OT Just think how large the SG losses might have been if Ben hadn't cut the interest rate. IMO the Dow would have dropped 800+ without a cut (market was only down 500 because of the risk of a cut). Then another big drop in Europe Wednesday.
Maybe the FED knew a major European bank was going down unless there was immediate relief.
Jan. 24 (Bloomberg) -- The rogue trader who triggered 4.9 billion euros ($7.2 billion) of losses at Societe Generale SA has fled, Bank of France Governor Christian Noyer said.
He's ``on the run,'' Noyer told reporters at a briefing in Paris.
Noyer, who opened an investigation after the bank reported the loss today, declined to reveal the trader's name.
The central banker blamed the individual for the loss and absolved the bank of wrongdoing.
Please tell me how a responsible central banker can make such sweeping statements before an investigation has been completed, before any criminal charges have been filed.
Shouldn't he be saying instead: "We'll get to the bottom of this, with the help of police, and give a full public report of findings?"
Where are the French police and why are they so silent?
Excuse me. This is total BS. The markets should be tanking right now on the inanity of this orchestrated farce.
With an attitude like that, I'm not sure he'll last longer than Armondo Falcon after he issued the report on "Systemic Risk." Now THAT was a scary little horror book.
Wow, what a week, I am almost convinced they will reblow this bubble. But I think FHA will have to offer zero down with income requirements, 500,000,interest only 40 years. then we may get a couple more years out of bubble. Good time to unwind if you own a house.
I think they should start offering interest-only mortgages with a grace period on the interest. That would get me to move up to a bigger house and put some carpenters back to work.
Some big hedge fund is allegedly on the ropes. We'll see if the rumor becomes a reality, but it certainly wouldn't surprise me.
Goldman also just announced they're cutting 5% of their workforce: Expired
I hope Lockhart continues to step up to the plate in regard to fraud at Fannie; there is no way they should be given more cash to burn, and at the tax payers expense. This is criminal, but with the mafia in control, crime is not a problem with this current coup!
Quite the pull back on Wall Street today. The Nasdq 100 (QQQQ) was up over two percent close to the open, now it is down 0.58%. Maybe what this says is "fade the open" for traders. Must be a lot ofmoney being lost in trading futures after hours. Of course we could have another reversal today. But on days when the market opened low we've seen bounces, but when it open high today, we are seeing a sell off. I wonder if some of the concerns about credit and inflation are coming to the fore today. Maybe traders are realizing that 0.25 is the most likely fed cut on Tuesday.
Somewhat encouraging that the OFHEO takes its job seriously. Am I being naive with this statement? Would concerns from the OFHEO slow things down in Congress? I assume that at least a few Republicans still have concerns about the GSE's.
Bill -
There's a big rumor circulating that a very large hedge fund is on the ropes and may need to go into a forced liquidation which obviously wouldnt be good for the market. There's also a ton of noise around Fitch's actions on SCA (downgrade) and FGIC (negative outlook)yesterday thats creating a bit of havoc on some balance sheets today.
Quite the pull back on Wall Street today. The Nasdq 100 (QQQQ) was up over two percent close to the open, now it is down 0.58%. Maybe what this says is "fade the open" for traders.
Please buy stocks and help the hedgies keep the market from breaking downwards.
With your help we can all get the DOW back to 13,500 and oil over $100.
It will be like hitting the SNOOZE bar one more time before having to wake up and go to work.
Plus you can hit it again afterwards even though you're really late and promised yourself not to.
Lockhart is putting his view of the imprudent decisions regarding FNM and FRE before the inevitable Debacle. BTW , supposedly the hedge fund in trouble is a quant fund located in Boston.... don't want to speculate on the name at this point.
Re: Please tell me how a responsible central banker can make such sweeping statements before an investigation has been completed, before any criminal charges have been filed.
Gravatar I think they should start offering interest-only mortgages with a grace period on the interest. That would get me to move up to a bigger house and put some carpenters back to work.
Sssh! Don't tell Paulson, Bush, Pelosi, or Schumer that ... you honestly don't know economically-challenged those folks are.
Thanks--in the trenches, even though I would need to do some research to figure out all of the meaning. It sure would not be surprising to see some tottering hedge funds at this point.
OFHEO just don't get it. The problem is a lack of demand--the supply situation is just right. There are countless flippers starving to death because they can't engage in their closed-loop speculation right now, and demand stimulus will be just the ticket to get things moving again.
Inflation? We don't worry about no steenkin' inflation. OFHEO needs to just STFU and let the brilliance of Pelosi and Boehner shed its warming illumination over us all.
I only wonder why they are setting the limit lower than three quarters of a mil--real bubble blowers think bigger.
I believe the legislation 'allows' the agencies to write to that limit.
To allow is not to compel.
How much leeway would agencies have for discretion is the limit is raised?
Re: Maybe the FED knew a major European bank was going down unless there was immediate relief.
This is the retarded casino/lotto mentality that has destroyed America. The Europeans dont game the market like our Fed and it is criminal that they act like a hedge fund bail out machine which uses any mechanics available to keep the casino running for insider friends!!!
Immediate relief...can you please give any example of how a Fed cut has any immediate relief other than for daytraders to buy on the rumor and sell on the news? How can a slow moving event which may take a year to be factored in, can bring about immediate retarded relief???
Yup that is how you will save us from a recession by limiting people debts
We I think that's precisely the idea: Limiting peoples debts won't save us from recession.
I think the idea is to go through a period where bad businesses are replaced with good businesses... even if that's painful.
That's basic economic common sense, but we've been living in the fantasy world of the Great Moderation for so long that we can't contemplate the idea that toxic businesses need to be removed from the economy, because the loss of jobs is too stressful.
Due to the long-term accumulation of waste we are now, unfortunately, looking at a much larger loss of jobs than would occur in an economy that wasn't artificially propped up for so long.
Honestly, I think the markets pumped just long enough for some folks to sell out. When I see whole shows devoted to "please by stocks now, they are such a great deal!", I get that whiff of bs in the air. I don't have the nerves to short (you folks are braved them moi'). I'm happy investing like a grandma.
probert- if you're out there, who was I suppose to meet?
Good for OFHEO! Perhaps there will still be qualification standards, but there seems to be a huge risk that the government/GSEs will allow incredibly poor quality loans that the taxpayers will be forced to bail out later.
As a high earner who saves like a miser (with a view toward spending when I am not working so much), I am confronted with the reality that the government hates people like me. I pay huge amounts of taxes, which are going to give others (1) tax rebates that I will not see due to my income and (2) federal guarantees of risky loans that cause me to have to spend more to buy a home (or to rent while I wait for the correction that the powers that be are determined to prevent). The federal debt will go up, causing inflation, which will eat into my savings. The only way to even try to keep up with real inflation is to invest in markets or housing where prices are based on irrationality or government bailouts. There must be many who are also wondering why work so hard to get ahead and to stay ahead, only to see society protect the fools (or geniuses?) who live beyond their means. I can't believe I am growing to agree that our society is designed to keep the masses in perpetual debt slavery. It is clear the model of perpetual debt and consumerism must fail some day, but how long must we wait for that to occur? Until then, every financial move is based on guessing at how long the farce can continue and not on any fundamental wealth being created by our country. With every step in this progression of bailouts, throwing in the towel and living by the beach seems a more and more attractive escape from funding the charade.
He's saying that he was given the job of trying to toe the line on risk management at the GSEs and he is not inclined to pretend otherwise. He has been saying this for a long time.
The business about "increase . . . moves through their rigorous new product approval process" is more or less what I was saying yesterday. Lockhart isn't going to let them just yank up maximum loan amounts without doing the analysis and setting appropriate underwriting and pricing guidelines. He is 'splainin' to Congress that he has no intention of letting the GSEs pick up the lunch tab.
That's a pretty strong statement. Doesn't he serve at the pleasure of the President, who's gushing about the plan? I don't think I've ever seen a statement so contrary to the White House's agenda from a political appointee.
It definitely should give pause to anyone thinking of investing in GSE debt.
Hopefully the GSE's will wait to explode until after the current mess is swept under the carpet, and a couple years before the Medicare/Social Security debacle coming down the pipes.
slamic law prohibits usury, the collection and payment of interest, also commonly called riba in Islamic discourse. In addition, Islamic law prohibits investing in businesses that are considered unlawful, or haraam (such as businesses that sell alcohol or pork, or businesses that produce media such as gossip columns or pornography, which are contrary to Islamic values).
Ok, so scrw the pork and all the sin stuff, what we need is a stop to usury as it relates to capitalism, thus as our society enters a new era of prosperity, our nation will conform to new ideals which will enable each and every American to be free of the burdens of debt...
Im taking off time as I write The State Of The New Union Address
Here is what I sent this morning to the Congresscritters I have supported in the past. I would have mentioned the OFHEO comments if I had seen them. If you see anything you like feel free to use it.
I wanted to share my concern about the proposed "stimulus" plan with ______. This package does not make the Democratic congress look good.
Once again the Democratic congress is adopting ill-considered George Bush Lite legislation instead of attending to vital public interests, such as restoring the US image in the world by investigating crimes committed in furtherance of the Iraq war, and vindicating congressional subpoena power. The fact that the Republicans are still controlling the agenda more than a year after the Democrats supposedly took power gives those of us who have supported Democratic congressional candidates in the past serious reason for concern.
The increase in conforming limits for the federally chartered lenders has not been well thought out, and appears to be intended either as a pure PR stunt, or as a bailout of irresponsible California lenders such as Countrywide. I recognize that there are serious problems in the mortgage industry right now, but this proposal as it is being described in the press will not accomplish anything constructive. If the GSE's are doing their jobs correctly, they won't buy the undersecured mortgages that are the source of the problem. If the GSE's fail to do their jobs correctly, the government will simply be contributing to the Angelo Mozilo legal defense fund by relieving private lenders of their liability for fraudulently originated mortgages. Based on recent history, there is reason to believe that the GSE's may fail to do their jobs correctly.
As for the plan to distribute checks, it simply makes the Democratic congress look like the same kind of pandering hacks that we thought we were getting rid of in the 2006 election. I support a more progressive tax system, even though it would probably not benefit me personally. I do not support paying taxes to fund a perpetual motion arbitrary refund machine.
Fannie, Freddie and Sallie are amost insolvent so by allowing these types of mis-managed entities to continue on, by giving them even more access to capital is a massive mistake directly related to corruption!
At least somebody the media knows by name expressed displeasure with this plan. That's about all the satisfaction we are going to get wrt. to this plan.
I feel so ignored. I asked a serious question (in my little mind, anyhow) on the previous comment section and got no answer. I will keep using up comment space until somebody (starts with a "T", ends with "anta" - Toxic Santa!) tells me what I want to know.
If the GSEs are gonna buy up a bunch of formerly jumbo loans, won't they need new capital? Isn't that what OFHEO has already warned about? Can't maintain their share in the formerly conforming market and make a serious dent in formerly jumbos without more capital than they have now, can they?
The basic principle of Islamic banking is the sharing of profit and loss and the prohibition of riba´ (interest). Amongst the common Islamic concepts used in Islamic banking are profit sharing (Mudharabah), safekeeping (Wadiah), joint venture (Musharakah), cost plus (Murabahah), and leasing (Ijarah).
Ok, so we are looking into a new twist on the Ownership Society, since the last method basically failed with the no-doc loans, thus we see The Ownership Society becoming a Joint-Ownership Society, where we will partner our fellow Americans with partners that will share in joint homeownership ventures which will be allowed to be taken off the balance sheets and packaged into joint ownership obligation funds (JOOF). These JOOFs will be available in exchange for Treasury vehicles which will be available to money markets and mutual funds. pensions, and hedges funds
Re: Another approach is Ijara wa Iqtina, which is similar to real-estate leasing. Islamic banks handle loans for vehicles in a similar way (selling the vehicle at a higher-than-market price to the debtor and then retaining ownership of the vehicle until the loan is paid).
This does seem to be the direction our society is taking under Bush, i.e, between NAR and Paulson, Fannie, etc, we see a push to get 40 year mortgages with zero down and Jumbos for $1 million, with less and less collateral, i.e, secured lending, thus we are going to become (thanks to these retards) not a homeownership society, but a rental society with greater debt obligations, and fewer opportunities to increase equity!
