Rumor has it that while depositers were wating in line to cash out their saving from CFC bank loan officers were passing "cash re-fi" application forms.
Intersting article but I did not understand the last paragrph. why would neg-arm get a short term slowing - because LIBOR rates are coming down ? But the reset pushes up way above the current teaser rate ?
"Intersting article but I did not understand the last paragrph. why would neg-arm get a short term slowing - because LIBOR rates are coming down ? But the reset pushes up way above the current teaser rate ?"
For OptionARM, teaser period is only like 1-3 mths. Most of them are already out of that period, so they're already paying fully-indexed rate. LIBOR going down will help them. MTA/COFI OA will get relief too although slower (since those are lagging indexes)
Forgive me for being an ARM noob, but I don't understand the examples you gave for the ARM rate adjustments.
I understand 3/1 - the rate adjusts once per year after the first 3 years. Simple enough. But you say 2/28 means adjust every six months after the first two years. How does "28" end up meaning six months?
You seem to be able to trace implications of this kind type of thing from both the mortgage and the security angle. How would your suggested conversion of always-current subprime loans to lower points spreads play out through the security tranches and credit enhancement mechanisms, both in terms of return and valuation? Would this, for example, be a windfall for insurers or one side of credit default swaps, like whatever prompted that kerfuffle from the hedge funds a couple of weeks ago?
The Fed just cut the Discount Rate by 50 bps to 5.75%. Funds rate unchanged. The statement from the FOMC indicates the move will persist as long as liquitidy is a problem.
DumbGuy, we do that just to confuse you civilians.
The problem is that if I called that a 2/6, you might get the impression that it adjusted every six years after the first two years.
There did, actually, back in the exploding S&L days, used to be real live "3/3" and "5/5" ARMs. They adjusted every three or five years.
It would probably make more sense to use "2/6M" rather than "2/28," but once you've started doing something stupid it's hard to stop. Excuse me while I take a smoke break.
The important distinction here would be 2/28 verus 2/38. A "2/38" would be a 40-year loan.
To promote the restoration of orderly conditions in financial markets, the Federal Reserve Board approved temporary changes to its primary credit discount window facility. The Board approved a 50 basis point reduction in the primary credit rate to 5-3/4 percent, to narrow the spread between the primary credit rate and the Federal Open Market Committee's target federal funds rate to 50 basis points. The Board is also announcing a change to the Reserve Banks' usual practices to allow the provision of term financing for as long as 30 days, renewable by the borrower. These changes will remain in place until the Federal Reserve determines that market liquidity has improved materially. These changes are designed to provide depositories with greater assurance about the cost and availability of funding. The Federal Reserve will continue to accept a broad range of collateral for discount window loans, including home mortgages and related assets. Existing collateral margins will be maintained. In taking this action, the Board approved the requests submitted by the Boards of Directors of the Federal Reserve Banks of New York and San Francisco.
It should be good for an insane burner of a rally in the markets today - looks like the index futures are set to pop about 2% for the S&P and NASDAQ, more like 1.5% for the DOW atm - could get some oomph behind it with some frantic short covering...
TStockmann, think about it this way: lowering the margin on these loans would just ratchet down the yield on the underlying mortage pool. A deal that relies on "excess spread" or borrowers making 6.50% over LIBOR payments for its "credit enhancement" could have some problems with that. Of course, you get zero excess spread if the loan forecloses.
But mostly they didn't plan on ever getting very much at 6.50 over LIBOR. They planned on those borrowers refinancing into something sane, if they were still able to make mortgage payments.
So the modified loans are a plus on one hand (hey! you're getting 3.50 over LIBOR instead of nothing!) and a minus on the other (we wanted that loan to prepay so the bond would amortize.)
At this point, I think those subprime ABS calculations are so farkled up that nobody wins, everybody wins, nobody notices, whatever. We're going to have to just "make sense" for each loan and stop worrying about what some fancy-assed spread model said two years ago when the loan was originated.
