeple. I was hoping the "thud" was Rose's brain falling out of his backside onto the floor.
Ok, let me say this in a simpler language. satan | 12.07.08 - 3:51 pm | #
Thanks, because the problem is clearly that we are simpletons and not merely people who don't agree with everything Taleb says.
He is telling you, obliquely, that most of the speculative assumptions of western thinking are BS. Most of your beliefs about the future are therefore worthless. He is calling out something that I have often mentioned- Hubris. satan | 12.07.08 - 3:51 pm | #
Pot, meet kettle, and what makes you think I share "speculative assumptions of western thinking"?
He is also pointing out that some of the basic assumptions and behaviors of western capitalism will have to change if we want a functional society. Some of you might yammer about how human behavior never changes and status quo. Some of you believe that we go back to GD1 or even medievial times. I predict that given the nature and spread of technology + demography- the present course of events will lead us to a place where we won't have much of a species left. satan | 12.07.08 - 3:51 pm | #
Straw-man all the way. I'm anti-capitalist, for example, and don't believe any of these things about human behavior you ascribe.
When the velocity of money stops falling, then inflation should kick in. If we have destroyed our production and distribution infrastructure during the deflation caused by the dropping velocity of money and credit destruction phase, the inflation phase will be magnified.
Plan on getting whipsawed by deflation and then inflation.
This guy's a walking contradiction. He believes in "random walk theory" of markets and yet also makes predictions about said markets.
I believe market analysis and forecasting are legitimate practices, however timing of trend changes must be given lenience depending on the scale; in other words, if you're making a macro economic prediction, or if you're forecasting the trend of a stock index from a monthly basis, then your timing deserves a larger error margin than if you're discussing some micro event or looking at a stock chart on an hourly basis.
But the change in both economic and market trends can be forecast correctly, with some room for error, and Taleb is plain wrong in assuming otherwise.
Read the comments concerning production and consumption. I am in total agreement. Dwindling supply versus increased demand is going to make a big comeback. After Christmas sales will become going out of business sales.
Stock up on anything you think will be useful in times of trouble. Store shelves will be getting bare and prices will go up.
true, but the timing was. who knows if the t-bond futures will hit 150 before or after 110? nemo sciet. bgates | 12.07.08 - 3:56 pm | #
This is why Taleb is a finance capitalist speaking to finance capitalists. If all you care about is predicting short-term moves in markets to make money, then Taleb is correct, though he's not really saying much that is new, and his audience should be fools like Robert Rubin and Phil Gramm.
The thing that I think that people fail to notice about how Obama is handling things are twofold:
1: transparency. As of now they are going out of their way for folks to dig into discussions with full disclosure.
2: deliberative politics. I first read about the subject 25 years ago, but this presidency is the first that is actively pursuing it beyond Clinton's antediluvian triangulation. Obama isn't driving policy thru an ideological prism, he's using focus groups to make sure policies are palatible to the majority with the understanding of difficulty.
I get the impression that what Taleb is trying to say is that there is NO way to model for every unforeseen event.
There is more on this in the book of his that nobody reads - "Dynamic Hedging". A book by an options trader for options traders, written before he took on his current public persona. It has math in it, too, though some of it is a bit dated now.
Basically, he argues that it's fine to use Black-Scholes or any of its many derivatives for day to day stuff. No problem - you need models and it's no more flawed than any other model. But in addition to that, stress-test your portfolio against the six-sigma events and be sure you can live to fight another day. It's not about predicting when the next 40%-in-two-months move will happen, it's about knowing for sure that you'll survive it when it does.
As you point out, this leads directly to deleveraging, which is constantly at odds with the desire to maximize short term profits.
So it seems to me, the way to start fixing the system, is to stop over-weighting the financial rewards for the short term. There are lots of way to do that, in theory, but I have no idea how one gets political buy-in short of a semi-revolution in the streets.
The only important thing to notice in the current market is that - for the time being - it cannot be predicted. Hedge funds still need to unwind; the new administration offers hope for recovery; the market is in a bottoming process.
The important thing to notice is that [ if you do not have inside information ] you are a fool to put any new money into the market.
"
So it seems to me, the way to start fixing the system, is to stop over-weighting the financial rewards for the short term. There are lots of way to do that, in theory, but I have no idea how one gets political buy-in short of a semi-revolution in the streets."
I believe that we may get there through another Depression. Seems like that's the only way changes are forced into the system.
comrade artichoke | 3:45 pm - Exactly right. Poor eyesight is worse than 20/20 but is still much better than complete blindness. So much for the deep insight
if you're forecasting the trend of a stock index from a monthly basis, then your timing deserves a larger error margin than if you're discussing some micro event or looking at a stock chart on an hourly basis.
This is exactly backwards. On short time frames markets hit more six-sigma events than on long time frames. This has been quantified to death in all kinds of literature and is the reason volatility surface has the shape it does.
Money is a model of reality. Right now, people still believe in the model over reality because it's simpler and more pleasant.
The model has been purposely debased by the credit cycle (and manipulators of money and perception) to motivate people to invest time and effort that they can't recover.
I doubt if anything is fixable until people think in terms of goods & services instead of "money" and paper instruments.
let me be illustrate my points with a few examples.
Amost everyone in 1945 era USA belived that the USSR would not be able to develop a nuclear weapon for 10 years. How did that work out?
Almost everyone in western countries used to belive, justifiably, that japanese products were of inferior quality. How did that work out?
When the IBM PC came out in 1981, it was criticized for having a poor non-propietary architecture with an OS from an emerging company, and parts made in taiwan. The apple route was the way to go. How did that work out?
When companies started outsourcing to other countries, it was supposed to fail because they were "inferior" people. How many major disasters has outsourcing caused?
I can go on.. My point is that past performance is not a good predictor of future returns. While many of you have read this diclaimer, most see it as just another example of legal weasel wordplay.
"When the velocity of money stops falling, then inflation should kick in. If we have destroyed our production and distribution infrastructure during the deflation caused by the dropping velocity of money and credit destruction phase, the inflation phase will be magnified.
Plan on getting whipsawed by deflation and then inflation."
Anyone with suggestions on early indicators of this finally occuring (velocity bottoms, inflation kicks in). Any predictions on how far away we are, and supporting rationale? WAGs also welcome.
"Rice said she stressed during her visit to Pakistan last week how important it was for Islamabad to act quickly but denied there was a 48-hour deadline to take action."
" Any predictions on how far away we are, and supporting rationale?"
1998 lows in crude and 1987 lows in equities might be a signal that most of the froth in our economy is gone. same, i s'pose, with djia and an ounce of shiny yellow stuff.
This guy seems to be a bit overly optimistic--it might take many months into '09 to see the 'real' collapse.
As I am a product of our immediate gratification society, I want collapse before Santa rides. Can you imagine millions of US kids totally pissed at Santa for not delivering the goods?
Today I have started to shift some of my long-term goals. Farming is too much work, and I am shifting toward a hunter/gatherer model. This model will involve a degree of intentional agriculture, however (stocking fish, introducing wild game in some areas, etc.)
Implications of the union backed sit in at the Republic Windows and Doors plant are tremendous.
-Bad PR for the bank bailout.
-Unions leading the fight against social injustice.
-Seizing of assets by the workers.
-Possible escalation of force becoming widespread.
-Hispanic workers leading the way for reform through nonviolent protest.
Add in an immigration friendly administration coupled with the potential amnesty program for illegal immigrants and you have given the unions a large membership gift.
Let me be clear that I am against illegal immigration but support the amnesty program. Get everyone here illegally on the tax rolls and then start cracking down on any business hiring illegal aliens. I am also pro-union.
""We're going to stay here until we win justice," said Blanca Funes, 55, of Chicago, after occupying the building for several hours. Speaking in Spanish, Funes said she fears losing her home without the wages she feels she's owed. A 13-year employee of Republic, she estimated her family can make do for three months without her paycheck. Most of the factory's workers are Hispanic."
The more i read these comments the more optimistic i get. I've been bearish for 2 years and massively short for most of that period. I read this blog regularly and am involved with several businesses in a variety of industries. It seems clear to me that the bearish opinions expressed in these comments are now bordering more on greed and herd mentality than anything else. I have covered all my short positions in the past few weeks and am now 100% in cash (US dollars) other than equities of the companies i am involved with which represent option value more than anything else. When i see Roubini referred to as an "optimist" i laugh. I've followed Roubini for a long time and for 99% of that period people have called him an incredible pessimist - so now that his prognostications have come true, people in these comments call him an optimist. Thats funny. He was simply right. I think that those that call him an optimist will do just about as well as those that called him a pessimist - they will both ultimately be buried. I dont know if Roubini will be exactly right, but my guess is that he will be much closer to reality than those that call him a pessimist or optimist. Business is very bad - I know first hand and there's no doubt about it. That being said, the businesses i am involved with started preparing for this over a year ago - the cost reductions have occured and are continuing - however, for the first time we are seeing competitors problems benefit us in a big way - actually, quicker and to a greater degree than i've ever seen before. The constraint of capital is creating huge opportunities for those that have it. Also, we have had the ability to actually expand the credit for many of our businesses in the past couple months because we did not drink the kool-aid and overleverage in the past few years. The credit is more expensive, but the margins on the business opportunites are 2-3x as large as they used to be. I have no doubt Q4 and Q1 will be absolutely awful and i doubt there will be much of a bounceback in the 2nd half of 2009. However, i expect we'll see improvement in 2010. I have learned that over the passt 4 decades that the stock market is a rigged game and rigged to go up as is the "economy" - and you cant fight city hall. I fully expect that world governments to give citizens money if they need to. Inflation will not be a concern - instead it will be desired. We will see if that is needed - I suspect it will be in some form (most likely through massive tax cuts and huge government stimuli). When the world central banks dont care about inflation (which they wont if the unwind gets much worse) then they cannot be stopped from dropping money from helicopters globally. Its amazing, but the deflationist have become the herd as evidenced by the comments here and the recent movements in the 10 year treasury. I have no idea where the market or economy is going - 18 months ago I had a ton of conviction. In my mind we are at a point of inflection now - but unlike before, the govts of the world see massive risk so they will err on the side of being overly stimulative and inflationary. That was not the case 2 years ago despite what i'm sure all the ultra-bears think. Be prepared for money to be "given away" by governments on a global basis - the world will inflate their way out of this - it will be like a global currency revaluation - so parody among currencies will remain, but asset values will inlfate allowing the world to deleverage. Inlfation is awesome for returns in LBOs allowing those businesses to deleverage quickly - the same can be said for the global economy.
Now, at the end of all of this, the world's governments balance sheets will have massive leverage - but everyone will be in that place - so it will be a problem to solve for another day...
We will not have systematic failure and the global economy will not be destroyed. There will be no need for canned goods and shotguns - people will just need to suck it up for a couple years.
We've become pretty soft - and everyone seems more concerned with being "right" than seeking the truth. No one knows what is going to happen, but to hear many call Roubini an optimist makes me realize that the ultra-bears are as buried in their own beliefs as the ultra-bulls were. We've had almost a 50% drop in the market and a severe recession and the ultra-bears cry when we have a 2% rally in the markets and still blame the alleged PPT.... It hilarious to read the comments and whining when that happens.
Well, it all reminds me of the ultra-bulls expecting 10+% returns every year as if they were entitled to it. No one is entitled to anything. It seems to me like its been pretty easy to make money on the short side for the past 6 months - now, its seems that a sense of entitlement is building in the bears - like, "hey, i was right! i am right! look at me, i'm right! this market is going to 0! we're going to have systematic failure! the PPT is responsible for every uptick in the market! you'll be sorry! i'm right! i'm right! look at me!"
Well, like many here i WAS right, but thats history and i took my winnings and went to the bank (or should i say US treasuries). I dont know where we are going from here, but i see far more risk going short than long. You cant fight city hall, and city hall could give a damn if you're right - they want their citizens to be happy, not just the perma-bears. I'm not going long, but i find the ultra-bearishness i read here as comedic as Kudlow, Cramer and NAR during the bubble years. I expect that the greedy bears will eventually lose most of their net worths just as the greedy bulls did.
Good luck and be careful because many on this sight are very close to starting to believe their own bullsh-t.
commodity volatility makes this a confusing lesson
I've done technical trend analysis using keywords since 1993. Up until 2000 or so, nobody else was explicitly acting on that sort of information. But now there are many sites which do the same thing, so I use them now instead of my home-grown engine -
That gives an idea of how Adobe's next generation UI is doing against Microsoft's. As you can see, Microsoft is still trailing.
But I think what's happened is that widespread observance of the trend creates a positive feedback loop.
One of the mysteries to me is what counter-balancing forces are there?
I know they exist but the best I can come up with is "diversity", i.e. certain products fill certain niches more effectively than others so overall trend is a minor factor.
Anyway, you used to be able to make general stock observations from keyword analysis. Most people don't understand how branded the world is (I didn't) and keywords DO mean something.
That's a keyword count versus stock price chart. The correlation is very high, probably over 90%. I think there' used to be a tradeable delay but since 2000 it's been arbitraged away.
Here's an earlier chart for Palladim which unfortunately I discovered after the fact -
Notice that keyword usage precedes price by almost two years. I've seen similar changes in the charts since 2000 which tells me that large-scale data mining began about then, and the time delay was abitraged away.
I think it's still possible to mine out value in more complex patterns but it's increasinly complex and convoluted.
Trenches,
Disagree on many fronts. You have a misguided notion that the government can fix this mess. It can't. You're just a contrarian -- you don't have any fundamental opinion of where this is going.
The Fed "prints money" when it increases it liabilities (which are, t0 oversimplify, the green pieces of paper in our wallets and purses, and the balances in the reserve accounts that banks hold with the Fed). As comrade artichoke wrote above, the Fed started doing this in a very big way starting in September.
