So falling this far has almost completely crushed our financial system and greater economy. But we still have so much further to go! What will happen when we complete the trip down?
Would "nominal household median income" catch high rates of unemployment? In other words, when someone's income goes from $40,000 to $0, do they drop out of the data, i.e. get dropped from the data set used to calculate median income, or does the $0 still get averaged in?
It's a race to see if housing prices can correct to appropriate levels before gov't measures to fix "the problem" of falling housing prices can work.
One thing is working for us, one against. Working for us, the problem of housing price deflation is so big that gov't efforts will likely just waste money and have little effect. Against us, global deflation means that we can't count on wages increasing to try to meet the falling prices, so we'll have to rely on falling housing prices to carry the full burden of correction. Q3-09 sounds about right, ignoring overshoot.
THe only problem with these charts is they only go back to the last housing boom. Looking at history, the bottom of the last boom is ~normal http://photos1.blogger.com/blogger/6089/1833/1600/shiller.gif
(I'd say ~110 is about the norm since ~1950)
blueridge, median household income doesn't capture everything. It is a pretty general number - and people losing their jobs only negatively impact the median if they make MORE than the median.
This is just a guide ... and it suggests further price declines of probably 10% to 20% or so.
The guy is really a huge failure on so many fronts, and it's basically the same reasons the last presidency went down in flame...strict adherence to a flawed ideology.
The sooner we can get him out the better. Jan 2010 is far too long to wait.
That said, I think we are screwed, in the same way that we are screwed in Iraq (and no that war wasnt won, it was and is an incredible policy catastrophe that we are now forced to pay the price of just to avoid a massive failure.) It's just like our financial system now. Terrible policy decisions leave us in a huge mess, and there is no way out. We just slowly bleed ourselves because to not do so would ensure a massive fail.
oh, and if anybody in a policy position is paying attention to the income/pricing graphs, then they know MBS is still a problem, so they'll try inflation by printing (or as I fondly call it, Murder by Death). Dollar is trashed in that scenario as well as Tbills, US default blah blah...
Policy option is defining where best to place the bullet in the head...
Income = the amount one earns, after the US takes taxes to pay the banks that have lost the most money, from selling fake pay stubs, hoopajoops, and their assorted derivative securities.
It is true that nominal incomes usually increase, but I do not think these are normal times and I do not think nominal incomes will increase. And I am guessing that as prices rise due to massive base monetary increases, folks will have less to spend on housing and the overcorrection in housing prices will be greater than other corrections.
CR, perhaps another chart would also be helpful. How about real interest rates over a similar period? For people who wonder why mortgage rates have stayed the same, well they haven't.
For much of 2007, nominal interest rates were between 5.5% and 6.5%. Inflation was running about 3% annually. Real interest rates were about 3%. With nominal interest rates around 6% and no inflation, real rates would be 6%.
We are currently experiencing deflation. If we have 3% annual deflation, a 6% nominal loan has a 9% real interest rate.
CR - the median gross rent for renter is in there also, series B25111, but I havent pulled it and dont know if it will be useful or not. Perhaps you can try the combo of the MSA NAR median price data with this. It's only annual though, but it could give you an idea of where things are heading.
I don't see how the The Thing will work right even if they stabilize it for awhile. Entitlements still go up, and now the few remaining savers are completely trashed by zero interest rates. It sure looks to me like more reward for liars, more punishment for honesty.
I know a number of people who have worked as consultants for JPM for the last five years. In November their compensation packages were all been reduced by 30%.
has income been adjusted for the .com and then equity withdrawl/40x leverage and coming 10% plus unemployment? if not then the graph needs to re indexed
Consumer Expenditure Surveys
Prepared annually, the Consumer Expenditure Surveys (CEX) measure what typical consumers spend. The spending inflation does not segregate price from quality or assume certain behavior, but rather reflects actual levels of consumer spending. The Consumer Expenditure Surveys provide demographic breakdowns to help us understand age and income differences.
Geoff: Thanks for the link to the article on Bernanke. That is quite a read. A lot of info about him I wasn't aware of, and one of the best quotes (I thought anyway) was this:
"Bernanke, though, remains remarkably calm. (Jim Cramer would say oblivious.)"
I'm in agreement with you--he needs to be gone. I've been wondering if he could be influenced to "retire early" ----otherwise we're all stuck with him until 2010. I wonder how he and Geithner get along.
Disgusted writes: I wonder how he and Geithner get along.
Answer:
Bernanke 3/28/07
" At this juncture, however, the impact on the broader economy and financial markets of the problems in the subprime market seems likely to be contained."
Guithner 3/28/07
"As of now, though, there are few signs that the disruptions in this one sector of the credit markets will have a lasting impact on credit markets as a whole."
I know I've commented on this before, but here at ground zero(SWFL) we are seeing continued acceleration in re, cc, cars, and boat walkaways. A lot of people on the margins are so disgusted with all the bailouts they just stop payments. Consequences.
"A metric that can overshoot by 70% can undershoot by 70%."
RobDawg, this isn't like a poll that is susceptible to a certain percentage of error. It's not a +/- thing. That is hard data. The reason it will overshoot (beyond the fact that it always has in the past) is the glacial pace with which the housing market moves. You can see its turns coming literally years in advance.
CR writes : House Price-to-Income Ratio : ...that this ratio needs to fall another 15% or so...
Cr, I think you are still too optimistic.
In natural systems (includes economy), whenever you have an overshoot, you will also have an correlating undershoot (of smaller magnitude probably, think of "damped oscillation").
If you have not planned for this you will perish
Crewman
I wonder, if as an unintended consequence a ZIRP will grow a nation of super-savers. In the past you might assume that your money might double every 10 years. Without this accellerator of time and low/zero interest folks just might become super-savers to protect and build that nest egg.
Barley
"The New York-based Conference Board said Tuesday its Consumer Confidence Index now stands at 44.9, up from a revised 38.8 in October. Last month's reading was the lowest since the research group started tracking the index in 1967."
Well, Mish is learning that the Fed will assist in debasing the currency, something that he never expected to happen. The Fed after all is a politically motivated institution and in times like these the banks have lost their power.
My personal canaries are zip 92397. The new cheapest home just knocked $20,000 off the wishing price. Now $74,900. Purchased Feb 22, 2006 $221,500. Still overpriced IMHO.
"I still don't understand how this is a good deal for C or any of the other banks other than it says that the Fed is serious about not letting the whole system fail (which we knew already)."
Without this accellerator of time and low/zero interest folks just might become super-savers to protect and build that nest egg
I think I can answer that.
"No".
Personally, I'm not going to bother anymore. I'm going to stick Uncle Sam with my health care costs, file 1099 and pay no more taxes and the Feds can go get fucked, put me in jail if they want. Free food & health care & hopefully there will be some cable television.
The world wants a new reserve currency.
Are we not providing that by destroying the dollar?
Is the government creating a poison pill for the world to swallow when they move ahead with a new reserve currency?
Lived in the third world for a while. When I got back to my home and turned on the light the cockroaches all scurried for the dark taking what they could.
The light has been turned on revealing the American economy/financial system. Look at the cockroaches run.
C&C - If ur still having trouble w/ international shipments and LOC consider setting up a Canadian holding company...govt considering a new way to guarentee canadian exports and payments rec'd
Displaced workers with no paychecks or prospects could add a potentially catastrophic drag to a U.S. economy already facing its worst downturn in decades, says Joel Cutcher-Gershenfeld, the dean of the School of Labor and Employment Relations.
But he says businesses can cushion the blow of layoffs that are inevitable in the months ahead as companies align labor supply with sagging demand.
In the first of a series of commentaries on labor and the crippled economy, Cutcher-Gershenfeld urges employers to provide a softer landing for both workers and the economy through programs ranging from severance packages to retraining benefits.
Were not asking businesses to do this out of charity, he said. There are ways to approach layoffs that maintain options with the displaced workers, deepen loyalty with remaining workers, give meaning to stated corporate values, and help avoid an accelerated collapse in the economy. Instead of knee-jerk, across-the-board job cuts that will have a contagion effect on the economy, respond with programs that mitigate the harm to workers, while leaving businesses and society better situated to recover when there is an upturn.
Alone, each companys decision to scale back workers makes sense in a sour economy, Cutcher-Gershenfeld said. But collectively, a flurry of layoffs will accelerate a downward spiral if employees are simply cut loose, he said.
Providing safety nets may seem more costly than just letting workers go, but could save money in the long run, said Cutcher-Gershenfeld, whose research includes labor-management relations, public policy and economic development.
The world wants a new reserve currency.
Are we not providing that by destroying the dollar?
I don't think that the world really wanted a new reserve currency. It is obvious that the U.S. did not manage the reserve currency well and debased it. Once Nixon unilaterally canceled Bretton Woods, it was clear that the dollar as the reserve currency was on borrowed time.
These last few years the process simply went into hyperdrive and now just about anybody knows that the U.S. cannot be trusted with the reserve currency. It wasn't an issue of desire by the ROW but clear and obvious self serving mismanagement that lead to it.
Same comment as the earlier thread; might one glean more information from something like 360*(P+I)/median income than price/median income? Taking Principle+Interest payments at prevailing interest rates at the time, assuming 30 yr fixed and 20% down. Then the effect of varying interest rates should be captured better.
O/T but interesting speaking of debasing the currency:
(DETROIT) - Nissan Motor Co. said Monday that it has decided to pull out of the 2009 North American International Auto Show as well as the 2009 Chicago Motor Show
Nissan's departure shakes the foundation of a show that is Detroit's signature annual event, generating tourism revenue estimated at nearly $500 million annually
Thanks so much for providing this singularly useful data and analysis on the central issue underlying the present crisis. This site has become by far the best single source for clear and quantitative information to assess where we really are in this historic correction. Until prices are back normal, sustainable levels relative to incomes/rents, the situation can never stabilize. So it is especially critical that this data is out there for all to see -- to make informed decisions accordingly.
"The Fed wont be removing cash from other parts of the financial system to make up for the purchases, government officials told reporters on a conference call. They rejected any comparison with Japans so-called quantitative easing effort to combat deflation, saying that the Feds objective is to buttress credit markets rather than ramp up money.
The aim of credit policy is focused on narrowing credit spreads, as opposed to expanding the money supply, said Mark Gertler, a New York University economics professor who has collaborated with Bernanke on research. The hallmark of this crisis is unusually high credit spreads which are dampening borrowing and spending across the economy.
The helicopters are en-route, they are going to drop the money in the wrong place. Just deposit the cash in my personal account, Chairman B. and I guarantee it'll be used to reduce the exposure of a major bank to mortgage loan assets.
Bubblevision is hilarious today. That the bottom is in has become an accepted assumption. The discussion has moved on to sector allocation and stock picking.
Citigroup's $306 Billion Rescue Fueled by Pizza From Domino's
The deal to rescue the world's best- known bank was pieced together by regulators over Domino's pizza in near-empty offices one block from the White House...
CR, It would be a better metric to use the 3rd quartile income or the 3rd quintile income instead of the median. This is because homeownership is skewed toward those in upper income while the majority of the lowest income quartile rent.
Have most of the regulars here jumped ship for nakedcapitalism and other more sophisticated blogs? The banter here lately is very low class, but I guess you get what you pay for.
on the confidence numbers...dont forget the oil issue. Before the big stock market collapses, the Umich sentiment gauge was a direct inverse map to gas prices. Only after the big blowout in stocks did we get the sentiment to sink to the downside. Now that gas prices are pulling back while stocks are somewhat sideways, we'll get a little lift. Confidence in general isnt that useful, since its pretty much a coincident indicator. The expectations components can be interesting however.
On Nov. 18, five days before he was forced to bail out Citigroup, Treasury Secretary Henry Paulson told Congress he was handing over to President-elect Barack Obama ``a significantly more stable banking system where the failure of a systemically relevant institution is no longer a pressing concern rattling the markets.''