Didn't they effectively lower this rate for some of the repos this week? This would then be an official change for what was already changed.
How many people will initially confuse this with a change in the prime rate (ie, the headline skimmers)? Recall that Calamity Will pronounced that a rate cut will only happen in a calamity. How many people will interpret this as admission of a calamity?
Gold, silver, CAD,GBP, and EUR all seem to be reacting to this as a "dollar devalue" event.
It should be good for an insane burner of a rally in the markets today - looks like the index futures are set to pop about 2% for the S&P and NASDAQ, more like 1.5% for the DOW atm - could get some oomph behind it with some frantic short covering...
energyecon
Okay, but the text of this Bloomberg announcement sounds like they are pretty downbeat on economy. I don't see Poole's name on the list of those voting in favour.
It clarified for me mightily why you are "pro" loan mods... and it makes a far better case (or should I say far more understandable case) for loan modification by the servicers.
this doesn't change anything except the prospects for a 'crash up' rally that will squeeze the shorts and suck in some retail investors to hold the bag for the hedgies... at the risk of blathering my book, I am keeping my puts and will consider adding to them when this bit of idiocy seems to be near its top...
when i was looking at the charts yesterday, i figured after 1375 was hit , we'd have a nice 100 point window... 1375 to about 1475, which had been prior support a few times(rough#'s)
Who knew we'd come close in the course of 1 trading hour...
The Dicount Window is available but, as I understand it, banks are loath to use it as a source of borrowed funds because it suggests that the particular bank is in deep trouble.
So the Discount Window is rarely used meaning this is mostly symbolic i.e. an "I feel your pain" statement by the FED.
As I posted yesterday, I would like to know when the discount rate cut was decided and who was told.
You wanna bet that there was some big leaks late yesterday to let the good old boys and girls position themselves for the snack back rally that began late yesterday.
Don't want those traders at Goldman hung out to dry while Mr. Big Paulson can help.
As Tennis8 suggests, the discount window is the last source of funds for banks suffering for illiquidity. So you can borrow, but there's a penalty rate of interest to dissuade lenders from abusing it (in reality, banks don't like to use it, because it signals real problems - the perception can aggravate a run)
does this fed cut in anyway mean i can refi my fixed to a lower rate by half a percent?
Well, if your name is Wells Fargo or Citicorp, then yes.
If you're just some punk on the street looking for a mortgage loan, you don't get to borrowew at the discount window, and you probably need your money for more than a month.
Tanta, I've been wondering if this had the potential to mess things up. What about ARMs that were written to use this number?
They'll all just change to the WSJ LIBOR instead of the Fannie Mae LIBOR. There never was that much of a difference between the two.
All notes have fine print allowing the noteholder to chose a substitute index if the one chosen goes out of business (that is, is no longer published). You just have to pick something "comparable," and the WSJ LIBOR will be it.
It has happened before. I can remember having to wade through a portfolio of ARMs indexed to some weird fractional reserve treasury yield and change them all to CMTs. That involved an adjustment to the borrower's margin. The change to WSJ shouldn't affect margins, since the difference between the FNMA and the WSJ might have been a basis point or two.
Since Bernanke delivered his economic outlook on July 18, the Standard & PoorÂ’s 500 Index has fallen x.x percent through yesterday, the dollar is trading near record lows against the euro, and even crude oil prices have slid on forecasts of weaker U.S. demand.
They couldn't do the math this morning ? x.x percent was to be filled in later and someone forgot!
Don't bother clicking the link; they updated it before I could link to it. I have a saved PDF version of the original though.
Anonymous, my purpose in writing this post was to remind people that your rate on an ARM is set based on the time/money calculation for the duration of the adjusted rate.
If you have a one-year ARM, the lender is adjusting you to the cost of one-year money.
