We've read that MEW has declined and credit card debt has accellerated. Can we get some kind of a year to date trend in what has happened more recently?
I don't have any information at my fingertips about how much of that CC balance actually revolves. Does this data come from actual "outstandings" or just money that flows through a CC?
CR asked, "So credit card outstanding balances grew by ~20% at the same time that ~40% of it was rolling into the home equity book?"
I'm not sure if this was rhetorical, but if both are correct, then this is pretty grim. CC debt increases by 20%, but could have been substantially higher if the home equity loans weren't available. Again, more evidence that consumers went on a shopping binge these past 6 years, and could be tapped out.
Well, it does matter to me whether the "card debt carried by Americans" is really a revolving balance, and not just average monthly activity.
Since 2001 we have all increased the amount of our spending that flows through credit cards. Pay at the pump. Amazon.com. Etc. That doesn't mean that we all don't pay those balances off within the grace period.
So I do think it's important to separate out activity from revolving balance.
"Of the $850 billion in credit card debt, about 18% is paid-off each month without incurring interest charges and about 3% is revolving business credit card debt, according to CardData (http://www.carddata.com) Discounting interest-free and commercial debt, Americans are revolving about $672 billion on all credit cards."
I definitely funnel a lot of expenses through my cc for cash back, expense tracking and online purchase protection. I also pay the thing off each month...I would be curious to know how many others do the same.
I believe the dollar figure includes CC balances that are paid off at the end of the month. There was an article on MSN about the myth of CC debt a few days ago that claimed such, anyway.
If the low interest HELO and declining standards to make RE loans and increasing RE prices had not been, we would have hit the CC crisis aways back.
Now we hit CC crisis, just as underlying assets are declining and claims against those assets are at a maximum. In simple terms the ability to pay the cards with asset transfers or RE loans are bad and declining.
The only thing that can help is declining consumption. And that will hit the economy bad.
I used to pay the CCs off each month, but after 6 years of no work or low paid work(Former IT worker), the cards are approaching 10K and I have just been laid off.
The St. Louis Fed publishes the monthly "Household Debt Service Payments as a Percent of Disposable Personal Income". The chart is well worth looking at, but it is not pretty.
Just because CC debt is paid off at the end of the month doesn't mean it isn't borrowed.
For example, say you regularly charge $1,000 a month on a card. You always pay off the balance at the end of the month. But at the same time, you are charging up another $1,000.
There's no difference between this and borrowing $1,000 from the bank permanently. Either way, you're always in hock $1,000.
A lot of Americans are using CCs as convenient alternatives to permanent loans, in part because they can play the low teaser rate game. When low teaser rates end, the game ends.
Why was The Bankruptcy Reform Act of 2005 enacted at such a time where consumer debt was expanding at that rate?
I wonder why the legislation did not address interest rates on credit cards?
Why didn't it encourage or regulate for clarity of critical terms and conditions on credit card applications?
There's no difference between this and borrowing $1,000 from the bank permanently. Either way, you're always in hock $1,000.
I must be one of those bad consumers, because I confess I don't get that part. This seems to me to confuse the balance sheet with the cash flow statement.
According to the group's quarterly delinquency survey, a seasonally adjusted 0.65% of loans on one- to four-unit residential properties entered the foreclosure process during the period, the highest level in the survey's 55-year history. In the first quarter, when the previous record was set, 0.58% of loans entered the process; a year ago, 0.43% entered the process.
California has 17% of the subprime ARMs in the country and more than 19% of the foreclosure starts on subprime ARMs. California, Florida, Nevada and Arizona have more than one-third of the country's subprime ARMs and more than one-third of the foreclosure starts on subprime ARMs.
According to the survey, 1.40% of all outstanding loans were somewhere in the foreclosure process during the second quarter, up from 1.28% in the first quarter and 0.99% a year ago.
The delinquency rate for mortgages on one- to four-unit proprieties was 5.12% in the second quarter, up from 4.84% in the first quarter and 4.39% a year ago.
More evidence that the real estate inflation was the driving force behind the "goldilocks economy". Without the effects of real estate inflation the economy would have been flat or worse.
Everything worked well as long as real estate went up, up and up.
So I do think it's important to separate out activity from revolving balance. Obviously that data exists... isn't it part of the basis for a credit report ?
Robert C's observation about serious delinquencies is, of course, directly related to the record level of foreclosures. Lenders really did jam the poor subprime ARM bastards in Q2, which is the proximate reason lenders are taking such heat now. Given the apparent failure to turn concern into action, Robert's surge in serious deliquencies will mean another new record for foreclosures in Q3.
In case you missed the good research and post by safe_as_apartments, I'm re-posting it here:
According to CardTrak,
"Of the $850 billion in credit card debt, about 18% is paid-off each month without incurring interest charges and about 3% is revolving business credit card debt, according to CardData (http://www.carddata.com) Discounting interest-free and commercial debt, Americans are revolving about $672 billion on all credit cards."
