Tanta, as a data junkie, I really enjoy this stuff. I've come at starts several different ways, and I still think we have another substantial decline ahead of us.
Yea I've dug in to BLS data and it isn't pretty, but looks like 4 months inventory is as close to "0" as builders get as inventory includes homes under construction and, this is the good one... lots ready for construction.
But not including condos probably sounded like a good idea 40 years ago... the guy who made that decision probably now lives in the "its not my problem" retirement condo project.
Anyway, looks like a long way left to go down in starts now that public builder's bankers have figured out that a start=cash to builder and they had to stop the incentives.
But I think the way the mortgage market looks like it's just breaking up makes me think this situation is going to be really hard to parse.
If there's a real panic and people start walking away from homes en masse (as Jim Cramer seems to be advising) I think we could have an unprecedented crisis. And as happened in 1929, it seems that other speculative markets are drawing liquidity from markets that really need it - the Fed needs to cut rates to help housing, but he's up against the wall by the threat of rampant speculation in stocks, currencies, genetically modified pets, etc.
The stock market seems to be turning into something resembling a "credit vortex" as it did back then.
During the NASDAQ bubble the bears were overly optimistic predicting 60%-70% declines. We got 80%-90% declines in Internet and Telcom stocks, and the overall NASDAQ came close to that too (78%?).
So mabye Jim "Super-Bear" Cramer is right when he says the bears are way too optimistic this time around.
I worry that the market could just seize up and cause a real panic.
I may need to reinforce my bunker or build one much deeper.
They tried to rehabilitate a certain area that had degenerated but was once prime beach front property. The did a great job - got rid of all the strip joints and run down apartments and replaced them with really really nice condos and houses. They built tons and tons and tons of them over the past several years.
It's a new beautiful beach front community. Except only a few of the houses are sold. As far as I can tell over HALF the properties there are for sale or rent and nothing has moved since spring of last year. Residents are desperate watching their property values plummet.
But worst of all, crime is beginning to rise rapidly in the area. There's been more thefts and murders. Untended houses and streets are beginning to visibly deteriorate. The place is getting a very bad reputation, suddenly, due to the reports of increasing crime.
It looks like a downward spiral.
It's a terrible shame because it has the potential to be a great community.
But there's nobody to live there.
Another tragedy of easy money driven overproduction.
And this is before any of this recent mortgage turmoil or the advent of a local recession.
i'm finally hearing about local pain as well. beach community, west coast, originally thought to be immune to this decline. talked to friend this am about how they scalped a house REO from local bank who originally had several offers higher than he paid; $1.4 down to $1.1. he and wife make >100K/yr in stable professions. apps were scrutinized up and down. just closed early last wk before jump in rates on friday.
talked to friend this am about how they scalped a house REO from local bank who originally had several offers higher than he paid; $1.4 down to $1.1. he and wife make >100K/yr in stable professions.
idoc,
Unless the place was really worth $1.1 million (as in, check its 1998 value and adjust for inflation), I suspect it was your friend, not the local bank, that was being "scalped" here.
Another thing to consider is, unless BOTH your friend and his wife are making ~$100K (for a combined income of ~$200k), or he had a HUGE down-payment (in the $600-700k range), his HTI ratio would be 11:1. This is a "tad" high per historical norms --even for CA.
Does the phrase "catch a falling knife" mean anything to you?
CR, what a great job!!! The graph of months of supply against inventory ALONE shows what a historical oddity this is. (If anyone wants to go back and take a second look, the surge in inventory over months of supply in the late 70's presaged the big spike in months of supply in the early 80's, and the average inventory running above months of supply in the mid-late 80's presaged the escalation of months of supply in the early 90's.)
My thumbnail estimate was that if we want to make meaningful progress at reducing inventory the rate of starts needs to go close to 900,000 for a couple of years. The situation is complicated by would-be retirees wanting to move to other locations, but it seems to me that many of those locations have been overbuilt already.
I really worry about what will happen in some areas with a big bulge of close-to-retirement folks seeking to move.