Have most of the regulars here jumped ship for nakedcapitalism and other more sophisticated blogs? The banter here lately is very low class, but I guess you get what you pay for.
Anonymous | 11.25.08 - 2:39 pm | #
Perhaps bloggers are adjusting their banter to low class reflecting their new financial lower class.
Have most of the regulars here jumped ship for nakedcapitalism and other more sophisticated blogs? The banter here lately is very low class, but I guess you get what you pay for.
Anonymous | 11.25.08 - 2:39 pm | #
Hey, I resemble that remark.
I suspect that this is 'old news' to many long time readers here. Just confirming what CR and some others were paying attention to a long time ago.
The sound and fury of the bailouts has been an attempt to negate gravity. Prices will fall to where people can afford the monthly payment using prudent underwriting (and below, for a while, like a block of wood thrown into water.)
Until then, we wait, and watch the thrashing about.
R. Timm writes:
CR, It would be a better metric to use the 3rd quartile income or the 3rd quintile income instead of the median. This is because homeownership is skewed toward those in upper income while the majority of the lowest income quartile rent.
More than 2/3rds of households are "owners." The median is clearly an acceptable number for this comparison. 3rd quintile would skew at least as far in the other direction.
"The Russian central bank said Monday that it had allowed the ruble to weaken by widening its trading band against other currencies, the second time it has done so in two weeks"
Bubble lending practices have to return for this to change.
And that's what concerns me with this latest statistic CR has posted. It can serve to rationalize that.....if there are jobs, but that's a big if, and more like a probably not. Everywhere you step there's shit.
Great graphic...is there comparable price-to-household income data from Japan or the Eurozone? It would be a good comparison with the US curve. Is the 1.0 line the valid trendline or is there a different mean that is being observed?
Do the Billionaires run for the dollar? Even though it's lost its value to the dollar, it's gained against the Euro which has hurt its trading position.
Money sucked out of emerging markets. Credit costs go through the roof. "Til now Russia has over the last three weeks, spent 56B keeping the ruble in a range - no longer. And, IMF wants some other E. European countries to end currency pegs.
In a nut shell outside of the USD, pound, euro, yen, and maybe Cdn dollar most currencies will fall like a rock in the weeks ahead. Gold should hold since the currency defence has stopped. Oh, and oil prces decline leaving Russia w/ less money to operate leading to escalating deficits weakening the ruble even more. Did you know 40% of Moscovites no longer pay their hydro bill - yet the lights stay on.
It should be obvious that we are in a period where authorities are determined to prevent price drops via inflation. The system simply cannot afford sustained deflation without huge disruption that might cause significant political instability. Just about every pension fund would be underwater and walkaways (commercial and residential) would go into the stratosphere sinking the remaining private banking system.
Therefore, without overtly admitting it, we see policy actions costing in the neighborhood of $8 trillion and counting. Given that fact that this is almost doubling the U.S. national debt within a year, I am not at all certain that falling prices is a certainty, especially not in the medium to long term. As I assume currency (forced or intentional) devaluation on top, that question becomes even more pertinent.
U.S. action is much more aggressive than Japans in the 90s. Todays trend may not at all be tomorrows and constant analysis should be the order of the day.
RUSSIAN ANALYST PREDICTS DECLINE AND BREAKUP OF USA
Tue Nov 25 2008 09:04:22 ET
A leading Russian political analyst has said the economic turmoil in the United States has confirmed his long-held view that the country is heading for collapse, and will divide into separate parts.
Professor Igor Panarin said in an interview with the respected daily IZVESTIA published on Monday: "The dollar is not secured by anything. The country's foreign debt has grown like an avalanche, even though in the early 1980s there was no debt. By 1998, when I first made my prediction, it had exceeded $2 trillion. Now it is more than 11 trillion. This is a pyramid that can only collapse."
The paper said Panarin's dire predictions for the U.S. economy, initially made at an international conference in Australia 10 years ago at a time when the economy appeared strong, have been given more credence by this year's events.
When asked when the U.S. economy would collapse, Panarin said: "It is already collapsing. Due to the financial crisis, three of the largest and oldest five banks on Wall Street have already ceased to exist, and two are barely surviving. Their losses are the biggest in history. Now what we will see is a change in the regulatory system on a global financial scale: America will no longer be the world's financial regulator."
When asked who would replace the U.S. in regulating world markets, he said: "Two countries could assume this role: China, with its vast reserves, and Russia, which could play the role of a regulator in Eurasia."
Asked why he expected the U.S. to break up into separate parts, he said: "A whole range of reasons. Firstly, the financial problems in the U.S. will get worse. Millions of citizens there have lost their savings. Prices and unemployment are on the rise. General Motors and Ford are on the verge of collapse, and this means that whole cities will be left without work. Governors are already insistently demanding money from the federal center. Dissatisfaction is growing, and at the moment it is only being held back by the elections and the hope that Obama can work miracles. But by spring, it will be clear that there are no miracles."
He also cited the "vulnerable political setup", "lack of unified national laws", and "divisions among the elite, which have become clear in these crisis conditions."
He predicted that the U.S. will break up into six parts - the Pacific coast, with its growing Chinese population; the South, with its Hispanics; Texas, where independence movements are on the rise; the Atlantic coast, with its distinct and separate mentality; five of the poorer central states with their large Native American populations; and the northern states, where the influence from Canada is strong.
He even suggested that "we could claim Alaska - it was only granted on lease, after all." Panarin, 60, is a professor at the Diplomatic Academy of the Russian Ministry of Foreign Affairs, and has authored several books on information warfare.
On currency devaluation - for the first time in a while, Mr. Practical at minyanville makes an appearance and has something to say about devaluing a currency.
A leading Russian political analyst has said the economic turmoil in the United States has confirmed his long-held view that the country is heading for collapse, and will divide into separate parts. You mean the mason-dixon line might resurrect? And you Californians could have your wild wild west back. We could go straight back in history! That would be kinda cool.
Not paying hydro bills and the power stays on, smart move. Keep the people inside where it's warm instead of out in the cold rioting because the economy is crashing. I hope our government is as smart.
Read this on another site, but I'm surprised by no post from Bill: 30 year fixed mortgage rates dropped to 5.25%, down 50 b.p. in last few hours. Wells Fargo and Security National are so swamped with rate locks that their entire Web networks have crashed.
PCA - this morning my mother was quoted 5.75% by WAMU (central Cal. coast). She called for my opinion.
50 bips in since then? Wow...
After all, the 10 year bond is now below where it was in May 2003, when 30 year fixed rates dropped to 4.75% for a couple of days, and hovered at 5% for a couple of weeks.
@ Commissar Rob Dawg: If 65% are homeowners then the bottom 25% are likely rentors. Hence the average income of a homeowner could easily be the 60th or 75th percentile overall.
The highest income households are almost ten times as likely to own their homes rather than rent, but in the lowest quintile, the ratio of owners to renters is nearly one to one.
Well put. So let's say it takes another 4 trill, puts us at 12 trill, what are the consequences?
As is obvious from history, command economies are not at all immune to significant bouts of inflation.
The big question in my mind is, how much does it take to reverse the deflationary mindset? We have been in deflation for only a few months, therefore a switch to an inflationary mindset is very easily accomplished. It is simply a matter of governmental resolve, i.e. a repeat of Roosevelt's 1934 dollar devaluation in stealth clothing. I am watching very closely.
Today, Jack Daniel's is sponsoring the final hour countdown on Marketwatch.com
Still time to send out for refreshments for after the close. Or maybe the charts are showing a cup pattern?
why is it so hard to figure out that the lower rate does nothing for the perosn entering the house price other than force them to choose between a lower payment today and a capital loss when they sell. Anything else assumes that itnerest rates can be manipulated forever lower. artifically Lower rates does not mean high prices. it just means the lower the rate the greater your eventual capital loss.
Ruh roh. What better way to seize computers and press charges against any American who has blogged or complained about the governments actions. The internet doesn't need to be shut down, just the vocal citizens. Seize my computers if I have watched a video that was copyrighted and infringed on by my IP.
Shouldn't have watched Californication Season 1 over the weekend.
Passed the House with 410 Ayes, 11 Nays, 12 Present/Not Voting. Currently in the Senate.
"Panarin, 60, is a professor at the Diplomatic Academy of the Russian Ministry of Foreign Affairs, and has authored several books on information warfare."
and in this case, Professor Panarin is demonstrating to his students the application of his expertise.
To suggest that Chinese or Russian governments should take the role of regulator of global financial systems is ludicrous. In both countries, corruption, opacity, and arbitrary measures are far worse in government than in the US.
"The New York-based Conference Board said Tuesday its Consumer Confidence Index now stands at 44.9, up from a revised 38.8 in October. Last month's reading was the lowest since the research group started tracking the index in 1967."
sm_landlord | Homepage | 11.25.08 - 2:09 pm | #
You didnt get the memo?
PE/O and his new team are going to fix it all. You didnt know?
If rogue bureacrats are pumping like crazy ($3000 billion for Citi; another $800 billion today) why is the 10-year T-Note up 2 points today, and the 30-year up 3%?
El Cliffo: What if the world's central banks are printing in unison, but using the printed currency to buy other countries bonds? Is there a mechanism for obfuscating the printing by central bank collaboration?
sm_landlord writes:
Let's see: A Russian specialist in information warfare issues a statement that is clearly propaganda.
Actually, as a Californian, I wouldn't mind seceding that much as long as Cali could be broken up into the three states it really is
sm_landlord | Homepage | 11.25.08 - 3:06 pm | #
If you did that, you could probably get Oregon and Washington to go along. Far Northern Cal would probably side with them on many things, balancing out the power.
Information warfare sounds much more interesting than my current job. Perhaps if I apply to doctoral programs I could submit my CR posts as part of my CV.
R. Timm writes:
@ Commissar Rob Dawg: If 65% are homeowners then the bottom 25% are likely rentors. Hence the average income of a homeowner could easily be the 60th or 75th percentile overall.
The highest income households are almost ten times as likely to own their homes rather than rent, but in the lowest quintile, the ratio of owners to renters is nearly one to one.
No, that's oversimplification to the point of failure. 31% of houses have no mortgage. Lots of retirees with bottom quintile incomes there. See? If you want to use mean rather than median I'll agree but when you start throwing out high and low scores from an unequal distribution you change the whole picture.
Looks like ridiculously low volume in the first half of the last hour. not going to be hard to juice this sucker 2% into the close in whatever direction someone chooses. I'd bet up in light of the end of the month coming soon.
There are people at a military hospital in my neighborhood who have no arms and legs.
Yeah, and there are hundreds of thousands of innocent Iraqis and Afghanis, non-military, in the same, or worse shape. What are you going to give to them, Pavel? They didn't sign up to go "kick some ass." And don't hand me the B.S. that the soldiers are in Iraq and Afghanistan defending our country. Bullocks!!
I'm so proud of my 10 year old daughter. Her teacher had everyone give thanks for something the other day, and when they were nearly finished, the teacher says "and let's not forget to give thanks for our soldiers in Iraq and Afghanistan." My daughter asked why. The teacher replied, rather indignantly, according to my daughter, "because they are defending our country." My daughter said, "how can they be defending our country when they're in Iraq and Afghanistan and killing innocent people?" The teacher responded "we're not going to talk about this right now." I'm doing my part in raising children who will stand up against empire.
"I believe that all classes and factions need to work together, give together and sacrifice as one,"
I agree with this...and would add, no military adventures, without a universal draft. Imagine if the Congress and the White House faced the prospect of their own children being drafted....might slow down their risk appetite.
Please do not apologise, Pavel, for it seems you do not understand me. It is exactly because I empathize with the suffering of all humans, regardless of faith or race, that I abhor exclusivist narratives.
Such narratives are political weapons, and deliberately conduct good-willed people to the moral aberration of condoning a present genocide as an aversion reflex to the genocide perpetrated by our grand-parents.
Stretch002 writes: Would the clan strongman or mercenary protection team have charged my more than 50% of my income forever?
