w writes:
sdtfs writes:
I'm guessing we're not talking pesticides; more like bT=Bacillus thuringiensis. A bacteria that attacks the mosquito larvae and is relatively safe for the environment, non-toxic to vertebrates and adult insects. It kind of works, I haven't gotten much benefit from the blocks, but the granules work fine, just need periodic re-application
Actually, I work in the pesticide industry. BT's are not a bacteria that attacks mosquito larvae. They are a stomach poison that is grown in a bacteria and processed into a fairly safe insecticide. many BT products are registered organically. If a poison can be made from a "natural" source it can be registered organically. I spray my organic crops much more than my conventional ones because the pesticides are not as effective or do not last as long. I do live in Ventura County and the County Vector Control has the mosquito fish available for free. While I am proponent of responsible pesticide usage I think the less we use and the safer the products we use the better for everyone. Homeowner usage is probably not as important as food production. I think it is funny that someone worried about putting oil into the ocean is not concerned about using a pesticide unnecessarily.
w | 02.19.08 - 5:50 pm | #
I am so sick of the use of the word subprime. Look, it doesn't matter what type of loan the borrower got; if the property is foreclosed on, it will negatively impact values.
Home prices are falling and will fall a lot more regardless of the type of loan program the owner has.
It's really quite amazing to see the lead NAR shill trying to paint Shiller as a shill. Geez, he basically accuses him of being un-American (quote, an approach that flies directly in the face of the American sense of democratic values.)
The CS index is a tool. NAR is a marketing spin machine. The MSM is a hype machine. None of them knows exactly what, when and where.
There just is not as many qualified buyers now. As the market for a given neighborhood drops from 700k to 600k there will be a few buyers. Some people will point to these new purchases as the new value for these homes. But with these buyers out of the market the neighborhood homes will fall to 500k. Then there will be another pool of buyers to buy a few homes. Again people will point and say that the market is stabilized and the homes in the neighborhood are worth 500k. Then the search for qualified buyers will start again.
Markets will drop slowly and give a lot of false signals to be taken as hope until markets stabilize at a reasonable multiple of local incomes. Everything else is wishful thinking.
Why bother arguing with Yun? It almost seems to legitimize him by suggesting there's a reasonable debate to be had. It should be patently obvious to everyone that he's got a huge vested interest in cherry picking, spinning, and when all else fails simply distorting the available statistics, and I think the most effective approach to dealing with him is to make sure the term "shill" appears with every mention of his name, not picking apart his "argument".
Lawrence Yun is a Shill. His directive is to try to gain some credibiity so people buy houses and realtors make commissions. Anyone who listens to anything he says is a fool.
CR - I believe that even areas with relatively tight supply could see price declines as credit continues to tighten.
Boston is one market I have been following for years. The decline had started earlier (price overrun) and the market appeared to be leveling out and perhaps moving up a tad when the crunch hit this summer. Since it has resumed its downward march.
The extremely loose underwriting creates a constriction of demand relative to supply when standards rise again. I am by no means implying that your excellent work on supply isn't relevant. Of course it is.
I'm just suggesting that we have multiple downward escalators at the current time.
PS: Everyone used to complain about Lereah, but to me Yun seems infinitely less connected to reality.
I just got off the phone with an LO from a major bank, and he said there was another rate change coming today -- which is something they never see. It was 6% this morning, and expected to rise this afternoon.
Not to be outdone by Lereah, Yun just released a new book,
"Why this is the year to buy a house--and how you can profit from buying at the bottom."
(Unlike Lereah however, Yun will not capitulate and change the name a year later. In fact, Yun plans to keep the book's name constant for the next six to seven years.)
The market is telling us something,'' Brown said.The marketplace is saying it doesn't work well to have two stores selling these products under one roof.''
Secondly, and I'm sure this has been brought up, but the Case/Shiller index would seen to get distorted by MEW for home improvements which were high flying until recently. So, if a $300k house gets $50k worth of upgrades and sells for $375,000, I think C/S would say the house appreciated by $75k although net appreciation is really only $25k. When MEW collapses and home improvements are small, the index will be more reflective of the changes in net home value. So, over the next 5 years, the index should be pretty accurate.
Gotta love all those stupid home builders, real estate agents and mortgage brokers who thought this bubble would continue to the moon and they'd never stop making money.
My chance of "epic pain coming soon" stands at 73.56 %, which is above my cutoff of 13.13 % above which this potential first time homebuyer does not buy.
Calculation based on the rigorous method of pulling my head out of my a$$ and looking around. No shills needed thank you very much.
but to me Yun seems infinitely less connected to reality
More like reality has shifted farther "off-message" since Yun took over.
Like any salesman, Yun is not being paid to tell the truth. Nor is he being paid to lie. He is being paid to tell the same story regardless of the facts. Like Lereah, he is simply doing his job. It is a distasteful way to make a living, but not the most distasteful by a long shot.
The mystery is why anybody ever takes such people seriously.
Here is a report from the DRHorton Sale:
I went to the DRHorton sale in Temecula, the Bungalows.
It was rather humorous. They opened at 9:00 and we got there at 8:55, walked up to the office. There was a big sign that said "line forms here" with an arrow.
We were the only ones there, except for a couple standing over by the catering truck.
They only cut about 15% off of these though. High three's down to low three's.
One model was 398k marked down to about 328K. My son offered them 275K and they turned him down.
Anyway, the best part was the "rule" on there info page.
Not all of these sales were even at peak prices, a lot of places were sold in 2004 and 2005, then resold recently at gigantic losses.
More reasonable housing prices plus all the other great things about living in California mean the outflow from CA that has been driving the market in AZ, CO, NV, OR, and much of the rest of the West will stop.
Current CA homeowners can't sell at the old bubble prices anymore, and renters who want to buy no longer need to look outside of the state to find reasonable prices. It is now possible, once again, to find a 2-bedroom condo or bungalow here in San Diego for under $250,000. It wasn't from 6/04 to 6/07.
Same with the Southeast, where the outflow from Florida was helping the market in Georgia, South Carolina, etc.
There ought to be a law: Some dude named Armando was just on the radio pitching his real estate flipping system, by which I too can build my own real estate empire. Isn't this guy a little behind the curve?
Yes, in Austin Texas, despite the favorable mention of our real estate market in the NYTs, the market has definitely slowed. Suddenly, the California investors are gone and the urgency to buy is gone. Locals no longer feel that they have to move quickly to beat the out of town investors and with the credit crunch most can't move quick anyway. Prices are holding steady but the low end in outlying areas is dead and sellers are feeling pain. Inventory is rising and homes are just sitting. Our market was virtually flat between 2001-05 thanks to the tech bust so we don't have far to fall to get in line with incomes but our skyline is full of cranes building high-rise condo towers, who knows what will happen to them?
"There ought to be a law: Some dude named Armando was just on the radio pitching his real estate flipping system, by which I too can build my own real estate empire. Isn't this guy a little behind the curve?"
I've heard that one also. Armando probably has done some flipping, but the only profitable activity now in that regard is to sell his system to suckers.
I've also heard a few "learn how to play the stock market" ads lately.
I havent read all the comments yet. Forgive me if this has been posted already. But it seems to me the big problem we have is people went from the first photo to the middle one, and the middle photo to the last one. Thanks to the Fed and stupid policies of easy credit.
"Prices will continue to fall until the inventory levels decline significantly"
Inventory is understated. We should get pent up supply on line and concurrently REOs being priced more aggressively, in a race to the bottom. This all occurring at the same time credit is contracting, the job market is deteriorating and LT rates should be rising. Lots of moving objects all going the wrong way.
The natural demand under these credit conditions won't even dent supply numbers without radical price declines.
--
Vast majority of economists with access to the MSM lie.
I know that many Americans would like to shoot the lawyers to get rid of many problems. That would be a mistake, IMO. However, shooting all the economists would do wonders for America! Most of the bad ideas relating to the management of the economy that get adopted by the USG and the Fed come from economists.
Those who want a good example of an economist who is worse than politicians can watch Lakshman Achuthan of ECRI in the video in the following link:
"Areas with more inventory will likely see larger price declines; areas with less (especially less than 6 months of inventory) will probably see minor or no price declines."
This is a serious question - is there ANYWHERE in the US right now with less than 6 months of housing inventory? Is anyone measuring the change in months of supply in various markets?
That is exactly what is happening. The long-time homeowners who listed their homes but were really just dipping their toes in the water and trying to get bubble prices largely have left the market.
In their place are increasing numbers of motivated sellers willing to chop 40% or more off peak prices to move the inventory.
Who said, "There are lies, damn lies and statistics"? My boots-on-the-ground perspective from So. Cal: the higher-end properties are experiencing very little decline. Not so for the middle and working class areas.
The buzz word in North Eastern New Jersey among the Realtors is "short sale". Every one is trying to learn more about them and become a short sale expert around here. There are a few buyers coming back in, from what I'm hearing, but their intentions are to pick up the pieces. I personally think they're catching a knife, but we'll see.
I can only imagine that this will have an even worse effect on housing prices down the road. The appraisers are going to have to start using short sale figures to comp the value of the homes.
With fewer and fewer sales, there will be fewer and fewer comps for appraisals. And guess what's the only thing selling. The cheapest homes within each market. Too much supply, so only best of deals sell.
It will start to catch more speed as the comps keep coming in lower and lower. Appraisers are telling me it's getting harder and harder to find good comps.
