The moral to this story is you don't have to be samert to work on Wal Street. In fact, all you have to do is act like you know alot and demand big bonuses.
"Son, quit running as fast as you can into the wall head first."
"But, Daddy, want I work on Wall Steet."
"Well, why didn't you tell me? Here is a hammer. Start hitting yourself in the head with that, too. It will increase your chances of running Goldman Sachs and then working for the president."
How could so many smart people do so many dumb transactions? I could have made stupid decisions at Lehman for a lot less than some of the dopes working there today. I guess it just takes a special pedigree of stupid to run an IB into the ground.
Washington Mutual, Inc. (the Company) entered into an Investment Agreement, dated as of April 7, 2008 (the Investment Agreement) with investment vehicles managed by TPG Capital (TPG)..
Re: In the event that, within eighteen months of the closing of the transactions under the Investment Agreement, the Company (i) sells more than $500 million of common stock or other equity-linked securities at a price less than $8.75, or (ii) the Company engages in a change of control transaction wherein the implied value of the Companys common stock is less than $8.75, upon the occurrence of each such event the Company is required to pay to those Investors whose shares are subject to transfer restrictions an amount sufficient to compensate them for the dilution suffered by them as a result of the above-described actions of the Company.
YLSP, As you know we are in a time warp, so last August is actually this August and stopping subprime early actually might be late summer. So, who really knows what is going on except for Nostradamus, and he is busy playing checkers with Satan right now.
I was reading through CR archives waiting/on the plane.... happened to have August 2007. Everyone was rejoicing back then that Ben didn't cut the rate during the August meeting, and the banks weren't going to get their bailouts.
Trying to remember what happened forced me to look at Fed rate policy... it's like roller coaster.
From Jan 2001 to June 2003 dropping the rate from 6.5% to 1% and holding it there until June 2004. From June 2004 to June 2006 raising the rate from 1% to 5.25% and holding it there until September 2007. September 2007 to now cutting from 5.25% down to 2%. What's up with that? I'm an EE (by degree) but that's no way to exert control over this system...
I was just reading CR's bio. Did you know...
CR, aka Cokie Roberts (born December 27, 1943) is an American Emmy Award-winning journalist and bestselling author. She is a contributing senior news analyst for National Public Radio as well as a regular roundtable analyst for the current This Week with George Stephanopoulos. Roberts also works as political commentator for ABC News, serving as an on-air analyst for the network. Roberts, along with her husband, Tanta, writes a blog around the United States. She serves on the boards of several non-profit organizations and was appointed by President George W. Bush to his Council on Service and Civic Participation until she resigned when he appointed Hank Paulson.
"Judith Kennedy, president of the National Association of Affordable Housing Lenders, said that while Fannie and Freddie nurtured unregulated subprime lenders, an estimated 30 percent of subprime borrowers could have qualified for safe, lower-cost prime loans."
for the love of pete, some people just got to go to jail
I'm an EE (by degree) but that's no way to exert control over this system...
Actually, it is.
Think of it as a control system for an airplane autopilot. If the plane goes into a stall, it's fatal. So anytime you are nearing a stall, a drastic correction occurs.
In the economic situation, deflation is a stall: There's no monetary way to pull out once you are in it. So when a whiff of deflation was detected in both in 2001 & 2007, rates dropped precipitously.
You also need to know that 5-6% is on the low side historically, but near the midpoint.
So putting it all together, when you are close to 7% rates, you can model the system like an engineer: Assume it's a two-pole system and apply a lead or lag filter as appropriate. But when you are far away from 7%, you are correcting for something that has serious instabilities.
Does anyone else get the sense that Erin Callan hasn't actually ever been to the Inland Empire?
And if banks, like Lehman, so badly misrepresented SoCal then what are the chances that their Asian real-estate investment pools are anything close to what they claim?
Actually, Jack, no. I get the sense that the majority of smart money didn't understand the oversupply and debt bubble problem and they got what they deserved. Personally, I deserve a harem, but, I didn't get that either.
