They can't sell at a mark to fantasy price, so the market is frozen eh? I don't think so. Methinks Mr. Seller wants to high a price for that junk, so instead of lowering prices to mark to market and destroy each others balance sheets, they sell only top quality stuff, leaving their B-Sheets even more impaired.
A gang of chimpanzees could do a better job running this stuff.
They will take most of Americans down with them, especially, Scam Lovers and Home-Debtors.
And they will definitely send a big bill to the politically impotent US taxpayers in one form or another. All in the name of saving the system and helping American People.
"We believe the downturn was driven by a lack of affordability and think that the rebound in demand will come from improved affordability," Oppenheim wrote.
Why is it that these analysts believe the two halves of boom/bust cycle are assymetric in length? They see boom for 6 years, bust for 6 months, and call the bottom.
"...a customer would be qualified for a loan because their credit score and other factors based on the written product description, however, when I went in to put their (this only happened to African-Americans) - they were not qualified for the loan product and had to be referred to Countrywide's subprime mortgage company Full Spectrum. Full Spectrum offered higher rates and fees. I got wise one day and started not inputing the race so the computer could give me "approval."
Most of my troubles with Countrywide began when I was told I needed put customers in more exotic products such as the "No Income-No Ratio (NINA)," "Stated Income-Stated Assets (SISA)," any ARM product or the classic "Pay Option ARM" (where you have a choice of 4 payments). Countrywide offered incentives for putting customers in those types of products. My customers needed stability on their loan and didn't need to refinance every two to three years stripping them of their equity (provided they had any). I didn't agree with their policies so my tenure was short-lived.
I'm not saying this could actually happen, but what if a bank fails? What happens to its "assets?" For example, homes and other real estate they acquired via foreclosure? Don't those assets become public property at some point in the FDIC process?
Stark - banks fail all the time. FDIC can handle one or a few, but not one that is "too big to fail" or a systemic crisis - at least not without a taxpayer backstop.
The secondary market for CDO's IS THE SOURCE OF FUNDS for the mortgage market. If it is frozen, it is 10000% impossible for housing to improve. It is a mathematical certainty.
More than 60 ``opportunity'' funds have been created to take advantage of a plunge in prices for mortgage assets, said Carlos Mendez, a senior managing director at Institutional Credit Partners LLC.
Sounds like liquidity is around, just not at current asking prices. I'm sure there's somebody that will buy the toxic waste at 10 cents on the dollar.
With all this talk of a stronger dollar, I was toying with the idea of getting out of gold at least partially. But with more talk about more rate cuts, I hear that whopwhopwhopwhopwhopWHOPWHOPWHOPWHOP coming closer and closer.
F. Frederson writes:
Stark - banks fail all the time. FDIC can handle one or a few, but not one that is "too big to fail" or a systemic crisis - at least not without a taxpayer backstop.
I know banks fail. My humor fails too, even more often. I still hope someone can explain what happens to the bank's assets, such as foreclosed real estate, when that happens. What happened after the S&L debacle, for example? Do the feds wind up with title to the real estate that they eventually sell to recoup some of the losses?
Still trying to follow. If the CDO market is frozen, how are any nonconforming loans at all getting written, and how are other businesses that rely on CDOs keeping their doors open?
u were asking about dividends and SRS yesterday. i don't think they do have to pay b/c most of its holdings are CDS's. the other advantage is there u can take long term capital gains on SRS if u hold long enuf.
Although both past-due derivative contracts and derivative charge-offs increased in the third quarter, these
figures remain at nominal levels. For all U.S. commercial banks, the fair value of contracts past due 30 days or
more totaled $223 million, up $175 million from the $48 million of the second quarter but only 0.09% of net
current credit exposure from derivatives contracts.
This language has changed from previous reports, which stated that charge offs of credit deriviatees were almost always zero
that's becasuse the total PIE kept growing exponentially.
Credit contraction means winner's and loser's will soon be identified in the race for cash
Though the winners may have a credit recievable that won't be paid.
Back to this report... it still feels as though not all is being reported... and Freezes occur due to the unwillingness of interested parties to come clean
If the CDO market is frozen, how are any nonconforming loans at all getting written, and how are other businesses that rely on CDOs keeping their doors open?
This is the exact the same lie as yesterday. The deals are getting written just at numbers that don't enrich the Wall Streeters.
--
""It is difficult to get a man to understand something when his salary depends on his not understanding it" -Upton Sinclair"
That is why one has to be a born-and-bred dope to be successful in America, i.e., believe in the entire BS that most others believe in!
That is especially true of economists. You don't want to be a maverick if you are one. Don't ever forecast a recession until after the economy is in a recession. And you must deny the depression unless you want to be laughed at or risk losing your job, or clients.
Stark - start here. The short version is that the government set up an entity that took control of the bank assets and sold them off for less than the government spent making depositors whole.
Misean writes:
They can't sell at a mark to fantasy price, so the market is frozen eh? I don't think so. Methinks Mr. Seller wants to high a price for that junk, so instead of lowering prices to mark to market and destroy each others balance sheets, they sell only top quality stuff, leaving their B-Sheets even more impaired.
No, It's not so much about price. There really aren't many buyers for a lot of it...and there's a lot of it.
Markel writes:
Still trying to follow. If the CDO market is frozen, how are any nonconforming loans at all getting written
Nonconforming loans are still being made, but with much tighter lending standards to prime lenders. Those loans are staying on lender balance sheets or going into securitized whole loan deals.
Subprime, midprime, Alt-A, etc are not getting done precisely because the CDO bid has dried up...it got all arb'd out!
Wasn't one of his early observations on this whole crunchy episode that it's impact on the real economy was a function of duration? I speculate that is also a non-linear function of time...
F. Frederson writes:
Stark - start here. The short version is that the government set up an entity that took control of the bank assets and sold them off for less than the government spent making depositors whole.
No, It's not so much about price. There really aren't many buyers for a lot of it...and there's a lot of it.
No, it is about price. At the right price, somebody would be willing to buy.
The problem is that, both financially and in a regulatory sense, the holders of these particular decks' black Queens can't afford to sell at that price. Because then that would lay out in black and white what they, and everyone with half a brain, already know: once you mark them to market, the major holders of much of this debt are completely bankrupt.
Norma has it exactly right ... this is a true Mexican standoff. And our participants have no choice but to float self-serving, transparent, and increasingly preposterous plans for rescue from the outside ... because, here in the circle, everyone's trigger fingers are, shall we say, getting itchy.
My recollection was that he said that duration of the credit crunch was key. If it ended withing 2-3 months, there would be no significant economic effects.
If it lasted longer (winter? November? December? The new year? St. Patrick's Day?), then in the words of Robocop, there would be.............trouble.
I had been expecting inflation, but I am starting to think things are happening too fast for fiscal policies to rescue the situation - plus, the dollar amounts needed are so large I question whether there is any practical ability to move that much borrowed money into the economy that fast.
Deflation.
If the government is deeply in debt going in to deflation, I am wondering whether default on the debt is inevitable.
even some famous bears must be getting mauled. Frank Barbera was crooning this weekend on Financial Sense about how he'd called the bottom and went long and expected the rally to last another week. sometimes i use these guys as contra indicators.
visited a Walmart last night in socal and it was the first time I've not had to wait in line to pay for something. they had even shut down the cash registers in gardens and electronics an hour before closing which is something I've never seen before.
The biggest inflation in the world is in American Egos, American Ignorance, and Political Power of America's Crooks.
All these will deflate in due course of time. Economics is all about behavior of the participants, leaders as well as the led. In America, both have been behaving badly.
"Why is the dollar up today? Makes no much sense in the face of weak economic data."
Aside from what anonymous said, there has been some talking in the media from Deutsche Bank that the dollar should soon begin to strengthen against the Euro. They're expecting rate cutes in Euroland.
i think something thats not been talked about is that stupid budget Bush is proposing that just cranks up our deficit w/o even a reference to our spendthrift ways. most of it was increases in military spending as well which caused our foreign neighbors to throw up their hands i'm sure. when are they going to get it?
so those itchy trigger fingers are gettin' pretty chaffed about now.
At some point, very soon, one of these banks will break rank and sell thinking that they will be in line first and get the best price before the selling tanks the whole thing to .10 on the dollar.
Worked for SOC. GEN. didn't it?? Oh right they "didn't know"
Well, looks like the counter trend rally in HBs and financials has run its course, eh? Hope all of you shorties did ok. Me, I got burned but learned a good lesson about playing these bear markets.
proposing a numerical scale from 1 to 21 as an example. The agency floated other ideas too, such as adding "sf" to current alphabetical ratings to highlight a structured finance security.