If the GSEs are gonna buy up a bunch of formerly jumbo loans, won't they need new capital? Isn't that what OFHEO has already warned about? Can't maintain their share in the formerly conforming market and make a serious dent in formerly jumbos without more capital than they have now, can they?
I'm sorry, I thought those were rhetorical questions. My answers are yes, yep, and "bingo."
They don't have to carry all these LFKAJ* in their portfolios. They could securitize them. They'd need to beef up the g-fee account a little. Same problem, different side of the balance sheet.
Lockhart is a hero of the housing crisis. He has been on Fannie Mae/ Freddie since at least 2004 in spite the fact that they run to their political hirelings evertime someone tries to held them to some reasonable standard.
Despite their craven abuse of the political system, I doubt even they are dumb enough to write anything near the junk WS came up with. Their equity holders are not protected by an "implicit guarantee" of the gov't.
A system of the Crooks, by the Crooks, and for the Crooks.
The "politicians" and the Fed, or the Feds, exist to help the Crooks! Fed exists to take the blame for evil deeds of Bankrupters and Fraudsters of New York City, as was the case with Great Depression, and help them as long as possible before that happens.
I can't believe they haven't fired Lockhart for gross competence. He's clearly not a "team" player and is way out of step with the times. We need to get that Arabian horse breeder in there, the Katrina FEMA guy, I bet he'd do a "heck of a job" with the GSEs. Or how about Chuck Prince, he'll keep dancing as long as there's music, or maybe Mozilo, I hear he might need a new job, and he's soooo experienced, or maybe even one of the Enron guys. I don't see why we need someone like Lockhart getting in the way of "stimulus" with so many qualified people to choose from.
Seriously, you read and forward this tinfoil hat stuff? Is this journalist really writing about the WSJ accepting an ad? Oh...and guess what...gold is just a commodity. Sorry that Corsi's friends and ADVERTISERS are upset it's not worth more.
"The mechanism of monetary policy is ineffective in these circumstances. I'm not saying it won't work at all: it will help the banking system but the credit squeeze is going to go on because nobody trusts anybody else. The Fed is pushing on a string,"
Well I'm glad the middle class destroying actions of the Fed will help the BB&B. Article is worth a read.
I find this encouraging. I figure we will have to have some kind of quasi-nationalization of the mortgage system, just because the banks will be locked up for years. Freddie and Fannie realize refis of current toxic jumbos will amount to catching a guillotine blade - with their necks - and I think they'll be cooperative with setting up decent underwriting standards. Freddie/Fannie jumbos with decent underwriting would be a good things - loans would be available, but only when deserved.
In a nutshell, OFHEO + the GSE's may put the sense into this plan that the politician don't dare to. If Pelosi takes a stand against GSE Jumbos her constituents (mostly with jumbo loans) will tear her throat out, regardless of how justified that stand is. The agencies, however, can put up "hey, you don't want us to make bad loans" as a shield against political pressure.
FormerlyknownasJS: " I can't believe they haven't fired Lockhart for gross competence."
Believe me, he is the first one gone when the regime changes. He is far too caring about his mission, everytime I have seen him speak he has this underlying stressed vibe. Like he is sitting at his desk at the OFHEO with a roll of Tums and a bottle of Peptol saying, "The Congress wants to do WHAT!??!"
Pilgrim--I'm in the same boat as you (high-earning miser) and have long since come to the same conclusions as you. But I've also come to the conclusion that it's better to be a government-hated miser than a government-loved spendthrift.
1..Fannie Mae: In 1938, the Federal government established Fannie Mae to expand the flow of mortgage money by creating a secondary market.
The secondary market is the financial market for trading of securities that have already been issued in an initial private or public offering.
Underwriter: An entity that purchases securities from a Depositor for sale to third-party investors.
The objective of a Balance Sheet CDO is to finance or transfer risk with respect to such assets
Bankruptcy Remote: Assumption of additional debt, makes it unlikely that an entity would engage in any other (future) activity other than the current securitization transactions.
Thus, Fannie has a job to expand mortgages by allowing these loans to be packaged into securitized vehicles by underwriters who spin off things like MBS, ABS, CMOs, etc, which are then available to third parties, like trusts, hedge funds, mutual funds, pensions, etc, which are thereby structured to manage risk and generate yield enhancement opportunities and thus to not become bankrupt.
In this foodchain, Fannie has become a conduit machine that turbocharges loans that have not been verified, examined or linked to core collateral obligations from homeowners with sustainable cahflows.
Fannie has contaminated the entire financial foodchain from top to bottom and this is unwinding as a systemic collapse directly linked to government mis-management, collusion and corruption!
Why are we giving Fannie and this government an even greater opportunity to destroy the American economy?
I started looking into GATA's arguments in '97. They have a whole lot of stuff that COULD be manipulation. It could also be stupid decision (BoE sale in 2000), or something else.
Now, the people in GATA have a pay site which is very informative, with a number of experts in various fields. But as far as I'm concerned GATA has been blowing the same horn for over 10 years now, and have nothing new.
I didn't mean that Daddy appointed him, just that he is associated with Daddy's crowd (not W's crowd). He isn't a liberal of any sort as far as I can tell, but he's "career" (i.e., "qualified") and he's an adult.
W. put him in charge back when shrinking the GSEs was Operative. Lockhart was supposed to be strong enough and independent enough and hard-nosed enough to withstand all the libruls who wanted the GSEs to stay in the mortgage market. Or whatever the Bushies' religion was at the time.
Now that all that's Inoperative, Junior is having a touch of trouble getting Lockhart to act like a loyalist, as far as I can tell.
sorry, but all of us in california need the higher limits atleast like they have in hawaii and since california's the strongest economy in the US, it only seems fair!! 417,000 does nothing for us unless you are way inland.
If you remove the fact that it is the mythical "house" the "American dream" and replace that with tulips, internet stocks or South Sea trading companies then all this amazing amount of money and government support going to support this bubble looks not only silly but extremely dangerous.
They just cant wrap their head around the fact that it was a bubble.
Pilgrim,
I think the govt actually loves the fact that people like you exist. They just don't treat you well because they know they can take you for granted. I've noticed in MA, politicians claim people like we "won life's lottery", in pandering to masses of people who think scratch tickets are the only way to achieve in life.
I started looking into GATA's arguments in '97. They have a whole lot of stuff that COULD be manipulation.
Boy you people kill me..could be manipulated...what like whats going on in front of our eyes at this very moment...its all being manipulated..and blatant...
From: Jeroen van der Veer, Chief Executive
To: All Shell employees
Date: 22 January 2008
Subject: Shell Energy Scenarios
Dear Colleagues
In this letter, I'd like to share reflections about how we see the energy future, and our preferred route to meeting the world's energy needs. Industry, governments and energy users - that is, all of us - will face the twin challenge of more energy and less CO2.
This letter is based on a text I've written for publication in several newspapers in the coming weeks. You can use it in your communications externally. There will be more information about energy scenarios inthe months ahead.
By the year 2100, the world's energy system will be radically different from today's. Renewable energy like solar, wind, hydroelectricity and biofuels will make up a large share of the energy mix, and nuclear energy too will have a place.
Mankind will have found ways of dealing with air pollution and greenhouse gas emissions. New technologies will have reduced the amount of energy needed to power buildings and vehicles.
Indeed, the distant future looks bright, but getting there will be an adventure. At Shell, we think the world will take one of two possible routes. The first, a scenario we call Scramble, resembles a race through a mountainous desert. Like an off-road rally, it promises excitement and fierce competition. However, the unintended consequence of "more haste" will often be "less speed" and many will crash along the way.
The alternative scenario, called Blueprints, has some false starts and develops like a cautious ride on a road that is still under construction. Whether we arrive safely at our destination depends on the discipline of the drivers and the ingenuity of all those involved in the construction effort. Technical innovation provides for excitement.
Regardless of which route we choose, the world's current predicament limits our maneuvering room. We are experiencing a step-change in the growth rate of energy demand due to population growth and economic development, and Shell estimates that after 2015 supplies of easy-to-access oil and gas will no longer keep up with demand.
As a result, society has no choice but to add other sources of energy - renewables , yes, but also more nuclear power and unconventional fossil fuels such as oil sands. Using more energy inevitably means emitting more CO2 at a time when climate change has become a critical global issue.
In the Scramble scenario, nations rush to secure energy resources for
They monetize obligations which seem to be engineered to explode, thus they seem to be a key element in providing liquidity on the short end of things, i.e, look at Goldman and the pre-packaged goodies they traded long, and then shorted; great financial engineering!
Or here is something very new: Morgan Stanley Institutional Liquidity Funds also offers six series that operate as money market funds subject to rule 2a-7
The money markets are exploding with cash as people walk away from this trash and in terms of FNM, this provides a short-term opportunity for some people to hedge these cash movements.
I think as liquidity dries up or freezes in a liquidity trap, fannie will have less fuel to offer in terms of interacting with the secondary markets and thus, the third parties, or pensions will be very hesitant to jump into new packages that look like Goldman short traps; at least you would hope some increased level of parinoid risk management would make future investments something to manage with care. Thus fannie can expand its theory on paper and be granted new loan limits, but as I recall, home prices are going down, so this is a non issue that is just smoke and mirrors. I guess you would have to look at how that loan limit for jumbos would impact underwriter packages in terms of selling these new units that will be highly suspect.
In the Scramble scenario, nations rush to secure energy resources for themselves, fearing that energy security is a zero-sum game, with clear winners and losers. The use of local coal and homegrown biofuels increases fast.
Taking the path of least resistance, policymakers pay little attention to curbing energy consumption - until supplies run short. Likewise, despite much rhetoric, greenhouse gas emissions are not seriously addressed until major shocks trigger political reactions. Since these responses are overdue, they are severe and lead to energy price spikes and volatility.
The other route to the future is less painful, even if the start is more disorderly. This Blueprints scenario sees numerous coalitions emerging to take on the challenges of economic development, energy security and environmental pollution through cross-border cooperation.
Much innovation occurs at the local level, as major cities develop links with industry to reduce local emissions. National governments introduce efficiency standards, taxes and other policy instruments to improve the environmental performance of buildings, vehicles and transport fuels.
As calls for harmonization increase, policies converge across the globe. Cap-and-trade mechanisms that put a cost on industrial CO 2 emissions gain international acceptance. Rising CO2 prices accelerate innovation, spawning breakthroughs. A growing number of cars are powered by electricity and hydrogen, while industrial facilities are fitted with technology to capture CO 2 and store it underground.
Against the backdrop of these two equally plausible scenarios, we will only know in a few years whether December's Bali declaration on climate change was just rhetoric or the beginning of a global effort to counter it. Much will depend on how attitudes evolve in Beijing, Brussels, New Delhi and Washington.
Shell traditionally uses its scenarios to prepare for the future without expressing a preference for one over another. But, faced with the need to manage climate risk for our investors and our grandchildren, we believe the Blueprints outcomes provide the best balance between economy, energy and environment.
For a second opinion, we appealed to climate change calculations made at the Massachusetts Institute of Technology. These calculations indicate that a Blueprints world with CO2 capture and storage results in the least amount of climate change, provided emissions of other major manmade greenhouse gases are similarly reduced.
The sobering reality is that the Blueprints scenario will only come to pass if policymakers agree a global approach to emissions trading and actively promote energy efficiency and new technology in four sectors: heat and power generation, industry, mobility and buildings. It will be hard work and there is little time.
For instance, Blueprints assumes CO2 is captured at 90% of all coal- and gas-fired power plants in developed countries in 2050, plus at least 50% of those in non-
Blueprints will not be easy. But it offers the world the best chance of reaching a sustainable energy future unscathed, so we should explore this route with the same ingenuity and persistence that put humans on the moon and created the digital age.
The world faces a long voyage before it reaches a low-carbon energy system. Companies can suggest possible routes to get there, but governments are in the driving seat. And governments will determine whether we should prepare for a bitter competition or a true team effort.
That is the article, and how I see our challenges and opportunities. I look forward to hearing how you see the situation (please be concise).
The post you made last nite is dead nuts on. This is NOT about munis. This is about all the off balance sheet intems that will come onto the books as a result of downgrades. The unwind has to be controlled.
What would happen if a 1T capital call happened over the course of a few days?? Could the global economy handle it?? Hell I don't know and I don't want to find out.
The underlying contracts can be renegotiated but until then we are pretty much stuck...
I will confess to just bieng a dumb truck mechanic and willing to learn...
