50-55% LTV for hotel finance hasn't emerged as the norm for limited service hotel projects (e.g. Courtyard, Hampton Inn). 70-75% LTV is market right now for good projects with strong sponsorship (operator and flag). I'm guessing Jim is talking about big ticket resort/luxury projects.
A weekend of steampunks, Flaming Lotus Girls, LED Hula Hoops, power tool drag racing, and combat robots. A geekfest par excellence. A sovereign vacation from economic gloominess.
Once again, Las Vegas leads the way in insanity. Wynn is the prime example of overstretch- he did it in the 90s and almost lost everything. I stood at the intersection of Flamingo and the Strip and counted 15 big cranes in use within view. 15!!! There isn't enough money coming into vegas with these oil prices to sustain the current level of properties and rooms- and there is how much under construction?
WTF? Who financed this pile of stuff?
Who is going to take those magnificent losses? Another Trump development? Who the heck is stupid enough to invest with Trump with his track record?
Geez, there are still tons of losses to be realized!!!
I can hardly wait to see this bit o' history repeat again.
"It is appalling where we are right now," former St. Louis Fed President William Poole, who retired in March, said in an interview. The Fed has introduced "a backstop for the entire financial system."
The Fed's loans to Bear Stearns were "a rogue operation,'' said Anna Schwartz, who co-wrote "A Monetary History of the United States'' with the late Nobel laureate Milton Friedman.
my take...yeah it was appalling...but the alternative was total market meltdown...but if we don't get some justice along the way, just maybe the meltdwon might have been preferable...just maybe
The blue line on that graf is just ca-raaazy! It looks like the grafs for issuance of nonconforming mortgages. Why did we need to more than double our investment in hotels in a mere two years? Why did people with millions of dollars to lend think this was a good idea? Hotels are great investments in Monopoly, I suppose.
Looks like the madness was NOT just confined to home mortgages.
Linens 'n Things files for bankruptcy protection NEW YORK - A Chapter 11 bankruptcy filing by Linens 'n Things is the latest sign that the retail sector is becoming leaner and meaner amid a difficult consumer environment.
On Friday, the bedding- and home-furnishing retailer filed a petition in bankruptcy court in Delaware and said it would close 120 underperforming stores, almost a quarter of them in California.
Here's a terrific comment from a Realtor on the blog post that Cal mentions above:
The saddest thing about property values declining is that they don't have to be! The housing market....even in the most over-heated of markets... is fundamentally strong. Housing formations and the population keep going up. There was a reason that the markets that over-heated did so. Because they were desirable!
If they "fix" the credit markets, the housing markets will come roaring back and there will be no need to paint scarlet "D"s on any body's front door!
"During the first quarter about $29 billion in home equity was cashed out through refinance of conventional loans made to prime borrowers, off from a downwardly revised $36 billion cashed out in the fourth quarter of 2007. This is about one-third of the amount cashed out in the same quarter a year earlier," said Amy Crews Cutts, Freddie Mac deputy chief economist. "While research has shown a limited effect in the current quarter of equity conversion into cash, the reduced equity extraction we saw in the first quarter will likely be felt in the consumption and investment decisions of households later on
By "great sponsorship" they mean somebody who is good for 25% recourse. That is very different from last year, even if they only went from 75% LTV to 70%.
But these [SF bay area] cities, these rare areas of healthy real estate, will be DRIVEN TO DECLINE by these policies. These areas are victims of REVERSE DISCRIMINATION. These areas must pay the price so that those other areas (with foreclosures) do not poison the bank's ailing real estate portfolio. Why? Just because they are in the same county, all of which has been painted with the same declining value brush.
Looks like the poor SF Bay Area is being "driven to decline" through "reverse discrimination". Sniff, sniff... if only we could've had some containment to those who deserved it!
mock turtle, I kept it the same as the data from the BEA (in millions). It would probably be clearer in billions (the data is quarterly at the seasonally adjusted annual rate).
The peak for non-residential structures (ex-lodging) was about $450 billion.
Cal's link is funmy, depressing and eye-opening all at the same time. Yeah - just keep giving loans to people who can't pay them back, and people will start buying again!
These are the people who were advising FTHB on the biggest investment in their lives.
What IS it doing to res in CA. That is very close to what is happening in Jumbo land.... the lender promises 70% LTV, comes in low on the appraisal, then the appraisal manager slashes another 15% from the appraisal "just in case". BINGO 55%
You're talking about 55% LTV. But what about the other 45%, nobody seems to be talking about that.