--
"Begin the morning by saying to thyself, I shall meet with the busybody, the ungrateful, arrogant, deceitful, envious, unsocial. All these things happen to them by reason of their ignorance of what is good and evil." -- Meditations of Marcus Aurelius.
American dopes don't know that banking and finance Crooks are evil even when they built Debt Concentration Camps and piped them with financial poison gas.
Dr. Housing Bubble Blog has a very interesting entry (Feb. 3rd) on the Great Depression mortgage market situation from 1932 perspective:
Besides MEW even Level 3 assets made their appearance, on the later:
"A reappraisal indicated that the value of the houses had fallen to $16,000 each. On one, the bank held a mortgage for $5,000, on the other for $17,000. What did the bank do? It commenced foreclosure proceedings on the strong mortgage fro $5,000 and allowed the weaker to stand. Why? It could readily transform the smaller mortgage into an asset on its books, whereas the larger mortgage would inevitably show a loss if the property were taken over"
3 solutions:
"1. Inflation of the currency in the hope of raising prices ...
go by default. ...widespread foreclosure with properties passing into the hands of the prior mortgagee, or, where unsatisfied tax liens exist, into the hands of local governmental units.
The third method offers the substitution of new machinery for the adjustment of contracts which cannot be carried out in their original terms. In brief, this means the establishment of legal sanctions to permit the waiving of accepted foreclosure proceedings in the public interest, on condition that all parties to the contract enter into new agreements which are equitable in the light of changed conditions "
AKA "Hope Now Please"
Why don't you lay off the stereotyping and moralizing, bro? I'm not sure where you're from, but I'm sure there are perfectly nice people there. I would never judge all of them based on your behavior here.
Now - how 'bout that stock market? Down 300! Damn!
--
Rating agencies have been practicing junk science! Analyst Tavakoi on Bloomberg.
They were serving the CROOKS!!!!!!!!
Everyone wanting a good-life in America is, or was, better of serving the Crooks, just as everyone wanting a good-life in Nazi Germany was serving the Nazi leadership. No, Americans are in no way better than the Germans during the period before and during the Nazis.
Less than a year after Apollo Management LP paid $6.6 billion for real estate broker Realogy Corp....
WTF, it's one thing to suppose the overall economy might slip through OK during a real estate bust, but to suppose a real estate bust will have no effect on a real estate broker. That ranks up there with the purchase of about.com after the dot.com bust was well underway.
everyones saying we're gonna go thru a period of V shaped bottoms with gentle rolling tops as we head down. i'm not sure that we won't have a bunch of spiking, A shaped tops and V bottoms. why? the hedgies and everyone else know they're running short squeezes but as soon as they sense the tide turning i think everyone hits the sell button.
When my CDOs are frozen, I usually place them in a warm oven with a small pan of water, as the humidity helps to keep the air moist which also prevents the yeast from suffocating or coughing. I usually allow between 2 to 4 years for my CDOs to rise and then if all the ingredients are in proper proportion, your dough will yield fabo results!
Investors are being told by their brokers that the meltdown in earnings is due only to finance/mortgage and homebuilders. But it's a smokescreen.
Earnings are soft and weakening in many other sectors including telecommunications, semiconductors, hardware, restaurants, hotels, gambling, publishing, retail and food.
Inflation is killing costs and there's too much overcapacity and desperation to raise prices. Big companies are trying to grab share, even if it means losing money, and smaller companies are shark meat, especially if they are overleveraged (which most are).
The earnings scene is just carnage, and yet most investors still can't see it. If you could see it, you would dump all stocks right now. This kind of trend is a train, and it doesn't reverse fast.
what about etf's especially short?
Just got off phone with a client (auto dealer) he states ( some of the dealer owners are ready to jump off the roof as they can't sell cars and flooring is eating any profit)
I'm looking for a long, maybe year long, fall in the Russell 2000 for pretty much that reason. It has about the highest p/e ratio around, the companies are more dependent on bank credit than big caps, and they generally have less income from overseas.
How come these guys get handed the downgrade so fast while the monolines are still being 'evaluated'? Can these guys take the rating agencies to court?
"Agencies mull changes to structured finance ratings proposing a numerical scale from 1 to 21 as an example. The agency floated other ideas too, such as adding "sf" to current alphabetical ratings to highlight a structured finance security."
I like it. Leaves room to add new levels of low ratings from 22-99 as the need arises.
"Just got off phone with a client (auto dealer) he states ( some of the dealer owners are ready to jump off the roof as they can't sell cars and flooring is eating any profit)"
"Well, if you're going down that road, change it to B-29s with our chairman in the lead plane, the "Enola Bernanke."
Heck, if you need raw lifting power for all that money, I say go with the Russian AN-225. You could just load the Denver Mint into the cargo hold and literally print while you drop. The only consumable limiting factors are paper, ink, and fuel.
--
No one dare tell Their Royal Highnesses, aka American People, the Truth. If any politician dares he, or she, will lose his, or her, job. Only liars need to talk and tell us what we want to hear, cries a born-and-bred American dope.
Crooks love the dopes because they can count on the dopes to defend them.
There are consequences to breeding dopes and there are reasons for breeding dopes.
u were asking about dividends and SRS yesterday. i don't think they do have to pay b/c most of its holdings are CDS's.
idoc,
One minor point, SRS (and other short proshares funds) hold general swaps contracts on whatever is being shorted.. not Credit Default Swaps.. those are just a specific type of swap.
Great day for shorts. We hit the -3% handle on all major U.S. equity indexes on the last tick.
Combined with strong dollar/weak yen, this shows that hedgies are coming ove to bear side now, lowering net exposure.
Some hedgies got killed last week in the short unwind. Others won big. But now it's time for most of them to do some serious shorting.
Understand the dynamics of huge amounts of hedge fund money turning gradually shorter. Joe 401(k) just stands there like a dumb target, absorbing cannonball after cannonball, until he finally has to bail or go on welfare.
Then, the hedgies turn long. It's not fair. But it's America.
I feel sorry for people who lose money in bear markets. But not bulls who have been hanging out on this board, absorbing so much good information but arguing day after day about how great things are. That kind of stupidity deserves to lose.
Heck, if you need raw lifting power for all that money, I say go with the Russian AN-225. You could just load the Denver Mint into the cargo hold and literally print while you drop.
Of course, with our luck the Fed would end up dropping rolls of quarters over populated areas from 10K feet.
REBear,
Thanks for the link on the downgrade of U.S. Central Federal Credit Union. Anybody who has money in a credit union may want to read that article.
4822-Florida-
Tampa area
Dealer body is hurting big time with service the only profit center paying bills right now. The big show is this weekend in San Francisco. Should be telling. Dealers employ a lot of highly paid people. Finance guys were making 120K+ easily last couple years. Now they would be lucky to make 80K..
The auto industry is like the fed right now, they played their hand by bringing in longer term financing, 0 Down and no payments until? Guess what? They front loaded sales to people who wouldnt have been buying till this year but bought early because of rates-discounts etc.
"eli writes:
u were asking about dividends and SRS yesterday. i don't think they do have to pay b/c most of its holdings are CDS's.
idoc,
One minor point, SRS (and other short proshares funds) hold general swaps contracts on whatever is being shorted.. not Credit Default Swaps.. those are just a specific type of swap.
eli | 02.05.08 - 4:16 pm | # "
And to add some clarity - hopefully. The daily swaps held by the levered ETF's (like SRS) provide much more than 2 to 1 leverage such that SRS holds much of its assets in the form of very liquid cash equivalents and treasuries. Since they own treasuries they generate a fair amount of income that must be distributed out to shareholders - so yes SRS and other leveraged ETF's are likely to have income distributions or dividends if you prefer to call them that.
You guys are just evil peer pressure...derivatives were a dirty word when I was learning about trading from my Patrician elders...always go long on fundamentals.
you're welcome.. i wouldn't want you to be trying to impress some nice lady at a bar with all this Ultra Short Proshares stuff... and then get to the part about the swaps.. and she's all like, "Why do they own Credit Default Swaps? I thought those were for insuring CDOs and other types of corporate debt??"
Then you're smoked.. she'll go hang out with the quant nerds who know all the swaps lingo..
Sorry to scare you. I didn't mean the entire fund was levered more than 2 to 1. I meant to say that since swaps are levered that the entire assets of the fund COULD NOT BE invested entirely in swaps and therefore had to invest in treasuries. The net result is 2 to 1 exposure to the daily index return.
I think Jas is mentally ill, and we need to help him out - nobody else will. What do you think? Does anyone know of a good shrink, hypnotherapist or a psychic to boot? In the meantime he shouldn't be left alone...
SRS is tied to the daily performance of the Dow Jones US Real Estate Index - more specifically negative 2 to 1. The fund will buy swaps to gain that exposure on a daily basis. Here's a link to a Dow Jones site that will let you look at components and historical values Dow Jones Indexes
You'll have to scroll down to find the Real Estate one.