Re: SocGen does not want to get to the bottom of it. At least not in public. In fact they have been told not to discuss it.
Did you see how Northern Rock (Blackbird) is trying to shut media by censoring information; same deal with SocGen and this will be a trend in withholding info from Tanta, et al
And - despite the extraordinary sums involved - it emerged that news of Kerviel's alleged operation was covered up for a full three days after he was "grilled for six hours" by his bosses on Saturday night. Admitting that the man had not yet even been fired, the beleaguered Société Générale Chairman and Chief Executive Daniel Bouton said: "If he escapes he will be found - there is no doubt about it."
He was grilled for six hours. But not by the police. He wasn't reported or turned over to the police. He was allowed to just walk out the door and "escape."
As Bill Clinton might say: "This is a total fairy tale."
This is ridiculous but if you can't beat 'em . . . refi.
Are the GSE underwriting guidelines for LTV, FICO and debt service posted on either on this site or on the internet somewhere?
bork, gata.org sent out a press release challenging Bill O'Reilly to a verbal duel. Please. Stick to actual news sources. if you're going to quote whackjobs, at least give us an update on batboy's exploits.
Retail: Assets of retail money market funds increased by $12.09 billion to $1.196 trillion. Taxable money market fund assets in the retail category increased by $13.06 billion to $906.85 billion, and tax-exempt fund assets decreased by $975 million to $289.49 billion.
Institutional: Assets of institutional money market funds increased by $52.33 billion to $2.055 trillion. Among institutional funds, taxable money market fund assets increased by $52.16 billion to $1.873 trillion, and tax-exempt fund assets increased by $177 million to $182.36 billion.
That is as friggn amazing as a shark with a laser on its head!
Fooled ya...Friday is a good day to screw off at work(And get all my weekly paperwork done)...
The best part is my reporting managers office is 300 miles away...God I love my job!!!
I heard an interview with Lockhart on the radio last spring. He went on in detail about the unfunded entitlement programs and the coming mortgage problems...pulled no punches.
He must have an insulated post. I can't imagine why he hasn't been fired.
Whatever happened to savings. CD rates are down because the fed wants the elderly to die of starvation, beg and cheat because as they lower the fed funds rate the ss check gets smaller and why they say inflation is tamed is because SS is tied to that also, if inflation goes up the SS has to pay more to that senior citizen who deserves it. What a great country, starve and lie to the people who built it and give money away to illegal immigrants, immigrant families hosting thier mother/father for a year and then become US citizens who then get to a ss check without ever paying into it. I saw that first hand with my neighbor.
I say everybody claim exempt and demand change. They will listen to us when we hold them by the balls. They have us by the balls now. We need a Subprime tea party! Our govt. is in shambles. Congressman are paid and supported by industry to vote according to their interests. Democracy and the great american dream are being squashed by the elite.
Disclaimer-I make real good money, have 800 credit and a down payment but they (the govt.) just lost me as a home buyer. I will be withholding all my taxes and will plead innocent of tax evasion based off me contracting the subprimeitis disease. This disease popped up after watching all the efforts to save lenders, banks and greedy borrowers from going underwater by the Govt., I believe it' derived from the holy water that Mr. Bush sells from his Crawford Ranch but distributes free to his admin.
Rant off- but this affect me and my daughter( her even longer) financially and emotionally as they have now begun the artificial propping of overpriced homes.
I quit! I gotta go and open my corporation in Nevada. Need to hide my money....
Bring the troops home and give them the money, they deserve it! We will have a positive net gain while saving young men/women from dying in an illegal war.
The beaches in Peru and Ecuador are looking better and better Pilgim!
OK, slightly rhetorical, but meant to start what I think will be an important discussion about the implications of the GSEs raising capital right now.
I think raising capital when lots of others (like monoline guys and Citibank and Countrywide) needs to do the same is a questionable proposition. Even if we take this as another part of "temporary" in the three Ts of a stimulus package, it comes at a time when capital for the financial sector is in short supply. I know that these are extraordinary times, but this comes close to directed capital. Even that might make sense, if we had the notion that, with market failure was keeping capital in less than optimal places, we can solve the problem by directing it to the GSEs. That, I think, is a questionable proposition, and maybe a very big one right now. Other parts of the plan are meant to remedy inadequate demand. There is plenty of demand for capital, and this won't increase supply. It increases demand in a way that may divert supply. And I'm not particularly averse to the notion of government intervention. I'm just getting flutter-tummy over this one.
Ella, i followed your ideas to the effect that the fed funds rate cut was an act of fear approaching panic on the part of bernanke and the 12 other members of the fomc.
i believe you are right.
ben made a speech to the congress a week ago thursday and emphasized inflation fears in his speech. this spooked investors,
friday one week ago the president announced a very vague plan and this was disquieting.
finally the asian markets on MLK day went nuts...major markets down 4 to 8 percent for a time and then a circuit breakers pop.
finally ben announced an unprecedented rate cut right before NYSE opens...cant wait till the regular meeting especially since the futures market was in the toilet.
i live in the west and i could smell the fear in nyc and dc all the way from here
Have any of you friggn people really read how friggn fannie does business?? Granted this is a very friggn old link, but this is the core and heart of where this current friggn systemic crisis was hatched:
Automated Valuation Models
In a move that has drawn fire from appraisers, Fannie Mae is allowing some mortgage lenders to forego appraisals on sales and refinancing for a $50 fee.
Appraisals are not being banished altogether, says Fannie Mae, but eliminated when adequate electronic valuation data is available. Most applications received through Desktop Underwriter, Fannie's automated underwriting system, require no appraisal or only an exterior inspection; very few need a complete appraisal.
Wait... did I just read that?????
Most applications received through Desktop Underwriter, Fannie's automated underwriting system, require no appraisal or only an exterior inspection; very few need a complete appraisal.
Ill stick to what i see with my own eyes...and that is manipulation across the board..do i believe 100% of what i read...no...do i believe 100% of what i see in front of me...yes i do...unless of course i have been drinking the night before.
DaveNYC, I know what you mean, but this whole "Bankrupters and Fraudsters" thing is a bit innacurate. You see, first you have the fraud, then comes the bankruptcy.
Seriously, I think the guy had a rough career or something. Maybe his boss was always calling him names, now he want's to give that label to strangers, "dopes" et al.
In many cases, you can discern truth by reading between the lines of legalese that crafty lawyers write.
There are two glaring omissions in the press release:
not naming the trader.
not promising a full investigation with assitance of law enforcement and independent banking regulators.
The careful wording gives SocGen dubious deniability, because it does not link the stated loss (4.9 bn euros) directly to the "trader" accused.
Strangely, however, it calls the trader's actions a "fraud" (a financial crime) which would seem to compel a criminal investigation. That must have slipped by the lawyers.
Let me be clear. I do not deny manipulation in any market, especially one as small as gold. What I am saying is that GATA has been making the same arguments for over 10 years and has come up with nothing new since their custodial gold find in 1998. That's a long time to keep tooting the same old horn. Give me some solid evidence for a change.
Given a set of options we can be certain that our bought and paid for politicians will always make the wrong choice.
And for those itching to buy the dips I urge you read Bob Rodriguez at FPA Funds. Full disclosure: I have been a multi-decade shareholder in several FPA funds.
Re: I forgot. I heard that some of the money market funds were invested in this stuff.
Could be trouble there.
Some? I heard that some of the money market funds were invested in this stuff.
You would be hard pressed to find a money market not connected to this crap! You are aware of The Pension Protection Act and the relief granted to underwriters, to help you invest your money market funds in CDOs and derivatives,,,,right? That DOL granting of exemptions of prohibited actions by underwriters is not just a pension issue, most every money market out there is connected to derivatives and the only safe ones, if you believe The Fed isnt broke, are Treasury-linked money markets that just hold Treasuries; however, these money markets often have the right to invest in anything they want, regardless of what you think, so PLEASE for God's sake, read your current prospectus and look at holdings!!!
This whole bear scenario like the-housing-bust-will-detroy-the-economy and how we only have the choice between a severe recession and a Great Deproession was complete hogwash from the beginning. Now there are two choices for the bears:
a) Realize this was completely wrong and illogical from through and through
b) blame others (FED, politicians, banks etc.) to have sabotaged the depression and succomb to even more absurd conspiracy theories.
Let me be clear. I do not deny manipulation in any market, especially one as small as gold. What I am saying is that GATA has been making the same arguments for over 10 years and has come up with nothing new since their custodial gold find in 1998. That's a long time to keep tooting the same old horn. Give me some solid evidence for a change.
Keep you lawns mowed, windows clean, no trash, keep the dogs in backyard, keep your garage door shut, no BBQ in driveway, make sure liquor bottles are inside garage.
Anyone have other tips to get values back up for Fannie?
I have read some stuff by this little lady and she may have a few names for this stuff (Collateralized Debt Obligations & Structured Finance
by Janet Tavakoli):
She used to work as a Goldman quant...I think? Been a few years??
All of the following are examples of SPEs: Special Purpose Corporations (SPCs) which may or may not be Special Purpose Subsidiaries or captives; Master Trusts; Owners Trusts; Grantor Trusts; Real Estate Mortgage Investment Conduits (REMICs); Financial Asset Securitization Investment Trust (FASIT); Multiseller Conduits; Single Seller Conduits; and certain Domestically Domiciled Corporations
Per CR's post Q3 Mortgage Equity Withdrawal: $133 Billion this is slightly less than the average quarterly MEW during 2004-2006. Beginning last quarter of 2006 MEW has dropped, most recent value was ~$133B and its trajectory is down.
Assuming that during 2008 it averages $75B per quarter, then a $150B injection (plus actual MEW) is equivalent to about 4 months of 2006 MEW, a level that the economy got accustomed to.
Bottom line; $150B isnt piddling, but adds only 4 more months of breathing room before any economical fundamentals take over again.
No need to worry about GWB re-blowing the bubble, because it just can't work. The problem is not and cannot be contained. It will play itself out, one way or another. It can't be swept under the rug or re-inflated. If the GSE's start eating bad jumbo loans, they will develop a very bad case of dysentery.
Let me put this another way. Consonant with the bubble, the Bushies claimed that they were an empire now and created their own reality. Well, that empire is crumbling and reality is biting us all on the ass. If the GSE's don't practice good business sense, a la OFHEO, then reality will bite them, real hard, and the whole world of GSE mortgage backed securities will scream like you wouldn't believe.
The underlying issue w/ the residential real estate appraisal process is the use of 'comparables' - vs. an income based approach (rents). The true value of any property is the underlying rental value, any other value is emotional/speculative value. Moving appraisals to an income based approach would isolate the speculative value, banks should lend no more than (let's say) 90% of the income value of the property, the speculative/emotional value would then be born by the buyer.
What fund holdings would we look for specifically?
They can hide this stuff so well. Clever names, etc.
stealthwii | 01.25.08 - 1:15 pm | #
** Re: reset mechanisms
... may use futures and options as a low-cost method of gaining exposure to a particular securities market without investing directly in those securities, for speculative purposes, and for traditional hedging purposes
Variable Rate Master Demand Notes. The Fund may also invest in variable rate master demand notes. A variable rate master demand note (which is a type of commercial paper) represents a direct borrowing arrangement involving periodically fluctuating rates of interest under a letter agreement between a commercial paper issuer and an institutional lender pursuant to which the lender may determine to invest varying amounts.
Because the US government is not obligated by law to provide support to an instrumentality it sponsors
STRIPS are sold as zero coupon securities. See Zero Coupon Securities.
Custodial Receipts. US government securities, the holder will resell the stripped securities in custodial receipt programs with a number of different names, including TIGRs, and CATS.
What kind of time delay will there be between passage of the legislation to raise limits, and the actual availability of those new higher-limit loans?
After all, time is of the essence... The more prices drop, the more homes are foreclosed, the smaller the effect this measure can have on propping up prices.
Re: Anyone have other tips to get values back up for Fannie?
Remove junk cars, buses, trailers and other impaired capital, like older wash machines, fridges, and OT, dogs, remove the dogs and crap. Bake bread, that was the numero uno NAR request, bake more bread and have the area smell really good!
We will issue the notes in book-entry or uncertificated form. Subject to certain limited exceptions, you will not receive a certificated security or a negotiable instrument that evidences your notes. Sumner Harrington Ltd. will deliver written confirmations to purchasers of the notes. Wells Fargo Bank, National Association will act as trustee for the notes.