Yun wrote: I would avoid any investment that is thinly traded.
LMAO! As opposed to liquid investments like houses and condos in Miami.
Yun wrote: If it is any comfort to those who lost money on a Case-Shiller home price futures contract, I would suggest that they contact Dr. Shiller about price revisions.
Will somebody pleeeeeeease post Yun's email addie so that all those who have lost money in RE can contact him.
Yun wrote: If I was on the losing end of a contract bet I would demand to know more about revisions. Keep trying, as the data is constantly revised.
"You will never recover your reputation for competence. You are politically a dead man walking and if the Prime Minister could actually make a decision he would move you."
It will be March very soon. Between March and June, there usually comes a spike in inventory levels from the winter lows. This year I think it will be a double wammy because we'll have many who are currently off the market (because they got fustrated last year) coming back on again this year.
Nothing seems to be indicating that sales are picking up. I wonder if the panic will start to set in by the fall when another selling season has slipped by and it dawns on the public just how serious this is getting. Too few buyers, too many sellers! I think some get it. But there are way too many still in denial. Especially the current homesellers.
--
"Who said, "There are lies, damn lies and statistics"? My boots-on-the-ground perspective from So. Cal: the higher-end properties are experiencing very little decline. Not so for the middle and working class areas."
High-end properties are mostly bought by Crooks and their agents. I know someone in PVE who refinanced his home worth $2M at 95% (1st and a second) during 2007Q1, who works in CRE and RRE financing, and now all set to walk away if things go south. And he is worth millions outside of his home. It was preplanning in case his area gets hit.
"What happens when California prices drop 50%, and all the people who left CA because of the high prices start coming back?"
They'll file for unemployment?
A lot of jobs left because of the high prices too, particularly production. Some went out of the country, plenty others just went out of state.
You have to have something to come back to, besides sunny skies and traffic. I'd like to think lower prices would bring manufacturing jobs back eventually, but there's no guarantee.
Some people might come back, regardless, but mainly those who already have prospects; ie, they know they can get reasonable work. Nurses, cops, accountants, people who can almost always get work anywhere. The rest, not so much. Not unless some vast opportunity opens up.
He's talking his book...but there's two sides to every story.
And cranking up the current flow on the Super Colander Tin Foil Hat, you asked Killer on a thread a few ago how the Fed et. al. could hide monetizations. Maybe here? Just a raw guess with NO data.
"An epic downturn in the residential real estate market? Somebody should tell the buyers and sellers of the priciest houses in the Washington area.
The average price for the region's 25 most expensive home sales increased by 21 percent in 2007, according to Washington Business Journal research."
Don't forget that in Austin, SF and Seattle, if you take sales that occurred in the 2nd week of the month on either Thursday or Friday, for homes with a ratio of indoor space to outdoor space of 8:1, and with purchase prices that had odd first-digits, sales are up 8.9%, on a per-room basis.
still think theres no inflation goin on in China? sorry. have to yank your chain
Oh idoc - if you only knew. I had a talk with a very good friend who has been in mfg in China for a decade - the lid is completely blowing off over there. All of it in the last six mmonths...
The 'dollar sterilization' that worked so well for so long has completely ground to a halt with the US credit markets in reverse. Very hard to recycle dollars back w/out big loses.
That was what kept the visible money creation minimal for so long over there - not any longer.
To give you an idea he said his company sent out an internal memo saying be prepared to exit China & fast... meaning have both other developing market sources in line & also domestic capacity...
He was a little drunk at the time we talked but said "Domestic???" It will be his job to staff those plants.
Should get interesting.
BTW I asked him for a copy of the memo and he said no way he's lettin' me put that out on the internets (even camouflaged) until he's a LOT closer to retirement. LOL. He is a survivor like so many still in mfg.
Case/Shiller is a really great marketing piece with a lot of credibility but it is not above criticism...should make those guys a lot of money on the real estate papparazzi circuit.
It is just too concidental that the index topped at 200%.... how did they pick the starting year? probably to get to 200%.... you change starting years and the data changes alot 170...180... wheres the bottom? It won't hit 100 in the coastal markets.
When does modern mortgages start and how did they affect prices? Late 1800s? early 1900s?
Obviously mortgages with interest only/teasers and HELOCs impacted the index.
A former modeler, I've seen too many managers tweek models until the answer was what they want, not so scientific. (see Wall Street CDOs for example)
I like Krugman's observations of the "Two America's..the zoned lands vs flatlands..." look for the indexes in the flatlands to be more normal vs income.
We have a significantly restricted land supply in desirable places to live.... more people are coming and they don't care about other people's income multipliers.
How long does it take to move production back? I am seeing a lot more US made parts coming into the shop. The only thing I can think of blatantly stamped "Hencho en China" are a couple of the belts we use. Pretty much all other parts are "Made in US"...Esp the Cummins and Freightliner parts...This is a major shift from just 6-8 months ago.
Sippn said: We have a significantly restricted land supply in desirable places to live.... more people are coming and they don't care about other people's income multipliers.
Not true. Middle class is migrating out of CA. Immigrants moving in lead to increase in population.
Chris Cobra - yea... visited IKEA last week for a toddler table and you know how they do it? That fancy Euro/Sweedish design? Nope - its all "Made in China" and of course you get to assemble it - the real hidden cost.
W - thats what I said. I didn't mean the WASPs were leading the charge, its foriegn investment. Most of the higher end homes I see sold are not native ... even in middle NorCal. Like I said, they don't care about "your" income problems...
"...Half Moon Bay is wrestling with unpleasant options for responding to a court ruling that officials say threatens the "very existence of our city government" - a $36.8 million judgment against the city for turning a proposed housing development site into wetlands.
Under the worst-case scenario, officials say, Half Moon Bay would become the first Bay Area city forced to dissolve, and the coastal town's land would become an unincorporated part of San Mateo County.
Members of the City Council say that's unlikely, and they plan to vote at a public meeting tonight to retain an appellate law firm and a financial consultant to advise them on how to tackle a court judgment that is more than three times Half Moon Bay's $10 million annual budget."
As a wrench turner,I realllllly enjoy the super high quality tool steel forged in someones outhouse in China tools they include. Oh and the directions also rock!!! Thank God for pics(sometimes)...
Depends on how long it takes to get labor back... I see labor shortages already in basic machining & such.
Specifically I'd say it will take as long it takes Gen Xers to realize they can't all be realtors, investment bankers or mortgage brokers and get happy with the idea they will be married to a machine for the rest of their life. This time period will EXACTLY coincide with the time it takes Boomers to realize they won't all get to retire on the golf course near Myrtle Beach... for exactly the same reassons.
Where were you getting after market replacement parts before? I was unaware that China's industry could put out such parts.
Oh they can make good stuff in some cases - just not any less expensive than we can produce good stuff. That's the key thing cheap is cheap no matter where you make'em.
Don't get mad at me...OEM. A lot of the stuff had Canada and Mexico tags but that has dropped off a bunch. Don't get me wrong,I am thrilled shitless to get the mfg back but with automation the hiring just won't be there.
I had mentioned this earlier...All the Neon parts I bought 2 weeks ago were made in the US. All bought from the China kings of Advance and Autozone. Surprised the shit outta me. Even the coil pack was made in the US,the prior one was a China,purchased 4 years ago.
Don't disagree with ya, but I'm hard pressed to continue buying Detroit Iron when 20% of my price goes to some retired overpaid auto worker instead of making my Expedition's brakes as large as my mechanic's Toyota Supra's (Ford: "its your driving habits" - yea, I like to stop)
30+ year owner of Detroit products by my favorites so far have been Bavarian...
"How many households will end up in negative equity territory and will thus an incentive to walk away from their mortgages? The answer to this question of course depends on how much home prices will eventually fall from their peak. A recent analysis by Goldman Sachs suggests that if home prices fall another 10% in 2008 after having fallen by about 8% from peak in 2007 (based on the Case-Shiller/S&P index) about 15 million households will be in negative equity territory. There are other estimates that are consistent with the Goldman Sachs one. Calculated Risk a very well respected housing blogger estimated that if home prices decline by 10% in 2008 the number of households with negative equity will be 10.7. But this estimate was based on a partial underestimate of the fall in home prices in 2007 relative to its 2006 peak (as the Case-Shiller data for all of 2007 were not available at the time of that estimate). Thus, the number of households with negative equity could be closer to 12 million. Calculated Risk also estimates that a cumulative fall in home prices of 20% implies 13.7 million households with negative equity while a 30% cumulative fall implies 20.3 million households with negative equity.
These figures are staggering considering that in 2006 the total number of households with mortgages was 51.2 million. So between 20% to 40% of households with mortgages may end up with negative equity in their homes and with a big incentive to walk away from their mortgages. Even the lower bound figure of 10 million households with negative equity (20% of those with mortgages) is huge.
Well, if we have to start making our own shite again, I'm not gonna complain. My grandparents did well working assembly lines, and the next gen did well doing that or doing the engineering/management.
The sad part is all the newer stuff is all pretty much the same. I was seeing a huge improvement in even Dodge with the stuff DC was integrating...Suppose thats dead now. I have light duty trucks that have 200k plus and have had nothing but routine maintenance performed since new...Yes I feel the same way about legacy costs. It pretty much killed a company I worked for...