The people on this blog don't seem to understand real estate finance. Here's someone who does.
"...Ritke provided a general example of the economics of this: You live in a house you value at $300,000 and the house you want to move up to is priced at $500,000. If you give a discount of 10 percent ($30,000) on your house and get a 10 percent discount ($50,000) on the new home, you just made $20,000 in equity...
Good one. And Your debt service increased $180,000 so that $20,000 in instant equity is costing you ~70% APR provided there is no depreciation. Indeed for this to make any sense as a purely financial exercise the new house would need to appreciate 5-6% per annum minimum.
The a$$hats in that article are the worst form of pump and dumpers. anyone buying a home right now is the smart buyer, Ritke said. And what does Ritke do? He sells houses. He's President of Will-Grundy Counties Home Builders and Associates. Always ask yourself why they are doing the exact opposite (selling) of what they are advising others. The only thing that comes close is Sam Zell recently.
One big question I have about the hotel market generally is what's going to happen with all the condo hotels? I always found that concept a little suspect, and in a downturn it would seem even more so.
He's President of Will-Grundy Counties Home Builders and Associates.
Ever been to Will or Grundy County? We're talking Romeoville, Joliet & Morris Illinois.
Its another one of those 'walk away' counties... way out suburb/exurbs of Chicago with way too much building & development & far to few good local jobs (meaning hellacious commutes for most - straight into the teeth of some of Chicago area's most congested highways).
And Rob't we aren't talking 'Ventura County Chablis' vintage exurbs - we're talking 'mass produced plastic sided cookie cutter interstate exit development' exurbs. The OTHER kind of exurb...
I would expect there would be VERY significant 'discounts' in those counties - there would have to be to draw bids from any would be knife catchers... especially with $3.50 gas driving a four year old SUV (with three more years of payments to go).
"...Ritke provided a general example of the economics of this: You live in a house you value at $300,000 and the house you want to move up to is priced at $500,000. If you give a discount of 10 percent ($30,000) on your house and get a 10 percent discount ($50,000) on the new home, you just made $20,000 in equity...
These people were proven dumb-as-stumps 2 years ago. How did they get back in the limelight? Why does America think the more BS shilling will solve the deep economic issues. Buy houses and stocks, why? Because that's all we know here in America.
dryfly, too funny. VC Chablis! Seriously though, Ventura County developments are nothing special. Substitute "foam and stucco" for "plastic". Right on the freeway, they all lead onto the 101 and major congestion into either Santa Barabara or LA.
John Stark writes:
The blue line on that graf is just ca-raaazy! It looks like the grafs for issuance of nonconforming mortgages. Why did we need to more than double our investment in hotels in a mere two years? Why did people with millions of dollars to lend think this was a good idea? Hotels are great investments in Monopoly, I suppose.
Looks like the madness was NOT just confined to home mortgages.
John Stark | 05.03.08 - 12:35 am | #
To get back on topic - I think Mr. Stark hit the nail on the head - too many!!!
I travel a lot of the central US and from what I can see there are WAY too many mid-priced chain hotels and the rates they charge are outrageous.
I'm not talking major metros - I can see why those would cost a pretty penny (high demand, high cost of land limited supply = high cost)... But $75 a night in Mauston Wisconsin (off I 94 halfway between Chicago & Minneapolis and a so-so chain)? Give me a break...
I am now far more sensitive to the trade off of long drive vs overnight stay. As a result I've done 'day trips' DRIVING from my home in small town SE Minnesota to Milwaukee or Chicago and back - all in one day. My vehicle gets 50 mpg diesel so at highway speed its about $6/hr to drive... six hours each way & six hours of business - its a wash... get up early get home late - no hotel & eat/sleep mostly at home. Come down to which is worse - sitting in my car or sitting in a chain motel... hmmmm tough choice.
The only way I stay over is if I have multiple days of work there OR early morning appt's - about 50-50%.
I can't quite do the same in Omaha, KC or St Louis - more than one day out... but can do it for almost all of central Iowa, NW Minnesota, etc.
I am running into more road warriors like me re-thinking the cost of being on the road.
dryfly writes:
...Will or Grundy County? We're talking Romeoville, Joliet & Morris Illinois.
...And Rob't we aren't talking 'Ventura County Chablis' vintage exurbs - we're talking 'mass produced plastic sided cookie cutter interstate exit development' exurbs. The OTHER kind of exurb...
If it weren't so early here on the left coast I'd lift my glass. Will a mug of Dunkin' Donuts coffee suffice?
For all their evil google does quick mapping pretty darn well.
