It should be clear that the utterances of Paulson, Thain, Rubin, Bernanke, Kudlowe, Greenspan, Bush, et al, are just spin, reverse-engineered to serve the interests of their immediate cohort.
The collapse of the housing/credit bubble presents us a rare opportunity to evaluate whether their theories are working.
Who should make our economic policy? Using what tools? In whose interests?
Are we really going to stick with debt-intensive, pay-to-play, trickle-down?
By the way, ditech.com is currently offering a 4.875% 30 year fixed with 2 points on refinance. APR 5.147% anyone have any opinions on how low 30 year fixed will go in this meltdown?
Peripheral Visionary, yeah - the market perception is that "data driven" means stock prices are falling.
Hmmm ... I was assuming the FOMC statement would be on the 31st (the 2nd day of the meeting), but a couple of sites have it on the 30th. That could make a difference because the BEA personal income release is on the morning of the 31st (and that will give us a strong hint if the economy was in recession in December).
OT, but has CR or Tanta written on securitized credit card debt? Listening to a Barron's guy on the radio say it's about a trillion total, most of which is securitized, but it should't be a problem like subprime. Why don't I believe him?
Everyone knows that Fed rate changes have effects only months in the future, so for Bernanke to cut in a manner that makes it seem like he is not looking past the end of his nose is a great mistake. In effect, he appeared to take responsibility for maintaining stock market prices and when they drop it will now be seen as his failure.
That aside, if Bernanke now sees recession, then he should cut deeply and quickly. The real test will come later. When to raise again? Will he fail to anticipate recovery and bake in a new bubble like Greenspan did, or will he raise rates quickly and aggressively before things get too steamy?
The FED can do things like this as long as foreigners are willing to buy our debt. China, Japan, and oil exporters will all complain about our low interest rates as they buy our debt buy buy our debt they will. The US will force the European Union to lower rates too.
The FED is fast becoming a joke. The FED deemed waiting 1 week too long a time span to delay an emergency cut. How come when inflation is running rampant they can patiently sit back and wait for "inflation to moderate in the coming quarters" but when Wall Street is getting smacked 1 week is too long a haul? Rates are going to 1% by June, so why not just do 2.5% next week and stop the endless parade of buffoonary!
It's all about psychology at this point, and not just the market's.
J6P has been able to somewhat overlook his own deteriorating circumstances as long as the MSM kept up the happy talk -- just look at those soaring markets!!! Well, now that the people on Wall Street are crying J6P will know there's something wrong and react accordingly. IOW, they'll pull in their horns and affirm the recession in spades.
It's just like what Bernanke has said about inflation... it's not inflation itself, it's the perception of same.
All Americans will soon have to face a bitter and now obvious truth: Our national, political and economic leaders have squandered this nation's wealth, and the price of this profligacy is enormous, and the bill has just come due for all of us.
Another day of shaky stocks getting big bounces. I did buy puts on RIMM yesterday and QID last week. However, it will be interesting (and painful for me) if retail, homebuilders and financials (and small cap value in general) keep skyrocketing up. Some of these "value stocks" will start looking very tempting as shorts/puts again. But maybe that will be after the next fed hike.
Still no opinions on how low 30 year mortgage rates will go? Anyone think we shall see much better than 4.875% 30 year fixed with 2 points on refinance - APR 5.147%?
Soon they'll figure out that mortgage rates should be going up, regardless of long term treasuries.
Mortgages should be tied to risk and not the price of money.
How can rates be going DOWN, when people wanting mortgages are wanting it to buy overvalued homes (30% according to MER) heading into a recession. Risks are going UP not DOWN.
Fed and Fannie have to fail before risks can be priced correctly.
"It's just like what Bernanke has said about inflation... it's not inflation itself, it's the perception of same."
Our economic captains are voodoo doctors; they know that their nostrums and powders and spells only work if people believe in them.
Which is why the corporate-owned MSM are compelled to keep saying yes, trust the voodoo, trust the voodoo, pay no attention to the man behind the curtain. That video a couple of weeks back of the CNBC crowd trying to shut up the president of Overstock.com when he got too frank about the economy and financial system: priceless.
A 5% mortgage strikes me as crazy-low already. That's only about 1% above inflation - or below it, if you are cynical about the government's inflation numbers. I'd wouldn't hesitate much about taking it - if it is really available, and your situation warrants. TINFA.
F. F. - don't forget - you may be paying low interest, but why pay it on a depreciating asset? Still makes no sense. They can lower to 0% and Im not buying for a long long time. (Of course, I do live in CA.)
Well they just called me back and offered me 4.75% with 1.5 points, an even better deal on a 30 year fixed, I am getting very tempted - we have a 5.875% 30 year fixed now.
0% is not good enough - there is still that "saving glut" that Greedspam and others talked about. Some people out there are still saving their money, wrongly thinking that their wealth actually belongs to them instead of to Wall Street pigs. We need to make sure that there are no safe investments so that the sheeple are forced to buy declining stocks, worthless McMansions, and toxic mortgage backes securities.
What a joke! I am sure that giving more dope to the druggie-like clowns on Wall Street will fix everything. Certainly things like: reduced consumption, jobs with living wages and some degree of security, and so on won't help!
As someone who's career is (hopefully) getting ready to take off, and currently rents--
I am worried about the mortgage environment in the next 3-5 years. Unlike many of you (apparently) I can't drop 40-50% on a down payment. I mean, I hope that I can (!), but I don't see it in the cards currently.
At what point does an intelligent purchaser look for a 'bottom' on a 30 year to go out and buy?
I certainly am going to let the market push prices down more (I think it's clear that prices will drop substantially over 2008); but in 2009 if risk is properly figured in rates-- is it really worth it to wait?
Fed and Fannie have to fail before risks can be priced correctly.
Yes. I am concerned that nationalization of mortgages, via fannie, freddie, and the FHLB, is the truly inflationary part of all this. The government cannot afford the debt it now has, let alone buying up mortgages. I am worried that a massive mortgage bailout is already in process.
M-F check out Indymac,they were offering 5.375% with no points yesterday.If you are doing a Rate/Term refi and have 20% or better equity it should go smoothly.
It was interesting to see the "financial advice" given on the evening news broadcasts last night. CBS basically said don't panic, don't sell your stocks.
NBC was alot gloomier: first they had some guy who wanted to retire at 60 but couldn't, then 62, now he's 64 and looking over his 401k balances and has to keep working. Then their advice was: don't buy into this market, cut your expenses, and take the $800 the Feds are sending us and put it in a savings account. Sorta surprising that it wasn't the usual propaganda. Doesn't TV ad revenue drop during recessions?
You are right about the conundrum. Generally speaking, paying less for the asset is better than paying less for the loan, since you can conceivably refinance someday, but you can't readjust your principal.
But high rates still cost and there may be a sweetspot point where prices are close enough to the bottom and rates are still artifically low.
The dad unit just consolidated some small loans on the rental properties. It wasn't a huge chunk of cash...BofA did 5.00 for a flat 299 fee/no points. But he has been with them forever...
LawStudent,you can refi,you can not re buy.Homes are entropy in action,Wait until the numbers work, IE income/price ratios and GRM's are at historically sustainable levels.We have $200k plus to drop in Sonoma county before median prices return to historic levels...That is a lot of $ to eat.
We may be looking at something more than a recession. We may be staring uncomfortably at an epochal shift in economic reality.
For decades our economy has been driven by the mantra of growth and consumption fueled by cheap and abundant oil.
But we could only grow with such vigor because the world was our economic playground. But that has changed. China, India, Brazil, Vietnam and others are churning out goods and services.
So the era of boundless growth and consumption may be coming to an end because the world does not have the energy or the resources to sustain it.
What comes next? Who knows exactly. Maybe the era of sustain and improve. Maybe chaos.
Are you SURE that's a Macanudo that Conjure has? I swear I heard him whisper a buddy about some bodacious spliff he's been Marley'n. Hey, gotta do what the times say.
Testimony of Chairman Alan Greenspan
The economic outlook
Before the Joint Economic Committee, U.S. Congress
June 9, 2005
http://www.federalreserve.gov/Bo 092/ default.htm
Although a bubble in home prices for the nation as a whole does not appear likely, there do appear to be, at a minimum, signs of froth in some local markets where home prices seem to have risen to unsustainable levels.
to answer your Q from last thread: no one is ever sure.
i just try to connect all the dots from various sites like this and draw reasonable conclusions. i don't care if some hedge funds watch what i post and try to squeeze me on that PHM trade today; eventually it will i'm comfident of that. patience and time.
The problems, while serious, are not beyond our capacity to deal with them given, above all, leadership. While there is little likelihood of getting that from the current "leader", if one or more of the candidates was willing to get beyond who is a racist or who was businessman, something could actually be done.
Everyone knows that Fed rate changes have effects only months in the future, so for Bernanke to cut in a manner that makes it seem like he is not looking past the end of his nose is a great mistake.
Not if you're a speculator. Your margin interest payments nosedive, your carry goes even more positive (or less negative) and you can gear up to even greater heights!
Speaking of global recession and reductions in government spending and increases in debt, what happens in a global recession, do all countries print more money and thus how will value exchange be impacted?
We have a very serious mess that is inflating at a rapid pace, like Katrina coming ashore, and these freak retards on wallstreet are all running to The Astrodome thinking rate cuts will keep them safe; hope they enjoy themselves and get a nice taste of economic anarchy!
I am an older LawStudent, saw the writing on the wall with my previous field and thought I better change plans before it was too late.
While it has been a good decision I am married, and we are beginning to 'tire' of our current living situation.
*
I just don't want to get into a situation where prices have fallen 30%, but credit has tightened so much that it is still inaccessible.
I suppose as long as you are looking for a conforming loan Freddie/Fannie will always step up to be the sugar-daddy/mommy.
2009 is my target, but I've been pretty vigilantly watching the market locally. Just don't want to pass up a sweet spot in both the real estate and credit market if it becomes available.
Cool blog. Just got pointed over here from another.
I kind of agree with Binko.
The talking heads and those that direct them will try to "create their own reality" by telling the consumers that up is down and black is white so that they and their stakeholders can sell their chips to the taxpayers all the way to the bottom.
Uh, without gov't cartelized banks under the Fed, this couldn't have happened. And with 70,000 pages in the Federal Register alone, I don't see all this deregulation people keep throwing around as fact.
Why isn't the SEC investigating the monolines? Or the ratings agencies.
Oh yeah and let's not forget the gov't regs that require Moody/Fitch/S&P ratings paid for by the bond issuers.
Hey brain surgeon are asset home prices rising or falling, are stock prices around the world rising or falling, are credit spreads tightening or loosing? If inflation is going to be a problem how come every one is flying into treasuries at these pitifully low interest rates?
Hum?
If a lender priced their loans on the basis of risk,they would not make any deals as long as other lenders price on the basis of spreads.The choice is to make deals that will be going bad 1-3 years out,and keep the cash flowing,or no income.
Funan: The CITI bankruptcy rumor is ridiculous. It's a dump and frump fictive rumor.
Ambac is possible but probably not. They record losses long before they pay so a regulatory takeover is far more likely than a BK. Strictly speaking, they are probably preparing a BK, but only to have the option, not with any intent to use it in the near future.
CRE deals to be had - just locked in a multi-million dollar rate at 5.44% for 10 years - the free money machine is alive and well. Take it while its there...
I am much like yourself (though I just graduated from my grad program). I wouldn't worry too much about it. If interest rates rise, that will place even more pressure on the housing prices. Remember, things eventually have to fall back to where the median family can afford the median house.
So rising interest rates are a great thing for you. As home prices plummet, you can get a house for a much lower price, but equal payments. This means your (projected) huge income stream will be able to make additional payments to drop the principal, getting you the house for much much less than if you bought with a higher price, lower interest rate scenario.
No, Misean: The private speculators, with all regulatory restraints, removed got us into it. This has always been the case and probably always will.
We have to choose between free markets and responsible monetary policy or heavily regulated markets so we're free to pursue short-sighted easy monetary policy.
I prefer the more responsible policy with more market freedom. But maybe that's not realistic when politicians always interject themselves into monetary decisions for short term political gains.
Misean: So there were never bank/credit panics before the Federal Reserve? I don't think history supports you. They happened regularly and were very severe.
The regulations are there; the Fed has a duty to regulate lending. The problem is that they didn't do it.
I prefer the more responsible policy with more market freedom
Corporations and "market freedom" simply don't mix. Everyone in the mortgage production chain -- from the drive-by appraiser to the broker to the Wall Street packager to the respective CEOs of these borderline criminal organizations -- personally profited from the scam and are free now to find a new corporate host -- or retire on their ill-gotten millions -- now that their old one has kicked the bucket.
Many economists who are highly critical of the Fed, including Krugman, Roubini, and Stiglitz, believe the Fed should cut rates aggressively to prevent a longer/steeper recession than might be. They believe inflation will subside once demand fall. Inflation is the key uncertainty. With the things the way they are, lending will be tightened anyway.
M-F said: "Well they just called me back and offered me 4.75% with 1.5 points, an even better deal on a 30 year fixed, I am getting very tempted - we have a 5.875% 30 year fixed now."
I don't have any particular downside target in mind for mortgage rates but, personally, if I could do a cash-out refi at 5.5% or better on a 30-year fixed with no points I'd be happy. JMO, but anything below 6% is going to trigger a ton of refi activity and probably new buying, too.
Sure does. The biggest bubbles have been under fiat regimes. 1929 was something this country never saw before, and 70's were a real blast. This credit bubble is the largest in the history of mankind.
Kass's housing bailout is a non-starter. There will be riots if nonperforming mortgages are let off the hook with subsidized 1-2% fixed rates. The only way it would work is if every mortgage holder gets those rates, then only renters are screwed. Not enough of an outcry. Gov't can't afford to bailout everybody. Game over.
"The problems, while serious, are not beyond our capacity to deal with them given, above all, leadership."
Now that IS scary.
Minh: Lou Dobbs often appalls me but he's on target here. With one important exception. He's saying our leaders are to blame. That's comforting, but I'm afraid we get the leaders we deserve. Nobody made us borrow all that money. Sure, some borrowers were tricked and scammed; some borrowers should have been living under the authority of court-appointed guardians. But a lot of us just took the short-term approach without listening to our financial consciences, while laughing indulgently at the received fiscal wisdom of our parents and grandparents.
Law Student--don't you need to know difference between "who's" and "whose" in order to pass your bar exams? Guess not. We have the president we deserve.
Why was hardly anybody outraged after 9-11 when our leader told us to go shopping? When we re-elected the man and his message, the blame shifted to us.
I know the FED is a slut with her easy money but is anyone detecting a whiff of post-coital regret re: her 75 BPS cut?
and after her half-sister the ECB refused to lay down that maybe she's feeling like she ain't gonna walk the street again next week? like maybe -hold your breath-- she may NOT CUT next week?
damondidit-No I wouldn't go to 1-2 %. But 4-5 % would work, because that is what almost anyone will be able to get in a month or 2. The issue is to re-fi those who are underwater and that will require action.
Misean-There were huge bubbles throughout history. Tulips, South Sea company, railroads. You could go back to the Babylonians and find them if you wanted to. It's endemic in human nature. As John Stark said, "Nobody made us borrow all that money". Including Greenspan.
I feel like we're all coming out of a fog of insanity. We thought we could borrow and spend, borrow and spend, where spend equals consume. Businesses borrowed to invest--investing in commercial real estate to provide the stores that survived on our consumption. All along, there were people (whose voices often broke into mainstream media, at least on the print side) saying that this could not go on forever. We all knew this was true, and yet the music was still playing, and most of us kept dancing, from Mr. Prince all the way to J6P. (I just figured out what J6P meant a few minutes ago.)
Okay, now that we have defined the problem, what's next? Where do we go from here? If you were the President, what would you do? What would you say.?