I'm not sure yet - things are happening fast, similar to what happened in the 80s.
A good book to read is 'The Machine That Changed The World' about 'Lean Mfg' written around 1990... it is still relevant today. If you have finance background then read between the lines (financial lines that is). Many believe the resurgence in US production will come from a more realistic and intelligent understanding of real cost and risk.
There was an article in Manufacturing Engineering about this recently... costing lean systems and why old metrics are so hard to use in new systems.
BTW - the key to the 80s resurgence was avoiding excessive fixed cost (especially debt) even if it meant you had to assume somewhat higher variable cost (pay higher wages). That lesson was lost from the late 90s and beyond.
Sorry, the guy got a first and a second as if it was a buy. He made sure that both (1st and 2nd) were non-recourse loans because I specifically asked him about it. The guy and his wife (she always worked for banks for some 25+ years) have been in financing business.
Also, he "helped" many motel owners to be in a position to walk away when things go south! Lot of crookery in the lending business over the past 5 years.
O dear, I feel the need to break into song again...
To the tune of Da Doo Ron Ron
I heard him on the TV and my heart stood still
Say screw Yun Yun Yun, Say screw Yun Yun
I knew it right away he was a real shill
Say screw Yun Yun Yun, Say screw Yun Yun
Yes my heart stood still
Yes he was a real shill
And when he hypes them homes
Say screw Yun Yun Yun, Say screw Yun Yun
I knew what he was doin' when he told that lie
Say screw Yun Yun Yun, Say screw Yun Yun
He sold that snake oil, but my oh my
Say screw Yun Yun Yun, Say screw Yun Yun
Yes, he told that lie
Yes, my oh my
And when he hypes them homes
Say screw Yun Yun Yun, Say screw Yun Yun
Say screw Yun Yun Yun, Say screw Yun Yun
Say screw Yun Yun Yun, Say screw Yun Yun
He spun the crashing market, made it look so fine
Say screw Yun Yun Yun, Say screw Yun Yun
Recov'rys round the corner, says the dotted line
Say screw Yun Yun Yun, Say screw Yun Yun
Yes, he made it look so fine
Yes, he drew the dotted line
And when he hypes them homes
Say screw Yun Yun Yun, Say screw Yun Yun
Say screw Yun Yun Yun, Say screw Yun Yun
Say screw Yun Yun Yun, Say screw Yun Yun
DC1000 the washington deep pockets,but we out hwerein the burbs...busted. I mean southern MD here in Charles the inventory has grown every month since 2004 from mid 100 to 1600+ now, and the majorityof homes are over 399K with our movement in Charles County we have over 65 months inventory of 399K + and the moajority of our toxic mortgages were done late 05 till the 2007 March cut off. Folks have no concept what is fixing to hit them. but its "always great time to buy or sell". OH BTW over 29 months total inventory
"Are banks are too powerful, so that this could never happen?
The major financial institutions probably will not object, as seen in this quote from the American Securitization Forum conference (4 February):
Merrill Lynch senior director Sarbashis Ghosh, in a session on RMBS research: Its not a subprime problem, its a housing leverage problem we have people with a mortgage who simply cannot afford to make their payments. Ghosh suggested the solution was to address the question of leverage, and went so far as to suggest something like a food stamp program to help borrowers with payments.
From Bloomberg (1 Feb 2008):
Alex Pollock, former president of the Federal Home Loan Bank of Chicago, urges the creation of a federal lending agency based on the Home Owners Loan Corp., or HOLC, created by Congress during the Great Depression. Robert Kuttner, co-founder of the Washington-based Economic Policy Institute, Senate Banking Committee Chairman Christopher Dodd and others have proposed similar ideas.
Many who are calling for action point to the 1930s, the last time the U.S. national median home price fell, as an example of what government should do. During the worst economic slump of the 20th century, HOLC issued tax-exempt bonds and used the proceeds for below-market- rate mortgages. It refinanced one-fifth of U.S. homes between 1933 and 1936 after negotiating with the original lenders to accept less than the amount owed on the defaulted mortgage.
In the 1930s, lenders were seizing homes at an average rate of 3,000 a day, adjusted for todays housing stock size. In the fourth quarter of 2007, new foreclosures averaged 2,939 a day, double the pace of a year earlier, according to RealtyTrac Inc., an Irvine, California-based real estate data company."
You would think in a deal like this, the seller of the final mansion would be able to assist the subprime at the base of the scheme. Of course it's never that easy or obvious.
I can remember waiting for the buyer of my buyer to qualify to I could buy.
The 'dollar sterilization' that worked so well for so long has completely ground to a halt with the US credit markets in reverse. Very hard to recycle dollars back w/out big loses.
We all know NAR spews lies, propaganda, false housing data, etc. As far as I'm concerned anything NAR has to say is unimportant fictional gibberish and a waste of time reading. It borders on insulting when NAR fairy tails corrupt the pages of Calculated Risk.
My prediction on this one is a little less dire...what we had that caused the problem is a financing/leverage problem. The market now is over-reacting to that by restricting lending on all sorts of things, not just mortgages. And what is happening is a lot of buyers who would otherwise get a mortgage are being rejected or have to cough up more than they'd have to in the past (I bought my first house in 1989 with 10% down, try that now).
So there will be pent-up demand for when the market unsticks. When that happens, the price declines will stop as these buyers return. So the key to figuring this out, is to figure out when the credit markets start to be lubricated again.
shake magic eight ball, will the credit market unstick by the end of summer?
Signs point to Yes
There you have it! Hey, it's as good as most economists
Where do you find the time? for such
amusement? Thanks for the laugh.
The NAR, supported by dues paying Realtors, and as the easy money in being an agent between buyers and sellers goes away so will many of the easy money chasers, leaving NAR (and the Home Builders Group, over time), very under budgeted.
As an appraiser, my biz is picking up, there will be considerable mark to market, refi and REO loan purchase work for those qualified. And the lenders still surviving can and should get picky about their choices in appraisers, not that they have the brains to do so.
Even so, there is an oversupply of Realtors. Then there are those who have or will get on the REO gravy train of listings. Ya gotta work for that money though, usually.
The 'dollar sterilization' that worked so well for so long has completely ground to a halt with the US credit markets in reverse. Very hard to recycle dollars back w/out big loses.
Sorry, can you make this a bit more clear? - Kicker
The Chinese have been running an almost perfect perpetual motion machine... growing their economy at 10-12% per year with inflation a fraction of that.
They did it by sterilizing the surplus driven currency growth. Follow the flows... they receive dollars from exports they sell to us. Their exporters then convert those dollars into RMB to pay workers & buy materials. If the loop stopped there it would be hugely inflationary (significant monetary supply growth)... but the Chinese PBoC has been creating special bonds that the Chinese 'savers' have been buying to sop up that extra monetary growth.
At the same time they match those 'liabilities' by taking the dollars they exchanged RMB for earlier and go out and buy USD denominated debt. That balances the liability of having to pay off those special bonds with an asset that is going to pay them.
Now they could buy any asset in theory to balance off those special bonds but in practice they really have to buy USD assets to maintain the RMB-USD pseudo peg... that's the dollar recycle part.
it resulted in painless inflation sterilization!!!
Except they used those dollars to buy GSE MBS and such... hum, not so safe.
Then they started buying PE-Hedgies - like Blackstone. Hmmm also not so safe. And our investment banks, and brokerages, etc.
You get the picture... the recycling dollars back is looking a lot more costly than anticipated.
And the little guy on the street in China is getting less interested in those sterilization bonds too - he'd rather buy the Shanghai Stock Index!
So it is getting harder & harder for the PBoC to run large mfg based surpluses and hold down domestic inflation via dollar recycling. My buddy working in China tells me he is finally seeing tangible evidence of this... its not just econ theory anymore.
So, do you think this is a blow-off or is it self-sustaining? Meaning, have Chinese manufacturers moved up the value chain enough that they can maintain (or increase) margins in face of higher input costs? Are wages rising?
In other words, have the "decoupled"?
I work with hundreds of small Chinese software companies. So far, none of these companies have been able to either diversify away from the US market (although they have tried) or increase pricing enough to offset declines in the dollar.
"I bought my first house in 1989 with 10% down, try that now"
"So there will be pent-up demand for when the market unsticks. When that happens, the price declines will stop as these buyers return. So the key to figuring this out, is to figure out when the credit markets start to be lubricated again."
Anyone who tries to buy will surley have to put more than 10% down when the credit markets start to be lubricated again. Problem is most Americans can't afford it. Gonna be ugly.
Meaning, have Chinese manufacturers moved up the value chain enough that they can maintain (or increase) margins in face of higher input costs? Are wages rising?
In other words, have the "decoupled"?
Kicker you ask the multi-trillion dollar question.
I don't know.
I think it is possible they could in theory at least partially de-couple... but not 100%. No way 100% after they coupled as closely as they have.
From what my buddy tells me he thinks the party over there is trying like crazy to (1) stay in control and (2) continue to find employment for their poor rural masses. Can they pull continue to do that if they turn inward & consume more instead of continuing to export?
I don't know - I sure hope they make a smooth transition 'cause if they don't we got a billion hard working and now very pissed off & disillusioned Chinese. And we Americans aren't the only people who look for scapegoats when shit happens.
