Commercial real estate prices were up more than 5% nationally at the end of March from the same time last year, according to Standard & Poors March GRA Commercial Real Estate Indices.
A massive foreclosure rescue bill cleared a key Senate test Tuesday by an overwhelming margin, with Democrats and Republicans both eager to claim election-year credit for helping hard-pressed homeowners.
The mortgage aid plan would let the Federal Housing Administration back $300 billion in new, cheaper home loans for an estimated 400,000 distressed borrowers who otherwise would be considered too financially risky to qualify for government-insured, fixed-rate loans.
In 1999, former Senator Phil Gramm (who is, incidentally, Senator John McCain's economic adviser and cochairs his presidential campaign) set out to completely gut the Glass-Steagall Act, and did so successfully, replacing most of its components with the new Gramm-Leach-Bliley Act:
Never mind, I was looking at the second graph first. Based on the rate-of-change of the first graph in the early 1990s, we've seen over 50% of the final price decline but the remaining 40-45% decline will probably take three to four years to bottom.
That makes sense, i.e. the bulk of the pricing loss will be obscured by inflation, just like in the 1990s.
Yes, those are lubricated prices this time around. A bubble minus easy credit equals lubricated prices on the way down.
BTW, when Minneapolis home prices do this you know there is trouble. Unbearably cold 5 months of the year and terribly humid 4 months of the year. Leaves about 3 good months. Home prices should be 1/4 of the price of places with better weather.
Breaking down the performance for different property types, Blitzer says, In the property sector warehouse was the star performer during the March/February period, up 0.9%. The other three property sectors reported small positive returns. Confirming that a turnaround may be taking place following a weak 2007, apartments are showing the highest one-year return since March 2007, up 7.7%.
don't be the last one into commercial real estate. The next boom is upon us. Buy now or be priced out! Warehouses are hot!
Re: "The low price range is less than $408,960 (current dollars). Prices in this range have fallen 37.9% from the peak in real terms.
The mid-range is $408,960 to $617,001. Prices have fallen 32.5% in real terms."
Ok, yah, in about Jan 2000 one could have bought this range of housing for $408,960 US Dollars or one could have used US Dollar to buy Euros, e.g, we would have utilized $408,960 US $ to obtain about 434,233.728 Euros, hence if we had stuffed our Euros under the bed and brought them out to look at today, these Euros would now be able to obtain $676,101.9145 US Dollars.
Crazy baby! If you would have watched the stupidity of Bush and Iraq, this would have been a no brainer gain of $241,868.....but, no, everyone wanted to support the little bastard and buy into The Ownership Society Bullshit ConGame and trade up into a new fuck'n McMansion and fill the garage with gas guzzle machines and use The HELOC to tap into all those Patriotic durable goods that are now sinking in value faster than Congressional ratings!
Ok, that was dumb, because people like Dodd et al, in general borrow 100% @ zero down of $408,960 and then get a no doc loan with no interest and then refi later, so, sorry about that last post. My hat is held in shame!
Apologies to Tanta (goat really is quite tasty if they are young), but I recall you do like poetry. A poem for the CR community (from Upsidedown.com....yes I confess i checked to see if it was available:
"If ponies rode men and if grass ate cows,
And cats should be chased into holes by the mouse...
If summer were spring and the other way around,
Then all the world would be upside down. "
(Words of a popular tune reportedly played at the Surrender at Yorktown, 1781)
I'm more partial to the second poem except I'd change Death to one of the following:
Benny B,
Georgey B,
Cramer!
Who is in charge of the clattering train?
The axles creak and the couplings strain;
And the pace is hot, and the points are near,
And sleep has deadened the drivers ear;
And the signals flash through the night in vain,
For Death is in charge of the clattering train.
'Twixt my house and thy house the pathway is broad,
In thy house or my house is half the world's hoard;
By my house and thy house hangs all the world's fate,
On thy house and my house lies half the world's hate.
For my house and thy house no help shall we find
Save thy house and my house -- kin cleaving to kind;
If my house be taken, thine tumbleth anon.
If thy house be forfeit, mine followeth soon.
'Twixt my house and thy house what talk can there be
Of headship or lordship, or service or fee?
Since my house to thy house no greater can send
Than thy house to my house -- friend comforting friend;
And thy house to my house no meaner can bring
Than my house to thy house -- King counselling King.
Gee, where are the DemoKrats? Wait till the "savior" gets in.
diogenes | 06.24.08 - 7:05 pm | #
What an asshat idiotic comment !
Bush and the GOP have fucked up this country and esp. the middle class for at a decade !
25+ yrs of industrial production decline and increasingly financial engineered driven bullshit for the US economy ( especially last 8 yrs under Bush ) with massive market bubbles has created systemic damage.