SRS is tied to the daily performance of the Dow Jones US Real Estate Index - more specifically negative 2 to 1. The fund will buy swaps to gain that exposure on a daily basis.
idoc and Mike,
Yah, Mike's right on.. Proshares enters into a swaps contract with some counter party... Proshares will pay out the daily return on a notional amount on the DJUSREI that's 2x the cash they hold. The counter party pays them the daily decline on that notional amount.
Look at the literal list of Proshares holdings here
Believe me, there is lot to be understood about what is going on in America by observing how dopes react to the general criticism of the American system, which very much includes the so-called American People, as a group. You cant understand a democratic society without understanding what and how the population thinks and who drives their thoughts.
A swap is just a contract that two parties enter into.. agreeing to exchange money on some schedule over a period of time.
The swap payout is effectively the same as shorting at 2x leverage... except.. there's no actual traded index on the DJUSREI.. it's just a number. They can't short that.
So they have to use swaps.. since.. it'd be a big pain trying to short all the components at any level they wanted.
If you look at the Proshares holdings.. you see it over and over... the long funds hold all of the component stocks.. but the short funds use 99% swaps.
duh, help me with what u mean by a NOTIONAL amt on the REIT index.
idoc,
here example.. if you short one share of a $100 stock while holding $50 margin in your account.. you are 2x leveraged and you are short a notional amount of $100.
The notional amount just tells you how much of the underlying thing (in this case USDJREI) is used for percent gain and loss calculations.
Does that make any sense... sometimes i can't tell.
i remember u and rich had a long discussion about the safety of these ultrashort vehicles using swaps. am i correct that u see these as risky in the event of counterparty default? any basis for that other than just intuitive sense?
i remember u and rich had a long discussion about the safety of these ultrashort vehicles using swaps. am i correct that u see these as risky in the event of counterparty default? any basis for that other than just intuitive sense?
I don't think it's necessarily dangerous with a capital "D".. just that, everyone should have their eyes open.
Swaps are not traded on exchanges... it's all OTC.. so you are dependent on the counterparty to pay up.
I guess... worst case scenario, you would be screwed out of a gain since the counterparty couldn't pay up.
(I'm ignoring the chance that the place Proshares holds their cash goes under.. then this is all sort of moot)
My official stance may be... i don't know what to think.. anything can happen.
thanks for the info. i do think that SRS is poised to rocket upward as CRE worsens. i had IYR shorted for a long time but didn't like paying out dividends. i really like the double payout and long term cap gain status too.
I cant believe the president proposed a budget with a 400 billion deficit - and thats putting things nicely (manipulating numbers, leaving out some things (i.e. Afganistan))
The congress needs to sit down NOW and balance the damn budget THIS YEAR.
Don't think Choppers, think of the 1944-45 bombing raids on Hamberg and Berlin, except with $ not bombs being dropped. Yanks by Day, Brits by night (or was that the other way around)
Nice week so far for shorts - I'm almost back to where I was at the beginning of last week (would be higher if I wasn't such an idiot, but as they say, bear markets are hell for bulls and bears).
Don't get complacent - bulls always have one surprise or another to rally the market.
DIS report was very positive regarding consumer, so tomorrow could be a bit of a rally. Also BHP Billiton upped their offer for Rio Tinto.
Productivity and Costs economic news tomorrow. Not sure how market sensitive this will be tomorrow.
News and sentiment is trending bearish again, which is annoying if you are a bear, sets up these counter trend rallies too easily.
Also, everyone is looking for a retest, so if we hit the lows again (this week if CSCO tanks and jobless claims come in hot again), I'm taking a some off this time (learned my lesson), and wait for a confirm that we're breaking lower.
What planet do you live on? What part of Crooks in control of the American system don't you get??
Bush promised to reduce the deficit to half when he leaves office. He will leave the office with the largest deficit in history, if counted honestly. Yesterday, Bush promised that the budget will be in balance by 2012! You wanna bet on a $1.0Tr.+ deficit in 2012?
Open your eyes to the reality in America and not what you want things to be like. With Crooks in-charge, the future is highly predictable.
Congress will do that the Economists are doing now - calling the recession when we are alread in one - not because they couldnt predicit it, but it was socially unacceptable to do so before hand and they didnt have the ***** to do it.
Congress knows a day of financial reconing is coming. They just dont have enough patriotism and sense to overcome their personal fear of doing something socially unacceptable - cutting spending
--
"They just dont have enough patriotism and sense to overcome their personal fear of doing something socially unacceptable - cutting spending."
It is amazing that politically impotent people expect their representatives to have *****. They want an easy job that pays well, especially, the retirement and health benefits! Easy and well-paying jobs involve serving the crooks!!
Ha ha ha all you punks expect me to airdrop the loot? I just will press this button at the Fed control panel the elites equipped me with and you schmucks won't dare speak up or I send Hank round to muss wid yer neck
Oh I might as well tell you since I rule wait till the zero's get added to all my buddies reserves on the elite internets. Ha ha stupid little people have some more ice cream and behave, Hank angry for bussi
"I'm not saying this could actually happen, but what if a bank fails? What happens to its "assets?" For example, homes and other real estate they acquired via foreclosure? Don't those assets become public property at some point in the FDIC process?
John Stark"
John Stark - In a nutshell - the FDIC takes the bank's assets and gets rid of them. In the case of real estate - it sells the stuff. During the S&L crisis in the early 80's - a frequent complaint by S&L's taken over by the FDIC was that the FDIC sold the assets too fast and too cheap. Indeed - a lot of people got great bargains at those "fire sales".
You have all forgotten about the lowly CD as a form of raising money for lending for mortgages. The lenders I bought from this week were Wachovia and National City Bank - and I'm sure that more than a fair amount of this CD money is going to mortgage lending. Roby
Fat Tuesday, yeah right. Or as brother Jerome from la Defense might have it, Mardi Gras. Ash Wednesday tomorrow, if anyone still cares. Or as Siegfried would say, "Do not panic until I give the order to panic."
Jas, you're swimming against a tide of 100s of millions of neurotypicals. LaRouche, Ryskamp, and a host of others have been on this case for years to no effect. Jungian F is the human organ of ontology, and if you are influenced by car commercials, there's no way you can see this particular tsunami on the horizon. I left this file months ago, and don't know why I even visit here -- sort of the look-at-car-crash reflex (besides being in the car). Except for an abortive attempt to get Tanta to look at the systemic as opposed to the servicing implications of the conforming limit boost, my efforts are otherwise directed now. Just discovered evidence that Douglas Adams accidentally sent one of his manuscripts through a worm-hole into the early 17th century. Suggest you explore such irrelevancies. It's most relaxing and we'll have ten to fifteen years to adjust to World Depression II, so let's work strategically.
On the American Enterprise Site there is a 28Mar07 video which ends with the chief economist of FDIC asking a senior UBS analyst to please, please come up with a plus-minus 10 percent number for the ultimate mortgage default number. Peter Wallison jokes about "reps & warranties." Doesn't sound funny now. You can't insure against a systemic risk.
--
"Except for an abortive attempt to get Tanta to look at the systemic as opposed to the servicing implications of the conforming limit boost, my efforts are otherwise directed now."
Thanks, JohnM.
Tanta, a legalistic robot, is a great example of the doping that I speak of. She is intelligent, I believe that she means well, but there is no way that she can overcome the doping from birth about the system and its mooring.
I do respect CR and Tanta as human beings, but not for their understanding of the root causes of the problems discussed on this blog. Actually, I think that most people of this blog are good people but with very bad understanding of the system as it exists. That is where the doping process has had its greatest success.
Dopes simply cannot handle criticism and no one is worse here than Tanta. She feeds her intolerance to many others. She got measure problems in that department. In this regard, CR is commendable.
I don't think it's indoctrination at all, it's simply that some of the most important issues require connecting the dots between areas where you can't be competent in all of them. Almost everyone is programmed to subscribe to collective wisdom in nearly everything in their own area (from their peers) and everything in other areas (deferring to the experts in that area). The ability (indeed compulsion) to connect those dots nevertheless is a key symptom pointing at some pretty serious stuff with a code number in DSM IV (but not III).
Dr. David Lereah, for example, was displaying evidence of robust mental health all through this exercise.
The daily swaps are costing the proshares Libor + basis points.