A third party may be unwilling to purchase a mortgaged property at a
public sale because of the difficulty in determining the exact status of title
to the property due to, among other things, redemption rights that may exist and
because of the possibility that physical deterioration of the property may have
occurred during the foreclosure proceedings. Therefore, it is common for the
lender to purchase the mortgaged property for an amount equal to the secured
indebtedness and accrued and unpaid interest plus the expenses of foreclosure,
in which event the borrower's debt will be extinguished, or for a lesser amount
to preserve its right to seek a deficiency judgment if it is available under
state law and under the terms of the mortgage loan documents. The mortgage
loans, however, are expected to be non-recourse. See "Risk Factors--Investment
in commercial and multifamily mortgage loans is riskier than investment in
single-family mortgage loans."
Nothing on Asia Times Online. Don't know what to tell you.
Only thing on Bloomberg is this on Enron suit. Apparently the creditors are asking for CITI to shell out $18B, while CITI has $2.5B in reserves for the suit.
John Stark- The idiot's father did the RTC. Basically it worked. Doug Kass proposes something very similar here. There is not a shadow of a doubt that something along those lines will be done. What is the point of waiting?
For all the moral hazardists, there are prosecutors and prisons to take care of that. Let's put them to work on this now. But let's deal with things as they are, not some Austrian fairyland.
Funan: The CITI bankruptcy rumor is ridiculous. It's a dump and frump fictive rumor.
Fair Economist
It's likely a rumor, but it ain't ridiculous.
The bake sale they've had to get their reserves up worked for now, but they've got $200-300 billion of pier loans still on the books and it's tying up a ton of capital. They still have leftover writedowns coming and the question suddenly becomes this:
If another shock comes(counterparty risk, monoline failure, CRE exposure) do they have enough capital to be considered a "well reserved" bank?
If they have another $25B episode, then no. And considering on how big they bet in so many areas, it's possible.
.
I have a question for you guys. Would anyone hold a mortgage for me at 5% 30 year fixed?(827 credit score and a very decent income) If not, why do you think the banks are doing it? Could it be becouse of Fannie & Co?
PS It doesn`t always make sense to refinance just becouse you get a better rate.(Tanta would do a better job than I, explaining all the factors involved)
"Why was hardly anybody outraged after 9-11 when our leader told us to go shopping?"
I was so enraged by that I nearly had blood pouring out of my eyes. I am sure that many other posters here reacted the same way.
After voting for that clown in 2000, that was one of the things that irrevocably turned me against the GOP. That and the pandering tax cuts with the shifting justification (strong economy? tax cuts! oh wait, weakening economy? tax cuts!)
"People need to work for a living" is so true, but not useful here. If I have been out of work ever since New Century shut down, what do you want me to do? As president, what do you tell me and everybody else in your first Fireside Chat? And beyond what you say, what are you going to do?
If it weren't for the fact that we're all more or less screwed, I'd be laughing in the faces of all the people I know who looked down on people like me for using my credit wisely and having living arrangements that were maybe unglamorous, but didn't put me in debt at all.
I own my home. Mortgage paid off in 1973. Yeah, I inherited it from Grandma. So what? It meant I had to take care of Grandma instead of putting her in a nursing home. Nice house, well-built (from the 1950s), dull neighborhood but conveniently located to my job. No 60 minute commutes for me.
I bought unfashionable cars like Saturns. With traditional 4- or 5-year financing. Second car will be paid off in spring. Both cars are still in good shape. Sure, they don't have in-dash CD players, which makes me an inferior human being I suppose, but at least I'm not in debt.
One credit card at a time for the last 20 years. One. Credit. Card. Used it quite a bit, but often for big ticket items which I'd pay off immediately. Banks hate people like me.
My lifestyle is exactly the "poverty" that most of America seems to fear. Actually, not being in debt at a time like this is sort of fun. Will still have to deal with inflation, but I feel like a small forest-floor=-dwelling mammal in the age of the dinosaurs, and the asteroid's about to hit.
One credit card at a time for the last 20 years. One. Credit. Card. Used it quite a bit, but often for big ticket items which I'd pay off immediately. Banks hate people like me.
My lifestyle is exactly the "poverty" that most of America seems to fear. Actually, not being in debt at a time like this is sort of fun. Will still have to deal with inflation, but I feel like a small forest-floor=-dwelling mammal in the age of the dinosaurs, and the asteroid's about to hit.
We must be long distant relitives...i live the same lifestyle
Literally, go to work. Work for food. Real work for all Gov't handouts. THERE IS PLENTY OF PUBLIC WORKS REHAB TO DO. Anyone & everyone can see it. Here'a s shovel, here's a clipboard, now get going. No play, no pay. No tickie, no laundry. Period.
.
"Running the numbers, that's a TCO on the condo of $2137."
hmmm... are you sure?
Running the numbers, I get $380k loan at 4.75% for 15 year fixed to have a $2955.76/month for Prinicpal and interest.
Then you need to add tax and insurance to that. and maintenance.
In the end, if you're going to be a lawyer, I would assume you will have a decent income.
If lending really tightens then you will be in a good position to buy... because asking prices for housing will need to drop dramatically if lending is tightened. Look at what has happened in most of California now that it's mainly only conforming loans getting done.
only you can tell when it is time for you to buy. buying is risky. you may get in for a TCO of $2000 or $2500... but that's no consolation if your home loses 30% more (or over $100,000) while you own it!
I guestimate that my house has lost $65,000 in the last 18 months.
luckily for me,
-I love my home
-I can afford it (my mortgage payment is around 8-9% of my take home pay)
-I don't mind the loss. If I did mind the loss, I would have sold 2 years ago.
Don't want to step on mp's toes but he seems not to be around atm - last clock call I saw was 11:59:30 - emergency rate cut ratcheted forward the hour...
Broker asked: "I have a question for you guys. Would anyone hold a mortgage for me at 5% 30 year fixed?(827 credit score and a very decent income) If not, why do you think the banks are doing it?..."
The banks would do it because they've got a lower cost of money than I do. I'm not a mortgage-banking insider, but it seems to me that a bank can now borrow in the overnight market (Fed funds) at 3.5%, then turn around and loan it to you at 5%, plus whatever fees they can extract from you.
I dunno about C but on CNBC a constant refrain, about 6 times, from 6 different people is that the Fed cut because it was approached by a bank in serious trouble, or that it knows there is a bank in trouble(they have their own examiners physically located in the banks ) and so on.
Well one thing is different with me MAL i have not owned a credit card in 10 years...so my credit score sucks...but i do own a home...so what ever...oh and stacks of silver coins...and funny green paper with dead people on it hehe!
"Don't want to step on mp's toes but he seems not to be around atm - last clock call I saw was 11:59:30 - emergency rate cut ratcheted forward the hour..."
energyecon | 01.23.08 - 1:22 pm
You're right energyecon. Thing is, the original 11:59:06 was also due to the emergency rate cut. Something new must've occurred to Conjure, or his reflexes approach those of dinosaurs.
Where is Banker | when my character-string-search wants him most?
When Fannie and its GSE friends go BK the Political leadership will act like chickens with their heads cut off , will not be a pretty sight but its hard to expect much more out of this bunch of duds.
I use credit cards to get cash back-several $100s/year, but pay in full every month. I don't like to turn down free money from banks. The President might send me to Gitmo if I did.
the whole stupid thing is that now credit is going to be seen as eeeeevil. Which it isn't.
Oh, and as for home equity... I couldn't give a crap about it, except if my home needed major repairs. (It does need a serious internal makeover, but I paid $3K cash last summer to get it painted and for some external repairs to be done)
Grandma was mortally afeared of losing the house she'd worked so hard for so she sort of implanted in our brains that you never, ever, ever dip into HELOC for anything but DIRE emergencies. Not sure that's always great advice, but she sure put the fear of hellfire into me on that.
Central banks have lost control, said billionaire financier George Soros.
...
We have a market-friendly Fed possibly injecting a lot of liquidity in the system which will set us up for another bubble economy, said Stephen Roach, head of Asia for U.S. investment bank Morgan Stanley (MS.N).
Im sort of worried that all they did yesterday was to hit the snooze button. (This is) excessive monetary accommodation that just takes us from bubble to bubble to bubble.
Lawrence Summers, a former U.S. treasury chief, was critical too: Its hard to give a high grade (to central banks) for whats happened in the last six months.
And the boyz friends at Treasury had two auctions this morning, TIO pumping out ~$15.5 B tomorrow, ~$3.5 B that comes off in two days and the other ~$12 B comes off in five days...
And grand ma is right MAL...get a second job if it warrants and pay cash for the upgrades..why borrow from your, safe haven...i dont know..i considered a refi..and 4.75 is tempting
One other thing: Standard of living has been confused with wealth for too long and for too many in the middle class.
My home may be humble, but when the smoke clears, I'm gonna be landed gentry compared to too many other people who started out where I did. (and that's pretty sad)
You Austrians "free mousketeers" can say what you want about the Fed; like it or not they are there, they aren't going away and we have a right to demand un-Bushlike competence from them.
And the government exists-wishing it away won't change that. So they need to step up to the plate.
Whenever there is a 10% or better swing in value between SRS and EEV, you should sell the higher one and buy the lower one.
I've given up trying to figure out which will tank first, US CRE or emerging markets. The answer probably is BOTH.
But in the end, you want to be in EEV. SRS will probably turn up first and fastest because there's still institutions (pensions) that see intrinsic value in CRE.
It would be tempting to convert EEV shares to SRS about now wouldn't it?
Yes.
rich
Wow. That's exactly what I just did. (Makes me feel less like a moron) rich, thanks again for the heads up on EEV. Bought Friday, sold today. Will likely go back in if EEV goes down.
thanks for your work on SRS and CDS swaps. ever get a satisfactory answer from rich?
idoc,
If you check that comment thread.. I posted a link to the daily holdings for proshares stuff.
Essentially, all (98%-100%) of each proshares short or ultrashort etf consists of swap agreements (not credit default swaps.. those are just a particular type of swap).
Proshares, for example, would have $1 on hand... and they would enter into a swap agreement with some bank. The swap would say that Proshares would pay out the percent of positive return on $2 notional of QQQQ's over some time period to the bank.
And, the bank would pay out any negative return on that $2 notional to Proshares.
"the whole stupid thing is that now credit is going to be seen as eeeeevil. Which it isn't. "
I disagree; not credit, but the creditors, rightly or wrongly. Look for a lot more regulation, eventually. Some of it possibly punitive and wrong-headed, but that's life.
I do hope that all the good folks who think a good FICO score is most important will begin to see that savings and real assets (and lack of indebtedness) is where it's at. Boy, would that bring changes....
What's really pathetic here is the US Federal Reserve is now being driven like a slave by the manic hedge fund traders. The hedgies are clearly now flipping wall st upside down to shake every nickel out of the pockets of 401k & pension plans and Bernanke has to race in to the rescue.
Unregulated rougue hedgie traders tearing the global equities markets to shreds. I think hedgies should be FORCED to publish every single trade they make, in advance.
Thanks, aheadofthecurve, but the pressure to "keep up" never stops, and it's very subtle. What's scary is that financial behavior that would have been seen as clearly profligate even back in the "greed is good" Eighties somehow became a social norm. I keep having cathartic financial discussions with people I know who are also feeling like they're "allowed" to question the way their friends and family have been living - the expensive vacations, the bigger and bigger cars, the sudden removal to the big new home on the outskirts of town, etc.
The #1 reason why people buy SUVs is because they feel they need a bigger car so they can haul around... more stuff. It's all about having room to bring big things home from the mall (or from the home supply store). The folderol about "safety" and "snow maneuverability" is what they tell themselves, but in reality, it's all about the stuff. Same thing with the "well, I need room for the children." No, you need more room for their sports equipment - the stuff you feel compelled to buy to keep your kids in step with the Joneses.
No assumption about American life is safe now - including the mad rush to get your kid into a "good school." A certain percentage of the middle class are going to start questioning why their public schools don't prepare kids for jobs that pay a living wage and why they are expect to borrow, borrow, borrow just to "keep up." Higher ed will be the next bubble to burst.
Just heard from my broker again, and he says fixed rates are available at 5% today, but nobody will let him lock. Which I find a little weird, but there it is. Anyway, he says it's looking like those rates will be crossing down sub-5% soon.
Yup best to live within your means, and watch the show, knowing your, set, dry, and able to afford your life style...the got to haves are the ones falling around your feet...just walk over them..they did not listen.
Well I guess the lenders have learned their lessons...
Called Ditech..
I told him I was looking for a refi on about $110,000...home value $300,000. He said the best rate was 5.00 with 2 pts., BUT IF I HAD SOME OTHER DEBT TO ROLL IN AND GET IT TO $250,000, THEN I COULD GET 4.625%. I laughed and said sorry, I don't have any other debt. (Maybe I should get with the program )
Earnings yield for S&P 500 = 8.23% (including divs) Skyrocketing higher with lower earnings; remember the inversion folks, i.e, lower earnings in a stock increase P/E
10 year Treasury = 3.31% (falling like rock)
Thus S&P 500 about 5% overvalued for fair value, i.e, the yield on S&P500 is somewhat equivalent to a 10 year treasury; however, as with BAC and many corporations that make up components of S&P index, future EPS for 2008 is already projected to be 25% lower, thus as time goes by in this recession, we will see P/Es go either up or be entered as N/A which thus will crank
"but in reality, it's all about the stuff. Same thing with the "well, I need room for the children." No, you need more room for their sports equipment - the stuff you feel compelled to buy to keep your kids in step with the Joneses."
Mal, that's probably why property storage has been the growth industry for the past 20 years. Funny thing is, they rarely get rid of their storage lockers after they buy a bigger place!
OTOH, I'm looking to get into storage auctions for delinquent rent in the coming year. That should be another growth industry.
"Just curious. Doesn't it give you pause when it appears opinion almost uniformly accepts that now is the time to short, and then short again?"
Yes, and then the Fed cuts rates, SRS goes down, and I buy. Not exactly foolproof, but it's done well for me this year. In the near term, I just have a hard time conceiving of CRE doing well. I bought REW the other week on the same blunt logic. I have a hard time imaging tech doing well in a recession.
i think sk said i right the other day. being a contrarian means getting out ahead of the crowd but then letting the crowd catch up and run with u until the masses r totally on board. we aren't there yet by my estimation.
Sallie Mae, the embattled student lender, said Wednesday it lost $1.6 billion in the fourth quarter as borrowing costs rose and it set aside $575 million to cover bad loans.
The Citi rumor is ridiculous not because Citi can't go insolvent but it would be addressed by regulatory seizure rather than bankruptcy. Even more likely, the Feds would cover up for them and let them keep going, which is what happened the last time Citi merited BK. Because the second part of the rumor is made up I suspect the first part is too.
Misean - mortgage rates are dropping in response to the cuts. The market smells deflation. Bad, stinky deflation. Probably the same odor is emanating from the Fed's auditing screen, but even fresher.
Well, I've been trying to get people to move on from "bash the borrowers, bash the creditors, if only more people were like me..." without much success.
I'm not one of the borrowers, myself...My cars are 12 and 16 years old respectively and my house is paid for. Credit card balance zero. Television is also 16 years old! So when I lose my job in this recession you all are promising me, I'll still have a place to live, and a car to drive, and credit card balances I can run up to fill my tank. I'll be better off than a lot of people, for sure, but it is still going to suck big time.
So let's take one more shot at this, shall we? What's the way forward? What should the next president do? I'm guessing that the fix is going to be a long-term process--it did, after all, take us a long time to get to the bottom of this whole.
My guess is that we'll need to raise public revenue wherever we can, without doing too much damage to the economy, and put people to work catching up on infrastructure--especially the most productive kinds of infrastructure that make communications and transportation more efficient, less fuel-intensive. We'll need to start scaling back the promises on social security and Medicare even as we ramp up the income to their trust funds by raising taxes on those still working. (Hmmm--how many states will I carry on that platform, when I run for reelection??? Oh well...)
And we should blow up our entire public education system and gear it 100 percent toward giving people skills, abilities and attitudes that will help them live happy and productive lives. (Oops, there goes the teachers' union endorsement.)
weeell... I anticipate that the spring garage sales are going to feature some mighty fine pickin's this year.
You guys play your market, I'll play mine.
For real and pay cash for a 40" plasma tv for 10 cents on the dollar...I can here it now....well i paid $3000 for it...no you did not you borrowed $3000 for it...and to me its worth $400 used...going once twice!
