I wonder if the horrific October dip sets up what looks like a rebound in coming months as we recover from "totally horrific" to only "terrible" conditions and it head fakes soooo many people, sets up a bear rally, robs more people of hard earned cash, etc, etc.
WASHINGTON (AP) A Republican congressman from Georgia said Monday he fears that President-elect Obama will establish a Gestapo-like security force to impose a Marxist or fascist dictatorship.
"It may sound a bit crazy and off base, but the thing is, he's the one who proposed this national security force," Rep. Paul Broun said of Obama in an interview Monday with The Associated Press. "I'm just trying to bring attention to the fact that we may may not, I hope not but we may have a problem with that type of philosophy of radical socialism or Marxism."
I didn't vote for O but that congressman sounds overly dramatic and looks like sour grapes and comes off as a nutter. Funny though how the first words are "A Republican congressman". MSM name the party immediately when it's a negative story about the R party but then play guess the party when it's a negative about the D party. classic stuff.
God bless Georgia. That is truly a great American. Of course, he was all good with what the current administration has done to our liberties, rights and the Constitution.
MSM name the party immediately when it's a negative story about the R party but then play guess the party when it's a negative about the D party. classic stuff.
A phenomenon which is entirely in your imagination, however.
Was looking at more of mini-me's speech from yesterday. He mentioned a tranche report delivered to Congress. Found it via ustreas.gov at following link.
The Capital Purchase Program deadline is November 14. I imagine there will be some bloodletting as the scope of institutions who applied for help is much larger than expected.
ille_vir writes: Seriously, Byzantine, does that post have anything to do with Toll Brothers and their guidances? Keep it topical, this isn't a political blog.
Umm, well, see, let me get a chalkboard here -- the economics takes place in the context of the American political milieu.
I would say that is an accurate indicator of the current American political climate. Irrationalism is strong factor in policymaking, even if you don't subscribe to it.
Seriously, I put the chance that O really wants a Gestapo-like security force to impose a Marxist or fascist dictatorship at 1 in 100,000. I put the probability that O was just spouting foolish, fantasy rhetoric at 1 in 3. Rookie, dumb-ass mistake to pontificate about some fantasy nat'l security force. When I actually see progress being made to assemble said force is when I'll take it seriously.
And yet no major HB has BKd. I think it is a function of the credit bubble. Durring the good times they were given huge lines of credit far beyond normal operating needs. They used that the do large scale flipping and speculation. The sale of BLM land at auction being a glaring example. When the first goes down all the other lenders will be forced to either limit draws and/or mark existing loans way down triggering serial HB implosion as they all rush for the exit simultaneously.
Hard to 'conjure" up what the Toll buyer would look like. He/she would need excellent credit, a large down payment, and a very secure job. Maybe there are some that meet that criteria for a starter home, but "better" homes will demand the buyer either has a rich relative, or has just sold a house well above his mortgage.
Most likely, home builders are going to go bust, and their properties will be fire saled. It wouldn't surprise me if the feds bought some of this property and used it for subsidized housing--and the spiral grows.
Looking at Japan as a guide, where the government became the last borrower standing to prop up money supply, is it possible for the government to survive when balance sheets are finally repaired and interest rates begin to rise in concert?
OMG! I read the Trench Report, and thought, "what a nice introduction to the report. But where is the report?"
Then I realized that that WAS the report! It doesn't say ANYTHING! Paulson must be laughing his ass off. Pelosi will certainly change the subject next time transparency or accountability is mentioned.
When the first goes down all the other lenders will be forced to either limit draws and/or mark existing loans way down triggering serial HB implosion as they all rush for the exit simultaneously.
How far down do you think TBTF extends?
I imagine we're going to bail the top 3 mkt participants but HBs are not where my heart lies -- do folks really think these co.s will be allowed to fail in the current climate of Uncle Sugar running the economy out of his pocket?
It seems like an "unreasonable" blow to confidence when we are trying to pretend this is a liquidity situation and all we need to do it build confidence to put a bottom in on housing.
I have a friend that works a senior position for Toll, they know it's ugly there but when I talk to my friend, I don't get the sense that they really get how deep and nasty this downturn is, they use platitudes such as "yeah, real estate is cyclical and we're in a downturn right now". That ho-hum sentiment doesn't lead me to believe the people on the inside fully grasp the severity of this situation.
The first report was just a rehash of old news, although some might find the terms of the deal interesting beyond what has been reported by the MSM. It's basically the report on the $125B given to 9 banks in late October.
"I imagine we're going to bail the top 3 mkt participants but HBs are not where my heart lies -- do folks really think these co.s will be allowed to fail in the current climate of Uncle Sugar running the economy out of his pocket?"
Start-up costs for a homebuilding company are minimal, so barriers to entry are low. There is no need to bailout a homebuilder. Absolutely none. And I am highly doubtful it will be done. I believe the homebuilders are seen one of the major reasons for this debacle. The gov't will not show sympathy.
Re: plantaganet
The details are in the appendices. I'm trying to figure out if there is something to the December 31, 2009 date... but I just realized it's 2009; not 2008.
"Re: plantaganet
The details are in the appendices."
No, no, I include those as having been read. People provide more detail to explain a late gas bill payment when applying for a mortgage (OK, 20 years ago they did).
The HBs will not be rescued. Not only won't the public stand for it but they need to be destroyed so that their liabilities go to the grave with them. Too many home warranties on stick stacks, too many HOAs underwater, etc.
Elvis: I believe the homebuilders are seen one of the major reasons for this debacle. The gov't will not show sympathy.
I certainly hope you are right, although I have to say I find that kinda ironic. Don't blame the people who made the financial structure that made it all happen, blame the people who build the houses in response to demand.
Not that they don't deserve it, I'll just be sad if they string up Toll Bros. and proclaim they "got the bad guy".
I don't know why Toll Brothers would have any trouble moving their inventory. I went to their website and pulled up their listings for my state, and first on the list is a lovely community of half-million dollar homes in Nazareth, PA.
Why aren't people buying these homes? Just think how short your commute would be to beautiful downtown Easton! Plus, coming soon is flintlock antlerless AND antlered deer season. Come on folks, there's nothing like kicking back in your new estate home while watching the neighbors hang carcass.
"Step right up, everyone's a winner, bargains galore..."
How about instituting knockout clauses on all debt in the case of deflation. This would prevent the strangle effect, while allowing poor business models to fail.
interesting article on concept of how to deal with derivatives in the future, seems to have merit. derivatives certainly won't be going away and need to be transparently regulated. post riots of course.
"However, Mr Andrews, who helped build the London Stock Exchange trading system before founding Xchanging in 1999, stresses the need for a neutral platform independent of the exchanges to promote transparency."
"Don't blame the people who made the financial structure that made it all happen, blame the people who build the houses in response to demand."
The Congresses' primary friends/financial supporters were the creaters of the financial structures. Homebuilders are an easy sacrificial lamb, especially since it is so simple to start up a new homebuilder. I'm not saying it is completely fair, but it will likely be the outcome.
"during our 2008 third quarter earnings call, were upended by the past month's financial crisismonth's financial crisis. Results of this crisis -- accelerating fears of job"
Umm...wrong, it's going down regardless of the "financial crisis". The "financial crisis" isn't helping, but lets not put the chicken ahead of the egg. I love how these con-men goons twist the truth for their own financial benefit.
If they do not pay dividends for 6 periods, the Treasury has the right to appoint two directors. (Was that a requirement in the legislation? I lost track.)
Basically nothing compensation.
Pretty amusing compared to the amount of reporting you have to do for actual securities.
What? Not stand for it? They've stood for everything else, and this will be no different. If HB doesn't get a bail, it's because they're seen as low brow as compared to the sophisticated, intellectual FIRE, not because the public won't stand for it. The public matters not.
Elvis writes: I'm not saying it is completely fair, but it will likely be the outcome.
I'm not disagreeing with you or Rob Dawg. I'm actually glad to hear someone might not get bailed. It's just typical -- it's a circus of crime and the coppers nab the retarded clown.
How about instituting knockout clauses on all debt in the case of deflation. This would prevent the strangle effect, while allowing poor business models to fail.
