Oil Prices: Cliff Diving

in

Crap. I guess this means that oil prices are about to spike again.

Where's the monkey?

anything on Shaun Donovan? I know he was a researcher at Harvard's Center for Housing Studies.

At least we don't have to burn the furniture to keep warm this winter and Kudlow's got an outside chance of seeing his gulf war prediction of $25 bbl come true.

"...who had been one of the market's biggest bulls this year, predicting that crude could hit $200 a barrel, has slashed his 2009 forecast to $45, blaming “incredibly bad predicting abilities”

The OECD (non-OPEC) countries experience higher decline rates in their existing production than the OPEC countries do, and new production is higher cost in both capital expenditure and operating expense. New projects are getting shelved right and left in the industry right now, from Canadian oilsands production that won't be happening to deepwater conventional oil...so production will be reduced by underinvestment, which will tee up the next price run-up when the global economy starts to rev up in 201?.

This illustrates nicely the structural element of oil price cycles, due to the extensive lags from discovery to production, on the order of ten years. For the large deepwater discoveries, irreversible multi-billion dollar investment decisions need to be made for a project that won't go into production for years, and then will experience a producing life of fifteen to twenty years (typically much shorter in the US GoM). So prices run up, exploration kicks up, discoveries are made (smaller over time in any given province as the big bumps get drilled first), marginal production onshore is quickly ramped, and eventually the big projects come online leading to oversupply and price declines...add in OPEC supply constraints of variable effectiveness along with supply and demand shocks plus the excessive finacialization of crude futures markets (as part of the entire commodity complex) and the complexity of crude price determination begins to emerge.

One analyst on CNBC said oil could crash to $10 next year.

Daily Kos: State of the Nation 

Driving less with cheaper gas--why do we "need" more credit again?

CR: "it is difficult for some countries to cut production when their expenditures are $50 per barrel and oil prices are in the mid $40!"

Krugman logic says they should solve their lower-income problem by increasing their spending to $100 per barrel.

Wrong Link! Here it is

Video - CNBC.com

deepsouthdoug:
no that was the correct link.im going to call school board monday and see if they can use help with school lunchs or breakfasts.
i saw it when i was over at kos and yours meant twice. so time to do something or at least a little something.

Comment relates to previous thread, which is, or will be shortly, dead.

More than a year ago, with my closing business suddenly dead, and I heard Countrywide had a quarter trillion in REOs, and they had 20% of the country's mtges, I did some back of the envelop--not even that really--mental estimates, and came up with losses of 1/2 a trill to a trill and a 1/2, and said to myself that the banks couldn't take thoses losses. And I 3/4ths got out of the stock mkt.

I'm not so smart.

I wasn't blogging then. Hadn't heard the words troll or snark except for Harry Potter and Lewis Carroll.

I can't do those complicated equations.

So why could I come to these conclusions and the (then) gurus not?

I guess if you have a stake in what's going on, you have a motive not to perceive reality.

If oil even drops to $30/bbl you will find me curled into the fetal position sucking my thumb chanting "75% of the people kept their jobs during GD1."

I've been officially scared for a bit. I now think there is a 40% chance of a Depression. Sad (I like to do probabilities... a quirk of mine.)

If it hits $10/bbl... I'm buying oil futures! Wink Heck, I'll buy them earlier.

Got Popcorn?
Neil

energycon,

So what you're saying is, the vast of oil price prognosticators have no idea what they're talking about? That seems about right.

Based on what you said, you're expecting that prices will remain somewhat depressed for the time being, but when things finally recover we'll get the double whammy of increased demand and a significant decrease in available supply. Sorry to paraphrase your post - just no real experience with the oil cycles and I want to make sure I am getting it right.

Given the probable long lead times (and inevitable false starts) in bringing up alt energy sources, my initial reaction is that there will be another very, very bad supply crunch in the next decade. However, if prices stay down for the next couple of years, what will countries like Venezuela do? Chavez is walking a tightrope that's fraying at both ends unless oil prices come back up soon.

"...who had been one of the market's biggest bulls this year, predicting that crude could hit $200 a barrel, has slashed his 2009 forecast to $45, blaming “incredibly bad predicting abilities”
McWoozy | 12.13.08 - 9:39 am | #

Bad spice can lead to bad predictions. I know firsthand.

At last - a chart that does'nt want to make me hide under the bed -

Is officially scared worse than scared?

The spice must flow.

But watch out for the worms.

Liz,

It's better to be officially scared - you don't have to wear the tin foil hat in public while it lasts.

Lawyerliz - the numbers were all calculable. The ponzi hedge was what the playas were counting on seeing them through.

Until it couldn't, didn't, and won't.

Black Monday Bonfire of the Hedgies coming...

C

hmm Emperor Shadam is dead, does our Georgie really think he is Paul Atreides?

Thirty dollar oil means goodbye Canada. Certain places, like the Great White North, have been riding the commodities rollercoaster to increased state and local revenue. Yank out the oil and there is no economic viability. Texas is already feeling the pinch.

Just wanted to clarify. My smarmy first post was aimed at Arjun Murti's fearless predictions, not CRs.

Given the probable long lead times (and inevitable false starts) in bringing up alt energy sources, my initial reaction is that there will be another very, very bad supply crunch in the next decade.

Probably sooner.

All the 'we need energy independence ... blah blah' political rhetoric is dead. Nothing will be done to get off oil, things will pick up, boom ... $200+ oil.

2 years.

.

citizen energyecon,

Even though all the things you cite play a role, I nevertheless believe that oil prices will be determined by policy decisions, and the principle driver of policy being the Saudi Royal family.

The Saudi Royals not only determine Saudi Arabia's policy, but exert great influence over the policy decisions of other countries as well, including the United States.

Even though the U.S. could rob the Royals of their inordinate influence by curtailing oil imports through a combination of tariffs, quotas or taxes on gasoline consumption, I don't see this happening. This would be perceived as a self-inflicted wound to our "American lifestyle."

Unfortunately, there are still those in the U.S. who believe they can continue to enjoy the benefits of cheap oil. The reason for this probably lays in the hubris, even self-deception, that attends leading world economic power status.

However, that economic power seems to be eluding us, like sand falling through our fingers.

Consumer demand, state energy policies, geopolitical concerns and an opaque oil trade. I think people can be expert in oil trading, but I don't think anyone can really predict pricing. Just too many elements.

Many in wall st. and banks deserve the gom jabbar test.

A little accountability this morning. Here were Thursday night comments predicting a black Friday on news of the auto bailout collapse:

PeakVT writes: 
Holy Mother of Glod.

Strap in everybody. This sucker is going down.
PeakVT | 12.11.08 - 11:09 pm

mp writes: 
CONJURE'S GLOBAL DEPRESSION CLOCK

The time is now--

11:59:48

Pavel Chichikov writes: 
"People making too much out of this."

I don't think so.

crispy&cole writes: 
Thats all folks...Senators are going home...tommorow will be ugly...

Maybe they can replace GM from the DOW to tonight to ease the pain?
crispy&cole | Homepage | 12.11.08 - 11:55 pm | #

mmckinl writes: 
HELLO GD2 ...!

Check those futures ...

I love the smell of napalm in the morning ...

We are in deep caca dodo ...
mmckinl | 12.12.08 - 12:14 am | #

Comrade Scared Shitless writes: 
Bloomberg TV absolutely Sucks! They aren't even mentioning the collapse taking place. Talking about Cuba & Korea right now.
Comrade Scared Shitless | 12.12.08 - 12:26 am | #

" deepsouthdoug writes:
One analyst on CNBC said oil could crash to $10 next year.

Daily Kos: State of the Nation 651601
deepsouthdoug | 12.13.08 - 9:47 am | # "

Yeh, that was the wrong link -- but everybody should read it. It's a real report from the front lines of our collapsing economy.

My fears regarding Venezuela is that Hugo goes up in flames or starts a war with Colombia to divert the populace...if we stay low for a long time or go very low for some time.

But to your point, like the man said about the stock market, prices will fluctuate. The historic volatility of oil prices is pretty impressive, and those statistics just got a real shot in the arm over the last six months.

The really big oil companies (aka the majors, large international integrated companies) did not build anything like the price run-up into their long term planning...but they didn't plan on $40 oil either for an extended period of time. Many (most?) annual statements regarding production forecast, or capital budgets are being delayed or revised. The first signs of employment pain in those worlds will be contractors going away...then hiring reductions, and early retirement offers.

The immediately sweaty companies are in the independents of various sizes, these are the companies that find and produce oil & gas, then sell it at the lease line (maybe some midstream (pipeline) ops)...here you will find some who could have trouble rolling over debt if they have a levered up balance sheet. My WAG is that there will be some consolidation as it is discovered who is swimming without their shorts on...

But if $10 oil arrives for any length of time, we will have likely stepped over the threshold into depression space, as it seems to me the only way to get there is China melting down due to social unrest...but stranger things have happened.

"MissFired writes:
A little accountability this morning. Here were Thursday night comments predicting a black Friday on news of the auto bailout collapse:"

Sometimes around here, it can get to be a little bit like fundamentalists predicting the end times. I dunno, maybe they watch too much cable news.

I've been guilty in the past, but I'm trying to quit.

Does a 75% drop in oil mean a 75% drop is Saudi Treasuries purchases?

MissFired - (+1)I do believe you have found your 'niche'- maybe a post like this every so often will keep some of the more radical prognostications in check-

We can't even decide amongst our very smart selves whether there is gonna be inflation or deflation. And the erring posters didn't factor in the part about the car companies being bailed out by another agency.

My son, who is mooning over trucks, sez that the trucks of his dreams are 40% off what they were last year.

energyecon--lots of good comments; thanks.

MissFired - no, it's Monday. What's three days between friends?

C

I came to this site via the irvine housing blog (which I no longer read because the format became stale).

But I recalled a graph from that site that looked remarkably like the spot oil graph posted this am. here at CR.