I thought this was interesting, and to me unexpected:
"Were it not for the increases in foreclosure starts in those four states, we would have seen a nationwide drop in the rate of foreclosure filings. Thirty-four states had decreases in their rates of new foreclosure and the increases were very modest in the states with increases, other than those four," Duncan said.
I would have expected this to be more of a national phenomena. Certainly the areas in VA, MD, and DC I am following seem to have more pre-foreclosure activity on RealtyTrac.
"Just because CC debt is paid off at the end of the month doesn't mean it isn't borrowed."
Well, no different than 'float' on a paper check - really not an issue. If the 18% monthly pay-off that safe_as_apartments cites is right, then the average monthly roll-through is about $1300 or $1400, which seems about right to me.
Someone should do it, and I expect now is as good a time as any.
People could collectively bargain for fairer terms on their credit card debt and use a collective stop payment as their main threat. I think that, more than anything, people have their debt in common.
I've had numerous disagreements with my girlfriend (who is much smarter and more learned than I) about this. I want to lead the Debtors' Union because I am vain and am fascinated by the image of standing in front of the federal reserve with an ocean of debtors before me and yelling, "STOP PAYMENT! STOP PAYMENT NOW!!" into a microphone. She, on the mano otro, believes it best to let the idea float out into the system and have all debtors organize together.
In deference to her, I give you "Debtors' Union".. use the idea wisely.. I fear it will grow out of control and destroy our financial system.
Also, I believe there is/was a version of this in Central or South America. Their catch phrase is/was "I owe money, this is true, but I will pay what is fair"
Many people use the credit card use it as a better debt card. For example you get rebates in cash or frequent flyer miles and protection above $50 if it is stolen.
If most people who pay off the balance are using credit cards as an interest free payday loan then, I agree with you. I dont know how you can find the proportion.
So if the average American owes ~$7,500 (of debt they do not pay off)then the average homeowning family owes $15,000. Can we assume that they do not have $15,000 in savings to simply cancel this out? In which case the card debt works as an anchor as soon as the typical American family hits any type of financial dislocation.
"For example, say you regularly charge $1,000 a month on a card. You always pay off the balance at the end of the month. But at the same time, you are charging up another $1,000.
There's no difference between this and borrowing $1,000 from the bank permanently. Either way, you're always in hock $1,000."
Sure, but it ends up that the bank is funding your working capital requirements interest free.
Put it this way, you've put that $1000 in more productive assets, say a CD earning 5%, and instead of paying for purchases with cash, you end up with $50 in interest at the end of the year because the bank has funded your working capital interest free.
Don't forget, you're doing the same thing for your employer unless you're paid in advance
--
I sincerely hope that one day Tanta and the rest here understand one fact that there is a direct cause and effect relationship between increase in Consumption Debt (including the Federal deficit that funds consumption, which is mostly the case), corporate profits and, hence, the stock market. Needless to point out that a very large % of the compensation of corporate chieftains has been in the form of stock prices going up. Also, other things being equal Consumption Debt pushes the inflation rate up. When debt starts to decline we should see outright deflation due to sharp fall in the aggregate demand.
Pushing Consumption Debt has been the game that the USG, the Fed and the corporations have been playing, especially, for the past 5 years.
It Is the Debt, Stupid! (That kept the US economy artificially going and will take it down very hard).
Is it any wonder that there are so many new wonderful sleep drugs out there? If i was in the financial position of the average american I would need that nice Butterfly to come tuck me into bed every night as well.
Personally my wife and I charge and payoff between $5 and $10K a month on credit cards. I don't pay interest so it sure seems like a good deal to me.
My neighbor told me he recently started getting 5-10 CC offers a day in the mail. Very noticeable upward trend.
Well, if any of these CC folks are hoping for an imminent rate cut, this pretty much rules it out :
DOW JONES NEWSWIRES
...Poole acknowledged, but given that the unemployment rate has hovered around 4.5% since January, "the economy seems to be operating near full employment."
"Rather than being a sign of a weakening economy, the recent slowdown in the rate of job creation is almost certainly related to a slowing of labor force growth as the baby-boom generation reaches retirement age," Poole noted."
Just remember the Fed's mandate. Full employment...
The Bankruptcy Reform Act of 2005 was written by Lawyers working for the big credit card issuers,there were quite a few articles about it at the time.Their Lawyers wrote the bill,the K street boys got behind it,and it sailed through.mosy media types ignored it at the tie since BK law is not sexy.Horrible legislation.
"If most people who pay off the balance are using credit cards as an interest free payday loan then, I agree with you. I dont know how you can find the proportion."
Exactly. Except payday loans are for poor people who have to shlep down to some seedy place once a month. Credit cards are for "affluent" people who can get payday loans anywhere and several times a day, every day of the month. It's much more elegant and convenient.
Many American households are not poor. But a large part of their savings is in relatively illiquid places, such as IRAs or 401(k)s. The best way to finance day-to-day lifestyles is with credit card payday loans. Nobody holds it against you, and it does help to BUILD YOUR CREDIT.
Yup Tom, and it's the very reason we saw the article yesterday about how the CC companies targeted subprime for new cards once they were going under from their bad RE decisions. They knew very well they could keep many of them on the hook forever and they had sufficient info to know which would qualify for BK and which would not. It was surely a calculated risk. Harhar.