Typical Impac borrowers include self-employed workers who have decent credit, but do not qualify for prime lending rates because their income may be seasonal or uneven. In a filing in March, the company said 91 percent of the loans it transferred to its portfolio last year were Alt-A mortgages.
Dr. Pepper through nose. if this is what Alt-A really was, there'd be no reason for the full -blown retreat.
Eh... I like to retain a bit of anonymity on the Internets (in part so nobody can determine what I'm making up or not). But I'll say it's some place on the Atlantic ocean coast that was once a beach front resort area, that deteriorated dramatically in the past few decades.
Now they've rebuilt much of it very nicely, but there's no residents to support it.
I overdramatize things a bit, but my description isn't too far from the truth.
If you're that interested and have a site of your own, I could send you a link to a local news story.
You really have to drive around the area to really appreciate the magnitude of the problem though. The number of "For Sale" signs is simply unbelievable and they never get taken down.
It's worse than anything that I remember seeing during the Houston real-estate bust in the early 80s, but I paid less attention to these things back then.
"Typical Impac borrowers include self-employed workers who have decent credit, but do not qualify for prime lending rates because their income may be seasonal or uneven. In a filing in March, the company said 91 percent of the loans it transferred to its portfolio last year were Alt-A mortgages."
Nobody thinks Casey Serin fits the description very well.
I believe that immigrants are an overlooked part of the housing equation. They are the group that will be expected to buy the homes of aging boomers, but they do not have the income or credit in many cases to accomplish it. They have also been a growing percentage of new homebuyers and the credit crunch will have a huge impact on this group. I think we can also assume that immigrants are being hit by the wave of foreclosures that hitting many communities across the country. Immigrants are a double edge sword, and may be among the first to feel a recession.
There are two demographic problems that concern me. The first problem is the fact that many boomers are at or past their peak earning years. For boomers the need or desire to move up to a larger new home is going to disapear. 2010 is the year when boomers as a group will start to retire, and this right around the time when bulls expect the housing market to be in recovery. The second problem is the fact that long term employment patterns are being disrupted by globalization. People are employed for shorter periods of time today compared with a generation ago. This instability increases the financial stress experienced by many people and seems to be a problem that is accelerating. I think these problems have not been taken into account by home builders and developers in general.
I don't think the market will react in a positive fashion when the debt ceiling is raised in 6 weeks and as more CDOs implode. Call me a long term housing BEAR.
I don't think latin american immigrants are gonna be our chevaliers azul on caballos blanco(MMI +1)
Remittances in $ to Mexico via Western Union are down 7% this half even though volume of transactions is up.
Considering the likely prolonged downturn in RE, a good number of folks may pack their Bolsas and head back home to finally hang their own shingle. The sinking US$ may force the matter.
The quicker people start getting their heads shaved the quicker the housing market and actual economy can heal, Greenwich be damned.
In addition, like somebody had written in an earlier thread, there's plenty of 2nd homeowners in Miami from S. Amerca who looked at it as a "safe investment" free of political risk.
I really worry about what will happen in some areas with a big bulge of close-to-retirement folks seeking to move.
1) Many aren't going to be able to retire - 401Kitis.
2) Many who are 'forced' into retirement won't be able to afford the places they want to move to anyway.
3) Just as well... since they probably won't be able to sell the home they are in now for what they hoped they'd get & that is a big part of what they planned to use for retirement.
Lesson for you young'uns... live and work in a place you enjoy, you might be there longer than you think.
BW:"A July 27 Census report shows a 44% drop in the number of new households formed in the year ended in June, 2007, to only 891,000. That's below the five-year trend of 1.1 million to 1.2 million new households per year."
But the BW article never really explains why such a sharp drop took place, and the reasons for believing that it represents a change to a new lower level rather than a unique event.
I am seeing a trickle of folks retiring overseas. Living in SoCal, I know many Asians who came here 20-30 years ago, did average to well, and are leveraging their SS$ and California equity to retire "back home". $2000/month goes pretty far in much of Asia, esp if you are a local. Globalization and internet make it very easy to stay in touch. You can get a decent latte and the New York Times almost anywhere now...