Here's the link, and the parallel is obviously that the oil bubble/speculative mania has reached the second half of the capitulation stage. This graph obviously applies to any bubble : tulips, Beanie Babies, hedge funds, ratings for Heroes etc.

Tuesday Morning: Irvine Blogger Goes Inside the Mind of the Bubble | L.A. Land | Los Angeles Times

Since we're talking abut cliff diving check out this skydiving commercial

Fleg Master Tlpizza Video - sevenload

OT - it just occurred to me, a history rhyming thing - the Maddow thing reminds me of the matchstick guy...any financial history buffs on atm?

The main driver of oil prices right now isn't supply/demand but the U.S. dollar.

Last week, oil was up big on dollar weakness.

In 2009, oil will start to be considered the "accepted global currency." A lot of currencies will eventually be pegged to oil-heavy baskets.

Financial sense has Simmons and Hirsch on a podcast this morning.

Financial Sense Newshour 

rich,

Excellent point, and one more wrinkle in the mix of things that move oil price around...

In 2009, oil will start to be considered the "accepted global currency." A lot of currencies will eventually be pegged to oil-heavy baskets.

Not sure what this means, but i expect oil to drop in the first and second quarter and shoot up towards the 2nd half of next year.

If oil remains at these depressed levels, there probably won't be a recovery for a few years.

Here it is, good write-up by The Economist on Ivar Kreuger, the world's greatest swindler...

Premium content | Economist.com

am i going to need that 1,000.000.00 bill thats somewhere in the house?
is it possible to have hyperinflation along with deflation?

rich writes:
"The main driver of oil prices right now isn't supply/demand but the U.S. dollar."

But there again, what happens to the U.S. dollar will be a policy decision. There are those who stand to benefit from inflation and those who stand to benefit from deflation, and which one wins out in the political arena will determine whether it's inflation or deflation.

None of this stuff is inevitable or pre-ordained.

One more to rich's point then got to get cracking on my 'honey do's'...my guess is that we will see substantial price improvement across the commodity complex as a function of our currency losing value...timing subject to question, but sooner than we think.

The Saudi Royals not only determine Saudi Arabia's policy, but exert great influence over the policy decisions of other countries as well, including the United States.

Hardly.

Read Mathew Simmons 'Twilight in the Desert'.

Anyone who's spent any time in the Gulf will attest that the 'Saudis hold all the cards, pull all the strings' meme is ridiculous.

.

The price of oil based in USD is about to explode, just as are USD interest rates.

This is as obvious as the housing bubble explosion, and just as much ignored.

Does a 75% drop in oil mean a 75% drop is Saudi Treasuries purchases?
Not One Cent | Homepage | 12.13.08 - 10:17 am | #

Probably not a drop that big as they have a sh!tpot of Treasuries that mature and need to be rolled...so then the question is, do they become active sellers at some point? Passive sellers by simply not rolling?

Which goes to DownSouth's point about policy being the determinant...OK type at you all later.

Low oil prices might be the major salvation factor in preventing the US from just collapsing, with its effect on the dollar value in trade and impact on domestic inflation reduced. We might be able to afford to eat.

This would be a great time to enact a escalating carbon tax (not a carbon offsets program) over a, say 5-7 yr period, to full impact.

MissFired

You make an important contribution.

I think the line between day-trading predictions and broader efforts to comprehend the ill fate of the economy can become blurred, unless one carefully tracks who says what, and whether it is a prediction about the stock market tomorrow (or Monday) or an analysis of longer term economic trends.

Some of the comments you note fall into the day trade category.

Others, e.g. the Conjure Clock, are broader analyses and part of a long running commentary that has shown lots of prescience. No offense to any other posters you named. My respect for Conjure in no implies the contrary for others.

The common sense of doom may blur the difference, but Conjure (and his imaginary friend MP) and some others are not in the day-trade and daily predicitions business. My view is like their view: I don't know what the market and economy might do short term, but over the next few quarters and years (and maybe next decade or two) I think it looks very grim.

I confess I do think about the short-term, too, and the Madoff business scares me. Deeply.

Privateer Gerkinov | Homepage | 12.13.08 - 10:38 am | #

When Ghawar is clearly in irreversible decline then all bets are off, yep.

Regarding Citadel discussion on previous thread, I bet they received a lot of redemption requests when the Madoff news broke.

It is not illegal to freeze redemptions at all. When you put your money into a hedge fund, you sign a contract stating that you understand that you may not be able to liquidate your investment for a period as dictated by management, and many only allow for liquidation during certain windows anyway.

poor moorthy, had swotted up on simms? peak oil theory, internalized GS sponsored propoganda of chindia's rapid development led oil demand..
little did moorthy know that it was all built on sand.
Analysts always bring smile to the cynics who are amused by their existential merit.

Or the dollar could crash to 100 dollars a barrel - think about it.

Nothing ensures that the world oil exports will remain oriented to the U.S.

And if the price for oil is too low, no one finds any economic reason to invest in the infrastructure necessary to meet demand as oil fields 'mature' (another one of those wonderful euphemisms for 'emptied,' though not to the last drop). Thus ensuring a completely unforeseeable round of massive price jumps - and so on, and so on.

Though as with much of the U.S., the picture looks a bit grimmer - no one has really invested in much oil infrastructure in the U.S. for decades, and the bills for replacing much of the rusting relics will be coming due in the next couple of years.

Only an analyst can drop a price target by 75% and not be embarassed. "Now, I've discovered the previously unknown principle of demand destruction due to unaffordability. I'm very smart."

At least we don't have to burn the furniture to keep warm this winter and Kudlow's got an outside chance of seeing his gulf war prediction of $25 bbl come true.
Comrade Alexei Mikhailovich | 12.13.08 - 9:38 am | #

For all the wrong reasons - LK thought we'd have oil supply increases AND growth... instead we have recession and demand destruction. Oh well - I guess it is better to be right for the wrong reasons. For Larry that's about as good as it gets.

Uh oh, looks like the unrest is beginning. Someone just bombed a bank.

Bank blast kills police officer in Oregon

WOODBURN, Ore. – A bomb exploded inside a bank here late Friday afternoon, killing a police officer who arrived to check on a suspicious object and seriously injuring two others.

A spokesman for the Oregon State Police, Lt. Gregg Hastings, said a Woodburn police officer died. He did not identify him.

He also said the blast seriously injured the Woodburn police chief and a bomb technician with the Oregon State Police.

Yahoo! 404 - Page Not Found

The tide went out and Madoff was naked.

Some formerly rich people had all their money with him. Haven't they heard about eggs and baskets? One was the dean of a famous lawschool, according to the local rag, too lazy to go downstairs to see if it was Harvard or Yale or whatever.

Hub used to be a prosecutor with Reno's ofc. Asked him why the heck these people just don't take the money and run? He said that insofar as he understood the criminal mind, it was for the thrill--of doing something anti-social, of getting away with something. Everytime they did something bad, and nothing bad happened to them, they'd get the thrill and would get more confidant, they'd be able to get away with it, and then would escalate.

Me, if I were evil, it would be to get rich, and I'd have the end game as planned out as everything else. This guy had been in business since what, 1960? And I'd be careful not to steal too much from anybody, so I'd not feel too guilty, and they'd be less likely to track me down.

I thought your hub worked in Meteorology?

He does. He has a Ph D from Hopkins and a law degree. He wanted to go to med school to and I said enough was enough. I'm the stupid one in the family. Except he can't invest his way out of a paper bag, and he can't play poker, 'cause he just can't bluff.

Ponzi schemes are the ultimate long con.

Deep down, anybody who runs a Ponzi scheme has nothing but contempt for their marks. Madoff hated the wealthy and the elite at the beginning. But then he became one of them. The level of self-loathing must have been sky high.

Like 50 B sky-high.

I imagine he was enchanted with his social standing and lost track of what it was that he was actually doing.

Oh, and please let it be the fabled Harvard endowment that takes a fisting in this Madoff scheme.

Comrade Kristina, here is my answer to your request about no-Detroit-bailout scenarios: Not One Cent: Detroit Big 3 Bailout Misses Supply-Demand Big Picture

How do you know he hated the wealthy?
I'll stick with the thrill theory.

It was a person that I read about, not an endowment. Tho it couldabin the endowment too, wasn't discussed.

Okay, how many of you smart guys and girls shorted oil all the way down and made millions in the process? Surely if CR and Tanta saw all of this coming, they invested heavily in shorting oil...I mean, it was a no brainer, right? Just as oil's going to cliff dive further is a no brainer, right? Not that I would expect an honest answer, but how many of you are going to take short positions on oil as it further dives to $25? I mean, that appears to be the implication and sentiment of the discussion here thus far, so how many are going to short it to $25?

How do you know he hated the wealthy?

According to the WSJ, he started his business with $5,000 saved from a lifeguard job and installing sprinkler systems.

I wonder how many regulators he bought off.

and he can't play poker, 'cause he just can't bluff.

Unlike Madoff who is nothing but one big bluff.

Oh gee, blame it on his sons now.

Yep, I still haz love after almost 43 years. He's out playing with his
ham radio antenna at the moment.

I personally don't have the nerve to short anything. Just sitting on the sidelines, twiddling my thumbs, waiting for the dow to drop to what I think is ridiculously low.

MissFired(Unrated) writes:
\tA little accountability this morning. Here were Thursday night comments predicting a black Friday on news of the auto bailout collapse:

MissFired | 12.13.08 - 10:11 am | #

It isn't going to happen until it happens - besides the market ISN'T the economy. The economy is the economy & the market is part of or a shadow of the economy.

The claim isn't that a non-bailout will tank the - it's that a non-bailout will lead to the demise of the auto sector. Conversely there is the other side of the argument that says a bailout won't stem the demise of the auto sector.

I tend to agree with the latter UNLESS the 'bailout' comprises something very close to a 'universal prepackaged bankruptcy' - not likely to happen.