What's a "knockout clause"? Also, when it comes down to debt you either make good on your promise to pay it back or you don't. The lender either gets his wealth back or he doesn't. In real terms there is no grey area or in between.
And whenever lenders don't get their wealth back, whatever the mechanism, however much it is hidden behind paper manipulations, that leads to a strangling effect as lenders increasingly refuse to lend.
People know when they can buy less than before they made the loan.
If these guys fail, could that create problems down the line for those particular financial institutions?
homedad43
When the HBs fail they will singlehandedly take down(ey) many institutions. The scarier aspect his that HBs were darlings of MMFs and retirement funds. The HBs were a secret backdoor to laundering what is in effect mortgage loans and have the debt come out smelling like commercial paper backed by assets.
"If these guys fail, could that create problems down the line for those particular financial institutions?
homedad43"
The collapse in land prices are the reason homebuilders will go BK, because they greedily war chested 10 year supplies of land at market top prices (liabilities). Their lenders will get hurt, but, at least, they can sell the land at pennies on the dollar to recoup some of their loans. Not sure home much leverage the hombebuilders were using to buy the land when they were cash rich, but I imagine it was significant.
Rob Dawg writes: The HBs were a secret backdoor to laundering what is in effect mortgage loans and have the debt come out smelling like commercial paper backed by assets.
Bonds on forward income streams collateralized by the land marked at inflated prices at the time of issuance?
The collapse in land prices are the reason homebuilders will go BK, because they greedily war chested 10 year supplies of land at market top prices (liabilities).
Specifically why I mentioned the BLM land auctions around Las Vegas and the phantom assets behind commercial paper. Lucky/unlucky that many "purchases" were actually JVs and options. Lucky because of lower gross exposure, unlucky because those investments are zeros at best.
So give yourself and the economy a present while you're shopping for others. This is the year to shop till you drop, and don't be afraid to haggle on prices.
Nowadays, everything is negotiable, whether it's a luxury car, a designer dress or a flat-screen TV. Don't forget to ask for a discount at restaurants as well -- especially the high end, which are suffering dramatic declines in diners.
The 6.5% unemployment rate means that 93.5% have jobs. What's more, many are not only keeping up with inflation, they are beating it.
More than ever, it pays to remember that when the going gets tough, the tough go shopping.
If the HBs bankrupt does that mean all of their land and houses will get auctioned off?
OT, related
So if one of the automakers were to BK would that mean all of their dealerships BK, and we get some type of insane "everything must go now!" type of sales?
WASHINGTON -- Fannie Mae, Freddie Mac and U.S. officials are expected to announce plans Tuesday to speed up the modification of hundreds of thousands of loans held by the housing finance giants, marking the latest effort to try and prevent more foreclosures, people familiar with the matter said.
The effort will target certain loans that are past due and will aim to bring the ratio of household debt to income for these borrowers down to 38%, these people said. It could apply to a broad range of borrowers. U.S. government officials plan to encourage big banks that hold loans in their portfolios to take similar steps.
The announcement is expected to come at a press conference at 2 p.m. ET at the Federal Housing Finance Agency, which temporarily has Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac in conservatorship because of their shaky financial condition.
Spokespeople for the companies, the Treasury Department and the Federal Housing Finance Agency weren't immediately available for comment.
The program is expected to be an extension of the Hope Now alliance announced last year that aimed to help people avert foreclosure by reworking the terms of their mortgages. Several large banks, including Bank of America Corp., Citigroup Inc., and J.P. Morgan Chase & Co., have announced their own foreclosure prevention plans.
Some bankers have complained that Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac weren't being flexible enough in discussions over loan modifications.
The administration is still discussing a range of other, more extensive options to help homeowners.
Bonds on forward income streams collateralized by the land marked at inflated prices at the time of issuance?
Byzantine_Ruins
I was thinking more about lines of credit than actual bond issuance. The inflated land value was an interesting of sardine trading. Carrying low cost land on the books was for the HBs "dead equity" being marked at accquisiton not inflated bubble value. The solution was to trade with other HBs and then appear to have valuable assets at the new market price.
Please tell me this cp is somehow not the cp Treasury is buying.
popeye
Even if it isn't on their books directly (likely) it is in many money market funds which now are backstopped against breaking the buck so in effect they are govt liabilities regardless.
serf Alan Greenspend,
I was speculating that the gold on their books is valued at the lower of (cost of acquisition) or (market price), which is how German banks do their books. I just threw in some german words to be fancy, but may have been confusing.
It's the reserves and IMF accounts so it is conceivable that they acquired it at $42.22 back in the early 70s. There was no reason to net acquire more gold since Nixon busted up Bretton Woods. A bunch of countries sold off gold around 2000 or thereabout, it's trendy
I wonder how they are going to pay for it.... Modifications for hundreds of thousands of homeowners.
Not even sure how they can handle that logistically. Just mail everyone a package of paperwork with a note, "This is your new mortgage. Cheers, US Treasury"
"The effort will ... aim to bring the ratio of household debt to income for these borrowers down to 38%."
Let's see how this works. The immigrant gardener, with $15k salary, has purchased an $800k home, with no money down. Just lower his principal by $760,500. Problem solved.
Rob Dawg writes: I was thinking more about lines of credit than actual bond issuance. The inflated land value was an interesting of sardine trading. [...] The solution was to trade with other HBs and then appear to have valuable assets at the new market price.
Right, so we're gonna buy the land at the bubble price by bailing the creditors. It's awesome, sell the taxpayer sizzle without steak then submit the bill for the steak dinner.
I'm curious, since you're clearly involved in shorting the crap out of these guys, how did the pension side deal when the market for the paper froze? Obviously the banks can just keep extending credit to avoid recognizing losses, but how do the pensions do it? Did they mark their losses then, are the still rolling over this "AB"CP in non-market deals, or did they do even more arcane crap like establishing a company to buy paper and investing in it?
Our government has been frantically waving its arms around to prevent a cataclysmic stock market free-fall. I mean, another one aside from the one they caused by banning shorts.
At least they learned their lesson and haven't outlawed shorts again...
"The solution was to trade with other HBs and then appear to have valuable assets at the new market price."
Guys gets a new banking job in Charlotte and drives out into the country on weekends. In a tiny hamlet, spots a man with a big blue tick hound. Asking how much the man wants for the dog, the reply is "five thousand dollars." Banker laughs at it and leaves. Next week, goes back, same thing; ask price still the same.
Third week, goes back, and instead of the dog, two little kittens are playing under the chair. Asking where the dog was, old man says he got rid of him.
"Bet you didn't get 5000 for him."
"Sure did. Traded him for these two twenty five hundred dollar cats."
The Federal Reserve said its big rescue plan for money-market funds will be delayed until later this month.
The delay, announced Monday, presents a challenge for the $3.6 trillion money-market industry, which is struggling to sell short-term debt into tight credit markets. The Fed plans to finance purchases for as much as $540 billion of the money funds' short-term debt.
Many had expected the buying program to be up and running last week, but now the Fed says it will start on or about Nov. 24. The funds need the money to meet investor redemptions.
The reason for the delay appears to be the Fed's preoccupation with other bailouts and wrangling over how the money-fund program will be set up.
It's hard to watch what's going on in each ring of the circus.
Rob Dawg writes:
The HBs will not be rescued. Not only won't the public stand for it but they need to be destroyed so that their liabilities go to the grave with them. Too many home warranties on stick stacks, too many HOAs underwater, etc.
Excellent point Rob but what the Public will and will not stand for is beyond the question, I think your point about home warranties on poorly constructed homes is the kind of logic that our pubic officals appreciate!
Could it be that the american tradition against haggling is like banning shorts on a stock exchange? Instead of a gradual decline of prices of goods in a store as less interested buyers meet their prices, buyers unwilling to buy at full price simply shake their head and walk away, until the stock is worthless.
"The Martinezes bought their house in early 2005 for $630,000. It is now worth about $420,000. They have an interest-only mortgage, a popular loan during the boom that allows owners to forgo principal payments for a time.
