There must be some lag between these tightening conditions in consumer credit and the actual consumer credit numbers we see from the Fed. The June numbers were something like a 6.5% increase, so I guess we can expect that at some point in the next few months the consumer credit numbers will be either flat or declining?
So aggregate wages will be down. MEW will be down. No government handouts on the horizon and high probability of declining consumer credit. I'm sick of the "don't bet against the American consumer" mantra. The evidence is now overwhelming that the bet against the consumer is the right one.
What's even scarier is that only one bank of 50 said it planned to ease credit standards in the next year, while most said they would continue to tighten.
And this survey doesn't include Fannie and Freddie, which are also tightening their standards....
As I said yesterday, and said before, yeah, the lenders are tightening standards, but basically, they are not lending money because they have no money to lend.
So if they did have some money to lend, they'd be real careful with it . . .
According to the chart almost all institutions have almost always been tightening their standards with only a couple of slight exceptions. That doesn't sound right to me.
It is funny how everyone is tightening and the FDIC is looking for more ways the banks can make risky loans. The FDIC sure does not want anyone else to have a piece of the lending pie.
FDIC Pilot Program Explores Alternatives to Payday Loans
"yeah but what do dropping oil and rising dollars mean....gotta be bad right bears?"
Yes we'll go honky tonkin' make every club in town
We'll go to the park where it's dark we won't fool around
But if you run short of money I'll run short of time
Cause you with no more money honey I've no more time
For those who don't believe that the rumors of oil's demise is greatly exaggerated, the Big Picture has a nice chart of World GDP and oil production levels (real data, not projections):
and curiouser, you expect that world GDP trend line to continue shooting upwards to infinity? good luck!
Production is falling faster than anyone estimated... Look at XOM, CVX production. Not a good thing unless you have a pump in your backyard but its the truth.
China and India's contribution to the World GDP in 2007 was less than 4%, whereas the US alone contributed 26%.
In that chart on BP, the GDP curve still has a long way to go if China and India continue to expand towards their full potential. Good luck finding enough oil to match that expansion.
So tell me dollar bulls...can you think of any country with more national debt, more of citizens with more outstanding debt + rising unemployment + falling wages, and a financial system on the brink of complete failure...who will out print Paulson?
Stretch a bit here and consider the thought that speculative bubbles and peak oil may both exist...the existence of one does not disprove the existence of the other (before you go long Hummers).
Seen 'em too - and seen every field that has gone into production go into decline - let's see what the new 'floor' is...
Consider watching rolling 3 and 5 year averages for F&D and drillbit reserve replacement rates against the five year price incline that preceded the blowoff bubble... Just sayin...
The problem with credit tightening now is that, with contraction going on, the appropriate economic response would be to loosen credit, spurring consumption. Now the exact opposite is happening and that is a not a good spiral to be in...lowered credit leading to lower spending leading to job contraction leading to lower spending....Of course the big losers here are the auto companies. I still think at least one of them is in BK before this is over. And Cerebus isn't going to turn around Chrysler period.
The second part about this is that the banks just might teach people that they don't really need all these things they've been buying if this continues for a while. That's also bad for the banks, and for spending. Some of your political bents may say that is good, but if I asked you if you'd sacrifice your own or your family's job or business to achieve this on a macro scale, I bet you wouldn't. I wouldn't.
On the economic front the US is still the biggest GDP contributor in the world, bar none. The EU comes close, but after that it drops to the floor. Whatever happens here happens everywhere for as long as we're alive. China and India (which is now slowing and contracting also and has massive internal issues) aren't going to even come close for many years. The ballpark where the game is played is here and in the EU for the foreseable future. Not that those two aren't important, but don't look for the scortching growth to continue.
"
Hydrocarbons will be the central element of our energy matrix for a twenty year time horizon...its just that we picked most of the low hanging fruit."
Daily I witness my bank clients turning down loans that even 6 months ago they were making as fast as they could. This is in Texas were there is a still a lot of optimism (delusion).
Check out the next to the last chart titled:
"Net Percentage of Domestic Respondents Reporting Increased Willingness to Make Consumer Installment Loans"
They also say that we will need to expand the use of pretty much every alternative in the same time frame, and that we better get cracking now to transition as it is a multi-decadal effort...try the executive summary.