Until a market consensus is reached - you probably won't see your 'accountability' either way. The game is still undecided.

And one of the most likely morals - the family's money is as pure as driven snow, untainted by any hint of criminality.

A verdict delivered by the same regulators who were unable to notice the criminality in the first place.

Can anyone explain why hedge funds are allowed to go unregulated (and I don't want to hear that the rich folks are so sophisticated that they don't need regulatory intervention to protect them).

They are a major part of the shadow financial economy that makes for the sort of non-transparency that scares the crap out of average folks.

RE: thrill or hating the wealthy

I have no idea. But to run a scheme like this for so long amazes me personally. So many people and so much money bought into it. Madoff is wired wrong, in a way that I couldn't begin to understand his motivations. Stunning that so many people fell into the delusion.

401k's, the ethanol industry, global warming theory, peak oil true believers, housing prices only go up, weapons of Mass Destruction..., now those I can understand.

His family turned him in.

Can you imagine the humilation to love, respect, and be in awe of your dad, and then to discover that he is a con artiste?

There is only a few hundred mil left and he was proposing to give it to friends and family investors.

If I was offered money from my dad underthose circumstances the first thing I would do was throw up.

Liz, I'm a spectator, as well, but I guess that's not even accurate. Whether we like it, or not, we are all participants in this most vicious game of Russian Roulette.

Yeah, but Liz, he was not your ordinary Dad. Imagine how disfunctional that family was. I've been around those types of families much of my life, and it's beyond bizarre.

rent_to_own, don't you think they were trying to save their own skins?

Oh, the sons were senior employees 1 & 2? I read the first few pages of the brief.

Wondered if SE 1 & 2 REALLY knew something funny was going on when I read it. Brief said they had money in it too. So he stole from his sons?

If in the aggregate people start purchasing less (the velocity of money declines) does that effect CPI? Does the index measure changes in prices or is it changes in (prices X quantity purchased)? I'm trying to figure out if a weakening of the dollar might result in CPI increases if quantities purchased also decline.

O/T

Anybody having trouble with the new haloscan refreshing?  After 10 minutes the comments stop coming through.

Sometimes I'll refresh and it just won't. That's been going on for a week. I right click and hit open.

Yeah, but I find it hard to believe they weren't in the know, somehow. When they realized the scheme was collapsing, they take what the least penal route.

Anybody having trouble with the new haloscan refreshing? After 10 minutes the comments stop coming through.

Yep, I'm blaming it on Ken's CR Companion.

Madoff is just a typical Wall Street crook and scam artist.
How many more like him?
Our wonderful regulatory system did not even detect this 50 billion dollar scam.

Just a diversion while the big crooks are stealing 2 trillion.
Who got it?
Come on Hank, Ben and George tell us where the money went.
Bush and his buddies stole it on the way out, and now leave us the Shock Doctrine.

I guess we will find out.

Son demanding use of the computer. I should do the dishes.

Energyecon writes,

So prices run up, exploration kicks up, discoveries are made (smaller over time in any given province as the big bumps get drilled first)-------------

I'll take you idea one step further. There is a good chance that all the major oil fields ( billion bbl. or more) fields have been discovered.

back to the chart

it looks like a pennant pattern is forming, could one of the better chartists/Elliot Wave persons please explain the implications?

I would really appreciate that. This Goldman guy seems not a good source for predictions

You can bet it isn't just the Treasury and SEC working weekends.  Pension plans, endowmwnts and chairitable trusts have got to cracking the books after the events of the last few weeks.  Interesting factoid; it costs 'vard more to charge tuition than to give free rides because of administration and overhead.  It is likely that CalPERS and their ilk had possibly low double digit positions in Madoff type schemes.  I say schemes not because they are corrupt but because I believe enough are to bring down the entire sector which has no elegant unwinding/exit mechanism and they know it. 

Concerning endowments the real story is the ripple effects.  <a href=http://business.timesonline.co.uk/tol/business/industry_sectors/technology/article5333745.ece>Time Online</a>
Harvard’s endowment lost $8 billion (£5.35 billion) in the past four months and the California Public Employees’ Retirement System (CalPERS) portfolio lost 31.1 per cent of its value since peaking last autumn, a $81.4 billion drop. CalPERS, America’s largest public pension fund and one of the leading investors in VC funds, is facing the prospect of asking state and local employers for more money. It has asked private equity companies to ease off on requests for capital that it had previously committed to deliver.
You can bet that being stung the bigs now get real conservative driving down returns impacting their benefits outlays and in the case of pensions increased taxes to backfill. 

google exposure to madoff (he was almost like a one man lehmans) lot of money and a lot of doubt.

as for refresh, i post and that seems to get. never thought about right click and open.duh will try it next time. thanks lawyerliz

I'll take you idea one step further. There is a good chance that all the major oil fields ( billion bbl. or more) fields have been discovered.
trader walt | 12.13.08 - 11:16 am | #

It appears that way.

.

The duration of Madoff's scheme is amazing to me.

Question : I read people are lining up their legal counsel for the Madoff affair. Who, exactly, do you sue? And what do you hope to get? The money just moved around, there were no real "returns," and it's all been spent?

I guess you liquidate everything Madoff/family have left, but that can't be too much. And I"m sure they took steps to protect themselves already.

Interesting factoid; it costs 'vard more to charge tuition than to give free rides because of administration and overhead. 
--Rob Dawg

No offense is meant, but where did you get this (ludicrous, incredible, stupid, ... insert whatever adjective fits) factoid?

I see us re-testing the $9/barrel low of 1998.

Interesting factoid; it costs 'vard more to charge tuition than to give free rides because of administration and overhead.

I remember a fable about being too fat to eat and then starving to death....

lawyerlizwrites:
\tSometimes I'll refresh and it just won't. That's been going on for a week. I right click and hit open.

lawyerliz | 12.13.08 - 11:13 am | #

Thanks!

I see us re-testing the $9/barrel low of 1998.
Liquidate GM please | 12.13.08 - 11:22 am | #

If we do, the nationwide system of distribution may well be disrupted, which will cascade into many other things, fast.

Interesting factoid; it costs 'vard more to charge tuition than to give free rides because of administration and overhead.
--Rob Dawg

I heard that Mikey kid from the Life commercial ate Pop Rocks while drinking a Coke and died ! 11 1!

"repukes_suck writes:
Our wonderful regulatory system did not even detect this 50 billion dollar scam."

That gives you some idea of what to expect in next year's emergency stimulus programs.

I see us re-testing the $9/barrel low of 1998.
---Liquidate GM please

Heh! I remember filling up on $0.69 gas in Atlanta at that time!!!

I would imagine that Madoff didnt start off with the intentions of launching a Ponzi scheme.

His fund probably had a loss at some point in the distant past, and he covered up the loss by paying out from his in-flows. Just a one-time fix, he thought. Then he did it again, with ever increasing amounts of money. Eventually the lie becomes so big that there is no way to pull the plug (without going to jail). So he keeps on lying and bringing in more new money to cover the old.

Not clear how much he was personally making in the racket, as he may have just been funneling most of the $ to people who withdrew, in order to keep up confidence in the scam. As long as he could keep kicking the can forward, no one was hurt. Their paper wealth remained, and they were able to cash out smaller sums as needed, so long as he could find new investors.

When its all said and done it'll be interesting to see how much he personally looted, and how much of the $50B was just distributed to earlier cash-outs.

What a lunatic.

Listening to the economic-bull folks, they say that oil prices coming down is good. To me it seems like it's a case of "hey the tide is out, let's go play on that beach over there!"

Hard to tell how much is deleveraging and demand destruction. If there is so much demand destruction we have a lot more to fear.

I'll take you idea one step further. There is a good chance that all the major oil fields ( billion bbl. or more) fields have been discovered.
trader walt

More oil has been extracted from the Continental US since 1975 than was proven to exist in 1975 and we still have nearly the same proven reserves available. The recent collapse in world demand has also moved years of oil left back into it's traditional multidecade range.  Another interesting thing is depleted fields recharging.  The drop in demand is actually making it cheaper to get oil out of the same holes.  . 

FLL Renter writes:
I would imagine that Madoff didnt start off with the intentions of launching a Ponzi scheme.

I was thinking the same thing.

Kind of a Mark Leeson writ large.

.

Madoff-

WSJ points out that since he was running the funds inside his broker/dealer, SIPC protection may apply in the event of theft such as a ponzi. SIPC has assets of 1.5bn per WSJ. SIPC can demand another $1bn from SEC, but over and above that, SEC will need to go to Congress.

I absolutely can't wait for that debate, if it were to come to that- hilarious.

I won't ever get there of course and this is fantastic news- greed and stupidity is finally being punished. This is just the event the industry needed (I'm a hedgie) to drive the needed regulatory changes.

This is the best financial news of the last 6 months.

Other ponzis will swiftly revealed.

ot an oil expert and would love to hear from one respond to the following observations.

  1. The low point in the price cycle has to correspond in some way to the cost of marginal new production. As older fields get used up (low cost)and the cost of new production goes up the low price needs to go up as well. Ego the idea of $10 oil low point of previous cycle doesn't make sense.
  2. If I am an oil company and the cost of replacing my crude reserves is $40/barrel why would I pump any more oil then is needed to meet my debt service requirement at prices lower than that? As a shareholder in one of these companies I should be urging them not to pump oil. Is it possible that the real production cuts will come not from OPEC but from private producers?
  3. If that happens wouldn't OPEC be tempted to cut production- a cartel works brilliantly when prices are rising?

I see us re-testing the $9/barrel low of 1998.
Liquidate GM please | 12.13.08 - 11:22 am | #

If we do, the nationwide system of distribution may well be disrupted, which will cascade into many other things, fast.
pooki | 12.13.08 - 11:24 am | #

Pooki-

How come this never happened in 1998 then? What makes 2008 special besides the current apocalyptic mood?

@ Rob Dawg

The thing about peak oil isn't that the oil is gone. It's that the easy to get at cheap oil is gone.