The notes will be issued in book entry or uncertificated form only. Except under limited circumstances, the notes will not be evidenced by certificated securities or negotiable instruments. See Description of the Notes Book Entry Registration and Transfer.
as i told all of u, last Th i took down 40% of my shorts. i've been scaling back into them the last 2d into the teeth of the rally. today its paying off big. my pt is that the mkts are VERY weak on all measures so don't be squeezed out of your positions.
Anyone heard of CDIs ( certificated depositary interests)? Fannie could have unregistered
Both the original notes and the exchange notes are represented by one or more certificated depositary interests, or CDIs, as more fully explained in Book-Entry, Form, Clearance and Settlement.
Upon the global notes being credited to the account of The Bank of New York as the holder of 100% of the book-entry interests in such global notes in the records of Euroclear, The Bank of New York, as Book-Entry Depositary for the exchange notes, will create one or more certificated depositary interests, or CDIs, representing a 100% interest in the Book-Entry Depositarys book-entry interests in the underlying global notes and issue them in the name of Cede & Co., as nominee of DTC.
The CDI Depositary will hold the CDIs as custodian on behalf of DTC.
We need more custodians, we need more cowbell!!! Bring on the transfers baby!
That is quite interesting and not spam IMNSHO, though OT for the thread!
Scenario analysis is a great way to frame potential states of the world, though I would say the letter gives us the middle/upper bounds and left out the downside scenarios which involve massive economic dislocations and resource wars.
I'd say what was most optimistic was the probability assessment, that they are equally likely. Dramatic policy change and resource commitments have to occur for the successful 'Scramble,' because as a sage in Alaska taught me long ago, "For every mile of road there's two miles of ditch."
general obligation funds & Custodial receipts and secondary market derivatives from the King of derivatives and best showman out there folks! He also has $33 Billion in goodwill accounting!
This populist rhetoric of saving homes is sickening since on the back of this language they try to raise caps to $625,500. How do those in middle America feel about this? Our national median home price is roughly $223,800. Heck, even Southern Californias median home price is now near $400,000 and no county in Southern California is even over $565,000. Guess who called for higher caps last year:
NEW YORK, Dec 5 (Reuters) - Countrywide Financial Corps (CFC.N: Quote, Profile , Research) chief executive called on the U.S. Congress to temporarily raise the maximum size of mortgages that Fannie Mae (FNM.N: Quote, Profile , Research), Freddie Mac (FRE.N: Quote, Profile , Research) and the Federal Housing Administration may buy or insure by 50 percent to $625,000.
In an opinion piece in the Wall Street Journal on Wednesday, Chief Executive Angelo Mozilo, whose company is the largest U.S. mortgage lender, said the increase from $417,000 should be implemented for up to a year.
He said this would go a long way toward alleviating a nationwide housing crunch, which analysts expect to pinch borrowers and lenders throughout 2008 and probably beyond.
It should be enacted as part of a broader package of reforms to ensure that these linchpins of our mortgage system can aggressively support the housing market in a time of need, and that the appropriate controls and oversight are in place to protect taxpayers, Mozilo wrote.
Mozilo had previously called for the cap to be raised to as much as $850,000.....................
There you have it...proven mobsters at its finest...these junkies taking the playbook from..MOZILO...
Is it possible that the higher cap is to bail out all the second lien holders that are getting killed from the 0% down deals.....and in effect socialize the risk?
Anyone who is pissed about the increase in the mortage limits for the GSEs to $700K + should do this. I know some folks here have said its a moot point since its only FHA limits that are increased and they have tough underwriting, but thats not right. Its Freddie and Fannie also, and that means all the banks/mortgage companies have somewhere to dump their junk for much larger loans.
I just posted this on congress.org. Its a great site. All you do is put in your zip and then it give you all your govt. reps and the President and you can type in one message and get it sent to all of them.
I am fine with a lot of the stimulus package, but I am not OK with the
expansion of the loan limits that the GSEs (Freddie/Fannie) can take on their books.
Why? Because there hasnt been reform of the rules that the GSEs operate under and thus increasing the loan limit will allow the same trail of poorly underwritten loans that Freddie/Fannie have on their books now up to $417K to just be extended to $700k+.
This doesnt make sense. The bad underwriting/lending scam that got us into this mess with lenders dumping bad loans to Freddie/Fannie or to the MBS market will now just be larger loans and now only to Freddie/Fannie.
That will only delay the inevitable and put the burden on tax payers
instead of the corporations/executives at banks,mortgage companies, etc. who made the bad decisions in the first place.
If you require the same kind of prudent rules to Freddie and Fannie that
FHA applies to undrewriting a loan before they approve it, then that is
fine, but dont make this a situation where the government brings in a new case of booze to a party that should have been shut down a long time ago by the police.
This issue is of critical importance to me and many folks I know, and what happens will reflect in how we vote this fall.
Regards .
Dont know if will help, but in I have to do it to know I tried. Again, please do this if you can. It will only take a few minutes.
Since raising the conforming loan limit will take loans away from other parts of the country (outside of California) we can probably get this stopped by writing our Senators (assuming you're outside of CA, that is). I just sent the following email to my Senators here in Oregon:
The recent economic "stimulus" package proposed by President Bush and House Democrats contains some questionable items. I would like to highlight one that I think is actually dangerous; that is the proposal to increase the conforming loan limit to $729,000 from the current $417,000.
First of all, OFHEO Director James B. Lockhart is opposed to increasing the limit. Today he said: "We are very disappointed in the proposal to increase the conforming loan limit as we believe it is a mistake to do so in the absence of comprehensive GSE regulatory reform. To restore confidence in the markets we must ensure that the GSEs regulator has all the necessary safety and soundness tools." As you know, the OFHEO is the regulator charged with ensuring the safety and soundness of Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac.
And secondly, raising the conforming loan limit will mean that less total loans are made since the GSEs have a finite amount of money to lend. For example, a $729,000 loan made for a house in California, could have been two (or possibly even 3) loans made in Oregon. This will be bad for Oregonians and for citizens of others states who have housing prices which are much less than California's home prices.
And finally, the GSEs (Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac) were created to help people of "modest means" to buy a home. A $729,000 limit seems to help people who are very well off.
Please oppose the raising of the conforming loan limit.
Yep. Appeal to their fear: fear that their constituents are going to lose out so that California will benefit. This is why we've got a Senate: the founding fathers were wise.
looks like no one on here lives in california.. they would still have to qualify full doc for the higher limits, they will just get better rates than what is jumbo right now. i don't think it will take anything away from all of you outside california !!!!!!!!! lighten up !!!!!!!
as i told all of u, last Th i took down 40% of my shorts. [...]
idoc | 01.25.08 - 1:59 pm | #
Took my shorts down hard, too... (but for me, my GS PUTS are PERSONAL now...)
(To everyone, getting emotional's always a bad thing, really, in investing... but I think it's OK to attach to a bit, just a bit, of your portfolio where you can savor the smell of the final immolation, or rage at how they escaped...)
Politicians dont care about safety right now. Its an election year. They will just worry about it later. Never worry long term, only short.
Frist?
Credit trading desk says mortgage remittance data is decidedly BAD this morning. Remits come in once a month.
Credit indices are selling off from their bounce highs.
Larry, Moe, and Curly get upbraided by the Warden - and the wacky hijinks contnue...
Check's and No-Balances...
A fine system
OT Just think how large the SG losses might have been if Ben hadn't cut the interest rate. IMO the Dow would have dropped 800+ without a cut (market was only down 500 because of the risk of a cut). Then another big drop in Europe Wednesday.
Maybe the FED knew a major European bank was going down unless there was immediate relief.
Can we send this guy a medal or something?
OT
Jan. 24 (Bloomberg) -- The rogue trader who triggered 4.9 billion euros ($7.2 billion) of losses at Societe Generale SA has fled, Bank of France Governor Christian Noyer said.
He's ``on the run,'' Noyer told reporters at a briefing in Paris.
Noyer, who opened an investigation after the bank reported the loss today, declined to reveal the trader's name.
The central banker blamed the individual for the loss and absolved the bank of wrongdoing.
Please tell me how a responsible central banker can make such sweeping statements before an investigation has been completed, before any criminal charges have been filed.
Shouldn't he be saying instead: "We'll get to the bottom of this, with the help of police, and give a full public report of findings?"
Where are the French police and why are they so silent?
Excuse me. This is total BS. The markets should be tanking right now on the inanity of this orchestrated farce.
I blame Sarbanes-Oxley ...
With an attitude like that, I'm not sure he'll last longer than Armondo Falcon after he issued the report on "Systemic Risk." Now THAT was a scary little horror book.
Wow, what a week, I am almost convinced they will reblow this bubble. But I think FHA will have to offer zero down with income requirements, 500,000,interest only 40 years. then we may get a couple more years out of bubble. Good time to unwind if you own a house.
Good insight into how we got into the fix we are in:
America – A Bankrupt Empire by Justin Raimondo -- Antiwar.com
It isn't just housing. It's also the drain of empire.
I think they should start offering interest-only mortgages with a grace period on the interest. That would get me to move up to a bigger house and put some carpenters back to work.
Mae West to Societe Generale rogue trader:
Is that $7.2 billion in quarters in your pocket, or are you just glad to see me?
Some big hedge fund is allegedly on the ropes. We'll see if the rumor becomes a reality, but it certainly wouldn't surprise me.
Goldman also just announced they're cutting 5% of their workforce:
Expired
We're turning into a rich nation with the financial system of a 3rd world country.
We're not likely to stay rich that way.
Tanta,
Is Lockhart talking his book or blowing smoke? You know his history better than I.
Is it just since the 'turmoil' started that OFHEO has been about the only regulator actually on the job or have they been consistent?
If consistent, how refreshing! Unfortunately, IMNSHO OFHEO will steamrollered by electioneering...but they are trying to do the right thing.
So somebody (the regulator responsible for oversight) see's a problem? Somebody give that guy a hug for me.
I hope Lockhart continues to step up to the plate in regard to fraud at Fannie; there is no way they should be given more cash to burn, and at the tax payers expense. This is criminal, but with the mafia in control, crime is not a problem with this current coup!
Quite the pull back on Wall Street today. The Nasdq 100 (QQQQ) was up over two percent close to the open, now it is down 0.58%. Maybe what this says is "fade the open" for traders. Must be a lot ofmoney being lost in trading futures after hours. Of course we could have another reversal today. But on days when the market opened low we've seen bounces, but when it open high today, we are seeing a sell off. I wonder if some of the concerns about credit and inflation are coming to the fore today. Maybe traders are realizing that 0.25 is the most likely fed cut on Tuesday.
So does this mean they can refuse to take jumbo loans even if they're given the legal authority to do so?
Can we send this guy a medal or something?
How about some teeth instead?
Somewhat encouraging that the OFHEO takes its job seriously. Am I being naive with this statement? Would concerns from the OFHEO slow things down in Congress? I assume that at least a few Republicans still have concerns about the GSE's.
Bill -
There's a big rumor circulating that a very large hedge fund is on the ropes and may need to go into a forced liquidation which obviously wouldnt be good for the market. There's also a ton of noise around Fitch's actions on SCA (downgrade) and FGIC (negative outlook)yesterday thats creating a bit of havoc on some balance sheets today.
Quite the pull back on Wall Street today. The Nasdq 100 (QQQQ) was up over two percent close to the open, now it is down 0.58%. Maybe what this says is "fade the open" for traders.
Please buy stocks and help the hedgies keep the market from breaking downwards.
With your help we can all get the DOW back to 13,500 and oil over $100.
It will be like hitting the SNOOZE bar one more time before having to wake up and go to work.
Plus you can hit it again afterwards even though you're really late and promised yourself not to.
You cant put out a credit fire by adding more credit
Lockhart is putting his view of the imprudent decisions regarding FNM and FRE before the inevitable Debacle. BTW , supposedly the hedge fund in trouble is a quant fund located in Boston.... don't want to speculate on the name at this point.
Sorry CR, I didn't read the tagline.
My question is still on the table.
Re: Please tell me how a responsible central banker can make such sweeping statements before an investigation has been completed, before any criminal charges have been filed.
They call that CIA/ Bush spi
Gravatar I think they should start offering interest-only mortgages with a grace period on the interest. That would get me to move up to a bigger house and put some carpenters back to work.