Yes, Jack, I see it every day and I shake my head. The pressure to invest when you have a pot of money is overpowering to most, and as a result, they lose other people's parent's moeny.
Has anybody else read the Bloomburg article about the IBs creating a clearinghouse for credit default swaps and other previously OTC derivatives? Too little, too late?
From Jan 2001 to June 2003 dropping the rate from 6.5% to 1% and holding it there until June 2004. From June 2004 to June 2006 raising the rate from 1% to 5.25% and holding it there until September 2007. September 2007 to now cutting from 5.25% down to 2%.
Historians are going to have a field day with GWB. Neither has someone so clueless been placed is such unfamiliar circumstances.
Jan 2001-June 2003: Bush enters office in Jan during the dot.com recession. Fed's already been lowering rates, but then 9/11 occurs in September causing a nationwide coma. God, instead using the low rates for a New Deal renewable energy package, he tells us to go shopping because that how we can beat the terrorists (now, they just own outright). Fed lowers interest rates all the way down to 1%, trying to get employment. All this money is basically going to overpriced housing; between real estate agents, non-reporting independent contractors, and illegal aliens, jobs were heavily understated, leading to the so-called jobless recovery. Because the Fed's job is to maintain full employment, it kept the rates low to maintain the putrid job growth as it were, so that GWB could claim 53 straight months of job growth. All the while, Wall Street uses this easy credit to create RMBS crack. And here we are.
I rent an apartment in an Archstone-Smith apartment. I wonder if this means large rent increases for me in order to make up for Lehman's mistakes. One of my friends down the street is moving out of the apartment he's been renting for the past 4 years because the building was bought by some REIT (Vornado?) who jacked up the rents by 30%. Most of his floor is now unoccupied. I wonder is this is a broader trend. If it is, CPI will skyrocket.
I looked at few archstone apartments a few months ago. They are marketed as some sort of luxury apartment but they are complete crap. In Thousand Oaks they built a complex that is rather expensive right next to some low income housing. All the complexes I looked at had a lot of vacancies. I could only conclude the company was ran by Monkeys....low and behold it is!
REIT's in trouble, eh? What a surprise. Perhaps shorting them all via SRS isn't such a bad idea?
IYR has a big holding in Vornado. None in Archstone, unfortunately.
One of the reasons I like SRS so much is that IYR's biggest holding is Simon. This is what Simon does.
As of December 31, 2007, the company owned or held an interest in 320 income-producing properties in the United States, which consisted of 168 regional malls, 38 Premium Outlet centers, 67 community/lifestyle centers, 37 properties acquired in the Mills acquisition, and 10 other shopping centers or outlet centers in 41 states and Puerto Rico. The company also owns interests in 4 parcels of land held for future development in the United States;
Land values have probably fallen closer to 80% in parts of the Inland Empire. I've heard of bids right now at 20 cents on the dollar for some of these properties.
You know, what alot of people don't realize is to a large degree, it's not the cost of land that determines the cost of a house. Rather, the price of a house, minus the cost of construction yields the price of raw land. So if the price of houses goes down 20% and the cost of construction was 60% of the price of the house, than the price of raw land goes down 50%, until the price is determined by it's value for other uses, perhaps agriculture.
You also need to know that 5-6% is on the low side historically, but near the midpoint.
Okay, that makes a lot of sense. I thought the "stability" point was 3%, since you know for the past 8 years (my historesis) rates haven't been up to 7%. So basically we're in a plane that keeps stalling, and throttle up just enough to get stablity again... but then we stall again.
They sold $130 billion of asset that are junior in nature and took $17 billion in losses - does anyone know if any of the junior tranches trade 85-90%? - they are still talking about keeping upside on tranches/securites. Watchout for their LEVEL III assets...
There is an old statement to the effect that when you buy and hold raw California land you are making your grandchildren rich. I have a feeling that may have to be changed to great great grandchildren.