The clan birthed you, raised you, fed you, clothed you, protected you, educated you. All you have is the clan's, or that's how they'll see it when they enforce their will.
As for the mercs, 50% before or after they betrayed you to your enemies or shot you and robbed your hacienda?
People with nothing to cry about sure invent reasons.
I am afraid that phrase "all classes and factions need to work together, give together and sacrifice as one" sounds a lot to communism to me.
Why would this the solution to our troubles? I would certainly not be willing to work the long hours and endure high stress of my job were I not receiving more compensation than someone working in a much lesser role. You risk people like me ceasing to work or working far beneath our abilities if you start trying to put us all on the a level playing field. What good is being above average if you only reap an average reward?
People with nothing to cry about sure invent reasons.
What a bunch of crap you're spouting. Nice dualism, by the way. It's the clan or strong arm mercenary, or our air force dropping bombs on brown and yellow people from 30,000 feet. As if they're the only choices.
"Yeah, and there are hundreds of thousands of innocent Iraqis and Afghanis, non-military, in the same, or worse shape."
War is an evil, not something good. My Church is opposed to war under almost every circumstance, and was opposed specifically to at least one of the wars you mention - perhaps to both.
Sorry Mandarin, but we are nto living in the "Third World Wasteland" you are describing. Can you adjust your examples of why I should give up more than 50% of my earnings and "sacrifice" with everyone in a meaningful and RELEVANT context please?
here are people at a military hospital in my neighborhood who have no arms and legs.
MB,
with respect, I think many of those suffering vets were the undereducated folks who were victimized by the people who run the empire, who deliberately conflate patriotism with military adventurism.
Because, Stretch, all those military contractors have to send their kids to college, travel the world, have second and third homes....and, because we have built an economy around building things to bomb us and everyone else on the planet into extinction.
I'm not arguing that, Fried, but I can't condone it, or support it, regardless. If we support it, and coddle it, it continues. I do not support the troops, because I do not support the wreckless administration of death for corporate profiteers.
I do support troops who see the light and repudiate their charge, and walk away. That is a noble act, IMHO.
I still do not understand how anyone who joins the military by CHOICE is a victim. I come from a poor welfare family, we lost our home to foreclosure and I was homeless in my teens, I was educated in public schools, and I have risen above this through hard work and self education. I could have CHOSEN to join the military and gone off to fight Desert Storm 1. Instead I chose to work and study and work some more. At one point I had a job during the day and another stocking shelves after midnight.
give me a compelling reason that I should sacrifice and give up more than I am already giving. I do not recall ANYONE from my parents welfare circle giving up anything more than the time to go collect their free check and government/church sponsored food. These folks are going to sacrifice with me in the coming months? Give me a break...
I think my quota of bleeding heart, let's all get through together nonsense has been reached...
With that in mind: At what point should I decide to stop working and just ask for my bailout too? Only getting back half of what I make is becoming a serious deterrant to showing up to work everyday. Add that to various factions asking me to sacrifice more and more and you can see why I am frustrated.
This state is unjust and faltering -- there is no question of that. I'm hardly agreeing with everything Pavel says -- I think he's a barmy pollyanna. I also have enough historical perspective to know that it could be SO MUCH worse, and horse sense to think that most other places aren't too hot for jumping ship.
The crisis is the biggest opportunity ever to fall into your lap. Not now, but soon. Don't cry about it, cherish it. You'll never have another chance to make so much of yourself, and not in a positivist "you can change the world" sort of way.
Ignore the transient crap where they destroy the currency, old dynasties lead to new dynasties. This is just the lead-up to you getting SO RICH if you put your mind to it.
Stretch, if you truly make about $220k (based on your claim of $100k in taxes being 45% of your income) and pay $100k in taxes, I think you need a better accountant. The state and federal tax rates you cite are the marginal rates. I assume you're in CA based on the 10% you cite for state taxes. We do get to the 9.3% rate pretty quick (after about $44k in taxable income for a single filer, I think). But still, your state income tax burden for a gross income of $220k should be no greater than about $18k even if you don't itemize. Social security (presumably included in your 35% federal tax rate) tops out this year at $6300. Medicare has no cap, so that's 1.45% of $220k or another $3200. If you're paying $18k in state income taxes, I assume you itemize at the federal level, so your federal taxable income can't be larger than about $202k. The federal tax on $202k in taxable income for a single filer is ~$53k, which brings the total to around $80k (or 36% of $220k) for state and federal payroll/income taxes. Even if you include sales tax in your calculation, you'd have to have purchased $250k worth of taxable merchandise during the year to get to $100k in total tax burden. Something isn't quite adding up.
Ignore the transient crap where they destroy the currency, old dynasties lead to new dynasties. This is just the lead-up to you getting SO RICH if you put your mind to it.
The_Littlest_Mandarin | 11.25.08 - 4:34 pm | #
Nice to be optimistic in these times.
Wealth is a by-product of a functioning society. Should society cease to function, those without wealth will discover those who do.
Good stuff Crash Positions. I was only talking MY income, not including my wifes. Together our HH income goes well above the numbers you have there as she makes more than I do...
I like to joke that she bought when my stock was low!
As a side note to Ed: I am now a Director of Marketing for an IT company. I started as a PC tech, as my industry got out sourced in the late 90's early 2000's I became an IT buyer, once that got centralized I became an IT Salesman, I have sinced moved into marketing and am now a Marketing Director.
During that work period I got half a dozen computer certifications, went back to college and got my BA degree, and continue to take courses/seminars to improve my skills.
Here's the first problem with any sign that prices have reached a correciton point:
"...and an estimate of 2% increase in household median income for 2008."
You can forget an increase this year. There are over a million new people making $0/yr so far in 2008.
Stretch002(Unrated) writes: Sorry Mandarin, but we are nto living in the "Third World Wasteland" you are describing. Can you adjust your examples of why I should give up more than 50% of my earnings and "sacrifice" with everyone in a meaningful and RELEVANT context please?
Sans political goods, everywhere is a "third world wasteland". The state provides you with political goods. The cost of a state can only really be measured in comparison to the costs of autarky.
Could you provide political goods for yourself as good as the ones you're getting here for less? REALLY?
Then you should jump ship. Take your money and your work ethic and good luck.
Frankly you should probably jump ship anyway, as you do not seem sufficiently hardcore to ride the upcoming attraction we're all in line for. Good luck being an auslander in Costa Rica.
CR, "needs to fall another 15%" when it is at 1.2 and we are having 5% deflation? In my math book this is 25% and 10% overshoot towards the lower end is entirely possible even without a great depression.
I dreamed last night that I was riding on a passenger train. Suddenly it began to lurch, smoke started to fill the compartment, and the conductor strode into the aisle and shouted: 'We're using the emergency brake.'
"I'm not arguing that, Fried, but I can't condone it, or support it, regardless. If we support it, and coddle it, it continues."
MB, Again, I respect your position, but I wonder if you remember that half the population has an IQ of 100 or less. Not trying to be difficult, but in my job I sometines have to talk to folks who are perfectly functional but unable to deconstruct polemics.
And these are people who are very much interested in contributing and doing the right thing. IMO, they are victimized by political marketing, in fact by marketing of all sorts.
I have a great deal of sympathy for them...they are exploited a great deal.
Hard to take a tough line with a kid who's been burned or broken doing his best to serve his country. YMMV.
You seem to be more virtuous and talented than so many of us, so I agree that you should be excused from your overwhelming tax burden.
Of course, there are a couple of small sacrifices that you should make in exchange for not paying taxes:
-If you or your family are assaulted on the street or in your home, you may not call the police for protection.
-If you lose your job, and have a pre-existing medical condition and, as a result, are not able to get medical insurance, you won't be able to use the emergency room, even if you are about to die.
If a foreign power or terrorist group invades our country, we can offer you up as a sacrifice to allow the rest of us to survive.
If you parents become ill, medicare is not available to them and you must watch them die in the street. Of course, it goes without saying that they will give up their social security.
You may not use public streets or the interstate system to get to work, shopping, or any other location.
Since we can't educate our children (hey, I don't have any kids myself, I'd love to be excused from paying for the little bastard's education, too), you must bear the lions share of the damage to our economy from having an uneducated work force.
House on fire -- get a hose. Of course, you can't use the municipal water system. I wish you the best of luck.
I'm sure there are some other services that you would need to forego in exchange for the nullfication of your tax burden, but, hey, I'm sure you can provide for yourself better than our communistic government could ever dream of.
Please also tattoo yourself and your family on your faces so that if I see you suffering in the street, I'll know that I should just walk away since you have decided to provide for yourself.
I wish you the best of luck, I'm sure you will do just fine.
This is good stuff: a build out of this analysis would provide a long term moving average that could flag buy and sell markets as housing pricing changed.
But personal income is only the start of the analysis: it needs to be adjusted by inflation, interest rates, future sellability, credit availability, lending rules, and other parameters that influence the ability to "pay the house's mortgage," not simply "pay the house's price."
If rogue bureacrats are pumping like crazy ($3000 billion for Citi; another $800 billion today) why is the 10-year T-Note up 2 points today, and the 30-year up 3%?
El Cliffo | Homepage | 11.25.08 -
Financials usually rally before Thanksgiving, so it's partially a seasonal play.
Someone here posted an interesting take: People walking away from personal debt because of the bailouts. I don't know if that's more than anecdotal, but it is true that if people get the idea that the sacrifice is theirs and the rewards go elsewhere, there could be trouble. Nations don't get through crises by unfairly splitting the sacrifices.
Actually, as a Californian, I wouldn't mind seceding that much as long as Cali could be broken up into the three states it really is
sm_landlord
Right now California has 2 Senators and 53 congresscritters. Plus one for 2000 versus 1990. We added 4.7 million to snag that next seat. How about
Georgia who added 2 seats? Yup, they added 2.1 million. Arizona +2 seats, 2.0 million. Better than 4:1 disparities.
To answer your question, 8 States can carefully be designed to get more than 70 seats in Congress. The break up would put several in the "sweet spot" of the formula and the small population, large area Sierra states would get their mandatory 1 regardless of population.
PC Pacifica; SF peninsula and environs. (PC as in Politically Correct, (even Hillary Clinton could get elected.)
MC Centro or Sierra; Central Valley plus mountains. (America's Vegetable Drawer.)
AC Alta or Upper California Northern counties. (Big High Country.)
CC Costa California Ventura to Monterey - Tehachapis/Coastal Range. (Alternative Aurocosta, Gold Coast.)
LA Angeles; All the Miserable urban crap, social problems, etc. LA, Orange, Riverside, Antelope Valley, San Berdoo. (Lousiana can take LS for their abbreviation)
SC From Sud California San Diego, Imperial and environs. (Alternatives Imperial or just tell South Carolina to buzz off.)
- OR --
WC Wacko California. SF peninsula and environs. Obvious.
CC Centro California. Central Valley, mountains.
PC Pacifica. Northern counties and Oregon.
This leaves Washington State to move its' new capital to Vancouver.
California is in fact at the very least 6 states. A map of Southern California alone would entirely cover New England to Penn. Not only that but the shapes, amount of coastline and population and economy are roughly comparable.
Q. [What's your like of separation between Wacko & Pacifica, and Wacko & Costal?]
A. Marin can go either way... Don't go there!
Q. I still think Ventura belongs in L.A.
A. (serious for a minute) LA thinks that. They need the good air, landfill sites, growth expansion, etc. If you were to look at aerial photos it would be obvious that there WERE reasons why Vta did not become like Orange County or San Berdoo. You can actually see the border from the air.
In fact linear proximity is the only factor that puts Vta in LA's sphere of influence.
SC Sudo (Pronounced Pseudo) California. San Diego, Imperial and environs. For all the lighthearted description above; the areas have geographic, historical, economic justification. We need more Senators, representative state govt, federal clout, regional solutions, etc.