But these loans eventually become unmanageable. In 2015, Martinez said, his monthly payments will be $12,000 a month."
Not tradition so much as the evolved consequence of UPC code tags, scanners, point of sale inventory control and sales staff lacking authority to make any modification to price or terms.
I'm curious, since you're clearly involved in shorting the crap out of these guys, how did the pension side deal when the market for the paper froze? Obviously the banks can just keep extending credit to avoid recognizing losses, but how do the pensions do it? Did they mark their losses then, are the still rolling over this "AB"CP in non-market deals, or did they do even more arcane crap like establishing a company to buy paper and investing in it?
Byzantine_Ruins
Want to hear something really sad? Doctors orders no stress while recovering so no trading for me. The best shorting environment ever and I'm on the bench. My best guess is that the pensions are all "hold to maturity" for their investments. They aren't yet in a position of having to sell to cover distributions and they take a long view. Won't work this time but it doesn't have an immediate impact either. CalPERS already owns several holes in the ground in Sacramento and I expect more funds will join them as landowners versus bondholders soon.
crispy&cole writes:
C is collapsing...
D'oh! Another stock in my inheritance portfolio. I'm trying to figure out if I can calculate whether he'd have done better investing in a broad based index or picking the way he has done.
I'm not sure if he got advice from others or if he picked everything by himself.
Wow, GLD and SLV getting killed... are these moves signifying trouble in some hedge fund?
The conundrum is this:
A lot of debt does not reflect expected hold to maturity value
That problem is so large that it directly shrinks money supply, and indirectly discourages more lending through fear/uncertainty
Resulting deflation from a money supply contraction would strangle all debtors, even those that could reasonably repay under regular low or higher inflation
The popular solution (supported by Bernanke, Krugman, Koo, ...) is to substitute for the contracting private credit, with public credit via government borrowing + spending
I would advocate a more direct solution such as imposing deflationary knockouts on all debt (to keep legitimate loans payable, bad loans fail like bad loans should) or a combination of expediting default proceedings while acting as financier of last resort (market-based cramdowns if you will)
-* to ease the transition for this shock, relax tax code for a period of time to allow losses to be spread out
ø the problem will persist until there is private credit growth (the expansionist public credit makes helps debts to be repaid slowly but surely with low interest rates, mine attacks the principal and is more of a controversial spanking of irresponsible lenders)
ø dangers include the newly undertaken public debt being unaffordable amongst increasing interest rates if it was spent without regard to generating a return
ø if other economies are growing, and thus their credit demand, then there is a threat to currency collapse
the do nothing option is to scare everyone off from debt for their entire lifetimes, and prolong the balance sheet repairing
Toll Brothers' Execs -- A Fine Example Of Corporate Crooks of America
Toll Brothers' Scam, aka stock, has been my number one short position for the past 6 months (I was early, as always) among the Housing and Finance related companies and I have commented on it several times during this period (see one commentary below, for example, and you will see that I had already concluded then that he was lying).
My skills at identifying Corporate Crooks is well-honed by now and it took me watching two interviews each by Mr. Robert Toll, one of the two Toll brothers and the CEO, and Joel Rassman, the CFO, to conclude that they are genuine Crooks and they were purposely misleading the public to pump-and-dump their holdings of the companys Scam.
The Scam, which has been going down sharply for the past 3½ months, went down another 14% today when these execs lies about the future demand for their homes could no longer be held back from the public. The two Crooks again appeared on the TV today and what a difference in their demeanor and the lack of former confidence about the business in 2006 that they exuded only two months ago.
Vast majority of America's public corporations are run by Crooks who are in the BUSINESS of selling their company's Scam. Dont feed the Crooks by being a Scam Lover. If you got the guts and, most importantly, the skills, be a Scam Hater! It would be good for your character.
Want to hear something really sad? Doctors orders no stress while recovering so no trading for me. The best shorting environment ever and I'm on the bench.
Awww man, that sucks.
Oh well, just think of it as preserving you from frustration when you watch them reduce the worth of your winnings to the price of an egg salad sandwich.
That would be 22.5% interest(fully amortized over remaining 20 years). I don't think that is even close to being right.
Anonymous | 11.11.08 - 11:36 am | #
I think they were suggesting that his debt service costs would come from not paying principal for a period of time, not from rising interest rates. Who knows what really went on.
I am tempted to call all of these people idiots until I realize that I am going to be paying for their debt.
Austin Tex,
I know of no such precedent, just my original musing about.
I guess you could relate it to a country declaring default on debt, and then unilaterally repaying on its own terms. That is common in history, and usually makes for nasty disputes -- but hey everyone is in the same boat this time
Published: November 11 2008 14:42 | Last updated: November 11 2008 14:42
The global economy is entering a slowdown of epic proportions, comparable to the Great Depression, John Thain, chairman and chief executive of Merrill Lynch, warned on Tuesday.
Speaking at the firms annual banking and financial services conference, Mr Thain said that while he was cautiously optimistic about the future of the financial services industry, he was not at all optimistic about the near-term prospects of the US economy and global markets.
Right now, the US economy is contracting very rapidly. We are looking at a period of global slowdown, and a global slowdown in economic activity that affects everyone who participates in global markets, he told investors. This is not like 1987 or 1998 or 2001. The contraction going on is bigger than that. We will in fact look back to the 1929 period to see the kind of slowdown were seeing now.
Gee John thanks for the timely update on your thinking. I hear Seattle's getting to be a really hot city to move to, what do you think Mr Thain?
Low demand for Toll and other properties beyond the balance sheet issues is the problem going forth for the entire ponzi RE business. Keeping folks locked in there upside down mortgage does nothing for sales velocity and while home prices decline inventory levels continue to increase will sooner or later force the investor speculator to the sideline further killing the demand side.
grim!
bondgirl, I assumed that he had paid no principle after 10 years and used the $630,000 amortized over 20 which is the way most interest only loans are set up.
So I won't bore anyone with a more detailed response to serf Alan Greenspend:
From the U.S. Supreme Court:
The United States Gold Standard Act of 1900 set the value of the dollar at $20.67 per troy ounce of gold. 6 On January 31, 1934, nine months before the United States ratified the Convention, President Roosevelt increased the official domestic price of gold to $35 per ounce. 7 In 1945 the United States accepted membership in the International Monetary Fund (IMF) and so undertook to maintain a "par value" for the dollar and to buy and sell gold at the official price in exchange for balances of dollars officially held by other IMF nations. 8 For almost 40 years the $35-per-ounce price of gold was used to derive from the Convention's [466 U.S. 243, 249] Article 22(2) a cargo liability limit of $7.50 per pound. See, e. g., 14 CFR 221.176 (1972).
When the central banks of most Western nations instituted a "two-tier" gold standard in 1968 the gold-based international monetary system began to collapse. Thereafter, official gold transactions were conducted at the official price, and private transactions at the floating, free market price. App. 21. In August 1971 the United States suspended convertibility of foreign official holdings of dollars into gold. In December 1971 and then again in February 1973 the official exchange rate of the dollar against gold was increased. These changes were approved by Congress in the Par Value Modification Act, passed in early 1972 (increasing the official price to $38 per ounce 9 ) and in its 1973 reenactment (setting a $42.22-per-ounce price.
Mtn House community is a commute town east of bay area...If we forgive thier loans, I'm up in arms..
Why anyone would live there and commute over the altamont pass everyday is mind boggling..Windy, ugly, cold in winter, hot in summer and no trees...Merced relocated by about 70 miles...
Austin Tex,
I do like the idea as it is a simple feedback method to keep the credit system stable. It is probably too late for the US to switch tracks in mid-course this time without some very strong political moves
RE: low barriers to entry
How hard is it to start up a bank?
AXP lost money for 4 straight quarters and became a bank holding company. The only product a bank has to produce is money; they don't make houses or cars. Yet we bail them out.
If a biomedical company working on new cancer cures lost money for a year, it MIGHT be a OK to bail them out, after a public process of experts proving they had promising ideas.
some investor guy writes:
Can someone explain to me why homebuilders aren't converting to only building houses which people already have a substantial deposit on?
I am tempted to call all of these people idiots until I realize that I am going to be paying for their debt.