Sheesh make me want to go out and apply for about 5 credit cards and max everyone of them out, and simply not pay...why not! seems to be the American way..why continue working hard..when a free ride is a swipe around the corner....pathetic!!
Actually, we use cash-back cards for everything and always pay the complete balance. We get 2% back on gas, drugstore and grocery (including beer) purchases via a Citi visa (it was 5% for about a year.) We get at least 1% back on everything else. Basically, we get loans at -1+% interest. I suspect there is a large number of people doing the same thing.
The 88m people carrying the debt are only about half of adults.
Regarding rate cut from a 30 year Fed watcher.
New York web site provides official Fed Fund values. Between 8/10 and yesterday Fed Funds rate averaged 4.96% - a stealth cut.
Short term September Fed Fund futures, historically extremely accurate, predict a Fed Fund average rate this month of 4.96%.
This could come about by fed funds remaining unchanged, with a cut in the target at Sept FOMC meeting to 5.0%, or a rise in Fef Funds till the meeting. Then a cut of 1/2 percent.
Don't forget the unending stream of 0% introductory interest rates offers. It is quite easy to roll the balances over from one card to another every year or so.
Any American who hasn't carried huge balances at 0% over the last few years has actually lost money.
When people offer to lend you money cheaper than the Feds can borrow, it is generally a good idea to take it...
And yet those credit card companies are still reporting record earnings based on their 18-30% interest rate plus late fee charges when really their customers are just canibalizing the principle. . . oh well, its unsecured. The Fed measures these CC companies as a part of the "growing economy".
who are these people, and why don't the stop buying worthless crap they don't need?
I thought the assumption that the only thing people purchase with a credit card is "worthless crap" went out in the 50s.
Please. A lot of people are paying medical bills and heating oil and rent with current income, and managing only by using the card for gas and groceries. Of course that's a recipe for economic disaster, but I don't consider medical care, heat, shelter, transportation and food to be "worthless crap." There's just a big difference between what it all costs and what a lot of people get paid.
many people in a world that you seem to know little about have to buy groceries and sometimes fund daily life on CC. and they may be doing it at 28%. of course this isn't by choice it's just the way the game has to be played at that level.
i think your apparent disgust is directed at the wrong people.
Credit Card debt is not free, even if you pay your balances in full every month. You pay a fee everytime you buy something at almost any store in the Country. It's just that people who pay cash are changed the fee as well. Whatever happened to stores/gas stations that gave a discount for cash?
Its kind of funny that the main spending categories that cash back credit card are two of the most inflation sensitive areas of our economy as of the last few years....FOOD(groceries) and ENERGY(gas).
Whether the Middle Class in America is spending on basics or luxuries, economists have a built in assumption that it has a 100% propensity to consume. Some might be savers, some may die in debt. On average, 100% of Middle Class take home pay is spent.
This is factored in decisions on tax policy. In brief:
Do we need more investment? Give a break to the rich.
Do we need more consumption? Give a break to the middle class.
For comparative purposes: Private debt in Germany rose from 1500 billion euros in 1999 to 1600 billion euros in 2006. That is a (nominal) increase of about 1250 euros per capita.
Assets increased by around 1000 billion euros (to 9300 billion euros) and that's with falling nominal house prices.
Basically, the debt on credit cards just grew at slightly more than inflation over the last few years, whereas in the 1980s and 90s it was increasing much faster than inflation.
I read somewhere that credit card profits always peak as things turn bad, there's a sweet spot between when card holders rack up debt and when they start defaulting in real numbers.
Credit Card debt is not free, even if you pay your balances in full every month. You pay a fee everytime you buy something at almost any store in the Country. It's just that people who pay cash are changed the fee as well.
I pay for the store's property taxes too, but I really don't factor that into my thinking.
I'm starting to see posts by barking moonbats where they claim that the credit squeeze was caused by people getting HELOC to pay off credit cards (which effectively aren't dischargable in bankrupcty any more) and then defaulting on their mortgages because that is the new bankruptcy.
I expect this to become our generation's version of "the welfare queen." A new urban legend that won't go away.
The distintion between revolving debt and using a cc for cash flow purposes (and rewards) and paying it off durig the grace period is VERY important for this statistic. It's nearly meaningless without making such a distinction, although it's good for conversation.
CC companies have seen that their use is declining for revolving debt. That's why there has been such a proliferation of reward cards, and innovation to make the use of ccs easier and faster.
If anyone has data that makes this distinction, I would be very interested in seeing it.
Ok - I look at loan apps everyday and have been in some capacity for 30 yrs. A few observations:
Everyone should have a MC or Visa. Not several, just 1. That should be tucked away in a drawer and used for emergency expenses only. Many moons ago, if you had an unusual expense, you needed to get a short term loan at your friendly bank or finance company. Today, that source has been replaced by the Card so having one in reserve for those little household hiccups is not a bad thing. And when you need to charge something on it because of said hiccup, by definition, you do not have the cash - so you pretty much will carry a balance until it is paid. Not a bad thing at all.