Romeoville: romeoville, il - Google Maps
Kinda like Oxnard with snow: htttp://tinyurl.com/5hgfvs
It isn't so much the exurbs that will get killed as the recently developed product types independent of location.
Gulf states are considering dropping their pegs to the dollar, which has fallen 13 percent against the euro in the last 12 months, after the U.S. currency's decline stoked inflation across the region, Kuwaiti Finance Minister Mustafa al- Shimali said yesterday. Inflation is close to 10 percent in Saudi Arabia and the U.A.E., while Qatar's consumer prices rose 14 percent in the fourth quarter.
snip
Gulf states should not end their pegs to the dollar because the U.S. currency's fall is nearing an end, Henry Azzam, Deutsche Bank's chief executive officer for the Middle East and North Africa, said. The worst is behind us in terms of interest rate declines internationally and on local currencies,'' Azzam said in an interview today at the Arab Economic Forum in Beirut.Let's not do anything today structural to cope with a cyclical phenomenon that is coming to its close and could affect us for many years.''
hummmm
seem to recall saddam h stating in 2002 he would soon no longer market oil in dollars. guess he lost his head over the whole affair.
Bob in Ma,
I've stayed at those extended stay places while on long projects. They charge about 3 times going rents, but are furnished. I think those are all about location. If there's enough consulting or other large firms with high paying jobs AND they bought well, I think they'll fair OK.
For example, we were paying $3,400 for a one bedroom that would have sold for, say $200-250k at peak. If they bought at peak, I don't think they would survive lean times. If they bought before 2002, I think they'd be fine.
Just outside DC, FYI.
Dry, Did you feel double crossed when the price of deisel went up $.80/gal? What's that about? A family member bought a deisel about a year ago and now regrets it.
All my colleagues drive Lexus, BMW, Infinity, so I had to splurge myself. I bought some Turtle Wax and put two (2) coats on my Accord. One colleague even told me what a nice looking car I had.
It isn't so much the exurbs that will get killed as the recently developed product types independent of location.
Rob Dawg | Homepage | 05.03.08 - 10:32 am | #
Exactly - that's why I haven't joined in on the 'pile on dog' over exurbs per se... there are the right ways to do it 7 the wrong ways & lotsa stereo-types to over come.
That also applies to 'urbanism' - it can work but you have to get past stereotypes - good & bad.
Point is Will & Grundy are mostly the worst examples of 'exurb nation' - unsupported stand a lone energy inefficient developments with far too few good local jobs. Ironically - Romeoville is one of the exceptions... there are a lot of pretty fair mfg & mfg-service support jobs along I 55 corridor into Chicago. More than enough to support the development there.
Not all automotive either - lotsa commodities, chemicals, transport, etc. Good jobs, real middle class money.
But that's the exception out that way - not the rule. Jobs at the 'Empress' are the 'rule'...
Service and entertainment jobs are scary. Bottom of the food chain stuff. Very low local multipliers in industries that usual drain money from the area rather than recycle.
Yup, there are a lot of myths about urban development patterns that are going to be exploded in this downturn. One of the biggest IMO will be the horrible mistake of purpose built residential clusters. Levittowns had enough flexibility to evolve and remodel to new needs and purposes. The stuff that's gone up in the last few years is presented fait accompli, boom there it is in its already highest and best form. Anything changes and they aren't good for anything else. What idiot approves driveways too short to hold a vehicle?
Dry, Did you feel double crossed when the price of deisel went up $.80/gal? What's that about? A family member bought a deisel about a year ago and now regrets it.
All my colleagues drive Lexus, BMW, Infinity, so I had to splurge myself. I bought some Turtle Wax and put two (2) coats on my Accord. One colleague even told me what a nice looking car I had.
lama | 05.03.08 - 10:39 am | #
Nope. My Jetta gets 50 mpg consistently. Plus the engine will last FOREVER - I'll be handing it down to kids even as the body falls apart - a great opportunity to 'Bondo' with my kids.
There is no gas powered vehicle out there that is as economical AND does heavy over the road high speed driving for cheap like the manual tranny diesel Jetta... the smaller gas powered Honda's do upper 30s & low 40s and are as economical considering the gas/diesel differential... but they do not hold up to heavy over the road pounding - I've tried small gas powered vehicles & they don't cut it - too light, too flimsy.
However if I were doing a lot of city driving, shorter haul commute - then I would definitely buy one of those instead. Or maybe even a hybrid (if a lot of the commute was stop-go city) If I change my job - and I'm considering doing that due to the frustrations of dealing with the knuckleheads I currently work for - then I'd maybe not own a Jetta diesel.