Re: Airplanes. If you C.G. moves aft of your center of lift you are in big trouble. If your thrust to weight ratio is above 1 then maybe the addition of power will save your ass. It would be a good idea to have very powerful flaps to help you control the pitch up. Best of Luck
Numero Uno
A few more quarters and people will be begging Wall Street to come clean and mark everything to market...
The moral to this story is you don't have to be samert to work on Wal Street. In fact, all you have to do is act like you know alot and demand big bonuses.
"Son, quit running as fast as you can into the wall head first."
"But, Daddy, want I work on Wall Steet."
"Well, why didn't you tell me? Here is a hammer. Start hitting yourself in the head with that, too. It will increase your chances of running Goldman Sachs and then working for the president."
"(Drooling) Hanks, Addy,"
How could so many smart people do so many dumb transactions? I could have made stupid decisions at Lehman for a lot less than some of the dopes working there today. I guess it just takes a special pedigree of stupid to run an IB into the ground.
Land values have probably fallen closer to 80% in parts of the Inland Empire.
Almost back to true value!
Washington Mutual/Inc · 8-K · For 4/7/08
SEC Info - Washington Mutual/Inc - 8-K - For 4/7/08
Entry into Material Definitive Agreement
Washington Mutual, Inc. (the Company) entered into an Investment Agreement, dated as of April 7, 2008 (the Investment Agreement) with investment vehicles managed by TPG Capital (TPG)..
Re: In the event that, within eighteen months of the closing of the transactions under the Investment Agreement, the Company (i) sells more than $500 million of common stock or other equity-linked securities at a price less than $8.75, or (ii) the Company engages in a change of control transaction wherein the implied value of the Companys common stock is less than $8.75, upon the occurrence of each such event the Company is required to pay to those Investors whose shares are subject to transfer restrictions an amount sufficient to compensate them for the dilution suffered by them as a result of the above-described actions of the Company.
** >> WM @ $6.25????
They aren't paid to make smart decisions.. They are paid to execute transactions.
They can't be saved.. It's just a slow train wreck..
What's in your wallet?
I've got receipts and a picture of my prom date.
What is utterly amazing is that these are Wall Street firms that specialize in stocks and bonds. Yet these are REAL ESTATE purchases.
Everyone knows real estate is local. They were buying raw land in Bakersfield and San Bernardino.
The apartment units are a negative cash flow.
These guys should stick to their knitting of stocks and bonds. Instead of raw land speculation.
They are steps behind Bear Stearns.
they must have stolen the Glen Gary leads.
frank, Frankly, real estate really isn't rally local in this national debt bubble, and frankly I prefer hamburgers to franks.
Being simply put, they were betting that CA was local (not a bubble) and they lost their asses.
Fortunately, they found their asses in D.C. and they expect them to protect their butts.
Ewww, Archstone. Sucks to live in their apartments... rent hikes every year.
Was Lehman one of the early people to stop Subprime loans or am I mis-remembering (August)?
YLSP, As you know we are in a time warp, so last August is actually this August and stopping subprime early actually might be late summer. So, who really knows what is going on except for Nostradamus, and he is busy playing checkers with Satan right now.
All these venerable wall street firms are about to learn what happens when you can't pay the piper.
yeah, if you cant pay the piper
then
you bend over and let the piper pay you
How HUD Mortgage Policy Fed The Crisis
Subprime Loans Labeled 'Affordable'
How HUD Mortgage Policy Fed The Crisis - washingtonpost.com
its 1:15 in he afternoon
tomorrow
in Nihon
all asian markets are down, modestly
except NZ up and KL getting hammered
Foreclosures in May surpass 1,700 per month in San Diego County. Set the start date to 1982 for a historical perspective.
I paid the piper and he gave me three pepperoni pizzaa and two sodas, but, now, I think he might be out of business.
I was reading through CR archives waiting/on the plane.... happened to have August 2007. Everyone was rejoicing back then that Ben didn't cut the rate during the August meeting, and the banks weren't going to get their bailouts.