For those that think you are pretty smart because you have a low rate, think again. If you charge 1000 on a card monthly and pay it off, you have lived within your means that month. If you do NOT pay it off because of whatever rationale you want to dream up, then you have lived beyond your means that month. If you set aside exactly what you charged into a liquid account to gain the "interest, props to you as long as you never ever spent it. The day you do, you are living beyond your means.
I have yet to see a significant portion of the folks with mortgages not have a ton of card debt. Multiple cards with 5 figure balances. Refi to pay them off and I guarantee 90% of them will have significant balances on multiple cards within 1 year.
So give it some thought - and have some disipline for the everyday and reserve use for those unexpected emergencies.
Jeez, I am so bad at financial math, paying 18% versus getting 1% can not possibly be simply 19%. I mean getting paid versus paying seems like it ought to be an infinite difference.
Sorry to seem to be in disagreement Tanta, but somebody out there is buying a lot of stuff and it can't be all sensible well reasoned purchases. Of course may be it's not all on credit cards. Oh, who am I kidding, I've got the same prejudice that "pacified" does.
Incidentally, I'm not sure mercurial applies to anyone on this blog, I'd characterize it as acerbic wit, quicksilver-like to be sure, but constant as to purpose..
sdtfs - point is that people are living beyond their means and have been for some time. And it will always be that way until the availability of cards changes. Look at it this way - if your income is 5000 per month and you charge 1000 per month, you are living at a higher standard. Sure, you will pay for it sometime but since when has anyone worried about sometime? It is all about now - at least that is what I see every day and have seen every day for a long time.
We had one of those "sales tax amnesty" days here in August and we were trying to come up with things to buy and all we could come up with was plants for the garden. I think some people just enjoy spending money and some people don't. I don't mind spending money on something I want, I just don't get a buzz out of it like some people. I think some people shop as a form of entertainment. They might buy a lot of what I see as worthless crap, but than they might say I waste a lot of money on beer and dry sherry.
As far as carrying debt on the card, I know a lot of people see it has how much debt payment can they carry? If it's $300/month, then you could give them $10,000 to pay off their card and they will be back to carrying $300/month within a year.
Some people spend $15-25/day on lottery tickets and I guess to them it's a form of entertainment that pays 50% cash-back.
Of course, Tanta's correct that some people rack up debt out of desperation.
"I definitely funnel a lot of expenses through my cc for cash back, expense tracking and online purchase protection. I also pay the thing off each month...I would be curious to know how many others do the same. KP"
Damn near every expense goes through the VISA. Same reasons as you. Paid in full monthly.
I financed the last few months of grad school back in the 90's on revolving credit, then paid it off. Since paying that off, I've used credit cards on a pay-full-balance basis.
But I'm a bit unusual in that I save 30% of my income. Very few people are willing to live on $40k when they have a $60k income.
Jon: saving for retirement, saving for college education for kids, and building equity in the house via part of my mortgage payment: total, 31% of my income. Each of those budget items makes sense when taken in isolation. Together... ouch!
Present the Banks are requited the home loans. because home lone are safe for bank side. Bank like the mortgage loans but they not like any other loans to give the customer because no recovery by the banks.
wow
Doesn't look good to me. Almost $1 trillion in credit card debt. Is this something that could turn a recession into a depression?
Dog help us.
We've read that MEW has declined and credit card debt has accellerated. Can we get some kind of a year to date trend in what has happened more recently?
I don't have any information at my fingertips about how much of that CC balance actually revolves. Does this data come from actual "outstandings" or just money that flows through a CC?
Does anyone else know?
Now is a good time to be starting up a debt counseling/consolidation business.
Two words: Universal Default
CR asked, "So credit card outstanding balances grew by ~20% at the same time that ~40% of it was rolling into the home equity book?"
I'm not sure if this was rhetorical, but if both are correct, then this is pretty grim. CC debt increases by 20%, but could have been substantially higher if the home equity loans weren't available. Again, more evidence that consumers went on a shopping binge these past 6 years, and could be tapped out.
Well, it does matter to me whether the "card debt carried by Americans" is really a revolving balance, and not just average monthly activity.
Since 2001 we have all increased the amount of our spending that flows through credit cards. Pay at the pump. Amazon.com. Etc. That doesn't mean that we all don't pay those balances off within the grace period.
So I do think it's important to separate out activity from revolving balance.
CR:
According to CardTrak,
"Of the $850 billion in credit card debt, about 18% is paid-off each month without incurring interest charges and about 3% is revolving business credit card debt, according to CardData (http://www.carddata.com) Discounting interest-free and commercial debt, Americans are revolving about $672 billion on all credit cards."
CardTrak.com - CardFacts Media Center
Never underestimate American consumers recklessness and thoughtlessness.
Dog help us.
Okay. I've got low five digits revolving. 0%, 1% and a little at 2.9%. We should all have these problems.
Excuse me now the MBA is out with a huge jump in "Seriously Delinquent" mortgages.
Excellent point Tanta.