The USA needs $2B a day from China et al or could not keep its economy stable or spare the dollar from collapse.
The USA already has close to $10 Trillion in national debt
The USA has a trade deficit of $800B/yr
The USA is the prime engine for derivatives 'ticking bomb' that grew into a massive bubble, from about $100 trillion in 2000 to $516 trillion by 2007 that is starting to go off in blowback stages and the latest ploys by the The Fed, G7 will have little effect to stop it.
The USA already has way too many Americans overwhelmed by personal debt racking up a household debt-to-income ratio of 1.42 ( for total of $13.8 trillion in debt including mortgages ) that already matches the countrys $14 trillion G.D.P.
The USA has Bushie boy racking up $32 Trillion dollars in total liabilities and unfunded commitments for future payments since 2000.
It will take 2 terms of Obama and a bigger majority in House and Senate to fix the tax cut and spend like a drunken sailor polices of the GOP.
This is obviously not an economic decision but a political one. Paying protection money to the US vs. Islamic nationaistic movements in the region. I don't think however than 5 billion is enough of a payback for the trillion spent by the US on recolonizing Iraq.
LOL - find out more about that okay? Sounds like a very funny story. But then when I first heard about flipping old houses I laughed then too...
I have a brother-in-law here who's done it profesionally for years, so I'll ask him, but the people I'm hearing this from are former co-workers that are talking about fellow white collar professionals doing it.
One of these guys who's trying to recruit me to go work for a financial company (lol) is coming over for a visit this week so I'll pump him for info.
But I hear a used SUV with 50k miles upgraded with burled walnut and granite cup holders is selling for 30% more than a new SUV off the lot now.
"If they're flipping Pruises, it just might work."
Read an article about Prius lust a couple of weeks ago; one dealer wanted $30K for a good-condition 2005 with the much-sought-after yellow sticker that allows the car to drive in the carpool lane.
psy·cho·sis (s-kss)
n. pl. psy·cho·ses (-sz)
A severe mental disorder, with or without organic damage, characterized by derangement of personality and loss of contact with reality and causing deterioration of normal social functioning.
So, has Tanta or anyone else that comes around now and then gone over H.R.3221?
Re: Revises funding for consumer education counseling and outreach to authorize the Secretary to use a portion of the mortgage insurance premiums to fund mandatory counseling and disclosure activities, including counseling for homeowners who elect not to take out a home equity conversion mortgage.
Car flipping to Europe - ex girlfriends husband does this into Holland. TJ Cruiser is the latest - he'll net $5k on the vehicle after costs to ship. Doing one or two per month, no less than $2k net per deal. Course he IS Dutch, so that helps.
It was the Gang Of Pedophiles who stopped Congress from passing the correct remedy--returning the power of BK judges to cram down mortgage principal, ensuring both parties pay a hefty price for the bad loan without turning entire cities into ghost towns. The current bill is just a substitute for that. It spares foreclosure, but at the cost of a huge haircut for the lender, and a recourse loan and foregone appreciation for the buyer.
It doesn't matter anyway. Nobody is going to declare a bonus over this weak tea.
The big underlying trend of the past 25 years, and of the last 7 in particular, has been the increasing concentration of wealth in a very small number of hands - roughly the top 0.1% in the US and a few European countries. They have managed to essentially capture all income growth for themselves, leaving everybody else with stagnant real incomes.
In that context, plentiful and cheap debt was a simple way to distract people from their plight, by giving them a convenient way (and, when backed by house price increases, an apparently safe one) to continue on spending even without the requisite income, and thus to feel prosperous.
That was a deliberate con, pushing the ideology of greed, idolising financial markets and the stupendous profits they seems to generate (but, in fact, capture from others), and driving the economy to focus on only one thing: corporate profits, at the expense of everything else, in particular wages and workers' perks and rights.
Tax cuts for the rich, pork for corporate friends, anti-labor propaganda everywhere, and cheap debt for everybody to "pay" for it or sugarcoat it.
To nades and Km4, Please learn something about your government and how it operates. The President (Dem or Rep) cannot spend one thin dime without Congressional approval. To blame Bush (who I agree is an idiot) for the deficit spending shows your ignorance. Bush has been able to spend like a drunken sailor with both a Rep. Congress and Dem. Congress. (i.e. Dem = Rep = Crooks!)
This isn't a political blog. Tanta doesn't like it when we stray too far off course.
We like Tanta and want to pull her away from her e-book to share her wisdom. Talking politics doesn't help. there are blogs for that if you are so inclined.
If you keep it up we will send conjure bag to feast on your dangly bits.