If I continue on this path though I will definitely start looking to buy another one. Maybe as soon as this next fall/winter. Probably used - they are out there if you really look.
I would have to say that this is a very compelling and well-documented argument.
Yet, still no recession, even though there have been compelling, well-documented arguments for a long time.
Clearly, there's a critical factor that's missing, otherwise we'd have been in recession long ago.
I think that key factor is our location on the business cycle. We're still in the middle and not at the end, and that trumps all the indicators "proving" that we're either in a recession or on the verge of one.
We won't see recession until the Fed starts tightening at the soonest, and probably not until it tightens by quite a bit.
You think that VW diesel will live forever? I wish you luck. I love the feel of VWs, but my experience is that the mechanical reliability and durability are not in the same league as the better Japanese cars - and even some US cars.
Sebasatian,
This is really insulting: "I know you're not really interested, but..."
You know nothing of the kind and it is beyond presumptuous to claim you know my mind. Cheap sophomoric debating trick at best.
The 2001 recession call was not manipulated very much because it conveniently fit the existing political calendar and certain political agendas. The Oct '07 - Sept '10 recession serves no political expediency and is thus earning the title "An Inconvenient Economy." I'd like to thank the members of the Nobel selection committee for their...
"It isn't so much the exurbs that will get killed as the recently developed product types independent of location."
On those terms I think we can agree, for the most part.
Dryfly, there is cumulative overbuilding in many areas of CRE, but the physical overbuilding didn't go at the rate shown in that graph over the last couple of years. That's why CR and others keep saying we're not as overbuilt in CRE as we were in the late 80's.
I've been at a conference this week, and the folks on one panel pointed out very astutely that usually a CRE bust is caused by too much money and too many buildings. In this case they didn't overbuild the physical structures nearly as much as they overbuilt the capital structures.
Everything was financialized, derivativized and leveraged to the max. In other words, much of that growth in investment consists of "financial inovation" that allows the financiers to sell the same project over and over again.
Lots of CRE was justified by assuming the capture of future appreciation. Imagine how little would have been built with any speculative component if there were a model incorporating an assumption of flat to declining asset valuation.
We are truely cr junkies to be reading a post on Hotel Financing on Friday night. First, but I need a life!
Viewing with alarm,
CR is the perfect accompaniment to a smooth cab on a Friday night.
Good point, enjoy!
Paging Dryfly re: upper midwest hotel standards, paging Dryfly!
I would think hotel development or ROW would be Africa/Chindia/E & C. Europe.
50-55% LTV for hotel finance hasn't emerged as the norm for limited service hotel projects (e.g. Courtyard, Hampton Inn). 70-75% LTV is market right now for good projects with strong sponsorship (operator and flag). I'm guessing Jim is talking about big ticket resort/luxury projects.
Continued...local banks are definitely still active in this market...but it is definitely harder to secure development finance
"We are truely cr junkies to be reading a post on Hotel Financing on Friday night. First, but I need a life!"
Yeh, well, I'm here, too, but check out where I'm spending the weekend.
makerfaire.com: Maker Faire
A weekend of steampunks, Flaming Lotus Girls, LED Hula Hoops, power tool drag racing, and combat robots. A geekfest par excellence. A sovereign vacation from economic gloominess.
A home bought today at 55% LTV in Sonoma county would likely be at 95% LTV in 3 years...
A mortgage broker blogging how their borrower on a Super Jumbo in No. Cal. had their deal blowup because the lender won't go above 70% LTV:
Real Estate Blog - One Dead Goose and Another Loan Goes Belly Up: How Declining Value Restrictions Hurt Property Values
please help explain the scale of the graph.
left vertical axis is in millions?
so the peak of 450,000 investment non residential ex lodging is 450 thousand times one million ?
sorry for being dense.
Bob Dobbs..
looks warm looks fun wish i were there
cold may night here up north
Once again, Las Vegas leads the way in insanity. Wynn is the prime example of overstretch- he did it in the 90s and almost lost everything. I stood at the intersection of Flamingo and the Strip and counted 15 big cranes in use within view. 15!!! There isn't enough money coming into vegas with these oil prices to sustain the current level of properties and rooms- and there is how much under construction?
WTF? Who financed this pile of stuff?
Who is going to take those magnificent losses? Another Trump development? Who the heck is stupid enough to invest with Trump with his track record?
Geez, there are still tons of losses to be realized!!!
I can hardly wait to see this bit o' history repeat again.