I definitely funnel a lot of expenses through my cc for cash back, expense tracking and online purchase protection. I also pay the thing off each month...I would be curious to know how many others do the same.
o rate cut?
U.S. Aug ISM services 55.8% vs 55.8% in July
I believe the dollar figure includes CC balances that are paid off at the end of the month. There was an article on MSN about the myth of CC debt a few days ago that claimed such, anyway.
IMHO
If the low interest HELO and declining standards to make RE loans and increasing RE prices had not been, we would have hit the CC crisis aways back.
Now we hit CC crisis, just as underlying assets are declining and claims against those assets are at a maximum. In simple terms the ability to pay the cards with asset transfers or RE loans are bad and declining.
The only thing that can help is declining consumption. And that will hit the economy bad.
I used to pay the CCs off each month, but after 6 years of no work or low paid work(Former IT worker), the cards are approaching 10K and I have just been laid off.
The St. Louis Fed publishes the monthly "Household Debt Service Payments as a Percent of Disposable Personal Income". The chart is well worth looking at, but it is not pretty.
St. Louis Fed: Series: TDSP, Household Debt Service Payments as a Percent of Disposable Personal Income
Just because CC debt is paid off at the end of the month doesn't mean it isn't borrowed.
For example, say you regularly charge $1,000 a month on a card. You always pay off the balance at the end of the month. But at the same time, you are charging up another $1,000.
There's no difference between this and borrowing $1,000 from the bank permanently. Either way, you're always in hock $1,000.
A lot of Americans are using CCs as convenient alternatives to permanent loans, in part because they can play the low teaser rate game. When low teaser rates end, the game ends.
Why was The Bankruptcy Reform Act of 2005 enacted at such a time where consumer debt was expanding at that rate?
I wonder why the legislation did not address interest rates on credit cards?
Why didn't it encourage or regulate for clarity of critical terms and conditions on credit card applications?
OT, but new numbers just reported
New foreclosures set record in latest MBA survey - MarketWatch
Let's see:
There's no difference between this and borrowing $1,000 from the bank permanently. Either way, you're always in hock $1,000.
I must be one of those bad consumers, because I confess I don't get that part. This seems to me to confuse the balance sheet with the cash flow statement.
OT but debt related.
New foreclosures set record
Moin
New foreclosures set record in latest MBA survey
New foreclosures set record in latest MBA survey - MarketWatch
According to the group's quarterly delinquency survey, a seasonally adjusted 0.65% of loans on one- to four-unit residential properties entered the foreclosure process during the period, the highest level in the survey's 55-year history. In the first quarter, when the previous record was set, 0.58% of loans entered the process; a year ago, 0.43% entered the process.
California has 17% of the subprime ARMs in the country and more than 19% of the foreclosure starts on subprime ARMs. California, Florida, Nevada and Arizona have more than one-third of the country's subprime ARMs and more than one-third of the foreclosure starts on subprime ARMs.
According to the survey, 1.40% of all outstanding loans were somewhere in the foreclosure process during the second quarter, up from 1.28% in the first quarter and 0.99% a year ago.
The delinquency rate for mortgages on one- to four-unit proprieties was 5.12% in the second quarter, up from 4.84% in the first quarter and 4.39% a year ago.
More evidence that the real estate inflation was the driving force behind the "goldilocks economy". Without the effects of real estate inflation the economy would have been flat or worse.
Everything worked well as long as real estate went up, up and up.
It won't when it doesn't.
The death spiral is only beginning.
But Walmart sales are up. Where his mp with his Walmart graphs?
So I do think it's important to separate out activity from revolving balance.
Obviously that data exists... isn't it part of the basis for a credit report ?
Robert C's observation about serious delinquencies is, of course, directly related to the record level of foreclosures. Lenders really did jam the poor subprime ARM bastards in Q2, which is the proximate reason lenders are taking such heat now. Given the apparent failure to turn concern into action, Robert's surge in serious deliquencies will mean another new record for foreclosures in Q3.
In case you missed the good research and post by safe_as_apartments, I'm re-posting it here:
According to CardTrak,
"Of the $850 billion in credit card debt, about 18% is paid-off each month without incurring interest charges and about 3% is revolving business credit card debt, according to CardData (http://www.carddata.com) Discounting interest-free and commercial debt, Americans are revolving about $672 billion on all credit cards."
CardTrak.com - CardFacts Media Center
safe_as_apartments | 09.06.07 - 10:07 am | #
I thought this was interesting, and to me unexpected:
"Were it not for the increases in foreclosure starts in those four states, we would have seen a nationwide drop in the rate of foreclosure filings. Thirty-four states had decreases in their rates of new foreclosure and the increases were very modest in the states with increases, other than those four," Duncan said.
I would have expected this to be more of a national phenomena. Certainly the areas in VA, MD, and DC I am following seem to have more pre-foreclosure activity on RealtyTrac.
Nothing to worry about. Relax. We'll be fine as long as the credit card companies don't pursue subprime borrowers.
Credit card companies pursue subprime borrowers
Oh. Well, we'll still be fine as long as they aren't engaging in risky, irresponsible lending to vulnerable consumers.