Yun's bias of course is given, but this piece is just shocking in how poorly it is argued and written. Chief economist of the NAR! If a 25-year-old MBA investment banking recruit delivered this to his bankers/traders as a summary of differing indices, it would be seen as unacceptably poor work.
I put 30% down on my first house and the mortgage company still made me jump thru hoops to get the loan back in 1991. I got so angry at the time. I screamed at the woman you should hope I never make a payment and you'll make out fine. Well, that certainly isn't the case today. The house I'm in now I put 50% down and the same lady said to me wouldn't you like a bigger house? I said no thank you. When I first moved here a 2 bedroom apartment cost me $485 a mo. 15 years later I pay $522.00 a month for a 4 bedroom 2 1/2 bath 3,000 sq. ft. house. First house loan @7.25%, this one 5.25%. Annual return on first house was 8% a year. It pays to save and always make extra principle payments when possible. I pay $800 a month, very affordable. The bottom line is save. Something most Americans cant or will not do.
sfvrealestate writes:
Who said, "There are lies, damn lies and statistics"? My boots-on-the-ground perspective from So. Cal: the higher-end properties are experiencing very little decline. Not so for the middle and working class areas.
That quote is from Mark Twain, one of my favorite writers and noted misanthropes. It is, of course, incisively true, in the way that only Twain can express it.
Not only did Case & Shiller start working on their index back in the 80s, but they have an established trail of publications that describe their progress and why certain decisions were made. Finding enough data has to do with it.
We have a significantly restricted land supply in desirable places to live.... more people are coming and they don't care about other people's income multipliers.
Sippn
Greater demand for 'desirable places' is pretty much a tautology. The question is, what makes a place desirable-- and how long will it stay that way? I bought my first house in a beach side neighborhood of a big city back in the late 70's. At the time it was far from desirable. Gang rapes and murders were everyday occurances. Nowadays those run down beach cottages go for a million dollars.
Now, I suspect, we're about to see a lot of 'desirable' neighborhoods go into reverse. And as for being 'saved' by foreign buyers, well, that may happen for awhile. But much of the desirability of American property is based on an image of life here that is about to become outdated.
I'm living right now in a capital city of the 'New Europe'. There are ads every day in local papers for beachfront houses in Florida. In local currency some of them even look like bargains, especially at the current rate of exchange. I expect the first articles on the disillusionment of those who bite to start trickling in a year or so from now as people start to visit their property...
If I have the NAR and Yun's (il)logic understood correctly, "All real estate is local," except when offering criticism of Case-Shiller. Then, Dr. Shiller is some profit-engineering hack with an agenda, and doesn't take into account broader trends.
I especially love this line from Yun, speaking to folks who've lost money on housing futures:
"I would suggest that they contact Dr. Shiller about price revisions. Their methodology requires constant price revisions. What is reported today will get revised next month in two months in three months; theoretically forever."
Laffing my frikkin butt off on that one! The NAR gettin' all snarky about revisions! HAHAHAHA!
anyone have a good resource for converting inventory numbers to "supply" in months? i'm looking at the jacksonville area and we're currently flirting with about 20k units...some of the data is pointing to the local market flattening out, calm before the storm?
Yun: "A government agency the Office of Federal Housing Enterprise Oversight (OFHEO) also surveys home prices from 287 local markets and found that nearly 70 percent of U.S. markets are showing price increases (the latest data is as of third quarter 2007)."
The latest data available tells us that we have no current data at all. Also, that people who listen to us are suckers.
CR,
One thing you fail to mention is the differences between Case/Shiller and OFHEO is that the Case/Shiller is weighted based on the total value of homes in each area. If you look at the weightings of each state in the Case/Shiller index, California accounts for over 17% of the US home values. California has higher income levels than say Kansas so fundamentally home prices should be higher in California. The Case/Shiller index tends to favor the costal states where home values have been higher through history but have also had greater bubble appreciation as well. The Case/Shiller tends to exaggerate price increases and declines if those price increases and declines were prominent in costal areas with historically higher home values. On a national basis, the Case/Shiller index has been exaggerating price increases and declines.
On a market only basis, the Case/Shiller index is by far the best. On a national basis, price increases and declines are probably in between OFHEO and Case/Shiller.
As far as NAR goes, the chief Economists forecasts have been way off for such a long time. It makes me wonder if his models incorporate a factor that puts more weight on his association member's best interest, than good economics. To me what comes out of that office as far as forecasts have very little credibility these days.
CR: Good graphic on the "moving up" process. Another important graphic to show is "filtering" (devaluation of homes as they age). It will be interesting to see how many McMansions filter downward far before they ever would have without the bubble.
"I have no crystal ball, but the key to house prices is supply and demand."
Ultimately, true, however, just what impacts demand must be considered; and the deleveraging going on in credit markets results in less demand. You cannot simply be willing, to be in the demand category; you also must be able. And the massive credit crunch going on is stifling demand. And that is the crux of the issue with where home prices are going.
Real estate is going nowhere for the next 5-10 years as we go through a massive deleveraging throughout all sectors of the economy.
The reasons real estate went up are the very reasons it is going to go down. Lots of money availble sent it up, no money available is going to send it down.
20% decline
OT - follow up to another thread.
w writes:
sdtfs writes:
I'm guessing we're not talking pesticides; more like bT=Bacillus thuringiensis. A bacteria that attacks the mosquito larvae and is relatively safe for the environment, non-toxic to vertebrates and adult insects. It kind of works, I haven't gotten much benefit from the blocks, but the granules work fine, just need periodic re-application
Actually, I work in the pesticide industry. BT's are not a bacteria that attacks mosquito larvae. They are a stomach poison that is grown in a bacteria and processed into a fairly safe insecticide. many BT products are registered organically. If a poison can be made from a "natural" source it can be registered organically. I spray my organic crops much more than my conventional ones because the pesticides are not as effective or do not last as long. I do live in Ventura County and the County Vector Control has the mosquito fish available for free. While I am proponent of responsible pesticide usage I think the less we use and the safer the products we use the better for everyone. Homeowner usage is probably not as important as food production. I think it is funny that someone worried about putting oil into the ocean is not concerned about using a pesticide unnecessarily.
w | 02.19.08 - 5:50 pm | #
I am so sick of the use of the word subprime. Look, it doesn't matter what type of loan the borrower got; if the property is foreclosed on, it will negatively impact values.
Home prices are falling and will fall a lot more regardless of the type of loan program the owner has.
It's really quite amazing to see the lead NAR shill trying to paint Shiller as a shill. Geez, he basically accuses him of being un-American (quote, an approach that flies directly in the face of the American sense of democratic values.)
The NAR comedy keeps coming!
ShortCourage, yes. That piece is hilarious.
I enjoyed reading it. For some reason, Yun seems to draw the opposite conclusion as many of us.
Best Wishes.
The CS index is a tool. NAR is a marketing spin machine. The MSM is a hype machine. None of them knows exactly what, when and where.
There just is not as many qualified buyers now. As the market for a given neighborhood drops from 700k to 600k there will be a few buyers. Some people will point to these new purchases as the new value for these homes. But with these buyers out of the market the neighborhood homes will fall to 500k. Then there will be another pool of buyers to buy a few homes. Again people will point and say that the market is stabilized and the homes in the neighborhood are worth 500k. Then the search for qualified buyers will start again.
Markets will drop slowly and give a lot of false signals to be taken as hope until markets stabilize at a reasonable multiple of local incomes. Everything else is wishful thinking.
Why bother arguing with Yun? It almost seems to legitimize him by suggesting there's a reasonable debate to be had. It should be patently obvious to everyone that he's got a huge vested interest in cherry picking, spinning, and when all else fails simply distorting the available statistics, and I think the most effective approach to dealing with him is to make sure the term "shill" appears with every mention of his name, not picking apart his "argument".
"A wise man said never argue with fools 'cause people from a distance can't tell who is who..."
CR great post. Easy to understand.
CR.
Don't you think that appraisals tend to smooth price changes?
Lawrence Yun is a Shill. His directive is to try to gain some credibiity so people buy houses and realtors make commissions. Anyone who listens to anything he says is a fool.
CR - I believe that even areas with relatively tight supply could see price declines as credit continues to tighten.
Boston is one market I have been following for years. The decline had started earlier (price overrun) and the market appeared to be leveling out and perhaps moving up a tad when the crunch hit this summer. Since it has resumed its downward march.
The extremely loose underwriting creates a constriction of demand relative to supply when standards rise again. I am by no means implying that your excellent work on supply isn't relevant. Of course it is.
I'm just suggesting that we have multiple downward escalators at the current time.
PS: Everyone used to complain about Lereah, but to me Yun seems infinitely less connected to reality.
Yes, ok we all seem to agree.
But don't forget to appreciate the NAR for its entertainment value.
It almost seems hard to believe that is possible....
OT, but what is going on with mortgage rates?
I just got off the phone with an LO from a major bank, and he said there was another rate change coming today -- which is something they never see. It was 6% this morning, and expected to rise this afternoon.
In Portland we just went from 8.3 months inventory in December to over 12 months inventory in January.
And it was all supposed to be different here. So much for one of the last markets standing.
Not to be outdone by Lereah, Yun just released a new book,
"Why this is the year to buy a house--and how you can profit from buying at the bottom."
(Unlike Lereah however, Yun will not capitulate and change the name a year later. In fact, Yun plans to keep the book's name constant for the next six to seven years.)