The big underlying trend of the past 25 years, and of the last 7 in particular, has been the increasing concentration of wealth in a very small number of hands - roughly the top 0.1% in the US and a few European countries. They have managed to essentially capture all income growth for themselves, leaving everybody else with stagnant real incomes.
Exactly the same trend we saw leading up to the Great Depression - wealth pooled in one part of the economy and the other part of the economy attempted to make up for it by borrowing.
The problem is even if the government tries to redistribute this wealth, the rich folks may decide to wage a financial war to protect it. It could be that we're already seeing that to some degree with the rising commodity prices.
Main Street America will find McPain appealing, as he advocates: dropping Federal prohibitions on offshore drilling; ramping up nuclear power; appointing constructionist judges who will not legislate from the bench; sealing the border first, before considering how to deal with illegals already here stateside.
"the power of BK judges to cram down mortgage principal"
are you serious? Lenders have a contract. They can foreclose or, if they decide to take the long odds in a losing bet, forgive principal to losers that probably won't pay anyhow. Let them decide what flavor shit sandwich they want to eat. Either way they get what they deserve.
It may turn out to be a race, after all.
jg | 06.24.08 - 7:51 pm | #
Was driving through rural Midwest today and saw a large gas guzzler van with BOTH a 'Jeebus Fish' and an Obama bumper sticker on the back... Did a double take to be sure it wasn't a Darwin Fish (legs) - nope, right the first time.
Passed it. White middle-aged hunter farmer type guy driving it. Did another double take.
Its gonna be the oddest race we've seen in decades. Hope the pop corn holds out - Iowa is under water you know.
On topic - Is the complacency amongst underwater debt-slaves a result of their belief that house prices fluctuate like the DOW, and this is just a momentary blip? I sense this is a common belief; perhaps time really is the crucial element in this mess - only time not resolving these crises will change people's behavior.
Prior house price declines tell us nothing about this one. This past year has seen the fastest drop ever, including the Great Depression. CA fell about 10 times as fast it did in the previous decline.
This decline is being driven by a very different mechanism from other post-WWII declines. In those, people mostly could afford their houses and mostly still had equity. They sold only when life changes forced them to. Now so many are profoundly overstretched and/or hopelessly underwater that they leave even without additional stresses. In earlier declines houses were held back from the market. In this one there's no stopping the REOs from hitting the market and making prices collapse.
Indications from areas that started the collapse somewhat early (San Diego, inland CA) are that it doesn't slow. I see no mechanism to halt the drop until renting becomes more expensive than owning, and that's what's going to happen. Until we reach that we will continue to see decline rates far exceeding those of any post-WWII collapse and rivaling or surpassing the Great Depression peak.
The mortgage bill is not a bailout. The Feds aren't going to spend very much, if anything. It will save taxpayers on the back-end by reducing transaction costs on foreclosures, which are going to end up in taxpayer laps via FDIC. It's just a way to encourage banks to take inevitable losses in a way somewhat less damaging to the overall economy when possible (specifically, avoiding foreclosure when the current residents could afford the house at a fair price.) The only risk is that appraisal fraud could be used to defraud the government now.
It's far less consequential than either its detractors or proponents say. It's supposed to help 400,000 homeowners, but such estimates are always optimistic (remember Hope Now?). Possibly very optimistic. I'd be pleasantly surprised if it helps 150,000. In the face of millions of foreclosures it's just not going to make much difference. It will save some foreclosure costs, slightly reduce the overshoot, but things will still be worse than the MSM can yet imagine.
Sorry Fair Economist, but I've actually read the bill and I call bullshit.
The only way the bill doesn't cost the taxpayers is under the most optimistic scenario, basically where home values stop falling soon, and the foreclosure rate doesn't get much worse. Like that's going to happen.
The worst case scenario is a $40 billion cost to the taxpayers. And the loans are backed by Ginnie Mae, which has an explicit govt backstop.
Anything that costs me or my kids a dime, when I behaved responsibly and didn't buy a Mc-shithouse at 10x my income or get HELOC'd out the ying-yang, is a bailout.
Why not just let the market run its course? Some banks would fail, and some idiots would go back to renting.
The Feds only make loans 15% less than a current appraisal and become first position, and only if the new loan is readily affordable. For them to lose we have to go something like 25% down from where things are now. That's not going to happen.
On topic - Is the complacency amongst underwater debt-slaves a result of their belief that house prices fluctuate like the DOW, and this is just a momentary blip?
I live in the infamous Bay Area. What you state above is how the mortgage-holders I know here sleep at night.
Previously, what was allowing them into dreamtime was the thought that "things are different here."
They are indeed different here: 25% off y-o-y on a median home is a ~$150,000 loss on a property that's bleeding you to the tune of $5k/month.
For fun, I ran the numbers: 25% loss is 14 years of equity on a 30 year loan at 6%.