Sssh! Don't tell Paulson, Bush, Pelosi, or Schumer that ... you honestly don't know economically-challenged those folks are.
Thanks--in the trenches, even though I would need to do some research to figure out all of the meaning. It sure would not be surprising to see some tottering hedge funds at this point.
I say we combine a few Fed agencies, like Federal Bureau of Investigation and Central Intelligence Agency, into the new improved:
Federal Bureau of Intelligence Investigation
or FBI Squared
Then, give them absolute power to corrupt our society and continue to let our economy to be run by the mafia
OFHEO just don't get it. The problem is a lack of demand--the supply situation is just right. There are countless flippers starving to death because they can't engage in their closed-loop speculation right now, and demand stimulus will be just the ticket to get things moving again.
Inflation? We don't worry about no steenkin' inflation. OFHEO needs to just STFU and let the brilliance of Pelosi and Boehner shed its warming illumination over us all.
I only wonder why they are setting the limit lower than three quarters of a mil--real bubble blowers think bigger.
I believe the legislation 'allows' the agencies to write to that limit.
To allow is not to compel.
How much leeway would agencies have for discretion is the limit is raised?
if you dont like what pelosi is doing,
call her
here's the numbers
District Office - 450 Golden Gate Ave. - 14th Floor - San Francisco, CA 94102 - (415) 556-4862
Washington, D.C. Office - 235 Cannon HOB - Washington, DC 20515 - (202) 225-4965
i just shorted some more HB's on this bounce getting ready for late next wk.
Re: Maybe the FED knew a major European bank was going down unless there was immediate relief.
This is the retarded casino/lotto mentality that has destroyed America. The Europeans dont game the market like our Fed and it is criminal that they act like a hedge fund bail out machine which uses any mechanics available to keep the casino running for insider friends!!!
Immediate relief...can you please give any example of how a Fed cut has any immediate relief other than for daytraders to buy on the rumor and sell on the news? How can a slow moving event which may take a year to be factored in, can bring about immediate retarded relief???
So what are the juicy rumors about hedge funds in trouble? The article doesn't mention which ones.
Expired
Give this man the congressional medal of Honor
Yup that is how you will save us from a recession by limiting people debts
We I think that's precisely the idea: Limiting peoples debts won't save us from recession.
I think the idea is to go through a period where bad businesses are replaced with good businesses... even if that's painful.
That's basic economic common sense, but we've been living in the fantasy world of the Great Moderation for so long that we can't contemplate the idea that toxic businesses need to be removed from the economy, because the loss of jobs is too stressful.
Due to the long-term accumulation of waste we are now, unfortunately, looking at a much larger loss of jobs than would occur in an economy that wasn't artificially propped up for so long.
Honestly, I think the markets pumped just long enough for some folks to sell out. When I see whole shows devoted to "please by stocks now, they are such a great deal!", I get that whiff of bs in the air. I don't have the nerves to short (you folks are braved them moi'). I'm happy investing like a grandma.
probert- if you're out there, who was I suppose to meet?
Re: I think they should start offering interest-only mortgages with a grace period on the interest.
I think they should have interest free mortgages with zero down, hey wait, what about Islamic Financing, wait, Ill, be right back with details
Good for OFHEO! Perhaps there will still be qualification standards, but there seems to be a huge risk that the government/GSEs will allow incredibly poor quality loans that the taxpayers will be forced to bail out later.
As a high earner who saves like a miser (with a view toward spending when I am not working so much), I am confronted with the reality that the government hates people like me. I pay huge amounts of taxes, which are going to give others (1) tax rebates that I will not see due to my income and (2) federal guarantees of risky loans that cause me to have to spend more to buy a home (or to rent while I wait for the correction that the powers that be are determined to prevent). The federal debt will go up, causing inflation, which will eat into my savings. The only way to even try to keep up with real inflation is to invest in markets or housing where prices are based on irrationality or government bailouts. There must be many who are also wondering why work so hard to get ahead and to stay ahead, only to see society protect the fools (or geniuses?) who live beyond their means. I can't believe I am growing to agree that our society is designed to keep the masses in perpetual debt slavery. It is clear the model of perpetual debt and consumerism must fail some day, but how long must we wait for that to occur? Until then, every financial move is based on guessing at how long the farce can continue and not on any fundamental wealth being created by our country. With every step in this progression of bailouts, throwing in the towel and living by the beach seems a more and more attractive escape from funding the charade.
Is Lockhart talking his book or blowing smoke?
What book?
He's saying that he was given the job of trying to toe the line on risk management at the GSEs and he is not inclined to pretend otherwise. He has been saying this for a long time.
The business about "increase . . . moves through their rigorous new product approval process" is more or less what I was saying yesterday. Lockhart isn't going to let them just yank up maximum loan amounts without doing the analysis and setting appropriate underwriting and pricing guidelines. He is 'splainin' to Congress that he has no intention of letting the GSEs pick up the lunch tab.
I see that as blowing away the smoke.
That's a pretty strong statement. Doesn't he serve at the pleasure of the President, who's gushing about the plan? I don't think I've ever seen a statement so contrary to the White House's agenda from a political appointee.
It definitely should give pause to anyone thinking of investing in GSE debt.
Hopefully the GSE's will wait to explode until after the current mess is swept under the carpet, and a couple years before the Medicare/Social Security debacle coming down the pipes.
Re: Interest free mortgages:
slamic law prohibits usury, the collection and payment of interest, also commonly called riba in Islamic discourse. In addition, Islamic law prohibits investing in businesses that are considered unlawful, or haraam (such as businesses that sell alcohol or pork, or businesses that produce media such as gossip columns or pornography, which are contrary to Islamic values).
Ok, so scrw the pork and all the sin stuff, what we need is a stop to usury as it relates to capitalism, thus as our society enters a new era of prosperity, our nation will conform to new ideals which will enable each and every American to be free of the burdens of debt...
Im taking off time as I write The State Of The New Union Address
DH
Tanta,
It looks like the FED will cut the FFR by 125bp in about a week times.
This seems nuts to me.
What is your take on this.
Here is what I sent this morning to the Congresscritters I have supported in the past. I would have mentioned the OFHEO comments if I had seen them. If you see anything you like feel free to use it.
I wanted to share my concern about the proposed "stimulus" plan with ______. This package does not make the Democratic congress look good.
Once again the Democratic congress is adopting ill-considered George Bush Lite legislation instead of attending to vital public interests, such as restoring the US image in the world by investigating crimes committed in furtherance of the Iraq war, and vindicating congressional subpoena power. The fact that the Republicans are still controlling the agenda more than a year after the Democrats supposedly took power gives those of us who have supported Democratic congressional candidates in the past serious reason for concern.
The increase in conforming limits for the federally chartered lenders has not been well thought out, and appears to be intended either as a pure PR stunt, or as a bailout of irresponsible California lenders such as Countrywide. I recognize that there are serious problems in the mortgage industry right now, but this proposal as it is being described in the press will not accomplish anything constructive. If the GSE's are doing their jobs correctly, they won't buy the undersecured mortgages that are the source of the problem. If the GSE's fail to do their jobs correctly, the government will simply be contributing to the Angelo Mozilo legal defense fund by relieving private lenders of their liability for fraudulently originated mortgages. Based on recent history, there is reason to believe that the GSE's may fail to do their jobs correctly.
As for the plan to distribute checks, it simply makes the Democratic congress look like the same kind of pandering hacks that we thought we were getting rid of in the 2006 election. I support a more progressive tax system, even though it would probably not benefit me personally. I do not support paying taxes to fund a perpetual motion arbitrary refund machine.
Doesn't he serve at the pleasure of the President
I suspect he serves at the pleasure of the last Bush president. (As far as I know, he's one of the last of Daddy Bush's grownups.)
Fannie, Freddie and Sallie are amost insolvent so by allowing these types of mis-managed entities to continue on, by giving them even more access to capital is a massive mistake directly related to corruption!
I'm going long tinfoil.
Final post.
Tanta,
Hopefully he can hold the line on this foolishness of raising the caps.
Just this moment, the Nasdaq is up 6.66%!
Well, that's that. We have a lot more to worry about now than a piddling hedge fund or two imploding... hmmm, is that hail, or brimstone?
At least somebody the media knows by name expressed displeasure with this plan. That's about all the satisfaction we are going to get wrt. to this plan.
I feel so ignored. I asked a serious question (in my little mind, anyhow) on the previous comment section and got no answer. I will keep using up comment space until somebody (starts with a "T", ends with "anta" - Toxic Santa!) tells me what I want to know.
If the GSEs are gonna buy up a bunch of formerly jumbo loans, won't they need new capital? Isn't that what OFHEO has already warned about? Can't maintain their share in the formerly conforming market and make a serious dent in formerly jumbos without more capital than they have now, can they?
Tanta, Bob, thanks.
sorry, "His book", an expression I used for his history on increases.
Next up, with the rush to FHA increases how do we know the new standards and risk modeling are up to the task? Time?
Back to Islamic Mortgages for FHA:
The basic principle of Islamic banking is the sharing of profit and loss and the prohibition of riba´ (interest). Amongst the common Islamic concepts used in Islamic banking are profit sharing (Mudharabah), safekeeping (Wadiah), joint venture (Musharakah), cost plus (Murabahah), and leasing (Ijarah).
Ok, so we are looking into a new twist on the Ownership Society, since the last method basically failed with the no-doc loans, thus we see The Ownership Society becoming a Joint-Ownership Society, where we will partner our fellow Americans with partners that will share in joint homeownership ventures which will be allowed to be taken off the balance sheets and packaged into joint ownership obligation funds (JOOF). These JOOFs will be available in exchange for Treasury vehicles which will be available to money markets and mutual funds. pensions, and hedges funds
George is calling, more later
PS
OT
http://www.thisislondon.co.uk/news/article-23434064-details/Number+of+young+people+found+hanged+in+'suicide+cult+town'+rises+to+13/article.do
The Ring 3?
Re: Another approach is Ijara wa Iqtina, which is similar to real-estate leasing. Islamic banks handle loans for vehicles in a similar way (selling the vehicle at a higher-than-market price to the debtor and then retaining ownership of the vehicle until the loan is paid).
Islamic banking - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
This does seem to be the direction our society is taking under Bush, i.e, between NAR and Paulson, Fannie, etc, we see a push to get 40 year mortgages with zero down and Jumbos for $1 million, with less and less collateral, i.e, secured lending, thus we are going to become (thanks to these retards) not a homeownership society, but a rental society with greater debt obligations, and fewer opportunities to increase equity!
Think about my fellow Americans!!!
If the GSEs are gonna buy up a bunch of formerly jumbo loans, won't they need new capital? Isn't that what OFHEO has already warned about? Can't maintain their share in the formerly conforming market and make a serious dent in formerly jumbos without more capital than they have now, can they?
I'm sorry, I thought those were rhetorical questions. My answers are yes, yep, and "bingo."
They don't have to carry all these LFKAJ* in their portfolios. They could securitize them. They'd need to beef up the g-fee account a little. Same problem, different side of the balance sheet.
*Loans Formerly Known as Jumbos
ac, pilgrim,
Bravo. About sums it all up.
Cheers,
Re: "different side of the balance sheet"
Re: is that hail, or brimstone?
This is financial obligation hell
If there were any barbarians around, they'd be knocking down the gates.
Mal -
Fortress is one name being thrown around but who knows. All "rumors" at this point.
Please, Please let it be Citadel, Caxton or SAC
isn't this raising confirming limit thing just bringing us one step closer to test the implied government support of Fannie and Freddie?
Are they going to securitize lower limit confirming and higher limit confirming separately?
BTW, if 20% down is still a requirement, who is able to afford to pay it, or who is going to Heloc the balance?
If there were any barbarians around, they'd be knocking down the gates.
We already let them inside. Remember that huge CDO squared shaped like a giant horse?
Isn't this bit of new quite interesting..but not shocking
Feds accused of gold-price manipulation
Lockhart is a hero of the housing crisis. He has been on Fannie Mae/ Freddie since at least 2004 in spite the fact that they run to their political hirelings evertime someone tries to held them to some reasonable standard.
Despite their craven abuse of the political system, I doubt even they are dumb enough to write anything near the junk WS came up with. Their equity holders are not protected by an "implicit guarantee" of the gov't.
