Latest Radar Logic (CS and RL are converging) suggest much worse ahead. June (origination of transactions) decline was much worse than May and July decline is much worse than June. Add to that seasonally weak period ahead and we could see 25% from Peak this year and 35-40% decline from peak next year, assuming that we dont come out of recession in 2009H1 (very unlikely).
--
"From the chart it looks like the rate of decline has slowed . . . but I imagine this is just a pause to breathe before the biggest plunge yet."
Gary,
There was a pause in decline during two spring months (origination). CS does a 3-Month window. When the spring month comes out of the window we will see 20% Annual Rate (3-momth decline annualized and not YoY) decline.
Y'know, Jas, when you get off of the soapbox, you're very astute.
Sometimes you snare more flies with honey.
FWIW, I've sensed that the market/Street is playing a game of Chicken with us.
As someone posted the other week, akin to Sheriff Bart in Blazing Saddles taking himself hostage and threatening to put a bullet in his own head. THAT was a great analogy and kudos to whoever thought of it.
I wouldn't say prices are leveling off, but still, it isn't a steep as it was. But do I understand correctly that there is still a large amount of ARM's about to reset in 2009-2011?
Too bad Hank, George and Congress don't pay attention to this data. Herein lies the problem. DUHHHHHH. Perhaps the $$$$$$ should go to homeowners who really need it. Put, Hank, George and the Congress in Jail, where they belong.
In the words of BTO, I'm afraid "we aint seen nothin yet". Just wait until resets begin on all the other toxic loans in 2009.
Off Topic - Anyone know where there's a good reference for who gets paid what when a company liquidates?
Looked in Ubernerd-dom, but no luck. Was talking to father-in-law about Lehman Bonds - which spun into a discussion about the structuring of who gets paid during bankruptcy.
Like, who's more protected if Goldman dived, bond-holders or Buffet?
Erin is the most annoying little dweeb next to Cramer. She's rude, talks over anyone with an opposing view, and her transparent bias towards her masters of Wall Street sickens me.
I'll vomit if I hear her say we are stupid because we don't want Wall Street to get bailed out.
Can I get something clarified? It's pretty basic so forgive me. Does it matter that housing prices fall b/c people are unable to refinance to get into debt(or into more debt) to sustain their lifestyles and meet emergencies? Would we be able to stem some of that tide in the short/midterm by investing in the real economy to create jobs? And in UI benefits and food stamps to boost the economy quickly? I also like the idea of the return of the Home Owners Loan Corporation but other people have mentioned that a lot.
sportsfan - I think part of it is cheerleading, however, I manage several companies and one is consumer related and banks are still lending to anyone with reasonable credit.
There is a serious disconnect between this WS "no one is lending" bs and what is really happenening on Main Street. Dont get me wrong, there is a serious slow down, but things have been slow on the consumer side since Nov 2007.
Let me ask a question to CR. THe fed injected over 600 BILLION into the market yesterday and it dropped over 700 points. How would the 700 BILLION dollar bailout bill have mattered or made a difference?
Is anyone else disappointed and disgusted that the only leadership on the issue either candidate has taken is to suggest raising the insurance limits to $250000? I know I will shock everyone to suggest that Obama is as politically calculating as McCain and refuses to step up and put forth a decent proposal. McCain's political inaptness is shocking, one softball after another tossed his way and he strikes out again and again.
JS, if they were to raise the FDIC limit, I'd expect that to cost the banks more in insurance premiums to FDIC. So it may be self defeating w/r/t bank capitalization.
The really scary part (for my little lizard brain) is that I've read examples that in some groups of these loans as many as 85% of them are only making the minimum payment which means they would have been underwater at reset time even if prices has remained stable. When they reset prices in Cali will be down 30% or more in some places.
So people will be way underwater and in many cases will not be able to make the new payments even if they wanted to because they never really were qualified to purchase a house like that based on their income and it was all just based on some refinancing scheme down the road.
Can I get something clarified? It's pretty basic so forgive me.
Does it matter that housing prices fall b/c people are unable to refinance to get into debt(or into more debt) to sustain their lifestyles and meet emergencies?
Yes, it matters that house prices fall, no matter what the cause. Whether the fall is due to inability to finance due to high rates, or more stringent borrowing requirements, or a constriction of lending funds, or lower wages or job insecurity, or other "supply and demand" features, it matters.
Would we be able to stem some of that tide in the short/midterm by investing in the real economy to create jobs?
Probably, but the time it would take to invest in business and create new jobs may be quite a while -- and no amount of investment may stem the overriding consequences of a long-lasting recession or stave off an imminent financial collapse.
And in UI benefits and food stamps to boost the economy quickly?
Not sure how either of these will "boost" the economy -- these are not capital producing nor significant consumer purchasing triggers. They simply allow people to survive.
I also like the idea of the return of the Home Owners Loan Corporation but other people have mentioned that a lot.
Agreed - although one inadvertent consequence may be a further loss in mortgage values (and mortgage-backed securities values) if the mortgage "work-outs" are not performed intelligently, i.e., they are done to garner votes but not with an eye towards weed out hopeless risks.
I'm 65 yrs. old. I have seen a couple of slowdowns, but the CS trend lines and JP Morgan's projections of the CA real estate market scare the crap out of me. Our economy can not survive when a large percentage of homeowners are underwater. Our country needs a man with a plan or I will be dead before the good times return.
There is a serious disconnect between this WS "no one is lending" bs and what is really happenening on Main Street.
I'm trying to sort out the BS factor myself. I think their point is that banks aren't willing to lend to each other now, so eventually that trend will reach Main Street, if it's not resolved soon.
Whether they're right is open to interpretation, but it seems that an awful lot of people from different perspectives say the problem is serious and needs to be resolved.
The sheer amount of fear-mongering on every major network news program is astounding.
The lack of perspective, conviction and courage of those in key positions of influence is what puts the final nail in our coffin. Greater Depression...here we come.
@12th Percentile: 85% making minimum payments... that's bad! Do I understand correctly that in a typical pay-option ARM the monthly payments will rise by several hundred dollars, dus to (a) minimum payments no longer allowed, and (b) the interest rate going up by typically 200 basis points (or more)?
They are both idiots. So to are those who vote for either of them.
my credit is crunchy | 09.30.08 - 10:11 am | #
Talk about idiocy.
Either work on a third party or pick a side and try to make that party better from the inside. believe me, it's an uphill battle (I was elected to county committee this year).
But spare me the nihilistic "pox on both their houses" cop-out bullshit.
Choices do matter. Just remember Bush vs. Gore . . . everybody was saying "what's the difference?" After 8 years, is there any doubt?
Maybe Al Gore wouldn't have shat ponies and farted rainbows, but I'm damn sure he wouldn't have been the worst President in history.
I'm 65 yrs. old. I have seen a couple of slowdowns, but the CS trend lines and JP Morgan's projections of the CA real estate market scare the crap out of me. Our economy can not survive when a large percentage of homeowners are underwater. Our country needs a man with a plan or I will be dead before the good times return.
dave in texas | 09.30.08 - 10:14 am
How exactly do you "fix" that problem?
1) re inflate the bubble and ignore reality
2) cramdowns that will cause even more problems
3) time machine to go back and make sure the fed lends money at a reasonable rate.
This has to run it's course, I haven't seen a plan yet that will "fix" it. Use the $700 billion to make sure the support structures in this country will survive the fallout.
Gary is scary. He still thinks he can trust people. He will never make it without alot of help.
Here is a tip, when massa looks at you, don't make direct eye contact. They HATE that.
I know I will shock everyone to suggest that Obama is as politically calculating as McCain and refuses to step up and put forth a decent proposal.
Who's shocked by that? Obama is trying to a) get elected and b) be able to be effective once in office. Proposing a plan would strengthen his mandate if wins but lower the chance he'll win by putting out something (necessarily) controversial. It's clear, though, that he will have all the mandate he could possibly want if he wins now that his opposition has pounded the panic drum and insisted doing anything whatsoever is better than nothing. So no benefit to putting out a plan.
Besides, a good plan needs thought. Obama can't whip up an instant solution any more than anybody else can. He and his advisors should take the time to form a good plan and float some trial balloons. I'm sure they are now. By the time he could have a good plan ready to bring to the public the election will be over.
The cognitive dissonance of picking the lesser of two evils is what brought us as a country to this point.
Those who wish to control you make it a point to give you only choices which serve their intent. Sooner or later we must break this cycle. Take the power back.