If you gain exposure to $10million at days end you pay Libor + basis points on the $10 million notional value. If the reference security (the index or equity the swap is based on) loses value you owe that loss as well. Conversely if the reference security increases in value you get the gains payed out to you (less whatever Libor + basis points on the $10 million notional)
If your swap counterparty blew up you would be out that days return on the notional amount of the swap (in the case of proshares they have daily swaps - so the proshares max exposure would be to one days return). If the index went up (and your swap is levered 2 to 1 on the inverse of the index) and your counter party blew out - you'd have a windfall - you wouldn't owe them. So in the case of SRS you'd be concerned about a counterpary failing on a day when the index was down big (and therefore your 2 to 1 inverse swap was up huge).
--
"I don't think it's indoctrination at all, it's simply that some of the most important issues require connecting the dots between areas where you can't be competent in all of them."
JohnM,
The doping process leans people towards a certain way of evaluating the evidence, i.e., how not to connect the dots. The propaganda machine is ever ready to connect the dots in a certain way and people can't escape the guidance.
Breeding dopes is one aspect of any civilization! Dopes are rewarded with material and social success, a nice reinforcement mechanism.
Jacques Ellul (above all), Derrida, Barthes and a host of others (largely French) are in perfect agreement with you, and so am I. What I'm saying is that there is a tiny minority out there that can't respond to emotional manipulation.
Mark writes: "Jas: seems your model of the world always seems to conflict with everybody elses'."
Don't be so sure.
Jas makes a lot of sense, most of the time. Other times, he still makes sense, but most have been conditioned to dismiss his ideas without rational consideration. Perhaps he's being extreme, just to get you thinking? The world is a much larger place than it appears on Fox News.
One of us is highly ignorant of the reality as it exists in America today. A dope automatically assumes that he is right because he thinks like, or is supported by, most others.
That is how democracy breeds dopes -- What do most others think?! Oh, I must be right.
Of course I mis-spoke at 7:17 PM about Tanta. At issue was not conforming limit, but Jonathan Weil's article on abuse of SFAS 140 and Tanta's defense of the seller's servicing the mortgages for the buyer. Weil was back for another kick at the can earlier today. Tanta has not yet bitten on this one, but again the key issue is systemic risk. Are we kidding ourselves about the amount of capital required to cover the risks on baskets of mortgages we've supposed to have sold on, but that in fact we're still very much involved in? Hat tip to an associate of Doom informant V for passing on this link.
By any objective reading, Hewitt's letter offered an accounting exemption that would let banks avoid unwelcome hits to their capital ratios. Yet at the time, nobody at the Financial Accounting Standards Board would say so publicly.
Now three FASB members have gone on record characterizing Hewitt's letter as an exemption to the standard known as FASB Statement 140. This highlights another problem. Unlike the SEC, Hewitt, as chief accountant, has no authority to issue exemptions from the FASB's standards.
Dow down 300 pts...this must matter.
Man, January is looking really ugly. Primeiro?
didn't the banks already take writedowns to account for the price drop of some of the lbo loans that stayed on their books?
They can't sell at a mark to fantasy price, so the market is frozen eh? I don't think so. Methinks Mr. Seller wants to high a price for that junk, so instead of lowering prices to mark to market and destroy each others balance sheets, they sell only top quality stuff, leaving their B-Sheets even more impaired.
A gang of chimpanzees could do a better job running this stuff.
Cheers,
Supply-side economics to the rescue!
Supply-side economics to the rescue!
Does this mean the helicopter is warming up?
whoom whoom whoom whoom chunka chunka chunka whop whop
BAC Analyst predicts 20% pop for homebuilders (on CNBC now).
Guy is comparing homebuilder market to early 90's based on unemployment picture, rather than the housing overhang.
With the glamour out of the equity research job, they sure are hiring some dumb ones.
Mexican standoff?
They never even shut the helicopter off.
--
Crooks got screwed?!
They will take most of Americans down with them, especially, Scam Lovers and Home-Debtors.
And they will definitely send a big bill to the politically impotent US taxpayers in one form or another. All in the name of saving the system and helping American People.
Jas
BAC Analyst Daniel Oppenheim Quote:
Standard Pacific rises on eased liquidity concerns, upgrade - MarketWatch
"We believe the downturn was driven by a lack of affordability and think that the rebound in demand will come from improved affordability," Oppenheim wrote.
Why is it that these analysts believe the two halves of boom/bust cycle are assymetric in length? They see boom for 6 years, bust for 6 months, and call the bottom.
Here's an unsubstantiated rumor from the Consumerist blog. Seems rather far-fetched, but should be easy enough to verify if true:
Leaks: Countrywide Made Racist Sub-Prime Loans?
"...a customer would be qualified for a loan because their credit score and other factors based on the written product description, however, when I went in to put their (this only happened to African-Americans) - they were not qualified for the loan product and had to be referred to Countrywide's subprime mortgage company Full Spectrum. Full Spectrum offered higher rates and fees. I got wise one day and started not inputing the race so the computer could give me "approval."
Most of my troubles with Countrywide began when I was told I needed put customers in more exotic products such as the "No Income-No Ratio (NINA)," "Stated Income-Stated Assets (SISA)," any ARM product or the classic "Pay Option ARM" (where you have a choice of 4 payments). Countrywide offered incentives for putting customers in those types of products. My customers needed stability on their loan and didn't need to refinance every two to three years stripping them of their equity (provided they had any). I didn't agree with their policies so my tenure was short-lived.
BAC has some HB to unload.
Seems the right time to resurface this quote:
"It is difficult to get a man to understand something when his salary depends on his not understanding it"
-Upton Sinclair
Wouldn't surprise me at all.
What bugs me now is the "You have to have good credit history for a good rate..."
How...creditist.
I'm not saying this could actually happen, but what if a bank fails? What happens to its "assets?" For example, homes and other real estate they acquired via foreclosure? Don't those assets become public property at some point in the FDIC process?
Stark - banks fail all the time. FDIC can handle one or a few, but not one that is "too big to fail" or a systemic crisis - at least not without a taxpayer backstop.
CDO Market Almost Frozen
aw, gross! there goes Paulson running down the street in his bathrobe carrying his blowdryer!
Idiots, off the them.
The secondary market for CDO's IS THE SOURCE OF FUNDS for the mortgage market. If it is frozen, it is 10000% impossible for housing to improve. It is a mathematical certainty.
Almost frozen
SO WHAT! Either lower the prices or hold on to the assets. JUST STOP ALL THE CRYING!
Or better yet, admit your're over-paid morons, get your pink slips and go to the back of the line.
More than 60 ``opportunity'' funds have been created to take advantage of a plunge in prices for mortgage assets, said Carlos Mendez, a senior managing director at Institutional Credit Partners LLC.
Sounds like liquidity is around, just not at current asking prices. I'm sure there's somebody that will buy the toxic waste at 10 cents on the dollar.
Does this mean the helicopter is warming up?
blogenfreude | Homepage | 02.05.08 - 2:14 pm
Do you know what Operation Rolling Thunder was?
Housing can improve as prices drop. Balance sheets are toast though. The fed doesn't have enough life boats.
We have WAY to many banks and bankers. A bubble in my view.
With all this talk of a stronger dollar, I was toying with the idea of getting out of gold at least partially. But with more talk about more rate cuts, I hear that whopwhopwhopwhopwhopWHOPWHOPWHOPWHOP coming closer and closer.
F. Frederson writes:
Stark - banks fail all the time. FDIC can handle one or a few, but not one that is "too big to fail" or a systemic crisis - at least not without a taxpayer backstop.
I know banks fail. My humor fails too, even more often. I still hope someone can explain what happens to the bank's assets, such as foreclosed real estate, when that happens. What happened after the S&L debacle, for example? Do the feds wind up with title to the real estate that they eventually sell to recoup some of the losses?
When AAA debt becomes worthless, you might have a minor trust issue in the market.
Those "opportunity"/vulture funds certainly have brass.
Bob Dobbs:
Helicopters aren't going to cut it much longer. There is a reason I call Bernanke, "B-52" Ben.
Still trying to follow. If the CDO market is frozen, how are any nonconforming loans at all getting written, and how are other businesses that rely on CDOs keeping their doors open?
MAB
u were asking about dividends and SRS yesterday. i don't think they do have to pay b/c most of its holdings are CDS's. the other advantage is there u can take long term capital gains on SRS if u hold long enuf.
Forensics---
since were talkin CDO's may as well look at the OCC report,
http://www.occ.treas.gov/ftp/release/2007-137a.pdf
particularly page 4--
Although both past-due derivative contracts and derivative charge-offs increased in the third quarter, these
figures remain at nominal levels. For all U.S. commercial banks, the fair value of contracts past due 30 days or
more totaled $223 million, up $175 million from the $48 million of the second quarter but only 0.09% of net
current credit exposure from derivatives contracts.
This language has changed from previous reports, which stated that charge offs of credit deriviatees were almost always zero
that's becasuse the total PIE kept growing exponentially.