Is this intended to provoke the last few people with money in the bank (and little or no debt) to run right out and spend it ?
Leaving it in the bank is going to provide zero equity improvement (or at least thats how I'm interpreting this).
Maybe some really big institution is tottering on the edge of insolvency. How can we tell who is actually borrowing from the Fed at these rates ? God help them if everyone who has funds on deposit tosses in the towel and says "oh what the hell".
M-F I'd really run those numbers on the refi. including the after-tax savings (remember you'll have less interest to deduct), the fact that you may be extending your term (if you're refi a mortgage with 22 years left on it for a new 30 year mortgage), etc.
Perhaps the best calculation you can run is to see what happens if you drop an extra hundred on the principal each month of the existing mortgage. Could save you far more than a measly 1% cut on the rate, which may save you nothing at all.
"You Austrians 'free mousketeers' can say what you want about the Fed; like it or not they are there, they aren't going away and we have a right to demand un-Bushlike competence from them. And the government exists-wishing it away won't change that. So they need to step up to the plate." [aotc]
Well spoken, aotc. Where do people get the idea that we'd be better off without government. It's complete fantasy. Look how well Somalia is doing...
"OTOH, I'm looking to get into storage auctions for delinquent rent in the coming year. That should be another growth industry."
Bob Dobbs
When you open up one of those abandoned lockers, be careful. One time a guy found a live, but starving bengal tiger in one.
Another time, the storage manager opened up a defaulted locker and found the decomposing body of the renter's first wife. (Seems his second wife decided to stop paying the bill on the thing, and forgot to tell her hubby...)
GSEs worth less and less and they have mkt caps which are the size of many write downs; anyone find that interesting??
Sallie Mae @ $7 Billion Mkt Cap
Sallie Mae, the embattled student lender, said Wednesday it lost $1.6 billion in the fourth quarter as borrowing costs rose and it set aside $575 million to cover bad loans.
Fannie @ $30 Billion mkt cap
Freddie @ $18 Billion mkt cap
Fannie, Freddie May Face $16 Billion Losses, Credit Suisse Says
The world's biggest banks and brokerages have disclosed more than $120 billion of writedowns and credit losses since June, mostly caused by the collapse of the subprime mortgage market.
CBO Sees $250 Billion Deficit
Senate Budget Committee Chairman Kent Conrad, D-N.D., said the 2008 deficit would reach more than $350 billion once the costs of an upcoming economic stimulus measure under negotiation between the Bush administration and Congress are factored in.
I prefer Vodka Martinis. Not sure about BB's preference. Not claiming I had a 3 Martini lunch. Not quite lunch time here. And I would like to be conscious at 9PM to watch Mythbusters. Never know though.
mal asked: "so why IS the Dow going up this afternoon? Do they believe they're going to get another .75 cut tomorrow?!"
Well, yesterday there were about 1,100 new 52-week lows on the NYSE. I think that's the highest number since late-August, 1998, around the time of the LTCM/Russian currency crises. IOW, based on the panic level it's looking like a major stock-market low is forming here.
Kass should stick to writing about topics where he has at least a glimmer of a clue.
He confuses market cap with claims-paying ability. There is no direct relationship. Maybe he thinks insurers pay claims with stock?
He asserts a lot of things that just aren't true.
He's just looking for a huge government handout. Welfare for the rich.
IF there needs to be a massive government bailout of the mortgage markets (and I think this is far from proven), there's a very good model for how to do it that's worked in the past, with no taxpayer liability.
AOTC and Detroit Dan, right on.
Libertarianism is an adolescent masturbatory fantasy.
For the vast majority of people, government is not the problem, it is the solution provider.
Someone upthread keeps asking for solutions. So I'll repeat it again: bring back the WPA. This time invest in mass transit and true renewable resources (solar and wind, NOT ethanol, biofuels, etc) and get this country off the fossil fuel addiction.
Curiously, what I'm starting to see amongst some of my friends is a drive to "simplify" and remove all of the stuff. Xmas was much less for the kids (theirs and ours) and there's a push to get rid of extraneous stuff.
Some is this is related to a religious message about simplifying and some is just the sense that things are too out of control.
FWIW - we moved to a newer smaller house two months and are already talking refi.
I dunno about C but on CNBC a constant refrain, about 6 times, from 6 different people is that the Fed cut because it was approached by a bank in serious trouble, or that it knows there is a bank in trouble (they have their own examiners physically located in the banks ) and so on.
That makes no sense at all. If a single bank faces a solvency problem, no amount of liquidity will help. If a single bank faces a liquidity problem, it can always hit the discount window or the TAF.
So cutting the overnight rate would either be unhelpful or unnecessary to a single troubled bank, depending on the nature of its trouble.
Cutting the FF rates is pure economic stimulus. And it takes 6-18 months to have an effect. That they did not wait one more week can only mean they were, in fact, responding to the broad market decline.
I have long been a defender of both the Fed's competence and its intentions, but this action has seriously tested my faith.
The 10 year Treasury has gone from 5% to 3.5% within that same time frame.
One could also look at oil costs and dollar values within the last year, but the main issue that concerns me, is the amount of accumulating writedowns and re-valuations which may or may not factor in subprime ARM resets coming due which may push these GSEs into further declines as The Treasury is forced to back up more and more bad loans and then make more and more loans to banks that have more and more bad loans.
Does this mean that there willl be more jobs at Treasury printing press, in regard to lowering interest rates further?
Misean - with 10 year tbills below the inflation rate - and falling - and mortgage rates falling too, all early in the recession, I'm confident the market now smells the same deflation you have. Congrats on your nose. Hope living with that smell hasn't been to nasty because I think we all get to live with it now.
John Stark - Nobody knows how to get out of this. The Japanese have been trying to get out of their liquidity trap for 16 years now with no success. I figured when their asset values had gotten reasonable things would pick up but they have to no avail. They ran up an enormous public debt doing public works - going from least indebted big country to one of the most indebted - also to no avail. AFAIK there's not even a decent economic model to explain the kind of indefinite liquidity trap they've experienced and our long bond market predicts.
well yeah, normally i watch him on wednesday's, but Tanta lost him yesterday, so it's not my turn again until she finds him. you're really screwing up the rotation, T (did you check under the bed?)!
"And we should blow up our entire public education system and gear it 100 percent toward giving people skills, abilities and attitudes that will help them live happy and productive lives."
After a short and somewhat ill-fated career in the school system, I would have to agree.
Schooling on the U.S. is basically done on the industrial, one-size-fits all model, more brains for the buck, that sort of thing. It doesn't really work. A lot of kids learn in spite of it, not because of it. Most of the kids who do well in math or reading do so because their parents and family already have those skills, and share them, or at least know enough to support the learning process vigorously. There are exceptions. Not that many.
There are proven theories of education that work. I've seen it. Unfortunately, the public schools in the US don't use them. The Finns, who made a concerted effort to ramp up their country's educational levels and put resources behind it, have it nailed.
Sebastian -
Please stop. You have been calling a bottom and no recession for 6 months and you have simply been wrong. A bottom is not forming - it will form when you and others stop declaring it. The only thing forming is an an opinion across the board that you have absolutely no idea what your talking about. How's that Wright Model B treating you? Maybe you can sue Mr Wright for screwing you.
Anonymous asked: "...Does this mean that there will be more jobs at Treasury printing press, in regard to lowering interest rates further?"
I'm not much into subjective "what all this means" speculations, but based on the fact that there's still a pretty wide spread between the Fed funds rate and the 13-week Treasury Index, it looks like an excellent bet that the Fed will be easing yet again before this is all over.
"John Stark - Nobody knows how to get out of this."
I suspect that's true, if by "get out of this" you mean, get things back to the way they were. I'm guessing we all agree that's not going to happen.
And it is infuriating to hear grown men and women talking as though a rate cut and a rebate check could actually MAKE that happen.
I don't for a minute think that a public works program will make that happen either--but it doesn't mean it's not worth doing. A big part of the public works program, as I suggested above, should be 21st century communications, transportation and energy infrastructure--infrastructure that enables us to reduce our energy consumption.
After all, we don't really want to go back to the way things were (way back in 2006) do we? That's not the point of the exercise. The question is, what's the best way to keep the greatest number of people happy and healthy, going forward? We need to go beyond philosophy to policy.
That said, philosophy and psychology are going to be a big part of the solution, since they were a big part of the problem. As many have suggested, we need to recognize that "stuff" doesn't equal the good life. Maybe people are going to discover that, in the years ahead, because they won't have any choice.
Personally I'm going to enlarge the garden this year and dig more clams, assuming that guys with guns haven't claimed all the best tideflats.
anon said: "...How's that Wright Model B treating you? Maybe you can sue Mr. Wright for screwing you."
On the contrary, if he had a tip-jar I'd contribute. I don't care how many people become convinced/panicked into thinking the economy is in a recession, as long as the objective data says otherwise.
No recession now, no recession at any time in 2008, and a pick-up in housing in 2008.
Biflation is the state of an economy where the processes of inflation and deflation occur simultaneously. During this period there is a rise in the purchasing prices of commodity items and a fall in the purchasing prices of non-commodity items.
The purchasing price of an item is based on the demand for it and the amount of money in circulation to pay for it.
Biflation is preceded by an overabundance of money placed in circulation within the population by a central bank. Since commodities (such as food, energy,clothing) are essential and are in high demand, the purchase price for them rises due to the increased money available to buy them. This increasing purchase amount is Price Inflation.
Likewise, Biflation is preceded by a decrease in employment within the population. Although there is an increase of money in circulation, fewer people have access to the money to make purchases. As a result, a greater percentage of individual wages is directed toward purchasing commodities and less is utilized for purchasing non-commodity items. Since non-commodities (such as automobiles, televisions, stocks) are less essential and are in lower demand, the purchase price for them falls due to the decreased money available to buy them. This decreased purchase amount is Price Deflation.
You may very well be right that the market will continue to slide, but sounds like a lot of folks are becoming complacent on one side of the boat.
We all have to be a little careful of the short-term volatility, and the fact that bulls haven't all given up yet. But given that there's at least 6 months of overall misery left, and maybe as much as 18, I can't see stocks going higher over the intermediate-term. It's kind of like having a short put. If you're wrong on timing, you can make it up by holding. That's how I feel, anyway.
I am not high on SKF. Too late in the cycle.
One interesting ultra short I'm considering is RXD, double short health care. I think the political scene over the next couple of months may hammer it. So far, it hasn't dropped as far as other shorts mentioned here
Nobody knows how to get out of this. - Fair Economist
Not exactly so. There are several ways that people know to get out of this:
1) Jubilee! Bankrupt entities renege on their debts
2) Wild Abandon! Productive enterprises are left to rot, amidst large scale unemployment
3) Wanton Destruction! Blowing people and things up to clear the decks
All of these solutions involve pain, and everyone involved likes to commit as much of that as possible to "others"; history demonstrates that this doesn't usually stay that way,but that doesn't stop anyone from hoping.
The upside is that the survivors get to start over, and have great stories to tell.
"weeell... I anticipate that the spring garage sales are going to feature some mighty fine pickin's this year.
You guys play your market, I'll play mine. :-)"
I'm trying to establish a presence on the local Craigslist, selling last year's garage sale finds through a regularly-published list. Doing well, too, though it's still at the hobby stage. When the sales pick up again in February or March, I'm heading out again.
Unfortunately, nobody ever wants to buy the Magic Q-ball.
Well, if they are reporting that a bank is in trouble, I can almost guarantee you that Corus Bankshares is in trouble, even though there's not one word of news about it and I don't have any inside information.
There's no way that many South Florida high-rise $60 million+ condo loans can be above water.
"Schooling on the U.S. is basically done on the industrial, one-size-fits all model, more brains for the buck, that sort of thing. It doesn't really work."
David Halberstam's book on the 1950s explains how this happened. School officials did not see the baby boom coming. (I mean, who could've known?) So when kids started to show up for kindergarten and first grade in unprecedented numbers, they basically invented our modern public school system, based on processing the maximum number of kids at minimum expense. (Apologies to all the dedicated and hard-working school teachers and administrators out there--I know you exist, but I also know that many of you agree with me...)
Sorry for posting so much today. I've got the morning off. (Pacific Standard Time.) Gotta run soon.
"Perhaps the best calculation you can run is to see what happens if you drop an extra hundred on the principal each month of the existing mortgage. Could save you far more than a measly 1% cut on the rate, which may save you nothing at all."
I second that. I almost refied a few years ago. Then I plugged the numbers into my Excel spreadsheet and realized that I could reduce the term by 14 years just by paying $200/mo. to principal. No fees, no points, no hassle. And if I need to, I can keep my $200 each month.
You make a good point about paying the extra principal, but our mortagge is only 26.5 years old, and we near max out our 401ks and have other money left over to invest... but I don't wnt to pay down the mortgage with it. We are basically doing it to reduce monthly expences, we plan on keeping the house.
I'm glad Seb just re-iterated his no recession call, otherwise it would start to look like I was agreeing with him. We're in a recession now - whether it lasts long enough to become an "official" recession is another question, but I'd say that's better than an even money bet. I'm not calling for a bottom in stocks either, but the market has marked down a number of stocks to levels that look like excellent value to me. Housing - definitely further to run on the downside there, but 5% mortgages and 4% inflation does bring nominal house prices somewhat more back into line.
ratefink - those are the traditional outcomes of a liquidity trap but I wouldn't call 2 or 3 an "out". More like "out of the frying pan into the fire". 1, maybe, but when's the last time that was tried in an economy-wide trap, when it results in the death of most existing financial organizations?
Thanks for the link, I'll take a look later today.
Why are payday advance companies and pawn shop stocks doing so poorly the last few months?
w | 01.23.08 - 2:45 pm | #
w,
I know of one pawn shop for sure here in Fl that has pretty much quit buying. The storage area is packed and the owner basically said nothing was moving...
But hey,I have greatly increased my,um,self defense collection for .25 on the dollar.
Chris
I agree that we'd like to see his data, or observations that lead to his conclusions.
I don't agree with sebastian, but he might be right that the fed and the prez and congress can juice this dying drug addict one more time just to get him thru the next year.
stranger things have been known
but hey seb you gotta admit the econ trends are just awful...plus just look how shaky the hands of all our leaders are on the controls...you can smell the fear.
Where can the next bubble be? We had a stock bubble, a real estate bubble, what's the logical next one?
Zac | 01.23.08 - 3:25 pm | #
I read an article in Harper's by Eric Janszen (cited on the big picture) claiming the next bubble may be in alternative energy.
[snip]
There is one industry that fits the bill: alternative energy, the development of more energy-efficient products, along with viable alternatives to oil, including wind, solar, and geothermal power, along with the use of nuclear energy to produce sustainable oil substitutes, such as liquefied hydrogen from water. Indeed, the next bubble is already being branded. Wired magazine, returning to its roots in boosterism, put ethanol on the cover of its October 2007 issue, advising its readers to forget oil; NBC had a "Green Week" in November 2007, with themed shows beating away at an ecological message and Al Gore making a guest appearance on the sitcom 30 Rock. Improbably, Gore threatens to become the poster boy for the new new new economy: he has joined the legendary venture-capital firm Kleiner Perkins Caufield & Byers, which assisted at the births of Amazon.com and Google, to oversee the "climate change solutions group," thus providing a massive dose of Nobel Prizewinning credibility that will be most useful when its first alternative-energy investments are taken public before a credulous mob. Other venturesLazard Capital Markets, Generation Investment Management, Nth Power, EnerTech Capital, and Battery Venturesare funding an array of startups working on improvements to solar cells, to biofuels production, to batteries, to "energy management" software, and so on. ...