As for UI benefits and food stamps, they are universally acknowledged to be the two best (targeted, temporary and timely) ways to stimulate the economy b/c those dollars are spent immediately. Good chart here. There are infrastructure projects (jobs) that have been suspended and which can start up within a year - many within months. All they need is the money to get going. If we have to give money to Wall St - and we probably do now b/c blackmail works - I'm saying keep it as low as possible. I'm with Ian Walsh. And here. As for real money, I'd put serious investment into the real economy (UI benefits, food stamps, infrastructure and a new HOLC).
Land prices are sticky, sticky, sticky until a bank collapses in the area. Why?, primarily b/c their incentive is to keep prices from falling by rolling over the defaulted debt to someone else in order to keep their balance sheet in line (and not get taken over).
Remember, the assets and liabilities have to at LEAST match up (especially for a bank) and since the value of the loans are a direct consequence of the value of the collateral for the loans, a bank has a very intense incentive for the price to never go down.
Some of those 15-20 cent/dollar deals in California were because they were part of bonds sold through Wall Street. Not through traditional depository institutions.
And, you're seeing how that has paid off for them:( So, you can imagine what might happen if there are clearing transactions on bank-owned land in the depository world.
IMHO, the ABA (American Bankers Assoc.) is attacking this problem by going to the wrong "trough", but, then again, I think it's too late to fix.
The absolute, unquestionable, fundamental problem is that there is not enough money to be retrieved from the loans that were given out to meet the obligations that have accrued BY banks TO their depositors. (Deposits are liabilities- when you deposit money in a bank, you are, in effect, LOANING the bank your money).
Please read this again until it sinks in
I believe a rational argument could be made that depositors have never been compensated for the risks they have unknowingly taken, but, that's a topic for another day.
Apologies for the length, it's hard to encapsulate scope in a few words.
Housing is a symptom. Redistribution of wealth and it's effect on capital allocation in our economy is the source.
Rich lazy people don't put money back into the economy in a way that benefits society. So instead of more better roads, telecom infrastructure, science grants, etc. We get bigger houses, boats, Ferraris, H2's, etc. None of this is a long term benefit to our economy. Quite the opposite.
register, enter your inputs, & then click on any house that comes up. Go to "sales trends", up in the top menu, & it will give info on current Median List, Sale, $ perSQF prices, and Sales Volume for that neighborhood. It also does a good job if you click on "recent sales", next to the "sales trends" box-- gives you a gps style map of all sales in that area-- 3-month, 6-month, etc.
It's the best public-access realty site I've found so far. It also gives you separate daily e-mail updates on new foreclosures.
(& no I don't work for either of these sites!
If this trend continues, houses will eventually be AFFORDABLE!! Imagine being able to actually BUY a house and PAY IT OFF - the horror! Whatever shall our banker-parasites do?! How can they can rich from interest and debt if people can afford to BUY things?!
Fortunately, Bailout Bill II will help fix all this, I am sure!
MickeyD writes:
How healthy is your company if you have to borrow to make payroll??
MickeyD | 09.30.08 - 10:30 am | #
FYI - your company doesn't have sacks of cash in the back to make payroll with. Its in a bank that doesn't have a lot of reserves... that USUALLY can borrow from other banks who also don't have a lot of reserves... who if both are short & no one else is lending (or trusts them) can then go to the Fed window.
What LIBOR is saying is there is no there there in the banks right now... so even if your super-corp has lotsa digits in its asset account somewhere the bank might not... hence payroll might not get paid ON TIME.
Will it all work out? Sure. But explain that to J6P when the Eagle doesn't fly on Friday.
That is the concern & it is REAL... does this bailout address that concern long term? No.
Understand the problem & you can argue against the bad solutions more effectively.
People by and large(middle class) have allowed this misallocation to occur in the past because rich folks have been dangling the carrot...err maintaining the illusion of upward mobility. This upward mobility has been an illusion because of rampant inflation(house prices, etc.) as soon as people "make" money...it's value is decreased. So we over-extend on credit EVEN more....again only making ourselves poorer. After all of these unsustainable financial decisions start unravelling TPTB prepare for a bailout (Bernanke, Paulson, et al). Look around in all of the key decision making positions...they are all the very people OR appointed by the very people who have fostered this madness. We are all being fleeced. We have been willingly taking part in our own financial destruction. It is now time to make amends. No matter what the final solution, the peons pay dearly. Let's just make sure the puppetmasters are exterminated as well.
so this is why the banks buy back their own defaulted loans at note price at the foreclosures on courthouse steps auctions, foreclosure sales, right?-- to hang onto it in shadow inventory so as to avoid busting out all their other comps for other properties they hold as collateral in that area. (am I understanding this correctly?)correct?
and remember: the root of the housing problem is that incomes cannot support current prices.
I'm a solid member of Gen X. Few of my colleagues can afford their houses over 30 years. They certainly cannot buy upper level houses. And we have could jobs. Keep this in mind, all in older generations.
Summer is the best selling season, helping prices to the upside
We have enough inventory to work through another winter or two before anyone begins to think about a bottom. It doesn't matter how desperate people are right now, because they'll only be more so in the future.
Rather than talk of "extermination," uh, let's just go back to some regulation. We can even have a bailout plan if only some regulation and oversight is involved.
Just for amusement value--when there are 10.5 months of supply on the housing market pushing prices down, why is Habitat for Humanity building new homes instead of taking over existing, empty homes?
Isn't LIBOR the Inter BANK lending rate? And banks won't lend to each other? I wonder why? Maybe because the government is taking under even seemingly healthy banks, that doesn't inspire a lot of confidence in the system.
On the other hand, in the middle of the worst credit crisis in recent memory, Microsoft is going to start a CP program.
Maybe they can, because no matter how hard they tried, the government couldn't take down MS.
Confidence these days is not being recession-proof, but regulator-proof.
Just for amusement value--when there are 10.5 months of supply on the housing market pushing prices down, why is Habitat for Humanity building new homes instead of taking over existing, empty homes?
Probably because there are certain designated places in these communities where brown people "should" live?
Paulson's working model, remember the details will be left to the hired managers, is to bake in current defaults as having peaked and using the treasury's borrowing cost for the discount rate.
Basically 80 cents on the dollar, although he has been careful to say that they could pay above the HTM price and pay up to full original face value
For what its worth, Bill Gross called for 60¢/$ and then later 65¢/$. Earlier there had been a consensus 70¢/$ showing up in gossip
Make no mistake. With great power, comes great responsibility. The con job that these people have pulled is a direct threat to our nation's safety and security. Our enemies see this weakness. You really believe that Putin's invasion of Georgia is coincidental to our troubles?
What these people have done is tantamount to treason.
dryfly says What LIBOR is saying is there is no there there in the banks right now... so even if your super-corp has lotsa digits in its asset account somewhere the bank might not... hence payroll might not get paid ON TIME.
sorry I call BS, there are no cases of company check or savings accounts not paying out in whatever form the customer wants, in whatever amount they want (within reasonable notice). It would be headlines and the bank would be toast.
libor reflects that banks are not lending to each other, nothing to do with how they deal with NORMAL demands on their services by their customers, whether corporate or other.
Other people have said it already: if a company has so little reserves, even with lumpy revenue, that it has to setup a NEW line of credit to meet payroll then it deserves to fail.
if a company is profitable, put some money aside for a rainy day earning 3% or 4% in a money market fund! What company is so thinly profitable that it can't save up enough to cover the lumps in its revenue stream, apart from oil exploration companies and the like? (which are a whole other setup challenge).
the banks that have been "taken under" by the government were dead men walking for some time. They were going down long before the government did anything.
Please, really try to understand what's going on around here before posting drivel.
banks won't lend to each other because nobody knows who is healthy and who is not. Firm after firm have said 'we're healthy' but then later we find their level 3 assets are far over-valued and overleveraged. it's a problem of solvency. The problem: the banks don't know who is and who is not insolvent.
I'm starting to think that the dems were just hood-winked.
Perhaps the republicans have internally conceded the oval office, but threw the current executive branch on the grenade to create some financial hysteria (bait) that the Dems foolishy gobbled up. Now, whatever happens, the dems look like cowardly idiot pawns of WS and the Republicans get control of possibly both the house and senate as all reps who voted for the bill are voted out by the pitchfork holding J6P.
If the the stock markets rally or go flat, the dems look quite foolish for pushing so hard on the bailout of WS.
If it tanks, they look like they have no balls to pass a bill on their own.