To assume that a reduction in the Fed funds rate will translate into a reduction of the 1-year Treasury (or LIBOR) might or might not be wise. It will, of course, depend on when you are scheduled to adjust. As I said in my post, you never get "today's" index value. If you happen to have a Treasury ARM that adjusts in October, you got the index value from two days ago, and you'll have that for the following year, regardless of what happens today or tomorrow or next Thursday to Treasury rates.
"They couldn't do the math this morning ? x.x percent was to be filled in later and someone forgot!"
That's just silly conspiracy nonsense. I've written hundreds of stories and filled in figures at the last moment because you want to use the latest figures. It's easy to forget, and sometimes harried editors miss things.
"The discount window is rarely used; only an average of $87 million is borrowed on an average day, said Tony Crescenzi, chief bond market strategist for Miller Tabak & Co."
(quote)
Aug. 17 (Bloomberg) -- Goldman Sachs Group Inc. said the Federal Reserve will cut the overnight target interest rate to 4.5 percent from 5.25 percent this year, citing ``sharp tightening in financial conditions'' and expectations the economy will slow.
The Fed will reduce the rate by at least 0.25 point on or before policy makers meet on Sept. 18, economists led by Jan Hatzius and Ed McKelvey in New York forecast in a note today before the central bank reduced its discount rate.
The Fed will cut another 50 basis points after that, possible at the next two meetings in October and December, McKelvey said in an interview. The Fed today cut the rate at which it makes direct loans to banks by 0.5 percentage point to 5.75 percent. It's the first reduction in borrowing costs between scheduled meetings of the Federal Open Market Committee since 2001 and Ben S. Bernanke's first as Fed chairman.
White House deputy press secretary Tony Fratto declined to comment on the announcement but said, "We have full confidence in the Federal Reserve on these issues and respect their independence."
"The Fed is bringing back stability in the market," said Michael Malpede, a senior currency analyst in Chicago at Man Global Research. "The Fed's move will also encourage people to get back to the carry trade."
Get back into the carry trade? Is that a smart move?
The discount rate ease works if nobody has to use the window. To the extent that bank A understands bank B has readier (cheaper) access to alternative borrowing, bank A is going to be more willing to provide short-term credit to bank B in the interbank market. In addition, to the extent that bank A realizes coming up short because it lent to bank B is now less expensive because bank A also has a cheaper source of alternative funding, there is additional reason to lend to bank B. Think in terms of opportunity cost. The interbank market should become more liquid because the cost of making a mistake is now lower. Is there a stigma to resorting to the discount window? Heck, I suppose so, but if there is, the stigma didn't get any bigger, and the borrowing rate got smaller, so the analysis doesn't change.
Told ya so.
You wouldn't listen;
"They can't because of inflation"
"They can't because it will weaken dollar"
"They wont until the economy weakens more"
I Told you this had potential systemic issues and needed to be done.
"The best nondestructive way to measure melon ripeness is with a laser:"
I grow my own and being that I'm tight as bark on a tree I don't see myself buying a laser to check my melons or anyone else's for that matter.
Many home gardeners experience difficulty in determining when watermelons are ripe. Use a combination of the following indicators: (1) light green, curly tendrils on the stem near the point of attachment of the melon usually turn brown and dry; (2) the surface color of the fruit turns dull; (3) the skin becomes resistant to penetration by the thumbnail and is rough to the touch; and (4) the bottom of the melon (where it lies on the soil) turns from light green to a yellowish color.
NEW YORK (Standard & Poor's) Aug. 17, 2007--Standard & Poor's Ratings Services
today lowered its ratings on 158 classes of U.S. residential mortgage-backed
securities (RMBS) backed by U.S. first-lien Alternative-A (Alt-A) mortgage
collateral issued from the beginning of October 2005 through the end of
December 2006. At the same time, we are affirming our ratings on 82 classes of
U.S. RMBS backed by Alt-A collateral and removing them from CreditWatch
negative. Additionally, we are affirming all other outstanding ratings on
Alt-A classes issued from the beginning of October 2005 through the end of
December 2006.
