The breakout is also important. Existing single family sales were flat versus last month, condos took another hit and multifamily was what made Oct look so "not awful."

No need to worry (according to Realtors)...

“2007 has been a year of challenge; 2008 will be a year of opportunity for serious buyers and for REALTORS®,” NAR Chief Economist Lawrence Yun told a packed house at the NAR Conference Nov. 13.

Home prices nationally have declined by some 1.5 percent in 2007, which is "no big deal" after years of rapid appreciation, said Yun.

“For buyers who are into home ownership for the long term, housing still remains the best investment,” he concluded.

—Source: REALTOR® Magazine Online

Even if inventory levels stabilize, the months of supply could continue to rise - and possibly rise significantly - if sales continue to decline.

When we hit a year's worth of supply, which we will shortly since sales are continuing to decline, how will the average seller react?

Could a perceived need to undercut the next guy wipe out the stickiness in pricing?

You missed the redaction after the word serious

serious(ly stupid) buyers

I mean, heck, if you havent figured out yet to wait on a purchase decision, you must have a learning disability.

CR,

I know you've been expecting commercial re to follow the residential train wreck. Seems you are not alone. Bloomberg had this this morning:

Deadbeat Developers Signaled by Property Derivatives (Update2) - Bloomberg.com

CR - question :

Where are the data values coming from in the first chart? You are talking about nearly 5 mil and the Sep and Oct numbers are just over 4mil. What exactly is charted there?

thx, G

OK, senior moment over. NSA vs SA. CR, please ignore previous question.

Geoff nailed what may be a big feature in the next credit mess. Condo sales were down and the condo inventor rose by almost a full months' sales. The pipeline of multi-family construction is longer. Starts may have fallen more or less in tandem with single starts, but I suspect (and am too lazy to check right now) that multi-family completions still have some catching up to do. That bulge in condo inventories may well represent completions of big projects. More of that to come, I suspect.

Bloomberg reports today on credit protection for commercial real estate loans. Costs doubled over the past month. Our host has been warning us about the coming stink-storm in the real side of the business. Given the truly terrible lending standards in the commercial mortgage market, trouble on the real side will mean trouble on the finance side, too.

Is it ironic or apropos that pj's housing wire diagram has the

Borrower in Blue

and the lender in ...."tan"

http://www.housingwire.com/wp-content/uploads/2007/11/spapr1707a2.gif

I don't see how the months of supply number can go down substantially until prices drop at least 20% on average. At the current pace, I don't see this happening for 3 or more years. In fact, I suspect it will only get worse as the bulk of foreclosures will likely occur in 2008 and 2009.

CR,
Does the months of supply graph include REO properties?

With a big bit of Schadenfreude-5.0 Million!!!
Looks like my prediction skillz were on this year!

Now, how to move this inventory.
Investors are reluctant to put 20-30% down unless it runs 120x monthly rent. So that just leaves new homebuyers and people moving.

I don't see much room over 4.0 million next year, including reo sales.

Someday this war's gonna end...

More later today on existing home sales.

ahhh, the hook !

selling no longer necessary, were all rabid cr addicts! Wink

Funny. I just checked SRS. It's down 8.53 from yesterday's close. Perverse.

CR, is this a number that normally sees revision? In other words, might the final October # be below September?

charlie, most REOs are included (because they are listed) - but not all. That is going to be one of the problems going forward with the inventory data.

Gary, these numbers will see some revisions - but usually the revisions aren't large.

Best to all.

--
–
John Hussman Quiz (he is on CNBC):

How much money Fed has injected into the economy since March?

A. 1 Trilllion
B. 500 Billion
C. 15 Billion
D. None of the Above

Jas

CR,

How does the -5% y/y price decline compare historically? I can't seem to find the data series on the NAR web site (going back to the 80's).

Thanks.

I like the style with which you present this data, always the exact same words, it's better to have things very orderly, this way the main points stick with the readers.

With all due respect CR, with, in fact, the greatest respect, credit crunch shmedit crunch.

This has absolutely nothing to do with credit.

People don't buy when they think the price is going down. The hot money is gone.

This was never about poor working people trying to put a roof over their heads. This was about "Rich Dad, Poor Dad" goofballs trying to make a buck.

It's deflation.

And July was the peak in inventory, as I predicted. This is turning into a collapse, remember listings will fall as real estate brokers close and pull back. They will only spend the money listing and promoting what will sell. I predict a lot more desperation coming soon.

The fallout from housing is going to take years to work out. Once again, we have had an immense party due to liquidity, and now the fed will mitigate the hangover. BTW- Arizona is facing YOY declines in tax revenues. The percentage gain model used for the last several years has just been chucked out the door. We had a bubble.

Someday this war's gonna end...

CR -

I once again hasten to add my suspicion there is a lot of inventory on the sidelines that is not making it into the listings. I think a lot of potentially stressed sellers are waiting until the flowers bloom. The spring selling season should be interesting as a result. Turnaround or capitulation? My vote is capitulation.