I know, it's a long shot - but this has popped into my head a few times over the last few days. Anyone else thinking this?
and to whomever above who posted about new HUD grants-- this is from my local newsrag I'm in Norfolk VA) on 9/28/08:
am summarizing: 'HUD announced Friday how they'll divide $4 billion in CBDG's (*community block development grants) across the country. Of that, nearly $3 million will go to Wash. DC, $46 million to Maryland, & $45 million to VA. In VA, Prince George's County gets $11 mil, Prince William, $4 mil, & Fairfax County gets $2.8 mil.' direct quote: "The money will be used to buy foreclosed homes at a discount, demolish and renovate them, or help buyers with down payment and closing costs among other things."
Did anyone see the Fast Money crew interview the Rep from TX. They dismissed his logic for voting no as "vile idealism during a time when Rome is burning". I immediately turned off the TV.
BTW...I checked with my mortgage broker yesterday. I still qualify and the jumbo conforming (below 729K) is available but now at a slightly lower rate than last month. no credit crisis in the OC
Someone smarter than me once said the most effective way to control the citizens is "to keep them in fear and keep them in debt". The last 8 years of Bush shows how effective this strategy has been and still is. I believe this "rescue plan" aka bailout is yet another application of this plan and is nothing more than an egregious attempt to loot the taxpayers of what little they have left. JP6 are finally opening their collective eyes and seeing this for what it really is and at the same time coming to the stark realization that our government, BIG corporations and Wall Street are a criminal enterprise rampant with greed and corruption. Apparently now Congress knows that we know and that they are being watched very carefully. As an aside to the foregoing, Jas Jain has been right on throughout these many months and it appears a shift has taken place among CR commenters concerning the wisdom of his "uncomfortable" description of us being "born and bred dopes". We HAVE been, we still ARE to a great degree, but that is changing and changing fast. So I say thanks to Jas for telling an Inconvenient Truth. We can still save this country and economy along with our freedom and dignity by keeping intense pressure on the politicians to do what's right and come up with the best possible course of action. Today's up market seems to expose the fiction of imminent collapse so lets capitalize on this and make a loud noise to our elected "leaders".
I love CR but on this Case Shiller index he is wrong wrong wrong. CS is up m-m in four or five cities. From April, it is up for 5. Toss out California, Phoenix, and Las Vegas, and most Americans are seeing RISING home prices over the past few months, or close to it. Media and analysts have a blind spot for this fact, however. Moreover, the CS index is heavily weighted to foreclosed properties because of the wave of foreclosures in the distressed regions. If your home is not foreclosed, you get much better prices when you sell. So if we are looking at the over housing market for the average household, CS is very misleading. When will media figure this out?
anonymous:
I don't think you understand the Fractional reserve lending system. Dryfly is correct and you are incorrect.
there are 2 SEPARATE issues:
banks have lots of inflows and outflows. it's based on what their depositors do. Remember, the bank doesn't have all "your" money in it's vault somewhere. rather, it has a percentage. Most of the time the banks have enough to give their customers on demand. But at times they run short. If this happens, the bank simply borrows the money for a day or two until their inflows balance it all out. It happens from time to time. This allows the banks to lend out more of their deposits (fractional reserve) and increases the velocity of money.
let's say a few big businesses try to do payroll on the same day, and a few other depositors all want to withdraw money and extra large checks come in to clear, all on the same day. In the past prior to the Fed system the bank would run out of money. Now it can simply borrow the funds for a day or two. system solved (sort of)
HOwever, that system is now in jeapordy. if this continues, it is possible that too many withdrawals will happen on one day (like payroll) and the bank WONT BE ABLE to cover payroll to the business. Thus, your paycheck won't clear.
see the problem?
A secondary aspect is the Commercial Paper market. That market is also suffering. Companies used this in the past as it was cheaper to do than other types of loans. Sure, they can eventually get into something else, but right now it's tight BECAUSE THE BANKS ARENT LENDING and investors aren't investing. Thus, these companies are having a hard time because the CP is short term. so as it rolls over the company needs to either get back into CP, or get a loan from somewhere, or just pay it all off (difficult but not impossible)
Its the f'ing BANKS who don't have the reserves anymore... and they don't have the collateral to borrow even from the Fed... THAT'S what has these knuckleheads worried...
So if 3M has an 'account' with 10 Gazillion dollars in it but their bank doesn't have it - and can't borrow it - how do 3M employees cash their checks from the 3M account???
The bank pissed away the 3M cash on dodgy MBS and such - its all written down and gone.
That's what has these guys worried & they ought to be worried. But this bill is a bad way to fix that - better to just buy bank preferred stock directly & re cap that way.
OT: news from my sister on the the ground in Charlotte, NC. Gives an idea how this all looks to average people.
"Patients who worked for Wachovia come in to the office crying yesterday. What a black monday for this town. The loss of wachovia, the market crashing after failure of the bailout, and gas rationing here in town makes it feel like the Depression is already here! What a day yesterday was."
Resets are when interest rates go up. According to tanta most of these can't go up more than 7.5% in one year. That seems manageable, at least the first year.
Recast is when the interest only (or less than interest only loans) become normal fully amortized principal and interest loans. The jump in payment in that case can be much more than 7.5%.
I wish there was a "calculated risk-elite" section where one must be nominated in which to post.
too much noise and stupidity lately
FWIW: I'm not suggesting that i should be allowed to post. but there are people who know things and then people who blabber.
"Patients who worked for Wachovia come in to the office crying yesterday."
Steady, there. I think banking services will continue to exist and so will banking jobs. Maybe not the casino-level jobs of packaging mortgages with some underlying value into tranches that are worth zero, but some other banking jobs.
...and speaking of too much noise and stupidity, it seems that the Chicago area has been left off of the routing list for the "We're in a recession headed for Depression" memo.
U.S. Sept. Chicago PMI holds at high level
By Greg Robb
Last update: 9:52 a.m. EDT Sept. 30, 2008
Comments: 11
WASHINGTON (MarketWatch) -- Business activity in the Chicago region expanded at a healthy pace in September, according to a survey of corporate purchasing managers released Tuesday. The Chicago purchasing managers index inched lower to 56.7 in September from 57.9 in August but stayed well above the 53.0% expected by analysts. Readings above 50 indicate overall business expansion. The Chicago PMI has rebounded after hitting a low of 40.5% in February. The Chicago PMI is considered a leading indicator to the national Institute for Supply Management manufacturers' survey to be released on Wednesday. Economists surveyed by MarketWatch expect the ISM factory index to slip to 49.6% from 49.9%.
banks won't lend to each other because nobody knows who is healthy and who is not. Firm after firm have said 'we're healthy' but then later we find their level 3 assets are far over-valued and overleveraged. it's a problem of solvency. The problem: the banks don't know who is and who is not insolvent.
Which is why, as Dirk mentioned in another thread, removing mark to market will only muddy the waters more. Until every financial institution is FORCED to bring forth its dead, the crisis of confidence will linger and linger and linger.
Any rescue or bailout or whatever you want to call it, needs this more than any single other thing.
NYTIMES:
"As the assumptions that had blown air into the bubble began to dissipate, many mainstream reports became increasingly skeptical in their reporting and blogs like Calculated Risk offered increasingly alarming insights."
Daring to Say Loans Made No Sense
"Its as if the global pool of money thought it was putting trillions of dollars in a savings account, but really, half of it was going into a furnace. The money is gone, burned up, never to come back. That was five months ago, and now that same furnace is about to burn public money."
A secondary aspect is the Commercial Paper market. That market is also suffering. Companies used this in the past as it was cheaper to do than other types of loans. Sure, they can eventually get into something else, but right now it's tight BECAUSE THE BANKS ARENT LENDING and investors aren't investing. Thus, these companies are having a hard time because the CP is short term. so as it rolls over the company needs to either get back into CP, or get a loan from somewhere, or just pay it all off (difficult but not impossible)
That's just not true. The Fed publishes figures on commercial paper every business day, at:
The figures clearly show that nonfinancial companies with good credit are having no trouble selling their paper at low interest rates. Volumes at all but the longest maturities are running higher than usual. The "freeze-up" looks to be hitting only financial firms, lower-rated firms, and asset-backed paper.
The Fed also publishes the weekly H.8 release showing assets and liabilities of commercial banks. The latest data are for the week ending Sept 17'th, at: http://www.federalreserve.gov/releases/H8/
and they show bank credit increasing at a healthy rate.
All of the evidence I've heard so far of a falloff in lending to nonfinancial firms is anecdotal and contradicted by the available data. The commercial paper data are very timely, even if the bank credit data is not. The Fed will publish data for the week ending Sept 24'th on Thursday afternoon. Can we not wait until then to see how much panic is called for?