I need sleep.
"Just because CC debt is paid off at the end of the month doesn't mean it isn't borrowed."
Well, no different than 'float' on a paper check - really not an issue. If the 18% monthly pay-off that safe_as_apartments cites is right, then the average monthly roll-through is about $1300 or $1400, which seems about right to me.
I love this headline from Market Watch
:
KP- how do you get into the debt consolidation/workout business?
Two words, four syllables:
Debtors Union
Someone should do it, and I expect now is as good a time as any.
People could collectively bargain for fairer terms on their credit card debt and use a collective stop payment as their main threat. I think that, more than anything, people have their debt in common.
I've had numerous disagreements with my girlfriend (who is much smarter and more learned than I) about this. I want to lead the Debtors' Union because I am vain and am fascinated by the image of standing in front of the federal reserve with an ocean of debtors before me and yelling, "STOP PAYMENT! STOP PAYMENT NOW!!" into a microphone. She, on the mano otro, believes it best to let the idea float out into the system and have all debtors organize together.
In deference to her, I give you "Debtors' Union".. use the idea wisely.. I fear it will grow out of control and destroy our financial system.
Also, I believe there is/was a version of this in Central or South America. Their catch phrase is/was "I owe money, this is true, but I will pay what is fair"
STOP PAYMENT! STOP PAYMENT NOW!!
@Rich
Many people use the credit card use it as a better debt card. For example you get rebates in cash or frequent flyer miles and protection above $50 if it is stolen.
There was a recent debate about whether carrying case was worthwhile in a couple of blogs.
How Much Cash Is In Your Wallet? Why?, Bryan Caplan | EconLog | Library of Economics and Liberty
Marginal Revolution: How much cash should you carry?
If most people who pay off the balance are using credit cards as an interest free payday loan then, I agree with you. I dont know how you can find the proportion.
Bertram
So if the average American owes ~$7,500 (of debt they do not pay off)then the average homeowning family owes $15,000. Can we assume that they do not have $15,000 in savings to simply cancel this out? In which case the card debt works as an anchor as soon as the typical American family hits any type of financial dislocation.
Then the Grasshopper knew:
IT IS BEST TO PREPARE FOR THE DAYS OF NECESSITY.
"For example, say you regularly charge $1,000 a month on a card. You always pay off the balance at the end of the month. But at the same time, you are charging up another $1,000.
There's no difference between this and borrowing $1,000 from the bank permanently. Either way, you're always in hock $1,000."
Sure, but it ends up that the bank is funding your working capital requirements interest free.
Put it this way, you've put that $1000 in more productive assets, say a CD earning 5%, and instead of paying for purchases with cash, you end up with $50 in interest at the end of the year because the bank has funded your working capital interest free.
Don't forget, you're doing the same thing for your employer unless you're paid in advance
God bless Retainer....
--
I sincerely hope that one day Tanta and the rest here understand one fact that there is a direct cause and effect relationship between increase in Consumption Debt (including the Federal deficit that funds consumption, which is mostly the case), corporate profits and, hence, the stock market. Needless to point out that a very large % of the compensation of corporate chieftains has been in the form of stock prices going up. Also, other things being equal Consumption Debt pushes the inflation rate up. When debt starts to decline we should see outright deflation due to sharp fall in the aggregate demand.
Pushing Consumption Debt has been the game that the USG, the Fed and the corporations have been playing, especially, for the past 5 years.
It Is the Debt, Stupid! (That kept the US economy artificially going and will take it down very hard).
Jas
Is it any wonder that there are so many new wonderful sleep drugs out there? If i was in the financial position of the average american I would need that nice Butterfly to come tuck me into bed every night as well.
Personally my wife and I charge and payoff between $5 and $10K a month on credit cards. I don't pay interest so it sure seems like a good deal to me.
My neighbor told me he recently started getting 5-10 CC offers a day in the mail. Very noticeable upward trend.
Well, if any of these CC folks are hoping for an imminent rate cut, this pretty much rules it out :
DOW JONES NEWSWIRES
...Poole acknowledged, but given that the unemployment rate has hovered around 4.5% since January, "the economy seems to be operating near full employment."
"Rather than being a sign of a weakening economy, the recent slowdown in the rate of job creation is almost certainly related to a slowing of labor force growth as the baby-boom generation reaches retirement age," Poole noted."
Just remember the Fed's mandate. Full employment...
The Bankruptcy Reform Act of 2005 was written by Lawyers working for the big credit card issuers,there were quite a few articles about it at the time.Their Lawyers wrote the bill,the K street boys got behind it,and it sailed through.mosy media types ignored it at the tie since BK law is not sexy.Horrible legislation.
"If most people who pay off the balance are using credit cards as an interest free payday loan then, I agree with you. I dont know how you can find the proportion."
Exactly. Except payday loans are for poor people who have to shlep down to some seedy place once a month. Credit cards are for "affluent" people who can get payday loans anywhere and several times a day, every day of the month. It's much more elegant and convenient.