Bond Girl | 11.11.08 - 11:43 am | #
Yeah, I know what you mean. I am an idiot for buying a house that was not overpriced, that fit my budget, that I am working towards paying off early. I wish I was able to receive a cut in the principal that I owe. But no, I get to pay for someone else's debt reduction through my taxes. Moral hazard indeed.
"He has cut his DVD buying from 50 a month to perhaps one, and is waiting until the Christmas sales to buy a high-definition television. He does not indulge much anymore in his hobbies of scuba diving and flying. "Best to wait for a better price, or do without," Rogers, 52, said."
"I thought the best quote was about how they stay at home now and play board games as a family, except for Monopoly.
Lifeguard1999"
I bet they play this alot:
In Trump: the Game players compete in two parts. In the first part, players circle the board, feeding money into the eight available properties, then bidding on those properties (not being able to see how much the property is worth) and collecting Trump cards . When all the properties are gone, the negotiation phase begins. Players use their Trump cards to buy and sell properties, some cards award huge payoffs for specific sets. After each player has passed their turn, the property values are revealed, and the player with the most money wins (usually in the $400-$600M range).
Elvis writes:
"Keeping folks locked in there upside down mortgage does nothing for sales velocity"
Or does not stimulate the economy by creating a need/demand for more new homebuilding.
No new furiture,drapes etc for the new house, repairs and up grades are put off, the entire money cycle is broken.
Currently everyonw is looking at sales numbers but nobody is talking about the move-up market which is being destroyed by the current foreclosure/economy cycle. What do you think will happen to the various pricing levels as the bottom level buyers are wiped out and replaced with investor own rentals...
Thanks for the series of entries, CR: the actual Toll quote, the WSJ affiliate Marketwatch (John Spence) report about it, your edit of/take on it, and finally our responses to the package.
Poor Bob Toll doesn't get the same overview, nor does poor John Spence (but nor does he help his readership by deleting any mention of previous Toll family trading) who doesn't need to respond to any blog queries.
Blogs, possibly a demonstration of the disintegration of insider trading...a hope for us who just like to gather rather than network and score.
The banks are not giving mortgages to anybody so nobody will be able to buy houses anymore. So what do you expect to happen. House sales will go done en prices with it!
First?
woo hoo
hah!
shit!
Step right up, and be first - to buy a brand new house.
I'm sure that the interest is even greater than in being the first poster right? Right?
make them a "bank holding company" I'm sure they all have applications at hand.
Ciao
MS
I wonder how much the loss of down payment assistance has contributed to this?
I wonder if the horrific October dip sets up what looks like a rebound in coming months as we recover from "totally horrific" to only "terrible" conditions and it head fakes soooo many people, sets up a bear rally, robs more people of hard earned cash, etc, etc.
MOT-thanks for the chuckle so early!
Found on Drudge:
The article requested is no longer available.
Georgia congressman warns of Obama dictatorship
By BEN EVANS 15 hours ago
WASHINGTON (AP) A Republican congressman from Georgia said Monday he fears that President-elect Obama will establish a Gestapo-like security force to impose a Marxist or fascist dictatorship.
"It may sound a bit crazy and off base, but the thing is, he's the one who proposed this national security force," Rep. Paul Broun said of Obama in an interview Monday with The Associated Press. "I'm just trying to bring attention to the fact that we may may not, I hope not but we may have a problem with that type of philosophy of radical socialism or Marxism."
GM on its merrily way to O
Byzantine,
Seriously that article is ummm... stupid. Breaking news!! Some idiot says asdlkfjasjf so it must be true!!!
Maybe Obama will be a radical socialist, but isn't BushCo already socialist/kleptocratic and militant?
skent writes:
Byzantine,
Seriously that article is ummm... stupid. Breaking news!! Some idiot says asdlkfjasjf so it must be true!!!
I don't really think it's true, I think it's a leading economic indicator.
BR,
I didn't vote for O but that congressman sounds overly dramatic and looks like sour grapes and comes off as a nutter. Funny though how the first words are "A Republican congressman". MSM name the party immediately when it's a negative story about the R party but then play guess the party when it's a negative about the D party. classic stuff.
Seriously, Byzantine, does that post have anything to do with Toll Brothers and their guidances? Keep it topical, this isn't a political blog.
God bless Georgia. That is truly a great American. Of course, he was all good with what the current administration has done to our liberties, rights and the Constitution.
MS writes:
make them a "bank holding company" I'm sure they all have applications at hand.
That will have to wait until they are completely out of money. Then they get to be considered a bank.
Anonymous:
BushCo is fascist.
Now is a great time to buy. You lose your job, and your loan gets modified.
If you happen to find another job, you get to keep the low, low modified payments.
Why everyone isn't buying I don't know.
MSM name the party immediately when it's a negative story about the R party but then play guess the party when it's a negative about the D party. classic stuff.
A phenomenon which is entirely in your imagination, however.
B_R, that's what you get for reading Drudge. "The Dreck Report" would be more appropriate . . .
Somebody tell Broward Horne, he'll believe anything about O, as long as it sounds bad.
+1 on the snark MS, made me laugh.
Was looking at more of mini-me's speech from yesterday. He mentioned a tranche report delivered to Congress. Found it via ustreas.gov at following link.
First Tranche Report to Congress
The Capital Purchase Program deadline is November 14. I imagine there will be some bloodletting as the scope of institutions who applied for help is much larger than expected.
Toll Brothers, Hanovian, Amex, $.99 Store....We're all bank holding companies now.
Nostrovia,
ille_vir writes:
Seriously, Byzantine, does that post have anything to do with Toll Brothers and their guidances? Keep it topical, this isn't a political blog.
Umm, well, see, let me get a chalkboard here -- the economics takes place in the context of the American political milieu.
I would say that is an accurate indicator of the current American political climate. Irrationalism is strong factor in policymaking, even if you don't subscribe to it.
man from nantucket
I don't think Drudge qualifies as MSM: favors repubs, but mostly favors dirt.
Seriously, I put the chance that O really wants a Gestapo-like security force to impose a Marxist or fascist dictatorship at 1 in 100,000. I put the probability that O was just spouting foolish, fantasy rhetoric at 1 in 3. Rookie, dumb-ass mistake to pontificate about some fantasy nat'l security force. When I actually see progress being made to assemble said force is when I'll take it seriously.
Steelhead,
Disagree. Think they <a href=http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Kleptocracy">kleptocratic.
And yet no major HB has BKd. I think it is a function of the credit bubble. Durring the good times they were given huge lines of credit far beyond normal operating needs. They used that the do large scale flipping and speculation. The sale of BLM land at auction being a glaring example. When the first goes down all the other lenders will be forced to either limit draws and/or mark existing loans way down triggering serial HB implosion as they all rush for the exit simultaneously.
Hard to 'conjure" up what the Toll buyer would look like. He/she would need excellent credit, a large down payment, and a very secure job. Maybe there are some that meet that criteria for a starter home, but "better" homes will demand the buyer either has a rich relative, or has just sold a house well above his mortgage.
Most likely, home builders are going to go bust, and their properties will be fire saled. It wouldn't surprise me if the feds bought some of this property and used it for subsidized housing--and the spiral grows.
"Stop the world, I want to get off."
Here are the Appendices.
Tranche Report Appendices
The report itself is just propaganda...
I think we should be expecting another tranche report soon...
Looking at Japan as a guide, where the government became the last borrower standing to prop up money supply, is it possible for the government to survive when balance sheets are finally repaired and interest rates begin to rise in concert?
Woo! GM below 3 bucks a share! That's the lowest number since WW2 even without adjusting for inflation.
OT-
everyone on Shorts be careful
Fannie, Freddie Work on Mass Loan Modification Plan
This could cause rally later today
U.S. Steps Up Help for Homeowners - WSJ.com
2:00 pm est announcement
OMG! I read the Trench Report, and thought, "what a nice introduction to the report. But where is the report?"
Then I realized that that WAS the report! It doesn't say ANYTHING! Paulson must be laughing his ass off. Pelosi will certainly change the subject next time transparency or accountability is mentioned.