The next bubble must be large enough to recover the losses from the housing bubble collapse. How bad will it be? Some rough calculations. the gross market value of all enterprises needed to develop hydroelectric power, geothermal energy, nuclear energy, wind farms, solar power, and hydrogen-powered fuel-cell technologyand the infrastructure to support itis somewhere between $2 trillion and $4 trillion; assuming the bubble can get started, the hyperinflated fictitious value could add another $12 trillion. In a hyperinflation, infrastructure upgrades will accelerate, with plenty of opportunity for big government contractors fleeing the declining market in Iraq. Thus, we can expect to see the creation of another $8 trillion in fictitious value, which gives us an estimate of $20 trillion in speculative wealth, money that inevitably will be employed to increase share prices rather than to deliver "energy security." When the bubble finally bursts, we will be left to mop up after yet another devastated industry. FIRE, meanwhile, will already be engineering its next opportunity. Given the current state of our economy, the only thing worse than a new bubble would be its absence.
mock turtle said: "...but hey seb you gotta admit the econ trends are just awful...plus just look how shaky the hands of all our leaders are on the controls...you can smell the fear."
You're right about the fear, but by the very numbers that policy-makers use to measure the economy there's no recession and no compelling reason to think there's going to be one, a big disconnect. What they're afraid of and what is are two different things.
It's "Iraq has WMD, they're a threat to our security and we must invade" all over again.
I'm not even convinced that Sebastian exists. I suspect many people have assumed the Sebastian persona to keep the straw man alive.
safe_as_apartments,
hehe.. that's what I like to imagine too. Sort of like those amphibian communities where... if all members end up being the same sex, some will randomly change sex suddenly.
Same here... the echo chamber needs a bounceboard so Sebastian shall rise again even if he left long ago.
Alternative energy: Let the buyer beware. The pump-and-dump penny stock guys have been onto this one for quite awhile now--when they are not touting their holdings in nonexistent gold mines and oil fields. It's incredible how many people will buy stock in a company based on a press release saying the company has plans to build a biodiesel plant or some such thing--at most, they have an option on a piece of land where this plant will be built, and an artist's rendering of the completed plant on their website. And they sell stock at 50 cents a share or something on that basis.
Sometimes they show up at small town newsrooms like mine, to try to lure some unwary reporter into writing a story about their plans. If somebody bites, they then have a news story to link to on the company website.
A couple of years ago one of these guys came up to me wanting a story on his ethanol plant. I told him if he was already selling stock in his company, it was no deal unless he could show me all kinds of documentation on his level of financing and so forth.
"I'll get back to you," he said.
I'm sure that will happen any minute now.
I got wise to this kind of thing about 30 years ago when an unwary colleague wrote a story about the investment opportunity involved in operating your own worm farm. The promoter assured the reporter that the Japanese eat earthworms and were importing them by the shipload.
After this appeared in the newspaper, the reporter got a call from the Japanese consulate. The Japanese diplomat, as I recall, suggested that the reporter needed to salvage his personal honor by slashing his midsection with a short sword. (Okay, I made that last part up, but everything up to that point was the truth.)
"...as long as the objective data says otherwise. No recession now, no recession at any time in 2008, and a pick-up in housing in 2008."
Sebastian | 01.23.08 - 2:50 pm
Mirror listening (or direct listenting to the Pamplona Pavlovians on CNBC) is the only explanation for getting all this backwards:
Highest housing inventory overhang in two decades, prices remaining 3X income, resets stretching through 2009, rising acceptablility of jingle mail, billions in yet-to-be declared losses on CRE, SIV, & a few hundred trillion of notational fictions, and then there's the climbing unemployment and real stagnating wages.
Do you really think $140B line of snort's gonna jolt all of the above into the black?
I'm beginning to believe the notion you're a fiction for the entertainment, derision and pleasure of the rational skeptics who congregate here.
w,
It depends . I have found some smoking deals and some other WTF prices. I never buy on the spot,take the info and check gunbroker prices online for a comparison. I usually shoot for 50% of msrp. Anything under is a bonus. Oh,carry cash and ALWAYS lowball em. Most they can say is no...
As a mekanik I have picked up some deals on name brand(sk/snap-on/mac)tools also. I am a cheap bastard who flat refuses to pay full price...
Chris
"Where can the next bubble be? We had a stock bubble, a real estate bubble, what's the logical next one?"
Energy's a logical choice, I agree with beryl "west with the night" markham, that green energy might be real bubble material. Imagine how much economic activity -- and speculation -- could be generated by refitting American homes and businesses for solar, geothermal heating, etc. etc. etc., especially with new and cheaper thin-film solar a possibility. And that's just a slice of it.
Short term, speculative money could go into oil or any other commodity that looks likely, especially if the international situation gets shakey.
Sebastian: No recession now, no recession at any time in 2008, and a pick-up in housing in 2008.
Yea, tell that to my NJ-based contractor friends, including my brother, who over the last two months have witnessed the most significant and abrupt slowdown in their business since 1991. The phones are not ringing anymore.
Dow 2000 or Dow 20000 -- doesn't matter. Construction at the very least is in recession...right now.
Thanks for posting that link to the Element. 34 floors high, 395 units, 15,000 square feet of condo space located in downtown Tampa, a true residential paradise. ("24-hour amenities!" Must mean hookers.)
Here's a breakdown on Corus' condo construction projects in the works:
In Florida, 27 condo projects (mostly Gold Coast) with $2.9 billion of Corus construction loans.
In California, 25 condo projects, with $1.7 billion of Corus construction loans.
puravidavid: "...I'm beginning to believe the notion you're a fiction for the entertainment, derision and pleasure of the rational skeptics who congregate here."
I'm not sure the term "rational skeptics" applies. Wouldn't a rational skeptic also question CR's posts and conclusions? How many here actually have, found the weak points and then had the confidence to call him on them?
Whatever. I'm going to be right, but I'm also never going to get credit for it here, that's for sure.
Beautiful PPT action today - gotta keep the market above 12,000! Can't allow any corrections - not now, not ever!
Was it all locking in shorts? Was it the PPT? Is it just lots of stupid people (Marketwatch claims Financials drove the rise upwards - now THERE'S a stupid choice of things to buy!) Or, maybe we're going enter a New Era, where ever day is either: a rate cut, or an up market!
I read "West with the Night" long before Isac Dinesen's memoirs were turned into "Out of Africa". She wrote a fine and moving book... a one hit wonder in the literary world.
Get back to me when milk is back at $2.99. Or gas is $2, ...
Well, milk is $2.99 a gallon here, but gas is still over $3 a gallon. I don't see that coming down any time soon.
Seb, I have seen CR and Tanta get called on errors, and if they are wrong they correct their mistake. But they are not wrong very often, so you may be confusing their being right with others being afraid to call them out on it.
If it ain't broke, ya can't fix it.
I have to admit that I enjoy reading Seb though. I need something to laugh at while reading all of the depressing news here.
puravidavid, I shouldn't underestimate the posters on CR! I knew this was an unusual place, but really, very few non-pilots -- at least in my experience -- know anything about BM. Of course, I don't walk up to strangers and ask, "what do you think of Beryl Markham?"
Her attitude in WWTN towards worldly goods is one I try to keep in mind: "For me the bags held pajamas, slacks, a shirt, toothbrush, and comb... I never owned less, nor can I be sure that I ever needed more."
ZIRP!!!!
HELICOPTERS RO THE RESCUE
Yep, once these bps cuts start, the market, like a heroin addict, seems to demand more.
Not too much more to give, methinks....
The market may get more rate cuts before then if it continues to drop.
Market Down -> Rate Cuts
Market Down -> Rate Cuts
Market Down -> Rate Cuts
"Data driven" . . . right.
Just one more hit, man! I swear; this is the last one!
Hopefully this will encourage enough borrowing to pay off our excess debts.
It should be clear that the utterances of Paulson, Thain, Rubin, Bernanke, Kudlowe, Greenspan, Bush, et al, are just spin, reverse-engineered to serve the interests of their immediate cohort.
The collapse of the housing/credit bubble presents us a rare opportunity to evaluate whether their theories are working.
Who should make our economic policy? Using what tools? In whose interests?
Are we really going to stick with debt-intensive, pay-to-play, trickle-down?
By the way, ditech.com is currently offering a 4.875% 30 year fixed with 2 points on refinance. APR 5.147% anyone have any opinions on how low 30 year fixed will go in this meltdown?
Oh wow... this will Really help this time. I just know it!
Peripheral Visionary, yeah - the market perception is that "data driven" means stock prices are falling.
Hmmm ... I was assuming the FOMC statement would be on the 31st (the 2nd day of the meeting), but a couple of sites have it on the 30th. That could make a difference because the BEA personal income release is on the morning of the 31st (and that will give us a strong hint if the economy was in recession in December).
Best to all.
OT, but has CR or Tanta written on securitized credit card debt? Listening to a Barron's guy on the radio say it's about a trillion total, most of which is securitized, but it should't be a problem like subprime. Why don't I believe him?
This in a world where a 1% daily decline in the Dow is considered the SUCCESSUL result of a 3/4% reduction in the fed rate.
Actually earlier this morning the fed futures were 50-50 between a 50bps and 75bps cut.
Looking at the CBOT quote as of 9:30 am its more like 67-33 in favor of 50bps.
The .75 cut suggests panic from the Fed. Giving another .50 cut one week later will confirm it.
Everyone knows that Fed rate changes have effects only months in the future, so for Bernanke to cut in a manner that makes it seem like he is not looking past the end of his nose is a great mistake. In effect, he appeared to take responsibility for maintaining stock market prices and when they drop it will now be seen as his failure.
That aside, if Bernanke now sees recession, then he should cut deeply and quickly. The real test will come later. When to raise again? Will he fail to anticipate recovery and bake in a new bubble like Greenspan did, or will he raise rates quickly and aggressively before things get too steamy?
So, the Fed is aiming for -1% real rates without a confirmed recession?
But they're not panicking. No-dee-nodee-no, no-siree-bob. No stench of panic here.
Seems like pumping anabolic steroids to a quadriplegic on a football match.
Perfect graph illustating income and house prices (Exhibit 1)
Winter (Economic and Market) Watch » The Blame Game
did anyone find Mishkin?
The FED can do things like this as long as foreigners are willing to buy our debt. China, Japan, and oil exporters will all complain about our low interest rates as they buy our debt buy buy our debt they will. The US will force the European Union to lower rates too.
Brake linings getting thin on the old fedmobile.
You can see what happens when you take the the shorts out from under stocks by watching the big tech names today
AAPL, RIM, GOOG, POT, there are no buyers to catch these today.
No one dared short them as everyone said that a move to tech was safe since it was "immune" from the mess in financials and consumer discretionary.
Bernanke's unpredicatable moves, ie. the Bernanke Put, will mean no support for falling financials. They will be bid up with only air underneath.
His moves are setting up for a big stock overdrop.
i heard he's beside ohio! ahahaha!
125 bps in a week. If I wasn't so freaked out, I'd laugh.
Cheers,
don't be so sure that the 75 bps wasn't the rate cut
50 bps NOT A SURE THING
The FED is fast becoming a joke. The FED deemed waiting 1 week too long a time span to delay an emergency cut. How come when inflation is running rampant they can patiently sit back and wait for "inflation to moderate in the coming quarters" but when Wall Street is getting smacked 1 week is too long a haul? Rates are going to 1% by June, so why not just do 2.5% next week and stop the endless parade of buffoonary!
It's all about psychology at this point, and not just the market's.
J6P has been able to somewhat overlook his own deteriorating circumstances as long as the MSM kept up the happy talk -- just look at those soaring markets!!! Well, now that the people on Wall Street are crying J6P will know there's something wrong and react accordingly. IOW, they'll pull in their horns and affirm the recession in spades.
It's just like what Bernanke has said about inflation... it's not inflation itself, it's the perception of same.
If they cut again, I want to see real helicopters, in my neighborhood, dropping currency.
I refuse to pay for this shit if I don't get my fair share.
Dobbs: Our leaders have squandered our wealth - CNN.com
All Americans will soon have to face a bitter and now obvious truth: Our national, political and economic leaders have squandered this nation's wealth, and the price of this profligacy is enormous, and the bill has just come due for all of us.
"It's all about psychology at this point, and not just the market's."
Since when is the FED supposed to be a psychiatrist??? Too bad our "great nation" has been reduced to a neurotic patient on the couch.
Watch out below! This ship be sinkin!
Another day of shaky stocks getting big bounces. I did buy puts on RIMM yesterday and QID last week. However, it will be interesting (and painful for me) if retail, homebuilders and financials (and small cap value in general) keep skyrocketing up. Some of these "value stocks" will start looking very tempting as shorts/puts again. But maybe that will be after the next fed hike.
Still no opinions on how low 30 year mortgage rates will go? Anyone think we shall see much better than 4.875% 30 year fixed with 2 points on refinance - APR 5.147%?
Bloody idiots.
Kill savers, check
Unleash inflation, check
Bury J6P deeper, check
Save the pigmen, check
1/19/2009 PRICELESS!
We canz all haz 3%?
Mortgage rates:
Soon they'll figure out that mortgage rates should be going up, regardless of long term treasuries.
Mortgages should be tied to risk and not the price of money.
How can rates be going DOWN, when people wanting mortgages are wanting it to buy overvalued homes (30% according to MER) heading into a recession. Risks are going UP not DOWN.
Fed and Fannie have to fail before risks can be priced correctly.
For the junky commentators, not only:
Just give me one more hit, please
But also:
oh, and before I forget, give me that $800 that W promised.
Then I'm good, I'm off the stuff...forever. Promise.
Never trust a junkie.
"It's just like what Bernanke has said about inflation... it's not inflation itself, it's the perception of same."
Our economic captains are voodoo doctors; they know that their nostrums and powders and spells only work if people believe in them.
Which is why the corporate-owned MSM are compelled to keep saying yes, trust the voodoo, trust the voodoo, pay no attention to the man behind the curtain. That video a couple of weeks back of the CNBC crowd trying to shut up the president of Overstock.com when he got too frank about the economy and financial system: priceless.
Market Expects 50bps Cut Next Week
And they better get it, if the Fed knows what's good for em'.
Howyadoin Benny?
Fuggedaboutit!
I've seen enough. IMO, the Dow is now headed for a test of 11,500.
Yeh. You better go and just comfort Conjure Bag. Looks like he could use a hug. Just don't get any cigar burns in the process.
A 5% mortgage strikes me as crazy-low already. That's only about 1% above inflation - or below it, if you are cynical about the government's inflation numbers. I'd wouldn't hesitate much about taking it - if it is really available, and your situation warrants. TINFA.
F. F. - don't forget - you may be paying low interest, but why pay it on a depreciating asset? Still makes no sense. They can lower to 0% and Im not buying for a long long time. (Of course, I do live in CA.)
Well they just called me back and offered me 4.75% with 1.5 points, an even better deal on a 30 year fixed, I am getting very tempted - we have a 5.875% 30 year fixed now.
you may be paying low interest, but why pay it on a depreciating asset?
He said refinance, and I said if it warrants.
M-F - a detailed, multiple-scenario spreadsheet will probably give better answers than sum doodz on teh intertubez.
M-F
Tell them you will do it for 1 point and make them disclose their fees-those can kill you.
I wouldn't buy now either but if you already have a mortgage and can pay a lower rate-fixed, of course.
Hopefully this will encourage enough borrowing to pay off our excess debts.
Ah, I needed a laugh this morning. Thanks, ac.
The FED will follow the bond market down, the 10 yr is below or close to 3% now.
0% is not good enough - there is still that "saving glut" that Greedspam and others talked about. Some people out there are still saving their money, wrongly thinking that their wealth actually belongs to them instead of to Wall Street pigs. We need to make sure that there are no safe investments so that the sheeple are forced to buy declining stocks, worthless McMansions, and toxic mortgage backes securities.
What a joke! I am sure that giving more dope to the druggie-like clowns on Wall Street will fix everything. Certainly things like: reduced consumption, jobs with living wages and some degree of security, and so on won't help!
This is the question I have...
As someone who's career is (hopefully) getting ready to take off, and currently rents--
I am worried about the mortgage environment in the next 3-5 years. Unlike many of you (apparently) I can't drop 40-50% on a down payment. I mean, I hope that I can (!), but I don't see it in the cards currently.
At what point does an intelligent purchaser look for a 'bottom' on a 30 year to go out and buy?
I certainly am going to let the market push prices down more (I think it's clear that prices will drop substantially over 2008); but in 2009 if risk is properly figured in rates-- is it really worth it to wait?
Fed and Fannie have to fail before risks can be priced correctly.