The harder to get, more expensive oil can be extracted forever, in increasingly smaller and more expensive amounts.

As for low oil prices making it cheaper to extract oil ... well yeah, but do the math.

Here were Thursday night comments predicting a black Friday on news of the auto bailout collapse:

Did you happen to notice that, in fact, plans for a whole new bailout program were announced on Friday - one that used a funding source that the administration had been denying access to for weeks?

I wasn't "calling" the next day's market action as I am not an active trader, but instead I was saying that a non-preplanned bankruptcy by one or more of the Detroit 3 at this time would be a devastating shock to the economy. The domestic auto industry will have to make huge adjustments over the next few years - just like the FIRE sector - but as long as the changes happen predictably they won't push the recession beyond what is already baked in (though something else could).

FLL Renter writes:
I would imagine that Madoff didnt start off with the intentions of launching a Ponzi scheme.

Why would you think that.
Wall Street itself is just a big Ponzi scheme.
Madoff investors knew he was crook but just kept giving him money, because they thought he was a crook with connections

Demand is obviously the biggest driver of price but plenty of others. Political instability, dollah strength... I'm thinkin the dollah stumbles here and commoditied climb in '09. Not a moon shot like '08 but up from these levels, notional pricing. We'll see.

I see us re-testing the $9/barrel low of 1998.

The day you see $9 oil again is the day you can drive along any freeway and see only a couple of other cars per mile.

How can you square $9 oil with packed U.S. highways?

Who would trade nine vastly diluted U.S. dollars for a whole barrel of oil?

Oil is the world's real wealth. If you own it, you can keep it safe and sound in the ground for a day, year, decade or century. It only goes up against currencies over time.

One of my smarter students (undergrad) wrote a very good research paper comparing and contrasting Mugabe's Zimbabwe with Chavez' Venezuela, in which he speculated on the possibility that Chavez' governance (or rather, "governance") might lead Venezuela down a similar path. Certainly there are other issues involved, but as long as oil prices stayed relatively high, it's unlikely, he concluded. Of course with oil at $40-ish and dropping, who knows.... It was a very thoughtful, well-researched paper, one of those that makes me happy I chose this line of work. 

Another interesting thing is depleted fields recharging. The drop in demand is actually making it cheaper to get oil out of the same holes.

Yeah, and all this amazing change has happened just since oil hit $147 per barrel, five months ago!

I guess the Madoff thing finally answers the question that I have had for a long time. If the market participants are transacting with each other 90% of the time how come all of them are making money. Who lost the money that the "smart money" made? Now we are discovering the truth- they didn't make any money.

I see us re-testing the $9/barrel low of 1998.

The day you see $9 oil again is the day you can drive along any freeway and see only a couple of other cars per mile.

|How can you square $9 oil with packed U.S. highways?

Who would trade nine vastly diluted U.S. dollars for a whole barrel of oil?

Oil is the world's real wealth. If you own it, you can keep it safe and sound in the ground for a day, year, decade or century. It only goes up against currencies over time.|

Once again, how is this difficult than 1998? At least, you consider that all of the growth from 1982 (most of my lifetime) is all bullshit based upon the expansion of credit. Global economic history since 1982 has basically been a slight of hand based upon credit expansion. So, when this deflationary cycle resolves itself, you're saying all prices won't revert back to where prices where in the 80s and 90s? If equity prices are leading indicators, they are back to 1995 prices.

"A little accountability this morning. Here were Thursday night comments predicting a black Friday on news of the auto bailout collapse:"

MissFired, you don't read too good. Conjure wasn't predicting a "Black Friday." Conjure is talking about the likelihood of a global depression.

He stands by his clock update of December 11, 2008.

Anyway, Conjure is completely out of the market, has been for some time, and is currently uninterested in what the market does day-to-day.

Please, quote Conjure accurately.

Conjure is completely out of the market, has been for some time, and is currently uninterested in what the market does day-to-day.

The correct approach, I estimate.

Last Thread

Politician's with a Trillion

Can they put 1 trillion in perspective.... it's only 66 miles into space when stacking 1000 dollar bills flat.

Now if US could remove one 1000 bill per day = 2.74 million years

Almost forgot there's an addional 55 stacks already in place......

Wonder if Madoff will be paroled in time.

Kinda scary when you think of Conjure, LawyerLiz and Dawg all sitting on the sidelines itching for a massive once in a lifetime opportunity buy. 

I wouldn't be surprised if PPT is shorting oil like crazy.

crazyvermonter:

I'm with you that something shady is embedded in Wall Street's business model(s), but I am skeptical that there are very many true Ponzi schemes. As an example of a non-Ponzi fraud, a pump and dump stock manipulation scheme certainly enriches the stock promoter at the expense of subsequent investors, but what I think is missing is the surreptitious transfer of funds by the promoter from one investor to an earlier investor. In a Ponzi scheme, only the promoter knows where the "profit" comes from, and in fact he knows that it is not profit at all, but rather someone else's principal. In a pump and dump (and I imagine in a lot of other schemes on Wall Street) all of the prices and transactions are publicly disseminated, and so the fraud occurs as the promoter misrepresents his financial interest and the veracity of his belief in the future upside. In other words, the promoter keeps talking up the stock while liquidating his position.

...and the complexity of crude price determination begins to emerge.

Thanks, energyecon, for an illuminating and concise contribution.

Right now I'm looking at that graph that CR posted. It reminds me of graphs of, perhaps, subprime loan volumes, housing starts, etc., except of course the spike occurs at a different point in time.

When oil was $140 and gas was $4, a lot of smart people (including, if I recall correctly, Dr. Krugman) were saying that the price appeared to have been driven by fundamentals and would probably stay up there. The poor Goldman Sachs guy went even farther than that...

So was that spike, in fact, driven by fundamentals at the time, or was it just another speculation-driven bubble? Again, looking at the chart, that recent spike seems to go well beyond the kind of cyclical movement in petroleum prices that you explain so well. What I'm saying is, I would love to read another paragraph or two of your insights.

The EIA data tables show two years of declining net oil exports in 2006 and 2007, principally because of an overall decline by the top 5 net oil exporters--Saudi Arabia; Russia; Norway; Iran and the UAE--which account for about half of current world net oil exports.

Our middle case shows the top five collectively approaching zero net oil exports in about 23 years. For more info, do a Google Search for Net Oil Exports + Jeffrey Brown.

In the short term, the actual and the perceived decline in demand is outpacing the long term decline in net oil exports. Also, we saw, through 9/08, a year over rebound in net exports by the top five, albeit to a level well below their 2005 rate.

In any case, It's possible that a plot of annual average crude oil prices may not even show the late 2008 price decline. I suspect that a combination of voluntary + involuntary net export reductions will cause the 2009 average annual price to exceed the 2008 average annual price of about $100.

The price of oil in dollars is primarily determined by the strength of the dollar. Go back and chart it. Anybody that says oil is going sub-$10 must believe that the dollar is going to rebound to all-time highs versus every other major currency. If you believe the dollar is going to weaken significantly AND think that oil will go sub-$10, then you are a complete idiot.

There was a hedgie linked a few thread back, who warned friends? family? that they should be suspicious of Madoff, because nobody could figure out how he did what he did & it was too good to be true. The advisees ignored the advice because they had been getting the good returns for so very long=-decades I guess--that it couldn't possibly be a scam.

The brief said was was at least as far as a number of years ago, forget how long, but it certainly wasn't decades.

So he may have found the thrill accidentally, but then he was hooked?

I dunno, once I found out I was in too deep to ever get out, I'd plan to take the money and run.

Anybody know how to find that SEC brief again? I'd like to read more of it.

Liz:

The NYT had links to the SEC docs as well as to a report from one investment advisor basically bragging about how they had been suspicious of Madoff for years and had steered their people away from him.

--
This blog can be renamed Cliff Diving (CD).

Cliff diving into a normal recession, of course, and nothing more serious. With all the Economists Power that the US has how could we have anything more serious.

Our economy is a good reflection of the Economists Power (EP) that we have. As goes EP so goes our economy.

Is our EP cliff diving? Now, that is something worth worrying about.

Jas

If only I had enough money to make a difference!!!

I can't believe how dumb the posts in these comments have gotten over the past 2 years. The pitchfork and canned goods crowd has clearly taken over these threads. I yearn for the past posters to return....but unfortunately they wont because they make too much sense for this crowd.
I'm outta here. Good luck and remember, protect Ruby Ridge at all costs!!!

I'm outta here.
Anonymous | 12.13.08 - 12:11 pm | #

Bye-bye.

.....(out looking for pitchfork)....

I'm outta here.
Anonymous

good riddance coward

Bye-bye.

dryfly | 12.13.08 - 12:14 pm |

How about "Buh-bye!"

I've got my Ken Cooper CR Home Companion turned up to "full blast" and now the only commenter whose comments can get through is Nobel prize-winning economist, Dr. Paul Krugman (PBUH).

Anonymous writes:
The price of oil in dollars is primarily determined by the strength of the dollar. Go back and chart it. Anybody that says oil is going sub-$10 must believe that the dollar is going to rebound to all-time highs versus every other major currency. If you believe the dollar is going to weaken significantly AND think that oil will go sub-$10, then you are a complete idiot.|

Anonymous-

We'll miss you and everything, but please do consider your historic highs in the dollar theory. There's really no reason over the next two years for money to flow into the safest assets out there (heck no reason for the next six or seven years) and those assets are dollars and T-bills.

I live here in Dubai, and when you're inside the American bubble, I'll bet things in America look pretty unstable. But in emerging markets, let me tell ya, they are REALLY unstable.

I'm with you that something shady is embedded in Wall Street's business model(s), but I am skeptical that there are very many true Ponzi schemes.
j marston | 12.13.08 - 12:04 pm | #

I agree - pretty hard to hide a full blown ponzi of the Madoff caliber - how he did it will become legendary on 'The Street'.