"One of the mysteries to me is what counter-balancing forces are there?"
A glimpse of the future? Maybe that is the "Black Swan". Balance needs to be restored and right now the teeter totter has a 200lb fat kid(USA) holding the skinny kid off the ground.
...after all the "wash is run thru the machines", only some will realize that the 300mil customers we used to be won't be nearly so gullible, reactive, and downright stupid nor ignorant.
We've had almost a 50% drop in the market and a severe recession
Japan had a greater drop despite massive government intervention and that was long before the derivatives bubble.
they want their citizens to be happy
I would be quite happy if somebody somehow managed to fix this mess but the fundamental problems are still in place. I suggest that YOU are the one focused on markets and greed. I have no vested interest in any US paper, either short or long.
I don't see that anything has been "fixed" by a stock market decline.
Fleck said it was too stressful, not that it was unprofitable.
I've now seen the performance numbers - Fleck's fund was indeed unprofitable - both for the life of the fund and for pretty much every 3 year window during that time.
OMG. That's just horrible. WTF gives McCain the right to be over there saying anything?!
Cynical Dude | 12.07.08 - 2:43 pm | #
I dunno...maybe the same thing that gives Jesse Jackson the right to interject himself into international politics? At least McCain has a fairly high standing in the US government.
I don't think that we disagree. You and your companies have battened down the hatches for the deflationary storm. If they are lucky, they might survive to benefit from the demise of their competition during the inflationary upswing to follow.
Refresh my memory, what religions were Hitler, Stalin, Mao, Pol Pot and Castro?
See my point above. They all killed their own nationals, and with the exception of Hitler, didn't start wars so much outside their borders. We're not counting revolutions are we?
Take a bow satan. I've always wondered who caused everyone to buy that wintel crap.
When the IBM PC came out in 1981, it was criticized for having a poor non-propietary architecture with an OS from an emerging company, and parts made in taiwan. The apple route was the way to go. How did that work out?
Work out for who, the benighted who bought IBM clones and suffered with an inferior operating system and inferior hardware for 30 years? satan this was one of your most evil deeds ever.
Heard a guy at Church this AM speaking on friend that was told to pick up extra shifts...at reduced pay. The Co. refuses to hire new workers and tells currently employed to work or else. These extra shifts used to pay time and 1/2. Coming down the tracks...and it aint lookin' back.
Well, after that boston write up I am afraid I will have to stop posting as much.
Any fame would be detrimental to my preference to live my life out of spotlight, and quite frankly might be detrimental to my continued employment.
Quite frankly, it has been extremely fun, and sobering at times to participate in this blog, but unfortunately as conditions worsen the messengers will be blamed for the message.
CR, I will comment from time to time, but this is getting too big and too well known.
Stalin killed only his own nationals? You are very much mistaken.
On Stalin:
THE ONLY SIGN OF LIFE
When Stalin died
No one at the station came to greet him
The platform deserted, the green train dropped him off
In the midst of a dry plain, scrub and yellow dust
But nothing else
Where were his aides, his bodyguards?
Had he descended solo?
The long train was gone
And Stalin looked around.
Stationmaster!
No one answered, and the earthly shadows did not move
It was late in the afternoon
And there was no long dry wind to blow
Over the flat scrub plain -
Of Kazakhstan?
Who is there?
Inside the heavy door he found a ticket counter
But when he peered across the board he saw
A sun bar on the wall, diagonal
But nothing, no one there
Between himself and that unyielding stripe
Empty. No one has come out to greet me.
He went looking for the lavatory
To wash his hands and face
But when he turned the faucets only dust came out
A puff, a sigh, and that a little only -
He gazed up to the speckled mirror, saw his own pale face
Unreadable expression
Yet perhaps some puzzlement?
It was the only sign of life
Joe Klein's conscience wrote:
Watch .. it will now become fashionable to say Roubini is an optimist .. especially if the Republicans in the Senate try to obstruct everything
You mean like the democrats (copperheads) have done for a good part of the last century or maybe you believe we should have what the good ole marxists called "democratic centalism". I didn't vote for a dictatorship.
"When Taleb says "quickly", he doesn't mean "soon". He means that when it starts happening, it will be like cresting that first peak on a roller coaster."
Cynical Dude | 12.07.08 - 2:23 pm | #
Inflation may rise up and bite us all in the a** in some way we'll never see coming: a total credit freeze causes demands for COD payment, shortages spread, and suppliers not knowing when or how they will rebuild inventory, decide to double their prices.
Or some morning the currencies open off the graph.
I don't think an unstable, chaotic credit collapse will have a scholastic, textbook solution or conclusion. Reflate that Ben.
Pavel - Stalin's main focus was on maintaining terror within USSR boundaries. Yes, there were purges and repression in Eastern Europe, but not even close to what happened in the USSR in the 30's and 40's. Stalin did not set out to annihilate other nations, like Hitler.
For the reference - I am not defending Stalin, I lost some of my family in the purges.
Hitler said he would (in so many words) destroy the Catholic Church after the war.
Anyone who has been baptized into the Church is a Catholic. What they do with the rest of their lives may not have anything to do with living a Catholic life.
Germany was not yet an atheist country. Nazi Germany was functionally atheist, with slatherings of half-rancid, neo-romantic teutonism.
Pavel - Of course Stalin did not persecute only Russians or only Jews. He persecuted all nationalities who happened to live within boundaries of his domain. I also do not want to go into crusades etc.
My point is that one cannot claim that atheism or religion is more prone to mass killings than its opposite.
Speaking of which - I strongly suspect Trotsky would have exceeded Stalin in mass terror. He put as little value on human life but was much better at organization issues. He would have installed a much more effective and efficient Nazi-style mass production of death.
"So, Pavel - was Nazi Germany an atheist or Christian state?"
Atheist. The country was not yet entirely atheist. The ruling political structure was godless. Or do you think they celebrated High Mass at Berchtesgaden, and adored the Blessed Sacrament at Gestapo headquarters?
"Spain during the times of Inquisition - how tolerant was it?"
You compare 16th century Spain with 20th century Nazi Germany? Interesting.
As for the Islamic states - ask a Muslim to defend them - or not. There's a debate going on among Catholic bloggers about whether or not to count them as fraternal believers.
What I know for sure is that whenever doctrinaire atheists take state power it's bad news for everyone else.
Have you ever lived in a police state? Denmark? That powerhouse?
Is atheism in the Danish constitution? A state secular cult? Are there institutes and mass organizations promoting atheism in Denmark? It might be coming to Canada, though, if they can put down their beer long enough.
What I know for sure is that whenever doctrinaire atheists take state power it's bad news for everyone else.
How about this:
What I know for sure is that whenever doctrinaire religious groups take state power it's bad news for everyone else.
Now we introduce the concept of time 20th century religious states vs 16th century states.
I would argue that both religion and and atheism by themselves are neither precondition for state terror nor a guarantee against it.
Given the fact that many established monotheistic religions assume only they have the ultimate truth, I would rather live in an a-theist state, everything else being equal - the state which is completely separated from any religion (and that allows religous practices, of course).
Pavel, It seems to me that you define an atheist country as a country that prohibits any religious. If so, then of course this is a police country, which can be up to no good only
On the other hand, I do not supposed you define a religious country as a country where only one religion is allowed, but other religions and atheism are prohibited. Is this right?
No, I moved to Canada and then the US a while ago, but I go back often.
Frankly, I would argue the communism was the state religion of the USSR, with its dogmas, rituals, saints, etc. And if you think about its stated values and goals, it was a decent religion.
"Frankly, I would argue the communism was the state religion of the USSR, with its dogmas, rituals, saints, etc. And if you think about its stated values and goals, it was a decent religion."
A romantic interpretation, but without a belief in a transcendent power what you have is a secular cult, not a religion.
This is probably going to develop into a discussion of sunsets with a color-blind person. I hope this isn't the case, but you may have to wait until your deathbed until you understand what religious faith is about.
Btw, Pavel - what is your position vis-a-vis Israel (obviously, a very religious country) and its foreign policy? South Africa during apartheid (a Christian ruling minority) and its domestic policy?
I am not trying to pick up a fight, but am genuinely interested in your views, without annoying other CR-zens with OT posts
Btw, Pavel - what is your position vis-a-vis Israel (obviously, a very religious country)
From what I understand there are some very religious people in that country, but as a whole it isn't particularly religious - though the religious parties heft a lot of weight out of proportion to their numbers.
Excuse me, but the original question was whether atheists cause more wars. And the point I was trying to make was: people cause wars, not religion or lack of it.
"And the point I was trying to make was: people cause wars, not religion or lack of it."
That's an abstract point. Powerful, doctrinally atheist states have killed a lot of people over the past century, and they've done it for reasons that are essentially irrational, amoral and fanatical.
I am back.
I think there are no truly religious states in Pavel's sense, even if Israel does not qualify.
Therefore all states are more or less atheistic and therefore all wars are waged only by atheistic states.
Religious state is an abstract ideal.
Pavel - please correct me if I misinterpreted your view.
"Therefore all states are more or less atheistic and therefore all wars are waged only by atheistic states."
I'd rather say that modern Catholic thinking about war is that it is extremely rarely justified, must be defensive, proportionate etc. I don't know about the positions of other religious confessions.
I really do have nothing against non-believers on a personal level. On the contrary, there's someone I used to know in Moscow who might even qualify as a saint, if she only knew it. An exceptionally sweet, self-giving person.
She had some interesting things to say about Fr. Alexandr Men, btw. Do you know about him?
Goodness is not limited to believers. But I think that believers can give a better account of where goodness comes from.
Hey, are you keeping a "who knew, who tried to warn, who was an ostrich" collection anywhere?
Here's one (a caustic book review of a book predicting this problem would happen again -- so the review goes in the ostrich bin and the author in the "tried to warn" bin):
"So I guess all other wars are better for being rational, moral, and reasonable?"
Not at all, War is madness, even justifiable defensive war. I just don't want to let atheists get away with saying that they're rational and religious people are irrational. I'm stubborn that way. : )
Yes, I know of A. Men. He was a very very good and kind man.
I respectfully disagree that believers can give a better account of where goodness comes from .
Believers have to rely to a higher authority to explain how they ought to behave. Note that the religious interpretation of what is right/wrong has changed dramatically over the centuries.
Non-believers rely on what they think is right. Of course, their views will change over time as the humankind changes.
As for states being essentially atheistic or not - the proposition is probably not relevant to what states are, especially modern states. Modern states are self-perpetuating bureaucratic organisms with political blood circulating through their organizational veins. Or something. This gets confusing. : )
emo
2nd
CR - have any good hikes planned for the holiday? LA Times lists a pretty nice looking 19 mile loop to a hot spring. Oh, that, and how to dial 211 for free food distribution.
3rd?
When it comes to forecasting, black is the new black, I guess.
Exit,
Thank God! For just a moment, I thought every other person on the planet had been sucked into the debt hole.
Proof bongwater should be avoided just before show time.
FDIC tells OneUnited to cut perks, boost capital - Boston Business Journal:
FDIC tells OneUnited to cut perks, boost capital
Roubini IS an optimist. And he is a sellout, embracing Obama's extension of the Keynesian policies (failures) of the Bush administration.
This coming from a big Roubini fan. He is a genius, but there is more here than meets the eye...
That damn Mayan calendar.
and it's going to be a lot worse
ahh, luv the optimists.
Sorry, but I think Roubini's view is way too optimistic.
I watched the 20 minute interview yesterday on 1440WallStreet and those are the two things he said:
Frankly, I found the other 19 minutes a waste of time.
Watch .. it will now become fashionable to say Roubini is an optimist .. especially if the Republicans in the Senate try to obstruct everything
Funny - This interview was already discussed at some length in yesterday's comments
if the Republicans in the Senate try to obstruct everything
"if"?
that's a given.
what will be the Obama, Reid, Pelosi response to fillibusters on every action (as in nearly every proposal in the last Congress)?
Talen says this will happen quickly. I'm not so sure, given the delaying tactics of the Fed/Treasury. But I am SURE Congress will be tied up in proposals that don't get to final votes in the Senate.
"it will now become fashionable to say Roubini is an optimist"
Wouldn't the real contrarian take that as a signal that the worst is then behind us?
I have a vivid imagination and I still can't grasp this thing! Will I have to shoot my neighbors when they come for my food and gold? I am starting to believe that I might. damn it!
I don't understand why Roubini is seen as such a doomster. The guy throws out a modest appraisal, waits for it to be born out and then edges in a new slightly more negative opinion. Remember when it was just a "credit cronch with an economic hard londing"?
Kevin Phillips had some nasty comments for Paulson, Bush, Rubin etc and the financial eleetes on CSPAN's In Depth program this am. Gives Obama a 3 in 10 chance to get the system fixed (due to Clinton era baggage reload). His new book, "Bad Money: Reckless Finance, Failed Politics, and the Global Crisis of American Capitalism" sounds like an interesting read. Basically he agrees we are screwed big time.
Remember when $1 trillion was considered excessive? Ah, the good old days.
You can send your neighbors to the gulag and then you would not have to worry about them. I can send you the link to report them to the Obama administration.
The housing bubble doesn't add up - MSN Money
When things do not make sense they do not look like they make sense.
I still have not figured out how everyone thinks they can afford the houses they live in and their retirement and this is not in a so called bubble area- but it is a bubble area. I have been thinking this for at least twenty years.
I think it all goes back to Fantasy Island.
Da plane, da plane! Oh sh!t, it's in a nose dive and headed for the cabana.
FRom the LATimes, a service piece for the newly poor...the formerly middle class who are now homeless, jobless and without health-care...a list of agencies and services. As the piece notes, those who have been poor for a while, know all this.