Someday this war's gonna end...
ot but worth it
"It is appalling where we are right now," former St. Louis Fed President William Poole, who retired in March, said in an interview. The Fed has introduced "a backstop for the entire financial system."
The Fed's loans to Bear Stearns were "a rogue operation,'' said Anna Schwartz, who co-wrote "A Monetary History of the United States'' with the late Nobel laureate Milton Friedman.
Financial Blogs — DistillingFinance
my take...yeah it was appalling...but the alternative was total market meltdown...but if we don't get some justice along the way, just maybe the meltdwon might have been preferable...just maybe
We are truely cr junkies to be reading a post on Hotel Financing on Friday night. First, but I need a life!
I don't know about you, but after reading that blog, I'm thinking of opening a hotel. Let's see 55% LTV,...I just need to save $48,000,067 more.
55% LTV on home loans....... My.Dream.Come.True.
48 mil +/- 0.000002% ....damn you're good
The blue line on that graf is just ca-raaazy! It looks like the grafs for issuance of nonconforming mortgages. Why did we need to more than double our investment in hotels in a mere two years? Why did people with millions of dollars to lend think this was a good idea? Hotels are great investments in Monopoly, I suppose.
Looks like the madness was NOT just confined to home mortgages.
Off-topic...
Linens 'n Things files for bankruptcy protection
NEW YORK - A Chapter 11 bankruptcy filing by Linens 'n Things is the latest sign that the retail sector is becoming leaner and meaner amid a difficult consumer environment.
On Friday, the bedding- and home-furnishing retailer filed a petition in bankruptcy court in Delaware and said it would close 120 underperforming stores, almost a quarter of them in California.
link above fixed...
Linens 'n Things files for bankruptcy protection.
Here's a terrific comment from a Realtor on the blog post that Cal mentions above:
The saddest thing about property values declining is that they don't have to be! The housing market....even in the most over-heated of markets... is fundamentally strong. Housing formations and the population keep going up. There was a reason that the markets that over-heated did so. Because they were desirable!
If they "fix" the credit markets, the housing markets will come roaring back and there will be no need to paint scarlet "D"s on any body's front door!
Dollar Volume of Equity Cashed-Out Drops to $29 Billion: Lowest in Four Years
"During the first quarter about $29 billion in home equity was cashed out through refinance of conventional loans made to prime borrowers, off from a downwardly revised $36 billion cashed out in the fourth quarter of 2007. This is about one-third of the amount cashed out in the same quarter a year earlier," said Amy Crews Cutts, Freddie Mac deputy chief economist. "While research has shown a limited effect in the current quarter of equity conversion into cash, the reduced equity extraction we saw in the first quarter will likely be felt in the consumption and investment decisions of households later on
By "great sponsorship" they mean somebody who is good for 25% recourse. That is very different from last year, even if they only went from 75% LTV to 70%.
Great rant in Cal's link above:
But these [SF bay area] cities, these rare areas of healthy real estate, will be DRIVEN TO DECLINE by these policies. These areas are victims of REVERSE DISCRIMINATION. These areas must pay the price so that those other areas (with foreclosures) do not poison the bank's ailing real estate portfolio. Why? Just because they are in the same county, all of which has been painted with the same declining value brush.
Looks like the poor SF Bay Area is being "driven to decline" through "reverse discrimination". Sniff, sniff... if only we could've had some containment to those who deserved it!
mock turtle, I kept it the same as the data from the BEA (in millions). It would probably be clearer in billions (the data is quarterly at the seasonally adjusted annual rate).
The peak for non-residential structures (ex-lodging) was about $450 billion.
Best Wishes.
Thornburg thinks California unemployment will top 8%, Nationally 7%:
http://www.beaconecon.com/products/Presentations/lachamberapr08.pdf
Since Thornburg's proven to be an optimistic bear I'd say 8%'s the best the state could hope for.
Cal's link is funmy, depressing and eye-opening all at the same time. Yeah - just keep giving loans to people who can't pay them back, and people will start buying again!
These are the people who were advising FTHB on the biggest investment in their lives.
CR - What would that do to residential?
What IS it doing to res in CA. That is very close to what is happening in Jumbo land.... the lender promises 70% LTV, comes in low on the appraisal, then the appraisal manager slashes another 15% from the appraisal "just in case". BINGO 55%
What retail REIT will doing poorlt in the comeing years ?
I am looking for higher leverged REIT in bubble areas (west , Florida etc..)
The MBAA forecasts a 5.9% unemployment rate for mid year 2009 (5.9% is the high pt in their April forecast which forecast out through 2010) mbaa.org
You're talking about 55% LTV. But what about the other 45%, nobody seems to be talking about that.