"Housing is a symptom. Redistribution of wealth and it's effect on capital allocation in our economy is the source.
Rich lazy people don't put money back into the economy in a way that benefits society. So instead of more better roads, telecom infrastructure, science grants, etc. We get bigger houses, boats, Ferraris, H2's, etc. None of this is a long term benefit to our economy. Quite the opposite."
I was trying to make that very point last night to a group of friends -- retirees or near-retirees all, and all afraid to look at this month's statement from their broker. You did it better.
While they are all more or less liberal democrats, their understandable thoughts of self-interest had some of them edging toward bailing out the fatcats, because "there's no other choice."
Well sure there is, but there'll be years of upset and financial downturn. And these guys don't have many years left, and they'd really rather that things continued as they were (low interest rates, stable high stock prices) until they were too old to care, or dead. Not that this is possible.
On the other hand, every one of these guys goes off on one or two multi-week trips overseas every years, travels inside the states on pleasure a lot, etc. Whereas I maybe go to LA once in a while.
So while I would never say this to them, the reality is that they can lose half their nest egg and still afford to not work, have a nice house and nice car, in one of the most attractive areas on the west coast, and good medical insurance to boot. They talk liberal -- they are in most cases -- but they're acting somewhat like victims when in fact they're doing better in retirement than 99 percent of anyone else out there.
Much ado about nothing. Shillers Composite since 1987 is up +4.5% per year. The 30yr mortgage payment is up only +3.4% per year (rates now 6.5%, then 9.2%). Hell, the CPI is up 3.1% so mortgage payments have grown about as much as the CPI. And the S&P 500 is +6.5% per year. Nominal GDP is +5.2% per year.
Well, to your comment
"I love CR but on this Case Shiller index he is wrong wrong wrong"
all I can say is, Huh?
There are 6 cities that had an increase in C-S index from April to July: Denver, Atlanta, Boston, Minneapolis, Charlotte, and
Dallas. Up approximately 1.8%. Coincidentally, these 6 cities also showed an increase over the same April to July period in 2007. You may be confusing seasonality with a potential trend.
In any event, every city is lower today than one year ago (July 2008 vs. July 2007).
Also, I'm not sure what you mean that C-S focuses on foreclosures. C-S is an apples to apples comparison -- selling price today vs. last selling price of the same house. So unless you're suggesting that somehow C-S oversamples homes that are likely to be foreclosed, I simply don't get your point.
C-S may be over-broad; an area like Los Angeles will have sub-markets of varying degrees of weakness or strenght. So it may not exactly comport to what someone is seeing in their neighborhood, let alone on the street on which they live.
But to contend that C-S is simply obscuring a rising market because of an emphasis on CA, NV, FLA and foreclosures is simply incorrect.
strange...
More...
Case Shiller Is a Whopper
CS-10 -17.5%, YoY, -21.1% From Peak
CS-20 16.3%, YoY, -19.5% From Peak
Latest Radar Logic (CS and RL are converging) suggest much worse ahead. June (origination of transactions) decline was much worse than May and July decline is much worse than June. Add to that seasonally weak period ahead and we could see 25% from Peak this year and 35-40% decline from peak next year, assuming that we dont come out of recession in 2009H1 (very unlikely).
Jas
From the chart it looks like the rate of decline has slowed . . . but I imagine this is just a pause to breathe before the biggest plunge yet.
Make that "just a pause for breath". Sounds better.
Soft-Landing!
--
"From the chart it looks like the rate of decline has slowed . . . but I imagine this is just a pause to breathe before the biggest plunge yet."
Gary,
There was a pause in decline during two spring months (origination). CS does a 3-Month window. When the spring month comes out of the window we will see 20% Annual Rate (3-momth decline annualized and not YoY) decline.
Jas
so the bottom is in, right?
never a better time to buy?
buy now or be priced out forever?
I would definitely not want to hike that terrain.
(The 2nd chart I mean)
There's also a limit as to HOW FAST prices can fall.
15% YOY is pretty fast -- eg:
2006: $650K
2007: $552K
2008: $470K
2009: $399K
2010: $340K
This seems pretty aggressive to me. Entirely possible, but I don't think prices will fall any faster than that.
Keep kicking the can America, you can do it.
Pretty soon the new Hybrid Escalade will be out and you can save the planet (and get a 18 year loan in the process).
Patriots shop.
What about land prices?
Are those going down concurrent with housing?
Y'know, Jas, when you get off of the soapbox, you're very astute.
Sometimes you snare more flies with honey.
FWIW, I've sensed that the market/Street is playing a game of Chicken with us.
As someone posted the other week, akin to Sheriff Bart in Blazing Saddles taking himself hostage and threatening to put a bullet in his own head. THAT was a great analogy and kudos to whoever thought of it.
LOL if the market is flat or goes up.
I wouldn't say prices are leveling off, but still, it isn't a steep as it was. But do I understand correctly that there is still a large amount of ARM's about to reset in 2009-2011?
CNBC no one is lending and payroll will be missed is bull.
No credit freeze on Kern's Main Street
Bakersfield residents qualified ones can still get home, car and business loans, local lenders say, despite Wall Streets throes.
We are open for lending in Kern County, said Neil Marshall, chief financial officer at Kern Federal Credit Union.
As with other credit unions, home and car loans are a staple for Kern Federal, a $270 million-asset institution that opened in 1949.
San Joaquin Bank, meanwhile, a business bank headquartered in Bakersfield, is also making loans and maintaining lines of credit.
Were accommodating all of the credit requests of our customers, said Bart Hill, chief executive officer of the $878 million-asset bank.
404 - Page not found
Sorry to repost, but you guys have got to see Setser's chart of the Fed balance sheet over time.
Brad Setser: Follow the Money » Blog Archive » Do not doubt that this is a real crisis: more on Fed’s balance sheet
Dow is up 200 points I guess they passed the "bailout".... oops
Too bad Hank, George and Congress don't pay attention to this data. Herein lies the problem. DUHHHHHH. Perhaps the $$$$$$ should go to homeowners who really need it. Put, Hank, George and the Congress in Jail, where they belong.
In the words of BTO, I'm afraid "we aint seen nothin yet". Just wait until resets begin on all the other toxic loans in 2009.
Westside of LA will get spanked.
WestsideREmeltdown
"Dow is up 200 points I guess they passed the "bailout".... oops"
Come on, Brontide! The game today isn't the Dow, but instead the credit markets. Man, don't you watch CNBC?
Bush Is The Picture Of A Beaten Dog after seeing his speech.
No, no, no.
Something is wrong.
Case-Shiller shows this for Charlotte:
July 2007 - 135.60
July 2008 - 133.20
That can't be right.
Sebastian, give us the true reading from the ground there in NC.
You guys are still immune, right?
Friggin' Ivy League elitist snobs. They've probably never been to the Research Triangle -- it's different there.
Now, the micro-economy of California, sure, that's another story.
But the powerhouse that is North Carolina -- we're invincible!
Cardboard boxes on sale, however, behind Best Buy. Affordable housing, as long as you're as short as a refrigerator.
Come on, Brontide! The game today isn't the Dow, but instead the credit markets. Man, don't you watch CNBC?
asl hearts lenin | 09.30.08 - 9:46 am
God forbid companies have to pay real interest to borrow money.... the sky is falling, watch out!
Comrade Martin
This would be the chart you want to look at.
Calculated Risk: IMF: Mortgage Reset Chart
If you want to avoid being paralyzed with fear, don't look at the X-axis to figure out how far into this we have progressed.
So because of the credit markets some companies will have to choose between payroll and that new G5!
Off Topic - Anyone know where there's a good reference for who gets paid what when a company liquidates?
Looked in Ubernerd-dom, but no luck. Was talking to father-in-law about Lehman Bonds - which spun into a discussion about the structuring of who gets paid during bankruptcy.
Like, who's more protected if Goldman dived, bond-holders or Buffet?
Erin is the most annoying little dweeb next to Cramer. She's rude, talks over anyone with an opposing view, and her transparent bias towards her masters of Wall Street sickens me.
I'll vomit if I hear her say we are stupid because we don't want Wall Street to get bailed out.
New Survey
"financial elite" have doubts about certainty of bailout.