I'm opposed to a bailout in general, but, once the government has made the decision to bail out the banks, I think that a bailout for people becomes morally required. Bailing out the former, but not the latter, is the worst possible option.
This Minneapolis homeowner is glad to own a duplex in Nordeast, which is more resistant to price declines, since zoning changes prohibit any new ones being built or converted.
"The only risk is that appraisal fraud could be used to defraud the government now." -Fair Economist
What about the impact of the flood of low-ball appraisals for distressed properties depressing prices even further for those who are not currently distressed? Wouldn't this serve to INCREASE the number of distressed properties?
What about the impact of the flood of low-ball appraisals for distressed properties depressing prices even further for those who are not currently distressed? Wouldn't this serve to INCREASE the number of distressed properties?
I don't think appraisals are supposed to be based on appraisals, so no. IIRC the feds will be doing their own appraisals anyway so it takes corruption to mess them up.
First, thanks for digging up the tiered price numbers. A great piece of work. I already posted a link on my blog to get people here so they can get to the numbers.
Second, Fair Economist Wrote,
The mortgage bill is not a bailout. The Feds aren't going to spend very much, if anything. It will save taxpayers on the back-end by reducing transaction costs on foreclosures, which are going to end up in taxpayer laps via FDIC. It's just a way to encourage banks to take inevitable losses in a way somewhat less damaging to the overall economy when possible (specifically, avoiding foreclosure when the current residents could afford the house at a fair price.) The only risk is that appraisal fraud could be used to defraud the government now.
To which I would respond:
There is no way to determine the cost of the bailout until the costs are realized. Whether or not it costs money is highly dependent on any number of factors which have nothing at all to do with housing. Fair economist is making a WAG which is what the appraisers call a wild ass guess. Somehow, I doubt it is going to be inexpensive given the fact that the head of the FHA is practically pleading with Congress not to do it.
By the way how do you determine a "fair" price for a house.
On a brighter note:
Commercial real estate prices were up more than 5% nationally at the end of March from the same time last year, according to Standard & Poors March GRA Commercial Real Estate Indices.
Commercial Property Prices Still Gaining
Everything is ok again....
(unless of course you live at the lower end in LA and dont own commerical property!)
A massive foreclosure rescue bill cleared a key Senate test Tuesday by an overwhelming margin, with Democrats and Republicans both eager to claim election-year credit for helping hard-pressed homeowners.
The mortgage aid plan would let the Federal Housing Administration back $300 billion in new, cheaper home loans for an estimated 400,000 distressed borrowers who otherwise would be considered too financially risky to qualify for government-insured, fixed-rate loans.
The article requested is no longer available.
The Subprime Mess and Phil Gramm: An Experiment in Deregulation
The Subprime Mess and Phil Gramm: An Experiment in Deregulation | InjuryBoard Los Angeles
In 1999, former Senator Phil Gramm (who is, incidentally, Senator John McCain's economic adviser and cochairs his presidential campaign) set out to completely gut the Glass-Steagall Act, and did so successfully, replacing most of its components with the new Gramm-Leach-Bliley Act:
I'd love to see some high end numbers. $2m+ stuff.
CR - can you run this data series back to 1985? I'd sure like to see the rate-of-change of the down curve to compare to the current rate of change.
It's damn steep right now, implying that the half-way point has passed, i.e. more than 50% of the final price decline has occurred.
And I just don't think that's true based on income/price ratios.
I think they started tracking in 2000
no earlier data
Never mind, I was looking at the second graph first. Based on the rate-of-change of the first graph in the early 1990s, we've seen over 50% of the final price decline but the remaining 40-45% decline will probably take three to four years to bottom.
That makes sense, i.e. the bulk of the pricing loss will be obscured by inflation, just like in the 1990s.
Yes, those are lubricated prices this time around. A bubble minus easy credit equals lubricated prices on the way down.
BTW, when Minneapolis home prices do this you know there is trouble. Unbearably cold 5 months of the year and terribly humid 4 months of the year. Leaves about 3 good months. Home prices should be 1/4 of the price of places with better weather.
Nades, thanks for the heads up. I like this part.
Breaking down the performance for different property types, Blitzer says, In the property sector warehouse was the star performer during the March/February period, up 0.9%. The other three property sectors reported small positive returns. Confirming that a turnaround may be taking place following a weak 2007, apartments are showing the highest one-year return since March 2007, up 7.7%.
don't be the last one into commercial real estate. The next boom is upon us. Buy now or be priced out! Warehouses are hot!
Looks like we've hit a bottom. And just in time, phew!
Re: "The low price range is less than $408,960 (current dollars). Prices in this range have fallen 37.9% from the peak in real terms.