Credit contraction means winner's and loser's will soon be identified in the race for cash
Though the winners may have a credit recievable that won't be paid.
Back to this report... it still feels as though not all is being reported... and Freezes occur due to the unwillingness of interested parties to come clean
If the CDO market is frozen, how are any nonconforming loans at all getting written, and how are other businesses that rely on CDOs keeping their doors open?
This is the exact the same lie as yesterday. The deals are getting written just at numbers that don't enrich the Wall Streeters.
--
""It is difficult to get a man to understand something when his salary depends on his not understanding it" -Upton Sinclair"
That is why one has to be a born-and-bred dope to be successful in America, i.e., believe in the entire BS that most others believe in!
That is especially true of economists. You don't want to be a maverick if you are one. Don't ever forecast a recession until after the economy is in a recession. And you must deny the depression unless you want to be laughed at or risk losing your job, or clients.
Jas
"OK, everybody continue to act surprised so we don't have to restate and give back our performance bonuses as SOX-404 dictates."
Stark - start here. The short version is that the government set up an entity that took control of the bank assets and sold them off for less than the government spent making depositors whole.
If you acknowledge the 800 lb. gorilla, he wakes up and thrashes you. Shhhhhh.
idoc,
Thanks, thats good info.
It wouldn't surprise me if the top REITS or REIT management were long SRS. If nothing else to hedge their big gains over the last 5 years.
Me, I'm long lawsuits, pitchforks and gallows. Useless, after the fact regulation will be our next growth industry. You heard it here first!
Stress Test 1
Modern Finance 0
Make that Postmodern Finance
watching the dow or s&p drop is like watching a leviathan scream and groan.
Misean writes:
They can't sell at a mark to fantasy price, so the market is frozen eh? I don't think so. Methinks Mr. Seller wants to high a price for that junk, so instead of lowering prices to mark to market and destroy each others balance sheets, they sell only top quality stuff, leaving their B-Sheets even more impaired.
No, It's not so much about price. There really aren't many buyers for a lot of it...and there's a lot of it.
Everything is down. Damn. Is this deflation?
Marcus,
Margin call, gentlemen!
Markel writes:
Still trying to follow. If the CDO market is frozen, how are any nonconforming loans at all getting written
Nonconforming loans are still being made, but with much tighter lending standards to prime lenders. Those loans are staying on lender balance sheets or going into securitized whole loan deals.
Subprime, midprime, Alt-A, etc are not getting done precisely because the CDO bid has dried up...it got all arb'd out!
"Joe Klein's conscience writes:
Bob Dobbs:
Helicopters aren't going to cut it much longer. There is a reason I call Bernanke, "B-52" Ben."
Well, if you're going down that road, change it to B-29s with our chairman in the lead plane, the "Enola Bernanke."
carpet bomb broad street.
That ought to do some good....at least there would less 'containment'
MS
Junk spreads spiking. Note the graph is as a %of 10yr yield, so I'm not sure that the absolute spreads are near a record
Sudden Debt: The Fear Factor (2)
CDoh!
So how long before the Fed starts accepting these things at the discount window / TAF?
How long since Banker has been sighted?
Wasn't one of his early observations on this whole crunchy episode that it's impact on the real economy was a function of duration? I speculate that is also a non-linear function of time...
Nemo,
Are you sure they haven't?
Cheers,
hey OJoe, Seb
do u hear the screams?
F. Frederson writes:
Stark - start here. The short version is that the government set up an entity that took control of the bank assets and sold them off for less than the government spent making depositors whole.
Thanks. This is what I assumed would happen.
OK, I understand this:
Those loans are staying on lender balance sheets
but not this:
or going into securitized whole loan deals.
Aren't those CDOs?
No, It's not so much about price. There really aren't many buyers for a lot of it...and there's a lot of it.
No, it is about price. At the right price, somebody would be willing to buy.
The problem is that, both financially and in a regulatory sense, the holders of these particular decks' black Queens can't afford to sell at that price. Because then that would lay out in black and white what they, and everyone with half a brain, already know: once you mark them to market, the major holders of much of this debt are completely bankrupt.
Norma has it exactly right ... this is a true Mexican standoff. And our participants have no choice but to float self-serving, transparent, and increasingly preposterous plans for rescue from the outside ... because, here in the circle, everyone's trigger fingers are, shall we say, getting itchy.
Markel writes:
OK, I understand this:
Those loans are staying on lender balance sheets
but not this:
or going into securitized whole loan deals.
Aren't those CDOs?
Markel | 02.05.08 - 3:09 pm | #
No, those are CMO's.
I miss Banker, too.
My recollection was that he said that duration of the credit crunch was key. If it ended withing 2-3 months, there would be no significant economic effects.
If it lasted longer (winter? November? December? The new year? St. Patrick's Day?), then in the words of Robocop, there would be.............trouble.
Mook,
Very nice. But what about the chimpanzes?
Cheers,
Conjure- How high & wide was that mushroom cloud, anyway?
"Enola Bernanke."
Bernanke gay, you should have stayed at home yesterday
Aha words cant describe the feeling and the way you lied
These games you play, theyre gonna end it more than tears someday
Aha Bernanke gay, it shouldnt ever have to end this way
Its 8:15, and thats the time that its always been
We got your message on the radio, conditions normal and youre coming home
Bernanke gay, is father proud of little boy today
Aha this kiss you give, its never ever gonna fade away
Bernanke gay, it shouldnt ever have to end this way
Aha Bernanke gay, it shouldnt fade in our dreams away
Its 8:15, and thats the time that its always been
We got your message on the radio, conditions normal and youre coming home
Bernanke gay, is father proud of little boy today
Aha this kiss you give, its never ever gonna fade away
HB's couldn't keep up their gains. have rolled over.
Anonymous writes:
Conjure- How high & wide was that mushroom cloud, anyway?
Conjure says, "The good times are back. Torpedos los!"
HB's cannot keep open their doors. They will roll over and over right to BK court.
HB's-the gift that keeps on giving.
Man o man I wish this could be simple like a dot-com crash.
Reverse leverage and pride of ownership. Bummer.
Going forward, many potential homebuyers not only won't have the money for a downpayment, they won't have the stomach.
CNBC-60% of companies have reported and earnings off 28% YOY. WOW!
Is it still morning in America?
Ronny?
...Ronny?
I'm hoping for 450 down...
I had been expecting inflation, but I am starting to think things are happening too fast for fiscal policies to rescue the situation - plus, the dollar amounts needed are so large I question whether there is any practical ability to move that much borrowed money into the economy that fast.
Deflation.
If the government is deeply in debt going in to deflation, I am wondering whether default on the debt is inevitable.
even some famous bears must be getting mauled. Frank Barbera was crooning this weekend on Financial Sense about how he'd called the bottom and went long and expected the rally to last another week. sometimes i use these guys as contra indicators.
idoc writes:
CNBC-60% of companies have reported and earnings off 28% YOY. WOW!
Conjure says, "mp, more torpedos! Schnell"
Lee Adler also was long.
Why is the dollar up today? Makes no much sense in the face of weak economic data.
Traders moving out of U.S. economy-dependent foreign currencies and in to treasuries?
visited a Walmart last night in socal and it was the first time I've not had to wait in line to pay for something. they had even shut down the cash registers in gardens and electronics an hour before closing which is something I've never seen before.
Eric- Agree. Just think: Fractional Reserve Squared, in Reverse.
oh the groans...
--
"Everything is down. Damn. Is this deflation?"
MA,
The biggest inflation in the world is in American Egos, American Ignorance, and Political Power of America's Crooks.
All these will deflate in due course of time. Economics is all about behavior of the participants, leaders as well as the led. In America, both have been behaving badly.
Jas
If the government is deeply in debt going in to deflation, I am wondering whether default on the debt is inevitable.
How can you default on your debt when you control the creation of money?
"Why is the dollar up today? Makes no much sense in the face of weak economic data."
Aside from what anonymous said, there has been some talking in the media from Deutsche Bank that the dollar should soon begin to strengthen against the Euro. They're expecting rate cutes in Euroland.
i think something thats not been talked about is that stupid budget Bush is proposing that just cranks up our deficit w/o even a reference to our spendthrift ways. most of it was increases in military spending as well which caused our foreign neighbors to throw up their hands i'm sure. when are they going to get it?
i actually think that when the ECB starts cutting rates glod will go to $1000.
so those itchy trigger fingers are gettin' pretty chaffed about now.
At some point, very soon, one of these banks will break rank and sell thinking that they will be in line first and get the best price before the selling tanks the whole thing to .10 on the dollar.
Worked for SOC. GEN. didn't it?? Oh right they "didn't know"
MS
Well, looks like the counter trend rally in HBs and financials has run its course, eh? Hope all of you shorties did ok. Me, I got burned but learned a good lesson about playing these bear markets.