LFKAJ*
At first glance, I thought this was loans formerly known as junk
--
Another piece of evidence that we have...
A system of the Crooks, by the Crooks, and for the Crooks.
The "politicians" and the Fed, or the Feds, exist to help the Crooks! Fed exists to take the blame for evil deeds of Bankrupters and Fraudsters of New York City, as was the case with Great Depression, and help them as long as possible before that happens.
Jas
I can't believe they haven't fired Lockhart for gross competence. He's clearly not a "team" player and is way out of step with the times. We need to get that Arabian horse breeder in there, the Katrina FEMA guy, I bet he'd do a "heck of a job" with the GSEs. Or how about Chuck Prince, he'll keep dancing as long as there's music, or maybe Mozilo, I hear he might need a new job, and he's soooo experienced, or maybe even one of the Enron guys. I don't see why we need someone like Lockhart getting in the way of "stimulus" with so many qualified people to choose from.
borkafatty-
Seriously, you read and forward this tinfoil hat stuff? Is this journalist really writing about the WSJ accepting an ad? Oh...and guess what...gold is just a commodity. Sorry that Corsi's friends and ADVERTISERS are upset it's not worth more.
IE
At first glance, I thought this was loans formerly known as junk
Don't be silly, we're not changing that part.
Actually, Lockhart was appointed in 2006, by W.
WP story
Nobel economist Joseph Stiglitz:
"The mechanism of monetary policy is ineffective in these circumstances. I'm not saying it won't work at all: it will help the banking system but the credit squeeze is going to go on because nobody trusts anybody else. The Fed is pushing on a string,"
Well I'm glad the middle class destroying actions of the Fed will help the BB&B. Article is worth a read.
Davos 2008: US slides into dangerous 1930s 'liquidity trap' - Telegraph
Cheers,
I find this encouraging. I figure we will have to have some kind of quasi-nationalization of the mortgage system, just because the banks will be locked up for years. Freddie and Fannie realize refis of current toxic jumbos will amount to catching a guillotine blade - with their necks - and I think they'll be cooperative with setting up decent underwriting standards. Freddie/Fannie jumbos with decent underwriting would be a good things - loans would be available, but only when deserved.
In a nutshell, OFHEO + the GSE's may put the sense into this plan that the politician don't dare to. If Pelosi takes a stand against GSE Jumbos her constituents (mostly with jumbo loans) will tear her throat out, regardless of how justified that stand is. The agencies, however, can put up "hey, you don't want us to make bad loans" as a shield against political pressure.
Yeah, this is good... people can't pay their loans now, so we'll raise the limits.
That just makes SO much sense.
FormerlyknownasJS: " I can't believe they haven't fired Lockhart for gross competence."
Believe me, he is the first one gone when the regime changes. He is far too caring about his mission, everytime I have seen him speak he has this underlying stressed vibe. Like he is sitting at his desk at the OFHEO with a roll of Tums and a bottle of Peptol saying, "The Congress wants to do WHAT!??!"
Here is the Ofheo note on why they think Jumbos for the GSEs is a bad idea:
http://www.ofheo.gov/media/research/MMNOTE11108.pdf
Pilgrim--I'm in the same boat as you (high-earning miser) and have long since come to the same conclusions as you. But I've also come to the conclusion that it's better to be a government-hated miser than a government-loved spendthrift.
Irrationally_Exuberant
Ya ok.. you know your suppose to remove your blinders after leaving the shearing room.
Jas, do you actually type each individual post or do you use an automatic vitriol generator?
borkafatty, World Net Daily isn't a credible source so don't waste your time there.
Misean Good Morning,
Last night Chris was going to follow up on an email he received re the insurers. Have you seen his/her follow up?
Dont' look now, but commodities are Roaring....
Ok...Look
INO.com Current Futures Trading Price Board - Intraday Prices, Charts, and Quotes for Futures and Commodities Markets
Actually i read it here...but i guess these guys are not reliable either...please.
Gold Anti-Trust Action Committee | Exposing the long-term manipulation of the gold market
Follow the money down the rat hole:
1..Fannie Mae: In 1938, the Federal government established Fannie Mae to expand the flow of mortgage money by creating a secondary market.
Thus, Fannie has a job to expand mortgages by allowing these loans to be packaged into securitized vehicles by underwriters who spin off things like MBS, ABS, CMOs, etc, which are then available to third parties, like trusts, hedge funds, mutual funds, pensions, etc, which are thereby structured to manage risk and generate yield enhancement opportunities and thus to not become bankrupt.
In this foodchain, Fannie has become a conduit machine that turbocharges loans that have not been verified, examined or linked to core collateral obligations from homeowners with sustainable cahflows.
Fannie has contaminated the entire financial foodchain from top to bottom and this is unwinding as a systemic collapse directly linked to government mis-management, collusion and corruption!
Why are we giving Fannie and this government an even greater opportunity to destroy the American economy?
lama,
ROFL.
borkafatty,
I started looking into GATA's arguments in '97. They have a whole lot of stuff that COULD be manipulation. It could also be stupid decision (BoE sale in 2000), or something else.
Now, the people in GATA have a pay site which is very informative, with a number of experts in various fields. But as far as I'm concerned GATA has been blowing the same horn for over 10 years now, and have nothing new.
Cheers,
Anyone thing Ms Clinton will give Pelosi the boot? I hope so, but I image they are in love?
Anonymous,
Just where are the investment banks in your analysis. How much did they contribute to the mess?
Actually, Lockhart was appointed in 2006, by W.
I didn't mean that Daddy appointed him, just that he is associated with Daddy's crowd (not W's crowd). He isn't a liberal of any sort as far as I can tell, but he's "career" (i.e., "qualified") and he's an adult.
W. put him in charge back when shrinking the GSEs was Operative. Lockhart was supposed to be strong enough and independent enough and hard-nosed enough to withstand all the libruls who wanted the GSEs to stay in the mortgage market. Or whatever the Bushies' religion was at the time.
Now that all that's Inoperative, Junior is having a touch of trouble getting Lockhart to act like a loyalist, as far as I can tell.
sorry, but all of us in california need the higher limits atleast like they have in hawaii and since california's the strongest economy in the US, it only seems fair!! 417,000 does nothing for us unless you are way inland.
Pilgrim-
Amen! And now we're un-American as well, given our tendency to save instead of spend AKA "stimulate the economy."
donna,
It makes all kind of sence. As ac said, hopefully we can borrow enough to pay of our debts...or something like that.
Cheers,
Ella,
Cobra posts after work time. He's not a network engineer sitting in the server room making the suits think he must be working cuz he's typing.
Cheers,
We're turning into a rich nation with the financial system of a 3rd world country.
Oh, you still think we're rich. How quaint.
We're rich the way Trump is rich - Millions in assets, Millionsx2 in debts.
If you remove the fact that it is the mythical "house" the "American dream" and replace that with tulips, internet stocks or South Sea trading companies then all this amazing amount of money and government support going to support this bubble looks not only silly but extremely dangerous.
They just cant wrap their head around the fact that it was a bubble.
Pilgrim,
I think the govt actually loves the fact that people like you exist. They just don't treat you well because they know they can take you for granted. I've noticed in MA, politicians claim people like we "won life's lottery", in pandering to masses of people who think scratch tickets are the only way to achieve in life.
I started looking into GATA's arguments in '97. They have a whole lot of stuff that COULD be manipulation.
Boy you people kill me..could be manipulated...what like whats going on in front of our eyes at this very moment...its all being manipulated..and blatant...
Where's Energyecon?
From: Jeroen van der Veer, Chief Executive
To: All Shell employees
Date: 22 January 2008
Subject: Shell Energy Scenarios
Dear Colleagues
In this letter, I'd like to share reflections about how we see the energy future, and our preferred route to meeting the world's energy needs. Industry, governments and energy users - that is, all of us - will face the twin challenge of more energy and less CO2.
This letter is based on a text I've written for publication in several newspapers in the coming weeks. You can use it in your communications externally. There will be more information about energy scenarios inthe months ahead.
By the year 2100, the world's energy system will be radically different from today's. Renewable energy like solar, wind, hydroelectricity and biofuels will make up a large share of the energy mix, and nuclear energy too will have a place.
Mankind will have found ways of dealing with air pollution and greenhouse gas emissions. New technologies will have reduced the amount of energy needed to power buildings and vehicles.
Indeed, the distant future looks bright, but getting there will be an adventure. At Shell, we think the world will take one of two possible routes. The first, a scenario we call Scramble, resembles a race through a mountainous desert. Like an off-road rally, it promises excitement and fierce competition. However, the unintended consequence of "more haste" will often be "less speed" and many will crash along the way.
The alternative scenario, called Blueprints, has some false starts and develops like a cautious ride on a road that is still under construction. Whether we arrive safely at our destination depends on the discipline of the drivers and the ingenuity of all those involved in the construction effort. Technical innovation provides for excitement.
Regardless of which route we choose, the world's current predicament limits our maneuvering room. We are experiencing a step-change in the growth rate of energy demand due to population growth and economic development, and Shell estimates that after 2015 supplies of easy-to-access oil and gas will no longer keep up with demand.
As a result, society has no choice but to add other sources of energy - renewables , yes, but also more nuclear power and unconventional fossil fuels such as oil sands. Using more energy inevitably means emitting more CO2 at a time when climate change has become a critical global issue.
In the Scramble scenario, nations rush to secure energy resources for
Ella,
They monetize obligations which seem to be engineered to explode, thus they seem to be a key element in providing liquidity on the short end of things, i.e, look at Goldman and the pre-packaged goodies they traded long, and then shorted; great financial engineering!
Or here is something very new: Morgan Stanley Institutional Liquidity Funds also offers six series that operate as money market funds subject to rule 2a-7
The money markets are exploding with cash as people walk away from this trash and in terms of FNM, this provides a short-term opportunity for some people to hedge these cash movements.
I think as liquidity dries up or freezes in a liquidity trap, fannie will have less fuel to offer in terms of interacting with the secondary markets and thus, the third parties, or pensions will be very hesitant to jump into new packages that look like Goldman short traps; at least you would hope some increased level of parinoid risk management would make future investments something to manage with care. Thus fannie can expand its theory on paper and be granted new loan limits, but as I recall, home prices are going down, so this is a non issue that is just smoke and mirrors. I guess you would have to look at how that loan limit for jumbos would impact underwriter packages in terms of selling these new units that will be highly suspect.
In the Scramble scenario, nations rush to secure energy resources for themselves, fearing that energy security is a zero-sum game, with clear winners and losers. The use of local coal and homegrown biofuels increases fast.
Taking the path of least resistance, policymakers pay little attention to curbing energy consumption - until supplies run short. Likewise, despite much rhetoric, greenhouse gas emissions are not seriously addressed until major shocks trigger political reactions. Since these responses are overdue, they are severe and lead to energy price spikes and volatility.
The other route to the future is less painful, even if the start is more disorderly. This Blueprints scenario sees numerous coalitions emerging to take on the challenges of economic development, energy security and environmental pollution through cross-border cooperation.
Much innovation occurs at the local level, as major cities develop links with industry to reduce local emissions. National governments introduce efficiency standards, taxes and other policy instruments to improve the environmental performance of buildings, vehicles and transport fuels.
As calls for harmonization increase, policies converge across the globe. Cap-and-trade mechanisms that put a cost on industrial CO 2 emissions gain international acceptance. Rising CO2 prices accelerate innovation, spawning breakthroughs. A growing number of cars are powered by electricity and hydrogen, while industrial facilities are fitted with technology to capture CO 2 and store it underground.
Against the backdrop of these two equally plausible scenarios, we will only know in a few years whether December's Bali declaration on climate change was just rhetoric or the beginning of a global effort to counter it. Much will depend on how attitudes evolve in Beijing, Brussels, New Delhi and Washington.
Shell traditionally uses its scenarios to prepare for the future without expressing a preference for one over another. But, faced with the need to manage climate risk for our investors and our grandchildren, we believe the Blueprints outcomes provide the best balance between economy, energy and environment.
For a second opinion, we appealed to climate change calculations made at the Massachusetts Institute of Technology. These calculations indicate that a Blueprints world with CO2 capture and storage results in the least amount of climate change, provided emissions of other major manmade greenhouse gases are similarly reduced.