Well, I think there is a millenial contingency here to be sure. You have to just take those with a grain of salt. And there are the bulls like Sebastian and Ojoe. You have to do the same there. Reality is seldom as dire or seldom as sweet. You also have to let the data tell the story, not put on your political glasses and let them filter the data for you. That's the cause of these posts here. They have an agenda, and if the data doesn't fit, well...the data's bad and the government is fudging it! That way you get to be right. They're the same sort that will tell you there are no contradictions in the bible, and go through all sorts of mental gymnastics to explain them away.
But let's be clear here. There are huge problems. Earnings are going to suck, oil rolling back is NOT a good thing at all (because it means the economy is in recession) and we have massive asset deflation on a scale never seen before. So far, we're walking the line, and I think we'll continue to do that. But there is more pain to come. Not depression pain, just drawn-out pain. I think there will be around 1.2T of write-offs, that housing will drop another 10%, and that unemployment will keep rising until it hits around 6.7%. One automaker is BK, another IB is merged, a couple of more large banks will fail and a slew of little ones. That's not a very bullish position. I do think the dollar's only position is up, given the EU's state though.
I can't help but think of the couple out there trying to send their son or daughter to a respectable tier 2 college. It's costing 30 grand a year. They don't have any money ("hey, we HAD to get a new flat screen"), and they can't HELOC the house. Student loans are drying up, and those put a huge burden on the new grad. It's a twisted cycle. Go into massive debt or work minimum wage.
history has shown time and time again that manic investments in infrastructure lead to deflationary booms post bust.
i think you are wrong, can you give an example of infrastructure expansion causing a "deflationary boom" as you call it???
a booming economy with defalation is a result of the importation of cheap foreign made goods usually couples with...
the importation of cheap labor which competes with indigenous higher priced labor,; often union labor, holding wages flat or driving wages and or benefits down.
Btw, I also had to listen to ridicule from the gold bugs (gold is a store of value that never goes down!) back in the spring when i said it was over. Hate to say this but that store is now worth a whole lot less and headed lower. But hey, it's shiny so who cares?
Anyone who thinks that China is going to equal or surpass the US or EU GDP in the next 10 to 15 years (if at all) doesn't understand the situation at all. Same goes for India. Manufacturing decisions were made on the assumption of cheap transportation costs. Those are gone, and probably forever. Or at least the perception that transportation will be cheap forever is gone and planning will have to account for that. So I'm thinking that China's ability to be the world's manufacturing will be diminished as wage costs there have no where to go but up, and transportation costs eat the old cost differential. So I'm not seeing it.
For an anonymous poster regarding the limitations of uncertain supply data - this is some pretty good work from The Oil Drum - calling ~11.5 MMBOD peak in 2013 or so, interesting read if you are so inclined and if not please ignore!
i'm a gold bug, sort of, and i agree that gold can, will and is going down.
gold is not a perfect store of value.
and i agree the shinny thing makes less sense than thee more strategic metals, but even those go down during economic downturns...ie platinum etc.
interesting to note however that during the last month when oil has dropped 20 plus percent gold has dropped closer to 10 percent.
but as i posted repeatedly over the last several months there are headwinds for gold, not the lease of which is G7 interest rate games, and IMF gold sales.
since senator maria cantwell has put the spotlight on oil options and futures trading games (hearings with proposed legislation), and the strategic petroleum reserve is closed to further deposits, we will see a strong downward pressure on the price of oil, and gold, but only for awhile.
dc1000 is onto something. Ever read Mandel's "The Coming Internet Depression"? Pretty prescient for its time.
Greenspan responded to a cap ex led boom (internet) with unprecedented cuts to FFR. Stimulated growth, but only in another cap ex led boom (housing). The problem with cap ex is that it is a one-trick pony (borrowing a Winterism) that gets confused for sustainable growth.
Look at the chart for TTH for 2000-2003 for comparison to what has (and will?) happend to XLF. Debt-fueled cap ex booms often end like this. Google Ravi Suria to find a great interview with Smart Money (early 2001 I think). His description of new 90's telecom and Baby Bells could parallel what has happened in this decade with regional and national/global banks/IBs.