The mid-range is $408,960 to $617,001. Prices have fallen 32.5% in real terms."
Ok, yah, in about Jan 2000 one could have bought this range of housing for $408,960 US Dollars or one could have used US Dollar to buy Euros, e.g, we would have utilized $408,960 US $ to obtain about 434,233.728 Euros, hence if we had stuffed our Euros under the bed and brought them out to look at today, these Euros would now be able to obtain $676,101.9145 US Dollars.
Crazy baby! If you would have watched the stupidity of Bush and Iraq, this would have been a no brainer gain of $241,868.....but, no, everyone wanted to support the little bastard and buy into The Ownership Society Bullshit ConGame and trade up into a new fuck'n McMansion and fill the garage with gas guzzle machines and use The HELOC to tap into all those Patriotic durable goods that are now sinking in value faster than Congressional ratings!
Ok, that was dumb, because people like Dodd et al, in general borrow 100% @ zero down of $408,960 and then get a no doc loan with no interest and then refi later, so, sorry about that last post. My hat is held in shame!
Do they seasonally adjust these? I notice the MN graph is a lot bumpier.
Maybe it's harder to get the seasonal adjustments right in a place that has real seasons.
I remember how shocked I was when I spent a year up north and it literally went from snowing one week (in May) to being 80 degrees the next.
don't be the last one into commercial real estate. The next boom is upon us. Buy now or be priced out! Warehouses are hot!
Recently I've had several people tell me they have friends that are flipping cars.
I'm not kidding.
It takes years to rinse out the smell of a bubble.
Bailout nays. Please acknowledge & reward those that refused to buckle to the banking lobby
NAYs ---9
Barrasso (R-WY)
Bond (R-MO)
Bunning (R-KY)
Crapo (R-ID)
DeMint (R-SC)
Ensign (R-NV)
Enzi (R-WY)
Kyl (R-AZ)
Vitter (R-LA)
U.S. Senate: Legislation & Records Home > Votes > Roll Call Vote
Apologies to Tanta (goat really is quite tasty if they are young), but I recall you do like poetry. A poem for the CR community (from Upsidedown.com....yes I confess i checked to see if it was available:
ac - In the USA we are "all bubble, all the time"
i think the romans discovered a recipe for a good bubble detergent. I have it somewhere.
the article that Nades posted just makes me chuckle about my good fortune.
i assume part of this is a function of sales velocity at various levels price levels with the 500K having a very slow rate of change
barely wrote:
Bailout nays. Please acknowledge & reward those that refused to buckle to the banking lobby.
Gee, where are the DemoKrats? Wait till the "savior" gets in.
Recently I've had several people tell me they have friends that are flipping cars.
I'm not kidding.
LOL - find out more about that okay? Sounds like a very funny story. But then when I first heard about flipping old houses I laughed then too...
Recently I've had several people tell me they have friends that are flipping cars.
I'm not kidding.
If they're flipping Pruises, it just might work.
12th,
I'm more partial to the second poem except I'd change Death to one of the following:
Benny B,
Georgey B,
Cramer!
Who is in charge of the clattering train?
The axles creak and the couplings strain;
And the pace is hot, and the points are near,
And sleep has deadened the drivers ear;
And the signals flash through the night in vain,
For Death is in charge of the clattering train.
The Houses
1898 -- A Song of the Dominions
'Twixt my house and thy house the pathway is broad,
In thy house or my house is half the world's hoard;
By my house and thy house hangs all the world's fate,
On thy house and my house lies half the world's hate.
For my house and thy house no help shall we find
Save thy house and my house -- kin cleaving to kind;
If my house be taken, thine tumbleth anon.
If thy house be forfeit, mine followeth soon.
'Twixt my house and thy house what talk can there be
Of headship or lordship, or service or fee?
Since my house to thy house no greater can send
Than thy house to my house -- friend comforting friend;
And thy house to my house no meaner can bring
Than my house to thy house -- King counselling King.
Rudyard Kipling
Nades
I also preferred that. But some people seem to think i'm too negative so I picked the other.
"and the signals flash through the night in vain"
Bob,
Good find!
Gee, where are the DemoKrats? Wait till the "savior" gets in.
diogenes | 06.24.08 - 7:05 pm | #
What an asshat idiotic comment !
Bush and the GOP have fucked up this country and esp. the middle class for at a decade !
25+ yrs of industrial production decline and increasingly financial engineered driven bullshit for the US economy ( especially last 8 yrs under Bush ) with massive market bubbles has created systemic damage.
It will take 2 terms of Obama and a bigger majority in House and Senate to fix the tax cut and spend like a drunken sailor polices of the GOP.
Kuwait pumps 5 billion into Citi and Merrill.