Yes. I am concerned that nationalization of mortgages, via fannie, freddie, and the FHLB, is the truly inflationary part of all this. The government cannot afford the debt it now has, let alone buying up mortgages. I am worried that a massive mortgage bailout is already in process.
anyone knows if we have again a quant funds short coverying event as we had in Aug ?
M-F check out Indymac,they were offering 5.375% with no points yesterday.If you are doing a Rate/Term refi and have 20% or better equity it should go smoothly.
It was interesting to see the "financial advice" given on the evening news broadcasts last night. CBS basically said don't panic, don't sell your stocks.
NBC was alot gloomier: first they had some guy who wanted to retire at 60 but couldn't, then 62, now he's 64 and looking over his 401k balances and has to keep working. Then their advice was: don't buy into this market, cut your expenses, and take the $800 the Feds are sending us and put it in a savings account. Sorta surprising that it wasn't the usual propaganda. Doesn't TV ad revenue drop during recessions?
LawStudent,
You are right about the conundrum. Generally speaking, paying less for the asset is better than paying less for the loan, since you can conceivably refinance someday, but you can't readjust your principal.
But high rates still cost and there may be a sweetspot point where prices are close enough to the bottom and rates are still artifically low.
When that is, is the 64 billion dollar question.
M-F | Homepage | 01.23.08 - 11:57 am |
The dad unit just consolidated some small loans on the rental properties. It wasn't a huge chunk of cash...BofA did 5.00 for a flat 299 fee/no points. But he has been with them forever...
Chris
LawStudent,you can refi,you can not re buy.Homes are entropy in action,Wait until the numbers work, IE income/price ratios and GRM's are at historically sustainable levels.We have $200k plus to drop in Sonoma county before median prices return to historic levels...That is a lot of $ to eat.
We may be looking at something more than a recession. We may be staring uncomfortably at an epochal shift in economic reality.
For decades our economy has been driven by the mantra of growth and consumption fueled by cheap and abundant oil.
But we could only grow with such vigor because the world was our economic playground. But that has changed. China, India, Brazil, Vietnam and others are churning out goods and services.
So the era of boundless growth and consumption may be coming to an end because the world does not have the energy or the resources to sustain it.
What comes next? Who knows exactly. Maybe the era of sustain and improve. Maybe chaos.
is it really worth it to wait?
Yes.
What Average Joe said, smart man.
sorry FF - missed that part. No coffee today, wahhhh.
According to Bloomberg, Dow is down 180 points.
Shouldn't the Fed kick in an emergency 25 bp cut today?
mp-
Are you SURE that's a Macanudo that Conjure has? I swear I heard him whisper a buddy about some bodacious spliff he's been Marley'n. Hey, gotta do what the times say.
blogenfreude -
The reason all the credit card debt won't be a problem is that it's all unsecured, so declining collateral values aren't an issue!
It's starting to look like yesterday was the suckers rally.
This may not be good.
Alec,
What do you mean by "may"?
Cheers,
MarkM, I don't understand why you're ragging Conjure.
Testimony of Chairman Alan Greenspan
The economic outlook
Before the Joint Economic Committee, U.S. Congress
June 9, 2005
http://www.federalreserve.gov/Bo 092/ default.htm
Although a bubble in home prices for the nation as a whole does not appear likely, there do appear to be, at a minimum, signs of froth in some local markets where home prices seem to have risen to unsustainable levels.
In the middle of the night, I am getting text messages on my cell phone that AMBAC and CITI are preparing & filing bankruptcy ?
Can someone pls confirm / deny this news ?
To clarify the "middle of the night part"....
I am a trader in HANG SENG
Global recessio
Thanks JBL. It's true that they can't come take your plasma TV if you don't pay.
burnside
to answer your Q from last thread: no one is ever sure.
i just try to connect all the dots from various sites like this and draw reasonable conclusions. i don't care if some hedge funds watch what i post and try to squeeze me on that PHM trade today; eventually it will i'm comfident of that. patience and time.
Geoff - no worries.
Dr. Funan - I have no way of confirming what messages you did or didn't get on your cell phone.
Doug Kass has some very valid points here
Kass: Two Solutions to What Ails the Market | Financial Advisor Update | Financial Articles & Investing News | TheStreet.com
The problems, while serious, are not beyond our capacity to deal with them given, above all, leadership. While there is little likelihood of getting that from the current "leader", if one or more of the candidates was willing to get beyond who is a racist or who was businessman, something could actually be done.
Everyone knows that Fed rate changes have effects only months in the future, so for Bernanke to cut in a manner that makes it seem like he is not looking past the end of his nose is a great mistake.
Not if you're a speculator. Your margin interest payments nosedive, your carry goes even more positive (or less negative) and you can gear up to even greater heights!
Speaking of global recession and reductions in government spending and increases in debt, what happens in a global recession, do all countries print more money and thus how will value exchange be impacted?
We have a very serious mess that is inflating at a rapid pace, like Katrina coming ashore, and these freak retards on wallstreet are all running to The Astrodome thinking rate cuts will keep them safe; hope they enjoy themselves and get a nice taste of economic anarchy!
In Australia, they think the central bank will raise rates to 7% next month to fight inflation. (Remember that old concept?)
This could make the U.S. dollar a great carry trade. Short the dollar and buy Aussie bonds at 7%+.
Dollar goes down, gold/silver up.
Ahead,
The gov't got us into this mess. Unlikely to get us out.
Cheers,
Thanks for the feedback.
I am an older LawStudent, saw the writing on the wall with my previous field and thought I better change plans before it was too late.
While it has been a good decision I am married, and we are beginning to 'tire' of our current living situation.
*
I just don't want to get into a situation where prices have fallen 30%, but credit has tightened so much that it is still inaccessible.
I suppose as long as you are looking for a conforming loan Freddie/Fannie will always step up to be the sugar-daddy/mommy.
2009 is my target, but I've been pretty vigilantly watching the market locally. Just don't want to pass up a sweet spot in both the real estate and credit market if it becomes available.
The debt junkies just keep needing a bigger and bigger fix. What happens to drug junkies that can't find that last fix after years of abuse... RIP.
Dollar = RIP
I just turned on the news,and they had a picture of the White House.Why are all those chickens on the roof?
No, Misean: The private speculators, with all regulatory restraints, removed got us into it. This has always been the case and probably always will.
So, any bets on how long until the dollar is worth little enough to be replaced by the New Dollar?
sweet spot in both the real estate
Real estate moves so much more slowly, the sweet spot lasts longer.
Cool blog. Just got pointed over here from another.
I kind of agree with Binko.
The talking heads and those that direct them will try to "create their own reality" by telling the consumers that up is down and black is white so that they and their stakeholders can sell their chips to the taxpayers all the way to the bottom.
Ahead,
Uh, without gov't cartelized banks under the Fed, this couldn't have happened. And with 70,000 pages in the Federal Register alone, I don't see all this deregulation people keep throwing around as fact.
Why isn't the SEC investigating the monolines? Or the ratings agencies.
Oh yeah and let's not forget the gov't regs that require Moody/Fitch/S&P ratings paid for by the bond issuers.
Cheers,
"Unleash inflation, check"
Hey brain surgeon are asset home prices rising or falling, are stock prices around the world rising or falling, are credit spreads tightening or loosing? If inflation is going to be a problem how come every one is flying into treasuries at these pitifully low interest rates?
Hum?
If a lender priced their loans on the basis of risk,they would not make any deals as long as other lenders price on the basis of spreads.The choice is to make deals that will be going bad 1-3 years out,and keep the cash flowing,or no income.
Funan: The CITI bankruptcy rumor is ridiculous. It's a dump and frump fictive rumor.
Ambac is possible but probably not. They record losses long before they pay so a regulatory takeover is far more likely than a BK. Strictly speaking, they are probably preparing a BK, but only to have the option, not with any intent to use it in the near future.
CRE deals to be had - just locked in a multi-million dollar rate at 5.44% for 10 years - the free money machine is alive and well. Take it while its there...
LawStudent,
I am much like yourself (though I just graduated from my grad program). I wouldn't worry too much about it. If interest rates rise, that will place even more pressure on the housing prices. Remember, things eventually have to fall back to where the median family can afford the median house.
So rising interest rates are a great thing for you. As home prices plummet, you can get a house for a much lower price, but equal payments. This means your (projected) huge income stream will be able to make additional payments to drop the principal, getting you the house for much much less than if you bought with a higher price, lower interest rate scenario.
No, Misean: The private speculators, with all regulatory restraints, removed got us into it. This has always been the case and probably always will.
We have to choose between free markets and responsible monetary policy or heavily regulated markets so we're free to pursue short-sighted easy monetary policy.
I prefer the more responsible policy with more market freedom. But maybe that's not realistic when politicians always interject themselves into monetary decisions for short term political gains.
t's starting to look like yesterday was the suckers rally
easy to do when you start 600 in the hole!
e-loan has a 4.75% 15 yr with 1.4 pts, (5% down required, $400,000 principal).
This is basically the equivalent to the apartment I'm in now (for which I'm paying $1500 now and surely $2000 eventually).
Running the numbers, that's a TCO on the condo of $2137. Tempting even though prices here have only come down 10%.
This was a refinance - BTW
Misean: So there were never bank/credit panics before the Federal Reserve? I don't think history supports you. They happened regularly and were very severe.
The regulations are there; the Fed has a duty to regulate lending. The problem is that they didn't do it.
aotc
aotc: Too busy to read prior post thread today?
Deregulation and the Financial Crisis
Breaking News and Opinion on The Huffington Post
FFDIC | 01.23.08 - 10:45 am
Yeah, it's the people's fault...right.
I prefer the more responsible policy with more market freedom
Corporations and "market freedom" simply don't mix. Everyone in the mortgage production chain -- from the drive-by appraiser to the broker to the Wall Street packager to the respective CEOs of these borderline criminal organizations -- personally profited from the scam and are free now to find a new corporate host -- or retire on their ill-gotten millions -- now that their old one has kicked the bucket.
Many economists who are highly critical of the Fed, including Krugman, Roubini, and Stiglitz, believe the Fed should cut rates aggressively to prevent a longer/steeper recession than might be. They believe inflation will subside once demand fall. Inflation is the key uncertainty. With the things the way they are, lending will be tightened anyway.
"they know that their nostrums and powders and spells only work if people believe in them."
The scene: a heath. Mortgage Pig leaning over a boiling cauldron. "Make the gruel thick and slab."
"I just turned on the news,and they had a picture of the White House.Why are all those chickens on the roof?"
Lol - awesome, Tom....
M-F said: "Well they just called me back and offered me 4.75% with 1.5 points, an even better deal on a 30 year fixed, I am getting very tempted - we have a 5.875% 30 year fixed now."
I don't have any particular downside target in mind for mortgage rates but, personally, if I could do a cash-out refi at 5.5% or better on a 30-year fixed with no points I'd be happy. JMO, but anything below 6% is going to trigger a ton of refi activity and probably new buying, too.
S.
Ahead,
Sure does. The biggest bubbles have been under fiat regimes. 1929 was something this country never saw before, and 70's were a real blast. This credit bubble is the largest in the history of mankind.
Cheers,
Aheadofthecurve:
Kass's housing bailout is a non-starter. There will be riots if nonperforming mortgages are let off the hook with subsidized 1-2% fixed rates. The only way it would work is if every mortgage holder gets those rates, then only renters are screwed. Not enough of an outcry. Gov't can't afford to bailout everybody. Game over.
today is a great opportunity to buy SRS. just bought some more.
Dow down 300
whats next? Looking bleaker-
"The problems, while serious, are not beyond our capacity to deal with them given, above all, leadership."
Now that IS scary.
Minh: Lou Dobbs often appalls me but he's on target here. With one important exception. He's saying our leaders are to blame. That's comforting, but I'm afraid we get the leaders we deserve. Nobody made us borrow all that money. Sure, some borrowers were tricked and scammed; some borrowers should have been living under the authority of court-appointed guardians. But a lot of us just took the short-term approach without listening to our financial consciences, while laughing indulgently at the received fiscal wisdom of our parents and grandparents.
F. Frederson - Your stupidity will be confirmed when USA becomes a poor country.
Law Student--don't you need to know difference between "who's" and "whose" in order to pass your bar exams? Guess not. We have the president we deserve.
Why was hardly anybody outraged after 9-11 when our leader told us to go shopping? When we re-elected the man and his message, the blame shifted to us.
207 to go mp.
Cheers,
On special mortgage deals: make sure that monthly payment covers tax and insurance.
BANKRUPTCY NEWS ALL OVER ASIA NOW can u guys confirm ?
just sold half of my oil royalty trusts and bought fcx at 6.9x 2008 earnings.
Man, the SRS ride today is a doozy but I couldn't resist another big chunk.
I know the FED is a slut with her easy money but is anyone detecting a whiff of post-coital regret re: her 75 BPS cut?
and after her half-sister the ECB refused to lay down that maybe she's feeling like she ain't gonna walk the street again next week? like maybe -hold your breath-- she may NOT CUT next week?
Trying to keep up here (I'm a slow typist)
damondidit-No I wouldn't go to 1-2 %. But 4-5 % would work, because that is what almost anyone will be able to get in a month or 2. The issue is to re-fi those who are underwater and that will require action.
Misean-There were huge bubbles throughout history. Tulips, South Sea company, railroads. You could go back to the Babylonians and find them if you wanted to. It's endemic in human nature. As John Stark said, "Nobody made us borrow all that money". Including Greenspan.
I feel like we're all coming out of a fog of insanity. We thought we could borrow and spend, borrow and spend, where spend equals consume. Businesses borrowed to invest--investing in commercial real estate to provide the stores that survived on our consumption. All along, there were people (whose voices often broke into mainstream media, at least on the print side) saying that this could not go on forever. We all knew this was true, and yet the music was still playing, and most of us kept dancing, from Mr. Prince all the way to J6P. (I just figured out what J6P meant a few minutes ago.)
Okay, now that we have defined the problem, what's next? Where do we go from here? If you were the President, what would you do? What would you say.?
CA RE Chart Porn:
http://media.sacbee.com/smedia/2008/01/22/21/188-3W23FORECLOSEZ.xlgraphic.prod_affiliate.4.gif
today is a great opportunity to buy SRS. just bought some more.
It would be tempting to convert EEV shares to SRS about now wouldn't it?
can someone in US Call C and find out about the bankruptcy news.
If there is a doubt, I need to get up and prepare for the market opening
A third party may be unwilling to purchase a mortgaged property at a
public sale because of the difficulty in determining the exact status of title
to the property due to, among other things, redemption rights that may exist and
because of the possibility that physical deterioration of the property may have
occurred during the foreclosure proceedings. Therefore, it is common for the
lender to purchase the mortgaged property for an amount equal to the secured
indebtedness and accrued and unpaid interest plus the expenses of foreclosure,
in which event the borrower's debt will be extinguished, or for a lesser amount
to preserve its right to seek a deficiency judgment if it is available under
state law and under the terms of the mortgage loan documents. The mortgage
loans, however, are expected to be non-recourse. See "Risk Factors--Investment
in commercial and multifamily mortgage loans is riskier than investment in
single-family mortgage loans."
John- simply:
"People need to actually work for a living"
.
Everything's working today except the DSL puts...What gives?
you can allways refinance and interest rate, you can't refinance a purchase price.
Dr. Funan,
Nothing on Asia Times Online. Don't know what to tell you.
Only thing on Bloomberg is this on Enron suit. Apparently the creditors are asking for CITI to shell out $18B, while CITI has $2.5B in reserves for the suit.
Citigroup Trial May Double Enron Creditors' Payout (Update2) - Bloomberg.com
Cheers,
mp-
Just an offbeat attempt at humor. Disregard it.
BANKRUPTCY NEWS ALL OVER ASIA NOW can u guys confirm ?
Who's calling who stupid?
Doc, is that you?
Financial stocks popping as folks try to catch a falling knife or is it a chain saw as one post noted awhile ago.
you can ignore my msgs at ur own peril
ac
they've been alternating upward thrusts the last week. i agree.
i just hit FSLR out of the park.