Agencies mull changes to structured finance ratings
Agencies consider changes to structured finance ratings - MarketWatch
proposing a numerical scale from 1 to 21 as an example. The agency floated other ideas too, such as adding "sf" to current alphabetical ratings to highlight a structured finance security.
--
"Begin the morning by saying to thyself, I shall meet with the busybody, the ungrateful, arrogant, deceitful, envious, unsocial. All these things happen to them by reason of their ignorance of what is good and evil." -- Meditations of Marcus Aurelius.
American dopes don't know that banking and finance Crooks are evil even when they built Debt Concentration Camps and piped them with financial poison gas.
Jas
Looks like the hedgies are trying to pull a fast one, and force, via futures, the S&P back to 1385, but no joy, yet:
Intraday Futures Prices - Markets Data Center - WSJ.com
bit OT but it is so funny/interesting:
Dr. Housing Bubble Blog
has a very interesting entry (Feb. 3rd) on the Great Depression mortgage market situation from 1932 perspective:
Besides MEW even Level 3 assets made their appearance, on the later:
"A reappraisal indicated that the value of the houses had fallen to $16,000 each. On one, the bank held a mortgage for $5,000, on the other for $17,000. What did the bank do? It commenced foreclosure proceedings on the strong mortgage fro $5,000 and allowed the weaker to stand. Why? It could readily transform the smaller mortgage into an asset on its books, whereas the larger mortgage would inevitably show a loss if the property were taken over"
3 solutions:
"1. Inflation of the currency in the hope of raising prices ...
AKA "Hope Now Please"
and on and on read for yourself...
Marcus Aurelius writes:
Is it still morning in America?
Ronny?
...Ronny?
Nope - It's mourning in America!
Hey, Jas,
Why don't you lay off the stereotyping and moralizing, bro? I'm not sure where you're from, but I'm sure there are perfectly nice people there. I would never judge all of them based on your behavior here.
Now - how 'bout that stock market? Down 300! Damn!
http://www.bloomberg.com/apps/news?pid=20601087&sid=aYSNYljr9vYA&refer=home
Goldman Fired by Massachusetts Fund Amid Changes
--
Rating agencies have been practicing junk science! Analyst Tavakoi on Bloomberg.
They were serving the CROOKS!!!!!!!!
Everyone wanting a good-life in America is, or was, better of serving the Crooks, just as everyone wanting a good-life in Nazi Germany was serving the Nazi leadership. No, Americans are in no way better than the Germans during the period before and during the Nazis.
Jas
ille_vir
if ur gonna play the short side u can't let yourself get squeezed out.
Jas- GWB's economic advisor is named Jain...any relation, or any info to share?
--
Markets are pricing the Fed Fund Rate of 1.75% by June.
Jas
REBear
very good question about GS.
Less than a year after Apollo Management LP paid $6.6 billion for real estate broker Realogy Corp....
WTF, it's one thing to suppose the overall economy might slip through OK during a real estate bust, but to suppose a real estate bust will have no effect on a real estate broker. That ranks up there with the purchase of about.com after the dot.com bust was well underway.
I never showed my son any love, attention or affection. Now you see the results.
This is all the result of the policies of the Bush administration. He must be impeached immediately.
everyones saying we're gonna go thru a period of V shaped bottoms with gentle rolling tops as we head down. i'm not sure that we won't have a bunch of spiking, A shaped tops and V bottoms. why? the hedgies and everyone else know they're running short squeezes but as soon as they sense the tide turning i think everyone hits the sell button.
When my CDOs are frozen, I usually place them in a warm oven with a small pan of water, as the humidity helps to keep the air moist which also prevents the yeast from suffocating or coughing. I usually allow between 2 to 4 years for my CDOs to rise and then if all the ingredients are in proper proportion, your dough will yield fabo results!
--
Marcus Aurelius,
Ignorant people always know when someone else is not behaving properly, but never know when they themselves are in error.
I am merely a critical observer of the American scene, which to me means the people.
Jas
No, Americans are in no way better than the Germans during the period before and during the Nazis.
Jas
Jas Jain | 02.05.08 - 3:50 pm
Do you realize what a f**** up statement that is?
Investors are being told by their brokers that the meltdown in earnings is due only to finance/mortgage and homebuilders. But it's a smokescreen.
Earnings are soft and weakening in many other sectors including telecommunications, semiconductors, hardware, restaurants, hotels, gambling, publishing, retail and food.
Inflation is killing costs and there's too much overcapacity and desperation to raise prices. Big companies are trying to grab share, even if it means losing money, and smaller companies are shark meat, especially if they are overleveraged (which most are).
The earnings scene is just carnage, and yet most investors still can't see it. If you could see it, you would dump all stocks right now. This kind of trend is a train, and it doesn't reverse fast.
CNBC just reporting that huge volume of puts have been bought in the last 5 minutes. several hundred thousand by a few players.
rut-roh
Rich,
what about etf's especially short?
Just got off phone with a client (auto dealer) he states ( some of the dealer owners are ready to jump off the roof as they can't sell cars and flooring is eating any profit)
Tough times indeed.
SRS-there she blows.
rich,
I'm looking for a long, maybe year long, fall in the Russell 2000 for pretty much that reason. It has about the highest p/e ratio around, the companies are more dependent on bank credit than big caps, and they generally have less income from overseas.
U.S. Central Credit Union Reports $760 Million Writedown, Loses AAA Rating
Subprime Markdowns Reach U.S. Central, Credit Unions (Update2) - Bloomberg.com
"Agencies mull changes to structured finance ratings proposing a numerical scale from 1 to 21 as an example. The agency floated other ideas too, such as adding "sf" to current alphabetical ratings to highlight a structured finance security."
I like it. Leaves room to add new levels of low ratings from 22-99 as the need arises.
cd
"Just got off phone with a client (auto dealer) he states ( some of the dealer owners are ready to jump off the roof as they can't sell cars and flooring is eating any profit)"
What part of the country?
"Well, if you're going down that road, change it to B-29s with our chairman in the lead plane, the "Enola Bernanke."
Heck, if you need raw lifting power for all that money, I say go with the Russian AN-225. You could just load the Denver Mint into the cargo hold and literally print while you drop. The only consumable limiting factors are paper, ink, and fuel.
"and flooring is eating any profit)""
mmm, anyone own any nice vacant lots intended for residental construction? business idea here.
mp,
Does Conjure have one of those U-boat commander hats on backward to operate the periscope?
[klaxon in background - "dive, dive, dive - this is not a drill - this is not a drill"]
--
No one dare tell Their Royal Highnesses, aka American People, the Truth. If any politician dares he, or she, will lose his, or her, job. Only liars need to talk and tell us what we want to hear, cries a born-and-bred American dope.
Crooks love the dopes because they can count on the dopes to defend them.
There are consequences to breeding dopes and there are reasons for breeding dopes.
Jas
Fitch puts MBIA ratings on Rating Watch Negative
Fitch puts MBIA ratings on Rating Watch Negative - MarketWatch
hey, i put in a buy order today! Woot! I'll take another one of these days tomorrow too.
u were asking about dividends and SRS yesterday. i don't think they do have to pay b/c most of its holdings are CDS's.
idoc,
One minor point, SRS (and other short proshares funds) hold general swaps contracts on whatever is being shorted.. not Credit Default Swaps.. those are just a specific type of swap.
Jas, go back to your website, you schmuck.
And, while you are at it, get your emigration papers going.
Your pearls of wisdom are no longer worth the price that you charge.
jg,
Have a look at this.
Great day for shorts. We hit the -3% handle on all major U.S. equity indexes on the last tick.
Combined with strong dollar/weak yen, this shows that hedgies are coming ove to bear side now, lowering net exposure.
Some hedgies got killed last week in the short unwind. Others won big. But now it's time for most of them to do some serious shorting.
Understand the dynamics of huge amounts of hedge fund money turning gradually shorter. Joe 401(k) just stands there like a dumb target, absorbing cannonball after cannonball, until he finally has to bail or go on welfare.
Then, the hedgies turn long. It's not fair. But it's America.
I feel sorry for people who lose money in bear markets. But not bulls who have been hanging out on this board, absorbing so much good information but arguing day after day about how great things are. That kind of stupidity deserves to lose.
Heck, if you need raw lifting power for all that money, I say go with the Russian AN-225. You could just load the Denver Mint into the cargo hold and literally print while you drop.
Of course, with our luck the Fed would end up dropping rolls of quarters over populated areas from 10K feet.
REBear,
Thanks for the link on the downgrade of U.S. Central Federal Credit Union. Anybody who has money in a credit union may want to read that article.
"There are consequences to breeding dopes and there are reasons for breeding dopes.