Expired
This is obviously not an economic decision but a political one. Paying protection money to the US vs. Islamic nationaistic movements in the region. I don't think however than 5 billion is enough of a payback for the trillion spent by the US on recolonizing Iraq.
barely,
You forgot:
Not Voting - 8
Allard (R-CO)
Brownback (R-KS)
Clinton (D-NY)
Coburn (R-OK)
Inhofe (R-OK)
Kennedy (D-MA)
McCain (R-AZ)
Obama (D-IL)
"and the signals flash through the night in vain" also my favorite part...
Some day us humans will learn... I'm not holding my breath tho....
Rudyard Kipling
Bob Burns Hoiliday | 06.24.08 - 7:10 pm | #
Touching. Of course he sent his son to his death because he was a friggin' imperialist warmonger.
LOL - find out more about that okay? Sounds like a very funny story. But then when I first heard about flipping old houses I laughed then too...
I have a brother-in-law here who's done it profesionally for years, so I'll ask him, but the people I'm hearing this from are former co-workers that are talking about fellow white collar professionals doing it.
One of these guys who's trying to recruit me to go work for a financial company (lol) is coming over for a visit this week so I'll pump him for info.
But I hear a used SUV with 50k miles upgraded with burled walnut and granite cup holders is selling for 30% more than a new SUV off the lot now.
Sins of the Father
Kuwait pumps 5 billion into Citi and Merrill.
OMG it's Dubai Ports all over again.
Terror mortgages.
"If they're flipping Pruises, it just might work."
Read an article about Prius lust a couple of weeks ago; one dealer wanted $30K for a good-condition 2005 with the much-sought-after yellow sticker that allows the car to drive in the carpool lane.
McCain: Offshore drilling provides beneficial psychological impact.
Bush psychosis now McCain psychosis
psy·cho·sis (s-kss)
n. pl. psy·cho·ses (-sz)
A severe mental disorder, with or without organic damage, characterized by derangement of personality and loss of contact with reality and causing deterioration of normal social functioning.
GOP = party of psychotics
So, has Tanta or anyone else that comes around now and then gone over H.R.3221?
Re: Revises funding for consumer education counseling and outreach to authorize the Secretary to use a portion of the mortgage insurance premiums to fund mandatory counseling and disclosure activities, including counseling for homeowners who elect not to take out a home equity conversion mortgage.
On gas prices i asked this before at the end of an old thread:
Is $5.00 / gallon gas here to stay? A co-worker and i were discussing this but neither of us know squat. Any oil junkies have a semi-educated opinion?
TIA!
GOP = party of psychotics
How about Grande Ol Psychotics
How about Grande Ol Psychotics
Anonymous | 06.24.08 - 7:23 pm | #
Yes that works !
how about Goofy Old Psychos...
Car flipping to Europe - ex girlfriends husband does this into Holland. TJ Cruiser is the latest - he'll net $5k on the vehicle after costs to ship. Doing one or two per month, no less than $2k net per deal. Course he IS Dutch, so that helps.
Notice how NO DEMOCRATS VOTED AGAINST THE LENDER BAILOUT ? Who are their masters ?
How about Great Overlords of Peons (i.e., DemoRats).
Oh, sorry. I probably hurt the feelings of m-t-, Gary, James, Detroit Dan et al.
Won't happen again.
It was the Gang Of Pedophiles who stopped Congress from passing the correct remedy--returning the power of BK judges to cram down mortgage principal, ensuring both parties pay a hefty price for the bad loan without turning entire cities into ghost towns. The current bill is just a substitute for that. It spares foreclosure, but at the cost of a huge haircut for the lender, and a recourse loan and foregone appreciation for the buyer.
It doesn't matter anyway. Nobody is going to declare a bonus over this weak tea.
Geriatric Obnoxious Psychotics
I am hoping that the shrub finally figures out how that veto thingy works and someone hands him a pen and teaches him to use it.
The big underlying trend of the past 25 years, and of the last 7 in particular, has been the increasing concentration of wealth in a very small number of hands - roughly the top 0.1% in the US and a few European countries. They have managed to essentially capture all income growth for themselves, leaving everybody else with stagnant real incomes.
In that context, plentiful and cheap debt was a simple way to distract people from their plight, by giving them a convenient way (and, when backed by house price increases, an apparently safe one) to continue on spending even without the requisite income, and thus to feel prosperous.
That was a deliberate con, pushing the ideology of greed, idolising financial markets and the stupendous profits they seems to generate (but, in fact, capture from others), and driving the economy to focus on only one thing: corporate profits, at the expense of everything else, in particular wages and workers' perks and rights.