I also agree something shady and unwholesome is embedded - and when all the little 'exaggerations' are exposed the damage is likely to be larger in aggregate than Madoff alone.
 

The only comments that get through my filters are tanta's classics!

Anyone think the next round of hedge fund redemptions and de-leveraging will take down all markets again? Or will it be an anti-climax.
Seems the markets this time are quite resilient to the bad news of late.

How about "Buh-bye!"
mp | 12.13.08 - 12:16 pm | #

LOL - ya that's what I meant.

In case y'all don't know-Jeffrey J. Brown is an oil man from way back and a frequent and valued contributor to TheOilDrum. Please tell us, Mr. Brown, how the easiest, cheapest oil-the light, sweet crude, the stuff that is easiest to pump and refine-peaked worldwide in the late 90's.

I live here in Dubai, and when you're inside the American bubble, I'll bet things in America look pretty unstable. But in emerging markets, let me tell ya, they are REALLY unstable.
Liquidate GM pretty please | 12.13.08 - 12:18 pm | #

I bet it is a trip to watch the small day traders logged in at the coffee shops go bonkers. I have a friend who visits Chennai on occasion & says it alone is worth the price of admission. We think we got day trader crazies here in the US. We know nothing about crazy - pikers we are.

Anyone who believes one word of what Goldman Sachs says publicly needs to need to have their head examined.

It isn't the business of Wall Street, it is the culture of Wall Street.  Investing should not extract 600 billion dollars annually for the services provided.  The problem is the culture tolerates, nay admires excess.  Thus people like Madoff grow larger than life.  I mean really, attracting European clients because he skiis well? 

Thanks for the complaint; do want the brief.

Wouldn't have liked the get the 2nd letter.

Hey, guys, there isn't any money left. Suing will be useless, unless there was proof of a reason to know on the part of the earlier investors and that's who you are suing.

Statutes of Limitations are prolly in effect depending on how long this went on.

How do we know it's the sons who turned him in? The WSJ article? Haven't read it yet, but will.

How could it not be noticed that 50b was missing? One of the posts sez 17 to 50b. Media exaggeration?

And I bet there are some others that will come to light, but I bet this is the biggest.

You have no idea how utterly destructive the Madoff bust is.

I am hearing stories this morning out of Palm Beach and London that are horrific.

Older folks in their 80's pawning their diamonds on Worth Ave, walking into real estate office saying "sell my house for anything you can get."

I have received three calls this morning from friends offering me their jewels, boats, houses, cars.

This cuts deep into heart of major cities. London, Miami, Palm Beach, L.A, NYC, Tel Aviv.

Do not for a second underestimate the consequences of what has transpired.

We can't even decide amongst our very smart selves whether there is gonna be inflation or deflation

Well, it certainly isn't a deflation in any Austrian sense. Base money supply is rising rapidly, but all of it appears to be going onto bank balance sheets. If there was a chart somewhere for velocity of money, I'd imagine it to be taking a cliff dive.

I'm coming to the position that inflation/deflation may be the wrong prism to look through. It's more trust/mistrust.

A little accountability this morning. Here were Thursday night comments predicting a black Friday on news of the auto bailout collapse:

I don't think it was predictable in advance that the Big 3 could cry to Daddy Bushbucks to undergo a complete policy reversal and promise to write a check out of the TARP.

But then, whole flocks of black swans are flying in formation these days.

"We are shocked and appalled by this news," said Jeffrey Tucker, founding partner of Fairfield Greenwich Group. "We have worked with Madoff for nearly 20 years, investing alongside our clients. We had no indication that we and many other firms and private investors were the victims of such a highly sophisticated, massive fraudulent scheme."
Mr. Tucker said that the firm's first imperative is to take all necessary steps to protect its investors.
As of November 1, 2008, assets under management at FGG totaled approximately $14.1 billion, of which approximately $7.5 billion was invested in vehicles connected to Bernard L. Madoff Investment Securities.

Seems like the secret to Madoff's "success" was the fact that he tapped into a pool of extremely wealthy investors who started out entrusting him, prudently enough, with small sums of their money. Pleased with the results, they then gave him a little more, and encouraged their acquaintances to do the same. And he's paying out 10 percent, 11 percent a year in "interest," while his total take keeps growing, probably faster than that until recently.

I reported on a similar deal on a much smaller scale here in the Northwest, based in Tacoma. Rich, smart people. They heard about this investment program from friends at the yacht club. They plunked down $10,000 and started getting two percent checks in the mail. Every month. So they invested more, and more, and more. And it all worked fine right up to the point that it didn't.

This only happened a day or so ago.

Why are these guys trying to pawn stuff already?

they have nothing in their checking accounts to tide them over?

Sure that such will happen; why would have already started. Plz explain why we should believe this?

The sad thing about using the term "cliff diving" so persistently is that it has completley co-opted and overshadowed a wonderful sport and competiition. It's important to pray to the shrine before you jump.

YouTube -

"But then, whole flocks of black swans are flying in formation these days."

Exactly. In this extraordinary environment, don't count on conventional rules to apply.

That is why Conjure and I are very uncomfortable with the current wisdom predicting a mid-2009 turnaround.

50 bucks to fill up the Navigator. love it. Nothing funnier than a early boomer in a Prius giving me dirty looks @ the gas station. I don't even turn the engine off.

Well, I suppose its more fun smoking out Prius owners on the freeway on-ramp with my diesel pickup as I flip the switch to the "Crazy Larry" setting, making me an a**h*le, but those people already think they are better than everybody else anyway.

lawyerliz writes:

Statutes of Limitations are prolly in effect depending on how long this went on.

There is a special SoL extension for financial crimes which involve defrauding a financial institution. It goes to like 20 years, if I recall correctly, and refreshes the series of actions with every new act in furtherance of the fraud.

The complaint said a form they filed said that they had 11-25 investors. People? Funds?

I guess we can't believe the form either!!!

mp, given this stampede, does Conjure view dollars and short term treasuries as a safehaven, or as a corral leading to a slaughterhouse?

I agree with a poster above who asserted the Madoff story is a sensationalist cannard to distract from the greater Ponzi Scheme, however, for the wiser amongst us, it is highly emblematic of a thoroughly corrupted, beyond reform system.

In this extraordinary environment, don't count on conventional rules to apply. - mp

I go one better and say you can count on the conventional rules to not apply. 

MW: I think you are right.

What happens when 50 B goes poof? When it's taxpayer money, it's all our money, and thus nobody's money and therefore there will be no outrage.

When it's somebody with a 100 ft yacht, an eponymous charity and trophy wife, then it's tragedy.

Tragedy I tell you ! Stop smirking.

Lawyer Liz:

it is the truth. you don't undestand the wealthy. They keep $25,000 in their bank accounts and the rest is invested.

You become addicted to the return, you want every penny earning the return. Respectfully, unly you are worth $750 M and up you won't understand.

A friend out of Palm Beach told me this morning that "this is the most devastating to happen to Jews since Hitler."

This will be a tipping point.

When you think about oil dropping to $10, try keeping the following in mind...

1) Reversion to the mean
2) World response to economic distress=war
3) Prices are set at the margins
4) Major field depletion rates are accelerating
5) Fewer large discoveries
6) Population growth continues

I'm betting that it will stabilize in the $60-80 range by end of 1st qtr 09 or 2nd qtr latest--barring war/unrest in MidEast/Iran/Israel.

I'm long oil until we have a viable alternative for personal/goods transportation from our current gas/diesel dependancy.

What's 50b when the FED won't release the details of 2T.
Suckers are we all.


MW

I have received three calls this morning from friends offering me their jewels, boats, houses, cars.

What kind of weird "friendships" do you have that you're the "go to guy" among your "friends" for pawning high ticket assets?

I was referring to people who invested early and had no reason to think it was a con on later investors, and people who had no intent to defraud. But the companies who invested in those feeder funds, shouldn't they have investigated thoroughly? They will get sued.

What is stinking mass of merde.

A friend out of Palm Beach told me this morning that "this is the most devastating to happen to Jews since Hitler."

Wow, that is a rather shallow comment, and commentary.

A friend out of Palm Beach told me this morning that "this is the most devastating to happen to Jews since Hitler."

backs away from this comment

"I mean, that appears to be the implication and sentiment of the discussion here thus far, so how many are going to short it to $25?
\t Morocco Bama | \t \t \tHomepage | \t12.13.08 - 10:55 am | # "

Seems like a loser bet with Russia in talks with OPEC.

Given MWs extensive posting history I suggest people give the comments the consideration they deserve. 

Fairfield Greenwich Group guy on Madoff.

There's nothing "sophisticated" about running a Ponzi. There is however something sophisticated about running a profitable $17bn on the up and up- like maybe 30-60 back office and accounting employees, managing relationships with prime brokers, accountants, legit auditors etc.

Given the profile of the returns here, the structure of the organization (one guy who doesn't answer questions) etc. it should have taken 0.27 seconds to determine that he's a fraud.

At my last fund we had an important European fund of funds client (now presumably wiped out) lament to us- "Why can't you be more like Madoff- he never loses money, when the market is bad he goes to cash, etc).

This situation is a) hilarious and b) long term great news for the honest operators and markets in general.

I didn't invest with Madoff.

And I am still very rich and they have lost everything......That is why.

They are on the phone with their kids telling them that the college tutions are gone.

You can't grasp the enormity of the situation.

MW isn't quite pulling off his "super-wealthy guy who knows what its like to have 750 million in the bank fielding calls from frenzied jews trying to pawn their luxury yachts, jewels, and purebred horses within days of a fund collapse shrieking about the holocaust" in a very believable manner. Perhaps if you reduced the lie to one or two elements, like, "I'm a rich guy" or "I heard a friend of a friend say that rich people were hurt" or such it would be more plausible.

Nope, I guess I'll never understand. I wouldn't even want that much. Just hanging on the the bottom of the lower upper middle crust.