Damn straight pigmen. No more free lunch.
the plan has already been renamed for better leverage:
" The catalyst for yesterday's sell-off was the House of Representatives rejecting the financial relief plan"
credit currency clarity confidence
Can I get something clarified? It's pretty basic so forgive me. Does it matter that housing prices fall b/c people are unable to refinance to get into debt(or into more debt) to sustain their lifestyles and meet emergencies? Would we be able to stem some of that tide in the short/midterm by investing in the real economy to create jobs? And in UI benefits and food stamps to boost the economy quickly? I also like the idea of the return of the Home Owners Loan Corporation but other people have mentioned that a lot.
crispy&cole,
That seems like a remarkably positive take on lending for central California areas.
I see that HUD is passing out money for 'foreclosure blight removal' and expect California cities will get a big chunk of the dollars.
@12th Percentile: Thanks, I've saved it on my hard disk. Looks pretty bad...
sportsfan - I think part of it is cheerleading, however, I manage several companies and one is consumer related and banks are still lending to anyone with reasonable credit.
There is a serious disconnect between this WS "no one is lending" bs and what is really happenening on Main Street. Dont get me wrong, there is a serious slow down, but things have been slow on the consumer side since Nov 2007.
Let me ask a question to CR. THe fed injected over 600 BILLION into the market yesterday and it dropped over 700 points. How would the 700 BILLION dollar bailout bill have mattered or made a difference?
Is anyone else disappointed and disgusted that the only leadership on the issue either candidate has taken is to suggest raising the insurance limits to $250000? I know I will shock everyone to suggest that Obama is as politically calculating as McCain and refuses to step up and put forth a decent proposal. McCain's political inaptness is shocking, one softball after another tossed his way and he strikes out again and again.
The bottom is near!
The bailout money will trickle down to the consumer and they will spend it on mortgage payments!
It's all good, go back to your recycled 90210 and football.
JS, if they were to raise the FDIC limit, I'd expect that to cost the banks more in insurance premiums to FDIC. So it may be self defeating w/r/t bank capitalization.
I think we need a new economic term: Trickle up.
Give the money to the consumer and one day in the future it may actually be deposited in a bank.
JS...
They are both idiots. So to are those who vote for either of them.
Comrade Martin
The really scary part (for my little lizard brain) is that I've read examples that in some groups of these loans as many as 85% of them are only making the minimum payment which means they would have been underwater at reset time even if prices has remained stable. When they reset prices in Cali will be down 30% or more in some places.
So people will be way underwater and in many cases will not be able to make the new payments even if they wanted to because they never really were qualified to purchase a house like that based on their income and it was all just based on some refinancing scheme down the road.
Let's reframe , remarket, resell this cashfortrash----"credit is totally frozen so you won't get a paycheck".
eRobin writes:
Can I get something clarified? It's pretty basic so forgive me.
Does it matter that housing prices fall b/c people are unable to refinance to get into debt(or into more debt) to sustain their lifestyles and meet emergencies?
Yes, it matters that house prices fall, no matter what the cause. Whether the fall is due to inability to finance due to high rates, or more stringent borrowing requirements, or a constriction of lending funds, or lower wages or job insecurity, or other "supply and demand" features, it matters.
Would we be able to stem some of that tide in the short/midterm by investing in the real economy to create jobs?
Probably, but the time it would take to invest in business and create new jobs may be quite a while -- and no amount of investment may stem the overriding consequences of a long-lasting recession or stave off an imminent financial collapse.
And in UI benefits and food stamps to boost the economy quickly?
Not sure how either of these will "boost" the economy -- these are not capital producing nor significant consumer purchasing triggers. They simply allow people to survive.
I also like the idea of the return of the Home Owners Loan Corporation but other people have mentioned that a lot.
Agreed - although one inadvertent consequence may be a further loss in mortgage values (and mortgage-backed securities values) if the mortgage "work-outs" are not performed intelligently, i.e., they are done to garner votes but not with an eye towards weed out hopeless risks.
CNBC Pisani - 'Better Economic news is helping keep the rally going'.
I'm 65 yrs. old. I have seen a couple of slowdowns, but the CS trend lines and JP Morgan's projections of the CA real estate market scare the crap out of me. Our economy can not survive when a large percentage of homeowners are underwater. Our country needs a man with a plan or I will be dead before the good times return.
"I know I will shock everyone to suggest that Obama is as politically calculating as McCain and refuses to step up and put forth a decent proposal."
You won't shock me because I know who butters his bread.
I've spent considerable time studying the same indicator (and others), which is one of the reasons I've gone to 75%+ invested.
Sebastian
Sebastian | 09.22.08 - 5:43 pm |
his 'back up the truck' call was after this date.
goold luck seb...
There is a serious disconnect between this WS "no one is lending" bs and what is really happenening on Main Street.
I'm trying to sort out the BS factor myself. I think their point is that banks aren't willing to lend to each other now, so eventually that trend will reach Main Street, if it's not resolved soon.
Whether they're right is open to interpretation, but it seems that an awful lot of people from different perspectives say the problem is serious and needs to be resolved.
Diety on a stick- Libor is going to toast a lot of high end ARMs since they base of it.
Tomorrow had best look much better in London or a ton of mortgages will now fail.
As for the plummeting house prices- they only stabilize on a housing finance bailout, not a Hank Paulson retirement fund bailout.
Someday this war's gonna end...
Anonymous writes:
I think we need a new economic term: Trickle up.
I think that is a lot like pissing into the wind.
The sheer amount of fear-mongering on every major network news program is astounding.
The lack of perspective, conviction and courage of those in key positions of influence is what puts the final nail in our coffin. Greater Depression...here we come.
"Our country needs a man with a plan or I will be dead before the good times return."
You're implying that there is something in the current state of the economy worth redeeming when there isn't.
Some folks know what time it is and some don't.
It's payback time.
Credit worthy customers have a myriad of credit options..The bush team spins lies like a black widow...
we all know what happens to the unsuspecting male...
@12th Percentile: 85% making minimum payments... that's bad! Do I understand correctly that in a typical pay-option ARM the monthly payments will rise by several hundred dollars, dus to (a) minimum payments no longer allowed, and (b) the interest rate going up by typically 200 basis points (or more)?
It's not Michelle? I'm shocked.
The banks: we'll be able to trust each other if we can give our festering bags of garbage to the taxpayer.
They are both idiots. So to are those who vote for either of them.
my credit is crunchy | 09.30.08 - 10:11 am | #
Talk about idiocy.
Either work on a third party or pick a side and try to make that party better from the inside. believe me, it's an uphill battle (I was elected to county committee this year).
But spare me the nihilistic "pox on both their houses" cop-out bullshit.
Choices do matter. Just remember Bush vs. Gore . . . everybody was saying "what's the difference?" After 8 years, is there any doubt?
Maybe Al Gore wouldn't have shat ponies and farted rainbows, but I'm damn sure he wouldn't have been the worst President in history.
I'm 65 yrs. old. I have seen a couple of slowdowns, but the CS trend lines and JP Morgan's projections of the CA real estate market scare the crap out of me. Our economy can not survive when a large percentage of homeowners are underwater. Our country needs a man with a plan or I will be dead before the good times return.
dave in texas | 09.30.08 - 10:14 am
How exactly do you "fix" that problem?
1) re inflate the bubble and ignore reality
2) cramdowns that will cause even more problems
3) time machine to go back and make sure the fed lends money at a reasonable rate.
This has to run it's course, I haven't seen a plan yet that will "fix" it. Use the $700 billion to make sure the support structures in this country will survive the fallout.
OT-market seems to dispell this financial armageddeon..
where is it? Prudent lending is not the end of the world...
0% loans from a lot of captives..
0% wasn't around in the 90's....
this Fear mongering is rediculous...
@Dave in Texas
JPM's loss estimates on Wamu's OAs and HELOCs are a tad optimistic for sure....20%? I don't think so Tim!
Gary is scary. He still thinks he can trust people. He will never make it without alot of help.
Here is a tip, when massa looks at you, don't make direct eye contact. They HATE that.
Dow is fine. No bailout.
Anyone who votes for it will be mopping stalls at McDonald's as his or her next career.
I know I will shock everyone to suggest that Obama is as politically calculating as McCain and refuses to step up and put forth a decent proposal.
Who's shocked by that? Obama is trying to a) get elected and b) be able to be effective once in office. Proposing a plan would strengthen his mandate if wins but lower the chance he'll win by putting out something (necessarily) controversial. It's clear, though, that he will have all the mandate he could possibly want if he wins now that his opposition has pounded the panic drum and insisted doing anything whatsoever is better than nothing. So no benefit to putting out a plan.
Besides, a good plan needs thought. Obama can't whip up an instant solution any more than anybody else can. He and his advisors should take the time to form a good plan and float some trial balloons. I'm sure they are now. By the time he could have a good plan ready to bring to the public the election will be over.