Each state would be among the top 20 most populous, or largest, or richest states in the union. The idea that the Ventura County Superintendent of Schools needs more votes to win than Senators from Montana is
weird to say the least. When people refer to LA County Supervisors as "Their Lordships" without smiling and they each represent multiple congressional districts something is wrong with California's political structure.
In the next 17 months CA will add the population of Wyoming. Can we
get another US Senator every 34 weeks forever? We deserve them.
Does it make since for other countries to unpeg from the dollar? Looks like we have a huge amount of control over their countries via financial manipulations..
The analysis ignores the difference in mortgage costs (especially during the late 70's and 80s vs. 2000-2007). It would be really interesting to adjust this to reflect true mortgage costs.
FDIC Graphs Show the Extent of Financial Crisis: More Institutions Report Declining Earnings, Quarterly Losses; Lower Asset Values Add to the Downward Pressure on Earnings; Growth in Reported Noncurrent Loans Remains High; Nine Failures in Third Quarter Include Washington Mutual Bank; Failure-Related Restructuring Contributes to a Decline in Reported Capital.
Nations don't get through crises by unfairly splitting the sacrifices.
Back in the day, Bill Clinton was only able to get tax increases during his term if he agreed to welfare reform. This way both classes feel like they're being screwed.
Today, sacrifice is more like this: X got their pony, now I want mine.
Pavel Chichikov writes:
"Maybe in some decades the persecuted minority will be human beings."
After alredy six decades of disposession, rape and murder, maybe in some decades the persecuted majority of occupied Palestina will be considered human beings.
If California was split into a number of separate states, we would just get more bankrupt states, or would the rich in California draw the lines so that only the state(s) in which their slaves lived would be bankrupt?
REL writes:
If California was split into a number of separate states, we would just get more bankrupt states, or would the rich in California draw the lines so that only the state(s) in which their slaves lived would be bankrupt?
Yes, sort of. Urban California is approaching the event horizon from which there is no plling back. This is a classic 80/20 situation. 80% of the state is fine by area. 80% of the state is screwed by population.
thoughts on tomorrow's jobs claims and personal income?
My guess (and consistent with the theme of the week)- better then expected ... happy happy joy joy, oh spend you beautiful sheepeople, oh spend (preferably on credit)
I am an archaic, ridiculously outdated, obsolete low-use human resource. I believe in patriotism and love of country. I believe that all classes and factions need to work together, give together and sacrifice as one, or we will indeed not get through this crisis without severe, maybe irreparable damage. If a senator says: Let's not raise taxes on the wealthy, I want to ask: What are the wealthy giving up for the country? Spending is not a sacrifice. Earning profits, however well deserved, is not a sacrifice. Saying God Bless America 20 times a day is not sacrifice.
This is pretty much, I believe, good Catholic social teaching. But no one needs to be Catholic to see the sense of it. Mobs have no future.
We're going to find out of this country is adaptive or not, like dinosaurs and mammoths.
I guess it depends on your definition of wealthy. Last I checked, I somehow qualify under Obama's definitation. Seeing as how I already pay 45% of my earnings in taxes each year (35% Federal, 10% State)I'd say I am already sacrificing quite a bit. Seeing as I am young, living in a good area and do not have children I fail to see what city services I am using to the tune of $100,000+ per year....
Pavel, with all due respect, before throwing around snipets of WWII kitsch, you may consider providing some context, such as this relevant citation by none other than Ben Gurion, the founder of Israel:
"If I knew that it was possible to save all the children of Germany by transporting them to England, and only half by transferring them to the Land of Israel, I would choose the latter, for before us lies not only the numbers of these children but the historical reckoning of the people of Israel."
I would like you to take into account that I could have been in that hospital as well had I CHOSEN to join the military. Whether VET benefits are appropriate or not is another discussion. I would guess if you decide to up my tax rate that the money would not be going solely if at all to the vets.
So please submit some real examples of why I should sacrifice more than 50% of my earnings, zero return on investments, paying for and probably not receiving SS, and high asset prices...
Zeev, the last thing on my mind was belittling the sufferings of the Jewish people. I am sorry if it seemed that way to you, and I ask your forgiveness for any offense I may have caused you.
Stretch002 writes: I would like you to take into account that I could have been in that hospital as well had I CHOSEN to join the military. Whether VET benefits are appropriate or not is another discussion. I would guess if you decide to up my tax rate that the money would not be going solely if at all to the vets.
Grow up, you live in a society, it's inequitable in a multitude of ways and directions. You never had to price mercenary protection for your hacienda or bow your head to the clan stongman and accept a political marriage to keep the family strong enough to survive in a lawless wasteland.
Pavel, when
Zeev Krankenfuss writes: "After alredy six decades of disposession, rape and murder, maybe in some decades the persecuted majority of occupied Palestina will be considered human beings,"
does he mean the sufferings of the Jewish people ?
Please know I am not trying to attack vets or anyone in a personal fashion. This is merely good discussion.
With that in mind:
At what point should I decide to stop working and just ask for my bailout too? Only getting back half of what I make is becoming a serious deterrant to showing up to work everyday. Add that to various factions asking me to sacrifice more and more and you can see why I am frustrated.
I have yet to see why I should give up more than 50% of my income so we can all "sacrifice together" to get through these hard times. What are the other factions giving up?
So falling this far has almost completely crushed our financial system and greater economy. But we still have so much further to go! What will happen when we complete the trip down?
and with incomes falling............
emo
Off topic but maybe I get a pony for finding this:
The Committee to Save the World
Would "nominal household median income" catch high rates of unemployment? In other words, when someone's income goes from $40,000 to $0, do they drop out of the data, i.e. get dropped from the data set used to calculate median income, or does the $0 still get averaged in?
It's a race to see if housing prices can correct to appropriate levels before gov't measures to fix "the problem" of falling housing prices can work.
One thing is working for us, one against. Working for us, the problem of housing price deflation is so big that gov't efforts will likely just waste money and have little effect. Against us, global deflation means that we can't count on wages increasing to try to meet the falling prices, so we'll have to rely on falling housing prices to carry the full burden of correction. Q3-09 sounds about right, ignoring overshoot.
FDIC: Number of Problem Rescue Plans Increased Sharply in Q3.
/snark off
We will overshoot the income to pricing ratio...imo.
THe only problem with these charts is they only go back to the last housing boom. Looking at history, the bottom of the last boom is ~normal
http://photos1.blogger.com/blogger/6089/1833/1600/shiller.gif
(I'd say ~110 is about the norm since ~1950)
Maybe we're approaching this from the wrong side. Let's increase rents,...double them all! Really punish those unpatriotic buggers.
CR,
Is the data available for a few prominent MSAs as with your Price-to-Rent ratio post? As you say, it would be better to do this for a local area.
Thanks for all you do.
Finally getting back to reality...
"Income"...? What are that? Isn't that the number you inflate (or completely fabricate) on your liar loan application?
I don't see why CR is spending so much time on something that has virtually nothing to do with establishing the market price of a house.
blueridge, median household income doesn't capture everything. It is a pretty general number - and people losing their jobs only negatively impact the median if they make MORE than the median.
This is just a guide ... and it suggests further price declines of probably 10% to 20% or so.
Best Wishes.
Incomes... what are those? Must check S-V agreement before hitting the "publish" button.
sm_landlord, I'm trying to find some good historical data for MSAs. I think that would be much better.
I'll post it if I can find it!
Best,
Bill
Not sure who posted the New Yorker article on Bernanke in the previous thread, but it really is worth reading :
A Reporter at Large: Anatomy of a Meltdown : The New Yorker
The guy is really a huge failure on so many fronts, and it's basically the same reasons the last presidency went down in flame...strict adherence to a flawed ideology.
The sooner we can get him out the better. Jan 2010 is far too long to wait.
That said, I think we are screwed, in the same way that we are screwed in Iraq (and no that war wasnt won, it was and is an incredible policy catastrophe that we are now forced to pay the price of just to avoid a massive failure.) It's just like our financial system now. Terrible policy decisions leave us in a huge mess, and there is no way out. We just slowly bleed ourselves because to not do so would ensure a massive fail.
stagnate = verb
stagnant = adjective
oh, and if anybody in a policy position is paying attention to the income/pricing graphs, then they know MBS is still a problem, so they'll try inflation by printing (or as I fondly call it, Murder by Death). Dollar is trashed in that scenario as well as Tbills, US default blah blah...
Policy option is defining where best to place the bullet in the head...
CR - you can get median household incomes from the American Community survey.
United States - Data Sets - American FactFinder
Just click on detailed tables, select MSA, select the ones you want, and click next to get to the variables where you can get median hh income.
Income = the amount one earns, after the US takes taxes to pay the banks that have lost the most money, from selling fake pay stubs, hoopajoops, and their assorted derivative securities.
CR - the only place for rents I used to know, and will look it up for you. Its a san franisco based firm.
It is true that nominal incomes usually increase, but I do not think these are normal times and I do not think nominal incomes will increase. And I am guessing that as prices rise due to massive base monetary increases, folks will have less to spend on housing and the overcorrection in housing prices will be greater than other corrections.
CR, perhaps another chart would also be helpful. How about real interest rates over a similar period? For people who wonder why mortgage rates have stayed the same, well they haven't.
For much of 2007, nominal interest rates were between 5.5% and 6.5%. Inflation was running about 3% annually. Real interest rates were about 3%. With nominal interest rates around 6% and no inflation, real rates would be 6%.
We are currently experiencing deflation. If we have 3% annual deflation, a 6% nominal loan has a 9% real interest rate.
Pretty pricey.
"However this does shows that the price-to-income is still too high, and that this ratio needs to fall another 15% or so."
That be why gubment of fools are trying to make sure they don't.
CR - the median gross rent for renter is in there also, series B25111, but I havent pulled it and dont know if it will be useful or not. Perhaps you can try the combo of the MSA NAR median price data with this. It's only annual though, but it could give you an idea of where things are heading.
The CA firm that has data on apartment rents is :
Realfacts - APARTMENT DATA
I used to buy there stuff years ago. It's coverage is a bit limited, but might be better now.
Re: estimate of 2% increase in household median income for 2008
I never got that memo!
Geoff writes:
Not sure who posted the New Yorker article
Bernanke = Guithner
National City's housing valuation analysis (don't know the methodology)
https://www.nationalcity.com/main/micro-site/economics/commentary-analysis/pages/housing-valuation-analysis.asp
guithner writes:
Bernanke = Guithner
Is this self-flagellation or a personal goal?
I don't see how the The Thing will work right even if they stabilize it for awhile. Entitlements still go up, and now the few remaining savers are completely trashed by zero interest rates. It sure looks to me like more reward for liars, more punishment for honesty.
I know a number of people who have worked as consultants for JPM for the last five years. In November their compensation packages were all been reduced by 30%.
-30%!!!
At least they still have jobs, I guess.
CR, are you coming out of the closet? You never sign your name.
has income been adjusted for the .com and then equity withdrawl/40x leverage and coming 10% plus unemployment? if not then the graph needs to re indexed
Consumer Expenditure Surveys
Prepared annually, the Consumer Expenditure Surveys (CEX) measure what typical consumers spend. The spending inflation does not segregate price from quality or assume certain behavior, but rather reflects actual levels of consumer spending. The Consumer Expenditure Surveys provide demographic breakdowns to help us understand age and income differences.
A metric that can overshoot by 70% can undershoot by 70%.
Geoff: Thanks for the link to the article on Bernanke. That is quite a read. A lot of info about him I wasn't aware of, and one of the best quotes (I thought anyway) was this:
"Bernanke, though, remains remarkably calm. (Jim Cramer would say oblivious.)"
I'm in agreement with you--he needs to be gone. I've been wondering if he could be influenced to "retire early" ----otherwise we're all stuck with him until 2010. I wonder how he and Geithner get along.
U.S. Inflation :: Federal Reserve Bank of Cleveland
One ominous take from this is it could predicate another real estate credit bubble if lending practices aren't regulated properly.
U.S. Inflation :: Federal Reserve Bank of Cleveland
"A metric that can overshoot by 70% can undershoot by 70%."