The people on this blog don't seem to understand real estate finance. Here's someone who does.
"...Ritke provided a general example of the economics of this: You live in a house you value at $300,000 and the house you want to move up to is priced at $500,000. If you give a discount of 10 percent ($30,000) on your house and get a 10 percent discount ($50,000) on the new home, you just made $20,000 in equity...
ERROR :: Sorry, the page you requested could not be found.- If you are trying to reach a page from a bookmark, the page URL may have changed. Please choose a community from the navigation at the top of this page.
- If you are looking for an ol
you just made $20,000 in equity...
Good one. And Your debt service increased $180,000 so that $20,000 in instant equity is costing you ~70% APR provided there is no depreciation. Indeed for this to make any sense as a purely financial exercise the new house would need to appreciate 5-6% per annum minimum.
The a$$hats in that article are the worst form of pump and dumpers. anyone buying a home right now is the smart buyer, Ritke said. And what does Ritke do? He sells houses. He's President of Will-Grundy Counties Home Builders and Associates. Always ask yourself why they are doing the exact opposite (selling) of what they are advising others. The only thing that comes close is Sam Zell recently.
anyone buying a home right now is the smart buyer,
hmm, well then why is he selling them anyway? is he a fool or what?
I forget his name but the guy from UCSB economic forecast was on the radio yesterday saying ABSOLUTELY no recession.
One big question I have about the hotel market generally is what's going to happen with all the condo hotels? I always found that concept a little suspect, and in a downturn it would seem even more so.
He's President of Will-Grundy Counties Home Builders and Associates.
Ever been to Will or Grundy County? We're talking Romeoville, Joliet & Morris Illinois.
Its another one of those 'walk away' counties... way out suburb/exurbs of Chicago with way too much building & development & far to few good local jobs (meaning hellacious commutes for most - straight into the teeth of some of Chicago area's most congested highways).
And Rob't we aren't talking 'Ventura County Chablis' vintage exurbs - we're talking 'mass produced plastic sided cookie cutter interstate exit development' exurbs. The OTHER kind of exurb...
I would expect there would be VERY significant 'discounts' in those counties - there would have to be to draw bids from any would be knife catchers... especially with $3.50 gas driving a four year old SUV (with three more years of payments to go).
VennData, that is classic.
"...Ritke provided a general example of the economics of this: You live in a house you value at $300,000 and the house you want to move up to is priced at $500,000. If you give a discount of 10 percent ($30,000) on your house and get a 10 percent discount ($50,000) on the new home, you just made $20,000 in equity...
These people were proven dumb-as-stumps 2 years ago. How did they get back in the limelight? Why does America think the more BS shilling will solve the deep economic issues. Buy houses and stocks, why? Because that's all we know here in America.
I agree with Reverend Wright. God Damn America!!!
dryfly, too funny. VC Chablis! Seriously though, Ventura County developments are nothing special. Substitute "foam and stucco" for "plastic". Right on the freeway, they all lead onto the 101 and major congestion into either Santa Barabara or LA.
John Stark writes:
The blue line on that graf is just ca-raaazy! It looks like the grafs for issuance of nonconforming mortgages. Why did we need to more than double our investment in hotels in a mere two years? Why did people with millions of dollars to lend think this was a good idea? Hotels are great investments in Monopoly, I suppose.
Looks like the madness was NOT just confined to home mortgages.
John Stark | 05.03.08 - 12:35 am | #
To get back on topic - I think Mr. Stark hit the nail on the head - too many!!!
I travel a lot of the central US and from what I can see there are WAY too many mid-priced chain hotels and the rates they charge are outrageous.
I'm not talking major metros - I can see why those would cost a pretty penny (high demand, high cost of land limited supply = high cost)... But $75 a night in Mauston Wisconsin (off I 94 halfway between Chicago & Minneapolis and a so-so chain)? Give me a break...
I am now far more sensitive to the trade off of long drive vs overnight stay. As a result I've done 'day trips' DRIVING from my home in small town SE Minnesota to Milwaukee or Chicago and back - all in one day. My vehicle gets 50 mpg diesel so at highway speed its about $6/hr to drive... six hours each way & six hours of business - its a wash... get up early get home late - no hotel & eat/sleep mostly at home. Come down to which is worse - sitting in my car or sitting in a chain motel... hmmmm tough choice.
The only way I stay over is if I have multiple days of work there OR early morning appt's - about 50-50%.