I guess some of "them" will come to understand me!!

Regardless of ethnic affiliation.

IN the end fundamentals will rule.
Oil won't be sold if it's below production cost.

Am looking for it to go decidedly higher towards the 2nd half of next year barring any more mindless wars started by senile old men.

You can't grasp the enormity of the situation.

LOL! Meanwhile, the Haitians eat mud cakes and cookies. I have news for them, there will be no need for a useless college education in the "new" economy.

Hey I can ski pretty well and can talk a good story, how do I get into this ponzi business?

Besides exogenous influences, e.g. military actions in or near oil fields, it seems to me that oil prices follow a classic fixed-cost delayed response. A price spike perturbation drives new well development; that and the demand destruction of high priced oil leads to a rapid drop in prices, which rise again only when demand is re-created by low prices, and/or there is more supply destruction.

When it is said it costs $50 per barrel to pump oil, is that variable cost or fully loaded with fixed costs? I bet that the $50 figure is fully loaded, and that the variable costs are much lower. Hence there is little disincentive to pump to their hearts' content.

Hoopajoops, we are in dollars because it is our home currency. We also have some euro and some gold. Mainly dollars.

We are afraid of treasuries. As you probably know, Conjure is waiting for the long bond to crash. He says it is a question of when, not if.

We don't want to be in, near, or around any market when that happens.

Well, if you say so Dawg.

What's it like, being rich???

German bonds are the true safe haven and buying now is the bottom of the currency range. Greece, Belgium, Netherlands and Italy are risky at almost any yield.

Rob Dawg wrote:
It isn't the business of Wall Street, it is the culture of Wall Street. Investing should not extract 600 billion dollars annually for the services provided...

---exactly

not only have they been selling crap but they are being over compensated

before 1980 financial services profits accounted for 7 percent of all profits from companies publicly traded

today it approaches 45 percent!

we're "going down" because of a disproportional award of compensation and a gross mis allocation of capital

Hey I can ski pretty well and can talk a good story

Only if you can play touch football whilst downhill skiing and talk like JFK.

Ask not what Madoff can do for you, but rother, what you can do for Madoff.

OPEC and/or Russia have a lot of tools at their disposal. Not just production cuts but also geopolitical mischief. I would be willing to bet that the average price next year is closer to $70 than $45. Check out gloomboom.com - it will make your day!

Hahahahaha, Bama.

Maybe their wealth is pure chance, a la Taleb?

You can't grasp the enormity of the situation.

I once challenged a girl to come to terms with that problem.

Madoff is The New Martha Stewart!

Wish you all well, you will see in the coming days the names associated with Madoff.

Lawyer Liz, why not drive up from your house in Coral Gables and witness for yourself what is happening at the jewelry shops on Worth Ave and then share your experiences here.

CR knows who I am, and you can trust I was just sharing the truth with all of you.

The comment about devastation as great as that done by Hitler came from one of the most well-know Jewish busineesman in the US.

I too am Jewish and this is no small comment to make or share.

Martha Madoff.....I like it. Madoff sounds an awful lot like something else, doesn't it? Takes mind out of gutter.

M of T:

You just need to know some wealthy people who want to be more wealthy. But you want to make them less wealthy.

Simple, no?

Why couldn't this Madoff thingy have happened here in San Diego, so I could see all these overpriced McMansions come tumblin' down?

I mean it, what's it like being rich?

I'm genuinely curious and never met anybody worth more than a few million. Which isn't rich by today's standards. And most of them lost it invesing in real estate.

Would you say you are happier than most? Is it an albatross around your neck?

Lawyerliz rests her head on hands are stares fascinated at MW.

Zack:

For more on inflation/deflation - I mean by that something reasonably interesting and substantive - London Banker's got a few observations I thought made for a good read:

London Banker 

Lawyer Liz,

US magazine says Stars are Just like Us !

I suspect it's just the same with Rich people. Only more so.

Rich people post on CR !! They're just like us !

The concept that Madoff hadn't intended to implement a Ponzi scheme, that it just ended up that way, is fascinating. I talked to a friend earlier this week who was down after having lost 50K in a housing-related deal in Huntington Beach, CA. He said the initial returns were good, and then the money just stopped one day and the company he had invested in vaporized. It sounded like a classic Ponzi to me, but my friend was adamant that the developers were legitimate, but things just went south. I can't make up my mind about either of them and this has me wondering if there won't be a whole slew of unintended Ponzi schemes showing up soon.

But the companies who invested in those feeder funds, shouldn't they have investigated thoroughly? They will get sued.

The NYT reports that a fund called "Ascot Partners" had "virtually all" of its clients' money with Madoff. What a terrific fund! I pay them to invest my money, and they give it all to some other guy and I pay fees to both of them. And then....

NYT also reports that Ascot has "retained counsel." Good idea.

Liz when you're rich, it's kinda like this....

YouTube -  

MW, I'll bite. I am close by. Name one or two jewelery shops on Worth I should go observe. I will return and describe the panicked jews trying to sell their assets and vindicate you. This is a real offer.

New Excutive Order: The word "problem" shall be removed and replaced by "challenge" or better yet "opportunty"

DownSouth writes:
rich writes:
"The main driver of oil prices right now isn't supply/demand but the U.S. dollar." 10:34


not so

us dollar is only part of the equation

****then there is the BEST REASON****

falling prices will help round up the last set of fools willing to buy super heavy duty gas guzzlers!

(all joking aside...you cant mistake the drop in consumption ...which btw took the contango out of the futures market)

The Jewish people I knew in my old Balto neighborhood were better off than the rest of us, but not at all rich. Great food. Great homemade Italian food too. Sigh.

Color me skeptical as well.

When you go visit the Palm Beach jewelry stores, let me know if anybody says, "First they came for the Phillipe Pateks, and I said nothing."

How come this never happened in 1998 then? What makes 2008 special besides the current apocalyptic mood?
Liquidate GM pretty pretty ple | 12.13.08 - 11:40 am | #

Good question. Back then we went from what to what in terms of high and low? Today, the stations have dropped by some 70% and fears have it falling further.

So, I guess it would be the severity or the breadth and depth in dollars and cents that matter. Retailers have lost their margins already, they can't pump out the last load fast enough to beat the next price drop. If it goes to 9, which I would be very surprised if it did, then like I said, all bets are off. And the stripper wells will close up for sure which will lead to a whole nuther set of situations.

Lionel- put me in the "started honest and it all went horribly wrong" camp.

The details are going to be fascinating, but I think this is almost a certainty. Not wanting to disclose the initial first losing month, then gradually degenerating.

Gonna be a movie. Robin Williams for Madoff?

I think MW is furiously googling at this very moment, shortly before coming to the realization that the real deal shops will barely have any net presence at all.

--
Could someone please explain references to "jews" above?

Just curios,

Jas

Yah,

Come on MW share your burden with us!

About Madoff... I suspect this could turn out to have some pretty big ripple effects - $50B with a heathy set of multipliers no one yet recognizes.

Same reason as the RE bust with fund-of-fund leverage and leverage for the wealthy investor chasing yield. I wouldn't be shocked to see some pretty good old fashion margin selling of CRE assets, more leveraged asset selling.

Thanks for your observations, MW. I for one value them. I have thought from the first I heard of this that it would be bigger than most news we have heard about lately.

Jas, follow MW's comments and the skeptical reaction we all have to them. Apparently the most well known jewish businessman in the US said that this 50 billion hedge fund collapse is the "worst thing to happen to the jews since the holocaust." He also claims that he is extremely wealthy, and within days of the collapse all of his super-mega-wealthy friends are calling him on the phone and offering to sell their cars, yachts, jewels and other things. He also claims that the jewelery district on Worth st in FL is swamped with panicked wealthy people selling their jewels and other assets. He also claims to have heard the megawealthy tell their children that as a result of this hedge collapse, their children have lost their college funds. He also claims that he is totally legit, because after all he himself is a jew and "CR knows him."

Did I get it all?

Madoff did not get caught, he allowed himself to be apprehended.
Most likely explanation.

I meant how it felt inside.

None of my business, I suppose.

The hub may take me to a jewelry store in Brevard to buy me a combo 43rd anniversary/Chistmas bauble. I will report, but there are very few Jews in Brevard. A temple even closed down a few years ago. Maybe I should hold off and see if I can get a fancier bauble cheaper later.

Deflation!!

Seriously it is very sad when anybody loses most/all of their money and can't fund college or pay the maid. As I said, I've seen up close recently people who have lost a million bucks in real estate. Some of them haven't admitted it yet.

One bounced a small check to me.

He's selling his rolex. Hope he got it sold before the rolex deflation.

Madoff, jews and jewlery, great thread so far!

No Jews in my neighborhood...just a bunch of SUV driving, fat-assed and bellied Rednecks. The two don't usually mix well.

throw the jews down the well - Google Videos

Madoff is just a typical Wall Street crook and scam artist.
How many more like him?
Our wonderful regulatory system did not even detect this 50 billion dollar scam.

Just a diversion while the big crooks are stealing 2 trillion.
Who got it?
Come on Hank, Ben and George tell us where the money went.
Bush and his buddies stole it on the way out, and now leave us the Shock Doctrine.

I am thinking a lot of this 2 trillion is funding the victims of Wall Street's great ponzi scheme of the last 8 years.

Wonder how much of China's stimulus package that hank and Ben are funding.
Probably a lot of countries got compensated.
No wonder they will not reveal where the 2 trillion is

uh guys, the entire CDS market is a ponzi'esque op.

Protection money for the 2Tril?

PonziMonetizaCoruptiCapitalism

CDS isn't a ponzi, it's a zero-sum reserveless CDS insurance scam.