On its way down to 1,1 million units, it WILL/MAY occur that commertial construction starts begin to fall. Then, we would see what happens with the construction employment conundrum.
"They tried to rehabilitate a certain area that had degenerated but was once prime beach front property. The did a great job - got rid of all the strip joints and run down apartments and replaced them with really really nice condos and houses. They built tons and tons and tons of them over the past several years."
Not sure this is such a great tragedy. What about the strippers who lost their jobs, and the po' folk who lived in the run-down apts?
And even if you don't care about the other half, I reject the idea that every spot on earth is improved by becoming a place where only upscale people live. Often--actually, mostly--places that are less than perfect, and which have evolved organically rather than sprung full-grown from the forehead of a developer, have more character, and more value to our culture.
first w00t!
Yaay! Prayers answered. Thanks!
Wow, CR. For a data junkie, it's like mainlining the pure stuff . . .
Wonderful.
Tanta, as a data junkie, I really enjoy this stuff. I've come at starts several different ways, and I still think we have another substantial decline ahead of us.
Best Wishes.
Yea I've dug in to BLS data and it isn't pretty, but looks like 4 months inventory is as close to "0" as builders get as inventory includes homes under construction and, this is the good one... lots ready for construction.
But not including condos probably sounded like a good idea 40 years ago... the guy who made that decision probably now lives in the "its not my problem" retirement condo project.
Anyway, looks like a long way left to go down in starts now that public builder's bankers have figured out that a start=cash to builder and they had to stop the incentives.
Will CSCO's great number's sooth an agitated manic market?
Great analysis (as always).
But I think the way the mortgage market looks like it's just breaking up makes me think this situation is going to be really hard to parse.
If there's a real panic and people start walking away from homes en masse (as Jim Cramer seems to be advising) I think we could have an unprecedented crisis. And as happened in 1929, it seems that other speculative markets are drawing liquidity from markets that really need it - the Fed needs to cut rates to help housing, but he's up against the wall by the threat of rampant speculation in stocks, currencies, genetically modified pets, etc.
The stock market seems to be turning into something resembling a "credit vortex" as it did back then.
During the NASDAQ bubble the bears were overly optimistic predicting 60%-70% declines. We got 80%-90% declines in Internet and Telcom stocks, and the overall NASDAQ came close to that too (78%?).
So mabye Jim "Super-Bear" Cramer is right when he says the bears are way too optimistic this time around.
I worry that the market could just seize up and cause a real panic.
I may need to reinforce my bunker or build one much deeper.
Buy yourself a Bankerdome (TM) ac.
And with that, I bid you good night.
Buy yourself a Bankerdome (TM) ac.
And with that, I bid you good night.
Gary | Homepage | 08.07.07 - 7:21 pm | #
LMFAO
"credit vortex"
Jim "Super-Bear" Cramer
ac-you are on tonite, LOL. what a great description of todays whipsaw ending up right at ground zero!
BTW, tragic story in my neck of the woods.
They tried to rehabilitate a certain area that had degenerated but was once prime beach front property. The did a great job - got rid of all the strip joints and run down apartments and replaced them with really really nice condos and houses. They built tons and tons and tons of them over the past several years.
It's a new beautiful beach front community. Except only a few of the houses are sold. As far as I can tell over HALF the properties there are for sale or rent and nothing has moved since spring of last year. Residents are desperate watching their property values plummet.
But worst of all, crime is beginning to rise rapidly in the area. There's been more thefts and murders. Untended houses and streets are beginning to visibly deteriorate. The place is getting a very bad reputation, suddenly, due to the reports of increasing crime.
It looks like a downward spiral.
It's a terrible shame because it has the potential to be a great community.
But there's nobody to live there.
Another tragedy of easy money driven overproduction.