Commissar Rob Dawg | Homepage | 11.25.08 - 1:56 pm | #
Rob,
I look at as...
4 years ago zero homes @ 3x median incomes in our county.
Now there are 1700...But there are also 8K listings(approx).
I figure we still have a ways to go yet.
Chris
Disgusted writes: I wonder how he and Geithner get along.
Answer:
Bernanke 3/28/07
" At this juncture, however, the impact on the broader economy and financial markets of the problems in the subprime market seems likely to be contained."
Guithner 3/28/07
"As of now, though, there are few signs that the disruptions in this one sector of the credit markets will have a lasting impact on credit markets as a whole."
I know I've commented on this before, but here at ground zero(SWFL) we are seeing continued acceleration in re, cc, cars, and boat walkaways. A lot of people on the margins are so disgusted with all the bailouts they just stop payments. Consequences.
@ blackhat
"Policy option is defining where best to place the bullet in the head..."
I agree....but I also really think these guys still actually think they can avoid the bullet. They are that arrogant and out of touch.
So what is the actual national ratio? I've seen 3:1, 4:1 and, most recently here in San Francisco, 10:1. Does anybody have a national ratio?
From Mish, ANOTHER $800 billion?
Mish's Global Economic Trend Analysis: Government To Commit Another $600 Billion On Mortgages, Another $200 Billion on TALF
What the hell? Can we at least wait until the preceding $7 trillion is digested?
Toss in Obama's $700 stimulus and we're where? I can't keep track anymore. $10.6T + $8.5T + .7T = $19.8 trillion?
Holy cow. We HAVE to get inflation. The gov't is now carrying almost $20 trillion in explicit guarantees that they can't afford to have deflate.
"A metric that can overshoot by 70% can undershoot by 70%."
RobDawg, this isn't like a poll that is susceptible to a certain percentage of error. It's not a +/- thing. That is hard data. The reason it will overshoot (beyond the fact that it always has in the past) is the glacial pace with which the housing market moves. You can see its turns coming literally years in advance.
Trillions in new loans & guarantees & tax cuts & "stimulus"...
But still no real jobs to pay it back. All gone away to China and India to "improve" efficiency.
Is anybody taking this seriously anymore?
Housing Tracker
stopped tracking in 2007 for some reaso
CR writes : House Price-to-Income Ratio : ...that this ratio needs to fall another 15% or so...
Cr, I think you are still too optimistic.
In natural systems (includes economy), whenever you have an overshoot, you will also have an correlating undershoot (of smaller magnitude probably, think of "damped oscillation").
And think of all the unrecorded, Broward.
BR,
I have followed the NC data for years and consider it to be the Gold standard.
In general, things are't looking very good.
OTR
-thanks for the laugh
from the prior thred:
If you have not planned for this you will perish
Crewman
I wonder, if as an unintended consequence a ZIRP will grow a nation of super-savers. In the past you might assume that your money might double every 10 years. Without this accellerator of time and low/zero interest folks just might become super-savers to protect and build that nest egg.
Barley
And yet:
Consumer confidence rises in November
"The New York-based Conference Board said Tuesday its Consumer Confidence Index now stands at 44.9, up from a revised 38.8 in October. Last month's reading was the lowest since the research group started tracking the index in 1967."
From Mish, ANOTHER $800 billion?
Well, Mish is learning that the Fed will assist in debasing the currency, something that he never expected to happen. The Fed after all is a politically motivated institution and in times like these the banks have lost their power.
Oregon added 43 personnel to handle unemployment claims. Quality job creation. NPR
Consumer Confidence Index now stands at 44.9, up from a revised 38.8 in October.
Holiday spending and delusional thinking on the part of Democrats that their economic ticket has come in....they're spending in anticipation.
My personal canaries are zip 92397. The new cheapest home just knocked $20,000 off the wishing price. Now $74,900. Purchased Feb 22, 2006 $221,500. Still overpriced IMHO.
No such thing as one cockroach.
C insiders taling (emailing):
"I still don't understand how this is a good deal for C or any of the other banks other than it says that the Fed is serious about not letting the whole system fail (which we knew already)."
Insider Rumors: Citi Terms In Detail - Dealbreaker - A Wall Street Tabloid - Business News Headlines and Financial Gossip
(see the whole link for some detailed information)
I noticed they have Gas Chamber and Crematorium Operators advertized on Career Builder. Should I be nervous?
Without this accellerator of time and low/zero interest folks just might become super-savers to protect and build that nest egg
I think I can answer that.
"No".
Personally, I'm not going to bother anymore. I'm going to stick Uncle Sam with my health care costs, file 1099 and pay no more taxes and the Feds can go get fucked, put me in jail if they want. Free food & health care & hopefully there will be some cable television.
A nest egg is the possibility of keeping both kidneys.
wowow look at the 10 Y T !!
The world wants a new reserve currency.
Are we not providing that by destroying the dollar?
Is the government creating a poison pill for the world to swallow when they move ahead with a new reserve currency?
Lived in the third world for a while. When I got back to my home and turned on the light the cockroaches all scurried for the dark taking what they could.
The light has been turned on revealing the American economy/financial system. Look at the cockroaches run.
Down goes Frazier
Down goes Frazier
what is CPI doing?
Error freq=quarterly
Barley
Yep, wild stuff in treasuries today.
PPT is late
OTR - 10 Y T < 3 tomorrow?
C&C - If ur still having trouble w/ international shipments and LOC consider setting up a Canadian holding company...govt considering a new way to guarentee canadian exports and payments rec'd
If I didn't know better, I'd say somebody's gaming Calculated Risk.
Displaced workers with no paychecks or prospects could add a potentially catastrophic drag to a U.S. economy already facing its worst downturn in decades, says Joel Cutcher-Gershenfeld, the dean of the School of Labor and Employment Relations.
But he says businesses can cushion the blow of layoffs that are inevitable in the months ahead as companies align labor supply with sagging demand.
In the first of a series of commentaries on labor and the crippled economy, Cutcher-Gershenfeld urges employers to provide a softer landing for both workers and the economy through programs ranging from severance packages to retraining benefits.
Were not asking businesses to do this out of charity, he said. There are ways to approach layoffs that maintain options with the displaced workers, deepen loyalty with remaining workers, give meaning to stated corporate values, and help avoid an accelerated collapse in the economy. Instead of knee-jerk, across-the-board job cuts that will have a contagion effect on the economy, respond with programs that mitigate the harm to workers, while leaving businesses and society better situated to recover when there is an upturn.
Alone, each companys decision to scale back workers makes sense in a sour economy, Cutcher-Gershenfeld said. But collectively, a flurry of layoffs will accelerate a downward spiral if employees are simply cut loose, he said.
Providing safety nets may seem more costly than just letting workers go, but could save money in the long run, said Cutcher-Gershenfeld, whose research includes labor-management relations, public policy and economic development.
gaming Calculated Risk?
Isn't that what CR is all about?
my move into HIO has been nice (proxy of longer comm paper > B+)
The world wants a new reserve currency.
Are we not providing that by destroying the dollar?
I don't think that the world really wanted a new reserve currency. It is obvious that the U.S. did not manage the reserve currency well and debased it. Once Nixon unilaterally canceled Bretton Woods, it was clear that the dollar as the reserve currency was on borrowed time.
These last few years the process simply went into hyperdrive and now just about anybody knows that the U.S. cannot be trusted with the reserve currency. It wasn't an issue of desire by the ROW but clear and obvious self serving mismanagement that lead to it.
Thailand. What happened to that great vacation destination? Looks like civil war.
Thai political crisis heightens with new rallies - Asia-Pacific - msnbc.com
Morocco Bama writes:
...Should I be nervous?
Nah, you would first need a failed "Conference of Évian".
Same comment as the earlier thread; might one glean more information from something like 360*(P+I)/median income than price/median income? Taking Principle+Interest payments at prevailing interest rates at the time, assuming 30 yr fixed and 20% down. Then the effect of varying interest rates should be captured better.
O/T but interesting speaking of debasing the currency:
(DETROIT) - Nissan Motor Co. said Monday that it has decided to pull out of the 2009 North American International Auto Show as well as the 2009 Chicago Motor Show
Nissan's departure shakes the foundation of a show that is Detroit's signature annual event, generating tourism revenue estimated at nearly $500 million annually
Dear CR,
Thanks so much for providing this singularly useful data and analysis on the central issue underlying the present crisis. This site has become by far the best single source for clear and quantitative information to assess where we really are in this historic correction. Until prices are back normal, sustainable levels relative to incomes/rents, the situation can never stabilize. So it is especially critical that this data is out there for all to see -- to make informed decisions accordingly.
From the link regarding Fed new $800 billion:
"The Fed wont be removing cash from other parts of the financial system to make up for the purchases, government officials told reporters on a conference call. They rejected any comparison with Japans so-called quantitative easing effort to combat deflation, saying that the Feds objective is to buttress credit markets rather than ramp up money.
The aim of credit policy is focused on narrowing credit spreads, as opposed to expanding the money supply, said Mark Gertler, a New York University economics professor who has collaborated with Bernanke on research. The hallmark of this crisis is unusually high credit spreads which are dampening borrowing and spending across the economy.
The helicopters are en-route, they are going to drop the money in the wrong place. Just deposit the cash in my personal account, Chairman B. and I guarantee it'll be used to reduce the exposure of a major bank to mortgage loan assets.
The hallmark of this crisis is unusually high credit spreads
Zombie Kung Fu Panda
So is it confidence or credit spreads?
Bubblevision is hilarious today. That the bottom is in has become an accepted assumption. The discussion has moved on to sector allocation and stock picking.
Another 10-15% off and we will be down to half off in Miami, which is where I opined we should be give or take 10%.
Thing is, even at half off, what's to be done, if nobody is lending any money.
Citigroup's $306 Billion Rescue Fueled by Pizza From Domino's - Bloomberg.com
PIZZA PARTY CONFIRMED! WE NEED A PIZZA THREAD PLEASE! FREE PIZZA!
Citigroup's $306 Billion Rescue Fueled by Pizza From Domino's
The deal to rescue the world's best- known bank was pieced together by regulators over Domino's pizza in near-empty offices one block from the White House...
The hallmark of this crisis is unusually high credit spreads which are dampening borrowing and spending across the economy. - Mark Gertler
Is it a crime to dope slap a Bernanke advisor?
CR, It would be a better metric to use the 3rd quartile income or the 3rd quintile income instead of the median. This is because homeownership is skewed toward those in upper income while the majority of the lowest income quartile rent.
Have most of the regulars here jumped ship for nakedcapitalism and other more sophisticated blogs? The banter here lately is very low class, but I guess you get what you pay for.
on the confidence numbers...dont forget the oil issue. Before the big stock market collapses, the Umich sentiment gauge was a direct inverse map to gas prices. Only after the big blowout in stocks did we get the sentiment to sink to the downside. Now that gas prices are pulling back while stocks are somewhat sideways, we'll get a little lift. Confidence in general isnt that useful, since its pretty much a coincident indicator. The expectations components can be interesting however.
On Nov. 18, five days before he was forced to bail out Citigroup, Treasury Secretary Henry Paulson told Congress he was handing over to President-elect Barack Obama ``a significantly more stable banking system where the failure of a systemically relevant institution is no longer a pressing concern rattling the markets.''
Consumer credit is DOA. 20-35% downstrokes means re is DOA. Bubble lending practices have to return for this to change.
Anonymous,
Everything smart has been said, why rehash the same analysis of the same events over and over?
CR is now in "comment on the collapse" mode. IMO
Have most of the regulars here jumped ship for nakedcapitalism and other more sophisticated blogs? The banter here lately is very low class, but I guess you get what you pay for.
Anonymous | 11.25.08 - 2:39 pm | #
Perhaps bloggers are adjusting their banter to low class reflecting their new financial lower class.
Have most of the regulars here jumped ship for nakedcapitalism and other more sophisticated blogs? The banter here lately is very low class, but I guess you get what you pay for.