The cognitive dissonance of picking the lesser of two evils is what brought us as a country to this point.
Those who wish to control you make it a point to give you only choices which serve their intent. Sooner or later we must break this cycle. Take the power back.
Thats ballgame--but why mop stalls if McDonalds has to have a bailout to make payroll..sarcasm off
Are there any websites or guidelines a person can use in determining the risk of their bank or credit union's closing.
How healthy is your company if you have to borrow to make payroll??
@Question
FDIC's SDI
FDIC: Statistics on Depository Institutions
Everything you ever wanted to know about your bank and more.
Google "Texas Ratio" and use it to do the math on your bank.
Housing, people, housing. This whole goddamned thing is about housing. Don't lose sight of that.
This economy won't correct until house prices stop falling and people start buying them again.
If you can't resist touching the economy's control levers, do something about housing, not investment banks.
Housing, damn it.
MickeyD writes:
How healthy is your company if you have to borrow to make payroll??
But it's efficient use of capital! ::eyeroll::
Case-Shiller: House Prices Declined in July
Ooh, that's a shocker. Hoocudanode?
bloomberg tv "the markets are up due to optimism that the bill will pass the senate tomorrow".
Thanks, Concerned Observer. Your answer helps.
As for UI benefits and food stamps, they are universally acknowledged to be the two best (targeted, temporary and timely) ways to stimulate the economy b/c those dollars are spent immediately. Good chart here. There are infrastructure projects (jobs) that have been suspended and which can start up within a year - many within months. All they need is the money to get going. If we have to give money to Wall St - and we probably do now b/c blackmail works - I'm saying keep it as low as possible. I'm with Ian Walsh. And here. As for real money, I'd put serious investment into the real economy (UI benefits, food stamps, infrastructure and a new HOLC).
When's the next big Treasury auction?
How healthy is your company if you have to borrow to make payroll??
Not all companies have a revenue stream that is as smooth as it's payroll outlays.
Land prices are sticky, sticky, sticky until a bank collapses in the area. Why?, primarily b/c their incentive is to keep prices from falling by rolling over the defaulted debt to someone else in order to keep their balance sheet in line (and not get taken over).
Remember, the assets and liabilities have to at LEAST match up (especially for a bank) and since the value of the loans are a direct consequence of the value of the collateral for the loans, a bank has a very intense incentive for the price to never go down.
Some of those 15-20 cent/dollar deals in California were because they were part of bonds sold through Wall Street. Not through traditional depository institutions.
And, you're seeing how that has paid off for them:( So, you can imagine what might happen if there are clearing transactions on bank-owned land in the depository world.
IMHO, the ABA (American Bankers Assoc.) is attacking this problem by going to the wrong "trough", but, then again, I think it's too late to fix.
The absolute, unquestionable, fundamental problem is that there is not enough money to be retrieved from the loans that were given out to meet the obligations that have accrued BY banks TO their depositors. (Deposits are liabilities- when you deposit money in a bank, you are, in effect, LOANING the bank your money).
Please read this again until it sinks in
I believe a rational argument could be made that depositors have never been compensated for the risks they have unknowingly taken, but, that's a topic for another day.
Apologies for the length, it's hard to encapsulate scope in a few words.
Have a great day everyone, gotta run.
Downsizing by babyboomers is accelerating. Tulipmania for housing is over. Only bulldozers can solve the price decline.
Housing is a symptom. Redistribution of wealth and it's effect on capital allocation in our economy is the source.
Rich lazy people don't put money back into the economy in a way that benefits society. So instead of more better roads, telecom infrastructure, science grants, etc. We get bigger houses, boats, Ferraris, H2's, etc. None of this is a long term benefit to our economy. Quite the opposite.
@my credit in crunchy: Completely right!
Dean Baker's kicking @ss and taking names on an NPR show this a.m. (I think it's Dianne Rehm show). Catch it in archives!
@citizen econ
Bloomberg.com:
Economic Calendar
Thank you for putting it so succinctly, my c is c.
"Redistribution of wealth and it's effect on capital allocation in our economy is the source."
This is one hell of an opportune time to start talking about redistributing wealth.
maybe these sites are already known to many here, but for those looking for housing data in their own markets:
Paper Economy - A Real Estate Bubble Blog
input your city/state & it breaks down your local inventory by land, SFR, condo, etc, & compares it to peak bubble era-- 7/2006 to present.
The best "statistical breakdowns" realty site I've found so far is at Homes for Sale, MLS Listings Search, Real Estate Agents -- Zip Realty
register, enter your inputs, & then click on any house that comes up. Go to "sales trends", up in the top menu, & it will give info on current Median List, Sale, $ perSQF prices, and Sales Volume for that neighborhood. It also does a good job if you click on "recent sales", next to the "sales trends" box-- gives you a gps style map of all sales in that area-- 3-month, 6-month, etc.
It's the best public-access realty site I've found so far. It also gives you separate daily e-mail updates on new foreclosures.
(& no I don't work for either of these sites!
For anyone who's interested, significant resistence on SPY @ $115.00 and DIA @ $107.50 (roughly SPX 1155 and DJIA 10775). Ugly bearish flag.
This is horrible!
If this trend continues, houses will eventually be AFFORDABLE!! Imagine being able to actually BUY a house and PAY IT OFF - the horror! Whatever shall our banker-parasites do?! How can they can rich from interest and debt if people can afford to BUY things?!
Fortunately, Bailout Bill II will help fix all this, I am sure!
"Soft-Landing!"
What happened to the "permanently high plateau" in house prices?
MickeyD writes:
How healthy is your company if you have to borrow to make payroll??
MickeyD | 09.30.08 - 10:30 am | #
FYI - your company doesn't have sacks of cash in the back to make payroll with. Its in a bank that doesn't have a lot of reserves... that USUALLY can borrow from other banks who also don't have a lot of reserves... who if both are short & no one else is lending (or trusts them) can then go to the Fed window.
What LIBOR is saying is there is no there there in the banks right now... so even if your super-corp has lotsa digits in its asset account somewhere the bank might not... hence payroll might not get paid ON TIME.
Will it all work out? Sure. But explain that to J6P when the Eagle doesn't fly on Friday.
That is the concern & it is REAL... does this bailout address that concern long term? No.
Understand the problem & you can argue against the bad solutions more effectively.
People by and large(middle class) have allowed this misallocation to occur in the past because rich folks have been dangling the carrot...err maintaining the illusion of upward mobility. This upward mobility has been an illusion because of rampant inflation(house prices, etc.) as soon as people "make" money...it's value is decreased. So we over-extend on credit EVEN more....again only making ourselves poorer. After all of these unsustainable financial decisions start unravelling TPTB prepare for a bailout (Bernanke, Paulson, et al). Look around in all of the key decision making positions...they are all the very people OR appointed by the very people who have fostered this madness. We are all being fleeced. We have been willingly taking part in our own financial destruction. It is now time to make amends. No matter what the final solution, the peons pay dearly. Let's just make sure the puppetmasters are exterminated as well.
serious moo goo:
so this is why the banks buy back their own defaulted loans at note price at the foreclosures on courthouse steps auctions, foreclosure sales, right?-- to hang onto it in shadow inventory so as to avoid busting out all their other comps for other properties they hold as collateral in that area. (am I understanding this correctly?)correct?
and remember: the root of the housing problem is that incomes cannot support current prices.
I'm a solid member of Gen X. Few of my colleagues can afford their houses over 30 years. They certainly cannot buy upper level houses. And we have could jobs. Keep this in mind, all in older generations.
Over 30 years == for the full term of a 30 year mortgage
I wonder what Hank Paulson's hold-to-maturity valuation model used for its HPA forecast?
Oh, he doesn't have one? He is going to use "reverse auctions" to discover the hold-to-maturity value? Hmmm.
Summer is the best selling season, helping prices to the upside
We have enough inventory to work through another winter or two before anyone begins to think about a bottom. It doesn't matter how desperate people are right now, because they'll only be more so in the future.
Rather than talk of "extermination," uh, let's just go back to some regulation. We can even have a bailout plan if only some regulation and oversight is involved.
Just for amusement value--when there are 10.5 months of supply on the housing market pushing prices down, why is Habitat for Humanity building new homes instead of taking over existing, empty homes?
Isn't LIBOR the Inter BANK lending rate? And banks won't lend to each other? I wonder why? Maybe because the government is taking under even seemingly healthy banks, that doesn't inspire a lot of confidence in the system.