And this is before any of this recent mortgage turmoil or the advent of a local recession.
i'm finally hearing about local pain as well. beach community, west coast, originally thought to be immune to this decline. talked to friend this am about how they scalped a house REO from local bank who originally had several offers higher than he paid; $1.4 down to $1.1. he and wife make >100K/yr in stable professions. apps were scrutinized up and down. just closed early last wk before jump in rates on friday.
AC,
May I ask where you are talking about?
Asbury Park has always made for a great top marker in RE, no different this time.
I think I may have overestimated my revised prediction by a couple of hundred k.
Alec
For some reason this made me snicker today... downloaded a rate sheet and it said in big letters on the first page:
"Please note that our rates have
worsened today."
I bet for many people it was breath of fresh air.
talked to friend this am about how they scalped a house REO from local bank who originally had several offers higher than he paid; $1.4 down to $1.1. he and wife make >100K/yr in stable professions.
idoc,
Unless the place was really worth $1.1 million (as in, check its 1998 value and adjust for inflation), I suspect it was your friend, not the local bank, that was being "scalped" here.
Another thing to consider is, unless BOTH your friend and his wife are making ~$100K (for a combined income of ~$200k), or he had a HUGE down-payment (in the $600-700k range), his HTI ratio would be 11:1. This is a "tad" high per historical norms --even for CA.
Does the phrase "catch a falling knife" mean anything to you?
CR, what a great job!!! The graph of months of supply against inventory ALONE shows what a historical oddity this is. (If anyone wants to go back and take a second look, the surge in inventory over months of supply in the late 70's presaged the big spike in months of supply in the early 80's, and the average inventory running above months of supply in the mid-late 80's presaged the escalation of months of supply in the early 90's.)
My thumbnail estimate was that if we want to make meaningful progress at reducing inventory the rate of starts needs to go close to 900,000 for a couple of years. The situation is complicated by would-be retirees wanting to move to other locations, but it seems to me that many of those locations have been overbuilt already.
I really worry about what will happen in some areas with a big bulge of close-to-retirement folks seeking to move.
From Reuters story re Impac:
Typical Impac borrowers include self-employed workers who have decent credit, but do not qualify for prime lending rates because their income may be seasonal or uneven. In a filing in March, the company said 91 percent of the loans it transferred to its portfolio last year were Alt-A mortgages.
Dr. Pepper through nose. if this is what Alt-A really was, there'd be no reason for the full -blown retreat.
AC,
May I ask where you are talking about?
Eh... I like to retain a bit of anonymity on the Internets (in part so nobody can determine what I'm making up or not). But I'll say it's some place on the Atlantic ocean coast that was once a beach front resort area, that deteriorated dramatically in the past few decades.
Now they've rebuilt much of it very nicely, but there's no residents to support it.
I overdramatize things a bit, but my description isn't too far from the truth.
If you're that interested and have a site of your own, I could send you a link to a local news story.
You really have to drive around the area to really appreciate the magnitude of the problem though. The number of "For Sale" signs is simply unbelievable and they never get taken down.
It's worse than anything that I remember seeing during the Houston real-estate bust in the early 80s, but I paid less attention to these things back then.
"Typical Impac borrowers include self-employed workers who have decent credit, but do not qualify for prime lending rates because their income may be seasonal or uneven. In a filing in March, the company said 91 percent of the loans it transferred to its portfolio last year were Alt-A mortgages."
Nobody thinks Casey Serin fits the description very well.
Wow then it must really be ugly because I lived and lost in Houston then ( my 1st house )
Calculated Risk
Thank you for a great post.
I believe that immigrants are an overlooked part of the housing equation. They are the group that will be expected to buy the homes of aging boomers, but they do not have the income or credit in many cases to accomplish it. They have also been a growing percentage of new homebuyers and the credit crunch will have a huge impact on this group. I think we can also assume that immigrants are being hit by the wave of foreclosures that hitting many communities across the country. Immigrants are a double edge sword, and may be among the first to feel a recession.