These rating actions affect a total of 89 RMBS transactions. The 158
downgraded classes had an original total balance of approximately $660
million, which represents 0.13% of the approximately $455.4 billion in U.S.
RMBS backed by first-lien Alt-A collateral rated by Standard & Poor's from the
beginning of October 2005 through the end of December 2006. During the same
period, the total balance of U.S. RMBS securities backed by all types of
residential mortgage collateral issued in the non-agency market was more than
$1.2 trillion.
Just wait. Somebody is going to see the slide in the long end of the Treasury curve and say it happened because the Fed caved in and will now allow run-away inflation. In that little world, there is one and only one implication from higher long-end rates.
And stop crowing. It isn't dignified.
Kett82,
Thumping ain't misleadin' iffen ya know how ta listen! And there ain't no lazer in the world thet kin test a melon good as a Barlow knife!
FED has just lost all of its credibility. 10 DAYS ago(!!) the biggest threat was inflation,now it suddenly is recession.And because they do not have credibility anymore, a recession will come by September.Rate cuts will not help, the lack of credibility is more important thing.
Told ya so.
You wouldn't listen;
"They can't because of inflation"
"They can't because it will weaken dollar"
"They wont until the economy weakens more"
I Told you this had potential systemic issues and needed to be done.
sloooowwwwwmotion |
The yield on 30&10 yr bonds popped 70+ bp this morning
Dollar weakened against the Euro
And this is all for a cut in the vig that the fed charges at the discount window.
Wanna see what happens when the do the full monty?
"A lot of the modifications that are going on right now involve servicers taking a look at that 6.50% margin"...when loans are securitized, do the servicers typically have the authority to make these kinds of adjustments on their own, or do they need to (somehow) get the consent of those who hold the bonds into which the mortgages were rolled up?
Rumor has it that while depositers were wating in line to cash out their saving from CFC bank loan officers were passing "cash re-fi" application forms.
Tanta,
Intersting article but I did not understand the last paragrph. why would neg-arm get a short term slowing - because LIBOR rates are coming down ? But the reset pushes up way above the current teaser rate ?
holy nikkei dizasta ....
FYI Many watermelons do not emit the proverbial "dull thud"when ripe. For these, the dull thud may indicate an over-ripe, mushy melon.
"Intersting article but I did not understand the last paragrph. why would neg-arm get a short term slowing - because LIBOR rates are coming down ? But the reset pushes up way above the current teaser rate ?"
For OptionARM, teaser period is only like 1-3 mths. Most of them are already out of that period, so they're already paying fully-indexed rate. LIBOR going down will help them. MTA/COFI OA will get relief too although slower (since those are lagging indexes)
Fed cut discount rate to 5.75. But why the discount rate? What impact does that have?
Forgive me for being an ARM noob, but I don't understand the examples you gave for the ARM rate adjustments.
I understand 3/1 - the rate adjusts once per year after the first 3 years. Simple enough. But you say 2/28 means adjust every six months after the first two years. How does "28" end up meaning six months?
Tanta -
You seem to be able to trace implications of this kind type of thing from both the mortgage and the security angle. How would your suggested conversion of always-current subprime loans to lower points spreads play out through the security tranches and credit enhancement mechanisms, both in terms of return and valuation? Would this, for example, be a windfall for insurers or one side of credit default swaps, like whatever prompted that kerfuffle from the hedge funds a couple of weeks ago?
The Fed just cut the Discount Rate by 50 bps to 5.75%. Funds rate unchanged. The statement from the FOMC indicates the move will persist as long as liquitidy is a problem.
DumbGuy, we do that just to confuse you civilians.
The problem is that if I called that a 2/6, you might get the impression that it adjusted every six years after the first two years.
There did, actually, back in the exploding S&L days, used to be real live "3/3" and "5/5" ARMs. They adjusted every three or five years.
It would probably make more sense to use "2/6M" rather than "2/28," but once you've started doing something stupid it's hard to stop. Excuse me while I take a smoke break.