Trying to remember what happened forced me to look at Fed rate policy... it's like roller coaster.
From Jan 2001 to June 2003 dropping the rate from 6.5% to 1% and holding it there until June 2004. From June 2004 to June 2006 raising the rate from 1% to 5.25% and holding it there until September 2007. September 2007 to now cutting from 5.25% down to 2%. What's up with that? I'm an EE (by degree) but that's no way to exert control over this system...
I was just reading CR's bio. Did you know...
CR, aka Cokie Roberts (born December 27, 1943) is an American Emmy Award-winning journalist and bestselling author. She is a contributing senior news analyst for National Public Radio as well as a regular roundtable analyst for the current This Week with George Stephanopoulos. Roberts also works as political commentator for ABC News, serving as an on-air analyst for the network. Roberts, along with her husband, Tanta, writes a blog around the United States. She serves on the boards of several non-profit organizations and was appointed by President George W. Bush to his Council on Service and Civic Participation until she resigned when he appointed Hank Paulson.
from FFDIC's link
"Judith Kennedy, president of the National Association of Affordable Housing Lenders, said that while Fannie and Freddie nurtured unregulated subprime lenders, an estimated 30 percent of subprime borrowers could have qualified for safe, lower-cost prime loans."
for the love of pete, some people just got to go to jail
"...could have qualified for safe, lower-cost prime loans."
Maybe THEN, but unlikely before or since.
I'm an EE (by degree) but that's no way to exert control over this system...
Actually, it is.
Think of it as a control system for an airplane autopilot. If the plane goes into a stall, it's fatal. So anytime you are nearing a stall, a drastic correction occurs.
In the economic situation, deflation is a stall: There's no monetary way to pull out once you are in it. So when a whiff of deflation was detected in both in 2001 & 2007, rates dropped precipitously.
You also need to know that 5-6% is on the low side historically, but near the midpoint.
So putting it all together, when you are close to 7% rates, you can model the system like an engineer: Assume it's a two-pole system and apply a lead or lag filter as appropriate. But when you are far away from 7%, you are correcting for something that has serious instabilities.
Why love Pete? He owes me money and he kicked my dog. Let's love somebody better like Oprah.
I loved engineers when I was a kid. Then I found out that most of them didn't drive trains. Now I think they are a bunch of lying bastards.
Does anyone else get the sense that Erin Callan hasn't actually ever been to the Inland Empire?
And if banks, like Lehman, so badly misrepresented SoCal then what are the chances that their Asian real-estate investment pools are anything close to what they claim?
Now I think they are a bunch of lying bastards.
You're absolutely right.
And this sentence is a lie.
Actually, Jack, no. I get the sense that the majority of smart money didn't understand the oversupply and debt bubble problem and they got what they deserved. Personally, I deserve a harem, but, I didn't get that either.
Elvis, yep, it's easy to ignore those details when you're betting with OPM.
Yes, Jack, I see it every day and I shake my head. The pressure to invest when you have a pot of money is overpowering to most, and as a result, they lose other people's parent's moeny.
Has anybody else read the Bloomburg article about the IBs creating a clearinghouse for credit default swaps and other previously OTC derivatives? Too little, too late?
From Jan 2001 to June 2003 dropping the rate from 6.5% to 1% and holding it there until June 2004. From June 2004 to June 2006 raising the rate from 1% to 5.25% and holding it there until September 2007. September 2007 to now cutting from 5.25% down to 2%.
Historians are going to have a field day with GWB. Neither has someone so clueless been placed is such unfamiliar circumstances.