On the other hand, in the middle of the worst credit crisis in recent memory, Microsoft is going to start a CP program.
Maybe they can, because no matter how hard they tried, the government couldn't take down MS.
Confidence these days is not being recession-proof, but regulator-proof.
Just for amusement value--when there are 10.5 months of supply on the housing market pushing prices down, why is Habitat for Humanity building new homes instead of taking over existing, empty homes?
Probably because there are certain designated places in these communities where brown people "should" live?
FYI New Thread.
Smaller Banks Thrive Out of the Fray of Crisis
404 Not Found? linkid=70750
ghostfaceinvestah
Paulson's working model, remember the details will be left to the hired managers, is to bake in current defaults as having peaked and using the treasury's borrowing cost for the discount rate.
Basically 80 cents on the dollar, although he has been careful to say that they could pay above the HTM price and pay up to full original face value
For what its worth, Bill Gross called for 60¢/$ and then later 65¢/$. Earlier there had been a consensus 70¢/$ showing up in gossip
Make no mistake. With great power, comes great responsibility. The con job that these people have pulled is a direct threat to our nation's safety and security. Our enemies see this weakness. You really believe that Putin's invasion of Georgia is coincidental to our troubles?
What these people have done is tantamount to treason.
dryfly says What LIBOR is saying is there is no there there in the banks right now... so even if your super-corp has lotsa digits in its asset account somewhere the bank might not... hence payroll might not get paid ON TIME.
sorry I call BS, there are no cases of company check or savings accounts not paying out in whatever form the customer wants, in whatever amount they want (within reasonable notice). It would be headlines and the bank would be toast.
libor reflects that banks are not lending to each other, nothing to do with how they deal with NORMAL demands on their services by their customers, whether corporate or other.
Other people have said it already: if a company has so little reserves, even with lumpy revenue, that it has to setup a NEW line of credit to meet payroll then it deserves to fail.
if a company is profitable, put some money aside for a rainy day earning 3% or 4% in a money market fund! What company is so thinly profitable that it can't save up enough to cover the lumps in its revenue stream, apart from oil exploration companies and the like? (which are a whole other setup challenge).
I'm listening to all of the talking heads on CNBC parroting how this is a "lifetime buying opportunity".
Anyone check the A/D line or up/down volume today on this rally? Sucker rally.
ghostfaceinvestah:
Maybe because the government is taking under even seemingly healthy banks, that doesn't inspire a lot of confidence in the system.
please elucidate, I'd LOVE to hear this. Which seemingly healthy banks were taken "under" by government?
WaMu? hahahahahahaha!
Wachovia? hahahahahahah!
Indymac? hahahahahha!
the banks that have been "taken under" by the government were dead men walking for some time. They were going down long before the government did anything.
Please, really try to understand what's going on around here before posting drivel.
banks won't lend to each other because nobody knows who is healthy and who is not. Firm after firm have said 'we're healthy' but then later we find their level 3 assets are far over-valued and overleveraged. it's a problem of solvency. The problem: the banks don't know who is and who is not insolvent.
it's possible they're all insolvent.
OT and possible Tinfoil:
I'm starting to think that the dems were just hood-winked.
Perhaps the republicans have internally conceded the oval office, but threw the current executive branch on the grenade to create some financial hysteria (bait) that the Dems foolishy gobbled up. Now, whatever happens, the dems look like cowardly idiot pawns of WS and the Republicans get control of possibly both the house and senate as all reps who voted for the bill are voted out by the pitchfork holding J6P.
If the the stock markets rally or go flat, the dems look quite foolish for pushing so hard on the bailout of WS.
If it tanks, they look like they have no balls to pass a bill on their own.
I know, it's a long shot - but this has popped into my head a few times over the last few days. Anyone else thinking this?
I'm listening to all of the talking heads on CNBC parroting how this is a "lifetime buying opportunity".
When they are not saying it is going to be as bad as the Great Depression.
Can't imagine why anyone would believe them.
and to whomever above who posted about new HUD grants-- this is from my local newsrag I'm in Norfolk VA) on 9/28/08:
am summarizing: 'HUD announced Friday how they'll divide $4 billion in CBDG's (*community block development grants) across the country. Of that, nearly $3 million will go to Wash. DC, $46 million to Maryland, & $45 million to VA. In VA, Prince George's County gets $11 mil, Prince William, $4 mil, & Fairfax County gets $2.8 mil.' direct quote: "The money will be used to buy foreclosed homes at a discount, demolish and renovate them, or help buyers with down payment and closing costs among other things."
CNBC has lost all credibility.
Did anyone see the Fast Money crew interview the Rep from TX. They dismissed his logic for voting no as "vile idealism during a time when Rome is burning". I immediately turned off the TV.
BTW...I checked with my mortgage broker yesterday. I still qualify and the jumbo conforming (below 729K) is available but now at a slightly lower rate than last month. no credit crisis in the OC
Someone smarter than me once said the most effective way to control the citizens is "to keep them in fear and keep them in debt". The last 8 years of Bush shows how effective this strategy has been and still is. I believe this "rescue plan" aka bailout is yet another application of this plan and is nothing more than an egregious attempt to loot the taxpayers of what little they have left. JP6 are finally opening their collective eyes and seeing this for what it really is and at the same time coming to the stark realization that our government, BIG corporations and Wall Street are a criminal enterprise rampant with greed and corruption. Apparently now Congress knows that we know and that they are being watched very carefully. As an aside to the foregoing, Jas Jain has been right on throughout these many months and it appears a shift has taken place among CR commenters concerning the wisdom of his "uncomfortable" description of us being "born and bred dopes". We HAVE been, we still ARE to a great degree, but that is changing and changing fast. So I say thanks to Jas for telling an Inconvenient Truth. We can still save this country and economy along with our freedom and dignity by keeping intense pressure on the politicians to do what's right and come up with the best possible course of action. Today's up market seems to expose the fiction of imminent collapse so lets capitalize on this and make a loud noise to our elected "leaders".
I love CR but on this Case Shiller index he is wrong wrong wrong. CS is up m-m in four or five cities. From April, it is up for 5. Toss out California, Phoenix, and Las Vegas, and most Americans are seeing RISING home prices over the past few months, or close to it. Media and analysts have a blind spot for this fact, however. Moreover, the CS index is heavily weighted to foreclosed properties because of the wave of foreclosures in the distressed regions. If your home is not foreclosed, you get much better prices when you sell. So if we are looking at the over housing market for the average household, CS is very misleading. When will media figure this out?
anonymous:
I don't think you understand the Fractional reserve lending system. Dryfly is correct and you are incorrect.
there are 2 SEPARATE issues:
banks have lots of inflows and outflows. it's based on what their depositors do. Remember, the bank doesn't have all "your" money in it's vault somewhere. rather, it has a percentage. Most of the time the banks have enough to give their customers on demand. But at times they run short. If this happens, the bank simply borrows the money for a day or two until their inflows balance it all out. It happens from time to time. This allows the banks to lend out more of their deposits (fractional reserve) and increases the velocity of money.
let's say a few big businesses try to do payroll on the same day, and a few other depositors all want to withdraw money and extra large checks come in to clear, all on the same day. In the past prior to the Fed system the bank would run out of money. Now it can simply borrow the funds for a day or two. system solved (sort of)
HOwever, that system is now in jeapordy. if this continues, it is possible that too many withdrawals will happen on one day (like payroll) and the bank WONT BE ABLE to cover payroll to the business. Thus, your paycheck won't clear.
see the problem?
A secondary aspect is the Commercial Paper market. That market is also suffering. Companies used this in the past as it was cheaper to do than other types of loans. Sure, they can eventually get into something else, but right now it's tight BECAUSE THE BANKS ARENT LENDING and investors aren't investing. Thus, these companies are having a hard time because the CP is short term. so as it rolls over the company needs to either get back into CP, or get a loan from somewhere, or just pay it all off (difficult but not impossible)
not said very eloquently, sorry.
Today (last day of the month) is payday for many americans.
Just checked my bank account: My auto-deposit of my paycheck is there.
Anyone having problems? For me, the "can't make payroll" thingy has not come to fruition....
Week before last we were offered a pre-qual at 5.5% 30yrs.
Anonymous | 09.30.08 - 10:56 am | #
Its the f'ing BANKS who don't have the reserves anymore... and they don't have the collateral to borrow even from the Fed... THAT'S what has these knuckleheads worried...
So if 3M has an 'account' with 10 Gazillion dollars in it but their bank doesn't have it - and can't borrow it - how do 3M employees cash their checks from the 3M account???