The important distinction here would be 2/28 verus 2/38. A "2/38" would be a 40-year loan.
Confused yet? I can go on . . .
For immediate release
To promote the restoration of orderly conditions in financial markets, the Federal Reserve Board approved temporary changes to its primary credit discount window facility. The Board approved a 50 basis point reduction in the primary credit rate to 5-3/4 percent, to narrow the spread between the primary credit rate and the Federal Open Market Committee's target federal funds rate to 50 basis points. The Board is also announcing a change to the Reserve Banks' usual practices to allow the provision of term financing for as long as 30 days, renewable by the borrower. These changes will remain in place until the Federal Reserve determines that market liquidity has improved materially. These changes are designed to provide depositories with greater assurance about the cost and availability of funding. The Federal Reserve will continue to accept a broad range of collateral for discount window loans, including home mortgages and related assets. Existing collateral margins will be maintained. In taking this action, the Board approved the requests submitted by the Boards of Directors of the Federal Reserve Banks of New York and San Francisco.
Fed lowered interest at the discount window to 5.75 %
Fed Cuts Discount Rate to 5.75%, Cites `Downside' Risks - Bloomberg.com
This can't be good.
Liquitidy? Oh, you know what I meant.
Re bacon dreamz, dis messages, I don't understand the implication. Would someone pls explain? Why "discount window"?
It should be good for an insane burner of a rally in the markets today - looks like the index futures are set to pop about 2% for the S&P and NASDAQ, more like 1.5% for the DOW atm - could get some oomph behind it with some frantic short covering...
oy vey
Ah, the discount window is different from the Fed funds rate (5.25%). For a moment, I felt as though my chocolate ration had been doubled again.
TStockmann, think about it this way: lowering the margin on these loans would just ratchet down the yield on the underlying mortage pool. A deal that relies on "excess spread" or borrowers making 6.50% over LIBOR payments for its "credit enhancement" could have some problems with that. Of course, you get zero excess spread if the loan forecloses.
But mostly they didn't plan on ever getting very much at 6.50 over LIBOR. They planned on those borrowers refinancing into something sane, if they were still able to make mortgage payments.
So the modified loans are a plus on one hand (hey! you're getting 3.50 over LIBOR instead of nothing!) and a minus on the other (we wanted that loan to prepay so the bond would amortize.)
At this point, I think those subprime ABS calculations are so farkled up that nobody wins, everybody wins, nobody notices, whatever. We're going to have to just "make sense" for each loan and stop worrying about what some fancy-assed spread model said two years ago when the loan was originated.
sure woulda been nice of them to annnounce last night... atb
surely it could'nt be in reaction to the nikkei...
Didn't they effectively lower this rate for some of the repos this week? This would then be an official change for what was already changed.
How many people will initially confuse this with a change in the prime rate (ie, the headline skimmers)? Recall that Calamity Will pronounced that a rate cut will only happen in a calamity. How many people will interpret this as admission of a calamity?
Gold, silver, CAD,GBP, and EUR all seem to be reacting to this as a "dollar devalue" event.
It should be good for an insane burner of a rally in the markets today - looks like the index futures are set to pop about 2% for the S&P and NASDAQ, more like 1.5% for the DOW atm - could get some oomph behind it with some frantic short covering...
energyecon
Okay, but the text of this Bloomberg announcement sounds like they are pretty downbeat on economy. I don't see Poole's name on the list of those voting in favour.
- Bloomberg.com
Tanta,
thank you for this ubernerd post.
It clarified for me mightily why you are "pro" loan mods... and it makes a far better case (or should I say far more understandable case) for loan modification by the servicers.
bravo.
ster,
this doesn't change anything except the prospects for a 'crash up' rally that will squeeze the shorts and suck in some retail investors to hold the bag for the hedgies... at the risk of blathering my book, I am keeping my puts and will consider adding to them when this bit of idiocy seems to be near its top...
when i was looking at the charts yesterday, i figured after 1375 was hit , we'd have a nice 100 point window... 1375 to about 1475, which had been prior support a few times(rough#'s)
Who knew we'd come close in the course of 1 trading hour...