John Stark- The idiot's father did the RTC. Basically it worked. Doug Kass proposes something very similar here. There is not a shadow of a doubt that something along those lines will be done. What is the point of waiting?
For all the moral hazardists, there are prosecutors and prisons to take care of that. Let's put them to work on this now. But let's deal with things as they are, not some Austrian fairyland.
LawStudent, don't be suckered into buying a depreciating house just because interest rates are low.
How would it feel if you got 4.8%/30yr fixed on a $400,000 loan - and in 3 years need to sell it for $250,000?
The bottom of the market won't hit until all the option arms reset in 2009-10.
Funan: The CITI bankruptcy rumor is ridiculous. It's a dump and frump fictive rumor.
Fair Economist
It's likely a rumor, but it ain't ridiculous.
The bake sale they've had to get their reserves up worked for now, but they've got $200-300 billion of pier loans still on the books and it's tying up a ton of capital. They still have leftover writedowns coming and the question suddenly becomes this:
If another shock comes(counterparty risk, monoline failure, CRE exposure) do they have enough capital to be considered a "well reserved" bank?
If they have another $25B episode, then no. And considering on how big they bet in so many areas, it's possible.
.
I have a question for you guys. Would anyone hold a mortgage for me at 5% 30 year fixed?(827 credit score and a very decent income) If not, why do you think the banks are doing it? Could it be becouse of Fannie & Co?
PS It doesn`t always make sense to refinance just becouse you get a better rate.(Tanta would do a better job than I, explaining all the factors involved)
"Why was hardly anybody outraged after 9-11 when our leader told us to go shopping?"
I was so enraged by that I nearly had blood pouring out of my eyes. I am sure that many other posters here reacted the same way.
After voting for that clown in 2000, that was one of the things that irrevocably turned me against the GOP. That and the pandering tax cuts with the shifting justification (strong economy? tax cuts! oh wait, weakening economy? tax cuts!)
"People need to work for a living" is so true, but not useful here. If I have been out of work ever since New Century shut down, what do you want me to do? As president, what do you tell me and everybody else in your first Fireside Chat? And beyond what you say, what are you going to do?
Nobody made us borrow all that money.
What do you mean "we," Paleface?
If it weren't for the fact that we're all more or less screwed, I'd be laughing in the faces of all the people I know who looked down on people like me for using my credit wisely and having living arrangements that were maybe unglamorous, but didn't put me in debt at all.
I own my home. Mortgage paid off in 1973. Yeah, I inherited it from Grandma. So what? It meant I had to take care of Grandma instead of putting her in a nursing home. Nice house, well-built (from the 1950s), dull neighborhood but conveniently located to my job. No 60 minute commutes for me.
I bought unfashionable cars like Saturns. With traditional 4- or 5-year financing. Second car will be paid off in spring. Both cars are still in good shape. Sure, they don't have in-dash CD players, which makes me an inferior human being I suppose, but at least I'm not in debt.
One credit card at a time for the last 20 years. One. Credit. Card. Used it quite a bit, but often for big ticket items which I'd pay off immediately. Banks hate people like me.
My lifestyle is exactly the "poverty" that most of America seems to fear. Actually, not being in debt at a time like this is sort of fun. Will still have to deal with inflation, but I feel like a small forest-floor=-dwelling mammal in the age of the dinosaurs, and the asteroid's about to hit.
Interesting view.
Re: inancial stocks popping as folks try to catch a falling knife or is it a chain saw as one post noted awhile ago.
Boat52 | 01.23.08 - 1:07 pm | #
No, Its a friggn shark with a laser on its head
(Dr. Evil)
CR -
What are the odds now? 80% chance of 75bps now, I think
The neighbor's dog has a couple of premium, extra large balls - would that be enough for Conjure to give another clock update? I miss them already.
"can someone in US Call C and find out about the bankruptcy news."
Dr. Funan,
I called C as you requested. They said, yes, they will be declaring bankruptcy tomorrow afternoon, but that I shouldn't tell anyone about it.
So, this is just between the two of us.
burnside
well i guess i was wrong. that PHM trade is gonna work out TODAY.
"People need to actually work for a living"
MADNESS
Such talk shouldn't be found on a decent financial blog... even in the comments.
The scene: a heath. Mortgage Pig leaning over a boiling cauldron. "Make the gruel thick and slab."
By the pricking of my thumbs, something wicked this way comes.
What would the rates be if Freddie and Fannie were not rate fixing the mortgage market?
One credit card at a time for the last 20 years. One. Credit. Card. Used it quite a bit, but often for big ticket items which I'd pay off immediately. Banks hate people like me.
My lifestyle is exactly the "poverty" that most of America seems to fear. Actually, not being in debt at a time like this is sort of fun. Will still have to deal with inflation, but I feel like a small forest-floor=-dwelling mammal in the age of the dinosaurs, and the asteroid's about to hit.
We must be long distant relitives...i live the same lifestyle
i'm about ready to head over to the Bankerdome with all my money. does it have a bar?
John- that's what should be said & done:
Literally, go to work. Work for food. Real work for all Gov't handouts. THERE IS PLENTY OF PUBLIC WORKS REHAB TO DO. Anyone & everyone can see it. Here'a s shovel, here's a clipboard, now get going. No play, no pay. No tickie, no laundry. Period.
.
"Running the numbers, that's a TCO on the condo of $2137."
hmmm... are you sure?
Running the numbers, I get $380k loan at 4.75% for 15 year fixed to have a $2955.76/month for Prinicpal and interest.
Then you need to add tax and insurance to that. and maintenance.
In the end, if you're going to be a lawyer, I would assume you will have a decent income.
If lending really tightens then you will be in a good position to buy... because asking prices for housing will need to drop dramatically if lending is tightened. Look at what has happened in most of California now that it's mainly only conforming loans getting done.
only you can tell when it is time for you to buy. buying is risky. you may get in for a TCO of $2000 or $2500... but that's no consolation if your home loses 30% more (or over $100,000) while you own it!
I guestimate that my house has lost $65,000 in the last 18 months.
luckily for me,
-I love my home
-I can afford it (my mortgage payment is around 8-9% of my take home pay)
-I don't mind the loss. If I did mind the loss, I would have sold 2 years ago.
We must be long distant relitives...i live the same lifestyle
And yeah, haven't you felt like everyone was going fucking crazy but nobody was talking about it?
Now it can be screamed from the rooftops: Y'ALL WERE FUCKING CRAZY!
(BTW I meant "in-dash DVD" not "in-dash CD" - although I don't have one of those either)
mal | 01.23.08 - 1:11 pm |
Mal,
There are a few more like you around...Yes,I still catch jokes about what I drive...But not even close to two years ago.
Chris
BTW..
What is a credit card??(I learned it the hard way 20 years ago).
Work for my money!!! HA!!! Where is my $800 check the government promised me?
six,
Don't want to step on mp's toes but he seems not to be around atm - last clock call I saw was 11:59:30 - emergency rate cut ratcheted forward the hour...
Broker asked: "I have a question for you guys. Would anyone hold a mortgage for me at 5% 30 year fixed?(827 credit score and a very decent income) If not, why do you think the banks are doing it?..."
The banks would do it because they've got a lower cost of money than I do. I'm not a mortgage-banking insider, but it seems to me that a bank can now borrow in the overnight market (Fed funds) at 3.5%, then turn around and loan it to you at 5%, plus whatever fees they can extract from you.
S.
I dunno about C but on CNBC a constant refrain, about 6 times, from 6 different people is that the Fed cut because it was approached by a bank in serious trouble, or that it knows there is a bank in trouble(they have their own examiners physically located in the banks ) and so on.
-K
To those that are playing this market (short or expecting an oversold bounce) my hat is off to you -- I couldn't take the anxiety.
I'm happy to be sitting this out and watching.
Well one thing is different with me MAL i have not owned a credit card in 10 years...so my credit score sucks...but i do own a home...so what ever...oh and stacks of silver coins...and funny green paper with dead people on it hehe!
"Don't want to step on mp's toes but he seems not to be around atm - last clock call I saw was 11:59:30 - emergency rate cut ratcheted forward the hour..."
energyecon | 01.23.08 - 1:22 pm
You're right energyecon. Thing is, the original 11:59:06 was also due to the emergency rate cut. Something new must've occurred to Conjure, or his reflexes approach those of dinosaurs.
Where is Banker | when my character-string-search wants him most?
When Fannie and its GSE friends go BK the Political leadership will act like chickens with their heads cut off , will not be a pretty sight but its hard to expect much more out of this bunch of duds.
Just a couple more sips from the bong... and then I'm done with it... I swear.
I use credit cards to get cash back-several $100s/year, but pay in full every month. I don't like to turn down free money from banks. The President might send me to Gitmo if I did.
the whole stupid thing is that now credit is going to be seen as eeeeevil. Which it isn't.
Oh, and as for home equity... I couldn't give a crap about it, except if my home needed major repairs. (It does need a serious internal makeover, but I paid $3K cash last summer to get it painted and for some external repairs to be done)
Grandma was mortally afeared of losing the house she'd worked so hard for so she sort of implanted in our brains that you never, ever, ever dip into HELOC for anything but DIRE emergencies. Not sure that's always great advice, but she sure put the fear of hellfire into me on that.
Business leaders criticize the Fed
Central banks have lost control, said billionaire financier George Soros.
...
We have a market-friendly Fed possibly injecting a lot of liquidity in the system which will set us up for another bubble economy, said Stephen Roach, head of Asia for U.S. investment bank Morgan Stanley (MS.N).
Im sort of worried that all they did yesterday was to hit the snooze button. (This is) excessive monetary accommodation that just takes us from bubble to bubble to bubble.
Lawrence Summers, a former U.S. treasury chief, was critical too: Its hard to give a high grade (to central banks) for whats happened in the last six months.
ac- 'MADNESS'
LOL
.
And the boyz friends at Treasury had two auctions this morning, TIO pumping out ~$15.5 B tomorrow, ~$3.5 B that comes off in two days and the other ~$12 B comes off in five days...
hrm.. is someone liquidating their positions in high fliers like GOOG, AMZN, POT, and RIMM?
They're all down over 9%-10%
This is the end of my speculative rumor-mongering.
And grand ma is right MAL...get a second job if it warrants and pay cash for the upgrades..why borrow from your, safe haven...i dont know..i considered a refi..and 4.75 is tempting
psycho,
pink ponies and nothing burgers for everyone!
One other thing: Standard of living has been confused with wealth for too long and for too many in the middle class.
My home may be humble, but when the smoke clears, I'm gonna be landed gentry compared to too many other people who started out where I did. (and that's pretty sad)
You Austrians "free mousketeers" can say what you want about the Fed; like it or not they are there, they aren't going away and we have a right to demand un-Bushlike competence from them.
And the government exists-wishing it away won't change that. So they need to step up to the plate.
Yes.
eli
no kidding on the 4 horsemen. the mkt is toast.
thanks for your work on SRS and CDS swaps. ever get a satisfactory answer from rich?
mal-You did the right thing to stay out of debt. Noone I know would make fun of you. If anyone did, they're a moron.
old hat-
Wow, you got me with a typo on a comment thread.. that is so awesome. Give yourself 2 points and enjoy your miserable life!
I also doubled down on SRS when it was at 116. This should be a fun ride.
Whenever there is a 10% or better swing in value between SRS and EEV, you should sell the higher one and buy the lower one.
I've given up trying to figure out which will tank first, US CRE or emerging markets. The answer probably is BOTH.
But in the end, you want to be in EEV. SRS will probably turn up first and fastest because there's still institutions (pensions) that see intrinsic value in CRE.
Yes.
rich
Wow. That's exactly what I just did. (Makes me feel less like a moron) rich, thanks again for the heads up on EEV. Bought Friday, sold today. Will likely go back in if EEV goes down.
idoc,
OK, I'll try a taste of SRS with what's left of my etrade money.
Cheers,
no kidding on the 4 horsemen. the mkt is toast.
thanks for your work on SRS and CDS swaps. ever get a satisfactory answer from rich?
idoc,
If you check that comment thread.. I posted a link to the daily holdings for proshares stuff.
Essentially, all (98%-100%) of each proshares short or ultrashort etf consists of swap agreements (not credit default swaps.. those are just a particular type of swap).
Proshares, for example, would have $1 on hand... and they would enter into a swap agreement with some bank. The swap would say that Proshares would pay out the percent of positive return on $2 notional of QQQQ's over some time period to the bank.
And, the bank would pay out any negative return on that $2 notional to Proshares.
This is how they do the 2-1 "shorting"
Rich and others,
Just curious. Doesn't it give you pause when it appears opinion almost uniformly accepts that now is the time to short, and then short again?
You may very well be right that the market will continue to slide, but sounds like a lot of folks are becoming complacent on one side of the boat.
"the whole stupid thing is that now credit is going to be seen as eeeeevil. Which it isn't. "
I disagree; not credit, but the creditors, rightly or wrongly. Look for a lot more regulation, eventually. Some of it possibly punitive and wrong-headed, but that's life.
I do hope that all the good folks who think a good FICO score is most important will begin to see that savings and real assets (and lack of indebtedness) is where it's at. Boy, would that bring changes....
What's really pathetic here is the US Federal Reserve is now being driven like a slave by the manic hedge fund traders. The hedgies are clearly now flipping wall st upside down to shake every nickel out of the pockets of 401k & pension plans and Bernanke has to race in to the rescue.
Unregulated rougue hedgie traders tearing the global equities markets to shreds. I think hedgies should be FORCED to publish every single trade they make, in advance.
There's a typo listing the current target rate at 0.5%: Monetary Policy :: Economic Research & Data :: Federal Reserve Bank of Cleveland
freudian slip?
Thanks, aheadofthecurve, but the pressure to "keep up" never stops, and it's very subtle. What's scary is that financial behavior that would have been seen as clearly profligate even back in the "greed is good" Eighties somehow became a social norm. I keep having cathartic financial discussions with people I know who are also feeling like they're "allowed" to question the way their friends and family have been living - the expensive vacations, the bigger and bigger cars, the sudden removal to the big new home on the outskirts of town, etc.
The #1 reason why people buy SUVs is because they feel they need a bigger car so they can haul around... more stuff. It's all about having room to bring big things home from the mall (or from the home supply store). The folderol about "safety" and "snow maneuverability" is what they tell themselves, but in reality, it's all about the stuff. Same thing with the "well, I need room for the children." No, you need more room for their sports equipment - the stuff you feel compelled to buy to keep your kids in step with the Joneses.
No assumption about American life is safe now - including the mad rush to get your kid into a "good school." A certain percentage of the middle class are going to start questioning why their public schools don't prepare kids for jobs that pay a living wage and why they are expect to borrow, borrow, borrow just to "keep up." Higher ed will be the next bubble to burst.
You may very well be right that the market will continue to slide, but sounds like a lot of folks are becoming complacent on one side of the boat.
MTMHood,
I'd say.. try buying underwater puts if you want to avoid whiplash.
Re: Mortgage rates.
Just heard from my broker again, and he says fixed rates are available at 5% today, but nobody will let him lock. Which I find a little weird, but there it is. Anyway, he says it's looking like those rates will be crossing down sub-5% soon.
FWIW.
S.
Hopefully this will encourage enough borrowing to pay off our excess debts.
ac | 01.23.08 - 10:54 am | #
A quote I am going to remember. Have already passed it around to my colleagues.
Captures the incongruity of rate cuts in one sentence.
regards
sbarrkum
Aheadofthecurve
Yup best to live within your means, and watch the show, knowing your, set, dry, and able to afford your life style...the got to haves are the ones falling around your feet...just walk over them..they did not listen.
Well I guess the lenders have learned their lessons...
)
Called Ditech..
I told him I was looking for a refi on about $110,000...home value $300,000. He said the best rate was 5.00 with 2 pts., BUT IF I HAD SOME OTHER DEBT TO ROLL IN AND GET IT TO $250,000, THEN I COULD GET 4.625%. I laughed and said sorry, I don't have any other debt. (Maybe I should get with the program
CNBC is reporting that Wall Street now wants another 3/4 points cut, not just a 1/2.
Sebastian - I am using ditech and you get a 30 day lock with the application. I guess they are taking the risk, but they give you a lock for nothing.