RDawg:
When the first goes down all the other lenders will be forced to either limit draws and/or mark existing loans way down triggering serial HB implosion as they all rush for the exit simultaneously.
How far down do you think TBTF extends?
I imagine we're going to bail the top 3 mkt participants but HBs are not where my heart lies -- do folks really think these co.s will be allowed to fail in the current climate of Uncle Sugar running the economy out of his pocket?
It seems like an "unreasonable" blow to confidence when we are trying to pretend this is a liquidity situation and all we need to do it build confidence to put a bottom in on housing.
I have a friend that works a senior position for Toll, they know it's ugly there but when I talk to my friend, I don't get the sense that they really get how deep and nasty this downturn is, they use platitudes such as "yeah, real estate is cyclical and we're in a downturn right now". That ho-hum sentiment doesn't lead me to believe the people on the inside fully grasp the severity of this situation.
This website is the one to watch for future tranche reports.
Tranche reports should be posted here.
The first report was just a rehash of old news, although some might find the terms of the deal interesting beyond what has been reported by the MSM. It's basically the report on the $125B given to 9 banks in late October.
"I imagine we're going to bail the top 3 mkt participants but HBs are not where my heart lies -- do folks really think these co.s will be allowed to fail in the current climate of Uncle Sugar running the economy out of his pocket?"
Start-up costs for a homebuilding company are minimal, so barriers to entry are low. There is no need to bailout a homebuilder. Absolutely none. And I am highly doubtful it will be done. I believe the homebuilders are seen one of the major reasons for this debacle. The gov't will not show sympathy.
Boring. This is bullshit orderly selling.
When do we get the HALTED ON TRADE IMBALANCE LIQUIDATIONS ?
If Bob Toll doesn't go to jail for SEC violations, we should disband the SEC.
When do we get the HALTED ON TRADE IMBALANCE LIQUIDATIONS ?
Actually, when can we just get rid of the specialists who might want to halt trading?
Re: plantaganet
The details are in the appendices. I'm trying to figure out if there is something to the December 31, 2009 date... but I just realized it's 2009; not 2008.
"Re: plantaganet
The details are in the appendices."
No, no, I include those as having been read. People provide more detail to explain a late gas bill payment when applying for a mortgage (OK, 20 years ago they did).
The HBs will not be rescued. Not only won't the public stand for it but they need to be destroyed so that their liabilities go to the grave with them. Too many home warranties on stick stacks, too many HOAs underwater, etc.
Elvis:
I believe the homebuilders are seen one of the major reasons for this debacle. The gov't will not show sympathy.
I certainly hope you are right, although I have to say I find that kinda ironic. Don't blame the people who made the financial structure that made it all happen, blame the people who build the houses in response to demand.
Not that they don't deserve it, I'll just be sad if they string up Toll Bros. and proclaim they "got the bad guy".
Rob Dawg writes:
The HBs will not be rescued.
Thanks for the reply!
I don't know why Toll Brothers would have any trouble moving their inventory. I went to their website and pulled up their listings for my state, and first on the list is a lovely community of half-million dollar homes in Nazareth, PA.
Why aren't people buying these homes? Just think how short your commute would be to beautiful downtown Easton! Plus, coming soon is flintlock antlerless AND antlered deer season. Come on folks, there's nothing like kicking back in your new estate home while watching the neighbors hang carcass.
"Step right up, everyone's a winner, bargains galore..."
How about instituting knockout clauses on all debt in the case of deflation. This would prevent the strangle effect, while allowing poor business models to fail.
interesting article on concept of how to deal with derivatives in the future, seems to have merit. derivatives certainly won't be going away and need to be transparently regulated. post riots of course.
"However, Mr Andrews, who helped build the London Stock Exchange trading system before founding Xchanging in 1999, stresses the need for a neutral platform independent of the exchanges to promote transparency."
FT.com / Companies / Property - Xchanging calls for neutral derivatives platform
"Don't blame the people who made the financial structure that made it all happen, blame the people who build the houses in response to demand."
The Congresses' primary friends/financial supporters were the creaters of the financial structures. Homebuilders are an easy sacrificial lamb, especially since it is so simple to start up a new homebuilder. I'm not saying it is completely fair, but it will likely be the outcome.
"during our 2008 third quarter earnings call, were upended by the past month's financial crisismonth's financial crisis. Results of this crisis -- accelerating fears of job"
Umm...wrong, it's going down regardless of the "financial crisis". The "financial crisis" isn't helping, but lets not put the chicken ahead of the egg. I love how these con-men goons twist the truth for their own financial benefit.
If they do not pay dividends for 6 periods, the Treasury has the right to appoint two directors. (Was that a requirement in the legislation? I lost track.)
Basically nothing compensation.
Pretty amusing compared to the amount of reporting you have to do for actual securities.
Ollie,
Stop knocking Nazareth. If it's good enough for Mark, it's good enough for me.
YouTube - Mark Knopfler - Speedway at Nazareth - Rome 2005
bearly writes:
When do we get the HALTED ON TRADE IMBALANCE LIQUIDATIONS?
Give it time man. If this is the American Three Kingdoms we're only on like page 9 of one of John Jakes' longer novels.
Do any large lenders hold HB/Toll lines of credit? Or is most of their financing stock?
If these guys fail, could that create problems down the line for those particular financial institutions?
I mean "about compensation."
Not only won't the public stand for it
What? Not stand for it? They've stood for everything else, and this will be no different. If HB doesn't get a bail, it's because they're seen as low brow as compared to the sophisticated, intellectual FIRE, not because the public won't stand for it. The public matters not.
Forward SP 500 earnings $40, too high?
Ministry of Truth, I don't think Toll was part of the DAP programs - that was more for the low end homebuilders.
Best to all.
Goldman Sachs urged bets against California bonds it helped sell
Hide your wives and daughters. Hide your groceries too. Great bankers of Wall Street coming through!
Elvis writes:
I'm not saying it is completely fair, but it will likely be the outcome.
I'm not disagreeing with you or Rob Dawg. I'm actually glad to hear someone might not get bailed. It's just typical -- it's a circus of crime and the coppers nab the retarded clown.
How about instituting knockout clauses on all debt in the case of deflation. This would prevent the strangle effect, while allowing poor business models to fail.
What's a "knockout clause"? Also, when it comes down to debt you either make good on your promise to pay it back or you don't. The lender either gets his wealth back or he doesn't. In real terms there is no grey area or in between.
And whenever lenders don't get their wealth back, whatever the mechanism, however much it is hidden behind paper manipulations, that leads to a strangling effect as lenders increasingly refuse to lend.
People know when they can buy less than before they made the loan.
You can't hide that with tricks.
What's wrong with Nazareth? It's God's country, I'll have you know.
If these guys fail, could that create problems down the line for those particular financial institutions?
homedad43
When the HBs fail they will singlehandedly take down(ey) many institutions. The scarier aspect his that HBs were darlings of MMFs and retirement funds. The HBs were a secret backdoor to laundering what is in effect mortgage loans and have the debt come out smelling like commercial paper backed by assets.
"If these guys fail, could that create problems down the line for those particular financial institutions?
homedad43"
The collapse in land prices are the reason homebuilders will go BK, because they greedily war chested 10 year supplies of land at market top prices (liabilities). Their lenders will get hurt, but, at least, they can sell the land at pennies on the dollar to recoup some of their loans. Not sure home much leverage the hombebuilders were using to buy the land when they were cash rich, but I imagine it was significant.
US International Reserve Positions release just came out for those that follow -
http://www.treas.gov/press/releases/2008111110131528808.htm
i've never found out why - Gold stock is valued monthly at $42.2222 per fine troy ounce.
Wow - the folks at Goldman sure believe in capitalism.
Goldman Sachs urged bets against California bonds it helped sell
Will be fun when the true capitalist come to tear their balls off as mp/conjure bag might say.
serf Alan Greenspend,
re: Gold
Cost of acquisition or market price, whichever is lower wie German banking stil?
Calculated Risk writes:
Ministry of Truth, I don't think Toll was part of the DAP programs - that was more for the low end homebuilders.