Those who used to make 80k a year, will need help navigating this new world.
Newly poor: How to cope when misfortune puts even the basics out of reach -- latimes.com
"Will I have to shoot my neighbors when they come for my food and gold? I am starting to believe that I might. damn it!"
In the America that we can hope will arise from this distress, neighbors will (again) help one another.
Say what you might about the Mormons' beliefs, but their sense of community and charity could bear some replication, as does the same sense among other groups, ethnic, immigrant, or rural, in this country.
If you can keep your head when all about you
Are losing theirs and blaming it on you,
If you can trust yourself when all men doubt you,
But make allowance for their doubting too;
If you can wait and not be tired by waiting,
Or being lied about, don't deal in lies,
Or being hated, don't give way to hating,
And yet don't look too good, nor talk too wise:
If you can dream - and not make dreams your master;
If you can think - and not make thoughts your aim;
If you can meet with Triumph and Disaster
And treat those two impostors just the same;
If you can bear to hear the truth you've spoken
Twisted by knaves to make a trap for fools,
Or watch the things you gave your life to broken,
And stoop and build 'em up with wornout tools:
If you can make one heap of all your winnings
And risk it on one turn of pitch-and-toss,
And lose, and start again at your beginnings
And never breathe a word about your loss;
If you can force your heart and nerve and sinew
To serve your turn long after they are gone,
And so hold on when there is nothing in you
Except the Will which says to them: 'Hold on!'
If you can talk with crowds and keep your virtue,
Or walk with kings - nor lose the common touch,
If neither foes nor loving friends can hurt you,
If all men count with you, but none too much;
If you can fill the unforgiving minute
With sixty seconds' worth of distance run -
Yours is the Earth and everything that's in it,
And - which is more - you'll be a Man my son!
- Rudyard Kipling, World Economist
fred:
I'll file on $120k for 2008, but I have been living at the $24k (or less) level for... my whole life. I expect to file on something like $20-30k in 2009. Funny how my lifestyle won't change a bit. Might travel more now that gas is cheaper though.
Nassim Taleb is a crank.
he once said atheists caused more wars than religious people because of nationalism.
wow, just wow.
Nassim Taleb is a crank.
Did a youtube search and found this gem
YouTube - Atheists and the Stock Market - Nassim Nicholas Taleb
I would say he is a crank.
Can someone like Roubini actually be anything other than an "optimist" or mere "ever-so-slightly more than pessimist optimist"? The Fed can't be anything but a soft-spoken slight optimist or barely a pessimist because, as if they are magic oracles, if they were to say what they (might) really think, the world would collapse into a black hole and form the core of a new galaxy.
The instant one of these people becomes "official" and "bonafide" they have to curtail their tongues - in either direction.
Something to look forward to when the Small 3 go down in flames:
AFS Trinity Power – A revolution in Fast Energy Storage™ featuring the Extreme Hybrid™.
Is This AFS Trinity 150 MPG SUV Being Suppressed By The Auto Industry?
Anybody seen one of these?
Our political whores haven't even blown the treasury market up and collaped the dollar yet leading into an Argentina dance, of course Roubini is an optimist!
"Nassim Taleb is a crank."
It is all the rage now in the mainstream to trot out anyone who did not engage in the hubris and deception that all was well.
Trouble is, there aren't very many that they are aware of. The Charlie Rose I would actually watch would have a panel of e.g., Shedlock, CR, and a few other bloggers whose identities most of you could list off without pause, discuss what it was that allowed them to see it coming.
Thank God! For just a moment, I thought every other person on the planet had been sucked into the debt hole.
Yancey Ward | 12.07.08 - 1:43 pm | #
Somebody is always on the other side of a trade if there is a trade. On the other hand the other side's position is only as good as their counterparties' ability to make good on their obligations.
If Taleb is right then nobody walks away from this wreck completely intact. The winners will be the ones carried away only horribly mangled and wounded. The losers will be ash.
The question for Taleb is simple: where does the "safe haven" portion of the portfolio go now that Treasuries themselves are in a bubble?
The point about the velocity of information is the salient issue. Someone misses a mortgage payment in Jersey and a factory shuts down in China and a ore barge is turned back to Australia and a bank delays a line of credit raising the LIBOR that adjusted the mortgage causing the missed mortgage payment.
There are no effective circuit breakers for international flow of funds or information because face it they are both conducted with electrons. Somebody's fat thumb could be the precipitator.
"Will I have to shoot my neighbors when they come for my food and gold? I am starting to believe that I might. damn it!"
They won't come to you. The have nothings have already hired Paulson and Bernanke to steal your savings, savings rate and wages by printing money and falsely decreasing their debt and increasing their assets worth. Worst part about it, they used your tax dollars to hire the crooks.
Talen says this will happen quickly.
When Taleb says "quickly", he doesn't mean "soon". He means that when it starts happening, it will be like cresting that first peak on a roller coaster.
Austin Tex writes:
"Will I have to shoot my neighbors when they come for my food and gold? I am starting to believe that I might. damn it!"
In the America that we can hope will arise from this distress, neighbors will (again) help one another.
But it is greed that got us where we are and I am sorry I don't see that changing..
Well then, dryfly, here's wishing you a good mangling.
Anybody posted this yet?
Inside the influential new world of econobloggers - The Boston Globe
Keynesian policies
Can someone in simple language explain to me Keynes views ?
Please keep it in econ 101 level, thanks.
Just as everything gets worse faster so does the ability to stimulate get more or less instant.
the aenemic or dehydrated patient needing blood food and water needs time to avoid shock and so it has to be given more or less one drop at a time with monitoring.
If we really get deflation every bank account in the universe can get a years salary. It wont matter where it came from. It will be spent and if that does not stop deflation we can have two years salary. Whatever it takes. If we get inflation then we can ajust the amount and begin removing money. But the amount available to avoid deflation has no limit and if we have inflation we remove it.
How hard can it be??
If debtors get money to solve their debts what is the problem? Roubini is already talking about debt forgiveness. Whinge all you want about that but it solves the deflation problem. That problem anyway.
When the ultra perma never again bears come out you know we reached bottom. Roubini is a bear but even he knows that things not as bad as the doom sayers.
Cynical Dude(Unrated) writes:
Talen says this will happen quickly.
When Taleb says "quickly", he doesn't mean "soon". He means that when it starts happening, it will be like cresting that first peak on a roller coaster.
Cynical Dude | 12.07.08 - 2:23 pm | #
Or already HAPPENED - think radiation burst from a neutron bomb with the financial 'contagion' analogous to radiation... things look okay for while then everybody stars dieing of radiation poisoning with some dieing faster than others.
The financials have blown and now the real economy (Main Street) is dieing from the radiation.
Can someone in simple language explain to me Keynes views ?
Government == good.
I think the idea of the global economy regressing to the stone age is crazy, but things could get very bad:
I think the most likely scenairo is a lengthy recession (15-20 years) with high unemployment--nearly equalling the great depression.
I guess the government will inflate its way out of debt, since there really is no other alternative.
Imported items will become far more expensive. Consumer electronics will not fall in price as has been the norm.
Budgets will be much tighter--people will spend all of their income just providing the basics. Most families will get by with 1 or 2 cars; three car families will be rare.
Most everyone will know someone employed by a massive government jobs program.
A bank holiday will be declared and a massive banking system consolidation will occur. Depositers may lose a fraction of funds above FDIC limits.
Hotels will close worldwide as travel is greatly reduced for business and leisure. Island resort properties will close and decay. One third of Disney's hotels will be mothballed.
Las Vegas will be a strange place indeed, with very new properties falling into disrepair and decay.
Child day care centers will decline dramatically.
Fewer homes are needed as extended familes move in together to share costs.
Many casual dining chains will go out of business.
Airline travel will become less frequent. Airport expansions will be cancelled. Many aircraft manufacturers will file BK.
Pressure on the dollar will increase the price of oil.
Gold will go up in dollar terms, but not to stratospheric levels.
Property crimes will increase. There will be a great increase in alarm systems, security services of all kinds, self-defense products, window bars, steel doors, fences, video monitoring, etc.
The euro will be used by an increasing number of countries.
The cruise industry will nearly collapse. Ships will be left to rust; nobody will pay above scrap prices for a ship.
I do not expect a "run on the dollar" to occur where there is a sudden and massive drop in the use of the dollar worldwide. Nor do I expect a lengthy period of unavailability of electronic payment systems.
I don't expect food supplies to become unavailable; there is no reason why this would happen. A great deal of the food consumed in the USA is made in the USA. Of course, imported fresh fruits would be pricier.
What is your "best guess" scenario?
"he once said atheists caused more wars than religious people because of nationalism."
Since atheism was in vogue, sure.
Las Vegas will be a strange place indeed
Will be?
Tim(Unrated) writes:
When the ultra perma never again bears come out you know we reached bottom. Roubini is a bear but even he knows that things not as bad as the doom sayers.
Tim | 12.07.08 - 2:29 pm | #
LOL - wish you could talk to some of my industrial contacts - their backlog has evaporated in less than 60 days. Layoffs will be accelerating after the first. My wife says her shop chops heads Monday (again second wave) - no one except the top executives know how big the cuts will be or whom. I hear this everywhere I go - wasn't like this as recently as late September. That was when the re-forecasting in earnest started.
And services based companies will cut even more aggressively than 'producers'.
Or already HAPPENED
As has been pointed out, what we're currently dealing with isn't even the Black Swan yet as it was eminently predictable. What's he's talking about is the future - eg the horns of mp's dilemna of 30% unemployment or 30% inflation.
THAT's where the Black Swan resides, as nobody can really predict how that will play out, especially in a globalized, nuked world. Maybe we somehow muddle through, maybe we have WW2 like event and 2 billion people cease to exist. Who knows?
Lots more fun days still lay ahead of us! Don't know whether to laugh or to cry...
Good God, OT but, are we really going to start another war before Jan 20th?
The Hindu : Front Page : McCain warns Pakistan of Indian air strikes
Something to look forward to when the Small 3 go down in flames:
Interesting...but I don't think the collapse of the big 3 losers will help matters. They each actively don't WANT to license this vehicle from AFS. They prefer to continue building SUVs, trucks, and the like with MARGINALLY improved fuel efficiency. They don't WANT a major-league, leapfrog improvement.
One of the Big 3 would have to be forced to license and build this thing by a Congress that makes it a stipulation of a bailout - yeah right, they'd do that.
Perhaps a Honda or Toyota or Tata motors would license and build it.
Government == good.
Rob Dawg | Homepage | 12.07.08 - 2:30 pm | #
Rob that is as simple and wrong as the opposite...
Market==Whore.
Cynical Dude, apropos we posted at the same time, no? Perhaps I found your blackswan?
Maybe there is hope for America yet.
You have Kenyian economics and nice Rice dishes
Rice's royal recital | Video | Reuters.com
Surprised me!
At the risk of ruffling a few feathers, I am looking for comments that are more specific in identifying the casual chain of coming events. Just as in the house/mortgage bubble, many (most here) correctly noted the disconnect with reality, but where are we headed and how will it unfold? Taleb's statements are typical of many who talk in absolute general terms "it will be much worse", but what specifically are we talking about?
I have been trying to reconcile the conflicting views of deflation/deflation, and my sense is that most recognize they are not competing events, but consecutive with the ordering pretty well assumed (deflation first, then rapid inflation). So what excatly will trigger the transition from deflation to inflation and how will this first appear?
Reflecting on collective comments in past threads, it seems this will not occur simply as a result of excessive stimulus and other "bailouts" as the current pace of deflation may absorb, at least initially, much of the impact. It occurs to me that the knee in the curve will finally occur when production will have been so crippled by the current economic dislocations that shortages begin to emerge. Only at that point, when crippled production can no longer meet demand will the hyper inflation phase begin.
Am I correct in this thinking? Isn't a critical step in the transition to hyper inflation a correction in production yielding a clear shortage in goods and services?
And if this is correct, how far do we really have to go before such shortages are an issue (for the sake of discussion putting aside oil)? Hard to imagine in an economy and world that seems to suffer from excess rather than limited productive capacity.
Thanks to all for the creative conversations.
Maybe Taleb is the optomist?
"I do not expect a "run on the dollar" to occur where there is a sudden and massive drop in the use of the dollar worldwide. Nor do I expect a lengthy period of unavailability of electronic payment systems."
A magisterial tone, o.jeff. How much confidence to you have in your own forecasts?
Roubini has never been a pessimist, and he is not an optimist now. Roubini is and always has been a realist.
Dry,
Not that you needed another anecdote, but we have many clients teetering near bankruptcy. This is a first. Yes, you know some of them.
Fortunately for us, they still have to file those k's.
Perhaps I found your blackswan?
OMG. That's just horrible. WTF gives McCain the right to be over there saying anything?!
If Taleb is right then nobody walks away from this wreck completely intact. The winners will be the ones carried away only horribly mangled and wounded. The losers will be ash.
dryfly | 12.07.08 - 2:20 pm |
Taleb certainly looked a bit smug.
I having been reading about deflation. The Irving Fischer link someone posted has been very helpful. He even has his version of what will happen, broken out into stages, probably where Roubini saw it.
I can't say I understood it completely but I think I understand why Bernake is printing. He knows we are experiencing deflation. He wants to inflate enough so the debt can be paid down easier for the large debtors. He won't succeed, but he can make it less devasting.
Comrade Kristina | 12.07.08 - 2:36 pm | #
A report quoting the Dawn newspaper said U.S. Secretary of State Condoleezza Rice was understood to have told Pakistan that there was âirrefutable evidenceâ of involvement of elements in the country in the Mumbai attacks and that it needed to act urgently and effectively to avert a strong international response.
Too bad Dr. Rice has no credibility left when it comes to "irrefutable evidence."