Jas
Jas Jain | 02.05.08 - 4:12 pm"
You know, eat it dipsh*t. What crap country are you from?
DNFTT
(do not feed the troll!)
sorry
4822-Florida-
Tampa area
Dealer body is hurting big time with service the only profit center paying bills right now. The big show is this weekend in San Francisco. Should be telling. Dealers employ a lot of highly paid people. Finance guys were making 120K+ easily last couple years. Now they would be lucky to make 80K..
The auto industry is like the fed right now, they played their hand by bringing in longer term financing, 0 Down and no payments until? Guess what? They front loaded sales to people who wouldnt have been buying till this year but bought early because of rates-discounts etc.
They are out of ammo too..
You are right, Mike; sorry.
rich, makes sense. Hope you are right (though I again ask for a one week moratorium while I get my margin account going to load up on SDS).
x, get Firefox with Greasemonkey and the Killfile script and your Haloscan comment browsing is oh so much more peaceful.
rich
i'm convinced hedgies hang out here too.
eli
i stand corrected. thanks
"eli writes:
u were asking about dividends and SRS yesterday. i don't think they do have to pay b/c most of its holdings are CDS's.
idoc,
One minor point, SRS (and other short proshares funds) hold general swaps contracts on whatever is being shorted.. not Credit Default Swaps.. those are just a specific type of swap.
eli | 02.05.08 - 4:16 pm | # "
And to add some clarity - hopefully. The daily swaps held by the levered ETF's (like SRS) provide much more than 2 to 1 leverage such that SRS holds much of its assets in the form of very liquid cash equivalents and treasuries. Since they own treasuries they generate a fair amount of income that must be distributed out to shareholders - so yes SRS and other leveraged ETF's are likely to have income distributions or dividends if you prefer to call them that.
mp writes:
Conjure says, "mp, more torpedos! Schnell"
mein capitan.. cruise ship off the starboard bow.. and its full of toxic debt paper !
idoc, rich, other shorties...
You guys are just evil peer pressure...derivatives were a dirty word when I was learning about trading from my Patrician elders...always go long on fundamentals.
Well, nice pop on EEV today..thanks!!!
This is nerve wracking though
i stand corrected. thanks
idoc,
you're welcome.. i wouldn't want you to be trying to impress some nice lady at a bar with all this Ultra Short Proshares stuff... and then get to the part about the swaps.. and she's all like, "Why do they own Credit Default Swaps? I thought those were for insuring CDOs and other types of corporate debt??"
Then you're smoked.. she'll go hang out with the quant nerds who know all the swaps lingo..
The daily swaps held by the levered ETF's (like SRS) provide much more than 2 to 1 leverage
Mike in Long Island,
whoa nelly.. pedant patrol here..
From my recollection the leverage is almost exactly 2:1.
They usually hold swaps where the notional value is 2x the cash they hold.
I'll quadruple check.
eli
LOL!! being married with kids nixes that. altho in my dreams i do love talking about swaps
Scott
we r going LONG: SRS and EEV! well, i guess i do have a few shorts...
eli,
Sorry to scare you. I didn't mean the entire fund was levered more than 2 to 1. I meant to say that since swaps are levered that the entire assets of the fund COULD NOT BE invested entirely in swaps and therefore had to invest in treasuries. The net result is 2 to 1 exposure to the daily index return.
--
Don't feed the Crooks!
Jas
eli is our resident swaps consultant:
1-800-eli-swaps.
I didn't mean the entire fund was levered more than 2 to 1.
Mike,
heh.. I'm just having fun being swaps pedant this evening..
I thought Jains were very understanding of others regardless of beliefs.
I think Jas is mentally ill, and we need to help him out - nobody else will. What do you think? Does anyone know of a good shrink, hypnotherapist or a psychic to boot? In the meantime he shouldn't be left alone...
idoc writes:
eli is our resident swaps consultant:
1-800-eli-swaps.
idoc | 02.05.08 - 4:48 pm | #
Swaptions too? What's his daily rate? As long as he accepts some shiny new CDO's as collateral I might have a short term consulting gig for him...
eli
so what do the general swaps on SRS represent? bets that the individual REITS will drop in price?
In the meantime he shouldn't be left alone...
cadams |
ok, well ur nominated.
Joe 401(k) just stands there like a dumb target, absorbing cannonball after cannonball, until he finally has to bail or go on welfare.
I was in the bear drawdown of 2002, my 401K contribs were doing DCA into that while the bulk of the 401K was in cash.
--
Dopes, invariably, are hypersensitive to criticism. And who could blame them.
It is the lack of critical thought that made them dopes in the first place. Dopes are enforcing the other dopes!
Jas
idoc,
SRS is tied to the daily performance of the Dow Jones US Real Estate Index - more specifically negative 2 to 1. The fund will buy swaps to gain that exposure on a daily basis. Here's a link to a Dow Jones site that will let you look at components and historical values Dow Jones Indexes
You'll have to scroll down to find the Real Estate one.
"Well, if you're going down that road, change it to B-29s with our chairman in the lead plane, the "Enola Bernanke."
Bob, You just made me get coffee all over my keyboard, lol!
Jas,
Don't bogart that dope you keep talking about! Share
SRS is tied to the daily performance of the Dow Jones US Real Estate Index - more specifically negative 2 to 1. The fund will buy swaps to gain that exposure on a daily basis.
idoc and Mike,
Yah, Mike's right on.. Proshares enters into a swaps contract with some counter party... Proshares will pay out the daily return on a notional amount on the DJUSREI that's 2x the cash they hold. The counter party pays them the daily decline on that notional amount.
Look at the literal list of Proshares holdings here
--
cd,
Believe me, there is lot to be understood about what is going on in America by observing how dopes react to the general criticism of the American system, which very much includes the so-called American People, as a group. You cant understand a democratic society without understanding what and how the population thinks and who drives their thoughts.
Merely pointing out the unpopular truth,
Jas
eli
duh, help me with what u mean by a NOTIONAL amt on the REIT index.
A swap is just a contract that two parties enter into.. agreeing to exchange money on some schedule over a period of time.
The swap payout is effectively the same as shorting at 2x leverage... except.. there's no actual traded index on the DJUSREI.. it's just a number. They can't short that.
So they have to use swaps.. since.. it'd be a big pain trying to short all the components at any level they wanted.
If you look at the Proshares holdings.. you see it over and over... the long funds hold all of the component stocks.. but the short funds use 99% swaps.
duh, help me with what u mean by a NOTIONAL amt on the REIT index.
idoc,
here example.. if you short one share of a $100 stock while holding $50 margin in your account.. you are 2x leveraged and you are short a notional amount of $100.
The notional amount just tells you how much of the underlying thing (in this case USDJREI) is used for percent gain and loss calculations.
Does that make any sense... sometimes i can't tell.
eli
i remember u and rich had a long discussion about the safety of these ultrashort vehicles using swaps. am i correct that u see these as risky in the event of counterparty default? any basis for that other than just intuitive sense?
i remember u and rich had a long discussion about the safety of these ultrashort vehicles using swaps. am i correct that u see these as risky in the event of counterparty default? any basis for that other than just intuitive sense?
I don't think it's necessarily dangerous with a capital "D".. just that, everyone should have their eyes open.
Swaps are not traded on exchanges... it's all OTC.. so you are dependent on the counterparty to pay up.
I guess... worst case scenario, you would be screwed out of a gain since the counterparty couldn't pay up.
(I'm ignoring the chance that the place Proshares holds their cash goes under.. then this is all sort of moot)
My official stance may be... i don't know what to think.. anything can happen.
eli
thanks for the info. i do think that SRS is poised to rocket upward as CRE worsens. i had IYR shorted for a long time but didn't like paying out dividends. i really like the double payout and long term cap gain status too.
i will keep my eyes open tho.
50 bp cut coming by Friday
SR-71 Ben at Mach 3+
I cant believe the president proposed a budget with a 400 billion deficit - and thats putting things nicely (manipulating numbers, leaving out some things (i.e. Afganistan))
The congress needs to sit down NOW and balance the damn budget THIS YEAR.
Grow some ***** Congress. Do whats right.
Anon
thats way to d**n sensible.
Don't think Choppers, think of the 1944-45 bombing raids on Hamberg and Berlin, except with $ not bombs being dropped. Yanks by Day, Brits by night (or was that the other way around)
Nice week so far for shorts - I'm almost back to where I was at the beginning of last week (would be higher if I wasn't such an idiot, but as they say, bear markets are hell for bulls and bears).
Don't get complacent - bulls always have one surprise or another to rally the market.
DIS report was very positive regarding consumer, so tomorrow could be a bit of a rally. Also BHP Billiton upped their offer for Rio Tinto.