Duh, I had not had my first cup of joe when I wrote that.
How about using these new communities for the new homeland military?
Rob Dawg writes:
The HBs were a secret backdoor to laundering what is in effect mortgage loans and have the debt come out smelling like commercial paper backed by assets.
Bonds on forward income streams collateralized by the land marked at inflated prices at the time of issuance?
The only Nazareth I know
rocks this morning
YouTube - Nazareth - Love Hurts Lyrics
The collapse in land prices are the reason homebuilders will go BK, because they greedily war chested 10 year supplies of land at market top prices (liabilities).
Specifically why I mentioned the BLM land auctions around Las Vegas and the phantom assets behind commercial paper. Lucky/unlucky that many "purchases" were actually JVs and options. Lucky because of lower gross exposure, unlucky because those investments are zeros at best.
sorta seems like we're all screwed.
From Chief Economist at MarketWatch:
So give yourself and the economy a present while you're shopping for others. This is the year to shop till you drop, and don't be afraid to haggle on prices.
Nowadays, everything is negotiable, whether it's a luxury car, a designer dress or a flat-screen TV. Don't forget to ask for a discount at restaurants as well -- especially the high end, which are suffering dramatic declines in diners.
The 6.5% unemployment rate means that 93.5% have jobs. What's more, many are not only keeping up with inflation, they are beating it.
More than ever, it pays to remember that when the going gets tough, the tough go shopping.
Cash is king, so get out there and shop Irwin Kellner - MarketWatch
Whatever happens to Toll Bros., I will always cherish their cookie recipe.
Rob Dawg writes:
Specifically why I mentioned the BLM land auctions around Las Vegas and the phantom assets behind commercial paper.
Please tell me this cp is somehow not the cp Treasury is buying.
Bond Girl,
ugh...
These clowns just make me gag.
If the HBs bankrupt does that mean all of their land and houses will get auctioned off?
OT, related
So if one of the automakers were to BK would that mean all of their dealerships BK, and we get some type of insane "everything must go now!" type of sales?
WSJ
WASHINGTON -- Fannie Mae, Freddie Mac and U.S. officials are expected to announce plans Tuesday to speed up the modification of hundreds of thousands of loans held by the housing finance giants, marking the latest effort to try and prevent more foreclosures, people familiar with the matter said.
The effort will target certain loans that are past due and will aim to bring the ratio of household debt to income for these borrowers down to 38%, these people said. It could apply to a broad range of borrowers. U.S. government officials plan to encourage big banks that hold loans in their portfolios to take similar steps.
The announcement is expected to come at a press conference at 2 p.m. ET at the Federal Housing Finance Agency, which temporarily has Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac in conservatorship because of their shaky financial condition.
Spokespeople for the companies, the Treasury Department and the Federal Housing Finance Agency weren't immediately available for comment.
The program is expected to be an extension of the Hope Now alliance announced last year that aimed to help people avert foreclosure by reworking the terms of their mortgages. Several large banks, including Bank of America Corp., Citigroup Inc., and J.P. Morgan Chase & Co., have announced their own foreclosure prevention plans.
Some bankers have complained that Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac weren't being flexible enough in discussions over loan modifications.
The administration is still discussing a range of other, more extensive options to help homeowners.
EHP, not sure of your clarification or question. what i don't understand is from the IRP chart, how gold is valued.
(4) gold (including gold deposits and, if appropriate, gold swapped) 3 ---11,041
3/ Gold stock is valued monthly at $42.2222 per fine troy ounce.
is this a historic precedent? just curious in my geeky way.
Bonds on forward income streams collateralized by the land marked at inflated prices at the time of issuance?
Byzantine_Ruins
I was thinking more about lines of credit than actual bond issuance. The inflated land value was an interesting of sardine trading. Carrying low cost land on the books was for the HBs "dead equity" being marked at accquisiton not inflated bubble value. The solution was to trade with other HBs and then appear to have valuable assets at the new market price.
OT-Yslp-most dealers are finacially better off than Detroit..
Service/parts keeping them afloat...
no benefit issues etc...
though you will see huge dropoff on numbers...8k less...
it needed to happe
why does GM take 5 days to go down to 0 ? (ie 20% every day) ?
Why doesnt it happen in a single (or two) ?
Isnt it funny that the justice is being delayed in market ?
Bond girl..I mentd that at top of thread and believe it could be a bear trap this afternoon....thier motive is so clear...
Please tell me this cp is somehow not the cp Treasury is buying.
popeye
Even if it isn't on their books directly (likely) it is in many money market funds which now are backstopped against breaking the buck so in effect they are govt liabilities regardless.
Don't imagine they're too happy in Dubai these days.
why does GM take 5 days to go down to 0 ?
Better yet, why has it taken 35 years?
Better yet, why has it taken 35 years?
Gov. support
Don't imagine they're too happy in Dubai these days.
Dubai will soon be Goodbai.
serf Alan Greenspend,
I was speculating that the gold on their books is valued at the lower of (cost of acquisition) or (market price), which is how German banks do their books. I just threw in some german words to be fancy, but may have been confusing.
It's the reserves and IMF accounts so it is conceivable that they acquired it at $42.22 back in the early 70s. There was no reason to net acquire more gold since Nixon busted up Bretton Woods. A bunch of countries sold off gold around 2000 or thereabout, it's trendy
Gov. support
That will explain the next 35 yrs. as they transition to bicycle manufacturer.
I wonder how they are going to pay for it.... Modifications for hundreds of thousands of homeowners.
Not even sure how they can handle that logistically. Just mail everyone a package of paperwork with a note, "This is your new mortgage. Cheers, US Treasury"
That will explain the next 35 yrs. as they transition to bicycle manufacturer.
The Chinese will still be better than them then.
"The effort will ... aim to bring the ratio of household debt to income for these borrowers down to 38%."
Let's see how this works. The immigrant gardener, with $15k salary, has purchased an $800k home, with no money down. Just lower his principal by $760,500. Problem solved.
The Chinese will still be better than them then.
We will be exporting the bicycles to China. In 35 yrs., the U.S. becomes the new cheap labor capital of the universe.
Funny thing about losses, you can try to hide em, delay accounting for them, transfer em etc., but you can't make them go away.
Rob Dawg writes:
I was thinking more about lines of credit than actual bond issuance. The inflated land value was an interesting of sardine trading. [...] The solution was to trade with other HBs and then appear to have valuable assets at the new market price.
Right, so we're gonna buy the land at the bubble price by bailing the creditors. It's awesome, sell the taxpayer sizzle without steak then submit the bill for the steak dinner.
I'm curious, since you're clearly involved in shorting the crap out of these guys, how did the pension side deal when the market for the paper froze? Obviously the banks can just keep extending credit to avoid recognizing losses, but how do the pensions do it? Did they mark their losses then, are the still rolling over this "AB"CP in non-market deals, or did they do even more arcane crap like establishing a company to buy paper and investing in it?
Our government has been frantically waving its arms around to prevent a cataclysmic stock market free-fall. I mean, another one aside from the one they caused by banning shorts.
At least they learned their lesson and haven't outlawed shorts again...
EHP, ahh gotcha. that's a plausible theory, especially if they no longer swap or acquire. may took a look at the historical charts.
yes, non english response threw me, LOL.
我的语言技能wiggly像面条。
is this a historic precedent? just curious in my geeky way.
serf Alan Greenspend | Homepage | 11.11.08 - 11:12 am | #
Yes, $42.22/tr.oz. is the official price.
It's been that way since 1971 when Nixon closed the gold window. (That was approximately the market price in Paris at the time.)
I believe the IMF uses the same valuation for its gold and it's possible that the IMF's number is why the U.S. uses that number.
"The solution was to trade with other HBs and then appear to have valuable assets at the new market price."
Guys gets a new banking job in Charlotte and drives out into the country on weekends. In a tiny hamlet, spots a man with a big blue tick hound. Asking how much the man wants for the dog, the reply is "five thousand dollars." Banker laughs at it and leaves. Next week, goes back, same thing; ask price still the same.
Third week, goes back, and instead of the dog, two little kittens are playing under the chair. Asking where the dog was, old man says he got rid of him.