The sobering reality is that the Blueprints scenario will only come to pass if policymakers agree a global approach to emissions trading and actively promote energy efficiency and new technology in four sectors: heat and power generation, industry, mobility and buildings. It will be hard work and there is little time.
For instance, Blueprints assumes CO2 is captured at 90% of all coal- and gas-fired power plants in developed countries in 2050, plus at least 50% of those in non-
scott,
Waaaaaah!
CA needs a serious reality check.
Special Edition: Real State of Genius: Today we Salute you California with Our Real Home of Genius Award! 10 Homes throughout the Golden Bubble State. » Dr. Housing Bubble Blog
Real Homes of Genius.
Cheers,
Blueprints will not be easy. But it offers the world the best chance of reaching a sustainable energy future unscathed, so we should explore this route with the same ingenuity and persistence that put humans on the moon and created the digital age.
The world faces a long voyage before it reaches a low-carbon energy system. Companies can suggest possible routes to get there, but governments are in the driving seat. And governments will determine whether we should prepare for a bitter competition or a true team effort.
That is the article, and how I see our challenges and opportunities. I look forward to hearing how you see the situation (please be concise).
Regards
Jeroen van der Veer, Chief Executive
thanks CR&T for allowing this SPAM
Misean,
Thanks
Shouldn't he be saying instead: "We'll get to the bottom of this, with the help of police, and give a full public report of findings?"
For all we know (or the police) that guy is swimming with the fishes by now.
SocGen does not want to get to the bottom of it. At least not in public. In fact they have been told not to discuss it.
Look fraud on this scale should equal criminal prosecution. So where are the police?
Ella | 01.25.08 - 12:26 pm |
Misean,
The post you made last nite is dead nuts on. This is NOT about munis. This is about all the off balance sheet intems that will come onto the books as a result of downgrades. The unwind has to be controlled.
What would happen if a 1T capital call happened over the course of a few days?? Could the global economy handle it?? Hell I don't know and I don't want to find out.
The underlying contracts can be renegotiated but until then we are pretty much stuck...
I will confess to just bieng a dumb truck mechanic and willing to learn...
Chris
Jas, do you actually type each individual post or do you use an automatic vitriol generator?
I think it's a vitriol-o-matic. What's scary is how his rants are looking more and more accurate.
Re: SocGen does not want to get to the bottom of it. At least not in public. In fact they have been told not to discuss it.
Did you see how Northern Rock (Blackbird) is trying to shut media by censoring information; same deal with SocGen and this will be a trend in withholding info from Tanta, et al
He was grilled for six hours. But not by the police. He wasn't reported or turned over to the police. He was allowed to just walk out the door and "escape."
As Bill Clinton might say: "This is a total fairy tale."
Chris,'
If not munis then what? SIV? Where is the stuff and who is holding? Pension Funds, Insurers?
This is ridiculous but if you can't beat 'em . . . refi.
Are the GSE underwriting guidelines for LTV, FICO and debt service posted on either on this site or on the internet somewhere?
bork, gata.org sent out a press release challenging Bill O'Reilly to a verbal duel. Please. Stick to actual news sources. if you're going to quote whackjobs, at least give us an update on batboy's exploits.
I hope people saw this:
404 : Page Not Found
Retail: Assets of retail money market funds increased by $12.09 billion to $1.196 trillion. Taxable money market fund assets in the retail category increased by $13.06 billion to $906.85 billion, and tax-exempt fund assets decreased by $975 million to $289.49 billion.
Institutional: Assets of institutional money market funds increased by $52.33 billion to $2.055 trillion. Among institutional funds, taxable money market fund assets increased by $52.16 billion to $1.873 trillion, and tax-exempt fund assets increased by $177 million to $182.36 billion.
That is as friggn amazing as a shark with a laser on its head!
Misean | 01.25.08 - 12:37 pm |
Fooled ya...Friday is a good day to screw off at work(And get all my weekly paperwork done)...
The best part is my reporting managers office is 300 miles away...God I love my job!!!
Chris
I heard an interview with Lockhart on the radio last spring. He went on in detail about the unfunded entitlement programs and the coming mortgage problems...pulled no punches.
He must have an insulated post. I can't imagine why he hasn't been fired.
Pilgrim- Kudos to you!
Whatever happened to savings. CD rates are down because the fed wants the elderly to die of starvation, beg and cheat because as they lower the fed funds rate the ss check gets smaller and why they say inflation is tamed is because SS is tied to that also, if inflation goes up the SS has to pay more to that senior citizen who deserves it. What a great country, starve and lie to the people who built it and give money away to illegal immigrants, immigrant families hosting thier mother/father for a year and then become US citizens who then get to a ss check without ever paying into it. I saw that first hand with my neighbor.
I say everybody claim exempt and demand change. They will listen to us when we hold them by the balls. They have us by the balls now. We need a Subprime tea party! Our govt. is in shambles. Congressman are paid and supported by industry to vote according to their interests. Democracy and the great american dream are being squashed by the elite.
Disclaimer-I make real good money, have 800 credit and a down payment but they (the govt.) just lost me as a home buyer. I will be withholding all my taxes and will plead innocent of tax evasion based off me contracting the subprimeitis disease. This disease popped up after watching all the efforts to save lenders, banks and greedy borrowers from going underwater by the Govt., I believe it' derived from the holy water that Mr. Bush sells from his Crawford Ranch but distributes free to his admin.
Rant off- but this affect me and my daughter( her even longer) financially and emotionally as they have now begun the artificial propping of overpriced homes.
I quit! I gotta go and open my corporation in Nevada. Need to hide my money....
Bring the troops home and give them the money, they deserve it! We will have a positive net gain while saving young men/women from dying in an illegal war.
The beaches in Peru and Ecuador are looking better and better Pilgim!
I forgot. I heard that some of the money market funds were invested in this stuff.
Could be trouble there.
Well than i might as well quote Ben, Bush, and all the other wackjobs..I mean its all one big nut job club...
Tanta,
OK, slightly rhetorical, but meant to start what I think will be an important discussion about the implications of the GSEs raising capital right now.
I think raising capital when lots of others (like monoline guys and Citibank and Countrywide) needs to do the same is a questionable proposition. Even if we take this as another part of "temporary" in the three Ts of a stimulus package, it comes at a time when capital for the financial sector is in short supply. I know that these are extraordinary times, but this comes close to directed capital. Even that might make sense, if we had the notion that, with market failure was keeping capital in less than optimal places, we can solve the problem by directing it to the GSEs. That, I think, is a questionable proposition, and maybe a very big one right now. Other parts of the plan are meant to remedy inadequate demand. There is plenty of demand for capital, and this won't increase supply. It increases demand in a way that may divert supply. And I'm not particularly averse to the notion of government intervention. I'm just getting flutter-tummy over this one.
Ella, i followed your ideas to the effect that the fed funds rate cut was an act of fear approaching panic on the part of bernanke and the 12 other members of the fomc.
i believe you are right.
ben made a speech to the congress a week ago thursday and emphasized inflation fears in his speech. this spooked investors,
friday one week ago the president announced a very vague plan and this was disquieting.
finally the asian markets on MLK day went nuts...major markets down 4 to 8 percent for a time and then a circuit breakers pop.
finally ben announced an unprecedented rate cut right before NYSE opens...cant wait till the regular meeting especially since the futures market was in the toilet.
i live in the west and i could smell the fear in nyc and dc all the way from here
One question though: who's going to actually buy the debt?
Have any of you friggn people really read how friggn fannie does business?? Granted this is a very friggn old link, but this is the core and heart of where this current friggn systemic crisis was hatched:
Automated Valuation Models
In a move that has drawn fire from appraisers, Fannie Mae is allowing some mortgage lenders to forego appraisals on sales and refinancing for a $50 fee.
Appraisals are not being banished altogether, says Fannie Mae, but eliminated when adequate electronic valuation data is available. Most applications received through Desktop Underwriter, Fannie's automated underwriting system, require no appraisal or only an exterior inspection; very few need a complete appraisal.
Wait... did I just read that?????
Chris,
Nice to see you. Thanks for the update.
Cheers,
Ill stick to what i see with my own eyes...and that is manipulation across the board..do i believe 100% of what i read...no...do i believe 100% of what i see in front of me...yes i do...unless of course i have been drinking the night before.
Well than i might as well quote Ben, Bush, and all the other wackjobs..I mean its all one big nut job club...
The difference is that these wackjobs are in charge. What they say may be stupid but it has effects.
WorldNutDaily will pass muster over at HousingPanic, but here you'll have to do better.
DaveNYC, I know what you mean, but this whole "Bankrupters and Fraudsters" thing is a bit innacurate. You see, first you have the fraud, then comes the bankruptcy.
Seriously, I think the guy had a rough career or something. Maybe his boss was always calling him names, now he want's to give that label to strangers, "dopes" et al.
Here is the SocGen press release:
http://www.telegraph.co.uk/money/graphics/2008/01/24/socgen.pdf
In many cases, you can discern truth by reading between the lines of legalese that crafty lawyers write.
There are two glaring omissions in the press release:
The careful wording gives SocGen dubious deniability, because it does not link the stated loss (4.9 bn euros) directly to the "trader" accused.
Strangely, however, it calls the trader's actions a "fraud" (a financial crime) which would seem to compel a criminal investigation. That must have slipped by the lawyers.
bokafatty,
Let me be clear. I do not deny manipulation in any market, especially one as small as gold. What I am saying is that GATA has been making the same arguments for over 10 years and has come up with nothing new since their custodial gold find in 1998. That's a long time to keep tooting the same old horn. Give me some solid evidence for a change.
Cheers,
Given a set of options we can be certain that our bought and paid for politicians will always make the wrong choice.
And for those itching to buy the dips I urge you read Bob Rodriguez at FPA Funds. Full disclosure: I have been a multi-decade shareholder in several FPA funds.
FPA News Article
Re: I forgot. I heard that some of the money market funds were invested in this stuff.
Could be trouble there.
Some? I heard that some of the money market funds were invested in this stuff.
You would be hard pressed to find a money market not connected to this crap! You are aware of The Pension Protection Act and the relief granted to underwriters, to help you invest your money market funds in CDOs and derivatives,,,,right? That DOL granting of exemptions of prohibited actions by underwriters is not just a pension issue, most every money market out there is connected to derivatives and the only safe ones, if you believe The Fed isnt broke, are Treasury-linked money markets that just hold Treasuries; however, these money markets often have the right to invest in anything they want, regardless of what you think, so PLEASE for God's sake, read your current prospectus and look at holdings!!!
Ya effect alright..someone please call in the sheep dogs...the pack is running astray.
This whole bear scenario like the-housing-bust-will-detroy-the-economy and how we only have the choice between a severe recession and a Great Deproession was complete hogwash from the beginning. Now there are two choices for the bears:
a) Realize this was completely wrong and illogical from through and through
b) blame others (FED, politicians, banks etc.) to have sabotaged the depression and succomb to even more absurd conspiracy theories.
What's your choice going to be?
O-Joe
Let me be clear. I do not deny manipulation in any market, especially one as small as gold. What I am saying is that GATA has been making the same arguments for over 10 years and has come up with nothing new since their custodial gold find in 1998. That's a long time to keep tooting the same old horn. Give me some solid evidence for a change.
Ok misean, ill give you that one.
rich,
Yeah it's fishy. So is Jerome's new bedroom. If you get my drift.
Cheers,
CNBC is reporting that Wilbur Ross is still interested in AMBANC. But earlier reports say Wilbur might set up his own firm.
Amazing
Re: please call in the sheep dogs...the pack is running astray.
I think its time for guns and fences, probably SUVs and lots of hard liquor
Here's some more press on the Soc Gen fraudster:
The Daily Mash - FRENCH TRADER WAS FORCED TO WORK 30 HOURS A WEEK
Enjoy...
What fund holdings would we look for specifically?
They can hide this stuff so well. Clever names, etc.
Driveby exterior appraisals
Keep you lawns mowed, windows clean, no trash, keep the dogs in backyard, keep your garage door shut, no BBQ in driveway, make sure liquor bottles are inside garage.
Anyone have other tips to get values back up for Fannie?
I have read some stuff by this little lady and she may have a few names for this stuff (Collateralized Debt Obligations & Structured Finance
by Janet Tavakoli):
Collateralized Debt Obligations & Structured Finance & Securitization
She used to work as a Goldman quant...I think? Been a few years??