Earnings yield for S&P 500 = 8.23% (including divs) Skyrocketing higher with lower earnings; remember the inversion folks, i.e, lower earnings in a stock increase P/E
10 year Treasury = 3.31% (falling like rock)
Thus S&P 500 about 5% overvalued for fair value, i.e, the yield on S&P500 is somewhat equivalent to a 10 year treasury; however, as with BAC and many corporations that make up components of S&P index, future EPS for 2008 is already projected to be 25% lower, thus as time goes by in this recession, we will see P/Es go either up or be entered as N/A which thus will crank
"but in reality, it's all about the stuff. Same thing with the "well, I need room for the children." No, you need more room for their sports equipment - the stuff you feel compelled to buy to keep your kids in step with the Joneses."
Mal, that's probably why property storage has been the growth industry for the past 20 years. Funny thing is, they rarely get rid of their storage lockers after they buy a bigger place!
OTOH, I'm looking to get into storage auctions for delinquent rent in the coming year. That should be another growth industry.
"Just curious. Doesn't it give you pause when it appears opinion almost uniformly accepts that now is the time to short, and then short again?"
Yes, and then the Fed cuts rates, SRS goes down, and I buy. Not exactly foolproof, but it's done well for me this year. In the near term, I just have a hard time conceiving of CRE doing well. I bought REW the other week on the same blunt logic. I have a hard time imaging tech doing well in a recession.
why is this guy pumping the citi thing and not getting crap from tanata or CR? Collusion?
orma,
That's mind numbing. 2.75%. Down 1.5% in a week.
This is insane. Something very bad behind the scenes.
Cheers,
MTHood
i think sk said i right the other day. being a contrarian means getting out ahead of the crowd but then letting the crowd catch up and run with u until the masses r totally on board. we aren't there yet by my estimation.
Sallie Mae, the embattled student lender, said Wednesday it lost $1.6 billion in the fourth quarter as borrowing costs rose and it set aside $575 million to cover bad loans.
The Citi rumor is ridiculous not because Citi can't go insolvent but it would be addressed by regulatory seizure rather than bankruptcy. Even more likely, the Feds would cover up for them and let them keep going, which is what happened the last time Citi merited BK. Because the second part of the rumor is made up I suspect the first part is too.
Some typo. Fnarg, fnarg.
Misean - mortgage rates are dropping in response to the cuts. The market smells deflation. Bad, stinky deflation. Probably the same odor is emanating from the Fed's auditing screen, but even fresher.
weeell... I anticipate that the spring garage sales are going to feature some mighty fine pickin's this year.
You guys play your market, I'll play mine.
at Davos they r apparently spraying all bankers with perfume on their way into the bldg, no kidding. i guess its to quell the stench.
Well, I've been trying to get people to move on from "bash the borrowers, bash the creditors, if only more people were like me..." without much success.
I'm not one of the borrowers, myself...My cars are 12 and 16 years old respectively and my house is paid for. Credit card balance zero. Television is also 16 years old! So when I lose my job in this recession you all are promising me, I'll still have a place to live, and a car to drive, and credit card balances I can run up to fill my tank. I'll be better off than a lot of people, for sure, but it is still going to suck big time.
So let's take one more shot at this, shall we? What's the way forward? What should the next president do? I'm guessing that the fix is going to be a long-term process--it did, after all, take us a long time to get to the bottom of this whole.
My guess is that we'll need to raise public revenue wherever we can, without doing too much damage to the economy, and put people to work catching up on infrastructure--especially the most productive kinds of infrastructure that make communications and transportation more efficient, less fuel-intensive. We'll need to start scaling back the promises on social security and Medicare even as we ramp up the income to their trust funds by raising taxes on those still working. (Hmmm--how many states will I carry on that platform, when I run for reelection??? Oh well...)
And we should blow up our entire public education system and gear it 100 percent toward giving people skills, abilities and attitudes that will help them live happy and productive lives. (Oops, there goes the teachers' union endorsement.)
Your turn.
weeell... I anticipate that the spring garage sales are going to feature some mighty fine pickin's this year.
You guys play your market, I'll play mine.
For real and pay cash for a 40" plasma tv for 10 cents on the dollar...I can here it now....well i paid $3000 for it...no you did not you borrowed $3000 for it...and to me its worth $400 used...going once twice!
what rates would i get on a conforming vs. jumbo refinance today?
Is this intended to provoke the last few people with money in the bank (and little or no debt) to run right out and spend it ?
Leaving it in the bank is going to provide zero equity improvement (or at least thats how I'm interpreting this).
Maybe some really big institution is tottering on the edge of insolvency. How can we tell who is actually borrowing from the Fed at these rates ? God help them if everyone who has funds on deposit tosses in the towel and says "oh what the hell".
M-F I'd really run those numbers on the refi. including the after-tax savings (remember you'll have less interest to deduct), the fact that you may be extending your term (if you're refi a mortgage with 22 years left on it for a new 30 year mortgage), etc.
Perhaps the best calculation you can run is to see what happens if you drop an extra hundred on the principal each month of the existing mortgage. Could save you far more than a measly 1% cut on the rate, which may save you nothing at all.
did anyone find Mishkin?
I thought it was your day to watch him sheesh
"You Austrians 'free mousketeers' can say what you want about the Fed; like it or not they are there, they aren't going away and we have a right to demand un-Bushlike competence from them. And the government exists-wishing it away won't change that. So they need to step up to the plate." [aotc]
Well spoken, aotc. Where do people get the idea that we'd be better off without government. It's complete fantasy. Look how well Somalia is doing...
"OTOH, I'm looking to get into storage auctions for delinquent rent in the coming year. That should be another growth industry."
Bob Dobbs
When you open up one of those abandoned lockers, be careful. One time a guy found a live, but starving bengal tiger in one.
Another time, the storage manager opened up a defaulted locker and found the decomposing body of the renter's first wife. (Seems his second wife decided to stop paying the bill on the thing, and forgot to tell her hubby...)
rich,
any view on SKF?
Some are calling it the Iraq recession: Think Progress » FLASHBACK: Economists Predicted That A Prolonged U.S. Presence In Iraq Could Lead To A Recession
so why IS the Dow going up this afternoon? Do they believe they're going to get another .75 cut tomorrow?!
http://img115.exs.cx/img115/1141/grammar-nazi.jpg
GSEs worth less and less and they have mkt caps which are the size of many write downs; anyone find that interesting??
Sallie Mae @ $7 Billion Mkt Cap
Sallie Mae, the embattled student lender, said Wednesday it lost $1.6 billion in the fourth quarter as borrowing costs rose and it set aside $575 million to cover bad loans.
Fannie @ $30 Billion mkt cap
Freddie @ $18 Billion mkt cap
Fannie, Freddie May Face $16 Billion Losses, Credit Suisse Says
The world's biggest banks and brokerages have disclosed more than $120 billion of writedowns and credit losses since June, mostly caused by the collapse of the subprime mortgage market.
CBO Sees $250 Billion Deficit
Senate Budget Committee Chairman Kent Conrad, D-N.D., said the 2008 deficit would reach more than $350 billion once the costs of an upcoming economic stimulus measure under negotiation between the Bush administration and Congress are factored in.
What the hell is going on with mortgage rates?
Are 10yr treasuries simply dragging the MBS's down with them?
Some are calling it the "at last I'll get my free pony recession."
mal,
Triple martini lunch.
Cheers,
Fair Economist,
I smell deflation. Have for a while. But I'm not convinced the Market does. But I think Bernutty does.
Cheers,
Misean - does inflation smell like gin?
And deflation like vodka? Or, uhh, vice versa...
MLM,
I prefer Vodka Martinis. Not sure about BB's preference. Not claiming I had a 3 Martini lunch. Not quite lunch time here. And I would like to be conscious at 9PM to watch Mythbusters. Never know though.
Cheers,
where are people getting the idea the fed is going down to a fed funds rate of 2, or even 1 percent?
that's nonsense.
i see zero percent just around the corner
real rates are negative already anyway.
what wall street and the amercican konsumer demand is more cowbell.
YouTube - More Cowbell
only listen to this if you are drunk and have seen the original (gets better half way thru)
mal asked: "so why IS the Dow going up this afternoon? Do they believe they're going to get another .75 cut tomorrow?!"
Well, yesterday there were about 1,100 new 52-week lows on the NYSE. I think that's the highest number since late-August, 1998, around the time of the LTCM/Russian currency crises. IOW, based on the panic level it's looking like a major stock-market low is forming here.
S.
John Stark, please stop making sense.
Kass should stick to writing about topics where he has at least a glimmer of a clue.
He confuses market cap with claims-paying ability. There is no direct relationship. Maybe he thinks insurers pay claims with stock?
He asserts a lot of things that just aren't true.
He's just looking for a huge government handout. Welfare for the rich.
IF there needs to be a massive government bailout of the mortgage markets (and I think this is far from proven), there's a very good model for how to do it that's worked in the past, with no taxpayer liability.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Home_Owners'_Loan_Corporatio
Dow even! The recession's over!
Yay!
.
recession smells like vermouth
inflation smells like whiskey
stagflationary mark has it right.
the fed is serving cocktails on the fan deck...we are all drinking manhattans.
AOTC and Detroit Dan, right on.
Libertarianism is an adolescent masturbatory fantasy.
For the vast majority of people, government is not the problem, it is the solution provider.
Someone upthread keeps asking for solutions. So I'll repeat it again: bring back the WPA. This time invest in mass transit and true renewable resources (solar and wind, NOT ethanol, biofuels, etc) and get this country off the fossil fuel addiction.
mal:
Curiously, what I'm starting to see amongst some of my friends is a drive to "simplify" and remove all of the stuff. Xmas was much less for the kids (theirs and ours) and there's a push to get rid of extraneous stuff.
Some is this is related to a religious message about simplifying and some is just the sense that things are too out of control.
FWIW - we moved to a newer smaller house two months and are already talking refi.
sk --
I dunno about C but on CNBC a constant refrain, about 6 times, from 6 different people is that the Fed cut because it was approached by a bank in serious trouble, or that it knows there is a bank in trouble (they have their own examiners physically located in the banks ) and so on.
That makes no sense at all. If a single bank faces a solvency problem, no amount of liquidity will help. If a single bank faces a liquidity problem, it can always hit the discount window or the TAF.
So cutting the overnight rate would either be unhelpful or unnecessary to a single troubled bank, depending on the nature of its trouble.
Cutting the FF rates is pure economic stimulus. And it takes 6-18 months to have an effect. That they did not wait one more week can only mean they were, in fact, responding to the broad market decline.
I have long been a defender of both the Fed's competence and its intentions, but this action has seriously tested my faith.
Someone please to help.
Please to look at Yahoo chart for FRE, FNM, SLM: FNM: Basic Chart for FANNIE MAE - Yahoo! Finance
In about one year, these GSEs have dropped about 50% in market value together as one unit, obviously backed by Fed. Thus, is that relationship related to this yahoo link: ^TNX: Basic Chart for 10-YEAR TREASURY NOTE - Yahoo! Finance
The 10 year Treasury has gone from 5% to 3.5% within that same time frame.
One could also look at oil costs and dollar values within the last year, but the main issue that concerns me, is the amount of accumulating writedowns and re-valuations which may or may not factor in subprime ARM resets coming due which may push these GSEs into further declines as The Treasury is forced to back up more and more bad loans and then make more and more loans to banks that have more and more bad loans.
Does this mean that there willl be more jobs at Treasury printing press, in regard to lowering interest rates further?
Misean - with 10 year tbills below the inflation rate - and falling - and mortgage rates falling too, all early in the recession, I'm confident the market now smells the same deflation you have. Congrats on your nose. Hope living with that smell hasn't been to nasty because I think we all get to live with it now.
John Stark - Nobody knows how to get out of this. The Japanese have been trying to get out of their liquidity trap for 16 years now with no success. I figured when their asset values had gotten reasonable things would pick up but they have to no avail. They ran up an enormous public debt doing public works - going from least indebted big country to one of the most indebted - also to no avail. AFAIK there's not even a decent economic model to explain the kind of indefinite liquidity trap they've experienced and our long bond market predicts.
I thought it was your day to watch him sheesh
well yeah, normally i watch him on wednesday's, but Tanta lost him yesterday, so it's not my turn again until she finds him. you're really screwing up the rotation, T (did you check under the bed?)!
"And we should blow up our entire public education system and gear it 100 percent toward giving people skills, abilities and attitudes that will help them live happy and productive lives."
After a short and somewhat ill-fated career in the school system, I would have to agree.
Schooling on the U.S. is basically done on the industrial, one-size-fits all model, more brains for the buck, that sort of thing. It doesn't really work. A lot of kids learn in spite of it, not because of it. Most of the kids who do well in math or reading do so because their parents and family already have those skills, and share them, or at least know enough to support the learning process vigorously. There are exceptions. Not that many.
There are proven theories of education that work. I've seen it. Unfortunately, the public schools in the US don't use them. The Finns, who made a concerted effort to ramp up their country's educational levels and put resources behind it, have it nailed.
Sebastian -
Please stop. You have been calling a bottom and no recession for 6 months and you have simply been wrong. A bottom is not forming - it will form when you and others stop declaring it. The only thing forming is an an opinion across the board that you have absolutely no idea what your talking about. How's that Wright Model B treating you? Maybe you can sue Mr Wright for screwing you.
idoc, nice about Pulte. That kind of "wrong" is the very best kind.
Anonymous asked: "...Does this mean that there will be more jobs at Treasury printing press, in regard to lowering interest rates further?"
I'm not much into subjective "what all this means" speculations, but based on the fact that there's still a pretty wide spread between the Fed funds rate and the 13-week Treasury Index, it looks like an excellent bet that the Fed will be easing yet again before this is all over.
Sebastia
Quick question, sorry I am jumping in since the comments section has gotten too large to keep up with...
Why are payday advance companies and pawn shop stocks doing so poorly the last few months?
"If inflation is going to be a problem how come every one is flying into treasuries at these pitifully low interest rates?"
Get back to me when milk is back at $2.99. Or gas is $2, or
Get in the express lobotomy line.
stagflation with hyperinflation, what is that?
"John Stark - Nobody knows how to get out of this."
I suspect that's true, if by "get out of this" you mean, get things back to the way they were. I'm guessing we all agree that's not going to happen.
And it is infuriating to hear grown men and women talking as though a rate cut and a rebate check could actually MAKE that happen.
I don't for a minute think that a public works program will make that happen either--but it doesn't mean it's not worth doing. A big part of the public works program, as I suggested above, should be 21st century communications, transportation and energy infrastructure--infrastructure that enables us to reduce our energy consumption.
After all, we don't really want to go back to the way things were (way back in 2006) do we? That's not the point of the exercise. The question is, what's the best way to keep the greatest number of people happy and healthy, going forward? We need to go beyond philosophy to policy.
That said, philosophy and psychology are going to be a big part of the solution, since they were a big part of the problem. As many have suggested, we need to recognize that "stuff" doesn't equal the good life. Maybe people are going to discover that, in the years ahead, because they won't have any choice.
Personally I'm going to enlarge the garden this year and dig more clams, assuming that guys with guns haven't claimed all the best tideflats.
anon said: "...How's that Wright Model B treating you? Maybe you can sue Mr. Wright for screwing you."
On the contrary, if he had a tip-jar I'd contribute.
I don't care how many people become convinced/panicked into thinking the economy is in a recession, as long as the objective data says otherwise.
No recession now, no recession at any time in 2008, and a pick-up in housing in 2008.
Sebastia
AFAIK there's not even a decent economic model to explain the kind of indefinite liquidity trap they've experienced and our long bond market predicts.
Economists never get cultural factors. Ever.
Ok, I have it:
Biflation is the state of an economy where the processes of inflation and deflation occur simultaneously. During this period there is a rise in the purchasing prices of commodity items and a fall in the purchasing prices of non-commodity items.
The purchasing price of an item is based on the demand for it and the amount of money in circulation to pay for it.
Biflation is preceded by an overabundance of money placed in circulation within the population by a central bank. Since commodities (such as food, energy,clothing) are essential and are in high demand, the purchase price for them rises due to the increased money available to buy them. This increasing purchase amount is Price Inflation.