He must have met Jesus-
The market is telling us something,'' Brown said.The marketplace is saying it doesn't work well to have two stores selling these products under one roof.''
MBIA's Brown Assuming 15% Drop in U.S. Housing Prices (Update1) - Bloomberg.com
I have a crystal ball. Prices will go down a lot.
Secondly, and I'm sure this has been brought up, but the Case/Shiller index would seen to get distorted by MEW for home improvements which were high flying until recently. So, if a $300k house gets $50k worth of upgrades and sells for $375,000, I think C/S would say the house appreciated by $75k although net appreciation is really only $25k. When MEW collapses and home improvements are small, the index will be more reflective of the changes in net home value. So, over the next 5 years, the index should be pretty accurate.
he's a dumb f#%$ing puppet (lawrence yun)
Gotta love all those stupid home builders, real estate agents and mortgage brokers who thought this bubble would continue to the moon and they'd never stop making money.
My chance of "epic pain coming soon" stands at 73.56 %, which is above my cutoff of 13.13 % above which this potential first time homebuyer does not buy.
Calculation based on the rigorous method of pulling my head out of my a$$ and looking around. No shills needed thank you very much.
-ck- Is it because of inflation concerns? Dollar weakness?
MaxedOutMama --
but to me Yun seems infinitely less connected to reality
More like reality has shifted farther "off-message" since Yun took over.
Like any salesman, Yun is not being paid to tell the truth. Nor is he being paid to lie. He is being paid to tell the same story regardless of the facts. Like Lereah, he is simply doing his job. It is a distasteful way to make a living, but not the most distasteful by a long shot.
The mystery is why anybody ever takes such people seriously.
CR is way too soft on Yun. He suggests that the Case Shiller is suspect because "he has a financial incentive to scare the market"
And the NAR has absolutely no incentive to influence the market. This is twisted.
The amazing thing is that every price measure under-stated prices at the bubble peak, and they will over-state prices as they crash.
Not measured in prices at the peak were: waived inspections, as-is clauses, free rent backs, buyers taking on fees and closing costs, etc...
Not measured during the crash are: incentives and upgrades, free/discounted financing, credit back for any needed repairs, etc..
Here is a report from the DRHorton Sale:
I went to the DRHorton sale in Temecula, the Bungalows.
It was rather humorous. They opened at 9:00 and we got there at 8:55, walked up to the office. There was a big sign that said "line forms here" with an arrow.
We were the only ones there, except for a couple standing over by the catering truck.
They only cut about 15% off of these though. High three's down to low three's.
One model was 398k marked down to about 328K. My son offered them 275K and they turned him down.
Anyway, the best part was the "rule" on there info page.
"One home to a customer, no exceptions"
Bakersfield Bubble: Capitulation
What happens when California prices drop 50%, and all the people who left CA because of the high prices start coming back?
Here is a partial listing of San Diego properties that are down 30-60% since the last sale:
San Diego real estate market in freefall; Banks dumping REOs 30-60% below bubble prices « Greg’s Law & Economics Blog
Not all of these sales were even at peak prices, a lot of places were sold in 2004 and 2005, then resold recently at gigantic losses.
More reasonable housing prices plus all the other great things about living in California mean the outflow from CA that has been driving the market in AZ, CO, NV, OR, and much of the rest of the West will stop.
Current CA homeowners can't sell at the old bubble prices anymore, and renters who want to buy no longer need to look outside of the state to find reasonable prices. It is now possible, once again, to find a 2-bedroom condo or bungalow here in San Diego for under $250,000. It wasn't from 6/04 to 6/07.
Same with the Southeast, where the outflow from Florida was helping the market in Georgia, South Carolina, etc.
There ought to be a law: Some dude named Armando was just on the radio pitching his real estate flipping system, by which I too can build my own real estate empire. Isn't this guy a little behind the curve?
Yes, in Austin Texas, despite the favorable mention of our real estate market in the NYTs, the market has definitely slowed. Suddenly, the California investors are gone and the urgency to buy is gone. Locals no longer feel that they have to move quickly to beat the out of town investors and with the credit crunch most can't move quick anyway. Prices are holding steady but the low end in outlying areas is dead and sellers are feeling pain. Inventory is rising and homes are just sitting. Our market was virtually flat between 2001-05 thanks to the tech bust so we don't have far to fall to get in line with incomes but our skyline is full of cranes building high-rise condo towers, who knows what will happen to them?
"There ought to be a law: Some dude named Armando was just on the radio pitching his real estate flipping system, by which I too can build my own real estate empire. Isn't this guy a little behind the curve?"
I've heard that one also. Armando probably has done some flipping, but the only profitable activity now in that regard is to sell his system to suckers.
I've also heard a few "learn how to play the stock market" ads lately.
in the battle of the indices it's shill vs. shiller
"One model was 398k marked down to about 328K. My son offered them 275K and they turned him down."
the vultures are still alive.
I havent read all the comments yet. Forgive me if this has been posted already. But it seems to me the big problem we have is people went from the first photo to the middle one, and the middle photo to the last one. Thanks to the Fed and stupid policies of easy credit.
OT, but what is going on with mortgage rates?
I don't think the GSE bond investors are real happy right now. Their mood probably won't improve if the CPI comes in hot.
"Prices will continue to fall until the inventory levels decline significantly"
Inventory is understated. We should get pent up supply on line and concurrently REOs being priced more aggressively, in a race to the bottom. This all occurring at the same time credit is contracting, the job market is deteriorating and LT rates should be rising. Lots of moving objects all going the wrong way.
The natural demand under these credit conditions won't even dent supply numbers without radical price declines.
"Their mood probably won't improve if the CPI comes in hot"
I placed some bets this AM at the open on the very expectation that CPI comes in RED HOT.
Wish me luck!
--
Vast majority of economists with access to the MSM lie.
I know that many Americans would like to shoot the lawyers to get rid of many problems. That would be a mistake, IMO. However, shooting all the economists would do wonders for America! Most of the bad ideas relating to the management of the economy that get adopted by the USG and the Fed come from economists.
Those who want a good example of an economist who is worse than politicians can watch Lakshman Achuthan of ECRI in the video in the following link:
ECRI | News | Professional Reports
Jas
No Jas, its the PHD's. Let's burn them and their books!
"Areas with more inventory will likely see larger price declines; areas with less (especially less than 6 months of inventory) will probably see minor or no price declines."
This is a serious question - is there ANYWHERE in the US right now with less than 6 months of housing inventory? Is anyone measuring the change in months of supply in various markets?
barely wrote:
REOs being priced more aggressively
That is exactly what is happening. The long-time homeowners who listed their homes but were really just dipping their toes in the water and trying to get bubble prices largely have left the market.
In their place are increasing numbers of motivated sellers willing to chop 40% or more off peak prices to move the inventory.
Who said, "There are lies, damn lies and statistics"? My boots-on-the-ground perspective from So. Cal: the higher-end properties are experiencing very little decline. Not so for the middle and working class areas.
The buzz word in North Eastern New Jersey among the Realtors is "short sale". Every one is trying to learn more about them and become a short sale expert around here. There are a few buyers coming back in, from what I'm hearing, but their intentions are to pick up the pieces. I personally think they're catching a knife, but we'll see.
I can only imagine that this will have an even worse effect on housing prices down the road. The appraisers are going to have to start using short sale figures to comp the value of the homes.
With fewer and fewer sales, there will be fewer and fewer comps for appraisals. And guess what's the only thing selling. The cheapest homes within each market. Too much supply, so only best of deals sell.
It will start to catch more speed as the comps keep coming in lower and lower. Appraisers are telling me it's getting harder and harder to find good comps.
Yun wrote: I would avoid any investment that is thinly traded.
LMAO! As opposed to liquid investments like houses and condos in Miami.
Yun wrote: If it is any comfort to those who lost money on a Case-Shiller home price futures contract, I would suggest that they contact Dr. Shiller about price revisions.
Will somebody pleeeeeeease post Yun's email addie so that all those who have lost money in RE can contact him.
Yun wrote: If I was on the losing end of a contract bet I would demand to know more about revisions. Keep trying, as the data is constantly revised.
Friggin amazing.
"You will never recover your reputation for competence. You are politically a dead man walking and if the Prime Minister could actually make a decision he would move you."
Northern Rock deal could cost us each £3,500 - Telegraph
sorry to repeat someone elses post but i couldn't resist highlighting this quote.
don't anyone believe this doesn't have consequences for US banking.
Moody’s: CRE Prices Declined Sharply in December : HousingWire || financial news for the mortgage market
go SRS!
I have no crystal ball, - CR
So, um, ebay never delivered?
hey dryfly
still think theres no inflation goin on in China? sorry. have to yank your chain
I dont make this stuff up, and yes i hand my license with the Sotheby's outlet here:
"An epic downturn in the residential real estate market? Somebody should tell the buyers and sellers of the priciest houses in the Washington area.
The average price for the region's 25 most expensive home sales increased by 21 percent in 2007, according to Washington Business Journal research."
International buyers drive sales of D.C. luxury homes - Washington Business Journal:
It will be March very soon. Between March and June, there usually comes a spike in inventory levels from the winter lows. This year I think it will be a double wammy because we'll have many who are currently off the market (because they got fustrated last year) coming back on again this year.