I can't quite do the same in Omaha, KC or St Louis - more than one day out... but can do it for almost all of central Iowa, NW Minnesota, etc.
I am running into more road warriors like me re-thinking the cost of being on the road.
Thank God & Al Gore for these Internets...
dryfly writes:
...Will or Grundy County? We're talking Romeoville, Joliet & Morris Illinois.
...And Rob't we aren't talking 'Ventura County Chablis' vintage exurbs - we're talking 'mass produced plastic sided cookie cutter interstate exit development' exurbs. The OTHER kind of exurb...
If it weren't so early here on the left coast I'd lift my glass. Will a mug of Dunkin' Donuts coffee suffice?
For all their evil google does quick mapping pretty darn well.
Romeoville: romeoville, il - Google Maps
Kinda like Oxnard with snow: htttp://tinyurl.com/5hgfvs
It isn't so much the exurbs that will get killed as the recently developed product types independent of location.
off topic
end of last week lots of talk about ending the dollar peg and ending the petro dollar
washington has no doubt received the word (threat) and understands the impact (magnification of dollar crisis etc)
so now push comes to shove...Bernanke and company must finally make the choice..defend the currency or defend the economy...can't do both.
the signal of course is "the pause" and is it just talk (jawboning the dollar)
May 2 (Bloomberg)
Gulf States Should Not End Dollar Peg, Deutsche Bank CEO Says - Bloomberg.com
Gulf states are considering dropping their pegs to the dollar, which has fallen 13 percent against the euro in the last 12 months, after the U.S. currency's decline stoked inflation across the region, Kuwaiti Finance Minister Mustafa al- Shimali said yesterday. Inflation is close to 10 percent in Saudi Arabia and the U.A.E., while Qatar's consumer prices rose 14 percent in the fourth quarter.
snip
Gulf states should not end their pegs to the dollar because the U.S. currency's fall is nearing an end, Henry Azzam, Deutsche Bank's chief executive officer for the Middle East and North Africa, said. The worst is behind us in terms of interest rate declines internationally and on local currencies,'' Azzam said in an interview today at the Arab Economic Forum in Beirut.Let's not do anything today structural to cope with a cyclical phenomenon that is coming to its close and could affect us for many years.''
hummmm
seem to recall saddam h stating in 2002 he would soon no longer market oil in dollars. guess he lost his head over the whole affair.
Bob in Ma,
I've stayed at those extended stay places while on long projects. They charge about 3 times going rents, but are furnished. I think those are all about location. If there's enough consulting or other large firms with high paying jobs AND they bought well, I think they'll fair OK.
For example, we were paying $3,400 for a one bedroom that would have sold for, say $200-250k at peak. If they bought at peak, I don't think they would survive lean times. If they bought before 2002, I think they'd be fine.
Just outside DC, FYI.
Dry, Did you feel double crossed when the price of deisel went up $.80/gal? What's that about? A family member bought a deisel about a year ago and now regrets it.
All my colleagues drive Lexus, BMW, Infinity, so I had to splurge myself. I bought some Turtle Wax and put two (2) coats on my Accord. One colleague even told me what a nice looking car I had.
It isn't so much the exurbs that will get killed as the recently developed product types independent of location.
Rob Dawg | Homepage | 05.03.08 - 10:32 am | #
Exactly - that's why I haven't joined in on the 'pile on dog' over exurbs per se... there are the right ways to do it 7 the wrong ways & lotsa stereo-types to over come.
That also applies to 'urbanism' - it can work but you have to get past stereotypes - good & bad.
Point is Will & Grundy are mostly the worst examples of 'exurb nation' - unsupported stand a lone energy inefficient developments with far too few good local jobs. Ironically - Romeoville is one of the exceptions... there are a lot of pretty fair mfg & mfg-service support jobs along I 55 corridor into Chicago. More than enough to support the development there.
Not all automotive either - lotsa commodities, chemicals, transport, etc. Good jobs, real middle class money.
But that's the exception out that way - not the rule. Jobs at the 'Empress' are the 'rule'...
Service and entertainment jobs are scary. Bottom of the food chain stuff. Very low local multipliers in industries that usual drain money from the area rather than recycle.
Yup, there are a lot of myths about urban development patterns that are going to be exploded in this downturn. One of the biggest IMO will be the horrible mistake of purpose built residential clusters. Levittowns had enough flexibility to evolve and remodel to new needs and purposes. The stuff that's gone up in the last few years is presented fait accompli, boom there it is in its already highest and best form. Anything changes and they aren't good for anything else. What idiot approves driveways too short to hold a vehicle?