What MW reveals is that he doesn't understand what it is to be rich, to be hooked into that social circle. The last thing the super-rich will do upon discovering that they've been busted financially is call their other rich friends and advertising this fact by offering to pawn their frickin cars and other crap. What the hell, that is the kind of retarded story that betrays a sheltered existence of extremely modest means. Someone who has never been "connected" or "in" with other connected, wealthy people. The last thing you do is phone up even a single one of your rich friends and tell him you're poor and desperate. No, you do the opposite. You embezzel, steal, play-act, do whatever to keep up appearances, until that is absolutely impossible.

Pookie

liquidate GM

wrote... why didn't this happen in 98


because LTCM crash and debt liability was a spit in the bucket compared with the derivatives market and debt liability at play today

because consumer debt as a percentage of GDP was lower

because the federal government in the late nineties...

ACTUALLY STARTED TO RETIRE US DEBT

and of course the debt has nearly doubled in the last 8 years

debt debt debt debt debt debt

Except for the commissions and bonuses paid to move the money around.

And I still miss CSC. Come baaaaaack!!!

I read Since Yesterday, an economic and social history of the depression, this weekend off of Project Gutenberg. Debt basically stayed flat from 1929-1933, but incomes and non-debt costs dropped in the range of 50-60%. Got me thinking about $9/bbl oil.

This thread quickly satisfied Godwin's Law.

Update

COMPETITIVE ADVANTAGES
The team at Royal Ascot has several notable distinct competitive advantages to offer you, the entrepreneur, during a succession plan, or transition period for your most prized financial asset, your company. We believe our team is unique in understanding the desires and needs from both a financial and legacy standpoint of a business owner. Royal Ascot is one of the few firms that offer a team made up of all entrepreneurs, has in-house Chief Operating Officers, and who has the investment flexibility and transaction experience from both the perspective of a purchaser, as well as a seller of businesses.
Management Incentives

Stock options and other carried interest programs accompany all of our transactions.

Stable or recurring revenue

Identifiable growth opportunities
Sustainable Margins

High returns on invested capital

Significant barriers to entry

Simple, understandable businesses

Non-cyclical industries

Seasoned owners who seek to retire but lack a fitting succession plan or exit strategy

YA right

Hoopajoops LTD:
The last thing you do is phone up even a single one of your rich friends and tell him you're poor and desperate. No, you do the opposite. You embezzel, steal, play-act, do whatever to keep up appearances, until that is absolutely impossible.

That's right. I learned that from that one movie a few years ago with the big boat and the iceberg. Forget the name.

Dawg sez he's legit and I do trust dawg.

Hey Hoop, go to a jewelry store and report!!

Hoops:

Pretty much agree. One typical response after "keeping up appearances" though is to "move away".

Remember the Lloyds names? Same deal, I suspect.

CDS guy writes:
PonziMonetizaCoruptiCapitalism

CDS isn't a ponzi, it's a zero-sum reserveless CDS insurance scam.
CDS guy | 12.13.08 - 1:03 pm | #


beg to disagree

because the swaps have been securitized, used as collateral, and traded and there has been leverage applied along the way

it is a tangled spaghetti mess

"So was that spike, in fact, driven by fundamentals at the time, or was it just another speculation-driven bubble?"

that needs to be put in context with commodities as a whole and the BRIC growth story. obviously, there are elements of both (just as there are now with possible overshooting on the way down).

"If you believe the dollar is going to weaken significantly AND think that oil will go sub-$10, then you are a complete idiot."

could go under 10 euros while shooting into hundreds of dollars - though that is more than a little extreme.

in any case, the euro and oil have both produced nice bounces in the past few days.

Here's the RDI ponzi thing out of Tacoma that I mentioned above:

404 Not Found

This one was smoke and mirrors from day one, but it managed to run for several years--nowhere near as long as Madoff, but it wasn't a short-term thing either.

Then you have Metropolitan Mortgage out of Spokane, a decades-old outfit with real insurance companies under its corporate umbrella, along with an investment arm that began to pay investors in a ponzi-like manner at some point until the roof fell in:

Metropolitan Mortgage bankruptcy :: Ongoing coverage from The Spokesman-Review

Point being that some are born ponzi, and some have ponzihood thrust upon them. Or something.

lawyerliz, I'm WAITING for a name. I'm not going to walk around all day!!!

I dunno how really rich people act. That's why I asked.

I only know how rich people act from the ones I've investigated in the process of having them thrown in jail, you know, reading their personal correspondences, emails, going through their bank records, looking through their divorce agreements, and other stuff like that. Maybe my perception of them is skewed because I've mostly dealt with the ones who are in the end-stages of a cardhouse collapse and about to go to jail.

It's interesting to read MWs comments.  Time will tell.

Last night I was helping a friend who owns and operates a botique winery in the Santa Ynez area.  Great stories.  The 60 year olds in the beat up pickup looking for some wine to drink on their boat while fishing.  They then buy 2 cases at $48/bottle and ask him to deliver it to the wine steward on his "boat."  The nice old black guy who "writes songs you've never heard of" until after the sale my friend googles and sees 60 charted credits.  But he says the fun ones are the thirtythousanaires.  Think Sideways II. 

The point is that he's seen no stress in the client list and with $80 bottles in the library he knows whereof he speaks. 

MW could be being straight up with us but my experience with my betters says they don't panic so obviously.  There's lots of resources to call in and less obvious ways to raise cash than pawning jewels and "selling" boats they more than likely don't own so much as lease from a shell corp who in turn is making payments from cashflow.  Boats don't get sold they get brokered.  Like I said, we'll see. 

Hoopajoops, LTD writes:
What MW reveals is that he doesn't understand what it is to be rich, to be hooked into that social circle.

Or sheer panic and desperation leaves you with no other options.

mock turtle | 12.13.08 - 1:04 pm | #

reread my post, with comprehension this time

Hoop--Were they ever REALLY rich? Or, was it always fake?

Igor(Unrated) writes:
Hoopajoops, LTD writes:
What MW reveals is that he doesn't understand what it is to be rich, to be hooked into that social circle.

Or sheer panic and desperation leaves you with no other options.

"No other option" stage does NOT come within days of a fund collapse. There are ways to stretch things out; even to the point of just not paying your bills and waiting for consequences. No. The story just does not check out in any way shape or form.

A pair of Wall Street giants are developing an equities-trading system as an alternative to the New York Stock Exchange, the latest in a series of companies seeking to eat into the Big Board's market share.
Madoff Investment Securities, a top market maker, is linking up with Merrill Lynch and Goldman Sachs to form a new company, Primex Trading, to provide a platform to trade stocks using an auction system.
Madoff says the platform will offer "price improvement and enhanced liquidity." Primex is expected to attract trading by allowing buyers and sellers to compete inside the quoted price for a stock, thereby narrowing the spread, or gap between bid and ask prices.
Madoff, Merrill, Goldman form Primex
- MarketWatch

"The drop in demand is actually making it cheaper to get oil out of the same holes. ."

mmm should do wonders for the green movement. Guess mother nature's not going to protect us from ourselves after all.

It's not the oil in the tank, it's the money in the bank baby. The last time I heard that was 1984.

Bernie Madoff arrested over alleged $50 billion fraud
Bernie Madoff arrested over alleged $50 billion fraud - Telegraph

In 2000, his market-making business BMIS partnered with Goldman Sachs and Merrill Lynch to the form the new Primex Trading platform, one of the early rival electronic exchanges to the main bourses which eventually fell by the wayside following a partnership with NASDAQ.
BMIS is also credited with ending the old practice of quoting New York Stock Exchange-listed securities in eighths of a dollar in 1997, instead listing them in sixteenths.
Mr Madoff began BMIS with just $5,000 of savings from jobs lifeguarding at Rockaway Beach and installing sprinkler systems.
The firm grew to become a leading market maker, with brother Peter, nephew Charles, niece Shana, and sons Mark and Andrew all involved in the business at some stage in recent years.
His firm's website claims that BMIS ranks among the top one per cent of US securities firms, and states that "clients know Bernard Madoff has a personal interest in maintaining... high ethical standards."

Madoff Investment Securities, a top market maker, is linking up with Merrill Lynch and Goldman Sachs to form a new company, Primex Trading, to provide a platform to trade stocks using an auction system.

And there you have it, all the parties exposed.

Hoopajoops - I see there's a Tourneau at 175 Worth.

Can't vouch for Palm Beach, but their NYC store is the go to spot for trading off your interesting timepiece for something more interesting or more of-the-moment - or for lucre.

If any of the riff raff from this blog try to go check out the action on Worth Ave they'll just raise the bridges.

lawyerliz(Very Good) writes:
Hoop--Were they ever REALLY rich? Or, was it always fake?

I've seen a few instances of rich person collapse. From what I gather, it's very rare for a sprinkler repairman to destory 50 billion dollars. New money collapses are also different from old money collapses. I've had the most experience with new money collapses. A shocking percentage of our new money rich people become wealthy not through skill, acumen, or any sort of merit, but instead they end up getting rich by being really, really, really lucky. Right skill, right pitch, right place, right time. When you take a nobody and make him rich, it changes his identity; he becomes his wealth. The story of his success becomes the story of his personhood. Few people I know of get lucky, rich, and then retire to a horse farm, and those that do tend to not get in trouble. The guys who keep rolling the dice, who need to continue the story of success, tend to get in trouble. I've got a lot of opinions about these types of people but it would take me too long to type them out and I have to go grab some breakfast.

I guess I'll summarize it by saying that most of the rich people whose books I've crawled through make me sick. They're preserved by virtue of the myth in our country that merit attracts wealth, that these people deserve the rewards that have fallen on them through chance and luck. If this myth were shattered, these people would be hunted down.

They knew Madoff was a crook
That is why they were investing with him.
Too bad they lost their money.

But certainly deserved

Re:

Primex Trading will continue to own its patent-pending technology that comprises the Primex Auction System, and will continue to seek new and additional partners to recognize the value of its electronic auction intellectual property

Oh shit, now I have to find that patent

How do you say "this sucker's going down" in Yiddish?