Tax cuts for the rich, pork for corporate friends, anti-labor propaganda everywhere, and cheap debt for everybody to "pay" for it or sugarcoat it.
Daily Kos: Oil, housing, dollar: the Blogs told you so.
To nades and Km4, Please learn something about your government and how it operates. The President (Dem or Rep) cannot spend one thin dime without Congressional approval. To blame Bush (who I agree is an idiot) for the deficit spending shows your ignorance. Bush has been able to spend like a drunken sailor with both a Rep. Congress and Dem. Congress. (i.e. Dem = Rep = Crooks!)
Audio Junkie please pontificate to lesser minds.
Km4, No pontification; I just expect more from the people on this blog than unfounded rhetoric
Public Service Announcement:
This isn't a political blog. Tanta doesn't like it when we stray too far off course.
We like Tanta and want to pull her away from her e-book to share her wisdom. Talking politics doesn't help. there are blogs for that if you are so inclined.
If you keep it up we will send conjure bag to feast on your dangly bits.
The big underlying trend of the past 25 years, and of the last 7 in particular, has been the increasing concentration of wealth in a very small number of hands - roughly the top 0.1% in the US and a few European countries. They have managed to essentially capture all income growth for themselves, leaving everybody else with stagnant real incomes.
Exactly the same trend we saw leading up to the Great Depression - wealth pooled in one part of the economy and the other part of the economy attempted to make up for it by borrowing.
The problem is even if the government tries to redistribute this wealth, the rich folks may decide to wage a financial war to protect it. It could be that we're already seeing that to some degree with the rising commodity prices.
Getting Os--- Panicking.
Soon enough.
Main Street America will find McPain appealing, as he advocates: dropping Federal prohibitions on offshore drilling; ramping up nuclear power; appointing constructionist judges who will not legislate from the bench; sealing the border first, before considering how to deal with illegals already here stateside.
It may turn out to be a race, after all.
12th Percentile; Point taken.
Okay, you invoked the name of T- and no politics.
No mas from me.
"If any question why we died,tell them,because our fathers lied."Kipling at his briefest,and true of most wars.
"the power of BK judges to cram down mortgage principal"
are you serious? Lenders have a contract. They can foreclose or, if they decide to take the long odds in a losing bet, forgive principal to losers that probably won't pay anyhow. Let them decide what flavor shit sandwich they want to eat. Either way they get what they deserve.
But I hear a used SUV with 50k miles upgraded with burled walnut and granite cup holders is selling for 30% more than a new SUV off the lot now. -ac
Beanie Babies with wheels... wow. Now I've seen everything. I suppose at the end of this mania we'll see pimped SUVs selling on street corners too...
GREEDY Old Psychos.
Could someone pass me a Kleenex as I shed a tear:
Financial Firms May Make Deeper Cuts, Eliminate 175,000 Jobs - Bloomberg.com
Dryfly,visit oakland or san jose.
diogenes writes:
Gee, where are the DemoKrats? Wait till the "savior" gets in.
And wouldn't the GOP know about presidents touted as superhuman saviors who turn out to be abject, total failures!
It may turn out to be a race, after all.
jg | 06.24.08 - 7:51 pm | #
Was driving through rural Midwest today and saw a large gas guzzler van with BOTH a 'Jeebus Fish' and an Obama bumper sticker on the back... Did a double take to be sure it wasn't a Darwin Fish (legs) - nope, right the first time.
Passed it. White middle-aged hunter farmer type guy driving it. Did another double take.
Its gonna be the oddest race we've seen in decades. Hope the pop corn holds out - Iowa is under water you know.
Yes, those are lubricated prices this time around. A bubble minus easy credit equals lubricated prices on the way down.
The phrase "happy cat on wet linoleum" comes to mind.
Any fresh LEH rumors lately?
Yep, d-, I think there will be a strong populist element in this race.
We'll see how it sorts out.
On topic - Is the complacency amongst underwater debt-slaves a result of their belief that house prices fluctuate like the DOW, and this is just a momentary blip? I sense this is a common belief; perhaps time really is the crucial element in this mess - only time not resolving these crises will change people's behavior.
are you serious? Lenders have a contract.
Pity Tanta isn't around in the thread. I love watching her eviscerate people.
Prior house price declines tell us nothing about this one. This past year has seen the fastest drop ever, including the Great Depression. CA fell about 10 times as fast it did in the previous decline.
This decline is being driven by a very different mechanism from other post-WWII declines. In those, people mostly could afford their houses and mostly still had equity. They sold only when life changes forced them to. Now so many are profoundly overstretched and/or hopelessly underwater that they leave even without additional stresses. In earlier declines houses were held back from the market. In this one there's no stopping the REOs from hitting the market and making prices collapse.