Dry, Did you feel double crossed when the price of deisel went up $.80/gal? What's that about? A family member bought a deisel about a year ago and now regrets it.
All my colleagues drive Lexus, BMW, Infinity, so I had to splurge myself. I bought some Turtle Wax and put two (2) coats on my Accord. One colleague even told me what a nice looking car I had.
lama | 05.03.08 - 10:39 am | #
Nope. My Jetta gets 50 mpg consistently. Plus the engine will last FOREVER - I'll be handing it down to kids even as the body falls apart - a great opportunity to 'Bondo' with my kids.
There is no gas powered vehicle out there that is as economical AND does heavy over the road high speed driving for cheap like the manual tranny diesel Jetta... the smaller gas powered Honda's do upper 30s & low 40s and are as economical considering the gas/diesel differential... but they do not hold up to heavy over the road pounding - I've tried small gas powered vehicles & they don't cut it - too light, too flimsy.
However if I were doing a lot of city driving, shorter haul commute - then I would definitely buy one of those instead. Or maybe even a hybrid (if a lot of the commute was stop-go city) If I change my job - and I'm considering doing that due to the frustrations of dealing with the knuckleheads I currently work for - then I'd maybe not own a Jetta diesel.
If I continue on this path though I will definitely start looking to buy another one. Maybe as soon as this next fall/winter. Probably used - they are out there if you really look.
Dryfly,
Tool around in style: craigslist | Page Not Found
Or smell like "Freedom Fries":.
-
Cars.com
Cal posted: "Cal writes:
Thornburg thinks California unemployment will top 8%, Nationally 7%:
Beacon Economics produc...hamberapr08.pdf"
I would have to say that this is a very compelling and well-documented argument.
Yet, still no recession, even though there have been compelling, well-documented arguments for a long time.
Clearly, there's a critical factor that's missing, otherwise we'd have been in recession long ago.
I think that key factor is our location on the business cycle. We're still in the middle and not at the end, and that trumps all the indicators "proving" that we're either in a recession or on the verge of one.
We won't see recession until the Fed starts tightening at the soonest, and probably not until it tightens by quite a bit.
Sebastia
Clearly, there's a critical factor that's missing, otherwise we'd have been in recession long ago.
Missing component: Honest data.
The Big Picture
http://bigpicture.typepad.com/.shared/image.html?/photos/uncategorized/2008/04/29/bizinflate430.gif
High unemployment, high inflation. Recession. Call it a pink pony and ride it around for all I care.
You think that VW diesel will live forever? I wish you luck. I love the feel of VWs, but my experience is that the mechanical reliability and durability are not in the same league as the better Japanese cars - and even some US cars.
Rob Dawg said: "Missing component: Honest data."
I know you're not really interested, but we had a recession in 2001 with data that you don't think was "honest."
How did that happen, if it's as easy as just manipulating the numbers to show "no recession"?
S.
Sebasatian,
This is really insulting: "I know you're not really interested, but..."
You know nothing of the kind and it is beyond presumptuous to claim you know my mind. Cheap sophomoric debating trick at best.
The 2001 recession call was not manipulated very much because it conveniently fit the existing political calendar and certain political agendas. The Oct '07 - Sept '10 recession serves no political expediency and is thus earning the title "An Inconvenient Economy." I'd like to thank the members of the Nobel selection committee for their...
"It isn't so much the exurbs that will get killed as the recently developed product types independent of location."
On those terms I think we can agree, for the most part.
Dryfly, there is cumulative overbuilding in many areas of CRE, but the physical overbuilding didn't go at the rate shown in that graph over the last couple of years. That's why CR and others keep saying we're not as overbuilt in CRE as we were in the late 80's.
I've been at a conference this week, and the folks on one panel pointed out very astutely that usually a CRE bust is caused by too much money and too many buildings. In this case they didn't overbuild the physical structures nearly as much as they overbuilt the capital structures.
Everything was financialized, derivativized and leveraged to the max. In other words, much of that growth in investment consists of "financial inovation" that allows the financiers to sell the same project over and over again.
Lots of CRE was justified by assuming the capture of future appreciation. Imagine how little would have been built with any speculative component if there were a model incorporating an assumption of flat to declining asset valuation.
Speaking from the lending trenches in NYC, getting anything done in credit committee is a bear right now, even for the best sponsors. Anything that smells of risk is being turned down or put on hold. The question is, when with the lenders return? As discussed here...
Lodginginsiders.com - lodging insiders Resources and Information.This website is for sale!