"This has absolutely nothing to do with credit."

arbogast: I disagree.

although it is true that buyers are now more wary due to falling prices... it is also true that new tightening credit is keeping MANY people from hanging themselves.

Have you noticed how a lot of metro areas are showing steep declines in home sales over about $417,000... I wonder why that is?

it's a chicken egg argument IMO; falling prices leads to tighter credit which freezes out some buyers and pushes out some homedebtors causing falling prices which causes tighter credit...

Jas,

b) 500 billio

“For buyers who are into home ownership for the long term, housing still remains the best investment,” he concluded."

—Source: REALTOR® Magazine Online
Boom2Bust.com | Homepage | 11.28.07 - 10:37 am | #

Doublespeak extrodinaire.

If buyers who were into home ownership for the long term, didn't turn to housing as the best investment, what would they turn to instead?

Pork belly futures?

if the FHLB counts as part of the fed, than it's over 51 billion, according to schumer's take.

Good... very good... Let the sales numbers keep falling and the headlines announce the greatest price drops since the Great Depression. That'll inflict more damage on the mindset of people and move us away from the idiotic viewpoints that dominated recent years: "housing only goes up!' and "price doesn't matter anymore."

Prices will need to fall a staggering 30+% to get anywhere near in-line with incomes, and once one considers the effects of runaway inflation in things we need (which the Fed likes to ignore as it trashs the dollar), prices will need to fall even further. We have only seen the tip of this iceberg. All trends revert to the mean unless the fundamentals have changed: if anything, they have changed for the worse with regard to what housing prices should be.

Of course, the NAR will report none of this, and will continue to make up numbers as they go until we all believe the BS "it is a good time to buy/sell/hang oneself with a toxic loan/pay some Realtor's mortgage for them by buying an overpriced house/etc."

I think that true inventory figures are hard to determine,even assuming that MLS figures are accurately reported (a big assumption) adding FSBO that are not on the MLS and cancelled new home sales increases supply quite a bit.I do know that I am seeing some sales in my area of sonoma county,and also quite a few new "for sale" signs each week.When I go to Craig's list i see FSBO that are not on the MLS,however I can not tell if this is a local phenomena.speaking of "Busts" I would guess that plastic surgeons won't be as busy next year what with the Real Estate Babes being out of the market and MEW declining,short silicone?

Pondering,
You can drive yourself crazy reading NAR scripts. If the NAR reported on Darfur, you'd think it was in Marin County.

--
BTW, the answer to Hussman Quiz is C -- 15 Billion. That takes care of "Printing Money" dopes' cries.

It Is the Debt, Stupid! (Not the Fed and the money supply unless the money gets into the real economy via increase in spendable debt).

Jas

everyone needs a place to live. if people don't buy houses they'll be renting from someone who did. the inventory needs to come down so i see a slow steady downward correction for 8-10 quarters before we bottom out. i don't see historical alignment with incomes ever happening again but that argument would take too long to type.

I love waking up to this blog each day to see what you have for me. Thanks.

I would be really interested to see what your informed inventory model would suggest months of supply would look like in 2008, 2009, 2010.

I am not an expert here but my stab at it looks like this:


Year-end 07 inventory
+
New construction delivered
+
REOs
+
Existing houses put on market
minus
Total 2008 housing sales (new +existing)
equals
2008 end inventory

divide this by YE combined sales SAAR

Fiddling around with numbers that we have seen on this blog earlier this year and assuming we leave 2007 with 4.5 mln units of inventory, I see 1.1 mln new units built and 0.5 mln REOs in 2008.

I flatline the current 5.7 mln combined existing plus new-home sales.

The only way I get months of inv declining on a year-over-year basis is if 4 mln existing homes or less are put on the market. That seems pretty unlikely if we're talking 5 mln in existing home sales; you gotta figure 4 mln homes is close to the amount of structural price insensitive sales each year, to say nothing of other financially strapped forced sellers and others who want to lock in profits from today's high prices.

If I assume 5 mln existing houses added to the market each year, I'm getting an increase in "months of inventory" by two months in 2008.

A similar phenomenon happens in 2009 and 2010, as rising REOs of 0.8 mln and 1.5 mln offset a slashing of new home construction to 0.7 mln and 0.4 mln.

My own conclusion is that we need to see a pretty dramatic fall in prices to induce fewer homes added to the market (to get to 4 mln existing homes rather than 5) and more buyers. It also looks to me like the 1 mln SAAR for new home building is really going to kill the market, and it needs to pull back in a big way (like more than 50%).

Mudgeo

Does anyone have a link to the Case-Shiller disagregated data?
Front page story this morning in Portland Oregon about how 'it's different here'... and I want to look at the different cities' curves.
Thanks.

Yossarian:

http://www2.standardandpoors.com/spf/pdf/index/CSHomePrice_History_112766.xls

Column S.

Looks like portland has flattened out, but the plunge has not yet begun.

Login or register to post comments
Syndicate content