All of the following are examples of SPEs: Special Purpose Corporations (SPCs) which may or may not be Special Purpose Subsidiaries or captives; Master Trusts; Owners Trusts; Grantor Trusts; Real Estate Mortgage Investment Conduits (REMICs); Financial Asset Securitization Investment Trust (FASIT); Multiseller Conduits; Single Seller Conduits; and certain Domestically Domiciled Corporations
OilEquations: I, for one, appreciated your Shell Oil posts.
Serendipity. Reading the article linked by Misean and my oldies station just played that great ode...
Turning Japanese
I think I'm turning Japanese
I really think so,
Dah dah dah DAAAAAAH dah dah dah
OT - back to the $150B tax refund injection...
Per CR's post Q3 Mortgage Equity Withdrawal: $133 Billion this is slightly less than the average quarterly MEW during 2004-2006. Beginning last quarter of 2006 MEW has dropped, most recent value was ~$133B and its trajectory is down.
Assuming that during 2008 it averages $75B per quarter, then a $150B injection (plus actual MEW) is equivalent to about 4 months of 2006 MEW, a level that the economy got accustomed to.
Bottom line; $150B isnt piddling, but adds only 4 more months of breathing room before any economical fundamentals take over again.
No need to worry about GWB re-blowing the bubble, because it just can't work. The problem is not and cannot be contained. It will play itself out, one way or another. It can't be swept under the rug or re-inflated. If the GSE's start eating bad jumbo loans, they will develop a very bad case of dysentery.
Let me put this another way. Consonant with the bubble, the Bushies claimed that they were an empire now and created their own reality. Well, that empire is crumbling and reality is biting us all on the ass. If the GSE's don't practice good business sense, a la OFHEO, then reality will bite them, real hard, and the whole world of GSE mortgage backed securities will scream like you wouldn't believe.
Relax and watch the horror movie.
Joe
RE: Fannie Mae appraisals
The underlying issue w/ the residential real estate appraisal process is the use of 'comparables' - vs. an income based approach (rents). The true value of any property is the underlying rental value, any other value is emotional/speculative value. Moving appraisals to an income based approach would isolate the speculative value, banks should lend no more than (let's say) 90% of the income value of the property, the speculative/emotional value would then be born by the buyer.
Anyone have other tips to get values back up for Fannie?
Anonymous | 01.25.08 - 1:17 pm | #
Take down basketball hoops and watch that backyard laundry?
*
What fund holdings would we look for specifically?
They can hide this stuff so well. Clever names, etc.
stealthwii | 01.25.08 - 1:15 pm | #
** Re: reset mechanisms
... may use futures and options as a low-cost method of gaining exposure to a particular securities market without investing directly in those securities, for speculative purposes, and for traditional hedging purposes
Variable Rate Master Demand Notes. The Fund may also invest in variable rate master demand notes. A variable rate master demand note (which is a type of commercial paper) represents a direct borrowing arrangement involving periodically fluctuating rates of interest under a letter agreement between a commercial paper issuer and an institutional lender pursuant to which the lender may determine to invest varying amounts.
Because the US government is not obligated by law to provide support to an instrumentality it sponsors
STRIPS are sold as zero coupon securities. See Zero Coupon Securities.
Custodial Receipts. US government securities, the holder will resell the stripped securities in custodial receipt programs with a number of different names, including TIGRs, and CATS.
Also see Brady Bonds
notice of assignments
right to accrued but unpaid interest
Municipal Leases, Certificates of Participation
Pre-Refunded Municipal Securities
Stripped Mortgage-Backed Securities
Kinda goes on forever.......
What kind of time delay will there be between passage of the legislation to raise limits, and the actual availability of those new higher-limit loans?
After all, time is of the essence... The more prices drop, the more homes are foreclosed, the smaller the effect this measure can have on propping up prices.
Re: Anyone have other tips to get values back up for Fannie?
Remove junk cars, buses, trailers and other impaired capital, like older wash machines, fridges, and OT, dogs, remove the dogs and crap. Bake bread, that was the numero uno NAR request, bake more bread and have the area smell really good!
Anonymous | 01.25.08 - 1:44 pm,
Awe screw all that. Just build a fascade in front of the actual house.
Cheers,
bubble,
that is reality!!
This looks fun:
We will issue the notes in book-entry or uncertificated form. Subject to certain limited exceptions, you will not receive a certificated security or a negotiable instrument that evidences your notes. Sumner Harrington Ltd. will deliver written confirmations to purchasers of the notes. Wells Fargo Bank, National Association will act as trustee for the notes.
The notes will be issued in book entry or uncertificated form only. Except under limited circumstances, the notes will not be evidenced by certificated securities or negotiable instruments. See Description of the Notes Book Entry Registration and Transfer.
as i told all of u, last Th i took down 40% of my shorts. i've been scaling back into them the last 2d into the teeth of the rally. today its paying off big. my pt is that the mkts are VERY weak on all measures so don't be squeezed out of your positions.
Anyone heard of CDIs ( certificated depositary interests)? Fannie could have unregistered
Both the original notes and the exchange notes are represented by one or more certificated depositary interests, or CDIs, as more fully explained in Book-Entry, Form, Clearance and Settlement.
Upon the global notes being credited to the account of The Bank of New York as the holder of 100% of the book-entry interests in such global notes in the records of Euroclear, The Bank of New York, as Book-Entry Depositary for the exchange notes, will create one or more certificated depositary interests, or CDIs, representing a 100% interest in the Book-Entry Depositarys book-entry interests in the underlying global notes and issue them in the name of Cede & Co., as nominee of DTC.
The CDI Depositary will hold the CDIs as custodian on behalf of DTC.
We need more custodians, we need more cowbell!!! Bring on the transfers baby!
Re Pilgrim | 01.25.08 - 11:43 am | #
Well, said.
I couldn't agree more.
Hey anyone have any idea what is holding up the dollar...it is looking strong considering the free money drop from the sky....
OilEquations,
That is quite interesting and not spam IMNSHO, though OT for the thread!
Scenario analysis is a great way to frame potential states of the world, though I would say the letter gives us the middle/upper bounds and left out the downside scenarios which involve massive economic dislocations and resource wars.
I'd say what was most optimistic was the probability assessment, that they are equally likely. Dramatic policy change and resource commitments have to occur for the successful 'Scramble,' because as a sage in Alaska taught me long ago, "For every mile of road there's two miles of ditch."
energyecon, did you see the info porn that you requested in the comparables thread?
I knew there was a reason, I always called the buffett the biggest con artist out there:
http://www.bondbuyer.com/$nocookies$/article.html?id=20080109BRZLPDQ8&from=home
general obligation funds & Custodial receipts and secondary market derivatives from the King of derivatives and best showman out there folks! He also has $33 Billion in goodwill accounting!
This populist rhetoric of saving homes is sickening since on the back of this language they try to raise caps to $625,500. How do those in middle America feel about this? Our national median home price is roughly $223,800. Heck, even Southern Californias median home price is now near $400,000 and no county in Southern California is even over $565,000. Guess who called for higher caps last year:
NEW YORK, Dec 5 (Reuters) - Countrywide Financial Corps (CFC.N: Quote, Profile , Research) chief executive called on the U.S. Congress to temporarily raise the maximum size of mortgages that Fannie Mae (FNM.N: Quote, Profile , Research), Freddie Mac (FRE.N: Quote, Profile , Research) and the Federal Housing Administration may buy or insure by 50 percent to $625,000.
In an opinion piece in the Wall Street Journal on Wednesday, Chief Executive Angelo Mozilo, whose company is the largest U.S. mortgage lender, said the increase from $417,000 should be implemented for up to a year.
He said this would go a long way toward alleviating a nationwide housing crunch, which analysts expect to pinch borrowers and lenders throughout 2008 and probably beyond.
It should be enacted as part of a broader package of reforms to ensure that these linchpins of our mortgage system can aggressively support the housing market in a time of need, and that the appropriate controls and oversight are in place to protect taxpayers, Mozilo wrote.
Mozilo had previously called for the cap to be raised to as much as $850,000.....................
There you have it...proven mobsters at its finest...these junkies taking the playbook from..MOZILO...
Lockhart for President!
Is it possible that the higher cap is to bail out all the second lien holders that are getting killed from the 0% down deals.....and in effect socialize the risk?
oooh no! many thx!
r0m30,
rawsome! thanks for the heads up - the most striking thing to me was the starting solid blue - visual has much more visceral impact than data tables
Anyone who is pissed about the increase in the mortage limits for the GSEs to $700K + should do this. I know some folks here have said its a moot point since its only FHA limits that are increased and they have tough underwriting, but thats not right. Its Freddie and Fannie also, and that means all the banks/mortgage companies have somewhere to dump their junk for much larger loans.
I just posted this on congress.org. Its a great site. All you do is put in your zip and then it give you all your govt. reps and the President and you can type in one message and get it sent to all of them.
I am fine with a lot of the stimulus package, but I am not OK with the
expansion of the loan limits that the GSEs (Freddie/Fannie) can take on their books.
Why? Because there hasnt been reform of the rules that the GSEs operate under and thus increasing the loan limit will allow the same trail of poorly underwritten loans that Freddie/Fannie have on their books now up to $417K to just be extended to $700k+.
This doesnt make sense. The bad underwriting/lending scam that got us into this mess with lenders dumping bad loans to Freddie/Fannie or to the MBS market will now just be larger loans and now only to Freddie/Fannie.
That will only delay the inevitable and put the burden on tax payers
instead of the corporations/executives at banks,mortgage companies, etc. who made the bad decisions in the first place.
If you require the same kind of prudent rules to Freddie and Fannie that
FHA applies to undrewriting a loan before they approve it, then that is
fine, but dont make this a situation where the government brings in a new case of booze to a party that should have been shut down a long time ago by the police.
This issue is of critical importance to me and many folks I know, and what happens will reflect in how we vote this fall.
Regards .
Dont know if will help, but in I have to do it to know I tried. Again, please do this if you can. It will only take a few minutes.
Thus is a state/local gov't budget bailout....remember the deficits?
Since raising the conforming loan limit will take loans away from other parts of the country (outside of California) we can probably get this stopped by writing our Senators (assuming you're outside of CA, that is). I just sent the following email to my Senators here in Oregon:
The recent economic "stimulus" package proposed by President Bush and House Democrats contains some questionable items. I would like to highlight one that I think is actually dangerous; that is the proposal to increase the conforming loan limit to $729,000 from the current $417,000.
First of all, OFHEO Director James B. Lockhart is opposed to increasing the limit. Today he said: "We are very disappointed in the proposal to increase the conforming loan limit as we believe it is a mistake to do so in the absence of comprehensive GSE regulatory reform. To restore confidence in the markets we must ensure that the GSEs regulator has all the necessary safety and soundness tools." As you know, the OFHEO is the regulator charged with ensuring the safety and soundness of Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac.
And secondly, raising the conforming loan limit will mean that less total loans are made since the GSEs have a finite amount of money to lend. For example, a $729,000 loan made for a house in California, could have been two (or possibly even 3) loans made in Oregon. This will be bad for Oregonians and for citizens of others states who have housing prices which are much less than California's home prices.
And finally, the GSEs (Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac) were created to help people of "modest means" to buy a home. A $729,000 limit seems to help people who are very well off.
Please oppose the raising of the conforming loan limit.
Yep. Appeal to their fear: fear that their constituents are going to lose out so that California will benefit. This is why we've got a Senate: the founding fathers were wise.
Maybe his boss was always calling him names...
Or maybe just took his red stapler and moved his desk into the basement.
looks like no one on here lives in california.. they would still have to qualify full doc for the higher limits, they will just get better rates than what is jumbo right now. i don't think it will take anything away from all of you outside california !!!!!!!!! lighten up !!!!!!!
Inspector Clouseau is on the case...film at 11!
as i told all of u, last Th i took down 40% of my shorts. [...]
idoc | 01.25.08 - 1:59 pm | #
Took my shorts down hard, too... (but for me, my GS PUTS are PERSONAL now...)
(To everyone, getting emotional's always a bad thing, really, in investing... but I think it's OK to attach to a bit, just a bit, of your portfolio where you can savor the smell of the final immolation, or rage at how they escaped...)
Lockhart was Pres. Bush's buddy at Yale. For insight into Bush's college days (including comment by Lockhart), see George W. Bush's Journey: Ally of an Older Generation Amid the Tumult of the 60's