Many theories on this crisis used by the most negative have been entirely blown out of the water and will not come back easily.
Decoupling. Collapse of the dollar. Bond vigilantes.
The world is more interested in helping America than i think most theorists want to believe. Instead they cling to theories now shown to have failed them.
"he once said atheists caused more wars than religious people because of nationalism."
Just musing. I doubt it. "Atheist" leaders killed more of their own nation's citizens, but I think "religious" opportunists caused more war. That's if your counting what the nations profess to believe.
And whether or not Taleb is a crank or Roubini said this or that; some people are looking for an infallible prophet. Just look at the ideas guys, do they make sense?
"Isn't a critical step in the transition to hyper inflation a correction in production yielding a clear shortage in goods and services?"
I always thought of hyperinflation as a monetary phenomenon.
does it need wage inflation to really happen? theoretically, but not necessarily in a situation of true capital flight, methinks.
So...does this mean the 2nd half recovery for 2008 is not going to happen?
I can't say I understood it completely but I think I understand why Bernake is printing. He knows we are experiencing deflation. He wants to inflate enough so the debt can be paid down easier for the large debtors. He won't succeed, but he can make it less devasting.
nova | 12.07.08 - 2:43 pm | #
Depends on your definition of 'success' - if we have some mangled bodies exiting the crash but still alive to see another day - he might consider that 'success'.
I doubt the mangled will feel all that lucky though.
I think the most likely scenairo is a lengthy recession (15-20 years) with high unemployment--nearly equalling the great depression.
Most families will get by with 1 or 2 cars; three car families will be rare.
cars in a depression?
What's worse Cynical is Rice is going even further...This is troubling, very troubling...I only half believed they would try something crazy before leaving power...now I'm leaning towards 99% sure in my belief...
I always thought of hyperinflation as a monetary phenomenon.
It is.
"Maybe Taleb is the optomist?"
Optometrist? Certainly not an ostrich. I feel admiration for anyone who knows how little we know, and how unexpected the unknowable can be. How can we not develop fall-back plans for the unexpected? Because we began as migratory hunter-gatherers, who depended on known cycles and adventitious finds. It's hard-wired. Long range planning is not us. These disasters happen over and over, and as soon as matters improve the next generation forgets what the previous one has learned. Ours is a very clever but in some ways a very dumb species. It's outgrown its own survival instincts.
Let's see if we can improve our adaptations to reality.
I am looking for comments that are more specific in identifying the casual chain of coming events...
That's going to be a bit tough, given that nobody really knows what is going to happen next. Or put another way - the things we can predict will be overwhelmed by the things we didn't see coming.
When some of you guys say "Bernanke is printing," do you mean it literally or metaphorically? If literally, what is the evidence?
I do not plan on shooting my neighbors. I would rather organize them which I think I can do. It helps I know almost everyone on my block. After 22 years of living in the same house that is not to difficult.
I like the idea of bouncing possible scenarios around. I do not see it as a chance for personal profit. Rather, a chance to do something good and useful.
cars in a depression?
Of course. There are already enough cars here for everyone to have one. They aren't just going to disappear in a cloud of poof.
"Instead they cling to theories now shown to have failed them."
like those idiots in 1974 who thought a gallon of gas could hit 50 cents. fools.
Deflation virus is moving the policy test beyond the 1930s extremes - Telegraph
Deflation virus is moving the policy test beyond the 1930s extremes
Q: What will trigger the switch from deflation to inflation?
A: China's huge currency reserves will start to come back into the market to cover for declining world demand. They will do this because maintaining high growth rates is the only way they can keep the populace gainfully employed instead of rioting in the streets. The flood of currency in the market chasing after real goods will cause massive inflation.
China is walking an even more difficult tightrope right now than the US is.
"Or put another way - the things we can predict will be overwhelmed by the things we didn't see coming."
It shouldn't surprise anyone, but if such things happen, they will.
Is it better to haved shared your last bit of food with a neighbor? Or better when they come to your door hungry; to turn them away?
Short term I see very ugly retail sales. Jobs cuts are going to come fast and furious. There is no social net to catch so many of us. There will be a gap when many will fall between the cracks.
ova writes:
I do not plan on shooting my neighbors. I would rather organize them which I think I can do. It helps I know almost everyone on my block. After 22 years of living in the same house that is not to difficult.
The problem is that if your neighbors are not prepared are you going to feed them? What about the neighborhood a mile away? I hope it does not get to that but it could. Bush deployed 20000 troops to respond to emergencies in the US. That scares me. They know what is coming?
When some of you guys say "Bernanke is printing," do you mean it literally or metaphorically?
Metaphorically at this point but it could turn 'literal' if they 'need it to' - watch how fast they (Fed) 'sterilize' the interventions (do they pull money out via TOMO equal to the money they pump in via TARP) It should show up in M1 & M2 eventually IF they don't keep these operations approximately equal in timing & magnitude. I believe that at least until recently - they have been equal (sterilized)... there is some discussion here & other econ blogs that might have changed recently.
M1 & M2 should eventually show it.
"Most families will ->get by
nova(Unrated) writes:
\tIs it better to haved shared your last bit of food with a neighbor? Or better when they come to your door hungry; to turn them away?
Did you ever see the movie Delicatessen?
"If literally, what is the evidence?"
Cash in circulation has been a small fraction of m2 m3 etc for a while. But I would agree that none of the trillions mentioned are real until the treasury auctions off the bonds. Congress still reserves the right to dissolve the Federal Reserve and repudiate any public liabilities based on their liabilities, which are explicitly private, of course.
I doubt the mangled will feel all that lucky though.
In time they will.
Taleb's claims about his clients being unaffected need close inspection. Even if he moved all of his clients money into cash - in which currency? If it is USD, was it a lucky guess a year ago or a conclusion of some chain of reasoning? If it is Euro, then they are not unaffected.
Taleb does not seem to have a positive theory/philosophy of how the world works, only a claim that anything is possible, and the likelihood of that is much more than you think. I had this insight when I was in school.
RE: My post at 2:54 pm was clipped. I'll try it again.
Did you ever see the movie Delicatessen?
PapaSloth | 12.07.08 - 2:54 pm |
No, did they eat people?
@ PapaSloth | 12.07.08 - 2:50 pm | #
Yup.
They call me Tim writes:
Anybody posted this yet?
Help - Page Not Found - Boston.com
They call me Tim | 12.07.08 - 2:27 pm
Don't think so. It was new to me:
One such blogger, a retired veteran of Wall Street who signed his posts "Calculated Risk," had established his own blog in January 2005.
Calculated Risk quickly developed a cult following for its sophisticated analysis of economic data, for rapidly crunching numbers into readable graphs, and for the knowledgeable posts of Tanta, a guest blogger with razor-sharp prose and an almost limitless enthusiasm for exposing the inner workings of the mortgage industry. Tanta had worked as a mortgage banker, and the blog created an instant platform for this one thoughtful - and worried - insider. Today, her posts have become legendary as a prescient warning cry about the current financial meltdown.
Also, big props to The Big Picture and others.
In time they will.
nova | 12.07.08 - 2:55 pm | #
Yup. But that might take time & reflection. Right now it's just bummer and more bummer.
Bernanke has started printing in the past few months.
For the year before that he was sterilizing which was worse: taking money from the broad economy and giving it, dollar-for-dollar, to the banks to lend back to us. He would rather do that still, I'm sure. That's who he seems to be and who he works for.
But for some reason, he is not sterilizing any more. Thank God.
Taleb does not seem to have a positive theory/philosophy of how the world works, only a claim that anything is possible.
GIven that's not his claim, it would appear a little more studying is called for before passing judgement.
"Taleb does not seem to have a positive theory/philosophy of how the world works"
May we have an example of someone who knows how the world works?
nova(Unrated) writes:
No, did they eat people?
I could tell you, but it would be better if you rented it and watched it yourself. It's worth the time.
dryfly writes:
"I always thought of hyperinflation as a monetary phenomenon.
It is."
dryfly, bgates; thanks for response. Given that inflation is a monetary phenomenon, isn't it measured by what you can purchase (X vs. 3X)? If production declines, or scarcity appears, and prices are finally bid up because demand can decline no further - what do you call that? If not tecnically inflation, isn't the result the same; money becomes worth less because you can buy less for the same amount?
The comment was on the statement that most families will get by on 1 or 2 cars.
My comment was:
The CIA's World Factbook reports chickens per capita for the world's countries. Why? Because it is a fairly good relative metric for nutrition and the ability of a country to feed itself.
When the US begins (speaking metaphorically) to think in terms of its own chickens, rather than cars, per capita, then the reality that change in life style of the last decade is both inevitable and necessary will gain traction.
Austin Tex writes:
In the America that we can hope will arise from this distress, neighbors will (again) help one another.
How exactly will this magical transformation take place in a people that have been conditioned to believe that government is there to provide for all their needs, cradle to grave?
I guess I found what I was looking for.. Take a look
A Photo Essay on the Great Depression
Personally, I worry about Mesiahs. I do not know who makes me worry more; a Mullah, or a Baptist.
Fischer mentions in his writing that FDR had to print. If he didn't, the gov would have fallen. He also mentions the midwest where people were already starting to cross the line into outright revolution.
In the next year or so, look for cities to start passing ordinances allowing backyard poultry and goats.
May we have an example of someone who knows how the world works?
Keynes and Fridman had postive, if opposite, theories that tried to explain how the world works. Nobody is trying to come with perfect Theory Of Everything (save string theorists). The point is that critisizing can be valuable but it usually is not hard. The real value is in trying to come with something new that helps understand how the world works.
This not a homogenous country. It could easily Balkanize. The fracture lines have always been covered with money. Or, the promise of it.
o.jeff writes:
Most everyone will know someone employed by a massive government jobs program.
Um. Already there.
The Federal government is already the largest employer in the country, even excluding the military and Post Office.
Comrade V | Homepage | 12.07.08 - 2:59 pm | #
V - I was trained as a chemical engineer but raised in a family full of economists (ya scary - you should have been to our family dinners).
Anyway the way I see it is inflation/deflation is like 'heat'... the thermal energy in molecules. There is no way to easily measure heat though - so we developed 'surrogate measures' that approximate heat content... temperature. Think of price & wage fluctuations as the monetary temperature... they aren't the underlying phenomenon but rather surrogate effects resulting from the deeper underlying cause.
"They aren't just going to disappear in a cloud of poof."
They will unless you have money to maintain them.
"If production declines, or scarcity appears, and prices are finally bid up because demand can decline no further"
interesting point. obviously, the relationship between money supply and prices is never linear.
a noted bay area entrepreneur recorded a lecture on the relationship between a scarce product and a lack of monetary liquidity in the context of our last significant recession, which this lecture dates from:
YouTube - E-40 - Drought Season
it contains some strong language, so it may not be sunday afternoon family material
In the next year or so, look for cities to start passing ordinances allowing backyard poultry and goats.
Chickens aren't the problem,...it's the roosters. Please remember, you don't need roosters for egg production.
dryfly: everybody stars dieing of radiation poisoning with some dieing faster than others.
Actually, that's "dying". You've been machine tooling for too long.
The Federal government is already the largest employer in the country, even excluding the military and Post Office.
Corey | Homepage | 12.07.08 - 3:06 pm |
Closely followed by Wal-Mart.
How exactly will this magical transformation take place in a people that have been conditioned to believe that government is there to provide for all their needs, cradle to grave?
Corey | Homepage | 12.07.08 - 3:01 pm | # [kill]
What does Sweden have to do with it?
Actually, that's "dying". You've been machine tooling for too long.
Outsider | 12.07.08 - 3:07 pm | #
LOL - I wondered about that but my spell checker let it go - I mean who am I to question a spellchecker?
Dryfly,
What do you think of a forced merger of GM and Chrysler?
Taleb does not seem to have a positive theory/philosophy of how the world works, only a claim that anything is possible, and the likelihood of that is much more than you think
People are linear creatures. We extrapolate action along linear lines.
Complexity is multiplicative.
Ergo, there will also be a mismatch in expectations versus reality.
The forced merger, to me, looks good on paper. The reality, I think, would mean the end of Chryler, and all all the jobs it provided. GM has nothing either. I guess all it would do is kill both.
Taleb also mentions in his Black Swan book that Fannie and Freddie are a "keg of dynamite."
Phila writes:
What does Sweden have to do with it?
Sure, sure. People in L.A. are dialing 211 for emergency Christmas gifts [see article upthread]. Somehow I doubt we're ready to become that mythical nation of self-sufficiency and "neighbor helping neighbor".
History Repeats! This is from 1936
During the Great Depression, unemployment was high. Many employers tried to get as much work as possible from their employees for the lowest possible wage. Workers were upset with the speedup of assembly lines, working conditions and the lack of job security. Seeking strength in unity, they formed unions. Automobile workers organized the U.A.W. (United Automobile Workers of America) in 1935. General Motors would not recognize the U.A.W. as the workers' bargaining representative. Hearing rumors that G.M. was moving work to factories where the union was not as strong, workers in Flint began a sit-down strike on December 30, 1936. The sit-down was an effective way to strike. When workers walked off the job and picketed a plant, management could bring in new workers to break the strike. If the workers stayed in the plant, management could not replace them with other workers. This photograph shows the broken windows at General Motors' Flint Fisher Body Plant during the Flint sit-down strike of 1936-37.
Dryfly: Anyway the way I see it is inflation/deflation is like 'heat'... the thermal energy in molecules.
If I could add that inflation is the average temperature of the economy. Increase in temperature/prices in some regions/asset classes does not constitute inflation. It has to be broad based.
The real value is in trying to come with something new that helps understand how the world works.
It seems to me that trying to understand where the boundary between "predictable" and "not-predictable" lies fully qualifies for your definition of "real value".