There are two demographic problems that concern me. The first problem is the fact that many boomers are at or past their peak earning years. For boomers the need or desire to move up to a larger new home is going to disapear. 2010 is the year when boomers as a group will start to retire, and this right around the time when bulls expect the housing market to be in recovery. The second problem is the fact that long term employment patterns are being disrupted by globalization. People are employed for shorter periods of time today compared with a generation ago. This instability increases the financial stress experienced by many people and seems to be a problem that is accelerating. I think these problems have not been taken into account by home builders and developers in general.
I don't think the market will react in a positive fashion when the debt ceiling is raised in 6 weeks and as more CDOs implode. Call me a long term housing BEAR.
AC is talking about Miami Beach.
BTW, I love all you guys on this site. From the eternal optimists to the eternal pessimists. Just sayin.
OK, back to sippin my Arrogant Bastard Ale and researching my fantasy football strategy for my draft this weekend.
Carry on.
I don't think latin american immigrants are gonna be our chevaliers azul on caballos blanco(MMI +1)
Remittances in $ to Mexico via Western Union are down 7% this half even though volume of transactions is up.
Considering the likely prolonged downturn in RE, a good number of folks may pack their Bolsas and head back home to finally hang their own shingle. The sinking US$ may force the matter.
The quicker people start getting their heads shaved the quicker the housing market and actual economy can heal, Greenwich be damned.
In addition, like somebody had written in an earlier thread, there's plenty of 2nd homeowners in Miami from S. Amerca who looked at it as a "safe investment" free of political risk.
OOPS!!!
I really worry about what will happen in some areas with a big bulge of close-to-retirement folks seeking to move.
1) Many aren't going to be able to retire - 401Kitis.
2) Many who are 'forced' into retirement won't be able to afford the places they want to move to anyway.
3) Just as well... since they probably won't be able to sell the home they are in now for what they hoped they'd get & that is a big part of what they planned to use for retirement.
Lesson for you young'uns... live and work in a place you enjoy, you might be there longer than you think.
BW:"A July 27 Census report shows a 44% drop in the number of new households formed in the year ended in June, 2007, to only 891,000. That's below the five-year trend of 1.1 million to 1.2 million new households per year."
But the BW article never really explains why such a sharp drop took place, and the reasons for believing that it represents a change to a new lower level rather than a unique event.
Another superlative presentation, CR!
Re: Retirement
I am seeing a trickle of folks retiring overseas. Living in SoCal, I know many Asians who came here 20-30 years ago, did average to well, and are leveraging their SS$ and California equity to retire "back home". $2000/month goes pretty far in much of Asia, esp if you are a local. Globalization and internet make it very easy to stay in touch. You can get a decent latte and the New York Times almost anywhere now...
InlandEmpire
"This is an attempt to forecast how much further housing starts will decline"
With all due respect...Economics is about observing the trends (short version) and not about fortelling the outcome.
A better way to say this, in Fed Speak is to say "Understanding the non-upward slope of the directional indicatores"
On its way down to 1,1 million units, it WILL/MAY occur that commertial construction starts begin to fall. Then, we would see what happens with the construction employment conundrum.
Thanks for the analysis, CR.
How does the idea that builders have to build on the land they've acquired in order to stay afloat come into this?
Could we see continued high starts, despite the lack of buyers? If so, what does that mean? (If not, why not?)
"How does the idea that builders have to build on the land they've acquired in order to stay afloat come into this?"
Good question Mr/Mrs ams.
"BTW, tragic story in my neck of the woods.
"They tried to rehabilitate a certain area that had degenerated but was once prime beach front property. The did a great job - got rid of all the strip joints and run down apartments and replaced them with really really nice condos and houses. They built tons and tons and tons of them over the past several years."
Not sure this is such a great tragedy. What about the strippers who lost their jobs, and the po' folk who lived in the run-down apts?
And even if you don't care about the other half, I reject the idea that every spot on earth is improved by becoming a place where only upscale people live. Often--actually, mostly--places that are less than perfect, and which have evolved organically rather than sprung full-grown from the forehead of a developer, have more character, and more value to our culture.