"Bet you didn't get 5000 for him."
"Sure did. Traded him for these two twenty five hundred dollar cats."
WSJ
The Federal Reserve said its big rescue plan for money-market funds will be delayed until later this month.
The delay, announced Monday, presents a challenge for the $3.6 trillion money-market industry, which is struggling to sell short-term debt into tight credit markets. The Fed plans to finance purchases for as much as $540 billion of the money funds' short-term debt.
Many had expected the buying program to be up and running last week, but now the Fed says it will start on or about Nov. 24. The funds need the money to meet investor redemptions.
The reason for the delay appears to be the Fed's preoccupation with other bailouts and wrangling over how the money-fund program will be set up.
It's hard to watch what's going on in each ring of the circus.
Rob Dawg writes:
The HBs will not be rescued. Not only won't the public stand for it but they need to be destroyed so that their liabilities go to the grave with them. Too many home warranties on stick stacks, too many HOAs underwater, etc.
Excellent point Rob but what the Public will and will not stand for is beyond the question, I think your point about home warranties on poorly constructed homes is the kind of logic that our pubic officals appreciate!
Could it be that the american tradition against haggling is like banning shorts on a stock exchange? Instead of a gradual decline of prices of goods in a store as less interested buyers meet their prices, buyers unwilling to buy at full price simply shake their head and walk away, until the stock is worthless.
A California town drowns as home values sink
http://www.iht.com/articles/2008/11/11/business/11home.php
Great Quotes:
"The Martinezes bought their house in early 2005 for $630,000. It is now worth about $420,000. They have an interest-only mortgage, a popular loan during the boom that allows owners to forgo principal payments for a time.
But these loans eventually become unmanageable. In 2015, Martinez said, his monthly payments will be $12,000 a month."
I thought the word tranche was going to be dropped by the banksters after structured finance hit the fa
Pretty hard to hide a bear trap in the desert.
"american tradition against haggling"
Not tradition so much as the evolved consequence of UPC code tags, scanners, point of sale inventory control and sales staff lacking authority to make any modification to price or terms.
C is collapsing...
"american tradition against haggling"
Which is just one of the many things that makes that Marketwatch cheerleader's quote posted by BondGirl above so funny.
I'm curious, since you're clearly involved in shorting the crap out of these guys, how did the pension side deal when the market for the paper froze? Obviously the banks can just keep extending credit to avoid recognizing losses, but how do the pensions do it? Did they mark their losses then, are the still rolling over this "AB"CP in non-market deals, or did they do even more arcane crap like establishing a company to buy paper and investing in it?
Byzantine_Ruins
Want to hear something really sad? Doctors orders no stress while recovering so no trading for me. The best shorting environment ever and I'm on the bench. My best guess is that the pensions are all "hold to maturity" for their investments. They aren't yet in a position of having to sell to cover distributions and they take a long view. Won't work this time but it doesn't have an immediate impact either. CalPERS already owns several holes in the ground in Sacramento and I expect more funds will join them as landowners versus bondholders soon.
But these loans eventually become unmanageable. In 2015, Martinez said, his monthly payments will be $12,000 a month
That would be 22.5% interest(fully amortized over remaining 20 years). I don't think that is even close to being right.
crispy&cole writes:
C is collapsing...
IMO, when 50 cents is a 4.5% stock drop, the collapse is in the past tense.
OOOOOooooohhh, how's Warren Buffet's fine investment in GS lookin' on this fine day ?
Just got a letter in the mail. My Pony is still coming next thursday! A week before Thanksgiving!
wonder if this is why american express in now bank holding company?
crispy&cole writes:
C is collapsing...
D'oh! Another stock in my inheritance portfolio. I'm trying to figure out if I can calculate whether he'd have done better investing in a broad based index or picking the way he has done.
I'm not sure if he got advice from others or if he picked everything by himself.
Wow, GLD and SLV getting killed... are these moves signifying trouble in some hedge fund?
The conundrum is this:
A lot of debt does not reflect expected hold to maturity value
That problem is so large that it directly shrinks money supply, and indirectly discourages more lending through fear/uncertainty
Resulting deflation from a money supply contraction would strangle all debtors, even those that could reasonably repay under regular low or higher inflation
-* to ease the transition for this shock, relax tax code for a period of time to allow losses to be spread out
ø the problem will persist until there is private credit growth (the expansionist public credit makes helps debts to be repaid slowly but surely with low interest rates, mine attacks the principal and is more of a controversial spanking of irresponsible lenders)
ø dangers include the newly undertaken public debt being unaffordable amongst increasing interest rates if it was spent without regard to generating a return
ø if other economies are growing, and thus their credit demand, then there is a threat to currency collapse
the do nothing option is to scare everyone off from debt for their entire lifetimes, and prolong the balance sheet repairing
--
*****November 08, 2005*****
Toll Brothers' Execs -- A Fine Example Of Corporate Crooks of America
Toll Brothers' Scam, aka stock, has been my number one short position for the past 6 months (I was early, as always) among the Housing and Finance related companies and I have commented on it several times during this period (see one commentary below, for example, and you will see that I had already concluded then that he was lying).
My skills at identifying Corporate Crooks is well-honed by now and it took me watching two interviews each by Mr. Robert Toll, one of the two Toll brothers and the CEO, and Joel Rassman, the CFO, to conclude that they are genuine Crooks and they were purposely misleading the public to pump-and-dump their holdings of the companys Scam.
The Scam, which has been going down sharply for the past 3½ months, went down another 14% today when these execs lies about the future demand for their homes could no longer be held back from the public. The two Crooks again appeared on the TV today and what a difference in their demeanor and the lack of former confidence about the business in 2006 that they exuded only two months ago.
Vast majority of America's public corporations are run by Crooks who are in the BUSINESS of selling their company's Scam. Dont feed the Crooks by being a Scam Lover. If you got the guts and, most importantly, the skills, be a Scam Hater! It would be good for your character.
Jas
"I would advocate a more direct solution such as imposing deflationary knockouts on all debt"
Very interesting. Do you know of any precedent - historical or current - for such a thing?
Rob Dawg:
Want to hear something really sad? Doctors orders no stress while recovering so no trading for me. The best shorting environment ever and I'm on the bench.
Awww man, that sucks.
Oh well, just think of it as preserving you from frustration when you watch them reduce the worth of your winnings to the price of an egg salad sandwich.
Jaswant,
Bob Toll has had a dubious track record for 3 years. Why did it take you 2.5 years to figure that one out?
[Wow, GLD and SLV getting killed... are these moves signifying trouble in some hedge fund?
YLSP ]
Volumes seem avg to light. I think it means NO BUYERS.
That would be 22.5% interest(fully amortized over remaining 20 years). I don't think that is even close to being right.
Anonymous | 11.11.08 - 11:36 am | #
I think they were suggesting that his debt service costs would come from not paying principal for a period of time, not from rising interest rates. Who knows what really went on.
I am tempted to call all of these people idiots until I realize that I am going to be paying for their debt.
Austin Tex,
I know of no such precedent, just my original musing about.
I guess you could relate it to a country declaring default on debt, and then unilaterally repaying on its own terms. That is common in history, and usually makes for nasty disputes -- but hey everyone is in the same boat this time
--
I posted this during 2007Q2
[CR blog comment]: " I would love to see Bob Toll dragged through the mud on this."
Who allowed Robert Toll to do what he did?
I would love to see minimum of 100,000 Bankrupters and Fraudsters be crucified in every zip code and at every major intersection of NYC.
Civil war is coming to America and Bankrupters and Fraudsters will flee.
There are consequences to the greatest fraud in history.
Jas
SDMisfit writes:
Goldman Sachs urged bets against California bonds it helped sell
Hide your wives and daughters. Hide your groceries too. Great bankers of Wall Street coming through!
SDMisfit | 11.11.08 - 10:59 am | #
I wish these guys would not work so hard to prove the point of a certain poster.
Is LVS still not open yet??
New thread.