Nothing seems to be indicating that sales are picking up. I wonder if the panic will start to set in by the fall when another selling season has slipped by and it dawns on the public just how serious this is getting. Too few buyers, too many sellers! I think some get it. But there are way too many still in denial. Especially the current homesellers.
I'm just suggesting that we have multiple downward escalators at the current time. - MOM
Its vector math with all the arrows pointing down right now.
--
"Who said, "There are lies, damn lies and statistics"? My boots-on-the-ground perspective from So. Cal: the higher-end properties are experiencing very little decline. Not so for the middle and working class areas."
High-end properties are mostly bought by Crooks and their agents. I know someone in PVE who refinanced his home worth $2M at 95% (1st and a second) during 2007Q1, who works in CRE and RRE financing, and now all set to walk away if things go south. And he is worth millions outside of his home. It was preplanning in case his area gets hit.
Jas
i have a feeling we're going to have a big move in the market very soon.
hang my license that is
"What happens when California prices drop 50%, and all the people who left CA because of the high prices start coming back?"
They'll file for unemployment?
A lot of jobs left because of the high prices too, particularly production. Some went out of the country, plenty others just went out of state.
You have to have something to come back to, besides sunny skies and traffic. I'd like to think lower prices would bring manufacturing jobs back eventually, but there's no guarantee.
Some people might come back, regardless, but mainly those who already have prospects; ie, they know they can get reasonable work. Nurses, cops, accountants, people who can almost always get work anywhere. The rest, not so much. Not unless some vast opportunity opens up.
"Inventory is understated."
barely | 02.19.08 - 6:50 pm |
Yep,and it will get a lot worse before the numbers even think about stabilizing.
Chris
idoc,
There's this as well:
"SRM Chief Decries Northern Rock Move, Vows Fight"
SRM Chief Decries Northern Rock Move, Vows Fight | FINalternatives
He's talking his book...but there's two sides to every story.
And cranking up the current flow on the Super Colander Tin Foil Hat, you asked Killer on a thread a few ago how the Fed et. al. could hide monetizations. Maybe here? Just a raw guess with NO data.
Cheers,
dc:
"An epic downturn in the residential real estate market? Somebody should tell the buyers and sellers of the priciest houses in the Washington area.
The average price for the region's 25 most expensive home sales increased by 21 percent in 2007, according to Washington Business Journal research."
Don't forget that in Austin, SF and Seattle, if you take sales that occurred in the 2nd week of the month on either Thursday or Friday, for homes with a ratio of indoor space to outdoor space of 8:1, and with purchase prices that had odd first-digits, sales are up 8.9%, on a per-room basis.
Rally on!
still think theres no inflation goin on in China? sorry. have to yank your chain
Oh idoc - if you only knew. I had a talk with a very good friend who has been in mfg in China for a decade - the lid is completely blowing off over there. All of it in the last six mmonths...
The 'dollar sterilization' that worked so well for so long has completely ground to a halt with the US credit markets in reverse. Very hard to recycle dollars back w/out big loses.
That was what kept the visible money creation minimal for so long over there - not any longer.
To give you an idea he said his company sent out an internal memo saying be prepared to exit China & fast... meaning have both other developing market sources in line & also domestic capacity...
He was a little drunk at the time we talked but said "Domestic???" It will be his job to staff those plants.
Should get interesting.
BTW I asked him for a copy of the memo and he said no way he's lettin' me put that out on the internets (even camouflaged) until he's a LOT closer to retirement. LOL. He is a survivor like so many still in mfg.
So ya my chain deserves to be rattled.
Jas,
A refi is a recouse loan. The person you know may have out smarted himself by refinancing a $2M mortgage.
dryfly writes:
"I have no crystal ball, - CR
So, um, ebay never delivered?"
I thought it was a magic eight ball?
Cheers,
How is the NAR funded?
Dryfly, today's LA Times:
"A sinking feeling for the dollar in China"
A sinking feeling for the dollar in China - Los Angeles Times
Elvis brought up some good points..
NAR has a job to do....
Case/Shiller is a really great marketing piece with a lot of credibility but it is not above criticism...should make those guys a lot of money on the real estate papparazzi circuit.
It is just too concidental that the index topped at 200%.... how did they pick the starting year? probably to get to 200%.... you change starting years and the data changes alot 170...180... wheres the bottom? It won't hit 100 in the coastal markets.
When does modern mortgages start and how did they affect prices? Late 1800s? early 1900s?
Obviously mortgages with interest only/teasers and HELOCs impacted the index.
A former modeler, I've seen too many managers tweek models until the answer was what they want, not so scientific. (see Wall Street CDOs for example)
I like Krugman's observations of the "Two America's..the zoned lands vs flatlands..." look for the indexes in the flatlands to be more normal vs income.
We have a significantly restricted land supply in desirable places to live.... more people are coming and they don't care about other people's income multipliers.
Pundrity..
NAR is paid by a hidden tax on every RE transaction, so its in their best interest to keep prices high....
Nah, their supported by Realtor dues - almost the same thing.
dryfly | 02.19.08 - 7:43 pm |
How long does it take to move production back? I am seeing a lot more US made parts coming into the shop. The only thing I can think of blatantly stamped "Hencho en China" are a couple of the belts we use. Pretty much all other parts are "Made in US"...Esp the Cummins and Freightliner parts...This is a major shift from just 6-8 months ago.
Chris
Sippn said: We have a significantly restricted land supply in desirable places to live.... more people are coming and they don't care about other people's income multipliers.
Not true. Middle class is migrating out of CA. Immigrants moving in lead to increase in population.
Chris Cobra - yea... visited IKEA last week for a toddler table and you know how they do it? That fancy Euro/Sweedish design? Nope - its all "Made in China" and of course you get to assemble it - the real hidden cost.
W - thats what I said. I didn't mean the WASPs were leading the charge, its foriegn investment. Most of the higher end homes I see sold are not native ... even in middle NorCal. Like I said, they don't care about "your" income problems...
Move to India to streach your wealth...
Mr Yun, we've put up with your nonsense because every chankered hooker needs to earn a living.
But you'll learn to watch your mouth around your betters, or you'll be tasting the back of my hand.
Half Moon Bay grapples with $36.8 million judgment against it
"...Half Moon Bay is wrestling with unpleasant options for responding to a court ruling that officials say threatens the "very existence of our city government" - a $36.8 million judgment against the city for turning a proposed housing development site into wetlands.
Under the worst-case scenario, officials say, Half Moon Bay would become the first Bay Area city forced to dissolve, and the coastal town's land would become an unincorporated part of San Mateo County.
Members of the City Council say that's unlikely, and they plan to vote at a public meeting tonight to retain an appellate law firm and a financial consultant to advise them on how to tackle a court judgment that is more than three times Half Moon Bay's $10 million annual budget."
dry
thanx for the info. you're a good guy.
Cobra,
"Esp the Cummins and Freightliner parts"
Where were you getting after market replacement parts before? I was unaware that China's industry could put out such parts.
Not criticizing, just surprised.
Cheers,
Sippn | 02.19.08 - 7:53 pm |
As a wrench turner,I realllllly enjoy the super high quality tool steel forged in someones outhouse in China tools they include. Oh and the directions also rock!!! Thank God for pics(sometimes)...
Chris
How long does it take to move production back?
Depends on how long it takes to get labor back... I see labor shortages already in basic machining & such.
Specifically I'd say it will take as long it takes Gen Xers to realize they can't all be realtors, investment bankers or mortgage brokers and get happy with the idea they will be married to a machine for the rest of their life. This time period will EXACTLY coincide with the time it takes Boomers to realize they won't all get to retire on the golf course near Myrtle Beach... for exactly the same reassons.
Recollections of Synchronicity...
Where were you getting after market replacement parts before? I was unaware that China's industry could put out such parts.
Oh they can make good stuff in some cases - just not any less expensive than we can produce good stuff. That's the key thing cheap is cheap no matter where you make'em.
dryfly,
I'm in, what classes do I need to take?
CRE finance is booooooring.
Misean | 02.19.08 - 7:57 pm |
Don't get mad at me...OEM. A lot of the stuff had Canada and Mexico tags but that has dropped off a bunch. Don't get me wrong,I am thrilled shitless to get the mfg back but with automation the hiring just won't be there.
I had mentioned this earlier...All the Neon parts I bought 2 weeks ago were made in the US. All bought from the China kings of Advance and Autozone. Surprised the shit outta me. Even the coil pack was made in the US,the prior one was a China,purchased 4 years ago.
Chris
Cobra driver
Don't disagree with ya, but I'm hard pressed to continue buying Detroit Iron when 20% of my price goes to some retired overpaid auto worker instead of making my Expedition's brakes as large as my mechanic's Toyota Supra's (Ford: "its your driving habits" - yea, I like to stop)
30+ year owner of Detroit products by my favorites so far have been Bavarian...
dryfly,
As I said I'm surprised that they're making engine parts for trucks/heavy equipment.
"That's the key thing cheap is cheap no matter where you make'em."
No disagreement there.
Cheers,
Nouriel RGE Monitor mentions CR.