Many American households are not poor. But a large part of their savings is in relatively illiquid places, such as IRAs or 401(k)s. The best way to finance day-to-day lifestyles is with credit card payday loans. Nobody holds it against you, and it does help to BUILD YOUR CREDIT.
Yup Tom, and it's the very reason we saw the article yesterday about how the CC companies targeted subprime for new cards once they were going under from their bad RE decisions. They knew very well they could keep many of them on the hook forever and they had sufficient info to know which would qualify for BK and which would not. It was surely a calculated risk. Harhar.
Credit card companies pursue subprime borrowers - The New York Times
Sheesh make me want to go out and apply for about 5 credit cards and max everyone of them out, and simply not pay...why not! seems to be the American way..why continue working hard..when a free ride is a swipe around the corner....pathetic!!
Actually, we use cash-back cards for everything and always pay the complete balance. We get 2% back on gas, drugstore and grocery (including beer) purchases via a Citi visa (it was 5% for about a year.) We get at least 1% back on everything else. Basically, we get loans at -1+% interest. I suspect there is a large number of people doing the same thing.
The 88m people carrying the debt are only about half of adults.
Fed will not cut F.Funds rate in September,but maybe another discount rate cut.
Regarding rate cut from a 30 year Fed watcher.
New York web site provides official Fed Fund values. Between 8/10 and yesterday Fed Funds rate averaged 4.96% - a stealth cut.
Short term September Fed Fund futures, historically extremely accurate, predict a Fed Fund average rate this month of 4.96%.
This could come about by fed funds remaining unchanged, with a cut in the target at Sept FOMC meeting to 5.0%, or a rise in Fef Funds till the meeting. Then a cut of 1/2 percent.
From the Consumer Credit Report released today:
We can see the growth in revolving debt via the G.19 reports:
Mid-point of 2004: $780 billion
Mid-point of 2007: $904 billio
Ah, the debtors' union was El Barzón, and it's in Mexico.
"Debo no niego, pago lo justo" ("I owe, I don't deny it, I'll pay what is fair")
Basically, we get loans at -1+% interest.
So effectively it's a 19% spread as opposed to carrying a $1000 loan all the way.
The 88m people carrying the debt are only about half of adults.
Are you implying they're not completely adult?
Don't forget the unending stream of 0% introductory interest rates offers. It is quite easy to roll the balances over from one card to another every year or so.
Any American who hasn't carried huge balances at 0% over the last few years has actually lost money.
When people offer to lend you money cheaper than the Feds can borrow, it is generally a good idea to take it...
Eli, I see that debtorsunion.org is available (for now): Whois.net - Domain Names
Of coure, you'll have to pay for it with a credit card. (Oh, the irony!)
And yet those credit card companies are still reporting record earnings based on their 18-30% interest rate plus late fee charges when really their customers are just canibalizing the principle. . . oh well, its unsecured. The Fed measures these CC companies as a part of the "growing economy".
There will be some large losses here.
who are these people, and why don't the stop buying worthless crap they don't need?
When did leaving within your means become so lame?
Time to change the site name to Incalculable Risk
who are these people, and why don't the stop buying worthless crap they don't need?
I thought the assumption that the only thing people purchase with a credit card is "worthless crap" went out in the 50s.
Please. A lot of people are paying medical bills and heating oil and rent with current income, and managing only by using the card for gas and groceries. Of course that's a recipe for economic disaster, but I don't consider medical care, heat, shelter, transportation and food to be "worthless crap." There's just a big difference between what it all costs and what a lot of people get paid.
pacified,
many people in a world that you seem to know little about have to buy groceries and sometimes fund daily life on CC. and they may be doing it at 28%. of course this isn't by choice it's just the way the game has to be played at that level.
i think your apparent disgust is directed at the wrong people.
wm
Credit Card debt is not free, even if you pay your balances in full every month. You pay a fee everytime you buy something at almost any store in the Country. It's just that people who pay cash are changed the fee as well. Whatever happened to stores/gas stations that gave a discount for cash?
Gold again over 700 USD,crude oil 77 USD and S&P 500 almost 1500 and still Fed is going to cut in September? I do not think so.
Its kind of funny that the main spending categories that cash back credit card are two of the most inflation sensitive areas of our economy as of the last few years....FOOD(groceries) and ENERGY(gas).
Just watch those average balances rise J.P.!
Whether the Middle Class in America is spending on basics or luxuries, economists have a built in assumption that it has a 100% propensity to consume. Some might be savers, some may die in debt. On average, 100% of Middle Class take home pay is spent.
This is factored in decisions on tax policy. In brief:
Do we need more investment? Give a break to the rich.
Do we need more consumption? Give a break to the middle class.
This bald reality is lost in political rhetoric.
For comparative purposes: Private debt in Germany rose from 1500 billion euros in 1999 to 1600 billion euros in 2006. That is a (nominal) increase of about 1250 euros per capita.
Assets increased by around 1000 billion euros (to 9300 billion euros) and that's with falling nominal house prices.
Basically, the debt on credit cards just grew at slightly more than inflation over the last few years, whereas in the 1980s and 90s it was increasing much faster than inflation.