The Dicount Window is available but, as I understand it, banks are loath to use it as a source of borrowed funds because it suggests that the particular bank is in deep trouble.
So the Discount Window is rarely used meaning this is mostly symbolic i.e. an "I feel your pain" statement by the FED.
As I posted yesterday, I would like to know when the discount rate cut was decided and who was told.
You wanna bet that there was some big leaks late yesterday to let the good old boys and girls position themselves for the snack back rally that began late yesterday.
Don't want those traders at Goldman hung out to dry while Mr. Big Paulson can help.
Europe was up. Big turnaround there
Major World Indices - Yahoo! Finance
US premarket is mixed--dow down and sp/nas up.
Pre-Market: Stock Trading Before the Markets Open from CNNMoney.com
Looks like another interesting day.
Kevin,
Quite right. A drum-like ring is the sound you want. Dull sound means dull melon.
As Tennis8 suggests, the discount window is the last source of funds for banks suffering for illiquidity. So you can borrow, but there's a penalty rate of interest to dissuade lenders from abusing it (in reality, banks don't like to use it, because it signals real problems - the perception can aggravate a run)
Tanta, I've been wondering if this had the potential to mess things up. What about ARMs that were written to use this number?
"Fannie Mae to Discontinue "Fannie Mae LIBOR" Indices" (as of June 28, 2007, release was March 30, 2007)
does this fed cut in anyway mean i can refi my fixed to a lower rate by half a percent?
Sterlingerl,
Nice catch. I haven't seen anyone mention Poole's absence. Maybe he was too busy to get on the conference call?
does this fed cut in anyway mean i can refi my fixed to a lower rate by half a percent?
Well, if your name is Wells Fargo or Citicorp, then yes.
If you're just some punk on the street looking for a mortgage loan, you don't get to borrowew at the discount window, and you probably need your money for more than a month.
Anony, No it just means they are letting everyone know they are willing to destroy your savings to keep you in a job.
It will be intesting to see which banks use the discount window. It probably won't do much good for their stock prices.
tg - what savings? When did Americans start saving again?
but tanta
doesnt the fed usually lower the target rate eventually which will effect what banks lend to each other which would lead joes like me with a refi
cant we assume a target reduction is in the future
Tanta, I've been wondering if this had the potential to mess things up. What about ARMs that were written to use this number?
They'll all just change to the WSJ LIBOR instead of the Fannie Mae LIBOR. There never was that much of a difference between the two.
All notes have fine print allowing the noteholder to chose a substitute index if the one chosen goes out of business (that is, is no longer published). You just have to pick something "comparable," and the WSJ LIBOR will be it.
It has happened before. I can remember having to wade through a portfolio of ARMs indexed to some weird fractional reserve treasury yield and change them all to CMTs. That involved an adjustment to the borrower's margin. The change to WSJ shouldn't affect margins, since the difference between the FNMA and the WSJ might have been a basis point or two.
Want an anecdotal observation that the good old boy knew about this rate cut in advance, check this out from Bloomberg:
Fed Cuts Discount Rate to 5.75% to Ease Credit Crunch (Update2) - Bloomberg.com
Since Bernanke delivered his economic outlook on July 18, the Standard & PoorÂ’s 500 Index has fallen x.x percent through yesterday, the dollar is trading near record lows against the euro, and even crude oil prices have slid on forecasts of weaker U.S. demand.
They couldn't do the math this morning ? x.x percent was to be filled in later and someone forgot!
Don't bother clicking the link; they updated it before I could link to it. I have a saved PDF version of the original though.
Tanta (on substitute for Fannie LIBOR), thanks, should have known they'd have that covered in the fine print.
quick! somebody sell me an IO strip and start doing some loan mods!
Anonymous, my purpose in writing this post was to remind people that your rate on an ARM is set based on the time/money calculation for the duration of the adjusted rate.