"How many households will end up in negative equity territory and will thus an incentive to walk away from their mortgages? The answer to this question of course depends on how much home prices will eventually fall from their peak. A recent analysis by Goldman Sachs suggests that if home prices fall another 10% in 2008 after having fallen by about 8% from peak in 2007 (based on the Case-Shiller/S&P index) about 15 million households will be in negative equity territory. There are other estimates that are consistent with the Goldman Sachs one. Calculated Risk a very well respected housing blogger estimated that if home prices decline by 10% in 2008 the number of households with negative equity will be 10.7. But this estimate was based on a partial underestimate of the fall in home prices in 2007 relative to its 2006 peak (as the Case-Shiller data for all of 2007 were not available at the time of that estimate). Thus, the number of households with negative equity could be closer to 12 million. Calculated Risk also estimates that a cumulative fall in home prices of 20% implies 13.7 million households with negative equity while a 30% cumulative fall implies 20.3 million households with negative equity.
These figures are staggering considering that in 2006 the total number of households with mortgages was 51.2 million. So between 20% to 40% of households with mortgages may end up with negative equity in their homes and with a big incentive to walk away from their mortgages. Even the lower bound figure of 10 million households with negative equity (20% of those with mortgages) is huge.
RGE - The Forthcoming “Jingle Mail” Tsunami: 10 to 15 Million Households Likely to Walk Away from their Homes/Mortgages Leading to a Systemic Banking Crisis
Cobra,
Not surprised at Canada/Mexico.
Well, if we have to start making our own shite again, I'm not gonna complain. My grandparents did well working assembly lines, and the next gen did well doing that or doing the engineering/management.
Cheers,
Topher,
"So between 20% to 40% of households with mortgages may end up with negative equity in their homes"
It's even more frightening. It means 60-90% of the $3T+ of equity on the books since then will disappear.
Cheers,
Sippn | 02.19.08 - 8:08 pm |
The sad part is all the newer stuff is all pretty much the same. I was seeing a huge improvement in even Dodge with the stuff DC was integrating...Suppose thats dead now. I have light duty trucks that have 200k plus and have had nothing but routine maintenance performed since new...Yes I feel the same way about legacy costs. It pretty much killed a company I worked for...
Chris
I'm in, what classes do I need to take?
I'm not sure yet - things are happening fast, similar to what happened in the 80s.
A good book to read is 'The Machine That Changed The World' about 'Lean Mfg' written around 1990... it is still relevant today. If you have finance background then read between the lines (financial lines that is). Many believe the resurgence in US production will come from a more realistic and intelligent understanding of real cost and risk.
There was an article in Manufacturing Engineering about this recently... costing lean systems and why old metrics are so hard to use in new systems.
BTW - the key to the 80s resurgence was avoiding excessive fixed cost (especially debt) even if it meant you had to assume somewhat higher variable cost (pay higher wages). That lesson was lost from the late 90s and beyond.
I read Lawrence Yun's missive. I have only one thing to say, for which I will probably be censored here:
Next to Paul Wolfowitz, Lawrence Yun is the dumbest son of a bitch on the planet.
Case-Shiller is the prices of house people actually live in, which is irrelevant... Yun's talking about "the core house price index...
Got it?
--
Angry saver,
Sorry, the guy got a first and a second as if it was a buy. He made sure that both (1st and 2nd) were non-recourse loans because I specifically asked him about it. The guy and his wife (she always worked for banks for some 25+ years) have been in financing business.
Also, he "helped" many motel owners to be in a position to walk away when things go south! Lot of crookery in the lending business over the past 5 years.
Who made such lending possible?
Jas
O dear, I feel the need to break into song again...
To the tune of Da Doo Ron Ron
I heard him on the TV and my heart stood still
Say screw Yun Yun Yun, Say screw Yun Yun
I knew it right away he was a real shill
Say screw Yun Yun Yun, Say screw Yun Yun
Yes my heart stood still
Yes he was a real shill
And when he hypes them homes
Say screw Yun Yun Yun, Say screw Yun Yun
I knew what he was doin' when he told that lie
Say screw Yun Yun Yun, Say screw Yun Yun
He sold that snake oil, but my oh my
Say screw Yun Yun Yun, Say screw Yun Yun
Yes, he told that lie
Yes, my oh my
And when he hypes them homes
Say screw Yun Yun Yun, Say screw Yun Yun
Say screw Yun Yun Yun, Say screw Yun Yun
Say screw Yun Yun Yun, Say screw Yun Yun
He spun the crashing market, made it look so fine
Say screw Yun Yun Yun, Say screw Yun Yun
Recov'rys round the corner, says the dotted line
Say screw Yun Yun Yun, Say screw Yun Yun
Yes, he made it look so fine
Yes, he drew the dotted line
And when he hypes them homes
Say screw Yun Yun Yun, Say screw Yun Yun
Say screw Yun Yun Yun, Say screw Yun Yun
Say screw Yun Yun Yun, Say screw Yun Yun
I feel so much better now.
cd
Venndata,
"Case-Shiller is the prices of house people actually live in, which is irrelevant... Yun's talking about "the core house price index..."
No???
Cheers,
" Next to Paul Wolfowitz, Lawrence Yun ... "
Well, I think that pretty definitively sums it up.
LOL and applause for Circling the Drain. Make sure that ditty is copyrighted. It's gonna be a smash hit.
DC1000 the washington deep pockets,but we out hwerein the burbs...busted. I mean southern MD here in Charles the inventory has grown every month since 2004 from mid 100 to 1600+ now, and the majorityof homes are over 399K with our movement in Charles County we have over 65 months inventory of 399K + and the moajority of our toxic mortgages were done late 05 till the 2007 March cut off. Folks have no concept what is fixing to hit them. but its "always great time to buy or sell". OH BTW over 29 months total inventory
This was an interesting read.
"Are banks are too powerful, so that this could never happen?
The major financial institutions probably will not object, as seen in this quote from the American Securitization Forum conference (4 February):
Merrill Lynch senior director Sarbashis Ghosh, in a session on RMBS research: Its not a subprime problem, its a housing leverage problem we have people with a mortgage who simply cannot afford to make their payments. Ghosh suggested the solution was to address the question of leverage, and went so far as to suggest something like a food stamp program to help borrowers with payments.
From Bloomberg (1 Feb 2008):
Alex Pollock, former president of the Federal Home Loan Bank of Chicago, urges the creation of a federal lending agency based on the Home Owners Loan Corp., or HOLC, created by Congress during the Great Depression. Robert Kuttner, co-founder of the Washington-based Economic Policy Institute, Senate Banking Committee Chairman Christopher Dodd and others have proposed similar ideas.
Many who are calling for action point to the 1930s, the last time the U.S. national median home price fell, as an example of what government should do. During the worst economic slump of the 20th century, HOLC issued tax-exempt bonds and used the proceeds for below-market- rate mortgages. It refinanced one-fifth of U.S. homes between 1933 and 1936 after negotiating with the original lenders to accept less than the amount owed on the defaulted mortgage.
In the 1930s, lenders were seizing homes at an average rate of 3,000 a day, adjusted for todays housing stock size. In the fourth quarter of 2007, new foreclosures averaged 2,939 a day, double the pace of a year earlier, according to RealtyTrac Inc., an Irvine, California-based real estate data company."
And if the banks resist?
A happy ending to the current economic recession « Fabius Maximus
http://bp3.blogger.com/_pMscxxELHEg/Rfd-oNpqM3I/AAAAAAAAAMI/_gmTXq52klI/s1600-h/subprimechain.jpg
Love the diagram.
You would think in a deal like this, the seller of the final mansion would be able to assist the subprime at the base of the scheme. Of course it's never that easy or obvious.
I can remember waiting for the buyer of my buyer to qualify to I could buy.
dryfly,
The 'dollar sterilization' that worked so well for so long has completely ground to a halt with the US credit markets in reverse. Very hard to recycle dollars back w/out big loses.
Sorry, can you make this a bit more clear?
We all know NAR spews lies, propaganda, false housing data, etc. As far as I'm concerned anything NAR has to say is unimportant fictional gibberish and a waste of time reading. It borders on insulting when NAR fairy tails corrupt the pages of Calculated Risk.
My prediction on this one is a little less dire...what we had that caused the problem is a financing/leverage problem. The market now is over-reacting to that by restricting lending on all sorts of things, not just mortgages. And what is happening is a lot of buyers who would otherwise get a mortgage are being rejected or have to cough up more than they'd have to in the past (I bought my first house in 1989 with 10% down, try that now).
So there will be pent-up demand for when the market unsticks. When that happens, the price declines will stop as these buyers return. So the key to figuring this out, is to figure out when the credit markets start to be lubricated again.
shake magic eight ball, will the credit market unstick by the end of summer?
Signs point to Yes
There you have it! Hey, it's as good as most economists
Circling,
Where do you find the time? for such
amusement? Thanks for the laugh.
The NAR, supported by dues paying Realtors, and as the easy money in being an agent between buyers and sellers goes away so will many of the easy money chasers, leaving NAR (and the Home Builders Group, over time), very under budgeted.
As an appraiser, my biz is picking up, there will be considerable mark to market, refi and REO loan purchase work for those qualified. And the lenders still surviving can and should get picky about their choices in appraisers, not that they have the brains to do so.
Even so, there is an oversupply of Realtors. Then there are those who have or will get on the REO gravy train of listings. Ya gotta work for that money though, usually.
The NAR should just hire that Baghdad Bob Iraqi information minister.
Sniff, and no one liked my "Oh Haloscan" ditty.
Sniff.
Cheers,
The 'dollar sterilization' that worked so well for so long has completely ground to a halt with the US credit markets in reverse. Very hard to recycle dollars back w/out big loses.