I think we are close to a once in a lifetime opportunity to buy energy stocks. Oil will hit $150 bucks sometime in the next 5 years. Geopolitcial issues and underinvestment in new infrastucture will drive the ultimate move. I think around $30 is my time to load up.

Re: Madoff. Do you think someone is unhappy enuff to kill him?

The Primex website;

The Primex Auction

And you should also check out the updated version of Madoff's own website--color scheme is mostly black. I think it's meant to indicate mourning, not "in the black..."

Bernard L. Madoff Investment Securities LLC Liquidation Proceeding

Liz only got a "Very Good" rating? That's sad.

Karl Denninger  analyzes the Madoff implosion:

"Madoff's company, just so we're all in the know here, is a market maker on Nasdaq, which means that a lot of other people's money (and shares) pass through his hands. T+3 will come, but will your shares be there when it does? . . . .Finally, let us never forget that there is never only one cockroach."

liz,
You asked how rich people are?

I suppose it depends on the person. Same thing for rich, poor, famous, infamous, prole... it all depends on the person.

There are people who can be content in any situation; there are people who can be crazy inspite of the financial security they have. Compared to the rest of the world, America is "rich". (Or maybe we were 20 years ago).

zero sum? your 8 fig account and your 7 fig salary say differently

Maybe this will be one of Obama's pardons.

Liz only got a "Very Good" rating? That's sad.

Naturally, I reserve (excellent) only for myself!
.
.
.
.
.
.
(I need to be able to look at all the posts I've made in a thread super-easy).

Liz, they liked him, but often referred to him, behind his back, of course, as a Madoff. You know...like "what a Madoff."

via Barley:

Requests for redemptions for this Q are over w/ most hedgies. But March 09 will be interesting.

Ah. So likely the timing of this blowup was not a coincidence. The PTB have until March to reassure hedge fund investors that this was an aberration.

By March, that will be impossible, I'd bet.

hmmmmm,

Love these mysteries:

BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS
AND INTERFERENCES

Ex parte PETER B. MADOFF,
ALBERTO C. CASANOVA,
and CHRISTOPHER KEITH

Appeal No. 2004-2085
Application 09/272,5421

HEARD: March 8, 2005

Ex Parte MADOFF et al - Page 1 - Patent Attorney Resources - Board of Patent Appeals and Interferences

I'm coming to the position that inflation/deflation may be the wrong prism to look through. It's more trust/mistrust.

Apparatchik Zackattack | Homepage | 12.13.08 - 12:27 pm | #

Exactly, and why the Madoff thing may have decidedly non-linear reactions.

At this point, with Ben and other central bankers around the world printing money as fast as they can and with Obama ready to unleash trillions of dollars of new fiscal stimulus, I feel sorry for people on this board who believe in Depression-style deflation and $9 oil.

I felt fortunate to have had the opportunity to buy some oil in my IRA a week ago at near $40.

In one week, I'm up 12-15% on that oil. But I don't really care about the short-term fluctuations.

I'm trying to hold purchasing power long-term against the flood of hyper-inflation that's coming. I don't want to retire with a pile of worthless dollars and paper in my IRA.

Is there anyone here who doesn't think oil won't hit $100 at some point in the next 4-5 years? If so, why wouldn't you buy it now?

Where else can you earn the same return?

Lawyerliz,

At first it scared me to death, but I realized that it don't mean a damned thing, just makes the opportunity costs non financial, only personal. I'm not happy or sad about myself, I merely exist. If my actions make others happy, that's what truly matters; however if you're a bad actor I will come down on you like a ton of bricks even though I have no power beyond my two fists and my mind.

My brother and sister do nothing with it and just watch the pile grow and I don't know how they to it, my parents wonder about me sometimes because I actually put my money into the greater economy. On the deals I do I'm just looking to come out a little bit ahead because as a rent seeker I do nothing but provide capital. When I actually work I expect proper compensation.

None of us are greedheads with solid BS detectors and most of our trading is macro in nature.

I don't know if that actually answers your question but it's as close as I can get.

Where is UB??

CHRISTOPHER KEITH, CHAIRMAN Chris Keith is the Chairman of PDQ Enterprises Chris Keith is the Chairman of PDQ Enterprises, LLC and the inventor of the PDQ idea. Chris, who is also the Chairman, CEO and co-founder of ExchangeLab, is responsible for the overall strategic business vision of the company and development of its technology initiatives. Mr. Keith was President and Founder of Financial Auction Network, Inc., an Internet auction based trading system designed to attract the hidden pools of liquidity in equity markets, formed PRIMEX in a strategic partnership with the Madoff Investment Group.

Where else can you earn the same return?
rich

Here: The page cannot be found

These oil swings concern me. Small shifts in demand and production cause huge swings in price (5% demand drop = 50% price drop) and then price affects development but with a multi-year delay on oil supply. It's like a governor that reacts strongly and slowly - very likely to be unstable and produce wider and wider swings.

I can certainly see 25. Probably not 10. But even 25 would completely halt development, and then the 4% or so decline rate would rapidly drag us back to soaring prices. I see ugly times for any business trying to deal with oil prices.

3 billion from Santander, oh my

I'm coming to the position that inflation/deflation may be the wrong prism to look through. It's more trust/mistrust.

Apparatchik Zackattack | Homepage | 12.13.08 - 12:27 pm | #

Exactly, and why the Madoff thing may have decidedly non-linear reactions.

Are you suggesting that the Madoff thing is going to undermine peoples' trust? Probably. But isn't it amazing that anyone was still trusting anyone the day before Madoff hit the news, given all the stuff we've learned in the past year?

lawyerliz writes:
Was that graph supposed to mean something?
lawyerliz | 12.13.08 - 1:43 pm | #

lawyerliz, it is the rate of oil production in the USA, all of it - and that rate is going down - and has been for decades. And will continue for all the decades to come, regardless of current reserve numbers or any other arm waving...until we don't use oil at all (at which point we will still not have "run out" - we just won't ever make it come out of the ground any faster).

If you were asking about that graph. Smile

There's one thing the Madoff affair will cement.  You can bet every year end hedge fund request for redemption will be exercised. 

http://www.pionline.com/apps/pbcs.dll/article?AID=/20081208/PRINTSUB/312089980

"Suppose you had a TV set, and every time someone had a new TV program they had to drop a different line to your living room, put a different box in your closet, and give you a different remote with a different methodology?" he asks. The analogy isn't too far-fetched; different trading systems and ECNs do require their own software and often their own hardware. "We're not trying to tout one method over another," Keith says, "We're trying to create an open platform. We're in the Time-Warner cable business -- not the program business."

Snore ...ZZZZZZZZZZZZ

I'd also like to remind you there were several people on this board who were ridiculing me a week or two ago for advocating gold, silver, food and energy in this environment.

All of those turned up big-time last week as the dollar started crashing.

Now, we'll see if the turn has legs.

I'm betting it does. You can bet the way you want. But don't ridicule people who are a little early into a big turn. You won't get anywhere by following herd-think.

Right now, herd-think has commodities and oil going down. Most of the MSM deals in herd-think.

[I'm thrilled. Finally I'm convinced we're going to get to where we need to be.
CDS guy ]

Sorry, but I am afraid you are suffering from delusion if you think we are going to get out of this deep hole by getting the religion of honesty. Better take a step back and take a hard look at the macro economy. We are deep in the hole on every measure, govt fiscal & current acct deficits and getting worse, as far as the eye can see. The sooner we become honest the faster we collapse.

The approach here is to keep the game going until we inflate our way to some measure of near term equilibrium.

Who in this country is going to make money when price signals are not shrouded in some way?

Even at a casino, one assumes there are rules to the game. The stock market has been exposed as corrupt, inept, and manipulated. There are no rules. I don't see how anyone can trade under such circumstances, short or long. We need a house cleaning of the first order, prison sentences and an independent SEC. Confidence is right. There is none now.

I can advocate hedging your gas price at these levels by purchasing shares in UGA (gasoline ETF), although I think crude will hit $20 next year.

For example, if you estimate your gas consumption next year to be 500 gallons, then multiply that by current price of gasoline, the resulting total should be the dollar amount of UGA shares you should purchase. Then, if UGA goes down, you should pay less for gas on average to offset this decline; and if retail gas rises, UGA should rise to offset that. Classic hedging.

So hedging is good. Otherwise, I think those who speculate on a hyperinflationary outcome are going to lose everything.

I hope The Donald had some money invested with Madoff, and leveraged it.

Fair Economist | Homepage | 12.13.08 - 1:51 pm | #

Have you taken a look yet at the IEA World Energy Outlook 2008 summary? For the first time they have generated a bottoms up supply forecast and underlying decline rates - 4% is a fond memory - worth a read.
http://www.iea.org/Textbase/npsum/WEO2008SUM.pdf

Pooki

i mis quoted AND misunderstood your post

in my enthusiasm to "overstate" what you said

got it now

thanks for the correction

I hope The Donald had some money invested with Madoff, and leveraged it.
\t bearly

What makes you think The Donald has any money?  We are talking about someone so inept he can't turn a profit with a monoply protected casino. 

the patents seem to imply that madoff was a significant part of the transition to decimal trading a decade ago.

interesting footnote

"Pavel, I agree...and I'm glad to see you're getting your fiber."

Thanks. I hope at least some of us grasping, selfish seniors will not put too great a strain on the medical system.

I just wrote a somber predictive poem. I hope it's merely literature.

"It is not enough that I succeed. Others must fail. . .

----Rouchefoucauld (sp?)"

He also wrote (from memory): Many complain of their health, few complain of their judgment.

"Where else can you earn the same return?"
rich | 12.13.08 - 1:49 pm | #

Our newest rental property purchases are returning 20%+.

Our family does do all our own repairs,except roofing and a/c replacements,so that helps a little.

You just have to purchase the property with the knowledge that you are only going to get 400/month or a little more for a competitive unit. Much above this price and the unit will go begging...

Chris

Login or register to post comments
Syndicate content