Anonymous | 11.25.08 - 2:39 pm | #
Hey, I resemble that remark.
I suspect that this is 'old news' to many long time readers here. Just confirming what CR and some others were paying attention to a long time ago.
The sound and fury of the bailouts has been an attempt to negate gravity. Prices will fall to where people can afford the monthly payment using prudent underwriting (and below, for a while, like a block of wood thrown into water.)
Until then, we wait, and watch the thrashing about.
R. Timm writes:
CR, It would be a better metric to use the 3rd quartile income or the 3rd quintile income instead of the median. This is because homeownership is skewed toward those in upper income while the majority of the lowest income quartile rent.
More than 2/3rds of households are "owners." The median is clearly an acceptable number for this comparison. 3rd quintile would skew at least as far in the other direction.
Nearing that pivot point:
"The Russian central bank said Monday that it had allowed the ruble to weaken by widening its trading band against other currencies, the second time it has done so in two weeks"
Russia allows ruble to weaken - The New York Times
Bubble lending practices have to return for this to change.
And that's what concerns me with this latest statistic CR has posted. It can serve to rationalize that.....if there are jobs, but that's a big if, and more like a probably not. Everywhere you step there's shit.
The hallmark of this crisis is unusually high credit spreads which are dampening borrowing and spending across the economy.
This isn't about the airplane crashing, it's about managing the altimeter needle.
Russian ruble devaluing?
Big picture on this? Anyone.
videoguy writes:
Big picture on this? Anyone.
Rubel's not a hard currency. They are running out of ForEx reserves for defending the currency's value.
Consumer confidence should be up. We've found out there is a much higher chance of a competent administration.
Great graphic...is there comparable price-to-household income data from Japan or the Eurozone? It would be a good comparison with the US curve. Is the 1.0 line the valid trendline or is there a different mean that is being observed?
-h_d
The 10-year Treasury is doing that thing again.
Jeepers.
Do the Billionaires run for the dollar? Even though it's lost its value to the dollar, it's gained against the Euro which has hurt its trading position.
Big picture on this? Anyone.
videoguy
Money sucked out of emerging markets. Credit costs go through the roof. "Til now Russia has over the last three weeks, spent 56B keeping the ruble in a range - no longer. And, IMF wants some other E. European countries to end currency pegs.
In a nut shell outside of the USD, pound, euro, yen, and maybe Cdn dollar most currencies will fall like a rock in the weeks ahead. Gold should hold since the currency defence has stopped. Oh, and oil prces decline leaving Russia w/ less money to operate leading to escalating deficits weakening the ruble even more. Did you know 40% of Moscovites no longer pay their hydro bill - yet the lights stay on.
Nemo - Deflation? Survey says yes.
It should be obvious that we are in a period where authorities are determined to prevent price drops via inflation. The system simply cannot afford sustained deflation without huge disruption that might cause significant political instability. Just about every pension fund would be underwater and walkaways (commercial and residential) would go into the stratosphere sinking the remaining private banking system.
Therefore, without overtly admitting it, we see policy actions costing in the neighborhood of $8 trillion and counting. Given that fact that this is almost doubling the U.S. national debt within a year, I am not at all certain that falling prices is a certainty, especially not in the medium to long term. As I assume currency (forced or intentional) devaluation on top, that question becomes even more pertinent.
U.S. action is much more aggressive than Japans in the 90s. Todays trend may not at all be tomorrows and constant analysis should be the order of the day.
RUSSIAN ANALYST PREDICTS DECLINE AND BREAKUP OF USA
Tue Nov 25 2008 09:04:22 ET
A leading Russian political analyst has said the economic turmoil in the United States has confirmed his long-held view that the country is heading for collapse, and will divide into separate parts.
Professor Igor Panarin said in an interview with the respected daily IZVESTIA published on Monday: "The dollar is not secured by anything. The country's foreign debt has grown like an avalanche, even though in the early 1980s there was no debt. By 1998, when I first made my prediction, it had exceeded $2 trillion. Now it is more than 11 trillion. This is a pyramid that can only collapse."
The paper said Panarin's dire predictions for the U.S. economy, initially made at an international conference in Australia 10 years ago at a time when the economy appeared strong, have been given more credence by this year's events.
When asked when the U.S. economy would collapse, Panarin said: "It is already collapsing. Due to the financial crisis, three of the largest and oldest five banks on Wall Street have already ceased to exist, and two are barely surviving. Their losses are the biggest in history. Now what we will see is a change in the regulatory system on a global financial scale: America will no longer be the world's financial regulator."
When asked who would replace the U.S. in regulating world markets, he said: "Two countries could assume this role: China, with its vast reserves, and Russia, which could play the role of a regulator in Eurasia."
Asked why he expected the U.S. to break up into separate parts, he said: "A whole range of reasons. Firstly, the financial problems in the U.S. will get worse. Millions of citizens there have lost their savings. Prices and unemployment are on the rise. General Motors and Ford are on the verge of collapse, and this means that whole cities will be left without work. Governors are already insistently demanding money from the federal center. Dissatisfaction is growing, and at the moment it is only being held back by the elections and the hope that Obama can work miracles. But by spring, it will be clear that there are no miracles."
He also cited the "vulnerable political setup", "lack of unified national laws", and "divisions among the elite, which have become clear in these crisis conditions."
He predicted that the U.S. will break up into six parts - the Pacific coast, with its growing Chinese population; the South, with its Hispanics; Texas, where independence movements are on the rise; the Atlantic coast, with its distinct and separate mentality; five of the poorer central states with their large Native American populations; and the northern states, where the influence from Canada is strong.
He even suggested that "we could claim Alaska - it was only granted on lease, after all." Panarin, 60, is a professor at the Diplomatic Academy of the Russian Ministry of Foreign Affairs, and has authored several books on information warfare.
On currency devaluation - for the first time in a while, Mr. Practical at minyanville makes an appearance and has something to say about devaluing a currency.
That sneaky PPT started early today. Another retest of 865 coming before the close?
A leading Russian political analyst has said the economic turmoil in the United States has confirmed his long-held view that the country is heading for collapse, and will divide into separate parts.
You mean the mason-dixon line might resurrect? And you Californians could have your wild wild west back. We could go straight back in history! That would be kinda cool.
On Life Support
Is this the source you pasted from? Please provide linkage next time....
It also appears on Drudge.
Re
Well put. So let's say it takes another 4 trill, puts us at 12 trill, what are the consequences?
AND DOWN THE STRETCH THEY COME!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
On Life Support,
That author uses vodka for life support
Thanks Littlest and Barley.
Not paying hydro bills and the power stays on, smart move. Keep the people inside where it's warm instead of out in the cold rioting because the economy is crashing. I hope our government is as smart.
Let's see: A Russian specialist in information warfare issues a statement that is clearly propaganda.
Actually, as a Californian, I wouldn't mind seceding that much as long as Cali could be broken up into the three states it really is
What's odd about that is the demographic that supports ending the fed using a russian to support their case.
Read this on another site, but I'm surprised by no post from Bill: 30 year fixed mortgage rates dropped to 5.25%, down 50 b.p. in last few hours. Wells Fargo and Security National are so swamped with rate locks that their entire Web networks have crashed.
high class comment:
Makers of Luxury Goods Loose Pricing Power
Dividend Stocks – The Dividend Daily » Blog Archive » Makers of Luxury Goods Losing Pricing Power (COH, LVMUY, SKS)
(always aiming to improve the tone of the comments)
Good point, Geoff.
PCA - this morning my mother was quoted 5.75% by WAMU (central Cal. coast). She called for my opinion.
50 bips in since then? Wow...
After all, the 10 year bond is now below where it was in May 2003, when 30 year fixed rates dropped to 4.75% for a couple of days, and hovered at 5% for a couple of weeks.
Just buy Any Old Thing in here....
Looks like no one wants to mis the last hour rally.
Lets see if it lasts.
@ Commissar Rob Dawg: If 65% are homeowners then the bottom 25% are likely rentors. Hence the average income of a homeowner could easily be the 60th or 75th percentile overall.
The highest income households are almost ten times as likely to own their homes rather than rent, but in the lowest quintile, the ratio of owners to renters is nearly one to one.
Household income in the United States - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
hanks training timmy on the new buy button at treas
Well put. So let's say it takes another 4 trill, puts us at 12 trill, what are the consequences?
As is obvious from history, command economies are not at all immune to significant bouts of inflation.
The big question in my mind is, how much does it take to reverse the deflationary mindset? We have been in deflation for only a few months, therefore a switch to an inflationary mindset is very easily accomplished. It is simply a matter of governmental resolve, i.e. a repeat of Roosevelt's 1934 dollar devaluation in stealth clothing. I am watching very closely.
Today, Jack Daniel's is sponsoring the final hour countdown on Marketwatch.com
Still time to send out for refreshments for after the close. Or maybe the charts are showing a cup pattern?
why is it so hard to figure out that the lower rate does nothing for the perosn entering the house price other than force them to choose between a lower payment today and a capital loss when they sell. Anything else assumes that itnerest rates can be manipulated forever lower. artifically Lower rates does not mean high prices. it just means the lower the rate the greater your eventual capital loss.
This legislation gives the government the power to seize property that facilitates the violation of intellectual property laws.
Read The Bill: H.R. 4279 [110th] - GovTrack.us
Ruh roh. What better way to seize computers and press charges against any American who has blogged or complained about the governments actions. The internet doesn't need to be shut down, just the vocal citizens. Seize my computers if I have watched a video that was copyrighted and infringed on by my IP.
Shouldn't have watched Californication Season 1 over the weekend.
Passed the House with 410 Ayes, 11 Nays, 12 Present/Not Voting. Currently in the Senate.
Is the ratio just straight median income to median house price?
"Panarin, 60, is a professor at the Diplomatic Academy of the Russian Ministry of Foreign Affairs, and has authored several books on information warfare."
and in this case, Professor Panarin is demonstrating to his students the application of his expertise.
To suggest that Chinese or Russian governments should take the role of regulator of global financial systems is ludicrous. In both countries, corruption, opacity, and arbitrary measures are far worse in government than in the US.
спасибо
mr. market failed to hold 8600 yesterday, wonder what he will do today?
Or maybe the charts are showing a cup pattern?
sm_landlord
That would be old fashioned, no?
sm_landlord writes:
And yet:
Consumer confidence rises in November
"The New York-based Conference Board said Tuesday its Consumer Confidence Index now stands at 44.9, up from a revised 38.8 in October. Last month's reading was the lowest since the research group started tracking the index in 1967."
sm_landlord | Homepage | 11.25.08 - 2:09 pm | #
You didnt get the memo?
PE/O and his new team are going to fix it all. You didnt know?
If rogue bureacrats are pumping like crazy ($3000 billion for Citi; another $800 billion today) why is the 10-year T-Note up 2 points today, and the 30-year up 3%?
El Cliffo - Who knows? A simple bubble forming, imho
(Delete one zero from the $3000. Thanks.)
RE TY
Delete one zero from the $3000. Thanks.
El Cliffo
If you wait a day, leave the zero in.
El Cliffo writes:
(Delete one zero from the $3000. Thanks.)
El Cliffo | Homepage | 11.25.08 - 3:18 pm | #
The Fed sure a hell isnt deleting zeros. Thats for damn sure!
El Cliffo: What if the world's central banks are printing in unison, but using the printed currency to buy other countries bonds? Is there a mechanism for obfuscating the printing by central bank collaboration?
sm_landlord writes:
Let's see: A Russian specialist in information warfare issues a statement that is clearly propaganda.
Actually, as a Californian, I wouldn't mind seceding that much as long as Cali could be broken up into the three states it really is
sm_landlord | Homepage | 11.25.08 - 3:06 pm | #
If you did that, you could probably get Oregon and Washington to go along. Far Northern Cal would probably side with them on many things, balancing out the power.
I think they have a big Monopoly board set up at the Fed.