I read somewhere that credit card profits always peak as things turn bad, there's a sweet spot between when card holders rack up debt and when they start defaulting in real numbers.
Credit Card debt is not free, even if you pay your balances in full every month. You pay a fee everytime you buy something at almost any store in the Country. It's just that people who pay cash are changed the fee as well.
I pay for the store's property taxes too, but I really don't factor that into my thinking.
I'm starting to see posts by barking moonbats where they claim that the credit squeeze was caused by people getting HELOC to pay off credit cards (which effectively aren't dischargable in bankrupcty any more) and then defaulting on their mortgages because that is the new bankruptcy.
I expect this to become our generation's version of "the welfare queen." A new urban legend that won't go away.
Please tell me this isn't really news to anyone here. I remember reading about this phenomenon over three years ago.
The distintion between revolving debt and using a cc for cash flow purposes (and rewards) and paying it off durig the grace period is VERY important for this statistic. It's nearly meaningless without making such a distinction, although it's good for conversation.
CC companies have seen that their use is declining for revolving debt. That's why there has been such a proliferation of reward cards, and innovation to make the use of ccs easier and faster.
If anyone has data that makes this distinction, I would be very interested in seeing it.
Ok - I look at loan apps everyday and have been in some capacity for 30 yrs. A few observations:
Everyone should have a MC or Visa. Not several, just 1. That should be tucked away in a drawer and used for emergency expenses only. Many moons ago, if you had an unusual expense, you needed to get a short term loan at your friendly bank or finance company. Today, that source has been replaced by the Card so having one in reserve for those little household hiccups is not a bad thing. And when you need to charge something on it because of said hiccup, by definition, you do not have the cash - so you pretty much will carry a balance until it is paid. Not a bad thing at all.
For those that think you are pretty smart because you have a low rate, think again. If you charge 1000 on a card monthly and pay it off, you have lived within your means that month. If you do NOT pay it off because of whatever rationale you want to dream up, then you have lived beyond your means that month. If you set aside exactly what you charged into a liquid account to gain the "interest, props to you as long as you never ever spent it. The day you do, you are living beyond your means.
I have yet to see a significant portion of the folks with mortgages not have a ton of card debt. Multiple cards with 5 figure balances. Refi to pay them off and I guarantee 90% of them will have significant balances on multiple cards within 1 year.
So give it some thought - and have some disipline for the everyday and reserve use for those unexpected emergencies.
Jeez, I am so bad at financial math, paying 18% versus getting 1% can not possibly be simply 19%. I mean getting paid versus paying seems like it ought to be an infinite difference.
Sorry to seem to be in disagreement Tanta, but somebody out there is buying a lot of stuff and it can't be all sensible well reasoned purchases. Of course may be it's not all on credit cards. Oh, who am I kidding, I've got the same prejudice that "pacified" does.
Incidentally, I'm not sure mercurial applies to anyone on this blog, I'd characterize it as acerbic wit, quicksilver-like to be sure, but constant as to purpose..
sdtfs - point is that people are living beyond their means and have been for some time. And it will always be that way until the availability of cards changes. Look at it this way - if your income is 5000 per month and you charge 1000 per month, you are living at a higher standard. Sure, you will pay for it sometime but since when has anyone worried about sometime? It is all about now - at least that is what I see every day and have seen every day for a long time.
We had one of those "sales tax amnesty" days here in August and we were trying to come up with things to buy and all we could come up with was plants for the garden. I think some people just enjoy spending money and some people don't. I don't mind spending money on something I want, I just don't get a buzz out of it like some people. I think some people shop as a form of entertainment. They might buy a lot of what I see as worthless crap, but than they might say I waste a lot of money on beer and dry sherry.
As far as carrying debt on the card, I know a lot of people see it has how much debt payment can they carry? If it's $300/month, then you could give them $10,000 to pay off their card and they will be back to carrying $300/month within a year.
Some people spend $15-25/day on lottery tickets and I guess to them it's a form of entertainment that pays 50% cash-back.
Of course, Tanta's correct that some people rack up debt out of desperation.
Correct me if I'm wrong, but wasn't there an article recently stating that more than half of CC users pay only the monthly minimum?
"I definitely funnel a lot of expenses through my cc for cash back, expense tracking and online purchase protection. I also pay the thing off each month...I would be curious to know how many others do the same. KP"
Damn near every expense goes through the VISA. Same reasons as you. Paid in full monthly.
I financed the last few months of grad school back in the 90's on revolving credit, then paid it off. Since paying that off, I've used credit cards on a pay-full-balance basis.
But I'm a bit unusual in that I save 30% of my income. Very few people are willing to live on $40k when they have a $60k income.
Buddy: same for me
Jon: saving for retirement, saving for college education for kids, and building equity in the house via part of my mortgage payment: total, 31% of my income. Each of those budget items makes sense when taken in isolation. Together... ouch!
Present the Banks are requited the home loans. because home lone are safe for bank side. Bank like the mortgage loans but they not like any other loans to give the customer because no recovery by the banks.
tribhuvan
Home Loans-Home Loans