Jan 2001-June 2003: Bush enters office in Jan during the dot.com recession. Fed's already been lowering rates, but then 9/11 occurs in September causing a nationwide coma. God, instead using the low rates for a New Deal renewable energy package, he tells us to go shopping because that how we can beat the terrorists (now, they just own outright). Fed lowers interest rates all the way down to 1%, trying to get employment. All this money is basically going to overpriced housing; between real estate agents, non-reporting independent contractors, and illegal aliens, jobs were heavily understated, leading to the so-called jobless recovery. Because the Fed's job is to maintain full employment, it kept the rates low to maintain the putrid job growth as it were, so that GWB could claim 53 straight months of job growth. All the while, Wall Street uses this easy credit to create RMBS crack. And here we are.
What a freaking comedy of errors.
Who is this GWB you speak of and why didn't his parents spank him?
I rent an apartment in an Archstone-Smith apartment. I wonder if this means large rent increases for me in order to make up for Lehman's mistakes. One of my friends down the street is moving out of the apartment he's been renting for the past 4 years because the building was bought by some REIT (Vornado?) who jacked up the rents by 30%. Most of his floor is now unoccupied. I wonder is this is a broader trend. If it is, CPI will skyrocket.
With SSI at ~ 22% of the budget, skyrocketing CPI = very, very bad.
anymore bad news?
Bitter Renter,
May I suggest moving into a rent free REO?
Argento,
I heard there is flooding in the midwest and 7-11 is discontinuing the Slurpee due to potential brain freeze lawsuits.
If there are no takers, I must go to sleep.
Folks, Elvis is a troll. Ignore it.
I looked at few archstone apartments a few months ago. They are marketed as some sort of luxury apartment but they are complete crap. In Thousand Oaks they built a complex that is rather expensive right next to some low income housing. All the complexes I looked at had a lot of vacancies. I could only conclude the company was ran by Monkeys....low and behold it is!
REIT's in trouble, eh? What a surprise. Perhaps shorting them all via SRS isn't such a bad idea?
IYR has a big holding in Vornado. None in Archstone, unfortunately.
One of the reasons I like SRS so much is that IYR's biggest holding is Simon. This is what Simon does.
As of December 31, 2007, the company owned or held an interest in 320 income-producing properties in the United States, which consisted of 168 regional malls, 38 Premium Outlet centers, 67 community/lifestyle centers, 37 properties acquired in the Mills acquisition, and 10 other shopping centers or outlet centers in 41 states and Puerto Rico. The company also owns interests in 4 parcels of land held for future development in the United States;
Land values have probably fallen closer to 80% in parts of the Inland Empire. I've heard of bids right now at 20 cents on the dollar for some of these properties.
You know, what alot of people don't realize is to a large degree, it's not the cost of land that determines the cost of a house. Rather, the price of a house, minus the cost of construction yields the price of raw land. So if the price of houses goes down 20% and the cost of construction was 60% of the price of the house, than the price of raw land goes down 50%, until the price is determined by it's value for other uses, perhaps agriculture.
It seems like Lehman was drinking the Cool-Aid. To date, Goldman is looking the best of all the major I-banks during this debacle.
6% on the wrong side of the IQ bell curve.
OT but kind off funny:-)
so no more bearing the worst is over!!
BBC NEWS | Business | Risk of US downturn 'diminishes'
You also need to know that 5-6% is on the low side historically, but near the midpoint.
Okay, that makes a lot of sense. I thought the "stability" point was 3%, since you know for the past 8 years (my historesis) rates haven't been up to 7%. So basically we're in a plane that keeps stalling, and throttle up just enough to get stablity again... but then we stall again.
They sold $130 billion of asset that are junior in nature and took $17 billion in losses - does anyone know if any of the junior tranches trade 85-90%? - they are still talking about keeping upside on tranches/securites. Watchout for their LEVEL III assets...
There is an old statement to the effect that when you buy and hold raw California land you are making your grandchildren rich. I have a feeling that may have to be changed to great great grandchildren.
Re: Airplanes. If you C.G. moves aft of your center of lift you are in big trouble. If your thrust to weight ratio is above 1 then maybe the addition of power will save your ass. It would be a good idea to have very powerful flaps to help you control the pitch up. Best of Luck