And these debt-driven infrastructure busts have happened before. In the US in the 30's it was in the wake of overbuild in the automotive complex. Japan had its cap ex boom in the 1980's.
It is the rate of growth not the overall size that is attractive to investors in placing their bets. Developing countries are characterized with rapid growth rate, whereas, mature economies often show moderate to slow rate of growth. China represents the most stable developing country of the third world and attracts lots of FDI (foreign direct investments). In a way we are piggy backing China by way of cheap recylcled dollars. The problem is our financial sectors mis-allocate these cheap funds disproportionately into the housing and mortgage sectors.
dc1000.........wow 5 years and we've come around to the same viewpoint. Get ready cause when this credit/infrastructure boom blows it is going to do so in a bigger way than the GD.
and "Peak Oil" is a hedge fund fantasy. Sorry, but the singular assumption to peak oil is that demand continues to grow. Plug in continuous year over year demand destruction in the use of oil from 5-10% and suddenly the you get a very different outcome. It is always the assumptions that F people up
and the dollar will rally cause there is about 400-600 trillion or so in promises/contracts/liabilities priced in dollars that would have to be paid in dollars. It isn't interest rate differentials all the time, and it won't be in the near future.
It will be the underlying defaults on trillions of dollars of debt and the desperate grasp for dollars to pay back debt that will drive up the value of the dollar IMO
You need to check out if your super hero tights are cutting off circulation...you are confusing a commodity price cycle punctuated by a blow off top with a physics problem.
The most interesting thing about that chart is that it shows the loosening/deterioration lending of standards in '96 and the subsequent effort to correct the mess of easy credit in '01/'02, which was then slammed down and led to where we are now.
But the consumer will lead us out of this economic malaise, right?
Looking at that chart, I'm not feeling the long promised 2nd half recovery.
There must be some lag between these tightening conditions in consumer credit and the actual consumer credit numbers we see from the Fed. The June numbers were something like a 6.5% increase, so I guess we can expect that at some point in the next few months the consumer credit numbers will be either flat or declining?
So aggregate wages will be down. MEW will be down. No government handouts on the horizon and high probability of declining consumer credit. I'm sick of the "don't bet against the American consumer" mantra. The evidence is now overwhelming that the bet against the consumer is the right one.
But the FED has been revolving 28-day loans until 2009...
Their standards are non-existant.
What's even scarier is that only one bank of 50 said it planned to ease credit standards in the next year, while most said they would continue to tighten.
And this survey doesn't include Fannie and Freddie, which are also tightening their standards....
A penny saved is a penny earned.
yeah but what do dropping oil and rising dollars mean....gotta be bad right bears?
As I said yesterday, and said before, yeah, the lenders are tightening standards, but basically, they are not lending money because they have no money to lend.
So if they did have some money to lend, they'd be real careful with it . . .
Nemo -- sure, but who wants to earn pennies?
Hi CR,
Do you happen to know the percentage of credit card or other consumer loans during the '91 recession?
Thanks.
Pennies where zinc is the new copper.
According to the chart almost all institutions have almost always been tightening their standards with only a couple of slight exceptions. That doesn't sound right to me.
Incidentally, CNBC has a video related to this topic: HELOC to Pay Off Debt?.
"yeah but what do dropping oil and rising dollars mean...."
exchange rates are changing.
About damn time.
dc1000
Oil is done going down, any strength in the dollar will be short lived...
tim, done going down even as its down today with all the bad oil news out there?
"i think that word doesnt mean what you think it means"
CR,
I'm surprised you're not all over this one:
One Third of New Owners Owe More Than House Is Worth
It is funny how everyone is tightening and the FDIC is looking for more ways the banks can make risky loans. The FDIC sure does not want anyone else to have a piece of the lending pie.
FDIC Pilot Program Explores Alternatives to Payday Loans
FDIC Pilot Program Explores Alternatives to Payday Loans - washingtonpost.com
Banks around the country have issued more than 3,000 small loans as part of a pilot program by the Federal Deposit Insurance Corp. exploring alternatives to payday lending.
Just a few years late on something that shouldn't of happened any way. It won't be enough to save their a%$.
jo6pac
The race to the bottom continues.