Sorry, can you make this a bit more clear? - Kicker
The Chinese have been running an almost perfect perpetual motion machine... growing their economy at 10-12% per year with inflation a fraction of that.
They did it by sterilizing the surplus driven currency growth. Follow the flows... they receive dollars from exports they sell to us. Their exporters then convert those dollars into RMB to pay workers & buy materials. If the loop stopped there it would be hugely inflationary (significant monetary supply growth)... but the Chinese PBoC has been creating special bonds that the Chinese 'savers' have been buying to sop up that extra monetary growth.
At the same time they match those 'liabilities' by taking the dollars they exchanged RMB for earlier and go out and buy USD denominated debt. That balances the liability of having to pay off those special bonds with an asset that is going to pay them.
Now they could buy any asset in theory to balance off those special bonds but in practice they really have to buy USD assets to maintain the RMB-USD pseudo peg... that's the dollar recycle part.
it resulted in painless inflation sterilization!!!
Except they used those dollars to buy GSE MBS and such... hum, not so safe.
Then they started buying PE-Hedgies - like Blackstone. Hmmm also not so safe. And our investment banks, and brokerages, etc.
You get the picture... the recycling dollars back is looking a lot more costly than anticipated.
And the little guy on the street in China is getting less interested in those sterilization bonds too - he'd rather buy the Shanghai Stock Index!
So it is getting harder & harder for the PBoC to run large mfg based surpluses and hold down domestic inflation via dollar recycling. My buddy working in China tells me he is finally seeing tangible evidence of this... its not just econ theory anymore.
Hope that helps...
Thanks, that helps...
So, do you think this is a blow-off or is it self-sustaining? Meaning, have Chinese manufacturers moved up the value chain enough that they can maintain (or increase) margins in face of higher input costs? Are wages rising?
In other words, have the "decoupled"?
I work with hundreds of small Chinese software companies. So far, none of these companies have been able to either diversify away from the US market (although they have tried) or increase pricing enough to offset declines in the dollar.
ipodius writes:
"I bought my first house in 1989 with 10% down, try that now"
"So there will be pent-up demand for when the market unsticks. When that happens, the price declines will stop as these buyers return. So the key to figuring this out, is to figure out when the credit markets start to be lubricated again."
Anyone who tries to buy will surley have to put more than 10% down when the credit markets start to be lubricated again. Problem is most Americans can't afford it. Gonna be ugly.
Meaning, have Chinese manufacturers moved up the value chain enough that they can maintain (or increase) margins in face of higher input costs? Are wages rising?
In other words, have the "decoupled"?
Kicker you ask the multi-trillion dollar question.
I don't know.
I think it is possible they could in theory at least partially de-couple... but not 100%. No way 100% after they coupled as closely as they have.
From what my buddy tells me he thinks the party over there is trying like crazy to (1) stay in control and (2) continue to find employment for their poor rural masses. Can they pull continue to do that if they turn inward & consume more instead of continuing to export?
I don't know - I sure hope they make a smooth transition 'cause if they don't we got a billion hard working and now very pissed off & disillusioned Chinese. And we Americans aren't the only people who look for scapegoats when shit happens.
Yun's bias of course is given, but this piece is just shocking in how poorly it is argued and written. Chief economist of the NAR! If a 25-year-old MBA investment banking recruit delivered this to his bankers/traders as a summary of differing indices, it would be seen as unacceptably poor work.
I put 30% down on my first house and the mortgage company still made me jump thru hoops to get the loan back in 1991. I got so angry at the time. I screamed at the woman you should hope I never make a payment and you'll make out fine. Well, that certainly isn't the case today. The house I'm in now I put 50% down and the same lady said to me wouldn't you like a bigger house? I said no thank you. When I first moved here a 2 bedroom apartment cost me $485 a mo. 15 years later I pay $522.00 a month for a 4 bedroom 2 1/2 bath 3,000 sq. ft. house. First house loan @7.25%, this one 5.25%. Annual return on first house was 8% a year. It pays to save and always make extra principle payments when possible. I pay $800 a month, very affordable. The bottom line is save. Something most Americans cant or will not do.
sfvrealestate writes:
Who said, "There are lies, damn lies and statistics"? My boots-on-the-ground perspective from So. Cal: the higher-end properties are experiencing very little decline. Not so for the middle and working class areas.
That quote is from Mark Twain, one of my favorite writers and noted misanthropes. It is, of course, incisively true, in the way that only Twain can express it.
Not only did Case & Shiller start working on their index back in the 80s, but they have an established trail of publications that describe their progress and why certain decisions were made. Finding enough data has to do with it.
First journal article on the index:
The Efficiency of the Market for Single-Family Homes
We have a significantly restricted land supply in desirable places to live.... more people are coming and they don't care about other people's income multipliers.
Sippn
Greater demand for 'desirable places' is pretty much a tautology. The question is, what makes a place desirable-- and how long will it stay that way? I bought my first house in a beach side neighborhood of a big city back in the late 70's. At the time it was far from desirable. Gang rapes and murders were everyday occurances. Nowadays those run down beach cottages go for a million dollars.
Now, I suspect, we're about to see a lot of 'desirable' neighborhoods go into reverse. And as for being 'saved' by foreign buyers, well, that may happen for awhile. But much of the desirability of American property is based on an image of life here that is about to become outdated.
I'm living right now in a capital city of the 'New Europe'. There are ads every day in local papers for beachfront houses in Florida. In local currency some of them even look like bargains, especially at the current rate of exchange. I expect the first articles on the disillusionment of those who bite to start trickling in a year or so from now as people start to visit their property...
If I have the NAR and Yun's (il)logic understood correctly, "All real estate is local," except when offering criticism of Case-Shiller. Then, Dr. Shiller is some profit-engineering hack with an agenda, and doesn't take into account broader trends.
I especially love this line from Yun, speaking to folks who've lost money on housing futures:
"I would suggest that they contact Dr. Shiller about price revisions. Their methodology requires constant price revisions. What is reported today will get revised next month in two months in three months; theoretically forever."
Laffing my frikkin butt off on that one! The NAR gettin' all snarky about revisions! HAHAHAHA!
anyone have a good resource for converting inventory numbers to "supply" in months? i'm looking at the jacksonville area and we're currently flirting with about 20k units...some of the data is pointing to the local market flattening out, calm before the storm?
Honest question from a beginner - How do I translate the inventory number for my area into number of months supply?
heh only 14 minutes apart Anonymous 9:22am
Yun: "A government agency the Office of Federal Housing Enterprise Oversight (OFHEO) also surveys home prices from 287 local markets and found that nearly 70 percent of U.S. markets are showing price increases (the latest data is as of third quarter 2007)."
The latest data available tells us that we have no current data at all. Also, that people who listen to us are suckers.
CR,
One thing you fail to mention is the differences between Case/Shiller and OFHEO is that the Case/Shiller is weighted based on the total value of homes in each area. If you look at the weightings of each state in the Case/Shiller index, California accounts for over 17% of the US home values. California has higher income levels than say Kansas so fundamentally home prices should be higher in California. The Case/Shiller index tends to favor the costal states where home values have been higher through history but have also had greater bubble appreciation as well. The Case/Shiller tends to exaggerate price increases and declines if those price increases and declines were prominent in costal areas with historically higher home values. On a national basis, the Case/Shiller index has been exaggerating price increases and declines.
On a market only basis, the Case/Shiller index is by far the best. On a national basis, price increases and declines are probably in between OFHEO and Case/Shiller.
Re: calculating months supply
Bubble Meter: Months Supply of Housing Units by Jurisdiction: July 2006 vs July 2005
As far as NAR goes, the chief Economists forecasts have been way off for such a long time. It makes me wonder if his models incorporate a factor that puts more weight on his association member's best interest, than good economics. To me what comes out of that office as far as forecasts have very little credibility these days.
best local data i've found is 3Q07
DQNews - DataQuick Real Estate Headlines and Statistics
implication there is that 20k inventory represents at least 8 months supply...
pd130: Only two years earlier, but Case and Shiller began publishing on their methods in 1987. See "Prices of Single Family Homes since 1970":
http://tinyurl.com/ypjh3g
Many other good papers there, as well.
CR: Good graphic on the "moving up" process. Another important graphic to show is "filtering" (devaluation of homes as they age). It will be interesting to see how many McMansions filter downward far before they ever would have without the bubble.
Novasold eats organ meat. Monkey organ meat. Crotch salamis. She is a real weener hound.
"I have no crystal ball, but the key to house prices is supply and demand."
Ultimately, true, however, just what impacts demand must be considered; and the deleveraging going on in credit markets results in less demand. You cannot simply be willing, to be in the demand category; you also must be able. And the massive credit crunch going on is stifling demand. And that is the crux of the issue with where home prices are going.
Real estate is going nowhere for the next 5-10 years as we go through a massive deleveraging throughout all sectors of the economy.
The reasons real estate went up are the very reasons it is going to go down. Lots of money availble sent it up, no money available is going to send it down.
sfvrealestate maven: here's at stat for you.
Foreclosures TRIPLE in the San Fernando Valley area.
That is all.
That was what kept the visible money creation minimal for so long over there - not any longer.
rc helicopter
Tactical Flashlights
video game
A lot of the stuff had Canada and Mexico tags but that has dropped off a bunch.
rc helicopter
Tactical Flashlights
video game