Information warfare sounds much more interesting than my current job. Perhaps if I apply to doctoral programs I could submit my CR posts as part of my CV.
хороший день
briwerk - interesting thought
"That would be old fashioned, no?"
--Barley
Depending on the close, they might not even rinse the coffee out of the cup. Last Thursday, it was straight from the bottle.
"Or maybe the charts are showing a cup pattern?"
We'll know shortly whether the action in the last 15 was a bat signal or a base camp.
R. Timm writes:
@ Commissar Rob Dawg: If 65% are homeowners then the bottom 25% are likely rentors. Hence the average income of a homeowner could easily be the 60th or 75th percentile overall.
The highest income households are almost ten times as likely to own their homes rather than rent, but in the lowest quintile, the ratio of owners to renters is nearly one to one.
No, that's oversimplification to the point of failure. 31% of houses have no mortgage. Lots of retirees with bottom quintile incomes there. See? If you want to use mean rather than median I'll agree but when you start throwing out high and low scores from an unequal distribution you change the whole picture.
"Far Northern Cal would probably side with them on many things, balancing out the power."
--Bob Dobbs
Oh, you mean South Oregon. Yes, that's one of the new states.
Re: Russian trash talking the dollar.
If you had a soft currency on the verge of a meltdown wouldn't you say anything to forestall that event?
phrase-o-day
Looks like ridiculously low volume in the first half of the last hour. not going to be hard to juice this sucker 2% into the close in whatever direction someone chooses. I'd bet up in light of the end of the month coming soon.
There are people at a military hospital in my neighborhood who have no arms and legs.
Yeah, and there are hundreds of thousands of innocent Iraqis and Afghanis, non-military, in the same, or worse shape. What are you going to give to them, Pavel? They didn't sign up to go "kick some ass." And don't hand me the B.S. that the soldiers are in Iraq and Afghanistan defending our country. Bullocks!!
I'm so proud of my 10 year old daughter. Her teacher had everyone give thanks for something the other day, and when they were nearly finished, the teacher says "and let's not forget to give thanks for our soldiers in Iraq and Afghanistan." My daughter asked why. The teacher replied, rather indignantly, according to my daughter, "because they are defending our country." My daughter said, "how can they be defending our country when they're in Iraq and Afghanistan and killing innocent people?" The teacher responded "we're not going to talk about this right now." I'm doing my part in raising children who will stand up against empire.
"I believe that all classes and factions need to work together, give together and sacrifice as one,"
I agree with this...and would add, no military adventures, without a universal draft. Imagine if the Congress and the White House faced the prospect of their own children being drafted....might slow down their risk appetite.
Please do not apologise, Pavel, for it seems you do not understand me. It is exactly because I empathize with the suffering of all humans, regardless of faith or race, that I abhor exclusivist narratives.
Such narratives are political weapons, and deliberately conduct good-willed people to the moral aberration of condoning a present genocide as an aversion reflex to the genocide perpetrated by our grand-parents.
Stretch002 writes:
Would the clan strongman or mercenary protection team have charged my more than 50% of my income forever?
The clan birthed you, raised you, fed you, clothed you, protected you, educated you. All you have is the clan's, or that's how they'll see it when they enforce their will.
As for the mercs, 50% before or after they betrayed you to your enemies or shot you and robbed your hacienda?
People with nothing to cry about sure invent reasons.
I am afraid that phrase "all classes and factions need to work together, give together and sacrifice as one" sounds a lot to communism to me.
Why would this the solution to our troubles? I would certainly not be willing to work the long hours and endure high stress of my job were I not receiving more compensation than someone working in a much lesser role. You risk people like me ceasing to work or working far beneath our abilities if you start trying to put us all on the a level playing field. What good is being above average if you only reap an average reward?
People with nothing to cry about sure invent reasons.
What a bunch of crap you're spouting. Nice dualism, by the way. It's the clan or strong arm mercenary, or our air force dropping bombs on brown and yellow people from 30,000 feet. As if they're the only choices.
"Yeah, and there are hundreds of thousands of innocent Iraqis and Afghanis, non-military, in the same, or worse shape."
War is an evil, not something good. My Church is opposed to war under almost every circumstance, and was opposed specifically to at least one of the wars you mention - perhaps to both.
I was talking about sacrifice.
Sorry Mandarin, but we are nto living in the "Third World Wasteland" you are describing. Can you adjust your examples of why I should give up more than 50% of my earnings and "sacrifice" with everyone in a meaningful and RELEVANT context please?
here are people at a military hospital in my neighborhood who have no arms and legs.
MB,
with respect, I think many of those suffering vets were the undereducated folks who were victimized by the people who run the empire, who deliberately conflate patriotism with military adventurism.
Stretch002,
So what exactly do you do and how long have you done it?
Because, Stretch, all those military contractors have to send their kids to college, travel the world, have second and third homes....and, because we have built an economy around building things to bomb us and everyone else on the planet into extinction.
"...does he mean the sufferings of the Jewish people ?
I understood he meant someone else ."
It looks as if I did misunderstand.
I'm not arguing that, Fried, but I can't condone it, or support it, regardless. If we support it, and coddle it, it continues. I do not support the troops, because I do not support the wreckless administration of death for corporate profiteers.
I do support troops who see the light and repudiate their charge, and walk away. That is a noble act, IMHO.
"I am afraid that phrase "all classes and factions need to work together, give together and sacrifice as one" sounds a lot to communism to me."
No, communism is supposed to be classless.
I still do not understand how anyone who joins the military by CHOICE is a victim. I come from a poor welfare family, we lost our home to foreclosure and I was homeless in my teens, I was educated in public schools, and I have risen above this through hard work and self education. I could have CHOSEN to join the military and gone off to fight Desert Storm 1. Instead I chose to work and study and work some more. At one point I had a job during the day and another stocking shelves after midnight.
give me a compelling reason that I should sacrifice and give up more than I am already giving. I do not recall ANYONE from my parents welfare circle giving up anything more than the time to go collect their free check and government/church sponsored food. These folks are going to sacrifice with me in the coming months? Give me a break...
I think my quota of bleeding heart, let's all get through together nonsense has been reached...
With that in mind:
At what point should I decide to stop working and just ask for my bailout too? Only getting back half of what I make is becoming a serious deterrant to showing up to work everyday. Add that to various factions asking me to sacrifice more and more and you can see why I am frustrated.
This state is unjust and faltering -- there is no question of that. I'm hardly agreeing with everything Pavel says -- I think he's a barmy pollyanna. I also have enough historical perspective to know that it could be SO MUCH worse, and horse sense to think that most other places aren't too hot for jumping ship.
The crisis is the biggest opportunity ever to fall into your lap. Not now, but soon. Don't cry about it, cherish it. You'll never have another chance to make so much of yourself, and not in a positivist "you can change the world" sort of way.
Ignore the transient crap where they destroy the currency, old dynasties lead to new dynasties. This is just the lead-up to you getting SO RICH if you put your mind to it.
Pavel, did you know Father Tipton?
Stretch, if you truly make about $220k (based on your claim of $100k in taxes being 45% of your income) and pay $100k in taxes, I think you need a better accountant. The state and federal tax rates you cite are the marginal rates. I assume you're in CA based on the 10% you cite for state taxes. We do get to the 9.3% rate pretty quick (after about $44k in taxable income for a single filer, I think). But still, your state income tax burden for a gross income of $220k should be no greater than about $18k even if you don't itemize. Social security (presumably included in your 35% federal tax rate) tops out this year at $6300. Medicare has no cap, so that's 1.45% of $220k or another $3200. If you're paying $18k in state income taxes, I assume you itemize at the federal level, so your federal taxable income can't be larger than about $202k. The federal tax on $202k in taxable income for a single filer is ~$53k, which brings the total to around $80k (or 36% of $220k) for state and federal payroll/income taxes. Even if you include sales tax in your calculation, you'd have to have purchased $250k worth of taxable merchandise during the year to get to $100k in total tax burden. Something isn't quite adding up.
I didn't recognize the name, but I just looked him up. He pressed Congress to investigate the murders of the Jesuits in El Salvador.
Ignore the transient crap where they destroy the currency, old dynasties lead to new dynasties. This is just the lead-up to you getting SO RICH if you put your mind to it.
The_Littlest_Mandarin | 11.25.08 - 4:34 pm | #
Nice to be optimistic in these times.
Wealth is a by-product of a functioning society. Should society cease to function, those without wealth will discover those who do.
And take it from them.
"I think he's a barmy pollyanna."
Barmy probably.
Good stuff Crash Positions. I was only talking MY income, not including my wifes. Together our HH income goes well above the numbers you have there as she makes more than I do...
I like to joke that she bought when my stock was low!
As a side note to Ed: I am now a Director of Marketing for an IT company. I started as a PC tech, as my industry got out sourced in the late 90's early 2000's I became an IT buyer, once that got centralized I became an IT Salesman, I have sinced moved into marketing and am now a Marketing Director.
During that work period I got half a dozen computer certifications, went back to college and got my BA degree, and continue to take courses/seminars to improve my skills.
Here's the first problem with any sign that prices have reached a correciton point:
"...and an estimate of 2% increase in household median income for 2008."
You can forget an increase this year. There are over a million new people making $0/yr so far in 2008.
Stretch002(Unrated) writes:
Sorry Mandarin, but we are nto living in the "Third World Wasteland" you are describing. Can you adjust your examples of why I should give up more than 50% of my earnings and "sacrifice" with everyone in a meaningful and RELEVANT context please?
Sans political goods, everywhere is a "third world wasteland". The state provides you with political goods. The cost of a state can only really be measured in comparison to the costs of autarky.
Could you provide political goods for yourself as good as the ones you're getting here for less? REALLY?
Then you should jump ship. Take your money and your work ethic and good luck.
Frankly you should probably jump ship anyway, as you do not seem sufficiently hardcore to ride the upcoming attraction we're all in line for. Good luck being an auslander in Costa Rica.
CR, "needs to fall another 15%" when it is at 1.2 and we are having 5% deflation? In my math book this is 25% and 10% overshoot towards the lower end is entirely possible even without a great depression.
I dreamed last night that I was riding on a passenger train. Suddenly it began to lurch, smoke started to fill the compartment, and the conductor strode into the aisle and shouted: 'We're using the emergency brake.'
I think it was the train of history.
Pavel, relax, take it easy.
No need for nightmares.
Just enjoy yourself. (live is short enough)
"I'm not arguing that, Fried, but I can't condone it, or support it, regardless. If we support it, and coddle it, it continues."
MB, Again, I respect your position, but I wonder if you remember that half the population has an IQ of 100 or less. Not trying to be difficult, but in my job I sometines have to talk to folks who are perfectly functional but unable to deconstruct polemics.
And these are people who are very much interested in contributing and doing the right thing. IMO, they are victimized by political marketing, in fact by marketing of all sorts.
I have a great deal of sympathy for them...they are exploited a great deal.
Hard to take a tough line with a kid who's been burned or broken doing his best to serve his country. YMMV.
Stretch002 --
You seem to be more virtuous and talented than so many of us, so I agree that you should be excused from your overwhelming tax burden.
Of course, there are a couple of small sacrifices that you should make in exchange for not paying taxes:
-If you or your family are assaulted on the street or in your home, you may not call the police for protection.
-If you lose your job, and have a pre-existing medical condition and, as a result, are not able to get medical insurance, you won't be able to use the emergency room, even if you are about to die.
I'm sure there are some other services that you would need to forego in exchange for the nullfication of your tax burden, but, hey, I'm sure you can provide for yourself better than our communistic government could ever dream of.
Please also tattoo yourself and your family on your faces so that if I see you suffering in the street, I'll know that I should just walk away since you have decided to provide for yourself.
I wish you the best of luck, I'm sure you will do just fine.
This curve is way off for many populated areas, including all of California. What's up?
that's not quite a fair chart, you should add the borrowing availabilty.
multiplying the income by a zero coupon 25y would be better.
is it a good time forforex trading?