"yeah but what do dropping oil and rising dollars mean....gotta be bad right bears?"
Yes we'll go honky tonkin' make every club in town
We'll go to the park where it's dark we won't fool around
But if you run short of money I'll run short of time
Cause you with no more money honey I've no more time
Deflation in asset prices baby.
dc1000
Put a fork in the downtrend...
To answer your question from the previous thread, LawyerLiz...
babypips.com/.../the_skinny_on_forex
Bucky's just the most commonly refered to, unless you're among FOREXers.
which downtrend did you have in mind...
oil? dollar? gdp? national debt?
For those who don't believe that the rumors of oil's demise is greatly exaggerated, the Big Picture has a nice chart of World GDP and oil production levels (real data, not projections):
The Big Picture
interest rate differentials and interest rate expectations drive currencies.
and curiouser, you expect that world GDP trend line to continue shooting upwards to infinity? good luck!
and curiouser, you expect that world GDP trend line to continue shooting upwards to infinity? good luck!
Production is falling faster than anyone estimated... Look at XOM, CVX production. Not a good thing unless you have a pump in your backyard but its the truth.
I'm about to buy 2x oil bull etf if it goes between 100 - 110.
Gold is also well below its 50 and 200 day moving averages. This has manipulation written all over it.
Still in cash.
dc100,
According to the CIA figures here
List of countries by GDP (nominal) - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
China and India's contribution to the World GDP in 2007 was less than 4%, whereas the US alone contributed 26%.
In that chart on BP, the GDP curve still has a long way to go if China and India continue to expand towards their full potential. Good luck finding enough oil to match that expansion.
interest rate differentials and interest rate expectations drive currencies.
Short term, but long term they're dependent upon relative economic strength. Interest rates can tend to reflect that, though.
Interesting Times What is the etf?
long term they're dependent upon relative economic strength. Interest rates can tend to reflect that, though.
+1
This has manipulation written all over it.
It's a gift. Take it while it's offered!
Sorry, in my previous post, China and India's contribution to the World GDP should have been "less than 10%."
Tim,
Canadian dollar etfs:
HOU.TO - Oil 2x bull
HGU.TO - Gold 2x bull
The bears are:
HOD.TO
HGD.TO
sorry guys but you got the currency bit backwards. long term its all interest rate differentials.
short term it can be whatever
the commodity bubble was the last asset class blow off.
the real deflationary period is upon us due 100% from the over investment in telecommunications (the internet) from the late 90's.
history has shown time and time again that manic investments in infrastructure lead to deflationary booms post bust.
think trains.
Thanks but can't buy them in the US, eh
Tim - I don't know. I can buy ETFs in both US and Canadian exchanges with my canadian bank.
Oh, bucky is an term of endearment for buck! Should have been able to figure that out from context.
Well with UBS losses and Goldman down grade,,banks should get smacked, with the rising dollar, the dollar seems to be moderating the effect..?
From dedicated reading of the postings on this site it is obvious that the world is coming to an end.
"It's over" - Just the leveraged excess is coming to an end. And it's about time.
"the commodity bubble was the last asset class blow off.
the real deflationary period is upon us due 100%"
Dc1000 - We finally agree. Peak oil was nothing more than Leveraged Speculation!
So tell me dollar bulls...can you think of any country with more national debt, more of citizens with more outstanding debt + rising unemployment + falling wages, and a financial system on the brink of complete failure...who will out print Paulson?
Give me a fucking break!
I've been customer of a major credit card company for 15 years.
I maybe was late on one payment ever.
Maybe I'm going nuts, but I swear, they've tightened up their terms to be
3? weeks instead of 6 weeks starting about 3 months ago.
They monkey with it just enough so you can't figure out if it's really changed (eg. 18 days) or you are going crazy. Look carefully....
Man, I'm not so sure that's a good strategy:
Building credibility up for 15 years & then flushing it down the tubes for a couple of extra points...
Golden goose=killed.
I'm sure these very thoughts seemed absurd to the Germans too long ago....until it came to pass.
TED spread down 7% today to 0.92
Thoughts?
c&c,
Stretch a bit here and consider the thought that speculative bubbles and peak oil may both exist...the existence of one does not disprove the existence of the other (before you go long Hummers).