The impression I'm getting - and forgive me if it's just poor interpretation on my part - is that you're talking about a comic book caricature of Taleb - not what Taleb actually argues. And I freely admit it's easy to caricature Taleb - his presentation style practically begs for it!
- but he's a lot more subtle than you appear to be giving him credit for.
This is a guy who has - in the past ten years - followed his style of thinking into capturing an equity bull market, an oil bull market, and the banking mother-of-all-bear markets. Damn few market mavens have the ability to switch meta-themes like this (Soros & Templeton come to mind, though Templeton rigidified in his late late years).
His persona and writing style can be quite harshly grating, no question. Personally I think he does himself a disservice using it, but then again, he's a best-selling author and I'm not, so maybe I'm misjudging how the public wants to hear its messages.
Thing to keep in mind - the guy puts his money where his mouth is - and makes serious coin doing so. For us market types, that's the only validation that really matters.
People are linear creatures. We extrapolate action along linear lines. Complexity is multiplicative.
We think arithmetic while the world acts geometric.
Crewman(Unrated) writes:
Bush deployed 20000 troops to respond to emergencies in the US. That scares me. They know what is coming?
20000 troops against 300 million inhabitants? I think we know who should be scared in that scenario. 20000 troops wouldn't even control a sizable midwest town; a metropolis is out of the question.
I don't know why Bush enacted that policy, but crowd control during a monetary collapse doesn't seem likely.
Did a youtube search and found this gem
YouTube - ? v=AxJvgbkDhng
I would say he is a crank.
RationalJeff | 12.07.08 - 2:13 pm | #
That was a great clip. Why would you think he is a crank because he points out the complete failure of economic analysts to explain the economic finance? The fact that people take advice from MSNBC or Wall Street Journal commentators certainly does stem from a religious-like belief system.
Corey:
How exactly will this magical transformation take place in a people that have been conditioned to believe that government is there to provide for all their needs, cradle to grave?
Funny, the lession I've been learning (or actually, the lesson that the powers that be have been trying to force into my skull) is that we are all on our own: "I got mine, screw you" or "Hooray for me, too bad for you" or "Not my problem if you were too stupid to not make yourself rich. Die already!"
stdfs:
Chickens aren't the problem,...it's the roosters. Please remember, you don't need roosters for egg production
Ah, but you NEED a rooster to propagate your flock. No rooster, no replication.
We are planning to acquire a dozen chickens next year plus 2 roosters...but then, we're in the sticks.
dryfly:
Thanks for your response. What got me on this point is the assumption I had been holding that deflation was good for savers and those holding stored wealth. But this comfortable assumption rests on the belief that goods will remain plentiful, onlt their prices will change as demand collpases. There is a point at which the downturn is so severe that it affects productive capacity, in which case scarcity is not easily solved simply by resorting to savings.
But in our enormous economy, how much further will we have to go before we see the impact on productive capacity and emergence of scarcity relative to demand? Quite a ways I believe. For now there seems plenty of surplus. I also don't see a serious case for deflation until wages begin declining. What is the evidence on this metric?
Sure, sure. People in L.A. are dialing 211 for emergency Christmas gifts [see article upthread]. Somehow I doubt we're ready to become that mythical nation of self-sufficiency and "neighbor helping neighbor".
Yep. We are not ready. Doesn't mean it won't happen. To your previous question, people will stop believing the government provides when it can no longer do so. Kind of scary, huh?
...Unless the crash is complete, the disease will still be walking around within the government.
...Unless the crash is complete, the disease will still be walking around within the government.
The disease, like the poor, will always be with us. Revolutions eat their children; just like software startups.
I only half believed they would try something crazy before leaving power...now I'm leaning towards 99% sure in my belief...
Reality is more complex than that. Do you believe the Somali pirates are also a creationa of the CIA?
People are opportunists. Power doesn't exist in a vacuum. This blog is a small microcosm of that. Cause and effect are difficult to discern.
Crewman, the opposite is going to occur in this collapse. Wages will decline precipitously and workers, blue collar and white collar alike, will be required to take it up the ass because there are others more desperate than them ready to open wider if they're not obliging. Unions were not the answer....just a band-aid...and now the wound is so large and deep, the band-aid's worthless. Workers should have taken control of the organizations and made them employee owned and run. It's too late now....they should have struck whilst the iron was hot, but instead they took the easy route...and now we're all going to pay.
@Cynical Dude 3:13 pm - I read both of Taleb's books and listened to/watched a number of his interviews. I value his view that financiers have to show more humility as there is much they cannot estimate. I wish he showed the same level of humility himself, instead of implying he is smarter than Merton, Black and others.
I am sorry to be off topic, but it's Sunday. Does anybody here, besides me, believe they will become homicidal if that Dell "caroling" commercial runs much longer? Thanks.
Most of you do not 'get' what taleb is implying-
You cannot predict the long term (+5yrs) future! The best predictions are short term (upto 1yr), very good and objective analysis might even be accurate at intermediate timescales (1-5 yrs). However even short term predictions can be upset by unknown or poorly understood factors.
He is challenging the very basis of modelling futures with mathematical techniques, whether they be environmental scenarios, technological changes or financial scenarios. Many of his detractors either see their livelihood disappearing or are just plain scared of the implications of his ideas. Of course there are useful idiots who oppose him because he somehow appears to criticize their pet hobby horses.
A very large source of oppostion to his ideas also comes from the simple fact that even partially accepting their validity would destroy the well cultivated self image of the west.
Comrade noob goldberg writes
20000 troops against 300 million inhabitants? I think we know who should be scared in that scenario. 20000 troops wouldn't even control a sizable midwest town; a metropolis is out of the question.
I agree but...
Paulson to Congress: There will be MARTIAL LAW in America if the bailout is not passed
LiveLeak.com - Paulson to Congress: There will be MARTIAL LAW in America if the bailout is not passed!!!!!
interesting, taleb as lenin. ok. where does larouche fit in?
They are learning...
More than 160 US, NATO vehicles burned in Pakistan
By RIAZ KHAN, Associated Press Writer Riaz Khan, Associated Press Writer 2 hrs 5 mins ago
PESHAWAR, Pakistan Militants torched 160 vehicles, including dozens of Humvees destined for U.S. and allied forces fighting in Afghanistan, in the boldest attack so far on the critical military supply line through Pakistan.
The American military said Sunday's raid on two transport terminals near the beleaguered Pakistani city of Peshawar would have "minimal" impact on anti-Taliban operations set to expand with the arrival of thousands more troops next year.
However, the attack feeds concern that insurgents are trying to choke the route through the famed Khyber Pass, which carries up to 70 percent of the supplies for Western forces in landlocked Afghanistan, and drive up the cost of the war
The disease, like the poor, will always be with us. Revolutions eat their children; just like software startups.
I don't know about always...but it will take multiple iterations of revolution to purge any last vestiges. That was the theory behind perpetual revolution, although, as we have witnessed, it was never put into practice. Sure, Castro continues to call it the revolution, but that's bullshit...and Che would agree if he was alive today. In fact, an argument could be made that's why he and Fidel parted ways. Che truly believed in the perpetuity of revolution to preclude the reentrenchment of corruption and vested individual interests. Fidel didn't want to lose his grip on power knowing full well that the Capitalists were waiting at the gates.
Thanks for your response. What got me on this point is the assumption I had been holding that deflation was good for savers and those holding stored wealth. But this comfortable assumption rests on the belief that goods will remain plentiful, onlt their prices will change as demand collpases. There is a point at which the downturn is so severe that it affects productive capacity, in which case scarcity is not easily solved simply by resorting to savings.
Deflation destroys productive capacity EXCEPT for 'pure services' - those that don't rely on any capital at all.
Everyone gets all hung up on debt vs savings but deflation also destroys capital intensive operations regardless whether they are debt free or not - look up 'operational leverage' [basically investing capital to produce more & better than is possible w/out that capital]... in a deflation it behaves almost like debt.
I mean who is going to invest in machinery TODAY if the products they produce are going to decline in price, even if the demand in non-monetary units is fairly constant? And especially if you believe the cost of those machines will also be declining - why not just wait?
So jobs go away in a deflation too - exacerbating the deflation.
People on this forum (and everywhere in general) are way to casual thinking through the repercussions - BOTH for inflation & deflation. They both suck but in different ways.
Food will always be available at a price. But it could become less available in the U.S. at affordable prices if other countries start bidding it up and hoarding it. Also, if the growth of the middle class in the undeveloped world resumes faster than we think. Also, if global warming creates nightmares for crops.
Recently, Argentina was starving while its farmers were getting rich exporting to people who would/could pay more than domestic. The govt. had to step in and restrict food exports, which caused the farmers to riot and strike.
Satan: You cannot predict the long term (+5yrs) future! The best predictions are short term (upto 1yr), very good and objective analysis might even be accurate at intermediate timescales (1-5 yrs). However even short term predictions can be upset by unknown or poorly understood factors.
Few businesses that I know of have a need to predict their operating needs 5+ years into the future. When they do, it is based on simple arguments like "China is a big and growing market, we should have presence there".
R&D definitely looks at a rather distant future, but smart companies do not try to apply strict forecasts to their R&D strategy, whether its high-tech or pharma. I think most of these companies try to pursue multiple paths and not be bound by "the" forecast.
What is the evidence on this metric?
The unemployment rates (UE's 3 through 6). Wages are sticky on the way down just like RE - doesn't mean they don't fall just more resistance down than up.
So just like you don't see RE prices fall much UNTIL sales all but stop... You won't see wages fall much UNTIL UE goes sky high...
We saw RE sales stop & prices fall... now we are seeing UE sky... wages will be next if this trend continues.
We think arithmetic while the world acts geometric
It's remarkable how few people understand the Mythical Man Month.
My favorite example is pregnancy - one woman can make a baby in nine months but nine women can't make a baby in one month.
Boise isn't that bad, overall. It's still isolated in many ways. A fellow stopped me in downtown with a question and I flinched, expecting another handout request.
But no, he just asked parking meters needed quarters after 5pm. Then we chatted about the city.
"on the critical military supply line through Pakistan"
Attempt at provocation, trying to goad the US into encroachment to defend its "critical" line (Khyber Pass!).
Doubt it will work. Two words: C and 5. (Actually, one letter and one number, I guess)
There's a lot of ads on TV that seem offkey for these times.
There's one for Burger King that shows Chinese peasants who have never tasted a hamburger ("Burger Virgins") doing a blind taste test between Big Mac and Whopper.
Is that sick or what?
You would think execs would be smart enough to pull offkey ads. Not so. Lots of denial.
"China is walking an even more difficult tightrope right now than the US is."
When china spends its reserves it will stimulate demand in the USA and tend to create inflation in the USA at some point they will be given the green light to begin spending and then their exports will recover.
If they spend dollars it buys stuff in the USA rather than China
I think there is that reality of cooperation and prearrangement
rich writes:
Unemployed people.. What can they afford?
I have met Nassim Taleb, he is a bigger horse's behind in person than he is on video. Arrogant and a very poor platform speaker. Had the whole audience hating him in the first 10 minutes.
interesting, taleb as lenin. ok. where does larouche fit in?
Charlie Chaplin.
Comrade V(Unrated) writes:
\tI also don't see a serious case for deflation until wagesbegin declining. What is the evidence on this metric?
See here:
Error 404: Page Not Found | NDN
It shows, among other things, that median household income has fallen monotonically for the last 5 years.
"Charlie Chaplin."
Uh oh, I sense Father Coughlin references coming down the pike...
Have to go. Thanks.
"I don't expect food supplies to become unavailable; there is no reason why this would happen:......
Funny....that's what they thought in the Soviet Union with all those Mega-Farms back in the early 80's. They couldn't feed their own people - we had to ship milions of tons of foodstuffs to them!
Broward Horne writes:
"It's remarkable how few people understand the Mythical Man Month."
One of my favorite sayings from our former Engineering VP - when pressured by the CEO to speed up a product's development by adding more resources - "How many men does it take to make a baby"
interesting, taleb as lenin. ok. where does larouche fit in?
Charlie Chaplin.
Broward Horne | Homepage | 12.07.08 - 3:36 pm | #
Taleb is not Lenin; he is capitalism's new favorite obscurantist.
..their people stopped working - why support the corrupt USSR?
They call me Tim writes:
Anybody posted this yet?
Help - Page Not Found - Boston.com
They call me Tim | 12.07.08 - 2:27 pm | #
Tim, did you send it to CR? It's cery interesting.
History Repeats! This is from 1936
By 1936, the 40-hour workweek was already in motion. The more "progressive" companies had already switched to it between 1928-1935 and official legislation was passed in 1938.
The 40-hour work week–dead or alive?
.
I really wish somebody would focus on the "production == consumption" aspect here. Credit is finite because production is finite. Production is finite because consumption is finite. So at any point in time, WORK is finite.
One of the major failing points of our current economic theory is that it assumes that infinite work is waiting in the wings to be discovered, and that information and coordination of information have zero costs or constraints.
Oopsie, gremlins inserted an extra space in my URL...
Error 404: Page Not Found | NDN
"all those Mega-Farms back in the early 80's"
the farms were collectivized in the late 20s, actually.
Moscow and Houston had a similar basis to their economies in the 80s, and a similar reaction to commodity price events.
OK, CR Companion insterted the extra space, and just did it again. Sigh.
Comrade V writes:
I also don't see a serious case for deflation until wages begin declining. What is the evidence on this metric?
The fast that those who are employed will have to accept lower wages will be reflected in declining average hourly earnings. Add to this rising unemployment and partial employment.
I received a bulletin from a news source which shall not be named here that there is some kind of 48 hour deadline to which Pakistan is supposed to respond, concerning a certain organization based in that country. A Pakistani official supposedly issued a statement that Pakistan does not answer to such ultimata.