The bank pissed away the 3M cash on dodgy MBS and such - its all written down and gone.
That's what has these guys worried & they ought to be worried. But this bill is a bad way to fix that - better to just buy bank preferred stock directly & re cap that way.
It isn't BS...
K:
foreclosures matter because they are making up so much of the market.
sure, if you exclude all pain then things are rosy. "core"-CS index huh?
OT: news from my sister on the the ground in Charlotte, NC. Gives an idea how this all looks to average people.
"Patients who worked for Wachovia come in to the office crying yesterday. What a black monday for this town. The loss of wachovia, the market crashing after failure of the bailout, and gas rationing here in town makes it feel like the Depression is already here! What a day yesterday was."
comrade martin
I actually used the wrong term before (reset) when according to this post by Tanta what I was referring to was actually the recast date, not reset.
Calculated Risk: Reset Vs. Recast, Or Why Charts Don't Match
Resets are when interest rates go up. According to tanta most of these can't go up more than 7.5% in one year. That seems manageable, at least the first year.
Recast is when the interest only (or less than interest only loans) become normal fully amortized principal and interest loans. The jump in payment in that case can be much more than 7.5%.
Hope that helps.
dryfly:
you worded it better and more concisely.
I wish there was a "calculated risk-elite" section where one must be nominated in which to post.
too much noise and stupidity lately
FWIW: I'm not suggesting that i should be allowed to post. but there are people who know things and then people who blabber.
"This is horrible!
If this trend continues, houses will eventually be AFFORDABLE!"
Now, that would make a great headline:
"Housing Becomes More Affordable".
Why always put the negative spin on things? Sort of like Paulson running around saying 'the sky is falling'.
"Patients who worked for Wachovia come in to the office crying yesterday."
Steady, there. I think banking services will continue to exist and so will banking jobs. Maybe not the casino-level jobs of packaging mortgages with some underlying value into tranches that are worth zero, but some other banking jobs.
...and speaking of too much noise and stupidity, it seems that the Chicago area has been left off of the routing list for the "We're in a recession headed for Depression" memo.
U.S. Sept. Chicago PMI holds at high level
By Greg Robb
Last update: 9:52 a.m. EDT Sept. 30, 2008
Comments: 11
WASHINGTON (MarketWatch) -- Business activity in the Chicago region expanded at a healthy pace in September, according to a survey of corporate purchasing managers released Tuesday. The Chicago purchasing managers index inched lower to 56.7 in September from 57.9 in August but stayed well above the 53.0% expected by analysts. Readings above 50 indicate overall business expansion. The Chicago PMI has rebounded after hitting a low of 40.5% in February. The Chicago PMI is considered a leading indicator to the national Institute for Supply Management manufacturers' survey to be released on Wednesday. Economists surveyed by MarketWatch expect the ISM factory index to slip to 49.6% from 49.9%.
http://www.marketwatch.com/news/story/us-sept-chicago-pmi-holds/story.aspx?guid={043F448E-1BE0-4254-960F-E5AD78CE1322}&dist=msr_1
Someday this recession's gonna start.
Sebastia
K writes:
I love CR but on this Case Shiller index he is wrong wrong wrong. CS is up m-m in four or five cities.
OMG! Buy now or be priced out forevah!
banks won't lend to each other because nobody knows who is healthy and who is not. Firm after firm have said 'we're healthy' but then later we find their level 3 assets are far over-valued and overleveraged. it's a problem of solvency. The problem: the banks don't know who is and who is not insolvent.
Which is why, as Dirk mentioned in another thread, removing mark to market will only muddy the waters more. Until every financial institution is FORCED to bring forth its dead, the crisis of confidence will linger and linger and linger.
Any rescue or bailout or whatever you want to call it, needs this more than any single other thing.
Nolaguy said: "
Today (last day of the month) is payday for many americans.
Just checked my bank account: My auto-deposit of my paycheck is there."
Mine, too.
S.
NYTIMES:
"As the assumptions that had blown air into the bubble began to dissipate, many mainstream reports became increasingly skeptical in their reporting and blogs like Calculated Risk offered increasingly alarming insights."
Daring to Say Loans Made No Sense
"Its as if the global pool of money thought it was putting trillions of dollars in a savings account, but really, half of it was going into a furnace. The money is gone, burned up, never to come back. That was five months ago, and now that same furnace is about to burn public money."
umber2son:
I agree. we need transparency.
That's just not true. The Fed publishes figures on commercial paper every business day, at:
http://www.federalreserve.gov/releases/cp/default.htm
The figures clearly show that nonfinancial companies with good credit are having no trouble selling their paper at low interest rates. Volumes at all but the longest maturities are running higher than usual. The "freeze-up" looks to be hitting only financial firms, lower-rated firms, and asset-backed paper.
The Fed also publishes the weekly H.8 release showing assets and liabilities of commercial banks. The latest data are for the week ending Sept 17'th, at:
http://www.federalreserve.gov/releases/H8/
and they show bank credit increasing at a healthy rate.
All of the evidence I've heard so far of a falloff in lending to nonfinancial firms is anecdotal and contradicted by the available data. The commercial paper data are very timely, even if the bank credit data is not. The Fed will publish data for the week ending Sept 24'th on Thursday afternoon. Can we not wait until then to see how much panic is called for?
does anyone have access to the DC MSA graph I cant seem to find it on S&P...
I am so sick of seeing people live off of their houses. Let them fall and live in their Hummers. I be ready with cash at the bottom of the slope.
Funny line from some one, I forget who.
Bush is negotiating with the Republicans. He nuclear option is to threaten to campaign for the Republicans
if they don't vote for his bill.
LIBOR at 6.8% means banks are lending to each other at 6.8% right.
So how can banks "not be lending?"
Re CBDG's- i used to go hear the B-52's play there...
ha ha
cheap rim shot
"Housing is a symptom. Redistribution of wealth and it's effect on capital allocation in our economy is the source.
Rich lazy people don't put money back into the economy in a way that benefits society. So instead of more better roads, telecom infrastructure, science grants, etc. We get bigger houses, boats, Ferraris, H2's, etc. None of this is a long term benefit to our economy. Quite the opposite."
I was trying to make that very point last night to a group of friends -- retirees or near-retirees all, and all afraid to look at this month's statement from their broker. You did it better.
While they are all more or less liberal democrats, their understandable thoughts of self-interest had some of them edging toward bailing out the fatcats, because "there's no other choice."
Well sure there is, but there'll be years of upset and financial downturn. And these guys don't have many years left, and they'd really rather that things continued as they were (low interest rates, stable high stock prices) until they were too old to care, or dead. Not that this is possible.
On the other hand, every one of these guys goes off on one or two multi-week trips overseas every years, travels inside the states on pleasure a lot, etc. Whereas I maybe go to LA once in a while.
So while I would never say this to them, the reality is that they can lose half their nest egg and still afford to not work, have a nice house and nice car, in one of the most attractive areas on the west coast, and good medical insurance to boot. They talk liberal -- they are in most cases -- but they're acting somewhat like victims when in fact they're doing better in retirement than 99 percent of anyone else out there.
Much ado about nothing. Shillers Composite since 1987 is up +4.5% per year. The 30yr mortgage payment is up only +3.4% per year (rates now 6.5%, then 9.2%). Hell, the CPI is up 3.1% so mortgage payments have grown about as much as the CPI. And the S&P 500 is +6.5% per year. Nominal GDP is +5.2% per year.
Everybody calm down.
Hi K,
Well, to your comment
"I love CR but on this Case Shiller index he is wrong wrong wrong"
all I can say is, Huh?
There are 6 cities that had an increase in C-S index from April to July: Denver, Atlanta, Boston, Minneapolis, Charlotte, and
Dallas. Up approximately 1.8%. Coincidentally, these 6 cities also showed an increase over the same April to July period in 2007. You may be confusing seasonality with a potential trend.
In any event, every city is lower today than one year ago (July 2008 vs. July 2007).
Also, I'm not sure what you mean that C-S focuses on foreclosures. C-S is an apples to apples comparison -- selling price today vs. last selling price of the same house. So unless you're suggesting that somehow C-S oversamples homes that are likely to be foreclosed, I simply don't get your point.
C-S may be over-broad; an area like Los Angeles will have sub-markets of varying degrees of weakness or strenght. So it may not exactly comport to what someone is seeing in their neighborhood, let alone on the street on which they live.
But to contend that C-S is simply obscuring a rising market because of an emphasis on CA, NV, FLA and foreclosures is simply incorrect.