TED spread is less meaningful if only one side of the equation actually changes.
Haven't you heard? Mission Accomplished, Treasuries are so July 2008.
Peak Oil will always be unprovable without accurate supply information.
"(before you go long Hummers)."
LOL
Remember I live in oil country...I have seen so many booms and busts...each time (boom or bust)was "different" for some reason.
The famous bumper sticker reads "Please God just give me one more Boom...I won't blow all my money this time"
Seen 'em too - and seen every field that has gone into production go into decline - let's see what the new 'floor' is...
Consider watching rolling 3 and 5 year averages for F&D and drillbit reserve replacement rates against the five year price incline that preceded the blowoff bubble... Just sayin...
c&c
Eventually, I would like to make a full time living off the oil trusts dividends so I'm hoping it lasts at least the rest of my lifetime.
Heh, there were a couple in Alaska that were good:
"Please God, give me one more boom - I promise not to piss this one away!"
"Happiness is seeing a Texan headed south with an Okie under each arm."
(Now a current Houston dweller)
From dedicated reading of the postings on this site it is obvious that the world is coming to an end.
Mayan calender ends on December 21st, 2012 A.D we still have a couple years.
Do you happen to know the percentage of credit card or other consumer loans during the '91 recession?
Cooking ramen, check here:
http://www.federalreserve.gov/boarddocs/SnLoanSurvey/200808/charts.pdf
for data going back to 1990. It looks like things were pretty tight back then.
The problem with credit tightening now is that, with contraction going on, the appropriate economic response would be to loosen credit, spurring consumption. Now the exact opposite is happening and that is a not a good spiral to be in...lowered credit leading to lower spending leading to job contraction leading to lower spending....Of course the big losers here are the auto companies. I still think at least one of them is in BK before this is over. And Cerebus isn't going to turn around Chrysler period.
The second part about this is that the banks just might teach people that they don't really need all these things they've been buying if this continues for a while. That's also bad for the banks, and for spending. Some of your political bents may say that is good, but if I asked you if you'd sacrifice your own or your family's job or business to achieve this on a macro scale, I bet you wouldn't. I wouldn't.
On the economic front the US is still the biggest GDP contributor in the world, bar none. The EU comes close, but after that it drops to the floor. Whatever happens here happens everywhere for as long as we're alive. China and India (which is now slowing and contracting also and has massive internal issues) aren't going to even come close for many years. The ballpark where the game is played is here and in the EU for the foreseable future. Not that those two aren't important, but don't look for the scortching growth to continue.
msm money sez bank worries are back.
I wasn't aware that they had gone away.
The predictions on this blog have almost always been early. Early to call the bust, the recession...and now it appears early to call the bottoming.
Bunch of premature prognosticators!
IT,
Hydrocarbons will be the central element of our energy matrix for a twenty year time horizon...its just that we picked most of the low hanging fruit.
NPC Report: Facing the Hard Truths about Energy
Let me finish the sentence:
"more than Leveraged Speculation" creating an upward pricing aberation on a curve that is tested by increasing demand.
Lawyerliz - They were hiding out inside the FED window.
Looks like they're running out of room in the fallout shelter and some are being kicked out sooner than expected.
"
Hydrocarbons will be the central element of our energy matrix for a twenty year time horizon...its just that we picked most of the low hanging fruit."
... so says the National Petroleum Council.
But what would you expect them to say?
Daily I witness my bank clients turning down loans that even 6 months ago they were making as fast as they could. This is in Texas were there is a still a lot of optimism (delusion).
http://www.federalreserve.gov/boarddocs/SnLoanSurvey/200808/charts.pdf
Check out the next to the last chart titled:
"Net Percentage of Domestic Respondents Reporting Increased Willingness to Make Consumer Installment Loans"
That's the spookiest one, IMO.
Bob Dobbs,
They also say that we will need to expand the use of pretty much every alternative in the same time frame, and that we better get cracking now to transition as it is a multi-decadal effort...try the executive summary.
Bunch of premature prognosticators!