I have not seen this item in any other news source so far.
I saw once a white swan on a lake beside the Novodevichy Cemetery in Moscow. May there never be a black swan on that lake.
....the next things nationalized here will be the agri-businesses. Our people won't be able to afford to feed themselves.
Pavel:
Several days back you alluded to a reflection on the society of bees and their homes built of spit and paper. It didn't register much at first but subsequently really got me thinking.
Just want to say thanks for your contributions on the blog. I have long been an analytical person. Only recently have I begun to appreciate the insightful perspectives of the poet. Keep it up.
Pavel - When did this countdown begin?
Taleb is taking on strawmen. The mathematical modelers do not believe everything runs according to Black-Scholes, or even a version of that with fat tails. We take it all with a grain of salt, it's just a model. Surely value-at-risk that ignores credit risk is not expected to account for credit risk.
The model does, however, help one to price options. People make money trading options with that formula (and other knowledge as well.)
If you want to model contagion, do it. And you'll understand that there is not much confidence in that model because it is not priced observably. To pretend that VAR accounts for contagion is intellectually dishonest, and those speaking have surely been told that and chosen to ignore the advice.
A carpenter who blames his tools for a mistake is not a good carpenter. He should know his tools.
If top management ignores what we say and says the models account for more than they do, that is entirely their fault. For example, Robert Rubin who says that he cannot be expected to know the nuts and bolts of Citi's operation, that is Risk Management's job. That remark was classic and should be enshrined somewhere.
I saw once a white swan on a lake
I've never seen a black swan,...but I have seen a platypus. Which is more unlikely?
Current economic theory does not all assume that information has no cost. Just the comic book versions that politicians use to galvanize the public.
....the next things nationalized here will be the agri-businesses. Our people won't be able to afford to feed themselves.
Not officially Nationalized, but certainly de facto. Consolidation in the Agribusiness sector has been occuring exponentially. Soon, there will only be a handful of players, and they will be joined at the hip with Government....kind of like the Oil Compananies.
Black swans are fairly common if you know where to look for them. I think for example rich peoples ornamental ponds and Australian parks tend to have them. Platypus i have no idea unless you go to Zoo Australia
RE: Pakistan news
Humvee cost is $150K each..
Army plans to buy next-gen Humvees - Army News, news from Iraq, - Army Times
Let's say they took out 100 humvees..
Without the terrorist wars we wouldn't be talking about recession, it would be depression...
The India news is not good....Pakistan is deteriorating after IMF bailout..
Actually, a link to the entire interview came from someone else in comments here yesterday. I did find the fun clip, though.
Pakistan is being set up as the next scapegoat.
Ok, let me say this in a simpler language.
What taleb is saying is that mathematical modelling of complex systems is worse than useless, especially when used to predict the future. Since we cannot account for all factors, our models will always be incomplete. While one can use incomplete models to start understanding reality, even very complex models are not reality!
He is telling you, obliquely, that most of the speculative assumptions of western thinking are BS. Most of your beliefs about the future are therefore worthless. He is calling out something that I have often mentioned- Hubris.
He is also pointing out that some of the basic assumptions and behaviors of western capitalism will have to change if we want a functional society. Some of you might yammer about how human behavior never changes and status quo. Some of you believe that we go back to GD1 or even medievial times. I predict that given the nature and spread of technology + demography- the present course of events will lead us to a place where we won't have much of a species left.
However consider the known trajectory of humans as a species. It is hard to say that we have not changed substantially over the millenia- behaviors, organizations, beliefs. Some of you might think that since most men still prefer bustier women, we are just cavemen in clothes. However that statement is only partially true, and the parts that have changed can hurt your modelling efforts much more than you realize.
Pakistan is being set up as the next scapegoat.
See - everybody thought it would be Iran - there's your Black Swan right there.
PapaSloth writes:
"It shows, among other things, that median household income has fallen monotonically for the last 5 years."
PapaSloth, Dryfly, thanks for responses. Maybe the aggregate data shows this, but I agree wages are "sticky" and even an emotional issue. Contractors in my locale, although more interested and "available" for projects are still not willing to acknowledge price competitivness, and will no bid rather than lower a tenative bid. When I see hourly rates notch lower than I'll know we've broken through. Hasn't happened yet, despite 18 months of shrinking demand.
911 a Black Swan? Now that's a hoot!
Taleb is taking on strawmen. The mathematical modelers do not believe everything runs according to Black-Scholes, or even a version of that with fat tails. We take it all with a grain of salt, it's just a model. Surely value-at-risk that ignores credit risk is not expected to account for credit risk.
comrade artichoke | 12.07.08 - 3:45 pm | #
As a (statistical) modeler, I can say that, with some exceptions, this is spot-on. I work for people who want The Answer, even if I know there is no such answer exists. You can push for a better understanding of risk all you like, but you're still a prisoner of the prejudices of management. The same applies to the Mythical Man-Month observation. The developers understand it; the traders don't. Yet it's the traders asking you if you could use another hand (not theirs) to work on something at the last minute.
That's not the whole picture, though, and it's intellectually dishonest and sloppy to say that the housing bubble was unknowable.
"Taleb is taking on strawmen. The mathematical modelers do not believe everything runs according to Black-Scholes, or even a version of that with fat tails. We take it all with a grain of salt, it's just a model. Surely value-at-risk that ignores credit risk is not expected to account for credit risk.
The model does, however, help one to price options. People make money trading options with that formula (and other knowledge as well.)
If you want to model contagion, do it. And you'll understand that there is not much confidence in that model because it is not priced observably. To pretend that VAR accounts for contagion is intellectually dishonest, and those speaking have surely been told that and chosen to ignore the advice.
A carpenter who blames his tools for a mistake is not a good carpenter. He should know his tools.
If top management ignores what we say and says the models account for more than they do, that is entirely their fault. For example, Robert Rubin who says that he cannot be expected to know the nuts and bolts of Citi's operation, that is Risk Management's job. That remark was classic and should be enshrined somewhere."
I get the impression that what Taleb is trying to say is that there is NO way to model for every unforeseen event.
If you accept that you can't model for every possibility then you must accept that you can't take as much risk going forward.
This leads to:
a reduction in leverage == less profit for financial companies
carrying proper financial reserves == less profit for financial companies
carrying loans on your books == less profit for financial companies
28% DTI properly documented loans == less profit for financial companies
Taleb may have a bad attitude and rub people the wrong way but how many 100 year 6-sigma blow up the model events do we need over the last 30 years to convince us that just perhaps modeling doesn't work too well in a high leveraged, complex, interconnected world?
Joe - do yourself a favor and put your TV out in the garage. After a week or so, you won't even know it's gone.
Is all of this happening in a vacuum? Is the US alone facing economic collapse? Do we still have allies after the CDO/CDS market and the past 8 years of unilateralism?
The economy is tanking, unemployment is doing a moonshot. The citizens are sedentary paper pushers with nary an original thought or the critical thinking skills to examine implications.
Mexico is a failed state. South America is heading towards socialism. Asia is dominated by China and China is pissed. Rumors of currency devaluation and trade wars in the near future. Russia will use it's military and energy resources to have it's way with Europe. India and Pakistan could very well blow up into war anyday. The only power we have left is our troops in Iraq keeping the petrodollar alive and our subs with nuclear weapons parked all over the world.
Worrying about our economy is great but the geopolitical instability resulting in war with the nuclear cards dealt to so many countries, most unfriendly to us, is scaring me spitless. The worst part is that these unfriendly states could easily lose a few weapons to some terrorist factions and our ports go boom.
We got the world into this mess and we damn well better show everyone a way out. The changes coming will literally beggar our nation and our sense of identity. Nationalism and populist rhetoric are a direct result of failed economies. We aren't alone in this recipe for disaster. We might be alone when we have to face the rest of the world over the hardship wall street started.
I am pretty willing to dig ditches and eat/live simply if it allows my children a future, even a bare basics existence. I am not willing to go to war because some companies lost money and influence.
there's your Black Swan right there.
So many Black Swans, so little time.
...well, I'll be waiting for you guys to come down to my $8950 annum. The only difference is I already have the cave, the chickens, cows, plowed fields and teenage slaves. Welcome to my world
"it's intellectually dishonest and sloppy to say that the housing bubble was unknowable."
true, but the timing was. who knows if the t-bond futures will hit 150 before or after 110? nemo sciet.
"Pavel - When did this countdown begin?"
I don't even know if the item is authentic, as I tried to point out. I can't find a corroborating source.
Nick Taleb is a lucky fool: the other side of Larry Kudlow. Charlie Rose, as usual provides us with twenty minutes of frippery and flummery. Don't trust people who steeple. I was hoping the "thud" was Rose's brain falling out of his backside onto the floor.
Trying to out-Roubini Roubini.
Ok, let me say this in a simpler language.
satan | 12.07.08 - 3:51 pm | #
Thanks, because the problem is clearly that we are simpletons and not merely people who don't agree with everything Taleb says.
He is telling you, obliquely, that most of the speculative assumptions of western thinking are BS. Most of your beliefs about the future are therefore worthless. He is calling out something that I have often mentioned- Hubris.
satan | 12.07.08 - 3:51 pm | #
Pot, meet kettle, and what makes you think I share "speculative assumptions of western thinking"?
He is also pointing out that some of the basic assumptions and behaviors of western capitalism will have to change if we want a functional society. Some of you might yammer about how human behavior never changes and status quo. Some of you believe that we go back to GD1 or even medievial times. I predict that given the nature and spread of technology + demography- the present course of events will lead us to a place where we won't have much of a species left.
satan | 12.07.08 - 3:51 pm | #
Straw-man all the way. I'm anti-capitalist, for example, and don't believe any of these things about human behavior you ascribe.
For those interested in "printing money", this shows additions to monetary base.
Graph: Board of Governors Monetary Base, Adjusted for Changes in Reserve Requirements (BOGAMBNS) - FRED - St. Louis Fed
But additions are getting minimal traction.
Graph: MZM Money Stock (MZMNS) - FRED - St. Louis Fed
When the velocity of money stops falling, then inflation should kick in. If we have destroyed our production and distribution infrastructure during the deflation caused by the dropping velocity of money and credit destruction phase, the inflation phase will be magnified.
Plan on getting whipsawed by deflation and then inflation.
This guy's a walking contradiction. He believes in "random walk theory" of markets and yet also makes predictions about said markets.
I believe market analysis and forecasting are legitimate practices, however timing of trend changes must be given lenience depending on the scale; in other words, if you're making a macro economic prediction, or if you're forecasting the trend of a stock index from a monthly basis, then your timing deserves a larger error margin than if you're discussing some micro event or looking at a stock chart on an hourly basis.
But the change in both economic and market trends can be forecast correctly, with some room for error, and Taleb is plain wrong in assuming otherwise.
Anonymous | 12.07.08 - 4:02 pm |
was me.
L.A. Gun owners trading for food in record numbers..
Yahoo! 404 - Page Not Found
Lot's of guns in L.A.
Roses too!
How many years did it take the South to recover their Wealth after the Civil War?
Spineless will hide and watch how long it takes to recover the wealth that has been looted by the US Treasury, in the name of Free Market's.
The 2 hand grenades were impressive!
Read the comments concerning production and consumption. I am in total agreement. Dwindling supply versus increased demand is going to make a big comeback. After Christmas sales will become going out of business sales.
Stock up on anything you think will be useful in times of trouble. Store shelves will be getting bare and prices will go up.
true, but the timing was. who knows if the t-bond futures will hit 150 before or after 110? nemo sciet.
bgates | 12.07.08 - 3:56 pm | #
This is why Taleb is a finance capitalist speaking to finance capitalists. If all you care about is predicting short-term moves in markets to make money, then Taleb is correct, though he's not really saying much that is new, and his audience should be fools like Robert Rubin and Phil Gramm.
The thing that I think that people fail to notice about how Obama is handling things are twofold:
1: transparency. As of now they are going out of their way for folks to dig into discussions with full disclosure.
2: deliberative politics. I first read about the subject 25 years ago, but this presidency is the first that is actively pursuing it beyond Clinton's antediluvian triangulation. Obama isn't driving policy thru an ideological prism, he's using focus groups to make sure policies are palatible to the majority with the understanding of difficulty.
Can someone in simple language explain to me Keynes views ?
No one can, because they aren't simple. I've been reading Krugman's blog to get the flavor of them.
Fleckenstein closed his bear fund this past week. Jus sayin'
I think he's about 1 year too early...
RE: Cranky
Thanks for the link:
YouTube - Atheists and the Stock Market - Nassim Nicholas Taleb
I find it interesting, and true.
I get the impression that what Taleb is trying to say is that there is NO way to model for every unforeseen event.
There is more on this in the book of his that nobody reads - "Dynamic Hedging". A book by an options trader for options traders, written before he took on his current public persona. It has math in it, too, though some of it is a bit dated now.
Basically, he argues that it's fine to use Black-Scholes or any of its many derivatives for day to day stuff. No problem - you need models and it's no more flawed than any other model. But in addition to that, stress-test your portfolio against the six-sigma events and be sure you can live to fight another day. It's not about predicting when the next 40%-in-two-months move will happen, it's about knowing for sure that you'll survive it when it does.
As you point out, this leads directly to deleveraging, which is constantly at odds with the desire to maximize short term profits.
So it seems to me, the way to start fixing the system, is to stop over-weighting the financial rewards for the short term. There are lots of way to do that, in theory, but I have no idea how one gets political buy-in short of a semi-revolution in the streets.
The only important thing to notice in the current market is that - for the time being - it cannot be predicted. Hedge funds still need to unwind; the new administration offers hope for recovery; the market is in a bottoming process.
The important thing to notice is that [ if you do not have inside information ] you are a fool to put any new money into the market.