This is good stuff: a build out of this analysis would provide a long term moving average that could flag buy and sell markets as housing pricing changed.
But personal income is only the start of the analysis: it needs to be adjusted by inflation, interest rates, future sellability, credit availability, lending rules, and other parameters that influence the ability to "pay the house's mortgage," not simply "pay the house's price."
Forgot to say that the bet won't be a large one.
Speaking of Russia
Russian reserves stood at $596.5 billion at their peak at the end of July. By the end of October, the figure had dropped by $100 billion.
http://www.istockanalyst.com/article/viewiStockNews+articleid_2832127.html
Cisco to close U.S., Canadian offices Dec. 29-Jan. 2: WSJ
If rogue bureacrats are pumping like crazy ($3000 billion for Citi; another $800 billion today) why is the 10-year T-Note up 2 points today, and the 30-year up 3%?
El Cliffo | Homepage | 11.25.08 -
Financials usually rally before Thanksgiving, so it's partially a seasonal play.
Cisco to close U.S., Canadian offices Dec. 29-Jan. 2: WSJ
I guess they need time to fill out the Bank Holding Company forms.
Is that no pay close?
I guess they need time to fill out the Bank Holding Company forms.
Eric
That was yesterday - today they will call themselves "Consumers"
Someone here posted an interesting take: People walking away from personal debt because of the bailouts. I don't know if that's more than anecdotal, but it is true that if people get the idea that the sacrifice is theirs and the rewards go elsewhere, there could be trouble. Nations don't get through crises by unfairly splitting the sacrifices.
Actually, as a Californian, I wouldn't mind seceding that much as long as Cali could be broken up into the three states it really is
sm_landlord
Right now California has 2 Senators and 53 congresscritters. Plus one for 2000 versus 1990. We added 4.7 million to snag that next seat. How about
Georgia who added 2 seats? Yup, they added 2.1 million. Arizona +2 seats, 2.0 million. Better than 4:1 disparities.
To answer your question, 8 States can carefully be designed to get more than 70 seats in Congress. The break up would put several in the "sweet spot" of the formula and the small population, large area Sierra states would get their mandatory 1 regardless of population.
PC Pacifica; SF peninsula and environs. (PC as in Politically Correct, (even Hillary Clinton could get elected.)
MC Centro or Sierra; Central Valley plus mountains. (America's Vegetable Drawer.)
AC Alta or Upper California Northern counties. (Big High Country.)
CC Costa California Ventura to Monterey - Tehachapis/Coastal Range. (Alternative Aurocosta, Gold Coast.)
LA Angeles; All the Miserable urban crap, social problems, etc. LA, Orange, Riverside, Antelope Valley, San Berdoo. (Lousiana can take LS for their abbreviation)
SC From Sud California San Diego, Imperial and environs. (Alternatives Imperial or just tell South Carolina to buzz off.)
- OR --
WC Wacko California. SF peninsula and environs. Obvious.
CC Centro California. Central Valley, mountains.
PC Pacifica. Northern counties and Oregon.
This leaves Washington State to move its' new capital to Vancouver.
California is in fact at the very least 6 states. A map of Southern California alone would entirely cover New England to Penn. Not only that but the shapes, amount of coastline and population and economy are roughly comparable.
Q. [What's your like of separation between Wacko & Pacifica, and Wacko & Costal?]
A. Marin can go either way... Don't go there!
Q. I still think Ventura belongs in L.A.
A. (serious for a minute) LA thinks that. They need the good air, landfill sites, growth expansion, etc. If you were to look at aerial photos it would be obvious that there WERE reasons why Vta did not become like Orange County or San Berdoo. You can actually see the border from the air.
In fact linear proximity is the only factor that puts Vta in LA's sphere of influence.
SC Sudo (Pronounced Pseudo) California. San Diego, Imperial and environs. For all the lighthearted description above; the areas have geographic, historical, economic justification. We need more Senators, representative state govt, federal clout, regional solutions, etc.
Each state would be among the top 20 most populous, or largest, or richest states in the union. The idea that the Ventura County Superintendent of Schools needs more votes to win than Senators from Montana is
weird to say the least. When people refer to LA County Supervisors as "Their Lordships" without smiling and they each represent multiple congressional districts something is wrong with California's political structure.
In the next 17 months CA will add the population of Wyoming. Can we
get another US Senator every 34 weeks forever? We deserve them.
Does it make since for other countries to unpeg from the dollar? Looks like we have a huge amount of control over their countries via financial manipulations..
timmy and lassie rally got legs?
Evian Conference - googled it.
Maybe in some decades the persecuted minority will be human beings.
One thing for sure, I will not be spending any more money until Im getting over 8% +. These pigs are pissing my hard earned money away!
Pavel Chichikov writes:
Maybe in some decades the persecuted minority will be human beings.
I resent that
...."be among the top 20 most populous, or largest, or richest states in the union".....
Union?.....What "Union"? I sure as He** wouldn't subject myself to THIS again....We like things as they are in Nevada, thank you...
Dawg -
very nice. nawt Deputy Dawg.. Senatarrrrr Dawg.
One way or another devaluation of the dollar is coming. Either by inflation or edict.
PCA - be a man, not a mouse... LOL
no offense.... but had to swing at that softball.
The analysis ignores the difference in mortgage costs (especially during the late 70's and 80s vs. 2000-2007). It would be really interesting to adjust this to reflect true mortgage costs.
Very nice. nawt Deputy Dawg.. Senatarrrrr Dawg.
Arrrr that be where the best piratin' be matey!
More Joy from the FDIC:
FDIC Graphs Show the Extent of Financial Crisis « Your Mortgage or Your Life…
FDIC Graphs Show the Extent of Financial Crisis: More Institutions Report Declining Earnings, Quarterly Losses; Lower Asset Values Add to the Downward Pressure on Earnings; Growth in Reported Noncurrent Loans Remains High; Nine Failures in Third Quarter Include Washington Mutual Bank; Failure-Related Restructuring Contributes to a Decline in Reported Capital.
Nations don't get through crises by unfairly splitting the sacrifices.
Back in the day, Bill Clinton was only able to get tax increases during his term if he agreed to welfare reform. This way both classes feel like they're being screwed.
Today, sacrifice is more like this: X got their pony, now I want mine.
"Persecuted Comrade Anonymouse writes:
Pavel Chichikov writes:
Maybe in some decades the persecuted minority will be human beings.
I resent that
Persecuted Comrade Anonymouse"
Mouse - human - all satisfied members of the Borg.
Commissar Rob Dawg said: "Re: Russian trash talking the dollar.
If you had a soft currency on the verge of a meltdown wouldn't you say anything to forestall that event?"
Many years ago, an old man, who was a Czech refuge, told me, "Never trust the Russians". I've never forgotten him, or what he said.
I don't think he meant 'the Russians talking their book' but, perhaps he was....
Pavel Chichikov writes: Shto?
I was talking about this :
Évian Conference - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
35 Nations not wanting them either. Clear sign of trouble ahead.
(Do not get me wrong : there is no way on earth to justify what happend later, but the story is a little bit ?wider/larger? than just '42, '43 )
New thread.
Pavel Chichikov writes:
"Maybe in some decades the persecuted minority will be human beings."
After alredy six decades of disposession, rape and murder, maybe in some decades the persecuted majority of occupied Palestina will be considered human beings.
hypocrite.
If California was split into a number of separate states, we would just get more bankrupt states, or would the rich in California draw the lines so that only the state(s) in which their slaves lived would be bankrupt?
emo
^TNX: Basic Chart for 10-YEAR TREASURY NOTE - Yahoo! Finance
REL writes:
If California was split into a number of separate states, we would just get more bankrupt states, or would the rich in California draw the lines so that only the state(s) in which their slaves lived would be bankrupt?
Yes, sort of. Urban California is approaching the event horizon from which there is no plling back. This is a classic 80/20 situation. 80% of the state is fine by area. 80% of the state is screwed by population.
thoughts on tomorrow's jobs claims and personal income?
My guess (and consistent with the theme of the week)- better then expected ... happy happy joy joy, oh spend you beautiful sheepeople, oh spend (preferably on credit)
I am an archaic, ridiculously outdated, obsolete low-use human resource. I believe in patriotism and love of country. I believe that all classes and factions need to work together, give together and sacrifice as one, or we will indeed not get through this crisis without severe, maybe irreparable damage. If a senator says: Let's not raise taxes on the wealthy, I want to ask: What are the wealthy giving up for the country? Spending is not a sacrifice. Earning profits, however well deserved, is not a sacrifice. Saying God Bless America 20 times a day is not sacrifice.
This is pretty much, I believe, good Catholic social teaching. But no one needs to be Catholic to see the sense of it. Mobs have no future.
We're going to find out of this country is adaptive or not, like dinosaurs and mammoths.
Pavel
Hear, hear.
Zeev, I was referring to prospects in bio-technology.
I guess it depends on your definition of wealthy. Last I checked, I somehow qualify under Obama's definitation. Seeing as how I already pay 45% of my earnings in taxes each year (35% Federal, 10% State)I'd say I am already sacrificing quite a bit. Seeing as I am young, living in a good area and do not have children I fail to see what city services I am using to the tune of $100,000+ per year....
I'd also like to ask what the factions who are supposed to be giving equally with me are going to provide for my $100k...
And you want me to sacrifice more?
Pavel, with all due respect, before throwing around snipets of WWII kitsch, you may consider providing some context, such as this relevant citation by none other than Ben Gurion, the founder of Israel:
"If I knew that it was possible to save all the children of Germany by transporting them to England, and only half by transferring them to the Land of Israel, I would choose the latter, for before us lies not only the numbers of these children but the historical reckoning of the people of Israel."
David Ben-Gurio - Wikiquote
"I'd also like to ask what the factions who are supposed to be giving equally with me are going to provide for my $100k...
And you want me to sacrifice more?"
There are people at a military hospital in my neighborhood who have no arms and legs.
Give whatever you feel able to give.
I would like you to take into account that I could have been in that hospital as well had I CHOSEN to join the military. Whether VET benefits are appropriate or not is another discussion. I would guess if you decide to up my tax rate that the money would not be going solely if at all to the vets.
So please submit some real examples of why I should sacrifice more than 50% of my earnings, zero return on investments, paying for and probably not receiving SS, and high asset prices...
Zeev, the last thing on my mind was belittling the sufferings of the Jewish people. I am sorry if it seemed that way to you, and I ask your forgiveness for any offense I may have caused you.
"I would guess if you decide to up my tax rate that the money would not be going solely if at all to the vets. "
I'm not a member of Congress.
Stretch002 writes:
I would like you to take into account that I could have been in that hospital as well had I CHOSEN to join the military. Whether VET benefits are appropriate or not is another discussion. I would guess if you decide to up my tax rate that the money would not be going solely if at all to the vets.
Grow up, you live in a society, it's inequitable in a multitude of ways and directions. You never had to price mercenary protection for your hacienda or bow your head to the clan stongman and accept a political marriage to keep the family strong enough to survive in a lawless wasteland.
Would the clan strongman or mercenary protection team have charged my more than 50% of my income forever?
"Would the clan strongman or mercenary protection team have charged my more than 50% of my income forever?"
The Chechen mafia might offer a bargain, but if you don't pay up or otherwise annoy them they take your head - literally.
Pavel, when
Zeev Krankenfuss writes: "After alredy six decades of disposession, rape and murder, maybe in some decades the persecuted majority of occupied Palestina will be considered human beings,"
does he mean the sufferings of the Jewish people ?
I understood he meant someone else .
Please know I am not trying to attack vets or anyone in a personal fashion. This is merely good discussion.
With that in mind:
At what point should I decide to stop working and just ask for my bailout too? Only getting back half of what I make is becoming a serious deterrant to showing up to work everyday. Add that to various factions asking me to sacrifice more and more and you can see why I am frustrated.
I have yet to see why I should give up more than 50% of my income so we can all "sacrifice together" to get through these hard times. What are the other factions giving up?