Likewise, Biflation is preceded by a decrease in employment within the population. Although there is an increase of money in circulation, fewer people have access to the money to make purchases. As a result, a greater percentage of individual wages is directed toward purchasing commodities and less is utilized for purchasing non-commodity items. Since non-commodities (such as automobiles, televisions, stocks) are less essential and are in lower demand, the purchase price for them falls due to the decreased money available to buy them. This decreased purchase amount is Price Deflation.
We all have to be a little careful of the short-term volatility, and the fact that bulls haven't all given up yet. But given that there's at least 6 months of overall misery left, and maybe as much as 18, I can't see stocks going higher over the intermediate-term. It's kind of like having a short put. If you're wrong on timing, you can make it up by holding. That's how I feel, anyway.
I am not high on SKF. Too late in the cycle.
One interesting ultra short I'm considering is RXD, double short health care. I think the political scene over the next couple of months may hammer it. So far, it hasn't dropped as far as other shorts mentioned here
Nobody knows how to get out of this. - Fair Economist
Not exactly so. There are several ways that people know to get out of this:
1) Jubilee! Bankrupt entities renege on their debts
2) Wild Abandon! Productive enterprises are left to rot, amidst large scale unemployment
3) Wanton Destruction! Blowing people and things up to clear the decks
All of these solutions involve pain, and everyone involved likes to commit as much of that as possible to "others"; history demonstrates that this doesn't usually stay that way,but that doesn't stop anyone from hoping.
The upside is that the survivors get to start over, and have great stories to tell.
Sebastian, you're killing me, bro! (Tears in my eyes, ROFL)
Sweet...mercy...
"weeell... I anticipate that the spring garage sales are going to feature some mighty fine pickin's this year.
You guys play your market, I'll play mine. :-)"
I'm trying to establish a presence on the local Craigslist, selling last year's garage sale finds through a regularly-published list. Doing well, too, though it's still at the hobby stage. When the sales pick up again in February or March, I'm heading out again.
Unfortunately, nobody ever wants to buy the Magic Q-ball.
Well, if they are reporting that a bank is in trouble, I can almost guarantee you that Corus Bankshares is in trouble, even though there's not one word of news about it and I don't have any inside information.
There's no way that many South Florida high-rise $60 million+ condo loans can be above water.
I'm pretty sure the market rallied because the writers and producers have resumed talks.
Keep the bread and circuses comin'! (Well, at least the circuses.)
"Schooling on the U.S. is basically done on the industrial, one-size-fits all model, more brains for the buck, that sort of thing. It doesn't really work."
David Halberstam's book on the 1950s explains how this happened. School officials did not see the baby boom coming. (I mean, who could've known?) So when kids started to show up for kindergarten and first grade in unprecedented numbers, they basically invented our modern public school system, based on processing the maximum number of kids at minimum expense. (Apologies to all the dedicated and hard-working school teachers and administrators out there--I know you exist, but I also know that many of you agree with me...)
Sorry for posting so much today. I've got the morning off. (Pacific Standard Time.) Gotta run soon.
...there's not even a decent economic model to explain the kind of indefinite liquidity trap...
Nothing is perfect, but this is a great place to start:
Hyman Minsky somewhat explained
JMO
Bob,
That's cuz they got one on the interwebs.
404 Not Found
Cheers,
stagflation with hyperinflation, what is that?
That my friend is Zimbabwe...why you think it can not happen here also/?
No recession now, no recession at any time in 2008, and a pick-up in housing in 2008.
Sebastian
Looks like Sebastian has been Model playing again...your suppose to apply the glue to the plastic parts Sebastian not the tip of your nose.
"Perhaps the best calculation you can run is to see what happens if you drop an extra hundred on the principal each month of the existing mortgage. Could save you far more than a measly 1% cut on the rate, which may save you nothing at all."
I second that. I almost refied a few years ago. Then I plugged the numbers into my Excel spreadsheet and realized that I could reduce the term by 14 years just by paying $200/mo. to principal. No fees, no points, no hassle. And if I need to, I can keep my $200 each month.
"Bob,
That's cuz they got one on the interwebs."
Nice... but mine, you can hit. It even complains if you hit it too hard.
Markets are now rolling over because of a rumor that the writers have quit the talks and the producers insist on running Alf re-runs throughout 2008.
Consumers apt to look out the window in 2008.
Speaking of the WPA:
Lawmakers Urge Spending on Infrastructure, Housing (Update2) - Bloomberg.com
You make a good point about paying the extra principal, but our mortagge is only 26.5 years old, and we near max out our 401ks and have other money left over to invest... but I don't wnt to pay down the mortgage with it. We are basically doing it to reduce monthly expences, we plan on keeping the house.
I'll tell you what - that's a whole lot better of an idea than "give everybody $800".
Corus is financing this one in Tampa:
Novare Group: Construction Camera
I'm glad Seb just re-iterated his no recession call, otherwise it would start to look like I was agreeing with him. We're in a recession now - whether it lasts long enough to become an "official" recession is another question, but I'd say that's better than an even money bet. I'm not calling for a bottom in stocks either, but the market has marked down a number of stocks to levels that look like excellent value to me. Housing - definitely further to run on the downside there, but 5% mortgages and 4% inflation does bring nominal house prices somewhat more back into line.
I expected a gun for Christmas, and all I got were some dadgum longjohns...
ratefink - those are the traditional outcomes of a liquidity trap but I wouldn't call 2 or 3 an "out". More like "out of the frying pan into the fire". 1, maybe, but when's the last time that was tried in an economy-wide trap, when it results in the death of most existing financial organizations?
Thanks for the link, I'll take a look later today.
Sebastian -
I think this link pretty much sums up my views on your posts:
YouTube -
Why are payday advance companies and pawn shop stocks doing so poorly the last few months?
w | 01.23.08 - 2:45 pm | #
w,
I know of one pawn shop for sure here in Fl that has pretty much quit buying. The storage area is packed and the owner basically said nothing was moving...
But hey,I have greatly increased my,um,self defense collection for .25 on the dollar.
Chris
50 bps again this country is definitely in recession, non farm and inflation numbers are a joke
Where can the next bubble be? We had a stock bubble, a real estate bubble, what's the logical next one?
let's lighten up on sebastian a bit.
I agree that we'd like to see his data, or observations that lead to his conclusions.
I don't agree with sebastian, but he might be right that the fed and the prez and congress can juice this dying drug addict one more time just to get him thru the next year.
stranger things have been known
but hey seb you gotta admit the econ trends are just awful...plus just look how shaky the hands of all our leaders are on the controls...you can smell the fear.
Interesting Chris, I have never shopped at a pawn shop. You really get some deals on guns there? I think I'll check it out.
mock turtle, I believe Sebastian to be one of the most successful blog trolls of all time.
Not that that is much of an achievement, but there you have it.
I'm not even convinced that Sebastian exists. I suspect many people have assumed the Sebastian persona to keep the straw man alive.
Where can the next bubble be? We had a stock bubble, a real estate bubble, what's the logical next one?
Zac | 01.23.08 - 3:25 pm | #
I read an article in Harper's by Eric Janszen (cited on the big picture) claiming the next bubble may be in alternative energy.
[snip]
There is one industry that fits the bill: alternative energy, the development of more energy-efficient products, along with viable alternatives to oil, including wind, solar, and geothermal power, along with the use of nuclear energy to produce sustainable oil substitutes, such as liquefied hydrogen from water. Indeed, the next bubble is already being branded. Wired magazine, returning to its roots in boosterism, put ethanol on the cover of its October 2007 issue, advising its readers to forget oil; NBC had a "Green Week" in November 2007, with themed shows beating away at an ecological message and Al Gore making a guest appearance on the sitcom 30 Rock. Improbably, Gore threatens to become the poster boy for the new new new economy: he has joined the legendary venture-capital firm Kleiner Perkins Caufield & Byers, which assisted at the births of Amazon.com and Google, to oversee the "climate change solutions group," thus providing a massive dose of Nobel Prizewinning credibility that will be most useful when its first alternative-energy investments are taken public before a credulous mob. Other venturesLazard Capital Markets, Generation Investment Management, Nth Power, EnerTech Capital, and Battery Venturesare funding an array of startups working on improvements to solar cells, to biofuels production, to batteries, to "energy management" software, and so on. ...
The next bubble must be large enough to recover the losses from the housing bubble collapse. How bad will it be? Some rough calculations. the gross market value of all enterprises needed to develop hydroelectric power, geothermal energy, nuclear energy, wind farms, solar power, and hydrogen-powered fuel-cell technologyand the infrastructure to support itis somewhere between $2 trillion and $4 trillion; assuming the bubble can get started, the hyperinflated fictitious value could add another $12 trillion. In a hyperinflation, infrastructure upgrades will accelerate, with plenty of opportunity for big government contractors fleeing the declining market in Iraq. Thus, we can expect to see the creation of another $8 trillion in fictitious value, which gives us an estimate of $20 trillion in speculative wealth, money that inevitably will be employed to increase share prices rather than to deliver "energy security." When the bubble finally bursts, we will be left to mop up after yet another devastated industry. FIRE, meanwhile, will already be engineering its next opportunity. Given the current state of our economy, the only thing worse than a new bubble would be its absence.
[snip]
Any thoughts, ragazzi?
mock turtle said: "...but hey seb you gotta admit the econ trends are just awful...plus just look how shaky the hands of all our leaders are on the controls...you can smell the fear."
You're right about the fear, but by the very numbers that policy-makers use to measure the economy there's no recession and no compelling reason to think there's going to be one, a big disconnect. What they're afraid of and what is are two different things.
It's "Iraq has WMD, they're a threat to our security and we must invade" all over again.
S.
I'm not even convinced that Sebastian exists. I suspect many people have assumed the Sebastian persona to keep the straw man alive.
safe_as_apartments,
hehe.. that's what I like to imagine too. Sort of like those amphibian communities where... if all members end up being the same sex, some will randomly change sex suddenly.
Same here... the echo chamber needs a bounceboard so Sebastian shall rise again even if he left long ago.
opps! there goes gold & silver..up...and there goes the dollar...(flush)
Alternative energy: Let the buyer beware. The pump-and-dump penny stock guys have been onto this one for quite awhile now--when they are not touting their holdings in nonexistent gold mines and oil fields. It's incredible how many people will buy stock in a company based on a press release saying the company has plans to build a biodiesel plant or some such thing--at most, they have an option on a piece of land where this plant will be built, and an artist's rendering of the completed plant on their website. And they sell stock at 50 cents a share or something on that basis.
Sometimes they show up at small town newsrooms like mine, to try to lure some unwary reporter into writing a story about their plans. If somebody bites, they then have a news story to link to on the company website.
A couple of years ago one of these guys came up to me wanting a story on his ethanol plant. I told him if he was already selling stock in his company, it was no deal unless he could show me all kinds of documentation on his level of financing and so forth.
"I'll get back to you," he said.
I'm sure that will happen any minute now.
I got wise to this kind of thing about 30 years ago when an unwary colleague wrote a story about the investment opportunity involved in operating your own worm farm. The promoter assured the reporter that the Japanese eat earthworms and were importing them by the shipload.
After this appeared in the newspaper, the reporter got a call from the Japanese consulate. The Japanese diplomat, as I recall, suggested that the reporter needed to salvage his personal honor by slashing his midsection with a short sword. (Okay, I made that last part up, but everything up to that point was the truth.)
"...as long as the objective data says otherwise. No recession now, no recession at any time in 2008, and a pick-up in housing in 2008."
Sebastian | 01.23.08 - 2:50 pm
Mirror listening (or direct listenting to the Pamplona Pavlovians on CNBC) is the only explanation for getting all this backwards:
Highest housing inventory overhang in two decades, prices remaining 3X income, resets stretching through 2009, rising acceptablility of jingle mail, billions in yet-to-be declared losses on CRE, SIV, & a few hundred trillion of notational fictions, and then there's the climbing unemployment and real stagnating wages.
Do you really think $140B line of snort's gonna jolt all of the above into the black?
I'm beginning to believe the notion you're a fiction for the entertainment, derision and pleasure of the rational skeptics who congregate here.
w | 01.23.08 - 3:29 pm
w,
. I have found some smoking deals and some other WTF prices. I never buy on the spot,take the info and check gunbroker prices online for a comparison. I usually shoot for 50% of msrp. Anything under is a bonus. Oh,carry cash and ALWAYS lowball em. Most they can say is no...
It depends
As a mekanik I have picked up some deals on name brand(sk/snap-on/mac)tools also. I am a cheap bastard who flat refuses to pay full price...
Chris
"Where can the next bubble be? We had a stock bubble, a real estate bubble, what's the logical next one?"
Energy's a logical choice, I agree with beryl "west with the night" markham, that green energy might be real bubble material. Imagine how much economic activity -- and speculation -- could be generated by refitting American homes and businesses for solar, geothermal heating, etc. etc. etc., especially with new and cheaper thin-film solar a possibility. And that's just a slice of it.
Short term, speculative money could go into oil or any other commodity that looks likely, especially if the international situation gets shakey.
Dow's closes up 250!
"Hey everybody, we're gonna get laid!"
Sebastian: No recession now, no recession at any time in 2008, and a pick-up in housing in 2008.
Yea, tell that to my NJ-based contractor friends, including my brother, who over the last two months have witnessed the most significant and abrupt slowdown in their business since 1991. The phones are not ringing anymore.
Dow 2000 or Dow 20000 -- doesn't matter. Construction at the very least is in recession...right now.
Remember...Denial is a river in Egypt.
300!?!
bj's, too!
Thanks for posting that link to the Element. 34 floors high, 395 units, 15,000 square feet of condo space located in downtown Tampa, a true residential paradise. ("24-hour amenities!" Must mean hookers.)
Here's a breakdown on Corus' condo construction projects in the works:
In Florida, 27 condo projects (mostly Gold Coast) with $2.9 billion of Corus construction loans.
In California, 25 condo projects, with $1.7 billion of Corus construction loans.
Are they ground zero or what?
puravidavid: "...I'm beginning to believe the notion you're a fiction for the entertainment, derision and pleasure of the rational skeptics who congregate here."
I'm not sure the term "rational skeptics" applies. Wouldn't a rational skeptic also question CR's posts and conclusions? How many here actually have, found the weak points and then had the confidence to call him on them?
Whatever.
I'm going to be right, but I'm also never going to get credit for it here, that's for sure.
S.
Sebastian the fed is panicking not us
Seb,
Thus far CR and Tanta have been smacking the cover off the ball; you haven't made contact... with the horsehide or reality.
If you're right, I'll ask for your address off line and send you cash.
Beautiful PPT action today - gotta keep the market above 12,000! Can't allow any corrections - not now, not ever!
Was it all locking in shorts? Was it the PPT? Is it just lots of stupid people (Marketwatch claims Financials drove the rise upwards - now THERE'S a stupid choice of things to buy!) Or, maybe we're going enter a New Era, where ever day is either: a rate cut, or an up market!
Whatever!
Bob Dobbs, you must be a pilot. No one else knows who BM is...
Beryl,
No one? Make it at least two of us.
I read "West with the Night" long before Isac Dinesen's memoirs were turned into "Out of Africa". She wrote a fine and moving book... a one hit wonder in the literary world.
Well, milk is $2.99 a gallon here, but gas is still over $3 a gallon. I don't see that coming down any time soon.
Seb, I have seen CR and Tanta get called on errors, and if they are wrong they correct their mistake. But they are not wrong very often, so you may be confusing their being right with others being afraid to call them out on it.
If it ain't broke, ya can't fix it.
I have to admit that I enjoy reading Seb though. I need something to laugh at while reading all of the depressing news here.
puravidavid, I shouldn't underestimate the posters on CR! I knew this was an unusual place, but really, very few non-pilots -- at least in my experience -- know anything about BM. Of course, I don't walk up to strangers and ask, "what do you think of Beryl Markham?"
Her attitude in WWTN towards worldly goods is one I try to keep in mind: "For me the bags held pajamas, slacks, a shirt, toothbrush, and comb... I never owned less, nor can I be sure that I ever needed more."