If you have a one-year ARM, the lender is adjusting you to the cost of one-year money.
To assume that a reduction in the Fed funds rate will translate into a reduction of the 1-year Treasury (or LIBOR) might or might not be wise. It will, of course, depend on when you are scheduled to adjust. As I said in my post, you never get "today's" index value. If you happen to have a Treasury ARM that adjusts in October, you got the index value from two days ago, and you'll have that for the following year, regardless of what happens today or tomorrow or next Thursday to Treasury rates.
I have some really good paper I want to exchange for a few million bucks who do I call.
o mine is fixed rate around 6.5 VA
Jack-
"They couldn't do the math this morning ? x.x percent was to be filled in later and someone forgot!"
That's just silly conspiracy nonsense. I've written hundreds of stories and filled in figures at the last moment because you want to use the latest figures. It's easy to forget, and sometimes harried editors miss things.
Mr. Poole will now be entered into a number of upcoming extreme-eating contests so as to better prepare for eating his words (especially "calamity").
Kevin and k harris,
The best nondestructive way to measure melon ripeness is with a laser:
Acta Horticulturae
Thumping can be highly misleading.
Regards,
"The discount window is rarely used; only an average of $87 million is borrowed on an average day, said Tony Crescenzi, chief bond market strategist for Miller Tabak & Co."
Fed cuts discount rate to ease credit crunch - MarketWatch
Neal - Mr. Poole was refering to the Fed Funds rate, although I agree that the timing was unfortunate.
Wow, look at her gap... good thing gaps below don't have to get filled, no sir...
So let me get this straight. Wink, nod, rally 300+, Fed drops pants, rally 300+ - all < 1 trading hour.
If the Fed is just going to do this, why don't we just replace Bernanke with Cramer at the helm and be done with it.
Mr. Poole, meet Mr. Paulson
(quote)
Aug. 17 (Bloomberg) -- Goldman Sachs Group Inc. said the Federal Reserve will cut the overnight target interest rate to 4.5 percent from 5.25 percent this year, citing ``sharp tightening in financial conditions'' and expectations the economy will slow.
The Fed will reduce the rate by at least 0.25 point on or before policy makers meet on Sept. 18, economists led by Jan Hatzius and Ed McKelvey in New York forecast in a note today before the central bank reduced its discount rate.
The Fed will cut another 50 basis points after that, possible at the next two meetings in October and December, McKelvey said in an interview. The Fed today cut the rate at which it makes direct loans to banks by 0.5 percentage point to 5.75 percent. It's the first reduction in borrowing costs between scheduled meetings of the Federal Open Market Committee since 2001 and Ben S. Bernanke's first as Fed chairman.
(end quote)
Carlomagno
I know, but see the article above, it's coming.
White House deputy press secretary Tony Fratto declined to comment on the announcement but said, "We have full confidence in the Federal Reserve on these issues and respect their independence."
Heckuva job, Bennie.
Hey, if they don't cut the FF rate in September, Dow 1000 here we go... What a setup!
Oh the ARMS folks are going to get killed...look at those rates rise....good bye housing...hello 40% price cuts.
Greenspan.....Bernanki
The more things change..............
"The Fed is bringing back stability in the market," said Michael Malpede, a senior currency analyst in Chicago at Man Global Research. "The Fed's move will also encourage people to get back to the carry trade."
Get back into the carry trade? Is that a smart move?
Oh the ARMS folks are going to get killed...look at those rates rise....good bye housing...hello 40% price cuts.
bfatz | 08.17.07 - 9:54 am | #
bfatz,
where are you seeing mortgage IR climbing as a result of FF cut?