FT.com / Companies / Property - Merrill chief sees severe global slowdown
Merrill chief sees severe global slowdown
By Greg Farrell in New York
Published: November 11 2008 14:42 | Last updated: November 11 2008 14:42
The global economy is entering a slowdown of epic proportions, comparable to the Great Depression, John Thain, chairman and chief executive of Merrill Lynch, warned on Tuesday.
Speaking at the firms annual banking and financial services conference, Mr Thain said that while he was cautiously optimistic about the future of the financial services industry, he was not at all optimistic about the near-term prospects of the US economy and global markets.
Right now, the US economy is contracting very rapidly. We are looking at a period of global slowdown, and a global slowdown in economic activity that affects everyone who participates in global markets, he told investors. This is not like 1987 or 1998 or 2001. The contraction going on is bigger than that. We will in fact look back to the 1929 period to see the kind of slowdown were seeing now.
Gee John thanks for the timely update on your thinking. I hear Seattle's getting to be a really hot city to move to, what do you think Mr Thain?
Low demand for Toll and other properties beyond the balance sheet issues is the problem going forth for the entire ponzi RE business. Keeping folks locked in there upside down mortgage does nothing for sales velocity and while home prices decline inventory levels continue to increase will sooner or later force the investor speculator to the sideline further killing the demand side.
grim!
bondgirl, I assumed that he had paid no principle after 10 years and used the $630,000 amortized over 20 which is the way most interest only loans are set up.
New thread.
So I won't bore anyone with a more detailed response to serf Alan Greenspend:
From the U.S. Supreme Court:
The United States Gold Standard Act of 1900 set the value of the dollar at $20.67 per troy ounce of gold. 6 On January 31, 1934, nine months before the United States ratified the Convention, President Roosevelt increased the official domestic price of gold to $35 per ounce. 7 In 1945 the United States accepted membership in the International Monetary Fund (IMF) and so undertook to maintain a "par value" for the dollar and to buy and sell gold at the official price in exchange for balances of dollars officially held by other IMF nations. 8 For almost 40 years the $35-per-ounce price of gold was used to derive from the Convention's [466 U.S. 243, 249] Article 22(2) a cargo liability limit of $7.50 per pound. See, e. g., 14 CFR 221.176 (1972).
When the central banks of most Western nations instituted a "two-tier" gold standard in 1968 the gold-based international monetary system began to collapse. Thereafter, official gold transactions were conducted at the official price, and private transactions at the floating, free market price. App. 21. In August 1971 the United States suspended convertibility of foreign official holdings of dollars into gold. In December 1971 and then again in February 1973 the official exchange rate of the dollar against gold was increased. These changes were approved by Congress in the Par Value Modification Act, passed in early 1972 (increasing the official price to $38 per ounce 9 ) and in its 1973 reenactment (setting a $42.22-per-ounce price.
FindLaw | Cases and Codes
Clarifies things in my mind also.
But, it is a covenant that could legally be included in debt; in fact, in it very much like a put provision on a straight debt or convertible bond.
Mtn House community is a commute town east of bay area...If we forgive thier loans, I'm up in arms..
Why anyone would live there and commute over the altamont pass everyday is mind boggling..Windy, ugly, cold in winter, hot in summer and no trees...Merced relocated by about 70 miles...
"Keeping folks locked in there upside down mortgage does nothing for sales velocity"
Or does not stimulate the economy by creating a need/demand for more new homebuilding.
thanks sportsfan! quite the team here at CR.
Austin Tex,
I do like the idea as it is a simple feedback method to keep the credit system stable. It is probably too late for the US to switch tracks in mid-course this time without some very strong political moves
Can someone explain to me why homebuilders aren't converting to only building houses which people already have a substantial deposit on?
Alternatively, can a homebuilder officially declare dormancy? It wouldn't build anything for a while, and just keep a pile of cash and investments.
RE: low barriers to entry
How hard is it to start up a bank?
AXP lost money for 4 straight quarters and became a bank holding company. The only product a bank has to produce is money; they don't make houses or cars. Yet we bail them out.
If a biomedical company working on new cancer cures lost money for a year, it MIGHT be a OK to bail them out, after a public process of experts proving they had promising ideas.
some investor guy writes:
Can someone explain to me why homebuilders aren't converting to only building houses which people already have a substantial deposit on?
Ans: Sharks. Swim or die.
I am tempted to call all of these people idiots until I realize that I am going to be paying for their debt.
Bond Girl | 11.11.08 - 11:43 am | #
Yeah, I know what you mean. I am an idiot for buying a house that was not overpriced, that fit my budget, that I am working towards paying off early. I wish I was able to receive a cut in the principal that I owe. But no, I get to pay for someone else's debt reduction through my taxes. Moral hazard indeed.
Lifeguard1999, you left out the best quote of all from the IHT article http://www.iht.com/articles/2008/11/11/business/11home.php. I think this sums up the mindless consumption of some US consumers.
"He has cut his DVD buying from 50 a month to perhaps one, and is waiting until the Christmas sales to buy a high-definition television. He does not indulge much anymore in his hobbies of scuba diving and flying. "Best to wait for a better price, or do without," Rogers, 52, said."
50 DVD's a month? Whaaaat?
You know, if housing prices were lowered to an AFFORDABLE level based upon ACTUAL INCOMES, people might be more inclined to buy them - who coodadnode?
No, no - better to steal the money from taxpayers and savers (via inflation) to keep mortgage-fraud committing goofballs in their houses... sigh
"50 DVD's a month? Whaaaat?
Ulsterman"
Porn addiction?
Ulsterman writes:
Lifeguard1999, you left out the best quote of all...
Ulsterman | 11.11.08 - 12:01 pm | #
I thought the best quote was about how they stay at home now and play board games as a family, except for Monopoly.
EvilHenryPaulson writes:
...I just threw in some german words to be fancy...
Ahemm.. "stil" is not a german word, not even fancy.
"I thought the best quote was about how they stay at home now and play board games as a family, except for Monopoly.
Lifeguard1999"
I bet they play this alot:
In Trump: the Game players compete in two parts. In the first part, players circle the board, feeding money into the eight available properties, then bidding on those properties (not being able to see how much the property is worth) and collecting Trump cards
. When all the properties are gone, the negotiation phase begins. Players use their Trump cards to buy and sell properties, some cards award huge payoffs for specific sets. After each player has passed their turn, the property values are revealed, and the player with the most money wins (usually in the $400-$600M range).
Elvis writes:
"Keeping folks locked in there upside down mortgage does nothing for sales velocity"
Or does not stimulate the economy by creating a need/demand for more new homebuilding.
No new furiture,drapes etc for the new house, repairs and up grades are put off, the entire money cycle is broken.
Currently everyonw is looking at sales numbers but nobody is talking about the move-up market which is being destroyed by the current foreclosure/economy cycle. What do you think will happen to the various pricing levels as the bottom level buyers are wiped out and replaced with investor own rentals...
Serf AG:
Is it noon at Grand Central tomorrow?
....."It's just typical -- it's a circus of crime and the coppers nab the retarded clown".......
Hehehe...I'm savin' that....
"American tradition against haggling"
Coupons, 2 for 1, free toasters, 0% for 6 months- all haggling derivatives.
Thanks for the series of entries, CR: the actual Toll quote, the WSJ affiliate Marketwatch (John Spence) report about it, your edit of/take on it, and finally our responses to the package.
Poor Bob Toll doesn't get the same overview, nor does poor John Spence (but nor does he help his readership by deleting any mention of previous Toll family trading) who doesn't need to respond to any blog queries.
Blogs, possibly a demonstration of the disintegration of insider trading...a hope for us who just like to gather rather than network and score.
The banks are not giving mortgages to anybody so nobody will be able to buy houses anymore. So what do you expect to happen. House sales will go done en prices with it!
OOOOOooooohhh, how's Warren Buffet's fine investment in GS lookin' on this fine day ?
bearly | 11.11.08 - 11:37 am | #
Still looking much better than our (taxpayer) investment in GS.
"Can someone explain to me why homebuilders aren't converting to only building houses which people already have a substantial deposit on?"
They would then become a 'custom' builder. Different model all together. If you can afford 20% down, then why buy a Toll tract home?