Well, I think there is a millenial contingency here to be sure. You have to just take those with a grain of salt. And there are the bulls like Sebastian and Ojoe. You have to do the same there. Reality is seldom as dire or seldom as sweet. You also have to let the data tell the story, not put on your political glasses and let them filter the data for you. That's the cause of these posts here. They have an agenda, and if the data doesn't fit, well...the data's bad and the government is fudging it! That way you get to be right. They're the same sort that will tell you there are no contradictions in the bible, and go through all sorts of mental gymnastics to explain them away.
But let's be clear here. There are huge problems. Earnings are going to suck, oil rolling back is NOT a good thing at all (because it means the economy is in recession) and we have massive asset deflation on a scale never seen before. So far, we're walking the line, and I think we'll continue to do that. But there is more pain to come. Not depression pain, just drawn-out pain. I think there will be around 1.2T of write-offs, that housing will drop another 10%, and that unemployment will keep rising until it hits around 6.7%. One automaker is BK, another IB is merged, a couple of more large banks will fail and a slew of little ones. That's not a very bullish position. I do think the dollar's only position is up, given the EU's state though.
For a finance-based economy like ours, this is troubling since it now takes $5.57 in new debt to fuel $1 worth of GDP growth.
Raymond James
What about China's financed US asset reflation via US govt. The ultimate import from China, the much despised socialism.
dc1000 wrote
the real deflationary period is upon us due 100% from the over investment in telecommunications (the internet) from the late 90's.
dc1000 | 08.12.08 - 11:43 am | #
so the last 8 years dont matter much towards creating the trip over the financial water fall?
are you saying the Bush policies were economically impotent or incom-potent
I can't help but think of the couple out there trying to send their son or daughter to a respectable tier 2 college. It's costing 30 grand a year. They don't have any money ("hey, we HAD to get a new flat screen"), and they can't HELOC the house. Student loans are drying up, and those put a huge burden on the new grad. It's a twisted cycle. Go into massive debt or work minimum wage.
history has shown time and time again that manic investments in infrastructure lead to deflationary booms post bust.
i think you are wrong, can you give an example of infrastructure expansion causing a "deflationary boom" as you call it???
a booming economy with defalation is a result of the importation of cheap foreign made goods usually couples with...
the importation of cheap labor which competes with indigenous higher priced labor,; often union labor, holding wages flat or driving wages and or benefits down.
above post response to DC1000quote
"history has shown time and time again that manic investments in infrastructure lead to deflationary booms post bust."
DC1000 being a real estate developer conviently ignores the massive over-investment (with global savings) in real estates during the last decade.
Btw, I also had to listen to ridicule from the gold bugs (gold is a store of value that never goes down!) back in the spring when i said it was over. Hate to say this but that store is now worth a whole lot less and headed lower. But hey, it's shiny so who cares?
Anyone who thinks that China is going to equal or surpass the US or EU GDP in the next 10 to 15 years (if at all) doesn't understand the situation at all. Same goes for India. Manufacturing decisions were made on the assumption of cheap transportation costs. Those are gone, and probably forever. Or at least the perception that transportation will be cheap forever is gone and planning will have to account for that. So I'm thinking that China's ability to be the world's manufacturing will be diminished as wage costs there have no where to go but up, and transportation costs eat the old cost differential. So I'm not seeing it.
For an anonymous poster regarding the limitations of uncertain supply data - this is some pretty good work from The Oil Drum - calling ~11.5 MMBOD peak in 2013 or so, interesting read if you are so inclined and if not please ignore!
Forecast of Saudi Oil Production
to add to ipodius' argument: wage inflation in both China and India is real as well, and will also help to close that gap.
ipodius
i'm a gold bug, sort of, and i agree that gold can, will and is going down.
gold is not a perfect store of value.
and i agree the shinny thing makes less sense than thee more strategic metals, but even those go down during economic downturns...ie platinum etc.
interesting to note however that during the last month when oil has dropped 20 plus percent gold has dropped closer to 10 percent.
but as i posted repeatedly over the last several months there are headwinds for gold, not the lease of which is G7 interest rate games, and IMF gold sales.
since senator maria cantwell has put the spotlight on oil options and futures trading games (hearings with proposed legislation), and the strategic petroleum reserve is closed to further deposits, we will see a strong downward pressure on the price of oil, and gold, but only for awhile.
but hey
Ipodius
your call, past spring, gold top, was good!
salute!