"Can someone in simple language explain to me Keynes views ?"
JMK was a interventionist solipsist.
"
So it seems to me, the way to start fixing the system, is to stop over-weighting the financial rewards for the short term. There are lots of way to do that, in theory, but I have no idea how one gets political buy-in short of a semi-revolution in the streets."
I believe that we may get there through another Depression. Seems like that's the only way changes are forced into the system.
comrade artichoke | 3:45 pm - Exactly right. Poor eyesight is worse than 20/20 but is still much better than complete blindness. So much for the deep insight
if you're forecasting the trend of a stock index from a monthly basis, then your timing deserves a larger error margin than if you're discussing some micro event or looking at a stock chart on an hourly basis.
This is exactly backwards. On short time frames markets hit more six-sigma events than on long time frames. This has been quantified to death in all kinds of literature and is the reason volatility surface has the shape it does.
Money is a model of reality. Right now, people still believe in the model over reality because it's simpler and more pleasant.
The model has been purposely debased by the credit cycle (and manipulators of money and perception) to motivate people to invest time and effort that they can't recover.
I doubt if anything is fixable until people think in terms of goods & services instead of "money" and paper instruments.
let me be illustrate my points with a few examples.
I can go on.. My point is that past performance is not a good predictor of future returns. While many of you have read this diclaimer, most see it as just another example of legal weasel wordplay.
Anonymous writes:
"When the velocity of money stops falling, then inflation should kick in. If we have destroyed our production and distribution infrastructure during the deflation caused by the dropping velocity of money and credit destruction phase, the inflation phase will be magnified.
Plan on getting whipsawed by deflation and then inflation."
Anyone with suggestions on early indicators of this finally occuring (velocity bottoms, inflation kicks in). Any predictions on how far away we are, and supporting rationale? WAGs also welcome.
Any predictions on how far away we are, and supporting rationale?
I find it ironic to have this question in the same thread as the discussion about black swans and Taleb. Not that it isn't a very important question
MrM writes:
"Poor eyesight is worse than 20/20 but is still much better than complete blindness."
I believe the adage you were going for is "In the valley of the blind, the one eyed man is king". A personal favorite.
"I doubt if anything is fixable until people think in terms of goods & services instead of "money" and paper instruments."
commodity volatility makes this a confusing lesso
Satan, are you purposely choosing poor examples to make us chuckle?
How many major disasters has outsourcing caused?
[Apple] was the way to go. How did that work out?
.
Here's a denial via today's The Hindu"
"Rice said she stressed during her visit to Pakistan last week how important it was for Islamabad to act quickly but denied there was a 48-hour deadline to take action."
The Hindu News Update Service
" Any predictions on how far away we are, and supporting rationale?"
1998 lows in crude and 1987 lows in equities might be a signal that most of the froth in our economy is gone. same, i s'pose, with djia and an ounce of shiny yellow stuff.
This guy seems to be a bit overly optimistic--it might take many months into '09 to see the 'real' collapse.
As I am a product of our immediate gratification society, I want collapse before Santa rides. Can you imagine millions of US kids totally pissed at Santa for not delivering the goods?
Today I have started to shift some of my long-term goals. Farming is too much work, and I am shifting toward a hunter/gatherer model. This model will involve a degree of intentional agriculture, however (stocking fish, introducing wild game in some areas, etc.)
If Taleb had instead started his black swan 'way out of the money' put-buying in Dec 1987, he would be a broke nobody still to this day.
Instead, he got the luck of the draw by using this plan starting in early 1987. Now he looks like a genius.
Luck does not a genius make.
Using his plan starting in Jun 2006 would have broke you before you could actually swing a profit.
Beware of the man who claims there are no easy answers, except for his.
Implications of the union backed sit in at the Republic Windows and Doors plant are tremendous.
-Bad PR for the bank bailout.
-Unions leading the fight against social injustice.
-Seizing of assets by the workers.
-Possible escalation of force becoming widespread.
-Hispanic workers leading the way for reform through nonviolent protest.
Add in an immigration friendly administration coupled with the potential amnesty program for illegal immigrants and you have given the unions a large membership gift.
Let me be clear that I am against illegal immigration but support the amnesty program. Get everyone here illegally on the tax rolls and then start cracking down on any business hiring illegal aliens. I am also pro-union.
""We're going to stay here until we win justice," said Blanca Funes, 55, of Chicago, after occupying the building for several hours. Speaking in Spanish, Funes said she fears losing her home without the wages she feels she's owed. A 13-year employee of Republic, she estimated her family can make do for three months without her paycheck. Most of the factory's workers are Hispanic."
Yahoo! 404 - Page Not Found
The more i read these comments the more optimistic i get. I've been bearish for 2 years and massively short for most of that period. I read this blog regularly and am involved with several businesses in a variety of industries. It seems clear to me that the bearish opinions expressed in these comments are now bordering more on greed and herd mentality than anything else. I have covered all my short positions in the past few weeks and am now 100% in cash (US dollars) other than equities of the companies i am involved with which represent option value more than anything else. When i see Roubini referred to as an "optimist" i laugh. I've followed Roubini for a long time and for 99% of that period people have called him an incredible pessimist - so now that his prognostications have come true, people in these comments call him an optimist. Thats funny. He was simply right. I think that those that call him an optimist will do just about as well as those that called him a pessimist - they will both ultimately be buried. I dont know if Roubini will be exactly right, but my guess is that he will be much closer to reality than those that call him a pessimist or optimist. Business is very bad - I know first hand and there's no doubt about it. That being said, the businesses i am involved with started preparing for this over a year ago - the cost reductions have occured and are continuing - however, for the first time we are seeing competitors problems benefit us in a big way - actually, quicker and to a greater degree than i've ever seen before. The constraint of capital is creating huge opportunities for those that have it. Also, we have had the ability to actually expand the credit for many of our businesses in the past couple months because we did not drink the kool-aid and overleverage in the past few years. The credit is more expensive, but the margins on the business opportunites are 2-3x as large as they used to be. I have no doubt Q4 and Q1 will be absolutely awful and i doubt there will be much of a bounceback in the 2nd half of 2009. However, i expect we'll see improvement in 2010. I have learned that over the passt 4 decades that the stock market is a rigged game and rigged to go up as is the "economy" - and you cant fight city hall. I fully expect that world governments to give citizens money if they need to. Inflation will not be a concern - instead it will be desired. We will see if that is needed - I suspect it will be in some form (most likely through massive tax cuts and huge government stimuli). When the world central banks dont care about inflation (which they wont if the unwind gets much worse) then they cannot be stopped from dropping money from helicopters globally. Its amazing, but the deflationist have become the herd as evidenced by the comments here and the recent movements in the 10 year treasury. I have no idea where the market or economy is going - 18 months ago I had a ton of conviction. In my mind we are at a point of inflection now - but unlike before, the govts of the world see massive risk so they will err on the side of being overly stimulative and inflationary. That was not the case 2 years ago despite what i'm sure all the ultra-bears think. Be prepared for money to be "given away" by governments on a global basis - the world will inflate their way out of this - it will be like a global currency revaluation - so parody among currencies will remain, but asset values will inlfate allowing the world to deleverage. Inlfation is awesome for returns in LBOs allowing those businesses to deleverage quickly - the same can be said for the global economy.
Now, at the end of all of this, the world's governments balance sheets will have massive leverage - but everyone will be in that place - so it will be a problem to solve for another day...
We will not have systematic failure and the global economy will not be destroyed. There will be no need for canned goods and shotguns - people will just need to suck it up for a couple years.
We've become pretty soft - and everyone seems more concerned with being "right" than seeking the truth. No one knows what is going to happen, but to hear many call Roubini an optimist makes me realize that the ultra-bears are as buried in their own beliefs as the ultra-bulls were. We've had almost a 50% drop in the market and a severe recession and the ultra-bears cry when we have a 2% rally in the markets and still blame the alleged PPT.... It hilarious to read the comments and whining when that happens.
Well, it all reminds me of the ultra-bulls expecting 10+% returns every year as if they were entitled to it. No one is entitled to anything. It seems to me like its been pretty easy to make money on the short side for the past 6 months - now, its seems that a sense of entitlement is building in the bears - like, "hey, i was right! i am right! look at me, i'm right! this market is going to 0! we're going to have systematic failure! the PPT is responsible for every uptick in the market! you'll be sorry! i'm right! i'm right! look at me!"
Well, like many here i WAS right, but thats history and i took my winnings and went to the bank (or should i say US treasuries). I dont know where we are going from here, but i see far more risk going short than long. You cant fight city hall, and city hall could give a damn if you're right - they want their citizens to be happy, not just the perma-bears. I'm not going long, but i find the ultra-bearishness i read here as comedic as Kudlow, Cramer and NAR during the bubble years. I expect that the greedy bears will eventually lose most of their net worths just as the greedy bulls did.
Good luck and be careful because many on this sight are very close to starting to believe their own bullsh-t.
This is not a time to put new money into the market - in either direction -
This is a time to stand back and watch - attentively.
commodity volatility makes this a confusing lesson
I've done technical trend analysis using keywords since 1993. Up until 2000 or so, nobody else was explicitly acting on that sort of information. But now there are many sites which do the same thing, so I use them now instead of my home-grown engine -
I use Indeed.com often.
adobe flex, silverlight Job Trends | Indeed.com
That gives an idea of how Adobe's next generation UI is doing against Microsoft's. As you can see, Microsoft is still trailing.
But I think what's happened is that widespread observance of the trend creates a positive feedback loop.
One of the mysteries to me is what counter-balancing forces are there?
I know they exist but the best I can come up with is "diversity", i.e. certain products fill certain niches more effectively than others so overall trend is a minor factor.
Anyway, you used to be able to make general stock observations from keyword analysis. Most people don't understand how branded the world is (I didn't) and keywords DO mean something.
http://www.realmeme.com/Main/miner/investment/SEBLDejanews.png
That's a keyword count versus stock price chart. The correlation is very high, probably over 90%. I think there' used to be a tradeable delay but since 2000 it's been arbitraged away.
Here's an earlier chart for Palladim which unfortunately I discovered after the fact -
http://www.realmeme.com/Main/miner/investment/palladiumDejanews.png
Notice that keyword usage precedes price by almost two years. I've seen similar changes in the charts since 2000 which tells me that large-scale data mining began about then, and the time delay was abitraged away.
I think it's still possible to mine out value in more complex patterns but it's increasinly complex and convoluted.
Trenches,
Disagree on many fronts. You have a misguided notion that the government can fix this mess. It can't. You're just a contrarian -- you don't have any fundamental opinion of where this is going.
I'll take out puts on your optimism.
.
bearly writes:
Fleckenstein closed his bear fund this past week. Jus sayin'
Fleck said it was too stressful, not that it was unprofitable.
In_the_trenches | 12.07.08 - 4:32 pm |
NICE!
I Believe CR and Krugman:
The Fed "prints money" when it increases it liabilities (which are, t0 oversimplify, the green pieces of paper in our wallets and purses, and the balances in the reserve accounts that banks hold with the Fed). As comrade artichoke wrote above, the Fed started doing this in a very big way starting in September.
By the way, Krugman himself agrees:
Was the Great Depression a monetary phenomenon? - Paul Krugman Blog - NYTimes.com
The original source from which people are drawing this conclusion is the Fed's own weekly balance sheet filings:
FRB: H.4.1 Release--Factors Affecting Reserve Balances--December 3, 2009
Check out the year-over-year comparisions in the right most columns of Table H.4.1. Then compare with what normally happens over the course of a year in the Fed balance sheet by looking at
FRB: H.4.1 Release--Factors Affecting Reserve Balances--May 31, 2007
"Here's an earlier chart for Palladim"
Sadly, that's a good example of great info not being tradeable. try to find physical palladium within 20% of bid!
trying to exploit drift in the new 3x funds should keep the arbitrage monkeys busy until the holidays at least.
"One of the mysteries to me is what counter-balancing forces are there?"
A glimpse of the future? Maybe that is the "Black Swan". Balance needs to be restored and right now the teeter totter has a 200lb fat kid(USA) holding the skinny kid off the ground.
...after all the "wash is run thru the machines", only some will realize that the 300mil customers we used to be won't be nearly so gullible, reactive, and downright stupid nor ignorant.
at the end of the complete interview, Talebs surprised me by syaing he was impressed with what Paulson had accomplished re: deleveraging.
Why did that make me feel stupid?
Anybody...?
In_the_trenches | 12.07.08 - 4:32 pm |
I don't see an inflection point, but I do see a turning point.
Far off topic, but our national descent into Peronism makes me seek out the classics:
YouTube - A New Argentina - Buenos Aires
it will be like a global currency revaluation - so parody among currencies will remain,
I'm sure you meant "parity", but it reads well either way
New thread alert
We've had almost a 50% drop in the market and a severe recession
Japan had a greater drop despite massive government intervention and that was long before the derivatives bubble.
they want their citizens to be happy
I would be quite happy if somebody somehow managed to fix this mess but the fundamental problems are still in place. I suggest that YOU are the one focused on markets and greed. I have no vested interest in any US paper, either short or long.
I don't see that anything has been "fixed" by a stock market decline.
Fleck said it was too stressful, not that it was unprofitable.
I've now seen the performance numbers - Fleck's fund was indeed unprofitable - both for the life of the fund and for pretty much every 3 year window during that time.
The dude has awesome hair, though.
OMG. That's just horrible. WTF gives McCain the right to be over there saying anything?!
Cynical Dude | 12.07.08 - 2:43 pm | #
I dunno...maybe the same thing that gives Jesse Jackson the right to interject himself into international politics? At least McCain has a fairly high standing in the US government.
he once said atheists caused more wars than religious people because of nationalism.