The discount rate ease works if nobody has to use the window. To the extent that bank A understands bank B has readier (cheaper) access to alternative borrowing, bank A is going to be more willing to provide short-term credit to bank B in the interbank market. In addition, to the extent that bank A realizes coming up short because it lent to bank B is now less expensive because bank A also has a cheaper source of alternative funding, there is additional reason to lend to bank B. Think in terms of opportunity cost. The interbank market should become more liquid because the cost of making a mistake is now lower. Is there a stigma to resorting to the discount window? Heck, I suppose so, but if there is, the stigma didn't get any bigger, and the borrowing rate got smaller, so the analysis doesn't change.
does this mean the nikkei will have a 500 point opening gap come sunday night?
Told ya so.
You wouldn't listen;
"They can't because of inflation"
"They can't because it will weaken dollar"
"They wont until the economy weakens more"
I Told you this had potential systemic issues and needed to be done.
"Subprime can range from 3.50 to 6.50, again depending on loan quality and other terms."
And how much Yield Spread Premium the Loan Officer wants. They get more for selling a higher margin than required.
"The best nondestructive way to measure melon ripeness is with a laser:"
I grow my own and being that I'm tight as bark on a tree I don't see myself buying a laser to check my melons or anyone else's for that matter.
Many home gardeners experience difficulty in determining when watermelons are ripe. Use a combination of the following indicators: (1) light green, curly tendrils on the stem near the point of attachment of the melon usually turn brown and dry; (2) the surface color of the fruit turns dull; (3) the skin becomes resistant to penetration by the thumbnail and is rough to the touch; and (4) the bottom of the melon (where it lies on the soil) turns from light green to a yellowish color.
Watermelon - Watch Your Garden Grow - University of Illinois Extension
S&P says, alt-a sucks balls.
NEW YORK (Standard & Poor's) Aug. 17, 2007--Standard & Poor's Ratings Services
today lowered its ratings on 158 classes of U.S. residential mortgage-backed
securities (RMBS) backed by U.S. first-lien Alternative-A (Alt-A) mortgage
collateral issued from the beginning of October 2005 through the end of
December 2006. At the same time, we are affirming our ratings on 82 classes of
U.S. RMBS backed by Alt-A collateral and removing them from CreditWatch
negative. Additionally, we are affirming all other outstanding ratings on
Alt-A classes issued from the beginning of October 2005 through the end of
December 2006.
These rating actions affect a total of 89 RMBS transactions. The 158
downgraded classes had an original total balance of approximately $660
million, which represents 0.13% of the approximately $455.4 billion in U.S.
RMBS backed by first-lien Alt-A collateral rated by Standard & Poor's from the
beginning of October 2005 through the end of December 2006. During the same
period, the total balance of U.S. RMBS securities backed by all types of
residential mortgage collateral issued in the non-agency market was more than
$1.2 trillion.
SloMo,
Just wait. Somebody is going to see the slide in the long end of the Treasury curve and say it happened because the Fed caved in and will now allow run-away inflation. In that little world, there is one and only one implication from higher long-end rates.
And stop crowing. It isn't dignified.
Kett82,
Thumping ain't misleadin' iffen ya know how ta listen! And there ain't no lazer in the world thet kin test a melon good as a Barlow knife!
mp to Conjure Bag:
"Conjure Bag, summon the FedWatchers!"
FED has just lost all of its credibility. 10 DAYS ago(!!) the biggest threat was inflation,now it suddenly is recession.And because they do not have credibility anymore, a recession will come by September.Rate cuts will not help, the lack of credibility is more important thing.
Told ya so.
You wouldn't listen;
"They can't because of inflation"
"They can't because it will weaken dollar"
"They wont until the economy weakens more"
I Told you this had potential systemic issues and needed to be done.
sloooowwwwwmotion |
The yield on 30&10 yr bonds popped 70+ bp this morning
Dollar weakened against the Euro
And this is all for a cut in the vig that the fed charges at the discount window.
Wanna see what happens when the do the full monty?
"A lot of the modifications that are going on right now involve servicers taking a look at that 6.50% margin"...when loans are securitized, do the servicers typically have the authority to make these kinds of adjustments on their own, or do they need to (somehow) get the consent of those who hold the bonds into which the mortgages were rolled up?