Go into massive debt or work minimum wage.
There's always the option of becoming a tradesman. Too bad, these professions have the same social stigma as renters.
There's always the option of becoming a tradesman. Too bad, these professions have the same social stigma as renters.
I've been a tradesman for 40 years. If you like competing for the lowest wage with a Mexican or Chinaman it's a great living and a great future.
dc1000 is onto something. Ever read Mandel's "The Coming Internet Depression"? Pretty prescient for its time.
Greenspan responded to a cap ex led boom (internet) with unprecedented cuts to FFR. Stimulated growth, but only in another cap ex led boom (housing). The problem with cap ex is that it is a one-trick pony (borrowing a Winterism) that gets confused for sustainable growth.
Look at the chart for TTH for 2000-2003 for comparison to what has (and will?) happend to XLF. Debt-fueled cap ex booms often end like this. Google Ravi Suria to find a great interview with Smart Money (early 2001 I think). His description of new 90's telecom and Baby Bells could parallel what has happened in this decade with regional and national/global banks/IBs.
And these debt-driven infrastructure busts have happened before. In the US in the 30's it was in the wake of overbuild in the automotive complex. Japan had its cap ex boom in the 1980's.
It is the rate of growth not the overall size that is attractive to investors in placing their bets. Developing countries are characterized with rapid growth rate, whereas, mature economies often show moderate to slow rate of growth. China represents the most stable developing country of the third world and attracts lots of FDI (foreign direct investments). In a way we are piggy backing China by way of cheap recylcled dollars. The problem is our financial sectors mis-allocate these cheap funds disproportionately into the housing and mortgage sectors.
for some reason, my computer cannot
access the OilDrum. It has been that way for six months. All other blogs are accessible..... freaky.
I even added them to safe site list.
I even tried to get in there through other sites. Nothing works.
I think Gold will bottom when its near
perfect correlation to emerging markets breaks down for a few weeks.
I believe money is fake and the only true money is clamshells and rutabagas.
dc1000.........wow 5 years and we've come around to the same viewpoint. Get ready cause when this credit/infrastructure boom blows it is going to do so in a bigger way than the GD.
and "Peak Oil" is a hedge fund fantasy. Sorry, but the singular assumption to peak oil is that demand continues to grow. Plug in continuous year over year demand destruction in the use of oil from 5-10% and suddenly the you get a very different outcome. It is always the assumptions that F people up
and the dollar will rally cause there is about 400-600 trillion or so in promises/contracts/liabilities priced in dollars that would have to be paid in dollars. It isn't interest rate differentials all the time, and it won't be in the near future.
It will be the underlying defaults on trillions of dollars of debt and the desperate grasp for dollars to pay back debt that will drive up the value of the dollar IMO
FDIC Pilot Program Explores Alternatives to Payday Loans
"Banking industry experts are calling it a significant first step in an attempt to find a less-predatory way to provide short-term credit."
http://www.washingtonpost.com/ wp...8081102363.html
What if this claim is bogus? What if the banks are simply trying to horn in on the lucrative market of raping the poor?
Which is more likely, that the banks are doing this out of the goodness of their hearts or that they are out to make a buck?
Canadaman,
You need to check out if your super hero tights are cutting off circulation...you are confusing a commodity price cycle punctuated by a blow off top with a physics problem.
Canadaman,
Thanks for channeling Irving Fisher, I've been trying to remeber this link for a couple of days...
The Debt Deflation Theory of Great Depressions
mock:
sorry about my fat fingers. rather than deflationary boom i meant, 'post-boom deflationary period'
canadaman:
we've disagreed on things for longer than 5 years. all the way back to babe ruth baseball if i remember correctly?
CC:
lol. thats all i can say about that
john d:
thanks. you are absolutely right. telcom, auto, rails, telcom again, over invest boom and plummeting prices...
The most interesting thing about that chart is that it shows the loosening/deterioration lending of standards in '96 and the subsequent effort to correct the mess of easy credit in '01/'02, which was then slammed down and led to where we are now.
thanks a lot, easy money jerks.