Refresh my memory, what religions were Hitler, Stalin, Mao, Pol Pot and Castro?
Southern Baptists as I recall?
"Thud". As in Terry Pratchett's novel???
.
In_the_trenches | 12.07.08 - 4:32 pm
I don't think that we disagree. You and your companies have battened down the hatches for the deflationary storm. If they are lucky, they might survive to benefit from the demise of their competition during the inflationary upswing to follow.
Too bad Dr. Rice has no credibility left when it comes to "irrefutable evidence."
Too bad that every Democrat in congress saw the same evidence she saw, and 98% of them shared her conclusions.
Ream me some more Hank.
in_the_trenches - Good to hear a new, thoughtful voice. Don't be a stranger.
"No one knows what is going to happen..."
That's one prediction I can accept without reservation.
Refresh my memory, what religions were Hitler, Stalin, Mao, Pol Pot and Castro?
See my point above. They all killed their own nationals, and with the exception of Hitler, didn't start wars so much outside their borders. We're not counting revolutions are we?
Take a bow satan. I've always wondered who caused everyone to buy that wintel crap.
When the IBM PC came out in 1981, it was criticized for having a poor non-propietary architecture with an OS from an emerging company, and parts made in taiwan. The apple route was the way to go. How did that work out?
Work out for who, the benighted who bought IBM clones and suffered with an inferior operating system and inferior hardware for 30 years? satan this was one of your most evil deeds ever.
Quality doesn't always equal popularity.
sdtfs, isn't the more important point that correlation does not equal causation? That's the one I'd draw as a cautious non-believer.
Heard a guy at Church this AM speaking on friend that was told to pick up extra shifts...at reduced pay. The Co. refuses to hire new workers and tells currently employed to work or else. These extra shifts used to pay time and 1/2. Coming down the tracks...and it aint lookin' back.
That's the one I'd draw as a cautious non-believer.
That's why you're going to hell. If God doesn't like wars, why is he always on one or both sides?
Well, after that boston write up I am afraid I will have to stop posting as much.
Any fame would be detrimental to my preference to live my life out of spotlight, and quite frankly might be detrimental to my continued employment.
Quite frankly, it has been extremely fun, and sobering at times to participate in this blog, but unfortunately as conditions worsen the messengers will be blamed for the message.
CR, I will comment from time to time, but this is getting too big and too well known.
Thank you! One and all, thank you!
Someday this war's gonna end...
kidbuck - Hitler was a Catholic. Vermaht Army belts had "Gott Mit uns" engraved on buckles. Nazi Germany was not an atheist country.
"They all killed their own nationals"
Stalin killed only his own nationals? You are very much mistaken.
On Stalin:
THE ONLY SIGN OF LIFE
When Stalin died
No one at the station came to greet him
The platform deserted, the green train dropped him off
In the midst of a dry plain, scrub and yellow dust
But nothing else
Where were his aides, his bodyguards?
Had he descended solo?
The long train was gone
And Stalin looked around.
Stationmaster!
No one answered, and the earthly shadows did not move
It was late in the afternoon
And there was no long dry wind to blow
Over the flat scrub plain -
Of Kazakhstan?
Who is there?
Inside the heavy door he found a ticket counter
But when he peered across the board he saw
A sun bar on the wall, diagonal
But nothing, no one there
Between himself and that unyielding stripe
Empty. No one has come out to greet me.
He went looking for the lavatory
To wash his hands and face
But when he turned the faucets only dust came out
A puff, a sigh, and that a little only -
He gazed up to the speckled mirror, saw his own pale face
Unreadable expression
Yet perhaps some puzzlement?
It was the only sign of life
So many people died
But have they all died now?
\t\t\t\tPavel
\t\t\t\tMarch 2, 2008
Joe Klein's conscience wrote:
Watch .. it will now become fashionable to say Roubini is an optimist .. especially if the Republicans in the Senate try to obstruct everything
You mean like the democrats (copperheads) have done for a good part of the last century or maybe you believe we should have what the good ole marxists called "democratic centalism". I didn't vote for a dictatorship.
"When Taleb says "quickly", he doesn't mean "soon". He means that when it starts happening, it will be like cresting that first peak on a roller coaster."
Cynical Dude | 12.07.08 - 2:23 pm | #
Inflation may rise up and bite us all in the a** in some way we'll never see coming: a total credit freeze causes demands for COD payment, shortages spread, and suppliers not knowing when or how they will rebuild inventory, decide to double their prices.
Or some morning the currencies open off the graph.
I don't think an unstable, chaotic credit collapse will have a scholastic, textbook solution or conclusion. Reflate that Ben.
Pavel - Stalin's main focus was on maintaining terror within USSR boundaries. Yes, there were purges and repression in Eastern Europe, but not even close to what happened in the USSR in the 30's and 40's. Stalin did not set out to annihilate other nations, like Hitler.
For the reference - I am not defending Stalin, I lost some of my family in the purges.
"Hitler was a Catholic"
Hitler said he would (in so many words) destroy the Catholic Church after the war.
Anyone who has been baptized into the Church is a Catholic. What they do with the rest of their lives may not have anything to do with living a Catholic life.
Germany was not yet an atheist country. Nazi Germany was functionally atheist, with slatherings of half-rancid, neo-romantic teutonism.
"Pavel - Stalin's main focus was on maintaining terror within USSR boundaries. "
A multi-ethnic state. Ask the Baltic people, the people of the Caucasus, etc. if Stalin killed and persecuted only Russians.
Anyway, why stick up for atheist mass murderers? Do you think Hitler and Stalin were what people usually think of as believers?
What, something like one third the Ukrainians died. Technically within the USSR but definitely not Russian.
Pavel - Of course Stalin did not persecute only Russians or only Jews. He persecuted all nationalities who happened to live within boundaries of his domain. I also do not want to go into crusades etc.
My point is that one cannot claim that atheism or religion is more prone to mass killings than its opposite.
"trotskylives"
Did you send him a card for his hundred and thirtieth birthday?
"My point is that one cannot claim that atheism or religion is more prone to mass killings than its opposite."
Atheism's record in the last century, whenever it took power over the state, was one of mass murder. The USSR, Nazi Germany, China, Cambodia.
The only modern example I can think of on the religious side is Croatia. I mass murderous intolerance and ruthless amorality look at atheist states.
It is nice to have an OT chat on a zombie thread
Speaking of which - I strongly suspect Trotsky would have exceeded Stalin in mass terror. He put as little value on human life but was much better at organization issues. He would have installed a much more effective and efficient Nazi-style mass production of death.
For mass murderous intolerance and ruthless amorality look at atheist states.
So, Pavel - was Nazi Germany an atheist or Christian state?
"So, Pavel - was Nazi Germany an atheist or Christian state?"
Atheist. The country was not yet entirely atheist. The ruling political structure was godless. Or do you think they celebrated High Mass at Berchtesgaden, and adored the Blessed Sacrament at Gestapo headquarters?
Spain during the times of Inquisition - how tolerant was it? How tolerant is Saudi Arabia or Pakistan?
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Adolf_Hitler's_religious_beliefs
By this analogy Canada or Denmark are atheist states, who are pretty tolerant, I should say
"Spain during the times of Inquisition - how tolerant was it?"
You compare 16th century Spain with 20th century Nazi Germany? Interesting.
As for the Islamic states - ask a Muslim to defend them - or not. There's a debate going on among Catholic bloggers about whether or not to count them as fraternal believers.
What I know for sure is that whenever doctrinaire atheists take state power it's bad news for everyone else.
Try the United States for countries with Christian leaders who have killed many.
Or is the US an atheist country ?
It's interesting how people forget the slaughter we perpetrated in Vietnam.
"By this analogy Canada or Denmark"
Have you ever lived in a police state? Denmark? That powerhouse?
Is atheism in the Danish constitution? A state secular cult? Are there institutes and mass organizations promoting atheism in Denmark? It might be coming to Canada, though, if they can put down their beer long enough.
What I know for sure is that whenever doctrinaire atheists take state power it's bad news for everyone else.
How about this:
What I know for sure is that whenever doctrinaire religious groups take state power it's bad news for everyone else.
Now we introduce the concept of time 20th century religious states vs 16th century states.
I would argue that both religion and and atheism by themselves are neither precondition for state terror nor a guarantee against it.
Given the fact that many established monotheistic religions assume only they have the ultimate truth, I would rather live in an a-theist state, everything else being equal - the state which is completely separated from any religion (and that allows religous practices, of course).
"Or is the US an atheist country ?"
It's politically secular. Haven't you heard recently that it is?
Have you ever lived in a police state? Denmark? That powerhouse?
Not sure about your question, Pavel.
I am not sure about the point you are making, sorry
"I would rather live in an a-theist state, everything else being equal "
Best wishes, as your society falls apart morally and people stop reproducing themselves.
Pavel, It seems to me that you define an atheist country as a country that prohibits any religious. If so, then of course this is a police country, which can be up to no good only
On the other hand, I do not supposed you define a religious country as a country where only one religion is allowed, but other religions and atheism are prohibited. Is this right?
"- Have I lived in a police state? Yes, I grew up in the USSR"
Soviet atheism worked out so well, didn't it? It made everyone so happy.
Are you living there now?
No, I moved to Canada and then the US a while ago, but I go back often.
Frankly, I would argue the communism was the state religion of the USSR, with its dogmas, rituals, saints, etc. And if you think about its stated values and goals, it was a decent religion.
"Pavel, It seems to me that you define an atheist country as a country that prohibits any religious."
I'm defining an atheist country as one in which the prevailing ideology is atheism. Nazi Germany. China since 1947. We know the other examples.
There isn't enough power in Denmark to do serious harm to anyone, even if the Danes gave a rap about metaphysics and religion.
Are you really a former Soviet citizen? From where?
I grew up in Minsk, Belarus, My family still lives there. I went to Moscow State U.
"Frankly, I would argue the communism was the state religion of the USSR, with its dogmas, rituals, saints, etc. And if you think about its stated values and goals, it was a decent religion."
A romantic interpretation, but without a belief in a transcendent power what you have is a secular cult, not a religion.
This is probably going to develop into a discussion of sunsets with a color-blind person. I hope this isn't the case, but you may have to wait until your deathbed until you understand what religious faith is about.
Gramsci did.
Btw, Pavel - what is your position vis-a-vis Israel (obviously, a very religious country) and its foreign policy? South Africa during apartheid (a Christian ruling minority) and its domestic policy?
I am not trying to pick up a fight, but am genuinely interested in your views, without annoying other CR-zens with OT posts
"I grew up in Minsk, Belarus"
I've been there.
you may have to wait until your deathbed until you understand what religious faith is about.
This is what my Mom keeps telling me
I guess I'll have to wait the
Btw, Pavel - what is your position vis-a-vis Israel (obviously, a very religious country)
From what I understand there are some very religious people in that country, but as a whole it isn't particularly religious - though the religious parties heft a lot of weight out of proportion to their numbers.
"This is what my Mom keeps telling me
I guess I'll have to wait then"
At least you know that there may be something you don't yet understand. : )
Well, if Israel is not a particularly religious country, then I guess no country is.
At least you know that there may be something you don't yet understand. : )
And vice versa - there may be something you only think (or believe) you understand
Pavel - nice chatting with you, but I am afraid I have to step out for some time. I will see you around!
"And vice versa - there may be something you only think (or believe) you understand"
I'm talking about experience, and so do many other people.
Excuse me, but the original question was whether atheists cause more wars. And the point I was trying to make was: people cause wars, not religion or lack of it.
"And the point I was trying to make was: people cause wars, not religion or lack of it."
That's an abstract point. Powerful, doctrinally atheist states have killed a lot of people over the past century, and they've done it for reasons that are essentially irrational, amoral and fanatical.
So I guess all other wars are better for being rational, moral, and reasonable?
I am back.
I think there are no truly religious states in Pavel's sense, even if Israel does not qualify.
Therefore all states are more or less atheistic and therefore all wars are waged only by atheistic states.
Religious state is an abstract ideal.
Pavel - please correct me if I misinterpreted your view.
"Therefore all states are more or less atheistic and therefore all wars are waged only by atheistic states."
I'd rather say that modern Catholic thinking about war is that it is extremely rarely justified, must be defensive, proportionate etc. I don't know about the positions of other religious confessions.
I really do have nothing against non-believers on a personal level. On the contrary, there's someone I used to know in Moscow who might even qualify as a saint, if she only knew it. An exceptionally sweet, self-giving person.
She had some interesting things to say about Fr. Alexandr Men, btw. Do you know about him?
Goodness is not limited to believers. But I think that believers can give a better account of where goodness comes from.
Hey, are you keeping a "who knew, who tried to warn, who was an ostrich" collection anywhere?
Here's one (a caustic book review of a book predicting this problem would happen again -- so the review goes in the ostrich bin and the author in the "tried to warn" bin):
JSTOR: The Journal of Finance, Vol. 48, No. 4 (Sep., 1993), pp. 1553-1556
"So I guess all other wars are better for being rational, moral, and reasonable?"
Not at all, War is madness, even justifiable defensive war. I just don't want to let atheists get away with saying that they're rational and religious people are irrational. I'm stubborn that way. : )
Yes, I know of A. Men. He was a very very good and kind man.
I respectfully disagree that believers can give a better account of where goodness comes from .
Believers have to rely to a higher authority to explain how they ought to behave. Note that the religious interpretation of what is right/wrong has changed dramatically over the centuries.
Non-believers rely on what they think is right. Of course, their views will change over time as the humankind changes.
Hank - I am afraid this thread has totally diverged from the original topic. Sorry.
As for states being essentially atheistic or not - the proposition is probably not relevant to what states are, especially modern states. Modern states are self-perpetuating bureaucratic organisms with political blood circulating through their organizational veins. Or something. This gets confusing. : )