Productivity and Costs economic news tomorrow. Not sure how market sensitive this will be tomorrow.
News and sentiment is trending bearish again, which is annoying if you are a bear, sets up these counter trend rallies too easily.
Also, everyone is looking for a retest, so if we hit the lows again (this week if CSCO tanks and jobless claims come in hot again), I'm taking a some off this time (learned my lesson), and wait for a confirm that we're breaking lower.
--
Anon,
What planet do you live on? What part of Crooks in control of the American system don't you get??
Bush promised to reduce the deficit to half when he leaves office. He will leave the office with the largest deficit in history, if counted honestly. Yesterday, Bush promised that the budget will be in balance by 2012! You wanna bet on a $1.0Tr.+ deficit in 2012?
Open your eyes to the reality in America and not what you want things to be like. With Crooks in-charge, the future is highly predictable.
Jas
eli,
Don't those swaps get expensive in a bear market? How do they still manage to pay out 2 times underlying index?
Congress will do that the Economists are doing now - calling the recession when we are alread in one - not because they couldnt predicit it, but it was socially unacceptable to do so before hand and they didnt have the ***** to do it.
Congress knows a day of financial reconing is coming. They just dont have enough patriotism and sense to overcome their personal fear of doing something socially unacceptable - cutting spending
--
"They just dont have enough patriotism and sense to overcome their personal fear of doing something socially unacceptable - cutting spending."
It is amazing that politically impotent people expect their representatives to have *****. They want an easy job that pays well, especially, the retirement and health benefits! Easy and well-paying jobs involve serving the crooks!!
Jas
Ha ha ha all you punks expect me to airdrop the loot? I just will press this button at the Fed control panel the elites equipped me with and you schmucks won't dare speak up or I send Hank round to muss wid yer neck
Oh I might as well tell you since I rule wait till the zero's get added to all my buddies reserves on the elite internets. Ha ha stupid little people have some more ice cream and behave, Hank angry for bussi
"I'm not saying this could actually happen, but what if a bank fails? What happens to its "assets?" For example, homes and other real estate they acquired via foreclosure? Don't those assets become public property at some point in the FDIC process?
John Stark"
John Stark - In a nutshell - the FDIC takes the bank's assets and gets rid of them. In the case of real estate - it sells the stuff. During the S&L crisis in the early 80's - a frequent complaint by S&L's taken over by the FDIC was that the FDIC sold the assets too fast and too cheap. Indeed - a lot of people got great bargains at those "fire sales".
You have all forgotten about the lowly CD as a form of raising money for lending for mortgages. The lenders I bought from this week were Wachovia and National City Bank - and I'm sure that more than a fair amount of this CD money is going to mortgage lending. Roby
Fat Tuesday, yeah right. Or as brother Jerome from la Defense might have it, Mardi Gras. Ash Wednesday tomorrow, if anyone still cares. Or as Siegfried would say, "Do not panic until I give the order to panic."
Jas, you're swimming against a tide of 100s of millions of neurotypicals. LaRouche, Ryskamp, and a host of others have been on this case for years to no effect. Jungian F is the human organ of ontology, and if you are influenced by car commercials, there's no way you can see this particular tsunami on the horizon. I left this file months ago, and don't know why I even visit here -- sort of the look-at-car-crash reflex (besides being in the car). Except for an abortive attempt to get Tanta to look at the systemic as opposed to the servicing implications of the conforming limit boost, my efforts are otherwise directed now. Just discovered evidence that Douglas Adams accidentally sent one of his manuscripts through a worm-hole into the early 17th century. Suggest you explore such irrelevancies. It's most relaxing and we'll have ten to fifteen years to adjust to World Depression II, so let's work strategically.
Is Conjure Bag really Nouriel R? See his headline on the right side of the blog.
On the American Enterprise Site there is a 28Mar07 video which ends with the chief economist of FDIC asking a senior UBS analyst to please, please come up with a plus-minus 10 percent number for the ultimate mortgage default number. Peter Wallison jokes about "reps & warranties." Doesn't sound funny now. You can't insure against a systemic risk.
oops -- American Enterprise Institute (AEI)
--
"Except for an abortive attempt to get Tanta to look at the systemic as opposed to the servicing implications of the conforming limit boost, my efforts are otherwise directed now."
Thanks, JohnM.
Tanta, a legalistic robot, is a great example of the doping that I speak of. She is intelligent, I believe that she means well, but there is no way that she can overcome the doping from birth about the system and its mooring.
I do respect CR and Tanta as human beings, but not for their understanding of the root causes of the problems discussed on this blog. Actually, I think that most people of this blog are good people but with very bad understanding of the system as it exists. That is where the doping process has had its greatest success.
Dopes simply cannot handle criticism and no one is worse here than Tanta. She feeds her intolerance to many others. She got measure problems in that department. In this regard, CR is commendable.
Jas
--
Sorry, She got MAJOR problems in that department.
Jas
Jas,
I don't think it's indoctrination at all, it's simply that some of the most important issues require connecting the dots between areas where you can't be competent in all of them. Almost everyone is programmed to subscribe to collective wisdom in nearly everything in their own area (from their peers) and everything in other areas (deferring to the experts in that area). The ability (indeed compulsion) to connect those dots nevertheless is a key symptom pointing at some pretty serious stuff with a code number in DSM IV (but not III).
Dr. David Lereah, for example, was displaying evidence of robust mental health all through this exercise.
Sorry.
REBear,
Your question about the cost of swaps can be answered "No - they don't necessarily get more expensive".
Check out this link to a Bank of New York overview of how a swap transaction works -
Swap Description
The daily swaps are costing the proshares Libor + basis points.
If you gain exposure to $10million at days end you pay Libor + basis points on the $10 million notional value. If the reference security (the index or equity the swap is based on) loses value you owe that loss as well. Conversely if the reference security increases in value you get the gains payed out to you (less whatever Libor + basis points on the $10 million notional)
If your swap counterparty blew up you would be out that days return on the notional amount of the swap (in the case of proshares they have daily swaps - so the proshares max exposure would be to one days return). If the index went up (and your swap is levered 2 to 1 on the inverse of the index) and your counter party blew out - you'd have a windfall - you wouldn't owe them. So in the case of SRS you'd be concerned about a counterpary failing on a day when the index was down big (and therefore your 2 to 1 inverse swap was up huge).
--
"I don't think it's indoctrination at all, it's simply that some of the most important issues require connecting the dots between areas where you can't be competent in all of them."
JohnM,
The doping process leans people towards a certain way of evaluating the evidence, i.e., how not to connect the dots. The propaganda machine is ever ready to connect the dots in a certain way and people can't escape the guidance.
Breeding dopes is one aspect of any civilization! Dopes are rewarded with material and social success, a nice reinforcement mechanism.
Jas
Jas,
Jacques Ellul (above all), Derrida, Barthes and a host of others (largely French) are in perfect agreement with you, and so am I. What I'm saying is that there is a tiny minority out there that can't respond to emotional manipulation.
--
JohnM,
We agree. Sorry for taking the argument a bit further just for slight clarification.
Jas
Jas,
Salut! I take great comfort from AllenM's signature line.
"There are consequences to breeding dopes and there are reasons for breeding dopes."
True dat.
Thanks Mike.
Jas: seems your model of the world always seems to conflict with everybody elses'.
Hm, must be their problem, right?
Somewhere in Texas, there's a bridge missing a troll.
Mark writes:
"Jas: seems your model of the world always seems to conflict with everybody elses'."
Don't be so sure.
Jas makes a lot of sense, most of the time. Other times, he still makes sense, but most have been conditioned to dismiss his ideas without rational consideration. Perhaps he's being extreme, just to get you thinking? The world is a much larger place than it appears on Fox News.
Mike in Long Island, Eli & iDoc,
thanks for your discussion on Ultra/Inverse ETFs and how they operate using 'General Swap Contracts'.
Much appreciated.
--
Mark,
One of us is highly ignorant of the reality as it exists in America today. A dope automatically assumes that he is right because he thinks like, or is supported by, most others.
That is how democracy breeds dopes -- What do most others think?! Oh, I must be right.
Jas
Jas,
Of course I mis-spoke at 7:17 PM about Tanta. At issue was not conforming limit, but Jonathan Weil's article on abuse of SFAS 140 and Tanta's defense of the seller's servicing the mortgages for the buyer. Weil was back for another kick at the can earlier today. Tanta has not yet bitten on this one, but again the key issue is systemic risk. Are we kidding ourselves about the amount of capital required to cover the risks on baskets of mortgages we've supposed to have sold on, but that in fact we're still very much involved in? Hat tip to an associate of Doom informant V for passing on this link.
"Morgan Stanley Cries Mommy, SEC Comes Running", Jonathan Weil, Bloomberg, February 6, 2008.