Indications from areas that started the collapse somewhat early (San Diego, inland CA) are that it doesn't slow. I see no mechanism to halt the drop until renting becomes more expensive than owning, and that's what's going to happen. Until we reach that we will continue to see decline rates far exceeding those of any post-WWII collapse and rivaling or surpassing the Great Depression peak.
The mortgage bill is not a bailout. The Feds aren't going to spend very much, if anything. It will save taxpayers on the back-end by reducing transaction costs on foreclosures, which are going to end up in taxpayer laps via FDIC. It's just a way to encourage banks to take inevitable losses in a way somewhat less damaging to the overall economy when possible (specifically, avoiding foreclosure when the current residents could afford the house at a fair price.) The only risk is that appraisal fraud could be used to defraud the government now.
It's far less consequential than either its detractors or proponents say. It's supposed to help 400,000 homeowners, but such estimates are always optimistic (remember Hope Now?). Possibly very optimistic. I'd be pleasantly surprised if it helps 150,000. In the face of millions of foreclosures it's just not going to make much difference. It will save some foreclosure costs, slightly reduce the overshoot, but things will still be worse than the MSM can yet imagine.
Grandpa McCain and his crazy spiritual advisor John Hagee is praying for another terrorist incident in hopes that will get him elected.
Had enough?
Sorry Fair Economist, but I've actually read the bill and I call bullshit.
The only way the bill doesn't cost the taxpayers is under the most optimistic scenario, basically where home values stop falling soon, and the foreclosure rate doesn't get much worse. Like that's going to happen.
The worst case scenario is a $40 billion cost to the taxpayers. And the loans are backed by Ginnie Mae, which has an explicit govt backstop.
Anything that costs me or my kids a dime, when I behaved responsibly and didn't buy a Mc-shithouse at 10x my income or get HELOC'd out the ying-yang, is a bailout.
Why not just let the market run its course? Some banks would fail, and some idiots would go back to renting.
The Feds only make loans 15% less than a current appraisal and become first position, and only if the new loan is readily affordable. For them to lose we have to go something like 25% down from where things are now. That's not going to happen.
oops, Anon 10:10 is me.
On topic - Is the complacency amongst underwater debt-slaves a result of their belief that house prices fluctuate like the DOW, and this is just a momentary blip?
I live in the infamous Bay Area. What you state above is how the mortgage-holders I know here sleep at night.
Previously, what was allowing them into dreamtime was the thought that "things are different here."
They are indeed different here: 25% off y-o-y on a median home is a ~$150,000 loss on a property that's bleeding you to the tune of $5k/month.
For fun, I ran the numbers: 25% loss is 14 years of equity on a 30 year loan at 6%.
"...something like 25% down from where things are now. That's not going to happen."
Yeah, because real estate never goes down.
I'm opposed to a bailout in general, but, once the government has made the decision to bail out the banks, I think that a bailout for people becomes morally required. Bailing out the former, but not the latter, is the worst possible option.
This Minneapolis homeowner is glad to own a duplex in Nordeast, which is more resistant to price declines, since zoning changes prohibit any new ones being built or converted.
"The only risk is that appraisal fraud could be used to defraud the government now." -Fair Economist
What about the impact of the flood of low-ball appraisals for distressed properties depressing prices even further for those who are not currently distressed? Wouldn't this serve to INCREASE the number of distressed properties?
What about the impact of the flood of low-ball appraisals for distressed properties depressing prices even further for those who are not currently distressed? Wouldn't this serve to INCREASE the number of distressed properties?
I don't think appraisals are supposed to be based on appraisals, so no. IIRC the feds will be doing their own appraisals anyway so it takes corruption to mess them up.
Two things.
First, thanks for digging up the tiered price numbers. A great piece of work. I already posted a link on my blog to get people here so they can get to the numbers.
Second, Fair Economist Wrote,
The mortgage bill is not a bailout. The Feds aren't going to spend very much, if anything. It will save taxpayers on the back-end by reducing transaction costs on foreclosures, which are going to end up in taxpayer laps via FDIC. It's just a way to encourage banks to take inevitable losses in a way somewhat less damaging to the overall economy when possible (specifically, avoiding foreclosure when the current residents could afford the house at a fair price.) The only risk is that appraisal fraud could be used to defraud the government now.
To which I would respond:
There is no way to determine the cost of the bailout until the costs are realized. Whether or not it costs money is highly dependent on any number of factors which have nothing at all to do with housing. Fair economist is making a WAG which is what the appraisers call a wild ass guess. Somehow, I doubt it is going to be inexpensive given the fact that the head of the FHA is practically pleading with Congress not to do it.
By the way how do you determine a "fair" price for a house.
I would guess there are more than a few in Southern California hoping for the wildfires to spread.